Novel Cyclic Peptides from Lethal Amanita Mushrooms Through a Genome-Guided Approach
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Molecular Phylogenetic Studies in the Genus Amanita
1170 Molecular phylogenetic studies in the genus Amanita I5ichael Weiß, Zhu-Liang Yang, and Franz Oberwinkler Abstracl A group of 49 Amanita species that had been thoroughly examined morphologically and amtomically was analyzed by DNA sequence compadson to estimate natural groups and phylogenetic rclationships within the genus. Nuclear DNA sequences coding for a part of the ribosomal large subunit were determined and evaluated using neighbor-joining with bootstrap analysis, parsimony analysis, conditional clustering, and maximum likelihood methods, Sections Amanita, Caesarea, Vaginatae, Validae, Phalloideae, and Amidella were substantially confirmed as monophyletic groups, while the monophyly of section Lepidell.t remained unclear. Branching topologies between and within sections could also pafiially be derived. Stbgenera Amanita an'd Lepidella were not supported. The Mappae group was included in section Validae. Grouping hypotheses obtained by DNA analyses are discussed in relation to the distribution of morphological and anatomical chamcters in the studied species. Key words: fungi, basidiomycetes phylogeny, Agarrcales, Amanita systematics, large subunit rDNA, 28S. R6sum6 : A partir d'un groupe de 49 esp,ces d'Amanita prdalablement examinees morphologiquement et anatomiquement, les auteurs ont utilisd la comparaison des s€quences d'ADN pour ddfinir les groupes naturels et les relations phylog6ndtiques de ce genre. Les sdquences de I'ADN nucl6aire codant pour une partie de la grande sous-unit6 ribosomale ont 6t6 ddterminEes et €valu6es en utilisant l'analyse par liaison en lacet avec le voisin (neighbor-joining with bootstrap), l'analyse en parcimonie, le rcgroupement conditionnel et les m€thodes de ressemblance maximale. Les rdsultats confirment substantiellement les sections Afiarira, Caesarea, Uaqinatae, Ualidae, Phalloideae et Amidella, comme groupes monophyldtiques, alors que la monophylie de la section Lepidella demerxe obscure. -
Relationship Between the Conformation of the Cyclopeptides Isolated from the Fungus Amanita Phalloides (Vaill. Ex Fr.) Secr. and Its Toxicity
Molecules 2000, 5 489 Relationship Between the Conformation of the Cyclopeptides Isolated from the Fungus Amanita Phalloides (Vaill. Ex Fr.) Secr. and Its Toxicity M.E. Battista, A.A. Vitale and A.B. Pomilio PROPLAME-CONICET, Departamento de Química Orgánica, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Natu- rales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Pabellón 2, Ciudad Universitaria, 1428 Buenos Aires, Argentina E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: The electronic structures and conformational studies of the cyclopeptides, O- methyl-α-amanitin, phalloidin and antamanide, were obtained from molecular parameters on the basis of semiempiric and ab initio methods. Introduction During this century Amanita phalloides - the most toxic fungus known up to now - has been studied from different points of view. This basidiomycete biosynthesizes mono- and bicyclic peptides com- posed of rare amino acids. In order to determine the structure/activity relationships chemical modifica- tions were carried out and the properties of these compounds were evaluated. These results were con- firmed by studying the conformations of three selected compounds representative of the major groups of the macroconstituents of this fungus. Experimental Hyperchem package (HyperCube, version 5.2) was used for semiempirical studies, the molecular geometry being optimized by STO-631G. Net charges were calculated with HyperCube PM3 and the Polack-Ribiere algoritm. GAUSSIAN 98 was used for ab initio studies. Results and Discussion We were interested in obtaining information on the conformations that the cyclic peptides may adopt and about the potential energy maps in order to locate the regions related to the binding to pro- tein molecules, such as F-actin and RNA-polymerase. -
MMA MASTERLIST - Sorted Alphabetically
MMA MASTERLIST - Sorted Alphabetically Sunday, December 10, 20Taxa Count: 2115 Page 1 of 26 Agaricus abruptibulbus Amanita amerimuscaria Agaricus arvensis Amanita amerirubescens nom. prov. Agaricus campestris Amanita atkinsoniana Agaricus haemorrhoidarius Amanita aureosolea nom. prov. Agaricus micromegethus Amanita battarrae Agaricus pattersonae Amanita bisporigera Agaricus placomyces Amanita brunnescens Agaricus semotus Amanita ceciliae Agaricus silvaticus Amanita cinereoconia Agaricus silvicola Amanita citrina Agaricus sp. Amanita citrina f. lavendula Agaricus subrutilescens Amanita cokeri Agaricus xanthrodermus Amanita cothurnata Agrocybe acericola Amanita crenulata Agrocybe aegerita Amanita crocea Agrocybe dura Amanita elongata Agrocybe erebia Amanita excelsa var. spissa Agrocybe firma Amanita farinosa Agrocybe pediades Amanita flavoconia Agrocybe praecox Amanita flavorubens Agrocybe sp. Amanita flavorubescens Agrocybe tabacina Amanita frostiana Albatrellus caeruleoporus Amanita fulva var. alba Albatrellus confluens Amanita fulva var. crassivolvata Albatrellus ovinus Amanita gemmata Albatrellus sp. Amanita jacksonii Alboleptonia sericella Amanita longipes Albugo candida Amanita murrilliana Aleuria aurantia Amanita onusta Aleuria rhenana Amanita pantherina, cf. Aleurodiscus amorphus Amanita phalloides Aleurodiscus oakesii Amanita porphyria Amanita abrupta Amanita praecox nom. prov. Amanita aestivalis Amanita pseudovolvata nom. prov. Amanita albocreata Amanita RET T01 Amanita amerifulva nom. prov. Amanita ristichii Amanita rubescens -
AMATOXIN MUSHROOM POISONING in NORTH AMERICA 2015-2016 by Michael W
VOLUME 57: 4 JULY-AUGUST 2017 www.namyco.org AMATOXIN MUSHROOM POISONING IN NORTH AMERICA 2015-2016 By Michael W. Beug: Chair, NAMA Toxicology Committee Assessing the degree of amatoxin mushroom poisoning in North America is very challenging. Understanding the potential for various treatment practices is even more daunting. Although I have been studying mushroom poisoning for 45 years now, my own views on potential best treatment practices are still evolving. While my training in enzyme kinetics helps me understand the literature about amatoxin poisoning treatments, my lack of medical training limits me. Fortunately, critical comments from six different medical doctors have been incorporated in this article. All six, each concerned about different aspects in early drafts, returned me to the peer reviewed scientific literature for additional reading. There remains no known specific antidote for amatoxin poisoning. There have not been any gold standard double-blind placebo controlled studies. There never can be. When dealing with a potentially deadly poisoning (where in many non-western countries the amatoxin fatality rate exceeds 50%) treating of half of all poisoning patients with a placebo would be unethical. Using amatoxins on large animals to test new treatments (theoretically a great alternative) has ethical constraints on the experimental design that would most likely obscure the answers researchers sought. We must thus make our best judgement based on analysis of past cases. Although that number is now large enough that we can make some good assumptions, differences of interpretation will continue. Nonetheless, we may be on the cusp of reaching some agreement. Towards that end, I have contacted several Poison Centers and NAMA will be working with the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). -
The Genus Amanita 3Huv ,1/80%,1,=21( Nepal
THE GENUS AMANITA 3HUV ,1/80%,1,=21( NEPAL Hari Prasad Aryal * and Usha Budhathoki ** 3DNOLKDZD&DPSXV,QVWLWXWHRI$JULFXOWXUHDQG$QLPDO6FLHQFH%KDLUDKDZD &HQWUDO'HSDUWPHQWRI%RWDQ\7ULEKXYDQ8QLYHUVLW\.LUWLSXU.DWKPDQGX1HSDO Abstract: 'XULQJWKHVXUYH\RIZLOGHGLEOHPXVKURRPVLQWURSLFDOWRWHPSHUDWHEHOWRI1HSDOGXULQJUDLQ\VHDVRQVLQ DQGPDQ\PDFURIXQJDOVSHFLHVZHUHFROOHFWHGDQGLGHQWL¿HG7KHSDSHUKLJKOLJKWVRQWKH¿YHVSHFLHVRI genus Amanita 3HUVLQFOXGLQJQHZVSHFLHV Amanita volvata 3HFN /OR\G ZLWKWKHLULGHQWL¿FDWLRQDQGGRFXPHQWDWLRQ The new species was LGHQWL¿HGDQGWKLVLVEHLQJUHSRUWHGDQGUHGHVFULEHGIRUWKH¿UVWWLPHIURP1HSDO Amanita characterized by stipe with volva or rudiments of volva, annulus present, in some may be absent, clamp connection SUHVHQWRUDEVHQWVSRUHVDP\ORLGRULQDP\ORLG7KHVWXG\DUHDRFFXSLHGVTNPDPRQJWKHVT.PODQG DQGOLHVZLWKLQDQDOWLWXGHEHWZHHQDQGPDVOLQWURSLFDOGHFLGXRXVULYHULQHIRUHVWWRORZHUWHPSHUDWHPL[HG EURDGOHDYHGIRUHVW7KHGULHGVSHFLPHQVDUHKRXVHGLQWKH7ULEKXYDQ8QLYHUVLW\&HQWUDO+HUEDULXP 78&+ .LUWLSXU .DWKPDQGX1HSDO7KHDUHDHPEUDFHVPDQ\P\FRSKDJRXVHWKQLFFRPPXQLWLHV7KHP\FRHOHPHQWVSUHYDLOLQJLQWKLV DUHDQHHGVXVWDLQDEOHFRQVHUYDWLRQDQGXWLOL]DWLRQ Keywords: Tasonomy; %DVLGLRP\FHWHV Amanita volvata; 0DFURIXQJL INTRODUCTION 7KH LQYHVWLJDWLRQ DQG VWXG\ RQ PXVKURRPV RI 1HSDO started since 19 th FHQWXU\ /OR\G %HUNHOH\ 7KH JHQXV Amanita FRQWDLQV RYHU QDPHG VSHFLHV DQG YDULHWLHV $GKLNDUL et al Amanita IURP1HSDOKDVEHHQUHSRUWHGVLQFH th century (Singh, DE VLQFHWKHQVHYHUDOSDSHUVKDYHEHHQSXEOLVKHG 42 species and 2 subspecies of Amanita are reported IURP1HSDO $GKLNDUL et al VLQFHWKHQVHYHUDO -
Forest Fungi in Ireland
FOREST FUNGI IN IRELAND PAUL DOWDING and LOUIS SMITH COFORD, National Council for Forest Research and Development Arena House Arena Road Sandyford Dublin 18 Ireland Tel: + 353 1 2130725 Fax: + 353 1 2130611 © COFORD 2008 First published in 2008 by COFORD, National Council for Forest Research and Development, Dublin, Ireland. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, or stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, electrostatic, magnetic tape, mechanical, photocopying recording or otherwise, without prior permission in writing from COFORD. All photographs and illustrations are the copyright of the authors unless otherwise indicated. ISBN 1 902696 62 X Title: Forest fungi in Ireland. Authors: Paul Dowding and Louis Smith Citation: Dowding, P. and Smith, L. 2008. Forest fungi in Ireland. COFORD, Dublin. The views and opinions expressed in this publication belong to the authors alone and do not necessarily reflect those of COFORD. i CONTENTS Foreword..................................................................................................................v Réamhfhocal...........................................................................................................vi Preface ....................................................................................................................vii Réamhrá................................................................................................................viii Acknowledgements...............................................................................................ix -
The Ectomycorrhizal Fungus Amanita Phalloides Was Introduced and Is
Molecular Ecology (2009) doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.04030.x TheBlackwell Publishing Ltd ectomycorrhizal fungus Amanita phalloides was introduced and is expanding its range on the west coast of North America ANNE PRINGLE,* RACHEL I. ADAMS,† HUGH B. CROSS* and THOMAS D. BRUNS‡ *Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Biological Laboratories, 16 Divinity Avenue, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA, †Department of Biological Sciences, Gilbert Hall, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-5020, USA, ‡Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, 111 Koshland Hall, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA Abstract The deadly poisonous Amanita phalloides is common along the west coast of North America. Death cap mushrooms are especially abundant in habitats around the San Francisco Bay, California, but the species grows as far south as Los Angeles County and north to Vancouver Island, Canada. At different times, various authors have considered the species as either native or introduced, and the question of whether A. phalloides is an invasive species remains unanswered. We developed four novel loci and used these in combination with the EF1α and IGS loci to explore the phylogeography of the species. The data provide strong evidence for a European origin of North American populations. Genetic diversity is generally greater in European vs. North American populations, suggestive of a genetic bottleneck; polymorphic sites of at least two loci are only polymorphic within Europe although the number of individuals sampled from Europe was half the number sampled from North America. Endemic alleles are not a feature of North American populations, although alleles unique to different parts of Europe were common and were discovered in Scandinavian, mainland French, and Corsican individuals. -
Diversity of MSDIN Family Members in Amanitin-Producing Mushrooms
He et al. BMC Genomics (2020) 21:440 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-020-06857-8 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Diversity of MSDIN family members in amanitin-producing mushrooms and the phylogeny of the MSDIN and prolyl oligopeptidase genes Zhengmi He, Pan Long, Fang Fang, Sainan Li, Ping Zhang and Zuohong Chen* Abstract Background: Amanitin-producing mushrooms, mainly distributed in the genera Amanita, Galerina and Lepiota, possess MSDIN gene family for the biosynthesis of many cyclopeptides catalysed by prolyl oligopeptidase (POP). Recently, transcriptome sequencing has proven to be an efficient way to mine MSDIN and POP genes in these lethal mushrooms. Thus far, only A. palloides and A. bisporigera from North America and A. exitialis and A. rimosa from Asia have been studied based on transcriptome analysis. However, the MSDIN and POP genes of many amanitin-producing mushrooms in China remain unstudied; hence, the transcriptomes of these speices deserve to be analysed. Results: In this study, the MSDIN and POP genes from ten Amanita species, two Galerina species and Lepiota venenata were studied and the phylogenetic relationships of their MSDIN and POP genes were analysed. Through transcriptome sequencing and PCR cloning, 19 POP genes and 151 MSDIN genes predicted to encode 98 non- duplicated cyclopeptides, including α-amanitin, β-amanitin, phallacidin, phalloidin and 94 unknown peptides, were found in these species. Phylogenetic analysis showed that (1) MSDIN genes generally clustered depending on the taxonomy of the genus, while Amanita MSDIN genes clustered depending on the chemical substance; and (2) the POPA genes of Amanita, Galerina and Lepiota clustered and were separated into three different groups, but the POPB genes of the three distinct genera were clustered in a highly supported monophyletic group. -
Mushroom Toxins & Poisonings in New Jersey
Mushroom Toxins & Poisonings in New Jersey & Nearby Eastern North America What this document doesn’t do: (1) This document is not intended to be used as a guide for treatment and should not be so used. (2) Mushrooms should not be selected for eating based on the content of this document. [In identifying mushrooms in poisoning cases, this document does not replace expertise that should be obtained by calling NJPIES and obtaining contact with an experienced mycologist.] (3) This document is not a replacement for a detailed toxicological review of the subject of mushroom poisoning. (4) This document is intended for use with a broad set of audiences; for this reasons, it should not be used uncritically in setting protocols [for example, carrying out a Meixner test would be inappropriate for a first responder who would appropriately focus on collecting a poi- soning victim, the relevant objects from the scene of the poisoning, and the critical timing characteristics of the event such as the delay between ingestion and onset of symptoms.] POISON CONTROL: New Jersey “Poison Control” is called NJPIES (New Jersey Poison Information & Education System). Telephone: 1-800-222-1222 [works in all states—(WARN- ING) WILL CONNECT TO A MOBILE PHONE’S HOME STATE—IF YOU’RE UNCERTAIN, USE A LAND- LINE] If the victim is unconscious, call “911.” Background of these notes: This document was originally compiled by Rod Tulloss and Dorothy Smullen for an NJ Mycol. Assoc. workshop, 25 March 2006. Version 2.0 was compiled by Tulloss. When viewed with Acrobat Reader, underlined red or gray words and phrases are “hot linked cross-references.” We have included a few notes on fungal poisons that are not from “mushrooms.” The notes were prepared by mycologists with experience in diagnosis of fungi involved in cases in which ingestion of toxic fungi was suspected. -
Amatoxin Mushroom Poisoning in North America 2015-2016 by Michael W
Amatoxin Mushroom Poisoning in North America 2015-2016 By Michael W. Beug PhD Chair NAMA Toxicology Committee Assessing the degree of amatoxin mushroom poisoning in North America is very challenging. Understanding the potential for various treatment practices is even more daunting. Although I have been studying mushroom poisoning for 45 years now, my own views on potential best treatment practices are still evolving. While my training in enzyme kinetics helps me understand the literature about amatoxin poisoning treatments, my lack of medical training limits me. Fortunately, critical comments from six different medical doctors have been incorporated in this article. All six, each concerned about different aspects in early drafts, returned me to the peer reviewed scientific literature for additional reading. There remains no known specific antidote for amatoxin poisoning. There have not been any gold standard double-blind placebo controlled studies. There never can be. When dealing with a potentially deadly poisoning (where in many non-western countries the amatoxin fatality rate exceeds 50%) treating of half of all poisoning patients with a placebo would be unethical. Using amatoxins on large animals to test new treatments (theoretically a great alternative) has ethical constraints on the experimental design that would most likely obscure the answers researchers sought. We must thus make our best judgement based on analysis of past cases. Although that number is now large enough that we can make some good assumptions, differences of interpretation will continue. Nonetheless, we may be on the cusp of reaching some agreement. Towards that end, I have contacted several Poison Centers and NAMA will be working with the Center for Disease Control (CDC). -
Toxic Fungi of Western North America
Toxic Fungi of Western North America by Thomas J. Duffy, MD Published by MykoWeb (www.mykoweb.com) March, 2008 (Web) August, 2008 (PDF) 2 Toxic Fungi of Western North America Copyright © 2008 by Thomas J. Duffy & Michael G. Wood Toxic Fungi of Western North America 3 Contents Introductory Material ........................................................................................... 7 Dedication ............................................................................................................... 7 Preface .................................................................................................................... 7 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................. 7 An Introduction to Mushrooms & Mushroom Poisoning .............................. 9 Introduction and collection of specimens .............................................................. 9 General overview of mushroom poisonings ......................................................... 10 Ecology and general anatomy of fungi ................................................................ 11 Description and habitat of Amanita phalloides and Amanita ocreata .............. 14 History of Amanita ocreata and Amanita phalloides in the West ..................... 18 The classical history of Amanita phalloides and related species ....................... 20 Mushroom poisoning case registry ...................................................................... 21 “Look-Alike” mushrooms ..................................................................................... -
Thirty Plus Years of Mushroom Poisoning
Summary of the Poisoning Reports in the NAMA Case Registry for 2006 through 2017 By Michael W. Beug, Chair NAMA Toxicology Committee In the early years of NAMA, toxicology was one of the concerns of the Mycophagy Committee. The existence of toxicology committees in the Puget Sound and Colorado clubs stimulated the NAMA officers to separate the good and bad aspects of ingesting mushrooms. In 1973 they established a standing Toxicology Committee initially chaired by Dr. Duane H. (Sam) Mitchel, a Denver, Colorado MD who founded the Colorado Mycological Society. In the early 1970s, Sam worked with Dr. Barry Rumack, then director of the Rocky Mountain Poison Center (RMPC) to establish a protocol for handling information on mushroom poisonings resulting in the center becoming nationally recognized for handling mushroom poisonings. Encouraged by Dr Orson Miller and acting on a motion by Kit Scates, the NAMA trustees then created the Mushroom Poisoning Case Registry in 1982. Dr. Kenneth Cochran laid the groundwork for maintaining the Registry at the University of Michigan. Individuals can report mushroom poisonings using the NAMA website (www.namyco.org). The reporting is a volunteer effort and at the end of each year members of the NAMA toxicology committee assemble all of the reports for the previous year as well as any other earlier cases that can still be documented. Individuals are encouraged to submit reports directly through the NAMA website. In addition, members of the toxicology committee work with Poison Centers to gather mushroom poisoning reports. The toxicology committee has 160 toxicology identifiers living in 36 states and 3 Canadian Provinces.