(Monogenea) from Fishes of Iraq

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

(Monogenea) from Fishes of Iraq Basrah J. Agric. Sci., 26 (Special Issue 1), 2013 Checklists of Gyrodactylus Species (Monogenea) from Fishes of Iraq Furhan T. Mhaisen1 and Kefah N. Abdul-Ameer2 1 Tegnervägen 6B, Katrineholm 641 36, Sweden 2 Department of Biology, College of Education (Ibn Al-Haitham), University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. Surveying the literature concerning the occurrence of the monogeneans of the genus Gyrodactylus parasitizing fishes of Iraq indicated that there are 25 nominated species of this genus on 29 fish species. These are: G. baicalensis, G. barbi, G. ctenopharyngodontis, G. cyprini, G. derjavini, G. elegans, G. gobioninum, G. gussevi, G. katharineri, G. kherulensis, G. lavareti, G. longoacuminatus, G. macracanthus, G. malmbergi, G. markevitschi, G. medius, G. menschikowi, G. molnari, G. aff. mugili, G. salaris, G. shulmani, G. sprostonae, G. taimeni, G. vicinus and G. vimbi. All these species infected freshwater fishes, except G. aff. mugili which infected two marine fishes found in brackish waters. In addition to these species, some unidentified specimens of this genus were reported from 15 fish hosts among which five fish species showed no infection with any of the above nominated species of Gyrodactylus while the others showed mixed infection. Such unidentified Gyrodactylus species were recorded from 12 freshwater fishes as well as three marine fishes found within the freshwaters of Basrah province. Among Gyrodactylus species, number of hosts ranged from one host for 15 Gyrodactylus species to a maximum of 23 hosts in case of G. elegans. The distribution of the infection ranged from one parasite species in 14 fish hosts to a maximum infection with 21 Gyrodactylus species in the common carp (Cyprinus carpio). Key words: Monogenea, Gyrodactylus, freshwater fishes, marine fishes, Iraq. Introduction Monogeneans are small hermaphroditic worms that parasitize fishes and other aquatic animals. They infect fins, skin and gills of freshwater and marine fishes (59). The Class Monogenea includes 62 families, of which the family Gyrodactylidae has 34 genera. Among these genera, the genus Gyrodactylus has 518 nominated species of which 416 are valid species (91). However, number of Gyrodactylus species varies with varying references. Gyrodactylids are amongst the smallest monogeneans and some are similar in size to oncomiracidium larvae (200mm). The fusiform body has a posterior opisthaptor armed with 16 marginal hooks and a pair of median hooks. Anteriorly, two conspicuous cephalic processes bearing adhesive glands are apparent with no eye spots. The transparent body is dominated by the F1 generation embryo curled within the uterus (50). They are remarkable in that they give birth to live young, which already have a developing embryo, in a ‘Russian doll’ arrangement (58). Gyrodactylids feed on mucus, epithelium and sometimes blood (66). Secondary infections of the epidermal lesions with bacteria or fungi may also play a significant role in the pathogenicity of 8 Basrah J. Agric. Sci., 26 (Special Issue 1), 2013 Gyrodactylus (58). The pathogenicity of G. salaris on some strains of Atlantic salmon Salmo salar became clear in the early 1970s, when this parasite was introduced into Norway with juvenile Atlantic salmon imported from Sweden for aquaculture (94). In Iraq, the first gyrodactylid species, G. elegans, was reported from both Cyprinus carpio and Liza abu (21). Later on, extensive investigation on fish parasites from different parts of Iraq revealed the record of 24 additional species. These included G. baicalensis (98), G. kherulensis (27), G. markevitschi (1); G. ctenopharyngodontis (84), G. malmbergi, G. medius, G. paralatus (= G. macracanthus), G. salaris, G. sprostonae and G. vicinus (43); G. gussevi (4); G. vimbi (71), G. derjavini and G. menschikowi (44), G. barbi, G. cyprini, G. gobioninum and G. longoacuminatus (75), G. lavareti (2), G. taimeni (3), G. molnari (8), G. katharineri and G. shulmani (93) and G. aff. mugili (74). Information concerning gyrodactylids infecting fishes of Iraq are scattered in different local scientific journals, M. Sc. and Ph. D. theses as well as in few conference abstracts. Some of such parasites have been misidentified or given with wrong authorities and some parasite names are misspelled. Some of the infected fishes were given in synonymous names. For these reasons, it was decided to review these data in accordance with list of fishes of Iraq (57) and with up-to-date fish scientific names (61), to correct scientific names and authorities of the concerned gyrodactylids according to some major taxonomical references and a web site (62, 96, 91), and to provide a host- gyrodactylid checklist. Sources and Methods A total of 83 references (research papers, conference abstracts and M. Sc. and Ph. D. theses) dealing with gyrodactylids of fishes of Iraq were used to prepare the present review and checklists. Data from such references was gathered to provide gyrodactylid list and host- gyrodactylid list. Names and authorities of these gyrodactylids are checked with the list of nominal species of Gyrodactylus (64) as well as with two taxonomical accounts (62, 96) and the well known specialized electronic sites (99, 91). For fishes, the scientific names were reported as they appeared in their original references and then checked with the recent account on freshwater fishes of Iraq (57). However, the valid names used here were based, with minor modifications, on a relevant electronic site (61). Results and Discussion Surveys Achieved on Gyrodactylids of Fishes in Iraq The review of available literature indicated that since the first published account on fish parasites of Iraq (65) up till the first checklist of fish parasites of Iraq (78), no any gyrodactylid species was present from fishes of Iraq. Starting from 1984, when the first gyrodactylid species (G. elegans) was reported from two fish species (21) up to the present time, many surveys were achieved in different inland waters and fish farms and ponds which contributed in recording gyrodactylids from fishes of Iraq. These surveys 9 Basrah J. Agric. Sci., 26 (Special Issue 1), 2013 can be grouped into nine major categories according to localities of inspected fishes. These are: 1- Tigris River (26, 1, 56, 83, 10, 30, 31, 47) as well as some tributaries of Tigris River which included Greater and Lesser Zab rivers (4, 7), Lesser Zab River (75, 76, 93) and Diyala River (24, 25, 55, 87, 37). 2- Euphrates River and its branches (85, 15, 38, 44, 68). 3- Garmat Ali River, Basrah (70, 39, 72, 29) and Al-Salihiya River, Basrah (29). 4- Some lakes, depressions and marshes: These included surveys from Al- Tharthar region (73), Hemrin Dam Lake (54), Darbandikhan Lake (6, 8), Al-Qadisiya Dam Lake (49, 52), Al-Habbaniya Lake (82), Bahr Al-Najaf Depression (14, 16), Ibn- Najim Marsh (17, 63) and Al-Hammar Marsh (71). 5- Some drainage networks (51, 52, 47, 88). 6- Shatt Al-Arab Estuary in southern Iraq and Shatt Al-Basrah Canal (74). 7- Fish hatcheries (98, 80, 20, 32, 33, 75, 76). 8- Fish ponds and farms which included some from Kurdistan region (20, 5), Samarra region (73), man-made lakes at Al-Nibaey, north of Baghdad (23, 9), Al- Amiriya region, Baghdad (73, 34, 35), Al-Zaafaraniya Fish Farm, south of Baghdad (21, 19, 11, 12, 90, 13, 97, 48), some fish farms at Al-Medaen, south of Baghdad (48), Al-Wahda fish Farm at Al-Suwairah (98), Al-Latifiyah Fish Farm (21, 98, 89), two private sector fish farms at Al-Latifiyah region (89), Al-Furat Fish Farm, which was previously known as Babylon fish farm (27, 84, 79, 86, 43, 28, 41, 81, 42, 45, 18, 46), Al-Shark Al-Awsat fish farm, Babylon province (92, 67, 69), Technical Institte of Al- Mussayab Fish Farm (36), Earthern ponds at Saddat Al-Hindia district, Babylon province (40), Al-Aziziyah Fish Farm of Wasit Governorate (86) and Al-Dorah Fish Farm of Diyala Governorate (86) in addition to some floating cages at Al-Habbaniya Lake (22) and at Shatt Al-Hilla (40). 9- Some fish markets at Baghdad (41, 81, 42, 77, 2, 3). Gyrodactylids Recorded from Fishes in Iraq The review of literature indicated that a total of 25 nominated Gyrodactylus species are so far known from fishes of Iraq as well as some unidentified specimens of this genus. The following is an alphabetical list of such parasites. Gyrodactylid names and authorities are checked according to some major taxonomical accounts and web sites (62, 64, 96, 99, 91). The alphabetically arranged names of hosts for each parasite are quoted as they appeared in their original literature but the valid names have been updated according to Froese & Pauly (61) and the full authority of each valid fish host is shown in the host-gyrodactylid list. References of the records for each host within 01 Basrah J. Agric. Sci., 26 (Special Issue 1), 2013 each gyrodactylid species are chronologically arranged but references of the same year are alphabetically arranged. 1- Gyrodactylus baicalensis Bogolepova, 1950: This parasite was recorded for the first time in Iraq from C. carpio from Al-Wahda Fish Farm at Al-Suwaira and from Al-Latifiyah Fish Farm (98). Now, it has eight hosts. These are: Acanthobrama centisquama (52), Barbus sharpeyi, which is a synonym of Mesopotamichthys sharpeyi (85, 49, 68), Carasobarbus luteus (23), Carassius auratus (47, 48), Chondrostom regium (83), Cyprinion macrostomum (23, 9), C. carpio (98, 22, 79, 80, 43, 11, 12, 49, 90, 28, 87, 52, 48, 77, 75, 76) and L. abu (83, 90, 53). 2- Gyrodactylus barbi Ergens, 1976: This parasite was recorded for the first time in Iraq from C. carpio from Ainkawa fish hatchery, Erbil (75, 76). No more records for this parasite in Iraq are available. 3- Gyrodactylus ctenopharyngodontis Ling in Gusev, 1962: This parasite was recorded for the first time in Iraq from Ctenopharyngodon idella from Babylon (= Al-Furat) Fish Farm (84).
Recommended publications
  • Ahead of Print Online Version Gyrodactylus Aff. Mugili Zhukov
    Ahead of print online version FoliA PArAsitologicA 60 [5]: 441–447, 2013 © institute of Parasitology, Biology centre Ascr issN 0015-5683 (print), issN 1803-6465 (online) http://folia.paru.cas.cz/ Gyrodactylus aff. mugili Zhukov, 1970 (Monogenoidea: Gyro- dactylidae) from the gills of mullets (Mugiliformes: Mugilidae) collected from the inland waters of southern Iraq, with an evalutation of previous records of Gyrodactylus spp. on mullets in Iraq Delane C. Kritsky1, Atheer H. Ali2 and Najim R. Khamees2 1 Health Education Program, school of Health Professions, idaho state University, Pocatello, idaho, UsA; 2 Department of Fisheries and Marine resources, college of Agriculture, University of Basrah, Basrah, iraq Abstract: Gyrodactylus aff. mugili Zhukov, 1970 (Monogenoidea: gyrodactylidae) is recorded and described from the gill lamellae of 11 of 35 greenback mullet, Chelon subviridis (Valenciennes) (minimum prevalence 31%), from the brackish waters of the shatt Al-Arab Estuary in southern iraq. the gyrodactylid was also found on the gill lamellae of one of eight speigler’s mullet, Valamugil speigleri (Bleeker), from the brackish waters of the shatt Al-Basrah canal (minimum prevalence 13%). Fifteen Klunzinger’s mullet, Liza klunzingeri (Day), and 13 keeled mullet, Liza carinata (Valenciennes), collected and examined from southern iraqi waters, were apparently uninfected. the gyrodactylids from the greenback mullet and speigler’s mullet were considered to have affinity toG. mu- gili Zhukov, 1970, and along with G. mugili may represent members of a species complex occurring on mullets in the indo-Pacific region. A single damaged gyrodactylid from the external surfaces of the abu mullet, Liza abu (Heckel), was insufficient for species identification.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships of Freshwater Fishes of the Genus Capoeta (Actinopterygii, Cyprinidae) in Iran
    Received: 3 May 2016 | Revised: 8 August 2016 | Accepted: 9 August 2016 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.2411 ORIGINAL RESEARCH Phylogenetic relationships of freshwater fishes of the genus Capoeta (Actinopterygii, Cyprinidae) in Iran Hamid Reza Ghanavi | Elena G. Gonzalez | Ignacio Doadrio Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Biodiversity and Evolutionary Abstract Biology Department, CSIC, Madrid, Spain The Middle East contains a great diversity of Capoeta species, but their taxonomy re- Correspondence mains poorly described. We used mitochondrial history to examine diversity of the Hamid Reza Ghanavi, Department of algae- scraping cyprinid Capoeta in Iran, applying the species- delimiting approaches Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. Email: [email protected] General Mixed Yule- Coalescent (GMYC) and Poisson Tree Process (PTP) as well as haplotype network analyses. Using the BEAST program, we also examined temporal divergence patterns of Capoeta. The monophyly of the genus and the existence of three previously described main clades (Mesopotamian, Anatolian- Iranian, and Aralo- Caspian) were confirmed. However, the phylogeny proposed novel taxonomic findings within Capoeta. Results of GMYC, bPTP, and phylogenetic analyses were similar and suggested that species diversity in Iran is currently underestimated. At least four can- didate species, Capoeta sp4, Capoeta sp5, Capoeta sp6, and Capoeta sp7, are awaiting description. Capoeta capoeta comprises a species complex with distinct genetic line- ages. The divergence times of the three main Capoeta clades are estimated to have occurred around 15.6–12.4 Mya, consistent with a Mio- Pleistocene origin of the di- versity of Capoeta in Iran. The changes in Caspian Sea levels associated with climate fluctuations and geomorphological events such as the uplift of the Zagros and Alborz Mountains may account for the complex speciation patterns in Capoeta in Iran.
    [Show full text]
  • New Data on the Distribution and Conservation Status of the Two Endemic Scrapers in the Turkish Mediterranean Sea Drainages (Teleostei: Cyprinidae)
    International Journal of Zoology and Animal Biology ISSN: 2639-216X New Data on the Distribution and Conservation Status of the Two Endemic Scrapers in the Turkish Mediterranean Sea Drainages (Teleostei: Cyprinidae) Kaya C1*, Kucuk F2 and Turan D1 Research Article 1 Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, Turkey Volume 2 Issue 6 2Isparta University of Applied Sciences, Turkey Received Date: October 31, 2019 Published Date: November 13, 2019 *Corresponding author: Cuneyt Kaya, Faculty of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, DOI: 10.23880/izab-16000185 Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, 53100 Rize, Turkey, Tel: +904642233385; Email: [email protected] Abstract In the scope of this study, exact distribution of the two endemic Capoeta species in the Turkish Mediterranean Sea drainages was presented. Fishes were caught with pulsed DC electro-fishing equipment from 28 sampling sites throughout Turkish Mediterranean Sea drainages between Göksu River and stream Boğa. The findings of the study demonstrate that Capoeta antalyensis inhabits in Köprüçay and Aksu rivers, and streams Boğa and Gündoğdu, all around Antalya. Capoeta caelestis widely distributed in coastal stream and rivers between Stream Dim (Alanya) in the west and Göksu River (Silifke) in the east. Metric and meristic characters were collected from the fish samples which obtained in the field for Capoeta caelestis and Capoeta antalyensis, and museum material for Capoeta damascina. In this way, morphologic features of the species revealed and Capoeta caelestis compared with Capoeta damascina to remove the hesitations about the validity of the species. The conservation status of Capoeta antalyensis was recommended to uplist from Vulnerable to Endangered. Keywords: Freshwater Fish Species; Anatolia; Pisces; Capoeta antalyensis; C.
    [Show full text]
  • Article Taxonomic Review of the Genus Capoeta Valenciennes, 1842 (Actinopterygii, Cyprinidae) from Central Iran with the Description of a New Species
    FishTaxa (2016) 1(3): 166-175 E-ISSN: 2458-942X Journal homepage: www.fishtaxa.com © 2016 FISHTAXA. All rights reserved Article Taxonomic review of the genus Capoeta Valenciennes, 1842 (Actinopterygii, Cyprinidae) from central Iran with the description of a new species Arash JOULADEH-ROUDBAR1, Soheil EAGDERI1, Hamid Reza GHANAVI2*, Ignacio DOADRIO3 1Department of Fisheries, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Alborz, Iran. 2Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. 3Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology Department, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales-CSIC, Madrid, Spain. Corresponding author: *E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The genus Capoeta in Iran is highly diversified with 14 species and is one of the most important freshwater fauna components of the country. Central Iran is a region with high number of endemism in other freshwater fish species, though the present species was recognized as C. aculeata (Valenciennes, 1844), widely distributed within Kavir and Namak basins. However previous phylogenetic and phylogeographic studies found that populations of Nam River, a tributary of the Hableh River in central Iran are different from the other species. In this study, the mentioned population is described as a new species based on morphologic and genetic characters. Keywords: Inland freshwater of Iran, Nam River, Algae-scraping cyprinid, Capoeta. Zoobank: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3697C9D3-5194-4D33-8B6B-23917465711D urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:7C7ACA92-B63D-44A0-A2BA-9D9FE955A2D0 Introduction There are 257 fish species in Iranian inland waters under 106 genera, 29 families and Cyprinidae with 111 species (43.19%) is the most diverse family in the country (Jouladeh-Roudbar et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklists of Parasites of Fishes of Salah Al-Din Province, Iraq
    Vol. 2 (2): 180-218, 2018 Checklists of Parasites of Fishes of Salah Al-Din Province, Iraq Furhan T. Mhaisen1*, Kefah N. Abdul-Ameer2 & Zeyad K. Hamdan3 1Tegnervägen 6B, 641 36 Katrineholm, Sweden 2Department of Biology, College of Education for Pure Science, University of Baghdad, Iraq 3Department of Biology, College of Education for Pure Science, University of Tikrit, Iraq *Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract: Literature reviews of reports concerning the parasitic fauna of fishes of Salah Al-Din province, Iraq till the end of 2017 showed that a total of 115 parasite species are so far known from 25 valid fish species investigated for parasitic infections. The parasitic fauna included two myzozoans, one choanozoan, seven ciliophorans, 24 myxozoans, eight trematodes, 34 monogeneans, 12 cestodes, 11 nematodes, five acanthocephalans, two annelids and nine crustaceans. The infection with some trematodes and nematodes occurred with larval stages, while the remaining infections were either with trophozoites or adult parasites. Among the inspected fishes, Cyprinion macrostomum was infected with the highest number of parasite species (29 parasite species), followed by Carasobarbus luteus (26 species) and Arabibarbus grypus (22 species) while six fish species (Alburnus caeruleus, A. sellal, Barbus lacerta, Cyprinion kais, Hemigrammocapoeta elegans and Mastacembelus mastacembelus) were infected with only one parasite species each. The myxozoan Myxobolus oviformis was the commonest parasite species as it was reported from 10 fish species, followed by both the myxozoan M. pfeifferi and the trematode Ascocotyle coleostoma which were reported from eight fish host species each and then by both the cestode Schyzocotyle acheilognathi and the nematode Contracaecum sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Risk Analysis and Potential Implications of Exotic Gyrodactylus
    RISK ANALYSIS AND POTE NTIAL TRANSMISSION AND IMPLICATIONS OF EXOTIC GYRODACTYLUS SPECIES ON CULTURED AND WILD CYPRINIDS IN THE WESTERN CAPE, SOUTH AFRICA By: Monique Rochelle Maseng Submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Magister Scientiae Department of Biodiversity and Conservation Biology Faculty of Natural Sciences University of the Western Cape Bellville Supervisors: Dr Kevin Christison (Department of Biodiversity and Conservation, University of the Western Cape) Prof Charles Griffiths (Zoology Department, University of Cape Town) September 2010 Declaration I declare that this is my own work, that Risk analysis and potential implications of exotic Gyrodactylus species on cultured and wild cyprinids in the Western Cape, South Africa has not been submitted for any degree or examination in any other university, and that all the sources I have used or quoted have been indicated and acknowledged by complete references. ………………………………… Monique Rochelle Maseng September 2010 i Keywords Challenge infections Gyrodactylus Gyrodactylus burchelli Host specificity Morphological variation Phenotypic plasticity Pseudobarbus sp. Risk analysis ii Abstract The expansion of the South African aquaculture industry coupled with the lack of effective parasite management strategies may potentially have negative effects on both the freshwater biodiversity and economics of the aquaculture sector. Koi and goldfish are notorious for the propagation of parasites worldwide, some of which have already infected indigenous fish in South Africa. Koi and goldfish have been released into rivers in South Africa since the 1800’s for food and sport fish and have since spread extensively. These fish are present in most of the river systems in South Africa and pose an additional threat the indigenous cyprinids in the Western Cape.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Exploitation at the Sea of Galilee (Israel) by Early Fisher
    FISH EXPLOITATION AT THE SEA OF GALILEE (ISRAEL) BY EARLY FISHER- HUNTER-GATHERERS (23,000 B.P.): ECOLOGICAL, ECONOMICAL AND CULTURAL IMPLICATIONS THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY by Irit Zohar SUBMITTED TO THE SENATE OF TEL-AVIV UNIVERSITY November, 2003 FISH EXPLOITATION AT THE SEA OF GALILEE (ISRAEL) BY EARLY FISHER- HUNTER-GATHERERS (23,000 B.P.): ECOLOGICAL, ECONOMICAL AND CULTURAL IMPLICATIONS THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY by Irit Zohar SUBMITTED TO THE SENATE OF TEL-AVIV UNIVERSITY November, 2003 This work was carried out under the supervision of Prof. Tamar Dayan and Prof. Israel Hershkovitz Copyright © 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION AND STATEMENT OF PURPOSE 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Cultural setting 2 1.3 Environmental setting 4 1.4 Outline of research objectives 5 CHAPTER 2: FISH TAPHONOMY 6 2.1 Introduction 6 2.2 Naturally deposited fish 7 2.3 Culturally deposited fish 9 CHAPTER 3: SITE SELECTION AND FIELD TECHNIQUES 11 3.1. The archaeological site of Ohalo-II 11 3.2. Fish natural accumulation 13 3.3 Ethnographic study of fish procurement methods 14 CHAPTER 4: METHODS 18 4.1 Recovery bias 18 4.2 Sampling bias 18 4.3 Identification of fish remains 19 4.4 Fish osteological characteristics 20 4.5 Quantification analysis 20 4.5.1 Taxonomic composition and diversity 21 4.5.2 Body part frequency 22 4.5.3 Survival index (SI) 22 4.5.4 Fragmentation index 23 4.5.5 WMI of fragmentation 24 4.5.6 Fish exploitation index 24 4.5.7 Bone modification 25 4.5.8 Bone spatial distribution 26 Page 4.5.9 Analytic calculations 26 4.6 Osteological measurements 29 4.6.1 Body mass estimation 29 4.6.2 Vertebrae diameter 31 CHAPTER 5: FISH REMAINS RECOVERED AT OHALO-II 32 5.1.
    [Show full text]
  • A Bibliography of the Fishes of the Tigris-Euphrates Basin
    A Bibliography of the Fishes of the Tigris-Euphrates Basin Bibliographie der Fische des Euphrat - Tigris - Beckens by Brian W. Coad and Lalth A. J. al·Hassan Introduction The Tigris-Euphrates basin is the major drainage basin of the Middle East, flowing through Turkey, Syria, Iraq and Iran. Its ichthyofauna provides a useful source of food and has been studied by biologists and systematists. The literature on this fauna is scattered through journals and books published in the Middle East and in many foreign countries and this is the first attempt to bring it all together. The bibliography comprises the principal systematic, distributional and biological works on the freshwater fishes ofthe Tigris-Euphrates basin. Some extralimital papers are included to facilitate study of this fauna as are revisio­ nary works which have an application to this basin. A more extensive bibliography on the fishes of Iran and their environ­ ment is in preparation (CoAD, MS). CoAD and KURU (1986) provide a bibliography on the fishes ofTurkey. Usually, the titel was cited in its original language. How­ ever, for articles in Arabic and Russian the title was translated into English or, if available, the title of the English summary was used. EinfUhrung Das Euphrat - Tigris - Becken ist das wichtigste Gewiisser­ system des Mittleren Ostens. das die Liinder Tiirkei. Syrien. lrak und Iran umfaBt. Die Fischfauna dieser Gewiisser stellt eine wichtige Nahrungsgrundlage in den Anrainerstaaten dar und ist und war der Gegenstand zahlreicher biologischer Untersuchun­ gen. Diese Literatur ist auf zahlreiche Zeitschriften und Biicher sowohl im Nahen und Mittleren Osten selbst. als auch im Aus­ land verstreut.
    [Show full text]
  • Ontogenesis and Phylogenetic Interrelationships of Parasitic Flatworms
    W&M ScholarWorks Reports 1981 Ontogenesis and phylogenetic interrelationships of parasitic flatworms Boris E. Bychowsky Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/reports Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, Marine Biology Commons, Oceanography Commons, Parasitology Commons, and the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Bychowsky, B. E. (1981) Ontogenesis and phylogenetic interrelationships of parasitic flatworms. Translation series (Virginia Institute of Marine Science) ; no. 26. Virginia Institute of Marine Science, William & Mary. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/reports/32 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Reports by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. /J,J:>' :;_~fo c. :-),, ONTOGENESIS AND PHYLOGENETIC INTERRELATIONSHIPS OF PARASITIC FLATWORMS by Boris E. Bychowsky Izvestiz Akademia Nauk S.S.S.R., Ser. Biol. IV: 1353-1383 (1937) Edited by John E. Simmons Department of Zoology University of California at Berkeley Berkeley, California Translated by Maria A. Kassatkin and Serge Kassatkin Department of Slavic Languages and Literature University of California at Berkeley Berkeley, California Translation Series No. 26 VIRGINIA INSTITUTE OF MARINE SCIENCE COLLEGE OF WILLIAM AND MARY Gloucester Point, Virginia 23062 William J. Hargis, Jr. Director 1981 Preface This publication of Professor Bychowsky is a major contribution to the study of the phylogeny of parasitic flatworms. It is a singular coincidence for it t6 have appeared in print the same year as Stunkardts nThe Physiology, Life Cycles and Phylogeny of the Parasitic Flatwormsn (Amer. Museum Novitates, No. 908, 27 pp., 1937 ), and this editor well remembers perusing the latter under the rather demanding tutelage of A.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Strontium and Oxygen Isotope Analyses Reveal Late Cretaceous Shark Teeth in Iron Age Strata in the Southern Levant
    fevo-08-570032 December 11, 2020 Time: 20:56 # 1 ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 17 December 2020 doi: 10.3389/fevo.2020.570032 Strontium and Oxygen Isotope Analyses Reveal Late Cretaceous Shark Teeth in Iron Age Strata in the Southern Levant Thomas Tütken1*, Michael Weber1, Irit Zohar2,3, Hassan Helmy4, Nicolas Bourgon5, Omri Lernau3, Klaus Peter Jochum6 and Guy Sisma-Ventura7* 1 Institute of Geosciences, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany, 2 Beit Margolin, Oranim Academic College, Kiryat Tivon, Israel, 3 Zinman Institute of Archaeology, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel, 4 Department of Geology, Minia University, Minia, Egypt, 5 Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany, 6 Department of Climate Geochemistry, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, Germany, 7 Oceanographic and Limnological Research, Haifa, Israel Skeletal remains in archaeological strata are often assumed to be of similar ages. Here we show that combined Sr and O isotope analyses can serve as a powerful tool for assessing fish provenance and even for identifying fossil fish teeth in archaeological Edited by: contexts. For this purpose, we established a reference Sr and O isotope dataset of Brooke Crowley, extant fish teeth from major water bodies in the Southern Levant. Fossil shark teeth were University of Cincinnati, United States identified within Iron Age cultural layers dating to 8–9th century BCE in the City of David, Reviewed by: Jerusalem, although the reason for their presence remains unclear. Their enameloid Laszlo Kocsis, 87 86 18 Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Brunei Sr/ Sr and d OPO4 values [0.7075 ± 0.0001 (1 SD, n = 7) and 19.6 ± 0.9 Malte Willmes, (1 SD, n = 6), respectively], are both much lower than values typical for modern marineh University of California, Santa Cruz, United States sharks from the Mediterranean Sea [0.7092 and 22.5–24.6 (n = 2), respectively].
    [Show full text]
  • Spirulina Platensis Türünün Bakir, Kadmiyum Ve Toksisite Seviyesinin Belirlenmesi
    T.C. NEVŞEHİR HACI BEKTAŞ VELİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ FEN BİLİMLERİ ENSTİTÜSÜ MERSİN İLİ TATLI SU BALIK FAUNASI Tezi Hazırlayan Gizem TEMİZ Tezi Yöneten Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Sevil SUNGUR Biyoloji Anabilim Dalı Yüksek Lisans Tezi HAZİRAN 2019 NEVŞEHİR T.C. NEVŞEHİR HACI BEKTAŞ VELİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ FEN BİLİMLERİ ENSTİTÜSÜ MERSİN İLİ TATLI SU BALIK FAUNASI Tezi Hazırlayan Gizem TEMİZ Tezi Yöneten Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Sevil SUNGUR Biyoloji Anabilim Dalı Yüksek Lisans Tezi HAZİRAN 2019 NEVŞEHİR TEŞEKKÜR Yüksek lisans öğrenimim ve tez çalışmam süresince bilgilerini benimle paylaşmaktan kaçınmayan, her türlü konuda desteğini benden esirgemeyen ve güler yüzünü hiç eksik etmeyen değerli danışman hocam Dr. Sevil SUNGUR’a, Tez çalışmam süresince her türlü konuda desteğini benden esirgemeyen Prof. Dr. Erdoğan ÇİÇEK’e, Arazi çalışmalarım sırasında yardımlarından dolayı Selda ÖZTÜRK, Burak SEÇER’e, Teknik ve idari yardımlarından dolayı Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi, Fen- Edebiyat Fakültesi Dekanlığına, Biyoloji Bölüm Başkanlığı’na ve Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü’ne teşekkür eder, Öğrenim hayatım ve tüm yaşamım boyunca maddi ve manevi olarak her zaman desteklerini hissettiren değerli aileme minnettarlığımı sunarım. Bu çalışma materyallerinin bir kısmının, Orman ve Su İşleri Bakanlığı tarafından yürütülmekte olan, Ulusal Biyolojik Çeşitlilik Envanter ve İzleme Projesi (UBENİS) kapsamında Mersin İli Karasal ve İç Su Ekosistemleri Biyolojik Çeşitlilik Envanter ve İzleme İşi için yürütülmüş olan arazi çalışmaları sırasında elde edilmiş olması nedeniyle, Orman ve Su İşleri Bakanlığı, Doğa Koruma ve Milli Parklar Genel Müdürlüğü, Orman ve Su İşleri Bakanlığı 5 Bölge Müdürlüğü ve Mersin Şube Müdürlüğü’ne teşekkür ederim. iii MERSIN İLI TATLI SU BALIK FAUNASI (Yüksek Lisans Tezi) Gizem TEMİZ NEVŞEHİR HACI BEKTAŞ VELİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ FEN BİLİMLERİ ENSTİTÜSÜ Haziran 2019 ÖZET Bu çalışmada Mersin ilinin tatlı su balık faunası Mayıs 2017-Eylül 2018 tarihleri arasında yapılan arazi çalışmalarında toplanan örneklerin morfolojik karakterlere dayalı teşhisi ile belirlenmiştir.
    [Show full text]
  • Growth and Reproductive Biology of Capoeta Damascina (Valenciennes, 1842) from a Tributary of Tigris
    Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences 14(4) 956-969 2015 Growth and reproductive biology of Capoeta damascina (Valenciennes, 1842) from a tributary of Tigris Bahrami Kamangar B.1*; Ghaderi E.2; Hoseinpour H.3 Received: October 2013 Accepted: July 2015 Abstract Growth and reproductive attributes were determined for Capoeta damascina, an endemic fish species from west of Iran. A total of 147 specimens of both sexes were sampled monthly from November 2008 to October 2009. The overall sex ratio was female biased. Males were aged 0-4 years and females 0-5 years. The von Bertalanffy -1 growth parameters were estimated as; Linf=34.81 cm, k=0.27 year , t0=-0.65 for males -1 plus unsexed samples, Linf =46.29 cm, k=0.22 year , t0 =-0.59 for females plus unsexed -1 samples and Linf =67.52 cm, k=0.12 year , t0=-0.79 for whole samples. The length- weight relationships were W=0.021L2.815 for males, W=0.022L2.824 for females and W=0.020L2.836 for combined sexes, all of which exhibited a negative allometric growth. Spawning season started in May, ascending to June and ended in July for both sexes. Length at 50% maturity was estimated as 12.35 cm for males and 15.14 cm for females. Fecundity ranged from 1551 (2 years old) to 20523 (5 years old) eggs per fish. Losing of large individuals and decreasing in size at first maturity were observed in the studied population compared to data reported from other C. damascina populations, which could reflect an effect of overexploitation.
    [Show full text]