DOCSLIB.ORG

Case Officer: Sarah Kay File No: CHE/14/00644/FUL Tel

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Case Officer: Sarah Kay File No: CHE/14/00644/FUL Tel Case Officer: Sarah Kay File No: CHE/14/00644/FUL Tel. No: 345786 Plot No: 2/3037&1562&3456&3274 Ctte Date: 23rd February 2015 ITEM 3 PROPOSED SOLAR PHOTOVOLTAIC FARM WITH ASSOCIATED INFRASTRUCTURE FOR A TEMPORARY PERIOD FO 27 YEARS AT LAND TO THE WEST OF DUCKMANTON AND NORTH OF TOM LANE, CHESTERFIELD, DERBYSHIRE FOR RES UK & IRELAND LTD Local Plan: Open countryside and other open land Ward: Hollingwood and Inkersall 1.0 CONSULTATIONS DCC Highways Referred on 22/09/2014 – response received dated 29/10/2014 – see report DCC Planning Consulted on 17/09/2014 – response received dated 10/11/2014 stating DCC Officers were not able to provide comment due to their officer workload DCC Archaeology Consulted on 26/09/2014 – response received dated 08/10/2014 – see report DCC Rights of Way Consulted on 25/09/2014 – response received dated 25/09/2014 – see report Environmental Services Consulted on 17/09/2014 – responses received dated 19/09/2014 – see report Design Services Consulted on 17/09/2014 – response received dated 30/09/2014 – see report Environment Agency Consulted on 17/09/2014 – response received dated 09/10/2014 raising no objections Yorkshire Water Services Consulted on 17/09/2014 – response received dated 22/09/2014 stating their observation are not req’d as no public sewer infrastructure is recorded to cross the site North East Derbyshire DC Consulted on 17/09/2014 – no response received Bolsover DC Consulted on 25/09/2014 – response received dated 14/10/2014 raising no objection in principle however concerns are raised about the visual impact assessment upon Bolsover Castle English Heritage Consulted on 25/09/2014 – response received dated 30/09/2014 – see report Derbyshire Wildlife Trust Consulted on 25/09/2014 – response received dated 02/12/2014 – see report Natural England Consulted on 25/09/2014 – response received dated 30/09/2014 – see report Coal Authority Consulted on 25/09/2014 – responses received dated 06/10/2014 and 05/11/2014 – see report Ward Members Consulted on 16/09/2014 – no response received Neighbours / Site Notice Two representations received 2.0 THE SITE 2.1 The site the subject of the application comprises of land at the former Arkwright open cast mine, off Tom Lane Duckmanton. The majority of the open cast site has since been reclaimed and the fields specific to the application are currently utilised for arable farming. The site extends to approximately 19.5ha. 2.2 Access to the site is from Tom Lane to the south via a track which originally served the open cast workings. The residential settlements of Duckmanton, Inkersall and Staveley / Poolsbrook are situated to the east, west, and north of the site respectively. 2.3 The M1 motorway is approximately 1km to the east of the proposal and links to Tom Lane via Markham Road. The A632 Chesterfield Road runs approximately 1.2km to the south and the Staveley Road/Inkersall Road runs approximately 450m to the west. In addition there are 400kW overhead transmission lines adjacent the west and north of the site towards Inkersall and Poolsbrook Country Park. Footpath 10 also runs alongside the eastern boundary and partially through the northern half of the application site from Tom Lane to Poolsbrook. 2.4 To the immediate west of the application site boundary stands an 85m high wind turbine, which became operational towards the end of 2014. 3.0 SITE HISTORY 3.1 CHE/14/00060/EIA - screening opinion under regulation 5 of the town and country planning (EIA) regulations 2011 for the locating of a temporary (27 year period) solar voltaic farm capable of generating 6.5mw. Screening direction issued by LPA on 07/02/2014 confirming the proposals were not EIA development. 3.2 CHE/13/00420/FUL - installation of one (1) mid scale wind turbine of maximum height to tip of 84m and including: upgraded and new access track, a hardstanding area, a small substation enclosure, temporary guyed meteorological mast and associated infrastructure. Approved conditionally on 19/11/2013. 3.3 North East Derbyshire DC - 14/00563/FL - Construction of 4.9 MW Solar Farm with ancillary buildings, deer fence, cctv, access tracks and landscaping on land NE of Arkwright Town, Cherry Tree Farm, Chesterfield Road Duckmanton, Chesterfield, S44 5JG. Approved conditionally 11/09/2014 but not yet implemented. 4.0 THE PROPOSAL 4.1 The application as submitted details a proposed solar voltaic farm comprising a 7-8MW PV module array. The proposals also detail incidental works including electrical control cabinets, embedded substations, areas of hardstanding for craneage, a grid connection building, cabling, site access and internal access tracks, fencing, cctv and infra red lighting system, a pyranometer mast and construction compound. The application seeks consent for a period of 27 years, which allows for up to a year for construction; a 25 year operational period and up to a year thereafter for decommissioning. 4.2 The PV module array will be erected on a supporting racking system and will cover an area approximately 12ha which will include spacing between the rows and perimeter. The PV modules (solar panels) will be typically 1m x 1.6m x 500mm thick and will be mounted to a maximum height above ground level of 2.5m. The array will be arranged in rows on an east / west axis across the site with the modules mounted 30 degrees from the horizontal facing south to maximise solar gain. 4.3 The installation will require up to 80 small electrical cabinets (1m x 1m x 500mm) which will be positioned near or underneath the array racking to house the cable system that gathers energy from the panels and inverters; and 6 embedded substations are also proposed which will house the transformers and inverters whose function converts DC to AC and up-rate voltage as required by the grid. The substations will be 9m x 3m x 3m. 4.4 The entire installation will be reliant upon various cabling which is to be buried in trenching throughout the site. Trenching will be 1.5m deep and 600mm / 1.5m wide stretching between the array, cabinets, substations to the grid connection building and will contain DC and AC cables as well as communications cabling. 4.5 The grid connection building will house switch gear and metering equipment and is located at the point of connection with the electricity grid (the southern end of the site). The building measures 12m x 6m x 4.5m. 4.6 The proposals will be served by the existing highway access point off Tom Lane and the access track will be upgraded in part by the laying of compacted stone and a geotextile grid. In addition 6 no. hardstanding areas will be formed adjacent each embedded substation measuring 12m x 12m to allow for craneage. 4.7 The site boundary will be secured by 2m high deer fencing which will be sited within field boundaries and a CCTV system (with infra red lighting) will be installed comprising 15 no. 3.5m high columns. The installation also comprises the siting of a pyranometer mast which is a 3m high lattice mast which supports equipment to measure irradiation levels on site. 4.8 The application is supported by the submission of the following documentation: Planning Application Drawing Schedule Planning Statement Design and Access Statement Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (inc. Visuals) Flood Risk Assessment Heritage Statement Statement of Community Involvement Phase I Habitat Survey 4.9 Additional information was submitted by the applicant on 06/01/2015 which comprised: Revised Heritage Statement (further updated on 20/01/2015) Site Selection Appraisal Revised Infrastructure Layout Revised Landscape Mitigation Strategy Schedule of Clarifications 5.0 CONSIDERATIONS 5.1 National/Local Planning Policy 5.1.1 The application site is situated on open countryside / other open land as defined in the Chesterfield Local Plan: Core Strategy 2011 - 2031. Having regard the nature of the application proposals the National Planning Policy Framework and Planning Policy Guidance (NPPF and PPG); and Policy CS5 of the Core Strategy apply. 5.1.2 The NPPF (paragraph 98) directs that when determining planning applications for renewable energy development, Local Planning Authorities should: not require applicants for renewable energy development to demonstrate the overall need for renewable or low carbon energy and also recognise that even small-scale projects provide a valuable contribution to cutting greenhouse gas emissions; and approve the application if its impacts are (or can be made) acceptable. Once suitable areas for renewable and low carbon energy have been identified in plans, LPAs should also expect subsequent applications for commercial scale projects outside these areas to demonstrate that the proposed location meets the criteria used in identifying suitable sites. 5.1.3 Policy CS5 of the Core Strategy states the Council will support proposals for renewable energy generation particularly where they have wider social, economic and environmental benefits, provided that they: minimise adverse impact on the historic environment including designated heritage assets; minimise adverse impact on the natural landscape and townscape character; minimise adverse impact on nature conservation; minimise adverse impact on amenity - in particular through noise, dust, odour and traffic generation; reduce impact on the open countryside by locating distribution lines below ground where possible; and include provision to reinstate the site if the equipment is no longer in use or has been decommissioned. 5.1.4 Renewable energy developments are widely accepted and solely having regard to the location of the solar farm being proposed, the principle of the development in policy terms is acceptable. Detailed assessment of the local potential impacts of the development must however be considered and in this regard the sections of the report that follow look at each issue in turn.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Michelle Smith Eversheds LLP Bridgewater
    Michelle Smith Our Ref: APP/R1010/A/14/2212093 Eversheds LLP Bridgewater Place Water Lane LEEDS LS11 5DR 12 March 2015 Dear Madam TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 (SECTION 78) APPEAL BY ROSELAND COMMUNITY WINDFARM LLP: LAND EAST OF ROTHERHAM ROAD, BOLSOVER, DERBYSHIRE APPLICATION REF: 12/00159/FULEA 1. I am directed by the Secretary of State to say that consideration has been given to the report of the Inspector, Paul K Jackson BArch (Hons) RIBA, who held a public local inquiry which opened on 4 November 2014 into your client’s appeal against the decision of Bolsover District Council (the Council) to refuse planning permission for a windfarm comprising 6 wind turbines, control building, anemometer mast and associated access tracks on a site approximately 2.5km south of Bolsover between the villages of Palterton and Shirebrook, in accordance with application reference 12/00159/FULEA, dated 25 April 2012. 2. On 20 June 2014 the appeal was recovered for the Secretary of State's determination, in pursuance of section 79 of and paragraph 3 of Schedule 6 to the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, because it involves a renewable energy development. Inspector’s recommendation and summary of the decision 3. The Inspector recommended that the appeal be dismissed and planning permission refused. For the reasons given below, the Secretary of State agrees with the Inspector’s conclusions except where indicated otherwise, and agrees with his recommendation. A copy of the Inspector’s report (IR) is enclosed. All references to paragraph numbers, unless otherwise stated, are to that report.
    [Show full text]
  • Inkersall Road Solar Farm
    PROPOSED INKERSALL ROAD SOLAR FARM NEAR STAVELEY, DERBYSHIRE LANDSCAPE VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR LOW CARBON JUNE 2020 PROPOSED INKERSALL ROAD SOLAR FARM LANDSCAPE VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Planning Policy Context 3.0 Assessment Methodology and Criteria 4.0 Site Description and Proposals 5.0 Landscape Baseline 6.0 Landscape Effect 7.0 Visual Assessment 8.0 Mitigation Measures and Residual Degree of Effect 9.0 Cumulative Assessment 10.0 Conclusion References Figure 01: Survey Site Location Figure 02: Heritage Assets Figure 03: Zone of Theoretical Visibility (ZTV) Figure 04a: Potential Visual Receptors PROW Figure 04b: Potential Visual Receptors RRE Figure 05: Viewpoints Figure 06: Landscape and Biodiversity Scheme Figure 07: Cumulative Zone of Theoretical Visibility Appendix A: Landscape Setting of Listed Building – Inkersall Farm Appendix B: Selected Panoramas Report Ref D34.19 No: Hilary R Ludlow Author: MSc CMLI, CEnv Scientific Steven Weber check: BSc MCIEEM Presentation Zoe Lewis check: BA (Hons) Date: June 2020 LANDSCAPE SCIENCE CONSULTANCY LTD 2 | Page L:\LSC\D34.19 Staveley (Inkersall) LVIA\D34.19a Inkersall LVIA update\Reports & Drafts\Inkersall Road Solar Farm - LVIA - FINAL.doc PROPOSED INKERSALL ROAD SOLAR FARM LANDSCAPE VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Landscape Science Consultancy Ltd (LSC) was commissioned to conduct a Landscape Visual Impact Assessment at Inkersall near Staveley, Derbyshire in relation to proposals for a solar farm, hereafter referred to as the ‘Proposed Development’ within the ‘Survey Site’. The assessment defines the existing landscape and visual baseline and assesses the sensitivity to change and considers the effect of the Proposed Development on the landscape and its visual resources over a wider area centred on the Survey Site which is defined by the anticipated visual envelope – hereafter referred to as the ‘Study Area’.
    [Show full text]
  • 1300781EOT- Markham Vale, Item 142. PDF 362 KB
    Case Officer: Sarah Scott File No: CHE/13/00781/EOT Tel. No: (01246) 345786 Plot No: 2/544 Ctte Date: 31st March 2014 ITEM 7 EXTENSION OF TIME TO CHE/0502/0312 (MARKHAM VALE) - COMMERCIAL (NOT MAJOR RETAIL) OFFICE, INDUSTRIAL AND WAREHOUSE DEVELOPMENT NEW AND ALTERED ROADS (INCLUDING A MOTORWAY JUNCTION) LAND RECLAMATION, GROUND RE- MODELLING, DRAINAGE LANDSCAPING AND RE-USE OF RAILHEADS ON 360 HECTARES OF LAND IN BOLSOVER, STAVELEY AND SUTTON- CUM-DUCKMANTON ON BOTH SIDES OF THE M1 IN THE VICINITY OF THE FORMER MARKHAM COLLIERY A632 (CHESTERFIELD ROAD) ERIN ROAD, LOWGATES, ECKINGTON ROAD, HALL LANE AND THE A619 SOUTH OF STAVELEY AND LAND OFF, CHESTERFIELD ROAD, ERIN ROAD, LOWGATES, ECKINGTON ROAD AT MARKHAM EMPLOYMENT GROWTH ZONE, MARKHAM LANE, CHESTERFIELD, DERBYSHIRE, S44 5HS FOR DERBYSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL AND HENRY BOOT DEVELOPMENTS LTD 1.0 CONSULTATIONS DCC Highways Comments received dated 08/01/2014 and 19/03/2014 – no objections to proposed EOT App. acknowledging that conditions 9, 10, 11 and 18 (relating to highways matters) are no longer required. DCC Planning Comments received dated 31/01/2014 and 28/02/2014 – no objections to the proposed EOT App. as the development accords with local and national policy and is therefore supported for a further 10 years consent. Highways Agency Comments received dated 07/01/2014 and 12/03/2014 – no objections subject to previous conditions. Environment Agency Comments received dated 10/01/2014 – no objections subject to previous conditions. Yorkshire Water Comments received dated 24/12/2013 – no objections subject to previous conditions. English Heritage Comments received dated 15/01/2014 – advise that EOT should be determined in accordance with national / local policy guidance and the Council’s own conservation advice.
    [Show full text]
  • 1A Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    1A bus time schedule & line map 1A Chesterƒeld - Langwith View In Website Mode The 1A bus line (Chesterƒeld - Langwith) has 3 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Chesterƒeld: 6:20 PM - 11:38 PM (2) Hillstown: 5:14 AM - 9:07 PM (3) Newbold: 6:27 AM - 10:10 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 1A bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 1A bus arriving. Direction: Chesterƒeld 1A bus Time Schedule 49 stops Chesterƒeld Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 11:38 PM Monday 6:20 PM - 11:38 PM Water Tower, Hillstown Tower Crescent, Bolsover Tuesday 6:20 PM - 11:38 PM Methodist Church, Hillstown Wednesday 6:20 PM - 11:38 PM Langwith Road, Bolsover Thursday 6:20 PM - 11:38 PM Wells Street, Hillstown Friday 6:20 PM - 11:38 PM Wells Street, Bolsover Saturday 4:25 PM - 11:38 PM Langwith Road, Hillstown St Lawrence Avenue, Bolsover St Lawrence Avenue 71, Hillstown 1A bus Info St Lawrence Avenue, Hillstown Direction: Chesterƒeld Moorƒeld Avenue, Bolsover Stops: 49 Trip Duration: 28 min Moorƒeld Avenue, Bolsover Line Summary: Water Tower, Hillstown, Methodist Moor Lane, Bolsover Church, Hillstown, Wells Street, Hillstown, Langwith Road, Hillstown, St Lawrence Avenue 71, Hillstown, Huntingdon Avenue, Bolsover St Lawrence Avenue, Hillstown, Moorƒeld Avenue, Bolsover, Huntingdon Avenue, Bolsover, Smithson Smithson Avenue, Bolsover Avenue, Bolsover, Town End, Bolsover, Market Place, Bolsover, 4 High Street, Bolsover, Blue Bell, Bolsover, Town End, Bolsover Hornscroft Park, Bolsover, New Station Road Top, Town End,
    [Show full text]
  • Why Is the Water Quality in the River Doe Lea So Poor?”
    “Why is the water quality in the River Doe Lea so poor?” Dissertation submitted as part requirement for the Degree of Master of Science in Urban Water Engineering and Management By: Mark Stevens Supervisor: Prof. David Lerner The University of Sheffield Department of Civil & Structural Engineering September 2011 Declaration: Mark Stevens certifies that all the material contained within this document is his own work except where it is clearly referenced to others. _____________________ ii ABSTRACT: STEVENS, M. 2011. Why is the water quality in the River Doe Lea so poor? MSc Urban Water Engineering and Management Dissertation, Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, University of Sheffield The Doe Lea River has a long history of pollution issues which once earned it the reputation of the most polluted river in Europe. Water quality has succumbed to the pressures of mining heritage, industry, agriculture, urban growth and major highways which dominate the catchment. The catchment has a poor chemical and biological classification status with the Environment Agency and ecological statues varies between poor and bad. Conditions of poor flow are often observed, which intensify water quality issues. In order to determine the reasons for the degradation of surface water quality, a project has been devised to take a snapshot of the water chemistry. Fifty water samples were collected simultaneously across the whole catchment and repeated for each season of the year. Analysis of these samples has developed understanding of pressures and influences that are contributing to water quality degradation. Via a mass balance analysis, it has been possible to locate particular areas of concern, determine sources and quantities of pollution and devise land management options to alleviate pollution stresses.
    [Show full text]
  • Refuse & Recycling
    Refuse & Recycling Collections 2016-17 (North) Please refer to both calendars: REFUSE (black and green bins) and RECYCLING (burgundy bin) and note changed collection dates due to Bank Holidays and suspension of green bin collections THERE WILL BE NO GREEN BIN COLLECTIONS BETWEEN 5 DECEMBER 2016 AND 3 MARCH 2017 COLLECTIONS WILL RESUME WEEK COMMENCING 6 MARCH 2017 Please keep this leaflet for future reference This constitutes notice under section 46 of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 notifying residents of requirements to present their waste for collection. Please ensure when you employ a waste collection company they are a registered waste carrier so you comply with the Household Waste Duty of Care Regulations 2005. Key to calendars: Green Dates Green Bin Collection Black Dates Black Bin Collection Grey Dates Bank Holidays - collections one day later than normal (NB. See below for Christmas collections). White Dates NO REFUSE COLLECTION Burgundy Dates Burgundy Bin Collection December 2016 Su M T W Th F S 27 Nov 28 Nov 29 Nov 30 Nov 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Please note: Burgundy Bin Collections falling on 26th December 2016 will be collected Saturday 24th December 2016 . Collections after Bank Holiday (27th December) will be 1 day later than normal. Christmas & New Year collections Normal collection day Christmas collections Monday 26 December 2016 Bank Holiday, No Collections Tuesday 27 December 2016 Bank Holiday, No Collections Wednesday 28 December 2016 No Black/Green Collections
    [Show full text]
  • Plants at Clowne (Circa 1780)
    Chapter 3 Plants at Clowne (circa 1780) SOME NOTES ON PARISH RECORDS ETC.1 May 1991. One of a series of Chapters by Dr. John S. Plant, Keele University, England, ST5 5BG. Some of the descendants of Charles Plant (cf Chapter 6) have spent many years trying to ascer- tain his ancestry, largely from the clue of his being born, according to Census data, in the parish of the village of Clowne in Derbyshire. Although they have not yet traced the parental origins of this Charles Plant, they have done much to piece together the family trees of Plant families living at and around Clowne, such as at nearby Sutton-Cum-Duckmanton, from about 1730 to 1830. 3.1 Plants near Sutton and Clowne Records have been found (incomplete) for various Plants in parishes around Clowne. For example, Sutton-Cum-Duckmanton is immediately to the south of the parish of Staveley, which in turn is immediately to the west of the parish of Clowne. The ancestor William, in Figure 3.1, was of Duckmanton when he married Ann Webster in 1725 in the parish of Ault Hucknall2. It appears that their first child, Robert, was born to the north of this parish. It should be added, however, that the 1988 version of the IGI also records at Sutton-Cum- Duckmanton, in 1729, a marriage between a William Plant and Anne Green. 3.1.1 Robert(s) of Bolsover and Beighton A Robert Plant married Rachel Spaner at Beighton in 1751 (Figure 3.3); the parish of Beighton is about 8 miles to the north of Sutton-Cum-Duckmanton.
    [Show full text]
  • For Publication
    FOR PUBLICATION CURRENT CONSULTATION ON THE GOVERNMENT'S HIGH SPEED TRAIN (HS2) PROPOSALS MEETING: 1. OVERVIEW AND PERFORMANCE SCRUTINY FORUM DATE: 1.Thursday 17 th October 2013 REPORT BY: HEAD OF REGENERATION WARD: ALL KEY DECISION 331 REFERENCE: FOR PUBLICATION BACKGROUND PAPERS FOR PUBLIC REPORTS: TITLE: 1. HS2 Phase Two Consultation Document 2. Staveley and Rother Valley Corridor Area Action Plan, Preferred Option 2012 LOCATION: 1. http://www.hs2.org.uk/phase-two/route- consultation/document-library 2. http://www.chesterfield.gov.uk/Branches/Chesterfield/Websit e/Files/Documents/Environment/Local%20Development% 20Framework/Staveley%20Works%20Area%20Action%2 0Plan/SRVC%20AAP%20Preferred%20Option%20for%20 Publication%20Nov%202012.pdf Overview and Performance Scrutiny Forum th 17 October 2013 1.0 PURPOSE OF REPORT 1.1 To give an interim report on the government proposals for the Birmingham to Leeds high-speed rail line (HS2) published for consultation on 17 th July 2013. 1.2 To put forward for discussion elements that might be appropriate to include in the Chesterfield Borough Council response to the HS2 consultation. NOTE: AS MENTIONED IN THE REPORT, APPRAISAL OF THE EFFECTS OF THE HS2 PROPOSALS IS STILL TAKING PLACE. MANY OBSERVATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS IN THIS REPORT ARE ONLY PROVISIONAL THEREFORE, AND SHOULD NOT BE TAKEN AS FINAL COMMENTARY OR ADVICE. 2.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 2.1 That the report be considered. 3.0 BACKGROUND 3.1 On 28 th January 2013 the government announced that the Birmingham to Leeds leg of the proposed High Speed Rail link would pass through the eastern part of the borough.
    [Show full text]
  • White's 1857 Directory of Derbyshire
    KILLAMARSH DIRECTORY. 757 the premises are let for £7 10s. per annum. John Kaye, 1531, gave a messuage for a school-house, which is now used as a school, and kept in repair by the parish. Sarah Pole, in 1747, gave £30 to buy books and teach three poor children to read, at the Free-school. Phillis Butcher, 1746, gave £30, the interest to pay for four poor children learning to read and write. Margaret and Mary Pole, 1753 granted a messuage and several pieces of land, on trust, for the benefit of the school; one piece was sold to the Chesterfield Canal Company for £60, which with £30 from Sarah Pole’s gift was placed in the hands of John Billham, who became insolvent about 1796, afterwards the sum of £68 4s. 3d. was received as dividends, and £56 was placed in the hands of Sir George Sitwell, at 5 per cent. The income of the school amounts to £29, part of which is paid to a schoolmaster, who instructs 25 poor children, and the remainder goes for the reparation of four cottages. Marked 1 reside at Bridge foot, 1½ Church Town, 2 Gannow lane, 3 High moor, 4 Nether moor, 5 Netherthorpe, 6 The Forge, 7 Upper Thorpe, and 8 West Thorpe. Post Office (Receiving House) Mr. Turner Ward’s, Church Town. Bagaley John, poor rate collector, Moor and patent music wire manufrs., The Batty John, parish clerk Forge. Warehouse 15, Broomsgrove street, Hancock Miss Ann, Highmoor Birmingham, and Penns Mills, near Bir- Kelk Wm., shoemaker, Church Town mingham Manser George, schoolmaster 7 Wilson Edw., stone mason Need Thomas, Esq, Gannow House Richardson Thos.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Plan: Core Strategy 2011 – 2031
    APPENDIX B Submission Local Plan: Core Strategy showing proposed Main Modifications CHESTERFIELD BOROUGH COUNCIL LOCAL PLAN: CORE STRATEGY 2011 – 2031 Showing proposed Main Modifications Strikethrough = deletion Underlined = addition of new text CONTENTS Foreword 3 List of Policies 4 1 Introduction 5 2 A Picture of our Borough 11 3 Our Vision for the Borough 25 Strategic Objectives 31 4 Spatial Strategy 33 5 Core Strategy Policies 41 • The Spatial Strategy 41 • Key Diagram 44 • A Changing Climate 49 • Homes and Housing 59 • Jobs, Centres and Facilities 64 • Design and the Built Environment 77 • Travel and Transport 82 6 Making Great Places 88 Appendices 106 A Infrastructure Delivery 106 B Monitoring and Review 114 C Implementation 134 D Sustainability Appraisal 137 E Evidence Base 142 F Parking Standards 144 G Glossary 148 2 Chesterfield Borough Submission Local Plan: Core Strategy Showing Main Modifications Foreword by Executive Member for Planning Dear Reader, The Chesterfield Borough Local Plan: Core Strategy sets out our proposals for the development and use of land in Chesterfield for almost 20 years. The Strategy outlines our vision of what the Borough will look like in the future. The document reflects our determination to respond to the current economic situation by creating new opportunities for growth and regeneration. We need to ensure that there is an increase in good quality housing, jobs and training. Derelict land needs to be brought back into use. The Council is equally committed to ensuring the policies and plans will continue to improve our environment and meet the challenge of climate change. Our aspiration is for Chesterfield to become a flagship sustainable community, while retaining what makes our Borough special.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Boundary Commission for England Report No
    Local Government Boundary Commission For England Report No. 517 Principal Area Boundary Review ; BOROUGH OF CHESTERFIELD J STRICT OF NO?TH EAST )ERBYSH RE LOCAL GOVEHWfWT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOII ENGLAND REPORT NO.Sn LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN Mr G J Ellerton CMC MBE DEPUTY CHAIRMAN Mr J G Powell FRIGS FSVA MEMBERS Lady Ackner Mr G R Prentice Professor G E Cherry Mr K J L Newell Mr B Scholes QBE THE RIGHT HON. NICHOLAS RIDLEY MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT PROPOSALS FOR CHANGES IN THE BOUNDARY OF THE BOROUGH OF CHESTERFIELD WITH THE DISTRICT OF NORTH EAST DERBYSHIRE BACKGROUND 1. On 30 March 19&3 Chesterfield Borough Council wrote to us suggesting a number of alterations to their boundary with the district of North East Derbyshire (both districts being in the non-metropolitan county of Derbyshire). It was not clear at that time whether the Borough Council had consulted the other local authorities and the residents involved. We therefore asked Chesterfield Borough Council to consult these authorities and to indicate the extent.of the agreement reached before we decided whether or not to conduct a review. f-?hese consultations were completed by September 1983- 2. After taking into account the views of all the local authorities concerned, and having regard to DOE Circular 33/?8 and our own Report No. 2871 we deciJded to accede to Chesterfield Borough Council's request an,d undertake a review. \ •^ THS DRAFT SCHEME 3* Chesterfield Borough Council's request was made in the main on the grounds that administrative difficulties were caused by development; straddling the present boundary.
    [Show full text]
  • Thirteen Row Palterton, Derbyshire
    Thirteen Row Palterton, Derbyshire Computer generated image - for illustration purposes only Hidden away at the heart of it Palterton is a small village nestled amid tranquil sweeping fields and just a 30-minute drive from the majestic beauty of the Peak District National Park. It’s the kind of place where much-loved family memories are made. And yet, at just a six-minute drive from the M1 near Chesterfield, and with Nottingham, Sheffield, Leeds, Lincoln and Derby within easy reach, it’s also the perfect place to commute from. A family-friendly The affordable route to community rural bliss Thirteen Row is a small, high quality These homes are all available through development of five three-bedroom our Shared Ownership scheme. So houses on the northern edge of investing in your rural idyll is more Palterton. The village primary school affordable because you part buy, part is just a four-minute walk away and rent your home. You can then buy Bolsover’s secondary school is 14 more shares, if you choose to, when minutes door-to-door by bus, keeping you can afford it. It’s the ideal way to life nice and easy if you have children. buy the home you want in a location you’ll love. Why choose Shared Ownership? • You’ll need a smaller deposit and • You are able to buy more shares mortgage than if you bought a until you own the property outright. property outright. • Your monthly payments could be • Generally you are able to buy a less than renting privately. bigger property than you may otherwise be able to afford.
    [Show full text]