DOCSLIB.ORG

Next Generation Computing

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Next Generation Computing Next Generation Computing Erica Wiseman Strategic Information Analyst, National Research Council of Canada Prepared by: National Research Council of Canada / Government of Canada 1200 Montreal Rd, Ottawa, ON K1A 0R6 Contract Number: FE22071707 NRC Project #: EW16-02 Contract Scientific Valérie Lavigne, Defence Scientist and Bruno Gilbert, Chief Scientist The scientific or technical validity of this Contract Report is entirely the responsibility of the Contractor and the contents do not necessarily have the approval or endorsement of the Department of National Defence of Canada. Defence Research and Development Canada Contract Report DRDC-RDDC-2017-C049 March 2016 Template in use: SR Advanced_Oct_Release_EN_V.03.02_2015-08-12-V02_WW.dot © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of National Defence, 2016 © Sa Majesté la Reine (en droit du Canada), telle que représentée par le ministre de la Défense nationale, 2016 Strategic Technical Insights NEXT GENERATION COMPUTING Prepared for Valerie Lavigne Defence Scientist, C2I Section, Valcartier Research Centre Defence Research and Development Canada / Government of Canada [email protected] Bruno Gilbert Chief Scientist, Information Sciences, Valcartier Research Centre Defence Research and Development Canada / Government of Canada [email protected] Prepared by Erica Wiseman, Strategic Information Analyst, National Research Council of Canada / Government of Canada [email protected] DRDC Project #: FE22071707 NRC Project #: EW16-02 Report submitted: September 12, 2016 NRC-KM employees make every effort to obtain information from reliable sources. However, we assume no responsibility or liability for any decisions based upon the information presented. Scientometric Study on Next Generation Computing September, 2016 Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... 5 2 Background ................................................................................................................................ 7 2.1 Context .......................................................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Key Issues ...................................................................................................................................... 7 2.3 Key Questions ................................................................................................................................ 7 3 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 8 3.1 Phase 1 Findings .......................................................................................................................... 11 4 Phase 2 Findings ....................................................................................................................... 14 4.1 Biocomputing .............................................................................................................................. 17 4.1.1 Biocomputing Top Topics ................................................................................................... 21 4.1.2 Major Players and Area of Focus ........................................................................................ 23 4.1.3 Collaboration Networks ...................................................................................................... 25 4.2 Nanocomputing ........................................................................................................................... 27 4.2.1 Top Topics ........................................................................................................................... 32 4.2.2 Major Players and Area of Focus ........................................................................................ 33 4.2.3 Collaboration Networks ...................................................................................................... 35 4.3 Spintronics ................................................................................................................................... 36 4.3.1 Top topics ........................................................................................................................... 43 4.3.2 Major Players and Area of Focus ........................................................................................ 44 4.3.3 Collaboration Networks ...................................................................................................... 45 4.4 Optical/Photonic Computing ....................................................................................................... 47 4.4.1 Top Topics ........................................................................................................................... 53 4.4.2 Major players and Area of Focus ........................................................................................ 55 4.4.3 Collaboration Networks ...................................................................................................... 57 5 Conclusions .............................................................................................................................. 59 6 References ............................................................................................................................... 62 Appendix A: Definitions of Topics In Phase 1 .................................................................................... 67 Appendix B: Nanotechnology inspired Grand Challenge Goals .......................................................... 74 Appendix C: Roadmap for nanophotonic devices 2014-2020 ............................................................. 77 Appendix D: Attachments ................................................................................................................ 80 Appendix E: Methodology ................................................................................................................ 81 Searches ................................................................................................................................................... 81 Analysis .................................................................................................................................................... 82 Page 2 of 83 Scientometric Study on Next Generation Computing September, 2016 List of Figures Figure 1: Selected Predictions for the End of Moore’s Law ............................................................................... 8 Figure 2. Cluster Map: Phase 1 ......................................................................................................................... 12 Figure 3. Mind map of Next Generation Computing Topics ............................................................................. 13 Figure 4. Publication Trendlines, All Four Subsets ........................................................................................... 14 Figure 5. Cluster Map of Topics in the Four Selected Subtopics ...................................................................... 16 Figure 6. Biocomputing Top Topics by Publication Count ................................................................................ 21 Figure 7. Biocomputing Research Thrusts ........................................................................................................ 22 Figure 8. Biocomputing Top Affiliations ........................................................................................................... 23 Figure 9. Biocomputing Top Countries ............................................................................................................. 23 Figure 10. Top 10 Biocomputing Affiliations and Areas of Focus ..................................................................... 24 Figure 11. Biocomputing Top Affiliation Collaborations .................................................................................. 26 Figure 12. Arrangement of Electrons in Quantum Dots ................................................................................... 27 Figure 13. Taxonomy of Memory Devices ........................................................................................................ 30 Figure 14. Most Promising Emerging Memory Devices ................................................................................... 30 Figure 15. Most Promising Emerging Logic Devices ......................................................................................... 31 Figure 16. Nanocomputing Top Topics ............................................................................................................. 32 Figure 17. Nanocomputing Cluster Map .......................................................................................................... 32 Figure 18. Nanocomputing Top Affiliations ...................................................................................................... 33 Figure 19. Top Nanocomputing Major Players and Areas of Focus ................................................................. 34 Figure 20. Nanocomputing Affiliation Collaborations ...................................................................................... 35 Figure 21. Schematic of Magnetic Tunnel Junction .........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nano Computing Revolution and Future Prospects
    Recent Research in Science and Technology 2012, 4(3): 16-17 ISSN: 2076-5061 Available Online: http://recent-science.com/ Nano computing revolution and future prospects Deepti Hirwani and Anuradha Sharma Maharaja Agrasen International College, Raipur C.G, India Abstract There are several ways nanocomputers might be built, using mechanical, electronic, biochemical, or quantum technology. It is unlikely that nanocomputers will be made out of semiconductor transistors (Microelectronic components that are at the core of all modern electronic devices), as they seem to perform significantly less well when shrunk to sizes under 100 nanometers.The research results summarized here also suggest that many useful, yet strikingly different solutions may exist for tolerating defects and faults within nanocomputing systems. Also included in the survey are a number of software tools useful for quantifying the reliability of nanocomputing systems in the presence of defects and faults. Keywords: Nano computing, electronic devices, technology INTRODUCTION classical computer would have to repeat 2 x input numbers, Nanocomputer is the logical name for the computer smaller performing the same task that a classical computer would have to then the microcomputer, which is smaller than the minicomputer. repeat 2 x times or use 2 xprocessors working in parallel. In other (The minicomputer is called “mini” because it was a lot smaller than words a quantum computer offers an enormous gain in the use of the original (mainframe) computers.) More technically, it is a computational resources such as time and memory. This becomes computer whose fundamental part is no bigger than a few mind boggling when you think of what 32 qubits can accomplish.
    [Show full text]
  • Denys I. Bondar
    Updated on July 15, 2020 Denys I. Bondar Assistant Professor, Department of Physics and Engineering Physics, Tulane University, 2001 Percival Stern Hall, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA 70118 office: 4031 Percival Stern Hall e-mail: [email protected] phone: +1 (504) 862 8701 web: Google Scholar, Research Gate, ORCiD Education Ph. D. in Physics 01/2007{12/2010 Department of Physics and Astronomy, • University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada Ph. D. thesis [arXiv:1012.5334]: supervisor: Misha Yu. Ivanov; co-supervisor: Wing-Ki Liu M. Sc. and B. Sc. in Physics with Honors 09/2001{06/2006 • Uzhgorod National University, Uzhgorod, Ukraine B. Sc. in Computer Science 09/2001{06/2006 • Transcarpathian State University, Uzhgorod, Ukraine Awards, Grants, and Scholarships Young Faculty Award DARPA 2019{2021 Army Research Office (ARO) grant W911NF-19-1-0377 2019{2021 Defense University Research Instrumentation Program (DURIP) 2018 Humboldt Research Fellowship for Experienced Researchers 2017-2020 Air Force Young Investigator Research Program 2016-2019 Los Alamos Director's Fellowship (declined) 2013 President's Graduate Scholarship (University of Waterloo) 2010 Ontario Graduate Scholarship 2010 International Doctoral Student Awards (University of Waterloo) 2007-2010 Award of Recognition at the All-Ukrainian Contest of Students' Scientific Works 2006 Current Research Interests • Quantum technology • Optics including quantum, ultrafast, nonlinear, and incoherent • Optical communication and sensing • Nonequilibrium quantum statistical mechanics 1 • Many-body
    [Show full text]
  • Nanosystems, Edge Computing, and the Next Generation Computing Systems
    sensors Review Nanosystems, Edge Computing, and the Next Generation Computing Systems Ali Passian * and Neena Imam Computing & Computational Sciences Directorate, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 30 July 2019; Accepted: 16 September 2019; Published: 19 September 2019 Abstract: It is widely recognized that nanoscience and nanotechnology and their subfields, such as nanophotonics, nanoelectronics, and nanomechanics, have had a tremendous impact on recent advances in sensing, imaging, and communication, with notable developments, including novel transistors and processor architectures. For example, in addition to being supremely fast, optical and photonic components and devices are capable of operating across multiple orders of magnitude length, power, and spectral scales, encompassing the range from macroscopic device sizes and kW energies to atomic domains and single-photon energies. The extreme versatility of the associated electromagnetic phenomena and applications, both classical and quantum, are therefore highly appealing to the rapidly evolving computing and communication realms, where innovations in both hardware and software are necessary to meet the growing speed and memory requirements. Development of all-optical components, photonic chips, interconnects, and processors will bring the speed of light, photon coherence properties, field confinement and enhancement, information-carrying capacity, and the broad spectrum of light into the high-performance computing, the internet of things, and industries related to cloud, fog, and recently edge computing. Conversely, owing to their extraordinary properties, 0D, 1D, and 2D materials are being explored as a physical basis for the next generation of logic components and processors. Carbon nanotubes, for example, have been recently used to create a new processor beyond proof of principle.
    [Show full text]
  • Advances in Photonic Devices Based on Optical Phase-Change Materials
    molecules Review Advances in Photonic Devices Based on Optical Phase-Change Materials Xiaoxiao Wang 1, Huixin Qi 1, Xiaoyong Hu 1,2,3,*, Zixuan Yu 1, Shaoqi Ding 1, Zhuochen Du 1 and Qihuang Gong 1,2,3 1 Collaborative Innovation Center of Quantum Matter & Frontiers Science Center for Nano-Optoelectronics, State Key Laboratory for Mesoscopic Physics & Department of Physics, Beijing Academy of Quantum Information Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China; [email protected] (X.W.); [email protected] (H.Q.); [email protected] (Z.Y.); [email protected] (S.D.); [email protected] (Z.D.); [email protected] (Q.G.) 2 Peking University Yangtze Delta Institute of Optoelectronics, Nantong 226010, China 3 Collaborative Innovation Center of Extreme Optics, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Phase-change materials (PCMs) are important photonic materials that have the advantages of a rapid and reversible phase change, a great difference in the optical properties between the crystalline and amorphous states, scalability, and nonvolatility. With the constant development in the PCM platform and integration of multiple material platforms, more and more reconfigurable photonic devices and their dynamic regulation have been theoretically proposed and experimentally demonstrated, showing the great potential of PCMs in integrated photonic chips. Here, we review the recent developments in PCMs and discuss their potential for photonic devices. A universal overview of the mechanism of the phase transition and models of PCMs is presented. PCMs have injected new life into on-chip photonic integrated circuits, which generally contain an optical switch, Citation: Wang, X.; Qi, H.; Hu, X.; an optical logical gate, and an optical modulator.
    [Show full text]
  • Optical Memristive Switches
    J Electroceram DOI 10.1007/s10832-017-0072-3 Optical memristive switches Ueli Koch1 & Claudia Hoessbacher1 & Alexandros Emboras1 & Juerg Leuthold1 Received: 18 September 2016 /Accepted: 6 February 2017 # The Author(s) 2017. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Optical memristive switches are particularly inter- signals. Normally, the operation speed is moderate and in esting for the use as latching optical switches, as a novel op- the MHz range. The application range includes usage as a tical memory or as a digital optical switch. The optical new kind of memory which can be electrically written and memristive effect has recently enabled a miniaturization of optically read, or usage as a latching switch that only needs optical devices far beyond of what seemed feasible. The to be triggered once and that can keep the state with little or no smallest optical – or plasmonic – switch has now atomic scale energy consumption. In addition, they represent a new logical andinfactisswitchedbymovingsingleatoms.Inthisreview, element that complements the toolbox of optical computing. we summarize the development of optical memristive The optical memristive effect has been discovered only switches on their path from the micro- to the atomic scale. recently [1]. It is of particular interest because of strong Three memristive effects that are important to the optical field electro-optical interaction with distinct transmission states are discussed in more detail. Among them are the phase tran- and because of low power consumption and scalability [8]. sition effect, the valency change effect and the electrochemical Such devices rely in part on exploiting the electrical metallization.
    [Show full text]
  • Optical Computing: a 60-Year Adventure Pierre Ambs
    Optical Computing: A 60-Year Adventure Pierre Ambs To cite this version: Pierre Ambs. Optical Computing: A 60-Year Adventure. Advances in Optical Technologies, 2010, 2010, pp.1-15. 10.1155/2010/372652. hal-00828108 HAL Id: hal-00828108 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00828108 Submitted on 30 May 2013 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Hindawi Publishing Corporation Advances in Optical Technologies Volume 2010, Article ID 372652, 15 pages doi:10.1155/2010/372652 Research Article Optical Computing: A 60-Year Adventure Pierre Ambs Laboratoire Mod´elisation Intelligence Processus Syst`emes, Ecole Nationale Sup´erieure d’Ing´enieurs Sud Alsace, Universit´e de Haute Alsace, 12 rue des Fr`eres Lumi`ere, 68093 Mulhouse Cedex, France Correspondence should be addressed to Pierre Ambs, [email protected] Received 15 December 2009; Accepted 19 February 2010 Academic Editor: Peter V. Polyanskii Copyright © 2010 Pierre Ambs. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Optical computing is a very interesting 60-year old field of research.
    [Show full text]
  • Extending the Road Beyond CMOS
    By James A. Hutchby, George I. Bourianoff, Victor V. Zhirnov, and Joe E. Brewer he quickening pace of MOSFET technology scaling, as seen in the new 2001 International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors [1], is ac- celerating the introduction of many new technologies to extend CMOS Tinto nanoscale MOSFET structures heretofore not thought possible. A cautious optimism is emerging that these new technologies may extend MOSFETs to the 22-nm node (9-nm physical gate length) by 2016 if not by the end of this decade. These new devices likely will feature several new materials cleverly incorporated into new nonbulk MOSFET structures. They will be ultra fast and dense with a voracious appetite for power. Intrinsic device speeds may be more than 1 THz and integration densities will exceed 1 billion transistors per cm2. Excessive power consumption, however, will demand judicious use of these high-performance devices only in those critical paths requiring their su- perior performance. Two or perhaps three other lower performance, more power-efficient MOSFETs will likely be used to perform less performance-criti- cal functions on the chip to manage the total power consumption. Beyond CMOS, several completely new approaches to information-process- ing and data-storage technologies and architectures are emerging to address the timeframe beyond the current roadmap. Rather than vying to “replace” CMOS, one or more of these embryonic paradigms, when combined with a CMOS plat- form, could extend microelectronics to new applications domains currently not accessible to CMOS. A successful new information-processing paradigm most likely will require a new platform technology embodying a fabric of intercon- nected primitive logic cells, perhaps in three dimensions.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Table of Contents Schedule-at-a-Glance . 2 FiO + LS Chairs’ Welcome Letters . 3 General Information . 5 Conference Materials Access to Technical Digest Papers . 7 FiO + LS Conference App . 7 Plenary Session/Visionary Speakers . 8 Science & Industry Showcase Theater Programming . 12 Networking Area Programming . 12 Participating Companies . 14 OSA Member Zone . 15 Special Events . 16 Awards, Honors and Special Recognitions FiO + LS Awards Ceremony & Reception . 19 OSA Awards and Honors . 19 2019 APS/Division of Laser Science Awards and Honors . 21 2019 OSA Foundation Fellowship, Scholarships and Special Recognitions . 21 2019 OSA Awards and Medals . 22 OSA Foundation FiO Grants, Prizes and Scholarships . 23 OSA Senior Members . 24 FiO + LS Committees . 27 Explanation of Session Codes . 28 FiO + LS Agenda of Sessions . 29 FiO + LS Abstracts . 34 Key to Authors and Presiders . 94 Program updates and changes may be found on the Conference Program Update Sheet distributed in the attendee registration bags, and check the Conference App for regular updates . OSA and APS/DLS thank the following sponsors for their generous support of this meeting: FiO + LS 2019 • 15–19 September 2019 1 Conference Schedule-at-a-Glance Note: Dates and times are subject to change. Check the conference app for regular updates. All times reflect EDT. Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday 15 September 16 September 17 September 18 September 19 September GENERAL Registration 07:00–17:00 07:00–17:00 07:30–18:00 07:30–17:30 07:30–11:00 Coffee Breaks 10:00–10:30 10:00–10:30 10:00–10:30 10:00–10:30 10:00–10:30 15:30–16:00 15:30–16:00 13:30–14:00 13:30–14:00 PROGRAMMING Technical Sessions 08:00–18:00 08:00–18:00 08:00–10:00 08:00–10:00 08:00–12:30 15:30–17:00 15:30–18:30 Visionary Speakers 09:15–10:00 09:15–10:00 09:15–10:00 09:15–10:00 LS Symposium on Undergraduate 12:00–18:00 Research Postdeadline Paper Sessions 17:15–18:15 SCIENCE & INDUSTRY SHOWCASE Science & Industry Showcase 10:00–15:30 10:00–15:30 See page 12 for complete schedule of programs .
    [Show full text]
  • Photonic Computing by Smit Patel What Is Photonic Computing?
    PHOTONIC COMPUTING BY SMIT PATEL WHAT IS PHOTONIC COMPUTING? • Optical Computing • Photonic computers perform its computations with photons or IR beams as opposed to electron-based computation which are seen in the traditional computers. • Two types: Pure Optical Computers & Electro-Optical Hybrid ELECTRO-OPTICAL HYBRID • Use optical fibers and electric parts to read and direct data from the processor Light pulses send information instead of voltage packets. • Processors change from binary code to light pulses using lasers. • Information is then detected and decoded electronically back into binary. OPTICAL TRANSISTORS • Transistors based off the Fabry-Perot Interferometer. • Constructive interference yields a high intensity (a 1 in binary) • Destructive interference yields an intensity close to zero (a 0 in binary) HOLOGRAPHIC MEMORY • A holographic memory can store data in the form of a hologram within a crystal. • A laser is split into a reference beam and a signal beam. • Signal beam goes through the logic gate and receives information • The two beams then meet up again and interference pattern creates a hologram in the crystal. HOLOGRAPHIC MEMORY OPTICAL FIBERS • Small in size • Low transmission losses • No interference from radio frequencies, electromagnetic components, or crosstalk • Safer • More secure • Environmental immunity OPTICAL FIBERS PROS • Small size • Increased speed • Low heating • Reconfigurable • Scalable for larger or small networks • More complex functions done faster Applications for Artificial Intelligence • Less power consumption (500 microwatts per interconnect length vs. 10 mW for electrical) LIMITS OF PHOTONIC COMPUTING • Optical fibers on a chip are wider than electrical traces. • Crystals need 1mm of length and are much larger than current transistors • Software needed to design and run the computers.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Boolean Computing with Spintronic Devices
    Full text available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/1000000046 Non-Boolean Computing with Spintronic Devices Kawsher A. Roxy University of South Florida [email protected] Sanjukta Bhanja University of South Florida [email protected] Boston — Delft Full text available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/1000000046 Foundations and Trends R in Electronic Design Automation Published, sold and distributed by: now Publishers Inc. PO Box 1024 Hanover, MA 02339 United States Tel. +1-781-985-4510 www.nowpublishers.com [email protected] Outside North America: now Publishers Inc. PO Box 179 2600 AD Delft The Netherlands Tel. +31-6-51115274 The preferred citation for this publication is K. A. Roxy and S. Bhanja. Non-Boolean Computing with Spintronic Devices. Foundations and Trends R in Electronic Design Automation, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–124, 2018. R This Foundations and Trends issue was typeset in LATEX using a class file designed by Neal Parikh. Printed on acid-free paper. ISBN: 978-1-68083-362-1 c 2018 K. A. Roxy and S. Bhanja All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission of the publishers. Photocopying. In the USA: This journal is registered at the Copyright Clearance Cen- ter, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923. Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use, or the internal or personal use of specific clients, is granted by now Publishers Inc for users registered with the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC).
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 8 Photonic Neuromorphic Signal Processing and Computing
    Chapter 8 Photonic Neuromorphic Signal Processing and Computing Alexander N. Tait, Mitchell A. Nahmias, Yue Tian, Bhavin J. Shastri and Paul R. Prucnal Abstract There has been a recent explosion of interest in spiking neural networks (SNNs), which code information as spikes or events in time. Spike encoding is widely accepted as the information medium underlying the brain, but it has also inspired a new generation of neuromorphic hardware. Although electronics can match biologi- cal time scales and exceed them, they eventually reach a bandwidth fan-in trade-off. An alternative platform is photonics, which could process highly interactive infor- mation at speeds that electronics could never reach. Correspondingly, processing techniques inspired by biology could compensate for many of the shortcomings that bar digital photonic computing from feasibility, including high defect rates and signal control problems. We summarize properties of photonic spike processing and ini- tial experiments with discrete components. A technique for mapping this paradigm to scalable, integrated laser devices is explored and simulated in small networks. This approach promises to wed the advantageous aspects of both photonic physics and unconventional computing systems. Further development could allow for fully scalable photonic networks that would open up a new domain of ultrafast, robust, and adaptive processing. Applications of this technology ranging from nanosecond response control systems to fast cognitive radio could potentially revitalize special- ized photonic computing. 8.1 Introduction The brain, unlike the von Neumann processors found in conventional computers, is very power efficient, extremely effective at certain computing tasks, and highly adaptable to novel situations and environments. While these favorable properties are often largely credited to the unique connectionism of biological nervous systems, it is A.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Types of Computers Contents
    1. Types of Computers Contents 1 Classes of computers 1 1.1 Classes by size ............................................. 1 1.1.1 Microcomputers (personal computers) ............................ 1 1.1.2 Minicomputers (midrange computers) ............................ 1 1.1.3 Mainframe computers ..................................... 1 1.1.4 Supercomputers ........................................ 1 1.2 Classes by function .......................................... 2 1.2.1 Servers ............................................ 2 1.2.2 Workstations ......................................... 2 1.2.3 Information appliances .................................... 2 1.2.4 Embedded computers ..................................... 2 1.3 See also ................................................ 2 1.4 References .............................................. 2 1.5 External links ............................................. 2 2 List of computer size categories 3 2.1 Supercomputers ............................................ 3 2.2 Mainframe computers ........................................ 3 2.3 Minicomputers ............................................ 3 2.4 Microcomputers ........................................... 3 2.5 Mobile computers ........................................... 3 2.6 Others ................................................. 4 2.7 Distinctive marks ........................................... 4 2.8 Categories ............................................... 4 2.9 See also ................................................ 4 2.10 References
    [Show full text]