Joint Forcible Entry Operations

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Joint Forcible Entry Operations Joint Publication 3-18 OF NT TH E E W M I S E' L L H D T E F T E N A R D R A M P Y E D • • U A N C I I T R E E D M S A T F AT E S O Joint Forcible Entry Operations 11 May 2017 Incorporating Change 1 9 January 2018 PREFACE 1. Scope This publication provides joint doctrine for planning, executing, and assessing joint forcible entry operations. 2. Purpose This publication has been prepared under the direction of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (CJCS). It sets forth joint doctrine to govern the activities and performance of the Armed Forces of the United States in joint operations, and it provides considerations for military interaction with governmental and nongovernmental agencies, multinational forces, and other interorganizational partners. It provides military guidance for the exercise of authority by combatant commanders and other joint force commanders (JFCs), and prescribes joint doctrine for operations and training. It provides military guidance for use by the Armed Forces in preparing and executing their plans and orders. It is not the intent of this publication to restrict the authority of the JFC from organizing the force and executing the mission in a manner the JFC deems most appropriate to ensure unity of effort in the accomplishment of objectives. 3. Application a. Joint doctrine established in this publication applies to the Joint Staff, commanders of combatant commands, subordinate unified commands, joint task forces, subordinate components of these commands, the Services, and combat support agencies. b. The guidance in this publication is authoritative; as such, this doctrine will be followed except when, in the judgment of the commander, exceptional circumstances dictate otherwise. If conflicts arise between the contents of this publication and the contents of Service publications, this publication will take precedence unless the CJCS, normally in coordination with the other members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, has provided more current and specific guidance. Commanders of forces operating as part of a multinational (alliance or coalition) military command should follow multinational doctrine and procedures ratified by the United States. For doctrine and procedures not ratified by the US, commanders should evaluate and follow the multinational command’s doctrine and procedures, where applicable and consistent with US law, regulations, and doctrine. For the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff: KEVIN D. SCOTT Vice Admiral, USN Director, Joint Force Development i Preface Intentionally Blank ii JP 3-18 SUMMARY OF CHANGES REVISION OF JOINT PUBLICATION 3-18 DATED 27 NOVEMBER 2012 • Expands the discussion of sea control and eliminated the term coastal control. • Clarifies the discussion of operational access in the joint force environment, to include cyberspace. • Clarifies the discussion of space control operations. • Incorporates a discussion of joint electromagnetic spectrum management operations. • Modifies the discussion of principles applied by planners to achieve surprise for setting favorable conditions to ensure operational success in the joint force environment. • Describes where forcible entry normally occurs within the notional phasing construct. • Updates command and control responsibilities and control mechanism language throughout. • Enhances the discussion of multinational capabilities, collaboration, and planning. iii Summary of Changes Intentionally Blank iv JP 3-18 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................. vii CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION Forcible Entry ............................................................................................................. I-1 United States National Military Strategy and Joint Forcible Entry Operations .......... I-2 Principles for Forcible Entry Operational Success ..................................................... I-3 Operational Applications of Forcible Entry Operations ............................................. I-8 Forcible Entry Capabilities ......................................................................................... I-9 Multinational Considerations .................................................................................... I-11 CHAPTER II COMMAND AND CONTROL Purpose .......................................................................................................................II-1 Force Employment .....................................................................................................II-1 Organization of the Forcible Entry Operational Area ................................................II-2 Command Relationships for Forcible Entry Operations ............................................II-3 Airspace Control ........................................................................................................II-5 Air Defense Command and Control ..........................................................................II-7 Communications ........................................................................................................II-8 Rules of Engagement ...............................................................................................II-10 Friendly Fire Prevention ..........................................................................................II-10 CHAPTER III PLANNING Purpose ..................................................................................................................... III-1 Forcible Entry and the Joint Planning Process ........................................................ III-1 Forcible Entry Planning Considerations .................................................................. III-2 CHAPTER IV OPERATIONS Purpose ..................................................................................................................... IV-1 Section A. Integration and Synchronization Introduction .............................................................................................................. IV-1 Forcible Entry Operations Phases ............................................................................ IV-2 Integration and/or Synchronization Considerations ............................................... IV-12 Section B. Supporting Operations Special Operations Forces...................................................................................... IV-14 Fires ....................................................................................................................... IV-15 Intelligence Support and Considerations ............................................................... IV-15 v Table of Contents Information Operations .......................................................................................... IV-17 Public Affairs ......................................................................................................... IV-19 Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Considerations ......................... IV-20 Air Mobility Operations ......................................................................................... IV-20 CHAPTER V LOGISTICS General ...................................................................................................................... V-1 Specific Logistic Considerations for Supporting Forcible Entry Operations ........... V-1 APPENDIX A Airborne and Air Assault Operations ............................................................... A-1 B Control Joint Forcible Entry Operations ...........................................................B-1 C References .........................................................................................................C-1 D Adminstrative Instructions ............................................................................... D-1 GLOSSARY Part I Abbreviations, Acronyms, and Initialisms .............................................. GL-1 Part II Terms and Definitions ............................................................................. GL-4 FIGURE I-1 Forcible Entry Operations ........................................................................... I-2 IV-1 Operation Plan Rehearsal Benefits ........................................................... IV-1 IV-2 Forcible Entry Operations Phases ............................................................ IV-2 IV-3 Intelligence Support ............................................................................... IV-16 V-1 Logistics Planning Considerations ............................................................ V-1 A-1 Example Distribution of Responsibilities for Airborne Assault ............... A-4 vi JP 3-18 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY COMMANDER’S OVERVIEW • Presents an Introduction of Joint Forcible Entry • Explains the Command and Control of Joint Forcible Entry Operations • Covers Joint Forcible Entry Operations Planning • Describes How Forcible Entry Operations Are Conducted Introduction Forcible Entry Joint forcible entry operations seize and hold lodgments against armed opposition. A lodgment is a designated area in a hostile or potentially hostile operational area (OA) (such as an airhead, a beachhead, or combination thereof) that affords continuous landing of troops and materiel while providing maneuver space for subsequent operations. United States National Military To be credible both as a deterrent and as a viable Strategy and Joint Forcible Entry military option for policy enforcement, the Armed Operations Forces of
Recommended publications
  • Helena Chester the Discursive Construction of Freedom in The
    The Discursive Construction of Freedom in the Watchtower Society Helena Chester Diploma of Teaching (Early Childhood): Riverina – Murray Institute of Higher Education Graduate Diploma of Education (Special Education): Victoria College. Master of Education (Honours): University of New England Thesis submitted in fulfilment of requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Charles Darwin University, Darwin. October 2018 Certification I certify that the substance of this dissertation has not already been submitted for any degree and is not currently being submitted for any other degree or qualification. I certify that any help received in preparing this thesis, and all sources used, have been acknowledged in this thesis. Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................... 4 Dedication ............................................................................................................................. 5 Thesis Abstract ..................................................................................................................... 6 Keywords .............................................................................................................................. 7 Acronyms and Abbreviations ................................................................................................ 8 Chapter 1: The Discursive Construction of Freedom in the Watchtower Society ................... 9 The Freedom Claim in the Watchtower Society .............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Part II Session 3 “Technology to Seize an Enemy-Held Shore”
    Part II Session 3 “Technology to Seize an Enemy-held Shore” 1 Opposed Allied Amphibious Operations Prior to Normandy-Many Painful Lessons • UK-Norway, April 1940 • UK-Dakar, September 1940 • UK-Madagascar, May 1942 • UK/Canadian-Dieppe raid on the French coast, August 1942 • US/UK-Torch-Casablanca, Oran and Algiers, Nov 1942 • US/UK- Sicily/Italy – Sicily (Husky), Salerno (Avalanche), Anzio (Shingle), July –September 1943 2 “How to seize an enemy-held shore” • Examine from that past, then plan, plan, review the plan and exercise what you can of the plan. • Make sure that some one was in-charge of each action and was drilled in what to do. • What are the Germans doing and what would be a German response? Plan for that response. • Special training, new weapons, what do you need to clear the beach, how do you protect the landing forces, where is the unified command and control? 3 “How to seize an enemy-held shore” • While some of this sessions applies in the Pacific, the context here is a build up for the Normandy invasion: - One million troops and a 100,000 vehicles and everything needed to kept functioning. - The Normandy invasion was on the shore of a continent. • The Pacific War was a series of island invasions or jungle enclaves in New Guinea. No opposing armor, limited air cover or the probably of massed reserves. • Only the Philippine invasion and the possible invasion of the Japanese home Islands in November 1945 had the scope of Normandy. 4 What a Successful Amphibious Landing Requires-1 • Off-shore Command ships containing cooperative inter- service and inter-Allied staffs functioning below the Senior Chiefs level.
    [Show full text]
  • A Historical Assessment of Amphibious Operations from 1941 to the Present
    CRM D0006297.A2/ Final July 2002 Charting the Pathway to OMFTS: A Historical Assessment of Amphibious Operations From 1941 to the Present Carter A. Malkasian 4825 Mark Center Drive • Alexandria, Virginia 22311-1850 Approved for distribution: July 2002 c.. Expedit'onaryyystems & Support Team Integrated Systems and Operations Division This document represents the best opinion of CNA at the time of issue. It does not necessarily represent the opinion of the Department of the Navy. Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited. Specific authority: N0014-00-D-0700. For copies of this document call: CNA Document Control and Distribution Section at 703-824-2123. Copyright 0 2002 The CNA Corporation Contents Summary . 1 Introduction . 5 Methodology . 6 The U.S. Marine Corps’ new concept for forcible entry . 9 What is the purpose of amphibious warfare? . 15 Amphibious warfare and the strategic level of war . 15 Amphibious warfare and the operational level of war . 17 Historical changes in amphibious warfare . 19 Amphibious warfare in World War II . 19 The strategic environment . 19 Operational doctrine development and refinement . 21 World War II assault and area denial tactics. 26 Amphibious warfare during the Cold War . 28 Changes to the strategic context . 29 New operational approaches to amphibious warfare . 33 Cold war assault and area denial tactics . 35 Amphibious warfare, 1983–2002 . 42 Changes in the strategic, operational, and tactical context of warfare. 42 Post-cold war amphibious tactics . 44 Conclusion . 46 Key factors in the success of OMFTS. 49 Operational pause . 49 The causes of operational pause . 49 i Overcoming enemy resistance and the supply buildup.
    [Show full text]
  • QHN Spring 2020 Layout 1
    WESTWARD HO! QHN FEATURES JOHN ABBOTT COLLEGE & MONTREAL’S WEST ISLAND $10 Quebec VOL 13, NO. 2 SPRING 2020 News “An Integral Part of the Community” John Abbot College celebrates seven decades Aviation, Arboretum, Islands and Canals Heritage Highlights along the West Island Shores Abbott’s Late Dean The Passing of a Memorable Mentor Quebec Editor’s desk 3 eritageNews H Vocation Spot Rod MacLeod EDITOR Who Are These Anglophones Anyway? 4 RODERICK MACLEOD An Address to the 10th Annual Arts, Matthew Farfan PRODUCTION Culture and Heritage Working Group DAN PINESE; MATTHEW FARFAN The West Island 5 PUBLISHER A Brief History Jim Hamilton QUEBEC ANGLOPHONE HERITAGE NETWORK John Abbott College 8 3355 COLLEGE 50 Years of Success Heather Darch SHERBROOKE, QUEBEC J1M 0B8 The Man from Argenteuil 11 PHONE The Life and Times of Sir John Abbott Jim Hamilton 1-877-964-0409 (819) 564-9595 A Symbol of Peace in 13 FAX (819) 564-6872 St. Anne de Bellevue Heather Darch CORRESPONDENCE [email protected] A Backyard Treasure 15 on the West Island Heather Darch WEBSITES QAHN.ORG QUEBECHERITAGEWEB.COM Boisbriand’s Legacy 16 100OBJECTS.QAHN.ORG A Brief History of Senneville Jim Hamilton PRESIDENT Angus Estate Heritage At Risk 17 GRANT MYERS Matthew Farfan EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR MATTHEW FARFAN Taking Flight on the West Island 18 PROJECT DIRECTORS Heather Darch DWANE WILKIN HEATHER DARCH Muskrats and Ruins on Dowker Island 20 CHRISTINA ADAMKO Heather Darch GLENN PATTERSON BOOKKEEPER Over the River and through the Woods 21 MARION GREENLAY to the Morgan Arboretum We Go! Heather Darch Quebec Heritage News is published quarterly by QAHN with the support Tiny Island’s Big History 22 of the Department of Canadian Heritage.
    [Show full text]
  • Neptune's Might: Amphibious Forces in Normandy
    Neptune’s Might: Amphibious Forces in Normandy A Coast Guard LCVP landing craft crew prepares to take soldiers to Omaha Beach, June 6, 1944 Photo 26-G-2349. U.S. Coast Guard Photo, Courtesy Naval History and Heritage Command By Michael Kern Program Assistant, National History Day 1 “The point was that we on the scene knew for sure that we could substitute machines for lives and that if we could plague and smother the enemy with an unbearable weight of machinery in the months to follow, hundreds of thousands of our young men whose expectancy of survival would otherwise have been small could someday walk again through their own front doors.” - Ernie Pyle, Brave Men 2 What is National History Day? National History Day is a non-profit organization which promotes history education for secondary and elementary education students. The program has grown into a national program since its humble beginnings in Cleveland, Ohio in 1974. Today over half a million students participate in National History Day each year, encouraged by thousands of dedicated teachers. Students select a historical topic related to a theme chosen each year. They conduct primary and secondary research on their chosen topic through libraries, archives, museums, historic sites, and interviews. Students analyze and interpret their sources before presenting their work in original papers, exhibits, documentaries, websites, or performances. Students enter their projects in contests held each spring at the local, state, and national level where they are evaluated by professional historians and educators. The program culminates in the Kenneth E. Behring National Contest, held on the campus of the University of Maryland at College Park each June.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation Overlord James Clinton Emmert Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2002 Operation overlord James Clinton Emmert Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons Recommended Citation Emmert, James Clinton, "Operation overlord" (2002). LSU Master's Theses. 619. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/619 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. OPERATION OVERLORD A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Liberal Arts in The Interdepartmental Program in Liberal Arts by James Clinton Emmert B.A., Louisiana State University, 1996 May 2002 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis could not have been completed without the support of numerous persons. First, I would never have been able to finish if I had not had the help and support of my wife, Esther, who not only encouraged me and proofed my work, but also took care of our newborn twins alone while I wrote. In addition, I would like to thank Dr. Stanley Hilton, who spent time helping me refine my thoughts about the invasion and whose editing skills helped give life to this paper. Finally, I would like to thank the faculty of Louisiana State University for their guidance and the knowledge that they shared with me.
    [Show full text]
  • Soldier Illness and Environment in the War of 1812
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Electronic Theses and Dissertations Fogler Library Spring 5-8-2020 "The Men Were Sick of the Place" : Soldier Illness and Environment in the War of 1812 Joseph R. Miller University of Maine, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd Part of the Canadian History Commons, Military History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Miller, Joseph R., ""The Men Were Sick of the Place" : Soldier Illness and Environment in the War of 1812" (2020). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 3208. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd/3208 This Open-Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “THE MEN WERE SICK OF THE PLACE”: SOLDIER ILLNESS AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE WAR OF 1812 By Joseph R. Miller B.A. North Georgia University, 2003 M.A. University of Maine, 2012 A DISSERTATION Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (in History) The Graduate School The University of Maine May 2020 Advisory Committee: Scott W. See, Professor Emeritus of History, Co-advisor Jacques Ferland, Associate Professor of History, Co-advisor Liam Riordan, Professor of History Kathryn Shively, Associate Professor of History, Virginia Commonwealth University James Campbell, Professor of Joint, Air War College, Brigadier General (ret) Michael Robbins, Associate Research Professor of Psychology Copyright 2020 Joseph R.
    [Show full text]
  • Too Much of a Good Thing by Amy Mccullough, Senior Editor the Air Force Is Struggling to Keep Its Personnel Numbers in Balance
    USAF photo by SrA. Grovert Fuentes-Contreras Too Much of a Good Thing By Amy McCullough, Senior Editor The Air Force is struggling to keep its personnel numbers in balance. t seems the threat of yet another the number down to the authorized “Without these actions in FY10, our combat deployment is less daunt- 332,800 by the end of Fiscal 2012. overall retention would have exceeded ing than the weak job market. In addition, the Air National Guard the goal by more than four percent,” The majority of today’s airmen is projecting it will be at or near its CMSAF James A. Roy told the Senate have spent their entire careers at authorized end strength of 106,700 by Armed Services personnel subcommit- war—many can’t count their combat the end of Fiscal 2011. tee in April. tours on one hand—yet Air Force re- To remedy things, Air Force leaders tention is at a 16-year high and active have implemented a series of voluntary Above: USAF Lt. Col. Andy Veres (l), duty end strength remains bloated above and involuntary force-shaping measures, Provincial Reconstruction Team Zabul congressionally mandated levels. such as convening reduction-in-force commander, re-enlists MSgt. James At the end of Fiscal 2010, there boards and encouraging early separa- Sandifer at Forward Operating Base Smart, on top of Alexander’s castle in were 334,196 active duty personnel, tions through waivers for active duty Qalat City, Afghanistan. Active duty but officials say they expect to whittle service commitments. retention is at a 16-year high.
    [Show full text]
  • Casemate Wall with Abutting Structures at Khirbet Qeiyafa: the Archaeology of Architecture and Its Implications for Khirbet Qeiyafa’S Identity
    ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! The Architectural Phenomenon of ‘Casemate Wall with Abutting Structures at Khirbet Qeiyafa: The archaeology of Architecture and its Implications for Khirbet Qeiyafa’s Identity Rachel Hyung Guong Ko School of Religious Studies McGill University, Montreal February 2018 A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Arts (M.A. thesis). ©2018 by Rachel Hyung Guong Ko ABSTRACT This work catalogues and re-examines the main architectural features that were uncovered at the Iron Age city of Khirbet Qeiyafa. The site was excavated for a total of seven seasons under the direction of Dr. Yosef Garfinkel of the Hebrew University and Saar Ganor on behalf of the Israel Antiquities Authorities; Michael G. Hasel of the Southern Adventist University joined Garfinkel and Ganor for the 2009-2011 excavation seasons. The excavators have proposed that the site be identified as the biblical site of Sha’arayim, meaning “two gates”, mentioned three times in the Hebrew Bible (Joshua 15:36, 1 Samuel 17:52, 1 Chronicles 4: 31). Their identification of Khirbet Qeiyafa as belonging to the kingdom of Judah has stirred much controversy amongst scholars who support current theories of state formation in the Levant during the Iron Age. These scholars, so called ‘minimalists’, maintain that there is no archaeological evidence to support an United Monarchy, and insist that the northern Kingdom of Israel only emerged in the early 9th century BC, and the kingdom of Judah only in the late 8th century BCE, some 300 years later than the events as purported to have happened in the biblical narrative (Lemche 1988; Finkelstein 1996; Thompson 1999)”.1 The architectural remains of the Iron Age city at Khirbet Qeiyafa have been particularly important in the discussion regarding the socio-political identity and the territorial affiliation of the site.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation-Overlord.Pdf
    A Guide To Historical Holdings In the Eisenhower Library Operation OVERLORD Compiled by Valoise Armstrong Page 4 INTRODUCTION This guide contains a listing of collections in the Dwight D. Eisenhower Library relating to the planning and execution of Operation Overlord, including documents relating to the D-Day Invasion of Normandy on June 6, 1944. That monumental event has been commemorated frequently since the end of the war and material related to those anniversary observances is also represented in these collections and listed in this guide. The overview of the manuscript collections describes the relationship between the creators and Operation Overlord and lists the types of relevant documents found within those collections. This is followed by a detailed folder list of the manuscript collections, list of relevant oral history transcripts, a list of related audiovisual materials, and a selected bibliography of printed materials. DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER LIBRARY Abilene, Kansas 67410 September 2006 Table of Contents Section Page Overview of Collections…………………………………………….5 Detailed Folder Lists……………………………………………….12 Oral History Transcripts……………………………………………41 Audiovisual: Still Photographs…………………………………….42 Audiovisual: Audio Recordings……………………………………43 Audiovisual: Motion Picture Film………………………………….44 Select Bibliography of Print Materials…………………………….49 Page 5 OO Page 6 Overview of Collections BARKER, RAY W.: Papers, 1943-1945 In 1942 General George Marshall ordered General Ray Barker to London to work with the British planners on the cross-channel invasion. His papers include minutes of meetings, reports and other related documents. BULKELEY, JOHN D.: Papers, 1928-1984 John Bulkeley, a career naval officer, graduated from the U.S. Naval Academy in 1933 and was serving in the Pacific at the start of World War II.
    [Show full text]
  • SUNBURST 1 Cover: Spc
    SUNBURST 1 Cover: Spc. Kerick S. Francis, a gunner with C Company, 1st Battalion, 133rd CONTENTS Infantry, scans the road for signs of insurgent activity. - Photo by Sgt. Gary Witte The SUNBURST is a monthly magazine distributed in electronic and print format. It is authorized for publication by the 13th SC (E) Public Affairs Office. The contents of the SUNBURST are unofficial and are not to be considered the official views of, or endorsed by, the U.S. Government, including the Department of Defense. The SUNBURST is a command information publication in accordance with Army Regulation 360-1. The Public Affairs Office is on LSA Anaconda on New Jersey Ave. in building 4136, DSN telephone: (318) 829-1234. Website at www.hood.army.mil/13sce. Contact Sgt. Joel F. Gibson via e-mail at [email protected] 13th SC (E) Commanding General Brig. Gen. Michael J. Terry 13th SC (E) Chief of Public Affairs Maj. Jay R. Adams COVER STORIES 1-133 Out West p. 8 One Tree At A Time p. 24 VETERANS DAY PATCH CEREMONIES p. 14 HIGH SCHOOL BUILDS CONNECTION p. 15 TAE BO-ATHON, ALIVE AND WELL IN TAJI p. 21 MECHANICS GET COURSE IN ASV REPAIR p. 22 SOLDIER’S PPE SAVES THE DAY p. 26 SOLDIERS CREATE A SLICE OF HOME p. 27 THE ZIGGURAT OF UR p. 28 2 SUNBURST SUNBURST 3 Back Page: A Heavy Equipment Transport (HET) Prepares to leave Camp Ar- ifjan in Kuwait to deliver supplies throughout Iraq. - Photo Illustration by Spc. Adryen Wallace 210th MPAD Commander 210th MPAD NCOIC Sunburst Forward Print Officer Maj.
    [Show full text]
  • Record of Protected Structures
    RECORD OF PROTECTED STRUCTURES Glenties Electoral Area Ref. Name Description Address Number Electoral Area Rating Importance Value 40904202 Dunlewey House Detached early 19th century three-bay two-storey house with projecting open Dunlewey House, Glenties E.A. Regional AGSM porch, recessed two-storey wing to east, three-bay single-storey battlemented Dunlewey, Gweedore billiard room to west, two-storey wing to south, with two-and single-storey canted bay windows to west. 40902615 St John's Church Detached four-bay single-storey Church of Ireland Church, built 1752, with bell St. John's, Clondehorky Glenties E.A. National AIPSM cote to west gable Venetian east window, internal gallery, porch with staircase Parish, Ballymore to west and projecting gabled vestry to north-west corner. Lower, Creeslough 40903210 Carrickfin Church Detached three-bay single-storey Church of Ireland Chapel of Ease with gabled Carrickfin Church, Glenties E.A. Regional AHSM entrance porch, with bellcote to centre of south-west side and projecting sacristy Carrickfin, Kincasslagh, to north, built early 19th century. Letterkenny 40902601 St Michaels Church Detached Ronchamp-esque Catholic Church built 1970, with Baptistry, Blessed Creeslough Glenties E.A. National AP Sacrament Chapel, entrance porch, sacristy, confessionals and Marian chapel to perimeter. 40901501 Hornhead Bridge Twelve arch rubble stone road bridge over tidal stream built c.1800 with rubble Dunfanaghy Glenties E.A. Regional ATS stone segment arches; vaults, cutwaters, parapets, abutments and causeway to south. 40905802 Doocharry Bridge Road bridge over Gweebara river in two segmental-arched spans with custone Doocharry Bridge, Glenties E.A. Regional ATS voussoirs, dressed squared rubble stone haunched ashlar abutments and rubble Doochary stone parapets.
    [Show full text]