Our Family History

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Our Family History Our Family History The ancestors of Denise Margaret (nee Harwood) and John Stewart Plant by John Stewart Plant 2 Contents 1 Nana Denise’s ancestors 7 1.1 Harwood: Inherited Information . ....... 7 1.2 Harwood: Genealogical Research . ...... 11 1.2.1 The Stead(e) connection to Harwood . 12 1.2.2 The Bradbury and Barrat(t) connections to Harwood . ......... 13 1.3 Sharpe: Inherited Information . ....... 13 1.4 Sharp(e): Genealogical Research . ........ 16 1.4.1 Goddard.................................... 17 1.4.2 Brackenbury ................................. 18 2 Grandad Stewart’s Plant ancestors 21 2.1 Introduction.................................... 21 2.2 Our family connection to some key events in Sheffield history ........... 21 2.3 Shoemaker William’s origins and kin . ........ 23 2.3.1 Wm(shoe)’s evident father, marriage, and associates ............ 23 2.3.2 Wm(shoe)’s children and death . 24 2.3.3 Wm(shoe) at Sylvester Street and his son James . ........ 26 2.4 Grandad Stewart’s great grandfather James Plant . ............ 26 2.4.1 The Sheffield ‘Little Mester’ James Plant (1829-1904) . 26 2.4.2 Some tales of James (snr) and his children . ....... 34 2.5 Grandad Stewart’s grandfather Tom (snr) and his children.............. 38 2.5.1 Tom’ssonTom(jnr) ............................. 39 2.5.2 Other children of Tom (snr) . 41 2.6 Summary ....................................... 41 3 Rowlinsons in Sheffield 43 3.1 Historical Significance of the name Rollinson . ........... 43 3.2 Family History of Mary Rowlinson . ...... 44 3.3 AldermanEGRowlinson.. ...... ..... ...... ...... .... 45 3.3.1 HisObituary ................................. 45 3.3.2 TheRowlinsonCampus ........................... 47 4 Till Rose Bea (1868-34) 49 4.1 WRIGHT - reconstruction at 18.12.1987 . ........ 49 4.2 FRANKS - reconstruction at 18.12.1987 . ........ 51 4.3 FRANKS - reconstruction at 20.9.91 . ....... 52 4.3.1 Robert’s son Robert (1811-) . 54 4.3.2 Robert’s son John (1811-) . 54 4.3.3 John’s son Thomas (1833-) . 55 4.3.4 John’s son Henry (1836-) . 57 4.3.5 John’s son John (1837-) . 58 3 4 CONTENTS 4.3.6 John’s daughter Sarah Ann (1842-) . 58 4.3.7 John’s son Robert (1846-) . 59 4.3.8 John’s daughter Roseanna (1849-) . ..... 59 4.3.9 John’s son William (1852-) . 59 4.3.10 John’s son Benjamin (1854-) . 60 5 Ellen’s stories: Vasey 61 5.1 Inherited information . ..... 61 5.1.1 Circa George Vasey, d 1888 . 61 5.1.2 BrotherWilliam ............................... 62 5.1.3 CircaMaryHanah,d1897 . 63 5.1.4 Circa George Vasey, d 1905 . 64 5.1.5 SisterLilly .................................. 64 5.2 WidowEllenandLait............................... 64 5.2.1 DaughterAda................................. 64 5.2.2 DaughterMary ................................ 65 5.2.3 GrandsonLouis................................ 65 5.2.4 TheLaitfamily................................ 65 5.3 Genealogical Research . 66 5.3.1 Gunn(ee/ey/y) ................................ 66 6 Ellen’s stories: Sayles 67 6.1 Inherited information . ..... 67 6.1.1 TheFamilyChemistsShop. 67 6.1.2 TheSimpsonWill .............................. 67 6.1.3 Edward Sayles’s children . 69 6.1.4 Ellen’ssisterAda.............................. 70 A Our link to earlier records for the Plant surname 73 A.1 Introduction.................................... 73 A.2 Various William Plants in our family history . ........... 73 A.3 Wm(0)’s 18th century will and family . ....... 74 A.4 PlantsnearSuttonandClowne . ..... 74 A.4.1 Wm(0)’s sons Robert, James and Benjamin . ..... 76 A.4.2 PlantsfromnearBuxton . 76 A.4.3 JamesandEllenofSutton . 78 A.4.4 Wm(0)’s son, our ancestor Thomas ..................... 79 A.4.5 Thomas’s second marriage . 79 A.5 Offspring of our ancestor Thomas . ...... 81 A.5.1 SonsofThomasandAnn........................... 81 A.5.2 SonsofThomasandMary ... ..... ...... ...... ..... 81 A.5.3 Grandsons called William . 82 A.6 DeparturefromClowne. 82 A.6.1 Plants ariving in Sheffield . 83 A.6.2 A contended connection with Clowne . 83 A.7 OurfarmerThomas’ssonWm(1). 85 A.7.1 Wm(1)’sdeathinSheffield. 87 A.7.2 Wm(1)’s wife and children in Sheffield . ..... 87 A.7.3 Wm(1)’ssonThomasfromClowne . 87 A.7.4 Wm(1)’s daughter Ann from Clowne . 88 A.7.5 Wm(1)’s son Benjamin from Clowne . 91 A.7.6 A little guidance to the reader . 92 CONTENTS 5 A.7.7 Some ambiguities of birth place . 92 A.7.8 Possible travels of this family group . ....... 93 B Plants Yard Plants 95 B.1 Early owners of Ben(bellows)’s Coal-pit Lane site . ............. 97 B.2 The Little Sheffield site of Plant’s Yard . .......... 101 B.3 BricklayerJohn .................................. 104 B.3.1 The bricklayer John’s 1816 will . 104 B.3.2 An1834deed................................. 104 B.4 Ben(bellows)’s property and Plant posterity . ............ 106 B.4.1 Some pre-Enclosure Award rate books and deeds . ....... 107 B.4.2 Allotments from the 1788 Enclosure Award and our ancestor Wm(1) . 109 B.4.3 Land near the Broomhall Wheel . 110 B.4.4 DukesAllotment ............................... 111 B.4.5 TheSpurror‘SpurGart’Wheel . 112 B.4.6 Some business and family connections . 113 B.4.7 The three favoured Plant nephews in Ben(bellows)’s 1805 will . 116 B.4.8 Benjamin’s finally listed properties . ....... 117 B.5 Some offspring of Ben(bellows)’s brother James (1740-1825)............ 119 B.5.1 Two1816deeds ............................... 119 B.5.2 Four deeds of 1823 and 1824 . 119 B.5.3 Ben(carp)’s son Ben(son.of.Ben) . 121 C Austin Plant: World War I casualty 125 C.1 TheGreatWar..................................... 125 C.1.1 Historical context of Austin’s actions . ........ 125 C.2 Austin’sfirstBattle .............................. 126 C.3 Austin’sfinalBattles .... ...... ..... ...... ...... .. 126 C.4 Austin’s personal record . 129 C.5 NamesandAddresses............................... 141 C.6 FromtheMinistryofDefence . 141 D ‘Sayles’ addresses 143 D.1 TheSimpsonTrust ................................. 143 D.2 AdaGamble’sNotebook .. ...... ..... ...... ...... .... 143 6 CONTENTS Chapter 1 Nana Denise’s ancestors THE ANCESTORS OF NANA DENISE’S FATHER ERIC HARWOOD AND MOTHER EDNA SHARPE 1.1 Harwood: Inherited Information Nana Denise’s father was called Eric Harwood whose father was called Frank Harwood whose father was called Harry Harwood. Both Harry (b 1861) and Frank (b 1887) were silversmiths. Eric (b 1917) was a transport manager. Eric’s grandfather Harry Harwood is recorded in 18871 as being a silversmith sets maker of 17 Pembroke Street, Sheffield.2 Harry is said to have been born (30.11.1860) at the Stag Hotel, Psalter Lane, Sheffield3 and he died in 1924 at his home (41 Glover Road); he was described by Eric to have been ‘clean living and a good citizen’ and ‘liked walking and a drink of beer before Sunday lunch’. Harry’s wife (Eric’s grandmother) (see Figure 1.2) is believed to have been the younger sister of Joseph Stead (1850-3.1917). She was said by Eric to have ‘loved baking bread, etc.’ and she died (aged 69) in the Sheffield Royal Infirmary. Eric’s father Frank Harwood is recorded to be a projectile examiner on Frank’s marriage certificate of 1916; this became similarly a shell examiner on the 1917 birth certificate of Eric. Later, Frank was a silversmith for the company Mappin & Webb; his address (41 Glover Road4) was that of his parents in 1916 but had become 27 Woodhead Road in 1917, 1926 and at his death, in his sleep, in 1958. Frank’s daughter Nora (Eric’s sister) was still living with her father at Woodhead Road5 in 1958; her mother had died earlier there (aged 50) in 1936. Eric had an Aunt Emily and Uncle Harry at the same Glover Road address as Eric’s grandfather Harry’s as well as his father Frank’s (until Frank left there in 1916). Frank’s sister, Emily B, is recorded to be at this address (41 Glover Road) in 1924, 1931, 1936, and 1958. Frank’s younger brother Harry (jnr) served in the Royal Artillery during the 1914-18 war and died suddenly in 1963 aged 68 years; Hugh, the son of Harry (jnr), was born at the same Glover Road address and he served in the RAF Coastal Command during the Second World War 1939-45. Eric’s mother Seney Barrat Bradbury was the twin of Francis Barratt Bradbury and Seney in turn had twin children who both died. Seney was born (5.1.1886) at 23 Malvern Road, Darnall, Sheffield and was married (6.5.1916) at St Barbabas Church, Highfield. She was described by Eric 1This is on the birth certificate (1887) of Eric’s father Frank. 2Pembroke Street lies off Cemetery Road near the General Cemetery (opened in 1836) and nearly opposite the end of Washington Road. 3The Stag Hotel derived its name from the Stag’s head in the MacKenzie family crest; the Reverend Alexander MacKenzie, Vicar of St Pauls, Pinstone Street (on the site of the present Peace Gardens by the Town Hall), had inherited the nearby Sharrow Head House from his wife’s family, called Battie, in 1789 (his second wife belonged to the Wilson family of the nearby snuff mill). 4Glover Road is on the opposite side of Wolsey Road from the ‘Harwood Works (Cutlery)’ that are marked on a 1903 map as being on land between Staveley Road and Abbeydale Road; adjoining the Harwood Works was the Atlas Foundry. 5Woodhead Road is the next road but one to Harwood Street. 7 8 CHAPTER 1. NANA DENISE’S ANCESTORS Figure 1.1: Denise in 1969 and with her sister Pauline and mother in 1953. Also, Denise’s parents: Eric Harwood in 1944 and Edna (n´ee Sharpe) in 1942. 1.1. HARWOOD: INHERITED INFORMATION 9 (a) Earliest inherited information Nellie m Ernest Bates Emmie Reginald m Ernest Evans Kenneth George (jnr)
Recommended publications
  • 'The Freedom of Election'
    'THE FREEDOM OF ELECTION' THE COMPANY OF CUTLERS IN HALLAMSHIRE AND THE GROWTH OF RADICALISM IN SHEFFIELD 1784-1792 JULIE MACDONALD VOLUME TWO Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History, The U ni versity of Sheffield August, 2005 203 CHAPTER FIVE Sheffield in 1790 Introduction For much of the eighteenth century, Sheffield was a relatively harmonious place. Trade, generally, was booming and work was plentiful. There had been no significant riots since 1756, there was very little serious crime and its inhabitants were, in the main, tolerant of one another despite their religious differences.365 But, after six years of acrimony within the town's principal trade, the situation had changed dramatically. Divisions had begun to appear at all levels of society, divisions that, in some cases, would continue well into the twentieth century. And with these divisions had come mistrust anger and fear. Even Joseph Gales had suffered: on May 16th 1789, for example, he noted that 'the journeymen were highly enraged' with him for publishing the letter from 'A Votary of Freedom' (see previous chapter), so much so that some workshops had cancelled their order for the Register. He reassured himself, and his readers, that his publication of the reply from' A Friend to Freedom' would not only see the order reinstated but also that the journeymen would have his paper 'framed and glazed' .366 365 The riots in 1756 had been caused by food shortages and widespread anger about 'stuffing', the local name for payment in kind (see chapter one). The cutlery trades had been badly affected by the outbreak of the Seyen Years War and the subsequent loss access to the European markets.
    [Show full text]
  • Michelle Smith Eversheds LLP Bridgewater
    Michelle Smith Our Ref: APP/R1010/A/14/2212093 Eversheds LLP Bridgewater Place Water Lane LEEDS LS11 5DR 12 March 2015 Dear Madam TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 (SECTION 78) APPEAL BY ROSELAND COMMUNITY WINDFARM LLP: LAND EAST OF ROTHERHAM ROAD, BOLSOVER, DERBYSHIRE APPLICATION REF: 12/00159/FULEA 1. I am directed by the Secretary of State to say that consideration has been given to the report of the Inspector, Paul K Jackson BArch (Hons) RIBA, who held a public local inquiry which opened on 4 November 2014 into your client’s appeal against the decision of Bolsover District Council (the Council) to refuse planning permission for a windfarm comprising 6 wind turbines, control building, anemometer mast and associated access tracks on a site approximately 2.5km south of Bolsover between the villages of Palterton and Shirebrook, in accordance with application reference 12/00159/FULEA, dated 25 April 2012. 2. On 20 June 2014 the appeal was recovered for the Secretary of State's determination, in pursuance of section 79 of and paragraph 3 of Schedule 6 to the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, because it involves a renewable energy development. Inspector’s recommendation and summary of the decision 3. The Inspector recommended that the appeal be dismissed and planning permission refused. For the reasons given below, the Secretary of State agrees with the Inspector’s conclusions except where indicated otherwise, and agrees with his recommendation. A copy of the Inspector’s report (IR) is enclosed. All references to paragraph numbers, unless otherwise stated, are to that report.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of History
    History at Sheffield 1 Department Of History. Our Postgraduate Courses. 2 The University of Sheffield Contents: Why choose Sheffield? 1 First-class facilities 2 Sheffield life 3 Our research culture 4 Postgraduate community 5 What can an MA in history offer you? 6 Our MA programme 7 Part-time study 8 Core modules 9 Skills development 10 Public history experience 11 MA programmes 12 Your career 18 Our PhD programme 19 Our PhD students 21 Our staff research interests 22 Applying 34 Fees and funding 36 Visiting 36 1 Why choose Sheffield? The Department of History at the University of Sheffield is one of the largest, most active and successful centres for teaching and historical research both in the UK and internationally. We offer expert teaching and supervision in a wide range of periods stretching from the ancient world to the present day and extending geographically from Britain to the Middle East and from America to India. Our teaching has been highly rated by both students and external auditors and we combine this with consistently excellent ratings in research. In the latest Research Excellence Framework Exercise (REF) in 2014, we were ranked third in the UK for our world-leading research. Why choose Sheffield History at a glance • 92% student satisfaction rate: more than six years at over We value excellence in both teaching and research, ensuring 90% and placing us 2nd in the Russell Group we use the most up-to-date digital resources. (National Student Survey 2018) • Innovative and intellectually stimulating, research-led • 95% of
    [Show full text]
  • Page 13 View That As Much of the Frontage of Cambridge Street Should Be Retained in Order to Maintain the Context Within Which Leah’S Yard Is Located
    Sheffield Conservation Advisory Group SHEFFIELD RETAIL QUARTER Observations on the outline planning application 1. SCAG considered the proposals for the Sheffield Retail Quarter at a special meeting on 29 September 2015. 2. The question that the Group has considered is whether the scheme would preserve and enhance the character and appearance of the City Centre Conservation Area, in which much of the scheme lies, and its impact on listed buildings in, and immediately adjacent to, the area, one of which is Grade I (Town Hall). 3. The Group considers that the proposals are an improvement on the previous schemes produced by Hammersons, although has reservations about aspects of the scheme as it currently appears. These are set out below. The Group is also conscious that the success of the scheme will depend in large measure on the detailed realisation of the individual blocks. But they take the view that it is essential that the overall form and massing of the development is subject to critical analysis at this stage, given that an outline permission will constrain the way in which the scheme can be integrated into the fabric of the city. 4. The Group’s major concern is about the views of the development from key locations within the city centre and the relationship of new buildings to their immediate surroundings. The scheme proposals make much play of the view along Fargate and the proposed New Fargate from Marks & Spencers store to the new anchor department store to the north of the present Charter Square. The Group expressed concern over the views from the Peace Gardens and the Town Hall steps and the way in which the proposed height of buildings would dominate the frontages in Pinstone Street, including Town Hall Chambers.
    [Show full text]
  • Practice Information Leaflet
    PRACTICE INFORMATION LEAFLET HACKENTHORPE MEDICAL CENTRE 15 MAIN STREET HACKENTHORPE SHEFFIELD, S12 4LA TELEPHONE: 0114 2488187 (24 HOURS) FAX: 0114 2510539 www.hackenthorpemedicalcentre.co.uk DOCTORS: Dr. Andrew M Parkes MBChB MRCGP Dr. Julie E Pycock MBChB DipObs Dr. Joanne P. Beckett MBBS MRCGP Dr. Victoria J Hodges MBChB MRCGP Dr. Fleur R Jones MBChB MRCGP DFSRH Dr. Kathryn Almond (currently covering Maternity Leave) Dr. Victoria Holden (currently covering Maternity Leave) Practice Manager: Angela Powell Business Manager: Helen Lenthall Practice Nurses: Louise McSweeney & Carol Clinton Rebecca Page – Nurse Practitioner Health Care Assistant / Phlebotomist: Michelle Hall & Tina Morton & Katy Myers Other Staff: District Nurses – Claire Hollingsworth Health Visitor – Brenda King Midwife – Jo Varley Counsellor – Mel Sharman Team Leader Podiatrist - Arranged by Podiatry Services OPENING HOURS: Medical Centre: Mon to Fri. 08:30 to 18:00hrs CONSULTATIONS: Monday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday: 08:30 - 10:45 & 15:15 - 17:45. Tuesday 08:30 – 10:45 & 15:15 – 20:15 hrs (All consultations are by appointment only) DISABLED PATIENTS Suitable access is available for disabled patients and visitors. MAKING AN APPOINTMENT TO SEE A DOCTOR Please telephone or call into the Surgery or book your appointment online. The Receptionist will try to arrange a convenient appointment with the Doctor of your choice. You may consult any of the Doctors in the Practice but it is better to see your regular Doctor. However if you require an URGENT appointment you will be either allocated an appointment with the first available Doctor without choice, or you may be offered an initial telephone consultation with the doctor on duty.
    [Show full text]
  • Valid From: 01 September 2019 Bus Service(S) What's Changed Areas
    Bus service(s) 208 Valid from: 01 September 2019 Areas served Places on the route Sheffield Sheffield Interchange Carbrook Ice Sheffield Meadowhall Tinsley Brinsworth Meadowhall Interchange Canklow Dinnington Interchange Whiston Thurcroft Laughton Common Dinnington What’s changed Route and timetable changes. Operator(s) How can I get more information? TravelSouthYorkshire @TSYalerts 01709 51 51 51 Bus route map for service 208 01/02/2019 Scholes Parkgate Dalton Thrybergh Braithwell Ecclesfield Ravenfield Common Kimberworth East Dene Blackburn ! Holmes Meadowhall, Interchange Flanderwell Brinsworth, Hellaby Bonet Lane/ Bramley Wincobank Brinsworth Lane Maltby ! Longley ! Brinsworth, Meadowhall, Whiston, Worrygoose Lane/Reresby Drive ! Ñ Whitehill Lane/ Meadowhall Drive/ Hooton Levitt Bawtry Road Meadowhall Way 208 Norwood ! Thurcroft, Morthen Road/Green Lane Meadowhall, Whiston, ! Meadowhall Way/ Worrygoose Lane/ Atterclie, Vulcan Road Greystones Road Thurcroft, Katherine Road/Green Arbour Road ! Pitsmoor Atterclie Road/ Brinsworth, Staniforth Road Comprehensive School Bus Park ! Thurcroft, Katherine Road/Peter Street Laughton Common, ! ! Station Road/Hangsman Lane ! Atterclie, AtterclieDarnall Road/Shortridge Street ! ! ! Treeton Dinnington, ! ! ! Ulley ! Doe Quarry Lane/ ! ! ! Dinnington Comp School ! Sheeld, Interchange Laughton Common, Station Road/ ! 208! Rotherham Road 208 ! Aughton ! Handsworth ! 208 !! Manor !! Dinnington, Interchange Richmond ! ! ! Aston database right 2019 Swallownest and Heeley Todwick ! Woodhouse yright p o c Intake North Anston own r C Hurlfield ! data © y Frecheville e Beighton v Sur e South Anston c ! Wales dnan ! r O ! ! ! ! Kiveton Park ! ! ! ! ! ! Sothall ontains C 2019 ! = Terminus point = Public transport = Shopping area = Bus route & stops = Rail line & station = Tram route & stop 24 hour clock 24 hour clock Throughout South Yorkshire our timetables use the 24 hour clock to avoid confusion between am and pm times.
    [Show full text]
  • There's Metal in Those Hills Sheffield Was Once the Iron, Steel and Cutlery
    There’s Metal in Those Hills Sheffield was once the iron, steel and cutlery capital of the world. The hills around Sheffield and Rotherham were full of raw materials like coal and iron ore that could be used in cutlery and blade production. Before we were Famous Sheffield and Rotherham became famous for manufacturing and production for four main reasons: crucible steel, stainless steel, electroplating and cutlery. Crucible Steel Benjamin Huntsman invented the crucible steel process. Before this process was invented, the quality of the steel was unreliable and slow to produce. Benjamin Huntsman’s invention allowed people to produce tougher, high-quality steel in larger quantities. Stainless Steel Harry Brearley began testing why rifles rusted and exploring ways to stop steel from rusting. He developed Stainless Steel which was much more rust resistant than the steel that had been used previously. Cutlery Sheffield and Rotherham have been connected to the production of cutlery since the 1600s. Sheffield was the main center of cutlery production in England outside of London. Sheffield became world famous for its production of high-quality cutlery. The moving story of Sheffield’s remarkable Women of Steel Yorkshire Post article 13th June 2020 The story of Kathleen, one of the last surviving Sheffield steelworkers from the war. When war broke out, the lives of the young women of Sheffield were turned upside down. With the men sent away to fight they had no choice but to step into their shoes and became the backbone of the city’s steel industry. Through hard graft and companionship in the gruelling, and often dangerous world of factory work, they vowed to keep the foundry fires burning.
    [Show full text]
  • Ownership and Belonging in Urban Green Space
    This is a repository copy of Ownership and belonging in urban green space. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/118299/ Version: Accepted Version Book Section: Abram, S. and Blandy, S. (2018) Ownership and belonging in urban green space. In: Xu, T. and Clarke, A.C., (eds.) Legal Strategies for the Development and Protection of Communal Property; Proceedings of the British Academy. Proceedings of the British Academy . Oxford University Press , Oxford , pp. 177-201. ISBN 9780197266380 Ownership and Belonging in Urban Green Space, Dr Simone Abram and Professor Sarah Blandy, Legal Strategies for the Development and Protection of Communal Property edited by Ting Xu and Alison Clarke, 2018, reproduced by permission of Oxford University Press https://global.oup.com/academic/product/legal-strategies-for-the-development-and-protecti on-of-communal-property-9780197266380?cc=gb&lang=en Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Ownership and belonging in urban green space Simone Abram and Sarah Blandy Abstract This chapter examines urban green spaces which are accessible to the public, from both anthropological and socio-legal perspectives.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic Development of Sheffield and the Growth of the Town Cl740-Cl820
    The Economic Development of Sheffield and the Growth of the Town cl740-cl820 Neville Flavell PhD The Division of Adult Continuing Education University of Sheffield February 1996 Volume Two PART TWO THE GROWTH OF THE TOWN <2 6 ?- ti.«» *• 3 ^ 268 CHAPTER 14 EXPANSION FROM 1736 IGOSLING) TO 1771 (FAIRBANKS THE TOWN IN 1736 Sheffield in Gosling's 1736 plan was small and relatively compact. Apart from a few dozen houses across the River Dun at Bridgehouses and in the Wicker, and a similar number at Parkhill, the whole of the built-up area was within a 600 yard radius centred on the Old Church.1 Within that brief radius the most northerly development was that at Bower Lane (Gibraltar), and only a limited incursion had been made hitherto into Colson Crofts (the fields between West Bar and the river). On the western and north-western edges there had been development along Hollis Croft and White Croft, and to a lesser degree along Pea Croft and Lambert Knoll (Scotland). To the south-west the building on the western side of Coalpit Lane was over the boundary in Ecclesall, but still a recognisable part of the town.2 To the south the gardens and any buildings were largely confined by the Park wall which kept Alsop Fields free of dwellings except for the ingress along the northern part of Pond Lane. The Rivers Dun and Sheaf formed a natural barrier on the east and north-east, and the low-lying Ponds area to the south-east was not ideal for house construction.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dearne and Dove Canal Which Went on the DEARNE Towards Hoyle Mill
    Stop lock that led to PART ONE the Dearne and Dove Canal which went on THE DEARNE towards Hoyle Mill. AND DOVE CANAL Hoyle Mill to Stairfoot Due to the increase in volumes of coal and iron workings 2 in the area the Don Navigation Company agreed to build JUNCTION LOCK HOUSE – a little further down from the house in the photograph a canal from Swinton to Barnsley. This became known as on the left. This was the junction of the Dearne and Dove Canal as it ran into the 1 Barnsley Canal. The location of the house along with the house in the photograph the Dearne and Dove Canal. In part one of a series of three on the left can be seen in the map below. LOOKING FROM the direction of the articles, Peter Hadfield looks at the development of the of coal and iron works in the Barnsley (Barnsley Canal), time William Jessop’s supervision, was Old Mill Basin towards Hoyle Mill. The canal and the route it took from the aqueduct carrying the Barnsley Canal goes to the left of the area. was of the essence for the Don engaged to do the survey. Acts of house and then over the aqueduct on its As the Aire and Calder Navigation Company to act Parliament for both canals were Barnsley canal to Stairfoot. way towards Cundy Cross. The Dearne Navigation was already in the quickly to progress with their granted in June 1793. and Dove Canal was beyond the stop survey stages of constructing £50,000 estimated proposal.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    INTRODUCTION Beauchief in Sheffield is a beautiful hillside at the foot of which, near the river Sheaf, and on the still wooded south-western fringes of the city, are the remains of the medieval abbey that housed, from the late twelfth century until the Henrician Reformation, Augustinian canons belonging to the Premonstratensian order. Augustinian canonries were generally modest places, although for reasons that have been persuasively advanced by the late Sir Richard Southern, this fact should never obscure the breadth of their significance in the wider history of medieval urban and rural localities: The Augustinian canons, indeed, as a whole, lacked every mark of greatness. They were neither very rich, nor very learned, nor very religious, nor very influential: but as a phenomenon they are very important. They filled a very big gap in the biological sequence of medieval religious houses. Like the ragwort which adheres so tenaciously to the stone walls of Oxford, or the sparrows of the English towns, they were not a handsome species. They needed the proximity of human habitation, and they throve on the contact which repelled more delicate organisms. They throve equally in the near-neighbourhood of a town or a castle. For the well-to-do townsfolk they could provide the amenity of burial-places, memorials and masses for the dead, and schools and confessors of superior standing for the living. For the lords of castles they could provide a staff for the chapel and clerks for the needs of administration. They were ubiquitously useful. They could live on comparatively little, yet expand into affluence without disgrace.
    [Show full text]
  • Electrical Review, July 20Th, 1945 HAMS HALL “ B” STATION
    Electrical Review, July 20th, 1945 HAMS HALL “ B” STATION Vol. CXXXVII. No. 3530 JULY 20, 1945 9d. WEEKLY FM80a ii E l e c t r ic a l R e v ie w July 20, 1945 REDUCED PRICES -------------- for --------------- SÎEMÈRS ELECTRIC LAMPS BRITISH MADE Millions of Siemens Lamps for war lit the way to Victory—and to these new low prices for the Public. M ILLIONS and millions of Siemens Lamps were supplied to the Services and to vital industries. Siemens carried manufacturing skill and efficiency to such a point that, to-day, a genuine Siemens household lamp can be offered to the public for no more than one shilling and three pence. N E W LIST PRICES exclusive of Purchase Tax SINGLECOIL “ COILED-COIL ” CLEAR OR PEARL PEARL W A T T S 2SV 50V 100/130V 200/260V WATTS 200/260V 15 1/9 1/9 1/3 1/3 __ __ 25 1/9 1/9 1/3 1/3 -- — 40 V- V- I/ 3 1/3 40 1/6 60 2/6 2 6 1/3 1/3 60 * 1/6 75 — — 1/7 1/7 7 5 * 1/8 ; 100 — 4/- 1/9 1/9 100* 1 1 0 150 —— 2/9 2/9 — — Particulars of other price reductions on application * W ill be supplied as soon as available SIEMENS ELECTRIC LAMPS AND SUPPLIES LTD., 38/9 UPPER THAMES ST., LONDON, E.C.4 July 20, 1945 E l e c t r ic a l R ev ie w Bull Industrial Motors By courtesy of Messrs.
    [Show full text]