Local Plan: Core Strategy 2011 – 2031

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Local Plan: Core Strategy 2011 – 2031 APPENDIX B Submission Local Plan: Core Strategy showing proposed Main Modifications CHESTERFIELD BOROUGH COUNCIL LOCAL PLAN: CORE STRATEGY 2011 – 2031 Showing proposed Main Modifications Strikethrough = deletion Underlined = addition of new text CONTENTS Foreword 3 List of Policies 4 1 Introduction 5 2 A Picture of our Borough 11 3 Our Vision for the Borough 25 Strategic Objectives 31 4 Spatial Strategy 33 5 Core Strategy Policies 41 • The Spatial Strategy 41 • Key Diagram 44 • A Changing Climate 49 • Homes and Housing 59 • Jobs, Centres and Facilities 64 • Design and the Built Environment 77 • Travel and Transport 82 6 Making Great Places 88 Appendices 106 A Infrastructure Delivery 106 B Monitoring and Review 114 C Implementation 134 D Sustainability Appraisal 137 E Evidence Base 142 F Parking Standards 144 G Glossary 148 2 Chesterfield Borough Submission Local Plan: Core Strategy Showing Main Modifications Foreword by Executive Member for Planning Dear Reader, The Chesterfield Borough Local Plan: Core Strategy sets out our proposals for the development and use of land in Chesterfield for almost 20 years. The Strategy outlines our vision of what the Borough will look like in the future. The document reflects our determination to respond to the current economic situation by creating new opportunities for growth and regeneration. We need to ensure that there is an increase in good quality housing, jobs and training. Derelict land needs to be brought back into use. The Council is equally committed to ensuring the policies and plans will continue to improve our environment and meet the challenge of climate change. Our aspiration is for Chesterfield to become a flagship sustainable community, while retaining what makes our Borough special. From the lively activity of Chesterfield Market and town centre to the tranquillity of Holmebrook and Poolsbrook Country Parks. We want to protect our green spaces and maintain green gaps between our communities to stop them coalescing. Chesterfield can feel proud of its planning achievements over the last 20 years with the construction of the Vicar Lane shopping centre, the building of the Dunston and Tapton Innovation Centres and the major new leisure facilities – Staveley Healthy Living Centre and the Chesterfield Football Club stadium. The broad policy framework established in this Core Strategy will be further developed through the preparation of other Development Plan Documents, Supplementary Planning Documents and Development Briefs for individual sites such as the Staveley and Rother Valley Corridor. Together these documents will provide an effective means of managing development. The Strategy has been subject to extensive consultation of local residents and businesses. I would like to thank everyone who has contributed to the development of the Core Strategy. I am confident that the hopes and aspirations of the local community have been reflected. I believe the Strategy provides a sound basis for the future and will make Chesterfield a place that people wish to live, work and visit. Yours faithfully, Councillor Terry Gilby, Deputy Leader and Executive Member for Planning 3 Chesterfield Borough Submission Local Plan: Core Strategy Showing Main Modifications List of Policies Page Number The Spatial Strategy 41 CS1 Spatial Strategy 41 CS2 Principles for Location of Development 45 CSX Presumption in favour of sustainable development 46 CS3 Infrastructure Delivery 48 A Changing Climate 49 CS4 Renewable Energy 49 CS5 Sustainable Design and Construction 52 CS6 Management of the Water Cycle 54 CS7 Environmental Quality 55 CS8 Green Infrastructure and Biodiversity 57 Homes and Housing 59 CS9 Phasing of Flexibility in delivery of Housing Delivery 60 CS10 Range of Housing 61 CS11 Sites for Travellers 62 Jobs, Centres and Facilities 64 CS12 Economic Growth 65 CS13 Tourism and the Visitor Economy 68 CS14 Vitality and Viability of Centres 72 CS15 Retail 74 CS16 Social Infrastructure 75 Design and the Built Environment 77 CS17 Design 79 CS18 Historic Environment 80 Travel and Transport 82 CS19 Influencing the Demand for Travel 86 CS20 Major Transport Infrastructure 87 Making Great Places 88 PS1 Chesterfield Town Centre 89 PS2 Chatsworth Road 93 PS3 Waterside and the Potteries 96 PS4 Markham Vale 99 PS5 Staveley and Rother Valley Corridor 101 PS6 Neighbourhood Plans 105 4 Chesterfield Borough Submission Local Plan: Core Strategy Showing Main Modifications 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Welcome to the Submission stage Chesterfield Borough Local Plan: Core Strategy. Over the next fifteen to twenty years, the borough will have many challenges to face. This includes providing new housing and jobs, securing infrastructure and facilities for residents and visitors, in a way that helps us adapt to a changing climate. The planning system has a key role in helping to manage these changes and helping to reduce the impact on our borough and its residents. As the local planning authority, the borough council’s main way of doing this is through the production of the Local Development Framework (LDF). What is the Local Development Framework? 1.2 Up to now we have had a local plan covering the period up to 2016 to guide the development of the borough. We are now required by government to produce a Local Development Framework (LDF) which is broader than the local plan. This means that we must look at wider social, environmental and economic considerations when planning for the future. The LDF policies, together with national policy guidance, will form the basis for planning decisions in the borough to 2031. Most of the policies within the 2006 Local Plan have been saved to continue to provide the basis for planning decisions until replaced by new policies and documents within the LDF. 1.3 A Local Development Framework is a ‘folder’ of documents that outlines how spatial planning will be implemented, managed and monitored within the local area. 1.4 The Chesterfield Borough LDF will contain: - Local Plan: Core Strategy - Local Plan: Sites and Boundaries - Statement of Community Involvement - Staveley and Rother Valley Corridor Area Action Plan - Supplementary Planning Documents 1.5 The LDF will be used to shape decision-making by the borough council both in terms of investment and in the determination of planning applications. It will also influence other public sector bodies and private organisations in their decision making and investment plans for the borough. What is the Local Plan: Core Strategy? 1.6 The Local Plan: Core Strategy (referred to hereafter as the Core Strategy) provides the overall spatial strategy for the LDF. It sets out why change is needed; what should be done; and where, when and how it is going to happen, including the provision of supporting infrastructure. It provides the basic principles and policies that will steer development and the use of land. It establishes the overall general scale and location of development, and the 5 Chesterfield Borough Submission Local Plan: Core Strategy Showing Main Modifications approach to the key issues facing the Borough. The Core Strategy covers the period from its adoption to 2031. 1.7 The Core Strategy is the foremost Development Plan Document (DPD) within the Local Development Framework. All other DPD’s must be in line with the Core Strategy. How has it been prepared? 1.8 The Core Strategy has been developed by the Council over the past four years. We did not start with a blank canvas, we took account of government guidance, as well as the outcomes of engagement activity that has taken place so far to shape the Core Strategy. We have also carried out and commissioned technical background work to help inform the process. The Localism Act 2011 introduced a duty for local authorities to consult and engage with its neighbouring councils. Chesterfield Borough has worked closely with its neighbouring authorities and other stakeholders to assist the production of its Local Development Framework. It has worked with the other members of its housing market area to produce its Strategic Housing Market Assessment 2007 and a methodology to guide the production of its Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment. It has worked with other authorities in Nottinghamshire and Derbyshire to produce the East Midlands Northern Sub- region Employment Land Review 2008 and scenarios to estimate dwelling requirements for 2008 household projections. Officers of the local authorities in the housing market area meet regularly to discuss issues arising from the progress on individual LDF documents. Chesterfield Borough has also developed consultation and engagement with the Sheffield City Region as it has developed . It is essential that key issues like housing and employment are discussed jointly in the future, to find solutions that are compatible with and not exclusive of the development strategies of adjoining councils, particularly in respect of strategic issues such as development along the A61 corridor south of Chesterfield and Markham Vale. The Policy Context 1.9 The Core Strategy has been prepared within the strategic policy context of the East Midlands Regional Plan (2009) and is in general conformity with it. Whilst the government’s intention to abolish Regional Plans was formalised in the Localism Act 2011, at the time of publication the East Midlands Regional Plan remains in place pending further legislation, and is therefore still relevant. If and when the Regional Plan is abolished the strategic context will be replaced by a Local Strategic Statement (LSS) prepared by Chesterfield Borough Council following consultation with neighbouring authorities within the East Midlands Northern Housing Market Area. The Core Strategy is consistent with the evidence base of the East Midlands Regional Plan (2009) which will continue to be relevant, and national planning policy, as expressed within the National Planning Policy Framework, Circulars and Ministerial Statements. 6 Chesterfield Borough Submission Local Plan: Core Strategy Showing Main Modifications The full range of national planning guidance can be found at www.communities.gov.uk/planningandbuilding.
Recommended publications
  • Michelle Smith Eversheds LLP Bridgewater
    Michelle Smith Our Ref: APP/R1010/A/14/2212093 Eversheds LLP Bridgewater Place Water Lane LEEDS LS11 5DR 12 March 2015 Dear Madam TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 (SECTION 78) APPEAL BY ROSELAND COMMUNITY WINDFARM LLP: LAND EAST OF ROTHERHAM ROAD, BOLSOVER, DERBYSHIRE APPLICATION REF: 12/00159/FULEA 1. I am directed by the Secretary of State to say that consideration has been given to the report of the Inspector, Paul K Jackson BArch (Hons) RIBA, who held a public local inquiry which opened on 4 November 2014 into your client’s appeal against the decision of Bolsover District Council (the Council) to refuse planning permission for a windfarm comprising 6 wind turbines, control building, anemometer mast and associated access tracks on a site approximately 2.5km south of Bolsover between the villages of Palterton and Shirebrook, in accordance with application reference 12/00159/FULEA, dated 25 April 2012. 2. On 20 June 2014 the appeal was recovered for the Secretary of State's determination, in pursuance of section 79 of and paragraph 3 of Schedule 6 to the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, because it involves a renewable energy development. Inspector’s recommendation and summary of the decision 3. The Inspector recommended that the appeal be dismissed and planning permission refused. For the reasons given below, the Secretary of State agrees with the Inspector’s conclusions except where indicated otherwise, and agrees with his recommendation. A copy of the Inspector’s report (IR) is enclosed. All references to paragraph numbers, unless otherwise stated, are to that report.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Health Impact Assessment of the Avenue Development August 2016
    Rapid Health Impact Assessment of the Avenue development August 2016 Author Richard Keeton, Public Health Manager, Derbyshire County Council Contributors Steering group members Julie Hirst, Public Health Principal, Derbyshire County Council Mandy Chambers, Public Health Principal, Derbyshire County Council Jim Seymour, Transport Strategy Manager, Derbyshire County Council Alan Marsden, Project Officer - Transportation Projects, Derbyshire County Council Tamsin Hart, Senior Area Manager, Homes & Communities Agency Martyn Handley, Economic Development Projects Officer, North East Derbyshire District Council Sean Johnson, Public Health, Lincolnshire County Council Steve Buffery, Derbyshire County Council Andrew Grayson, Chesterfield Borough Council Community consultation leads Susan Piredda, Public Health Development Worker, Derbyshire County Council Louise Hall, Public Health Development Worker, Derbyshire County Council Fiona Unwin, Public Health Development Worker, Derbyshire County Council Lianne Barnes, Public Health Development Worker, Derbyshire County Council Appraisal panel members Joe Battye, Derbyshire County Council Councillor Allen, Cabinet Member, Health and Communities (Public Health), Derbyshire County Council Neil Johnson, Economic Growth and Regeneration Lead, Chesterfield Borough Council Allison Westray-Chapman, Joint Assistant Director Economic Growth, Bolsover District Council & North East Derbyshire District Council Steve Brunt, Assistant Director Streetscene, Bolsover District Council & North East Derbyshire District
    [Show full text]
  • EAST MIDLANDS REGION - Wednesday 8 June 2016
    MINUTES OF THE DECISIONS OF THE COMMISSION ON THE INITIAL PROPOSALS FOR THE EAST MIDLANDS REGION - Wednesday 8 June 2016 Session 1: Wednesday 8 June 2016 Present: David Elvin QC, Commissioner Neil Pringle, Commissioner Sam Hartley, Secretary to the Commission Tony Bellringer, Deputy Secretary to the Commission Tim Bowden, Head of Reviews Glenn Reed, Review Manager Sam Amponsah, Review Officer Mr Reed and Mr Amponsah presented the Secretariat's schemes to Commissioners. Lincolnshire The Commissioners considered that, due to its almost whole allocation of constituencies with a Theoretical Entitlement (TE) to 6.97 constituencies, Lincolnshire could be treated on its own and should continue to be allocated seven constituencies. Commissioners considered that the two constituencies of Gainsborough, and South Holland and the Deepings could remain wholly unchanged, while Grantham and Stamford CC, and Louth and Horncastle CC would be changed following changes to local government ward boundaries. The electorate of the existing Sleaford and North Hykeham CC constituency was too large at 86,652, while that of its neighbouring constituencies of Lincoln BC (at 67,115) and Boston and Skegness CC (66,250) were too small. Commissioners therefore agreed that the five wards comprising the town of North Hykeham, and the Waddington West ward be included in the new Lincoln constituency, which in turn loses the Bracebridge Heath and Waddington East ward to the Sleaford constituency. It would not be possible to retain this ward in the Lincoln constituency without dividing the town of North Hykeham. In order to further reduce the electorate of the existing Sleaford and North Hykeham constituency, and to increase that of Boston and Skegness, Commissioners also agreed the transfer of the additional two wards of Kirkby la Thorpe and South Kyme, and Heckington Rural from the existing Sleaford constituency.
    [Show full text]
  • Bolsover North East Derbyshire Leader
    BOLSOVER NORTH EAST DERBYSHIRE LEADER PROGRAMME EVALUATION FEBRUARY 2014 Foreword The past few years have not been easy for our local rural communities and businesses. Government cuts and the economic downturn have led to reduced services and difficulties in accessing much needed finance which has resulted in restricted growth for this area. The £2.4m which the Bolsover North East Derbyshire LEADER Programme has delivered since 2008 into the economies of both Council areas, has played a major part in supporting business, encouraging visitors and creating much needed new jobs. As Chair of the Local Action Group, I have seen projects develop from the first expression of interest through to the finished article, be that a new piece of equipment, a new business or even a new hotel. All of the LEADER funded projects, from the smallest to the biggest, have contributed to the enhancement of the area and to the growth of the local economy. This evaluation document explains what the BNED LEADER Programme has achieved and the rationale for doing what it has. I hope you find the document both informative and interesting. We are now looking forward to submitting a bid for more funding in the next Rural Development Programme which is due to start in 2015 and will run until 2020. By talking with and listening to local people and businesses, we hope to deliver as much, if not more in the next programme to improve our area and communities. Cllr Ken Savidge Chair BNED LEADER Page 2 of 30 CONTENTS Page Foreword 2 Executive Summary 4 Diversification into
    [Show full text]
  • Official Opening New Building Chesterfield School
    Derbyshire County Council _________ The Excepted District of the Borough of Chesterfield. _________ CHESTERFIELD BOROUGH Founded 1594 EDUCATION COMMITTEE OFFICIAL OPENING of the NEW BUILDING for CHESTERFIELD SCHOOL by Sir Philip B. Dingle, C.B.E., LL.D. Thursday, 19th October, 1967 DERBYSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL ____________ THE EXCEPTED DISTRICT OF THE BOROUGH OF CHESTERFIELD ____________ The Worshipful The Mayor COUNCILLOR G. A. WIGFIELD, J.P. The Chairman of the Borough Education Committee ALDERMAN E. SWALE, C.B.E., D.F.C., J.P. Vice-Chairman of the Borough Education Committee ALDERMAN H. C. MARTIN Town Clerk: Borough Education Officer: R. A. KENNEDY B. MATTHEWS, B.Sc. Headmaster: W. E. GLISTER, M.A., J.P. P R O G R A M M E ___________ 1. Alderman E. Swale, C.B.E., D.F.C.. J.P., Chairman of the Borough Education Committee and Chesterfield School Governors, will preside. 2. The Borough Education Ofiicer will explain the purpose of the school. 3. The Chairman will welcome Sir Philip Dingle and invite him to open the school. 4. Opening by Sir Philip B. Dingle. C.B.E., LL.D. At the conclusion of his address, Sir Philip Dingle will be invited to unveil the commemorative plaque in the entrance hall. The audience is asked to remain in-the hall during this period and it is hoped that the unveiling will be seen in the hall by means of closed circuit television. 5. The Chairman of the County Education Committee, Alderman J. W. Trippett, LL.B., will propose a vote of thanks to Sir Philip Dingle, which will be seconded by Councillor V.
    [Show full text]
  • Land at Blacksmith's Arms
    Land off North Road, Glossop Education Impact Assessment Report v1-4 (Initial Research Feedback) for Gladman Developments 12th June 2013 Report by Oliver Nicholson EPDS Consultants Conifers House Blounts Court Road Peppard Common Henley-on-Thames RG9 5HB 0118 978 0091 www.epds-consultants.co.uk 1. Introduction 1.1.1. EPDS Consultants has been asked to consider the proposed development for its likely impact on schools in the local area. 1.2. Report Purpose & Scope 1.2.1. The purpose of this report is to act as a principle point of reference for future discussions with the relevant local authority to assist in the negotiation of potential education-specific Section 106 agreements pertaining to this site. This initial report includes an analysis of the development with regards to its likely impact on local primary and secondary school places. 1.3. Intended Audience 1.3.1. The intended audience is the client, Gladman Developments, and may be shared with other interested parties, such as the local authority(ies) and schools in the area local to the proposed development. 1.4. Research Sources 1.4.1. The contents of this initial report are based on publicly available information, including relevant data from central government and the local authority. 1.5. Further Research & Analysis 1.5.1. Further research may be conducted after this initial report, if required by the client, to include a deeper analysis of the local position regarding education provision. This activity may include negotiation with the relevant local authority and the possible submission of Freedom of Information requests if required.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Health Impact of the Avenue Development
    Rapid Health Impact Assessment of the Avenue development August 2016 Author Richard Keeton, Public Health Manager, Derbyshire County Council Contributors Steering group members Julie Hirst, Public Health Principal, Derbyshire County Council Mandy Chambers, Public Health Principal, Derbyshire County Council Jim Seymour, Transport Strategy Manager, Derbyshire County Council Alan Marsden, Project Officer - Transportation Projects, Derbyshire County Council Tamsin Hart, Senior Area Manager, Homes & Communities Agency Martyn Handley, Economic Development Projects Officer, North East Derbyshire District Council Sean Johnson, Public Health, Lincolnshire County Council Steve Buffery, Derbyshire County Council Andrew Grayson, Chesterfield Borough Council Community consultation leads Susan Piredda, Public Health Development Worker, Derbyshire County Council Louise Hall, Public Health Development Worker, Derbyshire County Council Fiona Unwin, Public Health Development Worker, Derbyshire County Council Lianne Barnes, Public Health Development Worker, Derbyshire County Council Appraisal panel members Joe Battye, Derbyshire County Council Councillor Allen, Cabinet Member, Health and Communities (Public Health), Derbyshire County Council Neil Johnson, Economic Growth and Regeneration Lead, Chesterfield Borough Council Allison Westray-Chapman, Joint Assistant Director Economic Growth, Bolsover District Council & North East Derbyshire District Council Steve Brunt, Assistant Director Streetscene, Bolsover District Council & North East Derbyshire District
    [Show full text]
  • Available Property 29
    Available Property 20/04/2016 to 26/04/2016 29 Properties Listed Bid online at www.rykneldhomes.org.uk 01246 217670 Properties available from 20/04/2016 to 26/04/2016 Page: 1 of 11 Address: Honeysuckle Road, Hasland, Chesterfield, Derbyshire S41 0QH Ref: *0003 Type: 2 Bed House Rent: £ 94.31 per week Landlord: Derwent Living Address: Springvale Road, Clay Cross, Chesterfield, Derbyshire S45 9SB Ref: 1023081 Type: 2 Bed Bungalow Rent: £ 91.69 per week Landlord: Rykneld Homes Address: Fairview Road, Dronfield, Derbyshire S18 2HG Ref: 1027776 Type: 2 Bed Flat Rent: £ 88.14 per week Landlord: Rykneld Homes Properties available from 20/04/2016 to 26/04/2016 Page: 2 of 11 Address: Lorne Close, Dronfield, Derbyshire S18 8ZJ Ref: 1030144 Type: 2 Bed Bungalow Rent: £ 94.03 per week Landlord: Rykneld Homes Address: Larch Road, Eckington, Derbyshire S21 4ED Ref: 1046748 Type: 3 Bed House Rent: £ 96.25 per week Landlord: Rykneld Homes Address: Moss Rise Place, Eckington, Derbyshire S21 4HA Ref: 1047774 Type: 2 Bed House Rent: £ 89.35 per week Landlord: Rykneld Homes Properties available from 20/04/2016 to 26/04/2016 Page: 3 of 11 Address: Southgate, Eckington, Derbyshire S21 4FT Ref: 1050437 Type: 1 Bed Flat Rent: £ 78.87 per week Landlord: Rykneld Homes Address: Kent House Close, Ridgeway, Derbyshire S12 3XS Ref: 1056435 Type: 1 Bed Flat Rent: £ 84.16 per week Landlord: Rykneld Homes Address: Wood Nook Grove, Marsh Lane, Derbyshire S21 5SA Ref: 1058884 Type: 1 Bed Bungalow Rent: £ 89.47 per week Landlord: Rykneld Homes Properties available from
    [Show full text]
  • Inkersall Road Solar Farm
    PROPOSED INKERSALL ROAD SOLAR FARM NEAR STAVELEY, DERBYSHIRE LANDSCAPE VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR LOW CARBON JUNE 2020 PROPOSED INKERSALL ROAD SOLAR FARM LANDSCAPE VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Planning Policy Context 3.0 Assessment Methodology and Criteria 4.0 Site Description and Proposals 5.0 Landscape Baseline 6.0 Landscape Effect 7.0 Visual Assessment 8.0 Mitigation Measures and Residual Degree of Effect 9.0 Cumulative Assessment 10.0 Conclusion References Figure 01: Survey Site Location Figure 02: Heritage Assets Figure 03: Zone of Theoretical Visibility (ZTV) Figure 04a: Potential Visual Receptors PROW Figure 04b: Potential Visual Receptors RRE Figure 05: Viewpoints Figure 06: Landscape and Biodiversity Scheme Figure 07: Cumulative Zone of Theoretical Visibility Appendix A: Landscape Setting of Listed Building – Inkersall Farm Appendix B: Selected Panoramas Report Ref D34.19 No: Hilary R Ludlow Author: MSc CMLI, CEnv Scientific Steven Weber check: BSc MCIEEM Presentation Zoe Lewis check: BA (Hons) Date: June 2020 LANDSCAPE SCIENCE CONSULTANCY LTD 2 | Page L:\LSC\D34.19 Staveley (Inkersall) LVIA\D34.19a Inkersall LVIA update\Reports & Drafts\Inkersall Road Solar Farm - LVIA - FINAL.doc PROPOSED INKERSALL ROAD SOLAR FARM LANDSCAPE VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Landscape Science Consultancy Ltd (LSC) was commissioned to conduct a Landscape Visual Impact Assessment at Inkersall near Staveley, Derbyshire in relation to proposals for a solar farm, hereafter referred to as the ‘Proposed Development’ within the ‘Survey Site’. The assessment defines the existing landscape and visual baseline and assesses the sensitivity to change and considers the effect of the Proposed Development on the landscape and its visual resources over a wider area centred on the Survey Site which is defined by the anticipated visual envelope – hereafter referred to as the ‘Study Area’.
    [Show full text]
  • POST OFFICE DERBYSHIRE Publicans-Continued
    202 POST OFFICE DERBYSHIRE PUBLICANs-continued. New inn, J. Lomas, Horwich end, Fetnilee, Buxton JJfarquls of A nglesea, T. Foster, 10 Cheapside, Drrby Ne?v inn, G. Milward, Little Eaton, Derby Marquis of Gran by, E. vYibberley, St. John st. Ashbourne New inn, H. J. Oldbam, Chapel-en-le-Frith Masons' Arms, J. Else, Edward street, Derby New inn, J. Oliver, Bonsall, Matlock Bath Masons' Arms, J. Fox, 9 Albion street, Derby New inn, J. Overton, Hardwich, Ault Hucknall, Chesterfld Masons' Arms, J. Hihbert, New Mills New inn, D. Oxspring Wirksworth Masons' Arms, W. Hodgkinson, Mickleover, Derby New inn, D. Peace, Newhall, Borton-on-Trent Masons' Arms, Mrs. A. Seddon,Woodseats, :Norton,Sbeffid New inn, 1\'Irs. M. Pearson, HorslPy '\Voodhouse, Derby JJ[asom' Arms, Mrs. R. Wilson, Froggatt, Bakewell New inn, J. Riley, Pinxton wharf, Alfreton Mazeppa, J. Cowlishaw, 58 Traffic street, Derby New inn, H. Robinson, 41 Canal street, Derby Jllelancthon's Head, J. Allsop, 78 Park street, Derby New inn, J. Rowbottoro,jun. Dinting, Glossop liielbourne Arms, T. Brookes, the Common,Melhrue.Derby New inn, G. Staniforth, Hackenthorpe, Beighton, Sheffield Melbourne Arms, J. Wiikins, ll Siddal's lane, Derby N&w inn, A. Steer, 17 King street, Derby Midland hotel, J. Tbompson, Station, Chesterfield New ·inn, S. Warren, Potter street, Melbourne, Derby JJfidland Railway hotel, Mrs. Susan Cbatfield, manager, Nt:w inn, W. Watson, Market place, Belper Midland road, Derb:v New inn, J. Watts, Repton, Burton-on-Trent JJfill Stone, Mrs. E. Wilkin, Booths, Hatbersage, Bakewell New inn, W. Whiteboose, Codnor park, Alfreton Miners' Arms, Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Derby City and Derbyshire County Pharmaceutical Needs Assessment
    Derby City & Derbyshire County Pharmaceutical Needs Assessment 2015 Derby and Derbyshire Pharmaceutical Need Assessment 2015 | 1 Version History Version Date Review by Authors 1.0 March 2015 March 2018 Chris McManus Derby and Derbyshire Pharmaceutical Need Assessment 2015 | 2 CONTENTS 1. Executive summary 2. Introduction 2.1 Wider Context. 2.2 PNA development in Derby City and Derbyshire County Councils 3. Overview of Current Pharmaceutical Services Provision in Derby and Derbyshire 3.1 Essential services 3.2 Advanced services 3.3 Locally commissioned services 3.4 Out of hours provision 3.5 Distance selling pharmacies 3.6 Dispensing practices 3.7 Dispensing Appliance Contractors 3.8 Out of area providers of pharmaceutical services 3.9 The effectiveness of pharmacy services 3.10 Determination of localities for the PNA 3.11 Current provision of community pharmacy services by district 4. Overview of findings from the public consultation on needs 5. Derby City Profile 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Population and other characteristics 4.3 Key findings 4.4 Future housing developments 4.6 Current provision 6. Derbyshire County Profile 5.1 Introduction 5.2 Key challenges 5.3 Population and other characteristics 5.4 Key findings 5.5 Future housing developments 7. Locality profiles and pharmaceutical provision 6.1 Amber Valley 6.2 Bolsover 6.3 Chesterfield 6.4 Derbyshire Dales 6.5 Erewash 6.6 High Peak 6.7 North East 6.8 South 8. Summary Derby and Derbyshire Pharmaceutical Need Assessment 2015 | 3 9. APPENDICES 1. Steering Group Terms of Reference 2. List of pharmacies by District and services provided 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix E Scenario S2 Proposed Layout
    Chesterfield Borough Council, Chatsworth Settlement Trustees & Rhodia Ltd HS2 Infrastructure Maintenance Depot (Staveley) High Level Option Appraisal Issue | 30 January 2014 This report takes into account the particular instructions and requirements of our client. It is not intended for and should not be relied upon by any third party and no responsibility is undertaken to any third party. Job number 234106-00 Ove Arup & Partners Ltd Admiral House Rose Wharf 78 East Street Leeds LS9 8EE United Kingdom www.arup.com Chesterfield Borough Council, Chatsworth Settlement Trustees & HS2 Infrastructure Maintenance Depot (Staveley) Rhodia Ltd High Level Option Appraisal Contents Page Executive Summary 1 1 Introduction 2 2 Context 3 2.1 HS2 3 2.2 Staveley Works Area 4 2.3 Local Planning Policy – Core Strategy 4 2.4 Local Planning Policy – Area Action Plan 5 2.5 Local Interests 6 3 Approach 8 3.1 Study Area 8 3.2 Quantitative Criteria 8 3.3 Scoring of Quantitative Criteria 10 3.4 Qualitative Criteria 10 3.5 Scenario Assessment Criteria Summary 11 3.6 Constraints and Limitations 11 3.7 Liaison 12 4 Infrastructure Maintenance Depot Development Description 13 5 Defining the Impact of the IMD 15 5.1 Scenario B1 15 5.2 Scenario B2 16 5.3 Scenario B1 and B2 Comparison 18 6 Potential Solutions 19 6.1 Scenario S1 19 6.2 Scenario S2 21 6.3 Scenario S3 23 6.4 Scenario S4 26 6.5 Scenario S5 28 7 Internal Reconfiguration of the IMD 29 7.1 Shortening the IMD 29 7.2 Narrowing the IMD at its Western End 29 7.3 Relocating the Sidings 30 7.4 Adjusting the Route
    [Show full text]