Public Service Rail Transport in the European Union: an Overview Public Service Rail Transport in the European Union: an Overview

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Public Service Rail Transport in the European Union: an Overview Public Service Rail Transport in the European Union: an Overview The Voice of European Railways Public Service Rail Transport in the European Union: an Overview Public Service Rail Transport in the European Union: an Overview Table of contents Public Service Rail Transport in the European Union: an Overview The Voice of European Railways The Community of European Railway and Infrastructure Companies (CER) brings together more than 70 railway undertakings, their national associations as well as infrastructure managers and vehicle leasing companies. The membership is made up of long-established bodies, new entrants and both private and public enterprises, representing 73% of the rail network length, 80% of the rail freight business and Foreword p .4 about 96% of rail passenger operations in EU, EFTA and EU accession countries. CER represents the interests of its members towards EU policy makers and transport stakeholders, advocating rail as the backbone of a competitive and sustainable transport system in Europe. Publisher: Community of European Railway and Infrastructure Companies (CER), Avenue des Arts 53, 1000 Brussels - Belgium Author: Miguel Ángel Caramello-Álvarez, CER Chief Legal Officer Special thanks to former CER Legal Stagiaire’s Christina Kechagia and Alberto de Juan Saiz Design and production: Page in Extremis - www.inextremis.be Photos: Kindly provided by CER members & purchased at www.fotolia.com Overview p .6 Published in June 2017 For more information: www.cer.be DISCLAIMER CER, nor any person acting on its behalf, may be responsible for the use to which information contained in this publication may be put, nor for any errors which may appear despite careful preparation and checking. Reproduction is authorised, provided the source is acknowledged. 2 CER - The Voice of European Railways Public Service Rail Transport in the European Union: an Overview PART 1 Legal, political and 2. State of play and trends PART 2 Country reports economic context 2.1 Introduction p. 18 1. Legal, political and economic context 2.2 General framework for the organisation p. 19 of public service operations 1.1 First steps towards the fair provision of public p.11 2.3 Operators on the market p. 20 service transport: Regulation 1191/69 2.4 Definition of public service requirements p. 22 1.2 The turning point: the Altmark judgement p.12 2.5 Scope of public service transport by rail p. 23 1.3 Overhaul of the legal framework: p.14 2.6 Contract p. 26 Regulation 1370/2007 2.7 Awarding of public service contracts p. 27 Belgium p. 48 Lithuania p. 96 1.4 Application of Regulation 1370/2007: p.15 a brief overview of the relevant case law 2.8 Contract negotiation p. 31 Bulgaria p. 51 Luxembourg p. 100 1.5 The Fourth Railway Package: amendment of p.16 2.9 General payment conditions p. 32 Croatia p. 55 The Netherlands p. 102 Regulation 1370/2007 2.10 Duration of public service contracts p. 34 Czech Republic p. 58 Norway p. 105 2.11 Rolling stock p. 36 Denmark p. 62 Poland p. 108 2.12 Involvement of the regulatory body p. 37 Estonia p. 66 Portugal p. 115 or other authorities in public service contract Finland p. 69 Romania p. 118 discussions France p. 71 Slovakia p. 123 Germany Slovenia 3. Public service financing: p. 75 p. 126 Greece Spain the ‘heart of the matter’ p. 82 p. 129 Hungary p. 84 Sweden p. 132 3.1 Overview of the provisions foreseen in the p. 39 Italy Switzerland p. 137 amended Regulation 1370/2007 p. 89 Latvia p. 94 3.2 Current state of the art: too much p. 42 under-compensation 3.3 The problem of under-compensation p. 43 CER - The Voice of European Railways 3 Public Service Rail Transport in the European Union: an Overview Foreword Is there a foreword? Public service transport plays a crucial role in passenger trans- Over the next six years, the evolution on these two fronts continued and port in the European Union, both from a political and an economic has to a certain extent become even more noticeable today. First, com- point of view. The vast majority of passenger transport services petition has substantially grown, with an increasing number of public in the EU are currently provided within the context of public service contracts being tendered out: approximately 17% of regional service contracts, which in many cases represent substantial rev- services are awarded exclusively through a competitive process, while enue for railway undertakings. Moreover, public service transport the relevant percentage for long-distance services is 12.5%. Apart from is unarguably an important social policy instrument for public the traditionally competitive markets of Germany, Great Britain, Italy and authorities. Sweden, other national markets, such as Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Denmark, the Netherlands, Norway and Poland have emulated this exam- The operation and organisation of public service transport ple and achieved discernible progress. In light of the regulatory overhaul differs greatly throughout the EU due to the various needs and brought about by the Fourth Railway Package – the main thrust of which social backgrounds. This is why the Community of European is to fully liberalise the market for passenger railway services – this trend Railway and Infrastructure Companies (CER) decided in 2005 to is likely to become the norm. publish the first edition of a brochure illustrating the different approaches in the European Union. At the time, it was striking On the second front, although there is still vast room for improvement to see that the conditions for operating public service contracts and fuller compliance with EU legislation, some further progress has were divided into two major groups: the EU-15 countries, been made with regards to the financing of public service require- where public service passenger transport was organised in ments. A significant development to that effect can be detected in the compliance with a straightforward legal framework and where overall increase, particularly within the EU-13 Member States, of the du- railway operators were considered as commercial enterprises; ration of public service contracts. These longer agreements provide some and the EU-10 countries, where the situation was much more leeway to railway operators to make more efficient long-term plans for problematic, with operators being forced to provide public their business and allow for the gradual proliferation of leasing markets services while receiving inadequate financial compensation in for rolling stock. Nevertheless, financing levels remain unsatisfactory and return. In other words, the conditions under which public service fail to unlock the sector’s untapped potential in terms of attracting modal transport was provided were multifarious and it was thus clear shift to rail. that homogenous rules could not be applied without taking into account the specific political and economic context in each In this context, CER is publishing the third edition of this brochure Member State. which describes the current rail public service landscape in the Euro- pean Union as well as in Norway and Switzerland. A general commen- Six years later, at the time of our first update of the brochure in tary is also included, guiding the reader through the various elements 2011, there was already a marked evolution of the situation in two to be taken into account when analysing the provision of public service key areas: competition as evidenced by increased tendering of public transport. With this brochure, CER hopes to provide a useful analytical service contracts was growing, and some improvement was being tool to stakeholders in their assessment of the constantly changing legal made with regards to the financing of public service obligations. framework for railway undertakings in Europe. 4 CER - The Voice of European Railways Public Service Rail Transport in the European Union: an Overview Libor Lochman CER Executive Director Public service transport plays a crucial role in passenger transport in the European Union, both from a political and from an economic point of view. The vast majority of passenger transport services in the EU are currently provided within the context of public service contracts. CER - The Voice of European Railways 5 Public Service Rail Transport in the European Union: an Overview Overview Overall, passenger railway traffic increased Traditionally, government payments were annual budget discussion on the overall level of their political choices; while on the other, from 2010 to 2015 by 5.6%. In 2014 a provided in the rail transport sector as a means of the operating subsidy. This in turn gave operators had strong incentives to meet the total of 429 billion passenger-kilometres of serving three main objectives. First, the poor incentives for the state-owned railway quantitative targets listed in the contract in a were operated across Europe, out of provision of a transport service of general company, which rather than concentrating on cost-efficient way. which 404 billion passenger-kilometres interest to all citizens, with a view to satisfying generating new sources of revenue, or trying on national railway networks and just 25 the fundamental right to mobility, has been to reduce costs, would focus on the annual In 2000, the European Commission voiced its billion on international routes.1 However, it an essential element of political agendas budget negotiations with the Government. concerns about the fact that this Regulation, should be noted that although the volume throughout the years. Second, securing last modified in 1991, was not reflecting of passenger rail demand has grown, its affordable and continuous rail services has been At the time, the main piece of EU legislation current needs as it did not fit in with the modal share in land transport at EU level an important component of governments’ social on public service obligations (PSOs) for overall Commission policy of opening up the has shifted only a half of a percentage point welfare and regional aid programs, aimed at rail and road was Regulation 1191/69.
Recommended publications
  • Here in 2017 Sillamäe Vabatsoon 46% of Manufacturing Companies with 20 Or More Employees Were Located
    Baltic Loop People and freight moving – examples from Estonia Final Conference of Baltic Loop Project / ZOOM, Date [16th of June 2021] Kaarel Kose Union of Harju County Municipalities Baltic Loop connections Baltic Loop Final Conference / 16.06.2021 Baltic Loop connections Baltic Loop Final Conference / 16.06.2021 Strategic goals HARJU COUNTY DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY 2035+ • STRATEGIC GOAL No 3: Fast, convenient and environmentally friendly connections with the world and the rest of Estonia as well as within the county. • Tallinn Bypass Railway, to remove dangerous goods and cargo flows passing through the centre of Tallinn from the Kopli cargo station; • Reconstruction of Tallinn-Paldiski (main road no. 8) and Tallinn ring road (main highway no. 11) to increase traffic safety and capacity • Indicator: domestic and international passenger connections (travel time, number of connections) Tallinn–Narva ca 1 h NATIONAL TRANSPORT AND MOBILITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2021-2035 • The main focus of the development plan is to reduce the environmental footprint of transport means and systems, ie a policy for the development of sustainable transport to help achieve the climate goals for 2030 and 2050. • a special plan for the Tallinn ring railway must be initiated in order to find out the feasibility of the project. • smart and safe roads in three main directions (Tallinn-Tartu, Tallinn-Narva, Tallinn-Pärnu) in order to reduce the time-space distances of cities and increase traffic safety (5G readiness etc). • increase speed on the railways to reduce time-space distances and improve safety; shift both passenger and freight traffic from road to rail and to increase its positive impact on the environment through more frequent use of rail (Tallinn-Narva connection 2035 1h45min) GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF CLIMATE POLICY UNTIL 2050 / NEC DIRECTIVE / ETC.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Rail Accessible: Helping Older and Disabled Customers
    TfL Rail Making rail accessible: Helping older and disabled customers May 2016 MAYOR OF LONDON Contents Our commitment to you page 3 Commitments page 5 Assistance for passengers page 6 Alternative accessible transport page 9 Passenger information page 10 Fares and tickets page 12 At the station page 16 On the train page 17 Making connections page 19 Accessible onward transport page 20 Disruption to facilities and services page 21 Contact us page 23 Station accessibility information page 24 Contact information back page 2 Our commitment to you TfL Rail is managed by Transport for London (TfL) and operated by MTR Crossrail. We operate rail services between Liverpool Street and Shenfield. At TfL Rail, we are committed to providing you with a safe, reliable and friendly service. We want to make sure that you can use our services safely and in comfort. 3 Our commitment to you (continued) We recognise that our passengers may have different requirements when they travel with us and we are committed to making your journey as easy as possible. This applies not only to wheelchair users, but also: • Passengers with visual or auditory impairment or learning disabilities • Passengers whose mobility is impaired through arthritis or other temporary or long term conditions • Older people • Passengers accompanying disabled children in pushchairs • Disabled passengers requiring assistance with luggage We welcome your feedback on the service we provide and any suggestions you may have for improvements. Our contact details are shown on the back page of this
    [Show full text]
  • E-News N21 Coul.Qxp
    The electronic newsletter of the International Union of Railways n°21 - 7th September 2006 Proximity with UIC members Latest news FS: Innocenzo Cipolletta appointed President, Mauro Moretti new Chief Executive Officer Mr. Innocenzo Cipolletta, an Economist, who has been during 10 years Director General of the Italian confederation Confindustria, is appointed as the new President of FS Group. Mr. Mauro Moretti, who was previously the Amminstratore Delegato (CEO) of Rete Ferroviaria Italiana (RFI), the Italian railway infrastructure manager -and currently President of the UIC Infrastructure Forum at international level- is appointed as the new Amministratore Delegato Innocenzo Cipolletta Mauro Moretti (CEO) of the Italian railways FS Group. They are succeeding Elio Catania who is leaving the Italian Railways Group. UIC conveys its sincere congratulations to Mr. Cipolletta and Mr. Moretti for theses appoint- ments and many thanks to Mr. Elio Catania for his action in UIC. Information session for representatives from Russian railways at UIC HQ A group of 25 representati- ves from Russian railways participating to a study trip in France visited the UIC Headquarters in Paris on Monday 28th August. Members of this delegation were general directors, senior managers and engi- 1 neers from the Russian rail- L L L way companies and a series of rail- way organisations. The represented in particular JSC Russian Railways (RZD), October Railways (Saint- Petersburg), Oural SA, VNIIAS (Ministère), and cooperating compa- nies as Radioavionika, etc. This information session on UIC role and activities was opened by UIC Chief Executive Luc Aliadière. By wel- coming the delegation, Luc Aliadière underlined the promising perspectives resulting from Russian railways' mem- bership in UIC and from the enhanced cooperation between RZD and UIC in a series of strategic cooperation issues: development of Euro-Asian corridors, partnership in business, technology and research, training, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Twinning Conference Presentation – 12Th December 2017
    Welcome to the conference Network rail 10-Apr-18 Safety Culture Twinning conference 1 Agenda 10:00 - 10:15 The value of twinning (Keir Fitch, European Commission) 10:15 – 10:30 Welcome (Lisbeth Fromling, Network Rail) 10:30 – 11:30 Group 1 presentation (Network Rail, CFR, Infrabel and HZ) 11:30 – 11:50 Break 11:50 – 12:40 Group 2 presentation (ProRail, Irish Rail and OBB) 12:40 – 13:15 Lunch 13:15 – 14:05 Group 3 presentation (Trafikverket, Adif and PLK) 14:05 – 14:35 Group 4 presentation (RFI and SNCF Reseau) 14:35 – 14:55 Learning activity based on safety culture evaluation 14:55 – 15:15 Opportunity for questions 15:15 – 15:30 Summary of event and closure 10-Apr-18 Safety Culture Twinning conference 2 Welcome from Keir Fitch Head of Unit C4 "Rail Safety & Interoperability”, European Commission 10-Apr-18 Safety Culture Twinning conference 3 Welcome from Lisbeth Fromling Chief Health, Safety, Quality and Environment Officer, Network Rail 10-Apr-18 Safety Culture Twinning conference 4 10-Apr-18 Safety Culture Twinning Programme Welcome to the final conference • Thank you for joining us • Today is a good day! • Purely pro-active project • All information is good • Lots to share PRIME Safety Culture Sub-Group / 5 10-Apr-18 Safety Culture Twinning Programme Co-ordinator Participant PRIME Safety Culture Sub-Group / 6 10-Apr-18 Safety Culture collaboration PRIME Safety Culture Sub-Group / 7 Group 1 Presentations Network Rail, CFR, Infrabel and HZ 10-Apr-18 Safety Culture Twinning conference 8 Group 1 Presentations Network Rail 10-Apr-18 Safety
    [Show full text]
  • This Is the Published Version of a Chapter
    http://www.diva-portal.org This is the published version of a chapter published in Conflict and Cooperation in Divided Towns and Cities. Citation for the original published chapter: Lundén, T. (2009) Valga-Valka, Narva – Ivangorod Estonia’s divided border cities – cooperation and conflict within and beyond the EU. In: Jaroslaw Jańczak (ed.), Conflict and Cooperation in Divided Towns and Cities (pp. 133-149). Berlin: Logos Thematicon N.B. When citing this work, cite the original published chapter. Permanent link to this version: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-21061 133 Valga-Valka, Narva-Ivangorod. Estonia’s Divided Border Cities – Co-operation and Conflict Within and beyond the EU Thomas Lundén Boundary Theory Aboundary is a line, usually in space, at which a certain state of affairs is terminated and replaced by another state of affairs. In nature, boundaries mark the separation of different physical states (molecular configurations), e.g. the boundary between water and air at the surface of the sea, between wood and bark in a tree stem, or bark and air in a forest. The boundaries within an organized society are of a different character. Organization means structuration and direction, i.e. individuals and power resources are directed towards a specific, defined goal. This, in turn, requires delimitations of tasks to be done, as well as of the area in which action is to take place. The organization is defined in a competition for hegemony and markets, and with the aid of technology. But this game of definition and authority is, within the limitations prescribed by nature, governed by human beings.
    [Show full text]
  • Markedet Overtar
    RAPPORT 2:2020 O Roar Eilertsen og Paul Bjerke Markedet overtar Konsekvenser av jernbanereformen 2 Forord Valget i 2021 vil få enorm betydning for utviklingen av norsk jernbane- sektor. Hvis de blå vinner, vil jernbanereformens omfattende oppsplitting og markedsgjøring fortsette. Hvis de rødgrønne vinner vil politikken bli lagt om, og videre fordyrende og byråkratiserende konkurranseutsetting bli stoppet. Med mer høyrepolitikk er konsekvensene for de mange tusen ansatte i sektoren usikker, og det er store sjanser for at passasjerene må betale mer for å reise med tog. I denne rapporten belyser vi både hva som har skjedd så langt etter at reformen ble innført fra 1. januar 2017, hvilke planer som foreligger, og erfaringer med tilsvarende politikk i andre land. Og vi viser hvordan de mange titalls milliarder kronene som hvert år bevilges til jernbaneformål brukes. Rapporten konsentrerer seg om persontrafikken med tog. Gods med tog ble konkurranseutsatt fra 2008, som følge av EUs jernbanepakke 2, og blir ikke berørt her. I arbeidet med rapporten har vi snakket med ledelse og tillitsvalgte i jernbanen, vi har studert budsjettdokumenter og årsrapporter, og vi sammenfatter internasjonal forskning på erfaringer med konkurranse- utsetting av jernbanen. Tusen takk til alle som har stilt opp, brukt tid på oss og delt kunnskap med oss. Rapporten er utarbeidet av undertegnede i De Facto – Kunnskapssenter for fagorganiserte på oppdrag fra Norsk Jernbaneforbund. Takk til ledelsen i NJF, som på en utmerket måte har lagt til rette for arbeidet vårt. Vi håper at rapporten kommer til nytte i fagbevegelsens arbeid med å utvikle en framtidsrettet politikk for jernbanen, uten den ansvarspulverisering, ressurssløsing og usikkerhet som dagens jernbanepolitikk medfører.
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Access Integrated Ticketing Report May 2018 1
    SURFACE ACCESS INTEGRATED TICKETING REPORT MAY 2018 1. Contents 1. Executive Summary 3 1.1. Introduction 3 1.2. Methodology 3 1.3. Current Practice 4 1.4. Appetite and Desire 5 1.5. Barriers 5 1.6. Conclusions 6 2. Introduction 7 3. Methodology 8 4. Current Practice 9 4.1. Current Practice within the Aviation Sector in the UK 11 4.2. Experience from Other Modes in the UK 15 4.3. International Comparisons 20 5. Appetite and Desire 25 5.1. Industry Appetite Findings 25 5.2. Passenger Appetite Findings 26 5.3. Passenger Appetite Summary 30 6. Barriers 31 6.1. Commercial 32 6.2. Technological 33 6.3. Regulatory 34 6.4. Awareness 35 6.5. Cultural/Behavioural 36 7. Conclusions 37 8. Appendix 1 – About the Authors 39 9. Appendix 2 – Bibliography 40 10. Appendix 3 – Distribution & Integration Methods 43 PAGE 2 1. Executive Summary 1.1. Introduction This report examines air-to-surface access integrated ticketing in support of one of the Department for Transport’s (DfT) six policy objectives in the proposed new avia- tion strategy – “Helping the aviation industry work for its customers”. Integrated Ticketing is defined as the incorporation of one ticket that includes sur- face access to/from an airport and the airplane ticket itself using one transaction. Integrated ticketing may consider surface access journeys both to the origin airport and from the destination airport. We recognise that some of the methods of inte- grated ticketing might not be truly integrated (such as selling rail or coach tickets on board the flight), but such examples were included in the report to reflect that these exist and that the customer experience in purchasing is relatively seamless.
    [Show full text]
  • Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 2016 Annual Report
    Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 2016 Annual Report Genesee & Wyoming Inc.*owns or leases 122 freight railroads worldwide that are organized into 10 operating regions with approximately 7,300 employees and 3,000 customers. * The terms “Genesee & Wyoming,” “G&W,” “the company,” “we,” “our,” and “us” refer collectively to Genesee & Wyoming Inc. and its subsidiaries and affiliated companies. Financial Highlights Years Ended December 31 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Statement of Operations Data Operating revenues $874,916 $1,568,643 $1,639,012 $2,000,401 $2,001,527 Operating income 190,322 380,188 421,571 384,261 289,612 Net income 52,433 271,296 261,006 225,037 141,096 Net income attributable to Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 48,058 269,157 260,755 225,037 141,137 Diluted earnings per common share attributable to Genesee & Wyoming Inc. common stockholders: Diluted earnings per common share (EPS) $1.02 $4.79 $4.58 $3.89 $2.42 Weighted average shares - Diluted 51,316 56,679 56,972 57,848 58,256 Balance Sheet Data as of Period End Total assets $5,226,115 $5,319,821 $5,595,753 $6,703,082 $7,634,958 Total debt 1,858,135 1,624,712 1,615,449 2,281,751 2,359,453 Total equity 1,500,462 2,149,070 2,357,980 2,519,461 3,187,121 Operating Revenues Operating Income Net Income Diluted Earnings ($ In Millions) ($ In Millions) ($ In Millions) 421.61,2 Per Common Share 2 2,001.5 401.6 1 $2,000 2,000.4 $400 394.12 $275 271.3 $5.00 1 2 4.79 1 374.3 1 380.21 384.3 261.0 4.581 1,800 250 4.50 350 1,639.0 225.01 225 2 1 1,600 233.5 4.00 2 3.89 1,568.6 4.10 2 300 2 200 213.9 213.3 2 3.78 2 1,400 1 3.50 3.69 289.6 183.32 3.142 250 175 1,200 3.00 211.
    [Show full text]
  • Stadler Inaugurated Its New Factory in Belarus
    MEDIA RELEASE Fanipol, 20 November 2014 Stadler inaugurated its new factory in Belarus Alexander Lukashenko, President of the Republic of Belarus and Peter Spuhler, owner and CEO of Stadler Rail Group have today ceremonially inaugurated the new rolling stock manufacturing factory of Stadler established in Fanipol, Belarus. The new plant is responsible for the production of broad gauge rolling stock for CIS countries, including the starting project for the manufacturing of 21 double decker EMUs for Russian airport railways operator Aeroexpress. The maximum output of the factory at full capacity reaches the 120 carbodies per annum. The value of investment is EUR 76 million, while the number of employees is 600 people. Stadler decided to found a subsidiary and establish a factory in Belarus in order to supply dynamically developing CIS countries with the broad gauge products of the group. The reason behind establishing the factory in Fanipol was the available qualified workforce, its proximity to broad gauge countries, and the country’s customs union with Russia and Kazakhstan. The subsidiary was established in 2012 under the name of OJSC Stadler Minsk as a joint venture, originally with the majority ownership of Stadler Rail AG and the minority ownership Minsk Oblast Executive Committee. Later Stadler bought up the minority shares and became 100% owner of the Belarusian subsidiary. The value of investment Stadler has up till now performed in Belarus is totalling to EUR 76 million. The subsidiary currently employs altogether 600 people. Within the group OJSC Stadler Minsk is responsible for the production of broad gauge rolling stock ordered by customers operating in CIS countries.
    [Show full text]
  • NS Annual Report 2018
    See www.nsannualreport.nl for the online version NS Annual Report 2018 Table of contents 2 In brief 4 2018 in a nutshell 8 Foreword by the CEO 12 The profile of NS 16 Our strategy Activities in the Netherlands 23 Results for 2018 27 The train journey experience 35 Operational performance 47 World-class stations Operations abroad 54 Abellio 56 Strategy 58 Abellio United Kingdom (UK) 68 Abellio Germany 74 Looking ahead NS Group 81 Report by the Supervisory Board 94 Corporate governance 100 Organisation of risk management 114 Finances in brief 126 Our impact on the environment and on society 134 NS as an employer in the Netherlands 139 Organisational improvements 145 Dialogue with our stakeholders 164 Scope and reporting criteria Financial statements 168 Financial statements 238 Company financial statements Other information 245 Combined independent auditor’s report on the financial statements and sustainability information 256 NS ten-year summary This annual report is published both Dutch and English. In the event of any discrepancies between the Dutch and English version, the Dutch version will prevail. 1 NS annual report 2018 In brief More satisfied 4.2 million trips by NS app gets seat passengers in the OV-fiets searcher Netherlands (2017: 3.1 million) On some routes, 86% gave travelling by passengers can see which train a score of 7 out of carriages have free seats 10 or higher Customer 95.1% chance of Clean trains: 68% of satisfaction with HSL getting a seat passengers gave a South score of 7 out of 10 (2017: 95.0%) or higher 83% of
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL REPORT 2020 2020 RESULTS at a GLANCE 16.1 ORDER BACKLOG in CHF BILLION NET REVENUE Previous Year: 15.0 in Thousands of CHF
    ANNUAL REPORT 2020 2020 RESULTS AT A GLANCE 16.1 ORDER BACKLOG IN CHF BILLION NET REVENUE Previous year: 15.0 in thousands of CHF 3,500,000 2,800,000 2,100,000 3,200,785 3,084,948 34,912 REGISTERED SHAREHOLDERS AS AT 31.12.2020 1,400,000 Previous year: 30 419 2,000,806 700,000 0 2018 2019 2020 NET REVENUE BY GEOGRAPHICAL MARKET in thousands of CHF Germany, Austria, Switzerland: 1,502,759 4.33 Western Europe: 963,548 ORDER INTAKE Eastern Europe: 457,488 IN CHF BILLION CIS: 68,207 Previous year: 5.12 America: 83,909 Rest of the world 9,037 % 12,303 5.1 EBIT MARGIN EMPLOYEES WORLDWIDE Previous year: 6.1% (average FTE 1.1. – 31.12.2020) Previous year: 10 918 156.1 EBIT IN CHF MILLION Previous year: 193.7 STADLER – THE SYSTEM PROVIDER OF SOLUTIONS IN RAIL VEHICLE CONSTRUCTION WITH HEADQUARTERS IN BUSSNANG, SWITZERLAND. Stadler Annual Report 2020 3 SUSTAINABLE MOBILITY – 16.1 ORDER BACKLOG TRAIN AFTER TRAIN IN CHF BILLION Previous year: 15.0 Stadler has been building rail vehicles for over 75 years. The company operates in two reporting segments: the “Rolling Stock” segment focuses on the development, design and production of high-speed, intercity and re gional trains, locomotives, metros, light rail vehicles and passenger coaches. With innovative signalling solutions Stadler supports the interplay be tween vehicles and infrastructure. Our software engineers in Wallisellen develop Stadler’s own solutions in the areas of ETCS, CBTC and ATO. The “Service & Components” segment offers customers a variety of services, ranging from the supply of individual spare parts, vehicle repairs, mod erni- sation and overhauls to complete full-service packages.
    [Show full text]
  • The Norwegian Railway Museum
    2009 On track for More! Photo: RuneFossum,Jernbanefoto.no Parliament Jernbaneverket in Norwegian Government society Ministry of Ministry of Fisheries and Transport and Coastal Affairs Communications Norwegian Railway Inspectorate Norwegian Coastal Public Road Avinor AS Administration Administration (airports) The national transport agencies jointly Train companies formulate proposals for the National Transport Plan (NTP) Passengers Freight shippers Ownership In 1996, the former Norwegian State Railways (NSB) was split into a train company, NSB BA, and an infrastructure manager, the Norwegian National Rail Administration (Jernbaneverket). Jernbaneverket owns: • Railway lines • Platforms and waiting areas • Stations built since 1996 • Electrification equipment • Signals and interlockings • Traffic control systems • Telecommunications systems Our core processes • Planning, designing and constructing rail infrastucture • Operating and maintaining rail infrastructure • Allocation track capacity • Operational traffic management Our tasks • To provide Norway’s train companies with a safe and efficient transport system • To plan, improve and maintain the rail network, including stations and freight terminals • To manage rail traffic • To plan and produce timetables • To allocate track capacity between different train companies Our core areas • Safety, Punctuality and Customer Satisfaction • Productivity and Quality • Competence and Culture Our organizational structure National Transport Plan (NTP) 2010-2019 The Government’s White Paper for the
    [Show full text]