DOCSLIB.ORG

European Green Party 1981-2009

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
European Green Party 1981-2009 european green party 1981-2009 inventory Annette Hendrick august 2014 étopia centre d’animation et de recherche en écologie politique European Green Party Archives (1981-2009) Inventory Annette HENDRICK August 2014 TABLE DES MATIÈRES TABLE DES MATIÈRES ....................................................................................................................................... 1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE ARCHIVES ....................................................................................................... 5 ARCHIVAL FOLDERS INVENTORY .................................................................................................................... 13 1. EUROPEAN GREEN COORDINATION ....................................................................................................................... 13 I. Generality ................................................................................................................................................. 13 II. Coordination Meetings and Co-Secretary (Co-Sec) .................................................................................. 13 III. Relations between Greens in Europe ...................................................................................................... 15 2. EFGP (1993-2004) PUIS EGP (2004-) ............................................................................................................... 16 I. Foundation and Evolution ......................................................................................................................... 16 A. Foundation ........................................................................................................................................................... 16 B. 20th Anniversary ................................................................................................................................................... 17 C. EFGP Statutes changes: from an ASBL to an AISBL (closing of the EFGP ASBL and creation of the AISBL EFGP) .. 17 II. Party bodies ............................................................................................................................................. 19 A. EFGP Congress/EGP Congress .............................................................................................................................. 19 B. EFGP Council/EGP Council .................................................................................................................................... 22 C. EFGP Committee / EGP Committee ...................................................................................................................... 31 D. Treasurers Meetings ............................................................................................................................................ 35 E. Extra-Meetings : Green Local Councillors or Green Party Leaders ....................................................................... 36 III. EFGP Members/EGP members................................................................................................................ 37 A. Membership and Observership Applications files submitted to the EFGP in the 90s .......................................... 37 B. EFGP Members Parties in 1992 ............................................................................................................................ 37 C. EFGP no-Members Parties in 1992 ....................................................................................................................... 45 D. EFGP Members Parties after 1992. ...................................................................................................................... 49 E. EFGP Observer Parties .......................................................................................................................................... 53 F. Contacts with other European Green Parties, potential new members ............................................................... 54 G. Small Parties in the EFGP ..................................................................................................................................... 55 IV. General-Secretary ................................................................................................................................... 56 A. Generality ............................................................................................................................................................. 56 B. Office Information/ Knowledge Management ..................................................................................................... 56 1. Information about Members and Observer parties in Europe or around the world ....................................... 56 2. Contacts with Green parties or movements from Europe and from around the world .................................. 58 3. Contacts with the media ................................................................................................................................. 58 3. EFGP/EGP COLLABORATION WITH GGEP ............................................................................................................. 59 I. GGEP Generality ....................................................................................................................................... 59 II. Formalization of the collaboration between GGEP and EFGP ................................................................. 60 III. Regional Networks Working Groups ....................................................................................................... 61 A. Alpine Network .................................................................................................................................................... 61 B. Balkan Green Network ......................................................................................................................................... 61 C. Baltic Sea Network ............................................................................................................................................... 61 D. Green East West Dialogue (GEWD) ...................................................................................................................... 62 E. Mediterranean Network (MED) ............................................................................................................................ 65 F. North Sea Greens Network ................................................................................................................................... 67 IV. Topical Working Groups ......................................................................................................................... 68 A. Climate Change Group ......................................................................................................................................... 68 B. Economic Working Group..................................................................................................................................... 69 C. Eco-Tax Group ...................................................................................................................................................... 69 D. Enlargement Group .............................................................................................................................................. 69 E. Euro Group ........................................................................................................................................................... 69 F. Foreign and Security Group .................................................................................................................................. 69 G. GMOs ................................................................................................................................................................... 70 H. IGC (Inter Governmental Conference) in the EU .................................................................................................. 70 I. Statutes Group....................................................................................................................................................... 71 J. WTO Group (World Trade Organisation) OMC ...................................................................................................... 71 K. Various Groups ..................................................................................................................................................... 71 V. Thematic campaigns ............................................................................................................................... 72 1 Table of Contents A. EGP Climate Change Campaign 2006-2007. ......................................................................................................... 72 B. Various campaigns or simple actions ................................................................................................................... 73 VI. European Green Conference and others European meetings ................................................................. 74 4. ELECTIONS ....................................................................................................................................................... 74 I. Generality ................................................................................................................................................. 74 II. European Elections
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Party of European Socialists, European Greens and European Left Party Respond to the Crisis1
    All anti-neo-liberal now? The Party of European Socialists, European Greens and European Left Party respond to the crisis1 Luke March University of Edinburgh [email protected] Paper for PSA 2013 Draft version 1.0. Work very much in progress. Please do not quote without author’s permission. Why has the left failed to benefit from the post-2008 economic crisis? This is a common, but perhaps slightly unfair question. It is difficult to see any one political family as a unique beneficiary, and indeed the right’s apparent earlier ideological hegemony has become unstuck with the ‘austerity medicine’ having consistently failed to revive the European patient. Nevertheless, there is still something remarkable about socio-economic conditions that should be a ‘perfect storm’ for left-wing politics regularly failing to produce anything like a clear boon for the left. The February 2013 Italian elections are just the latest that may mark a ‘no- confidence’ vote in the Centre-Left (McDonnell and Bobba 2013). The social democratic Democratic Party (PD) and its more leftist ally, the post-communist Left Ecology Freedom threw away an apparently unassailable lead to squeak ahead of the right and Beppe Grillo’s Five-Star Movement. This paper aims to contribute to answering this overarching question by comparing the policy and ideological response to the crisis undertaken by the three ‘left’ transnational party federations (TNPs) at European level, the Party of European Socialists (PES), European Green Party (EGP) and European Left Party (EL).2 Comparing the three TNPs is an apposite approach. Although TNPs are ‘timidly rising actors’, relatively weak formations that fall far short of being fully integrated parties, they at the very least aspire to a minimal level of ideological and policy co-ordination (Bardi 2004; cf.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the 2018-2019 Activity Report
    GENERAL 14-18 AUG ISTANBUL ASSEMBLY Financialactivity Conditions report 2018-2019and guidelines Activity Report 2018–2019 In the second part of 2018 and the first part of 2019 we implemented diverse activities, drafted resolutions, hosted progressive events, ran the campaign for the 2019 European elections and led many other processes that are defined in this document. FYEG’s work is taking place at a time where Europe is in a turbulent situation. We have a holistic, radical political vision of Europe, where we show the interlinkages between different issues - equality, sustainability, social justice, democracy. When it comes to political visions, we are a progressive think tank within the Green movement. With the capacities of the Executive Committee but also the Campaign Team, Prep Teams and several Working Groups, we continue to come up with radical ideas and push for change through in person meetings with various actors, state-of-the-art communication and impactful actions. Young Green Candidates had several, changemaking electoral successes in the European Elections, as well on local and national level - in Belgium, Ireland, Luxembourg, Finland and Germany. Many Young Greens (especially many young women* and including young people with a migrant background) were elected to local councils or parliaments around Europe. Besides, we see more and more youth standing up for what they think is right and taking their future in their own hands. A remarkable example are the climate strikes that spread all over Europe and mobilised tens of thousands of young people, mostly teenagers and high school students. These are important determinants for the future of Europe and of an ecological movements like us.
    [Show full text]
  • Raport Odpowiedzialny Biznes W Polsce. Dobre Praktyki
    Koordynatorka wydania: Ewa Albińska Nadzór merytoryczny: Mirella Panek-Owsiańska Redakcja: Ewa Albińska Magdalena Andrejczuk Agnieszka Gajek Marcin Grzybek Tysiące pracodawców Agnieszka Siarkiewicz Współpraca: z całej Europy Natalia Ćwik Justyna Januszewska Marta Krawcewicz podpisało już Kartę! Renata Putkowska Piotr Sobolewski Dołącz do tego grona! Karolina Szlasa Tłumaczenie: Promuj różnorodność Biuro tłumaczeń KONTEKST Redakcja i korekta: w swoim miejscu pracy! Beata Stadryniak-Saracyn Monitoring rynku: Podpisz Kartę Różnorodności! zespół Forum Odpowiedzialnego Biznesu Monitoring mediów: na podstawie materiałów dostarczonych przez Źródło materiałów: materiały własne firm Kalendarium: na bazie informacji z portali odpowiedzialnybiznes.pl kampaniespoleczne.pl Publikacja udostępniona jest na licencji: Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne 3.0 Polska (CC BY-NC 3.0 PL). Prawa do zdjęć, grafiki i logo są zastrzeżone. Treść licencji jest dostępna Więcej: na stronie: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ www.kartaroznorodnosci.pl by-nc-sa/3.0/pl Wydawca: Forum Odpowiedzialnego Biznesu ul. Szpitalna 5/5, 00-031 Warszawa koordynator karty różnorodności w polsce tel.: +48 22 627 18 71, fax: +48 22 627 18 72 e-mail: [email protected] www.odpowiedzialnybiznes.pl Opracowanie graficzne i skład: Olga Figurska, www.lunatikot.pl patronat honorowy Druk: Libra Print, www.libra-print.pl Inicjatywa promowana przez Komisję Europejską Fotokod, zamieszczony na okładce, został wygenerowany na stronie Podpisanie Karty w Polsce jest bezpłatne i dobrowolne www.koddlaciebie.pl należącej do SUPERMEDIA Interactive. SPIS TREŚCI Słowo wstępne Mirella Panek- Owsiańska . 3 Koniec świata odwołany Natalia Ćwik . 4 oo Konferencja Rio+20 Beata Jaczewska . 6 ACTA Jarosław Lipszyc, Marcin Drabek . 7 Nieistniejące słowo roku Krzysztof Grabowski . 8 Efektywność zarządzania różnorodnością Maria Hegarty . 9 Równe traktowanie standardem dobrego rządzenia Agnieszka Kozłowska-Rajewicz .
    [Show full text]
  • Ms. Frieda Brepoels (PPE -DE, Belgium) Mr
    Parliamentary endorsement for a Nuclear Weapons Convention marking 40th anniversary nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty Initiators Deputy Chairs EP section Parliamentarians for Non-proliferation and Nuclear Disarmament Ms. Ana Gomes (PSE - Portugal) Ms. Annemie Neyts (ALDE - Belgium) Mr. Girts Kristovskis (UEN - Latvia). Ms. Angelika Beer (Greens - EFA - Germany) Mr. Andre Brie (GUE/NGL - Germany) Co-signers on July 1st 2008 - 40th anniversary NPT (alphabetical per country) Ms. Evelin Lichentenberger (Greens/EFA, Austria) Mr. Johannes Voggenhuber (Greens/EFA, Austria) Ms. Frieda Brepoels (PPE -DE, Belgium) Mr. Ivo Belet (PPE-DE, Belgium) Main Political groups in EP (with number of MEP) Mr. Jean-Luc Dehaene (PPE-DE, Belgium) Mr. Raymond Langendries (PPE-DE, Belgium) PPE-DE (289) Group of the European People's Party Mr. Philippe Busquin (PSE, Belgium) (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats Ms. Anne Van Lancker (PSE - Belgium) PSE (215) Socialist Group in the European Parliament Mr. El Khadrahoui Saïd (PSE - Belgium) ALDE (101) Group Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe Mr. Dirk Sterckx (ALDE, Belgium) UEN (44) Union for Europe of the Nations Group Greens/EFA (42) Group of Greens/ European Free Alliance Mr. Johan Van Hecke (ALDE - Belgium) GUE/NGL (41) Confederal Group of the European United Left - Mr. Pierre Jonckheer (Greens/EFA, Belgium) Nordic Green Left Mr. Bart Staes (Greens/EFA, Belgium) Ms. Muriela Baeva (ALDE - Bulgaria) Mr. Marios Matsakis (ALDE, Cyprus) Ms. Zuzana Roithova (PPE-DE, Czech Republic) Mr. Jiří Maštálka (GUE/NGL, Czech Republic) Mr. Johannes Lebech (ALDE, Denmark Ms. Margrete Auken (Greens/EFA, Denmark) Mr. Michel Rocard (PSE, France) Mr. Francis Wurtz (GUE/NGL, France) Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • Motion: Europe Is Worth It – for a Green Recovery Rooted in Solidarity and A
    German Bundestag Printed paper 19/20564 19th electoral term 30 June 2020 version Preliminary Motion tabled by the Members of the Bundestag Agnieszka Brugger, Anja Hajduk, Dr Franziska Brantner, Sven-Christian Kindler, Dr Frithjof Schmidt, Margarete Bause, Kai Gehring, Uwe Kekeritz, Katja Keul, Dr Tobias Lindner, Omid Nouripour, Cem Özdemir, Claudia Roth, Manuel Sarrazin, Jürgen Trittin, Ottmar von Holtz, Luise Amtsberg, Lisa Badum, Danyal Bayaz, Ekin Deligöz, Katja Dörner, Katharina Dröge, Britta Haßelmann, Steffi Lemke, Claudia Müller, Beate Müller-Gemmeke, Erhard Grundl, Dr Kirsten Kappert-Gonther, Maria Klein-Schmeink, Christian Kühn, Stephan Kühn, Stefan Schmidt, Dr Wolfgang Strengmann-Kuhn, Markus Tressel, Lisa Paus, Tabea Rößner, Corinna Rüffer, Margit Stumpp, Dr Konstantin von Notz, Dr Julia Verlinden, Beate Walter-Rosenheimer, Gerhard Zickenheiner and the Alliance 90/The Greens parliamentary group be to Europe is worth it – for a green recovery rooted in solidarity and a strong 2021- 2027 EU budget the by replaced The Bundestag is requested to adopt the following resolution: I. The German Bundestag notes: A strong European Union (EU) built on solidarity which protects its citizens and our livelihoods is the best investment we can make in our future. Our aim is an EU that also and especially proves its worth during these difficult times of the corona pandemic, that fosters democracy, prosperity, equality and health and that resolutely tackles the challenge of the century that is climate protection. We need an EU that bolsters international cooperation on the world stage and does not abandon the weakest on this earth. proofread This requires an EU capable of taking effective action both internally and externally, it requires greater solidarity on our continent and beyond - because no country can effectively combat the climate crisis on its own, no country can stamp out the pandemic on its own.
    [Show full text]
  • Election Guide for Member Organisations Global Young Green Elections
    ELECTION GUIDE FOR MEMBER ORGANISATIONS GLOBAL YOUNG GREEN ELECTIONS This guide is designed to answer key questions about the Global Young Green Steering Committee elections, which will be held online in Spring 2020. Summary ● When? Deadline Steering Committee candidate applications, See 23:59 CET, 23.04.2020 more information here. ​ ​ Registration of voters 23:59 CET, 23.04.2020 Vote 25.04.2020 - 04.05.2020 ● Where? Survey Monkey - an anonymised online voting platform. ● How? Registered representatives will be sent a link to vote. ● Who? Each Global Young Green Member Organisation has 1 vote. ​ ​ ● What voting system? Single Transferable Vote (voters are asked to rank candidates in order of preference and candidates are elected upon filling a quota of votes). Who votes? As stated in the GYG Organisational Principles, each Member Organisation of Global Young ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Greens has 1 vote. ​ ​ ● Please See Annex A for a full list of Member Organisations and votes. ​ ​ ● Please also refer to page 4 of the GYG Organisational Principles for more information ​ ​ on “Members”. Each Member Organisation is responsible for registering one person to vote on behalf of ​ ​ ​ ​ their organisation, this could be the Chair, International Secretary or Spokesperson, for example. How can I register to vote? Global Young Green Elections Spring 2020 Global Young Greens Oversight Committee To register one voter for your organisation please fill out the following registration survey ​ ​ until 23rd of April 2020, 23:59 CET: ​ Voter registration form region Africa: https://www.surveymonkey.de/r/9RBY335 ​ ​ ​ Voter registration form region Americas: https://www.surveymonkey.de/r/9S56MG5 ​ ​ ​ Voter registration form region Asia-Pacific: https://www.surveymonkey.de/r/9TK9D9R ​ ​ ​ Voter registration form region Europe: https://www.surveymonkey.de/r/MKKDN5S ​ ​ ​ How do I vote? 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Estonian Research Agreement a Social Agreement to Ensure the Further Development of Estonian Research and Innovation
    Estonian Research Agreement A social agreement to ensure the further development of Estonian research and innovation Sharing the common belief that research, development and innovation are strategically important for the well-being of the Estonian people and sustainability of society, the parties to this agreement confirm the need to guarantee the performance of the objectives agreed upon in the Estonian Research and Development and Innovation Strategy 2014–2020 “Knowledge-Based Estonia” and undertake to commit to the achievement of these objectives. For this purpose, they agree upon the following: 1. the undersigned political parties, represented by their Chairpersons, are in favour of increasing the public funding of research, development and innovation to 1% of the gross domestic product and maintaining it at least on the same level in the future. To this end, the parties agree that it will be specified in the 2019 state budget strategy that the target level is to be reached within three years with the addition of equal funding amounts; 2. Estonian research institutions, represented by the President of the Board of Universities Estonia, an association uniting Estonian public universities, affirm that research institutions will establish the institutional arrangements required for conducting and providing further incentive for performing high quality research and cooperation between researchers and entrepreneurs; 3. Estonian researchers, represented by the President of the Estonian Academy of Sciences and the President of the Estonian Young Academy of Sciences, affirm that Estonian researchers will do their best to ensure that the resources at their disposal are used for research and development in a way that guarantees a balance between basic and applied research, with the primary focus on developing fields aimed at the advancement of the Estonian economy and society; 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties
    ISBN 0 85403 604 0 © The Royal Society 2004 Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of research or private study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act (1998), no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of the publisher, or, in the case of reprographic reproduction, in accordance with the terms of licences issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency in the UK, or in accordance with the terms of licenses issued by the appropriate reproduction rights organization outside the UK. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the terms stated here should be sent to: Science Policy Section The Royal Society 6–9 Carlton House Terrace London SW1Y 5AG email [email protected] Typeset in Frutiger by the Royal Society Proof reading and production management by the Clyvedon Press, Cardiff, UK Printed by Latimer Trend Ltd, Plymouth, UK ii | July 2004 | Nanoscience and nanotechnologies The Royal Society & The Royal Academy of Engineering Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: opportunities and uncertainties Contents page Summary vii 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Hopes and concerns about nanoscience and nanotechnologies 1 1.2 Terms of reference and conduct of the study 2 1.3 Report overview 2 1.4 Next steps 3 2 What are nanoscience and nanotechnologies? 5 3 Science and applications 7 3.1 Introduction 7 3.2 Nanomaterials 7 3.2.1 Introduction to nanomaterials 7 3.2.2 Nanoscience in this area 8 3.2.3 Applications 10 3.3 Nanometrology
    [Show full text]
  • Green Parties and Elections to the European Parliament, 1979–2019 Green Par Elections
    Chapter 1 Green Parties and Elections, 1979–2019 Green parties and elections to the European Parliament, 1979–2019 Wolfgang Rüdig Introduction The history of green parties in Europe is closely intertwined with the history of elections to the European Parliament. When the first direct elections to the European Parliament took place in June 1979, the development of green parties in Europe was still in its infancy. Only in Belgium and the UK had green parties been formed that took part in these elections; but ecological lists, which were the pre- decessors of green parties, competed in other countries. Despite not winning representation, the German Greens were particularly influ- enced by the 1979 European elections. Five years later, most partic- ipating countries had seen the formation of national green parties, and the first Green MEPs from Belgium and Germany were elected. Green parties have been represented continuously in the European Parliament since 1984. Subsequent years saw Greens from many other countries joining their Belgian and German colleagues in the Euro- pean Parliament. European elections continued to be important for party formation in new EU member countries. In the 1980s it was the South European countries (Greece, Portugal and Spain), following 4 GREENS FOR A BETTER EUROPE their successful transition to democracies, that became members. Green parties did not have a strong role in their national party systems, and European elections became an important focus for party develop- ment. In the 1990s it was the turn of Austria, Finland and Sweden to join; green parties were already well established in all three nations and provided ongoing support for Greens in the European Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • Rap2012 ANG.Indd
    Copyright by Forum Odpowiedzialnego Biznesu, Warszawa 2012. Responsible Business Forum ul. Szpitalna 5/5 00-031 Warszawa tel. +48 (22) 627 18 71 tel/fax: +48 (22) 627 18 72 [email protected] www.responsiblebusiness.pl For more information about Report mail us at: [email protected] “Responsible business in Poland 2012. Good practices” Report is a summary of the activities undertaken by companies, institutions and non-governmental organizations in the domain of corporate social responsibility and sustainable development. Report is an abstract of all the events that took place last year in Poland, in regard to these issues. A core element of the publication are corporate good practices – this year Report contains 262 good practices from areas in according to ISO 26000 standard: Organizational governance, Human rights, Labour practices, The environment, Fair operating practices, Consumer issues, Community involvement and development. They are inspiring examples of principles of responsibility application in all sections of business – in the workplace, towards market, society, and environment. In addition, the Report contains articles and experts’ statements, analysis, opinions and review of last year events, research results review, and press publications overview. CONTENTS Foreword Mirella Panek- Owsiańska ............................................. 3 End of the world cancelled Natalia Ćwik ......................................................... 4 oo Rio+20 Beata Jaczewska ...................................................... 6 ACTA Jarosław
    [Show full text]
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
    [Show full text]
  • Dariusz Szwed (Biuro Wspierania Lobbingu Ekologicznego)
    INSTYTUT NA RZECZ EKOROZWOJU Raport 1/2002 Rola organizacji pozarządowych w kształtowaniu proekologicznych wzorców konsumpcji Projekt dofinansowany przez Narodowy Fundusz Ochrony Środowiska i Gospodarki Wodnej Projekt pod kierunkiem Jolanty Kamienieckiej Warszawa, 2002 r. Instytut na rzecz Ekorozwoju (InE) jest pozarządową organizacją “non profit” o statusie fundacji, mającą na celu propagowanie, rozwijanie i wdrażanie do praktyki zasad i metod rozwoju zrównoważonego (ekorozwoju). InE powstał i działa dzięki pomocy finansowej German Marshall Fund of the United States, Ford Foundation i Rockefeller Brothers Fund, a od 1995 roku również Charles Stewart Mott Foundation. W swojej działalności skupia się na zagadnieniach ekonomicznych, prawnych, społecznych i politycznych – w powiązaniu z ochroną środowiska; współpracuje z Sejmem, Senatem, administracją pań- stwową i samorządową oraz z organizacjami ekologicznymi. Instytucje i osoby pragnące wesprzeć działalność Instytutu mogą dokonywać wpłat na rzecz Fundacji Instytut na rzecz Ekorozwoju w Banku Polska Kasa Opieki SA, II Oddział w Warszawie, nr konta dla wpłat w złotówkach: 12401024-21016572-2700-401112-001, nr konta dla wpłat w dewizach: 12401024-21016572-2700-457872-001. The Institute for Sustainable Development (ISD) is an independent, non-governmental and non-profit organisation, whose main target of activity is implementation and dissemi- nation of the sustainable development concept in Poland. The Institute has been esta- blished – and carried out its operations – thanks to donations of the German Marshall Fund of the United States, the Ford Foundation and the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, and, since 1995, also the Charles Steward Mott Foundation. It focuses on economic, legal, so- cial and political issues in connection with environmental protection; collaborates with Polish parliament, with state administration as well as local governments and non- governmental ecological movements.
    [Show full text]