DOCSLIB.ORG

TCRP Report 101 – Toolkit for Rural Community Coordinated

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
TCRP Report 101 – Toolkit for Rural Community Coordinated TRANSIT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH TCRP PROGRAM REPORT 101 Sponsored by the Federal Transit Administration Toolkit for Rural Community Coordinated Transportation Services TCRP OVERSIGHT AND PROJECT TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 2004 (Membership as of January 2004) SELECTION COMMITTEE (as of January 2004) OFFICERS CHAIR Chair: Michael S. Townes, President and CEO, Hampton Roads Transit, Hampton, VA J. BARRY BARKER Vice Chair: Joseph H. Boardman, Commissioner, New York State DOT Transit Authority of River City Executive Director: Robert E. Skinner, Jr., Transportation Research Board MEMBERS MEMBERS KAREN ANTION MICHAEL W. BEHRENS, Executive Director, Texas DOT Karen Antion Consulting SARAH C. CAMPBELL, President, TransManagement, Inc., Washington, DC GORDON AOYAGI Montgomery County Government E. DEAN CARLSON, Director, Carlson Associates, Topeka, KS RONALD L. BARNES JOHN L. CRAIG, Director, Nebraska Department of Roads Central Ohio Transit Authority DOUGLAS G. DUNCAN, President and CEO, FedEx Freight, Memphis, TN LINDA J. BOHLINGER GENEVIEVE GIULIANO, Director, Metrans Transportation Center and Professor, School of Policy, HNTB Corp. Planning, and Development, USC, Los Angeles ANDREW BONDS, JR. BERNARD S. GROSECLOSE, JR., President and CEO, South Carolina State Ports Authority Parsons Transportation Group, Inc. SUSAN HANSON, Landry University Prof. of Geography, Graduate School of Geography, Clark University JENNIFER L. DORN JAMES R. HERTWIG, President, Landstar Logistics, Inc., Jacksonville, FL FTA HENRY L. HUNGERBEELER, Director, Missouri DOT NATHANIEL P. FORD, SR. ADIB K. KANAFANI, Cahill Professor of Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley Metropolitan Atlanta RTA RONALD F. KIRBY, Director of Transportation Planning, Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments CONSTANCE GARBER HERBERT S. LEVINSON, Principal, Herbert S. Levinson Transportation Consultant, New Haven, CT York County Community Action Corp. SUE MCNEIL, Director, Urban Transportation Center and Professor, College of Urban Planning and Public FRED M. GILLIAM Affairs, University of Illinois, Chicago Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority MICHAEL D. MEYER, Professor, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute KIM R. GREEN of Technology GFI GENFARE SHARON GREENE KAM MOVASSAGHI, Secretary of Transportation, Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development Sharon Greene & Associates CAROL A. MURRAY, Commissioner, New Hampshire DOT JILL A. HOUGH JOHN E. NJORD, Executive Director, Utah DOT North Dakota State University DAVID PLAVIN, President, Airports Council International, Washington, DC ROBERT H. IRWIN JOHN REBENSDORF, Vice Pres., Network and Service Planning, Union Pacific Railroad Co., Omaha, NE British Columbia Transit PHILIP A. SHUCET, Commissioner, Virginia DOT CELIA G. KUPERSMITH C. MICHAEL WALTON, Ernest H. Cockrell Centennial Chair in Engineering, University of Texas, Austin Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and LINDA S. WATSON, General Manager, Corpus Christi Regional Transportation Authority, Corpus Christi, TX Transportation District PAUL J. LARROUSSE EX OFFICIO MEMBERS National Transit Institute MARION C. BLAKEY, Federal Aviation Administrator, U.S.DOT DAVID A. LEE Connecticut Transit SAMUEL G. BONASSO, Acting Administrator, Research and Special Programs Administration, U.S.DOT CLARENCE W. MARSELLA REBECCA M. BREWSTER, President and COO, American Transportation Research Institute, Smyrna, GA Denver Regional Transportation District GEORGE BUGLIARELLO, Chancellor, Polytechnic University and Foreign Secretary, National Academy FAYE L. M. MOORE of Engineering Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation THOMAS H. COLLINS (Adm., U.S. Coast Guard), Commandant, U.S. Coast Guard Authority JENNIFER L. DORN, Federal Transit Administrator, U.S.DOT STEPHANIE L. PINSON ROBERT B. FLOWERS (Lt. Gen., U.S. Army), Chief of Engineers and Commander, U.S. Army Corps of Gilbert Tweed Associates, Inc. Engineers ROBERT H. PRINCE, JR. EDWARD R. HAMBERGER, President and CEO, Association of American Railroads DMJM+HARRIS JOHN C. HORSLEY, Exec. Dir., American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials JEFFREY M. ROSENBERG RICK KOWALEWSKI, Deputy Director, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, U.S.DOT Amalgamated Transit Union WILLIAM W. MILLAR, President, American Public Transportation Association PAUL P. SKOUTELAS MARY E. PETERS, Federal Highway Administrator, U.S.DOT Port Authority of Allegheny County SUZANNE RUDZINSKI, Director, Transportation and Regional Programs, U.S. EPA LINDA S. WATSON JEFFREY W. RUNGE, National Highway Traffic Safety Administrator, U.S.DOT Corpus Christi RTA ALLAN RUTTER, Federal Railroad Administrator, U.S.DOT EX OFFICIO MEMBERS ANNETTE M. SANDBERG, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administrator, U.S.DOT WILLIAM W. MILLAR WILLIAM G. SCHUBERT, Maritime Administrator, U.S.DOT APTA ROBERT A. VENEZIA, Program Manager of Public Health Applications, National Aeronautics and Space MARY E. PETERS Administration FHWA JOHN C. HORSLEY TRANSIT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH PROGRAM AASHTO Transportation Research Board Executive Committee Subcommittee for TCRP ROBERT E. SKINNER, JR. TRB MICHAEL S. TOWNES, Hampton Roads Transit, Hampton, VA (Chair) JOSEPH H. BOARDMAN, New York State DOT TDC EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR JENNIFER L. DORN, Federal Transit Administration, U.S.DOT LOUIS F. SANDERS GENEVIEVE GIULIANO, University of Southern California, Los Angeles APTA WILLIAM W. MILLAR, American Public Transportation Association SECRETARY ROBERT E. SKINNER, JR., Transportation Research Board ROBERT J. REILLY C. MICHAEL WALTON, University of Texas, Austin TRB LINDA S. WATSON, Corpus Christi Regional Transportation Authority, Corpus Christi, TX TRANSIT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH PROGRAM TCRP REPORT 101 Toolkit for Rural Community Coordinated Transportation Services JON E. BURKHARDT Westat Rockville, MD CHARLES A. NELSON Nelson Development, Ltd. Akron, OH and GAIL MURRAY DAVID KOFFMAN Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates, Inc. San Francisco, CA SUBJECT AREAS Planning and Administration • Public Transit Research Sponsored by the Federal Transit Administration in Cooperation with the Transit Development Corporation TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD WASHINGTON, D.C. 2004 www.TRB.org TRANSIT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH PROGRAM TCRP REPORT 101 The nation’s growth and the need to meet mobility, Project B-24 FY’01 environmental, and energy objectives place demands on public ISSN 1073-4872 transit systems. Current systems, some of which are old and in need ISBN 0-309-08797-X of upgrading, must expand service area, increase service frequency, Library of Congress Control Number 2004107820 and improve efficiency to serve these demands. Research is necessary to solve operating problems, to adapt appropriate new © 2004 Transportation Research Board technologies from other industries, and to introduce innovations into Price $36.00 the transit industry. The Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP) serves as one of the principal means by which the transit industry can develop innovative near-term solutions to meet demands placed on it. The need for TCRP was originally identified in TRB Special Report 213—Research for Public Transit: New Directions, published in 1987 and based on a study sponsored by the Urban Mass Transportation Administration—now the Federal Transit Admin- istration (FTA). A report by the American Public Transportation NOTICE Association (APTA), Transportation 2000, also recognized the need The project that is the subject of this report was a part of the Transit Cooperative for local, problem-solving research. TCRP, modeled after the Research Program conducted by the Transportation Research Board with the longstanding and successful National Cooperative Highway approval of the Governing Board of the National Research Council. Such Research Program, undertakes research and other technical activities approval reflects the Governing Board’s judgment that the project concerned is in response to the needs of transit service providers. The scope of appropriate with respect to both the purposes and resources of the National TCRP includes a variety of transit research fields including plan- Research Council. ning, service configuration, equipment, facilities, operations, human The members of the technical advisory panel selected to monitor this project and resources, maintenance, policy, and administrative practices. to review this report were chosen for recognized scholarly competence and with TCRP was established under FTA sponsorship in July 1992. due consideration for the balance of disciplines appropriate to the project. The Proposed by the U.S. Department of Transportation, TCRP was opinions and conclusions expressed or implied are those of the research agency authorized as part of the Intermodal Surface Transportation that performed the research, and while they have been accepted as appropriate Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA). On May 13, 1992, a memorandum by the technical panel, they are not necessarily those of the Transportation agreement outlining TCRP operating procedures was executed by Research Board, the National Research Council, the Transit Development the three cooperating organizations: FTA, The National Academies, Corporation, or the Federal Transit Administration of the U.S. Department of acting through the Transportation Research Board (TRB); and Transportation. the Transit Development Corporation, Inc. (TDC), a nonprofit Each report is reviewed and accepted for publication by the technical panel educational and research organization
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The 2014 Regional Transportation Plan Promotes a More Efficient
    CHAPTER 5 STRATEGIC INVESTMENTS – VERSION 5 CHAPTER 5 STRATEGIC INVESTMENTS INTRODUCTION This chapter sets forth plans of action for the region to pursue and meet identified transportation needs and issues. Planned investments are consistent with the goals and policies of the plan, the Sustainable Community Strategy element (see chapter 4) and must be financially constrained. These projects are listed in the Constrained Program of Projects (Table 5-1) and are modeled in the Air Quality Conformity Analysis. The 2014 Regional Transportation Plan promotes Forecast modeling methods in this Regional Transportation a more efficient transportation Plan primarily use the “market-based approach” based on demographic data and economic trends (see chapter 3). The system that calls for fully forecast modeling was used to analyze the strategic funding alternative investments in the combined action elements found in this transportation modes, while chapter.. emphasizing transportation demand and transporation Alternative scenarios are not addressed in this document; they are, however, addressed and analyzed for their system management feasibility and impacts in the Environmental Impact Report approaches for new highway prepared for the 2014 Regional Transportation Plan, as capacity. required by the California Environmental Quality Act (State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15126(f) and 15126.6(a)). From this point, the alternatives have been predetermined and projects that would deliver the most benefit were selected. The 2014 Regional Transportation Plan promotes a more efficient transportation system that calls for fully funding alternative transportation modes, while emphasizing transportation demand and transporation system management approaches for new highway capacity. The Constrained Program of Projects (Table 5-1) includes projects that move the region toward a financially constrained and balanced system.
    [Show full text]
  • Zeroing in on Zebs 2020 Edition
    ZEROING IN ON ZEBS 2020 EDITION THE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY TRANSIT BUS INDEX: A NORTH AMERICAN ZEB INVENTORY REPORT December 2020 A CALSTART Report By John Jackson, Bryan Lee, and Fred Silver www.calstart.org Zeroing in on ZEBs: 2020 Edition Copyright © 2020 by CALSTART. All rights reserved. This report was funded by funding from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), and the California Air Resources Board (CARB) Hybrid and Zero-Emission Truck and Bus Voucher Incentive Project (HVIP). No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission by CALSTART. Requests for permission or further information should be addressed to CALSTART, 48 S. Chester Ave, Pasadena, CA 91106. This document is based on information gathered in December 2020. This is the 2020 edition of this document. i Zeroing in on ZEBs: 2020 Edition List of Acronyms APTA American Public Transit Association BEB Battery Electric Bus CAA Clean Air Act CARB California Air Resources Board FCEB Fuel Cell Electric Bus FAA Federal Aviation Administration FTA Federal Transit Administration GVWR Gross Vehicle Weight Rating HVIP Hybrid and Zero-Emission Truck and Bus Voucher Incentive Project ICT Innovative Clean Transit kW kilowatt LoNo Federal Transit Administration Low or No Emissions Program MOU Memorandum of Understanding MW Megawatt TIRCP Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program TIUOO Total In-Use or On-Order U.S. United States of America ZEB Zero-Emission Bus ii Zeroing in on ZEBs: 2020 Edition Table of Contents List of Acronyms ............................................................................................................................ ii Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fy19-20 Low Carbon Transit Operations Program Allocation Award List
    Caltrans-Division of Rail and Mass Transportation FY19-20 LOW CARBON TRANSIT OPERATIONS PROGRAM ALLOCATION AWARD LIST Disadvantaged Low 1/2 Mile Low- Community Income Income Buffer Total Project Project Benefit Benefit Benefit Request SB 1119 District Project ID Lead Agency: Project Name: Type: Project Description (Short): FY19-20 City of Arcata (Arcata Mad River Transit To allow Free Transit to encourage ridership on Arcata Mad River Transit NO YES NO #N/A 1 19-20-D01-001 System) AMRTS Free Fares Operations System $13,339 This project will provide reduced fares and free ticket vouchers to raise Humboldt Transit Reduced Fares and Free awareness of public transportation. This will give riders an opportunity to NO YES NO #N/A 1 19-20-D01-002 Authority Ticket Vouchers Operations try transit at no cost. $303,307 This project provides for the purchase and installation of a solar canopy to cover the bus parking lot. The canopy will provide enough electricity to power four electric buses and the operations facility. The canopy will also shade the lot, reducing the time buses are idling prior to inspection and NO YES NO #N/A 1 19-20-D01-003 Lake Transit Authority Solar Canopy Project Capital start-up. $102,736 The project will provide unlimited free use of Lake Transit Authority bus routes anywhere in Lake, Napa, or Mendocino counties for the following: Free Fares for Community (1) any Mendocino College or Woodland College student displaying a College Students and the valid student identification and (2) any child between the age of 7 and 17 NO YES NO #N/A 1 19-20-D01-004 Lake Transit Authority Summer Cruisin' Program Operations between June 15 and August 31 (known as the Summer Cruisin' Program) $23,351 RCTA will use LCTOP funding in a three-year bus electrification project, planning an installing an electric recharge facility and augmenting an FTA bus grant to purchase an electric powered vehicle.
    [Show full text]
  • An Evaluation of California's Continuously Appropriated
    San Jose State University SJSU ScholarWorks Master's Projects Master's Theses and Graduate Research Fall 12-2019 An Evaluation of California’s Continuously Appropriated Programs Funded through Cap-and-Trade Domingo Candelas San Jose State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_projects Part of the Energy Policy Commons, Environmental Policy Commons, Health Policy Commons, Policy Design, Analysis, and Evaluation Commons, Policy History, Theory, and Methods Commons, Public Administration Commons, and the Transportation Commons Recommended Citation Candelas, Domingo, "An Evaluation of California’s Continuously Appropriated Programs Funded through Cap-and-Trade" (2019). Master's Projects. 899. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31979/etd.rjby-w76c https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_projects/899 This Master's Project is brought to you for free and open access by the Master's Theses and Graduate Research at SJSU ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Projects by an authorized administrator of SJSU ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. An Evaluation of California’s Continuously Appropriated Programs Funded through Cap-and-Trade By Domingo Candelas A Thesis Quality Research Paper Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Master’s Degree in PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Frances Edwards, Ph.D. The Graduate School San Jose State University Fall 2019 CONTINUOUS APPROPRIATIONS IN CAP-AND-TRADE 2 Abstract In 2006, the State of California passed AB 32, the Global Warming Solutions Act (CARB, 2014). Through this legislation, the state sought to reduce its carbon emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. The California Air Resources Board (CARB) was tasked with doing so and thus instituted the Cap-and-Trade program, a market-based mechanism to reduce emissions.
    [Show full text]
  • Kern Council of Governments (Kern Cog) 2014 P Reliminary R Egional T Ransportation P Lan (Rtp)
    KERN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS (KERN COG) 2014 P RELIMINARY R EGIONAL T RANSPORTATION P LAN (RTP) Prepared for: KERN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS (KERN COG) 1401 19TH STREET, SUITE 300 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93301 Prepared by: 2729 PROSPECT PARK DRIVE, SUITE 220 RANCHO CORDOVA, CA 95670 DECEMBER 2012 K ERN C OUNCIL OF G OVERNMENTS (KERN COG) 2014 PRELIMINARY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN (RTP) Prepared for: KERN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS (KERN COG) 1401 19TH STREET, SUITE 300 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93301 Prepared by: PMC 2729 PROSPECT PARK DRIVE, SUITE 220 RANCHO CORDOVA, CA 95670 DECEMBER 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 1-1 Regional Planning Process ........................................................................................................................ 1-1 Federal Surface Transportation Act (SAFETEA-LU and Its Successor) ................................................... 1-2 Overview of State Requirements ............................................................................................................... 1-2 Public Outreach .......................................................................................................................................... 1-3 Transportation Planning in the Kern Region .............................................................................................. 1-4 CHAPTER 2 Transportation Planning Policies ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Missed Opportunity: Transit and Jobs in Metropolitan America
    METROPOLITAN INFRASTRUCTURE INITIATIVE SERIES and Metropolitan Opportunity Series Missed Opportunity: Transit and Jobs in Metropolitan America Adie Tomer, Elizabeth Kneebone, Robert Puentes, and Alan Berube Findings An analysis of data from 371 transit providers in the nation’s 100 largest metropolitan areas reveals that: n Nearly 70 percent of large metropolitan residents live in neighborhoods with access to transit service of some kind. Transit coverage is highest in Western metro areas such as “ As states and Honolulu and Los Angeles, and lowest in Southern metro areas such as Chattanooga and Greenville. Regardless of region, residents of cities and lower-income neighborhoods have regions strive to better access to transit than residents of suburbs and middle/higher-income neighborhoods. n In neighborhoods covered by transit, morning rush hour service occurs about once every put Americans 10 minutes for the typical metropolitan commuter. In less than one quarter of large metro areas (23), however, is this typical service frequency, or “headway,” under 10 minutes. These back to work, include very large metro areas such as New york, Los Angeles, Houston, and Washington. Transit services city residents on average almost twice as frequently as suburban residents. poli cymakers n The typical metropolitan resident can reach about 30 percent of jobs in their metropoli- tan area via transit in 90 minutes. Job access differs considerably across metro areas, from should be careful 60 percent in Honolulu to just 7 percent in Palm Bay, reflecting variable transit coverage levels and service frequencies, and variable levels of employment and population decentralization. not to sever the Among very large metro areas, the share of jobs accessible via transit ranges from 37 percent in Washington and New york to 16 percent in Miami.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 6. Transit Systems Included in Database
    Appendix 6. Transit Systems Included in Database Primary Metropolitan Area Transit System Akron, OH Metro Regional Transit Authority Akron, OH Portage Area Regional Transportation Authority Akron, OH Stark Area Regional Transit Authority Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY Capital District Transportation Authority Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY City of Mechanicville Transit Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY Schoharie County Public Transportation Albuquerque, NM ABQ Ride Albuquerque, NM City of Belen Transit Albuquerque, NM Pueblo of Santa Ana Transit Albuquerque, NM Rail Runner (NMDOT) Albuquerque, NM Sandoval County Transit Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ County of Carbon Transit Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ Lehigh and Northampton Transportation Authority Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA Buckhead Community Improvement District Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA City of Canton Transit Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA Cobb Community Transit Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA Georgia Regional Transportation Authority Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA Gwinnett County Board of Commissioners Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC Augusta Richmond County Transit Department Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC Best Friends Express (Lower Savannah COG) Austin-Round Rock, TX Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority Austin-Round Rock, TX Capitol Area Rural Transportation System Bakersfield, CA City of Arvin Transit Bakersfield, CA City of Delano Transit Bakersfield, CA Golden Empire
    [Show full text]
  • Zeroing in on Zebs
    ZEROING IN ON ZEBS THE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY TRANSIT BUS INDEX October 17, 2019 A CALSTART Report By Fred Silver, John Jackson and Bryan Lee www.calstart.org Copyright © 2019 by CALSTART. All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission by CALSTART. Requests for permission or further information should be addressed to CALSTART, 48 S. Chester Ave, Pasadena, CA 91106. This document is based on information gathered on September 27th, 2019. This is the second edition of this document. i Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................................ 1 Results and Analysis of Survey .............................................................................................................................. 3 Important Notes About This Report ........................................................................................................................ 4 State-By-State Zero-emission Bus Distribution ................................................................................................... 5 Transit Properties with Battery Electric or Fuel Cell Transit Buses ................................................................ 7 United States Zero-Emission Bus Map ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Esplanade Mall Santa Barbara County Courthouse Goleta Hollister
    Transit Services of California and Nevada with connecting services in neighboring states Drain Reedsport LL-Fri LL-Fri LL-Mon Elkton Yoncalla Wells Creek Oakland Sutherlin Key LL-Fri B For detailed information on design choices and what services are or aren't included, see Lakeside Wilbur transitingla.wordpress.com/2018/03/06/california-transit-map North Bend Pony Village Mall Glide Idleyld Park Umpqua Community College LL-Thu This map is intended for reference purposes only. Please verify routes, schedules, and policies with carriers before travel! Map is not to scale. All trademarks are the property of their respective owners. This is an unofficial map which is not authorized by or affiliated with any public transportation provider. © 2018-2020 Transiting LA O Version 1.3.7, March 8, 2020 Hauser 1 2 3 For buses and ferries, color coding groups routes of same carrier 99 IC-L/H Stop served by lines 1, 2, and 3 Roseburg Stop served by lines 1 and 3 UTrans Green www.umpquatransit.com Gy Stop served by line 2 Coos County Area Transit (CCAT) Winston www.coostransit.org LL-Tue Dotted line: Limited/seasonal service on line 2 North Bend Newmark Center Dillard Coos Bay Tioga Hotel Thin black dotted line: Pedestrian connection Myrtle Creek Coos Bay 2nd/Central Tenmile Riddle 4 SCBEC Camas Valley Porter Creek Canyonville Dashed line: flex-route/on-demand service on line 4. Box encloses service area with multiple connection points to other lines. LL-Wed IC-MP/C CE Azalea Coquille Quail Trail Public Transit Glendale klamathtribes.org/ administration/bus-schedules
    [Show full text]
  • Areawide Directory 2
    2020 Better Planning, Better Transportation 1401 19th Street, Suite 300 Bakersfield, CA 93301 Phone: 661-635-2900 Fax: 661-324-8215 TTY: 661-832-7433 TDD: 800-874-9436 www.kerncog.org Volume: 19 Number: 3 Table of Contents PAGE PAGE KERN REGIONAL AGENCIES…………………....52 INTRODUCTION………………………………………5 Kern Regional Agencies…………………...53 Background Miscellaneous Local Organizations………54 Services Kern County Superintendent Members of Schools………………………………..….55 Major Functions KERN TRANSPORTATION AGENCIES………….57 KERN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS…………….7 Golden Empire Transit District…………….58 Member Agencies and Representatives Regional Transit Services Directory……...59 Ex-Officio Members Transportation Agencies…………………...60 Transportation Technical Advisory Committee OTHER REGIONAL AGENCIES…………………..62 KERN COG STAFF…..……………………………....8 San Joaquin Valley Regional Social Services and Transit Operators Planning Agencies………………………….63 Committees Eastern California Transportation Planning Partnership……………………….64 KERN MOTORIST AID AUTHORITY……………….9 Other Regional Agencies…………………..65 CALENDAR OF MONTHLY LOCAL AGENCY MEETINGS…………………………….....11 STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENTS, COMMISSIONS AND AUTHORITIES………….….67 ESTIMATED DISTANCE BETWEEN CITIES California Department of Transportation IN KERN COUNTY…………………………14 (CALTRANS)……….……..…………….…..68 California Transportation Commission INCORPORATED CITIES OF KERN COUNTY….16 (CTC)……………….….………………….....69 Arvin………………………………………….17 California High-Speed Rail Authority……..70 Bakersfield…………………………………..19 California City……………………………….21
    [Show full text]
  • LCTOP 20-21 Award List
    CALTRANS DIVISION OF RAIL AND MASS TRANSPORTATION FY 20-21 LOW CARBON TRANSIT OPERATIONS PROGRAM ALLOCATION AWARD LIST Disadvantag Low 1/2 Mile Low- ed Total Project Dist. Project ID # Lead Agency Project Name Project Type Project Description (Short) Income Income Buffer SB 1119 Community Request FY20-21 Benefit Benefit Benefit City of Arcata (Arcata Mad Operations To allow Free Transit to encourage ridership on Arcata Mad River Transit 1 20-21-D01-001 AMRTS Free Fares N Y N $11,531 N River Transit System) System City of Arcata (Arcata Mad Funding to Purchase Capital This money will be used to supplement other monies to be used to purchase 1 20-21-D01-002 N Y N $149,146 N River Transit System) electric buses electric buses. Capital This project provides for the purchase and installation of a solar canopy to cover the bus parking lot. The canopy will provide enough electricity to 1 20-21-D01-003 Lake County Authority Solar Canopy Project power four electric buses and the operations facility. The canopy will also N Y N $69,466 N shade the lot, reducing the times buses are idling prior to inspection and start- up. Operations Allow fare free rides system wide to Mendocino County residents a during 1 20-21-D01-004 Mendocino Transit Authority Fare Free Ride Program certain predetermined dates to encourage ridership during and after Covid- N Y N $6,881 N 19. Purchase ZEB to replace Capital 1 20-21-D01-005 Mendocino Transit Authority MTA is going to replace an older gas-powered bus with a zero-emission bus.
    [Show full text]
  • Erin Kenneally
    Agreement of Services by Independent Contractor THIS AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES BY INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR is made and effective as of this 15th day of October , 2019 , by and between the CITY OF BEAUMONT (“CITY”) whose address is 550 E. 6th Street, Beaumont, California 92223 and Moore and Associates, Inc., a California corporation , whose address is 25115 Avenue Stanford, Suite B215, Valencia, CA 91355 (“CONTRACTOR”). RECITALS This Agreement is entered into on the basis of the following facts, understandings and intentions of the parties to this Agreement: A. CITY published a Request For Proposals (“RFP”) on September 18, 2019, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit “A” B. In response to the RFP, CONTRACTOR made a proposal (“Proposal”) to the CITY to provide such professional services, which Proposal is attached hereto as Exhibit “B”; and C. CITY desires to engage CONTRACTOR to provide a Comprehensive Operations Analysis as provided in the RFP and Proposal.; and D. CONTRACTOR agrees to provide such services pursuant to, and in accordance with, the terms and conditions of this Agreement, and represents and warrants to CITY that CONTRACTOR possesses the necessary skills, licenses, certifications, qualifications, personnel and equipment to provide such services. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing Recitals and mutual covenants contained herein, CITY and CONTRACTOR agree as follows: 1. Term of Agreement. This Agreement is effective as of the date first above written and shall continue until terminated as provided for herein. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, this Agreement shall automatically terminate after one (1) year unless extended by the parties with the approval of the City Council of the CITY.
    [Show full text]