Response to the Union of Orthodox Rabbis Statement by Rabbi Barry Freundel Recently, the Union of Orthodox Rabbis Released A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Response to the Union of Orthodox Rabbis Statement by Rabbi Barry Freundel Recently, the Union of Orthodox Rabbis Released A Response to the Union of Orthodox Rabbis Statement By Rabbi Barry Freundel Recently, the Union of Orthodox Rabbis released a statement declaring Conservative and Reform Judaism "not to be Judaism at all." This statement was seen as inflammatory and divisive by the mainstream of the Orthodox community, including the Rabbinical Council of America and the Union of Orthodox Congregations of America (the familiar "OU"--please note that this is a different organization than the Union of Orthodox Rabbis). I have a more fundamental difficulty with the statement made by the Union of Orthodox rabbis. To my knowledge of halachik (Jewish legal) history, this statement is unprecedented and, therefore, without halachik credibility. Sadly, we have known schisms and differences throughout history. Despite debate, recrimination, and argument, I know of no time in history when traditional Judaism declared the Essenes, the Sadducees, the Karaites, or any other group of Jews "not to be Judaism at all," on the basis of ideological and practical differences. According to my understanding of history, the only time a group has been read out of Judaism is when that groupís members are no longer, in large part, halachikally Jewish. The Christians, as demonstrated in Professor Lawrence Schiffman's seminal book Who Was a Jew? are an example of this as they were declared outside the pale at the point where a large number of "converts" were brought into the Judeo-Christian community without going through a halachikally acceptable conversion process. At the point where these converts vastly outnumbered those that were halachikally Jewish, the Rabbis declared Christianity to be a separate religion. This paradigm does not presently apply to our differences with Reform and Conservative Judaism. Even the Union of Orthodox Rabbis took great care in stating the halachik position that any person born of a Jewish mother is Jewish. The large majority of Conservative and Reform Jews meet this crtieria. Instead, both in terms of doctrine and practice, our debates with these groups are similar to those between the Pharisees, Sadducees, and Essenes, or those between the Rabbinites and the Karaites. Rabbinite, or Pharisaic Judaism, never declared those earlier groups "not to be Judaism at all." This statement by the Union of Orthodox Rabbis, therefore, does not follow the tradition of our halachik ancestors in responding to doctrinal disagreement within Judaism. To understand this in another way, one needs to realize that the Union of Orthodox Rabbis has fallen victim to thinking in Western modes of thought, rather than in Jewish legal categories. The term "Judaism," meaning (as the Encyclopaedia Britannica explains it) "the religion of the Jews," is a handy catch word that we all use as we discuss our beliefs and our community within the Western, secular world. However, the Jewish people does not and should not view itself as an "ism." We are far more than a religion. We are, as I'm sure every member of the Union or Orthodox Rabbis would agree, an entire way of life governed by Torah and halachah. As such, the judgment of a particular individual or a particular group, is not simply a judgment of its "ism," but of every one of its individual beliefs and actions. Using that measuring rod, which is the only one I've ever understood Torah and halachah to subscribe to, there are certainly many profound and fundamental areas of disagreement between what we call "Orthodox," and what we call "Conservative" and "Reform". There is no way to minimize those disagreements, and one should not overlook the fact that they touch on the core issues of Jewish identity, Jewish belief, and Jewish survival. The differences are profound, painful, and present perplexing problems as we try to deal with the issues that confront us as a total community. Nonetheless, to declare all activities of Conservative and Reform Jews in a religious setting not to be a part of Judaism is simply not correct. Despite the halachik problems that we have in the way a Conservative or Reform synagogue is built, despite the disagreements we might have in the way a minyan (a prayer quorum) is constituted in a Conservative or Reform temple, despite our objections to many liturgical changes they have made, I would ask the Union of Orthodox rabbis the following question. When a Conservative or Reform Jew comes to his synagogue or temple, and puts on a pair of kosher Tefillin because his Rabbi tells him that Jewish law requires this ritual, is that not an act of religious significance according to Halachah? Does he not fulfill a mitzvah by doing so? Is he not fulfilling his obligation as a Jew? Similarly, if a poor person came to the synagogue door and charity were collected by the synagogue for him, would not this constitute fulfillment of the mitzvah of Tzedakah for all who contribute? I do not believe that any member of the Union of Orthodox Rabbis would answer these questions in the negative. They must, therefore, see these acts as Jewishly significant even though it is performed under Conservative or Reform auspices. Further, I know of no halachik source that even suggests that actions such as this are not Jewishly significant. On the other hand, I know of many sources that say that it is. An example appears in the writings of Moses Maimonides, the great codifier of Jewish law. Maimonides in his code, his magnum opus, has several very uncomplimentary things to say about the founders of Karaism. His condemnation of them challenges their beliefs and declares those beliefs fundamentally flawed in ways that parallel the most critical attacks on Conservative and Reform ideology that one finds in Orthodox circles today. (Maimonides, Laws of Mamrim, Ch. 3.) It is interesting to note that even here, Maimonides' treatment of those raised as Karaites is far more lenient and tolerant. Maimonides also wrote responsa. Responsa are the case law of Judaism. Responsa, as opposed to statutes or codes, deal with the practical application to real situations of the principles enunciated in our books of law. In two pivotal letters, (Blau edition nos. 265 and 449) Maimonides lays out an agenda for the Rabbinites dealing with the Karaites of his day. In the first, Maimonides is asked whether a Karaite should be counted toward a minyan. Maimonides answers, "no." His grounds for saying so are that Karaites do not believe in a minyan. As part of their practice, as part of their ideology, they do not accept Rabbinic law, so this concept is foreign to them. As such, says Maimonides, we cannot work with them in an area in which they fundamentally do not believe as we do. However, says Maimonides, in those areas where they believe as we do, we are duty-bound to work with them and to share with them. Maimonides cites as an example, circumcision, which is accepted by the Karaites as it was by the Rabbinites. Maimonides goes even further in the second responsum, stating unequivocally that in all areas of agreement, the Rabbinite community must support the Karaite community, and further, that we are to treat them in ways that reflect aspects of honor (Riuyim Hem Lechalkam Meichelkei Hakavod). Again, my question to the Union of Orthodox Rabbis is why doesn't this paradigm apply today? And further, is not this paradigm completely at odds with your statement and with your actions? The Chazon Ish is an icon of right-wing Orthodox ideology. His personality and the scope of his genius makes him a force to be reckoned with for anyone serious about halachah. In discussing those who had deviated from halachah in his day (the late 19th and early 20th centuries), the Chazon Ish lays down three very important principles (Yoreh Deah, 2:16). 1)Actions which appear to the world to be unethical and morally bankrupt must be avoided. 2)We in the traditional community must dedicate the totality of ourselves to healing the breaches in the community (Kol Atzmeinu Letaken). 3)Given the contemporary situation, our policy with regard to our brethren who have chosen to deny the authority of Jewish law in whole or in part is to approach them with chains of love (Avotot Shel Ahavah). Again, I must ask the Union of Orthodox Rabbis, where is the paradigm of the Chazon Ish in what they are saying and in what they have done? The closest the Jewish community has ever come to having a cult leader was in the person of Jacob Frank. Jacob Frank, by all historical accounts, was a charlatan who mixed messianism, sabbateanism, and popular mysticism to justify acts such as orgies and the eating of non-kosher fat in the name of G-d. He was denounced and opposed by every responsible religious leader of his day. Later in life, he converted to Christianity. On the day that he experienced that conversion the Baíal Shem Tov, the founder of Chassidism, fasted. The Ba'al Shem was approached by his students, who said, "This man is anathema to everything that you stand for. Why, then, are you fasting for him?" Responded the Ba'al Shem, "As long as a limb of the tree is attached to the tree, no matter what problems it has, there is still a chance that it can be saved. Once the limb is severed, there is no longer any hope." The Union of Orthodox Rabbis, in opposition to the paradigms of Maimonides, Chazon Ish, and the Ba'al Shem Tov, have engaged in an act of severing of limbs. It is not simply enough to declare their statement divisive; it must be recognized as being anti-halachik, as well.
Recommended publications
  • A Synagogue for All Families: Interfaith Inclusion in Conservative Synagogues
    A Synagogue for All Families Interfaith Inclusion in Conservative Synagogues Introduction Across North America, Conservative kehillot (synagogues) create programs, policies, and welcoming statements to be inclusive of interfaith families and to model what it means for 21st century synagogues to serve 21 century families. While much work remains, many professionals and lay leaders in Conservative synagogues are leading the charge to ensure that their community reflects the prophet Isaiah’s vision that God’s house “shall be a house of prayer for all people” (56:7). In order to share these congregational exemplars with other leaders who want to raise the bar for inclusion of interfaith families in Conservative Judaism, the United Synagogue of Conservative Judaism (USCJ) and InterfaithFamily (IFF) collaborated to create this Interfaith Inclusion Resource for Conservative Synagogues. This is not an exhaustive list, but a starting point. This document highlights 10 examples where Conservative synagogues of varying sizes and locations model inclusivity in marketing, governance, pastoral counseling and other key areas of congregational life. Our hope is that all congregations will be inspired to think as creatively as possible to embrace congregants where they are, and encourage meaningful engagement in the synagogue and the Jewish community. We are optimistic that this may help some synagogues that have not yet begun the essential work of the inclusion of interfaith families to find a starting point that works for them. Different synagogues may be in different places along the spectrum of welcoming and inclusion. Likewise, the examples presented here reflect a spectrum, from beginning steps to deeper levels of commitment, and may evolve as synagogues continue to engage their congregants in interfaith families.
    [Show full text]
  • The Covenant Renewal Ceremony As the Main Function of Qumran
    religions Article The Covenant Renewal Ceremony as the Main Function of Qumran Daniel Vainstub Department of Bible, Archaeology and Ancient Near East, Ben‑Gurion University, Beer Sheva 8410501, Israel; [email protected] Abstract: Unlike any other group or philosophy in ancient Judaism, the yahad sect obliged all mem‑ ˙ bers of the sect to leave their places of residence all over the country and gather in the sect’s central site to participate in a special annual ceremony of renewal of the covenant between God and each of the members. The increase of the communities that composed the sect and their spread over the en‑ tire country during the first century BCE required the development of the appropriate infrastructure for hosting this annual gathering at Qumran. Consequently, the hosting of the gathering became the main function of the site, and the southern esplanade with the buildings surrounding it became the epicenter of the site. Keywords: Qumran; Damascus Document; scrolls; mikveh 1. Introduction The subject of this paper is the yearly gathering during the festival of Shavuot of all members of the communities that composed the yahad sect.1 After close examination of the Citation: Vainstub, Daniel. 2021. The ˙ evidence for this annual gathering in the sect’s writings and analysis of the archaeological Covenant Renewal Ceremony as the data on the development of the site of Qumran, it became evident that in the generation Main Function of Qumran. Religions 12: 578. https://doi.org/10.3390/ following that of the site’s founders, the holding of the annual gathering became the main ¶ rel12080578 raison d’ tre of the site and the factor that dictated its architectural development.
    [Show full text]
  • Teenage Supervision, Submitted by Yaakov Bieler, Jackbieler@Aol
    Proposed Resolutions for Adoption at the 48th Annual Convention of The Rabbinical Council of America April 29th - May 1st 2007 Museum of Jewish Heritage Battery Place, New York, NY Concluding with Parallel Yemei Iyyun at The Wilf Campus, Yeshiva University The Orthodox Union The Center for Jewish History Rabbi Daniel Cohen, Convention Chairman Rabbi Barry Freundel, Resolutions Committee Chairman On Friday, April 20, 2007, members of the RCA’s Executive Committee were invited to a conference call to be held on Tuesday, April 24, 2007 in order to define the scope of convention resolutions, as per its authority under Article 7, Section 2 of the RCA constitution, “The Resolutions Committee shall prepare and present resolutions to the annual meeting in accordance with the procedures adopted by the Executive Committee.” At that meeting, the Executive Committee unanimously approved the following procedure: “Convention resolutions shall not address the day to day governance of the RCA, which has historically been the responsibility of the officers and the Executive Committee.” Of the many resolutions submitted for possible adoption by the membership at the convention, only resolutions in accordance with the Executive Committee’s procedure are included in this packet, as follows (in no particular order): 1) Supervision of Teenagers, submitted by Yaakov Bieler, p. 2 2) Commendation of Rabbi Naftali Hollander, submitted by Menachem Raab, p. 2 3) Environmental Movement, submitted by Barry Kornblau, p. 2 4) Global Warming, submitted by Barry Kornblau, p. 3 5) Jordanian Construction of Temple Mount Minaret, submitted by Zushe Winner, p. 3 6) Plight of Jews of Gush Katif, submitted by Yehoshua S.
    [Show full text]
  • Conversion to Judaism Finnish Gerim on Giyur and Jewishness ​ ​ ​ ​
    Conversion to Judaism Finnish gerim on giyur and Jewishness ​ ​ ​ ​ Kira Zaitsev Syventävien opintojen tutkielma Afrikan ja Lähi-idän kielet Humanistinen tiedekunta Helsingin yliopisto 2019/5779 provided by Helsingin yliopiston digitaalinen arkisto View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk CORE brought to you by Tiedekunta – Fakultet – Faculty Koulutusohjelma – Utbildningsprogram – Degree Programme Humanistinen tiedekunta Kielten maisteriohjelma Opintosuunta – Studieinriktning – Study Track Afrikan ja Lähi-idän kielet Tekijä – Författare – Author Kira Zaitsev Työn nimi – Arbetets titel – Title Conversion to Judaism. Finnish gerim on giyur and Jewishness Työn laji – Aika – Datum – Month and year Sivumäärä– Sidoantal Arbetets art – Huhtikuu 2019 – Number of pages Level 43 Pro gradu Tiivistelmä – Referat – Abstract Pro graduni käsittelee suomalaisia, jotka ovat kääntyneet juutalaisiksi ilman aikaisempaa juutalaista taustaa ja perhettä. Data perustuu haastatteluihin, joita arvioin straussilaisella grounded theory-menetelmällä. Tutkimuskysymykseni ovat, kuinka nämä käännynnäiset näkevät mitä juutalaisuus on ja kuinka he arvioivat omaa kääntymistään. Tutkimuseni mukaan kääntyjän aikaisempi uskonnollinen tausta on varsin todennäköisesti epätavallinen, eikä hänellä ole merkittäviä aikaisempia juutalaisia sosiaalisia suhteita. Internetillä on kasvava rooli kääntyjän tiedonhaussa ja verkostoissa. Juutalaisuudessa kääntynyt näkee tärkeimpänä eettisyyden sekä juutalaisen lain, halakhan. Kääntymisen nähdään vahvistavan aikaisempi maailmankuva
    [Show full text]
  • Orthodoxy in American Jewish Life1
    ORTHODOXY IN AMERICAN JEWISH LIFE1 by CHARLES S. LIEBMAN INTRODUCTION • DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS OF ORTHODOXY • EARLY ORTHODOX COMMUNITY • UNCOMMITTED ORTHODOX • COM- MITTED ORTHODOX • MODERN ORTHODOX • SECTARIANS • LEAD- ERSHIP • DIRECTIONS AND TENDENCIES • APPENDLX: YESHIVOT PROVIDING INTENSIVE TALMUDIC STUDY A HIS ESSAY is an effort to describe the communal aspects and institutional forms of Orthodox Judaism in the United States. For the most part, it ignores the doctrines, faith, and practices of Orthodox Jews, and barely touches upon synagogue hie, which is the most meaningful expression of American Orthodoxy. It is hoped that the reader will find here some appreciation of the vitality of American Orthodoxy. Earlier predictions of the demise of 11 am indebted to many people who assisted me in making this essay possible. More than 40, active in a variety of Orthodox organizations, gave freely of their time for extended discussions and interviews and many lay leaders and rabbis throughout the United States responded to a mail questionnaire. A number of people read a draft of this paper. I would be remiss if I did not mention a few by name, at the same time exonerating them of any responsibility for errors of fact or for my own judgments and interpretations. The section on modern Orthodoxy was read by Rabbi Emanuel Rackman. The sections beginning with the sectarian Orthodox to the conclusion of the paper were read by Rabbi Nathan Bulman. Criticism and comments on the entire paper were forthcoming from Rabbi Aaron Lichtenstein, Dr. Marshall Ski are, and Victor Geller, without whose assistance the section on the number of Orthodox Jews could not have been written.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Our Shabbat Morning Service
    Torah Crown – Kiev – 1809 Courtesy of Temple Beth Sholom Judaica Museum Rabbi Alan B. Lucas Assistant Rabbi Cantor Cecelia Beyer Ofer S. Barnoy Ritual Director Executive Director Rabbi Sidney Solomon Donna Bartolomeo Director of Lifelong Learning Religious School Director Gila Hadani Ward Sharon Solomon Early Childhood Center Camp Director Dir.Helayne Cohen Ginger Bloom a guide to our Endowment Director Museum Curator Bernice Cohen Bat Sheva Slavin shabbat morning service 401 Roslyn Road Roslyn Heights, NY 11577 Phone 516-621-2288 FAX 516- 621- 0417 e-mail – [email protected] www.tbsroslyn.org a member of united synagogue of conservative judaism ברוכים הבאים Welcome welcome to Temple Beth Sholom and our Shabbat And they came, every morning services. The purpose of this pamphlet is to provide those one whose heart was who are not acquainted with our synagogue or with our services with a brief introduction to both. Included in this booklet are a history stirred, and every one of Temple Beth Sholom, a description of the art and symbols in whose spirit was will- our sanctuary, and an explanation of the different sections of our ing; and they brought Saturday morning service. an offering to Adonai. We hope this booklet helps you feel more comfortable during our service, enables you to have a better understanding of the service, and introduces you to the joy of communal worship. While this booklet Exodus 35:21 will attempt to answer some of the most frequently asked questions about the synagogue and service, it cannot possibly anticipate all your questions. Please do not hesitate to approach our clergy or regular worshipers with your questions following our services.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Law 2011
    JEWISH LAW Syllabus Spring 2011 Professor Sherman L. Cohn Wednesday, 5:45-7:45 Professor Barry Freundel McDonough Room 492 Professor David Saperstein This course will examine from several perspectives the structure, concepts, methodologies, and development of substantive Jewish Law. It will compare Jewish and American Law, and explore the roots of Anglo-American law and politics in the Bible and later Jewish law. The course will examine the insights that Jewish law provides on contemporary legal issues. Each year, the particular issues examined are subject to change depending on controversies then current in society that make such issues interesting to examine, but generally include methods of conflict resolution, evidence, economic justice, privacy, bio-ethics, environment, and family law. Primary source material in translation will be used. A paper is required. Students will be expected to prepare brief discussions on the contrasts and similarities in American Law with the issues of Jewish law discussed. Syllabus Note: While this syllabus sets forth the thrust and the substance of the Seminar, it is subject to possible alteration as the seminar discussion proceeds. General Assignment: For those who do not have a background in Jewish history, Chaim Potok, Wanderings: A History of the Jews, Max Dimont, God, Jews and History, are the best of the shorter, popular books on the topic. It is highly recommended that students in the seminar read one of these books, if possible, as close to the start of the seminar as is feasible. Other good short works are: Ben Sasson, H.H. (ed.), A History of the Jewish People; Sachar, A.L., A History of the Jews; Roth, Cecil, A History of the Jews.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservative Judaism 101: a Primer for New Members
    CONSERVATIVE JUDAISM 101© A Primer for New Members (And Practically Everyone Else!) By Ed Rudofsky © 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 Table of Contents Page Introduction & Acknowledgements ii About the Author iii Chapter One: The Early Days 1 Chapter Two: Solomon Schechter; the Founding of The United Synagogue of America and the Rabbinical Assembly; Reconstructionism; and the Golden Age of Conservative Judaism 2 Chapter Three: The Organization and Governance of the Conservative Movement 6 Chapter Four: The Revised Standards for Congregational Practice 9 Chapter Five: The ―Gay & Lesbian Teshuvot‖ of 2006 14 Introduction – The Halakhic Process 14 Section I – Recent Historical Context for the 2006 Teshuvot 16 Section II – The 2006 Teshuvot 18 Chapter Six: Intermarriage & The Keruv/Edud Initiative 20 Introduction - The Challenge of Intermarriage 20 Section I – Contemporary Halakhah of Intermarriage 22 Section II – The Keruv/Edud Initiative & Al HaDerekh 24 Section III – The LCCJ Position 26 Epilogue: Emet Ve’Emunah & The Sacred Cluster 31 Sources 34 i Addenda: The Statement of Principles of Conservative Judaism A-1 The Sacred Cluster: The Core Values of Conservative Judaism A-48 ii Introduction & Acknowledgements Conservative Judaism 101: A Primer For New Members (And Practically Everyone Else!) originally appeared in 2008 and 2009 as a series of articles in Ha- Hodesh, the monthly Bulletin of South Huntington Jewish Center, of Melville, New York, a United Synagogue-affiliated congregation to which I have proudly belonged for nearly twenty-five (25) years. It grew out of my perception that most new members of the congregation knew little, if anything, of the history and governance of the Conservative Movement, and had virtually no context or framework within which to understand the Movement‘s current positions on such sensitive issues as the role of gay and lesbian Jews and intermarriage between Jews and non-Jews.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Essenism: Heinrich Graetz and Mysticism
    Trinity College Trinity College Digital Repository Faculty Scholarship 1998 A New Essenism: Heinrich Graetz and Mysticism Jonathan Elukin Trinity College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.trincoll.edu/facpub Part of the History Commons Copyright © 1998 The Journal of the History of Ideas, Inc.. All rights reserved. Journal of the History of Ideas 59.1 (1998) 135-148 A New Essenism: Heinrich Graetz and Mysticism Jonathan M. Elukin Since the Reformation, European Christians have sought to understand the origins of Christianity by studying the world of Second Temple Judaism. These efforts created a fund of scholarly knowledge of ancient Judaism, but they labored under deep-seated pre judices about the nature of Judaism. When Jewish scholars in nineteenth-century Europe, primarily in Germany, came to study their own history as part of the Wissenschaft des Judentums movement, they too looked to the ancient Jewish past as a crucia l element in understanding Jewish history. A central figure in the Wissenschaft movement was Heinrich Graetz (1817-1891). 1 In his massive history of the Jews, the dominant synthesis of Jewish history until well into the twentieth century, Graetz constructed a narrative of Jewish history that imbedded mysticism deep within the Jewish past, finding its origins in the first-cen tury sectarian Essenes. 2 Anchoring mysticism among the Essenes was crucial for Graetz's larger narrative of the history of Judaism, which he saw as a continuing struggle between the corrosive effects of mysticism [End Page 135] and the rational rabbinic tradition. An unchanging mysticism was a mirror image of the unchanging monotheistic essence of normative Judaism that dominated Graetz's understanding of Jewish history.
    [Show full text]
  • Convention Program
    Convention Program The 48th Annual Convention of The Rabbinical Council of America April 29th - May 1st 2007 Museum of Jewish Heritage Battery Place, New York, NY Concluding with Parallel Yemei Iyyun at The Wilf Campus, Yeshiva University The Orthodox Union The Center for Jewish History Rabbi Daniel Cohen Chairman Convention Program Tearoom: Sunday/Monday 2.00pm – 5.00pm in the Events Hall Time Sunday Events Sunday 1-3pm RCA Executive Committee Meeting Sunday 2pm Convention Registration Sunday 3pm Opening Keynote Plenary Welcoming Remarks Rabbi Daniel Cohen, Convention Committee Chairman The Rabbi’s Pivotal Leadership Role in Energizing the Future of American Jewish Life Richard Joel, Yeshiva University Rabbi Dr. Tzvi Hersh Weinreb, Orthodox Union Edmond J. Safra Hall Sunday 4 PM Talmud Torah Track Leadership Track Networking Track Part 1 Prophetic Leadership: Guided Workshop: Forget the Lone Ranger: Yirmiyahu as a Man of Emet in a Finding Your Leadership Style Best Networking Practices Within World of Sheker and Maximizing your Personal and Beyond the Synagogue. Rabbi Hayyim Angel, Power within your Shul Chairman: Rabbi David Gottlieb, Cong. Shearith Israel, NY Dr. David Schnall, Shomrei Emunah, Baltimore MD Azrieli Graduate School of Rabbi Reuven Spolter, Jewish Education and Young Israel of Oak Park Administration Rabbi Kalman Topp, YI of Woodmere Shomron Yehudah Chevron Sunday 5 PM Talmud Torah Track Leadership Track Networking Track Part 2 Communication or An IDF Officer’s Leadership Best Networking Practices Excommunication?: An Analysis Insights as Related to the Rabbi Eli Weinstock, of Two Rabbinic Policies Contemporary Rabbinate Cong. Kehilath Jeshurun, NY. Prof. Yaakov Elman, Rabbi Binny Friedman, Rabbi Ari Perl, Congregation Bernard Revel Graduate School Isralight Shaare Tefilla, Dallas TX Rabbi Chaim Marder, Hebrew Institute, White Plains, NY Shomron Yehudah Chevron Sunday 6 PM Mincha Edmond J.
    [Show full text]
  • Reliable Certifications
    unsaved:///new_page_1.htm Reliable Certifications Below are some Kashrus certifications KosherQuest recommends catagorized by country. If you have a question on a symbol not listed below, feel free to ask . Click here to download printable PDF and here to download a printable card. United States of America Alaska Alaska kosher-Chabad of Alaska Congregation Shomrei Ohr 1117 East 35th Avenue Anchorage, Ak 99508 Tel: (907) 279-1200 Fax: (907) 279-7890 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.lubavitchjewishcenter.org Rabbi Yosef Greenberg Arizona Congregation Chofetz Chayim Southwest Torah Institute Rabbi Israel Becker 5150 E. Fifth St. Tuscon, AZ 85711 Cell: (520) 747-7780 Fax: (520) 745-6325 E-mail: [email protected] Arizona K 2110 East Lincoln Drive Phoenix, AZ 85016 Tel: (602) 944-2753 Cell: (602) 540-5612 Fax: (602) 749-1131 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.chabadaz.com Rabbi Zalman levertov, Kashrus Administrator Page 1 unsaved:///new_page_1.htm Chabad of Scottsdale 10215 North Scottsdale Road Scottsdale, AZ 85253 Tel: (480) 998-1410 E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Website: www.chabadofscottsdale.org Rabbi Yossi Levertov, Director Certifies: The Scottsdale Cafe Deli & Market Congregation Young Israel & Chabad 2443 East Street Tuscon, AZ 85719 Tel: (520) 326-8362, 882-9422 Fax: (520) 327-3818 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.chabadoftuscon.com Rabbi Yossie Y. Shemtov Certifies: Fifth Street Kosher Deli & Market, Oy Vey Cafe California Central California Kosher (CCK) Chabad of Fresno 1227 East Shepherd Ave. Fresno, CA 93720 Tel: (559) 435-2770, 351-2222 Fax: (559) 435-0554 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.chabadfresno.com Rabbi Levy I.
    [Show full text]
  • Conversion to Judaism: a Historical Analysis on How Stringencies Arose and Why
    1 Conversion to Judaism: a Historical Analysis on How Stringencies Arose and Why Zane Barrios 2 Table of Contents Abbreviations .............................................................................................................................................. 3 1) Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 4 The Question of Conversion: Why the Stringencies? .......................................................................... 4 Elaboration on the Question .................................................................................................................. 5 An Outline of This Paper ....................................................................................................................... 6 Jewish Demographics Today ................................................................................................................. 7 2) Sources & Methodology...................................................................................................................... 9 Methodology/Theory ............................................................................................................................... 9 Sources Examined ................................................................................................................................. 13 Terminology..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]