DOCSLIB.ORG

I-5 Rose Quarter Improvement Project, Transit Technical Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
I-5 Rose Quarter Improvement Project, Transit Technical Report FINAL Transit Technical Report I-5 Rose Quarter Improvement Project Oregon Department of Transportation January 8, 2019 Transit Technical Report Oregon Department of Transportation Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations ........................................................................................................................ iv Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................ ES-1 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project Location ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Project Purpose ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Project Need .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.4 Project Goals and Objectives .................................................................................................... 5 2 Project Alternatives ............................................................................................................................. 6 2.1 No-Build Alternative ................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Build Alternative ........................................................................................................................ 8 2.2.1 I-5 Mainline Improvements ........................................................................................... 9 2.2.2 Highway Covers ......................................................................................................... 13 2.2.3 Broadway/Weidler Interchange Improvements .......................................................... 14 2.2.4 Related Local System Multimodal Improvements ...................................................... 16 3 Regulatory Framework ...................................................................................................................... 19 3.1 Federal Plans and Policies ...................................................................................................... 19 3.1.1 ADA Guide ................................................................................................................. 19 3.1.2 Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Bicycle and Pedestrian Guides ................ 19 3.1.3 Federal Transit Administration Regulations ............................................................... 19 3.2 State Laws, Plans, and Policies .............................................................................................. 20 3.2.1 Oregon Transportation Plan ....................................................................................... 20 3.2.2 Oregon Public Transportation Plan ............................................................................ 20 3.2.3 Oregon Highway Plan ................................................................................................ 20 3.2.4 ODOT Highway Design Manual ................................................................................. 21 3.2.5 Division 51: Access Management Rules .................................................................... 21 3.3 Regional and Local Plans........................................................................................................ 21 3.3.1 TriMet Plans ............................................................................................................... 21 3.3.2 Metro Regional Transportation Plan .......................................................................... 22 3.3.3 City of Portland Transportation System Plan and Modal Plans ................................. 22 3.3.4 Go Lloyd ..................................................................................................................... 22 3.4 Other Relevant Guidance ........................................................................................................ 23 3.4.1 American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) .................................................................................................................. 23 3.4.2 National Association of City Transportation Officials Urban Street Design Guide .......................................................................................................................... 23 4 Methodology and Data Sources ........................................................................................................ 25 4.1 Project Area and Area of Potential Impact .............................................................................. 25 4.2 Resource Identification and Data Sources .............................................................................. 25 4.3 Assessment of Impacts ........................................................................................................... 25 4.3.1 Existing Conditions Assessment ................................................................................ 25 4.3.2 Future Year (2045) No-Build and Build Assessments ............................................... 27 4.4 Cumulative Impacts ................................................................................................................. 27 5 Affected Environment ........................................................................................................................ 28 5.1 Transit Generators .................................................................................................................. 28 January 8, 2019 | i Transit Technical Report Oregon Department of Transportation 5.2 Transit Routes ......................................................................................................................... 28 5.2.1 4-Division/Fessenden ................................................................................................. 28 5.2.2 6-Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard ............................................................................ 28 5.2.3 8-Jackson Park/NE 15th Avenue ............................................................................... 29 5.2.4 17-Holgate/Broadway ................................................................................................. 29 5.2.5 35-Macadam/Greeley ................................................................................................. 29 5.2.6 44-Capitol Highway/Mocks Crest ............................................................................... 29 5.2.7 77-Broadway/Halsey .................................................................................................. 29 5.2.8 85-Swan Island ........................................................................................................... 29 5.2.9 MAX Blue Line ............................................................................................................ 30 5.2.10 MAX Green Line ......................................................................................................... 30 5.2.11 MAX Red Line ............................................................................................................ 30 5.2.12 Portland Streetcar “A” and “B” Loops ......................................................................... 30 5.3 Existing Transit Infrastructure ................................................................................................. 30 5.4 Transit Stops and Rider Activity .............................................................................................. 30 5.6 Transit Planning Designations ................................................................................................ 35 6 Environmental Consequences .......................................................................................................... 36 6.1 No-Build Alternative ................................................................................................................. 36 6.1.1 Direct Impacts ............................................................................................................ 36 6.1.2 Indirect Impacts .......................................................................................................... 36 6.2 Build Alternative ...................................................................................................................... 37 6.2.1 Short-Term (Construction Impacts) ............................................................................ 37 6.2.2 Long-Term and Operational Direct Impacts ............................................................... 40 6.2.3 Long-Term and Operational Indirect Impacts ............................................................ 42 6.3 Cumulative Effects .................................................................................................................. 42 6.3.1 Spatial and Temporal Boundaries .............................................................................. 43 6.3.2 Past, Present, and Reasonably Foreseeable Future Actions .................................... 43 6.3.3 Results of Cumulative Impact Analysis ...................................................................... 46 6.4 Conclusions ............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Union Station Conceptual Engineering Study
    Portland Union Station Multimodal Conceptual Engineering Study Submitted to Portland Bureau of Transportation by IBI Group with LTK Engineering June 2009 This study is partially funded by the US Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration. IBI GROUP PORtlAND UNION STATION MultIMODAL CONceptuAL ENGINeeRING StuDY IBI Group is a multi-disciplinary consulting organization offering services in four areas of practice: Urban Land, Facilities, Transportation and Systems. We provide services from offices located strategically across the United States, Canada, Europe, the Middle East and Asia. JUNE 2009 www.ibigroup.com ii Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................... ES-1 Chapter 1: Introduction .....................................................................................1 Introduction 1 Study Purpose 2 Previous Planning Efforts 2 Study Participants 2 Study Methodology 4 Chapter 2: Existing Conditions .........................................................................6 History and Character 6 Uses and Layout 7 Physical Conditions 9 Neighborhood 10 Transportation Conditions 14 Street Classification 24 Chapter 3: Future Transportation Conditions .................................................25 Introduction 25 Intercity Rail Requirements 26 Freight Railroad Requirements 28 Future Track Utilization at Portland Union Station 29 Terminal Capacity Requirements 31 Penetration of Local Transit into Union Station 37 Transit on Union Station Tracks
    [Show full text]
  • NS Streetcar Line Portland, Oregon
    Portland State University PDXScholar Urban Studies and Planning Faculty Nohad A. Toulan School of Urban Studies and Publications and Presentations Planning 6-24-2014 Do TODs Make a Difference? NS Streetcar Line Portland, Oregon Jenny H. Liu Portland State University, [email protected] Zakari Mumuni Portland State University Matt Berggren Portland State University Matt Miller University of Utah Arthur C. Nelson University of Utah SeeFollow next this page and for additional additional works authors at: https:/ /pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/usp_fac Part of the Transportation Commons, Urban Studies Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details Liu, Jenny H.; Mumuni, Zakari; Berggren, Matt; Miller, Matt; Nelson, Arthur C.; and Ewing, Reid, "Do TODs Make a Difference? NS Streetcar Line Portland, Oregon" (2014). Urban Studies and Planning Faculty Publications and Presentations. 124. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/usp_fac/124 This Report is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Urban Studies and Planning Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Authors Jenny H. Liu, Zakari Mumuni, Matt Berggren, Matt Miller, Arthur C. Nelson, and Reid Ewing This report is available at PDXScholar: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/usp_fac/124 NS Streetcar Line Portland, Oregon Do TODs Make a Difference? Jenny H. Liu, Zakari Mumuni, Matt Berggren, Matt Miller, Arthur C. Nelson & Reid Ewing Portland State University 6/24/2014 ______________________________________________________________________________ DO TODs MAKE A DIFFERENCE? 1 of 35 Section 1-INTRODUCTION 2 of 35 ______________________________________________________________________________ Table of Contents 1-INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Columbia River I-5 Bridge Planning Inventory Report
    Report to the Washington State Legislature Columbia River I-5 Bridge Planning Inventory December 2017 Columbia River I-5 Bridge Planning Inventory Errata The Columbia River I-5 Bridge Planning Inventory published to WSDOT’s website on December 1, 2017 contained the following errata. The items below have been corrected in versions downloaded or printed after January 10, 2018. Section 4, page 62: Corrects the parties to the tolling agreement between the States—the Washington State Transportation Commission and the Oregon Transportation Commission. Miscellaneous sections and pages: Minor grammatical corrections. Columbia River I-5 Bridge Planning Inventory | December 2017 Table of Contents Executive Summary. .1 Section 1: Introduction. .29 Legislative Background to this Report Purpose and Structure of this Report Significant Characteristics of the Project Area Prior Work Summary Section 2: Long-Range Planning . .35 Introduction Bi-State Transportation Committee Portland/Vancouver I-5 Transportation and Trade Partnership Task Force The Transition from Long-Range Planning to Project Development Section 3: Context and Constraints . 41 Introduction Guiding Principles: Vision and Values Statement & Statement of Purpose and Need Built and Natural Environment Navigation and Aviation Protected Species and Resources Traffic Conditions and Travel Demand Safety of Bridge and Highway Facilities Freight Mobility Mobility for Transit, Pedestrian and Bicycle Travel Section 4: Funding and Finance. 55 Introduction Funding and Finance Plan Evolution During
    [Show full text]
  • Public Transit a History of Public Transit in Portland
    Hilary Pfeifer Meredith Dittmar PUBLIC TRANSIT A history of public transit in Portland Melody Owen Mark Richardson Smith Kristin Mitsu Shiga Chandra Bocci trimet.org/history Traveling through time Dear Reader, Transit plays a critical role in providing options for traveling throughout the region. It connects people to work, school, recreational destinations and essential services. It’s not just a commuter service. It’s a community asset. And the benefits extend far beyond those who ride. TriMet’s transit system is recognized as a national leader for its connection to land use. By linking land-use planning and transit, we have helped create livable communities, vibrant neighborhoods and provide alternatives to driving. Transit is also a catalyst for economic development. More than $10 billion in transit-oriented development has occurred within walking distance of MAX light rail stations since the decision to build in 1980. Developers like the permanence of rail when investing in projects. Transit is also valued by the community. Most of our riders— 81 percent—are choice riders. They have a car available or choose not to own one so they can ride TriMet. With more than 325,000 trips taken each weekday on our buses, MAX Light Rail and WES Commuter Rail, we eliminate 66 million annual car trips. That eases traffic congestion and helps keep our air clean. TriMet carries more people than any other U.S. transit system our size. Our many innovations have drawn the attention of government leaders, planners, transit providers and transit users from around the world. We didn’t start out that way.
    [Show full text]
  • INFRASTRUCTURE CASE STUDY: Portland Airport MAX Red Line
    INFRASTRUCTURE CASE STUDY: Portland Airport MAX Red Line SUMMARY PROJECT TYPE YEAR DEAL STRUCTURE Light rail transit 2001 Design-build (plus transfer of development rights to public land) TOTAL COST $125.8 million construction cost FINANCING Private equity and TIF (Tax Increment Financing) FUNDING Airport passenger facility charge and TriMet general funds PUBLIC BENEFIT Connects downtown to the airport and encourages economic development of the Cascade Station area Background The Portland Airport MAX Red Line, located in Portland, Oregon, is a light rail line that connects downtown Portland to the Portland International Airport.1 It was financed and constructed through a private-public partnership (P3) agreement, and is operated by TriMet, Portland’s regional transit agency.2 It opened to the public in September 2001, and now provides more than 8 million trips per year, with 3,200 people getting on or off at the Portland Airport stop each weekday.3 Project Description The private-public partnership agreement for the Airport MAX Red Line came about through an unsolicited proposal from the private construction and engineering company Bechtel.4 Their proposal was $28.2 million in funding in return for sole rights to the $125 million design-build contract, and development rights for 85 years to 120 acres of land near the airport.5 This land would come to be known as Cascade Station. The original owner of the land was the Port of Portland, and the 120 acres were part of 458 acres earmarked for development as a mixed-use business park called the Portland International Center.6 TriMet’s unsolicited proposal policy allowed Bechtel to initiate the project.
    [Show full text]
  • Service Alerts – Digital Displays
    Service Alerts – Digital Displays TriMet has digital displays at most MAX Light Rail stations to provide real-time arrival information as well as service disruption/delay messaging. Some of the displays are flat screens as shown to the right. Others are reader boards. Due to space, the messages need to be as condensed as possible. While we regularly post the same alert at stations along a line, during the Rose Quarter MAX Improvements we provided more specific alerts by geographical locations and even individual stations. This was because the service plan, while best for the majority of riders, was complex and posed communications challenges. MAX Blue Line only displays MAX Blue Line disrupted and frequency reduced. Shuttle buses running between Interstate/Rose Quarter and Lloyd Center stations. trimet.org/rq MAX Blue and Red Line displays page 1 – Beaverton Transit Center to Old Town MAX Blue/Red lines disrupted and frequency reduced. Red Line detoured. Shuttle buses running between Interstate/RQ and Lloyd Center. trimet.org/rq MAX Blue and Red Line displays page 2 – Beaverton Transit Center to Old Town Direct shuttle buses running between Kenton/N Denver Station, being served by Red Line, and PDX. trimet.org/rq MAC Red and Yellow displays – N Albina to Expo Center Red, Yellow lines serving stations btwn Interstate/RQ and Expo Center. trimet.org/rq. Connect with PDX shuttle buses at Kenton. MAX Red display – Parkrose Red Line disrupted, this segment running btwn Gateway and PDX. Use Blue/Green btwn Lloyd Center and Gateway, shuttles btwn Interstate/RQ and Lloyd Center.
    [Show full text]
  • I-205/Portland Mall: MAX Green Line Fact Sheet
    I-205/Portland Mall: Expo Center Airport N MAX Green Line Portland Hillsboro Maintenance facility Ruby Junction Beaverton Gresham Snapshots Background Milwaukie Funding Ridership Since the beginning of light rail planning in the Clackamas Portland region, transportation planners have worked Sept. 2009–June 2010 (first year of service) – 4.9 million Wilsonville Total: $575.7 million toward reaching two goals—bringing light rail service FY11 – 6.9 million to Clackamas County for the first time and creating a of this activity meant that buses could not use 5th FY12 – 7.5 million north-south light rail alignment in downtown Portland. and 6th avenues during the two-and-a-half years of construction. After conducting extensive public outreach The Portland Mall opened in 1978, providing bus service $413.4 million and traffic analysis with the City of Portland, TriMet Frequency with a dedicated alignment on several blocks of 5th $23 million Federal created a bus relocation plan. State Approximately every 15 minutes during peak hours; and 6th avenues in downtown Portland. Meanwhile, approximately every 35 minutes during early morning in 1983 the completion of the northern portion of Twenty-eight bus lines that used the Portland Mall and nighttime service. Interstate 205 included a transitway parallel to much of were temporarily relocated to other downtown streets, $139.3 million the highway as it passed through Multnomah County. As the bulk of them moving to 3rd and 4th avenues. The Local Travel times the years passed, the need for high capacity transit to temporary routes included signage and shelters. When Clackamas Town Center–Gateway 16 minutes Clackamas County and on a new downtown alignment major construction ended in May 2009, buses moved Clackamas Town Center–Downtown Portland only increased.
    [Show full text]
  • ICE SKATE! out Along the Way
    SPONSORS TRANSPORTATION LOCATION LLOYD COMMUNITY MAP WALK PORTLAND We’re proud of our neighborhood’s walkability, and the SHOP, DINE & many artistic and historical points of interest you can check ICE SKATE! out along the way. Check out free walking maps at: LLOYD @shoplloydcenter www.lloydcenter.com golloyd.org/walk. NORTH HEALTHY & CARSHARE Several Zipcar spaces are reserved throughout the NORTHWEST CONVENIENT NORTHEAST IN THE neighborhood. Getaround and Car2Go vehicles are NEIGHBORHOOD often available as well. For more information, visit: golloyd.org/drive EAST 808 NE Multnomah @ Hassalo on Eighth SOUTHEAST BIKE SOUTHWEST Several designated bike routes, including a protected bike lane, serve Lloyd. Over 1,700 bike parking spaces provide a safe place to lock up your bike when you arrive at your destination. Join the Lloyd Cycle Station for secure deluxe bike parking, including a shower and locker room. Lloyd also has multiple BIKETOWN stations in the neighborhood and Go Lloyd offers a helmet loaner for your convenience. For more information, visit: golloyd.org/bike TRANSIT Nine TriMet bus lines and four MAX lines serve the neighbor- hood. The Portland Streetcar A & B Loops connect Lloyd with Downtown, the Pearl, and the Central Eastside. The C-TRAN #157 express also provides direct access for Washington commuters. For more information, visit: golloyd.org/transit BUSINESS LIST + MAP HISTORY / ABOUT NE Schuyler St. NE Schuyler St. Moda Center Stanford’s Restaurant & Bar Greenfield Health 1 1 N Center Court St. 15 29 913 Lloyd Center 700 NE Multnomah St., Suite 400 With widely recognized landmarks such as the Lloyd Center, rosequarter.com stanfords.com greenfieldhealth.com NE Broadway St.
    [Show full text]
  • Each with Its Own Distinctive Personality and Style, PORTLAND's
    THE GET READY FOR YOUR 34 DOWNTOWN way to NEXT 35 OLD TOWN CHINATOWN 36 NORTHWEST PORTLAND 37 PEARL DISTRICT 38 CENTRAL EASTSIDE 39 HAWTHORNE/BELMONT . 40 DIVISION/CLINTON “10 Best in U.S.” 41 ALBERTA ARTS DISTRICT –Fodor’s Travel STREET42 MISSISSIPPI/WILLIAMS -TripAdvisor Each with its own SCENE distinctive personality and style, PORTLAND’S NEIGHBORHOODS add character to the city. ney St Pearl District NW Irving St NW Irving St ve ve A A A th oyt St th NW Hoyt St 6 6 ve ve A A Couch Park A W 1 W N St th NW Glisan St th NW Glisan 5 W 1 W N NW Flanders St ders St TRAVELPORTLAND.COM verett St NW Everett St COME VISIT US! ve e A l NW Davis St v P A Newberg, Oregon th 4 h KEEN Garage Portland t nity 0 i r 2 W 1 NW Couch St T 503.625.7385 N 505 NW 13th AVE NW NW vistaballoon.com NW W Burnside St Portland OR, 97209 405 SW ve PHOTOGRAPH BY AMYPHOTOGRAPH OUELLETTEBY ANKENY ALLEY IN OLD TOWN CHINATOWN A 33 JELD- h 3t 1 e Smith Lake Lake Force North Portland Harbor Smith Lake Columbia Slough Lake Force Columbia River Smith and Bybee Lakes Park North Portland Harbor N Swift Hwy Columbia Slough Delta Park Slough Columbia Slough Portland Intl Airport Columbia Slough Drainage Canal Drainage Canal Columbia Slough Columbia Slough Columbia Slough an Island Basin Sw Columbia Slough Columbia Slo ugh Columbia Columbia Slough Slough Beach Elem. School EAT PLAY The 1 Alder Street food cart pod (S.W.
    [Show full text]
  • Leave the House Alone
    SUNRISE MONDAY EDmO JANUARY 7. 2008 Qkegonian t. ______~~c=~~~c=~ --------_:~~~~~~~ PORTLAND, OREGON 3REAKING NEWS AT OAEGONLlYLCOM WINNER Of THE 2007 fUUTZE~ PRIZE FOR BREAKING NEWS •• EDITORIALS TH.EOREGONIAN. MONOAY,JANUARY7,2008 THE OPINION OF THE OREGONIAN EDITORIAL BOARD Leave the house alone n the gritty southem edge of the transit cleared, as Tri-Met acquired various properties even after a 2004 environmental impact statement mall, where Interstate 405 dumps com­ and tore them down to make way for the tracks. concluded that the transit work would have mini~ muters into downtown, stands a lonely The Figo House is so isolated by construction work mal impact on his property. At the same time, the O vestige of old Portland, the Figo House now, it's hard even to reach Acker's office. State Historic Preservation Office agreed that the (named after the owner's dog.) It is channing to think that, when the work is house shouldn't be disturbed by the transit project It's a well·kept example of the Victorian archi­ done, the Figo House would again be accessible without some undefined measures, such as reloca­ tecture that has almost vanished from the central and situated by a busy light-rail station and the tion, to mitigate the changes. But TriMel says sub­ city. Unlike the last few remaining old houses state's largest university. But, of course, the transit sequent revisions to the light-rail route have put downtown, ~uch as the lovely but vacant halianale agency doesn't sec il that way. II wants 10 strip the the Figo House in tht' way.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 233/Monday, December 4, 2000
    Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 233 / Monday, December 4, 2000 / Notices 75771 2 departures. No more than one slot DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION In notice document 00±29918 exemption time may be selected in any appearing in the issue of Wednesday, hour. In this round each carrier may Federal Aviation Administration November 22, 2000, under select one slot exemption time in each SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, in the first RTCA Future Flight Data Collection hour without regard to whether a slot is column, in the fifteenth line, the date Committee available in that hour. the FAA will approve or disapprove the application, in whole or part, no later d. In the second and third rounds, Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the than should read ``March 15, 2001''. only carriers providing service to small Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. hub and nonhub airports may L. 92±463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: participate. Each carrier may select up is hereby given for the Future Flight Patrick Vaught, Program Manager, FAA/ to 2 slot exemption times, one arrival Data Collection Committee meeting to Airports District Office, 100 West Cross and one departure in each round. No be held January 11, 2000, starting at 9 Street, Suite B, Jackson, MS 39208± carrier may select more than 4 a.m. This meeting will be held at RTCA, 2307, 601±664±9885. exemption slot times in rounds 2 and 3. 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite Issued in Jackson, Mississippi on 1020, Washington, DC, 20036. November 24, 2000. e. Beginning with the fourth round, The agenda will include: (1) Welcome all eligible carriers may participate.
    [Show full text]
  • FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS and the MYTHS of TRACKLESS TRAMS January 2020 by Marie Verschuer Prepared As a Supplement of Sbenrc 1.62 Sustainable Centres for Tomorrow
    FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS AND THE MYTHS OF TRACKLESS TRAMS January 2020 By Marie Verschuer Prepared as a supplement of SBEnrc 1.62 Sustainable Centres for Tomorrow PURPOSE The following list of frequently asked questions have been compiled to assist those interested in Trackless Trams better understand the advantages and limitation of the technology and the areas where further research is needed. Information has been sourced from manufacturers, literature review and from study tours conducted in 2018 and 2019 to view and evaluate the emergent and latest technology suited to the provision of mid-tier prioritised public transit. This FAQ document is ancillary to the reports and case studies prepared as part of the SBNRC 1.62 Sustainable Centres for Tomorrow research project. FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS 1. What is a trackless tram (TT)? A trackless tram is a rubber tyred, high capacity vehicle suited to a corridor transit system equivalent to light rail. The vehicle in its design and internal layout is more closely aligned to a tram or light rail vehicle than to a bus as it has six innovations from High Speed Rail that have been transferred across. It travels in a dedicated corridor and should have signal priority to ensure smooth running free of traffic congestion. It is a smooth ride quality as it has sensors that anticipate bumps in the road so the vehicle adjusts its rail-like bogeys. It is a quiet electric vehicle with batteries on the roof. It has wide doors typically 2 per carriage, one each side. Boarding is from all doors adjacent to the platform.
    [Show full text]