Casemate Wall with Abutting Structures at Khirbet Qeiyafa: the Archaeology of Architecture and Its Implications for Khirbet Qeiyafa’S Identity

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Casemate Wall with Abutting Structures at Khirbet Qeiyafa: the Archaeology of Architecture and Its Implications for Khirbet Qeiyafa’S Identity ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! The Architectural Phenomenon of ‘Casemate Wall with Abutting Structures at Khirbet Qeiyafa: The archaeology of Architecture and its Implications for Khirbet Qeiyafa’s Identity Rachel Hyung Guong Ko School of Religious Studies McGill University, Montreal February 2018 A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Arts (M.A. thesis). ©2018 by Rachel Hyung Guong Ko ABSTRACT This work catalogues and re-examines the main architectural features that were uncovered at the Iron Age city of Khirbet Qeiyafa. The site was excavated for a total of seven seasons under the direction of Dr. Yosef Garfinkel of the Hebrew University and Saar Ganor on behalf of the Israel Antiquities Authorities; Michael G. Hasel of the Southern Adventist University joined Garfinkel and Ganor for the 2009-2011 excavation seasons. The excavators have proposed that the site be identified as the biblical site of Sha’arayim, meaning “two gates”, mentioned three times in the Hebrew Bible (Joshua 15:36, 1 Samuel 17:52, 1 Chronicles 4: 31). Their identification of Khirbet Qeiyafa as belonging to the kingdom of Judah has stirred much controversy amongst scholars who support current theories of state formation in the Levant during the Iron Age. These scholars, so called ‘minimalists’, maintain that there is no archaeological evidence to support an United Monarchy, and insist that the northern Kingdom of Israel only emerged in the early 9th century BC, and the kingdom of Judah only in the late 8th century BCE, some 300 years later than the events as purported to have happened in the biblical narrative (Lemche 1988; Finkelstein 1996; Thompson 1999)”.1 The architectural remains of the Iron Age city at Khirbet Qeiyafa have been particularly important in the discussion regarding the socio-political identity and the territorial affiliation of the site. Some scholars have asserted that: “the only clue to the territorial affiliation of the site [Kh. Qeiyafa] comes from its architectural tradition. From this work’s analysis of four other sites all exhibiting similar architectural features such as those found at Khirbet Qeiyafa, it has become clear from the architectural perspective, that although one cannot identify conclusively whether or not Khirbet Qeiyafa was an early Israelite city belonging to the northern kingdom or a Judahite city, it is reasonable “to affiliate the builders of Khirbet Qeiyafa with the highlands”.2 The main difficulty with identifying Khirbet Qeiyafa as a Judahite site was that the supporters of this identification have failed to conclusively demonstrate that the architectural phenomenon of the ‘casemate walls with the abutting structures’ was a uniquely Judahite tradition and a tradition intended to demonstrate Judahite hegemony and identity. The question of what constitutes Judahite as opposed to Northern Israelite architectural traditions remains open to future inquiry. !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! #!$%&'"()*+,!-.,!/0&*"0,!1.!$%(2&,!/.,!%(3!4%5*+,!6.$.!7/0%0*!82&9%0"2(!"(!:;3%<=!>"?+"@%+!A&%3"0"2(,! 623*&(!4"502&"@%+!A<*2&"*5!%(3!B%3"29*0&"@!C%0*5!%0!1<"&?*0!D*"E%'%F.!!"#$%&"'(%)*+,-*)%./0,! GHI#HJ=!K.!LMN. H!O?"3.,!K.!MH.! ! "! RÉSUMÉ Cette thèse catalogue et réexamine les principales caractéristiques architecturales qui ont été découvertes dans la ville de Khirbet Qeiyafa. Le site a été fouillé pendant sept saisons au total sous la direction du Dr Yosef Garfinkel de l'Université hébraïque et de Saar Ganor au nom des autorités israéliennes des antiquités; Michael G. Hasel de l'Université Adventiste du Sud a rejoint Garfinkel et Ganor pour les saisons de fouilles 2009-2011. Les fouilleurs ont proposé que le site soit identifié comme le site biblique de Sha'arayim, signifiant «deux portes», mentionné trois fois dans la Bible hébraïque (Josué 15:36, 1 Samuel 17:52, 1 Chroniques 4: 31). Leur identification de Khirbet Qeiyafa comme appartenant au royaume de Juda a suscité beaucoup de controverse parmi les érudits qui soutiennent les théories actuelles sur la formation de l'État au Levant à l'âge du fer. Ces savants, dits «minimalistes», soutiennent qu'il n'y a aucune preuve archéologique pour soutenir une monarchie unifiée et insistent sur le fait que le royaume du nord d'Israël n'a émergé qu'au début du 9ème siècle avant JC, et le royaume de Juda seulement à la fin du 8ème siècle BCE, environ 300 ans plus tard que les événements comme censés avoir eu lieu dans le récit biblique (Lemche 1988, Finkelstien 1996, Thompson 1999) ".3 Les vestiges architecturaux de la cité de l'âge du fer à Khirbet Qeiyafa ont été particulièrement importants dans la discussion concernant l'identité sociopolitique et l'affiliation territoriale du site. Certains érudits ont affirmé que: "le seul indice de l'affiliation territoriale du site [Kh. Qeiyafa] vient de sa tradition architecturale. D'après l'analyse de quatre autres sites présentant tous des caractéristiques architecturales similaires à celles de Khirbet Qeiyafa, il est clair, d'un point de vue architectural, qu'il n'y a aucun moyen de savoir avec certitude si Khirbet Qeiyafa était un site Israélite ou Judaïte. Cependant, ce qui est également clair, c'est qu'il est raisonnable "d'affilier les constructeurs de Khirbet Qeiyafa avec les hauts plateaux".4 La principale difficulté avec l'identification de Khirbet Qeiyafa comme site Judaïte est que les partisans de cette identification n'ont pas réussi à démontrer de manière concluante que le phénomène architectural des «murs de casemates avec les structures contiguës» était une tradition judaïque unique et une tradition destinée à démontrer l'hégémonie Judaïte et identité. La question de savoir ce qui constitue les traditions architecturales Judaïtes par opposition aux traditions architecturales israélites du Nord demeure ouverte à l'enquête future. !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! L!$%&'"()*+,!-.,!/0&*"0,!1.!$%(2&,!/.,!%(3!4%5*+,!6.$.!7/0%0*!82&9%0"2(!"(!:;3%<=!>"?+"@%+!A&%3"0"2(,! 623*&(!4"502&"@%+!A<*2&"*5!%(3!B%3"29*0&"@!C%0*5!%0!1<"&?*0!D*"E%'%F.!!"#$%&"'(%)*+,-*)%./0,! GHI#HJ=!K.!LMN. P!O?"3.,!K.!MH.! ! ""! ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS A major part of this work was conceived while I was a graduate student at Tel Aviv University (2015-2016). My studies in the field of Biblical archaeology were of great assistance in the writing of this work. I would like to thank the following professors whom I studied under at Tel Aviv University for their encouragement and guidance- Professor Israel Finkelstein, Dr. Oded Lipschits, Dr. Yuval Gadot and Dr. Omer Sergi. I would like to particularly acknowledge Professor Israel Finkelstein for his pioneering research into early Israelite settlements, which were instrumental for my understanding of the architectural traditions of the hill country and Khirbet Qeiyafa. I would also like to thank McGill University for giving me this opportunity to further build upon my studies from Tel Aviv University. This work is a testament to the countless hours I have spent in the McLennan and Birks Libraries. Special thanks must be extended to the many professors and fellow academic colleagues at the School of Religious Studies, who greatly encouraged and assisted me in my research. I would like to extend special thanks to Mr. Andrew Brockman and Ms. Amanda Rosini, who spent countless hours advising me on many issues. I would also like to extend my gratitude and love to my loving parents and siblings, whose support and affection has made my entire academic journey thus far possible. Without them, going to Israel and coming to Montreal would have been an impossible feat. To my supervisor, Dr. Patricia Kirkpatrick, I wish to dedicate this work. Her dedication and undying patience has helped me persevere in my academic work. Her encouragement throughout the various stages of this project and her invaluable insight contributed greatly to my views regarding Khirbet Qeiyafa. ! """! PREFACE I was first intrigued with the site of Khirbet Qeiyafa when I studied the site at Tel Aviv University back in 2015. The site was introduced in the broader context of current theories on Levantine state formation in the Iron Age. Only a small amount of class time was dedicated to the site, and the possible implications that the site posed for current theories of Levantine state formation in the Iron Age has continued to plague my mind. Being enrolled in the M.A. program at the School of Religious Studies at McGill University offered me the opportunity to conduct research in any topic that was appropriate to my studies. And although I initially wanted to write a thesis on Judahite state formation in the Iron Age, the topic proved too broad in comparison to the scope of this work. Khirbet Qeiyafa seemed an appropriate topic; not only was the archaeological site intriguing in its own right, it was in my mind, possibly a very significant site to understanding current theories of Levantine state formation in the Iron Age. Almost 5000 sq. meters were uncovered during the seven excavation seasons (2007-2013). Examining the entire site would have been an impossibility. While conducting preliminary research, it came to my attention that scholars the architectural remains at Khirbet Qeiyafa were really the focus of the debate regarding the identity of the site. The revolutionary implications that Khirbet Qeiyafa would have on current theories in Biblical archaeology, history, and theology was contingent on whether the site was identified as Sha’arayim, namely a 10th century BCE Judahite site. This work is dedicated to examining and evaluating how legitimate the claims of those supporting the Judahite identification. Due to the scope of this work, only the architectural remains were examined. A rich destruction layer containing a vast array of material remains dated to the mid-9th century BCE were found.
Recommended publications
  • Helena Chester the Discursive Construction of Freedom in The
    The Discursive Construction of Freedom in the Watchtower Society Helena Chester Diploma of Teaching (Early Childhood): Riverina – Murray Institute of Higher Education Graduate Diploma of Education (Special Education): Victoria College. Master of Education (Honours): University of New England Thesis submitted in fulfilment of requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Charles Darwin University, Darwin. October 2018 Certification I certify that the substance of this dissertation has not already been submitted for any degree and is not currently being submitted for any other degree or qualification. I certify that any help received in preparing this thesis, and all sources used, have been acknowledged in this thesis. Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................... 4 Dedication ............................................................................................................................. 5 Thesis Abstract ..................................................................................................................... 6 Keywords .............................................................................................................................. 7 Acronyms and Abbreviations ................................................................................................ 8 Chapter 1: The Discursive Construction of Freedom in the Watchtower Society ................... 9 The Freedom Claim in the Watchtower Society .............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • QHN Spring 2020 Layout 1
    WESTWARD HO! QHN FEATURES JOHN ABBOTT COLLEGE & MONTREAL’S WEST ISLAND $10 Quebec VOL 13, NO. 2 SPRING 2020 News “An Integral Part of the Community” John Abbot College celebrates seven decades Aviation, Arboretum, Islands and Canals Heritage Highlights along the West Island Shores Abbott’s Late Dean The Passing of a Memorable Mentor Quebec Editor’s desk 3 eritageNews H Vocation Spot Rod MacLeod EDITOR Who Are These Anglophones Anyway? 4 RODERICK MACLEOD An Address to the 10th Annual Arts, Matthew Farfan PRODUCTION Culture and Heritage Working Group DAN PINESE; MATTHEW FARFAN The West Island 5 PUBLISHER A Brief History Jim Hamilton QUEBEC ANGLOPHONE HERITAGE NETWORK John Abbott College 8 3355 COLLEGE 50 Years of Success Heather Darch SHERBROOKE, QUEBEC J1M 0B8 The Man from Argenteuil 11 PHONE The Life and Times of Sir John Abbott Jim Hamilton 1-877-964-0409 (819) 564-9595 A Symbol of Peace in 13 FAX (819) 564-6872 St. Anne de Bellevue Heather Darch CORRESPONDENCE [email protected] A Backyard Treasure 15 on the West Island Heather Darch WEBSITES QAHN.ORG QUEBECHERITAGEWEB.COM Boisbriand’s Legacy 16 100OBJECTS.QAHN.ORG A Brief History of Senneville Jim Hamilton PRESIDENT Angus Estate Heritage At Risk 17 GRANT MYERS Matthew Farfan EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR MATTHEW FARFAN Taking Flight on the West Island 18 PROJECT DIRECTORS Heather Darch DWANE WILKIN HEATHER DARCH Muskrats and Ruins on Dowker Island 20 CHRISTINA ADAMKO Heather Darch GLENN PATTERSON BOOKKEEPER Over the River and through the Woods 21 MARION GREENLAY to the Morgan Arboretum We Go! Heather Darch Quebec Heritage News is published quarterly by QAHN with the support Tiny Island’s Big History 22 of the Department of Canadian Heritage.
    [Show full text]
  • Record of Protected Structures
    RECORD OF PROTECTED STRUCTURES Glenties Electoral Area Ref. Name Description Address Number Electoral Area Rating Importance Value 40904202 Dunlewey House Detached early 19th century three-bay two-storey house with projecting open Dunlewey House, Glenties E.A. Regional AGSM porch, recessed two-storey wing to east, three-bay single-storey battlemented Dunlewey, Gweedore billiard room to west, two-storey wing to south, with two-and single-storey canted bay windows to west. 40902615 St John's Church Detached four-bay single-storey Church of Ireland Church, built 1752, with bell St. John's, Clondehorky Glenties E.A. National AIPSM cote to west gable Venetian east window, internal gallery, porch with staircase Parish, Ballymore to west and projecting gabled vestry to north-west corner. Lower, Creeslough 40903210 Carrickfin Church Detached three-bay single-storey Church of Ireland Chapel of Ease with gabled Carrickfin Church, Glenties E.A. Regional AHSM entrance porch, with bellcote to centre of south-west side and projecting sacristy Carrickfin, Kincasslagh, to north, built early 19th century. Letterkenny 40902601 St Michaels Church Detached Ronchamp-esque Catholic Church built 1970, with Baptistry, Blessed Creeslough Glenties E.A. National AP Sacrament Chapel, entrance porch, sacristy, confessionals and Marian chapel to perimeter. 40901501 Hornhead Bridge Twelve arch rubble stone road bridge over tidal stream built c.1800 with rubble Dunfanaghy Glenties E.A. Regional ATS stone segment arches; vaults, cutwaters, parapets, abutments and causeway to south. 40905802 Doocharry Bridge Road bridge over Gweebara river in two segmental-arched spans with custone Doocharry Bridge, Glenties E.A. Regional ATS voussoirs, dressed squared rubble stone haunched ashlar abutments and rubble Doochary stone parapets.
    [Show full text]
  • Traces of the Past Along the German Green Belt
    The Green Belt in its entire length is not a well developed and signposted hike and bicycle path. It is not always easy to tell where the former border strip was, as most of the border fortifications have been dismantled. Moreover, in some places the Green Belt is not recognisable because parts of it are now used as intensive grassland, arable land Traces of the Past or woodland. along the German Green Belt “Those who cannot remember their past are condemned to repeat it.” (George Santayana) The Green Belt in its entire length is not a well developed and signposted hike and bicycle path. It is not always easy to tell where the former border strip was, as most of the border fortifications have been dismantled. Moreover, in some places the Green Belt is not recognisable because parts of it are now used as intensive grassland, arable land or woodland. East German border guard on patrol Opening of the border at Mödlareuth “Western tourists” at the Iron Curtain 2 INHALT FOREWORD Dear visitors of the Green Belt and the borderland museums, For more than 25 years, the Green Belt, the stretch of unspoilt nature that has arisen as a result of the inhumane inner-German border, has been a constant reminder of our once divided nation. Nature has been left to its own devices here, not because we want to forget, but because we want to remember. Scores of people visit the Green Belt in an attempt to come to terms with history: the history of their country, their mothers and fathers, relatives, friends or even their own personal fate.
    [Show full text]
  • Val-Des-Arbres Citizens Demand Removal of Bike Path... PAGE 5
    Introducing, Mediterranean taste at your home our new Pilaros Pita! Also available in pie format TAKE OUT & DELIVERY Wednesday-Thursday Friday-Saturday 3pm - 8pm 3pm- 9pm 1670 Saint-Martin West 4806 Park Ave. It’s not a trend, it’s a tradition! 579-640-9099 514 271-9099 www.pilaros.com [email protected] • www.philinos.ca 1.888.PILAROS • 450.681.6900 Laval’s English Paper, Since 1993 Vol. 28 - No. 12 June 10, 2020 450-978-9999 www.lavalnews.ca [email protected] 120,000 readers Val-des-Arbres citizens Let’s continue to protect ourselves and consult demand removal health professionals! of bike path... PAGE 5 Information and advice inside. 20-210-192FA_Formats-promo_EN_.indd 2 20-06-03 09:59 MATURE L I F E Costas Rodaros shows a petition with more than 65 signatures he RAYMONDE FOLCO: helped to gather on de Blois Blvd. TEACHER, in Val-des-Arbres, calling for the PARLIAMENTARIAN, elimination of a bike path in front INSPIRATIONAL of their homes. Photo: Martin C. Barry WOMAN OF POWER AND INFLUENCE June 10, 2020 • nd BREAKING NEWS: Starting June 22 , small indoor gatherings and dining in restaurants The Laval News • will be allowed, with certain restrictions everywhere. Details at lavalnews.ca Pages 11-22 11 Happy Father’s Day to all the fathers of Chomedey ! & a Happy St-Jean-Baptiste Day to all ! Guy Ouellette 450 686-0166 | [email protected] MNA for Chomedey 4599, boul. Samson, Bureau 201, Laval (QC) H7W 2H2 Even during a pandemic, you can consult a professional.
    [Show full text]
  • Bickleigh Castle an English Historical Landmark
    Bickleigh Castle An English Historical Landmark Gardens, Guided Tour & Tea Room OPEN APRIL TO OCTOBER Walk in the footsteps of the English Monarchy! Bickleigh Castle, Tiverton, Devon, EX16 8RP www.bickleighcastle.com Bickleigh Castle An English Historical Landmark Bickleigh Castle originates in Saxon times when there was the fortified village of Bickleigh on the site, with a stone wall and watchtower. The Castle itself was built in the early Norman period, remodelled and enlarged as a fortified Manor House in the 1400s, damaged badly in the English Civil War, and restored in the 18th, 19th & 20th Centuries. A FASCINATING HISTORY The Castle has a fascinating history, with many interesting, famous and even infamous characters in its past and has particularly close links to the medieval monarchy, the Tudors and the Stuarts. Come and hear about the various Royal visitors, the families de Redvers, Courtenay and Carew, and see the armour and artefacts and some fine 17th Century portraits, several of kings and other royalty. AFTERNOON TEA & GARDENS Follow your tour of the Castle with a delicious Afternoon Tea in our Orangery. You are also most welcome to take a walk round our gardens. “1080s Bickleigh Castle was listed in the Domesday Book (1086) and the lands of some 3000 acres subsequently granted to Sir Richard de Redvers by King William I. A substantial Norman fortress was built, which included an inner and outer keep, moat and castellations.” OPENING TIMES Thursdays Only 4th April - 31st Ocotber Gardens Open 12.00pm - 5.30pm Castle Guided Tour 1.00pm and 3.00pm Tea Room Open 12.00pm - 5.00pm Serving cream teas, cakes and light refreshements PRICES Gardens & Grounds Only Adults ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hadrian's Wall 1999-2009
    HADRIAN’S WALL 1999-2009 HADRIAN’S WALL HADRIAN’S WALL 1999-2009 A summary of recent excavation and research prepared for the Thirteenth Pilgrimage of Hadrian’s Wall, 2009 HADRIAN’S WALL 1999-2009 The Pilgrimage of Hadrian’s Wall (a tradition going back to 1849) takes place every ten years, giving all who are interested in the remains of Rome’s most elaborate frontier a chance to revisit the remains and hear about the latest archaeological developments. This specially prepared book, with contributions from all the major excavators on the Wall, describes research and discovery that has taken place since the last pilgrimage in 1999. This has been an extraordinary decade for Wall-research, featuring the discovery of the probable ancient name for the barrier, and the recognition Compiled by N. Hodgson of a previously unknown element of its anatomy (obstacles in front of the Wall), which is the rst such addition to our image of the Wall in modern times. This book explains where the new information is to be found, and will appeal to all who visit or study Hadrian’s remarkable frontier. CUMBERLAND & WESTMORLAND ANTIQUARIAN AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY THE SOCIETY OF ANTIQUARIES OF NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE Compiled by N. Hodgson Front cover: the Staffordshire Moorlands Pan, inscribed with the names of Wall- forts and the probable ancient name of the Wall (courtesy of Portable Antiquities Scheme) Back cover: emplacements for obstacles between the Wall and its ditch, under excavation at Byker, Newcastle upon Tyne 551114_TWM_COVER.indd1114_TWM_COVER.indd 1 117/07/20097/07/2009 009:319:31 CUMBERLAND AND WESTMORLAND ANTIQUARIAN AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY THE SOCIETY OF ANTIQUARIES OF NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE HADRIAN’S WALL 1999-2009 A Summary of Excavation and Research prepared for The Thirteenth Pilgrimage of Hadrian’s Wall, 8-14 August 2009 compiled by N.
    [Show full text]
  • 07.Tunez.Recorrido Vii
    ITINERARY VII The Ribat Towns Mourad Rammah VII.1 MONASTIR VII.1.a The Ribat VII.1.b Sidi al-Ghedamsi Ribat (option) VII.2 LEMTA VII.2.a The Ribat (option) VII.3 SOUSSE VII.3.a The Ribat VII.3.b The Great Mosque VII.3.c Al-Zaqqaq Madrasa VII.3.d Qubba bin al-Qhawi VII.3.e Sidi ‘Ali ‘Ammar Mosque VII.3.f Buftata Mosque VII.3.g The Kasbah and the Ramparts The Ribat, Monastir. 185 ITINERARY VII The Ribat Towns Monastir The assaults of the Byzantine fleet along the itary and religious purpose were reflected coast following the Muslim Conquest in their robust and austere architecture, forced the Ifriqiyans to build a continuous characterised by the use of stone and vaults line of defence consisting of fortresses made of rubble and the banishment of called ribats. They rose along the coastline wood coverings and light structures. This from Tangier to Alexandria and communi- type of architecture spread across the cated via the use of fires lit up at the top of whole of the Tunisian Sahel, and Sousse and the towers. The ribats served as a refuge for Monastir became the two ribat-towns par the inhabitants of the surrounding coun- excellence. tryside and were lived in by warrior Whilst all making reference to the same monks. The prolonged stays and visits of school of architecture, they nevertheless the most illustrious Ifriqiyan scholars, each underwent a slightly different evolu- jurisconsults and ascetics reinforced the tion. Sousse became in the 3rd/9th century spiritual prestige of these buildings, trans- the headquarters of the Aghlabid fleet and forming them into veritable monastery- the most important naval military base, fortresses and centres of learning that which was involved in the Conquest of Sici- transmitted Arab-Muslim culture along the ly in 211/827, as well as being the crucible north coast of North Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing Archaeological Audiences Along the Roman Route Aquileia
    Developing archaeological audiences along the Roman route Aquileia-Emona-Sirmium-Viminacium Ljubljana, July 2016 WP3, Task 3.1 – Historiographic research update on the Roman route Index 3 Bernarda Županek, Musem and Galleries of Ljubljana Roman road Aquileia-Emona- Siscia-Sirmium-Viminacium: the Slovenian section 21 Dora Kušan Špalj and Nikoleta Perok, Archaeological Museum in Zagreb Roman road Aquileia-Emona-Siscia-Viminacium: Section of the road in the territory of present-day Croatia 37 Biljana Lučić, Institute for protection of cultural monuments Sremska Mitrovica Contribution to the research of the main Roman road through Srem 45 Ilija Danković and Nemanja Mrđić, Institute of Archaeology, Belgrade From Singidunum to Viminacium through Moesia Superior 2 Bernarda Županek, Musem and Galleries of Ljubljana Roman road Aquileia-Emona- Siscia-Sirmium-Viminacium: the Slovenian section The construction of the road that connected the Italic region with central Slovenia, and then made its way towards the east, was of key strategic importance for the Roman conquest of regions between the Sava and the Danube at the end of the first century BC. After the administrative establishment of the province of Pannonia this road became the main communication route, in the west-east direction, between Italy and the eastern provinces, especially with Pannonia and Moesia. The start of the road, which we follow in the context of the ARCHEST project, was in Aquileia, then across Emona to Neviodunim, passing Aquae Iassae towards Siscia and onwards into Sirmium, Singidunum and Viminacium. Myth-shrouded beginnings: the Amber Road and the Argonauts The territory of modern Slovenia was already covered with various routes during prehistoric times.
    [Show full text]
  • Defence Heritage Audit
    Binevenagh Coast and Lowlands Defence Heritage Audit (for proposed Landscape Partnership Scheme) by quarto and Ulidia Heritage Services April 2017 Contents 1. Background to the report p3 2. Research methodologies p5 3. What is the defence heritage of the Binevenagh area? 3.1. Historical overview p12 3.2. Audit of defence heritage features p15 3.3. Threats to preservation p17 4. Why is the defence heritage of the Binevenagh area important? p21 5. How do people access, learn about and participate in Binevenagh’s defence heritage now? p24 6. What opportunities and barriers exist to improving access, learning and participation? 6.1. Public access p28 6.2. Community engagement p31 6.3. Education p32 7. Project proposals 7.1. Development phase p35 7.2. Delivery phase p40 Appendices Appendix A: case studies p49 Appendix B: summary of curricula links p55 Appendix C: potential stakeholder contacts p58 Appendix D: gazetteer p62 Appendix E: references p93 * Cover image: Limavady Airfield Air Training Dome (courtesy of Causeway Coast and Glens Borough Council). 2 1. Background to the report The Causeway Coast and Glens Heritage Trust (CCGHT) promotes and develops the Causeway Coast and Glens area’s ‘scenic landscapes, important wildlife resources and… rich cultural heritage’. CCGHT encourages management of physical landscapes and their historical accretions with a view to sustainability and long-term benefit to local communities.1 CCGHT is responsible for managing the Antrim Coast and Glens Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB), Causeway Coast AONB and Binevenagh AONB. The Trust has delivered a successful Landscape Partnership Scheme in Antrim Coast and Glens AONB and is now developing a similar initiative in Binevenagh AONB.
    [Show full text]
  • French Riviera Côte D'azur
    10 20 FRENCH RIVIERA CÔTE D’AZUR SUGGESTIONS OF EXCURSIONS FROM THE PORT OF SUGGESTIONS D’EXCURSIONS AU DÉPART DU PORT D’ ANTIBES EXCURSIONS FROM DEPARTURE EXCURSIONS AU DÉPART d’ ANTIBES ­wE WELCOME YOU TO THE FRenCH RIVieRA Nous vous souhaitons la bienvenue sur la Côte d’Azur www.frenchriviera-tourism.com The Comité Régional du Tourisme (Regional Tourism Council) Riviera Côte d’Azur, has put together this document, following the specific request from individual cruise companies, presenting the different discovery itineraries of the towns and villages of the region possible from the port, or directly the town of Antibes. To help you work out the time needed for each excursion, we have given an approximate time of each visit according the departure point. The time calculated takes into account the potential wait for public transport (train or bus), however, it does not include a lunch stop. We do advice that you chose an excursion that gives you ample time to enjoy the visit in complete serenity. If you wish to contact an established incoming tour company for your requirements, either a minibus company with a chauffeur or a large tour agency we invite you to consult the web site: www.frenchriviera-cb.com for a full list of the same. Or send us an e-mail with your specific requirements to: [email protected] Thank-you for your interest in our destination and we wish you a most enjoyable cruise. ANTIBES Monaco/Monte-Carlo Vence Cap d’Ail Nice Saint-Paul-de-Vence Villefranche-sur-Mer Cagnes-sur-Mer Grasse Villeneuve-Loubet Biot Vallauris Antibes Cannes Saint-Tropez www.cotedazur-tourime.com Le Comité Régional du Tourisme Riviera Côte d’Azur, à la demande d’excursionnistes croisiéristes individuels, a réalisé ce document qui recense des suggestions d’itinéraires de découverte de villes et villages au départ du port de croisières d’Antibes.
    [Show full text]
  • Ano Vayia.8 Turning to the East(Fig
    TOWERS AND FORTIFICATIONS AT VAYIA IN THE SOUTHEAST CORINTHIA Author(s): William R. Caraher, David K. Pettegrew and Sarah James Source: Hesperia: The Journal of the American School of Classical Studies at Athens, Vol. 79, No. 3 (July-September 2010), pp. 385-415 Published by: The American School of Classical Studies at Athens Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40981055 . Accessed: 18/03/2014 10:15 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The American School of Classical Studies at Athens is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Hesperia: The Journal of the American School of Classical Studies at Athens. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 71.168.218.10 on Tue, 18 Mar 2014 10:15:35 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions HESPERIA 79 (2010) TOWERS AND Pages 385-415 FORTIFICATIONS AT VAYIA IN THE SOUTHEAST CORINTHIA ABSTRACT Althoughrural towers have long been central to the discussion of the fortified landscapesof Classical and Hellenistic Greece, the Corinthiahas rarely figured inthe conversation, despite the historical significance of exurban fortifications forthe territory. The authorsof this article report on therecent investigation bythe Eastern Korinthia Archaeological Survey of two towers and associated fortificationsinthe region of Vayia in the southeast Corinthia.
    [Show full text]