University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana

Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School

1994

Petrology and provenance of the Middle Proterozoic Bonner Formation and its correlatives Belt Supergroup Montana Idaho and Washington

Mohammad Ahmad Farooqui The University of Montana

Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y

Recommended Citation Farooqui, Mohammad Ahmad, "Petrology and provenance of the Middle Proterozoic Bonner Formation and its correlatives Belt Supergroup Montana Idaho and Washington" (1994). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 10425. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/10425

This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS

This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer.

The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction.

In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion.

Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book.

Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order.

University Microfilms international A Beil & Howell Information Comoany 300 Nortn Zeeo Road. Ann Ardor. Ml 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Order Number 9509600

Petrology and provenance of the Middle Proterozoic Bonner Formation and its correlatives, Belt Supergroup, Montana, Idaho and Washington

Farooqui, Mohammad Ahmad, Ph.D.

University of Montana, 1994

UMI 300 N. Zeeb Rd. Ann Arbor. MI 48106

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. PETROLOGY AND PROVENANCE OF THE MIDDLE PROTEROZOIC BONNER

FORMATION AND ITS CORRELATIVES, BELT SUPERGROUP, MONTANA

IDAHO AND WASHINGTON

By

Mohammad Ahmad Farooqui

MSc. The University of Baiochistan 1985

presented in the partial fulfilment of the requirements

for the degree of

Doctor of Philosophy

The University of Montana

1994

Approved by:

Chairman, Board of Examiners

Dean, Graduate School

Date

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Maureen and Mike MANSFIELD LIBRARY

TheMontana University of

Permission is granted by the author to reproduce this material in its entirety, provided that this material is used for scholarly purposes and is properly cited in published works and reports.

* * Please check "Yes " or "No “ and provide signature

Yes, I grant permission No, I do not grant permission

Author’s Signature

Date:

Any copying for commercial purposes or financial gain may be undertaken only with fhe author’s explicit consent. •

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ii Farooqui. Mohammad A.. Ph.D. September. 1994

Petrology and Provenance of the Middle Proterozoic Bonner Formation and its Correlatives. Belt Supergroup. Montana. Idaho and Washington.

Director: Donald Winston

The Middle Proterozoic Bonner Formation of Belt Supergroup represents a large composite alluvial apron that received sediments predominantly from a medium to high grade metamorphic and a granitic source terrane. In the southwestern part of the Belt basin the of the Bonner is dominated by well rounded quartzite pebbles and coarse-grained feldspathic arenite. These fine to north, where the Bonner is mostly medium- to fine-grained arenite. argillite, and siltite. The aim of this study is to determine the composition and location of the source areas of Bonner and interpret the tectonic events reflected in the Bonner sediments. An important part of this study includes defining the full extent of Bonner deposition by evaluating proposed correlation of Bonner with the Buffalo Hump Formation of Deer Trail Group in eastern Washington and the Swauger Formation of east central Idaho.

Provenance research was carried out by detrital grain typology and chemistry. Nine stratigraphic sections of the Bonner, two of the Swauger and one of the Buffalo Hump formations were sampled. Out of 824 samples studied. 384 thin sections were examined in detail by counting 300 grains per thin section using traditional method of point counting. Statistical analyses of the point count data revealed that the Bonner Formation in the southern part of the Belt basin is composed of 56.67^6.05% Qm. 21.80+6.26% Qp. 14.85+4.31% k-feldspar. and 5.61+1.95% lithic fragments w hereas in the northern part the Bonner contains 62.92+7.50% Qm. 12.53+3.82% Qp. 23.04+5.21% k-feldspar. and 0.92+0.55% lithic grains. Among the two proposed correlatives of the Bonner, the Buflalo Hump Formation is composed of 57.00+16.86% Qm. 38.13+15.57% Qp. 0% k-feldspar. and 4.63+4.53% lithic grains, whereas the Swauger Formation contains 86.72+5.71% Qm. 3.78+3.45% Qp. 8.87+4.74% k-feldspar. and 0.51+0.71% lithic grains. The microchemical analyses indicated that detrital feldspar from Bonner Formation is a high potassium low sodium variety and is not significantly different from that of Swauger feldspar.

Analytical results indicate that the Buffalo Hump Formation is net a correlative of the Bonner Formation as was suggested by Miller and Whipple (1989). It is younger than the Bonner (Ross. 1991 and 1992). and received sediments exclusively from mctasedimentary rocks. The detrital mineralogy of the Swauger Formation does not provide enough evidence to establish a firm correlation with the Bonner, it may represent the southern extension of Mount Shields Formation in east central Idaho.

Based on the analyses I conclude that the quartzite pebbles, rounded quartz grains and rounded zircon grains were derived from a remote Early Proterozoic metamorphic terrane that was covered by a relatively thin siliciclastic and carbonate veneer located south/southwest of the Belt basin. Angular K- feldspar. angular quartz . muscovite and angular zircons were eroded from a granite that intruded the metamorphic terrane at about 1.6-1.8 Ga.(Ross and others 1992). In addition to the southerly/ southwesterly supply of detrital grains, the northern end of the Bonner alluvial apron receiv ed sediments from north of the Belt basin that increased the potassium feldspar content of the detritus in the northern part of the Bonner Formation.

Bonner Formation records a major tectonic disturbance in and around the Belt basin that began at about 1.3 Ga (Elston. 1991; Elston and Link. 1993). Uplift of the southwestern metamorphic and granitic source terranes and subsidence of the Belt basin may have occurred along high angle normal faults that dominantly controlled the sedimentation in the basin.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 111

Acknowledgments

I greatly appreciate the encouragement and valuable advice offered by the Dissertation Committee:

Don Winston, Dave Alt, Arnold Silverman, Jim Sear.;, and Garon Smith. I am greatly indebted to Don

Winston for his unending enthusiasm, helpful suggestions and criticism, and editing the manuscript throughout

the project. He was always there when 1 needed him, both in the field and in the laboratory, and paid special

attention. I would also like to thank Donald Hyndman and Raymond Murray who helped me identify certain

minerals in thin sections and provoked valuable discussions on the chemistry of and origin of cherts.

Discussions with Jay Johnson, Janet Riddell, Laura Kuzel, Ted Doughty, Amjad Virk and Hamad Khuraiji

proved very helpful. Saiah Hijazi, Mohammad Akhtar Azeem. Jay Johnson and Robin Shripshire helped me

collect samples. I extend special thanks to Bonnie Barhyte who helped me both in the field in collecting data

and for typing and proofreading parts of the manuscript. Continuous encouragement and valuable support from

Bonnie helped me stay focused on my studies and research work during my stay in Missoula. 1 also appreciate

Najmun Nisa and Janet Klein for typing and proofreading the earlier versions of the manuscript.

I specially thank USAID which provided funds for my studies and for this project at the University of

Montana under the Faculty Development Project. I appreciate services provided by Academy for Educauonal

Development and the staff of the Pakistan Participant Training Program for managing the financial and logistic

matters related to my graduate studies. Faculty and staff of the Geology Department at the Universitv of

Montana have been very helpful during my stay in Missoula.

I am particularly indebted to the Ministry of Educauon. Government of Pakistan, and the Center of

Excellence in Mineralogy, University of Balochistan, for nominating and awarding me the USAID Scholarship

which helped me earn the Ph.D. from the University of Montana.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. (V

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page Number 0 Title P a g e ...... i ix) Abstract ...... si in) Acknowledgements ...... tii iv) Table of contents ...... tv v) List of figures ...... vi vi) List of Tables ...... l\

Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION ...... 2 A Background ...... 3 B Purpose of Study ...... C Study A r e a ...... S D Methods of Study ...... 10 a Field Work and Sampling Techniques ...... 10 b Petrographic Techniques ...... 10 c Electron Probe Microanalyses ...... 10

2 GENERAL GEOLOGY AND STRATIGRAPHY ...... !l A Middle Proterozoic Beit Rocks of Montana Jdaho and Eastern Washington II B Previous W ork on the Provenance of Beit Sediments ...... 12 C Structural Setting of the Beit basin ...... 13 D Missoula Group ...... 16 E Bonner Formation ...... 16 F Swauger Form ation...... 18 G Buffalo Hump Formation ...... 19

3 PETROGRAPHY ...... 21 A Clast Types...... 21 a Quartz ...... 23 i) Monocrvstalline Q uartz ...... 27 ti) Polycrystalline Q uartz ...... 29 b Feldspar ...... 35 i) Microciine ...... 38 ii) Orthoclase ...... 38 iii) Plagiociase ...... 38 c C hert...... 43 d Mica ...... 47 e Rock Fragments ...... 47 f Heavy Minerals ...... 55 g Opaque Minerals ...... 58 h Diagenetic/alteration products ...... 60 i Matrix and Cement ...... 60 B Descriptive Mineralogy ...... 63 a Bonner Formation ...... 63 i) Southern Sections ...... 64 1) Wise R iv e r...... 67 2) Flint C reek ...... 72 3) Emerine Lookout ...... 75

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Chapter Page Number

4) Clinton ...... 77 ii) Northern Sections ...... SO 1) Spotted B ear ...... 81 2) N yack...... S5 3) Fishtrap Creek ...... 88 4) Libby...... 90 5^ Clark Fork ...... 92 b Buffalo Hump Formation ...... 94 c Swauger Formation ...... 98 i) Cranks Canyon ...... 99 if) Fourth of My Creek ...... 103 C Basin-wide Lateral Distribution of Major Clast Types ...... 106 a Bonner Formation ...... 106 b Comparison with Buffalo Hump Formation...... 123 c Comparison with Swauger Formation ...... 123

4 CHEMISTRY OF FELDSPAR GRAINS ...... 124 A Feldspar Grains of the Bonner Formation ...... 128 a) Potassium Feldspar ...... 129 b) A lbite...... 142 B Feldspar Grains of the Swauger Formation ...... 144 a) Potassium Feldspar ...... 144 b) A lbite ...... 144

5 PROVENANCE ...... 146 A Bonner Form ation ...... 146 B Buffalo Hump Formation ...... 155 C Swauger Form ation ...... 155

6 TECTONIC INTERPRETATION ...... 157

7 CONCLUSIONS ...... 158

8 R E F E R E N C E S C IT E D ...... 159

9 E P IL O G ...... 175

10 APPENDICES Appendix 1 Location of stratigraphic sections ...... 189 Appendix 2 Sampling Log ...... 194 Appendix 3 Point Count Data ...... 204 Appendix 4 Analytical conditions and standards used in electron probe microanalysis .... 225 Appendix 5 Microprobe data ...... 226 Appendix 6 Measured section of the Swauger Formation ...... 234 Appendix 7 Bar graphs showing basin-wide distributionof detrital grains ...... 248

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. vi

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure Page Number

1. Generalized geologic map of the Belt and Purcell Supergroup ...... 4 2. Geographic location map for the Belt Supergroup showing localities mentioned in the text ...... 5 3. Hypothetical Proterozoic Crustal Blocks of the Belt basin ...... 15 4. Mega-mosaic poly crystalline quartz (QpMeg) from the Buffalo Hump Formation ...... 30 5. Mega-mosaic poly crystalline quartz (QpMeg) from Nvack section of the Bonner Formation ...... 31 6. Macro-mosaic polycrystalline quartz (QpMac) from Nvack; secuon of the Bonner Formation ...... 32 7a. Macro-mosaic polycrystalline quartz (QpMac) from Flint Creek section of the Bonner Formation ...... 33 7b. Macro-mosaic polycrystalline quartz (QpMac) from Wise River section of the Bonner Formation ...... 34 8. Micro-mosaic polycrystalline quartz (QpMic) from Flint Creek section of the Bonner Formation ...... 36 9. Macro-mosaic polycrystalline quartz (QpMac) from the Buffalo Hump Formauon ...... 37 10. Angular microcline and rounded monocrystalline quartz grains from Wise River secuon ...... 39 11. A large angular microcline grain from Wise River section ...... 40 12. Albitized potassium feldspar with albite overgrowth from Nvack secuon of the Bonner ...... 41 13. Euhedral diagenetic albite from Nvack section of the Bonner ...... 42 14. Well rounded detrital chert gram from Wise River secuon ...... 44 15. Well rounded detrital chert gram from Flint Creek section ...... 45 16. Replacement chert from the Buffalo Hump Formation ...... 46 17. Detrital biotite grains from Fourth of July Creek section of the Swauger Formauon ...... 48 18. Unidentifiable grain from Fourth of July Creek section of the Swauger Formauon ...... 50 19. Detntal quartzite rock fragment from Wise River section, the Bonner Formauon ...... 51 20. Highly stretched detrital quartzite rock fragment from Flint Creek secuon of the Bonner Formation ...... 52 21. Quartz overgrowth on second cycle monocrystalline quartz from Wise River secuon of the Bonner Formation ...... 53 22. Quartz overgrowth on second cycle monocrystalline quartz gram from the Buffalo Hump Formauon ...... 54 23. Angular zircon from Wise River, the Bonner Formation ...... 56 24. Rounded zircon from Wise River, the Bonner Formauon ...... 57 25. Sub-rounded tourmaline from Fourth nf July section, the Swauger Formation ...... 59 26. Extensive quartz cement. Nvack section, the Bonner Formation ...... 62 27. A quartzite pebble in the conglomerate of the Bonner Formauon, Wise River secuon ...... 65 28. Graph showing the mean composition and one standard deviation of the detntal grains of the Bonner Formation at Wise River ...... 68 29. Graph showing the mean composition and one standard deviation of the detntal grams of the Bonner Formation at Hint Creek ...... 73 30. Graph showing the mean composition and one standard deviation of the detntal grams of the Bonner Formation at Emerine Lookout ...... 76 31. Graph showing the mean composition and one standard deviation of the detrital grams of the Bonner Formation at Clinton ...... 78 32. Graph showing the mean composition and one standard deviation of the detrital grains of the Bonner Formation at Spotted Bear ...... 82 33. Graph showing the mean composition and one standard deviation of the detrital grams of the Bonner Formation at Nvack...... 86

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. vii LIST OF FIGURES (CONTINUED) Figure Page Number

34. Graph showing the mean composition and one standard deviation of the detrital grains of the Bonner Formation at Fishtrap Creek ...... 89 35. Graph showing the mean composition and one standard deviation of the detrital grains of the Bonner Formation at Libby ...... 91 36 Graph showing the mean composition and one standard deviation of the detrital grains of the Buffalo Hump Formation ...... 95 37. Graph showing the mean composition and one standard deviation of the detrital grains of the Swauger Formation at Cranks Canyon ...... 100 38. Graph showing the mean composition and one standard deviation of the detrital grains of the Swauger Formation at Fourth of July C reek...... 104 39. Bar graph showing the lateral distribution of total quartz population (Q=Qm+Qp) ...... 107 40 Bar graph showing the lateral distribution of non-undulose quartz (QNU) population ...... 108 41. Bar graph showing the lateral distribution of undulose quartz population (QU) ...... 109 42. Bar graph showing the lateral distribution of total polycrystalline quartz populauon (Qp) I ll 43. Bar graph showing the lateral distribution of Mega-mosaic polycTystalline quartz (QpMeg) population ...... 112 44. Bar graph showing the lateral distribution of Macro-mosaic polycrystalline quartz (QpMac) population ...... 113 45. Bar graph showing the lateral distribution of Micro-mosaic polycrvstalline quartz (QpMac) population ...... 114 46. Bar graph showing the lateral distribution of total detrital feldspar (F) population ...... 115 47. Bar graph showing the lateral distribution of detrital microcline (MC) population ...... 116 48. Bar graph showing the lateral distribution of detntal orthoclase (OR) population...... 117 49. Bar graph showing the lateral distribution of lithic grains (L) population ...... 119 50. Bar graph showing the lateral distribution of plutonic rock fragments (PRF) population ...... 120 51. Bar graph showing the lateral distribution of metamorphic rock fragments (MRF) population . 121 52. Bar graph showing the lateral distribution of total lithic grains (Lt=L+CFlT+Qp) populauon. . 122 53. Composition of feldspar (weight percent) in igneous and metamorphic racks as determined by electron microprobe analysis ...... 127 54. Composition of detrital feldspar grains (weight percent) from the Bonner and the Swauger formations ...... 131 55. Albite content of detrital potassium feldspar grains from Wise River secuon of the Bonner Formation ...... 134 56. Albite content of detrital potassium feldspar grains from Flint Creek secuon of the Bonner Formation ...... 135 57. Albite content of detrital potassium feldspar grains from Emerine Lookout section of the Bonner Formation...... 136 58. Albite content of detrital potassium feldspar grains from Clinton secuon of the Bonner Formation ...... 137 59. Albite content of detrital potassium feldspar grains from Spotted Bear secuon of the Bonner Formation ...... 138 60. Albite content of detrital potassium feldspar grains from Nvack secuon of the Bonner Formation...... 139 61. Albite content of detrital potassium feldspar grains from Fishtrap section of the Bonner Formation ...... 140 62. Albite content of detrital potassium feldspar grains from Libby secuon of the Bonner Formation ...... 141 63. Albite content of detrital potassium feldspar grains from Fourth of July Creek section of the Swauger Formation ...... 145 64. Schematic block diagram of the composition of the southern source terrane ...... 148

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. viii LIST OF FIGURES (CONTINUED) Figure Page Number

65. Schematic diagram of approximate source terrane locations showing transport direcuons of selected grain types ...... 154 66. QFLc triangular diagrams ofthearenitesofthe southern sections of the Bonner Formation 177 67. QFLc triangular diagrams ofthearenitesofthe northern sections of the Bonner Formation 178 68. QFLc triangular diagrams of the aremtes of the Buffalo Hump Formation ...... 179 69. QFLc triangular diagrams ofthearenitesofthe Swauger Formation ...... 180 70. QmFLt triangular diagrams of the aremtes of the southern sections of the Bonner Formation ...... 181 71. QmFLt triangular diagrams of the aremtes of the northern sections of the Bonner Formation ...... 182 72. QmFLt triangular diagrams of the arenites of the Buffalo Hump Formauon ...... 183 73. QmFLt triangular diagrams ofthearenitesofthe Swauger Formation;...... 184 74. QmPK triangular diagrams of the arenites of the southern sections of the Bonner Formation ... 185 75. QmPK triangular diagrams of the arenites of the northern sections of the Bonner Formauon .... 186 76. QmPK triangular diagrams of the aremtes of the Buffalo Hump Formauon ...... 187 77. QmPK triangular diagrams of the arenites of the Swauger Formation ...... 188 78. Graph showing the lateral distribution of total monocrystalline quartz (Qm) populauon 249 79. Graph showing the lateral distribution of non-undulose monocrystalline quartz (QmNU) population ...... 250 80. Graph showing the lateral distribution of undulose monocrystalline quartz (QmU) population...... 251 81. Graph showing the lateral distribution of non-undulose poivcrystalline quartz (QpNU) population...... 252 82. Graph showing the lateral distribution of undulose polycrystalline (QpU) population ...... 253 83. Graph showing the lateral distribution of total non-undulose mega-mosaic polvcrystailine (QpMegNU) population ...... 254 84. Graph showing the lateral distribution of undulose mega-mosaic poivcrystalline quartz (QpMegU) population...... 255 85. Graph showing the lateral distribution of non-undulose macro-mosaic poivcrystalline quartz (QpMacNU) population...... 256 86. Graph showing the lateral distribution of undulose macro-mosaic poivcrystalline quartz (QpMacU) population ...... 257 87. Graph showing the lateral distribution of non-undulose micro-mosaic poivcrystalline quartz (QpMicNU) population ...... 258 88. Graph showing the lateral distribuuon of undulose micro-mosaic poivcrystalline quartz (QpMicU) population...... 259 89. Graph showing the lateral distribution of potassium feldspar (K) populauon ...... 260 90. Graph showing the lateral distribution of fragments (SRF) ...... 261 91. Graph showing the lateral distribution of chert (CHT) population...... 262

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. a

LIST OF TABLES

Table Page Number 1. Summary of the analyses reported in this dissertation...... 9 2. Sediment types and lithoiopes of the Missoula Group (after Winston, 1989) ...... 17 3. List of detrital and authegenic minerals identified during petrographic study ...... 22 4. Genetic classification of quartz types ...... 24 5. Average detrital composition of the four southern sections of the Bonner Formation...... 79 6. Detrital constituents of the Bonner Formation in the northern sections ...... 93 7. Range of Molecular composition of feldspars in sandstones derived from various provenance. .. 125 8. Compositional range of potassium fledspar and their minor element contents ...... 132

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. A short note to the reader.

Throughout this Dissertation a number of abbreviations have been frequently used for different types of clasts. These abbreviation are listed on page 22. The same list of detrital grains and their abbreviated names is given below for quick reference.

1. GRN ...... Grains 2. M T X ...... Matrix 3. CMT ...... Cement 4. Q ...... Total quartz 5. Q N U ...... Nonundulose quartz 6. Q U ...... Undulose quartz 7. Q p ...... Poivcrystalline quartz 8. Q pN U ...... Nonundulose poivcrystalline quartz 9. QpU ...... Undulose poivcrystalline 10 Qm ...... Monocrystalline quartz 11. QmNU Non-undulose monocrystalline quartz 12. Q m U ...... Undulose monocrystalline quartz 13. QpMeg Mega-mosaic polycrystalline quartz 14. QpMegNU . .. Non-Undulose Mega-mosaic poivcrystalline quartz 15. QpMagU Undulose Mega-mosaic poivcrystalline quartz 16 QpMac Macro-mosaic poivcrystalline quartz 17. QpMacNU .... Non-Undulose Macro-mosaic poivcrystalline quartz 18. QpM acU Undulose Macro-mosaic poivcrystalline quartz 19. QpM ic ...... Micro-mosaic poivcrystalline quartz 20. QpMicNU Non-Undulose Micro-mosaic polycrystallme quartz 21. QpMicU Undulose Micro-mosaic poivcrystalline quartz 22. F ...... Total Feldspar 23. K ...... Potassium Feldspar 24. MC ...... Microcline 25. O R ...... Orthoclase 26. L ...... Rock fragments 27. CHT ...... Chert 28. P R F ...... Plutomc rock fragments 29. S R F ...... Sedimentary rock fragments 30. MRF ...... Metamorphic rock fragments 31. L t...... Rock fragments + chert + polycrystalline quartz

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. INTRODUCTION

This study of the sedimentary petrology of the Middle Proterozoic Bonner Formation and its proposed

correlatives reveals an array of source rock which provide a basis for more precisely interpreting the

tectonic framework and history of the Belt basin. The stratigraphic framework of most of the Bonner is well

described and the alluvial apron interpretation (Winston and others, 1986) is generally accepted. On this

background I have developed a model which describes the origin, composition, and location of the source

terranes of the Bonner. By analyzing and interpreting the detrital mineralogy of the Bonner, and its two

previously proposed correlatives, the Swauger and the Buffalo Hump formations, I have verified that the

Bonner sediments were mostly derived from a southern source terrane that was composed of low to high grade

metamorphic rocks and alkali feldspar granite. However some additional sources also provided minor amounts

of sediments from northwest of the Belt basin. The petrology of the Bonner Formation also provides a basis for

interpreting the tectonic environment of the Belt basin during deposition of the midddle part of the Missoula

Group.

This study not only supports the previously proposed southern magmatic ( orogenic?) and

metamorphic Bonner source terranes (Ross and others, 1991 a; 1992), it also identifies the origin and specific

lithologies of these terranes. The dominant source rock type in the southern terrane was composed of quartzite,

schist and gneissic rocks that shed far-travelled rounded detrital quartzose, metaquartzose, and high grade

metamorphic rock fragments into the alluvial apron. The second source rock was alkali feldspar granite that

provided short-travelled, angular to subrounded high-potassium low sodium alkali feldspar, and angular to

subrounded quartzose grains. In addition, the Bonner alluvial apron received sediments from two other minor

sources. Located to the south of the alluviai apron, one of those source rocks was a mixture of siliciclastic and

carbonate rocks that provided second cycle quartz grains (with overgrowths), rounded zircons, and reworked

chert grains that were originally or dolomite. The second minor source was located north of the Beit

2

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. basin that provided fine-grained potassium feldspar to the northern edge of the Bonner alluvial apron.

Moreover, this study concurs with Winston’s interpretation (1986c) that the high angle block faults in and

around the Belt basin controlled the tectonic events and the flux of sediments into the Belt basin during the

deposition of the Bonner.

Background

The Middle Proterozoic Bonner Formation of the Missoula Group forms a large arenite wedge, 200 to

500 meters thick, that is exposed over a wide area stretching from southwest Montana to north eastern Idaho

and British Columbia (Fig I). Winston and others (1986c) have described the stratigraphy of the Bonner

Formation by dividing it into seven units based on sediment types (Winston 1986a) which reflect depositional

environments. Several other Belt workers (e.g. Quattlebaum, 1980; Winston, 1977, 1978; Winston and others.

1986c; and Stanley and Sinclair. 1989) have also interpreted the Bonner to have been deposited in a vast

alluvial apron complex that headed south and west of the present Beaverhead Mountains and extended

northward to eastern Washington and Alberta. To the north the Bonner becomes finer grained, indicating

northward transport of sediments down an alluvial apron that prograded from the southwest of Montana mto

British Columbia (Fig. 2) and then retreated (Winston. 1978; Winston and others, 1986c; Link and others,

1993).

Miller and Whipple (1989) suggested that the Bonner Formation correlates with the Buffalo Hump

Formation (Deer Trail Group) of eastern Washington and Hobbs (1980) correlated the Swauger Formation of

east central Idaho with the Mount Shields and Bonner formations. This study reveals that the Buffalo Hump

Formation is not a correlative of Bonner, whereas the texture and mineralogy of detntal grains of the Swauger

Formation do not provide enough evidence to establish its lithologic correlation with the Bonner.

Mostly on the basis of stratigraphy, a number of Belt workers (Fenton & Fenton. 1937; Ross, 1963;

Harrison and Grims 1970; Harrison, 1972; Sears and Price, 1978; Winston, 1984; Winston and others, 1986c,

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 4

tr ro- EXPLANATION j 3t « r TnnI aid Pnw T div«r grauot

~i fcflnouaGrouo ond com c n v Pvkmi fanmma m od* 3«* car&oitara and t e a w w fiarmanon * ” A ] Nowsi Grouo and

L a » * r amt. a n d ROf w i o i h n Bweai fOHnaikjid • Ljwri Gftjuo, YMowiaawC. SwauQir. ana Lawton formarton ALSCari^ s e a P T fj d t c n t rafc* r o c x ii tneuoat MQMTANA 5 £ 3 iM HHiBia M i i P fiCflOrti in Pnmt Rfv

Thru*t fault t a u t t

srratioraonK eow oct

Figure I. Generalized geologic map of the Belt and Purcell Supergroup (Link and others, 1993).

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. INDEX MAP

Idaho

0.0 Libby

S p o lc o n c a Great Falla

Butte Oregon

!«r

30

u r

A Fishtrap Creek section (Bonner Formation) B Wise River section (Bonner Formation) C Clark Fork section (Bonner Formation) D Libby section (Bonner Formation) E Flint Creek section (Bonner Formation) F Emerine Lookout section (Bonner Formation) G Buffalo Hump Formation H Nyack section (Bonner Formation) K Spotted Bear section (Bonner Formation) M Clinton section (Bonner Formation) W Fourth of July Creek section (Swauger Formation) X Cronks Canyon section (Swauger Formation)

Figure 2. Geographic location map for the Belt Supergroup showing localitions of the stratigraphic sections mentioned in the text.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Hoffinan, 1988; Burwash and others, 1988; Stanley and Sinclair, 1989) have proposed several source terranes

for the sediments of the Belt Supergroup. Many of these workers have suggested a western and

southwestemsource for most of the Belt sediments including those of Bonner. However, only a few workers

(Frost and Winston, 1987; Ross and others, 199la,b; 1992) proposed general lithologies of the inferred source

terranes. Frost and Winston (1987) concluded from Sr/Nd analysis that most of the fine-grained Belt sediments

including those of the Bonner Formation were derived from an Early Proterozoic (2.0 + 0.3 Ga) western

continental terrane. Based on radiometric zircon dates, Ross and others (1991a, 1992) were able to

characterize the Bonner source rocks more precisely, concluding that the Bonner was mostly derived from 1.7

to 1.86 Ga granite mixed with sediments from an Archean terrane. They suggested Early Proterozoic Bonner

zircons to have come from magmatic ( orogenic?) crust west of the Belt basin, possibly the Amadius basin of

central Australia that includes Early Proterozoic Arunta, Willyama, Gawler, and Mount Isa blocks.

Beside source rock characterization, one of the goals of this study is to use the petrology of the Bonner

to interpret the tectonic setting of the Belt basin during the deposition of the Bonner. Although the actual

tectonic setting of the Belt basin is yet to be resolved. Link and others (1993) proposed that the sediments of

the Belt Supergroup have accumulated in a large, tectomcally active, and slowly subsiding basin. Late

Proterozoic rifting (Young, 1979; 1984; Ross and others 1992; Sears and Price, 1978), Cretaceous

compression, and Cenozotc extension in the western North America have obscured much of the Middle

Proterozoic tectonic framework of the Belt basin. However, Harrison and others (1974) suggested that the

Mesozoic and Cenozoic structures in the Belt basin were partly controlled by earlier Precambnan structures.

Winston (1982) proposed a hypothetic model for the tectonic framework of the Belt basin. He has divided the

Belt basin into six blocks; each block is separated by high angle extensional faults which he refers to as Lines.

This configuration (Fig. 3) has been discussed and interpreted in detail by Winston (1986d; 1989). Sears (Prs.

Comm. 1994) believes that many of the Belt thrust plates rotated into their present position.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Based on detntal mineralogy of the Bonner Formation, I propose that most of the Bonner sediments

were derived from an ancient fold belt exposed to the southwest of the present Belt basin. The fold belt was

dominantly composed of low to high grade metamorphoic rocks cut by a granitic intrusion and may have been

overlain by lithified siliciclastic and carbonate rocks. The two types of zircons reported by Ross and others

(1991 a,b; 1992), one being Early Proterozoic and the other Archean, may suggest a nonconformity between the

sedimentary cover and the underlying metamorphic rocks. Distinct increase in the feldspar content and angular

quartzose grains in the Clinton section of the Bonner Formation suggests the presence of an active high angle

normal fault which caused subsidence of the Belt basin during Bonner dsposition. The vertical uplift(?),

inferred to have been along the Garnet Line of Winston (1986c), may have exposed the underlying granitic

rocks to be erosion and transported the sediments down the Bonner alluvial apron. The extra amount of

microcline in the Libby and Clark Fork sections of the northern Bonner Formation suggests uplift and erosion

of a granitic source rock which added sediments to the northern parts of the Bonner Formation.

Purpose of Study

The purpose of this study is to identify and describe the source rocks that provided detntal sediments

to the Bonner Formation and to its proposed correlatives in order to analyze the tectonics of the Belt basin.

Based on petrologic and provenance interpretations, a general tectonic model for the Belt basin during the

deposition of the Bonner is developed. To fulfill the purpose of this study the following five major questions are

addressed in this Dissertation.

1. Can the proposed correlation of the Bonner Formation, Swauger Formation, and Buffalo Hump

Formation be petrographically supported, or are the Swauger and Buffalo Hump separate lithologic

units from the Bonner?

2. Where were the source terranes of Bonner and its correlatives?

3. Were these source terranes of uniform composition or were there a variety of rock types?

4. Were there significant changes in the source terrane during the deposition of the Bonner Formation?

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 8

5. What do the petrological and textural trends in the Bonner Formation imply about the depositional

framework of the Beit basin, and the tectonic events during deposition of these sediments?

Study Area

The Bonner Formation is mainly exposed in western Montana and northeastern Idaho, whereas the

Swauger Formation crops out at many places in east central Idaho, mainly in the Beaverhead Mountains and

the Lemhi Range (Fig. 2). Samples from nine sections of the Bonner, two sections of the Swauger and one

secuon of the Buffalo Hump Formation were analyzed (Table 1). Some of these sections have been previously

measured and described (Winston and others, 1986). In addition to sampling, both the secuons of the Swauger

Formation were measured and described.

Table 1 is the summary of all the stratigraphic sections studied for this Dissertation. Locauon and

accession of each stratigraphic secuon is given in Appendix 1.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Table I. Summary of the analyses reported in this dissertation. See Figure 2 for the location of the sections.

Name of Samples Samples Thickness of Measured the Section studied Point the section by Counted

Southern Sections of the Bonner Formation

I) Wise River 80 65 400 Ft Quattlebaum (1980)

2) Flint Creek 32 26 310 Quattlebaum (1980)

3) Emenne Lookout 81 46 800 Quattlebaum (1980)

4) Clinton 31 31 1800 Winston and others (1986)

Northern Sections of the Bonner Formation

5) Spotted Bear 97 20 990 Winston and others (1986)

6) Nvack 75 47 1215 Winston and others (1986)

7) Fishtrap Creek 133 34 890 Winston and others (1986)

8) Libby 125 25 770 Winston and others (1986)

9) Clark Fork 16 - 300 Winston and others (1986)

Swauger Formation

103 Cranks Canyon 96 46 2170 Author (Appendix 6)

11) Fourth of July Creek 34 23 1100 Author (Appendix 6)

Buffalo Hump Formation

123 Buffalo Hump Formation 24 21 170 Not measured

Total 824 384

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Methods of Study

FIELD WORK AND SAMPLING TECHNIQUES

Stratigraphic sections of the Bonner Formation, three measured by Quattlebaum (1980), six measured

by Winston and others (1986), were sampled using a disproportionate stratified sampling method (Haring and

others, 1992). Samples were collected from every 5 to 40 feet mostly from medium- to coarse-grained arenite

beds. Out of 824 total samples, 384 were selected for point counting (Table 1). A complete log of the sample

collection is given in Appendix 2.

PETROGRAPHIC TECHNIQUES

Samples were thin sectioned and stained with sodium cobaltinitrite for potassium feldspar

identification. Samples were analyzed under a petrographic microscope to characterize rock compositions and

textures. Sample gram sizes and percentages were measured using a micrometer eyepiece in the petrographic

microscope and two point counters; an electrical point counter attached to the stage of the microscope while the

other was operated manually. Point counts from each sample are tabulated in Appendix 3.

ELECTRON PROBE MICROANALYSES

Carbon-coated, polished thin sections of selected samples from each stratigraphic section were

prepared for electron microprobe analysis of feldspar and detrital mica. Two to five grains per thin section

were analyzed. Each gram was probed three times and an average of the three was used for further data

analysis. Analytical conditions and standards used in electron probe microanalysis are given in Appendix 4.

Complete data acquired by microprobe is tabulated in Appendix 5.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. GENERAL GEOLOGY AND STRATIGRAPHY

Middle Proterozoic Belt rocks of Montana, Idaho and Eastern

Washington

The Belt Supergroup, and the correlative Purcell Supergroup in the northern Canadian Cordillera

constitute a succession (up to 18,000 meters thick) of sedimentary rocks mostly exposed in western Montana,

north and east-central Idaho, eastern Washington and southern parts of British Columbia and Alberta (Fig. I).

Middle Proterozoic age has been assigned to the Belt rocks, however, the exact period within the Middle

Proterozoic is poorly constrained (Winston, 1989; Burwash, in press). Based on U-Pb (Zircon) radiometric

age dating from the Lumberton sill of the Movie Lake area, British Columbia, Burwash and Wagner (1989)

have assigned 1.445 ± 0.01 Ga to the base of the Belt rocks. The contested upper limit of the Belt rocks ranges

from 1.35 to 0.85 Ga (McMechan and Price, 1982; Evans, 1986; Elston, 1984; Obradovich and others, 1984;

Harrison and Peterman, 1984; Young, 1979; Young and others, 1979). Based on paleomagnetic apparent

polar wandering paths, Elston (1993) proposed an upper limit of Belt sedimentation at 1.25 Ga, a date

accepted by Link and others (1993).

Belt rocks are mostly composed of fine-grained quartzite, grey, green and red argillite, argillaceous

carbonate, subordinate conglomerate, and mafic sills. Sedimentary structures in Belt rocks are mostly well-

preserved. In the northwest United States the Belt rocks have been divided into four major subdivisions: the

lower Belt (Prichard Formation), the Ravalli Group, the middle Belt carbonate, and the Missoula Group (Fig.

I). In east-central Idaho the Belt equivalent rocks are designated as the Yellowjacket Formation, the Lemhi

Group, the Swauger Formation and the Lawson Creek Formation, whereas in eastern Washington they are

named the Deer Trail and Priest River groups. Each subdivision has been further divided into various

formations. Link and others (1993) have recently reviewed the history of Belt studies and proposed that the

11

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 12

Middle Proterozoic rocks of east-central Idaho, and the Priest River and Deer Trail groups of northeastern

Washington be included in the Belt Supergroup.

Although enormously thick, the Belt rocks are composed of relatively few rock-types that occur in

quite regular and repeated patterns throughout the basin. Winston (1978) initially proposed a classification of

rock types for Belt rocks based on sedimentary structures, texture, mineralogy, color, and stratification

sequences. The Rock-type scheme could not describe comprehensively the metamorphosed and diageneucally

altered thick mappable units of the Belt Supergroup. He (Winston. 1986a), therefore, later introduced a more

useiiil sediment type scheme based on sedimentary structures, grain size, and inferred original mineralogy, and

divided these rocks into thirteen Sediment Types. To date the"sediment type scheme’ is accepted and applied

by many Belt workers (Link and others, 1993 and references therein). For a detailed description of these

sediment types refer to Winston (1986a), and Link and others (1993).

Previous Work on the Provenance of Beit Sediments

Mostly on the basis of stratigraphy, a number of Belt workers (Fenton and Fenton, 1937; Ross, 1963;

Harrison and Grimes, 1970; Harrison, 1972; Winston, 1984; Winston and others, 1986 and many others), have

proposed several source terrains for sediments of ;he Belt Supergroup, ranging from Archean rocks of

Laurentia east of the Belt basin, to the Dillon Block of the Wyoming Province south of the Belt basin, to rocks

that lay west of the Belt basin that were rifled away in the Late Proterozotc (Sears and Price, 1978; Ross and

others, 1992). Frost and Winston (1987) concluded from Sr/Nd analysis that 1.9-2.0 Ga modal crustal

residence dates for mixed fine grained sediments combined with westward thickening arenite wedges indicate

that most Belt sediments were derived from a western, mostly Early Proterozoic, source terrane, not the

Archean rocks of Laurentia or the Wyoming Province to the east or south. Ross and others (1991 a) confirmed

Frost and W'inston's findings by reporting a mixture of Archean and Early Proterozoic zircon grains from the

Bonner and Mount Shields formations. Later, Ross and others (1992) interpreted most of the Bonner zircons to

have come from Early Proterozoic crust west of the Belt basin, mixed with fewer Archean zircons. Based on

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 13

radiometric age similarities between Early Proterozoic basement rocks of south-central Australia and the Belt

rocks, Ross and others (1992) have implied that Australia was joined to the west side of Laurentia, adjacent to

Belt basin, prior to the Greenville Orogeny.

Based on U-Pb radiogenic (zircon) dates (Ross and others, 199 lb), the sediments of the Belt-Purcell

Supergroup have been inferred to have been deposited on Archean to Early Proterozoic cratomc crust. Across

the eastern side of the basin. Belt rocks rest on Archean continental crust whereas in the west, tholeiitic diabase

sills in the Belt Supergroup indicate Early Proterozoic continental crust beneath the Belt (Zartman, 1991). The

presence of Early Proterozoic rocks across the western Belt basin and down mto the western edge of the Dillon

block (O'Niel and others, 1990) raises the question of where Ross and others' (1991a) zircons came from.

Structural Setting of the Belt Basin

Although the tectonic setting of the Belt basin is yet to be resolved. Link and others (1993) proposed

that the sediments of the Belt Supergroup have accumulated in a large but shallow, tectonically acuve. slowly

subsiding basin Late Proterozoic rifting (Young, 1979; 1984; Ross and others, 1992; Sears and Price, 1978),

Cretaceous compression and Cenozoic extension in western North America have obscured much of the Middle

Proterozoic tectonic framework of the Belt basin. However. Harrison and others (1974) suggested that the

Mesozoic and Cenozoic structures in the Belt basin were partly controlled by earlier Precambrian structures.

Winston (1982) proposed a hypothetical model for the tectonic framework of the Belt basin (Fig. 3). He has

divided the Belt basin into six blocks; each block is separated by high angle extensional faults which he refers

to as ’'Lines". This configuration (Fig. 3) has been discussed and interpreted in detail by Winston (1986c; and

1989).

According to Winston, three major zones of high angle west-trending faults controlled the structure of

and deposition in the Belt basin. These zones of faulting (Lines) formed the northern and southern boundaries

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 14

of four more tectorucally stable blocks. The Townsend Line, trending approximately northwest through the

Townsend Valley, is believed to mark the eastern boundary of the Deer Lodge, Ovando and Charlo blocks as

delineated by Winston (1986c) in the western thrust belt

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 15 r

3 LOCK

^jovasoo "T" v BLOCK S fl-N IABnF' ,!N £

■OOGE [M 8A Y M E N T

BLOCK

CHARLd'-'-.riKSS 8LCClT^—'p b ^ l OVANDO^J.;.:J SLOCK DEER LOOGE’ BLOCK

DILLON BLOCK

Figure 3. a) Winston's (1986c) hypothetical Proterozoic crustal blocks of the Belt basin b) Block giagram showing down faulted basins during deposition of the Missoula Group (Winston 1986c).

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 16

Missoula Group

Winston (e.g. 1989) has described the formations of the Missoula Group as alternating transgressive

and prograding sequences. In the central and southern part of the basin, the Missoula Group is composed of

predominantly red and green argillite, pink to purple arenite with thin intervals of carbonate and black argillite.

There it is divided into seven stratigraphic units; they are, in ascending order the Snowslip Formation, the

Shepard Formation, the Mount Shields Formation, the Bonner Formation, the McNamara Formation, the

Garnet Range Formation, and the Pilcher Formation The lithology of these formations are summarized in

Table 2.

Bonner Formation

The Benner Formauon and its Canadian counterpart, the Philips Formation, form a large arenite

wedge, 200-500m thick, that is exposed over a wide area stretching from southwestern Montana to eastern

Washington, Alberta and British Columbia. It has been interpreted as a vast alluvial apron complex that

headed south and west of the present Beaverhead Mountains and extended northward to eastern Washington

and Canada (Quattlebaum. 1980; Winston, 1977,1978. 1984, 1986b; Winston and others, 1936; Stanley and

Sinclair, 1989).

Nelson and Dobell (1961) originally described the Bonner Formauon at the type locality two miles

east of the town of Bonner on U.S. Highway 200, as a quartzite with a dominant gram size of 0.5 mm. The

Bonner is underlain by purple argillite of the upper part of the Mount Shields Formation and is overiain by

cherty purple argillite and siltite of the McNamara Formation. The Bonner Formation coarsens southward to

the Flint Creek where it is mostly very coarse-grained arenite and at the Wise River where it ranges from

conglomerate to coarse sand. Almost all sections of the Bonner in the northern part of the basin are much

finer-grained than the Bonner at the type locality. The Bonner Formation is composed of the gravel, cross

bedded, flat laminated, discontinuous layer, even couple and even couplet sediment types (Winston. 1986b).

Winston and others ( 1986b) identified seven different units within the Bonner Formation based on sediment

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 17

Table 2. Sediment types and lithologies of the Missoula Group (after Winston, 1989).

Name of the Iithologic Sediment-type Type Locality/ Formation Description Reference

Pilcher Croaabedrird irenite Cross bedded sand Kelson and Dobell with altern-aiing white (1961) anrl parplc T stnmsr

Garnet Dark, greenish-gray Quartzitic argillite and Clapp mdDeui micaceous, hummocky hummocky quartdte (1931) Range cross-bedded arenite and argillite

McNamara Gierty red and green Even and lenticular Clapp andDeiis argillite couplet and mudcracked (1931) mud sediment type

Bonner Pink to purple Croatbcridcd sand Bonner. Monlma crossbeddcd arenite, sediment type Kelson and Dobbel and conglomerate to (1961) flat laminated siltite and red argillite

Mount Red. green and black Microlamina, Even and Childers (1963) argillite. Pink arenite Iecticular couplet, Shields and tan carbonate mudcracked mud. flat laminated sand and even couple sediment types

Shepard Dark argillite and tan* Calcareous even and Childers (1963) weathering, thinly Iecticular couplet, laminated carbonate mrcrolamina and carbonate mud types.

Snows lip Red and green argillite Micro lamina. even and Childers (1963) and red arenite Iecticular couplet, and intervals mudcracked mud sediment types.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 18

types. The extent and the lateral and vertical distribution of these seven units (Winston, 1986b) indicate that

overall the Bonner Formation is a single sand wedge with two crossbedded arenite tongues representing

progradation and retreat of an alluvial apron. Stanley and Sinclair (1989) proposed two episodes of alluvial

apron progradation within the Bonner Formation. The lower episode is represented by a conglomeratic wedge

that grades northwesterly into crossbeddcd channel quartzite, whereas the upper episode, which is relatively

smaller, grades into flat-laminated, braided plain quartzites.

Swauger Formation

The Swauger Formation, as defined by Ross (1947) from exposures near the Swauger Ranch in the

Pahsimeroi Valley in east-central Idaho, is a thick succession (up to 3100 meters) of mostly grayish pink to

pale purple or pale red-purple to light brown to grayish green, coarse- to fine-grained, hematitic quartzite with

subordinate siltite and argillite. It overlies the Lemhi Group (Stazz, 1979; Anderson. 1948; Ruppel and Lopez.

1988; Ruppel, 1980; and McIntyre and Hobbs, 1987) and underlies the Lawson Creek Formation (Hobbs,

1980). At different localities it is variably feldspathic. The thick beds of Swauger are locally trough cross

bedded; some have climbing ripple crosslaminae. Greenish-gray to dark grayish-green to grayish red siltite and

argillite beds are interstratified with quartzite beds. At places it contains beds of gritty to conglomeratic arenite

with white crystalline quartz pebbles up to 2cm diameter. So far no attempt has been made to identify different

lithologic units within the Swauger Formation, however, it has been correlated with the entire Missoula Group

(e.g. Link and others, 1993; Hobbs, 1980; Ruppei, 1980). Hobbs (1980) suggested that the Middle

Proterozoic Swauger Formation of east central Idaho is the south-western extension of the upper Missoula

Group and probably the Bonner. Based on paleomagnetic reversals, Elston (1992) correlated the Swauger

Formation with the Mount Shields Formation of Missoula Group.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Buffalo Hump Formation

Evans (1987) and Miller and Whipple (1989) considered the Bonner Formation a possible lithologic

correlative of the Buffalo Hump Formation of the Dear Trail Group. Ross and others (1991 a, 1992) recovered

detrital zircons and monazites from the Buffalo Hump and dated the zircons as young as 1.07 Ga which is

considerably younger than the proposed age of the Bonner Formation.

The Buffalo Hump Formation is composed of argillite and quartzite between lower Stensger Dolomite

and the Late Proterozoic Windermere Group. The Buffalo Hump Formation, as defined by Campbell and

Loofbourow (1962), is composed of a lower unit of dark to greenish gray microiaminated argillite and an upper

unit which contains interbeds of fine to coarse grained. locally conglomeratic quartz arenite and green to red

feldspathic siltite and argillite. Miller and Whipple (1989) identified three sequences (facies?) within the

Buffalo Hump above the micro-laminated argillite and thin bedded siltitic argillite: (1) medium- to thick-

bedded, white, gray, and pink vitreous quartzite; (2) pale, greenish-gray and lavender-gray argillite that has

poorly defined lamination; (3) green, hematite-red. and gray even-parallel and cross bedded quartzite and siltite

that is locally feldspathic. The upper interval of vitreous quartzite is very coarse grained, in places pebble-

bearrng, and locally has an argillaceous matrix-supported conglomerate at its base. Evans (1987) suggested

that the quartzite beds of the Buffalo Hump Fortmation lie unconformably on the Belt and represent a younger

unit. At one place, as quoted by Evans (1987), the lower unconformity cuts down into the Stensger Dolomite.

Both the argillite and quartzite of the Buffalo Hump vary considerably in appearance and relative abundance

from one end of the Magnesite Belt to the other (Campbell and Loofoourow, 1962; Campbell and Raup, 1964;

and Evans, 1987). Campbell and Loofbourow (1962), for example, observed quartzite beds make up most of

the formation at each end of the Magnesite belt, whereas thick intervals of argillite predominate in the central

part.

The maximum thickness of the Buffalo Hump Formation, about 520 m as calculated from map width

(Miller and Whipple, 1989), is preserved in the central part of the Magnesite belt The unit is separated from

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 20

the overlying Windermere Group by an erosionai unconformity; an unknown amount of material was removed

dunng the penod of erosion.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. PETROGRAPHY

Clast Types

The Bonner, the Buffalo Hump and the Swauger formations are composed of immature to mature

aremtes with well rounded to angular grains, set in a fine-grained matrix that ranges from a few percent to as

much as 40% of the rock. In the Bonner Formation the grain size ranges, both vertically and laterally, from

pebbles to medium-grained sand in the south, to coarse-grained sand to silt and clay in the north. The Swauger

ranges from pebble conglomerate in the Fourth of July Creek section (Beaverhead Mountains, Idaho) to mostly

medium- to fine-grained arenite elsewhere m east central Idaho. The quartzite part of the Buffalo Hump

Formation is distinctly different mineralogically and texturally from both the Bonner and the Swauger. It is a

mature to sub-mature, mostly medium- to coarse-grained quartz arenite, and contains no phenetic feldspar.

Based on texture and mineralogy of the grams and matrix, samples of the Bonner, Buffalo Hump and

Swauger are classified into ten major categories. Each category is further divided into two or more types for

the purpose of enhanced provenance discussion and interpretation of dispersal patterns. Categories and types

are defined below and summarized in Table 3.

21

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Table 3. List of detrital and authegemc minerals identified during petrographic study. Letters in parenthesis are abbreviations used in the text and in tables/graphs in this dissertation.

Major Category Types

1. Monocrystalline quartz (Qm) Non-ucdulatory (QmNU) (Jndulalory (QmU)

2. Polvcrystalline quartz (Qp) Non-undulalory Mega-mosaic (QpMegNU) Undulatory Mega-mosaic (QpMegNU) Non-undulalory Macro-mosaic(QpMegNU) Undulatory Macro-mosaic (QpMegNU) Non-undulalory Micro-mosaic (QpMegNU) Undulatory Micro-mosaic(QpMegNU)

3. Feldspar (F) Vlicrodine (MC) Orthoclase (OR) Plagioclase (PLG)

4. Chert (CHD Detrital chert grains Replacement chert

5. Mica(M) Muscovite (MUS) Biotite (BIO)

6. Rock fragments (L) Plutonic (PRF) Volcanic (VRF) Metamorphic (MRF) Sedimentary (SRF)

7. Heavy minerals (H) Zircon Apatite Monazite Tourmaline Rutile

8. Opaque minerals Hematite Vlagnetite Pyrite

9. Diagenetic/alteration products Secondary quartz Senate Albtte Leucoxene Hematite Chlorite Clay minerals

10. Cement/matrix Silica cement Very fine-grained Quartz Very fine-grained Feldspar Clays

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. QUARTZ

The study of quartz types in sedimentary petrography is of great importance for paieogeographic and

paieo tectonic interpretation and has been increasingly used in the correlation of formations. H.C. Sorbv (1877.

1880) was the pioneer in this field who studied inclusions and extinction in quartz grains as a clue to their

source. In the 1890's, Mackie continued this work. It was Krynine (1946), however, who reshaped the whole

field by introducing the genetic classification of quartz types.

In the genetic classification, Krvnine (1946) classified detrital quartz grains into six types on the basis

of their extinction type, inclusions, and gram shape. These types are plutcnic, vein, volcanic, schistose,

recrvstallized metamorphic, and stretched metamorphic quartz. Although this classification is regarded by

some workers (e.g.. Folk. 1980) as highly subjective, it provides valuable infonnauon for the characterization

of source area and paleotectomc interpretation. Krynme’s quartz types classification is reproduced in Table 4.

Folk (1980) modified Krymne's genetic classification by replacing the six geneuc categories with

descriptively defined categories. He further replaced the term "plutonic" quartz by "common" quartz. In

addition. Folk introduced a new class which he named "Reworked sedimentary quartz". Folk (1980) devised a

new empirical matrix classification based on extinction and inclusions. Six types of extinctions and four types

of inclusions provide the base for a binomial series of 24 arbitrary classes. The six extinction types recognized

by Folk are mainly for counting purposes. They are 1) straight, 2) slightly undulose, 3) strongly undulosc. 4)

semicomposite, 5) composite, and 6) composite metamorphic. The second basis for the empirical

classification is the type of inclusions present in quartz grams. The four types are a) abundant vacuoles, b)

rutile needles or other hairlike inclusions, c) microlites, and d) sparse vacuoles, no microlites. The empirical

classification has been accepted by many sedimentary petrographers because of its descriptive basis. However,

the identification of undulosity m Folk's classification was challenged by Blatt and Christie (1963).

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 24

Table 4. Genetic classification of quartz types (Krymne, 1946).

Grain Characteristics Shape & Appearance

Common Quartz (Plutonic) 1) Straight to slightly undulose extinction. 2) Few vacouies; may be a few microlites. 3) Subequant, xenomorphic. 4) Typical of granites; but may also furnished by many other sources.

Vein Quartz 1) Abundant vacouies; sometimes vermicular chlorite (c); rarely, zoned phantom crystals (Ph). 2) Semicomposite to straight or undulose extinction, may also be badly sheared. Often shows comb structure. 3) Often forms large grains and pebbles. Schistose metamorphic Quartz 1) Elongate, composite with straight borders. 2) Mica inclusions (m). S t ® ' 3) Straight to slightlv undulose extinction.

Volcanic Quartz 1) Idiomorphic, hexagonal-bipyramidal shape with perfactly / ~ straight sides and rounded comers. Prism faces very small or 2 lacking. Embayments (e) common. 2) Almost no inclusions; water clear. May have negative crystals (n) 3) Straight Extinction Recrystallized metamorphic Quartz 1) Straight boundaries between equant interlocking crystals, forming mosaic. 2) May be some microlites and vacuoles. W 3) Straight to slightlv undulose extinction.

Stretched metamorphic Quartz 1) Strong undulose extinction; borders may be smooth (sm), crenulated (cr), or granulated (gr). 2) Elongate, lenticular shape of crystal units. 3) Some microlites and vacuoles.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 25

Blatt and Christie (1963) concluded that igneous and metamorphic rocks cannot be distinguished based

on degree of undulose extinction in quartz grains Blatt and Christie asserted that the apparent degree of

undulosity on a flat stage depends on the orientation of the grain and that true undulosity can only be measured

on a universal stage, a technique not employed by sedimentary petrologists. They, therefore, disagreed with

Folk's usage of greater than five degrees of undulose extinction to define "strongly” undulatory grains. In

another study, Blatt (1967) emphasized that gram size must be taken into account when percentages of non-

unduiatorv quartz m sandstones are compared. He contended that studies should be limited to grains of similar

size. Most of modem studies are generally confined to medium-sand size populations.

In the I970's Suttner and his students re-evaluated the use of undulatory extinction and polycrystallinity

in detrital quartz for provenance studies. Basu and others (1975) countered Blatt and Christie’s criticism of

identifying undulosity by showing that the amount of undulatory extinction in a quartz gram is a valid indicator

of its provenance. They (Basu and others, 1975) separated quartz grains with <5° undulosity from those with

>5° undulosity and identified four variables in polvcrystalline quartz grains. They are 1) undulose grains, 2) non-

undulose grains 3) grams with 2-3 crystals per grain, and 4) >3 crystal per grain. They then plotted the relative

percentages of each variable on a diamond diagram to discriminate piutonic, low-rank and high-rank

metamorphic parentage.

From petrographic examination of medium-grained fluvial sand derived from known crystalline source

rocks. Young (1976) concluded that petrographic textures of detrital polvcrystalline quartz can be used to

distinguish plutomc crystalline source rocks from metamorphic rocks. He also described the process of quartz

deformation with increasing temperature and pressure which results in the polygonization of grains. He inferred

that an original non-undulose quartz crystal passes through four stages of physical change, namely, deformation,

recovery, primary recrystallization, and secondary recrystallization. Further, he grouped quartz grains

resulting from deformation, recovery, and primary recrystallization as "unstable" grains, whereas detrital grains

with features of secondary recrystallization are grouped as "stable" grains.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 26

The size of individual quartz crystals within polvcrystalline quartz grains has also been discussed by-

several sedimentary petrographers. Blatt (1967) considered that medium-size polvcrystalline quartz grams

composed of 10 or more sub-crystals (composite quartz of Folk, 1980) are excellent indicators of low rank

metamorphic sources. He also asserted that medium sand-size grams composed of less than five sub-crystals

are as commonly derived from granite as from schists and gneisses. Suttner and his students seem to agree with

Blatt, however Basu and his colleagues (1975) defined polvcrystalline quartz grains as those consisting of at

least two discrete crystal units of quartz having a mean size of at least 30p, and with no more than 10% of

another mineral phase as polvcrystalline quartz.

The purpose of the above discussion and background of "quartz types" is to clarify to the reader that the

complex combination of 1) undulosity, 2) vacuolization, 3) inclusions, 4) shape of crystal-crystal boundaries, 4)

number, and 5) size of sub-crystals makes classifying quartz grains difficult. It is almost impossible to

incorporate all the above ideas and criteria for the descnption and classification of polvcrystalline quartz in a

single case study. Therefore, for simplicity, the "mosaic type" scheme of polvcrystalline quartz grains has been

devised for purely descriptive purposes and is explained later in this Chapter. In this dissertation the following

cntena have been used for the descnption of vanous types of monocrystalline and polvcrystalline quartz grains:

11 Undulosity:

Undulosity is the result of plastic deformauon of quartz grains, generally caused by stress, which

produces an angular separation between c axes m different parts of the crystal. The maximum angular separation

(or extinction) appears as shadows in the gram under crossed nicol.

Non-Undulose: <5° extinction

Undulose: >5° extinction

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 27

2) Shape of crvstal-crvstal boundaries.

Straight boundary: The boundary between any two crystals is a straight line (smooth border of Folk,

1980). At a triple junction the angle between two adjacent straight boundaries is about 120°.

Granulated boundary: The boundary is slightly irregular or sub-straight between two adjacent

crystals. Crystals are moderately sutured into each other because of moderate pressure and incipient

plastic deformanon of quartz grams.

Crenulated boundary: The boundary is extremely irregular and distorted line between two crystals.

Crystals are deeply sutured into each other. This fabric indicates plastic deformation of quartz grams.

3) Size of sub-crvstals in a gram:

In this dissertation well sorted medium-grained and moderately sorted medium- to coarse-grained

samples are selected for point-counting. Therefore, it became essential to extend the range of size of crystals per

gram from 30p (Basu and others, 1975), to the following;

Mega-mosaic 240-520p

Macro-mosaic I00-240p

Micro-mosaic 30-l00p

JL Monocrvitalline quartz (Om):

Monocrystalline quartz is the most abundant mineral category in all three formations studied for this

Dissertation. Monocrystalline quartz grains are defined by Blatt (1967) as those which are composed of 90

percent or more of a single crystal unit of quartz. Monocrystalline quartz grains are further subdivided on the

basis of extinction mto non-undulatory and undulatory types.

a. Non-undulatorv monocrystalline quartz (QmNU) grains show no visible evidence of strain and

become completely extinct with less than 5° of rotation of a flat microscope stage (Basu and others, 1975). Most

of the grains are generally clear, however, some contain a few internal fractures and vacuole planes. Generally,

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 28

vacuole planes show no pattern, however, in some grams these planes are parallel to the boundaries of the gram.

Though rare, crystal inclusions of vermicular chlorite, rutile, and sericite occur in these quartz grains

b. Undulatory monocrystalline quartz (QmU) grains show evidence of being strained In some

undulatory grains, extinction sweeps as a uniform band across the grain with a 5“ rotation of the stage. In others,

extinction is separated into more or less well defined segments. Well defined segments of undulatory extinction

result from 'strong” deformation of quartz grains (Young, 1976; Bailey and others, 1958). In some cases air

bubbles are trapped along these planes producing vacuole planes.

Plutonic rocks such as granite are the most common source of medium-grained monocrystalline quartz

(Folk, 1980; Blatt and Christie, 1963; Blatt, 1967). Gneisses and schists are the other two major sources of

coarse- to medium-grained monocrvstalline quartz in arenite (Blatt, 1967). Monocrystalline quartz grains

contain fracture planes that tend to part when sand grams strike other particles but, in general, monocrvstalline

quartz grains are more resistant to parting than polvcrystalline quartz. Non-undulatory quartz grains result from

the formation and preservation of coarse- to medium-grained quartz crystals in the absence of a tectonic stress.

Post-orogemc granites and deeply buned(?) recrystallized gneisses are common sources of non-undulatory

common quartz grains. Undulatory extinction in quartz grains develops by stress, within the source rock. Blatt

(1963, 1967), Folk (1980) and many other sedimentary petrologists debated the use of undulosity to distinguish

between plutonic quartz and metamorphic quartz. To date, no common ground exists in this regard, however,

Basu and others’ (1975) model is generally acceptable to me. In this model they (Basu and others, 1975)

contend that monocrystalline quartz from low-rank metamorphic rocks contains both undulose and nonundulose

grains, whereas plutonic quartz is dominantly nonundulose.

It should be noted that undulosity may develop by deformation after the rocks were deposited and

lithified. In deformed sandstone most of the grains are undulose and vacuole planes may pass from grain to

grain. The Bonner Formation contains beds with both the undulatory and non-undulatory monocrvstalline quartz

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. grains indicating that the grains came from both the undulose and non-undulose source terranes. However, m

the Swauger and, for the most part of the Buffalo Hump formations, all the monocTystalline quartz grains show

some degree of undulose extinction indicating either tectomcally induced stress after the rocks were deposited

and hthified or derivation of quartz grains from stressed source rocks. Therefore, undulosity in monocrvstalline

quartz grains is not used as the sole indicator of source rock. A better picture of the composition of source rock

emerges when undulosity is taken into consideration along with the polycrystallinity of quartz grains.

2. Polvcrystalline quartz (Opt

Polycrystalline quartz grains are composed of two or more quartz crystal units, each of which may be

non-undulose or undulose. Polycrystalline grams are those m which more than 10 percent of the gram area is

occupied by another quartz crystal. Shapes of boundaries between adjacent crystal units vary from planar to

crenulated. Polycrystalline quartz grams are divided into three types based on the size of internal sub-crystal.

The following scheme of mosaic tvne has been developed.

a. Mega-mosaic iO p Meg)

In the mega-mosaic type of polycrystalline quartz grains (Fig. 4,5) the sub-crystal range from 240 to

520 microns. Generally the borders of the interlocking sub-crystals are planar, however, m some cases both

cranulated and granulated (Folk, 1980) borders have also been observed. Individual sub-crystals show both

undulatory and non-undulatory extinction.

b. Macro-mosaic ('OoMaci

The sub-crystals range from 100 to 240 microns and generally have crenulated and/or granulated

borders (Fig. 6 and 7). Although uncommon, planar borders are also present. Both undulatory and non-

undulatory extinction are common in individual sub-crystals.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 30

Figure 4. Mega-mosaic poly-crystalline quartz (QpMeg) from Buffalo Hump Formation (sample G-

17).

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 31

Figure 5. Mega-mosaic poly crystalline quartz (QpMeg) from Nyack section of Bonner Formation (sample H-35).

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. I

32

Figure 6. Macro-mosaic polycrystalline quartz (QpMac) from Nyack section of Bonner Formation (sample H-35).

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 47

5. M IC A

Detrital mica flakes are abundant in ail three formations studied. Muscovite was found in almost even'

thin section, whereas detrital biotite flakes are present in only a few samples of the Swauger Formation.

a. Muscovite (MUSI

Detrital muscovite occurs in amounts ranging from a trace up to 5 percent. Detrital flakes lie parallel

to the bedding and are much larger than the diagenetic sericite grams. In places compacuon has broken or bent

flakes, demonstrating the detntal origin of the muscovite. Muscovite flakes are ubiquitous in all three

formations, however, they are more abundant in fine-grained beds.

Large amounts of muscovite are derived from schists, gneisses, and granites. The presence of large

muscovite flakes in the sediment indicates a high grade metamorphic or piutomc provenance (Blatt and others,

1980)

b. Biotite (BIOT)

Only a few unaltered flakes of biotite were found in some samples of tne Swauger Formation. Being

derived from igneous and metamorphic rocks, biotite is less resistant to weathering and transportation, and

because of its iron is very reactive. However, the grains found in the Swauger Formation are brown,

pleochrotc, and unaltered (Fig. 17).

6. ROCK FRAGMENTS (L):

Rock fragments in the Bonner, Buffalo Hump, and Swauger formations are divided into three major

types based on their origin as demonstrated by texture and mineralogy.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Figure 7 a. Macro-mosaic polycrystalline quartz (QpMac) from Flint Creek section of Bonner Formation (E-3).

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 34

Figure 7b. Macro-mosaic polycrystalline quartz (QpMac) from Wise River section of Bonner Formation (B-I3).

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 35

c. Micro-mosaic fOpMic)

Interlocking sub-crystals range from 30 to 100 microns and generally exhibit planar boundaries (Fig.

8 and 9). The individual sub-crystals usually are non-undulose.

Polycrystalline quartz grains are derived in abundance from weathering and erosion of granites,

gneisses, and schists (Blatt and others, 1980). These grams contain numerous crystal boundaries that range

from planar to sutured, and hence they may be more susceptible to breakage during transport than are the

monocrvstalline grams. Mega-mosaic type is believed to be derived from mainly plutonic rocks whereas

macro- and micro-mosaic types may have been derived from either metamorphic (gneisses or schists) and/or

granitic source rocks (Basu and others, 1975; Young, 1975; Blatt and others, 1980). Polycrystalline quartz

grams composed of stretched quartz crystals with crenulated intercrystalline boundaries are classified (for the

purpose of provenance determination) as metamorphic rock fragments and were counted during point-counting

as such.

3. FELDSPAR (F):

Feldspar grams are mostly derived from the weathering of igneous and metamorphic rocks, but

feldspar is more easily degraded than quartz by both weathering and transport. Therefore, in most arenites they

are less abundant than quartz. Orthoclase and microcline appear to be more resistant to weathering than

plagioclase. but like all feldspars, orthoclase contains cleavage planes along which weathering takes place and

the grains are easily parted (Blatt and others, 1980). Plagioclase feldspars which contain sodium or calcium,

are more susceptible to chemical weathering and these grains are less likely to survive during transport than the

potassium feldspars. In addition, all the feldspar grains are subject to further chemical alteration after

deposition during burial diagenesis. Texture and grain size of detrital feldspar grains provide limited

information about provenance. Therefore, detrital grains of all the feldspar types are analyzed for detailed

micro-chemical analysis to supplement the provenance information inferred from the texture and mineralogy.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 36

Figure 8. Micro-mosaic polycrystalline quartz (QpMic) from Flint Creek section of Bonner Formation (E-22).

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 37

Figure 9. Micro-mosaic polycrystalline quartz (QpMic) from Buffalo Hump Formation (G-18).

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 38

The results and the interpretations of micro-chemical analysis are discussed separately later m this dissertatiom.

Three types of feldspar grains are identified:

a. Microcline

The potassium feldspar microcline grains are present in all the thin sections of the Bonner Formation,

and most of the thin sections of the Swauger Formation. However, microcline was not found in any thin section

of the Buffalo Hump Formation. Some microcline grains appear very angular and fresh (Fig. 10.11), whereas

others are partly sencitized or deeply altered. The deeply altered grains are recognized by their shape. The

very angular, fresh grams were transported only a short distance.

b. Orthoclaae

Grains of the other potassium feldspar, orthoclase, range from 5% to as much as 25% in the Bonner

and Swauger formations. After quartz, orthoclase is the second most abundant detrital mineral in the Bonner

and Swauger formations. It is, however, absent in the Buffalo Hump Formation. In places orthoclase grams

are deeply altered to scricite and are coated with authegemc clay minerals, however, in the southern sections of

the Bonner Formation, most are very angular and fresh.

c. Plagioclase

Predominantly fine-grained plagioclase grains occur only in the northern sections of the Bonner

Formation and in the limited samples of the Swauger Formation. Microprobe analysis of feldspar grains

revealed that almost all the plagioclase grains are albitized or are metamorphic albite. Most of the

detritalalbitized grains are rounded to well-rounded (Fig. 12), commonly fractured, and sericitzed Generally,

they are slightly smaller than the quartz (Qm) population. Authegemc albite grains are euhedral and fresh

(Fig. 13). In samples where grains are tightly packed albite grew in pore spaces taking the shape of the pore.

The amount of plagioclase in the Bonner and the Swauger does not exceed 1.5%, therefore, during point-

counting, both the albitized detrital grains and authegenic albite grains were identified as alteration products.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 39

Figure 10. Angular microcline and rounded monocrystalline quartz grains from Wise River section (B-14).

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 40

Figure II. A large angular microcline grain from Wise River section (B-14).

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 41

Figure 12. Albitized potassium feldspar with albite overgrowth from Nyack section of Bonner (H-63).

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 42

Figure 13. Euhedral diagenetic albite from Nyack section of Bonner (H-l)

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 43

4. CHERT (CHT)

Generally, chert grams appear as uniform microcrystailine quartz with equant sub-crystals ranging in

size from <1 to 20 microns. Some chert grains are detrital (Fig. 14 and 15), whereas others are diagenetic (Fig.

16) and were formed by replacing original mineral (e.g. quartz) in the rock. Grains with more than 90 percent

microcrystailine quartz and no internal texture are considered detrital sedimentary chert rock fragments (Folk,

1980). Grains with less than 90 percent microcrystailine quartz are regarded as diagenetic/ alteration

(replacement) product. Most of the chert grains appear cloudy in plane light with a large number of vacuoles

and opaque grains. Occasionally rounded grains of chert appear isotropic under crossed nicols. Few chert

grains contain ’ghosts" of replaced rnombohedral crystals, probably a carbonate crystal.

The origin of chert in many Precambrian sedimentary rocks has been much debated during the last

100 years and the controversy is yet to be resolved. Models proposed for the dominantly Proterozoic banded

iron formations (BIFs) range from organic (LaBerge, 1973) to inorganic (Cloud, 1973), and from conunentai-

lacustnne (Magadi-type. Eugster, 1969; Eugster and Chou, 1973), or continental derived/fluviatiie (Garrels,

1987; Drever, 1974). The later models which involve either I) stratified basin (or oceans), 2) precipitation at

the pvcnoclinc, or 3) oceanic upwelling, are particularly attractive as they invoke a reservoir of reasonable

magnitude for iron and silica. The presence of rhombohedral crystals of quartz with in a chert grain in some

samples of the Bonner Formation strongly suggest derivation from a silicitic or dolomite (Raymond

Murray, personal communication). However, a large number of chert grains in the Bonner, Swauger and

Buffalo Hump formations are also formed diagenetically in situ by replacing original detrital mineral grains.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 44

Figure 14. Well rounded detrital chert grain from Wise River section (B-40).

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 45

Figure 15. Well rounded detrital chert grain from Flint Creek section (E-8).

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 46

Figure 16. Replacement chert from Buffalo Hump Formation (G-16).

r ------— Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 47

5. MICA

Detrital mica flakes are abundant in all three formations studied. Muscovite was found in almost even'

thin section, whereas detrital biotite flakes are present in only a few samples of the Swauger Formation.

a. Muscovite (Mils')

Detrital muscovite occurs in amounts ranging from a trace up to 5 percent Detrital flakes lie parallel

to the bedding and are much larger than the diagenetic sericite grains. In places compaction has broken or bent

flakes, demonstrating the detrital origin of the muscovite. Muscovite flakes are ubiquitous in all three

formations, however, they are more abundant m fine-grained beds.

Large amounts of muscovite are derived from schists, gneisses, and granites. The presence of large

muscovite flakes in the sediment indicates a high grade metamorphic or piutomc provenance (Blatt and others,

1980)

b. Biotite fBIOT)

Only a few unaltered flakes of biotite were found in some samples of tne Swauger Formation. Being

derived from igneous and metamorphic rocks, biotite is less resistant to weathering and transportation, and

because of its iron is very reactive. However, the grains found in the Swauger Formation are brown,

pleochroic, and unaltered (Fig. 17).

6. ROCK FRAGMENTS (L):

Rock fragments in the Bonner, Buffalo Hump, and Swauger formations are divided into three major

types based on their origin as demonstrated by texture and mineralogy.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 48

Figure 17. Detrital biotite grains from Fourth of July Creek section of Swauger Formation (W-1).

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. a. Plutonic rock fragments (PRF):

These are mainly intergrowths of quartz, microcline and/or orthoclase. In places the quartz crystals of

the fragments have undulatory extinction. Mica crystals within plutonic rock fragments are rare.

b. Volcanic rock fragments (VRF):

No identifiable volcanic rock fragments are found in any of the formations studied. The Buffalo

Hump Formation, however, contains some deeply altered grains which can not be identified with confidence

(Fig. 18). It can only be suspected that these unknown grains were once volcanic rock fragments, however, the

general petrography does not concur with this supposition because no volcanic quartz grains are found in any

of the samples.

c. Metamorphic rock fragments (M RP:

Metamorphic rock fragments mainly consist of sand grains to gravel-sizc clasts of metaquartztte,

schist, and gneiss. Mctaquartzite fragments are composed of polycrystalline quartz grains with a preferred

planar fabric (Fig. 19 and 20). Clasts of schists and gneiss show typical coarse crenuiate metamorphic texture.

Schistocitv is noticeable in many schist clasts whereas equant and straight crystal-crystal quartz boundaries

indicate gneissic origin of the fragment. Fine grained mica is present in some of the metamorphic rock

fragments.

d. Sedimentary rock fragments (SRF);

Sedimentary rock fragments include reworked quartz grains from quartz sandstone formations and

other siliciclastic source terranes. Some reworked quartz grams retain quartz cement overgrowths (Fig. 21 and

22). Intrabasinal non-carbonate fragments (Zuffa, 1980) which are mainly composed of fine silt and clay, are

identified as mud clasts, and are not counted as sedimentary rock fragments. Generally, the muscovite flakes

are more common in beds where mud clasts are abundant

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 50

Figure 18. An unidentifiable grain from the Buffalo Hump Formation (G-7).

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 51

Figure 19. Detrital quartzite rock fragment from Wise River section, Bonner Formation (B-16).

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 52

Figure 20. Highly stretched detrital metamorphic rock fragment from Flint Creek section of the Bonner Formation (E-14).

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 53

Figure 2 1. Quartz overgrowth on second cycle monocrystalline quartz from Wise River section, Bonner Formation (B-18).

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 54

Quartz overgrowth on second cycle monocrystalline quartz grain from Buffalo Hump Formation (G-2).

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 55

7. HEAVY MINERALS (H)

Trace amounts of zircon, apatite, monazite, tourmaline, and rutile grains occur in a number of thin

sections.

a. Zircon

Zircon grains are usually colorless to light pale brown, exhibit very high relief and birefringence, and

have very angular and well-rounded shapes. Angular grains of zircon (Fig. 23) are conclusive evidence of acid

to intermediate igneous source rock (Krumbian and Pettijohn, 1938). Zircon is hard and highly durable and,

therefore, the rounded (Fig. 24) and broken rounded grains are mostly interpreted as having been through more

than one erosional and depositions! cycle (Folk, 1980).

b. Apatite

Apatite grains are generally colorless, with moderate relief and weak birefringence. Few samples of

Bonner and Swauger formations contam rare, medium to fine grained, and sub-angular to well rounded apatite

grains. Apatite is very common in all types of volcanic rocks, hydrothermal veins, iron-rich plutomc rocks, and

many kinds of metamorphic rocks.

c. Monazite

Monazite grams are reported from the Buffalo Hump Formation (Ross and others, 1992), but were

not found during this study. They arc, however, present in a few thin sections of the Bonner Formation. The

grains are colorless and exhibit very high relief and strong birefringence. Monazite is a common accessory

mineral in granites, syenites, gneisses and pegmatites.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 56

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 57

Figure 24. Rounded zircon from Wise River, Bonner Formation (B-28).

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 58

A Tounnanline

Tourmaline grains are pleocfaroic (greenish-brown, yellowish-brown, and greenish blue), have high

relief and moderate birefringence, and are generally sub-rounded. The brown color of tourmaline in the

Bonner Formation is indicative of (Mg rich) mineral dravite which occurs almost exclusively in metamorphic

rocks. (Fig. 25).

e. Rutile

Rutile needles generally lie within quartz grains, however, individual rutile crystals occur in all three

t'ormauons studied In these rocks, rutile grains are generally yellow-brown-red with very high relief and

birefringence, and range from sub-angular to well-rounded Rutile is an accessory mineral in many intrusive

and metamorphic rocks or in quartz veins running through them.

8. OPAQUE MINERALS (O)

Magnetite and pynte are the only two opaque minerals found in a few thin sections. Their amount

generally vanes from rare to traces.

a. Magnetite

Megnetite grains are generally medium to very fine grained sub-angular to angular (subhedral) and

mostly occur in heavy mineral bands with zircon, tourmaline and apatite. Most of the magnetite grains arc

commonly oxidized to hematite, however, this is not a basin wide feature. At places, for example in sample G-

2 of the Buffalo Hump Formation, unaltered magnetite grains are also found. Magnetite has at least four

sources of origin: 1) mafic and uitramafic extrusive rocks where it forms as a differentiation product during the

magmatic stage, 2) metamorphic rocks where it forms by reduction of hematite derived from the dissociation of

sulfides and iron silicates, 3) pegmatites and hydrothermal veins, where it forms by hydrothermal fluids and 4)

in skams where it forms by contact metasomatic process.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 59

Figure 25. Sub-rounded tourmaline from Fourth of July section, Swauger Formation (W-7).

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 60

b. Pvrite

Pynte crystals generally appear as sub-angular to angular (subhedral) with bright brass yellow

metallic color in reflected light. Pvrite grains are found throughout the Bonner and the Buffalo Hump

formations, however their concentration and appearance vary from place to place. Pvrite may originate by

either magma tic segregation in mafic rocks, or as vein deposits formed by hydrothermal processes. In the

Bonner and Buffalo Hump formations, however, the pyrite is probably produced by diagenetic processes m

reduced beds.

9. DIAGENETIC/ALTERATION PRODUCTS

Variable metamorphism of Belt rocks produced a number of diagenetic minerals and alteration

products. Secondary quartz, albite, leucoxene, hematite, chlorite, illite, and sericite are among the most

abundant diagenetic minerals found in different parts of the Bonner, Swauger, and Buffalo Hump formations.

Their appearance and amount not only vanes from formation to formation, but also from bed to bed within a

single stratigraphic section.

10. MATRIX AND CEMENT (MTX AND CMT)

Matrix is finer grained material that fills interstitial spaces among framework grains. The upper size

limit of material in sandstones considered to be matrix is arbitrary and debatable, however, a maximum size of

0.03mm is generally accepted by many workers (e.g. Dott, 1964; Folk, 1980). In the three formations studied,

the matrix is mostly composed of fine quartz, feldspar, clay minerals and senate. The Swauger Formation, the

Buffalo Hump Formation and southern sections of the Bonner Formation, contain relatively a higher proportion

of matrix than that of northern sections of the Bonner. The amount of matrix in a rock has a direct bearing on

the post-depositional deformation of the quartz grain crystal lattice. In the presence of greater amounts of

matrix, clay content of the matrix absorbs pressure so that non-undulatory quartz grains generally are not

deformed. Where quartz grains are interlocked their boundaries are crenulated by pressure solutions and their

crystal lattice become strained.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 61

Intergranuiar cement is commonly made up of silica. Silica is precipitated as crystal overgrowths on

the quartz grains in optical continuity with the cemented grain or as layered overgrowth on the quartz (Fig. 26).

The northern Bonner Formation is silicified to a greater extent than that of southern Bonner. In the Swauger

and Buffalo Hump formations the silica mainiv replaces the fine-grained matrix Authegenic feldspar also

occurs as overgrowth, especially in the northern Bonner. Overgrown orthoclase and microcline grains tend to

appear euhedral in thin section.

The amount of matrix and cement varies both laterally and vertically. At places the matrix is more

than 50% of the rock.

______Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 62

Figure 26. Extensive quartz cement Nyack section, Bonner Formation (H-39).

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 63

DESCRIPTIVE MINERALOGY

BONNER FORMATION

Nine stratigraphic sections of the Bonner Formation selected for detailed petrologic study are divided

into two parts with respect to their lateral position in the Belt basin. They are I ) Southern sections of the

Bonner which include

a) Wise River

b) Flint Creek

c) Emenne Lookout and

d) Clinton

whereas 2) Northern sections of the Bonner include

a) Spotted Bear

b) Nvack

c> Fishtrap Creek

d) Libby and

e) Clark Fork sections.

Detntal mineralogy of each section is studied in detail. To avoid repetition the first section of each

part. i.e. Wise River section in the southern part and Spotted Bear section in the northern part, has been

described in detail. Description of the rest of the sections m the same part is limited to major differences and

similarities in the detntal mineralogy. However, the detntal composition of each section is accompanied by a

graph that contains the summary of point count results.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 64

SOUTHERN SECTIONS OF THE BONNER FORMATION

In the southern part of the Belt basin, the Bonner Formation is composed of moderately well to pooriy

sorted, medium-grained to pebbly feldspatic quartz arenite. The medium- to coarse-grained population

contains quartz, orthoclase, mi croc line, muscovite and metamorphic and plutonic rock fragments. Most quartz

grains are subrounded to well rounded, while the feldspar grams are angular to well rounded. Detrital grains

are cemented by silica and sericite. Minor amounts of chert, tourmaline, zircon, hematite and chlonte are also

present.

The dominantly matrix supported conglomeratic fraction is composed of compact to elongate

granules, pebbles, ana cobbles, which reach up to 10 cm in diameter at Wise River. Both the medium to

coarse sand matrix and the pebbles are moderately to poorly sorted, and the longer axis of elongate pabbles are

generally aligned more or less parallel to bedding. Subrounded to well rounded quartz and white quartzite

clasts dominate the large pebble and cobble fraction (Fig. 27), whereas the granule to medium pebble fracuon

also contains common angular to well rounded orthoclase and mi croc line, and minor chert and argillite.

Generally, the mineralogy of the conglomeratic population is very similar to that of the medium- to coarse­

grained arenite population.

The medium- to fine-grained population is composed of 75.51 to 81.67% quartz, up to 40% silt and

sencite matrix, 11.5 to 3.66% or'hociase, 5.45 to 13.51% microcline, 2.79 to 8.16% rock fragments and trace

to 3% muscovite. Medium to fine-grained quartzite beds vary from poorly to well sorted, with angular to

rounded quartz and angular to well rounded feldspar grains. Where fine to very fine-grained, the rock is

predominantly moderately well to well sorted, with angular to subrounded quartz and angular to well rounded

feldspar grains. The population of detrital muscovite flakes, of up to 0.5cm long, increases in abundance with

decrease in gram size of quartz and feldspar grains.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 65

Figure 27. A quartzite pebble in the conglomerate of Bonner Formation!, Wise River section (B-16).

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 66

The argillite fraction is composed of fine silt and clay-size detrital muscovite and senate. Larger

flakes of muscovite lie along the flat, millimeter-scale bedding planes. The southern sections of the Bonner

Formation contain considerably lesser amount of argillite than those of northern sections.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 67

a) Wise River Section

The Bonner at Wise River is composed of very poorly sorted, very fine- to very coarse­

grained feldspathic quartz arenite with pebble to cobble conglomerate beds. The conglomerate beds, separated

by medium to coarse sand beds, appear between 20 and 40 meters (60 to 125 feet) in the measured section.

The mean grain size of 65 point counted samples is 1.5mm (very coarse sand). The average grain size

gradually decreases upsection. The rocks are composed of 50 to 90% grains, 5 to 40% matrix, and 3 to 10%

cement. The matrix is composed of silt and clay, whereas the cement is mainly silica in the form of quartz

overgrowth and secondary silica in pore spaces.

The conglomerate beds are composed of predominantly matrix supported gravel with clasts up to

10cm in diameter, but mostly less than 7cm. Both the medium to coarse sand matnx, and the pebbles are

moderately to poorly sorted. In places the pebbles are roughly aligned to bedding. Subrounded to well

rounded quartz and quartzite clasts dominate the large pebble and cobble fraction, whereas the granule to

medium pebble fraction is composed of angular to well rounded orthoclase and microcline, plutomc rock

fragments, and minor chert and argillite. Some of the polycrystalline quartzite pebbles contain muscovite

flakes with a preferred planar fabric. Interlocking quartz subcrystals within the ppebbles have crenulated

boundaries and strong undulose extinction. Other quartz pebbles are mega-mosaic polycrystalline quartz with

straight to granular crystal-crystal boundaries.

Detrital Composition

The medium to fine-grained sand fraction of the Bonner Formation at Wise River contains, in

decreasing abundance, monocrystalline quartz, polycrystalline quartz, microcline, orthoclase, mud clasts,

metamorphic and plutomc rock fragments, and minor chert. Accessory minerals include, sencite, hematite,

muscovite, zircon, apatite, and chlonte. A summary of the pomt count results is given in Fig. 28.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. a oo too n=65 ST.DEV Mean 75 50 Volume Percent Wise River Section Bonner Formation t - t 25 L L F K K Q OR Qp MC MC QU Qm CHT QpU MTX MTX CMT QNU GRN QmU QpiMU QpiMU QmNU QpMac Ls(SRF) QpMicU Lp(PRF) Lt(LCQp) Lt(LCQp) Lm(MRF) Lm(MRF) QpMegU QPMicNU e 5 E j= QpMic C W W QPMegNU r> r> QpMeg C e Q , QpMacU•q QPMacNU o Figure 28

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 69

The monocrystaJline quartz (Qm) population makes up 43.18 to 76.49% of the total detrital grains.

These grains are subrounded to well rounded, medium- to very coarse-grained and are more or less evenly

distributed throughout the section with minor fluctuations in the middle of the measured section. In the

conglomeratic beds, however, medium- to very coarse-grained polycrystalline quartz grains dominate.

Extinction of monocrystalline grains varies from strongly undulose to straight Quartz grains are both clear and

vacuole-bearing. Crystal inclusions are rare. Inclusions that could be identified with reasonable certainty

include vermicular chlorite, rutile, and sericite. Most of the quartz grains are indented by surrounding

polycrystailine quartz and feldspar grains, making some gram boundaries difficult to identify. Few grams have

quartz overgrowths. Based on the above characteristics, the monocrystalline quartz grains are common quartz

(Folk, 1980).

The polycrystailine quartz (Qp) population makes up 7.41 to 38.98% of total detrital grains and is

poorly sorted, subrounded to well rounded, and ranges from medium-sand to granule size. Qp is divided into

three types. Macro-mosaic quartz (QpMac) is the most abundant type of polycrystailine quartz and makes up

3.5 to 22.12% of the detritus. These grains are medium sand to granule size, poorly sorted, subrounded to well

rounded and have both undulose and non-undulose extinction. Generally elongate subcrystals have straight

boundaries, however, crenulated and granulated boundaries of interlocking subcrystals are common in some

beds. The micro-mosaic polycrystailine quartz (QpMic) population ranges from 1.57 to 17.25. These grains

are medium- to coarse-grained, poorly sorted, subrounded to well rounded. Interlocking equant subcrystals

have straight boundaries with moderate undulose to straight extinction. Mega-mosaic polycrystailine quartz

(QpMeg) grains range from 0 to 11.36% in the point counted samples. They are, however, the most abundant

type in conglomerate beds. Most are medium sand to granule size, poorly sorted, subrounded to well rounded

grains. Most subcrystals are interlocked and sutured into each other, developing crenulated and granulated

borders. The subcrystals have both strong undulose and straight extinction.

______Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 70

Fresh, angular to subrounded, medium- to fine-grained microcline (MC) is the second most abundant

mineral of the Wise River Bonner. It constitutes 2.49 to 10.87% of the total detrital grains. Microcline grains

are fresher and less altered than orthoclase and are devoid of overgrowths.

Fresh to slightly altered, angular to subrounded, poorly sorted, medium- to very course-granted

orthoclase (OR) grains make up 0.62 to 9.32% of the detritus. Orthoclase grains can be further divided into

two sub-populations. One is moderately sorted, subangular to subrounded, medium-grained population which

occurs at all levels of the stratigraphic section. In places these orthoclase grains are partially altered to sericite.

The second orthociase is a poorly sorted, coarse-to granule size, subangular to very angular population which is

restricted to the conglomerate and very coarse grained quartzite beds of the Wise River section. These grains

are very fresh and show very little or no alteration to sencite.

Rounded to subrounded, medium- to fine-grained chert (CHT) is found in more than half of the

samples. The amount of chert does not exceed 2.5% in any sample. The chert grains appear cloudy in thin

section, and some contain a very fine granular opaque mineral, probably hematite. In a few chert grains ghosts

of incomplete dolomite or limestone rhombs are also observed. Such grains also show a very fine svntaxial

quartz overgrowths, most of which has probably been removed during their transport from source rock to the

Belt basin.

Medium- to fine-grained detrital muscovite (MUS) flakes are common. They are generally

concentrated in the fine-grained argillaceous silt beds, where they reach a maximum of 2% of the total rock.

Few very large flakes (4mm) are trapped between pebbles in the lower part of the section.

Mud clasts and metamorphic (MRF), and plutomc rock fragments (PRF) occur in almost every

sample. Mud clasts make up to 4% of the rock. They are medium to fine grained and composed of silt-size.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 71

straight extinction quartz grains. Because they are unlithified at the time of deposition, most of the mud clasts

were deformed by compaction, obscuring their boundaries.

The plutomc (granitic?) rock fragments are mostly composed of one to three quartz crystals

interlocked with one or two orthoclase or microcline crystals. They are generally angular and mostly restricted

to the conglomerate and very coarse-grained beds. These grains make up to 6.75% of the total detrital grams.

Metamorphic rock fragments are well rounded, medium- to coarse-grained and make up 1.83 to

7.35% of the total detrital grains. These grains are polycrystailine quartz, have strongly undulose extinction,

crenulated crystal-crystal boundaries, stretched subcrystals, and a preferred planar fabric. A few rounded

pebbles in the conglomerate beds contain muscovite crystals.

Plutomc rock fragments and metamorphic rock fragments show noticeable trend in their vertical

distribution. The amount of Plutomc Rock Fragments (PRF) increases steadily upsection whereas the

Metamorphic Rock Segment's (MRF) population decreases upsection.

Zircon (ZR) is the most noticeable heavy mineral that occurs m trace amount in almost every sample.

Most zircon grains are rounded to well rounded, broken rounded, very fine- to fine-grained, clear, and occur m

heavy mineral bands. A few are angular. Apatite (AP) is the second most abundant heavy mineral found in

almost half of the thin sections. Apatite grams are rounded to subangular and very fine- to fine-grained.

Hematite (HE) is the only opaque mineral and occurs as traces up to 5% of the total rock. Hematite

both coats grains and forms botroyds in pore spaces. Sericite (SC) and brownish green chlorite (CL) grams are

widespread in variable amounts. Sericite occurs as altered feldspar grains or as a slightly metamorphosed clay

matrix reaching up to 40% of the total rock. Chlorite is present in trace amount in most of the samples, and is

generally euhedral. indicating diagenetic origin.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 72

b) Flint Creek Section

The Bonner Bormation at Flint Creek is composed of very poorly sorted, very fine- to very coarse­

grained feldspathic quartz arenite. The mean grain size of 26 point counted samples is 0.74mm (coarse sand).

The rocks range from 80 to 95% grains, trace to 15% matrix, and 1 to 5% cement. The matrix is composed of

silt, clay and minor sericite, whereas, the cement is mainly quartz on quartz grains and as pore fillings.

Quattlebaum (1980) has given a detailed sedimentologic description of the conglomeratic beds of

Flint Creek section. Therefore, this section is limited to the thin section description of medium to fine grained

units only (Fig.29). In unit 2 of Quattlebaum the Flint Creek Bonner contains rounded quartzite pebbles up to

6.5cm in diameter, but mostly less than 3.5cm. Overall, the pebble size of the Bonner at Flint Creek is slightly

finer than that of the Bonner at Wise River. The conglomerate beds occur as lenses and are generally matrix

supported. The mineralogy of the Bonner at Flint Creek compares closely to that at Wise River with minor

differences.

Detrital Composition

The Bonner at Flint Creek contains, in decreasing abundance, monocrystalline quartz, polycrystailine

quartz, microcline, orthoclase, metamorphic and plutomc rock fragments, mud clasts and minor chert

Accessory minerals include muscovite, hematite, sericite, zircon, and chlorite. Apatite was found in only one

sample. In general the Bonner at Flint Creek contains more detrital grains and less cement and matnx, thus it is

more mature than the arenite at the Wise River.

Although texture and detrital mineralogy of the Bonner at Flint Creek does not differ greatly from that

of the Wise River section, there are some differences. They are outlined below.

1. On average the Bonner at Flint Creek contains about 7% less Qp than that of the Wise River section

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 100 .... [n=26 •I 80 St. DEV St. MEAN □ Volume PercentVolume 40 40 60 Flint Creek Section Bonner Formation 20 L F K u Q Q OR Qp MC QU Qm Qm SRF PRF CHT MRF QpU ' MIX QNU CMT QmU GRN QpMic QpNU QmNU QpMac QpMeg QpMlcU QPMicNU QPMacNU C n QpMegU 8 QPMegNU a >* IS 0 . QpMacU ■a o Graph allowing (he mean composition (he Graph and one detritalallowing standard ofthe deviulion grains of Formation the Boimer Creek at Flint Composition offramework grains given as percent total framework of grains, grains, cement, and matrix shown percent as total rock of Figure 29

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 74

(20.90% vs. 27.82%).

2. The average total potassium feldspar is increased by 3.6% at Flint Creek.

3. The Bonner at Flint Creek is richer in QmNU population by about 8%.

4. The Flint Creek Bonner contains no non-undulose mega-mosaic polycrystailine quartz (QpMegNU),

whereas the Wise River contains up to 9.74%.

MRF decreases gradually upsection, whereas PRF increase upsection at Flint Creek, similar to the

Bonner at Wise River. However, this trend is not as sharp as was observed at Wise River.

The significance of these differences and similarities in the texture and mineralogy of detrital grains of

the Flint Creek and Wise River secuons of the Bonner are addressed in detail elsewhwre within context of

Provenance.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 75

c) Emerine Lookout Section

The Bonner Formation at Emerine Lookout is composed of very poorly sorted to well sorted, very

fine- to coarse-grained feldspathic quartz arenite. The mean grain size of 46 point counted samples is 0.48mm

(medium sand). The rocks are composed of 80 to 95% grains, trace to 3% matrix, and 2 to 20% cement (Fig.

30). The matrix is composed of silt and clay, whereas, silica cement forms syntaxial quartz overgrowths.

Detrital Composition

The Emenne Lookout section has an average composition o f48.97% Qm, 26.54% Qp, 13.51%

microcline, 7.09% orthoclase, 2.79% rock fragments, and trace to a few percent muscovite, sericite, hematite,

zircon and monazite grains. Detrital grains of the Emerine Lookout Bonner are finer, and more rounded than

those of Wise River and Flint Creek, but otherwise are quite similar texturally. Feldspar grains are slightly

more altered and sericitized. More than 64% quartz grains (Qm+Qp) have undulose extinction, which is three

times more than that of the Wise River and Flint Creek sections.

One of the most noticeable differences in the detrital mineralogy of the Bonner at Emerine Lookout is

the abundance of undulose monocrystalline quartz and the pausity of non-undulose monocrystalline quartz.

The Bonner at Emenne Lookout section contains only 6.75% QmNU as compared to 40.94% and 49.08% in

Wise River and Flint Creek sections, respecuvely. The undulose monocrystalline quartz population (QmU) is

increased (42.22%) at the expense of QmNU. Similar to The Bonner at Flint Creek, the Emerine Lookout

section is completely devoid of QpMegNU grains. The interpretation of the textural and mineralogical trends

are discussed in detail in the provenance chapter.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 100 g e j i r 80 Mean St.Dev □ Volume PercentVolume 40 60 Bonner Formation Emerine Lookout Section 20

L K Q n QP OR QU MC MC SRF PRF CHT MTX MRF CMT GRN QNU QpMacU QPMacNU Graph showing meanihe composition and one standarddeviation detrital the ofgrains Formation of Honner the at limerine Lookout Composition frameworkof grains given as percent oftotal framework grains: grains, matrix cement and shown as percent total ofrock £ SQPM egNU Q. QpMeg c QmNU 2 5 QpMlcU QPMicNU la QpMic C ™ QpMac QpMegU 25 F ■O P •a QmU <3 u Qm QpU Q p N U Q . Figure 30.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 77

d) Clinton Section

The Bcmner Formation at Clinton is composed of moderately to well sorted, medium- to coarse­

grained, subrounded to well rounded quartz arenite. The mean grain size of 31 point counted samples is .45mm

(medium sand). The rocks are made up of 83.39% grains, 6.23% matrix and 10.23% cement (Fig. 31). The

matrix is composed of silt and clay, whereas the cement is mostly epitaxial quartz overgrowths on quartz grains

filling intergranular pore spaces.

Bonner at Clinton has an average composition of65.37% Qm. 11.93% Qp, 11.50% orthoclase,

5.45% microcline, 5.13% rock fragments, 2% mud clasts, 0.62% chert, 1% muscovite, 2.4% sericite, and trace

amounts of hemattte, zircon, rutile, tourmaline, and chlorite.

Detrital Composition

.Although overall composition of the Bonner at Clinton is the same as that of the other three sections

of the southern Bonner Formation, there are some differences in the amounts of individual detrital grains. These

differences are outlined below.

1. The average amount of total non-undulose quartz (QNTJ) grains is only 6.63% at Clinton as opposed

to 59.93%. 61.8% and 11.41% at Wise River. Flint Creek, and Emerine Lookout sections,

respectively.

2. The undulose quartz (QU) is abundant at Clinton (70.67%) than it is at Wise River (21.74) and at

Flint Creek (17.59%).

3. The Qp population at Clinton is almost half (11.93%) of the Qp population at the rest of the three

Southern Bonner sections. This difference is mainly in the macro-mosaic (QpMac) type.

With few exceptions, the Clinton section more closely resembles the Emerine Lookout section than

the Wise River and Flint Creek sections. The average volume percent of each grain type in all four sections of

the southern part of the Bonner Formation is summarized in Table 5.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. i oc 100 [nS31 •I 60 — r ~ St, DevSt, Mean 1— ------' ------Volume PercentVolume 40 60 —i Clinton Section Bonner Formation r 20 a S i L L F K K Lt Lt Q OR Qp MC MC QU Qm SRF PRF CHT MRF QpU MTX MTX QNU CMT GRN QpNU QmNU QpMac QpMeg QpMicU w p m i b u QPMIcNU framework framework grains given as percent total offramework grains, grains, cement, and matrix shown as percent rock oftotal E

QPMacNU £ a> jg QpMic C C m QpMegU 2 QPMegNU a q . -a QpMacU ■ ■ QmU Figure 31. Figure 31. showing compositionmeanthe and one standard Cirapli deviation ofdie detrital grains of die Bonner Formation at Clinton Composition of w

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 79

Table 5 Average detrital composition of the four southern sections of the Bonner Formation. Composition of framework grains given as percent of total framework grains: grains, matrix and cement shown as percent of total rock.

Summary of The Southern Bonner Formation

Gr.Types/ Wise Flint Emerine Clinton Mean StOev. Parameters River Creek Lookout GRN 79.31 89.73 92.55 83.39 86.24 5.20 MTX 14.55 7.38 1.30 6.23 131 4.74 CMT 6.11 2.88 6.21 10.23 6.36 2.60 Q 81.67 79.39 75.51 77.30 78.47 2.30 QNU 59.93 61.80 11.41 6.63 34.94 25.99 QU 21.74 17.59 64.11 70.67 43.53 24.02 Qp 27.82 20.90 26.54 11.93 21.80 6.26 QpNU 19.00 12.73 4.66 2.06 9.61 6.69 QpU 8.82 8.17 21.S9 9.86 12.19 5.63 Qm 53.85 58.49 48.97 65.37 56.67 6.05 QmNU 40.94 49.08 6.75 60.81 39.39 20.12 QmU 12.92 9.42 42.22 4.57 17.28 14.70 QpMeg 2.43 0.88 1.74 3.10 2.04 0.82 QPMegNU 1.66 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.46 0.70 QpMegU 0.78 0.88 1.74 2.92 1.58 0.86 QpMac 15.36 11.91 19.84 5.36 13.12 5.29 QPMacNU 9.75 7.17 3.55 0.00 5.12 3.68 QpMacU 5.61 4.74 16.29 5.36 8.00 4.80 QpMic 10.0 28.11 4.97 3.47 6.64 2.57 QPMicNU 7.59 5.56 1.10 1.89 4.03 2.65 QpMicU 2.43 2.55 3.87 1.59 2.61 0.82 F 9.14 12.74 20.59 16.95 14.85 4.31 K 9.14 12.74 20.59 16.95 14.85 4.31 MC 5.48 7.84 13.51 5.45 8.07 3.28 OR 3.66 4.89 7.09 11.50 6.78 2.98 L 8.16 6.38 2.79 5.13 5.61 1.95 CHT 1.04 1.49 1.10 0.62 1.06 0.31 PRF 3.26 2.81 0.47 1.90 2.11 1.06 MRF 4.90 3.57 2.32 2.35 3.28 1.06 SRF 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.88 0.22 0.38 Lt 37.01 28.77 30.44 17.68 28.47 6.95

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. NORTHERN SECTIONS OF THE BONNER FORMATION

Five complete stratigraphic sections of the Bonner Formation, exposed in the northern part of the Belt

basin, were selected for this study. These are the Spotted Bear, Nyack, Libby, Fishtrap Creek, and Clark Fork

sections. Sections in the northern part of the Belt basin differ texturaily from the southern Bonner sections. The

northern Bonner is mostly medium- to very-fine grained, moderately well sorted, diagenetically altered mature to

sub-mature, feldspathic arenite. Whereas the southern Bonner sections, as discussed earlier, are medium- to

coarse-grained, poorly sorted, sub-mature mostly unaltered feldspathic arenite. With the exception of the

Spotted Bear section, all the sections of the northern part of the Bonner Formation contain diagenetic aibite. On

the contrary, in the southern sections of the Bonner Formauon, no aibite was found. Textural and petrographic

descriptions of individual sections are as follows.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 81

a) Spotted Bear Section

Ninety six samples were collected at 5-15 foot intervals from a 1000-foot thick exposed section of the

Bonner Formation along the Spotted Bear River. Most of the samples are either very poorly sorted, very fine­

grained, or are silicified to the extent that the individual detrital grains have lost their original identity.

Twenty moderately to well sorted, medium- to fine- and medium- to coarse-grained samples were point

counted. The samples are mature to sub-mature containing 65-90% grains and 2-8% matrix. Silica and sencite

cement ranges from 8-30%, averaging 19.6%. Fig. 32 contains the average detrital composition and other

calculated parameters of the Bonner at Spotted Bear.

The moderately to well-sorted, medium- to fine-grained and medium- to coarse-grained samples of the

Spotted Bear section are composed of monocrystalline quartz, potassium feldspar, polycrystailine quartz, almost

equally distributed plutomc and metamorphic rock fragments, minor chert, a few percent mud clasts and rare

heavy minerals and albitized potassium feldspar. Svntaxial quartz and k-spar cement fills the pore spaces.

Detrital Composition

The monccrystalline quartz (Qm) population makes up 62.87 to 72.37% of the framework and ranges

from well rounded to very angular grains. This variation in roundness is grain-size dependent. The fine-grained

population of Qm appears more angular than the medium-grained population. Most of the angular Qm grains,

both undulose and non-undulose, appear to be broken fragments of Qp, most probably macro-mosaic type. Both

populations of quartz grains are generally vacuole-bearing and contain irregular vacuole planes (Folk, 1980),

with rutile and muscovite needle inclusions. Only 3.86% Qm grains show little or no sign of strain, whereas

68.73% of the monocrystalline quartz grains have undulose extinction. Few grains have quartz overgrowths, but

these grains were not encountered during point counting.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 100 i 80 ST. DEVST. I MEAN i n I H [— ------1 ------Volume PercentVolume 4 0 60 —I Spotted Bear Section Bonner Formation

r~ 20 — a. L L K LI LI Q Q Qp OR MC MC QU QU SRF PRF CHT MRF MTX MTX QNU QNU CMT QmU GRN Ciraph showing mean compositionone the standard deviationunii oftheCiraph detrital grains ofthe Bonner Formation at Spotted Bear. Composition offramework grains given as percent oftotal framework grains: grains, matrix cement and shown as percent oftotal rock F QPMacNU QPU £ £ E QpMicU QPMicNU jg QpMIo C ™ QpMac OpMegU ^ QpMeg c QmNU $ QPMegNU « Qm S i O. QpMacli■a k u QpNU Figure 32.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 83

Potassium feldspar is the second most abundant mineral type of the Spotted Bear section and makes up

to 21.57% of the framework. The microcline population averages almost twice (9.88%) the population of

orthoclase (5.93%). Both the microcline and the orthoclase g r a i n s are medium- to fine-grained, rounded to sub­

rounded, moderately to poorly sorted, and moderately to completely altered to sericite. The k-spar grains are

generally smaller than the quartz grains and were rounded to sub-rounded when deposited. Svntaxial k-spar

overgrowths on the rounded detrital k-spar g r a i n s has made most grams euh^ral and angular.

No plagioclase was found in Spotted Bear during pomt counting, however, during micro-chemical

analysis of feldspar grains a few aibite grains, were found. These aibite grains will be discussed later in the

Feldspar Provenance chapter.

The polycrystailine quartz population averages 12.69% and is mostly composed of undulose macro-

mosaic type. Mega-mosaic and micro-mosaic types, though present, are in smaller amounts; 2.26% and 2.65%

respectively. These are mostly medium- to coarse-grained, rounded- to well-rounded and are coarser than most

Qm grains. Most of the Qp population has undulose extinction.

Rock fragments are predominantly metamorphic and account for up to 3.56% of the framework. Mud

clasts and plutomc rock fragments are rare, averaging less than 1% of the detrital grains MRF and mud clasts

are generally coarse-grained, whereas PRF are mostly medium-grained Some of the well-sorted fine-grained

and very poorly sorted coarse- to fine-grained samples, which were not included in point counting, contain a

greater number of mud clasts. These mud clasts were originally composed of silt and clay, diagenetic processes

have transformed the clay to sericite. Where the mud clasts retained their original shape, they were identified

and counted as mud clasts, not as sericite. However, some mud clasts appear to have been deformed into

pseudo matrix (Dickinson, 1970) and are difficult to distinguish from true detrital matrix.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 84

Chert grams average 0.92% of the framework and are medium- to fine-grained, subrounded to well

rounded. A few chert grams appear blurred in thin section, as they contain very fine-grained opaque inclusions

(probably hematite), whereas others are clean and clear.

Detrital muscovite flakes are distributed throughout the strati graphic section but are most abundant in

fine-grained beds.

Few zircon and monazite grams were found in some thin sections. These grams are very fine, rounded

to well rounded. Most are colorless but some are light brown. Sericite, granular hematite, and euhedral chlorite,

were encountered in almost every thin section.

Interstitial cement and secondary constituents include siliciclastic matrix, authegemc quartz and

potassium feldspar. Most of the authegemc quartz and potassium feldspar matrix was probably formed by

mtergranular pressure solution during compaction and . Orthoclase overgrowths over rounded

orthoclase and microcline grains are euhederal.

In every thin section some grains have been altered to sericite the degree that their original mineralogy

cannot be identified with certainty. These grains were counted as unknowns, but were later ignored during the

analysis of the pomt count data. 1 suspect that these grains were originally either mud clasts or feldspar grains.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 85

b) Nyack Section

The Nyack section of the Bonner Formation is composed of well sorted to very poorly sorted coarse- to

fine-grained, well cemented, mature to sub-mature feldspathic arenite. Textural characteristics of detrital grains

are almost the same as those of Spotted Bear Bonner. However, the amounts of some of the individual detrital

minerals are different in each thin section. Fig. 33 contains average detrital composition and other calculated

parameters of the Bonner at Nyack.

Detrital Composition

The dental mineralogy of the Bonner at Nyack differs slightly from that of Spotted Bear. The Bonner

at Nyack contains 5% aibite grains. Aibite grains can be divided into two types: a) euhedral, unaltered, newly

grown crystals, and b) rounded to subrounded, moderately sericitized, detrital, albitized grains. Although

sparsely distributed, they are almost equally abundant in fine-grained and coarse-grained beds. Generally, aibite

grains range from very fine- to medium-grained (62 to 500 microns), are both twinned and untwinned, and are

not overgrown. Both the aibite and the K-spar grains were also analyzed using electron microprobe. The

results of micro-chemical analysis are discussed in chapter 4.

Other differences between the Spotted Bear section and the Nyack section are m the volume percent of

various grain types. They are summarized below:

1. The average amount of matrix in the Bonner at Nyack is only 1.5% as opposed to 4.35% in Spotted

Bear.

The Bonner at Nyack contains 31.28% QmNU and 37.47% QmU, whereas the Bonner at Spotted Bear

is composed of 3.94% QmNU, and 64.79% QmU. It seems that the amount of QmNU in Bonner at

Nyack has increased at the expense of QmU.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. (X O' 100 [ r i = 4 6 i 60 St.Dev, Mean n i i ' i Volume Percent 40 60 Nyack Section Bonner Formation r 20 L L F K K L t Q Q Qp OR QU QU MC MC Qm SRF PRF CHT QpU MRF MTX QNU QNU CMT QmU QpNU QmNU QpMicU QpMacLI QpMacLI E 9) 2 £ 2 QPMIcNU <0 QpMIc re QpMac c M M QpMegU gO PM egNU > . QpMeg £ ■g ■g QPMacNU 0 Graph allowing (he mean composition (he Graphone and standardallowing deviation ofthe dclrilal Formation grainsat Composition Nyack. of the Homier of framework grains as percentgiven total offramework grains: grains, cement, and matrix shown as percent ofrock. total Figure 33

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 87

3. The Bonner at Nyack has 4.18% QpMacU, whereas the Spotted Bear section contains 7.17% on

average.

4. The Nyack section contains about 7% less potassium feldspar than that of the Spotted Bear secuon.

5. The non-undulose quartz (QNU) population at Nyack is 32.9% whereas in the Spotted Bear section it

is only 5.3%.

6. The Nyack section contains 43.19% undulose quartz grains (QU), which is a little more than one half

of the QU population m the Spotted Bear section.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 88

c) Fishtrap Creek Section

The Fishtrap Creek section of the Bonner Formation is also not very different from other sections of

the northern Bonner Formation. One of the most discemable difference between the Fishtrap Bonner and the

other three sections of the Northern Bonner is the presence of a large amount of very fine-grained matrix and a

large number of argillite beds in the Fishtrap section. Out of 133 samples only 34 are found sufficiently coarse

and sorted for point counting. Fig. 34 contains average detrital composition and other calculated parameters of

the Bonner at Fishtrap Creek.

The Fishtrap Creek section of the Bonner Formation is composed of siltite, argillite and very fine- to

medium grained, mature to sub-mature feldspathic arenite. Detrital grains are bonded by silica and senate

cement, whereas the matrix is composed of silt and clay. Medium- to fine-detrital grains are subrounded to well

rounded and generally moderately to poorly sorted.

Detrital Composition

Texture and detrital mineralogy of the Bonner Formation at Fishtrap is similar to that of the Libby,

Spotted Bear and Nyack sections of the Bonner Formation. Minor, but noticeable differences in the volume

percent of detrital minerals are described below.

1. Among the four sections of the northern Bonner Formation, the Fishtrap Section contains the highest

average amount (6.13%) of QpMic grains.

2. The Fishtrap Bonner contains up to 7% diagcnetic aibite, which is highest among all the sections of the

northern Bonner Formation.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 100 80 St.Dev Mean LJ Volume Percent 40 40 60 Bonner Formation Fishtrap Creek Section 20 ? Urn H 1 L L F K K Q u Qp QU OR MC MC Qm SRF PRF QpU CHT MIX CMT MRF QNU GRN QmU QpNU QmNU QpMac QpMicU IP M Irk ll I Graph showing compositionmean die oneand standard deviation detritalofdie Formation Fishtrap grains at ofdie Homier Creek Composition offramework grains asgiven percent oftotal framework grains: grains, cement matrix and shown as percent total ofrock 2 a C 5 QpMicU QPMicNU > » n m l I 12 6 QpMic C 10 QpMegU 8 QPMegNU Q.Q. QpMeg 2 0 Q. QpMacUU QPMacNU Figure 34 I

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 90

d) Libby Section

Being exposed almost vertically along the railway track, the Libby section of the Bonner is the most

weathered among all the northern sections of the Bonner Formation. It is mostly composed of very fine­

grained, generally well sorted feldspathic arenite. Out of 125 total samples collected from a 770 foot thick

section, only 25 samples are suitable for pomt counting based on freshness, grain size and sorting of the

samples. The Rest of the 100 samples are either deeply weathered, very fine-grained or are composed of

argillite or siltite. Therefore, the point count results may not be a true representation of the whole Libby section

of the Bonner Formation. However, the following results of the 25 samples (Fig. 35) may be used, with

reasonable confidence, for the interpretation of medium-grained feldspathic arenite beds of the Libby section of

the Bonner Formation.

Detrital Composition

On average samples are composed of medium to fine, moderately to well sorted. 67.4% grains. 20.8%

matrix and 12.0% silica and clay cement. The Libby Bonner differs from both the Spotted Bear and Nyack

sections texturally, but mineralogically it is very similar to that of Nyack section. Overall, the Libby Bonner is

very fine grained, mostly red siltite and argillite, and contains a large number of mud clasts. In some samples

the mud clasts make up to 25% of the sample. With a few exceptions Libby Bonner is composed of the same

type of grains and minerals as that of the Bonner at Nyack. A few noticeable differences are described below.

1. The amount of matrix in the Libby Bonner is far greater than that of Spotted Bear and Nyack.

2. The Libby Bonner is completely devoid of the mega-mosaic type of Qp. It, however, contains greater

amounts of macro-mosaic and non-undulose micro-mosaic types of Qp than those of the Spotted Bear

and Nyack sections.

3. On average the Libby Bonner is very nch in orthoclase (27.19%) but contains only 3.35% microcline.

4. The Libby Bonner contains the highest amount (18.11 %) of polycrystalline quartz grains among all

the northern sections of the Bonner Formation.

5. Amongst all the northern sections of the Bonner Formation, the Libby section contains the lowest

amount (50.45%) of mcnocrystalline quartz grains.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 100 I 60 St.Dev. Mean n Volume Percent 40 60 Libby Section Bonner Formation 20 L L K Lt Lt Q OR Qp MC MC QU SRF PRF CHT MRF QpU MTX CMT QNU GRN QpMac QpMeg QPMicNU QmU QPMic QpMegU framework grains given as percenttotal offramework grains, grains, matrix cement and shown as percent ofrock. total Graph showing (tie mean Graphcomposition showing (tie one and standard deviationdetrital of Formation the Composition ofat grains of Homier Libby. 2 QpMicU £ 5 h C n ss F 8 QPMegNU c m QmNU Qm ■O QPMacNU■O O. QpMacU 2 ? O U QpNU Figure Figure 35.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 92

e) Clark Fork Section

The Bonner Formation in the Clark Fork section is composed of siltite and argillite. Samples from

this section are very fine-grained and are not suitable for point counting. The mineralogy of the detrital grains is

very similar to that of the Libby and Fishtrap sections. The visual estimation reveals following information.

The samples are composed 60 to 80% of grains. 10 to 20% matrix and 5 to 15% cement. Samples

are well sorted, fine- to very-fine grained, angular to well rounded and are silicified. Detrital grains are mainly

composed of 60 to 75% Qm; 20 to 25% potassium feldspar, mostly orthoclase; 3-5% abitized k-spar. 2-5%

muscovite; 1 to 5% mud clasts and a trace of heavy minerals and hematite.

Except that the grains are finer, the other textural features of the detrital grams are similar to those in

the Fishtrap and Libby secuons.

The northern section of the Bonner Formation contain less detrital grains, slightly more matrix and are

well cemented than southern secuons. Overall the northern sections are composed of less quartzose grams than

those of southern sections, however the Qp population in the northern secuons is decreased condiderably. One

of the most discemable difference is the greater amount of potassium feldspar grains in the the northern

secuons. Table 6 contains average detrital composition of all the four northern sections of the Bonner

Formation.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 93

Table 6. Detntal constituents of the Bonner Formation in the m aem sections. Composition of framework

grains given as percent of total framework grains: grains, matrix and cement shown as percent of total rock.

Gr. Types/ Spotted Nyack Libby Fishtrap Mean SUDev. Parameters Bear Creek GRN 77.10 78.91 67.40 74.85 74.57 4.38 MTX 4.35 1.50 20.80 11.91 9.64 7.48 CMT 19.60 19.59 12.00 12.35 15.88 3.71 Q 81.41 76.09 68.51 75.79 75.45 4.59 QNU 5.30 32.90 16.37 5.73 15.07 11.21 QU 76.12 43.19 52.14 70.06 60.38 13.27 Qp 12.69 7.34 18.11 11.99 12.53 3.82 QpNU 1.36 1.62 5.67 1.78 2.60 1.78 QpU 11.33 5.72 12.44 10.21 9.93 2.55 Qm 68.73 68.75 50.40 63.80 62.92 7.50 QmNU 3.94 31.28 10.70 3.95 12.47 11.21 QmU 64.79 37.47 39.71 59.85 50.45 12.02 QpMeg 2.26 1.50 0.00 0.63 1.10 0.86 QPMegNU 0.36 1.13 0.00 0.19 0.42 0.43 QpMegU 1.89 0.37 0.00 0.44 0.68 0.72 QpMac 7.78 4.51 13.62 5.23 7.78 3.58 QPMacNU 0.61 0.32 3.20 0.99 1.28 1.13 QpMacU 7.17 4.18 10.42 4.24 6.50 2.56 QpMic 2.65 1.33 4.49 6.13 3.65 1.82 QPMicNU 0.38 0.16 2.47 0.60 0.90 0.92 QpMicU 2.27 1.17 2.02 5.53 2.75 1.66 F 15.81 23.01 30.54 22.79 23.04 5.21 K 15.81 23.01 30.54 22.79 23.04 5.21 MC 9.88 13.55 3.35 11.83 9.65 3.86 OR 5.93 9.47 27.19 10.96 13.39 8.18 L 1.85 0.69 0.45 0.67 0.92 0.55 CHT 0.92 0.21 0.50 0.75 0.59 0.27 PRF 0.84 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.34 MRF 1.02 0.36 0.45 0.67 0.63 0.25 SRF 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lt 15.46 8.24 19.06 13.41 14.04 3.91

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 94

BUFFALO HUMP FORMATION

The Buffalo Hump Formation of Deer Trail Group in north-eastern Washington is composed of upper

argillite and lower quartzite parts. Twenty four samples from a 300 foot thick quartzite part were collected for

detailed petrological study. Twenty one samples were selected for point counting as they contain enough

medium-sand size grams.

The BufFalo Hump Formation is very poorly sorted, medium- to very coarse-grained, variably silicified

quartz arenite. A few samples contain granule-sized quartz grains.

The samples are mature to sub-mature containing 70 to 98% grains, 0 to 20% matrix and 1 to 10%

cement. The matrix is a variable combination of very fine-sand, silt and clay. The cement is m a i n l y composed of

silica and sencite. Fig. 36 contains average detrital composition and other calculated parameters of the quartzite

part of the Buffalo Hump Formation. Detailed composition data are tabulated in Appendix 3.

Detrital Composition

The Buffalo Hump Formation is composed of, in decreasing abundance, monocrystalline quartz,

polycrystalline quartz, sedimentary rock fragments, chert, a few heavy minerals, and secondary quartz.

Monocrystaiime quartz (Qm) grains range from 26 to 76.67% of the total detntal grains. They are

generally poorly sorted, sub-rounded to well rounded, and contain very fine rutile needles and vacuoles.

Generally, coarser grains (granule) are more rounded than smaller grains, however, the reverse relationship has

also been observed in some samples. A few Qm are internally deformed showing vague polycrystalline texture

(composite quartz of Folk, 1980). All the quartz grains are strained, probably indicating post-depositional

deformation that has created undulose extinction.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 100 | n=li n=li X i 80 St. Dev St. Mean n ■ Volume PercentVolume 40 60 Buffalo Buffalo Hump Formation 20 L K F LI Q Q OR Qp MC QU QU Qm SRF PRF CHT MRF QpU MTX MTX QNU CMT CRN Qmll QpMic QpNU QmNU QpMac QpMeg QpMicU QpMicU QpMacU QpMegU QPMIcNU QPMacNU QPMegNU Graph showing (he mean Graph compositionshowing (he and one lump Formation. standardComposition of deviation die ofdetrital I grains ofButfulo the grainsframework given as percent oftotal framework grains: grains, matrix cement and shown as percent rock oftotal E 0) E E m c m a 0) a. >. E 3 a. T3 0 Figure 36

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 96

Polycxystailine quartz ranges from 10.67 to 65.00% averaging 38.13%. This amount of Qp in the

Buffalo Hump Formation is almost twice the amount of Qp in the Bonner Formation. Qp is mostly composed of

the undulose macro-mosaic type. Minor amounts of undulose micro-mosaic and mega-mosaic types are also

present

Rock fragments range from 0 to 15.33% and are only metamorphic and sedimentary types. Some

metamorphic rock fragments are composed of quartzose grains with minor amounts of muscovite flakes. Others

are polycrystalline grains with a preferred planar fabric and strongly sutured crystal-crystal boundaries. Most of

the sedimentary rock fragments are recycled quartz grains with quartz overgrowths. A few rounded

polvcrystalline grams, however, are composed of coarse silt-size quartz grains surrounded by senate matrix.

Rounded to subrounded, medium- to coarse-grained chert is found in a few samples. The amount of

chert does not exceed 1.95% in any sample. The chert grams appear cloudy in thin section, and some contain

very fine granular opaque mineral, probably hematite. Most of the chert grains are detrital, however, some are

diageneticaily replaced detrital grains. Diagenetic chert was probably formed by either replacement of the

ongmal mmeral(s) or the recrystallization of quartz grains. A fine "dust-line" (under plane light) along the

borders of the chert grains indicates a replacement origin. Some diagenetic chert grains are indented by

surrounding quartz grains and probably represent mud clasts that were completely replaced by quartz after

deposition.

Trace to rare amounts of muscovite, zircon, and apatite are present in more than half of the samples.

Detrital muscovite occurs ranging from trace amounts up to 2%. Detrital flakes usually lie parallel to the

bedding and are much larger (about 0.05mm by 1.0mm) than the metamorphic sericite. In places compaction

has brocken or bent the flakes indicating a detrital origin. Zircon grains are well rounded, medium- to very fine­

grained, and are light brown in color. Apatite grains are very fine-grained, sub-angular to sub-rounded, and are

colorless.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 97

The Buffalo Hump Formation is devoid of any kind of feldspar. However, in every thin section there

are a few completely altered grains whose ongin can not be inferred with the help of existing properties. It is

suspected that these unidentified grains were originally either feldspar or mud clasts.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 98

SWAUGER FORMATION

Variably deformed and incomplete sections of the Swauger Formation are exposed in a wide area

stretching from the Beaverhead Mountains to the southern end of the Lemhi Range in East Central Idaho. After

inspecting a number of sections, of which some were poorly exposed while others were well exposed, I selected

two well exposed sections for detailed study. The two sections, the Fourth of July Creek section and the Cranks

canyon section (see Fig. 2 for location), were measured (Appendix 6) and sampled, as they contain a number of

Swauger Formation charactersistics described by previous workers (RuppeL 1568, 1973, 1975,1986;Ruppel

and others, 1975; Ruppel and Lopez, 1988; MacKenzie, 1949; Hobbs, 1980; Ross, 1947,1961,1962, 1963;

and Anderson, 1961).

The Swauger Formauon is light-pink, pinkish-tan, purplish-gray to locally red, grayish-pink to pale-

purple or pale-red purple or less commonly light-brown to grayish-green, medium- to coarse-grained, fairly

pure, hematitic, well-sorted quartzite and commonly contains several percent feldspar. Beds are 1-2 m thick and

many are prominently and coarsely cross laminated; some are ripple marked. In places thick quartzite beds are

separated by as much as 30 cm thick beds of greenish-gray to dark-grayish green or grayish-red argillite. Total

thickness of the formation can not be determined, because the base of the formation is not exposed anywhere in

the region and the upper part of the formation was eroded before the deposition of the overlying rocks. It,

however, reaches to a maximum exposed thickness of 3,100 m near the East Fork of Hayden Creek (Ruppel and

others, 1975).

The two sections of the Swauger Formation, measured and described petro graphically, are the Fourth

of July Creek and Cranks Canyon sections. Description of the measured sections and their locations are

appended to the end of this Dissertation (Appendix 1 and 6). A detailed petrographic description is as follows.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 99

a) Cronks Canyon Section

The Swauger Formation at Cronks Canyon is composed of very fine- to medium-grained, moderate to

poorly sorted, hematitic, feldspathic quartz arenite. It is, however, not feldspathic at the base of the measured

section. The average grain size is 0.4 mm. The rocks are composed of 60 to 85% detrital grains, 10 to 35%

matrix and 3 to 10% cement. The matrix is composed of fine silt-sized quartz grains, whereas the cement is

silica, mostly in the form of overgrowth on quartz grains. Some samples are intensely silicified and contain more

than 30% silica cement and recrystallized quartz. Since both the ends of the exposed section are buried under

Challis Volcanics, silica may have come from these Tertiary volcanics. Only unsilicified thin sections and grains

with original crystal fabric were point counted. The mineralogy of the detrital grains are given below (Fig. 37).

Detrital Composition

The medium-grained fraction of the Swauger Formation at Cronks Canyon is composed of. in

decreasing abundance, monocrystalline quartz, microcline, polycrystalline quartz, orthoclase, metamorphic rock

fragments, and chert. Accessory minerals include, hematite, senate, muscovite, chlorite, zircon, rutile apatite

and tourmaline.

The monocrvstalline quartz (Qm) population makes up 81.21 to 100% of the total detrital grains.

These grains are sub-angular to well rounded, medium- to fine-grained and are both clear and vacuole-bearing.

Rutile inclusions are common. In some samples grains are indented into each other, making some grain

boundaries difficult to identify. All the Qm population has strong undulose extinction. Most of the grains are

common quartz (Folk, 1980), however, some are polygomzed with segmented undulosity (Young, 1976).

Quartz overgrowth was observed on some grains but such grains were not encountered during point counting.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. c 100 | nls T 60 St. Dev, St. Mean L7J Volume PercentVolume 40 60 Cronks Canyon Section Swauger Formation 20 ■> L F K Lt Q Qp OR MC QU Qm SRF PRF CHT MRF QpU MTX QNU CMT CRN QmU QpNU QmNU QpMac QpMeg showing mean compositionthe and one standardCiraph deviation ofdetrital the the grains Swaugerof Cronksat Formation Canyon Compositionofframework grains given as percent oftotal framework grains: grains, cement, and matrix shown as percent ofrock total QPMIcNU QpMacU QpMegU 2j QpMicU 5 |= QpMic £ C n 8 QPMegNU a >. c 2 Si S. •O QPMacNU y - o Figure 37

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 101

Hie polycrvstalline quartz (Qp) population makes up to 9.62% of total detrital grains and is generally

medium-grained, poorly sorted and subrounded to well rounded. All of the Qp population is composed of

undulose mega-mosaic and macro-mosaic types. QpMagU is twice as abundant as the QpMacU type. QpMagU

grains have a peculiar distribution in the exposed section. These grains do not appear until about 150 feet from

the base of the sectioa The QpMagU population increases rapidly from zero to as much as 7.6% at about 400

feet. In the rest of the section it decreases gradually but does not fade out completely. Although QpMacU grains

do not follow any particular trend, they are present in certain horizons and arc completely absent in others. Their

amount does not exceed 3.62% in any one sample.

Subrounded to well rounded, moderately well sorted, mostly medium-grained microcline (MC) is the

second most abundant mineral in the Swauger Formation at Cronks Canyon. It constitutes up to 9.27% of the

total detrital grains. In some thin secuons microcline grains are replaced by secondary quartz. Unlike the Bonner

Formauon. the microcline of the Swauger Formation is not overgrown diagenetically.

Texturally, detntal orthociase grains in the Swauger Formation are similar to microcline grams.

Orthoclase, however, only reaches a maximum of 6.05% of the detritus and averages 2.08%.

Rounded to subrounded, medium-grained chert makes up to 1.27% of the total detrital grains. Chert

grams generally appear blurred probably because of unidentifiable impunties and very fine hematite inclusions.

Unlike chert grains of the Bonner Formation, no ghost rhombs were observed in these chert grains.

Metamorphic rock fragments are medium- to coarse-grained and make up to 3.55% of the total detrital

grains. These grams are polycrystalline quartz, have strongly undulose extinction, crenulated crystal-crystal

boundaries, stretched subcrystals, and preferred planar fabric. The individual subcrystals range from 30 to 100

microns. MRFs are present m certain horizons and are completely absent in other horizons of the measured

sectioa

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 102

Among heavy minerals, zircon and rutile are the most abundant, but present in only less than half of the

samples. Unlike the Bonner Formation, zircon grains in the Swauger Formation are angular and are very fine­

grained. Single detrital rutile crystals are rare; they are, however, present in trace amount in a large number of

Qm grains as inclusions. Fine-grained apatite is found in oniy a few samples, whereas a medium-grained,

moderately sericitized, angular tourmaline fragment was encountered in only one sample (X-8).

Fine-grained muscovite flakes make up to 2% of the total detrital grains and are present in less than

half of the samples. Because of their abundance in argillite beds, the actual amount of muscovite flakes is at least

three times more than what is reported in Fig. 37. The samples from the argillite beds were not included in the

point counted samples.

Hematite constitutes up to 4% of the total rock and mainly present as very fine-grained aggregates. In

some samples the hemaute grains are concentrated in layers, (e.g. X-8; not included in Fig.37), not essentially

parallel to beds, indicating a post-depositional(?) origin.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 103

B) Fourth of July Creek Section

Although the Swauger Formation in the Fourth of July Creek section is mostly similar to that of the

Cronks Canyon section, it differs in overall grain size and the amount of feldspar. The mineralogy of the detrital

grains is summarized in Fig. 38.

Detrital Composition

One of the most noticeable differences is the presence of a thin conglomerate bed (1.5m) in the middle

part of the measured section. Matrix supported conglomerate beds contain rounded to sub-angular white

quartzite pebbles of up to 2cm in diameter. The amount of pebbles in the bed ranges from 10 to 25%. The

matrix is devoid of "angular" feldspar grains, which is also true for conglomerate of the Bonner Formation at

Wise River. The pebbles are composed of clear undulose mega-mosaic and macro-mosaic types of the Qp with

no high-grade schistose fabric. The conglomerate bed is not traceable laterally, therefore, it is not known in what

direction the bed thickens.

The second major difference is the presence of diagenetic albite in the Fourth of July Creek section.

Some of the previous workers (e.g. Ruppel, 1968; Ross, 1961) have reported detrital plagiociase in the Swauger

Formauon. This study, which is supplemented with micro-chemical analysis of all feldspar minerals in the

Swauger and Bonner formations, reveals that the sodic plagiociase grains with sharp albite twinning were

actually formed diagenetically, replacing most probably detrital potassium feldspar. The micro-chemical analysis

and their effect on provenance interpretation is discussed later.

The other differences are merely the variations in the volume percent of some detrital grams. These

differences are outlined below;

1. The Fourth of July Creek section of the Swauger Formation contains only 0.11% QpMeg as opposed to

2.44% at Cronks Canyon.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 100 80 St.Dev. Mean I. I. I Volume Percent 40 60 Swauger Formation Fourth of July Creek Section 20 L L F K K u Q Qp OR MC MC QU SRF PRF CHT MRF MTX CMT QNU GRN Composition framework ofgrains given aspercent oftotal framework grains: grains, matrix cementand shown percent rockas oftotal Graph allowing meanthe Graphcomposition allowing one standardand deviation detritaldie of grainsof die Swauger Creek July Formation ofFourdi at QpMicU IPMI/-KIII QPMacNU QpNU £ QpMicU 12 0) £ QPMicNU a QpMic C ™ QpMac QpMegU SQPM egNU Q- QpMeg c ra QmNU Qm & Xj 0L 0L QpMacU • T QmU a a QpU Figure Figure 38

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 105

2. The average amount of QpMac at Fourth of July Creek is to 4.13% up from 0.31% at Cronks Canyon.

3. The average feldspar content at Fourth of July Creek is almost twice (11.51 %) the amount present at

Cronks Canyon. This difference is because of an increase in the orthoclase population.

4. The Fourth of July Creek section does not contain any chert whatsoever.

5. Some samples from the Fourth of July Creek section contain a few SRFs which were not encountered

during point counting. These fragments are medium-grained, rounded to well rounded, and are

composed of coarse silt size quartz grains cemented together by clays and senate. These SRFs are not

mud clasts, and if they had been encountered during point counting, would have been counted as

detntal, far-travelled sedimentary rock fragments.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 106

Basin-Wide Lateral Distribution of Clast Types

[n this chapter the lateral distribution of each detrital clast type is discussed by comparing its average

abundance in each stratigraphic section. The discussion is supplimented by graphs showing mean volume

percentages of some detrital clast types followed by boxplots indicating the dispersal patterns across the basin.

Each detrital clast has a unique distribution pattern both laterally and vertically, however, only the major

framework gram populations are discussed here. Bar graphs and box plots of those detrital grains which are not

discussed in the text are appendixed to the end of this dissertauon (Appendix 7j. This comparison provides

some insight into the composition and the location of the source rocks as well as the direction of transport of

sediments. There are some contrasting differences in the clast type distribution of the Bonner Formation, the

Buffalo Hump Formation and to a certain extent the Swauger Formation. Therefore, all three formations arc

discussed individually.

BONNER FORMATION

Except for minor fluctuauons. the lateral distribution of the average total quartz population

(Q=Qm+Qp) in the Bonner Formation does not change significantly across the Belt basm (Fig. 39). The non-

undulose quartz (QNU) population decreases rapidly northward, by about 50% from the Wise River to the

Ernenne Lookout section and then gradually decreases towards Spotted Bear (Fig. 40). It increases sharply by

about 20% at Nyack and then decreases gradually towards the Fishtrap Creek section. On the other hand the

undulose quartz (QU) population follows an opposite trend (Fig. 41). It increases sharply from the Flint Creek

section (Wise River contains almost same amount of QU as that of Flint Creek) by about 40% at Emerine

Lookout and keeps increasing gradually up to the Spotted Bear sectioa The QU population decreases by more

than 30% at the Nyack section and then increases gradually towards the Fishtrap Creek section where the

average QU population is 70.06%. A decrease of about 20% occurs from Fishtrap Creek to Libby. The

southern sections of the Bonner Formation contain approximately twice the amount of polycrystalline quartz

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 107

Total Quartz (Q)

Basin-wide distribution

£fl»nr» laoftaut SeoSMB* i C M o n Stratigraphic sections

Figure 39. Graph showing the lateral distribution of total quartz population (Q=Qm+Qp)- A) Box plots: circles represent outliers and asterisks represent extreme outliers B) Bar graph: each vertical bar corresponds to the mean amount in the respective stratigraphic section.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 108

Non-Undulose Quartz (QNU)

9asin-wide distribution 5

so -

Stratigraphic sections

Figure 40. Graph showing the lateral distribution of non-undulose quartz (QNU) population. A) Box plots: circles represent outliers and asterisks represent extreme outliers B) Bar graph: each vertical bar corresponds to the mean amount in the respective stratigraphic section.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 109

Undulose Quartz (QU)

120- "SI 100 i 80 i 60 -i 40 i

2 0 - i 01 -15 65 26 47 31 20 46 34 25 21 r \ J2 A f X * XA-

Basin-wide distribution B

Figure 41. Graph showing the lateral distribution of undulose quartz population (QU). A ) Box plots: circles represent outliers and asterisks represent extreme outliers B) Bar graph: each vertical bar corresponds to the mean amount in the respective stratigraphic section.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. n o

than the northern sections, but the lateral distribution of the total Qp population does not follow any

recognizable trend (Fig. 42). However, the individual lateral distribution of the three mosaic types of Qp does

provide information for provenance interpretation. The Clinton section contains the highest amount of the

mega-mosaic polycrvstalline quartz (QpMeg) population (3.1%) of all nine sections of the Bonner Formation

(Fig. 43). The QpMeg population decreases gradually north and south of the Clinton section except for the

Wise River Section where it increases slightly. To the north the QpMeg is gone at Libby section. In general, the

average amount of QpMeg is more in the southern sections than those of northern sections. The average

amount of macro-mosaic polycrvstalline quartz (QpMac) increases northward from Clinton to Libby and

follows the same trend from Clinton to Wise River to the south (Fig. 44). The only exception is the Emerine

Lookout section where QpMac makes up about 20% of the total detrital grains, the highest among all nine

sections of the Bonner. The distribution of QpMac may not represent a significant trend across the basin,

however, it is evident that the southern sections have more than 10% QpMac whereas the northern sections

have about 5% except at Libby. The micro-mosaic polycrvstalline quartz (QpMic) has a slightly different

lateral distribution than those the of mega- and macro-mosiac types. It decreases from 10% at Wiser River to

! .3% at the Nyack secuon and then increases to about 6% at Fishtrap Creek and again decreases to 4.5% at

Libby (Fig. 45).

The average amount of total detntal feldspar generally increases northward (Fig. 46). To the south the

Emerine Lookout secuon contains 20.59%, whereas the Libby section contains as much as 30.5% potassium

feldspar. Microcline is the most abundant feldsar at the Emerine Lookout and Nyack sections (Fig. 47),

whereas orthoclase is most abundant at Libby and follows a southward decreasing trend towards Wise River

(Fig. 48).

The micro-chemical analyses (chapter 4) reveal that pagioclase feldspar grains in the Bonner

Formation are either diagenetic albite or albitized feldspar. Moreover, the amount of albite grains, including

albitized potassium feldspar grains, does not exceed 2% of the total grains. Therefore, they are not r Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. I l l

Polycrystalline Quartz (Qp)

Basin-wide distribution

Figure 42. Graph showing the lateral distribution of total polycrystalline quartz population (Qp). A) Box plots: Circles represent outliers and asterisks represent extreme outliers B) Bar graph .each vertical bar corresponds to the mean amount in the respective stratigraphic section.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 112

Mega-Moasic Qp (QpMeg) l4,------I2i _ A

Basin-wide distribution

Figure 43. Graph showing the lateral distribution of Mega-mosaic polycrystalline quartz (QpMeg) population . A) Box plots: Circles represent outliers and asterisks represent extreme outliers B) Bar graph .each vertical bar corresponds to the mean amount in the respective stratigraphic section.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 113

Macro-Mosaic Qp (QpMac) 70 — 60-! 50 i 40 -i 301

20 '■ 10-i a O', -101 _ 4 5 23 55 26 ■17 31 20 46 34 25 21

C j %% v s % 'A s \ \ v ^ a \ V). %

Basin-wide distribution B OiWUc

Stratlgrapnic secllcns

Figure 44. Graph showing the lateral distribution of Macro-mosaic polycrystalline quartz (QpMac) population. A) Box plots: Circles represent outliers and asterisks represent extreme outliers B) Bar graph .each vertical bar corresponds to the mean amount in the respective stratigraphic section.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 114

Micro-Mosaic Qp (QPMic)

2 0 ------A

Basin-wide distribution

i ffasSfl j W Mi ; W m ( m m u o o i Onon joc«QB« Stratigraonic sections

Figure 45. Graph showing the lateral distribution of Micro-mosaic polycrystalline quartz (QpMic) population. A) Box plots: Circles represent outliers and asterisks represent extreme outliers B) Bar graph ;each vertical bar corresponds to the mean amount in the respective stratigraphic section.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Total Feldspar (F)

Basin-wide distribution

Figure 46. Graph showing the lateral distribution of total detritai feldspar (F) population. A) Box plots: Circles represent outliers and asterisks represent extreme outliers B) Bar graph teach vertical bar corresponds to the mean amount in the respective stratigraphic section.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 116

Microcline (Me) 301------A

Basin-wide distribution B

Figure 47. Bar graph showing the lateral distribution of detrital microcline (MC) population. A) Box plots: Circles represent outliers and asterisks represent extreme oudiers B) Bar graph '.each vertical bar corresponds to the mean amount in the respective stratigraphic section.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 117

Orthoclase (Or)

Basin-wide distribution B

2 10

Strwigraptiic secdons

Figure 48. Graph showing the lateral distribution of detrital orthoclase (OR) population. A) Box plots: Circles represent outliers and asterisks represent extreme outliers B) Bar graph ;each vertical bar corresponds to the mean amount in the respective stratigraphic section.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 118

considered as detntal grams. The addition of albitized potassium feldspar grains in the unaltered potassium

feldspar population would not cause any significant change m the lateral distribution of feldspar grains.

The Lithic grains, excluding mud clasts, decrease sharply from south to north with the exception of

the Clinton section (Fig. 49). They make up 8% of the total framework of the Bonner in the Wise River section

and less than 1% at Libby. The 2.34% increase m lithic grains at Clinton relative to the Emerine Lookout

section is attributed to more abundant plutonic rock fragments (Fig. 50) at Clinton. This difference is mainly

because of plutonic rock fragments at Clinton. Individually, the plutonic and metamorphic rock fragments

(MRF) follow the same trend of northward decrease (Fig. 51).

It is difficult to deduce any specific lateral trend in the distribution of chert grams (CHT) because they

comprise a maximum of only 1.5% of the total detrital grains. The neglible variations m the distribuuon of

chert grams across the basin may not be useful, but their presence, even though a small amount, is a strong

indication of the composition of the source rock. This aspect of the chert grams is discussed in the provenance

chapter.

Total lithic grams (Lt=L+CHT+Qp) decrease from Wise River to Nvack. but tend to increase

gradually from Nyack to Libby (Fig. 52).

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 119

Lithic Fragments (L) -A!

10-i

Basin-wide distribution

Stratfgrapmc (actions

Figure 49. Graph showing the lateral distribution of lithic grains (L) population. A) Box plots: Circles represent outliers and asterisks represent extreme outliers B) Bar graph ;each vertical bar corresponds to the mean amount in the respective stratigraphic section.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 120

Plutonic Rock fragments (PRF)

s i

4-;

* 21 A. 01 -2 J_ y = 45 65 26 ■17 31 20 46 34 25 21 c ,. \ *■ % % <¥ \

Basin-vwde distribution B

Stratigtapblc section*

Figure 50. Graph showing the lateral distribution of plutonic rock fragments (PRF) population. A) Box plots: Circles represent outliers and asterisks represent extreme outliers B) Bar graph ;each vertical bar corresponds to the mean amount in the respective stratigraphic section. r Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 121

Metamorphic Rock Fragments (MRF) 20i------A

101

Basin-wide distribution B

4

C h ao . jgS a > §2© S

1

a WCm C n m M M CMn Stratigrapwc sections

Figure 51. Graph showing thelateral distribution of metamorphic rock fragments (MRF) population. A) Box plots: Circles represent outliers and asterisks represent extreme outliers B) Bar graph .each vertical bar corresponds to the mean amount in the respective stratigraphic section.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 122

Total Lithic Fragments (Lt) 8 0 ~

60 i

401

201

0 - i ■ = -20 J_ 45 65 26 47 31 20 46 34 25 21 th \ S . \ V v a \ \ \

Basin-wide distribution B

Straflgiaptilc sections

Figure 52. Graph showing the lateral distribution of total lithic grains (Lt=L+CHT+Qp) population A) Box plots: Circles represent outliers and asterisks represent extreme outliers B) Bar graph ■.each vertical bar corresponds to the mean amount in the respective stratigraphic section.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 123

Comparison with the Buffalo Hump Formation

The detrital mineralogy of the Buffalo Hump Formation contrasts sharply from the lateral trends of the

clast types of the Bonner Formation. The average Qp population in the Buffalo Hump (38.13%) is far greater

than the Libby section (18.11%), the northern-most section of the Bonner Formation (and closest to the Buffalo

Hump outcrops). Moreover, all the Qp grains of the Buffalo Hump have undulose extinction, whereas the

Bonner at Libby contains up to 10% QpNU. The strong undulosity in the quartzose grains of the Buffalo Hump

Formation may have developed by the Cretaceous or earlier deformation but, at present, this cannot be verified.

The Buffalo Hump is rich in QpMeg (3.4%) and QpMac (29.66%) as compared to the Bonner at Libby which

is completely devoid of QpMeg and contains only 13.62% QpMac. The Buffalo Hump contains no feldspar of

any kind, whereas the Bonner at Libby has more than 30% potassium feldspar. The Buffalo Hump is comprised

of 4.63% metamorphic and sedimentary rock fragments, whereas the Bonner at Libby contains less than 0.5%

metamorphic rock fragments only.

Comparison with the Swauger Formation

Unlike the Buffalo Hump, the Swauger Formation has trends more or less similar to those of the

Bonner. The two. mutually related differences are: 1) a lower population of Qp (<5%); and 2) a greater

population of Qm (-93%) in the Swauger. QpMac and QpMic have the same trend of southward decrease, as

was seen in the Bonner, however, the QpMeg population does not follow this trend. The Cranks Canyon

secuon (the southernmost section of the Swauger) contains 2.44% QpMeg, as compared to 0.11% in the Fourth

of July Creek section, the section which is located between Wise River and Cranks Canyon. The 5-12%

feldspar population in the Swauger compares closely to that of the Wise River and Flint Creek sections, but is

less than at Emerine Lookout and Clinton. The same case is seen with the lateral distribution of rock fragments.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. CHEMISTRY OF FELDSPAR GRAINS

Provenance determination of feldspar in sedimentary rocks has been largely restricted to optical

methods (e.g. Pittman, 1963 and 1970). Suttner and Basu (1977) found that single crystal X-ray diffraction can

be useful for provenance determination of coarse and very coarse grains of alkali feldspar. Van der Plas ( 1966,

p. 48), Blatt, Middleton and Murray (1972), and Pettijohn, Potter and Siever (1973) recognized the potential of

the electron microprobe for provenance studies of detrital feldspar. However, microprobe work on feldspar in

sandstone, except for the study by Sibley and Pentony (1978), has focused mainly on authegenic feldspar

(Kastner, 1971; Odom. 1975; Stablein and Dapples, 1977; Garbarini and Carpenter, 1978; and Kastner and

Siever, 1979).

For many reasons the electron microprobe is well-suited for studies of feldspar provenance. Detntal

feldspar grains in a sandstone potentially are derived from many different source lithologies. Detrital feldspar

must be analyzed grain by grain, and because the number of possible source rocks of a sandstone is potentially

large, many feldspar grains should be analyzed. The microprobe is capable of rapidly analyzing feldspar on a

gram by grain basis. Analysis for major elements in feldspar can be done in approximately 10 seconds; minor

elements can be analyzed in approximately 30 seconds. This analytical speed allows many analyses to be made

in a relatively short time. Electron probe microanalysis requires no mineral separation and is not severely

affected by sample contamination problems. Because an electron beam may be finely focused to approximately

1 pm, very minute areas can be analyzed.

124

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Table 7. Range of Molecular composition of feldspars in sandstones derived from various provenance. (After

Trevena and Nash, 1981).

Composition of Feldspars (Weight %)

Feldspar Type Albitc Anorthite Orthoclase

[NaAiSi,Cy [CaAl,Si,Osj [KAlSi,OJ

i.Ab) (An) (Or)

Alkali Feldspar

Metamorphic 2-47 0-2 51-98

Plutomc 2-43 0-1 56-98

Volcanic 12-74 1-13 13-87

Authegemc 98-100 0-1 98-100

Placnoclase

Metamorphic 70-97 0-70 0-4

Plutonic 15-97 1-84 0-8

Volcanic 55-95 0-97 0-88

Authegemc 98-100 0-1 98-100

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 126

Feldspar is considered to be a useful provenance indicator because it is abundant in tnanv sedimentary

basins and because the variations in its chemical and physical properties have genetic implications. Feldspar,

which forms in the plutonic environment, for example, has inherent physical and chemical properties which

differ from those of feldspar which formed in the volcanic and metamorphic environments (Helmold, 1985).

Trevana and Nash (1981) compiled over 5,000 microprobe analyses of feldspar from crystalline rocks (Fig. 53).

These analyses indicate that potassium content is a useful parameter for determining the origin of both

piagioclase and alkali feldspars. Maximum potassium content of plagiociase gradually decreases from volcanic

to plutonic to metamorphic environments (Fig. 53). Due to the subtle nature of this trend, however, the fields of

high-potassium volcanic and plutonic piagioclase partially overlap, and those of low-potassium metamorphic

and plutonic piagioclase are also similar. Volcanic alkali feldspar vanes widely in potassium content with its

composition ranging from Ab. 4Anu0 ro to AbnAn,Orj., while aikali feldspar from both plutonic and

metamorphic rocks are potassium nch. Plutonic alkali feldspar ranges in composition from Ab 4 3 An,Orw to

Ab.AnjOr^g and alkali feldspar from metamorphic rocks ranges from Ab 1 7 AiuOr„ to Ab.An 0 Orw (Trevena and

Nash. 1981).

Trevana and Nash (1981) proposed eight provenance groups in the albite-anorthite-orthoclase ternary

diagram which define the compositional range of feldspar from the various crystalline environments (Fig. 53).

These groups can be used as a guide for determining the source of detrital feldspar from sandstones. Trevana

and Nash (1981) interpret the high-potassium piagioclase to be mostly of volcanic origin and the low-potassium

plagiociase to be derived from plutonic and/or metamorphic rocks. On the other hand, potassium-nch alkali

feldspar is most likely derived from plutonic and/or metamorphic rocks, whereas the intermediate alkali feldspar

is generally volcanic and/or plutomc in origin.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. a * m p * —^ o> An to Or An 1 0 1 0 and Nash, 1981) from volcanic rocksgroups B) of feldsparsFeldspar from v plutonic= volcanic, rocks. p = plutonic, C) Feldspar m = metamorphic, from metamorphic v+g = rocksvolcanic or I)) grunophyre, Compositional vtp =range volcanic ofeight or plutonic,provenance ptrn = plutonic or metamorphic, v+p+tn = volcanic or plutonic or metamorphic, p+m+a = plutonic or metamorphic or authegcnic (from Trevenu A b Figure 53 Composition offeldspar (weight percent) in igneous and inetumorphic rocks as determined by electron microprobe analysis. A) feldspar

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 128

Because many workers (e.g., Helmold, 1985. and references therein) consider the analyses of Trevana

and Nash (1981) to be the most comprehensive and reliable, therefore, the eight provenance groups proposed by

Trevana and Nash in the Ab-An-Or (albite-anorthite-orthoclase) ternary diagram will be used in this dissertation

for analyzing the source of detrital feldspar in the Bonner and the Swauger formations. As expressed earlier, the

traditional petrographic study of the samples from the Bonner Formation does not provide enough information

for a definitive provenance conclusion. Therefore, more than 200 feldspar grains from different sections of the

Bonner Formation were selected for microprobe analyses to supplement the existing provenance information

deduced from traditional optical methods.

Feldspar Grains of the Bonner Formation

The Bonner Formauon contains 9 to 20% feldspar in the southern sections and 15 to 33% feldspar

grains m the northern sections (Table 5 and 6 ). As already mentioned in the descriptive mineralogy section, the

southern Bonner Formation contains only potassium feldspar, whereas the northern Bonner Formation contains

small amounts (1-3%) of plagiociase in addition to potassium feldspar. Initially, the twinned piagioclase grains

of the northern Bonner appeared to me to be detrital, but later a closer examination, supplemented by the

microanalysis of feldspar grains, revealed that the these grains are actually either diageneuc albite or albitized K-

spar grams. The 1 -2% piagioclase in the northern Bonner secuons can be explained by post-depositional

mterstratal alteration of feldspar to sericite which releases Na to form albite (McBride. 1984). The possibility of

interstratal alteration of feldspar is supported by the presence of a large number of sericitized detrital grains, and

by the presence of senate matnx. On the other hand the presence of rounded to subrounded piagioclase grams

in the northern Bonner Formation can be explained by the albitization of detrital potassium feldspar grains.

Metamorphic albite grains are euhedral in shape and appear more cioudy than the diageneticallv albitized grains.

More than two hundred feldspar grains from eight stratigraphic sections of the Bonner Formation and

from one section of the Swauger Formation were analyzed for all major oxides as well as for barium and

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 129

strontium with an ARL EMX-SM 3-channel electron microprobe. Analytical conditions are given in Appendix

4. Care was taken to analyze only unaltered parts of feldspar grains. Analyses that totalled less than 95.0

percent or greater than 101.5 percent feldspar (weight percent) were eliminated. The rem aining analyses were

recalculated with the help of the ROCKWORKS computer program (Rockware, 1992) so that An + Or + Ab

totalled 100 percent by weight. Reported analyses are considered to be accurate to with in ±2% of the amount

of major components present.

Compositions of detntal feldspar grains are represented within the triangular diagrams as weight

percent anorthite (An), orthoclase (Or), and albite (Ab) in Fig. 54. Results of the microprobe analyses of

feldspar grams are discussed below.

POTASSIUM FELDSPAR OF THE BONNER FORMATION

The potassium feldspar (orthoclase and microcline) content of the Bonner Formation averages about

20 percent. The microprobe study reveals that most of the detntal K-spar m the Bonner is generally a high

potassic variety containing between 93 and 98% orthoclase. However, a few grains contain less orthoclase

amounts. According to Trevana and Nash (1981) the composition of most of these grains is typical of any

metamorphic or plutomc rock. All the grains, except one, plot m the metamorphic+plutonic field (Fig. 54). The

exceptional gram (sample E-32) from the Flint Creek section contanins 69.69% orthoclase and 29.55% albite.

Although in Trevena and Nash's (1981) figure this grain plots in the volcanic + plutomc + metamorphic field,

the volcanic origin is very unlikely because it is not supported by the detrital mineralogy of the sample.

However, the sharp difference between the composition of this gram and all other grains suggests a different

origin.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. The albite content of most of the K-spar grams m the Bonner Formation ranges from 2.12 to i I

weight percent. The anorthite content in all of the analyzed grains does not exceed 0.59 weight percent

molecule. A summary of microprobe results is tabulated in Table 8 .

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 131

C 3 y

< II oc

%>» 2 CO it

E» <3 y C2 -3 soy o > c. v : ^II t3 tn s s ~ w O y - -

—J ^ ii un y

C -£ « *

d1 'C = a H ^ c •I) jT

w5 a 2 id • 3 ^ 3 > .S g l.'n*vj

O= 1 O •- o

-Q u"lT a

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 132

Table 8 . Compositional range of potassium fledspar and their minor element contents. Iron, barium and strontium are expressed as oxide weight percent.

Name of Composition of Iron Barium Strontium the Section K-suar fWt%) fW t%l fW t% ) fWf/.-i N

Southern Bonner Foarmation

Wise River Ab^An^Or^, - Ab-TAn 0 OrWJ 0-0.50 0 -0 . 0 2 0 -0 . 0 1 29

Flint Creek Ab,;An 1 0 Or,5 S - Ab^An^-jOr^- 0-0.45 0 -0 . 0 2 0-015 2 0

Emerine Peak Abj2 An 0 Or

Clinton Ab^jAn^ggOr^g - Ab,,-AiV)ioOr^ 2 0-0.40 0 -0 . 0 2 0-0.015 31

Northern Bonner Formation

Spotted Bear Ab-gAnoOr,^- - AbnjAngjjoOr^g 0-0.52 0-0.03 0 -0 . 0 2 1 1

Navak Ab--Anq iqOt

Fishtrap Creek Ab^^AnoujOrg., * Ab,AnO IOn)4, 0-0.45 0-0.03 0 -0 . 1 0 6

9 Libby AbgAllojjOr^j * AbggAnggOTgj- 0-0.50 0 -0 . 0 2 0 -0 . 0 1

Clark Fork N.A.

Swauger Formation

Cranks Canyon N.A.

Fourth of July Ab, gArig [ - Ab, ,Ano;oOr , 3 T 0-0.47 0-0.018 0-0.014 1 0

Creek

Buffalo Hump Formation

Buffalo Hump No Feldspar

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 133

The albite composition within potassium feldspar grams show some important stratigraphic trends.

The albite content increases upward in more or less every stratigraphic column. i.e.. the K-spar becomes more

sodic up the stratigraphic section at the expense of potassium. This relationship is very obvious in the Emerine

Lookout section (Fig. 57), whereas it is slightly less obvious at Wise River and Flint Creek sections (Figs. 57-

56). The section at Clinton does not reveal this relationship at all (Fig. 58), however, this pattern is again

observable in the Spotted Bear and Nvack sections (Figs. 59-60). In the Fishtrap Creek (Fig. 61) and Libby

sections (Fig. 62) this pattern does not occur.

Minor Elements in Bonner K-Feldspar

Iron, barium and strontium are frequently detected in feldspar. Other elements in feldspar are discussed

by Smith (1974).

Because iron solubility in the feldspar phase is likely to be greater at higher temperatures, iron content

is considerably higher (1 to 3.5%) in volcanic feldspar (Basu and Vitaliano, 1976; Carmichael. 1967; Cundari,

1975) than in plutomc or metamorphic feldspar (Bohlen and Essene, 1977; Eamst and others. 1970; Immega

and Klien. 1976; Rock. 1978).

The non content of the Bonner K-Feldspar :s extremely low. and in some cases even below the

detection limit. In any sample the amount of total iron does not exceed 0.5 weight percent At present scant

information on the non content of feldspar limits the usefulness of non analyses for feldspar provenance studies.

Barium substitutes readily for K in orthoclase, forming a continuous solid solution series KAISi,0„-

BaAl.Si.O, (orthoclase-celsiun). Only a small number of analyses are avaliable for barium in feldspar of igneous

and metamorphic rocks (Carmichael, 1967; Evans and Guidotti. 1966; Nash and other, 1969).

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 4s. " " •* K-spa, m m content » lie

'

m m 1 Sample Number

m rn m m m

1 f

m

• I

B-14 B-14 B-22 B-28 B-28 B-32 B-40 B-52 B-60 Bonner Formation ■

Wise River Section (n-29) B-14 B-14 B-22 B-22 B-28 B 32 B 40 B-52 B-60 B-75 • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 B-14 B-14 B-14 B-22 B-28 B-32 B-32 B-40 B-52 B-75 llasc |„p 8 6 0 4 2 12 10

c s u g> (U t x: § threeone analysesof grain at different points. Figure Figure 55. Albite content deliitul ofpotassium feldspar grains from Wise River section Formation, ofpoint correspondsthe Homier Hach mean ofto CD ~5 Q. o Q.

■o with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. n

_ Cl

U

ui

Li.

O CO CM o One One point (in sample E-32) is out of scale that contains 29% albite. * * three three analyses of one grain at dittei cnt points Figure Figure 56 AJbilc content ofdelrilaJ potassium feldspur gruins from Him Creek section of the Hoiuicr Form ation, liuch point corresponds to iiieiin o f

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. n u> u> O ►—* ►—* Sample Number Bonner Formation F-4 F-4 F-14 F-14 F-U F-^6 F-U F-^Q F-!j8 F-42 F-42 F ^7 F-^7 F-kfl F-kfl F-^9 F-U Emerine Lookout Section (n=17) " *bto content in K-apar liuac | ()p

2 10 12

g> g> a> C 8 4 ) 2: i 6 § Albite content dctrital ofpotassium feldspar grums from limerine l.ookout point corresponds Formation section ofthe Homier such mean to I of three onulyses of one ofgrain of differentthreeat points onulyses Figure 57

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ►*—» lop • Albite Content in K-spar Sample Number Clinton Section (n=31) Bonner Formation M-1 M-1 M-1 M-7 M-7 M-15 M-15 M-15 M-21 M-26 M-26 M-29 M-29 M-29 M-31 M-31 Base 0 M-1 1 M-1 1 M-7 1 M-7 ' M-7 M-15 1 ' M-15 M-21 M-21 1 1 ' M-26M-26 M-29 1 1 ' M-29 M-29 M-31 1 1 ' M-31 12 10 ) ) CT> 0 c 8 0 CL 2 analyses of one analyses ofgrain different at points. Figure 58. content Aibite ofdetrilul potassium ofFonuutumthe Homier feldspar pointgrains inch corresponds Clintonfrom .section of three nicun to I

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. o CO CN o three three analyses of one grain at different points Figure Figure 59. Albite eonlciu of dclrital |>olns.suim feldspar grams from .S|ioltcd Hear section of (lie Homier Formation lurch point corresponds to mean o f

L Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Sample Number Nyack Section (n=13) K‘spar ,n " Con,ent Albite Bonner Formation I I I I I I I I I I I I I j H-4 H-4 H-4 H-4 H-4 H-39 H-39 H-53 H-53 H-73 H-73 H-73 H-73 ^ a5C 'lop 2 12 10 ) * 4> g i 0 2 CL Albite conlcnl of detritul Albite detritul potassiumconlcnl of feldspar grams from sectionNyack ufthe lionnei hinnalion. pointtiacti correspondsone ofgrain analyses ofmean to three at different points. Figure 60.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. _§ Homier Formation. inch I point corresponds to mean of three 3214 ''' • '''

luaojaj WDia/w analyses of one grain ut dilTerenl points Figure Figure 61 Albile content of delrital potassium leldspui gruin.s from f'islitrap se c '

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. SL , _ S ( 0 Q c

I . - S o Q O £ a 7 O 6214 Q w 03 A E 3 O 7 —T Q _03 CL E co _SW

.2 ST *-* it ■ . I «* = ; ' _ q E C : o ••= S _«? u. (n 1 q C >* = S O g Q CQ ■ - d

CM O ® CD CM T— juaojad w6(a/v\ analyses of one grain at dilfcrenl points. Figure Figure 62. Albite eoiuenl of delrilul potassium feldspar gruins from l.ibby sec": i Homier Formation. Haoh point corresponds to mean of three

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 142

Authegemc K-spar may contam substantial amounts of barium (Bjrfriykke and Griffin, 19731. Barium is present

in most of the feldspar grains of the Bonner Formation. Its amount, however, ranges from 0-0.55 weight percent

No distinction could be made between metamorphic and piutonic feldspar based on barium content.

Strontium was included in feldspar analysis from the Bonner Formation. However, the available results

are not reliable for any turther interpretation because in most samples the strontium was below the detection

limit of the microprobe. Moreover, strontium content has not been routinely analyzed in microprobe studies of

igneous and metamorphic feldspar, and its distribution is yet to be understood.

ALBITE OF THE BONNER FORMATION

Four out of nine stratigraphic secuons of the Bonner Formauon contam 0-2% albite grains. All of these

secuons are located in the northern part of the basin. Twenty eight albite grains from sixteen samples were

analyzed for detailed micro-chemical analyses.

The micro-chemical analyses reveal that most of the albite grains were diageneticaily formed. A few

grains are newly formed, almost pure, and angular crystals with sharp albite twinning and inferred to be

diageneuc, whereas others are albitized k-spar with no or very little anorthite and very little orthoclase content.

All. but two. albite grains are a highly sodic variety containing more than 98 weight percent albite. The

orthoclase content generally ranges from 0.05 to 1.64 weight percent, whereas the anorthite molecules make up

to 2.95 weight percent.

Although most of the grains plot in the authegemc albite field of Trevena and Nash's ternary diagram

(1981), a few plct in the metamorphic+plutomc field. The grains which plot in the authegenic field are fine­

grained angular crystals with sharp albite twinning, whereas the grains that plot in the lower left comer of the

metamorphic+plutonic field are rounded to subrounded medium- to fine-grained with slightly obfuscated albite

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 143

twinning. Considering the post-depositional diagenetic changes and low grade of metamorphism in the

sediments of the Bonner Formation, replacement of K-spar grains by albite may have been incomplete leaving

samll amounts of orthoclase molecules in most of the albite grains.

The orthoclase content of diagenetic albite in the Libby section decreases upsection. whereas the albite

content follows the reverse trend with the exception of two grains, one in sample D-36 and the other in sample

D -104. These grains have a relatively higher weight percent of orthoclase (0.69 and 0.72%. respectively)

compared to the other grains.

The two exceptional grains, that have different chemical composition than those described above, are

from sample numbers A-10 and A - 8 8 of the Fishtrap Creek section. The gram in sample number A -10 contains

8 . 8 weight percent anorthite which is unusually high compared to the rest of the grains. Although this gram plots

in the metamorphic+plutomc field, the higher An and lower Ab contents indicate a different origin. The other

grain from sample A- 8 8 , with a composition of Ab^^A n^O r,, qj, plots right at the boundary between the

volcanic and volcamc+ metamorphic+piutonic fields. Trevana and Nash's figure suggests that it is very unlikely

that a feldspar gram with more than 40% albite has either plutonic or metamorphic origin. On the other hand it

is very likely that such a gram could have been derived from a volcanic rock. It is. therefore, suggested that this

gram was probably derived from a volcanic rock, however, the detrital mineralogy of the sample does not concur

with this conclusion. Since most minerals formed in a volcanic environment are less resistant to weathering and

do not survive long transport distances, it is not reasonable to expect more volcanic feldspar grains and other

volanic rock fragments m dominantly fine-grained clastic rock, like the Bonner Formation in the northern part of

the Belt basin.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 144

Potassium Feldspar of the Swauger Formation

Detrital potassium feldspar from the Swauger Formation does not differ greatly from that of the Bonner

Formation. Although, all the data points plot in the same plutonic+metamorphic field (Fig. 63), the albite

content of the Swauger K-feldspar is generally lower than the Bonner K-feldspar- The microchemical analyses

revealed that the K-feldspar of the Swauger ranges from Ab 4An<,-Orw to AbjAn^ jOr,* and is obviously a high

potassic variety. Unlike southern sections of the Bonner Formation, no specific trend in the vertical distribution

of K-feldspar composition can be detected in the Swauger Formation. Similarly no difference is detectable in the

minor element contents of Swauger and Bonner feldspar.

ALBITE OF SWAUGER FORMATION

Out of two stratigraphic sections of the Swauger Formation, only the Fourth of July Creek section

contains up to 1.5% aibite grains. All but two grains contain more than 99 weight percent albite. One gram

from sample W-1 contains 2.38% anorthite, which is relatively higher than the other grains. Another gram from

sample W-31 contains a slightly higher amount of orthoclase.

All the grains plot m the plutomc + metamorphic + authegemc field. Considering the non-detntal

texture, I consider all the albite grains of the Swauger Formation to be authegenic.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. iiiji Sample Number Swauger Formation W-1 W-7 W-11 W-15 W-19 W-19 W-21 W-29 W-31 W-31 F ourth of July Cr. S ec tio n (n=10) " A,bi,e content of K spar Hrtic 0 I I I I 2 12 10

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. PROVENANCE

Themineralogy of the detrital grains in siliciclastic sedimentary rocks furnishes the primary evidence

for interpreting the lithologies of the parent rocks in the source areas. Our knowledge of the lithoiogy of the

rifted and drifted or vanished ancient mountain systems rests mainly on analyses of detrital framework modes of

siliciclastic rocks of the remaining deposits. Mineralogy also provides the most useful evidence for interpreting

tectonic setting because source rock lithoiogy commonly reflects tectonic setting (Ingersofl, 1S30). Detrital

mineralogy may also provide some insight into climatic conditions given that mineralogic maturity of sediments

is determined in part by selective destrucuon of minerals at weathering sites (Basu, 1985). Weathering under

very cold and very dry conditions is slow, allowing unstable minerals to be preserved. whereas intensive

weathering under hot. humid conditions does not Thus, detrital minerals provide some clues to climate.

Analyzing the chemical composition of some minerals in the detrital grains, may more precisely reflect source

rock lithologies (Crook. 1974; Bhatia. 1983,1985).

The petrology and the micro-chemical analyses reveal that the Buffalo Hump Formation is not a

correlative of the Bonner Formation, whereas, the Swauger Formauon only partly resembles the Bonner. The

Swauger and Bonner are not similar enough to establish a turn correlation between the two formations and the

Swauger may represents an extension of the Mount Shields Formation below the Bonner mto east central Idaho.

Therefore, in this chapter the provenance of the Bonner. Buffalo Hump and Swauger formauons are discussed

separately.

Bonner Formation

Provenance identification of the Bonner Formation is complicated by the fact that potential source

rocks of the Precambrian basement may have been rifted away during the Late Precambnan (Ross and others.

1992; Young, 1984). In addition, our understanding of Precambrian paleogeography and paleotectonics of this

146

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. I

147

region is still incomplete. However, the detntal mineralogy provides important constraints about source rock

lithologies whereas the distribution of different clast types across the basin provides insight to the possible

location of the source rocks, the direction of paleoflow within the basin, and the Proterozoic tectonics of the

basin.

The clastic mineral assemblage of the Bonner Formation indicates at least four types of source

lithologies. Three of these source rocks shed sediments from the south/southwestem side of the basin, whereas

the fourth source rock provided sediments from the north/northwest A hypothetical model for the

south/southwestem source terrane is given in Fig. 64. The Lithoiogy of each source rock is described below.

Source Rock 1

Rounded undulose monocrystalline quartz grains, rounded undulose polycTystalline quartz grains,

rounded metaquartzite pebbles, rounded schistose and gneissose rock fragments, and rounded zircons all reflect

a medium to high grade metamorphic source terrane. Consequently, I group them genetically into what I

interpret to have been the major source terrane of medium to high grade metamorphic rocks composed of

quartzites. schists, and gneisses. The quartzite suggests that this source rock was probably formed by regional

dvnamothermal metamorphism of older sedimentary rocks. Rounded zircons of ca. 2.6 Ga (Ross and others,

1991) probably belong to this population and suggest that this source terrane may have been of Archean age. A

high degree of rounding of detntal zircon grains suggests a second cycle of transportation (Basu. 1985).

Therefore. Archean rocks may have been eroded and deposited on top of source rock 3 (discussed later) before

being reworked into the Belt basm. The northward fining trend of this population of grains, from the Wise River

to the Clark Fork secuons. indicates introduction from south of the Wise River section and transport northward

down the alluvial apron. As the sediments of this terrane travelled down the apron, the monocrystalline quartz

grains fined to silt size. Most of the siltite in the northern sections are Qm grains. The polycrystalline quartz

sand grains, with their comparatively weak internal grain boundaries (Blatt and Christie, 1963), may have

broken into angular grains, thus increasing the total Qm population in the north.

L______Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 148

S N

Southern source terrane

Source Rock 1 Medium to high grade metamorphic rocks

f- \V ♦ ’ k s Source rock 2 High potassium feldspar granite 4 {:

Source rock 3 Siliciclastic and carbonate rocks

Figure 64. Schematic block diagram of the composition of the southern source terrane (source rock 1,

2 ,and 3 as discussed in the text).

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Similarly the quartztte pebbles not only became smaller by sorting, but also started breaking into smaller pieces.

This disintegration has been noticed at the Flint Creek, Emerine Lookout, and Spotted Bear sections where the

size of the quartzite pebbles is considerably finer and these sections contain more monocrystalline quartz (Qm)

relative to the total quartz population. A few half round quartzite grains at Spotted Bear indicate the spliting of

larger quartzite pebbels. Further transport sorting and breakage of quartzite grains left only 1% polvcrystalline

grains m the Libby and Clark Fork sections. The angular shape of most of the Qm grains in the southern sections

indicates that these grains are the product of both quartzite and Qp population degradation. The Qm grains in

the northern part of the Bonner Formation are fine- to very fine-grained except in a small number of coarse­

grained beds where a few or no Qm grains range from medium- to coarse sand size.

The gneiss and schist rock fragments abrade more easily than quartz. Consequently, these grains did

not last long m the drainage system and dropped out of the quartz population before reaching the Fishtrap, Libby

and Clark Fork sections. Similarly, the zircon grains evolved from rounded in the Wise River section to well

rounded and very fine-grained in the Libby and Clark Fork sections. Most of the detrital muscovite grains may

have also been derived from this metamorphic source rock, because, like other detrital grains, the muscovite

flakes also become finer in size, but remain mostly fresh because of the higher resistance to physical and

chemical disintegration. Figure 64 is the proposed model that shows the lithoiogy of the source rock 1 and its

straugraphic relationship with the source rock 2 and 3.

Source Rock 2

Angular to sub-rounded potassium feldspar, angular to sub-rounded monocrystalline quartz, angular

granitic rock fragments and subhedral zircon and monazite grains represent source rock 2. This group of clasts

are mostly medium- to coarse-grained in the southern sections. The fresh and angular shape of the grains

radicate that this source rock was located very close to the southern part of the Bonner alluvial apron, probably

very close to the Wise River section. Similar to source rock 1, the detrital grains from this source tend to fine

northward from the Wise River to Libby section. Early Proterozoic, 1.64 to 1.79 Ga. angular zircon grains of

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. L50

Ross and others (1991) may have come from this source. The preserved detrital mineralogy of the southern part

of the Bonner Formation reveals that this source was a granitic rock, composed of orthoclase, microcline, quartz

and probably muscovite. Barlow (1983) reported <1% albite-oligociase in the underlying Mount Shields

Formation that decreases from south to north and is absent in the northern most sections of Mount Shields.

Harrison and Campbell (1963), however, report 10% or more albite-oligiclase in the Stripped Peak Formation

which is the equivalent of Mount Shields in northern Idaho. The reason for this discrepency is not certain. Based

on micro-chemical analyses of feldspar grains of the Bonner Formation and the difference between the petrology

of Bonner and Mount Shields, I propose the following two-fold explanation:

1. Sediments of the Mount Shields were probably derived from different source rock than that of the

Bonner. This is supported by the change in the tectonic environment in the source area during East

Kootenai Orogeny (McMechan and Price, 1982) that is now termed the Bonner disturbance (Elston

and Link, 1993). This disturbance may have unroofed the granite which supplied potassium feldspar to

the Bonner.

2. The small amount of plagioclase in the northern Bonner is diagenetic albite. This is supported by the

micro-chemical analyses of Bonner feldspar (this study). Hamson and Campbell's data may be

erroneous as the concepts of diagenesis were not fully understood in the 1960s.

The absence of any kind of plagioclase and the very low albite content (2-11 %) of the potassium

feldspar raises the question of the original chemistry of this granite. Generally, potassium feldspar of one

feldspar granites (e.g., Lolo batholith; Hyndman, Prs. comm.) contain >20% albite content. If the albite content

in potassium feldspar is very low (i.e. <10%), then plagioclase is normally common in the granite. This unusual

chemistry of the low albite potassium feldspar can be explained tentatively by one of the following two

scenarios:

I. This granite evolved from a sodium deficient magma prohibiting both crystallization of the

plagioclase series feldspar and emplacement of sodium ions m the K-feldspar structure.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 151

2. Plagioclase was selectively destroyed during transportation of detritus from source rock to the

alluvial apron.

Both of these explanations have flaws; sodium free magmas are not known (Hyndman, Prs. C om m )

and the selective destruction of plagioclase and preservation of K-spar seems unlikely. However, comparative

feldspathic sandstones such as the Pennsylvanian Fountain and Lyons formations in Colorado's Front Range

(Hubert. 1960) closely resembles the Bonner. The Fountain and Lyons formations contain only 0.2% plagioclase

and more than 35% potassium feldspar. The chemistry of these feldspars, however, is not known. This problem

rem ains unresolved.

Clearly there are two principal source rocks, a medium to high grade metamorphic source with far

travelled grains, and a potassium feldspar granite much closer to the Wise River section. Based on rounding of

the far-travelled detritus from source rock 1 . 1 interpret the coarse-grained granite to have intruded into the pre­

existing metamorphic rocks of source rock 1 between 1 . 8 6 to 1.7 Ga. (zircon dates of Ross and others, 1991).

The metamorphic rocks overlying the granite may have been deepiy eroded and may have formed a gravel and

sand nonconformity resung on the granite. The drainage system that produced the Bonner alluvial apron

unroofed the granite intrusion just before the Bonner deposition started. This granite may have been located

between Wise River and source rock 1.

Fragmentauon of the polvcrvstalline quartz grams not only reduced the overall size of the Bonner

Formauon sediments to the north, it also contributed to the relative increase in the Qm population. The Qp

grains from this source, though very small in amount, survived as far as the Nyack secuon in the north. Granitic

rock fragments which are composed of quartz and potassium feldspar started splitting into individual minerals

which increased the potassium feldspar population towards north. The granitic rock fragments were carried by

the drainage system as far north as Nyack.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 152

The gradual northward increase in the K-feldspar population indicates little chemical alteration during

their transport down to the Bonner alluvial apron, suggesting little climatic weathering. The climate may have

been cold or dry. Since some of the potassium feldspar grains remained angular at least to the Clinton section,

flow from Wise River to Clinton was probably dominated by flashy, episodic flow that did not appreciably round

the grains.

Source Rock 3

Rounded monocrystalline quartz grains with a thin layer of quartz overgrowths and rounded chert

grains are grouped into source rock 3. Source rock 3 was also esposed to the south of the Belt basin. This source

rock was probably a mixture of quartz-cemented quartz sandstone and cherty carbonate rocks. Because they

represent <2% of the Bonner, this source may have formed a thin veneer over the source rock 1. Most of the

quartz grains from this source occur in the basal parts of the southern sections and decrease upward suggesting

that this source rock gradually eroded away from the source area. It is difficult to surmise that how these

overgrown second cycle monocrystalline quartz grains behaved while travelling down to the alluvial apron

because their overgrown quartz layer was removed during their transport toward the north. These grains are

identifiable only as far north as the Emenne Lookout section. Beyond Clinton they may have lost their quartz

overgrowths and appear to be first cycle Qm. Some of the rounded zircons (Ross and others. 1991) may have

been supplied by this source rock as well as by source rock 1 .

The presence of ghost rhombohederal carbonate crystals in some chert grains of the Bonner Formation

indicates that these grains were probably derived from carbonate rocks, most probably dolomite. Some of the

chert grains have a thin layer of fine crystals of quartz overgrowths, suggesting second cycle grains. It suggests

that the source carbonate rocks were partly to totally silicified.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 153

The distinction between the source rock 1 and source rock 3 populations is based on type of quartz

grains. The second cycle quartz grains are exclusively monocrvstalline quartz, whereas monocrystalline quartz

from source rock 1 is rare and lacks quartz overgrowths.

Source Rock 4

A distant low grade metamorphic or granitic rock that locally supplied high-potassium orthoclase and

probably some polvcrystalline and monocrvstalline quartz grains is proposed as a fourth source rock type. The

increase of these grains in the Libby and Clark Fork sections suggests that this population came from a source

rock north or northwest of Libby. Support for this source rock is based on the additional amount of orthoclase

feldspar in the Libby section. The orthoclase grams at the Libby are deeply altered and very fine grained,

suggesting a more weathered far-travelled population.

The above interpretauon of the fourth source rock type may be biased, because it is mosdv based on

the detntal mineralogy of the Libby section of the Bonner Fonnauon. The Libby section of the Bonner Formation

is mostly composed of argillite and siltite. Out of 125 samples collected from an 800 foot thick section, only 25

samples contained enough coarse grains for point counting. In rest of the samples the amount of orthoclase was

estimated visually and is not represented in the point count data and the graph (Fig. 35) developed on this data

base.

The source rocks 1.2 and 3 were probably part of one source terrane to the south, whereas the source

rock 4 was another separate source terrane located to the north/northwest of the basin and independent of the

southern source terrane. Figure 65 shows the approximate location source terranes and the transport directions

of selected gram types from each source rock.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 154

Distal Metamorphic/plutonic rocks provided frar travelled well rounded quartzite pebbles, rounded quartz grains and rounded zircon. Proximal granite provided short travelled angular potassium feldspar grains, i; angular quartz grains and angular zircons

Wyoming craton provided Archean sediments (rounded zircons of Ross and others. 1991)?

Distal plutonic/metamorphic rocks provided far travelled rounded potassium feldspar grains (?)

Belt basin with respect to the possible sources of sediment

Figure 65. Schematic diagram of approximate source terrane locations showing transport directions of selected gram types

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 155

Buffalo Hump Formation

The detrital mineralogy of the quartzite part of the Buffalo Hump Formation indicates a different

provenance than that of the Bonner. The source rocks that supplied sediments to the Buffalo Hump were

predominantly metamorphic and minor sedimentary (sandstone) rocks. This is indicated by the presence of

sedimentary and metamorphic rock fragments and by the absence of any kind of feldspar. SRFs are primarily

second cycle quartz grains (mostly Qm) with quartz overgrowths (Fig. 22), whereas the MRFs are quartzite

fragments. A few Qm grains contain intra-granular fractures that were filled by secondary microcrystalline

quartz. These fractures pomt out that, prior to the erosion, the quartzite source reck had gone through at least

one phase of deformauon and silicification. The difference in the textures of the detntal grains of the Buffalo

Hump (poorly sorted, coarse-sand to granule size) and the (northern) Bonner Formation (moderately to well

sorted, medium- to very fine-grained) also indicate a different provenance for the two formations. The source

rocks for the Buffalo Hump detritus were probably located to the west and/or northwest of the present location

of Deer Trail Group exposures.

1 concluded, therefore, that the Buffalo Hump Formation is not a correlative of Bonner Formation. This

conclusion concurs with the findings of Ross and Parrish (1991) and Ross and others (1992) who report detrital

zircon as young as 1.1 Ga. which are much younger than the 1.7 to 1.8 Ga zircon dates for the rest of the

Bonner.

Swauger Formation

The Swauger Formation contains >89% Qm, <5% Qp, <12% K-feldspar, and <1% lithic grains, and

differs significantly from the <%56 Qm. >20% Qp, >20% K-feldspar, and >8% lithic grains of the southern

Bonner. The detrital mineralogy of the Swauger does not reflect the multiple source rocks which is the most

discemable character of the southern sections of the Bonner. Therefore the Swauger probably does not represent

the extension of the Bonner into east-central Idaho. However, the well rounded Qm grains, the small population

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 156

of quartzite pebbles at Fourth of My Creek, the <6% albite content of the K-feldspar indicate that Swauger and

part of the Bonner may have had a common source.

The Swauger Formation, on the other hand, resembles more closely the Mount Shields Formation

which underlies the Bonner Formation. Barlow (1983) worked on the petrology of the Mount Shields Formation

and reported 58.7% quartz, 8.8% K-feldspar, about 1.7% rock fragments and 30% matrix and cement in the

Mount Shields Formation at the Rock Creek and Willow Creek sections. This composition appears closer to the

Swauger Formation. Therefore, the Swauger may correlate with the Mount Shields sand member (member 2 of

Winston. 1986a), making the Lawson Creek Formauon. the Mount Shields salt cast argillite member (member 3

of Winston, 1986a) correlative.

The thin conglomerate bed in the middle of the Fourth of My Creek section contains white quartzite

pebbles similar to those of the Bonner at its Wise River section. These quartzite pebbles clearly indicate that

Swauger received its sediment partially or completely from ancient quartzite rocks.

Considering the great thickness (>5000 ft) of the Swauger Formation we still don't know that which

part of the Swauger Formauon individually correlates with which formation of the Missoula Group. Because of

extensive erosion before the deposition of the overlying Kinnikinic Quartzite and Wilbert Quartzite (Rupple and

others. 1975; Ruppel, 1980; Ruppel and Lopez. 1981), and later folding, faulting and metamorphism (Ruppel.

1975) of Precambrian rocks in east-central Idaho, no exposed section of the Swauger is complete. These

processes have greatly obscured the possibility of drawing any firm correlation between the Swauger Formation

and the Belt rocks. Measurement and study of more stratigraphic sections of the Swauger and their detailed

detntal mineralogy and feldspar chemistry would help remove this obscunty.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. TECTONIC INTERPRETATIONS

Unlike other units of the Belt basin, the Bonner records a tectonicallv active environment on its

southern edge during its deposition as an alluvial apron. Elston (1991) suggested that the quartzite

conglomerate mixed with the short-travelled angular potassium feldspar of the southern Bonner (and the upper

part of the Mount Shields Formation) represent a — 1.3 Ga Bonner disturbance. McMechan and Pnce (1982)

suggested that this disturbance was probably part of the East Kootenay orogeny. Evans and Fischer (1986) and

later Ross and others (1992) proposed that the Bonner disturbance was accompanied or preceded by magmatism

tn the south of the Belt basin. Recently, Elston and Link (1993) suggested that the intrusion of stocks was

possibly along the svn-depositional faults in the western Belt basin, this faulting is reflected by distinct

increments of apparent polar wander recorded in the polar path (Fig 51 of Elston and Link, 1993). They (Elston

and Link. 1993) have proposed a counterclockwise rotation of the Belt basin and the North American craton as

well, which supplied the coarse detritus to the middle unit of the Mount Shields Formation. Ceasure of the

mouon was followed by northerly motion of the craton during deposition of the Bonner.

Elston's craton rotation model (1991), Ross and others' (1991.1992) Bonner zircon dates. Evans and

Fisher's (1986) intrusions of stocks, and Winston's (1986) block fault model together with my interpretation

based on the petrology of the Bonner Formation, all mutually support the hypothesis that the southern or

southwestern margin of the Belt basin was tectonicallv more acuve than the other parts of the basin. The tectonic

instability along the southern or southwestern margin of the Belt basin was probably initiated by the intrusion of

pluton/s into the pre-existing Archean metamorphic terrane at about 1 6 to 1.8 Ga. which activated the Perry line

and Gamet line (Winston, 1986), causing uplift of the Archean Dillon block of the Wyoming Province. This

uplift unroofed a fresh granite that shed angular potassium feldspar into the Belt basin near the Perry Line in the

Wise River area. At the same time the vertical movement along the Gamet line also exposed another part of

(probably) the same pluton which shed angular quartz and feldspar grains. This increased the amount of

orthoclase and plutonic rock fragments in the Bonner Formation at Clinton.

157

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. CONCLUSIONS

The Middle Proterozoic Bonner Formation is a vast composite alluvial apron that received sediments

from multiple sources of mixed lithoiogy. The predominant southern source terrane was composed of medium to

high grade metamorphic rocks. The second major source rock was high-potassium feldspar granite, whereas the

third source rock was a veneer of first cycie siliciclastic and carbonate sedimentary rocks over the metamorphic

source rock. The southern metamorphic source terrane was probably continental crust of Archean age that was

intruded by a granitic pluton during the Early Proterozoic. The northern source terrane was composed of low

grade metamorphic and/or plutonic rocks.

The Buffalo Hump Formation of the Deer Trail Group is a younger and petrographicallv different

elastic unit that deposited on Belt rocks, therefore, it is not a correlative of the Bonner. The petrology of the

Swauger Formation of East Central Idaho does not provide enough evidence for a firm lithologic correlation

with the Bonner Formation. However, being relatively low m detrital feldspar content, and containing more

mature aremte than Bonner, the Swauger Formation may correlate with the sandstone member of the Mount

Shields Formation.

Sedimentation was governed by block faulting in and around the Belt basin. Active block faulting

during the deposition of the Bonner caused uplift of the Dillon block and major subsidence of the southern part

of the basin. The subsidence exposed a fresh high-potassium feldspar bearing granite intrusion of—1.6-1.8 Ga.

that supplied short-travelled potassium feldspar to the southern part of the Bonner Formation. I suggest that the

similar uplift at the north western edge of the basin supplied additional orthoclase feldspar to the northern

margin of the Bonner alluvial apron.

158

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. REFERENCES CITED

Anderson, A. L., 1956, Geology and mineral resources of the Salmon Quadrangle, Lemhi County, Idaho: Idaho Bureau of Mines and Geology Pamphlet 106,102 p.

Anderson, A. L., 1957, Geology and mineral resources of the Baker Quadrangle, Lemhi County, Idaho: Idaho Bureau of Mines and Geology Pamphlet 112,71 p.

Anderson, A. L., 1958a, Uranium, Thorium, Columbium and rare earth deposits in the Salmon region, Lemhi County, Idaho: Idaho Bureau of Mines and Geology Pamphlet 115,81 p.

Anderson, A. L., 1958b, Geology and mineral resources of the North Fork Quadrangle, Lemhi County, Idaho: Idaho Bureau of Mines and Geology Pamphlet 118,92 p.

Anderson, A. L.. 1961, Geology and mineral resources of the Lemhi Quadrangle, Lemhi County, Idaho: Idaho Bureau of Mines and Geology Pamphlet 124, 111 p.

Andereson R. A., 1948, Reconnaissance survey of the geology and pre deposits of the southern portion of Lemhi Range, Idaho: Idaho Bureau of Mines and Geology Pamphlet 80.

Armstrong, R. L., Parish, R. R.. van der Hevden, P., Reynolds. S. J.. and Rehrig, W. A.. 1987, Rb-Sr and H-Pb geochronometry of Priest River metamorphic complex-Precambnan X basement and its Mesozoic - Cenozoic plutonic-metamorphic overprint, northeastern Washington and northern Idaho: Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources Bulletin 77. p. 15-40.

Arribas, J.. Marfil. R.. and De La Pena, J. A., 1985, Provenance of Triassic Feldspathic Sandstones in the Iberian Range (Spam): Significance of Quartz types: Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 55, no. 6. p. 864-868.

Bailey, S. W„ Bell, R. A., and Peng, C. J., 1958, Plastic deformauon of quartz m nature: Geological Society of America Bulletin., v. 69. p. 1443-1466.

Baskin, Y„ 1956, A study of Authegemc Feldspar. Journal of Geology, v. 64., p. 132-155.

Barlow, D. A., 1983, Petrology of the Mount Shields Formation (Belt Supergroup) Western Montana Northern Idaho: M.S. Thesis, unpublished, 57 p.

Basu, A., Young, S. W„ Suttner, L. J., James W. C„ and Mack, G. R . 1975, Re-Evaluation of the use of Undulatory Extinction and Polycrystallinity in Detntal Quartz for Provenance Interpretation: Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 45. no. 4, p. 873-882.

Basu, A. and Vitaiiano. C. J.. 1976. Sanidine from the Mesa Falls Tuff, Ashton. Idaho: American Mineralogist, v. 61, p. 405-408.

159

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 160

Basu. A., 1985. Influence of climate and relief on compositions of sand released at source areas, in Zuffa. G. G., ecL, Provenance of arenites: D. Reidel. Dordrecht, p. 231-247.

Becraft, G. E., and Weiss, P. L., 1963, Geology and mineral resources of Turtle Lake Quadrangle, Washington: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1131,73 p., scale 1:62,500.

Bhatia, M. R., 1985, Rare earth element geochemistry of Australian Paleozoic graywackes and mudrocks: provenance and tectonic control: Sedimentary Geology, v. 45, p. 97-113.

Bhatia, M. R., 1983, Plate tectonics and geochemical compositions of sandstones: Journal of Geology, v. 91, p. 611-627.

Blatt, R . 1967, Original Characteristics of Classic Quartz Grains: Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 37. no. 2, p. 401-424/Fig. 1-27.

Blatt, R . 1967. Provenance determination and recycling of sediment: Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 37. p. 1031-1044.

Blatt, H., 1979, DiageneUc processes in sandstones, in Scholle, P. A., and P. R. Schluger, eds.. Aspects of diagenesis: Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists Spec. Pub. 26, p. 141-157.

Blatt, R , 1985, Provenance Studies and Mudrocks: Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 55, no. 1. p. 0069- 0075.

Blatt. H.. Caprara, J. R. 1985. Feldspar dispersal patterns in shales of the Vanoss formation (Pennsylvanian), south-central Oklahoma: Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 33, p. 559-579.

Blatt, R . and Christie, J. M . 1963. Undulatorv extinction in quartz of igneous and metamorphic rocks and its significance in provenance studies of sedimentary rocks: Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 33, p. 559- 579.

Blatt. R , Middleton. Gerard, and Murray, Raymond, 1980. Origin of sedimentary rocks: 2nd Ed. Englewood Cliffs. New Jersey, Prentice Hall. 782 p.

Bohlen. S. R. and Essene, E. J.. 1977. Feldspar and oxide thermometry of granulites in the Adirondack highlands: Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, v. 62. p. 153-169.

Bjdrlvkke, K. O. and Griffin. W. C.. 1973, Barium Feldspars in Ordovician sediments, Oslo region. Norway: Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 43, p. 461-465.

Burwash, R. A., Cavel. P. A., and Burwash, E. J.. 1988. Source Terrains for Proterozoic sedimentary rocks in southern British Columbia: Nd Isotopic and Petrographic evidence: Canadian Journal of Earth Science, v. 25. no. 6.. p. 824-832.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 161

Burwash, R. A_, and Wagner, P. A., 1989, Sm/Nd geochronology of the Movie intrusions. Movie Lake map area, British Columbia: British Columbian Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources, Geological Fieldwork, paper 1989-1, p. 45-48.

Campbell, A. B., I960, Geology and mineral deposited of the S t Regis-Supenor area. Mineral County Montana: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1982-1, p. 545-612.

Campbell, A. B., and Raup, O. B., 1964, Preliminary geologic map of Hunters Quadrangle, Stevens and Ferry Counties, Washington: U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Field Investigations Map MF-276, scale 1:48.000.

Campbell. L. and Loofbourovv, J. S., 1962, Geology of the magnesite belt Stevens County: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1142-F, 53 p.

Carmichael, I. S. E„ 1967, The mineralogy and petrology of the volcanic rocks from the Leucite Hills, Wyoming: Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, v. 15, p. 24-26.

Childers. M. O., 1963, Structure and stratigraphy of southwest Marias Pass area. Flathead County, Montana, Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 74, p. 141-164.

Clapp, C. H., and Deiss, C. F„ 1931, Correlauon of Montana Algonkian formations: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 42, p. 673-696.

Cloud, P. E„ 1973. Paleoecological significance of banded iron formations: Economic Geology, v. 68, p. 1135- 1143.

Conolly, John R., 1965, The Occurrence of Polvcrystallinity and Undulatory Extinction in Quartz m Sandstones: Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 35., no. 1. p. 116-135.

Cressman. E. R., 1982, Generalized stratigraphic section of the Prichard Formation, basal Belt Supergroup, Proterozoic Y. near Plains. Montana: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 82-495, 1 p.

Cressman. E. R.. 1985, The Prichard Formation of the Lower part of the Belt Supergroup (Middle Proterozoic) near Palins. Sanders County, Montana: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1553, 64 p.

Cressman, E. R.. 1988, The Prichard Formation (middle proterozoic) and the early development of the Belt basin: Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, v. 20, p. 410-411.

Cressman. E. R., 1989, Reconnaissance stratigraphy of Prichard Formation (Middle Proterozoic) and the early developmemt of the Belt basin, Washington. Idaho, and Montana: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1490. 80 p.

Crook, K. A. W„ 1974, Lithogenesis and geotectonics: the significance of compositional variations in flysch arenites (graywackes), in Dott, R. H.. Jr., and R. H. Shaver, eds.. Modem and ancient geosynclinal sedimentation: Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists Special Pub. 19, p. 304-310.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 162

Cundari, A., 1975, Mineral chemistry and petrogenetic aspects of the Vico Lavas, Roman Volcanic region, Italy: Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, v. 53, p. 129-144.

O.-i I7 1 .4 . LW .D., 1991, Pacific margins of Laurentia and East Antarctica-Australia as a conjugate rift pain evidence and implications for an Eocambrian supercontinent: Geology, v. 19, p. 598-601.

Deiss, C., 193 5, Cambrian- Algonkian unconformity in western Montana: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 46, p. 95-124.

Dickinson, W. R . 1970, Interpreting Detrital modes of Grawacke and Arkose: Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 40, no. 2, p. 695-707.

Dickinson, W. R 1985, Interpreting provenance relations from detrital modes modes of sandstones, m Zuffa, G. G., ed.. Provenance of arenites: D. Reidel, Dordrecht, p. 333-361.

Dickinson, W. R . 1988. Provenance of Sediment Dispersal in relation to Paleo tec tonics and Paleography of Sedimentary Basins. In Kleinspehn, K. L , and Paola, C. (ed) "New Perspectives in Basm Analysis," Springer Verlog, p. 3-25 (chapter I).

Dickinson, W. R . Beard, L. S., Brakenridge, G. R . Erjavec. J. L., Ferguson. R G.. Inman, K. F.. Knepp, R A . Lmdberg, F. A , and Rvberg, P. I., 1983, Provenanve of North American Phanerozoic sandstones m relation to tectonic setting: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 94, p. 222-235.

Dickinson, W. R , and Ingersoll, R.V.. 1990, Physiographic controls on the composition of sediments derived from volcanic and sedimentary terrains on Barro Colorado Island, Panama—Discussion: Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 60, p. 797-798.

Dickinson, W. R and Rich, E. I., 1972, Petrologic intervals and petrofacies in the Great Valley Sequence, Sacramento Valley, California: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 83. p. 3007-3024.

Dickinson. W. R and Seely, D. R , 1979, Structure and stratigraphy of Foreare Regions: American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, v. 63, no. 1. p. 2-31.

Dickinson, W. R , and Snevek. C. A . 1979, Plate tectonics and sandstone composition: American Association ofPetroeum Geologists Bulletin, v. 63. no. 12, p. 2164-82.

Dickinson. W. R. and Vallom, R , 1980, Plate settings and provenance of sands in modem ocean basins: Geology, v. 8, p. 82-86.

Dinarco, M. J. and Lowe, D. R . 1989, Petrography and Provenance of Stratified early Archean volcaniciastic sandstones, eastern Pilbara Block, western Australia: Sedimentary, v. 36, p. 821-836.

DotL R H.. Jr., 1964. Gravwacke and matrix—What approach to immature sandstone classification?: Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 34, p. 625-632.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 163

Drever, J. I., 1974, Geochemical model for the origin of Precambrian handed iron formations: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 85, p. 1099-1106.

Ehrenberg, S. N. and Siring, E.. 1992, Use of Bulk Chemical Analysis in Stratigraphic correlation of sandstones: An Example from Statfjord Nord Field, Norwegian Continental Shelf: Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 62, no. 2, p. j 18-330.

Elston, D. P., 1984, Magnetostratigrapfay of the Belt Supergroup: a synopsis, in Hobbs, S. W„ ed.. The Belt Abstracts and Summaries: Belt Symposium 0, 1983: Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Special Publication 90, p. 88-90.

Elston, D. P., 1991, Geologic and paleomagnetic evidence for a -1,300 Ma tectonic event in the Missoula Group, Belt Supergroup (~ 1,450-1.250 Ma), Montana and Idaho: Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, v. 23, no. 4, p. 19.

Elston. D. P., and Link. P. K.. 1993, Middle and Late Proterozoic deposttionai and tectonic synthesis in Precambnan of the Conterminous United States, Geology of North America, v. C-2, Chapter 6, p. 569-575.

Ernst, W. G., Skeki, Y.. Onuki. R , and Gilbert, M. C.. 1970, Comparative study of low-grade metamorphism m the California Coast Ranges and the outer Metamorphic Belt of Japan: Geological Society of America Memoir 124, p. 276.

Eugster, R P., 1969. Inorganic bedded cherts from the Magadi Area, Kenya. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 22, p. 1-31.

Eugster, H. P.. and Chou, I. M., The depositional environments of Precambrian Banded Iron Formations: Economic Geology, 68, p. 1144-1168.

Evans, B. W. and Guidotti, C. V., 1966, The stillimanite-potash feldspar iso grad in western Maine, U.S.A.: Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, v. 12, p. 25-62.

Evans, J. G„ 1987, Geology of the Stensger Mountain Quadrangle, Stevens County, Washington: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1679,23 p. scale 1:24,000.

Evans, K. V.. 1986, Middle Proterozoic deformation and plutonism in Idaho, Montana and British Columbia, in Roberts, S. M.. ed.. Belt Supergroup: a guide to western Montana and adjacent areas: Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Special Publication 94, p. 237-244.

Evans, K. V.. and Fischer, L. B., 1986, U-Th-Pb geochronology of two augen gneiss terranes. Idaho: New data and tectonic implications: Canadian Journal ofEarth Sciences, v. 23, p. 1919-1927.

Evans, K. V,,andZartman. R. E., 1981. U-Th-Pb zircon geochronology of proterozoic Y granite intrusions in the Salmon area, east-central Idaho: Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, v. 13, p. 195.

Fenton. C. L.. and Fenton. M. A., 1937. Belt Series of the North: stratigraphy, sedimentation, paleontology: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 48, p. 1873-1969.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 164

Freeman, W„ and Winston, D., 1987, A quartz arenite blanket at the base of, or below Middle Proterozoic Belt Supergroup, Montana and Idaho: Geological Society of America Abstracts with Program?;, v. 19, no. 5, p. 276.

Frost, C. D., and Winston, D., 1987, Nd isotope svstematics of coarse- and fine-grained sediments: Examples from Middle Proterozoic Belt-Purcell Supergroup: Journal of Geology, v. 97, p. 303-27.

Folk. R. L., 1980, Petrology of sedimentary rocks: Hemphill, Austin, Texas, 182 p.

Garbanni, J. M. and Carpenter, A. B.. 1978, Albitization of plagioclase by oil field brines: Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, v. 10, p. 406.

Garrels, R. M.. 1987, A model for the deposition of the microbanded Precambrian iron formations: American Journal of Science, v. 287, p. 81-106.

Girty, G. H.. B. J. Mossman. and S. D. Pincus, 1988. Petrology of Holocene sand, peninsular ranges, California, and Baja Norte, Mexico: Implications for provenance-discnminauon models: Journal of Sedimentary Penology, v. 58, p. 881-887.

Gwinn, V. E., 1961, Geology of the Drummond area, central-western Montana: Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology, Geologic Map no. 4. scale 1:63360.

Haring, L. L„ Lounsburry, J. F„ Frazier, J. W„ 1992, Introduction to Scientific Geographic Research: 4th ed., Wm. C. Brown Publishers, Iowa, USA.

Hams, S. A.. 1957. Tectonics of Montana as related to Belt Series, in Graves, R. W„ ed.. Crazy Mountain basin: Billings Geological Society 8th Annual Field Conference Guidebook, p. 22-23.

Harrison, J. E., 1972. PreCambrian Belt basin of northwestern United States: Its geometry, sedimentation and copper occurrences: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 83, no. 5, p. 1215-40.

Harrison. J. E.. 1986, Proterozoic folding in Belt terrane of northwestern United States and adjacent Canada, and its effects on Phanerozoic thrusting: Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, v. 18, p. 629.

Hamson. J. E.. and Campbell. A B„ 1963. Correlations and problems in Belt Series stratigraphy, northern Idaho and western Montana: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 79, p. 1093-1095.

Harrison, J. E.. Griggs, A B„ and Wells, J. D.. 1974, Tectonic features of the Precambrian Belt basin and their influence on post-Belt structures: U.S. Geological Survey Professional paper 866, 15 p.

Harrison. J. E., Griggs, A B., and Wells, J. D„ 1986. Geologic and structure maps of the Wallace I x 2 Quadrangle, Montana and Idaho: U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Investigations Map I-509-A scale 1:250,000.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. L65

Harrison, J. E., and Gnmes, D. J., 1970, Mineralogy- and geochemistry- of some Belt rocks, Montana and Idaho: US Geological Survey Bulletin 1312-0, p. 1-49.

Harrison, J. E., and Jobin, D. A.. 1963. Geology of the Clark Fork Quadrangle, Idaho-Montana: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin II41-K. 38 p.

Harrison, J. E„ and Peterman, Z. E., 1984, Introduction to correlation of Precambrian rock sequences: U.S. Geological Survey professional paper 1241-A, 7 p.

Harrison. J. E., and Reynolds, M. W.. 1976, Western U.S continental margin: a stable platform dominated by vertical tectonics in the late Precambrian: Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, v. 8, no. 6, p. 905.

Helmold. K. P.. 1985, Provenance of feldspathic sandstones—the effect of diagenesis on provenance interpretations: a review, m Zuffa, G. G., ed.. Provenance of aremtes: D. Reidel, Dordrecht, p. 139-163.

Hobbs, S. W., 1980, The Lawson Creek Formation of Middle Proterozoic age in east-central Idaho: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1482-E, p. 3.

Hoffinan. P. F„ 1991, Did the breakout of Laurentia turn Gondwana inside-out?: Science, v. 252. p. 1409-1412.

Hoffinan, P. F., 1989, Precambnan geology and tectonic history of North America, in Bally, A. W., and Palmer, A. R.. eds.. The geology of North Amenca: an overview: Boulder, Colorado. Geological Society of America, v. A. p. 447-512.

Hoffinan. P. F. 1988, Belt Basin: A Landlocked Remnant Oceanic Basm?: Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, v. 20, A50.

Hoffinan. P. F„ and Strangway, D. W„ 1981, Wopmav Oregon: A Wilson Cycle of early Proterozoic age in the northwest of the Canadian Shield: The continental Crust and its mineral deposits: Geological Association of Canada special paper 20. p. 523-549.

Hofinann, A., 1971, Effect of regional metamorphism on radiometric ages in peltic rocks — preliminary results: Washington. D.C.. Carnegie Institute. Yearbook, no. 70, p. 242-245.

Hubert. J. F„ 1960, Petrology of the Fountain and Lyons Formations, Front Range, Colorado: Colorado School of Mines Quart Jour., v. 55, no. 1. 242 p.

Hyndman, D. W„ 1985, Petrology of Ingeous and Metamorphic Rocks: 2nd ed.. McGraw Hill Inc., 786 p.

Ingersoll. R. V.. 1980, Tectonics of Sedimentary Basins: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 100, p. 1704-1719.

Ingersoll. R. V., 1990. Actualistic sandstone petrofacies: Discriminating modem and ancient source rocks: Geology, v. 18, p. 733-736.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 166

Ingersoll, R. V., Bullard, T. F.. Grimm, J. P.. Pickle, J. D., and Sares, S. W., 1984, The Effect of Gram Size on detrital modes: a test of the Gazzi-Dickenson Point counting method: Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 54, no. 1, p. 103-116.

Inmega, L P. and Klein, C., Jr., 1976, Mineralogy and petrology of some metamorphic Precambrian iron- formations in southwestern Montana: American Mineralogist, v. 61, p. 1117-1144.

James, W. C., 1985, Early Digenesis, Atherton Formation (Quaternary): a guide for understanding Early cement distribution and Grain Modifications in Non Marine Deposits: Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 55, no. I, p. 0135-0146.

Johnson, M. J., and Stallard. R. F„ 1990, Physiographic controls on the composition of sediments derived from volcanic and sedimentary terrains on Barro Colorado Island, Panama—Reply: Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 60, p. 799-801.

Kastner, M., 1971, Authigenic feldspars in carbonate rocks: American Mineralogist, v. 56, p. 1403-1439.

Kastner, M. and Siever, R., 1979, Low temperature feldspars in sedimentary rocks: American Journal of Science, v. 279, p. 435-479.

Kidder, D. L., 1986. Sedimentary evidence for Proterozoic tectonism in the upper Belt Supergroup of northwestern Montana: Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, v. 18, no. 6, p. 656.

Kidder, D. L., 1988a, Svntectonic sedimentation in the Proterozoic upper Belt Supergroup, northwestern Montana: Geology, v. 16, p. 658-661.

Kidder, D. L., 1988b, StraUgraphy, micropaleontology, petrography, carbonate geocheommistry, and depositional history of the Proterozoic Libby Formation, Belt Supergroup, northwestern Montana and northeastern Idaho: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 87-635,133 p.

Kidder, D. C., 1989. Beltian evolution with an eye to Big Basin Analogues: Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, v. 21. no. 5, p. 101.

Korsch, R. J., 1984, Sandstone Compositions from the New England, Oregon, Eastern Australia: Implications for tectonic setting: Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 54, no. I. p. 192-211.

Krumbian, W. C. and Pettijohn, F. J.. 1938, Manual of Sedimentary Petrology: Appleton Century, New York, 549 p.

Krynine, P. D., 1946, Microscopic morphology of quartz types: Pan-American Congress: Mining and Geological Engineers. Annals of 2nd Comm., p. 35-49.

LaBerge, G. L.. 1973, Possible biological origin of Precambrian iron formations: Economic Geology, v. 68, p. 1098-1109.

|

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 167

Link, P. K.. and Winston, D.. 1993, Middle Proterozoic rocks of Montana, Idaho and Eastern Washington: the Belt Supergroup, in Precambrian of the Conterminous United States, Geology of North America, v. C-2, Chapter 6, p. 487-517.

Lis, M. G. and Price, R. A., 1975, Large-scale block faulting during deposition of the Windermere supergroup (hadrijniau) in Southeastern British Columbia: Geological Survey of Canada, paper 76-1 A.

Lowe, Donald R., 1980. Archean Sedimentation: Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Science, v. 8, p. 145- 167.

Mack, G. H.. 1984, Exceptions to the relationship between plate tectonics and sandstone composition: Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 54, no. 1, p. 212-220.

Mack. G. H.. 1981, Composition of modem stream sand in a humid climate derived from a low grade metamorphic and sedimentary foreland fold-thrust belt of North Georgia: Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 51, no. 4, p. 1247-1258.

MacKenzie, W. 0., 1949, Geology and the ore deposits ofa section ofthe Beaverhead Range east of Salmon, Idaho: Moscow Idaho. University of Idaho, Ph.D. thesis, 52 p.

McBride, E. F.. 1984, Diagenetic processes that affect provenance determinations in sandstone, in Suffa, G. G. ed.. Provenance of arenites: D. Reidel, Dordrecht. Holland, p. 95-113.

McBride, E. F., 1988, Source-Area Characterization: Introducuon: in Kleinspeh, K. L. and Paola. C.. eds.. "New perspecuves in Basin Analysis," Springer Verlog: Frontiers in Sedimentary Geology, p. 1 -2. + table of contents.

McBride. E. F. and Folk. R L., 1977, The Caballos Novacuiite revisited: Part II: Chert and shale members and synthesis: Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 47, p. 1261-1286.

McIntyre, D. H., and Hobbs, S. W.. 1987, Geologic map of Challis Quadrangle, Custer and Lemhi Counties. Idaho. U.S. Geological Survey Map GQ-1599, scale 1:62.500.

McLennan. S. M„ Nance, W. B.. and Taylor, S. R.. 1980, Rare earth element-thorium correlations m sedimentary rocks, and the composition of the continental crust: Geochemica etCosmochemica Acta. v. 44. p. 1833-1839.

McMannis. W. J., 1965, Resume of depositional and structural history of western Montana: American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, v. 49. no. II,p. 1801-1823.

McMcchan, M. E„ and Price, R. A.. 1982, Transverse folding and superposed deformation. Mount Fisher area, southern Canadian Rocky Mountain thrust and fold belt: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 19, p. 1011-1024.

Mizutani, S.. 1959, Clasuc plagioclase in Permian gravwacke from the Mugi area. Gifu Prefecture, central Japan: Journal of Earth Sciences, Nagoya University (Japan), v. 7, p. 108-136.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 168

Miller. F. K., 1982. Geologic map of the Salmon-Priest Wilderness study area. Pend Oreille County, Washington and Boundary County, Idaho: U.S. Geological Survey Map MF-l 192-A scale 1:48,000.

Miller, F. K.. 1989, Stratigraphic correlation of the trail group with the Belt Supergroup: Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, 85th annual meeting, Cordilleriau Section. 21(5), p. 117.

Miller, F. K., and Clark, L. D., 1975, Geology of the Chewelah-Loon Lake area, Stevens and Spokane Counties: Washington, D.C. Geological Survey Professional Paper 806,74 p.

Miller, F. K., Whipple, J. W.. 1989, The Deer Trail Group: Is it part of the Belt Supergroup? in Joseph. N. L., and 13 others, eds.. Geologic guidebook for Washington and adjacent areas: Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources Information Circular 86, p. 1 -22.

Milliken, K. L., 1989. Petrography and composition of Authigenic Feldspars. Oligocene Frio Formauon. South Texas: Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 59. no. 3, p. 361-374.

Monastersky, R., 1991. Mamed to Antarctica: new theory paper on ancient wedding between North America and the Lonely Polar Continent: Science News. v. 139, p.266-267.

Moores, E. M., 1991. Southwest U.S.: East Antarctic (SWEAT) connection: a hypothesis: Geology, v. 19. p. 425-428.

Nash, W. P.. Carmichael. I. S. E.. and Johnson, R. W.. 1969, The mineralogy and petrology of Mount Suswa. Kenya: Journal of Petrology, v. 10, p. 409-439.

Nelson. W. R , and Dobell. J. P., 1961. Geology of the Bonner Quadrangle, Montana: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1111-F, p. 189-235.

Obradovich. J. D., Zartman, R. E.. and Peterman. A E.. 1984. Update of the geochronology of the Belt Supergroup in Hobbs. S. W.. ed.. The Beit: Abstracts and Summaries, Belt Symposium 0. 1983: Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Special Publication 90. p. 82-84.

Odom. I. E., 1975. Feldspar gram relations in Cambrian aremtes, upper Mississippi Valley: Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 45, p. 636-650.

O'Neill, J. M„ Ferris. D. C.. Schmidt, C. J.. and Genovese, P. W.. 1990. Dillon cutoff—basement involved tectonic link between the disturbed belt of west-central Montana and overthrust belt of extreme southwestern Montana: Geology, v. 18, p. 1107-1110.

O'Neill, J. M„ Ferris, D. C., Schmidt, C. J.. and Hanneman, D. L., 1986. Recurrent movement along northwest- trending faults at the southern margin of the Belt basin. Highland Mountains, southwestern Montana, in Roberts, S. M., ed.. Belt Supergroup: a guide to Proterozoic rocks of western Montana and adjacent areas: Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Special Publication 94, p. 209-216.

Pearson, R. C., and Zen. E. A.. 1985. Geologic map of the eastern Pioneer Mountains, Beaverhead County, Montana: U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Field Studies Map M F-l806A scale 1:50.000.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 169

Pettijohn. F. J., Potter. P. E., Siever, R_. 1973. Sand and sandstone: New York. Springer Verlag, 618 p.

Pittman, E. D., 1970, Plagioclase Feldspar as an indicator of Provenance in Sedimentary Rocks: Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 40-2, p. 591-598.

Pittman, E. D., 1963, Use of zoned plagioclase as an indicator of provenance: Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 33, p. 380-386.

Price, R. A., 1964, The Precambrian Purcell System in the Rocky Mountains of southern Alberta and British Columbia: Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, v. 12, Special Issue (guidebook), p. 399-426.

Quattlebaum. D. M . 1980. Stratigraphy, regional correlation and depositional environment of Bonner Formation (Precambrian Missoula Group, southwestern Montana): M.S. thesis: Missoula. The University of Montana. 104 p.

Reed. J. R. and Condie. K. C.. 1987, Geochemical constraints on the composition of sandstone material and the interpretation of detrital modes: Geologic en Mijnbouw 66, p. 327-332.

Rehrig, W. A., Reynolds, S. J., and Armstrong, R. L., 1987, A tectonic and geochronologic overview of the Priest River crystalline complex, northeastern Washington and northern Idaho, in Schuster, J. E., eds.: selected papers on the geology of Washington: Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources Bulletin 77. p. 1-14.

Reid. R. R.. Morrson, D. A., and Greenwood, W. R„ 1973, The Clearwater orogenic zone: a relict of Proterozoic orogeny in central and northern Idaho, in Belt Symposium: Moscow, Idaho, Department of Geology, University of Idaho and Department of Mines and Geology, v. 1, p. 10-56.

Reynolds. M. W.. 1984. Session on structure and tectonics (summary), in Hobbs. S. W„ ed.. The Belt: Abstracts and Summanes. Belt Symposium II: Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Special Publication 90, p. 52- 56.

Robertson. A. H. F., 1977. The origin and diagnosis of cherts from Cyprus: Sedimentology, v.24. p. 11-30.

Rock. N. M. S.. 1978. Petrology and petrogenesis of the Monchique alkaline complex, southern Portugal: Journal of Petrology, v. 19, p. 171-214.

ROCKWARE. 1991. Rockworks Version 6.0: Rockware Inc.. Wheat Ridge. Colorado 80033.

Ross. C. P., 1947, Geology of the Borah Peak Quadrangle, Idaho: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 58, no. 12, p. 1085-1160.

Ross, C. P., 1961, Geology of the Southern Part of the Lemhi Range, Idaho: description of Swauger Formation only: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1081-F. p. 192-201.

Ross. C. P.. 1963. The Belt Series in Montana: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 346. 12- p.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 170

Ross, G. M., 1991, Tectonic setting of the Windermere Supergroup revisited: Geology, v. 19, p. 1125-1128.

Ross, G. M. and Panish R. R.. 1991, Single grain U-Pb and Sm-Nd Provenance of the middle Proterozoic Belt Super group (north western U.S.): implications for the Pre-Panthalassa Plate Deconstraction: Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, p A-210.

Ross, G. M., Parrish. R. R., and Dudas, F. O., 1991, Provenance of the Bonner Formation (Belt Supergroup), Montana: Insights from U-Pb and Sm-Nd analyses of detrital minerals: Geology, v. 19, p. 340-343.

Ross, G. M., Parrish, R. R., Villeneuve, M. W.. and Bowring, S. A , 1991, Geophysics and geochronology of the crystalline basement of the Alberta Basin, western Canada: Candian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 28, p. 512-522.

Ross, G. M.. Pamsh, R. R., and Winston. D., 1992, Provenance and U-Pb geochronology of the Mesoproterozoic Belt Supergroup (northwestern United States): implications for age of deposition and pre- Pan thiassa plate reconstructions: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, v. 113, p. 57-76.

RuppeL E. T.. 1968, Geologic map of the Leadore Quadrangle, Lemhi County, Idaho: U.S. Geological Survey Geologic Quadrangle Map GQ-733, scale 1:62,500.

Ruppel, E. T., 1973. Precambrian sedimentary rocks in east-central Idaho, m Belt Symposium, Volume 1: Idaho Bureau of Mines and Geology Special Publication, p. 78-79.

RuppeL E. T„ 1975, Precambrian Y sedimentary rocks in east-central Idaho and southwest Montana: U.S. Geological Survey professional paper 889-A. 23 p.

Ruppel, E. T.. 1980. Geologic map of the Patterson quadrangle. Lemhi County, Idaho: U.S. Geological Survey Quadrangle Map GQ-1529.

Ruppel. E. T„ 1986. The Lehmi Arch: a Late Proterozoic and early Paleozoic iandmass in central Idaho, in Peterson. J. A , ed., Paleotectonics and sedimentation in the Rocky Mountain region. United States: American Association of Petroleum Geologists Memoir 41, p. 119-130.

Ruppel, E. T.. and Lopez. D. A . 1981, Geologic map of the Gilmore quadrangle, Lemhi County, Idaho: U.S. Geolgical Survey Quadrangle Map GQ-l 543.

Ruppel, E. T., and Lopez, D. A.. 1988. Regional geology and mineral deposits in and near the central part of the Lemhi Range, Lemhi County, Idaho: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1480. 122 p.

Ruppel, E. T., Ross. R. J., Jr., and Schleicher, D. L., 1975. Precambrian Z and Lower Ordovician rocks in east- central Idaho: US Geological Survey Professional Paper 889-A p. 1-23.

Sanderson, I. D.. 1984, Recognition and significance of inherited quartz overgrowths in quartz Arenite: Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 54, no. 2, p. 473-486.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 171

Schmidt, C. J., and Garihan. J. M . 1986, Middle Proterozoic and Laramide tectonic activity along the southern margin of the Belt basin, in Roberts, S. M , ed.. Belt Supergroup: a guide to Proterozoic rocks of western Montana and adjacent areas: Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Special Publication 94, p. 217-235.

Schawab, F. L., 1975, Framework mineralogy and chemical composition of continental margin-type sandstone: Geology, p.487-490.

Schawab, F. L., 1981, Evolution of the Western Continental Margin, French, Italian Alps: Sandstone Mineralogy as an index of plate tectonic setting: Journal of Geology, v. 89, p.349-368.

Sears, J. W„ and Alt, D. A.. 1989, Impact origin of the Belt sedimentary basin: Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, v. 21, no. 5, p. 142.

Sears, J. W„ and Price, R. A., 1978, The Siberian connection: a case for the Precambrian separauon of North

American and Siberian cratons: Geology, v. 6 , p. 267-270.

Sibley, D. F. and Pentony, K. J., 1978, Provenance variation in turbitide sediments. Sea of Japan: Journal of Sedimentary Petrology’, v. 48, p. 1241 -1248.

Skipp, B., 1988, Cordillloran thrust belt and faulted foreland in the Beaverheads Mountains. Idaho and Montana: Geological Society of America. Memoir 171. p. 237-266.

Skoinick. H.. 1965. The quartzite problem: Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 35, no. I, p. 12-21.

Slover, S. M.. 1982. Fining-upward sequences in then lower Mount Shields Formation. Middle Proterozoic Belt Supergroup, west-central Montana: M.S. thesis. The University of Montana. Missoula, 55 p.

Slover, S. M., and Winston, D.. 1986. Fining-upward sequences in Mount Shields Formation members 1, and 2, central Belt basin. Montana: in Roberts. S. M.. ed.. Belt Supergroup: a guide to Proterozoic rocks of western Montana and adjacent areas: Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Special Publication 94, p. 169-181.

Smith, N. D.. 1974, Feldspar minerals 2, Chemical and textural properties: New York, Spring-Verlag, 690 p.

Smoot, J. P., 1983, Deposiuonal subenviroments in an arid closed basin: the Wilkins Peak Member of the Green River Formation (Eocene), Wyoming, U.S.A.: Sedimentology, v. 30, p. 801-827.

Sorbey, H. C.. 1877, The application of the microscope to geology: Monthly Microscopical Journal, 17, p. 113- 136.

Sorbey, H. C., 1880. On the structure and origin of non-calcareous stratified rocks: Geological Society of London Proc.. v. 36, p. 46-92.

Stablein, N. K., IE, and Dapples, E. C„ 1977, Feldspars of the Tunnel City Group (Cambrian), western Wisconsin: Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 47. p. 1512-1538.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 172

Stanley, C. R_, and Sinclair, A. J.. 1989, Depositional environment and stratigraphic setting of stratabound Cu- Ag occurrences m the Bonner Quartzite, Belt Supergroup, western Montana, in Boyle, R. W.. Brown, A. C., Jefferson, C. W., Jowett, E. C„ and Kirkham. R. V.. eds.. Sediment-hosted stratiform copper deposits: Geological Association of Canada Special Paper 36, p. 305-318.

Stazz, M. H., 1979, Geology and mineral resources of the Lemhi Pass Thorium District, Idaho and Montana: LT.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper I049-A.

Suttner, L. J. and Basu A., 1977, Structural state of detrital alkali feldspars: Sedimentology, v. 45, p. 63-74.

Suttner, L. J., and Basu A., 1985, The effect of grain size on Detrital Modes: Atest of the Guzzi-Dickinson Point Counting Method Discussion: Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 55, no. 4, p. 616-627.

Suttner, L. J., Basu, A., and Mack, G. H.. 1981. Climate and the ongin of quartz arenites: Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 51, no. 4, p. 1235-1246.

Trevena, A. S., and Nash, W. P.. 1979. Chemistry and provenance of detrital feldspars: Geology, v. 7, p. 475- 478.

Trevena, A. S., 1981, An electron microptobe study of detrital feldspar Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 51, p. 137-150.

Van der Plas, L., 1966, The identification fo detrital feldspars: New York. Elsevier, p. 305.

Wallace, C. A.. 1976. Diagnotic replacement of feldspar by quartz in the Uinta Mountain Group, Utah and its geochemical implications: Journal of Sedimentary Petrology:, v 46, no. 4. p. 847-861.

Wilson, C. J. L„ 1973, The Prograde Microfabric in a deformed quartzite sequence. Mount Isa. Australia: Tectonic Physics, v. 19, p. 39-81.

Winston, D., 1977, Alluvial fan, shallow water, and sub-wave deposits of the Beit Supergroup near Missoula, Montana: Geological Society of America, Rocky Mountain Section,, 30th Annual Meeting, Field Trip Guide no. 5, p. 41.

Winston. D., 1991, Evidence for Intracratomc, Fluvial and Lacustrine Settings of middle to late Proterozoic Basins of western U.S.A.: in Gower, C. F., Rinus, T.. Ryem. B., eds., mid-Proterozoic Laurentia-Baltica: Geological Association of Canada special paper 38, p. 535-564.

Winston, D.. 1989, A sedimentologic and tectonic interpretation of the Belt in Winston, D., Hoodyski. R. J., and Whipple, J. W.. eds.. Middle Proterozoic Belt Supergroup, western Montana: American Geophysical Union International Geological Congress Field Trip Guidebook T334, p. 47-69.

Winston. D„ 1988, Proposed Intracratonic setting of western U.S. middle Proterozoic Basin: Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, v. 20, p. 474.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 173

Winston, D., 1986a, Stratigraphic correlation and nomenclature of the Middle Proterozoic Belt Supergroup, Montana, Idaho, and Washington, in Roberts, S. M., ed.. Belt Supergroup: a guide to Proterozoic rocks of western Montana and adjacent areas: Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Special Publication 94, p. 69-84.

Winston, D., 1986b, Sedimentology of Ravalli Group, Middle Belt Carbonate, and Missoula Group, Middle Proterozoic Belt Supergroup, Montana, Idaho, Washington, in Roberts, S. M , ed.. Belt Supergroup: a guide to Proterozoic rocks of western Montana and adjacent areas: Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Special Publication 94, p. 85-124.

Winston, D., 1986c, Middle Proterozoic tectonics of the Belt basin, western Montana and northern Idaho, in Roberts. S. M., ed.. Belt Supergroup: a guide to Proterozoic rocks of western Montana and adjacent areas: Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Special Publication 94, p. 245-257.

Winston, D., I986d, Sedimentation and tectonics of the Middle Proterozoic Belt basin, and their influence on Phanerozotc compression and extension in western Montana and northern Idaho, in Peterson, J. A , ed., Paleotectomcs and sedimentation in the Rocky Mountain region. United States: American Association of Petroleum Geologists Memoir 41, p. 87-118.

Winston, D., 1984, Sedimentology and stratigraphy of the Missoula Group: abstract in Hobbs, S. W.. ed.. The Belt: Abstracts and Summaries. Belt Symostum D, 1983: Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Special Publication 90. p. 30-32.

Winston. D.. 1978, Fluvial systems of Precambrian Belt Supergroup, Montana and Idaho, U.S.A., in Miall. A. D.. ed.. Fluvial Sedimentology, Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists Memoir 5, p. 343-359.

Winston. D., Horodvski. R. J., and Whipple, J. W„ 1989, Field Guide to the Middle Proterozoic Belt Supergroup, western Montana: American Geophysical Union. 28th International Geological Congress Field Trip Guidebook T334. 103 p.

Winston, D., and Jacob, J. P.. 1977. Middle Missoula Group (Precambrian) units of Montana and Idaho: Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, v. 9. no. 6. p. 776-777.

Winston, D., Kruger, J., and Hoyt, W„ 1988. Late Proterozoic and Early Cambrian structural configuration of western Montana: Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, v. 20. no. 6, p. 475.

Winston. D„ and Link. P. K.. 1993, Middle Proterozoic rocks of Montana. Idaho and eastern Washington: the Belt Supergroup, in Reed, J. C.. and others, eds.. Precambrian: Conterminous U.S., The Geology of North America, v. C-2, Geological Society of America, p. 487-517.

Winston. D.. McGee, D„ Quattlebaum. D. M.. 1986, Stratigraphy and sedimentology of the Bonner Formation. Middle Proterozoic Belt Supergroup, western Montana: in Roberts, S., ed.. Belt Supergroup: a guide to Proterozoic rocks of western Montana and adjacent areas: Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Special Publication 94, p. 183-195.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 174

Young, G. M , 1984, Proterozoic Plate tectonics in Canada with emphasis on evidence for a late Proterozoic rifting event: Precambrian Research:, v. 25, p. 233-256.

Young, G. M., Jefferson, C. W.. Delaney, G. D.. and Yed, G. M., 1979, Middle and late Proterozoic evolution of the northern Canadian Cordillera and Shield: Geology, v. 7, p. 125-128.

Young, S. W., 1976., Petrographic textures of detrital Polvcrystalline quartz as an aid to interpreting Crystalline source rocks: Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 46, no. 3, p. 595-603.

Zartman, R. E., 1991, The Belt-Purcell basin and its Pb Isotopic clues to the underlying lithosphere: Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, v. 23, no. 5, p. A210.

Zuffa, G. G.. 1980, Hybrid aremtes: their composition and classification: Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 50, no. 1. p. 21-29.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. EPILOG

TERNARY DIAGRAMS VERSUS BAR GRAPHS

[n this dissertation I have presented the detrital grain point count data in the form of bar graphs rather than

ternary diagrams. However ternary diagrams (Figs.66-77) of framework-mode provenance models, following

the method of Dickinson and Suzek (1979) and subsequently refined by Dickinson and others (1983) and

Dickinson (1985), are also presented here for comparison. The comparison reveals to me that Dickinson's

methods are overly generalized and are not adequate tools for detailed provenance analysis.

The ternary diagrams of sedimentary petrology were actually borrowed from igneous and metamorphic

petrology where they h a v e been used to understand the equilibrium relationships between phases (melt and

crystals) over a wide range of temperatures, pressures, and total compositions (Hvndman, 1985). However,

mineral grains in sandstone are not in equilibrium.

Interpretauons based on modal composition may not always concur with interpretations made on the basis

of stratigraphic and structural relationships. For instance. Mack (1984) objected to the Dickinson’s models by

pointing out four categories that may plot m error on provenance framework ternary diagrams:

1. Sandstones deposited during the transition between tectonic regimes may be derived, in part, from

relict source rocks:

2. Sandstones enriched in detrital quartz owing to weathering and/or depositional reworking may lead to

inaccurate interpretation of tectonic setting from compositional data:

3. Sandstones deposited in tectonic settings as yet unrepresented on the provenance diagram may plot

between the provenance field or overlap existing fields: and

4. sandstones containing abundant detntal fragments may affect the location of data points

on provenance diagrams.

175

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 176

Schwab (1981) applied Dickinson and Vallom’s (1980) model to Mesozoic-Early Cenozoic sandstones

in the French-Italian Alps and found general support of the model, but emphasized the necessity for defining the

relationship between the sandstone mineralogy and the plate tectonic setting more specifically. Girty and others

(1988) also cautioned about the use of the model when the sandstone samples are from a limited geographic

area and when metavolcamcs are suspected in the provenance. Even Dickinson (1988) cautions against

overextension of these models when he points out that petrofacies of mixed provenance are common because

dispersal paths connecting sediment sources to basins of deposition are complex. Recently Dickinson and

Ingersoll (1990) and Johnson and Stallard (1990) have discussed the potential problems involved in the use of

ternary diagrams for tectonic and provenance interpretauons.

Considering the shortcomings of Dickinson's plots, I used bar graphs for each category of detrital

mineral and its types expressed in volume percent of the total detrital grains. Although these graphs do not show

any field or an area (on the graph) of a specific petrofacies or tectonic environment, they show the composite of

each gram type independently and provide a more objective and detailed analysis. By taking into account the

relative abundance of individual detrital minerals, these graphs yield to a reasonable interpretation of

provenance and tectonic environment of the source area and the depositional basin.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Q

Clinton

Emerine Lookout

Flint Creek

Wise River

Figure 66. Triangular diagrams of the arenites of the the southern sections of the Bonner Formation; Q, total quartzose grains(Q=Qm+Qp); F, feldspar grains; Lc, lithic grains plus chert.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 178 Q

Libby

Fishtrap Creek

Nyack

Spotted Bear

Figure 67. Triangular diagrams of the aremtes of the northern sections of the Bonner Formation; Q, total quartzose grains (Q=Qm+Qp); F. feldspar grains; Lc, lithic grains plus chert

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 179

Buffalo Hump

Lc

Figure 68. Triangular diagrams of the aremtes of the Buffalo Hump Formation; Q, total quartzose grams(Q=Qm+Qp); F, feldspar grains; Lc, iithic grains plus chert

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 180

Fourth o f July Creek

Cronks Canyon

Lc

Figure 69. Triangular diagrams of the arenites of the Swauger Formation; Q, total quartzose grains(Q=Qm+Qp); F, feldspar grains; Lc, lithic grains plus chert.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 181 Qm

Clinton

Emerine Lookout

Flint Creek

Wise River

Figure 70. Triangular diagrams of the aremtes of the the southern sections of the Bonner Formation; Qm, total monocrystalline quartz grains; F, feldspar grains; Lt, total lithic grains including chert and polycrystalline quartz grains.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 182 Qm

I Libby

Fishtrap Creek

Nyack

Spotted Bear

Figure 71. Triangular diagrams of the arenites of the the northern sections of the Bonner Formation; Qm, total monocrystalline quartz grains; F, feldspar grains; Lt, total lithic grains including chert and polycrystalline quartz grains.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 183

Qm

Buffalo Hump

Lt

Figure 72. Triangular diagrams of the aremtes of the Buffalo Hump Formation; Qm, total monocrystalline quartz grains; F, feldspar grains; Lt, total lithic grains including chert and polycrystalline quartz grains.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. (84

Qm

Fourth of July Creek

Cronks Canyon

i

i

Figure 73. Triangular diagrams of the aremtes of the Swauger Formation; Qm, total monocrystalline quartz grains; F, feldspar grains; Lt, total lithic grains including chert and polycrystalline quartz grains.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Clinton

Emerine Lookout

Flint Creek

Wise River

Figure 74. Triangular diagrams of the aremtes of the southern sections of the Bonner Formation; Qm, total monocrystalline quartz grains; P, plagioclase feldspar grains; K, potassium feldspar grains.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 186 Qm

Libby

Fishtrap Creek

Nyack

Spotted Bear

Figure 75. Triangular diagrams of the arenites of the the northern sections of the Bonner Formation; Qm. total monocrystalline quartz grams; P, plagioclase feldspar grains; K, potassium feldspar grains.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 187

Qm

! Buffalo Hump i

K

Figure 76. Triangular diagrams of the arenites of the Buffalo Hump Formation; Qm, total monocrystalline quartz grams; P, plagioclase feldspar grains; K, potassium feldspar grams.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 188

Qm

Fourth of July Creek

Cronks Canyon

Figure 77. Triangular diagrams of the arenites of the Swauger Formation; Qm, total monocrystailine quartz grains; P, plagioclase feldspar grains; K, potassium feldspar grains.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 189

Appendix 1: LOCATION OF THE STRATIGRAPHIC SECTIONS

1. Wise River Section

The Wise River section the Bonner Formation is located in the northwest 1/4 of the southeast 1/4 of

section 36. T. 1 S., R. I2W. on the U.S. Forest Service Beaverhead National Forest map (west half). A 90 To

120 meter (300 to 400 feet) high vertical cliff surrounded by coarse talus slopes crops out on the northwest

side of Forest Rout 484 (Wise River Road) opposite an elk ranch approximately seven miles southwest of the

town of Wise River. A U.S.G.S. stream gauging stauon and a small wooden bridge also occur next to the road

at this locauon. The secuon begins at the lowest exposure in the cliff and continuous up the talus slope along

the west side of the cliff base.

2. Flint Creek Section

The Flint Creek secuon of the Bonner Formation is located at the shared comer of sections 25.26, 35

and 36. T. 6 N.. R. 14W. on the U.S.Forest Service Deerlodge National Forest Map. The secuon includes three

nearly vertical road cuts along the northeast side of U.S. highway 10-A in the vicinity of Flint Creek

campground between Skaikaho Road (Forest Route 16) and Georgetown Lake. The lowest (stratigraphicallv)

outcrop occurs approximately 50 meters uphill from mile marker# 30. Downhill (up secuon) between mile

marker # 30 and the entrance to Flint Creek campground, lies the middle outcrop. The third outcrop occurs

approximately 300 meters downhill from the campground entrance. The middle out crop is the Bonner

Formauon. whereas the lower and upper outcrops are Mount Shields Formation and McNamara Formauon

respectively.

3. Emetine Lookout section

The Emerine Lookout Section of the Bonner Formation is located in the northwest 1/4 of section 8 .

T.5N., R. 16W. on the U.S. Forest Service Deerlodge National Forest map. The section can be reached by the

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 190

Appendix I ....contd.

Forest Route 200 which turns south off of Skalkaho Road approximately three miles west of its intersection

with Rock Creek Road. This road goes all the way to the top of the Emerine Peak where a lookout station sits at

an elevation of 8616 feet. The section is exposed as a steep northeast facing cirque wall just north of the

lookout. The section begins at the lowest outcrop on bearing S.57W. from the center of a small lake in the base

of the cirque and continues up the steep slope and along a narrow notch in the upper half until it reaches the top

just north of the lookout.

4. Clinton Section

The Clinton section of the Bonner Formauon is located in the west 1/2 of section 11. T.39N. R. 17W

on the US Forest Service Lolo National Forest Map. Access to the secuon is not provided by any road. The

closest road is Forest Rout 502 which runs along the Schwartz Creek into the Sapphire Mountains south of

Missoula. The secuon can be reached by foot, after crossing Schwartz Creek, approximately 2 miles south of

the intersection of Clark Fork River and Forest Rout 502. This intersection is about three miles southwest of

the Town of Clinton; about 19 miles south of Missoula. The section is exposed parallel to the Clark Fork River

dipping southward. Chertv aremte beds of the McNamara Formauon are also exposed above the Bonner

Formation.

5. Spotted Bear section

Spotted Bear Section of the Bonner Formation is located which in secuon 7 of R. I3W.. T. 25N.. of

the US Forest Service Flathead National Forest Map (South Half of Forest Visitor Map). Access to the section

is provided by Forest Rout 586. which starts approximately 13 miles east of the Spotted Bear Ranger Station.

The section is exposed about 2 miles east of Beaver Creek Campground on the north side of the road as a road

cut facing Spotted Bear River in the south.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 191

Appendix 1 ....contd.

6 . Nvack Section

The Nvack section of the Bonner Formation is located in northeast 1/4 of section 18. R. I7 W.. T.

3 IN., of the US Forest Service Flathead National Forest Map (North Half of Forest Visitor Map). The section

is exposed along US Highway 2, approximately 12 miles east of the town of West Glacier at the southern

boundary of the Glacier National Park. The section became exposed during road construction on both sides of

the highway, however, southern side of the highway contains more continuous outcrops than the northern side.

7. Fishtrap Creek Section

Fishtrap Creek section of the Bonner Formation is located in southwest 1/4 of section 26 R. 28W.. T.

24N., of the US Forest Service Lolo National Forest Map (Thompson Falls. Superior, and Plains Ranger

districts), about 30 miles north of the Town of Thompson Falls. Access to the section is provided by Forest

Rout 516, which merges into Forest Rout 56 about 12 miles south of the exposed section. A small

campground and a Forest Service Station is also located about 1/4 mile north of the section. Base of the section

is exposed at the southern side of the Fishtrap Creek. With a few patches of covered areas mostly in the lower

half, the section continues southward until it reaches the base of a small valley. Rest of the section (the upper

half) is completely exposed on the south side of the valley as northwest facing wall of the mountain. This

section was previously measured by Winston and others (1986) and the white paint markings of their

measurements can sull be found here and there.

8 . Libbv Section

The Libby section of the Bonner Formation is located in section the northwest 1/4 of 30, T. 3 IN., R.

31W.. of US Forest Service Kootenai National Forest Map. The section is exposed between US Highway 2 and

the Burlington Northern Railway track approximately 5 miles west of Libby. Recent construction of the US

Highway 2 has also exposed the eastern part of the section which includes the lower part of the overlying

McNamara Formation. Mile # 24 on the Railway Track is almost the top of the Bonner Formation.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 192

Appendix 1 ....contd.

9. Clark Fork Section

The Clark Fork section of the Bonner Formauon is located in the northwest 1/4 of section 18. T. 27N..

R. 3E., of the US Forest Service Idaho Panhandle National Forest Map (Kaniksu National Forest). Access to

the section is provided by a private road off the US Highway 200 approximately four miles southeast of the

town of Clark Fork. The secuon is exposed in a small gulch adjacent to a pnvate agriculture farm (owned by

Mr. Dan Vogai in 1990) northeast of the highway.

10. Cronks Canvon section

The Cronks Canyon secuon of the Swauger Formauon is located in sections 8 . 18 and northwest 1/4

of secuon 17 T. 16N.. R. 21E., of the US Forest Service Challis National Forest Map (east half). Access to the

secuon is provided by US highway 93. The secuon is exposed in the Salmon Mountains along the highway,

about 38 miles south of Salmon and about 19 miles north of Challis. It is a thick well exposed secuon with a

svnciine structure. A small motel with camping and cabin facilities is located at the southern end of the secuon

next to the Salmon River. Both the ends of the exposed section are buried under Challis Volcamcs.

11. Fourth of Julv Creek Section

Fourth of July Creek secuon of the Swauger Formauon is located in the western half of secuon 2, T.

4S.. R. 18W.. of the US Forest Service Salmon National Forest Map (beaverhead Mountains). Access to the

section is provided by Forest Rout 071 which starts from US highway 93 approximately six miles south of the

town of North Fork. The section is exposed about nine miles northeast of the junction of Fourth of July Creek

(which flows along the Forest Rout 071) and US Highway 93. The base of the exposed section is about 400

feet west of the Forest Rout right after a small bridge on the creek. The basal 200 feet of the section is covered

by talus, after which the section continues intermittently to the top of the mountain towards northwest.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 193

Appendix I ....contd.

12. Buffalo Hump Formation

One section of the Buffalo Hump Formation included in this study is exposed in the Stensger

Mountain area of the Magnesite Belt in eastern Washington. The section (quartzite part of the Buffalo Hump

Formation) is located in NW 1/4 section 4. T. 31 N.. R. 39 E., just outside the Colville National Forest

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Appendix 2. SAMPLING LOG

This appendix shows the location of each sample collected for this study. Each stratigraphic section

was assigned a letter (A, B, etc) and the samples collected from the section were marked using a number

prefixed by that letter. Following is the list of letters and the corresponding stratigraphic sections:

A Fishtrap Creek (Bonner)

B Wise River (Bonner)

C Clark Fork (Bonner)

D Libby (Bonner)

p Flint Creek (Bonner)

F Emenne Lookout (Bonner)

G Buffalo Hump Formauon

H Nvack (Bonner)

K Spotted Bear (Bonner)

M Clinton (Bonner)

W Fourth of July Creek (Swauger)

X Cronks Canyon (Swauger)

All the sections were sampled starting from the base of the exposed section which is considered as

zero Ft/meter. In appendix 2 the ietetrs designated to different stratigraphic section are given at the top most

line of each page whereas the distance (in Ft./meters) between the samples are given in the first two vertical

columns on the left.

Examples: Sample A-4 is from Fishtrap Creek section of the Bonner Formation collected from 15 Ft

(4.5m) above the exposed section. Sample G-10 is from Buffalo Hump Forrmation collected from 90 Ft. (27m)

above the base of the section.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 195

Appendix 2....Contd.. Feet Meters A B c DE F G H K M w X 0 0.0 I 1 I 1 i I i 1 1 I 1 I 5 1.5 2 2 2 8 2.4 2

10 3.0 3 3 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 12 3.6 ■>

15 4.5 4 4 4 3 3 16 4.8 4 20 6.0 5 5 3 5 3 3 3 3 5 24 72 2 3 25 IS 6 6 6 4 26 7.8 6 28 8.4 7 30 9.0 7 7 4 7 4 4 4 32 9.6 5 33 9.9 4 34 10.2 8 35 10.5 8 8 8 38 11.4 40 12.0 9 5 9 5 5 5 9 45 13.5 10 10 6 46 13.8 10 47 14.1 5 48 14.4 4. SO 15.0 11 6 11 6 6 6 11 51 15.3

55 16.5 12 12 12 7 60 18.0 13 7 13 n 7 7 61 18.3 6 65 19.5 14 14

67 20.1 8 68 20.4 13

70 21.0 15 8 15 8 8 8 14 3 5 ~5 22.5 16 16 7

78 23.4 9 80 24.0 17 9 17 9 9 9 85 25.5 18 18 15 87 26.1 8 1 0 90 27.0 19 10 19 10 10 10 95 28.5 20 20 16 98 29.4 6

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 196

Appendix 2....Contd.. Feet Meters A B c D EF G H K. M W X

100 30.0 2 1 II 2 1 1 1 II n n

105 31.5 2 2 2 2 9 17

108 32.4 18 1 2

110 33.0 23 1 2 23 1 2 1 2 1 2 113 33.9 115 34.5 24 24 13 116 34.8 13 120 36.0 25 13 25 13 13 14 122 36.6 15

125 37.5 26 26 1 0 19 14 128 38.4 16

130 39.0 27 14 27 14 14 2 0

131 39.3 2 1 133 39.9 15

135 40.5 28 28 17 2 2

139 41.7 1 1 NO 42.0 29 29 15 15 18 23 144 43.2 19 145 43.5 30 30 16 147 44.1 31 24

149 44.7 2 0 ISO 45.0 9 32 31 16 16

153 45.9 1 2

155 46.5 1 0 33 32 17

158 47.4 2 1

160 48.0 1 1 34 33 17 17 2 2 25 162 48.6 23 165 49.5 35 34 168 50.5 13 169 50.8 18 170 51.1 36 35 18 18 24 26 175 52.6 37 36

180 54.1 1 2 38 37 19 19 27 181 54.4 185 55.6 13 39 38 14

190 57.1 14 40 39 2 0 2 0 194 58.3 19 195 58.6 15 41 40

200 60.1 16 42 41 2 1 2 1 28 205 61.6 17 43 42 20

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 197

Appendix 2....ContcL

Feet Meters A BC D EFGH KM w X 207 62.2 29 208 62.5 9 210 63.1 18 44 43 22 22 212 63.7 30 214 64.3 15 215 64.6 45 44 219 65.8 21 220 66.1 46 45 23 23 225 67.6 47 46 230 69.1 48 47 24 24 232 69.7 22 233 70.0 16 31 235 70.6 49 48 7 240 72.1 19 50 49 25 25 32 243 73.0 23 245 73.6 20 51 50 33 249 74.8 10 250 75.1 21 52 51 26 26 17 34 24 255 76.6 22 53 52 35 260 78.1 23 54 53 27 27 261 78.4 36 265 79.6 24 55 54 267 80.2 37 268 80.5 18 270 81.1 25 56 55 28 28 272 81.7 38 274 82.3 25 275 82.6 57 56 280 84.1 58 57 29 29 26 281 84.4 282 84.7 39 285 85.6 59 58 19 8 290 87.1 26 60 59 30 30 40 293 88.0 41 295 88.6 27 61 60 300 90.1 28 62 61 31 31 20 11 301 90.4 42 27 305 91.6 29 63 62 307 92.2 43 310 93.1 30 64 63 32 32

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 198

Appendix 2....Contd.. Feet Meters ABCDEFGHK M W X 315 94.6 31 65 64 44 320 96.1 32 66 65 33 45 324 97.3 21 325 97.6 33 67 66 330 99.1 34 68 67 34 46 28 335 100.6 35 69 68 339 101.8 47 340 102.1 70 69 35 343 103.0 29 345 103.6 71 70 22 346 103.9 48 350 105.1 72 71 36 12 30 352 105.7 49 355 106.6 73 72 360 108.1 36 74 73 37 361 108.4 31 362 108.7 50 365 109.6 37 75 74 367 110.2 23 370 lll.l 38 76 75 38 32 375 112.6 39 77 76 51 376 112.9 380 114.1 40 78 77 39 52 383 115.0 24 33 385 115.6 '9 78 390 117.1 80 79 40 53 395 118.6 30 400 120.1 41 81 41 25 54 34 405 121.6 42 82 408 122.5 13 410 123.1 43 83 42 35 411 123.4 55 415 124.6 44 84 417 125.2 26 420 126.1 45 85 43 421 126.4 14 425 127.6 46 36 56 430 129.1 47 87 44 36 434 130.3 27 435 130.6 48 88

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 199

Appendix 2.... Contd.. Feet Meters A BCDE F GHKMWX 440 132.1 49 39 45 57 57 445 133.6 50 90 449 134.8 15 450 135.1 51 91 46 9 455 136.6 52 92 38 460 138.1 53 93 47 58 461 138.4 59 465 139.6 54 94 470 141.1 55 95 48 39 473 142.0 60 475 142.6 56 96 480 144.1 57 97 49 61 483 145.0 40 485 145.6 58 98 41 490 147.1 59 99 50 62 494 148.3 28 495 148.6 60 too 500 I50J2 61 101 51 10 505 151.7 62 510 153.2 63 102 52 63 511 153.5 16 515 154.7 64 518 155.6 520 156.2 65 103 53 64 525 157.7 66 530 159.2 67 104 54 65 11 535 160.7 68 42 540 162.2 69 105 55 66 545 163.7 70 30 549 164.9 17 550 165.2 106 56 67 43 560 168.2 107 57 31 68 568 170.6 18 569 170.9 19 570 171.2 108 58 69 12 575 172.7 32 580 174.2 71 109 59 70 20 585 175.7 72 588 176.6 33 590 177.2 73 110 60 71

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 200

Appendix 2....Contd. Feet Meters ABCD E F GHKMWX 595 178.7 74 597 1793 72 600 18022 75 HI 61 605 181.7 76 34 13 44 610 183.2 77 112 62 611 183.5 73 615 184.7 78 620 186-2 79 113 63 621 186.5 74 622 186.8 35 625 187.7 so 630 1892 81 114 64 75 635 190.7 S2 21 640 192.2 83 115 65 36 76 645 193.7 84 45 650 1952 85 116 66 77 654 196.4 78 655 196.7 86 14 22 658 197.6 37 660 1982 87 117 67 46 665 199.7 88 670 2012 89 118 68 79 673 202.1 47 674 202.4 38 48 675 202.7 90 680 2042 91 119 69 80 49 685 205.7 92 690 207.2 93 120 70 39 81 50 691 207.5 15 51 695 208.7 94 '00 210.2 95 121 71 23 52 704 211.4 40 705 211.7 96 82 707 212.3 53 ’10 213.2 97 122 72 83 715 214.7 98 54 719 215.9 55 720 2162 99 73 84 722 216.8 41 725 217.7 100

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 201

Appendix 2—Contd.. Feet Meters A B C D E F GHKMWX ~28 218.6 85 730 219.2 101 123 74 24 56 735 220.7 102 86 740 727? 103 75 42 87 '43 223.1 57 745 223.7 104 88 '50 225.2 105 124 76 89 755 226.7106 9016 ~57 227J 43 58 760 228^ 107 77 59 '65 229.7 108 770 231.2 109 125 78 44 91 '75 232.7 110 780 234a 111 79 92 '82 234.8 60 785 235.7 112 45 '90 237a 113 30 93 61 794 238.4 25 '95 238.7 114 800 240a 115 81 802 240.8 62 804 241.4 46 805 241.7 116 810 243a 117 17 814 244.4 63 815 244.7 118 820 246.2 119 26 825 247.7 120 47 64 830 249.2 121 334 250.5 65 835 250.8 122 840 252.3 123 48 845 253.8 124 849 255.0 94 850 255.3 125 66 855 256.8 126 860 258.3 127 49 18 67 862 258.9 27 865 259.8 128 870 261.3 129

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 202

Appendix 2—.Contd.. Feet Meters ABCDEF GHK.MWX 875 262.8 130 878 263.7 50

879 264.0 6 8 880 264.3 131 0 0 885 265.8 132 r» 890 267.3 133 891 267.6 69 895 268.8 51 902 270.9 70 906 272.1 19 912 273.9 52 915 274.8 71 922 276.9 53 925 277.8 72 926 278.1 73 930 279.3 95 29 74 936 281.1 75 940 282.3 54

942 282.9 2 0 76 950 285.3 30 954 286.5 55 955 286.8 77 960 288.3 78 966 290.1 56

975 292.8 96 2 1 79 978 293.7 57 981 294.6 SO 985 295.8 81 989 297.0 58 990 297.3 82

995 298.8 2 2 S3 1000 30023 59 1008 302.7 84 1010 30323 23 31 1013 304.2 60 1015 304.8 85

1023 307.2 8 6 1027 308.4 61 87 1032 309.9 24 32 1039 312.0 62

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 203

Appendix 2....Contd. Feet Meters A. B C D E FG H K M W X 1049 315.0 25 33 I0SI 315.6 63 1063 319.2 64 1077 323.4 65 26

1086 326.1 6 6 1098 329.7 67 1100 330.3 27 34

1115 334.8 6 8 1128 338.7 69 1140 342.3 70 28 1157 347.4 71 1170 351.4 72 1186 356.2 73 1189 357.1 29 1198 359.8 74 1213 364.3 30 1215 364.9 75 1241 372.7 31 2010 603.6 38 2030 609.6 89 2050 615.6 90 2070 621.6 91 2090 627.6 92 2110 633.6 93 2130 639.6 94 2150 645.6 95 2170 651.7 96

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. :o4

Appendix 3: POINT COUNT DATA

This appendix contains all the data acquired after counting 300 grains per thin section using traditional

point counting method. Because of a large number of clast types, two poit counters were used simultaneously; one,

powered by electricity, was attached to the stage of the microscope and the other was operated manually. All the

clast types are shown as volume percent of the counted grains whereas grains (GRN), matnx (MTX), and cement

(CMT) are volume percent estimateof the total rock.

The top most line of each page of the appendix 3 is the sample number. Locauon of the stratigraphic

sections are described in appendix 1 and position of each sample within a sirathgraphic secuon is given m

appandix 2 .

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1.66 2.32 7.95 3.97 4.97 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.98 000 0.00 A-55 10.00 10.00 11,59 66.56 23.18 1.02 0.00 8.87 2.39 0.002.39 0.99 0.68 138.1 141.1 71.33 77.13 74.50 71.33 67.22 450 460 470 5.28 3.41 5.63 7.59 5.80 066 3.30 4.29 3.41 0 00 0.00 0.00 000 924 7.51 960 A-51 A-53 135.1 74.59 75.00 85,00 80.00 23.10 21.16 23.18 23.10 21.16 67.66 44S 1.25 5.00 2.19 5.63 5.31 3.96 0.000.31 0.00 1.02 0.00 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.63 0.99 0.00 0.66 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.50 1.65 0.00 A*50 11.56 9,90 13.75 13.20 12.29 11.59 14.06 70.00 71.88 25.31 25.31 420 627 0.63 2.50 2.31 063 0.00 0.660.00 0.00 0.66 0.00 6.27 0.00 A-45 15.00 15.00 10.00 10.00 12.85 10.97 11.25 10.97 70.85 74.38 76.90 77.13 76.82 70.22 59.87 60.63 4IS 1.89 0.00 2.81 0.00 0.00 1.57 0.63 0.00 346 0.00 0.00 7.86 4.70 4.06 629 0.00 0.31 0.00 0.31 0.00 16.04 10.97 13.75 9.24 5.80 9,60 14.78 16.30 80.00 80.00 27.99 29.15 51.89 27.99 29.15 20.13 62.89 47.17 59.25 60.63 67.00 SSO 1.51 723 8.73 8 8 43 6.29 0.00 3.460.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.92 4.52 7.86 4,70 114.1 124.615.00 126.1 133.6 5.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 5.00 12.65 15.72 64.16 sso 8.64 99.1 4.65 241 4.72 6.98 631 12.35 13.21 59.14 61.75 21 26 14.76 20.60 14.46 63.79 SI0 722 II 30 7.90 12.96 93.1 8.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.19 5.65 A-31 A-34 A-40 A-44 16.84 14.95 21.08 17.18 16.15 65.98 1.04 0.69 1.66 1.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 000 000 000 7.61 5.19 6.92 9.62 4.50 0.00 A-29 19.03 1038 6.19 78.89 82.13 84.39 78.61 67.92 55.36 59.79 65,74 1 36 1 780 1522 5.00 20.00 20.00 15.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.42 9.69 13.40 17.61 0.00 4.75 0.68 3.46 2.75 2.99 1.81 A-24 II 86 12.11 7.22 12.54 73.90 2441 1903 16.84 14.95 21.08 24S 26S SOS 73.6 79.6 91.6 5.77 8.97 0 000.00 1.69 0.00 2.08 1.03 066 0.30 0 64 000 7.69 6.41 1.36 5.54 0.64 3.21 2 565.13 0.68 4.07 2.42 2.06 1.33 0.60 0.00 9 94 24 II 84 13 8.93 7.64 4 220.96 5.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.66 1.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 64 6.73 23.73 0 96 0.00 000 0.00 0.66 A-20 15.00 25.00 15.00 1000 5.00 10.00 15.00 10.00 15.71 15.06 6.10 13.15 II 54 11.86 20 51 75.00 70.00 65.00 70.00 80.00 65.00 20.51 24.41 78.85 57.05 44.07 68.91 49.49 65.05 73.20 76.74 74.40 63.78 67.80 240 1.57 1.57 57 1 1.57 3.76 8.46 0.00 3.13 0.00 A-19 66 14 63.01 69 91 200 1 33 1 0.00 60.1 72.1 864 3.76 033 25 1 4.98 4.70 15.61 1561 12.54 27.2427.24 22.57 22 57 67.77 1.19 1.99 0.00 1.79 00 1 2.98 365 4.70 7.74 0.60 2.98 3.65 15.00 15.00 15.00 16.07 1220 59,52 55.81 ISO 190 1.25 5 335 7.14 664 2.19 5.02 0.00 0.00 6.27 8 33 10.00 11.29 12.23 1667 94 16 II 29 80.00 7000 80.00 70.00 73.98 72.62 22.8822.88 23.81 23.81 64.89 1.61 094 8.06 968 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 097 2.19 3.23 3.76 5.95 3.99 3.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 000 99 1 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 32 0.00 0.66 0.00 A-10 A-12 A-14 A-16 10.00 1000 15.00 5.00 15.00 11.29 10.66 11.61 11.63 10.03 77.42 76.18 75.60 71.43 74.61 2097 69.35 64.89 59.52 55.81 SO ISS 9.0 46.5 54.1 57.1 1.27 8 8 86 7.10 9.09 13.10 11.96 6.90 5.06 4.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 000 0.324.75 0.65 3 87 0.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 5.060.95 3.55 4.11 1076 10.76 9.68 1223 10.13 76.27 23.10 20.97 23.10 66.14 25 7.5 5.71 5.08 0.63 2.22 1.27 0.97 6.35 13 33 13 12.06 12.34 10.79 11.11 13.02 23.17 63.49 6.0 A-5 A*6 A-7 5.00 10.00 15.00 5.00 0.00 2.22 0.00 5.71 6.67 5.71 0.63 0.32 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.59 12.38 15.00 15.00 10.00 13.65 11.75 72.70 74.29 75.00 76.45 80.00 70.00 75.00 85.00 26.67 72.70 76.51 26.67 23.17 60.95 63.49 66.14 69.35 F Meters Feet 20 I t MTX Q QNII K MC QU Qp L CM 1' CRN QmQmNlI 60.95 QpMcg 0.00 0.00 0.00 QPMIcNII QpMicll 6.03 ORPRF 13.02 MRF 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 QpNU QpU 11.75 Qmll QPMacNII QpMIc 6.03 CI1T Simple No SRF 0.00 0.00 QPMegNU QpMac QpMaclJ QpMegll

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 206 »0©©©©©vi3er*- — ©rs*r©vip<4©rsmoev»v,»©v,\© © — ee — >o -«o ‘ »N,^©©©<**©fN©©oo^©*r*n©«n© — t*";*'O©c,,C NO *n «n 30 © ©

«rv<\irt©©©©eN303er**©n«np>«**r'Caom©',n — rs © t*** c-* — v© r*« >e j;—»,J;©©©v^©-T©©©w'»©»«fs©M — fsaC'Caor-^^'^C'OO^'O “ o’ vi vi » — p* * ci os ji — > ri d —’ d vc n c i o ’ c o 6 © K C (N n fS -r m — -s — — —

lC•••^©COfS'A'CflCT^;^ O O C O -'O ^ W O (#lX'CNOJ\---C'(nO!*l,fl'flO'OnOO' - ps *r c— n© © — « v «n cn n n ^ n t O rs a O w w vi <©* ad —’ vri «© p"i —* ps K «n’ —* ac «n

rS'*-\./-}oe©rsv>p~r'"irs—«©r-t^psacw^rrs — r-* — so©©rNr—-©O^r ■ j o o © - « '0 ^ c , 'rtV-*«»o^fi,*|A(srv3'n vO '"">'*,<80'0 0'0 ® Oi^ n’ m t # riK oi*-’ n K *r n C'f' - *0/1 o ’ d dr^ «n © ©* © © oo'© — cs— vo*r — — —

— ©0 © 0 © * t — ^n©'Or^w-ivn — »or^©w^aer**oo~p,*©©r^oc'0©'C > g o o o © © ? « « i*j o t «c v * w - is » n *r « - “ ^ t*; ? o a ® o"© tn in o> NiniNN" p* f*i ri « f1* d vii-- o’ wi v is - «’ — oo n ee w ri —n —pi p* c* o d #*i©f^i©©o©'Ovnoo30©r,4r,,*««^r3evow’>©wp,i©©©p,,*r,*'C — © © **i©p^©©©-"'*nr**©vo^©'Om©'Cfnf*,i©fn'C©'©oooo^^vOfn© “ -c c" vi w» f* n *r ad - vo ev c « «r - ri — o’ - ri o ri o> O' n fi o’ d ^ (s « - r** r*- ' O ' C — — —

fs>n3c©©©'C«n-»fSvnp^wr© *r© © © © «n*rm © fn^r,^S,*'0© 0© f*4",\^ © © ©©©©f»\©»N\c©>c©©©r*»fn»r»np^QOfnfntN©©p^© ^ 50 « o’ id /i - *r p* - >d * O « O O o’ ri o’ fs v C ri n *r ffi d O 6 ^ n — — r» r-

r» © ps © © © — orjaco«T C »fO ao — '©o03Crsr'"i©©©w»»n©ao© 0 '0 3Q© © © ™ fwx3CiTrn*'0©'6f,\©r#%rs©fN©m'n©©r^-"©©© •^iNo’cd^N d-iN oi-d-fsc-’rd n v C ’f N OC •• — P- r- — vO >©

M,nNO©O»«'fiv0(N'f-e«OO©OOOP*NV ©«^^;©©l©r^'C“ 0'np,^p,*m ^ r© © © © © © “ rnoo J. ^ — w» v» ©*© — ©’©’© © © —•©’©" ©©' f+\ © m vO* © wi “• rs oo — r~» ~ c — >C vi

O^P'OSOOOO'rtO'rt'rtC'rtOOO-O-rOV©ps,rsjo©©©ooocv©©'©©« — ©©©•<■*© v» — © — ^ © © vn vi’ so v-i pm r-i © r-i -r in © © © © p" © r— v© © \© © © ■© rs © — © % NOC -vO -O- -w *f (S N - -

— »r«nr***©©©rs —•© oe‘«m»r'Or»©©©ao(N'0 ©m '0 ©©©—• © oo © ^ #> ^opqN --o5'**--C '© oo,rm -«^eiNr{,rP;0'nQ C J»'°©W'iw-i©r*,'r<"',»—-©©'■C r*"ir-i©©©'"H0<™’’'r-*0 * — — 3 *• — vO — — r- P«* — —• vO •© u — ©n©©©T©»-rr-P^©©w-i*r©m©'0«s©©©©©©«^©fn©©'0 ■3 — OQ — C. ©'nr»©©of*'*—•© n n 'n © — ^©-©©ae — © © p-*—'© rs©©©©©-*?© r». r*'^(M^©©©S30Pswn©»r»««r,»r^'0>oor**'0© — 'O'Toeooooor^cn© > v,'odocodj''C *rpi^'C ^-c-'C -*|floe-d'cdC'p,'NOO r«»rs — ae — © — —• © */i — — 0.00 000 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 m in © © © o © o © — "rr-pn — — — — r-»pn©30O

O 0 0 --n»OOO*r-pi'Opv©^'ni;O’TP ; 9 000 Ji^r\irio'pr>-n

«n© rso© © © r-rs© -'rr,,*© *rv»© © © © ,*r»r\ — © — © © r- rs © rs © • - — ^ ~ '■‘^©©©O'-'irs — — © — ■*r«vrsrs©m© jt^ninovidin'r - NCidpitddd'Orif'od'rt ©"©©©©©© — r*. — — so — © — © — »n — — —

•»CNOOO'P'nO(NTO>P\-NOS©80'r*f»t©l/'r i d irt^'Cviop'-'fl?'*f’w 6 o o ,n," ,N^c in ^ M "iN C )d 3 — p* — — p* r- © © rs rs — —

— ©rso©©p»m-rm©©rsr"*vi©3©©p*mTroo© 0.00 000 0.00

^Q aO O q'aO'O'fnON^'rtqOpfi'CO^'OO 000 ji^m dw iX 'O nn-N oi'Pd’rddOpicipipv-'dff'd’fv n - d ** — go — © © — «/1«« fS fS - -

r-© — o o © m m — p*© — 3e©©m3cr— — oom — © — oooommgc©© ^5^cao*ooo^O '^|iN X 'r|flTOviTrO'floinpp;«o,rooo — diNPioobtvn - pi © — vi ci 'O pi n o' o' ci r» — — «n vj n w —

»n© — ©©©rsrs©©©«nrs©©©©©r>*©oem©p».©ae©©©©© in p © © o oc m »n © © © rs © m. © © © © © © © © © — — >n *n o © O ^ d d d O O n o ri /i o' ,f n h - -’ O o' C © PS PS —• —

® = = 3 z z s z = 7 ^ - c = =_SfffSf«S«“S “ E i ■ 5 £ « zs_?^SSSSSSSSS r j _ , Is •*■ 5 S “ e! 2 *e Z = e . e . c . = E = o.a.a.c.&.c.c.tt.o. S * — K LI LI 9.60 93 18 15.49 7.69 11.82 12.15 15.30 19.59 18,15 12.66 15.70 10.06 12.46 8.01 11,11 31.85 29.62 38.26 46 01 42,17 MRF MRF 0.00 1.48 3.03 0.00 0.00 2.08 2.49 2.70 0.00 0.00 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.69 7.01 60S S.I4 S.43 7.3S w ^ S o S u O ’O'O’O'C'O'O’O'O’O’O’O’O’O 'O 'O 'O O 'u.M SO -'U a. SKK 0.00 0.00

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 57 1 5.35 5 66 5 5.35 5 5 35 3.77 4.40 0.94 2.52 0.00 3.00 12.26 17.92 33.02 59.12 24.84 66.04 9000 150 165 1.88 3.14 5,33 7.21 8.15 5.35 6.58 8.18 5.00 7.00 6.27 439 4.08 0.00 4.70 45.0 49.5 B-32 B-35 13,7911.91 14.15 II 01 10.6610.66 7.86 7,86 11.60 15.05 33 33 86 27.27 55.49 82,76 83.96 23,82 19.18 67.71 43,89 46.86 90.00 147 1.57 1.57 7.52 8.46 846 3.76 4,70 0.002.19 0.00 2.51 0.00 2.83 0.00 063 0.63 15 05 15 17.24 10.00 5.00 59.25 84.01 20.69 6332 145 7.81 7.52 5.31 3.13 0.00 5.00 6.56 3.45 3.45 4.69 1.88 B-30 B-31 10.00 15.00 40.00 13,75 19,06 4.08 80.00 50.00 55.00 76.49 60.31 41.25 140 2.50 1.88 0.94 0.94 7.817.81 9.69 9.69 2.81 6.56 4.69 5.33 0.00 0.00 42.0 43.5 44.1 B-29 11.56 1094 2 51 1 0 . 0 0 17.50 55.31 81.88 80.63 53.75 60.00 28.13 25.63 44 69 8.28 9.06 9.06 4,78 2.50 4.38 5.00 5.41 4.78 0 64 0.00 0.00 0.94 0.96 9.24 6.37 5.31 40.5 B-28 10.19 9.06 35.03 38,44 35 31 53.82 80,57 64.97 130 135 1.89 0.00 0.94 1.88 1.57 5.35 11.15 7.86 8.28 9.38 5.66 5.73 5.35 11.15 3.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.66 000 094 0.63 0.00 5.41 0.00 0.00 1.57 0.00 4.72 3.82 15.00 39.0 11-27 14.781006 12.10 16.56 8.28 14.69 1.56 3.45 1 0 . 0 0 10.69 21,34 10.63 19.50 15.61 26.56 20.31 26.10 84.91 20.00 5.00 30.00 68.55 1.89 2.20 2.55 1.89 1.89 1.89 7.26 7.57 095 4.42 13.84 9,15 9,15 B-26 15.14 1 0 . 0 0 1640 14.51 10.73 81.70 50.16 54.72 43.63 30.00 60 88 65 41 20.82 120 125 1.58 000 2 2 84 8.20 0.00 1.58 662 568 0.00 0.00 36.0 37.5 2.52 0.95 0,95 14.51 10.00 81.39 60.00 60.00 70.00 90.00 29.65 115 5 97 5 0.00 4.72 6.92 9.78 9.12 094 031 0.00 0 31 4.72 12.30 B-24 B-25 15 0915 221 063 13 8413 11.04 11.04 43.40 36.91 3628 55.66 51.74 24.21 11.36 27.99 3396 28.08 27.13 1635 26.75 1.59 2.52 221 7.32 8.28 692 9788.28 8.49 9.15 8.83 669 0.00 5,00 5.00 30.00 7.32 9,75 1672 3.82 8.28 3.50 4.09 6.31 0.64 637 B-17 12.42 19.81 14.01 18.24 12.93 35.03 82.80 83.65 56.69 49.69 53.31 54.57 90 00 90.00 61 61 46 42.68 31.45 40.38 70 80 1.90 1.91 1.59 5.08 4.78 2 83 3.47 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.40 5.08 7.30 5.41 0.00 6.35 6.35 4.76 21.0 24.0 34,5 4.76 063 2 55 9.21 921 B-15 12.70 14.29 21.34 10.16 9 55 11.43 53.65 80.95 27.30 26 II 44 44 22.22 18.79 60 18.0 1 62 1 5 84 5 5.00 5.00 5.00 7.47 7.47 844 6.82 2.92 2.92 2.54 2.87 3.90 7.47 6.49 0.00 1.27 0.65 0.00 4.55 B-13 Appendix 3...contd. 15.26 17.86 10.39 11.36 11.43 12 34 12 11.36 82.14 50.97 37.66 34.92 90 00 90.00 64 64 29 66.67 31.17 4058 23.70 5.81 806 5.48 2.58 8.06 9.35 2,90 8.06 4.52 B-12 11.29 17.10 14.19 86.13 9000 20.32 50 55 15.0 16.5 1.95 1.62 3 55 5.00 005 5.00 5.00 7.47 5.84 5.81 5.19 4 84 8 8 12 903 3.90 3 55 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 649 12.34 17.86 85.71 37.66 40.32 90.00 65.26 65 81 31 31 82 34 52 53.90 51.61 23.70 25,48 41.56 40.32 45 1.93 4.55 1.61 0.65 0.97 5.00 00 5 547 5.47 3 3 54 7.40 4.55 8.68 0.00 0.00 9.32 0.64 9.32 13.31 B-10 B-U 11.90 8.44 12.86 20.45 11.25 11.90 8.44 79.42 33.76 54.34 66.56 -to B-9 1.62 0.96 1.62 12.0 13.5 1.62 7.00 5.50 5.50 2.59 6.43 4.55 3.88 4.82 5.84 4.53 9,06 647 6 15 07 7 9.06 17.80 21.54 10.36 67 67 31 83.17 23 23 30 25 08 59,87 90,00 90.00 49 51 4502 B-8 1 95 1 5.00 00 3 7.14 5.00 6.17 8 8 77 7.14 8.44 8.44 3.90 0.65 0.00 0.00 2.60 2.27 6.49 6.15 8 36 4.55 0.00 0.00 17.53 15.86 11.36 16.88 11.65 14.29 9.39 83.77 51.62 90.00 32.14 4026 30 35 9.0 10.5 B-7 1 621 62 1 5.00 5.84 7.47 2.92 8.12 8.12 7.14 7.79 7.77 4.55 4.55 0.00 19.81 14.29 11.36 55.52 36.36 3994 07 31 90.00 64.94 66 23 21.75 25.97 25 7.5 B-6 1.62 5.00 5.00 7.79 3.57 6.49 7.47 9.74 6.49 6.82 0.00 0.65 0.97 6.170.00 6.17 0.00 4.55 4.55 4.55 10.00 17.86 11.36 12.34 11.36 7.47 16.88 12.34 12.34 85.00 80.84 84.74 37.66 29.22 62.99 31.17 31.82 43.18 4448 43.18 Feet MIX Meters CRN U U QNU CMT QU Qp Qpll Qm QmNlI K F MC L PRF MRF Sample No QpNII Qmll QpMeg QPMegNU QpMegll QpMac 19.81 QPMacNII QpM scll 2.92 2.92 QpMic QPMIcNII QpMicll 1.95 OR CIIT SRF

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. :o s p» m ae VO m m © O © O so © m © o© rs© © rs — — ao © r-* © — ^rs©toto©o©^©p«*tom — © © © «r — *r m 3 x x - © to —i cm —> *r m — —

© © ae m — r» «rO O © — p- *r © ac © © rs O os rs © © © O <0 Cs to ©, © PS — — m p*- © —• Cs xtt *r © © 0© © © ^T — PS O' O' © □O PS -P m © — XX- •»r m —•

«C W-V 00 o © o — rs — © © © © © © m m to v, © «o © © o oo O' -v sO © rs © © pi “ «r fi — on ao © © m © © © sO o © © * © — r-^ 'T ©* w-i © — •tr — PS —

© © © ©©>o — to rr — ©©p-rsao — oo© SO © © © o ©S O' © © Om — ^f-(NO', — - n X N q — - © vi to in tv c r*> O © O >fl « vi — O' — O O >o n » •» pI >ri oe — cn n rs

00 © © © r» r- to to On © fN © m rs *r © — © © «« v% to © © w r* *r « t n *r fN —» s©*T © ^ © ps m O' —*; vi to ri — oo c ic s » \C rs © © © © 80 — m n S5 'O r* (N fs v n n « - m

© rn oo © ao — © © m r»» O' sn «y to m © © © — p- m ••r © © P^ © © ©, © t o © so © — oo © sn to ©' rs ©' © © s' rs — O' ps © © © m r* — mayors OO — 30 rs —■

— tor-©©©torsm © — 3C©rs©o©rsm© M N J iP O O C O ifl>fioo© .'C N ’r p«tom^r©©o©©©rN rsrstorsacae© — 2 N ri O O O - ri O' ©iovi — m © o © m © m rs © rs © © pfsiN-nnd*fl ““ P** © m — OO to PS —. — «o »r — — —

r - © © © © to so ao oo © r** © © © © — 00 00 © m m m vO PS sO O © *T © © i © © p ^ rs © ©. rs p» O' © © © aci »o O — © — — m © rs — ao © — PS © to to ©’ © — P^ to PS O © © © SO SO —' ©‘ — © © © m © —• ps n n rs — —

© © a © ps >o ao © © © oo © © r» oo © © 'Tm to© © © ao© — p- to 3 to ao o rs 2 3 oo r- © m j, Ps © © © © PS m © m © —► o © m oo ao to PS *T © PS

ao vc © ac r-.-rm©©o©oomac «r ao to so ao ao P* — © © © to to mr*©©©©mao OO — © © © m — - r © © © © ao — to rs ps — *o m — —

— o oo © m m p- ao m rs so © PS Ps so © © to e © oo -r © — m © — — © © ' — p«^ © m «r © — PS — —

© p* © © © p» r— © © rs m © — m © no Ps © © © © © © © — © — ©ao©©rsr»©oe © '- 3 X Jt ‘“s © © to oo « O 6 ri p © © — © © © © — rs sc © © © go — n - ia n -

a . to V*> vc » — o o © — ocmootom — — orsac'ym to© — a . -r «n —* p- *o rs 'ao© ©ors so'C v-v © 'O© © *p so ac o vc rs © ps =5 ^ -P totnprirs-Ndpsdrsdodocri*friaotr,ri,:r i d 3 - ,r'ndri < aotommrstorsrs — — — «r

*r © so © © © to © — SO aeto©©©torNmNC*rPSP**r—tn.. _ © © rs p» O •r ■—. © © © © © m OO to to "r© © o © rsm © — to so to to pi m T © P’S — © ^ rNmdda©psp>p- — rs 'C'ddddtnpopi-odO 'tnp © © -r to © © to ■*r — p* © —

^ f \ O O O C * r |r© * “ PoenfS © © © 00 to ro to oo ao p* rs sc © rs © © •p©to©©o©©©^©^to© © © © sc © SO oo ac oo — © * p- to © to © © © © s c — © — ©©somacrs rs — —

rs © so © © SC to rs so sC © © -r pi rs to © © o © rs rs — © ac -r r«. r*> — -r m © O © © to to ps©©o©©toT*r© m — rs — —

©ootosc©oe©oo sc — © © © m m © © to

© © SO o © o © — © ps m 'Cr**p»»rmmto©oooo p*> rs © m © o — © © © © © © - r — ts n — — (S 'CtO'Coooopsmoo — — p«* —- rs ao rs o to sc © -- © r» n-'CnfSP»T-«od m © — ps sc © — a »o rr

©so>©©©©©T''CoepssorNrs© rn ae ao m © moo«o©o©so—, «r© cm © too © o ©[ r r*- o rs m***too© ©madtop^rsiototo© © © © vS —• -p — — ©' ©’ © — © © — -^ © fN “ tO'Cm — * so - - - © to­

© to ps tn tf ps T PS ©©rs-^©*r©m©to © © © o- oo - - - oo — 'r^to©-*ip©^r©©^r rs © vn to © © © © 0 0 m © m rs © © m vn »o m —

o 3 2 z Z 3 Z = ■S. C = = 2f ! f 2f S S S i ^ ^ 5 H ta S fc 5 5i - 5 2 - Z^e.c.c.EES — z=>=? =- s s.3.a.s.suc.3.a.e. s s s s s s s s id sc s a £ a — OO'O'OO'O'O'O’O'OO'OO'C'C'O'O’O *3.0 —

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 209 N X ’T'rtun — vs — — O' — ® “ * ©Cs©©^©vsvs© (N V T V cs cs p © <-i © 30 S ©‘ U, ^ rs © — O ^ ^ t*“ CO O' O' m n — -« O' N

© © © vs m rs © vi ®. ^ sc1 — © — ©©©©r**rs© — *r rn vi ac o -*. — rs rs © — vn © ao -'On-W 'rtfSN- — © c m ON ON — O'. esIp © © © r-* — os r-. — y-i rs ©’ vs o © © vi ©

©©©©©■*rrsrs © — ^«ro©©©ao^^ ao r- rs os cs vs oe r» cs © © _;©©©rs — — rs © rS O-O 'AO'flfnM in rs — — vs vs © r*s ei —' r-^ ©’ ©’ — ©’ — oo’ — © o rn ©’ o’ ©‘ rs

N O © — © © — n — rj in n O . . • t-** ^ — m v» fl N O ^ O © O vs rs © O' r* rs. © © Os ao p p vs oe © ao vi o vs tt «r oo © m vs © vs A "^ — © vi m Cs © Os © ©' iri n — rn — fN r-i v i rs od oo’ •*r r-* © v i rs ©’ *r © — cs — vs -r —

l/i vs © © © oo rs © rsvs©vi©mm — — oo os © t r « 5 ; ®. o Osi — ©©aoootsrsO* — — •*r©’*r©-»r,s©©* r -*r © — SQ ^ © © vs © — r-^m r»i — «*■» oo vs C N O « O' » O - — ©* o © © •** — © © — rs

© © © © cs rs — «©rs^r©ae © © © © a o r s vs © © * ’y vi -- -r v vi © © © © ■'T r-* — - r © © vi vs’ © ao — ©’ «r © Os «r© ©’ ©’ «n n r* ri ri oi ao rs © — © © — oo — ao vs rs '■‘■s cs - r r»s —

— «r rs © m © © © © © oo — © ao r»* © oe o ao os os rs p © © vs vs a o © p»* rs © © © — vio’ oi--OsOs©r’sOsrsvi<"-\©Os

© © © © © © C s© © © — ©vsOsOCs©© © © © © © © —•©©©v>©©©© © © © r-» — — O © p m ^ © © vs vs © rs m rs d (NO'O'sf *r >o n T n o»r “ • — © —

© — © © ©v» — »r © © © >«r p's — m ao oe p — © — © ao oe © o © © © © © *r © so * * ad oi © ©' ©' © ©* © © vi — Os rs oi — vs — rs —

© © o © — ©vsC'Cs©moovs©o O rs x — - vs © ao © oo © © O © © © . rn © r>« © — vi © « r* © © © © © © © — oo rn rn rs © ao vs m vs © © © vs vs O ci — *r r* r» in — n o o’ O "f oi vi © ad — ©’ © © ao vs rs rs — vi -r —

ae — © © © ao © O O N O 'O O O W f Os w — r^©oo©© — « © m © © © © os p vi © — «r ©i ©i © vs r- rs — — ©r—aomO'Viooor'* Os © vi vs od oi — © — oo r*\ r-i rs vi ri ri d o’ ri ri o’ *r ffl rs — —

t) c. r»v>©©© © — *racaooo©-r© •r oo — © © ©. “ - ©— —O ©— ao— «r- m - --oo vs os © O' © © © — Os O' © © rs o O' — © © oi 30 © — © — O O V i’TP'O ’TNO < S3 r* vs —

© © — © © © © VS oo©©vsvs-r©T rs O © o © © vi © © ^ O © © VS w viO'©o©m o'©o* t 8^ C; n ri *r O' © vs vs rn©©i^i© 0 0 © © oi — vs -f a 30 vs rs rs — vs m —

VJ Vi © © © T 00 © 30 ^ © m O vs vs v» vi © •*r -r m © m © © © O © Cs © © © vi r~ r«»rs rs © -r O' — v © vs © © vi vi vi © d O d fi ri ri © — vi rn © od —• vi rs ©

© — © © VI vs © r- — © *r -r — rn VS © © O' © © Os -r vs t © oo rs © © OO © oo OS O' rs r> rs w © vs p © vi v» r-i r** © vi od © © © © oi V © © • © © ©* m © — n* vi ©’ a ao — r- vs rs

— W-i © © © © © <~s r» © © rs © © — p» rs © rs © ad © © © — oo rs oo 3 © © © — © — © © © © rs © © © *ro^© oo — mm vs x —

© © © 8 § 2 - © © — *r r^ rs oo a © © oi © © ©

OS V"! © © © — oo © 00 © © © ao © oo r’SViO'Csr'1 ©©Vi — vs T T rs rs © © © — vs vs — rs — = » § 2 30©o©ao*r*rvi r*i m* ©" r«i © ©* © © — rr* oi — — oo « o i* o vi © fn — r*» vs rs rs

© »r os — © © © m © © r^» mr * r 'n ,r - 0'x n © ’f © p © — ©vsr* © r» © © © © O' O'© rsr** -r p - T p © oo©vivioirsscrsoi rsooo — csrs© Oi © d d d ri oo ri sf ri O ri ao — r«» © — rs — vs -r —

o n. y z s r 2 M % ± SC b S Z S a o .a e c s q ______. 0. a. c. c. a & fl> a * S K 5 B - JikS^Z^O'O'C'C'O'O'O'O'O'O’C'O'C'O’O'C'O'C'Sfc* cC -w »£71-

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 210 m © — ©©©>C«Trs«r — m rs m © © © © — © rs m rs — m m ae «ri r-» ^ © ae—■•f^p p © r ,*r*«*©t-‘r‘©©©C'©©©r«»-'0©©©©rsrS'«C'O'Cmp

d rs d d d m d m ©' d d m d ac © © d d m m -r d — vi w> rs rs o ©' d 0 . 0 0 — ^r*. — — sC—»vn — m *r m m m

S"iO — © 3 © r - c ,vr,*^r'Oaom*r©‘ ©©© *r — mcv*rv»mm'-or’«»©©© r>»©vp^pp© © © © ^r\o© r*>*ao© © or»© r'*>© m m © *pm vip© © 0 .0 0 -i ^ —. g o o o fn r-i -r 0^0 d o — csc^fW — r4 ss C''T d d d ■" *f»rsi — — ^ — — t — m —• m m m

m 3 — ©OOrsvnr*-© 3c — '*'ir>-'>c©©0 © ^r'C© ,T'OP-'r»QGac,yr-©

r»- >c jg- © © O © «rx -r p © oe — ^ p © p p v» © ^ © m p p >o rs m vo p 0 .0 0 d ^ © d d © d —• d rs’ ae d d d rs ©' d © d d rs d d rs d O' — oo © ©’ © ■" — ac — 'C rs »r rs — -»r — m —* — rs cs rs

30*^soooO'Cmmor»»rir>«»'0 — o o o > n r s r s ^ ^ o s * r ^ r s r ^ O O O

p ^ ;©p©'Caoaevi©vn©r-*m©©©-rc^r>» — m m m vv oe © © © 0 .0 0 rs d rs rs d d d © d —' — d d d d o d d © O d « vn —• m — — mm rs

G O O O © — r»rs«om'CNe©©©©v\crnoO'Crsaeaoac©e,‘m©

p p o p w i o r s — — m«roc©©©*r©*rr-©f-''C'©r**p'©pp 0 .0 0 d d d d © ©' ©’ d rs* d d rs' d rs rs m oe* d — © — »n — rn — — n rs -

—•© — O O O 0 0 rl'OO»TN0 « 0 0 OOOOsp‘0 s'O«riw,tO —• — rsos — OO

vOOc'OOOoo—• r--«n©^m©mpp©»r'Cr,^©mr'^ — — r*^ m © © © 0 .0 0 * c> © d © d ©\ d rs d d d d d d © d ac* — d d — rs d d d d — ©' d — rs - N \C Ifl •• V\ *T mm rs

3e‘n'ocoo^crs-rvc*rrsooorsooo^rsr~r>*rs«n'r^rr^r*“ 0 0 0 iriOow^© © © rsrs© c,'-rv3m r-«p© p© 3crsp© rsaer^r»;© pppp 0 .0 0 -i^seddodcNdrs’doeddaodddao'rsddd— doddddd • r- rs — vfl — >n — m «r mm rs

v0«^sc000 r‘4'^r«-ow-iinrsors000'caoac'vr»'r*'00*r\,^*r>» — o «o r-v ^ © © © ae m r* rs — p rs © © p p © oe m m — — *r p m r-* © 0 0 0 * i^ * a e d d d d d d d * rd rs o d d d d d d d d rs — — — — d d — — d — ac — >n — — — t m — *r *r m

Owjvoo00'0^rs0'00r»«-^m000— O — r-*0

in**^©©©«rrsrspaepaq^*rpp©pp©pp 0 0 0 ^^r-ddddddddddacdd©© — ri » wi ri - d d rs © —■© ’ — ao — ao rs m m rs t — rs m rs — — —•

'©m'OOOOw — -rNCmmaoae©©©© — ^rr-soopvnvioooe©©

*rrv4 p^ooooer«“ — '©mm — m ac © © p ao v* rs oo ao p — — «r p © p 0 0 0 -i^N odm dodddddddrsodd — ddoo'dddd — do© — s e c s — r~~ — mrs — — »n *r — rs rs rs

© m o © © © r s " r s ,voC"r*Tvi©v»©©©m©«/,immoommoeNOv,»©

^o^^©©©m©vmm•rc^c^v^•r©o©^cm•rv^©^ppao©p^,'; 0 .0 0 d d — d d d © d d o d — d d d d r s — O

j©r«>‘ *Tmv©rs^rrsrs©,»©©©m©**rrsm©»©v©*/,»*n*r©©

.^r4 W-o©«rv\©ac*r^'© — *ro© p— mpr-^pp — — mopmpp 0 .0 0 X d*— «ndddoddoeood—»rsd d d d d d d d d rsd d d d d d d — — 0 0 — * n ^ - — © — "T — ~ mm- ~

CS. rsmviOOOrsoomoeooov-iomOOOr-C'ae —• on rs ao ao r- —• © © ©

-> m m >^©©©mvkr-wr-'Qor,*aep© © p — mr**"«rm ©ppmmp©p 0 .0 0 d","-r© d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d \cd d — dodoo'dd© < — oo — —

©mvn©©©r*»mmr-©r,»©mr-©©om©mm©mp,,*r'»r-©r'-©© r

— O© s p>><;© ©0 © 0 ©©C'«rssavn — v»>o«omocaom©r-‘ p © p p — vnoo d rsddd-fdoedddddoddddrsmdrsrsd*r*fmdd — O

— «n m rs r* — v» — >n — m — rs rs rs 00 0 aovvmooow — «r r— •© — ©> v» -r © © © — oo m v© ao — ^ 1/^©©©©oors-r»r©v»mrspop*r©m©m d rsddddmdmddddddddd»rdmrsorsrsmoooo

"■ m vi rs oo rs © rs — © — ®r rs — — — . 0 0.0 somviOOOoocvOmaor-m — rs©o©©iOv©©aor-»aeoers©r>«»ac©

^ m 0 ©aomr'-'n-rmoc*'-Tmo©©o©*Tm©prscsors©©p 0 .0 0 — — dvidddacd o — ac — dd o o m d d d r s d — — moco — © in m — v> — m — — m — rs — — ~T m

^mv-»©©©©aor« — *rr--r«r©©©©r-v»rs*r©»©rsrs©v»©m©

^-"•^ooo-rrs — ©©a'acdrs©©©o,»©mdpprsrs©v>©mp 0 0 0 dabdddododddviddrsdd — dd©© — »r *r m m m

rsmu-iooO'OC'vr— — ■-nvO'nmrsooo-Tm — r-rsw-i — — — o o r s ©

d __; © © o o rs r» m p m r- w-> rs p © p rs p *n p p p p p -r v» p © p 0 0 0 ■" ddddrs — ddd© oersd© dorsdd — rsddd — © d © «r -r _ r* — © — © vn — rs rs rs 14.33 17.94 19.80 24.49 16.61 33 19 14.58 19.19 18.12 20.66 39.01 16.78 96 12 13.51 21.99 17.59 23.91 15.44 11,74

— © © © ©©©oeaomr-*©rs — r s o o o v — «rao©rsoooeo,vao© — ©

• ^© © © © oo — rs*rr»ao*T»ro©©rspmpm»raooo*rmmr,*p 0 .0 0 — d d d d d d d r - d d d r n d d o d d d d d — d d cs rs © © d -r *r m m m

= 3 = Z 3 Z 3 z 3 E = =_Sf2 1 f f S « S “ 5 " S — ? i! “ 3 Z3„?^S«?SSSSI5S3t „ C ^ 5; “ 2 “ «s Z3e.c.s.eE = o.a.c.c.a.e.n.a.c. ^EE X X Lt Lt 15.30 MRF MRF 0.36 0.00 0.34 1.00 0.00 0.67 0.67 0.00 0.34 1.05 0.00 1.42 1.37 0.00 1,01 0.69 0.00 0.34 0.00 0.67 tv .S o S y O ’O'O'O'O'O’O’O'O’O’OO'O'O'O’O’O'O'tfcJtfSOJUa. SRK

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 211 —r- ^•©^©©©ps—» © © © ©s-)»r —— ©in^rvcacr**.©©r*-wvPs*rviQO©©© o S'— c^©"Cpsm »*i o ^ - © —<© —r- *p*w*4psr"»f'"i© r-» ps — '' ’T 'X ’T - vi N O - S' *»■ - N C O O ’T f* >C 'C V fS ^ O' r* o’ — (S ■** © r- •/%

'0©©©©©r-p,-©vk30P--rS©m©©© — ^NC-r—io^^rrscs^^rps m w-v ^ © © © © w* r*» — ps ps © © © © **•> <"S es rs © fn oo ao fl •i1 n * ^ V d O d ■ O w p* v’ r>l - ci « -s ^ * • - in wi —* m m

—„. ’>psj©©©pS30fnr**'/,». _ _ _ ©«/•*>©©©©©—© — v^psrsfn©^©©© — ^ri—v — ©*»»r>«‘©©

«*©©©© ©© — oe — nf-oo ©v«cwnN«#-» r-* «e ^ r-» - in*;0 0505'Oninx'0,r-000»'nN'rtON'Cr^n‘N,rtiA'OC» •i N n W n ’^ - o - 36 t N N o’ o’ o’ - 'fl w * t (*i 'O *0 oi p* <0 - - “** © P*- w"v rS PS — w -T — — m m

m ^ o o o c o c — t^?'Ti,TC''C"pi» o x v 3 e 'O P * * r * o o o ’fi»rc\^(N m ^ ©©© — © — o ae n O - ^ O O Oj « «O; « N n N rs «/> © n m pn »j"**fn©,^i'<,'^*

3 —«■©©©©© © ^ © © © —© rs—• ©r- ©r*~ cs — w'l*r» —^ ©— *rrs©rsv"i©©©v-iw'»aors r>i © m vn rs rs oo © © ac ao ers ^© * rv-v r ’-*rr"’i© © m™ N n d © # n - 30 'C© —vi K— ji x t © «P* > - d - x /i n p* n m M x K - ri

3 ^ 0 ©©© — r«j©r>-r>»©*rvn©©©©fN-rao'Crnr^mr«^©r^\^r^© “ 0>p;C!OON0-N«C',r-NC'O©NS'Nin9i'0(SN'0'ClN (*in ■**•A n ©o K ^ ci -« 'f n pi si -- 0 - -n V o o’ o - ^ c »e o o <0 ei - rt

© © © 0 © © r-rS W ,\PS©©'r%r**00©© • 3CmO© ©oo-r*r — acrNC-v* — ©o “ rs©oors»j* 3e©©©«/,\a6 r^ — od © 6 'flN«tM |fl|<'W - r- — rs © oo © — — — © v% —

#SCwCO'flO/l(NMt'rr)Ni*lOn-ON*MC'M • _: © O ©O —'© © P S © — oCrnm©r«-i©pnr"»©©©© ™ fs©r^»,n«,n©fn',*,i*ri 3c©«^vn — © — vi © v> © ^* —» © © vv — 00 — cs

hCC00©W3''C'fl-?0#NnP'n ------— — ©rs-rr-©©© C'OMnON (NNIs;'A^O' tS U m © — — r*»«»r©ao — — — ©***©©rs

m^ «/i©©o©©©rs"rac©300orsw"i©©©

©©©©©r’\©*rrsors — ©rs©©Om — rs © © © m m 7 '<-\t«(;o©©©©oo"rv"»©»nvi©©©©v*©'©aew-ir*,\v»«rk SQ mM 3Mopsw M % ©— 14*1^©©©©©©mt-'^rsOGr^rsoo — M M — —

S.f», **»©©©o©rsrsoaeoe©*r-ro©©© •'N s0©©©'^; — 'O'^PNrn — 00m © 0© ^ -i 30—3 iAvirt«roii; 30 © — PS — in 5 >o(sed Tk «T — - © — rs M r** © Mr* rs — MM— oo ©OOOO'O'OOT^N — ’ff'OOOV^O'AONOOO © 'O »T — -T U;. \ M O— ©— - o © - O' N N N N in *n o < 1 « O' “ *r» — © © — vi'nao«rnodab'd-* m’ — ©

— ©©©©©«rr*n©©'C*r"T,aONC«/n©w"v*rm

©©rs©©©r*»v>rs©m©oors©©©© — aorsao^r^roopnr-m©© rsos^oooorsocrNOnr— rs««©©ooe© — -r m — ©©»«<■■»©©© T'COCO Oric(irtn--fM — x n o d o p * o i ^ ' A o ,rt'pi^fs>io- d c i rs r- rs — © «n rs ri *r m — — rt rn

'*>crJOOO-N«rnp,iC'©’r'n o © o n # ,r ■ N^©OiOO|t*;«'C»r-Nn©iOOOO'iWn 7 '°oo'

ao © c s© © © r,*©r"*-rrspSTao©©o©r» — © r* — ©f**rov» 3e © © © © P ' ^ O O O n 5>'ffS — — — r * n o o o — •ff'Ot^n'O'CiOviooo ■7 '<''r*vow-i©rsr'nac*Tdr>* 3b© — d d o o ’-fwi-rrs — r^r»ro-r©‘ © d Q M f-. — — \o — ^ r — t t — m <"o

iri© — ooa'Tr-r-- — *rr>-mroo©oo©©^r ON^^OO© — VkWOrS©*’*©©©©©©©* — rsr^-ri^i^ —' ^ ri ,»i»foe(*ixirt6 dd d N P » ri- — — — «r r»* © © © n m n — wo — «-o ps — psps —

'00800(NO'fiOOOO'?'fl»7*f— — O — OOO ©3o©r>-ro-roc©©o*r©^'n©roeoacr-* — ©o© go t n ™'i. ^ * ismoo d v>—

- 2 = = 3 Z z = Z = z 3 - c = = ?sf?sss“5“ E t — S — z 3_?^SSSSSSS5H c u ~ b ^ 5 5! " 36 E «5 Z3c.c.c.EeEc.a.a.n.a.c.a.fl.c. s 66 —a l.l l.l MRK MRK 0.00 0.36 000 000 1.03 3.54 2.62 33 2 6.58 4.64 4.18 5.65 93 4 5.94 4.93 2.97 4.61 3.30 5,92 3,96 w kSuSuC 'C 'C O 'O ’C'O'O'O'O'O’OO'OOO'O'O'u.^SOJUa. SRF 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 212 ©'*ies*r — C'rsrs©rs«"iov’*'C^n©>ov,sm«»\©fnacsC3 © — »«»nM'srsrsor,'»'*s>©©>©sn©©sr’i'0 ©rsrS’O'©cs^© i - ” **©©©©©s - « — - se’ri'Cr^dvic (N — «rs — w-i ris'rid^ — — —V — ridsedvirs©'© — — —

—^©©©©©'Oaer-«^s©p,-nrs©rs©n»rw’ics3Qri\ccsas 'n -^ © © © >c — *rOsrs'©r^csaom©m©Os©«rimrsmfn ^'■‘’•r-ivirsr’ivi — x».c>w^*T;vnw'ics — © — rsrr aa'C — widdxrvors — © ©s r- — vs rs rs -T rs — n n -

©©©©©p-rsi,nr,**r-©©r,>‘'n<,'\©mr-r\mr,'-rsf*\r\mr\©©©— — — - - “ _ ©©\cmf*s©m>crsrsso _ _ _ - - — - - - - _ -\r\c*sr\©©© - •r©*©os'C©«/*»©©©vc©'Ors©rs©©©©^r©rs ©* r- r~ — — s-i vs — —• cs rs — —

— ©S©©©*r*r©v"i3er»‘Csvornrs©nw"\'©©\aors\0«r^rsrs©ps© — ©^•©©©rsaevsCs'/smfnrs — m©m©rsr-*rsr"»cs©daorsmm© i N n trt ri f - ri od >fi ri vi < 0 - « ri ri ri ri - o © r* — >0 rs rs -*r rs — rs rs —

©•r©oer,\*raers'n©©©v'r©^r©0»©w,v*r — rn — rscsr'vcs<,*\’<©©'©'nw,,ir-risO'©Cs^rsv’*©\sc© — f*\**scs^n-v^© ~ - vi ri ri - n ®i o! «fl ri ri vi - d - ri ^ r* <« - ri ri ri \e K ri - d cs r» — w rs rs »r •■n rs — rs rs —

'C 3 3 3 0 0 r - c \C ,irns'iao*r^rOrsorsr«»vc— wiC‘'Or**-‘''--^rs*rrso ^•o,^©©©C 5 *r"rcsrs©©rsoom©fnr\rs — ncsrs©© — os>o_fn© - w ri ri « ri c< ^ ri r* P1* ® " O " ri i/i « o w O O *f ifl - « c cs r** — >o rs rs -^r m rs — rs rs —

tr;33030frr-r»f»sp^-r.oo3r»op^r^o**^rsr«-r*rsfrp~-r»r-voo • *,,^f^030'n\C'Crs>0'0000'03sOrsOr^rn'0'0<*'^'0'0'*SCO — d ©© — d © *r w-\ aei w-i rs rs ©i rs r~ rn^ — rs d d d«rs rs©d ©s — sc — i-~ rs — v-v «/\ — — — — —

'^ 3 3 3 3 3 3 C n s -v 3 'C ‘rt3or>*3^r3wr'*rc^-'Cfn3e‘rv3CQcri’03 ^ r3 ■ ^s ^‘ © © p © — © ae »n rs rs «/s r- sb © p ®s ws ^ rscsrscs cs *r v» '•s sc © d rs n-t d rsrs — vi <~i wi r>^ — © — m d acd© ws d © *r dri — © cs r* — 'Omrs-r'-n rs — rs rs —

<*13CC30aorS'OsO'CCsn\CP^sOO'03«^»P,,*Os'ns030rss©©sr^C' f7*^r^CSOOrnp^rs>oss30'C — soosO'OmrsOsfnsO'O'O'COs 5s rn ©s '■*• wi — «r in r i - r i © — rirsoo o oaeoaersorssiocsOrSo — ©s r-r-rsrs'Tss-i — — rs rs —

r»3 — 030rn>n3caeC'Cs>rsoC'333 — 'Tr-p^-*rrsr-ii^i — rir»r*r— n ^ o c o - O' - *r 5>. >r c o o q o 3 - «e ^ * 'O *r v n - - rs «s >0300 — dddrsp^xr rxd — — — m oo d rs «r> m — — rs rs —

— 3 — o o o r s o r ^ — 0»rsrs3r^330-rr*r»p**C'00'Ovo — ^ ^ > 0 ^ *n©s ©©©r*-aoae©*r«Too*r*r©©©srsm — monrsrsori^rw s — •“1 1 1,1 5> csri n ri — 303 — d — ob— r*i— vt r< -c oo -r«r — 0 © © — d *t* r*^ d — © —© —«b rs vi rs *r

33 — 030*r,i,P3'/iC''03sC’r©s3Csr*-©sr-C'CsOaeoe©sCsw-iri3 •■ncN^ooocv — acp^-rrsrss3«r»cs oas30ooooo>r»fn—■ — oors«r>r\rs x l^^aeoiobrsae-r-foo'rswsciocsOSOSsp^ — r «ri ri - — p* ri ao - d *■5 ©s r^o — — — 0 »n — —

_ _ _ _ _ © *-■> — r»* m rt f**\ ©» © © © r- #n *r m © rs rs ©» m rs m ©\ q. psoon;o3p-r-rp3r^rs«r3r»03 0 -rwnas«orsrn — — oorsoeooo ^ m« ^ » o ©s » ri - oo abd«rd'rr*ab9ed©d3eviriv»«t‘3 — — o*rs — as®sn;*rp^ — -r

303 — OO33r*-30*n — m — O'rvooorjoesnrs-rcsr-P'-'rsrsvnmcs rsr>.^3333P^rsn3330 — 3033333330s3Cs3rs3mcs '1SrN300r*rn'~\r^sTirsin©\p“»rsv-v003r,s3 'rvrsocrnC,>CssrY^rw-i — rs ©s so 3 — n — n ir — —

3 3 — 3333Cs — ws3es«rifnn — 3 — oon3P-*rrs3as«ri^*r3»r rs,^r^3op — 3 3 — aorscsrsp'‘3333r,«*3oOs — oor»r*3 — — 3 3 p^>33vscs — sor-irsO'Tsocr- — 3 — — r*rrcs3^r’»r^rcs333rn oo— r«.\o — rs — — 3-r — —• —

3 — 33O3Cs3P^n33er»3O3300P**— -- — — — v>*r — o 3 3 3 < n — n 3CS3*T30333 wrrs33'T3*rrsoe — 3 3 3 T,d 3 3 3 P^fnp^virsrsrs*rir^w-ir-irs o *r — — — —

3 — O3OCS00 — «■«■* — n300CS3333^rrS330 — — 3^T33rs rs ri^ p o o — ^rr*»r*3— T3C«/-ioooin — -.y — 'Tp-OO^rv’s — r—r» •/•^‘osri-rCs — r*or^3CCSp-S33r-irS33d— 3 — — — w i«r— — P'-T3o’3 — P^r^3 — — —.0’3 — rs

— O — 000n30rsac^rcsoarsr*or--rr-*r'' — rs033r->0srsoo rs33 003»rsw-kpoo-n*-rr-i — rvjorsr-ir*«rsP** — 3 3 3^ — rsrso '2jr'l33*rivi — dddsoaedocobrsdrsrsobr-idobrsrspsr'df — rs 00— 9CSO — n — TIT — — — —

3 3 — OOO'nn — m 0333«r030'ro0300000 — — *r3oooo»r — oo 3oqo30fSP-.»rP,xprx‘30»rsxr c*x*fn^ ^ px. — -rr-r«.oocs303P**30030rs‘r»3*n-r — r-r*03w-»rsrs CS r* V> — —• VO *? — ~ mm mm

— ooors^rsom — rsoo*r3px»33 rsroororspnp3fooooon*ors3m ■sroors — ‘O'OVO'O — CSCP3 0 3 0 r-i

^ ZD Z 3 z = u n — QAOi)QfiWWUu^^

£5 V s! i “ ^ 5 "1- Sd Z Z — — 333=EE3£-33a.3C.a.3ZZ-?zSSSS*iSS^S f, ^ wSC r* Z u u 28.38 26.19 30.84 26.53 26 92 29 26 32.23 23.45 28 62 26 92 27.92 26,58 35.74 26 67 32.89 33.77 32.57 23.67 33.88 27.15 MRF MRF 2.97 3.74 1.62 2.38 1,60 1.61 2.66 2,93 3.29 1.28 2.60 1.99 2,30 2.33 1.64 2.95 2.30 1,67 1.64 2.98 &

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 213 OOS3e**n-rrirnSviov‘i,*ro«y«rC'vnv"i ® c ® — rnwinricsssC'CO'C'Oinon ri ri »r - (*i ci # « n ri « r* - d -• r^ in — (*> « "i c r*- n — © — Wl CM PM -T P"t n — (N (N -

— O — Cs©Ssn®n*TsO®sesCfn'"-in' 0 © 'Omm®©©np,,i©sdsocs»nin©'pfn' 0 © ad /i f»i - O - p» wi — n - - vi m O' vi N 6 6 in in — — —• — ® —• © © © m —• — fnom©noe*r©"TnsOscr— *rpnoeoefnsoin*r© ^ O © ® — rs — n Cs m Cs r**. vC © sC Cs a pi n ^ "i - pi ao i*i pi 7 n - 3 - v C oo fi - in o’ o’ v 'd fi - O — o h -

O — ooo»rmom(NrnO^P,^morn\oaot'“'Ommr^p-p**o*nrnCT» sC — n m ® *n m — fn©fnnasnsOf*>fnrMrMOscn sOn ts, sC .-rvon — 'CmoOOOOOOr’-i'roocNOfSC'CsoeOrnO — — Cs P"* p** n rM »n sn n — — — —

pm © — ©©©©nsCsO^r — ^ c* p”* © p*s — m so n © rt — — © n sc © ^ —■.^©©©^sCP-n'Os© — — n © rs s© >C Qs f*l © m s© p m n so rn © '^."‘^ndd© — ©> — nddoa ninndpMr-'in — ri — PMdd — in — ©d — O' — oo r* n — *n «n — — —* — —

— © — 00®»r«r — »r — m —n'npMn'’idcsP,*PM*rp^Tr«r as — © — '•p p ’i — d — •noo^'C — — © — cs p^vomrs»rn-» n pm N

0\0 — OOOOOCOmP'-Or'mr^Or^OOOfnrnOCOOOOOrn «■) «o p © p p c; p p t * \ o © p m so o pi © © © m cn © o o © p © o m 'V .'"’’' —

r-*0—»©©©nr\©css©mm'©P“-ri©cnr,\'©r-*,n©mCsCs©©5«nm©5 ^ sq^- — QQ^>n — insOgsOQsC — PtOngssonfnOmsninnnpmgs ^ ^ ® d — -r r"i pm — n — d d © © d © d Cs — oo n © n n n i © pm m’ © — — os r^- p- n n

voo — o o o - r — —m-rov rn-rcvvncsnp-nonnaein — n cs© © o s— ^rno 3 •nmso*n©fncs^n©p’,ir,^n ^ 'O m n © © © O sd fn p i ^ O N n n - e

in® — ©© © n 'C s c n in r* — ncs^ro ^ T n — s© — ^fp-oeoefO'Csn-r© »n ^ p© o-r — pm sc n m p csp p ©sc © >c m pm P n cs cs p >n as ms © ^.^Osnrjir*-l»rd»roinnfn-roo — o — — ^noor^ — ‘noo^r Ori — o — os r-» — so <-» rs^ r rn n — n pm —

— *^® — ©©©oo — r^mos — snnmCsOCs^raer- — PM©snf^»as*rr*»PM© © pnr'»v^o o o s o v s — 0sw^fnp^osoo 0' 00smps* 0 '0fnr»oop**fsospno © i ’nO\'rtN^(,i — N o^ift ^ p iiflp c id s iv to ’ t-pipipiviis—’- o ’ yo OS P - >0 N PM -T <""1 PM PM PM PM — m — O — OOOCsoO'P^ocospmpmopmopmp **'0 — ocPMOPMPM^aor-rMO r^o^OOOrM»nr^inmcsP^CsoomO'^iSwPMTpinrMCsp <-* ^.r', o o o d d e s 'n s o d — escs— p^-rd-fddos'odw-i

'-scnOPMOs<*-iOOOO'—ir»«—tO rn P -r,<‘P**CmmOs OscnoaoosocooO'OrnrMcnOr^pMPMOsmsqpnos i x vi - -rinmPM — — d m — — d © © d — oo ri o’ fi o ci oo - pn d —

Os P**P*-PMPM«^Vsr» — — PM PM — 25.91 27 12 35 86 33 22 35.41 2961 26 58 00 26 35.20 25 25 30 23 36.72 25.83 33 11

f**® — ©O© — oom©«n-r — moop"i©nn*~»©*rm — ©Spmcs — oo© rM'o3QOOOOOOsrMsomoo-rmrMOPM*ri-> — snrnnooooasoopn© i^ r-^ d d d — vividdosd-fso-rd-rdddvidvirMPMr^'rcnrMd 30 fN P PI T I N — *n PM PM — — PM PM —

PSO® M ' n— ^© O O© OO r"t — nOspM'nrMrJ'O'OO'sOO'Csn'OOSrn'CsOPMPM'O'OOS'OO — PMOsmPMrrOs'PSO'PSsO-rfnOsOmfnfnO^OO'OO iAr'* r - .© © © d — oesnd'Cr-^'n — rM dn»n*T© -r — P M d d d v i n d © os — oo — sen — vs in — — — — —

«0® — OOOOOPM— PMOsOS'Ocn’OOsOp'.'O — OOsen^TmOOsOPM rM'>r^o o o s n o ' ‘n,nm — cs'Orn'CO'Ooo'OPMCssominnossom'Ofn — -rvnpMnrn — pm — — d d d o o s d o sp M O n o so sO sc s^ rd - os r- r» n pm »n sn — — — —

— o o o ^ r — c^ino-ros — 30i->o«inp,~ooo*ffn — r,*-p,»*rpn — aoo P M n ^ p o O so nesoccninn-rrnnonpos — inrnn — — Os fMOsnO t © ©------n" d vi © -- — oi — ------d d © — — © —© d d d — PM —PM o’— ^ n rs o

nosonsOsonino*rO»r — ncsn^ffnr**nr*OPM*ro OOQPMOQinnPMnO'OOsOsOOssOinsOOssO'Or^OssO'Op d — " T © d * r d d d — d — d*rabd — d c s c s d d n — © cs r-* — s© rn n p m — — —• —

os® — OOOP^-^rm sop- — oon — osoO' — OspMooooommr^'O — o>0 — aa,9;p p © in « n © '© n -ro o n 'C C s © C 'p n — nosn — — oo pm m os p sn d n d d cm -r — d d Tp d oc d d © d -r —" d — d © d pm ^ n d © os p»» — d n «r rn n cm n n —

U Z U = u U o Z u3 I = c, £ z X -- 2 7 ~ i § S “ S J Z ZSe.e.&SEEe.521i.^i.E^s.^i.eue. £2 ®4 — X II II 3498 3508 04 48 27 38 28 26.16 26 MRF MRF 231 262 91 3 298 98 2 91 3 66 1 25 4 97 1 97 1 2.95 1.64 1.66 67 1 64 1 1.66 66 1 2,95 95 2.32 2 MtfcSoSuO'O’O’O’O’O’O'O’O'O’O’O'O’O'OO'O'O'tfc^SOJya. SRF 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 00 0.00 0

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 214 3 © © o © o o o o o o o c © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © 3 S p © © © 3 o © © © 3

2 s mm 3 3 r s c o o PS vO o Cv r i VI r i rs 90 90 © 90 r s Ml 3 90 90 90 © •n 3 VI © © O o O © OO o m sC Cv <—i r» — IA s VI 90 © 90 PS 3 w 90 00 r s Ml r s © 3 r s © 90 t o ' —5 o* d pri r - d 00 d rs’ 90 ^ r 3 © d 90 3 d v i r-i rs' © rn d V g -C rSoo rsr-rs rs VI r s r s r s r s PS “ “

PN o o o r s o r i vC PS ■-r p— 90 90 n o m r s © r s © pn © PS m pn © pn 3 PN © o o r— m *T r s «—1 o - r Cs • r pn c rn vC r i r? pn o pn 3 3 pn rn m pn © m 3 © m © o ' d r i o ’ r s r i v i vd Cs r r v i rs’ d r i d ^ r r i pn mam rs ' v i v i © v i © © mm 3 pn r s © oo r—■r s vC VI PS “

_ . r s o o o -C m n VI PS Cv 2* o 2 >o © r— PS © 3 3 r s r - PS © r— 3 © o p m VI 90 Cv S3 r i n ; p • r cv 33 Cv n PS © 3 rn r s pn pn PS © rn 3 © 3 r s m v i r s ppj r i d r i 90 *T "T VI 90 o d d r i pn d - r rn rn pn 3 P*^ « © 3 PS PS On r - o r s r s -T r i r s r s r s PS rn

PN © o o o o o r» ri r*i ri r- r- r - o r - r - r - © pn r - r-* rn pn P— r - r— 0 © r - 3 m p m pn pn vC 3 © rn r i pn 3 . 3 3 © 3 3 © pn 90 © o o p o o v0

l r s © o © r— PS VI -!T - r vC r - c> o Cv 3 3 © - r 3 © © - r Ml © r s © © © r— r i n v i p o © — p r s Cv PS * r Cv o © PS p © 3 r s m pn * PS m pn 3 m © oo r s •ri m r i Vi rs’ r i C -i* v i Cv o d d r i v i 90 3 ’ v i d d 3 PN d r-i d •T r s © r* •c r i r s - r pn PS rs PS pn “*

r s © o r s m Cv O O pn 90 Cv o © 00 pn O r s 00 V Ml 90 P-> • r © © Ml © pn o p © VI **1 p S3 *T 2s C» Cv CV o © - r rs —• 3 pn r s • r s r r s 3 © 2 3 © © ns v i r s m T *—1 r i S3 vd •d • f d d d v i v i d 3* v i m m v i 3 r-i d d ©' r s © p— •M •C m r s T f—v r s r s r s r s rn

r s o o O VI o VI Cv r-» r s S3 pn m - r o * r 3 © r* © 90 r — »—■ *r pn • r 3 - r 3 r - r* VI rs PS •n VI © r— PS 3 r-^ © © o O °°. Cv - r Cv PS o p G P 3 © 3 © 3 3 3 3 v i r i rn * r mm r s d v i ~ r *T vd 90 9 • f n* e i - r o -n v i 3 s •M d rn r s © r - ”* >C n r s *T r i rs r s r s - pn

. , r s © o © S3 r i •c w r i PS PS O r s © VI m pn 90 oo © 90 © pn © 3 90 r s p S3 ■— r i Cv2 2 pn r s rn r s PS m m 3 2 Ml ob o © o m Cv * r 90 O © 3 3 pn © © © 3 o - o © O r s d r i v i vd d v i - r O mm vd - f r i pn mm PS v i v i © • r o ’ 3 ■ i 3 * f © 90 r - r s c VI PN ““

_ r s o o o -T

. r s o o o rn I—V o o i—i r» r i o r i T o © r s VI • r m n © - r © 3 © © m v£) © p O o r s r s p Cv p O S3 a p m VI p-* r s 3 3 © © pn VI m 3 3 pn © 90 mi r s * r r i r i o oo’ S3 —I VI 90 3 - r vd v i pn rn rn 3 r-‘ r s d r-i d r-i © r—■ vC r s r s *T pn r s r s PS m

r s o o o vO 00 r - Cv r s r» vC o Cv o © VI pn r s Ml © 3 VV m PS 90 r s m -T 9 90 © o p m — r s Cv r i o PS 90 Cv o © © © —■ r s © r s © © © r s rn 3 3 © OO 90 •ri r i r i r i r i 00 v i r s VI VI Cv o d o ’ mm ■*r >d 3 d v i v i v i -T r s m ^ d pn ON r— vC r s r s T pn PS r s PS pn “

_ r s o o 90 Cv 90 vC Cv r* o • r 3 - r 90 VI pn Ml *r m m © Ml • r © VI © Ml r» © © p - r - r Cv VI W1 pn Cv - r vq 3 p PS © pn r s 3 3 © © pn VI © 3 © © 0 r - r-* •rv r i r-i d d o - r VI v i v i d r i r s d v i pn p—i rn 3 r-i r-i © PN © r— S3 m r s -T pn rs r s r s PS pn

r s o o O © O Cv r s 90 o Cv w 3 VI 3 r s o 3 VI m pn © pn r s 3 © r s © © o o O r - w r s VI r s r s PS m Cv VC 3 vO VI p © r i 3 3 r s r s 3 3 *n 3 3 pn 3 n* r-* o* d d d Cv r i vC r-i r» v i r i d r i 3 - f mm mm r i -d 3 ' d v i r-i d 3 r s d -c © 00 vC r s VI VI ' r s “

r s o o o *r m O W • r ~ T VO 90 pn © rn PS m © • r pn ■M r - r - 3 00 3 © 90 v i o o o S3 o S3 r s vC VI T pn O PS o PS -r pn “• Ml rn PS — © rs © r s 3 © © pn S3 o ' o ' r i 00 - r d d Cv rs r i VI - r d d d © v i d v i mm v i v i rn rs' d p*i d -O 90 r s r - PS -T r s *“ VI rs r s r s PS “ PS _ _ r s o o O r s r s o r i VI vC Vl o VI VI 90 t—■ o © © © 3 - r © © 3 © © 90 r— r— r s o o O r s r s O Cv VI r s P-4 p 3 p • r © - r 3 © 3 90 00 90 © © © 0 © 9 © © v i r i r i 90 mm r*. O’ r i vd 90 00 3 d © vd d v i © a i m v i d d d d © mm © r* —

r s o o o m m o vC Cv r— r** r i pn m © m r - 3 3 m pn © © © © VI rn 3 © © * r r i V © o o p - r m — r s Cv r s — 90 m o m r s p 3 3 m pn V m PS 3 m 3 © © r s VI v i _ -T r s r i —j r i o ’ d o ’ Cv o d o ' © r-i r s d r s r-i r i d r-i «r d r-i 3 r-i © r - r - r s r s VI * r PS rp r s "

r s o o O PS m Cv VI » r r - PS VI r s o PS w © 3 00 r s 3 © © Ml p—■ r s © r— © m p o p m v i r - Cv p m r i Cv - r m o rn p r s f— Ml m r s m pn PS © pn 3 © 9 r s VI •ri rs r i -c o ' v i 90 • f -T P-* v i d _• pn r-i 3 v i ©' © 3 ' m m PM d __i d r i © t— vC r i rs T • r r s r s PS pn “ “ _ o e O -r r s rv r s VI r - r s vC vC r s © r s m © 00 r s 3 © © • r Ml - r PS © 3 0 0 r i OQ o O 'O 00 90 r s VI p »r PS — © rn r i r s © VI m r s pn pn rs 3 rn © 3 3 * rn •ri r i r-i -c r i r i i 90 - r n v i oo' mm © w v i r-i oo' 3 ’ v i d d -T 3 d d sd “* © r - ”* n r s - r rn r s “ PN PS n 2 __ z 3 Z 3 z —» 90 u u •> — 5 uQ£ u g> uei « AS u u g Z XH ZO Z o 2 s VI !© F- w M s s z vj jjj 'Jm oc ■fa fig s Z a. a . c. SS s c. 3- a . C. 3- a. c. a . X x x Z V s w O O' O' O OO O' O' o O' O' O' O o O O' O O lit X z O Am Z VI

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 5.81 1.29 4.84 0.65 5.81 0.97 1.00 0.97 0.00 7.10 000 11-4 39.03 81.61 42.58 70.00 29.00 48.39 88.71 40.32 9.9 1 001 0.00 162 33 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 6 6 000.00 0 65 0,32 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 54,67 26.00 5.48 26.00 5.48 33 33 67 63.33 88,33 98.00 97.00 48.6 7.00 6.00 0.32 3.00 00 2 065 7.00 160 0.00 0.00000 0.000.00 0.00 10.65 10.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 2 33 67 1 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.00 51.33 25.00 34.33 62.67 85.67 34.33 67 33 G-22 G-23 97.00 48.0 1.66 3.00 1.32 1.66 11.33 8.67 158 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.66 11.33 8.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.980.00 2.33 1.67 2,98 59.60 37 33 3667 7.74 50.99 25.00 57.95 38.74 57.95 40.40 96.69 98.00 95.00 47.4 8.67 867 U9 0.00 0.00 0.33 333 3.97 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 3.33 3.97 0.00 0.00 0.33 3,67 0.00 3.67 3.00 58.00 50.99 65.00 88.00 95.00 44.7 8.00 8.00 1.00 /VV 0.00 0.00 2.00 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 067 0.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.33 3,00 4 4 33 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 65.33 74.00 54.67 54.67 58.00 30 30 33 23.00 57.33 34 6734 26.00 57.33 65.00 87.67 G-I9 G-20 G-21 98.00 92.00 91.00 98.34 43.2 1.67 HO 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.67 0.00 0.00 15,33 6 6 00 0.00 41.33 41.33 41.00 43.67 G-18 43 67 84.67 42.0 1.67 135 0.00 7.00 600 0.00 033 0.00 0.00000 0 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 62 62 00 59.00 55.33 50.67 55.33 38.00 G-17 95.00 98.00 93,33 1 95 1 391 633 15.33 7.42 0.00 5.08 00 3 1.67 0.00 4.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.91 0.00 47.27 59.77 59.77 29.69 85.55 86.33 78.67 98.00 38.4 40.5 122 I2S 5.67 1.00 1.00 2.00 3.33 7,42 1.670.00 0.00 0.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.67 3.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 4.33 0.00 2 002 91 3 00 7 17.67 47.27 50.67 31 31 67 70 31 68.33 25 25 33 25.33 G-1S G-16 93.67 89.45 1.67 no 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 3 3 33 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 000 0.00 4.00 4 33 5.08 3.00 3 003 00 1 3 31 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 18.00 17.67 18.00 23 67 23 73.00 66.33 25.78 31.00 35.00 76.33 95.00 98.00 96.67 91.67 100.00 360 36.6 0.00 0.00 6.33 8.59 6.33 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 267 3.002.00 2.00 15.33 15.33 70.00 95 95 00 9367 100.00 Appendix 3...could., 110 115 2.67 5.67 2 2 67 5.670.00 1.67 000 0.00 0.00 0000.00 000 2 002 2 67 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 6.00 6 33 0 00 2.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 600 633 2600 23 67 68.00 21.33 21.33 74.00 76.33 26 26 00 67 23 2600 23.67 23.67 23.67 G-12 G-13 G-14 95 00 94.00 100 00 100 33.0 34.5 0.00 067 0.00 067 0.00 0.67 067 0 0 67 300 2.00 10 33 10 10.33 17.00 17.00 29 33 65.67 28.00 2800 95.00 98.67 93.67 300 90 100 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0000.00 0.00 900 0.00 9.00 0.00 0.00 4 4 00 00 5 0 00 000 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4 4 00 5.00 70.67 70.67 6667 G-10 G-U 29.33 29.33 96.00 9800 100.00 27.0 SO 7 7 33 7 7 33 0 0 007.33 0.00 000 7.33 0 00 0.00 000 0.00 0 00 5 00 5 3.33 000 0.00 0.00 000 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 G-9 3 3 33 0.00 0.00 4800 29 33 27.00 18.67 27.00 18.67 52.00 4867 95.00 92.67 24 24 0 70 5.00 633 67 1 3 3 67 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.67 0.00 5.00 6 33 67 1 0.00 0.00 367 067 0.00 5 67 5 0 00 G-8 2 00 2 0.00 10.33 10.33 19 0019 40.67 19.00 4067 23 23 33 71.00 76.67 98.00 90.00 89.33 21.0 60 1.67 1.67 600 000 6.67 3.67 7.33 4.33 G-7 7.33 12.67 10 67 10 10.67 23 23 33 76.67 80.00 18.0 V« 1.67 1.00 10.00 1 67 1 5.33 5 5 33 4.33 3 67 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 G-5 6.00 6.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 36.00 62.33 69.33 3600 24.67 4.67 36.00 64.00 98.00 75.00 12.0 30 1.00 1.00 1.00 15.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 267 3.00 0.00 2.67 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 G-4 3.00 0.00 11.00 10.00 10.00 11.00 24.67 4.67 33 33 33 63,67 87.00 98.33 23.33 23.33 66.67 98.00 90.00 100.00 87.33 95.67 9.0 F K MC l.t UpMic 9.67 QpMicll 9.67 I. OR PRF MRF Qmll QpMeg QPMegNlI QPMicNU QpMiclJ QPMicNU C.'IIT SRF Meters QmNU QpMegll QNII UP QpNIt QplI Qm QpMic Feet MTX CM1 GRN Q QU Simple No -5 O Q. C CD o CD Q.

■o with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 216 r«. O — O'T'O'^T— — ■J5 « = S°. " r

5 ^rNi£2 s 2 2 2 2 rtrvr'*!o2mrtr,‘|,*,n® nrkO p*3 § n \ 0 ® ® a ® 5n r ,= SS^-Sm S'>:=i^3°5;« = - - !=i- 0'=>=i ^ S - - = i:= !=i=i=>'>;

2v\rN.2®222M©®^!^°°. <,'4"*'3eS?5r£>0,yr*<®S'0*rmo®. rip^fnm©i""i©fnr«»or-- ®®® — — - H'O^yOO^O'O- p^r-iOwmor* — ^-"O-cs^rp^so-^ -o r^ fs * ^ * -—:•*---: •wn'rtO—; a o <-->' n d «:

f** r»* p** O © O © © r+\ r- ^ on ®- °. © °. ®- ^ ^ d d d ^ ^! « d © © © © © m >© d w. w. © m >o _ _ S ^ £ P - S £ m SO' - “ « ® £ => = <=> ^ <=> ^ => ■» S S - 00 d o d o = 2

^l^™.®©S c i ^ S o ®. 2 vlr^riC''-. S 2 S “ ^C'!«mS^<^®r^® v-i®.®. '9mrn©'0©'00\©CN^^T31»©©©©©0\ r|f*,,,®pfc2S S <*'0 0 * 0 0 ““ s ^ * £ N‘ - S R ? « - ^ s s s - - O ^ O V N fi w S s i « O 6 6 6 o 0 8

^ ^ S ®. p^ v°. “T >£ m m “ r^p^'Osoovo^e'mom^®'. ©*©vr^©©*n©© S ^ 3 oo — 2 £ * J? ^ « w ? ® ® ® ** ®* “ ® ® ®* 2 2 ^ « © © o' © O

5!» ^ r t O n ! ^ S £ - w *^lSw9'0'®,rt3'/''6rtr'a a » S M® s ,n 0 '*' m 5 ®- ®. © ® ^ ^ - fnm®»n!ri r^2NS,*0'00'C'O P,i« n ^ c>. ®. m © © ri © = ,'' S ! £ - - S ? ; ? “i^ - e=“-,°'-r'cici° s s - - - = i =:- = ^

M®>»-H2o ®. © 2®. i2r^~ i£ .9oc*©'^“2 oe3®® S 2 rie,»3,*©©©©©E;El^^©fn<,nao©® n ^ n PS°. ^ *! ^! »r N « °. ®. *. n 5 g -S S S S « " i"S2inN_0

®.2 =>© 2®. S 3S S^ rae * w'O -—• > !®- - g2®-'©'0©co — o — < o o « J 35S o ' ,"' 2'''''' 2ao S-SHH 5 « a «3 KSo' = «='o«='o- = -S S 2 2 o cici< 3 o o :

1 ? 5 q ? g 8 ? 8 5 ? s 2 « • » ! S S 5 i ! S8 5 8 8 . R S s g s P! 8 S 3 = ~'2£('<‘2£S*'-'®r,,:3S £ -:® -',:®'5;®®®*“ --®®®®®*

5< ^■i*'®®©®.J20 . o m o r ,,» < : S - 2 f S ; « - ^ S S R - - o « o « o « o S S 2 : 8 O 6 O ci o; S\

“ 3 «a • ® • ®. “ °°. © m no ~ °°. rivO'COC‘ O C 'm 'C 'O v>-v:^ev S fN^g N 2 S n ? f,:-'fl"nn;:io«'ro’,,;p‘C - ^ 2 « ' O d d d d 90

^™ ©«o 2 ®. o© §® S®- S . — -c'.S >'Om“ oonP !S ..rnrnO'nO rn,^‘ 0000 fnmp n m , n o o Si . 5 ..c) 2 ® s m f n o o o o < , n n o o . S = ’',^*-S®S?2-eiS?;3--d^d6 6 sd ^ ^2 co 6 d d o r r*>

«“Tf 2—, gogKS^S-^SSo2 o---- -r^v^---r^C'Ovio*nOOO o - i o - i o o o 22 ..v*mS ' O f = oom = ' ^ o. a " = ^ § S - 3 £ S 22-» 222--o« dooooo = = 2o N - o o o d o 2

252^p<,,^^sa^?^52^5\0'003i'00s'00'0 CT'C'OfNO : r,*S«2S55:s2;SSo»os;o'e'odci^SJ:siddda;

_ _ ,r!*r?<,s*rs*3 3 o O ' O C ' 3 o S f^,^^ ^ C 'O C N O O “ g - S P R ^ Z : ® 2 SS^dodcsO^OOO^S- = ®®®®®-

”,S^->2o-®^^'Orvim®3®oo § ® § £ _ £ «->C''oSS — fNfSOOOOrnOfn®®.CNCN®2 ® -rn® rM SS«J^® ..fNOfNOO®; ON® oS : ^ W15 S - 2 B R S * - « 3 S S - - o « o « o d d S S 2 2 - d - 6 d 2

2®£2£2©p">r«*2££5fnfn©r»©r*©©©£22££p««©©r-*©r-> • ^ —,® © ® ® ® ® © © >o 2 ® f^mfn©>c©' 0 © © © riH'0. '* 'ooo'oov© = :yg n ' 2 ^ S 2 ^=i -SP;?;'='=i!=-'=-'=>=i '=S??2 2 o o d d d < ^

z Z 3 2 3 z 3 ■* s - =_sfsfs«ass“5“ ■I S i ±“ 2S 2S o« Z-»c.c.cucE S—zs „ ? “ SSSSSSSSS = c.s-c.c.a.c.o,s-CL s ri— ®S S i s ^ £ a ^ *. ^U.SuSuO'OO'CO'O'O'C'O'OO'O’O'O'OO’C 'ai.^S O -'W a.Z S j

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 217

N V * V 3 ao © as 2 ^ sn = « — m ae p m >c © - d c w 3 50 8

3^*®2c3 2 r - d © d a m d . . . a so © a p o o

V) 9 2 *r n rp 2© 2 § 7 <*1 m rSs'ae^'O'Of^'^moooSSS^^'^m ■*. p m w-> • m so L-~-2*,''''C'Cd'C‘C© © © ^ 0iHsommm 71 6 — d oo ™ — d * ^ *n ® d —. © — 0 © m

— — © _ _ s o m s© 2 2 3 d ac m ~ ~ O SO Os ® O — 12 © s© Cs o m m i, © VS d n - S. s «n m d sO d ^ ^ m o’ — o’ £ « o' o’

>c m O © § — -• © m © so O SO S 2 ao m J, © d in © d © d © O <© m 7 os m 62 9.30 6 O so’ O' so' O O’ O 'O -O m12 -— o o o

30 O sn m ©s vj © <7 p s p «n «n " ^ 3 .j1 M © sn © m m - " O SO N - © © vi — o o o o" o ©

© A © © ae d ^ p S o p ci - —© ac d *r d © © © d d —_ © 00 © © m _; © © m ©©am ~ Os O O O o Os —« CS — — oso— <*roooS223 o’

O O cs — fl M O' "S’ ^ d d m m so m m —i O m © m d d s' 2 5£ o o o 15 9 18 7 84 9.51 9.51 84 18 7 15 9 6

d »r m O sn m ©SS "f -"ir d © © m a p O so O sC “ d m © © —•Osdvs-rmd-rd,^; -■ oo oo ^ d d in d d -y o’ o m O r-i o’ d d d d — 'o d d

o 2 S«a,c£-g^,n *r m d © O' « Sl ®! 9 . d Os m - . m m p © m © O' •m d JO 30 d so m m © m — © — o

*2 — — d O' © O' — d ae oo so SO o SO sC O' vO O sO © © O O' sO 30 SO O SO -- ao d* 1C m £ ? £ vi —* m - © o d d © d © d d

O d O ~4 *r -t- © * O 30 O ^ p so -r vs so O' «n o oo oo so — *r — ~ — o o so’ mdd«novvooo« 2 l2 2 N0 " " 0 —

C. c. O — O d mm m O ao in m m m d o d < T c, $ S ** *» p O' m o m 2 °C — — O O d — o S S os CS d d —

© m *r — "T •n W» O O v» «n — OS d VS -» g O O d O d O' O m os - w w * : ? * . 3 3 3 8 oo vi m so — O o O "f — “ - - S S - M O c d

so — vs "T -r o 'OOsCdsOsO—»Q = g 30 s o d 0.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 136 33 0.33 0 0.32 00 0.33 0.34 0.00 0 0.99 0.66 vs _; O' o m '■qp'OOs-Odmp 66 ddd*rd^r — d

oo oo m m . __ l^=3eooomO»n"rc-J.'Osoomommorn ^ T T s« O 2 oo w-v m * • »0 *• vs n - - -5--o-o-ddd d — 06 7 87 7 31 9 27 12 12 5 92 9 27 27 92 9 5.72 12 5 06 27 12 6 31 87 9 7 7 — o — d d o o o © 7 - , _ . o ••d 'O d ’dOoo — S - § o o •• —• 30 — d d "T d 2 ^ 0 d d

© d vs © m O' O' "T m © S -r sc © © d os d p O' 'C os d so © © 7 Ps. 5 ^*• so 2 d so oo’ d d o» © m d © d 2 ^ 0 0 0

© oo d "T "r © — © — d ft * N (S * m o o © © m © n 2 3 d p d m m © ^ ^ m S 5 « o so m Os vi *n m — O' © © © S * - d d d d’ © d’ — d d • dd d —

© d ^ *r © 2 S so © d o d © m so d d sc © so © © d — oo © oo

Z 3 Z 3 z — —■ U U u u w o

ex*-?; Z £ 5= E u. as u — c,©©ccBacuc,Q.o«o.©ft.a w ce • rv s*«C w -C sj MRF 0.33 0 00 0.66 0 00 1 01 01 00 1 0 0 MRF 00 0.66 0.33 0 C/3 ^ 3 6.06 1.1 9.87 4.12 13.33 aooaoacoaoooffooooott, a s 0.00 0.00 0.00 c0.00 0.00 s 0.00 0.00 0.00 £ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SKF 0.00 0.00 0.00

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 218 P«* sO m 2 S^SiiSss;i;S*S»o«;g:*§«SSS V rs SO SO 90 m’ ““ rs

Q O' sO sO ^ ■ R C - ^ O ' - v o . . cs ^ . so . O' m s© os cs os rn so d . . . m O' VO SO ^ ' ° s s ^ - S ' 3;S - - 2 5 ^ s = = = ^ = ^^'o^^; 2: 2: o ’ o ’ d

_ _ <3 ^ »r \c m O' m m Os m m Co «5 «a »* 040 — P-O'0r-lOf^l}_~ o ’ o ’ d

r»-£2r>-or--or-<*noo© P*X r*» m rn \a“ sa = NOO>OfnOOO so sC rn rn — so ’•r — m _ — rs’ •“ "" d

S2o£J£}*rj5oors'o««0 S'rn'OCNm'Cm'C'0- -C' O' m rn SO vi d d

rn f- o rn i: 8 ^ ? 8 8 ? 8 S " s S S r 5 8 8 8 s 5 8 5 8 s 5 5 8 m '■°- ©_ m •v’ — *■* d

m »r I g « q i i = S J ; g j S S j 3 i I S g S S i S " n f; w Os vO m i " ' ^ S ' n 2 S ’:S f = f'« 'f3 “ :i“ 'nov' cic’e'(:in2 IS “* “

© — © Ss o m «n 5 rs rs o rs — rn rn m SO i l°* > lN“ x r'N - :!2 5 P'3 rj:! N'|S:®'0 ":C’" - - - 'so’ C'" o d

J^O -s2o2^rn“ — o — J^rn^»ro^rmorn^o^ r** O vO oo 'O J ^ rT =. 0®--Ov ‘^Ow-kV?0'-'00'0

**? rs* ^ ®. o®. . s g ,ri®;qrp: 6 -KplNg-ddt;d'r(NdN^^®'od 6 d

”HC ^Sc-o3ariSoeS“ Ov • • o®. - 00. “ rtrn^®*r\^s©©'©°® 5 S p,‘5© 5 0 MNS fn^mO'rnc'C'rn«cm©©-5' N,f,f,s,s-00 ?, ^"'2S',S ; : ’ S riM is'5'

^.. »«asSTi -,_ ^ - ^ o ® = i. § -M ... S “ ^ 3®'=i='!J! o o o_ ^ 'r s ^ r—3;®'®o' s o r s 'r^ rsviO‘r%rsors“3-=’oo^rva\00 O<= ‘r>rsors09Q0.0 3 ' e

^Sn-O2"n n 3 a ’ n -fS ° 'r!-l''5 - .vo^°^'Ori'Ci^ifnooooo«mm

^ft_®0®-®-^^^sO®.2 © aOn3S3I\fl,n2w«Iflf,*® rn30^’«rvOwn-r-\Vfnfn5sOOOOOOO |s^ N iTO N }'© © ® Sr,‘®® a^-S^2g2SS^aR23^o^S-2cM-G>dddd-dd vn

£ £ » § o S2 — Se*-?£5!?ST3«r>^o^^o!>88iP3®®3■O rn 3 S " 2 S ? S « ;- r'° ” S n'- — •^d'nrioiNggoi'Sooo rn

ac‘®0®~^.— 2o22S2**r'^S22 w-i'nCsr1“ r^'nsnor4Csrn'0©'Oc^c^- 00 30 ® r**'°“ ,rt®w^ 8 8 rS “2 '~'C'0<,n00® S!g-£S?;?“ «-S S ? ’>;'»:,= > ^ - - ;c> != ,=i 2 2 = 2 = o o

r-: 5 <-. 5 § s s o; iB 2 S ? f= ^ ^ S S S 2 § £ 3 S S “. “. ®. s S S 3 = > s s -s s s 3 “ -<’sa;-' = = 'i = '"-; ® = 2 £ c: ^ 6 6 6 m

; I; -r i g 8 i ; ? s j « ? S « J * * s g s g q g § 8 ; » g g § = '?S "2 g 5 S 'r0nS S ?-oor

s 5 r> § o § a S g j s n S s s g s s § g q g o g § g S s s g s

Z 2 z s z s m??2«SSSuSo i 2 J J 5 — n ^ SC ^ Z^c.a.e.sEBa.fi.o.a.ftie.a.a.Q. ^ fl! 5 eg « rw 1.1 1.1 7.67 4.26 9.42 9.80 9.09 27.63 13.07 14.47 1262 29.04 10.56 12.46 12.70 12.46 19.00 17.88 1667 15.13 13.91 16.29 MRF MRF 0.33 0.00 0.32 0.33 0.00 1.97 0.00 1.64 1.94 2.31 0.66 1,31 0,65 1.64 1.33 0.66 1.33 0.66 0,33 0,65 V5 ^ s ^ Z s ja c 'O ’O'C'O’C'aoo'C'C'O'O'O'ao'Oto.aSo-iua. SRF 0.00 0.00 0 00 0.00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0.00 0 00 0 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. o © PS

o

©

a. ©

© Cv

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission

220

t 15 1.4 80 1.0 91 2,6 91 1.0 7 5 92 1.8 66 1.4 53 1.1 93 00 00 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19.38 16.51 15.38 12.94 16.67 16.88 19.28 25 17 17.80 19.11 21,56 19.11 14.80 18.03 15.94 21.57 Lt

SHF 0.98 0 94 0 66 0 66 66 0 66 0 94 0 0.98 SHF .5 .2 .2 .0 .5 .519 0 5 .2 .5 .2 .0 .0 .0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.62 1.25 0.32 65 0 1.92 0.65 0.65 1.60 0.32 0.32 1.25 127 R 39 25 16 1 7 8 21 .7 .4 .2 .9 .019 25 19 15 24 00 00 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.46 1,56 1.92 2.59 1.92 2.60 2.29 1.92 1.94 2.87 281 87 2 97 1 1.64 2.50 3.92 MRF 'o 3 3 - 3 3

3 3 3 3 O 3 — o' Os m O' — rs O' m 3 vs m 3 o' vO fN fN vO rs O O 3 3 O O' 3 3 3 rs 3 3 'T rs Ov fN © 3 O 3 0 O 3 3 O rs rs

ri o' o’ o' ri 90 vs — rs — vs ©s *r *r rs ri 3 ©s o’ -r -r 0 7 « - - 2 3 0 0 0 3 2 vs vs 2 O' ^ vs - 'O -5 'O 2 I? o I? fN O © © o © o' o O o o' fN o' •*r vo fN fN Si « « Si rs vs rs vs rs 5 *0 *0 cv *S r* « fN « r* ■ *S " cv P n* •f 2 « — r> « * P 2Z » S o 2 Pj os’ ®8?8SS os’ Pj 2 - - ■* - p

«•* cv i*J rs O' i*J cv «•* t O' O' O' 12 ^ ^ v» rs rs rs rs ^ H m P 90 PN 3 PN 90 m P ^ m ^ H ^ ^ ^ V*1 ^ fN fN ^ - ^ fN fN

9 *r vs p- r'* —. r'* p- 2 « vs 2 5! 2 ri 8 8 — !£ 2 vs ©s rs’ ©' ei ©' rs’ ©s vs 2 riri!£ cTv0'Or-0'0' — O' 3 O O' O' 3 O' O' O 3 O' *nr9(N“'°'rnfn 0 3 0 3 0 — — MMVivvr-imva ooiJUrs^vN o — £ 2 'd 2 'd 2 'd 2 £ — o 3 3 - - vs . O w ri ^ n o 3 n* 3 o e, - oo * ® r^ o o « vs vs « o o r^ ® * oo - — n -e, '*s VS3) vsr-irs'^^rsO\ — C» — ?! — C» — 3 rs r- — ©v vC ©v -r ? ? __ -r vd VS o’ 9 — VS — vd « -r - « -r O O O O O O' cs v> vs O' 3 3 O' — rs vs 3 «r 9 3 v> "T 90 3 3 3 0 3 0 3 — 0 O o o' 0 o’ vi v v vi o’

C. S. Q.O.S- B. Q.O.S- S. C. a -f o' -f O' 3 3 O O' vs < — o — oo -r ei oo so ri — — o 3 f* — o o O rv O' O Os 90 PS SO PS © 90 3 Os O O' 0 vs O vs — 3 — vs O vs m o m — —

C. C. 3 0 0 o o o 33000093030900 rn oo o oo rn Z 3 3 3 Z 3 Z z 3 rs oo rs O rs O' O O rs Os oo — rs pn © © fN — 3 rs -r O ©s rs © <*s o r- o <*s r»* © © rs 04 © ©s O fN 3 O ri O O O 3 3 C. S. S. C. csoos»ooc^roo3S rscirsvsovsrs’ 2 — ci 3 vsqvs — O — 0 3 3 0 — O rnvs-rO — rio — vsqvs 9 — VSOVSOOOOOOvOsOsw. — 3 — rs o rs o rs — 3 — © rs rs *r m 3 — 9 rs «r 3 *T rs o rs o rs *T 3 «r 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 fN O PS c 3 >c B B ^ ^ E =_SfS’SfSSS“ 5" 3 £ O 0 3 9 0 3 3 C O o o' 00 ^ 0 0 3 0 0 o o o' sc sc © £ r-» ^ «— ^ r-» <1 5S P '1 Q 3 3 3 ei 0303003 o c o Ov rs Ov —. —. r* r* O O' ~ O' O 3 r- 3 rs - **"» **"» z3 _ ?:sSSSSSSSSS 3 - £ 2i r- r- 2i £ - ” 3 90 s S N S s S.C.C.E S.C.C.E — — 3 n 3 O N « ^ ^ « ^ N O vd — in 2 o' £ 0 3 0 3 0 COO o o o o o 0 3 0 3 0 O 3 O — 3 — —, —, 3 — ^ £ — rs 3 vi vs ri vi • r* 3 vs — r-i — vs s — oo — Z — Z — *r — VS 3 VS — o o — ©s 3 ©s - ; 3 3 0 3 0 3 0 0 3 3 3 0 O 3 oo' O O 3 O’OOO'OO'OO'O’O'O'O'C'O'O'OC'O' 3 — O' 90 O' — 3 vs O vs vs O vs o n 3 rs — r- 2 m 2

« N - >C rs — r- — — r- — rs 3 3 3 © © O 3 PS *T PM *T vs PS 3 O 3 © © 3 O O — 3 3 3 — O 3 =S O PS O =S 3

90 — 90 90 vs O vs 90 rs © O O © rs — 90 ^ — 90 — •TOO /l PI _ (N (N _ PI /l T ^ rs. 3 VS 3 rs. ^ T §Z <* “ £ g P rs © rs ©s — Ov » VS » Ov — — 3 — •13 3 0 9 3 3 •13 -- « *■> o o *■> ^ rs rs «*s rs «*s 9 O in > P •piuon ' f X jpuaddy Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. pr e ih r si he oyih o r Frhr erdcin rhbtd tot r sin. ission erm p ithout w prohibited reproduction Further er. n ow copyright e th f o n issio erm p with ced u d ro ep R

Appendix 3,.,conld„, ac> 3C> «! J « —-*• vi © O ri > — —© — o , vs S3 O o © N S _ — w __ 53 vi £ p vi vi © vi ae —* 3 oc ©© © vi g v» ©© —r-~ — rs "©* PS *© ©"©© p © ©© vi © ao — — © r* — — oo © ©© © © © X x o © N Xd viT ^ ©© wn© wn r— —• — ae © © © © ©■ © © ' © Vi r*»- © © ts — © © — © © © ©© ©© © © © © © © © PS X© © ® ZX-- 2 Z= Z= 2 ZX-- ! S seaS se z s.e.a.S — a! S H * k U O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O u Z V — — OO • a e 3— : 3 W © o o © o o or* ©cs X ° r-*— © 3 © OO w-i m n *T —. — © ©£ — © — — © © © © © © o o © _ ©“ 2 © ps © © © ^ o S

o o oo 30 3 © © O' © © © • — © © © © © © © © © © © © © 00 © ae * © o O'© NO S®i O © vi© * © a 3 —- rs — rs 3 r* >, © 3 w " ©©© © r* —. £2 Xr- X * _ _ 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 © © © © ' © © © — Wi oo©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©© «i — o a 2 S S =: © o'© vi © ©' wi o' © ' © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © ’ p © © © o © v © i ©© ' v i » * w r* u r» OO © © ©© OO © © © 0 0 0 — 0 © 0 ©© 3 © 0 ©o© — 3 3 0 3 ©©©ooooo— —© — ©©rs© © ©©©ooooe— ©— 2 — v v o o o © © © © © ©V» © © vn ©I © s s o o oo© rso rso o o fnom o © © © adovcoo'ci©© .* & . a. a a e. & & S.O* © © © ©o’ © © © © © ©o' © © © © © © ci u u u o o © — — © — © 0 ©‘©303© ©’ ©®2 ©©'r©«rr»-©r^rn~ © © © © © © — z 3 o © o © © © © oo © oo © ©•^©•^©©o©© © v> ©©© rs ©© ©vi © ©r© © s©’ © ©© © © ©3 © 3 © rn © © rn © © © OO© © © 3 © ©rSP3 O S ©P Sr n© r n 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ___ 0 00 ^ ^ © ^ S H ^ - o ^ S o S 09 © © _ © © © © © O ©3 O © © O © © © © © ©ts ©m © ao © © 3 n r 2 2 o © © T © © rn © © 2 2 © ‘ © © - © ©r* © * © © © SS ^ ^ © © © © o © © 00 © © © © © w© v% — A 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 3 0 © ©' © rs ©2 — ovi 3 > “ “ V> 0 p ©2 P — p rn rs ca 2 2 © 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O' v* 2 2 2 ©©V»^©©©©©Vi 2 -«r»r r- 3 © ^ © © «

© — © © — *r — 00 ae—© 3 — © © © 0© 3 © © © 0 * © * © *o r** © © © c* 3 © — — © © ©~l — © © © © ©* © ' © © © o m vn © © © * © ©© © 3© 3 ©© © oe © rn © © © © O © © © © © O ©© ©© © 3 vi © v» © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © * © © © © wA. C .^ — A w © © © © 0 © © © © © * © © © © O*©3 ©© r—© vi — © © © © © © © — © rs S o § 3 0 0 © © © © >oO v\ —© 2 © © © § ©© vi 0 0 3 © © © © © © 8 /3 — 3 _ 221 pr e ih r si he oyih o e. ute rpouto poiie wihu pemison. n issio erm p ithout w prohibited reproduction Further ner. ow copyright e th f o n issio erm p with ced u d ro ep R

Appendix 3,..could... m x *n ae X ^ • ~ © ~ m >• X"* X w . *? £5 «> — © X -> OsT 2 n- T -1 r«. X 2 . s a f 2 V Z «r «.«* £ o rn r« 0 n V* 0 O vn rs» • m -r ri “ r- ^m d r**rn ae O sc rs O m vn w. O vn — r-» rs m d 3 «l» u u « 7.5 SO 0 p O © © © © 2 oc o so rn SO 0 0 ?- O O d p CS z 0 “ c o 0 0 rs 06 0 rn •ri p vn° 0 p- X rs o o SO O SO O sc •riCs o p rs rs o CSsc O S cs i r d Cs i r O Cs rn d rn osO O 0 0 0 0 0 o o o o o o o 0 d d 0

& — o o— ^ o o O P- o o 0 0 d o s O Z = sO* \0 r>- so 0 o o o o o 0 d n» 0 0 d c.

vn iA 5 s g oe d 0 d O O 0 'aO' a O' 0 e «• in ,«,• d o o • rn O m m m m o o o 3 0 0 d o 0 0 z ' o 0 £ £ C vn 0 0 0 * 3 d 0 d 0 d 0 0 0 r rn p rn . O O O cs rr so s * r so' so d r- r- d o o o o o o o ’ d d «’ c « d d *d O sC © © m O O © O m s o •ri o O C © s e a O o' O O vi o* d o d d so* o —— o d mso* rs m cs — r- © r» © — — o © © © © © © «r s C O s O s C O O O O O t-* r»* o o o d i r Cs O o - f 0 0 0 0 o o s c o s — — c d o' csocsoo o' d n d om o d m s r n o o o o o O T O r » ■ o o o o o' o o d o 0 0 0 0 0 0 'OOO O O O' z 0 . a Qfl 0 d ' nro o o d ri O o o o a. 3 Z — 3 O Z — 0 d 0 0 0 0 s Q. & . a . a a o o o o o o o o o o o o o o' 0 d d o o o o o o o o o o o o o o d d o d o oo o o o oo 0 0 0 0 0 d d o d o d o d o d o d o d o o o o o o d 0 x 0 0 «

o o o o o o o o o o o o d d d vi d d m d d d o o' s r m m © © © © © o o o o s C N r n o o o o o 0 0 0 0 0 O o* 0*0 u s a —o o o o o o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 d z « 0 d o' d o o o o o o — — © © ri © dd d © © © S rs i r n r r d - o o o p © 0 0 o o' d d o' d o o' do' d 0 0 o* o' d d o' d — g — o d 0 . t Z ti OO o o o * x oO S v O n P^ S ^ o sf o o © m d © O o O 0 © © © © © o p© o o o d ' o 2 0 n m o o p O n m p o o o O o o o o o o o O a. 3 V Os os cc s oo o o o o o Co SO SV i * p; © p-; r*- o o' o d o oo o CSO CS 00 O —^ 0’ o o o o o o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 s 0 u . ri ri ri " * — m -"i* d 0 o o o o o o o o o o 0 •Si 0 0 rim — m p d © O* — mas— o — Cs d p dmo. ^rfnpornop o o o o 'd00 0 d o' 0 0 o o 0 0 r-* so so r-* Os vn — — — d Cs SO VC O —— no 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' o ’ o O 3 (J i —’ o’ d o* — o d d d d d d d — o o o o o o mo o o o o— o o §s as *- m o t**- © ©© © ©© d o ©© O © © O O© Or* n vn o o vn r s d o ri ors d Cs d vnvn o n o ^ dd o'd d o’ o o d o o ''r o o o d d o d o o o c o oo o o o 0 0 o o oo o' o' o o o o d o o d o o 0 0 lM d d d d scd d d d ©o O Oorso O o m o o rs O*r ors d d d 0 0 0 0 o o o o O’ O O U — H o' — O SO o— d d o o oo o o o o o oo 0 0 0 0 O os ©>o O o 0 0 SC ■£• 0 0 m*•rs © ® O ^ o 0 0 0 o' o O O sc sc O O O rn O 0 0 0 0 0 0

Appendix 3,.,conld.. X r- rn x •» 5 i 2 X x X *o 7 T x j ^ a s 3 n ± s «. — © - c . c . Q ^ . c © - a © S c c ni5 © © as ± © — 2 «=. 3 g % — 'O— JP* oo o o —'5 o i © fN XO © £« oo © © ©. p S - § r = © © vn ©oo X© p © vi — o' fN 30 © d d d 3 d d d d 0 O O O I— vn© OO O fN — fN O O o — © — — oo od d ri OO OO O fN O fN 5 d ri o oo o ©O — f N — < N

vi o o <=> —,O f*n —. m 3 — s - 0 ZvOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO 2

rn © 0 £ o o d —j © -i o d ao £ d d o £ o —

OO x© © fN —. oe oo fN CN 0 vn 3X vn * —;ao r- OOn§ _ X 2 5 n O ^ S ^ O n 5 2 o © 5 — 0 0 X©* © -r 0 © © — vn © — vn £1 fv* O *© © xo fN fN O o o o — © — fN O O d d o d On O On o oo O O O d d o © © © d d 3 d - © x o - § a = § s oo o o o dd o OO o oo o © xo o d x© © 30 O oo 3 — —* 2 d © o © — - < — § « s " n VO (N £ ci O £ O ISS ao o fN § : § ; - g r - r- —© g r- © 0 0 . 0 - S S S S Z S S S S 5 ? S ——°. O© O mo m n o © © o d £ x© £ ©* d © d - o - 2 ©vn © © o ^ o A' o £ fN£ d °\ = o d = 2 O O“ O o o^ o ^— 2 — O — m d © r-* © m © - r rn — i c d On0 O On O d d d d o o d o o o o o o o o o o o o o d o d d o o o o o o o d o d o d d d o o d d d o d o o o o o o N 0 O x O O O O O O © * © x C x O r**o do *TO oeoo . o 0x00 >e © mcn© © d o vnO x ©©x © O — o oo o — o o o do o o o o o 0- 00 0 0 0 0 d o O d © r»o— 23 3 — f N o ' d o ' d o d P— x© © «© o d d o d r-«r© © o o© o o o p * r © * r N f © © © o © *© o' © o' © d ■«f *© © o o © vi d d n o‘ d v m©©©ooor-'p'*r'n»r©©© — oe © p ^ r © ^ ^ © © o oo © ~ © © _ -r^ d d © o d fN ^ d A © © © — © © © © © © ~© 3 © . ~ 3 'O 2 0 2 © o’ o d 0 d © d d © 0 © 0 © © 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' d o d o o o' >0 © OO O ' O O ddo'oddr*r^*rfsdod o o o © o © « r SO

0 P - f P ^ ^ S S o p o pfN .-P^O o O O O O o O o o o ©o©©© — ©o©©© "r^rn d o * d d d ^ “ v i n o ’ d — d O O O O O O o* d oo o o o o o o o do'oddr^dvn — d x " © © © “ d d d o* © oo o O o d o d o o o o' d oo'o o o d 0 ooo o

© © © O OO rn o O cn O © OO o o o o d d o oo o oo d d o on 0

dd oo oo O n n r* vn vn O O 0

o O O V O r n — OO © v © x © O i o o © m © d ®d O' —2 3 2© 'T © ' xc f T l r t 0 'toX ofl ”rn ” « o' - - “ oo' oo'vn vn — — o On On ■

MKF 0.00 000 0,00 000 0.00 184 2.76 2.25 2.17 0.67 0 00 000 000 0.00 0.00 2.68 2.19 2.95 168 1.03 SRF 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 0,00 I.l 6.98 5.23 2.40 203 0 74 2 94 6 21 4 50 4.69 2 01 0 34 2.41 0.70 2.77 2.23 2.68 5.00 2 95 2 69 2 40 224

c. a. <

© rn m >o © © rn rn © sO © ps o ps © © r* © o © pi © IN © PM p* © © © © ps ps © r- — o © — CN ST © © © rn rn NO © NO © © © m m © © © o PMoc in mi m" © -T -T rn rn rn X r*l V*i ps 00 © oc © oc c © o © o o © o' © ©

sn sn PM n © © © © © © © © PM © © o © m m NO o ps © p- NO © © o © © © © o rsm»©T©©o© ON © © *n © «n © «n © m © © © © © © ©

ps ps © ps rs. © © © © © o -f o © © NO © © o © ps © ps © © © © © © © © © ps ps pm OO m © se rN © © © © © © © © o © © © o © <© © © © © 00 «n ©’ NT pm" OO ps ©’ d © © e PM X © r~ OO OC -• — X © © o o*© o'o’ © © © © © PM m

m rn NO *n © © © © vn © © © © o © © •r o •r NO © NO © § © © © ^ « n o o o o o o © (S sn oc •n ps o © m rn X *- © ps © © n* © "T © © © o o o d © o' © © © o © © m

© o M © o PM PM © 9 PM© PMo © © © © rn © © 3 © ps ps o © m m © ® © O © 90 Os © 3 © © © © © NOo © m © m ©§ © rs d v i OO oe in m> © © © o © On

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

j i i t j CO 9947 99 84 99.68 99 78 100.71 100.25 Total 0 1

MeO 0.07 0.03 0 0 2 0 1 2 0 0

0 . 1 1 0 . 0 1 0 . 0 1 0 0 2 0 microns 8 0 0 0 . 0 1

I I 89 1 79 1 0 . ( 1 0 0 0 0 1

000 0 0 41 0 0 1 CuO FeO BttO j 16 96 16 1683 2005 36 36 14 94 18 0 52 ALQ 20 37 02 0 1 0 1 II 35 93 19 13 0 54 0 05

SrO 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 SjO, 43.40 65 51 64 29 61 I I 03 0 52 43 12 098 0 11 5211 67 65 Ntt.O Type ofType Analysis Feldspar elementsmajor uanoampere7 11 Hearn Current 20 kV lixitation Voltage Hearn Diameter (including Ha and (including Sr) Ha 01

28 0 0 19 46 11 6807 0 0 1 0 15 69 15 KiQ (all (all analyses made constant at beam current) Analyses wereAnalyses made at Geochemical l.abrolaries, Washington State Pullman, University, WA during two trips Pullman to Standards used euch lime gave Appendix 4: ANALYTICAL CONDITIONS AND STANDARDS USED IN ELECTRON PROBE MICROANALYSIS (he results: following (he Anorthite Trip 1 Julv 1993 STANDARDS Albite Orthoclase 23 15 Anorthite Trip 2 October 1993 Albite Orthocluse I*

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 226 Appendix 5: Microprobe analyses of feldspar grains from Bonner and Swauger formations

Sample No. KjO Na,0 Si02 SrO ai ,o 3 CaO FeO BaO MgO Total

IA-10 14.98 0.41 64.85 0.07 19.06 0.04 0.13 0.31 0 . 0 1 99.86

2A-I0 0.15 10.50 64.79 0 . 1 1 2 1 . 8 6 1.85 0.13 0.06 0 . 0 2 99.47

3A-22 0.29 11.04 66.37 0.04 2 0 . 8 6 0.60 0.08 0 . 0 0 0.03 99.31

•iA-22 15.24 0.34 63.92 0.06 19.07 0 . 0 2 0.07 0.19 0 . 0 2 98.93

5A-41 0.26 11.19 66.34 0.07 20.74 0 . 1 0 0.31 0 . 0 0 0.49 99.50

6A-4I 14.91 0.41 64.95 0.08 19.07 0.05 0.13 0.32 0 . 0 1 99.93

7A-71 0.05 11.38 67.00 0 . 0 2 20.40 0.31 0 . 0 1 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 1 99.18

8A-71 15.14 0.28 64.91 0.06 19.41 0 . 0 1 0.06 0.53 0 . 0 1 100.41

9A-88 8.50 5.35 66.51 0.04 19.38 0 . 0 1 0.27 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 1 100.07

iOA- 8 8 15.48 0.27 64.10 0 . 0 0 19.21 0 . 0 1 0.04 0 . 2 0 0 . 0 2 99.33

11A-94 0 . 0 2 1 1 . 8 8 66.72 0 . 0 0 20.58 0.05 0.08 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 1 99.34

12A-94 14.88 0.51 64.59 0.05 19.30 0 . 0 1 0 . 0 0 0.25 0.04 99.63

13A-94 0.05 11.39 68.23 0 . 1 0 19.94 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 99.75

14B-14 15.87 0.32 65.03 0 . 0 0 19.27 0 . 0 0 0.00 0.22 0.02 100.73

15B-14 16.00 0.26 64.33 0 . 0 0 19.01 0.00 0.00 0.21 0 . 0 1 99.82

16B-14 16.15 0.32 64.02 0.09 19.30 0 . 0 1 0.05 0 . 2 2 0 . 0 0 100.16

17B-14 16.16 0.36 64.66 0 . 0 1 19.19 0.04 0 . 0 2 0.23 0 . 0 1 1 0 0 . 6 8

18B-14 16.02 0.29 64.03 0.06 19.21 0.05 0 . 0 0 0.09 0 . 0 0 99.75

19B-14 15.89 0.33 64.97 0 . 0 0 19.21 0.04 0 . 0 1 0.35 0.03 100.83

20B-14 16.16 0.32 64.29 0 . 1 0 19.04 0 . 0 0 0.06 0 . 2 0 0.04 1 0 0 . 2 1

2 IB-22 15.65 0.36 63.84 0.07 19.26 0.06 0.04 0.35 0 . 0 2 99.65

22B-22 15.80 0.26 63.97 0 . 0 0 19.15 0 . 0 2 0.06 0.37 0 . 0 0 99.63

23B-22 15.79 0.36 64.26 0.09 19.07 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0.07 0 . 0 1 99.65

24B-22 15.65 0.30 63.78 0 . 1 0 19.08 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 2 0.55 0 . 0 0 99.48

25B-28 15.48 0.38 65.01 0 . 0 2 19.43 0 . 0 1 0.09 0.18 0 . 0 0 100.60

26B-28 15.67 0.38 64.18 0 . 0 1 19.46 0.04 0.01 0.12 0.01 99.88

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Appendix 5 Contd....

Sample No. K,0 Na,0 SiO: SrO MO, CaO FeO BaO MgO Total

27B-28 15.73 0.36 63.21 0.07 19.20 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 2 2 0 . 0 1 98.80

28B-28 15.65 0.32 64.22 0 . 1 0 19.14 0 . 0 1 0 . 0 0 0.27 0 . 0 0 99.71

29B-32 15.45 0.41 63.72 0.09 19.64 0 . 0 1 0.04 0.95 0 . 0 0 100.31

3 OB-3 2 15.43 0.44 63.89 0.08 19.38 0 . 0 0 0.04 0.26 0 . 0 2 99.54

31B-32 15.61 0.39 62.96 0.03 19.88 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0.29 0 . 0 1 99.17

32B-32 15.44 0.35 64.49 0.06 19.27 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0.08 0 . 0 2 99.71

33B-40 15.52 0.40 64.34 0 . 1 0 19.44 0.03 0 . 0 0 0 . 2 2 0 . 0 0 100.05

34B-40 15.21 0.53 64.55 0 . 0 1 19.45 0 . 1 1 0.03 0.19 0 . 0 2 1 0 0 . 1 0

35B-40 14.92 0.44 65.13 0.09 19.41 0 . 0 1 0 . 0 2 0.31 0.03 100.36

36B-52 15.25 0.46 64.47 0.07 19.37 0 . 0 2 0.08 0.51 0 . 0 1 100.24

37B-52 15.17 0.38 65.18 0.13 19.47 0.05 0.03 0.05 0 . 0 0 100.46

38B-52 15.28 0.40 65.38 0.04 19.14 0 . 0 0 0.06 0.08 0 . 0 0 100.38

39B-60 14.21 0.83 65.35 0 . 0 0 19.26 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0.37 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 2

40B-60 14.87 0.65 65.04 0.07 19.12 0.03 0 . 0 2 0.41 0 . 0 2 100.23

41B-75 15.69 0.37 65.11 0 . 0 1 19.01 0 . 0 0 0.04 0.09 0 . 0 1 100.33

42B-75 15.46 0.48 64.44 0 . 0 1 19.24 0.04 0 . 0 0 0.35 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 2

43D-08 0.03 11.83 67.39 0.04 20.34 0 . 1 2 0 . 1 2 0 . 0 1 0.04 99.92

44D-08 0.07 11.79 68.09 0.02 20.21 0.10 0.10 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 100.38

45D-08 15.65 0.36 63.84 0.07 19.26 0.06 0.04 0.35 0 . 0 2 99.65

46D-08 14.20 1.28 65.10 0 . 0 0 19.30 0 . 0 2 0.07 0.25 0 . 0 2 100.24

47D-14 15.74 0.34 63.92 0.06 19.07 0 . 0 2 0.07 0.19 0 . 0 2 99.43

48D-14 0.03 11.99 6 8 . 1 0 0 . 0 0 20.04 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 2 0.04 0.05 100.27

49D-14 0 . 0 2 12.54 66.69 0 . 0 0 19.92 0.15 0.03 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 99.35

50D-14 0 . 0 1 11.84 67.75 0.04 19.96 0.21 0.01 0.00 0.00 99.82

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Appendix 5 Contd....

Sample No. KtO NaI0 SiOj SrO AljOj CaO FeO BaO MgO Total

51D-14 0.04 11.97 66.65 0 . 0 0 2 0 . 1 2 0.38 0.04 0.05 0 . 0 0 99.25

52D-36 0.13 11.56 68.03 0 . 0 0 20.73 0.64 0.06 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 1 101.16

53D-36 15.61 0.47 65.01 0 . 0 1 18.91 0 . 0 0 0.04 0.09 0 . 0 1 100.15

54D-36 0 . 0 1 12.09 6 8 . 1 1 0.07 20.09 0 . 0 0 0.07 0.04 0 . 0 0 100.48

55D-40 15.36 0.42 64.83 0.06 18.76 0 . 0 0 0.03 0.25 0 . 0 2 99.73

56D-40 0.04 11.64 67.80 0.08 20.26 0.23 0.05 0.00 0.01 100.11

57D-40 0.03 11.64 68.13 0 . 0 1 19.87 0 . 0 2 0.07 0.05 0 . 0 0 99.82

58D-40 15.80 0.31 64.09 0.04 19.43 0 . 0 1 0.00 0.01 0.01 99.70

59D-68 0.04 11.58 67.99 0 . 0 0 20.03 0.13 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0.04 99.81

60D-68 15.01 0.69 64.30 0 . 1 0 19.08 0 . 0 2 0 . 0 0 0.24 0 . 0 1 99.45

61D-68 0.09 11.73 68.65 0.04 20.16 0.11 0.00 0.00 0 . 0 1 100.79

62D-68 0.03 11.83 68.06 0.05 19.95 0 . 1 0 0 . 0 1 0.05 0 . 0 0 100.08

63D-68 15.12 0.44 65.13 0.09 19.21 0 . 0 1 0 . 0 2 0.31 0.03 100.36

64D-104 0.13 11.54 68.15 0.03 19.89 0.06 0.05 0 . 0 0 0.03 99.88

65D-104 15.65 0.36 63.84 0.07 19.26 0.06 0.04 0.35 0 . 0 2 99.65

66E-03 15.76 0.43 64.82 0.04 18.99 0 . 0 0 0.06 0.34 0 . 0 0 100.44

67E-03 15.17 0.60 64.91 0.05 19.27 0.03 0.04 0.05 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 1 2

68E-03 15.36 0.53 64.80 0.05 i 9.23 0.04 0 . 0 0 0.24 0.04 100.29

69E-08 14.75 0.98 64.73 0 . 2 1 19.39 0 . 0 1 0 . 0 1 0.24 0 . 0 1 100.33

70E-08 15.15 0.44 64.07 0 . 1 0 19.37 0 . 0 0 0.05 0.96 0 . 0 1 100.15

71E-08 14.83 0.89 64.57 0.09 19.41 0.08 0 . 0 0 0.61 0 . 0 1 100.49

72E-08 15.19 0.73 64.36 0 . 0 0 19.45 0.04 0.05 0.30 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 1 2

73E-14 15.57 0.61 64.44 0.06 19.22 0.07 0.14 0.28 0.04 100.43

74E-i4 14.67 0.97 65.27 0 . 0 2 19.43 0.06 0.03 0.17 0.05 100.67

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Appendix 5 Contd....

Sample No. K ,0 Na, 0 SiOj SrO M O , CaO FeC BaO MgO Total

75E-14 15.28 0.65 65.29 0.06 19.23 0 . 0 2 0.04 0.39 0 . 0 2 100.98

76E-14 15.37 0.60 64.63 0.05 18.98 0 . 0 2 0 . 0 0 0.13 0.04 99.82

77E-18 14.61 1 . 0 0 64.72 0 . 1 1 19.24 0.04 0.03 0.27 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 2

78E-18 14.64 0.59 64.54 0 . 1 1 19.46 0 . 0 1 0.07 1.15 0 . 0 0 100.57

79E-18 15.42 0.34 64.84 0.04 19.18 0 . 2 0 0 . 0 0 0.14 0 . 0 0 100.16

80E-22 15.02 0.83 65.68 0 . 0 0 19.13 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0.06 0 . 0 1 100.73

81E-22 15.18 0.52 64.55 0.06 19.29 0.05 0 . 0 0 0.29 0 . 0 2 99.96

82E-32 15.37 0.55 63.89 0 . 0 1 18.99 0 . 0 1 0 . 2 0 0.06 0 . 0 1 99.13

83E-32 1 1 . 8 8 3.32 65.39 0.03 19.64 0.15 0.03 0.16 0 . 0 2 100.62

84E-32 15.15 0.70 63.71 0.09 19.26 0.04 0.03 0.27 0.04 99.29

S5E-32 14.45 1 . 0 0 65.04 0.03 19.50 0.05 0.05 0.28 0.14 100.54

86F-04 14.81 0.62 63.73 0.06 19.25 0.08 0.05 0.87 0.03 99.50

87F-04 15.12 0.56 64.68 0 . 0 0 18.94 0 . 0 0 0.04 0.05 0 . 0 1 99.40

88F-14 14.49 0.61 65.09 0.07 19.22 0.03 0 . 0 2 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 1 99.54

89F-14 15.27 0.57 64.65 0.04 19.02 0.04 0 . 0 1 0.03 0 . 0 1 99.64

SOF-26 14.99 0.50 63.78 0 . 1 1 19.22 0 . 0 2 0.08 0.47 0 . 0 1 99.18

91F-26 14.90 0.59 63.77 0 . 0 0 19.55 0.07 0 . 0 0 0.34 0 . 0 0 99.22

92F-38 15.19 0.51 64.40 0.03 18.84 0.05 0.03 0 . 0 1 0 . 0 1 99.07

93F-38 15.07 0.53 64.10 0.15 19.29 0.04 0.09 0.59 0 . 0 1 99.87

94F-38 15.22 0.51 64.40 0.09 19.11 0 . 0 1 0 . 0 0 0.36 0.03 99.73

95F-42 15.44 0.44 64.84 0.03 19.08 0 . 0 2 0.04 0.30 0 . 0 2 1 0 0 . 2 1

96F-42 15.34 0.52 64.57 0 . 0 2 19.11 0.04 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 1 99.61

97F-57 15.04 0.45 64.62 0 . 1 2 19.52 0.04 0 . 0 1 0.53 0 . 0 2 100.35

98F-57 15.50 0.39 63.74 0.07 19.07 0 . 0 1 0 . 0 2 0.19 0 . 0 2 99.01

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Appendix 5 Contd..

Sample No. KjO NajO SiOj SrO AljOj CaO FeO BaO MgO Total

99F-68 15.27 0.39 64.69 0 . 0 2 19.05 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 1 0.18 0 . 0 1 99.62

1 OOF- 6 8 15.12 0.40 64.24 0.07 19.33 0 . 0 2 0.07 0 . 2 2 0 . 0 0 99.47

101F-79 15.54 0.34 64.56 0.08 19.11 0 . 0 0 0.04 0.04 0 . 0 1 99.72

102F-79 15.02 0.44 64.47 0 . 0 0 19.01 0 . 0 2 0.06 0.35 0 . 0 2 99.39

103H-04 15.37 0.42 64.80 0.06 18.73 0 . 0 0 0.03 0.25 0 . 0 2 99.68

104H-04 0.03 11.58 68.16 0 . 0 1 19.83 0 . 0 2 0.06 0.05 0 . 0 0 99.74

105H-04 0.03 11.87 68.19 0.04 19.92 0.15 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 2 0

106H-04 15.44 0.33 65.09 0.05 18.84 0 . 0 1 0.04 0.34 0 . 0 1 100.15

107H-04 15.18 0.54 64.12 0.08 18.87 0 . 0 2 0 . 0 0 0.27 0 . 0 2 99.10

108H-04 15.16 0.39 65.01 0.04 19.41 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 2 0.32 0 . 0 2 100.37

109H-04 14.05 1.13 64.94 0 . 0 2 19.65 0.05 0 . 0 0 0.45 0.04 100.33

11 OH-3 9 14.47 0.90 64.90 0 . 0 0 19.04 0 . 0 0 0.04 0.59 0 . 0 2 99.96

111H-39 0.04 11.64 67.80 0.08 20.26 0.23 0.05 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 1 1 0 0 . 1 1

II2H-39 14.32 0.99 64.93 0 . 0 0 19.06 0 . 0 0 0.04 0.61 0 . 0 2 99.97

1I3H-39 0.04 11.97 66.65 0 . 0 0 2 0 . 1 2 0.38 0.04 0.05 0 . 0 0 99.25

114H-39 0.08 11.55 68.09 0.06 20.04 0.15 0.04 0 . 0 2 0 . 0 1 100.04

115H-53 13.95 0.97 63.99 0.16 19.96 0.05 0.04 0.40 0 . 0 2 99.54

116H-53 0.04 13.95 64.99 0.06 19.76 0.05 0.03 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 98.88

117H-53 0.04 11.49 66.83 0 . 0 0 20.46 0.09 0.00 0.01 0.02 98.94

1I8H-53 14.57 0.82 64.90 0 . 1 0 18.94 0.04 0 . 0 0 0.17 0 . 0 1 99.55

I19H-73 15.07 0.65 64.30 0 . 1 0 19.08 0 . 0 2 0 . 0 0 0.24 0 . 0 1 99.47

120H-73 15.45 0.32 64.56 0 . 0 0 18.74 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 2 99.09

I21H-73 0.05 11.69 68.39 0 . 0 1 19.87 0 . 0 2 0.07 0.05 0 . 0 0 100.15

122H-73 0.04 11.64 67.80 0.08 20.26 0.23 0.05 0.00 0.01 100.11

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 231

Appendix 5 Contd....

Sample No. K.O NajO SiO: SrO A1;0 3 CaO FeO BaO MgO Total

I23H-73 15.47 0.28 64.30 0 . 1 0 19.02 0 . 0 2 0 . 0 2 0.44 0 . 0 0 99.65

124H-73 14.32 0.77 64.67 0.09 19.41 0.05 0.03 0.91 0 . 0 0 100.25

125K-16 14.97 0 .6 o 63.76 0.04 19.95 0 . 0 1 0 . 0 0 0.06 0 . 0 0 99.45

I26K-I6 15.42 0.29 62.32 0.05 19.10 0 . 0 2 0.04 0.55 0 . 0 1 97.SO

127K-43 14.87 0.73 64.78 0 . 0 1 18.99 0.03 0.04 0.19 0 . 0 1 99.65

128K-43 14.88 0.64 64.14 0.05 19.23 0 . 0 2 0.04 0.32 0 . 0 1 99.33

i 29K-43 15.14 0.48 63.82 0 . 1 2 19.27 0.03 0.05 0.18 0 . 0 2 99.11

130K-80 14.48 0.95 63.93 0.16 19.30 0.04 0.04 0.36 0.03 99.29

13 IK-80 14.48 0.75 64.31 0 . 0 0 19.37 0 . 0 1 0 . 0 0 0.09 0 . 0 0 99.01

132K-80 15.06 0.36 65.06 0.04 19.22 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 2 0.32 0 . 0 2 1 0 0 . 1 0

133K-80 14.98 1.05 63.83 0.03 18.99 0.04 0.06 0 . 1 2 0 . 0 1 99.11

134K-80 14.79 0.67 64.91 0.06 19.34 0 . 0 1 0 . 0 0 0.18 0 . 0 2 99.98

135K-80 14.48 1.03 63.96 0 . 0 1 19.33 0 . 0 2 0 . 0 0 0.43 0 . 0 1 99.27

136M-1 15.87 0.27 64.04 0.04 19.44 0 . 0 1 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 1 0 . 0 1 99.69

137M-1 15.31 0.32 65.47 0 . 0 0 19.79 0.03 0.03 1.07 0.04 102.06

138M-I 15.47 0.76 64.19 0.05 19.42 0.09 0 . 0 0 0 . 1 0 0 . 0 0 100.08

I39M-1 15.74 0 . 2 2 64.60 0 . 0 0 19.30 0 . 0 1 0.07 0.58 0 . 0 2 100.54

140M-1 15.15 0.43 64.79 0 . 1 0 19.34 0.09 0.03 0.19 0 . 0 1 100.13

I41M-7 14.85 0.79 64.84 0 . 0 0 19.27 0.06 0 . 0 1 0.25 0.03 1 0 0 . 1 0

142M-7 15.50 0.27 64.93 0.08 19.14 0.07 0.08 0.23 0 . 0 0 100.30

143M-7 15.28 0.32 64.50 0.32 19.10 0 . 0 2 0.04 0.42 0 . 0 2 1 0 0 . 0 2

I44M-7 14.89 0.65 64.74 0 . 0 0 19.30 0.07 0 . 0 0 0.15 0 . 0 0 99.80

145M-15 14.73 0.84 64.96 0 . 0 1 19.42 0.07 0 . 0 0 0 . 1 0 0 . 0 0 100.13

146M-15 14.77 0.72 64.64 0 . 1 2 19.35 0.06 0 06 0.25 0 . 0 2 99.99

______Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Appendix 5 Contd....

Sample No. KtO NajO SiOj SrO M 0 3 CaO FeO BaO MgO Total

147M-15 15.65 0.36 65.06 0.06 19.04 0.04 0 . 1 1 0.19 0.04 100.55

I48M-I5 15.31 0.30 63.27 0 . 0 0 19.16 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 1 0 . 8 6 0 . 0 0 98.91

149M-15 14.23 1.24 65.30 0 . 0 0 19.60 0 . 0 2 0.07 0.25 0 . 0 2 100.73

150M-2I 15.21 0.63 64.74 0.07 19.37 0.05 0.06 0.34 0 . 0 0 100.47

I51M-21 14.30 1.03 64.60 0 . 1 2 19.66 0.06 0 . 0 2 0.33 0.26 100.38

152M-2I 15.36 0.26 64.92 0 . 0 1 19.27 0 . 0 1 0 . 0 0 0 . 1 2 0.03 99.98

I53M-26 15.73 0.24 64.85 0.07 19.15 0 . 0 1 0 . 0 1 0.26 0 . 0 1 100.33

I54M-26 14.53 0.99 64.95 0.06 19.41 0 . 0 1 0.30 0.23 0 . 0 2 100.50

I55M-26 15.00 0.53 64.88 0.04 19.36 0.07 0 . 0 0 0.39 0 . 0 2 100.29

I56M-26 15.03 0.51 63.45 0 . 0 1 19.74 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0.35 0 . 0 0 99.09

157M-29 14.64 0.54 63.75 0.19 19.54 0.03 0.07 1.42 0 . 0 1 100.19

158M-29 15.75 0.26 64.26 0.07 18.82 0 . 0 1 0.03 0.07 0 . 0 0 99.27

I59M-29 15.52 0.34 64.13 0 . 0 0 19.10 0.06 0 . 0 0 0.37 0.04 99.56

160M-29 15.39 0.33 64.90 0 . 0 0 19.01 0.03 0 . 0 2 0.26 0 . 0 2 99.96

i61M-29 14.36 1.04 63.98 0.04 19.38 0.07 0.04 0.62 0.04 99.57

I62M-29 15.54 0.23 64.44 0.07 19.19 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0.70 0 . 0 2 100.19

163M-31 15.06 0.46 65.26 0 . 0 1 19.31 0.07 0.09 0.26 0 . 0 1 100.53

164M-31 15.72 0.27 63.46 0.09 19.17 0 . 0 0 0.03 0.31 0.03 99.08

I65M-31 15.15 0.54 64.26 0 . 0 2 19.17 0.03 0 . 0 2 0.23 0 . 0 2 99.44

166M-31 14.51 0.93 65.30 0 . 1 1 19.41 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0.53 0 . 0 1 100.80

167W-1 0.05 11.39 68.54 0 . 0 2 2 0 . 1 2 0.07 0.01 0.00 0.00 100.20

168W-1 15.34 0.52 64.57 0 . 0 2 19.11 0.04 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 1 99.61

169W-11 0.04 11.67 67.39 0.09 2 0 . 1 1 0.05 0.04 0.04 0 . 0 2 99.45

I70W-11 14.32 0.77 64.67 0.09 19.41 0.05 0.03 0.91 0 . 0 0 100.25

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. -33

Appendix 5 Contd....

Sample No. K ,0 NajO SiO, SrO AljO] CaO FeO BaO MgO Total

171W-15 0.04 11.89 66.83 0 . 0 0 20.46 0.09 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 1 0 . 0 2 99.34

I72W-15 15.27 0.57 64.05 0.04 19.02 0.04 0 . 0 1 0.03 0 . 0 1 99.04

I73W-19 15.28 0.65 65.29 0.06 19.23 0 . 0 2 0.04 0.39 0 . 0 2 100.98

I74W-19 0.05 11.69 67.96 0 . 0 0 19.59 0.10 0.00 0.00 0 . 0 2 99.41

I75W-19 15.42 0.44 65.13 0.09 19.41 0 . 0 1 0 . 0 2 0.31 0.03 1 0 0 . 8 6

176W-20 0.07 11.93 66.74 0.09 19.98 0.06 0.05 0.03 0.03 98.98

177W-20 0.04 11.49 66.83 0 . 0 0 20.46 0.09 0.00 0.01 0.02 98.94

178W-21 15.27 0.57 64.05 0.04 19.02 0.04 0 . 0 1 0.03 0 . 0 1 99.04

179W-29 15.19 0.51 64.40 0.03 18.84 0.05 0.03 0 . 0 1 0 . 0 1 99.07

180W-29 0.09 12.65 67.68 0.07 19.04 0.08 0 . 0 0 0.03 0 . 0 1 99.65

181W-29 0.06 11.34 67.75 0 . 0 0 20.09 0.07 0.01 0.00 0.00 99.32

182W-29 0.17 10.99 68.62 0.04 19.62 0.07 0.03 0 . 0 0 0.06 99.60

183W-31 0.04 11.57 67.64 0.09 20.50 0.51 0 . 0 0 0.06 0 . 0 0 100.41

184W-31 0.05 11.60 67.49 0.03 20.06 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 99.33

185W-31 15.43 0.44 63.89 0.08 19.38 0 . 0 0 0.04 0.26 0 . 0 2 99.54

l86W-3t 15.34 0.52 64.57 0 . 0 2 19.11 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 99.61

I87W-07 0.03 11.49 67.40 0.07 20.25 0.16 0 . 0 2 0.05 0.03 99.50

188W-07 15.34 0.52 64.57 0 . 0 2 19.11 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 99.61

189W-15 0.05 11.60 67.49 0.03 20.06 0.10 0.00 0.00 0 . 0 0 99.33

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 234

Appendix 6 Measured Sections

This appendix contains the simplified description of two sections of the Swauger Formation, both are

exposed in east central Idaho. The Swauger Formauon is estimated to be more than 5000 feet thick (Hobbs.

19801, however it is not exposed completely anywhere. The following two sections were measured and

sampled because they are the least deformed and more or less continuous but are not complete. They represent

only part of the Swauger Formauon and may not be considered a complete sedimentary record for depositional

environment interpretauons.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. :3

Appendix 6 contd. EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS

Gravel

Verv coarse sand

Coarse sand

Medium sand

Fine sand

.‘Argillite and siltne

Trough cross bedding

Ripple structures

Quatrtz vein

Mud clasts

______Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Cronks Canyon section of the Swauger Formation 236

Appendix 6 contd...

Unit 2 94-175Ft Feldspathic quartzite (99%), argillite 1%. Generally same as unit 1, except dominantly medium grained. Most of the beds are separated by very thin layer of green argillite.that contanins muscovite flakes. Rarely ripple cross-bedded. Top of the unit contains vague trough cross beds. Beds are slightly thinner than those of unit 1.

too

Unit 1 0-94Ft Feldspathic quartzite (98%) argillite (2%). Feldspathic quartzite is light pinkish gray to light gray and weathers light reddish brown, Bedds range

■ -• -I from 1 to 6 Ft.thick, generally massive, and • • -I occasionally ripple cross-bedded. Few beds contain mud clasts. Dominantly medium- to fine-grained, 5 0* however, few thick massive beds are composed of I medium to coarse grained slightly more feldspathic quartzite (10-12% feldspar). Both quartz and

:';;vvv.^q > • - I, feldspar grains are rounded to sub-rounded. In few' beds there are lenses of very coarse-grained clean

vJ quartzite. Argillite beds are occasionally underlained by a thin layer of muscovite flakes. Strata above the 2 WS) unit are burned under Tertiary Challis Volcanics

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Appendix 6 contd...

Unit 5 354-400Ft Thich bedded massive feldspathic quartzite.(100%) Only one bed is trough cross-bedded.Grain size increases gradually upsection. Few beds have red spots probably becuse of hematite content.

Unit 4 225-354Ft Same as unit 1

.m m

inn. —

Unit 3 175-225Ft Feldspathic quartzite (95%) pure quartzite (5%). Dominantly medium-grained, and trough cross­ bedded. Also contains abundant lenses of very coarse-grained pure quartzite. Fresh and whethering colors are same as unit 1.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 238

Appendix 6 contd...

600 -p Unit 8 548-605Ft Same as unit 5 except that unit 8 contanis few thin beds (6-8 in thick) green argillite. Red hematitic spots are abundant.

Unit 7 410-548Ft Poor exposures. Same as Unit 1. except slightly finer-grained.

Unit 6 400-410Ft Thin bedded (1 Ft thick), massive, fine-grained feldspathic quartzite (100%).

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 239

Appendix 6 contd.

300

■. . . . r = Unit 9 605-742Ft Feldspathic quartzite (98%), argillite (2%). Dominantly medium to coarse-grained, very feldspathic (>20% feldspar), generally medium bedded (l-3Ft). Few thick beds (4-5Ft) contain large scale trough cross beds (hummocky cross beds?), others are massive. The upper half is finer-grained '00 § ® p than the lower half however, some beds in the upper half contain layers of coarse-grained clean quartzite.

630 ■ v

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 240

Appendix 6 contd...

IOOO-i Unit 11 858-lOOOFt Same as unit 9

950

900

1 5 3 ? Unit 10 742-858Ft Same as unit I. Feldspathic quartzite beds contain abundant dark red spots that weathers reddish brown. These spots are probably hematite grains, that give reddish tone to the quartzite.

800

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 241

;I -o„------Appendix 6 contd...

Unit 13 1030-2170Ft(?) Intensly silicified and deformed strata. This part of the section is the core of an anticline. The deformation has destroyes all the sedimentary structures whereas the silicification has onscured original characters of the detrital grains. Samples were collected from the southern limb of the * anticline with approximate measurement. Rest of the section on the southern end is burried under Teniarv Challis Volcanics.

Unit 12 1000-1030Ft

1030 Feldspathic quartzite (99%) argillite (1%). Medium to fine-grained with subordinate coarse-grained (few layers of coarse grained pure quartzite).Contians abundant muscovite flakes. Large scale trough cross-beds Some beds contain sole marks, scour tooo i '■■'■-■fi'-vnr marks and climbing ripples.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Appendix 6 contd...

Fourth of July Creek section of the Swauger Formation

r-'-V. -r: :s \

150 i

Unit 2. 77-138 F t Feldspathic quartzite (95%), argillite (5%). Lower half is composed ofthick(up to 8 feet) trough-cross bedded quartzite. Upper half contains both thick massive beds of quartzite and thin bedded (1 foot) quartzite. Most of the beds are ripple cross bedded.

Unit 1 0-77 F t Feldspathic quartzite (100%). Mostly composed of medium- to fine-grained ripple cross-bedded quartzite Most of the ripple structures are concentrated in the middle two third of the unit. Lower and upper two thirds of the unit are massive medium- to coarse-grained quartzite. Coarse­ grained beds contain up to 2mm large rounded quartz grains.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 243

Appendix 6 contd.. -

330 -i

300 C

Unit 3 177-255 F t Feldspathic quartzite (95%) argillite (5%). Mostly thin bedded (1-1.5Ft) One argillite bed is overiain by ripple-cross-bedded quartzite. Also contains one thick massive bed of coarse-grained quartzite.

200

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 244

Appendix 6 contd.. Unit 6 565-604.Ft 600- Feldspathic Quartzite (100%). This unit may be further divided into two parts. The lower half is medium-to fine grained and contains large scale trough cross beds. The upper half is thick bedded, medium-grained, and massive.

Unit 5 470-565 Ft Feldspathic quartzite (90%), argillite (10%). Medium bedded (1-3 Ft), mostly 1 foot thick beds, separated by thin(l-2 inch) green argillite beds. Two thick beds contain coarse-grained massive quartzite underlain by fine-grained ripple cross bedded quartzite.

Unit 4 400-470 F t Same as unit 5. except that it contains lesser amount of argillite beds and more ripple cross bedded 450 quartzite.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 245

Appendix o contd...

Unit 9 695-774 Ft. Feldspathic uartzite (97%) and argillite (3%).

1 Massive quartzite is medium- to fine-grained and mostly fine-grained. Beds range from I to 5 feet, but are generally 1 to 2 feet thick. Argillite beds are thin, ranging from 3 to 6 inches. Strata above the argillite beds are ripple cross bedded.. One thick bed in the middle of the unit is very coarse-grained and contains white rounded quartz grains as large as Imm.

Unit 8 605-695 Ft. '00 - Same as unit 9 except the beds are slightly thinner (1-2 Ft), and grains are dominantly finer.

Unit 7 604-605 F t s;o - -C-J Feldspathic Quartzite (50%) and conglomeratic quartzite (50%). This is the only bed in the section which contains conglomerate. Pebbles are i l S i subanguiar to rounded matrix supported, and are concentrated in a 9 inch thick bed capped by medium- to fine-grained quartzite. Pebbles are

£ :A :S ./L 2 \ composed of white quartzite and range from I to 3 cm in diameter. 600

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 246

Appendix 6 contd..

1000

Unit 10 774-974 Ft. Feldspathic quartzite (95%), and argillite (5%). Color and weathering characters are same as that of um't II. Mostly composed of medium to fine­ 950 grained sand, with subordinate coarse sand beds. Thick quartzite beds range from 3 to 8 feet. Lower half of the unit is slightly coarser than the upper half. Few beds contain ciimbing ripples, otherwise mostly massive. Generally climbing ripples are just above the arsillite beds.

900

350

800

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 247

Appendix 6 contd...

Unit 11 974-1020 F t Feldspathic quatrzite (97%), and argillite (3%). Feldspathic quartzite is light gray to reddish gray and weathers light reddish brown, whereas argillite is greenish gray and weathers moderate grayish brown. Quartz grains are rounded to subrounded whereas feldspar grains are rounded. The unit is generally clean, medium- to coarse-grained and appears moderately sorted. In the upper part of the unit the thick beds are massive. In few beds fining upward trend in grain size is vaguely observable. Feldspathic quartzite beds range from 2 to 6 feet,

1 0 2 0 but most are generally 3 feet thick. Few beds have %/ !*; V.* V/J climbing ripples. Green argillite beds are thin,

*/r ranging from 5 to 9 inches. Few argillite beds are iooo micaceous.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Appendix 7 Box plots and bar graphs showing basin-wide distribution of different ciast types.

Basin-wide lateral distribution of different clast types are discussed in pan C of chapter 3

(page 1061. Box plots and bar graphs of clast types, not discussed in the text, are appendixed in this secuon.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Appendix 7 contd.... 249

Monocrystalline Quartz (Qm)

Basin-wide distribution

Figure 78. Graph showing the lateral distribution of total monocrvstalline quartz (Qm) population. A) Box plots: Circles represent outliers and asterisks represent extreme outliers. B) Bar graph: each vertical bar corresponds to the mean amount in the respective stratigraphic section.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Appendix 7 contd... 250

Non-Undulose Qm (QmNU)

3asin-wida distribution B

9 0

5 0

> 3 0

t0

3 CMMUMI iHMtMT Stratigraphy sections

Figure 79. Graph showing the lateral distribution of non-undulose monocrvstalline quartz (QmNU) population. A) Box plots: Circles represent outliers and asterisks represent extreme outliers. B) Bar graph: each vertical bar corresponds to the mean amount in the respective stratigraphic section.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Appendix 7 contd... 251

Undulose Qm (QmU)

Basin-wide distribution

100 ------

Stratlgrapdic sections

Figure 80. Graph showing the lateral distribution of undulose monocrystalline quartz (QmU) population. A) Box plots: Circles represent outliers and asterisks represent extreme outliers. B) Bar graph: each vertical bar corresponds to the mean amount in the respective stratigraphic section.

______Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Appendix 7 contd....

Non-Undulose Qp (QpNU)

Basin-wide distribution B Q p N U

■ ■ B B Stratigraphic sections

Figure 81. Graph showing the lateral distribution of non-undulose polycrystalline quartz (QpNU) population. A) Box plots: Circles represent outliers and asterisks represent extreme outliers. B) Bar graph: each vertical bar corresponds to the mean amount in the respective stratigraphic section.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Appendix 7 contd... 253

Undulose Qp (QpU)

60 i 501 40 -i 30 i

2 0 -i 10 r

-10

n

Basin-wide distribution

§ 2 0 -

to —

Stratigraphic sections

Figure 82. Graph showing the lateral distribution of undulose poiycrystalline (QpU) population. A) Box plots: Circles represent outliers and asterisks represent extreme outliers. B) Bar graph :each vertical bar corresponds to the mean amount in the respective stratigraphic section.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Appendix 7 contd.... 254

Non-Undulose QpMeg (QpMegNU)

1 2 t i°i A 81 6i o o 2-j I — 0-1 -2 L s = 45 65 26 47 31 20 46 34 25 21 <* % \\ \ a % \

Basin-wide distribution g

M QPUagNU I

Figure 83. Graph showing the lateral distribution of total non-undulose mega-mosaic poiycrystalline (QpMegNU) population. A) Box plots: Circles represent outliers and asterisks represent extreme outliers. B) Bar graph: each vertical bar corresponds to the mean amount in the respective stratigraphic section.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Appendix 7 contd.... 155

Undulose Mega-Mosaic Qp (QpMegU) 1 0 7 —

8 - i — A

6 - i

4-i s i KiSSS-:! ~~ 7 4 m — cww'xt_____ o - i HI - 7 . 1 45 65 :6 47 31 :o 46 34 :i r\ 4;. /> 'A % •n *+ X O. %

Basin-wide distribution B

Q c M t g U

Stratigraphic sections

Figure 84. Graph showing the lateral distribution of undulose mega-mosaic poiycrystalline quartz (QpMegU) population. A) Box plots: Circles represent outliers and asterisks represent extreme outliers. B) Bar graph: each vertical bar corresponds to the mean amount in the respective stratigraphic section.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Appendix 7 contd... 256

Non-Undulose QpMac (QpMacNU)

Basin-wide distnbution B

...I

Figure 85. Graph showing the lateral distribution of non-undulose macro-mosaic poiycrystalline quartz (QpMacNU) population. A) Box plots: Circles represent outliers and asterisks represent extreme outliers. B) Bar graph: each vertical bar corresponds to the mean amount in the respective stratigraphic section.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Appendix 7 contd.... 257

Undulose Macro-Mosaic Qp (QpMacU) 70------601 —A j

Basin-wide distnbution B QpMaeU

2 5

20

5

0 omCwtw bmvmUatM* *MCM'MOM C M Stratigrapnic ucdons

Figure 86. Graph showing the lateral distnbution of undulose macro-mosaic poiycrystalline quartz (QpMacU) population. A) Box plots: Circles represent outliers and asterisks represent extreme outliers. B) Bar graph: each vertical bar corresponds to the mean amount in the respective stratigraphic section.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Appendix 7 contd-..

Non-Undulose QpMic (QpMicNU) 16- 1 4 -i 12H 1 0 - i — 8 - i 6 - i 4-i 2 - mBim 4gl 0 - i -2 ! x = 45 65 26 47 •I 20 46 34 25 21 /> ‘h- •■v X % \ % \

Sasin-wtde distnbution B

Stratigrapnic sections

Figure 87. Graph showing the lateral distribution of non-undulose micro-mosaic poiycrystalline quartz (QpMicNU) population. A) Box plots: Circles represent outliers and asterisks represent extreme outliers. B) Bar graph: each vertical bar corresponds to the mean amount in the respective stratigraphic section.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Appendix 7 contd... 259

Undulose Micro-Mosaic Qp (QpMicU) 14- 12-

1 0 -i

8 - 6- * JL — 4-i 2 - 0- - 2 . M = 45 65 26 47 20 46 34 26

CV 9*. vV. % % ■ 'a X \ \ - \

Basirvwide distribution B QpMkcU

Stratigrapnic M d io u

Figure 88. Graph showing the lateral distribution of undulose micro-mosaic poiycrystalline quartz (QpMicU) population. A) Box plots: Circles represent outliers and asterisks represent extreme outliers. B) Bar graph: each vertical bar corresponds to the mean amount in the respective stratigraphic section.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Appendix 7 contd.... 260

Potassium Feldspar (K) 501— 401 301 3 - — __ m m 20-1 10- i m m — o 0 m , ■0" - o-i -«r -10 I 45 23 65 26 XI 31 20 46 34 25 21

th o,. V % V ' '%

3asin-wide distribution B

Figure 89. Graph showing the lateral distnbution of potassium feldspar (K) population. A) Box plots: Circles represent outliers and asterisks represent extreme outliers. B) Bar graph: each vertical bar corresponds to the mean amount in the respective stratigraphic section.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Appendix 7 contd.... 261

Sedimentary Rock Fragments (SRF)

12 - 10i

8 1 6 i 4-i 2 - c-*>P -2i_ 45 65 26 ■17 21 20 46 14

r \ y> 'b. % % % \ % \ %% Q. X % %

3asin-wide distribution B

♦ 5 - c s £ c 1 ’ o > s o 2

3 5 •

Stratlgrapnic sections

Figure 90. Graph showing the lateral distribution of sedimentary rock fragments (SRF). A) Box plots: Circles represent outliers and asterisks represent extreme outliers. B) Bar graph: each vertical bar corresponds to the mean amount in the respective stratigraphic section.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Appendix 7 contd.... 262

Chert (CHT) 3.5 r 3.0-i 2.51 2 .0 i 1.5 i 1. 0 - i

i 0.0 -i

T 45 65 26 47 31 20 46 34 :i O 4*. /O. •ft \ \ V O' V S \ % \ \ Q. \

Basin-wide distribution □ CHT

1.6 •

1.4 ------

8 Q.93

0.8

(QC <330.6 S

0.4

0.2

0 Snann* Lookout Buffalo Humo O rton Stratigraphic sections

Figure 91. Graph showing the lateral distribution of chert (CHT) population. A) Box plots: Circles represent outliers and asterisks represent extreme outliers B) Bar graph: each vertical bar corresponds to the mean amount in the respective stratigraphic section.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.