DOCSLIB.ORG

Tibshelf to Shuttlewood

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

High Speed Two Phase 2b ww.hs2.org.uk October 2018 Working Draft Environmental Statement High Speed Rail (Crewe to Manchester and West Midlands to Leeds) Working Draft Environmental Statement Volume 2: Community Area report | Volume 2 | LA10 LA10: Tibshelf to Shuttlewood High Speed Two (HS2) Limited Two Snowhill, Snow Hill Queensway, Birmingham B4 6GA Freephone: 08081 434 434 Minicom: 08081 456 472 Email: [email protected] H21 hs2.org.uk October 2018 High Speed Rail (Crewe to Manchester and West Midlands to Leeds) Working Draft Environmental Statement Volume 2: Community Area report LA10: Tibshelf to Shuttlewood H21 hs2.org.uk High Speed Two (HS2) Limited has been tasked by the Department for Transport (DfT) with managing the delivery of a new national high speed rail network. It is a non-departmental public body wholly owned by the DfT. High Speed Two (HS2) Limited, Two Snowhill Snow Hill Queensway Birmingham B4 6GA Telephone: 08081 434 434 General email enquiries: [email protected] Website: www.hs2.org.uk A report prepared for High Speed Two (HS2) Limited: High Speed Two (HS2) Limited has actively considered the needs of blind and partially sighted people in accessing this document. The text will be made available in full on the HS2 website. The text may be freely downloaded and translated by individuals or organisations for conversion into other accessible formats. If you have other needs in this regard please contact High Speed Two (HS2) Limited. © High Speed Two (HS2) Limited, 2018, except where otherwise stated. Copyright in the typographical arrangement rests with High Speed Two (HS2) Limited. This information is licensed under the Open Government Licence v2.0. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/ open-government-licence/version/2 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or e-mail: [email protected]. Where we have identifi ed any third- party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. Printed in Great Britain on paper containing at least 75% recycled fi bre. High Speed Rail (Crewe to Manchester and West Midlands to Leeds) Working Draft Environmental Statement Volume 2: LA10 Contents Preface v Structure of the HS2 Phase 2b working draft Environmental Statement vi 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Introduction to HS2 1 1.2 Purpose of this report 3 1.3 Structure of this report 3 2 Overview of the area and description of the Proposed Scheme 6 2.1 Overview of the area 6 2.2 Description of the Proposed Scheme 12 2.3 Construction of the Proposed Scheme 26 2.4 Operation of the Proposed Scheme 55 2.5 Route section alternatives 56 3 Stakeholder engagement and consultation 60 3.1 Introduction 60 3.2 Key stages of Phase 2b engagement and consultation 60 3.3 Informing the Proposed Scheme 61 3.4 Engagement and consultation with stakeholder groups 62 4 Agriculture, forestry and soils 67 4.1 Introduction 67 4.2 Scope, assumptions and limitations 67 4.3 Environmental baseline 68 4.4 Effects arising during construction 75 4.5 Effects arising from operation 84 5 Air quality 86 5.1 Introduction 86 5.2 Scope, assumptions and limitations 86 5.3 Environmental baseline 87 5.4 Effects arising during construction 88 i High Speed Rail (Crewe to Manchester and West Midlands to Leeds) Working Draft Environmental Statement Volume 2: LA10 5.5 Effects arising from operation 90 6 Community 92 6.1 Introduction 92 6.2 Scope, assumptions and limitations 92 6.3 Environmental baseline 93 6.4 Effects arising during construction 96 6.5 Effects arising from operation 100 7 Ecology and biodiversity 102 7.1 Introduction 102 7.2 Scope, assumptions and limitations 102 7.3 Environmental baseline 102 7.4 Effects arising during construction 110 7.5 Effects arising during operation 119 8 Health 121 8.1 Introduction 121 8.2 Scope, assumptions and limitations 121 8.3 Environmental baseline 123 8.4 Effects arising during construction 125 8.5 Effects arising from operation 130 9 Historic environment 132 9.1 Introduction 132 9.2 Scope, assumptions and limitations 132 9.3 Environmental baseline 134 9.4 Effects arising during construction 141 9.5 Effects arising from operation 148 10 Land quality 150 10.1 Introduction 150 10.2 Scope, assumptions and limitations 150 10.3 Environmental baseline 151 10.4 Effects arising during construction 164 10.5 Effects arising from operation 172 11 Landscape and visual 174 11.1 Introduction 174 11.2 Scope, assumptions and limitations 174 11.3 Environmental baseline 176 11.4 Temporary effects arising during construction 186 11.5 Permanent effects arising from operation 195 12 Socio-economics 207 12.1 Introduction 207 12.2 Scope, assumptions and limitations 207 ii High Speed Rail (Crewe to Manchester and West Midlands to Leeds) Working Draft Environmental Statement Volume 2: LA10 12.3 Environmental baseline 207 12.4 Effects arising during construction 210 12.5 Effects arising from operation 214 13 Sound, noise and vibration 216 13.1 Introduction 216 13.2 Scope, assumptions and limitations 217 13.3 Environmental baseline 217 13.4 Effects arising during construction 218 13.5 Effects arising from operation 221 14 Traffic and transport 226 14.1 Introduction 226 14.2 Scope, assumptions and limitations 226 14.3 Environmental baseline 227 14.4 Effects arising during construction 229 14.5 Effects arising from operation 235 15 Water resources and flood risk 240 15.1 Introduction 240 15.2 Scope, assumptions and limitations 240 15.3 Environmental baseline 241 15.4 Effects arising during construction 252 15.5 Effects arising from operation 260 16 References 262 List of figures Figure 1: Structure of the working draft Environmental Statement ix Figure 2: The HS2 Phase 2b route and community areas 2 Figure 3: Community area context map 7 Figure 4: Location of construction compounds in the Tibshelf to Shuttlewood area 31 Figure 5: Construction compounds for civil engineering works 34 Figure 6: Construction compounds for railway systems installation works 35 Figure 7: Indicative construction programme between 2024 and 2033 50 Figure 8: Business sector composition in BDC and NEDDC areas and the East Midlands region 208 Figure 9: Employment by industrial sector in the BDC and NEDDC areas and the East Midlands region 209 List of tables Table 1: Demolitions required as a result of the works to be managed from the Heath South cutting main compound 36 Table 2: Demolitions required as a result of the works to be managed from the Tibshelf cutting satellite compound 37 iii High Speed Rail (Crewe to Manchester and West Midlands to Leeds) Working Draft Environmental Statement Volume 2: LA10 Table 3: Demolitions required as a result of the works to be managed from the Hardstoft South cutting satellite compound 39 Table 4: Demolitions required as a result of the works to be managed from the Stainsby viaduct satellite compound 42 Table 5: Demolitions required as a result of the works to be managed from the M1 Motorway South viaduct satellite compound 43 Table 6: Demolitions required as a result of the works to be managed from the Bolsover South embankment satellite compound 44 Table 7: Demolitions required as a result of the works to be managed from the Carr Vale embankment satellite compound 45 Table 8: Demolitions required as a result of the works to be managed from the Shuttlewood viaduct satellite compound 46 Table 9: Demolitions required as a result of the works to be managed from the M1 Motorway North satellite compound 47 Table 10: Consideration of local alternatives for the route of the Proposed Scheme through Heath 57 Table 11: Mechanisms and timeline of stakeholder engagement since route announcement 60 Table 12: Engagement to date with community stakeholders 63 Table 13: Engagement to date with local authorities and parish councils 63 Table 14: Summary of characteristics of holdings 74 Table 15: Summary of temporary effects 79 Table 16: Summary of permanent effects on holdings from construction 82 Table 17: Species potentially relevant to the assessment within the Tibshelf to Shuttlewood area 108 Table 18: Residual significant effects on ecological resources/features during construction 118 Table 19: Residual significant effects on ecological resources/features during operation 120 Table 20: Summary of the geology underlying the land quality study area 152 Table 21: Current and historical landfill sites located in the study area 158 Table 22: Current and historical mining, mineral sites and colliery spoil sites located in the study area 159 Table 23: Current and historical industrial sites located in the study area 160 Table 24: Summary of sensitive receptors 163 Table 25: Summary of baseline CSM for sites which may pose a contaminative risk for the Proposed Scheme 166 Table 26: Summary of construction CSM effects 168 Table 27: Summary of effects for mining and mineral resources 171 Table 28: Summary of significantly affected LCAs 178 Table 29: Summary description and assessment of effects on LCAs 187 Table 30: Construction phase potentially significant effects 190 Table 31: Operational phase significant landscape effects 196 Table 32: Operation phase significant visual effects 199 Table 33: Resources which would potentially experience significant direct effects 212 Table 34: Significance of effects on resources 213 Table 35: Surface water body receptors 242 Table 36: Summary of geology and hydrogeology in the study area 245 Table 37: River flood risk sources and receptors 249 Table 38: Surface water flood risk sources and receptors 251 iv High Speed Rail (Crewe to Manchester and West Midlands to Leeds) Working Draft Environmental Statement Volume 2: LA10 Preface The working draft Environmental Statement This report forms part of Volume 2 of the working draft Environmental Statement (ES) for Phase 2b of High Speed Two (HS2).
Recommended publications
  • Michelle Smith Eversheds LLP Bridgewater

    Michelle Smith Eversheds LLP Bridgewater

    Michelle Smith Our Ref: APP/R1010/A/14/2212093 Eversheds LLP Bridgewater Place Water Lane LEEDS LS11 5DR 12 March 2015 Dear Madam TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 (SECTION 78) APPEAL BY ROSELAND COMMUNITY WINDFARM LLP: LAND EAST OF ROTHERHAM ROAD, BOLSOVER, DERBYSHIRE APPLICATION REF: 12/00159/FULEA 1. I am directed by the Secretary of State to say that consideration has been given to the report of the Inspector, Paul K Jackson BArch (Hons) RIBA, who held a public local inquiry which opened on 4 November 2014 into your client’s appeal against the decision of Bolsover District Council (the Council) to refuse planning permission for a windfarm comprising 6 wind turbines, control building, anemometer mast and associated access tracks on a site approximately 2.5km south of Bolsover between the villages of Palterton and Shirebrook, in accordance with application reference 12/00159/FULEA, dated 25 April 2012. 2. On 20 June 2014 the appeal was recovered for the Secretary of State's determination, in pursuance of section 79 of and paragraph 3 of Schedule 6 to the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, because it involves a renewable energy development. Inspector’s recommendation and summary of the decision 3. The Inspector recommended that the appeal be dismissed and planning permission refused. For the reasons given below, the Secretary of State agrees with the Inspector’s conclusions except where indicated otherwise, and agrees with his recommendation. A copy of the Inspector’s report (IR) is enclosed. All references to paragraph numbers, unless otherwise stated, are to that report.
  • Legacy Subsurface Data Onshore UK 1

    Legacy Subsurface Data Onshore UK 1

    PREPRINT: Legacy subsurface data onshore UK 1 “Paucity of legacy oil and gas subsurface data onshore United Kingdom: implications for the 2 expansion of low carbon subsurface activities and technologies” 3 4 Mark T Ireland1*, Rachel Brown1, Miles P. Wilson2, Paul B. Stratesky3, and Richard Davies1 5 1Newcastle University, School of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Drummond Building, 6 Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 7RU. 7 2Durham University, Department of Earth Sciences, Science Site, Durham, DH1 3LE 8 3Department of Social Sciences & Languages, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK 9 *[email protected] 10 11 This manuscript has been submitted for publication in JOURNAL OF THE GEOLOGICAL 12 SOCIETY. The manuscript has not yet undergone peer review. Subsequent versions of this 13 manuscript may have different content if accepted and the final version will be available via the 14 “peer-reviewed Publication DOI” link. 15 Please feel free to contact the corresponding author directly to provide any constructive feedback. 16 1 PREPRINT: Legacy subsurface data onshore UK 17 Title: Paucity of legacy oil and gas subsurface data onshore United Kingdom: implications for the 18 expansion of low carbon subsurface activities and technologies 19 20 Mark T Ireland1*, Rachel Brown1, Miles P. Wilson2, Paul B. Stratesky3, and Richard Davies1 21 1Newcastle University, School of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Drummond Building, 22 Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 7RU. 23 2Durham University, Department of Earth Sciences, Science Site, Durham, DH1 3LE 24 3Department of Social Sciences & Languages, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK 25 *[email protected] 26 MTI - https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9777-0447 27 28 Running title: Legacy subsurface data onshore UK 29 30 Abstract 31 The decarbonisation of energy systems to achieve net zero carbon emissions will likely see the rapid 32 development of carbon capture and storage, energy storage in the subsurface and geothermal energy 33 projects.
  • Old Peverel Road

    Old Peverel Road

    PANEL 1 Old Peverel Road Few aspects of landscape history have had more Old Peverel Road, one of which survives in part as an nonsense written about them than roads and unmetalled track in the modern village of Duckmanton trackways. Generations of antiquaries have sought and the other is now part of Markham Lane. These lie to identify stretches of modern road or footpath as to the west of Bolsover and can hardly have been part prehistoric, Roman or medieval, or link references in of a route to South Wingfield. medieval deeds to routes on the ground. In fact there There is probably enough historical and is generally little evidence for the age of roads in use topographical evidence, as well as local tradition, to today, most of which (apart from those built from accept that there was a road (which may not have scratch since the 18th century) have probably been in followed the same route throughout its history) use since the area through which they pass was first connecting William Peverel’s castle at Bolsover with settled, long before they are mentioned in documents South Wingfield. It was presumably created after the or shown on maps. two manors were granted to Peverel, rather than before In some areas there are established traditions of the Norman Conquest. As a through route it would have roads built for particular purposes in the Middle Ages become redundant once Bolsover and South Wingfield which have since gone out of use. An example of this passed into different hands in the mid-12th century.
  • The Five Pits Trail

    The Five Pits Trail

    The Five Pits Trail Walkers, cyclists and horse riders can all enjoy the countryside of the Five Pits Trail. Follow the 5.5 mile off-road surfaced route from Grassmoor Country Park to Tibshelf Ponds or extend your route to 7.5 miles by exploring the route through Williamthorpe Ponds and Holmewood Woodlands. The trail mostly follows the route of the Great Central Railway. Since the large collieries and smaller pits along the railway closed, the landscape has changed dramatically. Parts of the land were opencast and Holmewood Sculpture Funded by the Young Roots Heritage Lottery Fund, students from most of the original railway line removed. Deincourt School worked with artists from Gotham-D to design this sculpture. Using metal, stone and wood, the sculpture shows leaves and keys (seeds) and takes its inspiration from both the Now you will find a rolling trail that has some long steep slopes. This may limit some people's access in places - look for natural and industrial heritage of the area. the 'steep slope' symbols on the map. There are no stiles or steps and you will find seats along the way to stop, rest and enjoy the views. Look out for the information boards with large site maps showing some of the heritage and wildlife along the trail. Mansfield Road Walking Routes Williamthorpe Walkers can explore the surrounding landscape on Public Rights of Way by following one of the Five Ponds Pits Trail Circular Walks. These walks are between 2.5 and 5.5 miles in length and each walk is waymarked This network of ponds, with a coloured disc.
  • Its Land, Fndustries & People

    Its Land, Fndustries & People

    DUCKIITANTON I.OOR Its Land, fndustries & people by G. Downs-Rose Dt CKtttAt{TON I.OOR, ITS LAI{D, INDUSTRIES AflD pEOpLE Copyrlght O G. Dorrns-Rose 1993 i |'r**J , ti h ,'*U c-,*,-f L'=--- ,, ?* -r Lo.*-,\ "^V-oxtAt- N". I of 1o DITCKIiANTON l,tOOR, ITS LAND, IIDUSTRIES AIID PEOPLE COTITEIITS l. Introductlon, page I 2. Early Hlstory, page 3 3. Ducknanton lioor ln t776, paEe 4 {. Farnlng Settlements on the l,ioor: 4.1. 1-g The Croft Settleuents, pp 6-20 4.2. l-7 The Farns, pp 21-36 5. Industrtal Settlenents on the ltioor: 5. 1 The Iron Uorks Coununtty, pp 37-+1 5.2 The Arkwright Tomr Conmunity,pp 4Z-S1 6. Ducknanton l{oor ln 1993, page 52 7. The Evldence From Fleld Names, page 54 8. liaps: Ducknanton Hoor ln 1776, page 2 Ducknanton ltloor ln 1837, page 10 Duckmanton lrbor ln 1919, page 3O 9. Plans: Duckaanton llorks Cottages, page 38 Arkwrtght Tonrn OId Vlllage, page 4{ 1O. Photograph: OId Arkrrlght Tour, Pre-lnprovement ff page 42 DUCKITANTON !|OOR,ITS LAND, ITIDUSTRIES AIID pEOpLE 1. INTRODTrcTION The locatlon name 'Ducknanton lrloor' ln North East Derbyshire occurred Ln records from the late slxteenth century and remalned ln use, e. g. by the Ordnance Survey, lnto the twentleth century long after lt had lost lts sl$nlf lcance. The nalre tms originatly used to denote that part of the lrlanor of Ducknanton wtrich remalned unenclosed lnto late uedlevar tlnes. For our purposes, lts boundaries (See lr{ap 1 oaEe 2) are those used in earller tlnes: the courses of brooks and civll boundarles.
  • Appendix E Heritage Visitor Numbers

    Appendix E Heritage Visitor Numbers

    HS2 Consultation Response Derbyshire County Council Appendix E Heritage Visitor Numbers 1.1 There are a number of highly significant heritage assets that form a tourism cluster in the north east of Derbyshire. Hardwick Hall, Bolsover, Bolsover Castle and Sutton Scarsdale Hall contribute to this cluster. The full potential of these assets as part of a tourism cluster has probably yet to be fully realised. 1.2 Details of the current and projected visitor numbers for Bolsover Castle and Hardwick Hall have been provided by English Heritage and the National Trust respectively. Bolsover Castle, English Heritage. 1.3 The key facts in relation to Bolsover Castle are as follows: 1.4 “Visitor numbers for the year 2012-13 were just under 68,000. This years projected figures for the period 2013-2014 are at over 75,000 and we are currently ahead of this target. In terms of income generated, this is forecast at around £630,000 in 2013-14 period. Separate to this, income generated from hospitality (including weddings) was worth around £80,000 in the last financial year.” 1.5 “English Heritage is currently undertaking significant investment into the site as part of a £1million project due for completion by Spring 2014. This includes: • repair works to the Little Castle - reinstatement of the French doors to the balconies and the addition of furnishings, as well as providing fancy dress items and props for young visitors; • repair works to the exterior of the Castle; • repair works to the high-level wall walk surrounding the Fountain Gardens which is to be re-instated and open for visitors for the first time in almost 400 years.” 1.6 “In addition, new exhibitions and interpretation is being developed” as well as “the addition of a children's play park in the grounds.” 1.7 “Through this significant investment, we hope to further increase visitor numbers to the property, thereby boosting the local tourism economy and providing a lasting contribution to the Castle's future.
  • Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012 Reg12

    Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012 Reg12

    Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012 Reg12 Statement of Consultation SUCCESSFUL PLACES: A GUIDE TO SUSTAINABLE LAYOUT AND DESIGN SUPPLEMENTARY PLANNING DOCUMENT Undertaken by Chesterfield Borough Council also on behalf and in conjunction with: July 2013 1 Contents 1. Introduction Background to the Project About Successful Places What is consultation statement? The Project Group 2. Initial Consultation on the Scope of the Draft SPD Who was consulted and how? Key issues raised and how they were addressed 3. Peer Review Workshop What did we do? Who was involved? What were the outcomes? 4. Internal Consultations What did we do and what were the outcomes? 5. Strategic Environmental Assessment and Habitats Regulation Assessment What is a Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Is a SEA required? What is a Habitats Regulation Assessment (HRA) Is a HRA required? Who was consulted? 6. Formal consultation on the draft SPD Who did we consult? How did we consult? What happened next? Appendices Appendix 1: Press Notice Appendix 2: List of Consultees Appendix 3: Table Detailed Comments and Responses Appendix 4: Questionnaire Appendix 5: Public Consultation Feedback Charts 2 1. Introduction Background to the Project The project was originally conceived in 2006 with the aim of developing new planning guidance on residential design that would support the local plan design policies of the participating Council’s. Bolsover District Council, Chesterfield Borough Council and North East Derbyshire District Council shared an Urban Design Officer in a joint role, to provide design expertise to each local authority and who was assigned to take the project forward.
  • July 2017 at the Glapwell Centre

    July 2017 at the Glapwell Centre

    GLAPWELL PARISH COUNCIL Minutes of meeting of Glapwell Parish Council held on Thursday 27 July 2017 At the Glapwell Centre Present: David Clough Tricia Clough Clive Fleetwood Jackie Hole John Jepson Tony Trafford (Chair) Also in attendance – Sue O’Donnell (Parish Clerk), Keith Woollen 77/17 Apologies for Absence – Rachel Hibbert, Councillor Ann Syrett, Councillor Clive Moesby 78/17 Declarations of Interest – None 79/17 Public Forum Complaint - An email had been received outlining incidents of anti -social behaviour at the playground on Saturday 22nd July. It was agreed that the CAN Rangers be contacted to see if they could patrol the area. 80/17 Minutes th Council Meeting held on 25 May 2017 The minutes were agreed as a correct record of the meetings and signed by the chair of the meeting. 81/17 Matters Arising 71/17 – Noticeboard The noticeboard was due to be replaced by the supplier. 45/17 – Co-option of New Member – The clerk reported that the vacancy had been advertised and electors given an opportunity to call for an election. There had been no response and the Council were now in a position to pursue the Co-option proposed in April. Keith Woollen was duly welcomed to the Council as a co-opted member until May 2019. 82/17 Reports Police-There was no report available. Derbyshire County Council – Councillor Moesby had arranged for speed monitors to be installed on The Hill. A report from this exercise will be available in September. Bolsover District Council- Councillor Syrett had provided the following report. Carnival – She sent her congratulations on the success of the recent carnival.
  • Land at Blacksmith's Arms

    Land at Blacksmith's Arms

    Land off North Road, Glossop Education Impact Assessment Report v1-4 (Initial Research Feedback) for Gladman Developments 12th June 2013 Report by Oliver Nicholson EPDS Consultants Conifers House Blounts Court Road Peppard Common Henley-on-Thames RG9 5HB 0118 978 0091 www.epds-consultants.co.uk 1. Introduction 1.1.1. EPDS Consultants has been asked to consider the proposed development for its likely impact on schools in the local area. 1.2. Report Purpose & Scope 1.2.1. The purpose of this report is to act as a principle point of reference for future discussions with the relevant local authority to assist in the negotiation of potential education-specific Section 106 agreements pertaining to this site. This initial report includes an analysis of the development with regards to its likely impact on local primary and secondary school places. 1.3. Intended Audience 1.3.1. The intended audience is the client, Gladman Developments, and may be shared with other interested parties, such as the local authority(ies) and schools in the area local to the proposed development. 1.4. Research Sources 1.4.1. The contents of this initial report are based on publicly available information, including relevant data from central government and the local authority. 1.5. Further Research & Analysis 1.5.1. Further research may be conducted after this initial report, if required by the client, to include a deeper analysis of the local position regarding education provision. This activity may include negotiation with the relevant local authority and the possible submission of Freedom of Information requests if required.
  • Inkersall Road Solar Farm

    Inkersall Road Solar Farm

    PROPOSED INKERSALL ROAD SOLAR FARM NEAR STAVELEY, DERBYSHIRE LANDSCAPE VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR LOW CARBON JUNE 2020 PROPOSED INKERSALL ROAD SOLAR FARM LANDSCAPE VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Planning Policy Context 3.0 Assessment Methodology and Criteria 4.0 Site Description and Proposals 5.0 Landscape Baseline 6.0 Landscape Effect 7.0 Visual Assessment 8.0 Mitigation Measures and Residual Degree of Effect 9.0 Cumulative Assessment 10.0 Conclusion References Figure 01: Survey Site Location Figure 02: Heritage Assets Figure 03: Zone of Theoretical Visibility (ZTV) Figure 04a: Potential Visual Receptors PROW Figure 04b: Potential Visual Receptors RRE Figure 05: Viewpoints Figure 06: Landscape and Biodiversity Scheme Figure 07: Cumulative Zone of Theoretical Visibility Appendix A: Landscape Setting of Listed Building – Inkersall Farm Appendix B: Selected Panoramas Report Ref D34.19 No: Hilary R Ludlow Author: MSc CMLI, CEnv Scientific Steven Weber check: BSc MCIEEM Presentation Zoe Lewis check: BA (Hons) Date: June 2020 LANDSCAPE SCIENCE CONSULTANCY LTD 2 | Page L:\LSC\D34.19 Staveley (Inkersall) LVIA\D34.19a Inkersall LVIA update\Reports & Drafts\Inkersall Road Solar Farm - LVIA - FINAL.doc PROPOSED INKERSALL ROAD SOLAR FARM LANDSCAPE VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Landscape Science Consultancy Ltd (LSC) was commissioned to conduct a Landscape Visual Impact Assessment at Inkersall near Staveley, Derbyshire in relation to proposals for a solar farm, hereafter referred to as the ‘Proposed Development’ within the ‘Survey Site’. The assessment defines the existing landscape and visual baseline and assesses the sensitivity to change and considers the effect of the Proposed Development on the landscape and its visual resources over a wider area centred on the Survey Site which is defined by the anticipated visual envelope – hereafter referred to as the ‘Study Area’.
  • Local Area Maps

    Local Area Maps

    Mansfield Station i Onward Travel Information Buses and Taxis Local area map Mansfield is aPlusBus area Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right 2020 & also map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, CC BY-SA Rail replacement buses and coaches depart from the 'Sports Direct' lay- PlusBus is a discount price ‘bus pass’ that you buy with your train ticket. It gives you unlimited bus travel around your by at the back of the station. chosen town, on participating buses. Visit www.plusbus.info Main destinations by bus (Data correct at July 2020) DESTINATION BUS ROUTES BUS STOP DESTINATION BUS ROUTES BUS STOP DESTINATION BUS ROUTES BUS STOP 1 Bus Stn Bay H 3A, 3B, 3C Bus Stn Bay I 23, 23B, pronto Bus Stn Bay L Alfreton Hucknall ^ { Pleasley 9.1, 9.3 Bus Stn Bay J 141 Bus Stn Bay B 53, 53A Bus Stn Bay O 3A, 3B, 3C Bus Stn Bay I { Huthwaite 1 Bus Stn Bay H 27, 27X, 28, 28B Bus Stn Bay K Annesley { Rainworth black cat* Bus Stn Bay B 1 Bus Stn Bay H 141 Bus Stn Bay B 218 Bus Stn Bay O 3A, 3B, 3C Bus Stn Bay I 14, 15, 15A Bus Stn Bay G { Kings Mill Hospital { Bellamy Road Estate 27, 27X, 28, 28B Bus Stn Bay K 9.1, 9.3, 141 Bus Stn Bay J { Ravensdale 16, 16A Bus Stn Bay F 141 Bus Stn Bay B black cat* Bus Stn Bay B 210 Bus Stn Bay O 218 Bus Stn Bay B 3A, 3B Bus Stn Bay I 141 Bus Stn Bay K { Ravenshead { Berry Hill 219 Bus Stn Bay O Kirkby-in-Ashfield ^ .9.3 Bus Stn Bay J pronto Bus Stn Bay D pronto Bus Stn Bay D black cat* Bus Stn Bay B Sherwood Business Park black cat* Bus Stn Bay B { Berry Hill (Lindhurst Way) Berry Hill Flyer
  • Michelle Smith Eversheds LLP Bridgewater Place Water Lane

    Michelle Smith Eversheds LLP Bridgewater Place Water Lane

    Michelle Smith Our Ref: APP/R1010/A/14/2212093 Eversheds LLP Bridgewater Place Water Lane LEEDS LS11 5DR 12 March 2015 Dear Madam TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 (SECTION 78) APPEAL BY ROSELAND COMMUNITY WINDFARM LLP: LAND EAST OF ROTHERHAM ROAD, BOLSOVER, DERBYSHIRE APPLICATION REF: 12/00159/FULEA 1. I am directed by the Secretary of State to say that consideration has been given to the report of the Inspector, Paul K Jackson BArch (Hons) RIBA, who held a public local inquiry which opened on 4 November 2014 into your client’s appeal against the decision of Bolsover District Council (the Council) to refuse planning permission for a windfarm comprising 6 wind turbines, control building, anemometer mast and associated access tracks on a site approximately 2.5km south of Bolsover between the villages of Palterton and Shirebrook, in accordance with application reference 12/00159/FULEA, dated 25 April 2012. 2. On 20 June 2014 the appeal was recovered for the Secretary of State's determination, in pursuance of section 79 of and paragraph 3 of Schedule 6 to the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, because it involves a renewable energy development. Inspector’s recommendation and summary of the decision 3. The Inspector recommended that the appeal be dismissed and planning permission refused. For the reasons given below, the Secretary of State agrees with the Inspector’s conclusions except where indicated otherwise, and agrees with his recommendation. A copy of the Inspector’s report (IR) is enclosed. All references to paragraph numbers, unless otherwise stated, are to that report.