DOCSLIB.ORG

The 2014 Regional Transportation Plan Promotes a More Efficient

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

CHAPTER 5 STRATEGIC INVESTMENTS – VERSION 5 CHAPTER 5 STRATEGIC INVESTMENTS INTRODUCTION This chapter sets forth plans of action for the region to pursue and meet identified transportation needs and issues. Planned investments are consistent with the goals and policies of the plan, the Sustainable Community Strategy element (see chapter 4) and must be financially constrained. These projects are listed in the Constrained Program of Projects (Table 5-1) and are modeled in the Air Quality Conformity Analysis. The 2014 Regional Transportation Plan promotes Forecast modeling methods in this Regional Transportation a more efficient transportation Plan primarily use the “market-based approach” based on demographic data and economic trends (see chapter 3). The system that calls for fully forecast modeling was used to analyze the strategic funding alternative investments in the combined action elements found in this transportation modes, while chapter.. emphasizing transportation demand and transporation Alternative scenarios are not addressed in this document; they are, however, addressed and analyzed for their system management feasibility and impacts in the Environmental Impact Report approaches for new highway prepared for the 2014 Regional Transportation Plan, as capacity. required by the California Environmental Quality Act (State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15126(f) and 15126.6(a)). From this point, the alternatives have been predetermined and projects that would deliver the most benefit were selected. The 2014 Regional Transportation Plan promotes a more efficient transportation system that calls for fully funding alternative transportation modes, while emphasizing transportation demand and transporation system management approaches for new highway capacity. The Constrained Program of Projects (Table 5-1) includes projects that move the region toward a financially constrained and balanced system. Constrained projects have undergone air quality conformity analyses to ensure that they contribute to the Kern region’s compliance with state and federal air quality rules. The Unconstrained Program of Projects (Table 5-2) incorporates the region’s unbudgeted “vision.” These projects represent alternatives that could be moved to the constrained program if support for an individual project remains strong and if project funding is identified. Status as an unconstrained project does not imply that the project is not needed; rather, it simply cannot be accomplished given the fiscal constraints facing Kern County. The Kern Council of Governments (Kern COG) is vigilant in its search for funding to support these projects. No unconstrained projects are included in the air quality conformity analysis. In the future, as the funding picture changes and community values and priorities for transportation projects are honed, unconstrained projects may be moved to the constrained program. Should this occur, the RTP would be amended and a new assessment of the plan’s conformity with state and federal air quality rules and standards would be made. For this Regional Transportation Plan, the Unconstrained Program of Projects reflects the vision for Kern County’s ideal system. Dialogue is ongoing with business, government, social services, and agriculture interests to improve everyone’s understanding of how the transportation system impacts the region’s quality of life. The participation process sheds light on important values such as mobility choice and accessibility, travel time reliability, cost effectiveness, and environmental sensitivity. Kern Council of Governments (Kern COG) 2014 Preliminary Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) April 2013 5-1 1401 19th Street, Suite 300, Bakersfield, California 93301 The source of specific funding and Kern COG are not responsible for any misuse or misinformation contained in the report. CHAPTER 5 STRATEGIC INVESTMENTS – VERSION 5 The planning process is iterative. System-wide performance measures have been developed and will be used to help policymakers and the community-at-large evaluate tradeoffs among transportation improvement alternatives. Performance measures will also be used to help evaluate how the 2014 RTP contributes to the Kern region’s quality of life. Refer to Chapter 2 for additional information about the performance measures. Each element in this chapter addresses proposed actions to implement the goals and policies of Chapter 2. These actions outline specifically how the goals of the plan will be accomplished. This chapter contains the following action elements: • Freight Movement Action Element • Public Transportation Action Element • Active Transportation Action Element • Transportation Air Emissions Reduction Action Elment • Intelligent Transportation Systems Action Element • Congestion Management Program Action Element • Regional Streets and Highways Action Element • Aviation Action Element • Safety/Security Action Element • Land Use Action Element In the following Constrained Program of Projects, major highway improvements are divided into five chronological groupings to facilitate estimations of project completion. Highway improvements that cannot be constructed within the financial constraint of any one group may be repeated in later groups. If a project is not fully funded within the five-year time frame, it would require phasing over a longer time frame. The entire corridor, however, would be environmentally assessed during the preliminary engineering phase. 2014 Preliminary Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Kern Council of Governments (Kern COG) April 2013 5-2 1401 19th Street, Suite 300, Bakersfield, California 93301 The source of specific funding and Kern COG are not responsible for any misuse or misinformation contained in the report. CHAPTER 5 STRATEGIC INVESTMENTS – VERSION 5 FIGURE 5-1 CONSTRAINED PROJECTS MAP (2014–2040) Kern Council of Governments (Kern COG) 2014 Preliminary Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) April 2013 5-3 1401 19th Street, Suite 300, Bakersfield, California 93301 The source of specific funding and Kern COG are not responsible for any misuse or misinformation contained in the report. CHAPTER 5 STRATEGIC INVESTMENTS – VERSION 5 PROJECT LISTING - TABLE 5-1. CONSTRAINED PROGRAM OF PROJECTS 2014 through 2040 - Transit Project Location Scope Y OE Cos t Vanpool Countyw ide Vanpools - build and maintaine fleet of 500 Vans by 2040 48,000,000 Park and Ride Various Park and Ride Lots (1,500 spaces) 6,000,000 Bus Service Metro Bkd Full size natural gas buses 232,500,000 Full size natural gas buses - 120 replacement buses Full size natural gas buses - Fixed Routes - 130 new buses Full size natural gas buses - Bus Rapid Transit - 24 new buses Full size natural gas buses - Express Service - 36 new buses Bus Service Countywide Full, midsize and mini-van size natural gas buses 34,700,000 Full size natural gas buses - Express Service - 10 new buses Midsize natural gas buses - 120 replacement buses Midsize natural gas buses - 120 new buses Mini van / buses - 45 replacement buses Bus Service Metro Bkd 2 Transit Maintenance Stations 10,000,000 Bus Service Metro Bkfd 3 transfer stations 15,000,000 ITS Countyw ide ITS related improvements / upgrades 3,000,000 Passenger Rail Rosamond Metrolink extension - Palmdale/Lancaster to Rosamond 112,000,000 Passenger Rail Bakersfield Amtrak Station - Phase II 13,000,000 Passenger Rail Bakersfield High Speed Rail Station - Bakersfield 50,000,000 Passenger Rail Region High Speed Rail Alignment and Facilities Fresno to Bakersfield 1,000,000,000 Passenger Rail Shafter/Wasco High Speed Rail Heavy Maintenance Facility 450,000,000 Sub-total $1,974,200,000 2014 through 2040 - Highway Operational Improvements Project Location Scope Y OE Cos t HOV Lanes Bakersfield Various State Routes - HOV lanes 149,000,000 Westside Parkw ay - Heath Road and Stockdale Highw ay to SR 58 at Fairfax State Route 178 - Existing w est freew ay terminus to Osw ell Street HOV Ram ps Bakersfield Install HOV Ramps and metering improvements at various locations 148,000,000 SR 99 Interchange at Snow Road - HOV Ramp Metering 6,434,783 SR 99 Interchange at Olive Drive - HOV Ramp Metering SR 99 Interchange at Rosedale Hw y - HOV Ramp Metering SR 99 Interchange at California Ave - HOV Ramp Metering SR 99 Interchange at Ming Ave- HOV Ramp Metering SR 99 Interchange at White Lane- HOV Ramp Metering 2014 Preliminary Regional Transportation Plan (RTP)/ Kern Council of Governments (Kern COG) Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) April 2013 5-4 1401 19th Street, Suite 300, Bakersfield, California 93301 The source of specific funding and Kern COG are not responsible for any misuse or misinformation contained in the report. CHAPTER 5 STRATEGIC INVESTMENTS – VERSION 5 PROJECT LISTING - TABLE 5-1. CONSTRAINED PROGRAM OF PROJECTS CONTINUED 2014 through 2040 - Highway Operational Improvements (Continued) Project Location Scope Y OE Cos t SR 99 Interchange at Panama Lane- HOV Ramp Metering SR 99 Interchange at SR 119 - HOV Ramp Metering SR 58 Interchange at Oak Street - HOV Ramp Metering SR 58 Interchange at H-Chester Ave - HOV Ramp Metering SR 58 Interchange at Union Street - HOV Ramp Metering SR 58 Interchange at Cottonw ood Road - HOV Ramp Metering SR 58 Interchange at Mount Vernon - HOV Ramp Metering SR 58 Interchange at Osw ell Street - HOV Ramp Metering SR 58 Interchange at Fairfax Road - HOV Ramp Metering SR 58 Interchange at Weedpatch Hw y - HOV Ramp Metering SR 178 Interchange at SR 204 - HOV Ramp Metering SR 178 Interchange at Beale Avenue - HOV Ramp Metering SR 178 Interchange at
Recommended publications
  • 0821 Piper Flyer.Pdf (207 Downloads)

    0821 Piper Flyer.Pdf (207 Downloads)

    piperflyer.org August 2021 / Volume 18 / Issue 8 …the heart of your aircraft® Aircraft Spruce is the leading worldwide distributor of general aviation parts and supplies. Our orders ship same day, at the lowest prices, and with the support of the most helpful staff in the industry. We look forward to our next opportunity to serve you! www.aircraftspruce.com ORDER YOUR FREE 2021-2022 CATALOG! 2 • Piper Flyer |August March 20212020 1000 PAGES OF PRODUCTS! Call Toll Free 1-877-4-SPRUCE …the heart of your aircraft® Aircraft Spruce is the leading worldwide distributor of general aviation parts and supplies. Our orders ship same day, at the lowest prices, and with the support of the most helpful staff in the industry. We look forward to our next opportunity to serve you! www.aircraftspruce.com ORDER YOUR FREE 2021-2022 CATALOG! 1000 PAGES OF PRODUCTS! Call Toll Free 1-877-4-SPRUCE August 2021 | Piper Flyer • 3 August 2021 What’s inside / VOLUME 18 / ISSUE 8 CONTENTS The View from Here 8 by Jennifer Dellenbusch Letters 8 Events 10 The High and the Writey 12 by Kevin Garrison Questions & Answers 14 by Steve Ells The Speed of Flight 18 by Tom Machum Comanche Landing Gear, Part 2 20 by Kristin Winter ATC: Unraveling the Mystery, 20 28 Part 3 by Robert Marks So, You Want to Be a Bush 34 Pilot? Here’s What You Need to Know 34 42 by Steve Ells Transponder and Altimeter/ 42 Static System Certification by Steve Ells Destination: 48 Minter Field by Steve Ells Press Releases 54 Aircraft Safety Alerts 58 Advertiser Index 64 Back When: Vintage Piper 66 Advertising and Marketing Cover: 1957 Piper PA-18 Super Cub on the beach at Hinchinbrook Island, Alaska- 2011 Valdez Fly-in, Alaska Daniel H.
  • Short Range Transit Plan (PDF)

    Short Range Transit Plan (PDF)

    Short Range Transit Plan FY 2020/21 - 2024/25 Golden Empire Transit District Adopted September 2020 Golden Empire Transit District Board of Directors Cindy Parra Jim Baldwin Chair Vice Chair City of Bakersfield County of Kern Carlos Bello Leasa Engel Rueben Pascual Director Director Director City of Bakersfield At-Large County of Kern A five-member Board of Directors governs Golden Empire Transit District. Two members are appointed by the Bakersfield City Council, two members are appointed by the Kern County Board of Supervisors, and one member is appointed at-large by the four other Board members. GET coordinates with City of Bakersfield, the County of Kern, and the Kern Council of Governments. Karen King Chief Executive Officer Short Range Transit Plan FY 20/21 – 24/25 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................... iv CHAPTER 1 SYSTEM DESCRIPTION ......................................................1 CHAPTER 2 SERVICE & PERFORMANCE STANDARDS ......................... 28 CHAPTER 3 SERVICE ANALYSIS .......................................................... 39 CHAPTER 4 PREVIOUS SERVICE REVISIONS ........................................ 77 CHAPTER 5 RECOMMENDED SERVICE PLAN ...................................... 81 CHAPTER 6 FINANCIAL PLAN ............................................................ 93 CHAPTER 7 GLOSSARY ...................................................................... 98 REFERENCE MAPS .........................................................................
  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District 1325 J Street Sacramento, California Contract: DACA05-97-D-0013, Task 0001 FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION

    U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District 1325 J Street Sacramento, California Contract: DACA05-97-D-0013, Task 0001 FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION

    CALIFORNIA HISTORIC MILITARY BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES INVENTORY VOLUME II: THE HISTORY AND HISTORIC RESOURCES OF THE MILITARY IN CALIFORNIA, 1769-1989 by Stephen D. Mikesell Prepared for: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District 1325 J Street Sacramento, California Contract: DACA05-97-D-0013, Task 0001 FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION Prepared by: JRP JRP HISTORICAL CONSULTING SERVICES Davis, California 95616 March 2000 California llistoric Military Buildings and Stnictures Inventory, Volume II CONTENTS CONTENTS ..................................................................................................................................... i FIGURES ....................................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF ACRONYMS .................................................................................................................. iv PREFACE .................................................................................................................................... viii 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 1-1 2.0 COLONIAL ERA (1769-1846) .............................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Spanish-Mexican Era Buildings Owned by the Military ............................................... 2-8 2.2 Conclusions ..................................................................................................................
  • East Bakersfield

    East Bakersfield

    Recommendations to Improve Pedestrian & Bicycle Safety for the Community of East Bakersfield October 2017 Recommendations to Improve Pedestrian & Bicycle Safety for the Community of East Bakersfield By Austin Hall, Tony Dang, Wendy Ortiz, California Walks; Jill Cooper, Katherine Chen, Ana Lopez, UC Berkeley Safe Transportation Research & Education Center (SafeTREC) Introduction At the invitation of the Kern County Department of Public Health, the University of California at Berkeley’s Safe Transportation Research and Education Center (SafeTREC) and California Walks (Cal Walks) facilitated a community-driven pedestrian and bicycle safety action-planning workshop in East Bakersfield to improve pedestrian safety, bicycle safety, walkability, and bikeability across the East Bakersfield community. Prior to the workshop, Cal Walks staff conducted an in-person site visit on Friday, July 14, 2017, to adapt the Community Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Training program curriculum to meet the local communities’ needs and to provide context-sensitive example strategies for the community’s existing conditions. Cal Walks facilitated the workshop on August 22, 2017, which consisted of: 1) an overview of multidisciplinary approaches to improve pedestrian and bicycle safety; 2) three walkability and bikeability assessments along three routes; and 3) small group action-planning discussions to facilitate the development of community-prioritized recommendations to inform East Bakersfield’s active transportation efforts. This report summarizes the workshop proceedings, as well as ideas identified during the process and recommendations for pedestrian and bicycle safety projects, policies, and programs. Background Community Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Training Program The Community Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Training (CPBST) program is a joint project of UC Berkeley SafeTREC and Cal Walks.
  • California State Parks

    California State Parks

    1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · 12 · 13 · 14 · 15 · 16 · 17 · 18 · 19 · 20 · 21 Pelican SB Designated Wildlife/Nature Viewing Designated Wildlife/Nature Viewing Visit Historical/Cultural Sites Visit Historical/Cultural Sites Smith River Off Highway Vehicle Use Off Highway Vehicle Use Equestrian Camp Site(s) Non-Motorized Boating Equestrian Camp Site(s) Non-Motorized Boating ( Tolowa Dunes SP C Educational Programs Educational Programs Wind Surfing/Surfing Wind Surfing/Surfing lo RV Sites w/Hookups RV Sites w/Hookups Gasquet 199 s Marina/Boat Ramp Motorized Boating Marina/Boat Ramp Motorized Boating A 101 ed Horseback Riding Horseback Riding Lake Earl RV Dump Station Mountain Biking RV Dump Station Mountain Biking r i S v e n m i t h R i Rustic Cabins Rustic Cabins w Visitor Center Food Service Visitor Center Food Service Camp Site(s) Snow Sports Camp Site(s) Geocaching Snow Sports Crescent City i Picnic Area Camp Store Geocaching Picnic Area Camp Store Jedediah Smith Redwoods n Restrooms RV Access Swimming Restrooms RV Access Swimming t Hilt S r e Seiad ShowersMuseum ShowersMuseum e r California Lodging California Lodging SP v ) l Klamath Iron Fishing Fishing F i i Horse Beach Hiking Beach Hiking o a Valley Gate r R r River k T Happy Creek Res. Copco Del Norte Coast Redwoods SP h r t i t e s Lake State Parks State Parks · S m Camp v e 96 i r Hornbrook R C h c Meiss Dorris PARKS FACILITIES ACTIVITIES PARKS FACILITIES ACTIVITIES t i Scott Bar f OREGON i Requa a Lake Tulelake c Admiral William Standley SRA, G2 • • (707) 247-3318 Indian Grinding Rock SHP, K7 • • • • • • • • • • • (209) 296-7488 Klamath m a P Lower CALIFORNIA Redwood K l a Yreka 5 Tule Ahjumawi Lava Springs SP, D7 • • • • • • • • • (530) 335-2777 Jack London SHP, J2 • • • • • • • • • • • • (707) 938-5216 l K Sc Macdoel Klamath a o tt Montague Lake A I m R National iv Lake Albany SMR, K3 • • • • • • (888) 327-2757 Jedediah Smith Redwoods SP, A2 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • (707) 458-3018 e S Mount a r Park h I4 E2 t 3 Newell Anderson Marsh SHP, • • • • • • (707) 994-0688 John B.
  • Real Time Arrival Information Using the Farebox How to Plan Your Trip

    Real Time Arrival Information Using the Farebox How to Plan Your Trip

    Real Time Arrival Information How to Plan Your Trip Smart phones: Use the Golden Empire Transit Start by finding your destination on the Free App for iphones and androids System Map located in the middle of the Computers/tablets: Go to getbus.org book. Regular phones: Using the number on the GET offers trip planning at getbus.org. stop, call 869-2GET (2438) and put in the stop Next, find the starting point where you will number. board the bus. To speak with a Customer Service Representa- Decide which route or routes you need to take. tive, call 869-2GET (2438) Some trips require more than one bus, which Customer Service Representatives are on duty means you will need to transfer from one bus Monday through Friday from 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 to another. If you will need to transfer, find the intersection of the two routes. This is where you p.m. and on Saturday and Sunday from 6:30 will exit the first bus and board the second. a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Check the schedule to determine what time GET now offers Real Time Information on you need to arrive at your bus stop. The buses computers and mobile devices travel through the schedule from left to right. Computer/Tablets: Click on real time infor- Choose the timetable section that refers to mation at getbus.org. Choose a route. Hold the direction you will be traveling, for example the clicker over a stop (red dot) for location Route 21- Bakersfield College/Eastbound.
  • Chapter 8 Manzanar

    Chapter 8 Manzanar

    CHAPTER 8 MANZANAR Introduction The Manzanar Relocation Center, initially referred to as the “Owens Valley Reception Center”, was located at about 36oo44' N latitude and 118 09'W longitude, and at about 3,900 feet elevation in east-central California’s Inyo County (Figure 8.1). Independence lay about six miles north and Lone Pine approximately ten miles south along U.S. highway 395. Los Angeles is about 225 miles to the south and Las Vegas approximately 230 miles to the southeast. The relocation center was named after Manzanar, a turn-of-the-century fruit town at the site that disappeared after the City of Los Angeles purchased its land and water. The Los Angeles Aqueduct lies about a mile to the east. The Works Progress Administration (1939, p. 517-518), on the eve of World War II, described this area as: This section of US 395 penetrates a land of contrasts–cool crests and burning lowlands, fertile agricultural regions and untamed deserts. It is a land where Indians made a last stand against the invading white man, where bandits sought refuge from early vigilante retribution; a land of fortunes–past and present–in gold, silver, tungsten, marble, soda, and borax; and a land esteemed by sportsmen because of scores of lakes and streams abounding with trout and forests alive with game. The highway follows the irregular base of the towering Sierra Nevada, past the highest peak in any of the States–Mount Whitney–at the western approach to Death Valley, the Nation’s lowest, and hottest, area. The following pages address: 1) the physical and human setting in which Manzanar was located; 2) why east central California was selected for a relocation center; 3) the structural layout of Manzanar; 4) the origins of Manzanar’s evacuees; 5) how Manzanar’s evacuees interacted with the physical and human environments of east central California; 6) relocation patterns of Manzanar’s evacuees; 7) the fate of Manzanar after closing; and 8) the impact of Manzanar on east central California some 60 years after closing.
  • 646 Subpart C—Private Aircraft

    646 Subpart C—Private Aircraft

    § 122.15 19 CFR Ch. I (4–1–08 Edition) § 122.15 User fee airports. Location Name (a) Permission to land. The procedures Trenton, New Jer- Trenton Mercer Airport. for obtaining permission to land at a sey. user fee airport are the same proce- Victorville, California Southern California Logistics Airport. Waterford, Michigan Oakland County International Airport. dures as those set forth in § 122.14 for Waukegan, Illinois .. Waukegan Regional Airport. landing rights airports. West Chicago, Illi- Dupage County Airport. (b) List of user fee airports. The fol- nois. Wheeling, Illinois .... Chicago Executive Airport. lowing is a list of user fee airports des- Wilmington, Ohio .... Airborne Air Park Airport. ignated by the Commissioner of Cus- Yoder, Indiana ........ Fort Wayne International Airport. toms in accordance with 19 U.S.C. 58b. Ypsilanti, Michigan Willow Run Airport. The list is subject to change without notice. Information concerning service (c) Withdrawal of designation. The des- at any user fee airport can be obtained ignation as a user fee airport shall be by calling the airport or its authority withdrawn under either of the fol- directly. lowing circumstances: (1) If either Customs or the airport Location Name authority gives 120 days written notice of termination to the other party; or Addison, Texas ...... Addison Airport. Ardmore, Oklahoma Ardmore Industrial Airpark. (2) If any amounts due to be paid to Bakersfield, Cali- Meadows Field Airport. Customs are not paid on a timely basis. fornia. Bedford, Massachu- L.G. Hanscom Field. [T.D. 92–90, 57 FR 43397, Sept. 21, 1992, as setts. amended by T.D. 93–32, 58 FR 25933, Apr.
  • 4.13 Public Health and Safety

    4.13 Public Health and Safety

    METROPOLITAN BAKERSFIELD METROPOLITAN BAKERSFIELD GENERAL PLAN UPDATE EIR 4.13 PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY This section describes the potential risks to human health as a result of exposure to agricultural pesticides, radon emissions, and spores of the Coccidioides Immitis Fungus (Valley Fever). This section also describes the means by which hazardous substances are regulated from a federal, state and local perspective and discusses potential adverse impacts to human health and the environment due to exposure to hazardous materials. Finally, this section addresses public safety issues associated with rail line and aircraft overflight hazards. Aircraft overflight hazards address public safety issues with the Meadows Field Airport and Bakersfield Airpark. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING HUMAN HEALTH HAZARDS Agricultural Chemicals Environmental risks to human health known to exist in the San Joaquin Valley include potential exposure to unsafe agricultural chemicals as a result of development on or adjacent to agricultural lands. According to the Kern County Health Department, potential risks to human health due to pesticide usage can result from contamination of groundwater, inhalation due to crop dusting, and inhalation of contaminated dust, as a result of grading activities. Additionally, pesticide overspray is a potential human health hazard. Pesticide overspray is defined as applying pesticide beyond the boundaries of the target area. Pesticide drift, like overspray, often implies a lack of due care on the part of the pesticide applicator. Drift is defined as the movement of pesticide in air currents or by diffusion onto property beyond the boundaries of the target area. Agricultural pesticides have contaminated certain groundwater basins in the west Bakersfield area; as a result these basins are no longer in use (refer to Section 4.8, Hydrology and Drainage).
  • TCRP Report 101 – Toolkit for Rural Community Coordinated

    TCRP Report 101 – Toolkit for Rural Community Coordinated

    TRANSIT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH TCRP PROGRAM REPORT 101 Sponsored by the Federal Transit Administration Toolkit for Rural Community Coordinated Transportation Services TCRP OVERSIGHT AND PROJECT TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 2004 (Membership as of January 2004) SELECTION COMMITTEE (as of January 2004) OFFICERS CHAIR Chair: Michael S. Townes, President and CEO, Hampton Roads Transit, Hampton, VA J. BARRY BARKER Vice Chair: Joseph H. Boardman, Commissioner, New York State DOT Transit Authority of River City Executive Director: Robert E. Skinner, Jr., Transportation Research Board MEMBERS MEMBERS KAREN ANTION MICHAEL W. BEHRENS, Executive Director, Texas DOT Karen Antion Consulting SARAH C. CAMPBELL, President, TransManagement, Inc., Washington, DC GORDON AOYAGI Montgomery County Government E. DEAN CARLSON, Director, Carlson Associates, Topeka, KS RONALD L. BARNES JOHN L. CRAIG, Director, Nebraska Department of Roads Central Ohio Transit Authority DOUGLAS G. DUNCAN, President and CEO, FedEx Freight, Memphis, TN LINDA J. BOHLINGER GENEVIEVE GIULIANO, Director, Metrans Transportation Center and Professor, School of Policy, HNTB Corp. Planning, and Development, USC, Los Angeles ANDREW BONDS, JR. BERNARD S. GROSECLOSE, JR., President and CEO, South Carolina State Ports Authority Parsons Transportation Group, Inc. SUSAN HANSON, Landry University Prof. of Geography, Graduate School of Geography, Clark University JENNIFER L. DORN JAMES R. HERTWIG, President, Landstar Logistics, Inc., Jacksonville, FL FTA HENRY L. HUNGERBEELER, Director, Missouri DOT NATHANIEL P. FORD, SR. ADIB K. KANAFANI, Cahill Professor of Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley Metropolitan Atlanta RTA RONALD F. KIRBY, Director of Transportation Planning, Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments CONSTANCE GARBER HERBERT S. LEVINSON, Principal, Herbert S. Levinson Transportation Consultant, New Haven, CT York County Community Action Corp.
  • Council Chamber • 336 Pacific Avenue • Shafter, CA 93263 AGENDA REGULAR MEETING SHAFTER CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, MAY 1, 2018 CA

    Council Chamber • 336 Pacific Avenue • Shafter, CA 93263 AGENDA REGULAR MEETING SHAFTER CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, MAY 1, 2018 CA

    Council Chamber • 336 Pacific Avenue • Shafter, CA 93263 AGENDA REGULAR MEETING SHAFTER CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, MAY 1, 2018 CALL TO ORDER: 7:00 p.m. ROLL CALL: Mayor Prout Mayor Pro Tem Alvarado Council Member Espericueta Council Member Garcia Council Member Givens PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Council Member Espericueta INVOCATION: Mayor Pro Tem Alvarado APPROVAL OF AGENDA: PRESENTATION: 1. Proclamation: April 29 – May 5, 2018 Cinco de Mayo Days. 2. Proclamation: May 6 – 12, 2018 Municipal Clerks Week. PUBLIC COMMENT: This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wanting to address the Council only on matters not listed on this agenda. Speakers are limited to five minutes unless additional time is needed for translation. Please state your name and address for the record before making your presentation. CONSENT CALENDAR: All items on the consent calendar are considered routine and non-controversial by staff and will be approved by one motion if no member of the Council or public wishes to comment or ask questions. If comment or discussion is desired by anyone, the item will be removed from the consent calendar and will be considered in the listed sequence with an opportunity for any member of the public to address the Council concerning the item before action is taken. 1. Approve General Checks: April 19, 2018, April 24, 2018, April 26, 2018. 2. Approve Payroll: April 30, 2018. 3. Accept Treasurer’s Report: February 2018. 4. Approve Minutes: April 17, 2018 Special, April 17, 2018 Regular. Shafter City Council Agenda May 1, 2018 Page 2 5. Approve Resolution of Commendation: Cinco de Mayo Grand Marshals Albert Barrera, Vince Duffy, and Gilbert Rodriguez.
  • Neither the Faith and Credit Nor the Taxing Power of The

    Neither the Faith and Credit Nor the Taxing Power of The

    NEW ISSUE — BOOK-ENTRY-ONLY NO RATING In the opinion of Quint & Thimmig LLP, San Francisco, California, Bond Counsel, subject, however, to certain qualifications described in this Official Statement, under existing law, interest on the 2010 Bonds (i) is excludable from gross income of the owners thereof for federal income tax purposes, (ii) is not included as an item of tax preference in computing the federal alternative minimum tax for individuals and corporations, and (iii) is not taken into account in computing adjusted current earnings, which is used as an adjustment in determining the federal alternative minimum tax for certain corporations. In addition, in the opinion of Bond Counsel, interest on the 2010 Bonds is exempt from personal income taxation imposed by the State of California. See “TAX MATTERS” herein. $12,670,000 TEJON RANCH PUBLIC FACILITIES FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2008-1 (TEJON INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS — EAST) SPECIAL TAX BONDS, SERIES 2010-A Dated: Date of Delivery Due: September 1, as shown on inside cover page The $12,670,000 Tejon Ranch Public Facilities Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 2008-1 (Tejon Industrial Complex Public Improvements — East) Special Tax Bonds, Series 2010-A (the “2010 Bonds”) are being issued by the Tejon Ranch Public Facilities Financing Authority (the “Authority”) on behalf of the Tejon Ranch Public Facilities Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 2008-1 (Tejon Industrial Complex Public Improvements — East) (the “District”). The Authority is a joint powers authority formed by the County of Kern (the “County”) and the Tejon-Castac Water District (the “Water District”).