DOCSLIB.ORG

2004 Regional Transportation Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

DESTINATION 2030 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN AUGUST 2004 Preparation of this report has been financed in part through grants from the U.S. Department of Transportation. Contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the official view or policies of the U.S. Department of Transportation. Kern Council of Governments 1401 19th Street, Suite 300 Bakersfield, California 93301 661/861-2191 Facsimile 661/324-8215 TTY 661/832-7433 Kern Council of Governments Board of Directors Kern Council of Governments is the regional planning agency as well as the technical and informational resource, and ride share administrator for the area's 11 incorporated cities and the County of Kern. Following Board direction, staff coordinates between local, state, and federal agencies to avoid overlap or duplication of programs. This intergovernmental coordination enables staff to work with many public agencies to ensure that planning and implementation of programs proceed in a coordinated manner. Chairman: Philip Smith Vice Chairman: David Couch Secretary/ Executive Director: Ronald E. Brummett City of Arvin Ex-Officio Members: John Olivares Caltrans City of Bakersfield Alan McCuen David Couch Military Joint Planning Policy Board City of California City Bill Shelton Nicholas Lessenevitch Golden Empire Transit District City of Delano Howard Silver Art Armendariz City of Maricopa Kern Council of Governments Staff: Aileen Throop Darrel Hildebrand, Asst. Director City of McFarland Peter W. Smith, Senior Planner Ralph Melendez Marilyn J. Beardslee, Senior Planner Robert Ball, Senior Planner City of Ridgecrest Joe Stramaglia, Senior Planner Ron Carter Ed Flickinger, Regional Planner III Bill Larsen, Regional Planner III City of Shafter Bob Snoddy, Regional Planner III Garry Nelson Michael Heimer, Regional Planner II Raquel Carabajal, Regional Planner II City of Taft Vincent Zhe Liu, Regional Planner Ray Hatch Greg Palomo, Administrative Assistant Robert Phipps, Administrative Analyst City of Tehachapi Laurie Collins, Executive Secretary Philip Smith Fasika Montalvo, Secretary City of Wasco Cheryl Wegman County of Kern Jon McQuiston County of Kern Raymond A. Watson FINAL DESTINATION 2030 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary Chapter 1 – Introduction Chapter 2 – Transportation Planning Policies Chapter 3 – Planning Assumptions Chapter 4 – Strategic Transportation Investments Chapter 5 – Financing Transportation Chapter 6 – Environmental Justice Chapter 7 – Future Links Chapter 8 – Monitoring Progress Chapter 9 – References Appendices 1. Valleywide Regional Transportation Plan 2. Public Participation Process 3. Compliance Checklist LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1-1 Kern County Figure 3-1 Kern County Population and Housing Figure 4-1 Metropolitan Bakersfield Near Term Projects 2004-2008 Figure 4-2 Near Term Projects in Outlying Areas 2004-2008 Figure 4-3 Metropolitan Bakersfield Long Term Projects Figure 4-4 Long Term Projects in Outlying Areas 2009-2030 Figure 4-5 Financially Unconstrained Projects Figure 4-6 Metropolitan Bakersfield Fixed Route Transit (2000) Figure 4-7 Fixed Route Rural Transit (2000) Figure 4-8 High Speed Rail Alternatives (2002) Figure 4-9 Airports Figure 4-10 Freight Rail Corridors Figure 4-11 Hazardous Material Routes Figure 4-12 Approved Explosive Materials Routes Figure 4-13 Metropolitan Bakersfield Bicycle Routes (2000) Figure 4-14 Incorporated Communities Bicycle Routes (2000) Figure 4-15 Bicycle Accessible Highways Figure 5-1 Transportation Revenues 2004-2030 Figure 5-2 Transportation Investments by Mode 2004-2030 Figure 5-3 Financial Resources for Non-Transit TCMs Figure 5-4 Financial Resources for Public Airport Projects Figure 5-5 Financial Resources for Bus Projects Figure 5-6 Financial Resources for Road Rehabilitation & Safety Projects Figure 5-7 Financial Resources for Non-Motorized Projects Figure 5-8 Financial Resources for Highway, Interchange and Rail Crossings Figure 5-9 Investment Shortfalls Figure 6-1 Environmental Justice Analysis Figure A2-1 Kern County Air Quality Planning Areas LIST OF TABLES Table 4-1 Constrained Program of Projects Table 4-2 Unconstrained Program of Projects Table 4-3 Public Transit Operators within Kern County Table 4-4 Passengers Transported by Kern County Transit Operators Table 4-5 Examples of ITS Benefits EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Destination 2030, Kern County’s Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), is a planning guide over the next 26 years. It provides transportation and air quality goals, policies and actions for now and into the future, and includes programs and projects for congestion management, transit, airports, bicycles and pedestrians, roadways, and freight. And it provides a discussion of all mechanisms used to finance transportation and air quality program implementation. The Destination 2030 RTP is a multi-modal plan representing Kern COG’s vision for a better transportation system to the planning horizon of 2030. The Destination 2030 RTP provides the basic policy and program framework for long- term investment in Kern’s vast regional transportation system in a coordinated, cooperative and continuous manner. Transportation investments in the Kern region that receive state and federal transportation funds must be consistent with the RTP and must be included in the Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) when ready for funding. Destination 2030 RTP is a regional long-range and comprehensive plan that coordinates local transportation plans for all communities within the Kern region. Each community has a different transportation emphasis in their local planning documents, which Destination 2030 RTP brings together under one plan. With adoption of the Destination 2030 RTP, proposed multimodal facilities can be constructed and transportation services can be implemented at a level consistent with projected funding. Projects funded in this RTP are based on the assumption that the successor of TEA-21 (federal Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century) will continue through the 26-year planning period. Chapter 2 – Transportation Planning Policies provides a Table in which the seven goals of the Destination 2030 RTP are linked to the policies for each transportation mode. The seven goals are: 1. Accessibility: the ease of reaching destinations as measured by the percent of commuters who can get to work within a given period of time; 2. Mobility: the ability to move throughout the region and the time it takes to reach desired destinations within a reasonable amount of time; 3. Environment: enhancing the existing transportation system while improving the environment; 4. Cost-effectiveness: maximizing the return on transportation investments; 5. Reliability: percentage of on-time arrivals by both transit and automobiles; 6. Safety: minimizing risk of accidents/injuries as measured by accident rates; 1 7. Equity: equitable distribution of transportation investment benefits; 8. Consumer satisfaction: conditions under which users agree that their transportation needs are being met in a safe, reliable, efficient and cost- effective manner. Chapter 3 – Planning Assumptions describes Kern County’s geographic setting and its demographic profile. The Destination 2030 RTP is required to include an Action Element, to which Chapter 4 responds. Chapter 4 – Strategic Transportation Investments describes by transportation mode: (1) the existing system; (2) accomplishments since 2000, when the previous Regional Transportation Plan was adopted; (3) needs and issues; (4) current activities; and (5) proposed actions. These actions are designed to implement the goals and policies described in Chapter 2. A complete listing of planned improvements by mode is provided in Tables 4-1 and 4.2 at the back of Chapter 4 – Strategic Investments. The list of constrained projects in Table 4-1 and graphic displays of projects are consistent with those projects that have been found to not inhibit regional air quality efforts and progress in attaining federal air quality standards. Chapter 4 also addresses land use issues and intelligent transportation investments. The Destination 2030 RTP is required to include a Financial Element that identifies resources to implement the plan. Chapter 5 – Financing Transportation is responsive to this requirement by providing a cost analysis for implementing the projects included in Chapter 4 - Strategic Transportation Investments. Chapter 6 – Environmental Justice is an important inclusion in the Destination 2030 RTP. The goal of Kern COG’s environmental justice process is to ensure that all people, regardless of race, color, national origin or income, are protected from disproportionate negative or adverse impacts caused by the Destination 2030 Program of Projects outlined in Tables 4-1 and 4-2. This chapter examines the methodology Kern COG uses to determine whether all neighborhoods have reasonable shares of the benefits from the Destination 2030 RTP. It is important to identify and preserve transportation corridors needed to expand or enhance transportation for Kern County’s future. Chapter 7 – Future Links discusses the difficulties that Kern region’s local governments could face in ensuring optimal locations for such activities as the proposed high speed rail as well as high-priority interregional routes such as the proposed south, west, and east beltways, the Union Pacific/Burlington Northern rail corridor between Bakersfield and Tehachapi, as well as other key projects. Air quality contingencies are also discussed. 2 As the designated Metropolitan
Recommended publications
  • Gateway Freeway 99 & Hosking Road Announcing

    Gateway Freeway 99 & Hosking Road Announcing

    BAKERSFIELD GATEWAY FREEWAY 99 & HOSKING ROAD ANNOUNCING • Bakersfield Gateway will offer 800,000 square feet of mixed use retail to be anchored by Bass Pro Shops • Excellent Freeway 99 location with both visibility and access via a new interchange to Freeway 99 • Located 20 miles from the new TEJON OUTLETS, another Freeway 99 traffic generator • Approximately 152,000 cars travel daily on Freeway 99 • Bakersfield Gateway will feature lifestyle amenities including a central gathering area for various family-oriented activities, upscale landscaping, fountains and park benches LIFESTYLE AMENITIES LOCATION COMMUNITY DUANE KEATHLEY VINCE ROCHE JOSH SHERLEY KARI STURGEON STACY BURT PACIFIC COMMERCIAL REALTY ADVISORS Executive Director | Principal Executive Director | Principal Director Sales Associate Sales Associate Lic. #01919464 (661) 633 3816 (661) 633 3817 (661) 633 3840 (661) 633 3820 (661) 633 3833 5060 California Avenue, Suite 1000 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Bakersfield, CA93309 Lic. #00935011 Lic. #01155079 Lic. #01876855 Lic. #01463739 Lic. #01938710 www.paccra.com The depiction in the included photograph of any person, entity, sign, logo or property, other than Cushman & Wakefield’s (C&W) client and the property offered by C&W, is incidental only, and is not intended to connote any affiliation, connection, association, sponsorship or approval by or between that which is incidentally depicted and C&W or its client. This listing shall not be deemed an offer to lease, sublease or sell such property; and, in the event of any transaction for such property, no commission shall be earned by or payable to any cooperating broker except if otherwise provided pursuant to the express terms, rates and conditions of C&W’s agreement with its principal, if, as and when such commission (if any) is actually received from such principal.
  • The 2014 Regional Transportation Plan Promotes a More Efficient

    The 2014 Regional Transportation Plan Promotes a More Efficient

    CHAPTER 5 STRATEGIC INVESTMENTS – VERSION 5 CHAPTER 5 STRATEGIC INVESTMENTS INTRODUCTION This chapter sets forth plans of action for the region to pursue and meet identified transportation needs and issues. Planned investments are consistent with the goals and policies of the plan, the Sustainable Community Strategy element (see chapter 4) and must be financially constrained. These projects are listed in the Constrained Program of Projects (Table 5-1) and are modeled in the Air Quality Conformity Analysis. The 2014 Regional Transportation Plan promotes Forecast modeling methods in this Regional Transportation a more efficient transportation Plan primarily use the “market-based approach” based on demographic data and economic trends (see chapter 3). The system that calls for fully forecast modeling was used to analyze the strategic funding alternative investments in the combined action elements found in this transportation modes, while chapter.. emphasizing transportation demand and transporation Alternative scenarios are not addressed in this document; they are, however, addressed and analyzed for their system management feasibility and impacts in the Environmental Impact Report approaches for new highway prepared for the 2014 Regional Transportation Plan, as capacity. required by the California Environmental Quality Act (State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15126(f) and 15126.6(a)). From this point, the alternatives have been predetermined and projects that would deliver the most benefit were selected. The 2014 Regional Transportation Plan promotes a more efficient transportation system that calls for fully funding alternative transportation modes, while emphasizing transportation demand and transporation system management approaches for new highway capacity. The Constrained Program of Projects (Table 5-1) includes projects that move the region toward a financially constrained and balanced system.
  • Low Stress Bikeway Network in The

    Low Stress Bikeway Network in The

    Bakersfield LOW STRESS BIKE NETWORK PLAN PROPOSAL TO CREATE A LOW-STRESS BIKEWAY NETWORK IN THE VICINITY OF THE BAKERSFIELD HIGH-SPEED RAIL STATION ALIFORNIA 81CYCLE COALITION CONTENTS Executive Summary � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 1 Summary of Implementation Objectives � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �1 Recommended Projects � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �2 Methodology � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �3 Existing Conditions � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �3 Community Outreach � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �3 Introduction � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 4 Site Area � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �4 Project Team � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �4 Existing Conditions � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �4 Demographics and Mode Share � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �5 Goals � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �6 Public Health � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �7
  • Home at Last! Kern County's Plan to End Homelessness

    Home at Last! Kern County's Plan to End Homelessness

    HOME AT LAST! KERN COUNTY’S PLAN TO END HOMELESSNESS BY 2028 Prepared For The Citizens of Kern County By United Way of Kern County And The Kern County Homeless Collaborative May 2018 “It is my strong belief that every individual and family deserves safe, af- fordable housing. I know the caring and compassionate people of Bak- ersfield and Kern County share this goal. It can be achieved through proactive, coordinated action and investments in cost-effective initiatives that solve homelessness. We have developed the plan. Now the real work begins. I am asking that you please join us now in ending homelessness in our community.” Harvey Hall, 2008 Mayor of Bakersfield, 2000-2016 Dedicated to: Harvey L. Hall, 1941-2018 Bakersfield Mayor, Businessman, Visionary Leader, Humanitar- ian, and Friend Executive Summary Home At Last! Kern County’s Plan to End Homelessness by 2028 ii The Kern County Homeless Collaborative believes that home- lessness is a solvable social problem and that through collabo- rative planning and action, we can eventually ensure that every individual and family has safe, affordable housing. Solving homelessness is the morally correct thing to do and will improve the life of the community. We look forward to the day when homelessness becomes a rare, brief and non-recurring event. During the past decade, Kern County saw an overall decrease of almost 40% in its home- less population, despite challenges brought on by Great Recession of 2008-2010. This was in large part due to the work of the Kern County Homeless Collaborative (KCHC) and its partner agencies, guided by the 2008 Home First! A Ten Year Plan to End Chronic Homelessness, which was prepared at the request of then Bakersfield Mayor Harvey L.
  • Draft Existing Conditions, Constraints and Opportunities Report

    Draft Existing Conditions, Constraints and Opportunities Report

    DRAFT METROPOLITAN BAKERSFIELD GENERAL PLAN UPDATE EXISTING CONDITIONS, CONSTRAINTS AND OPPORTUNITIES REPORT APRIL 2009 TM Submitted to: County of Kern Planning Department 2700 'M' Street, Suite 100 Bakersfield CA 93301 (661) 862-8600 City of Bakersfield Planning Department 1715 Chester Avenue, 2nd Floor Bakersfield CA 93301 (661) 326-3733 Submitted by: PMC 2729 Prospect Park Drive, Suite 220 Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 Phone: (916) 361-8384 Fax: (916) 361-1574 TABLE OF CONTENTS DRAFT EXISTING CONDITIONS, CONSTRAINTS AND OPPORTUNITIES REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Issues Discussed.......................................................................................1.0-1 1.2 Document Organization..............................................................................1.0-2 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT 2.1 Land Use Element .................................................................................................2.1-1 2.1.1 Existing Conditions.....................................................................................2.1-1 2.1.2 Issues .........................................................................................................2.1-5 2.2 Circulation Element................................................................................................2.2-1 2.2.1 Existing Conditions.....................................................................................2.2-1 2.2.2 Issues .......................................................................................................2.2-10
  • Amazon HQ2 Location Proposal

    Amazon HQ2 Location Proposal

    Amazon HQ2 Location Proposal October 2017 City of Bakersfield Community CONTACT: Development Department Jacquelyn R. Kitchen 1715 Chester Avenue, Community Development Director 661-326-3754 | [email protected] Bakersfield, CA 93301 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Amazon HQ2 Location Proposal Table of Contents SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................... 1 1.1 Understanding of Amazon Headquarters Project ........................................................... 1 1.2 Why Bakersfield? ......................................................................................................... 2 SECTION 2.0 DYNAMIC CITY IN THE IDEAL LOCATION ................................................ 3 2.1 Engaged Elected Officials and City Staff ....................................................................... 3 2.2 Growing Metropolitan Area ........................................................................................... 3 2.3 Personal Travel Times ................................................................................................. 3 SECTION 3.0 COMMUNITY AND FAMILY ........................................................................ 5 3.1 Quality of Life .............................................................................................................. 5 Affordability .................................................................................................................... 5 Comfortable Commute ...................................................................................................
  • Vested Tract Map # 7242 Approved • Bakersfield 258 Lots, Ne Bakersfield

    Vested Tract Map # 7242 Approved • Bakersfield 258 Lots, Ne Bakersfield

    VESTED TRACT MAP # 7242 APPROVED • BAKERSFIELD 258 LOTS, NE BAKERSFIELD Subject- 258 lots Lake Ming EXCLUSIVE OFFERING MEMORANDUM Stacey Osso Steve Relth WDLAND.COM Land Advisor Senior Land Advisor 94 Discovery ▪ Irvine, CA 92618 949.789.4555, X 17 760.433.7422 949.789.4555 ph | BRE # 01211887 [email protected] [email protected] VESTED TM # 7242 , 258 LOTS APPROVED | BAKERSFIELD, CA TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. Page No. Process & Timing 1 Development Location Maps Overview 9 High Aerial 2 Due Diligence Materials 10 Low Aerial 3 Assigned Schools Exhibit 11 Regional Map 4 Market Local Map 5 City of Bakersfield 12 Maps, Site Plans and Renderings Competitive Projects 13 Vesting Tract Map - Zoning 6 Resale Comparables 14 Vesting Tract Map 7 SP Land Use Map 8 Resale Comparables Map 15 The information contained herein has been obtained from sources we deem to be reliable. Buyer is cautioned to make an independent investigation of the property and review all information concerning the property as no representations or guarantees of accuracy and completeness are made, either expressed or implied by WD Land or its affiliates. BRE License No. 01211887. VESTED TRACT MAP # 7242, 258 LOTS | BAKERSFIELD, CA PROCESS & TIMING Offer Due Date OFFERS ARE DUE NO LATER THAN TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 9TH. Offer Preparation Due diligence information will be made available to buyers prior to the offer date for the property. Seller is seeking a buyer who has a strong understanding of the property and market, and has completed substantial review of the property without having it under contract. Offers are to be made with the following information provided by Buyer: ▪ Proof of Funds Asking Price $3,000,000 Terms All cash at the close of escrow.
  • Kern Council of Governments (Kern Cog) 2014 P Reliminary R Egional T Ransportation P Lan (Rtp)

    Kern Council of Governments (Kern Cog) 2014 P Reliminary R Egional T Ransportation P Lan (Rtp)

    KERN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS (KERN COG) 2014 P RELIMINARY R EGIONAL T RANSPORTATION P LAN (RTP) Prepared for: KERN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS (KERN COG) 1401 19TH STREET, SUITE 300 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93301 Prepared by: 2729 PROSPECT PARK DRIVE, SUITE 220 RANCHO CORDOVA, CA 95670 DECEMBER 2012 K ERN C OUNCIL OF G OVERNMENTS (KERN COG) 2014 PRELIMINARY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN (RTP) Prepared for: KERN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS (KERN COG) 1401 19TH STREET, SUITE 300 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93301 Prepared by: PMC 2729 PROSPECT PARK DRIVE, SUITE 220 RANCHO CORDOVA, CA 95670 DECEMBER 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 1-1 Regional Planning Process ........................................................................................................................ 1-1 Federal Surface Transportation Act (SAFETEA-LU and Its Successor) ................................................... 1-2 Overview of State Requirements ............................................................................................................... 1-2 Public Outreach .......................................................................................................................................... 1-3 Transportation Planning in the Kern Region .............................................................................................. 1-4 CHAPTER 2 Transportation Planning Policies ..............................................................................................................
  • ROSEDALE VILLAGE 2649-2733 CALLOWAY DRIVE, BAKERSFIELD, CA Northwest Bakersfield’S First Theater-Anchored Center

    ROSEDALE VILLAGE 2649-2733 CALLOWAY DRIVE, BAKERSFIELD, CA Northwest Bakersfield’S First Theater-Anchored Center

    A 218,714 SF COMMUNITY SHOPPING CENTER IN PRIME NORTHWEST BAKERSFIELD ROSEDALE VILLAGE 2649-2733 CALLOWAY DRIVE, BAKERSFIELD, CA Northwest Bakersfield’s First Theater-Anchored Center AGENT: JJ WOODS, CLS AGENT: GARRET TUCKNESS, CLS SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT | PRINCIPAL SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT | PRINCIPAL RETAIL PROPERTIES TEAM RETAIL PROPERTIES TEAM CENTRAL CALIFORNIA COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL CENTRAL CALIFORNIA 10000 Stockdale Highway DIR 661 631 3807 DIR 661 631 3811 Suite 102 LICENSE NUMBER 01420570 LICENSE NUMBER 01323185 Bakersfield, CA 93311 [email protected] [email protected] www.colliers.com/bakersfield ROSEDALE VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER PROPERTY INFORMATION 2649-2733 CALLOWAY DRIVE, BAKERSFIELD, CA Rosedale Village is a community shopping center located in the heart of the Northwest Bakersfield trade area. It is situated at the highly-traveled, signalized intersection of Rosedale Hwy and Calloway Drive with a combined average daily traffic count of 58,735 vehicles. Rosedale Village is one of only two community centers that services the entire Northwest trade area. It is also in proximity to power center, The Northwest Promenade. Per the REA, approved, shared parking is available at the north end of the property next to Firehouse Restaurant. > Primary Retail corridor in the Northwest > Come join these tenants!! AVAILABLE > Suite 110 3,375 SF > Suite 314 975 SF Contact Agent for Pricing! DEMOGRAPHICS 1 MILE 3 MILE 5 MILE POPULATION 9,327 86,076 199,609 EMPLOYEES 4,992 31,482 77,810 TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 3,266 29,383 71,617 AVERAGE
  • Metropolitan Bakersfield Transit System Long-Range Plan

    Metropolitan Bakersfield Transit System Long-Range Plan

    Golden Empire Transit District | Kern Council of Governments METROPOLITAN BAKERSFIELD TRANSIT SYSTEM LONG-RANGE PLAN Final Report April 2012 Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. | i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS METROPOLITAN BAKERSFIELD LONG-RANGE TRANSIT PLAN STEERING COMMITTEE Golden Empire Transit • Karen King, Chief Executive Officer • Gina Hayden, Marketing Manager • Emery Rendez, Planner Kern Council of Governments • Rob Ball, Interim Director • Ron Brummett, Executive Director (Retired December 2011) • Bob Snoddy, Regional Planner CONSULTANT TEAM Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates • Linda Rhine, Project Manager • Paul Jewel, Deputy Project Manager • Steve Boland, Lead Service Planner • Kara Vuicich, Financial Planner • Anneka Imkamp, GIS /Cartographer Fehr & Peers Transportation Consultants • Richard Lee, Modeler • Kyle Cooke, Assistant Modeler VRPA Technologies, Inc. • Georgiena M. Vivian, Marketing Specialist • Dena Graham, Marketing Assistant Table of Contents Page 1 Executive Summary .........................................................................................................1-1 Existing Conditions ................................................................................................................................. 1-1 Best Practices .......................................................................................................................................... 1-2 Public Outreach .....................................................................................................................................

  • OFFICE of the CITY MANAGER October 20, 2017 TO

    OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER October 20, 2017 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council AT FROM: Alan Tandy, City Manager SUBJECT: General Information Notable Items This week, Chevron announced a 26% reduction of its San Joaquin Valley Business Unit (SJVBU) workforce, a decision stemming from the company’s restructuring Transformation Project. The SJVBU includes Kern County, Fresno County and Monterey County. The exact number of employees to be reassigned or laid off is not known at this time. This reduction highlights the unfortunate repercussions to the local economy due to uncertainty in the oil market. On September 7, 2017, Amazon released a Request for Proposals (RFP) for their 2nd Headquarters in North America. Amazon expects to invest $5 billion in construction and provide up to 50,000 high-paying jobs. In addition to Amazon’s direct hiring and investment, construction and ongoing operation of Amazon HQ2 is expected to create tens of thousands of additional jobs and tens of billions of dollars in additional investment in the surrounding community. Under the direction of the City Manager’s Office, the Community Development Department has prepared a proposal on behalf of the City of Bakersfield. As you may be aware, this project and their locational process have generated submissions from all over the U.S. Many of those submissions will offer incentives not available to our situation. We felt our particular and unique advantages should be articulated and put forward. The thought processes involved will have applicability to other opportunities in the future. Thanks to the Community Development team for the special effort on this! The attached Proposal and Cover Letter was submitted to Amazon on October 19th, 2017.
  • Attachment to Submission L029 (Jerry Lakeman, Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District, October 13, 2011) - Fresno Metro Flood Control Attachments.Pdf - Continued

    Attachment to Submission L029 (Jerry Lakeman, Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District, October 13, 2011) - Fresno Metro Flood Control Attachments.Pdf - Continued

    California High-Speed Train Project EIR/EIS Fresno to Bakersfield Section Vol. IV Response to Comments from Local Agencies Attachment to Submission L029 (Jerry Lakeman, Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District, October 13, 2011) - Fresno Metro Flood Control Attachments.pdf - Continued Page 20-251 California High-Speed Train Project EIR/EIS Fresno to Bakersfield Section Vol. IV Response to Comments from Local Agencies Attachment to Submission L029 (Jerry Lakeman, Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District, October 13, 2011) - Fresno Metro Flood Control Attachments.pdf - Continued Page 20-252 California High-Speed Train Project EIR/EIS Fresno to Bakersfield Section Vol. IV Response to Comments from Local Agencies Attachment to Submission L029 (Jerry Lakeman, Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District, October 13, 2011) - Fresno Metro Flood Control Attachments.pdf - Continued Page 20-253 California High-Speed Train Project EIR/EIS Fresno to Bakersfield Section Vol. IV Response to Comments from Local Agencies Attachment to Submission L029 (Jerry Lakeman, Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District, October 13, 2011) - Fresno Metro Flood Control Attachments.pdf - Continued Page 20-254 California High-Speed Train Project EIR/EIS Fresno to Bakersfield Section Vol. IV Response to Comments from Local Agencies Attachment to Submission L029 (Jerry Lakeman, Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District, October 13, 2011) - Fresno Metro Flood Control Attachments.pdf - Continued Page 20-255 California High-Speed Train Project EIR/EIS Fresno to Bakersfield Section Vol. IV Response to Comments from Local Agencies Attachment to Submission L029 (Jerry Lakeman, Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District, October 13, 2011) - Fresno Metro Flood Control Attachments.pdf - Continued Page 20-256 California High-Speed Train Project EIR/EIS Fresno to Bakersfield Section Vol.