DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Existing Conditions, Constraints and Opportunities Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Existing Conditions, Constraints and Opportunities Report DRAFT METROPOLITAN BAKERSFIELD GENERAL PLAN UPDATE EXISTING CONDITIONS, CONSTRAINTS AND OPPORTUNITIES REPORT APRIL 2009 TM Submitted to: County of Kern Planning Department 2700 'M' Street, Suite 100 Bakersfield CA 93301 (661) 862-8600 City of Bakersfield Planning Department 1715 Chester Avenue, 2nd Floor Bakersfield CA 93301 (661) 326-3733 Submitted by: PMC 2729 Prospect Park Drive, Suite 220 Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 Phone: (916) 361-8384 Fax: (916) 361-1574 TABLE OF CONTENTS DRAFT EXISTING CONDITIONS, CONSTRAINTS AND OPPORTUNITIES REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Issues Discussed.......................................................................................1.0-1 1.2 Document Organization..............................................................................1.0-2 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT 2.1 Land Use Element .................................................................................................2.1-1 2.1.1 Existing Conditions.....................................................................................2.1-1 2.1.2 Issues .........................................................................................................2.1-5 2.2 Circulation Element................................................................................................2.2-1 2.2.1 Existing Conditions.....................................................................................2.2-1 2.2.2 Issues .......................................................................................................2.2-10 2.3 Conservation Element ...........................................................................................2.3-1 2.3.1 Existing Conditions.....................................................................................2.3-1 2.3.2 Issues .........................................................................................................2.3-7 2.4 Parks and Open Space Element ...........................................................................2.4-1 2.4.1 Existing Conditions.....................................................................................2.4-1 2.4.2 issues .........................................................................................................2.4-3 2.5 Noise Element .......................................................................................................2.5-1 2.5.1 Existing Conditions.....................................................................................2.5-1 2.5.2 Issues .........................................................................................................2.5-3 2.6 Safety Element ......................................................................................................2.6-1 2.6.1 Existing Conditions.....................................................................................2.6-1 2.6.2 Issues .......................................................................................................2.9-10 2.7 Public Services and Facilities Element..................................................................2.7-1 I APRIL 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS DRAFT EXISTING CONDITIONS, CONSTRAINTS AND OPPORTUNITIES REPORT 2.7.1 Existing Conditions .................................................................................... 2.7-1 2.7.2 Issues ...................................................................................................... 2.7-12 3.0 OTHER INFLUENCES ON METROPOLITAN BAKERSFIELD ............ 3.0-1 LIST OF TABLES Table 2.4.2-1 2002 Metropolitan Bakersfield Existing Park Standards Comparison ....... 2.4-4 Table 2.4.1-1 Existing Parks in Metropolitan Bakersfield................................................. 2.4-9 Table 2.7.1-1 Water Sources for Urban Water Purveyors in Metropolitan Bakersfield.... 2.7-7 Table 3.1-1 City of Bakersfield and Kern County Developer Impact Fees....................... 3.0-7 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 2.1.1-1 Centers and Resources ............................................................................ 2.1-3 Figure 2.1.2-1a Examples of Mixed-Use Development.................................................. 2.1-13 Figure 2.1.2-1b Examples of Transit-Oriented Development......................................... 2.1-13 Figure 2.1.2-2 Specific Plans for Rescission.................................................................. 2.1-24 Figure 2.1.2-3 Existing and Proposed Metropolitan Bakersfield Planning Area ............ 2.1-29 Figure 2.1.2-4 Urban - Opportunities and Reserve Map................................................ 2.1-34 Figure 2.2.1-1 State Routes ............................................................................................. 2.2-3 Figure 2.2.1-2 Golden Empire Transit (GET) Bus Routes ............................................... 2.2-5 Figure 2.2.1-3 Kern Regional Transit Routes................................................................... 2.2-5 Figure 2.2.1-4 Amtrak Routes .......................................................................................... 2.2-6 Figure 2.2.1-5 Existing and Proposed Bikeways.............................................................. 2.2-7 Figure 2.2.1-6 Airports.................................................................................................... 2.2-10 Figure 2.2.2-1 Physical Constraints to the Circulation System ...................................... 2.2-12 Figure 2.2.2-2 Canals..................................................................................................... 2.2-12 Figure 2.2.2-3 Proposed High Speed Rail Line.............................................................. 2.2-25 Figure 2.3.1-1 Known Mineral Resources........................................................................ 2.3-3 Figure 2.3.1-2 Prime Agricultural Lands........................................................................... 2.3-5 Figure 2.3.1-3 Williamson Act Properties......................................................................... 2.3-5 Figure 2.3.2-1 Kern River and Foothills ......................................................................... 2.3-10 Figure 2.4.1-1 Existing Parks ........................................................................................... 2.4-2 Figure 2.5.1-1 Major Noise Sources ................................................................................ 2.5-3 APRIL 2009 II TABLE OF CONTENTS DRAFT EXISTING CONDITIONS, CONSTRAINTS AND OPPORTUNITIES REPORT Figure 2.6.1-1 Major Active Faults....................................................................................2.6-2 Figure 2.6.1-2 Isabella Dam Inundation Areas .................................................................2.6-5 Figure 2.6.1-3 Areas of Potential Flooding .......................................................................2.6-7 Figure 2.6.1-4 Police/Sherriff and Fire Stations for the City of Bakersfield and Kern County...2.6-9 Figure 2.7.1-1 Water Storage Entities...............................................................................2.7-3 Figure 2.7.1-2 Water Supplier and Purveyor Service Areas.............................................2.7-5 Figure 2.7.1-3 Wastewater Treatment Plants ...................................................................2.7-9 Figure 2.7.1-4 Waste Facilities .......................................................................................2.7-11 III APRIL 2009 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION DRAFT EXISTING CONDITIONS, CONSTRAINTS AND OPPORTUNITIES REPORT 1.0 INTRODUCTION It is the intent of this Existing Conditions, Constraints and Opportunities Report for the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan Update to highlight issues, challenges, and recommended changes to the existing General Plan that will be considered during the update. Some of these issues pose challenges that may limit options for the accommodation of future growth and development in Metropolitan Bakersfield. However, in some cases, these challenges represent an opportunity to capitalize on existing or future conditions or trends. The recommended changes contained in this Report will be used to guide the creation of new or updated goals, policies, and implementing actions in the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan Update. 1.1 ISSUES DISCUSSED The Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan Update process began in May 2007 with a series of Phase 1 Town Hall Meetings and surveys to involve members of the community who live, work, and play in the Metropolitan Bakersfield area. Their input was important to help identify issues that need to be considered in the General Plan Update, and to identify potential solutions to issues facing the area. The results of the workshops and surveys were summarized in the Final Public Outreach Issues Report. Copies of this Report are available for viewing at: City of Bakersfield Planning Department 1715 Chester Avenue, 2nd Floor Bakersfield, CA 93301 www.bakersfieldcity.us Kern County Planning Department 2700 ‘M’ Street, Suite 100 Bakersfield, CA 93301 www.co.kern.ca.us Many of the issues discussed in this Existing Conditions, Constraints and Opportunities Report were derived from the results of the workshops, as documented in the Final Public Outreach Issues Report. The issues discussed in this Report were also derived from discussions with the City of Bakersfield and Kern County staff and input from other agencies or entities that provide services within the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan Update area. In addition to the issues identified in this Report, a series of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gateway Freeway 99 & Hosking Road Announcing
    BAKERSFIELD GATEWAY FREEWAY 99 & HOSKING ROAD ANNOUNCING • Bakersfield Gateway will offer 800,000 square feet of mixed use retail to be anchored by Bass Pro Shops • Excellent Freeway 99 location with both visibility and access via a new interchange to Freeway 99 • Located 20 miles from the new TEJON OUTLETS, another Freeway 99 traffic generator • Approximately 152,000 cars travel daily on Freeway 99 • Bakersfield Gateway will feature lifestyle amenities including a central gathering area for various family-oriented activities, upscale landscaping, fountains and park benches LIFESTYLE AMENITIES LOCATION COMMUNITY DUANE KEATHLEY VINCE ROCHE JOSH SHERLEY KARI STURGEON STACY BURT PACIFIC COMMERCIAL REALTY ADVISORS Executive Director | Principal Executive Director | Principal Director Sales Associate Sales Associate Lic. #01919464 (661) 633 3816 (661) 633 3817 (661) 633 3840 (661) 633 3820 (661) 633 3833 5060 California Avenue, Suite 1000 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Bakersfield, CA93309 Lic. #00935011 Lic. #01155079 Lic. #01876855 Lic. #01463739 Lic. #01938710 www.paccra.com The depiction in the included photograph of any person, entity, sign, logo or property, other than Cushman & Wakefield’s (C&W) client and the property offered by C&W, is incidental only, and is not intended to connote any affiliation, connection, association, sponsorship or approval by or between that which is incidentally depicted and C&W or its client. This listing shall not be deemed an offer to lease, sublease or sell such property; and, in the event of any transaction for such property, no commission shall be earned by or payable to any cooperating broker except if otherwise provided pursuant to the express terms, rates and conditions of C&W’s agreement with its principal, if, as and when such commission (if any) is actually received from such principal.
    [Show full text]
  • Low Stress Bikeway Network in The
    Bakersfield LOW STRESS BIKE NETWORK PLAN PROPOSAL TO CREATE A LOW-STRESS BIKEWAY NETWORK IN THE VICINITY OF THE BAKERSFIELD HIGH-SPEED RAIL STATION ALIFORNIA 81CYCLE COALITION CONTENTS Executive Summary � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 1 Summary of Implementation Objectives � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �1 Recommended Projects � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �2 Methodology � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �3 Existing Conditions � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �3 Community Outreach � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �3 Introduction � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 4 Site Area � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �4 Project Team � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �4 Existing Conditions � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �4 Demographics and Mode Share � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �5 Goals � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �6 Public Health � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �7
    [Show full text]
  • Home at Last! Kern County's Plan to End Homelessness
    HOME AT LAST! KERN COUNTY’S PLAN TO END HOMELESSNESS BY 2028 Prepared For The Citizens of Kern County By United Way of Kern County And The Kern County Homeless Collaborative May 2018 “It is my strong belief that every individual and family deserves safe, af- fordable housing. I know the caring and compassionate people of Bak- ersfield and Kern County share this goal. It can be achieved through proactive, coordinated action and investments in cost-effective initiatives that solve homelessness. We have developed the plan. Now the real work begins. I am asking that you please join us now in ending homelessness in our community.” Harvey Hall, 2008 Mayor of Bakersfield, 2000-2016 Dedicated to: Harvey L. Hall, 1941-2018 Bakersfield Mayor, Businessman, Visionary Leader, Humanitar- ian, and Friend Executive Summary Home At Last! Kern County’s Plan to End Homelessness by 2028 ii The Kern County Homeless Collaborative believes that home- lessness is a solvable social problem and that through collabo- rative planning and action, we can eventually ensure that every individual and family has safe, affordable housing. Solving homelessness is the morally correct thing to do and will improve the life of the community. We look forward to the day when homelessness becomes a rare, brief and non-recurring event. During the past decade, Kern County saw an overall decrease of almost 40% in its home- less population, despite challenges brought on by Great Recession of 2008-2010. This was in large part due to the work of the Kern County Homeless Collaborative (KCHC) and its partner agencies, guided by the 2008 Home First! A Ten Year Plan to End Chronic Homelessness, which was prepared at the request of then Bakersfield Mayor Harvey L.
    [Show full text]
  • Amazon HQ2 Location Proposal
    Amazon HQ2 Location Proposal October 2017 City of Bakersfield Community CONTACT: Development Department Jacquelyn R. Kitchen 1715 Chester Avenue, Community Development Director 661-326-3754 | [email protected] Bakersfield, CA 93301 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Amazon HQ2 Location Proposal Table of Contents SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................... 1 1.1 Understanding of Amazon Headquarters Project ........................................................... 1 1.2 Why Bakersfield? ......................................................................................................... 2 SECTION 2.0 DYNAMIC CITY IN THE IDEAL LOCATION ................................................ 3 2.1 Engaged Elected Officials and City Staff ....................................................................... 3 2.2 Growing Metropolitan Area ........................................................................................... 3 2.3 Personal Travel Times ................................................................................................. 3 SECTION 3.0 COMMUNITY AND FAMILY ........................................................................ 5 3.1 Quality of Life .............................................................................................................. 5 Affordability .................................................................................................................... 5 Comfortable Commute ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Riverlakes Ranch Specific Plan
    PROLOGUE In May of 1986 the City of Bakersfield adopted the Rancho Laborde Specific Plan covering approximately 1,900 acres of land in the Rosedale area of Bakersfield's northwest. This Specific Plan provided the control mechanism for the residential, commercial and recreation development of the plan area. The area covered by the Rancho Laborde Specific Plan, which was once under multiple land ownership, has since been reunited under one ownership. The name of the previous Rancho Laborde Development and Specific Plan had been changed to RiverLakes Ranch. On June 27, 1990, the City of Bakersfield adopted the RiverLakes RanchIUnibell Specific Plan, an amendment to the RiverLakes Ranch Specific Plan. In April, 1996, Fruitvale Properties, LLC acquired the Unibell portion of the land base and became the Master Developer for the remaining approximately 900 acres of undeveloped land in the Specific Plan area. On October 23, 1996, the City of Bakersfield adopted another major amendment to the Specific Plan document deleting references to "Unibell" and incorporating consistent development standards which will be applied to the remaining undeveloped land, thus eliminating the previous, two chapter format. DEVELOPER AND CONSULTING TEAM FRUINALE PROPERTIES, LLC 4560 Coffee Road Bakersfield, California 93308 Contact: Bonnie Godfrey (805) 588-0301 MICHAEL DHANENS ARCHITECT, AIA P.O. Box 82155 Bakersfield, California 93380 Contact: Michael Wlanens AlA (805) 588-8407 DEWALT CORPORATION 1930 - 22nd Street Bakersfield, California 93301 Contact: Dennis
    [Show full text]
  • Vested Tract Map # 7242 Approved • Bakersfield 258 Lots, Ne Bakersfield
    VESTED TRACT MAP # 7242 APPROVED • BAKERSFIELD 258 LOTS, NE BAKERSFIELD Subject- 258 lots Lake Ming EXCLUSIVE OFFERING MEMORANDUM Stacey Osso Steve Relth WDLAND.COM Land Advisor Senior Land Advisor 94 Discovery ▪ Irvine, CA 92618 949.789.4555, X 17 760.433.7422 949.789.4555 ph | BRE # 01211887 [email protected] [email protected] VESTED TM # 7242 , 258 LOTS APPROVED | BAKERSFIELD, CA TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. Page No. Process & Timing 1 Development Location Maps Overview 9 High Aerial 2 Due Diligence Materials 10 Low Aerial 3 Assigned Schools Exhibit 11 Regional Map 4 Market Local Map 5 City of Bakersfield 12 Maps, Site Plans and Renderings Competitive Projects 13 Vesting Tract Map - Zoning 6 Resale Comparables 14 Vesting Tract Map 7 SP Land Use Map 8 Resale Comparables Map 15 The information contained herein has been obtained from sources we deem to be reliable. Buyer is cautioned to make an independent investigation of the property and review all information concerning the property as no representations or guarantees of accuracy and completeness are made, either expressed or implied by WD Land or its affiliates. BRE License No. 01211887. VESTED TRACT MAP # 7242, 258 LOTS | BAKERSFIELD, CA PROCESS & TIMING Offer Due Date OFFERS ARE DUE NO LATER THAN TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 9TH. Offer Preparation Due diligence information will be made available to buyers prior to the offer date for the property. Seller is seeking a buyer who has a strong understanding of the property and market, and has completed substantial review of the property without having it under contract. Offers are to be made with the following information provided by Buyer: ▪ Proof of Funds Asking Price $3,000,000 Terms All cash at the close of escrow.
    [Show full text]
  • Cities and Joint Powers Committee
    CITIES AND JOINT POWERS COMMITTEE MISSION STATEMENT The Cities and Joint Powers Committee of the 2015-2016 Kern County Grand Jury is responsible for reviewing and overseeing the management, performance, and financial responsibilities of incorporated cities and joint powers agreements within Kern County. The Committee’s objective is to facilitate proper government practices in a manner that is fiscally responsible, transparent and efficient. Members: Mark Smith, Chairperson, Fred Garcia, Jr., Ray Grissom 35 CITIES AND JOINT POWERS COMMITTEE SUMMARY OF ACTIVITIES The Cities and Joint Powers Committee wrote the following reports that were approved by the Grand Jury and published: City of Bakersfield - Department of Recreation and Parks City of Delano - Celebrating a Century, Planning for the Future HIDDEN GOVERNMENTS - Joint Powers Authorities in California Inquired into the operations of the following cities: Arvin Bakersfield California City Delano Maricopa McFarland Reviewed Complaints: Three complaints were referred to the Cities and Joint Powers Committee. These complaints were reviewed and approved by the Grand Jury for closure through a letter. Further visits/inquiries made: City of Bakersfield Water Department City of Bakersfield Code Enforcement City of McFarland - McFarland Tri-Agency Partners Tobacco Settlement Joint Powers Authority Kern Groundwater Authority Other Activities Served on Grand Jury operating committees Toys-4-Tots Toy Drive Grand Jury Awareness Week 36 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD CODE ENFORCEMENT ON THE FRONT LINES SUMMARY: Neighborhoods becoming blighted, remodeling being accomplished with no regard for safety, vendors selling on street corners and homeless people camping in the riverbed, all are affecting the quality of life in Bakersfield. For these issues, the City of Bakersfield (City) Code Enforcement is on the front lines in maintaining the City’s quality of life.
    [Show full text]
  • FY 2018-19 Proposed Budget for Your Review
    About the Cover The FY 2018.19 cover features four photographs capturing various staff activities and projects occurring within the City over the past year. Top: 7KH.HHS$PHULFD%HDXWLIXO*UHDW$PHULFDQ&OHDQXS *$& LVRQHRIWKHODUJHVW community service events in the nation. $W WKLV \HDU·V th annual event, over 1,500 volunteers helped pick up litter, plant trees and weed gardens, and more across Bakersfield. This event is made possible through the leadership of the Keep Bakersfield Beautiful committee and its partners. Middle Left: Phase III of the Kaiser Permanente Thrive Sports Village officially opened to the public on April 20, 2018. The new facilities include a playground, picnic areas, restrooms, water features and parking lot. The park is located at 7300 Taft Highway. Phases I and II of complex include 12 soccer fields and four youth football fields. A tournament field is currently under construction. When completed, the 222 acre Sports Village will include additional soccer, football, baseball and softball fields, as well as community facilities. Middle Right: The Bakersfield Police Department hosted its 3rd annual Easter Egg Hunt for the Blind and Visually Impaired. The children, ages three through 13, searched for the eggs, which were outfitted with audible beepers that assisted the children in locating them. This event was brought indoors due to inclement weather, but officers still found a way to show the kids the equipment and answer any questions they had about law enforcement during the event. One little girl wanted to see the bomb squad trailer and was escorted back indoors by officers who took off their cover shirts to guard her from the rain.
    [Show full text]
  • Kern Council of Governments (Kern Cog) 2014 P Reliminary R Egional T Ransportation P Lan (Rtp)
    KERN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS (KERN COG) 2014 P RELIMINARY R EGIONAL T RANSPORTATION P LAN (RTP) Prepared for: KERN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS (KERN COG) 1401 19TH STREET, SUITE 300 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93301 Prepared by: 2729 PROSPECT PARK DRIVE, SUITE 220 RANCHO CORDOVA, CA 95670 DECEMBER 2012 K ERN C OUNCIL OF G OVERNMENTS (KERN COG) 2014 PRELIMINARY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN (RTP) Prepared for: KERN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS (KERN COG) 1401 19TH STREET, SUITE 300 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93301 Prepared by: PMC 2729 PROSPECT PARK DRIVE, SUITE 220 RANCHO CORDOVA, CA 95670 DECEMBER 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 1-1 Regional Planning Process ........................................................................................................................ 1-1 Federal Surface Transportation Act (SAFETEA-LU and Its Successor) ................................................... 1-2 Overview of State Requirements ............................................................................................................... 1-2 Public Outreach .......................................................................................................................................... 1-3 Transportation Planning in the Kern Region .............................................................................................. 1-4 CHAPTER 2 Transportation Planning Policies ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT 2018 Regional Transportation Plan and Sustainable Communities Strategy
    StratoLaunch System by Scaled Composites, Mojave Air & Space Port DRAFT 2018 Regional Transportation Plan and Sustainable Communities Strategy Pedestrian Overpass, McFarland Bike Rodeo, Bike Bakersfield Amtrak, Bakersfield Station Native American Petroglyph Monument Median Art, Ridgecrest Kern Council of Governments Board of Directors Chairman: Cheryl Wegman Vice Chairman: Bob Smith Executive Director: Ahron Hakimi City of Arvin City of Bakersfield Jose Gurrola Bob Smith City of California City City of Delano Jennifer A. Wood Rueben Pascual City of Maricopa City of McFarland Gary Mock Manuel Cantu City of Ridgecrest City of Shafter Michael R. Mower Cathy Prout City of Taft City of Tehachapi Orchel Krier Philip A. Smith City of Wasco County of Kern Cheryl Wegman David Couch County of Kern Zack Scrivner Military Joint Planning Policy Board Golden Empire Transit District Scott Kiernan Cindy Parra Caltrans District 6 Gail Miller TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES-1 CHAPTER 1 – INTRODUCTION Regional Planning Process 1-1 Federal Surface Transportation Act 1-3 Overview of State Requirements 1-3 Public Outreach 1-5 Transportation Planning in the Kern Region 1-6 Content of the 2014 RTP 1-9 Policy Element 1-9 Planning Assumptions 1-9 Sustainable Communities Strategy 1-10 Strategic Investment 1-10 Financial Element 1-10 Future Links 1-10 Monitoring Progress 1-10 Glossary & Acronyms 1-10 Appendices 1-11 CHAPTER 2 – TRANSPORTATION PLANNING POLICIES Introduction 2-1 Goals/Policies 2-2 Directions to 2050 Principles for Growth/RTP Goals Comparison
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Table of Contents General Information Inside Front Cover Members of the 2006-2007 Kern County Grand Jury Photograph of 2006-2007 Kern County Grand Jury Presiding Judge for the Superior Court, Assistant Presiding Judge Support Staff Officers of the Grand Jury Grand Jury Foreman John Mainland Grand Jury Foreman’s Letter to the Judge Grand Jurors’ Oath Formal Statement of Position 2006-2007 Kern County Grand Jury Board of Supervisor’s Proclamation Oversight Responsibilities of the Grand Jury Committees 2006-2007 Kern County Grand Jury Organization and Committees Chart Administration and Audit Committee Mission Statement Summary of Year’s Work Kern Council of Governments Kern County Elections System Response Response by Board of Supervisors (Web site only) Grand Jury Letter (Web site only) Kern County Mental Health Department (Revenue Collections) Response by Board of Supervisors Kern County Personnel Department and Civil Service Commission Response by Personnel Department Response by Board of Supervisors (Web site only) Kern County Resource Management Agency, Roads Department Response by Board of Supervisors (Web site only) Cities and Joint Powers Committee Mission Statement Summary of Year’s Work Arvin Community Services District Response City of Arvin City of Bakersfield Response (Web site only) City of California City City of Delano City of Maricopa Response City of McFarland Response City of Ridgecrest Response (Web site only) City of Shafter Response City of Taft -1 Response City of Taft -2 Response City of Tehachapi Wasco Recreation
    [Show full text]
  • ROSEDALE VILLAGE 2649-2733 CALLOWAY DRIVE, BAKERSFIELD, CA Northwest Bakersfield’S First Theater-Anchored Center
    A 218,714 SF COMMUNITY SHOPPING CENTER IN PRIME NORTHWEST BAKERSFIELD ROSEDALE VILLAGE 2649-2733 CALLOWAY DRIVE, BAKERSFIELD, CA Northwest Bakersfield’s First Theater-Anchored Center AGENT: JJ WOODS, CLS AGENT: GARRET TUCKNESS, CLS SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT | PRINCIPAL SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT | PRINCIPAL RETAIL PROPERTIES TEAM RETAIL PROPERTIES TEAM CENTRAL CALIFORNIA COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL CENTRAL CALIFORNIA 10000 Stockdale Highway DIR 661 631 3807 DIR 661 631 3811 Suite 102 LICENSE NUMBER 01420570 LICENSE NUMBER 01323185 Bakersfield, CA 93311 [email protected] [email protected] www.colliers.com/bakersfield ROSEDALE VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER PROPERTY INFORMATION 2649-2733 CALLOWAY DRIVE, BAKERSFIELD, CA Rosedale Village is a community shopping center located in the heart of the Northwest Bakersfield trade area. It is situated at the highly-traveled, signalized intersection of Rosedale Hwy and Calloway Drive with a combined average daily traffic count of 58,735 vehicles. Rosedale Village is one of only two community centers that services the entire Northwest trade area. It is also in proximity to power center, The Northwest Promenade. Per the REA, approved, shared parking is available at the north end of the property next to Firehouse Restaurant. > Primary Retail corridor in the Northwest > Come join these tenants!! AVAILABLE > Suite 110 3,375 SF > Suite 314 975 SF Contact Agent for Pricing! DEMOGRAPHICS 1 MILE 3 MILE 5 MILE POPULATION 9,327 86,076 199,609 EMPLOYEES 4,992 31,482 77,810 TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 3,266 29,383 71,617 AVERAGE
    [Show full text]