DOCSLIB.ORG

1300781EOT- Markham Vale, Item 142. PDF 362 KB

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1300781EOT- Markham Vale, Item 142. PDF 362 KB Case Officer: Sarah Scott File No: CHE/13/00781/EOT Tel. No: (01246) 345786 Plot No: 2/544 Ctte Date: 31st March 2014 ITEM 7 EXTENSION OF TIME TO CHE/0502/0312 (MARKHAM VALE) - COMMERCIAL (NOT MAJOR RETAIL) OFFICE, INDUSTRIAL AND WAREHOUSE DEVELOPMENT NEW AND ALTERED ROADS (INCLUDING A MOTORWAY JUNCTION) LAND RECLAMATION, GROUND RE- MODELLING, DRAINAGE LANDSCAPING AND RE-USE OF RAILHEADS ON 360 HECTARES OF LAND IN BOLSOVER, STAVELEY AND SUTTON- CUM-DUCKMANTON ON BOTH SIDES OF THE M1 IN THE VICINITY OF THE FORMER MARKHAM COLLIERY A632 (CHESTERFIELD ROAD) ERIN ROAD, LOWGATES, ECKINGTON ROAD, HALL LANE AND THE A619 SOUTH OF STAVELEY AND LAND OFF, CHESTERFIELD ROAD, ERIN ROAD, LOWGATES, ECKINGTON ROAD AT MARKHAM EMPLOYMENT GROWTH ZONE, MARKHAM LANE, CHESTERFIELD, DERBYSHIRE, S44 5HS FOR DERBYSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL AND HENRY BOOT DEVELOPMENTS LTD 1.0 CONSULTATIONS DCC Highways Comments received dated 08/01/2014 and 19/03/2014 – no objections to proposed EOT App. acknowledging that conditions 9, 10, 11 and 18 (relating to highways matters) are no longer required. DCC Planning Comments received dated 31/01/2014 and 28/02/2014 – no objections to the proposed EOT App. as the development accords with local and national policy and is therefore supported for a further 10 years consent. Highways Agency Comments received dated 07/01/2014 and 12/03/2014 – no objections subject to previous conditions. Environment Agency Comments received dated 10/01/2014 – no objections subject to previous conditions. Yorkshire Water Comments received dated 24/12/2013 – no objections subject to previous conditions. English Heritage Comments received dated 15/01/2014 – advise that EOT should be determined in accordance with national / local policy guidance and the Council’s own conservation advice. 89 Derbyshire Wildlife Comments received dated 06/02/2014 – no Trust objections subject to previous conditions. DCC Archaeology Comments received dated 07/01/2014 and 14/03/2014 – no objections subject to previous conditions. Sheffield City Council No comments received Environmental Comments received dated 15/01/2014 and Services 03/03/2014 – no objections to accompanying Noise Assessment and changes associated. Design Services Comments received dated 07/01/2014 and 11/03/2014 – no objections subject to previous drainage conditions. Economic Comments received dated 21/02/2014 – no Development objections but seek a condition in respect of a local labour clause being imposed. Fire Officer No comments received Chesterfield Cycle No comments received Campaign Ward Members No comments received Staveley Town No comments received Council Neighbours/Site One letter of representation received Notice 2.0 THE SITE & SITE HISTORY 2.1 The site the subject of this application covers the entire Markham Vale site, formerly known as MEGZ. 2.2 Outline planning permission was granted in April 2005 for the MEGZ development under application CHE/0502/0312. The application was described as: ‘Commercial (not major retail), office, industrial and warehouse development; new and altered road (including a new motorway junction); land reclamation, ground re-modelling, drainage, landscaping and re-use of railheads on 360 hectares of land in Bolsover, Staveley, Sutton-cum-Duckmanton on both side of the M1 in the vicinity of the former Markham Colliery, A632 (Chesterfield Road), Erin Road, Lowgates, Eckington Road, Hall Lane and the A619 south of Staveley at land off Chesterfield Road, Erin Road, Lowgates and Eckington Road.’ 90 and proposed: The development of 11 new employment areas totalling 85 hectares; A new motorway junction (29A) on the M1; New or improved roads linking the motorway junction and the new employment sites to existing roads in the area; Environmental improvements on some 201 hectares, the majority of which were occupied as tips; Retention of existing railway sidings; and The provision of hotel / conference facilities. 2.3 The application site is spread across the Council boundaries of Chesterfield Borough, Bolsover District and North East Derbyshire. Permission was conditionally granted by Chesterfield Borough Council subject to fifty three planning conditions. 2.4 Since the granting outline planning consent, a number of reserved matters / full applications for the Markham Vale site have been received and determined as follows: CHE/08/00268/REM - Reserved matters for industrial and warehousing buildings on Plot 1a on Plot 5 and Plot 1b. Conditional permission 26th June 2008. CHE/08/00424/REM - Approval of reserved matters for CHE/0502/0312 for Plot 1 north and Plot 1 south. Conditional permission 22nd October 2008. CHE/08/00382/REM - Approval of reserved matters of application CHE/0502/0312 for the construction of four industrial units on Plot 5 east. Conditional permission 20th November 2008. CHE/09/00536/REM - Approval of reserved matters for Plot 5 JRM Ltd. Conditional permission 23rd October 2009. CHE/09/00510/REM - Approval of reserved matters for Plot 5, MSE Hiller. Conditional permission 19th November 2009. CHE/09/00778/REM1 - Variation of Condition 21 of Planning Permission CHE/0502/0312 (MEGZ). Approved 23rd April 2010. 91 CHE/11/00566/FUL - Proposed erection of a restaurant with drive through facility, car parking and associated access, landscaping and drainage works for Plot 7 McDonalds. Conditional permission 1st November 2011. CHE/11/00592/REM - Construction of a warehouse & distribution unit (Class B8), with ancillary offices, access and car parking arrangements and associated infrastructure for Plot 2 south Andrew Page. Conditional permission 14th November 2011. CHE/13/00014/REM1 - Variation of conditions 7, 11, 20, 21, 47, 49 and 50 of CHE/0502/0312 - Markham Vale (MEGZ) Regeneration Scheme - conditions 12 and 23 removed from application by letter dated 6th June 2013. Conditional permission 24th September 2013. CHE/13/00288/REM - Construction of Class B2 unit including office and storage space, with associated landscaping, and associated access and car parking arrangements for Plot 5 Ready Egg. Conditional permission 8th July 2013. CHE/13/00322/FUL - Proposed erection of petrol filling station (sui generis) with ancillary retail floorspace (for the sale of convenience goods including food, cards and newspapers, stationary and a sandwich shop) and drive thru cafe/restaurant (Use Class A3), with associated car parking, access arrangements and landscaping works for Plot 7 Eurogarages and Starbucks. Conditional permission 23rd July 2013. CHE/13/00429/REM - Construction of Class B8 unit, with office space with associated landscaping, access and car parking arrangements for Plot 5 Holdsworth Foods. Conditional permission 2nd October 2013. CHE/13/00539/OUT - Outline planning permission (with all matters reserved) for the proposed erection of retail units (Use Class A1), restaurant with drive thru facility (Use Class A3), and public house (Use Class A4), and associated infrastructure. Conditional permission 19th November 2013. CHE/13/00846/REM - Application for approval of reserved matters for access, appearance, landscaping, layout, scale for public 92 house/restaurant - Planning Application CHE/13/00539/OUT. Pending consideration. 3.0 THE PROPOSAL 3.1 The application (which has also been submitted to Bolsover District Council and North East Derbyshire District Council) seeks an extension of time to implement the outline planning permission originally granted under application ref no. CHE/0502/0312. Permission was granted on 14th April 2005 fro a period of 10 years. 3.2 The extension of time submission includes a Noise Assessment and revisions to the Markham Vale Design Framework, which accompany changes sought to some of the original conditions of the outline planning permission as part of this latest application. 3.3 The original planning application was deemed to be EIA development and the original planning application was accompanied by an Environmental Statement. On this basis this latest application is accompanied by an updated Transport Assessment, an ES Addendum dated January 2013 and ES Appendices (submitted via email dated 19/12/2013) which seek to address changes in policy or other material considerations which have occurred since the previous grant of planning permission. 3.4 In respect of the above an accompanying letter prepared by Alliance Planning dated 27th November 2013 sets out which of the 53 original planning conditions the applicants seeks renewal of, and those which they consider are required to be amended or deleted. 4.0 PROCEDURE 4.1 The application has been submitted in accordance with the Town and Country Planning (General Development Procedure) (Amendment No. 3) (England) Order 2009 (SI 2009 No. 2261) and the Guidance issued by DCLG in October 2010 (Greater Flexibility for Planning Permissions), specifically under the exception of Paragraph 20. 4.2 Paragraph 20 of the Guidance allows Local Planning Authorities to extend outline planning permission with the ability to extend the time through which reserved matters applications can be submitted 93 in respect of the un-implemented phases of an outline planning application. The paragraph allows for such an extension in time where ‘the application has been submitted in outline and is to be implemented in phases, and one or more of the phases has begun. Under these circumstances, the procedures apply as long as the development was required or expressly permitted to be implemented in phases when the outline planning permission was originally granted by the local planning authority.’
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Michelle Smith Eversheds LLP Bridgewater
    Michelle Smith Our Ref: APP/R1010/A/14/2212093 Eversheds LLP Bridgewater Place Water Lane LEEDS LS11 5DR 12 March 2015 Dear Madam TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 (SECTION 78) APPEAL BY ROSELAND COMMUNITY WINDFARM LLP: LAND EAST OF ROTHERHAM ROAD, BOLSOVER, DERBYSHIRE APPLICATION REF: 12/00159/FULEA 1. I am directed by the Secretary of State to say that consideration has been given to the report of the Inspector, Paul K Jackson BArch (Hons) RIBA, who held a public local inquiry which opened on 4 November 2014 into your client’s appeal against the decision of Bolsover District Council (the Council) to refuse planning permission for a windfarm comprising 6 wind turbines, control building, anemometer mast and associated access tracks on a site approximately 2.5km south of Bolsover between the villages of Palterton and Shirebrook, in accordance with application reference 12/00159/FULEA, dated 25 April 2012. 2. On 20 June 2014 the appeal was recovered for the Secretary of State's determination, in pursuance of section 79 of and paragraph 3 of Schedule 6 to the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, because it involves a renewable energy development. Inspector’s recommendation and summary of the decision 3. The Inspector recommended that the appeal be dismissed and planning permission refused. For the reasons given below, the Secretary of State agrees with the Inspector’s conclusions except where indicated otherwise, and agrees with his recommendation. A copy of the Inspector’s report (IR) is enclosed. All references to paragraph numbers, unless otherwise stated, are to that report.
    [Show full text]
  • Inkersall Road Solar Farm
    PROPOSED INKERSALL ROAD SOLAR FARM NEAR STAVELEY, DERBYSHIRE LANDSCAPE VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR LOW CARBON JUNE 2020 PROPOSED INKERSALL ROAD SOLAR FARM LANDSCAPE VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Planning Policy Context 3.0 Assessment Methodology and Criteria 4.0 Site Description and Proposals 5.0 Landscape Baseline 6.0 Landscape Effect 7.0 Visual Assessment 8.0 Mitigation Measures and Residual Degree of Effect 9.0 Cumulative Assessment 10.0 Conclusion References Figure 01: Survey Site Location Figure 02: Heritage Assets Figure 03: Zone of Theoretical Visibility (ZTV) Figure 04a: Potential Visual Receptors PROW Figure 04b: Potential Visual Receptors RRE Figure 05: Viewpoints Figure 06: Landscape and Biodiversity Scheme Figure 07: Cumulative Zone of Theoretical Visibility Appendix A: Landscape Setting of Listed Building – Inkersall Farm Appendix B: Selected Panoramas Report Ref D34.19 No: Hilary R Ludlow Author: MSc CMLI, CEnv Scientific Steven Weber check: BSc MCIEEM Presentation Zoe Lewis check: BA (Hons) Date: June 2020 LANDSCAPE SCIENCE CONSULTANCY LTD 2 | Page L:\LSC\D34.19 Staveley (Inkersall) LVIA\D34.19a Inkersall LVIA update\Reports & Drafts\Inkersall Road Solar Farm - LVIA - FINAL.doc PROPOSED INKERSALL ROAD SOLAR FARM LANDSCAPE VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Landscape Science Consultancy Ltd (LSC) was commissioned to conduct a Landscape Visual Impact Assessment at Inkersall near Staveley, Derbyshire in relation to proposals for a solar farm, hereafter referred to as the ‘Proposed Development’ within the ‘Survey Site’. The assessment defines the existing landscape and visual baseline and assesses the sensitivity to change and considers the effect of the Proposed Development on the landscape and its visual resources over a wider area centred on the Survey Site which is defined by the anticipated visual envelope – hereafter referred to as the ‘Study Area’.
    [Show full text]
  • 1A Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    1A bus time schedule & line map 1A Chesterƒeld - Langwith View In Website Mode The 1A bus line (Chesterƒeld - Langwith) has 3 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Chesterƒeld: 6:20 PM - 11:38 PM (2) Hillstown: 5:14 AM - 9:07 PM (3) Newbold: 6:27 AM - 10:10 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 1A bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 1A bus arriving. Direction: Chesterƒeld 1A bus Time Schedule 49 stops Chesterƒeld Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 11:38 PM Monday 6:20 PM - 11:38 PM Water Tower, Hillstown Tower Crescent, Bolsover Tuesday 6:20 PM - 11:38 PM Methodist Church, Hillstown Wednesday 6:20 PM - 11:38 PM Langwith Road, Bolsover Thursday 6:20 PM - 11:38 PM Wells Street, Hillstown Friday 6:20 PM - 11:38 PM Wells Street, Bolsover Saturday 4:25 PM - 11:38 PM Langwith Road, Hillstown St Lawrence Avenue, Bolsover St Lawrence Avenue 71, Hillstown 1A bus Info St Lawrence Avenue, Hillstown Direction: Chesterƒeld Moorƒeld Avenue, Bolsover Stops: 49 Trip Duration: 28 min Moorƒeld Avenue, Bolsover Line Summary: Water Tower, Hillstown, Methodist Moor Lane, Bolsover Church, Hillstown, Wells Street, Hillstown, Langwith Road, Hillstown, St Lawrence Avenue 71, Hillstown, Huntingdon Avenue, Bolsover St Lawrence Avenue, Hillstown, Moorƒeld Avenue, Bolsover, Huntingdon Avenue, Bolsover, Smithson Smithson Avenue, Bolsover Avenue, Bolsover, Town End, Bolsover, Market Place, Bolsover, 4 High Street, Bolsover, Blue Bell, Bolsover, Town End, Bolsover Hornscroft Park, Bolsover, New Station Road Top, Town End,
    [Show full text]
  • Why Is the Water Quality in the River Doe Lea So Poor?”
    “Why is the water quality in the River Doe Lea so poor?” Dissertation submitted as part requirement for the Degree of Master of Science in Urban Water Engineering and Management By: Mark Stevens Supervisor: Prof. David Lerner The University of Sheffield Department of Civil & Structural Engineering September 2011 Declaration: Mark Stevens certifies that all the material contained within this document is his own work except where it is clearly referenced to others. _____________________ ii ABSTRACT: STEVENS, M. 2011. Why is the water quality in the River Doe Lea so poor? MSc Urban Water Engineering and Management Dissertation, Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, University of Sheffield The Doe Lea River has a long history of pollution issues which once earned it the reputation of the most polluted river in Europe. Water quality has succumbed to the pressures of mining heritage, industry, agriculture, urban growth and major highways which dominate the catchment. The catchment has a poor chemical and biological classification status with the Environment Agency and ecological statues varies between poor and bad. Conditions of poor flow are often observed, which intensify water quality issues. In order to determine the reasons for the degradation of surface water quality, a project has been devised to take a snapshot of the water chemistry. Fifty water samples were collected simultaneously across the whole catchment and repeated for each season of the year. Analysis of these samples has developed understanding of pressures and influences that are contributing to water quality degradation. Via a mass balance analysis, it has been possible to locate particular areas of concern, determine sources and quantities of pollution and devise land management options to alleviate pollution stresses.
    [Show full text]
  • Refuse & Recycling
    Refuse & Recycling Collections 2016-17 (North) Please refer to both calendars: REFUSE (black and green bins) and RECYCLING (burgundy bin) and note changed collection dates due to Bank Holidays and suspension of green bin collections THERE WILL BE NO GREEN BIN COLLECTIONS BETWEEN 5 DECEMBER 2016 AND 3 MARCH 2017 COLLECTIONS WILL RESUME WEEK COMMENCING 6 MARCH 2017 Please keep this leaflet for future reference This constitutes notice under section 46 of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 notifying residents of requirements to present their waste for collection. Please ensure when you employ a waste collection company they are a registered waste carrier so you comply with the Household Waste Duty of Care Regulations 2005. Key to calendars: Green Dates Green Bin Collection Black Dates Black Bin Collection Grey Dates Bank Holidays - collections one day later than normal (NB. See below for Christmas collections). White Dates NO REFUSE COLLECTION Burgundy Dates Burgundy Bin Collection December 2016 Su M T W Th F S 27 Nov 28 Nov 29 Nov 30 Nov 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Please note: Burgundy Bin Collections falling on 26th December 2016 will be collected Saturday 24th December 2016 . Collections after Bank Holiday (27th December) will be 1 day later than normal. Christmas & New Year collections Normal collection day Christmas collections Monday 26 December 2016 Bank Holiday, No Collections Tuesday 27 December 2016 Bank Holiday, No Collections Wednesday 28 December 2016 No Black/Green Collections
    [Show full text]
  • Plants at Clowne (Circa 1780)
    Chapter 3 Plants at Clowne (circa 1780) SOME NOTES ON PARISH RECORDS ETC.1 May 1991. One of a series of Chapters by Dr. John S. Plant, Keele University, England, ST5 5BG. Some of the descendants of Charles Plant (cf Chapter 6) have spent many years trying to ascer- tain his ancestry, largely from the clue of his being born, according to Census data, in the parish of the village of Clowne in Derbyshire. Although they have not yet traced the parental origins of this Charles Plant, they have done much to piece together the family trees of Plant families living at and around Clowne, such as at nearby Sutton-Cum-Duckmanton, from about 1730 to 1830. 3.1 Plants near Sutton and Clowne Records have been found (incomplete) for various Plants in parishes around Clowne. For example, Sutton-Cum-Duckmanton is immediately to the south of the parish of Staveley, which in turn is immediately to the west of the parish of Clowne. The ancestor William, in Figure 3.1, was of Duckmanton when he married Ann Webster in 1725 in the parish of Ault Hucknall2. It appears that their first child, Robert, was born to the north of this parish. It should be added, however, that the 1988 version of the IGI also records at Sutton-Cum- Duckmanton, in 1729, a marriage between a William Plant and Anne Green. 3.1.1 Robert(s) of Bolsover and Beighton A Robert Plant married Rachel Spaner at Beighton in 1751 (Figure 3.3); the parish of Beighton is about 8 miles to the north of Sutton-Cum-Duckmanton.
    [Show full text]
  • For Publication
    FOR PUBLICATION CURRENT CONSULTATION ON THE GOVERNMENT'S HIGH SPEED TRAIN (HS2) PROPOSALS MEETING: 1. OVERVIEW AND PERFORMANCE SCRUTINY FORUM DATE: 1.Thursday 17 th October 2013 REPORT BY: HEAD OF REGENERATION WARD: ALL KEY DECISION 331 REFERENCE: FOR PUBLICATION BACKGROUND PAPERS FOR PUBLIC REPORTS: TITLE: 1. HS2 Phase Two Consultation Document 2. Staveley and Rother Valley Corridor Area Action Plan, Preferred Option 2012 LOCATION: 1. http://www.hs2.org.uk/phase-two/route- consultation/document-library 2. http://www.chesterfield.gov.uk/Branches/Chesterfield/Websit e/Files/Documents/Environment/Local%20Development% 20Framework/Staveley%20Works%20Area%20Action%2 0Plan/SRVC%20AAP%20Preferred%20Option%20for%20 Publication%20Nov%202012.pdf Overview and Performance Scrutiny Forum th 17 October 2013 1.0 PURPOSE OF REPORT 1.1 To give an interim report on the government proposals for the Birmingham to Leeds high-speed rail line (HS2) published for consultation on 17 th July 2013. 1.2 To put forward for discussion elements that might be appropriate to include in the Chesterfield Borough Council response to the HS2 consultation. NOTE: AS MENTIONED IN THE REPORT, APPRAISAL OF THE EFFECTS OF THE HS2 PROPOSALS IS STILL TAKING PLACE. MANY OBSERVATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS IN THIS REPORT ARE ONLY PROVISIONAL THEREFORE, AND SHOULD NOT BE TAKEN AS FINAL COMMENTARY OR ADVICE. 2.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 2.1 That the report be considered. 3.0 BACKGROUND 3.1 On 28 th January 2013 the government announced that the Birmingham to Leeds leg of the proposed High Speed Rail link would pass through the eastern part of the borough.
    [Show full text]
  • White's 1857 Directory of Derbyshire
    KILLAMARSH DIRECTORY. 757 the premises are let for £7 10s. per annum. John Kaye, 1531, gave a messuage for a school-house, which is now used as a school, and kept in repair by the parish. Sarah Pole, in 1747, gave £30 to buy books and teach three poor children to read, at the Free-school. Phillis Butcher, 1746, gave £30, the interest to pay for four poor children learning to read and write. Margaret and Mary Pole, 1753 granted a messuage and several pieces of land, on trust, for the benefit of the school; one piece was sold to the Chesterfield Canal Company for £60, which with £30 from Sarah Pole’s gift was placed in the hands of John Billham, who became insolvent about 1796, afterwards the sum of £68 4s. 3d. was received as dividends, and £56 was placed in the hands of Sir George Sitwell, at 5 per cent. The income of the school amounts to £29, part of which is paid to a schoolmaster, who instructs 25 poor children, and the remainder goes for the reparation of four cottages. Marked 1 reside at Bridge foot, 1½ Church Town, 2 Gannow lane, 3 High moor, 4 Nether moor, 5 Netherthorpe, 6 The Forge, 7 Upper Thorpe, and 8 West Thorpe. Post Office (Receiving House) Mr. Turner Ward’s, Church Town. Bagaley John, poor rate collector, Moor and patent music wire manufrs., The Batty John, parish clerk Forge. Warehouse 15, Broomsgrove street, Hancock Miss Ann, Highmoor Birmingham, and Penns Mills, near Bir- Kelk Wm., shoemaker, Church Town mingham Manser George, schoolmaster 7 Wilson Edw., stone mason Need Thomas, Esq, Gannow House Richardson Thos.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Plan: Core Strategy 2011 – 2031
    APPENDIX B Submission Local Plan: Core Strategy showing proposed Main Modifications CHESTERFIELD BOROUGH COUNCIL LOCAL PLAN: CORE STRATEGY 2011 – 2031 Showing proposed Main Modifications Strikethrough = deletion Underlined = addition of new text CONTENTS Foreword 3 List of Policies 4 1 Introduction 5 2 A Picture of our Borough 11 3 Our Vision for the Borough 25 Strategic Objectives 31 4 Spatial Strategy 33 5 Core Strategy Policies 41 • The Spatial Strategy 41 • Key Diagram 44 • A Changing Climate 49 • Homes and Housing 59 • Jobs, Centres and Facilities 64 • Design and the Built Environment 77 • Travel and Transport 82 6 Making Great Places 88 Appendices 106 A Infrastructure Delivery 106 B Monitoring and Review 114 C Implementation 134 D Sustainability Appraisal 137 E Evidence Base 142 F Parking Standards 144 G Glossary 148 2 Chesterfield Borough Submission Local Plan: Core Strategy Showing Main Modifications Foreword by Executive Member for Planning Dear Reader, The Chesterfield Borough Local Plan: Core Strategy sets out our proposals for the development and use of land in Chesterfield for almost 20 years. The Strategy outlines our vision of what the Borough will look like in the future. The document reflects our determination to respond to the current economic situation by creating new opportunities for growth and regeneration. We need to ensure that there is an increase in good quality housing, jobs and training. Derelict land needs to be brought back into use. The Council is equally committed to ensuring the policies and plans will continue to improve our environment and meet the challenge of climate change. Our aspiration is for Chesterfield to become a flagship sustainable community, while retaining what makes our Borough special.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Boundary Commission for England Report No
    Local Government Boundary Commission For England Report No. 517 Principal Area Boundary Review ; BOROUGH OF CHESTERFIELD J STRICT OF NO?TH EAST )ERBYSH RE LOCAL GOVEHWfWT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOII ENGLAND REPORT NO.Sn LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN Mr G J Ellerton CMC MBE DEPUTY CHAIRMAN Mr J G Powell FRIGS FSVA MEMBERS Lady Ackner Mr G R Prentice Professor G E Cherry Mr K J L Newell Mr B Scholes QBE THE RIGHT HON. NICHOLAS RIDLEY MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT PROPOSALS FOR CHANGES IN THE BOUNDARY OF THE BOROUGH OF CHESTERFIELD WITH THE DISTRICT OF NORTH EAST DERBYSHIRE BACKGROUND 1. On 30 March 19&3 Chesterfield Borough Council wrote to us suggesting a number of alterations to their boundary with the district of North East Derbyshire (both districts being in the non-metropolitan county of Derbyshire). It was not clear at that time whether the Borough Council had consulted the other local authorities and the residents involved. We therefore asked Chesterfield Borough Council to consult these authorities and to indicate the extent.of the agreement reached before we decided whether or not to conduct a review. f-?hese consultations were completed by September 1983- 2. After taking into account the views of all the local authorities concerned, and having regard to DOE Circular 33/?8 and our own Report No. 2871 we deciJded to accede to Chesterfield Borough Council's request an,d undertake a review. \ •^ THS DRAFT SCHEME 3* Chesterfield Borough Council's request was made in the main on the grounds that administrative difficulties were caused by development; straddling the present boundary.
    [Show full text]
  • Thirteen Row Palterton, Derbyshire
    Thirteen Row Palterton, Derbyshire Computer generated image - for illustration purposes only Hidden away at the heart of it Palterton is a small village nestled amid tranquil sweeping fields and just a 30-minute drive from the majestic beauty of the Peak District National Park. It’s the kind of place where much-loved family memories are made. And yet, at just a six-minute drive from the M1 near Chesterfield, and with Nottingham, Sheffield, Leeds, Lincoln and Derby within easy reach, it’s also the perfect place to commute from. A family-friendly The affordable route to community rural bliss Thirteen Row is a small, high quality These homes are all available through development of five three-bedroom our Shared Ownership scheme. So houses on the northern edge of investing in your rural idyll is more Palterton. The village primary school affordable because you part buy, part is just a four-minute walk away and rent your home. You can then buy Bolsover’s secondary school is 14 more shares, if you choose to, when minutes door-to-door by bus, keeping you can afford it. It’s the ideal way to life nice and easy if you have children. buy the home you want in a location you’ll love. Why choose Shared Ownership? • You’ll need a smaller deposit and • You are able to buy more shares mortgage than if you bought a until you own the property outright. property outright. • Your monthly payments could be • Generally you are able to buy a less than renting privately. bigger property than you may otherwise be able to afford.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Employment Land Appraisal Summary Report
    Strategic Employment Land Appraisal Summary Report Sheffield City Region DĂLJϮϬϮϬ ΞϮϬϮϬEĂƚŚĂŶŝĞů>ŝĐŚĨŝĞůĚΘWĂƌƚŶĞƌƐ>ƚĚ͕ƚƌĂĚŝŶŐĂƐ>ŝĐŚĨŝĞůĚƐ͘ůůZŝŐŚƚƐZĞƐĞƌǀĞĚ͘ZĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŝŶ ŶŐůĂŶĚ͕ŶŽ͘Ϯϳϳϴϭϭϲ͘ϭϰZĞŐĞŶƚ͛ƐtŚĂƌĨ͕ůů^ĂŝŶƚƐ^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕>ŽŶĚŽŶEϭϵZ> &ŽƌŵĂƚƚĞĚĨŽƌĚŽƵďůĞƐŝĚĞĚƉƌŝŶƚŝŶŐ͘ WůĂŶƐďĂƐĞĚƵƉŽŶKƌĚŶĂŶĐĞ^ƵƌǀĞLJŵĂƉƉŝŶŐǁŝƚŚƚŚĞƉĞƌŵŝƐƐŝŽŶŽĨ,ĞƌDĂũĞƐƚLJ͛Ɛ^ƚĂƚŝŽŶĞƌLJKĨĨŝĐĞ͘ ΞƌŽǁŶŽƉLJƌŝŐŚƚƌĞƐĞƌǀĞĚ͘>ŝĐĞŶĐĞŶƵŵďĞƌ>ϱϬϲϴϰ ϲϬϯϯϱͬϬϭͬ:'ͬd, ϭϴϯϳϰϮϱϰǀϮ ^ƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĐŵƉůŽLJŵĞŶƚ>ĂŶĚƉƉƌĂŝƐĂů͗^ƵŵŵĂƌLJZĞƉŽƌƚ 1.0 Introduction 1.1 This document has been produced by Lichfields on behalf of the Sheffield City Region Mayoral Combined Authority (MCA). It provides a Summary of the Joint Sheffield City Region Strategic Employment Land Appraisal (SELA). 1.2 The SELA aims to provide a coherent understanding of current strategic-level employment land across all nine districts in the SCR, specifically Barnsley, Bassetlaw, Bolsover, Chesterfield, Derbyshire Dales, Doncaster, North East Derbyshire, Rotherham and Sheffield (Figure 1.1). &ŝŐƵƌĞϭ͘ϭdŚĞ^ŚĞĨĨŝĞůĚŝƚLJZĞŐŝŽŶ ^ŽƵƌĐĞ͗>ŝĐŚĨŝĞůĚƐ 1.3 It should be noted that this work started in early 2019, and therefore relied on the existing SCR SEP as the basis for identifying the growth areas, strategic positions, and the SCR geography (nine districts). Since then, the SCR LEP Geography has been modified, with SCR LEP now covering just the four South Yorkshire districts, with the other five districts (Bassetlaw, Bolsover, Chesterfield, Derbyshire Dales and North East Derbyshire) falling solely within the D2N2 LEP area. Therefore, any recommendations affecting SY will be for the SCR MCA/LEP and the four South Yorkshire districts to consider. Outside South Yorkshire, it will be for the five LPAs within the D2N2 LEP area to consider. 1.4 The study also preceded the production of a new draft SCR strategy (which is currently being consulted on). Where possible, reference has been made to the new Strategic Economic Plan [SEP], such as the new Growth Innovation Cluster Areas.
    [Show full text]