DOCSLIB.ORG

2007 Regional Transportation Plan Workshop in August 2006

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2007 Regional Transportation Plan Workshop in August 2006 FINAL 2007 DESTINATION 2030 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN May 17, 2007 Preparation of this report has been financed in part through grants from the U.S. Department of Transportation. Contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the official view or policies of the U.S. Department of Transportation. Kern Council of Governments 1401 19th Street, Suite 300 Bakersfield, California 93301 661/861-2191 Facsimile 661/324-8215 TTY 661/832-7433 Kern Council of Governments Board of Directors Kern Council of Governments is the regional planning agency as well as the technical and informational resource, and ride share administrator for the area's 11 incorporated cities and the County of Kern. Following Board direction, staff coordinates between local, state, and federal agencies to avoid overlap or duplication of programs. This intergovernmental coordination enables staff to work with many public agencies to ensure that planning and implementation of programs proceed in a coordinated manner. Chairman: Philip Smith Vice Chairman: David Couch Secretary/ Executive Director: Ronald E. Brummett City of Arvin Ex-Officio Members: John Olivares Caltrans City of Bakersfield Alan McCuen David Couch Military Joint Planning Policy Board City of California City Bill Shelton Nicholas Lessenevitch Golden Empire Transit District City of Delano Howard Silver Art Armendariz City of Maricopa Kern Council of Governments Staff: Aileen Throop Darrel Hildebrand, Asst. Director City of McFarland Peter W. Smith, Senior Planner Ralph Melendez Marilyn J. Beardslee, Senior Planner Robert Ball, Senior Planner City of Ridgecrest Joe Stramaglia, Senior Planner Ron Carter Ed Flickinger, Regional Planner III Bill Larsen, Regional Planner III City of Shafter Bob Snoddy, Regional Planner III Garry Nelson Michael Heimer, Regional Planner III Raquel Carabajal, Regional Planner II City of Taft Vincent Zhe Liu, Regional Planner II Ray Hatch Troy Hightowwer, Regional Planner I Greg Palomo, Administrative Assistant City of Tehachapi Robert Phipps, Administrative Analyst Philip Smith Laurie Collins, Executive Secretary Fasika Montalvo, Secretary City of Wasco Cheryl Wegman County of Kern Jon McQuiston County of Kern Raymond A. Watson TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY………………………………………………………………………………….1 CHAPTER 1 – INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………………...1-1 Regional Planning Process………………………………………………………………..…1-1 SAFETEA-LU……………………………………………………………………………..……1-2 Overview of State Requirements…………………………………………………………….1-3 Public Outreach……………………………………………………………………………..…1-4 Transportation Planning in the Kern Region………………………………………………..1-5 CHAPTER 2 – TRANSPORTATION PLANNING POLICIES………………………………………2-1 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………...2-1 Goals/Policies…………………………………………………………………………………..2-1 Performance Monitoring……………………………………………………………………….2-7 CAHPTER 3 – PLANNING ASSUMPTIONS………………………………………………………...3-1 Growth Trends………………………………………………………………………………….3-1 Demographics………………………………………………………………………...3-2 Housing, Households and Group Quarters………………………………………..3-3 Mobility and Air Quality……………………………………………………………….3-4 Land Use Nexus………………………………………………………………………………..3-4 CHAPTER 4 – STRATEGIC INVESTMENTS…………………………………..…………………...4-1 Introduction………………………………………………………………………………….….4-1 Regional Streets and Highways Action Element…………………………………………...4-2 Existing Streets and Highways System……………………………………………………..4-2 Accomplishments Since 2000………………………………………………………………..4-2 Needs and Issues……………………………………………………………………………..4-3 Deferred Local Maintenance Needs………………………………………………………...4-3 Level of Service ………………………………………………………………………….….…4-4 Regional Transportation Impact Fees (TIFs)…………………………………………..…..4-11 Interregional Partnership Planning………………………………………………………….4-11 Roads and Streets Monitoring……………………………………………………………….4-11 Proposed Capital Improvements………………………………………………………….…4-11 Proposed Actions……………………………………………………………………………..4-12 Near Term, 2007-2010………………………………………………………………….……4-12 Long Term, 2011-2030……………………………………………………………………….4-12 Major Highway Improvement Maps (Constrained 2007-2030 and Unconstrained, without time allotment)…………………………………………………………….…..….4-21 Public Transportation Action Element………………………………………………………4-33 Existing Transit Services……………………………………………………………….….…4-33 Accomplishments Since 2000……………………………………………………………….4-35 Golden Empire Transit District (GET)………………………………………….…4-35 Consolidated Transportation Service Agency (CTSA)………………………….4-36 Kern Regional Transit…………………………………………………………..….4-36 Amtrak – San Joaquin Service Improvements ………………………………….4-36 Transit Needs and Issues……………………………………………………………….…..4-37 Limited Transit Dollars………………………………………………………………4-37 Short-Range Transportation Development Plans (TDPs)………………………4-37 Senior/Mobility-Disabled Public Transportation………………………………….4-38 Population Residing More Than 1.4 Mile From Transit Route………………….4-38 Recent Transit Planning Activities…………………………………………………………..4-38 Eastern Sierra Public Transportation Study……………………………………...4-38 Regional Rural Transit Strategy…………………………………………………...4-39 High Speed Rail Authority……………………………………………………………..…….4-39 Proposed Actions……………………………………………………………………………..4-39 Near-Term, 2007-2010…………………………………………………………………….…4-39 Long-Term, 2011-2030……………………………………………………………………….4-40 Aviation Action Element………………………………………………………………………4-41 Existing Aviation System……………………………………………………………………..4-41 County of Kern Airports……………………………………………………………………....4-41 Municipal Airports……………………………………………………………………………..4-44 Airport Districts……………………………………………………………………………..…4-44 Military Aviation Facilities…………………………………………………………………….4-46 Needs and Issues………………………………………………………………………….…4-46 Demand…………………………………………………………………………..….4-46 Airport Ground Access/Intermodal Connectivity………………………………...4-46 Airport Land Use…………………………………………………………………….4-47 Recent Aviation Planning Activities…………………………………………………………4-47 Homeland Security……………………………………………………………..…..4-47 Proposed Actions…………………………………………………………………………….4-48 Near-Term, 2007-2010……………………………………………………………….………4-48 Long-Term, 2012-2030……………………………………………………………………….4-48 Freight Movement Action Element…………………………………………………….……4-49 Existing System………………………………………………………………………….……4-49 Trucks………………………………………………………………………………..4-49 Rail…………………………………………………………………………………...4-49 Rail Intermodal Facilities……………………………………………………………4-51 Air Freight Service…………………………………………………………………..4-51 Inland Port……………………………………………………………………………4-51 Pipelines……………………………………………………………………………...4-51 Hazardous Material Movement…………………………………………………….4-52 Needs and Issues……………………………………………………………………………..4-52 Proposed Actions……………………………………………………………………………..4-52 Near-Term, 2007-2010…………………………………………………………………….…4-52 Long-Term, 2011-2030……………………………………………………………………….4-53 Bicycle and Pedestrian Action Element…………………………………………………….4-54 Existing Systems……………………………………………………………………………...4-54 Accomplishments Since 2000…………………………………………………………….…4-54 Bicycle Facilities Plan………………………………………………………….……4-54 Class II Bikeway Facilities Constructed…………………………………………………….4-54 Pedestrian Enhancements………………………………………………………………..….4-55 Needs and Issues……………………………………………………………………………..4-55 Maintenance Issues…………………………………………………………….…..4-55 Public Support……………………………………………………………………….4-55 Current Planning Activities……………………………………………………………….….4-55 Proposed Actions……………………………………………………………………………..4-56 Lake Ming Bike Path……………………………………………………………..…4-56 Near-Term, 2007-2010……………………………………………………………………….4-56 Long-Term 2011-2030…………………………………………………………………..……4-56 Transportation Control Measures Action Element………………………………….……..4-57 Existing System……………………………………………………………………………….4-57 Accomplishments Since 2000……………………………………………………………….4-57 Alternative Fuels………………………………………………………………….…4-57 Traffic Flow Improvements…………………………………………………………4-57 Paving Dirt Roads………………………………………………………………..…4-57 Kern Commuter Connection/Public-Employer Outreach…………………….…4-57 Needs and Issues………………………………………………………………………….…4-58 Current Activities……………………………………………………………………………...4-58 Proposed Actions……………………………………………………………………………..4-58 TCM Coordination………………………………………………………………………….…4-59 TCM Implementation………………………………………………………………………….4-59 TCM Education………………………………………………………………………………..4-60 Land Use Action Element……………….……………………………………………………4-61 Major Transportation Investment Study…………………………………………………….4-61 Land Use Decisions Outside Kern County………………………………………………....4-62 Regional Housing Allocation Plan…………………………………………………………..4-62 A New Vision…………………………………………………………………………………..4-62 Near Term Actions 2007-2010………………………………………………………………4-63 Long Term Actions 2011-2030………………………………………………………………4-63 Intelligent Transportation Systems Action Element……………………………………….4-65 Kern EDP Needs and Issues…………………………………………………………..……4-65 Kern ITS Programs…………………………………………………………………………...4-65 ITS Benefits…………………………………………………………………………………...4-66 San Joaquin Valley ITS Plan……………………………………………………………..…4-67 Short- and Long-Term Actions – 2007-2030……………………………………….……...4-67 San Joaquin Valley ITS Architecture Maintenance Plan………………………………….4-67 Congestion Management Program Element…………………………………………….…4-68 Purpose………………………………………………………………………………………..4-68 Contents…………………………………………………………………………………….…4-69 Monitoring and Implementation Process…………………………………………………..4-70 Designated Regional Transportation System……………………………………………..4-70 Highways……………………………………………………………………….……4-71 Principal Arterials…………………………………………………………………...4-71 Level of Service Standards………………………………………………………………….4-73 Adopted Level of Service Standard…………………………………………………………4-73 Performance Standards……………………………………………………………………...4-74
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gateway Freeway 99 & Hosking Road Announcing
    BAKERSFIELD GATEWAY FREEWAY 99 & HOSKING ROAD ANNOUNCING • Bakersfield Gateway will offer 800,000 square feet of mixed use retail to be anchored by Bass Pro Shops • Excellent Freeway 99 location with both visibility and access via a new interchange to Freeway 99 • Located 20 miles from the new TEJON OUTLETS, another Freeway 99 traffic generator • Approximately 152,000 cars travel daily on Freeway 99 • Bakersfield Gateway will feature lifestyle amenities including a central gathering area for various family-oriented activities, upscale landscaping, fountains and park benches LIFESTYLE AMENITIES LOCATION COMMUNITY DUANE KEATHLEY VINCE ROCHE JOSH SHERLEY KARI STURGEON STACY BURT PACIFIC COMMERCIAL REALTY ADVISORS Executive Director | Principal Executive Director | Principal Director Sales Associate Sales Associate Lic. #01919464 (661) 633 3816 (661) 633 3817 (661) 633 3840 (661) 633 3820 (661) 633 3833 5060 California Avenue, Suite 1000 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Bakersfield, CA93309 Lic. #00935011 Lic. #01155079 Lic. #01876855 Lic. #01463739 Lic. #01938710 www.paccra.com The depiction in the included photograph of any person, entity, sign, logo or property, other than Cushman & Wakefield’s (C&W) client and the property offered by C&W, is incidental only, and is not intended to connote any affiliation, connection, association, sponsorship or approval by or between that which is incidentally depicted and C&W or its client. This listing shall not be deemed an offer to lease, sublease or sell such property; and, in the event of any transaction for such property, no commission shall be earned by or payable to any cooperating broker except if otherwise provided pursuant to the express terms, rates and conditions of C&W’s agreement with its principal, if, as and when such commission (if any) is actually received from such principal.
    [Show full text]
  • Low Stress Bikeway Network in The
    Bakersfield LOW STRESS BIKE NETWORK PLAN PROPOSAL TO CREATE A LOW-STRESS BIKEWAY NETWORK IN THE VICINITY OF THE BAKERSFIELD HIGH-SPEED RAIL STATION ALIFORNIA 81CYCLE COALITION CONTENTS Executive Summary � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 1 Summary of Implementation Objectives � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �1 Recommended Projects � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �2 Methodology � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �3 Existing Conditions � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �3 Community Outreach � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �3 Introduction � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 4 Site Area � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �4 Project Team � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �4 Existing Conditions � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �4 Demographics and Mode Share � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �5 Goals � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �6 Public Health � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �7
    [Show full text]
  • Home at Last! Kern County's Plan to End Homelessness
    HOME AT LAST! KERN COUNTY’S PLAN TO END HOMELESSNESS BY 2028 Prepared For The Citizens of Kern County By United Way of Kern County And The Kern County Homeless Collaborative May 2018 “It is my strong belief that every individual and family deserves safe, af- fordable housing. I know the caring and compassionate people of Bak- ersfield and Kern County share this goal. It can be achieved through proactive, coordinated action and investments in cost-effective initiatives that solve homelessness. We have developed the plan. Now the real work begins. I am asking that you please join us now in ending homelessness in our community.” Harvey Hall, 2008 Mayor of Bakersfield, 2000-2016 Dedicated to: Harvey L. Hall, 1941-2018 Bakersfield Mayor, Businessman, Visionary Leader, Humanitar- ian, and Friend Executive Summary Home At Last! Kern County’s Plan to End Homelessness by 2028 ii The Kern County Homeless Collaborative believes that home- lessness is a solvable social problem and that through collabo- rative planning and action, we can eventually ensure that every individual and family has safe, affordable housing. Solving homelessness is the morally correct thing to do and will improve the life of the community. We look forward to the day when homelessness becomes a rare, brief and non-recurring event. During the past decade, Kern County saw an overall decrease of almost 40% in its home- less population, despite challenges brought on by Great Recession of 2008-2010. This was in large part due to the work of the Kern County Homeless Collaborative (KCHC) and its partner agencies, guided by the 2008 Home First! A Ten Year Plan to End Chronic Homelessness, which was prepared at the request of then Bakersfield Mayor Harvey L.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Existing Conditions, Constraints and Opportunities Report
    DRAFT METROPOLITAN BAKERSFIELD GENERAL PLAN UPDATE EXISTING CONDITIONS, CONSTRAINTS AND OPPORTUNITIES REPORT APRIL 2009 TM Submitted to: County of Kern Planning Department 2700 'M' Street, Suite 100 Bakersfield CA 93301 (661) 862-8600 City of Bakersfield Planning Department 1715 Chester Avenue, 2nd Floor Bakersfield CA 93301 (661) 326-3733 Submitted by: PMC 2729 Prospect Park Drive, Suite 220 Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 Phone: (916) 361-8384 Fax: (916) 361-1574 TABLE OF CONTENTS DRAFT EXISTING CONDITIONS, CONSTRAINTS AND OPPORTUNITIES REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Issues Discussed.......................................................................................1.0-1 1.2 Document Organization..............................................................................1.0-2 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT 2.1 Land Use Element .................................................................................................2.1-1 2.1.1 Existing Conditions.....................................................................................2.1-1 2.1.2 Issues .........................................................................................................2.1-5 2.2 Circulation Element................................................................................................2.2-1 2.2.1 Existing Conditions.....................................................................................2.2-1 2.2.2 Issues .......................................................................................................2.2-10
    [Show full text]
  • Amazon HQ2 Location Proposal
    Amazon HQ2 Location Proposal October 2017 City of Bakersfield Community CONTACT: Development Department Jacquelyn R. Kitchen 1715 Chester Avenue, Community Development Director 661-326-3754 | [email protected] Bakersfield, CA 93301 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Amazon HQ2 Location Proposal Table of Contents SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................... 1 1.1 Understanding of Amazon Headquarters Project ........................................................... 1 1.2 Why Bakersfield? ......................................................................................................... 2 SECTION 2.0 DYNAMIC CITY IN THE IDEAL LOCATION ................................................ 3 2.1 Engaged Elected Officials and City Staff ....................................................................... 3 2.2 Growing Metropolitan Area ........................................................................................... 3 2.3 Personal Travel Times ................................................................................................. 3 SECTION 3.0 COMMUNITY AND FAMILY ........................................................................ 5 3.1 Quality of Life .............................................................................................................. 5 Affordability .................................................................................................................... 5 Comfortable Commute ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Vested Tract Map # 7242 Approved • Bakersfield 258 Lots, Ne Bakersfield
    VESTED TRACT MAP # 7242 APPROVED • BAKERSFIELD 258 LOTS, NE BAKERSFIELD Subject- 258 lots Lake Ming EXCLUSIVE OFFERING MEMORANDUM Stacey Osso Steve Relth WDLAND.COM Land Advisor Senior Land Advisor 94 Discovery ▪ Irvine, CA 92618 949.789.4555, X 17 760.433.7422 949.789.4555 ph | BRE # 01211887 [email protected] [email protected] VESTED TM # 7242 , 258 LOTS APPROVED | BAKERSFIELD, CA TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. Page No. Process & Timing 1 Development Location Maps Overview 9 High Aerial 2 Due Diligence Materials 10 Low Aerial 3 Assigned Schools Exhibit 11 Regional Map 4 Market Local Map 5 City of Bakersfield 12 Maps, Site Plans and Renderings Competitive Projects 13 Vesting Tract Map - Zoning 6 Resale Comparables 14 Vesting Tract Map 7 SP Land Use Map 8 Resale Comparables Map 15 The information contained herein has been obtained from sources we deem to be reliable. Buyer is cautioned to make an independent investigation of the property and review all information concerning the property as no representations or guarantees of accuracy and completeness are made, either expressed or implied by WD Land or its affiliates. BRE License No. 01211887. VESTED TRACT MAP # 7242, 258 LOTS | BAKERSFIELD, CA PROCESS & TIMING Offer Due Date OFFERS ARE DUE NO LATER THAN TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 9TH. Offer Preparation Due diligence information will be made available to buyers prior to the offer date for the property. Seller is seeking a buyer who has a strong understanding of the property and market, and has completed substantial review of the property without having it under contract. Offers are to be made with the following information provided by Buyer: ▪ Proof of Funds Asking Price $3,000,000 Terms All cash at the close of escrow.
    [Show full text]
  • ROSEDALE VILLAGE 2649-2733 CALLOWAY DRIVE, BAKERSFIELD, CA Northwest Bakersfield’S First Theater-Anchored Center
    A 218,714 SF COMMUNITY SHOPPING CENTER IN PRIME NORTHWEST BAKERSFIELD ROSEDALE VILLAGE 2649-2733 CALLOWAY DRIVE, BAKERSFIELD, CA Northwest Bakersfield’s First Theater-Anchored Center AGENT: JJ WOODS, CLS AGENT: GARRET TUCKNESS, CLS SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT | PRINCIPAL SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT | PRINCIPAL RETAIL PROPERTIES TEAM RETAIL PROPERTIES TEAM CENTRAL CALIFORNIA COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL CENTRAL CALIFORNIA 10000 Stockdale Highway DIR 661 631 3807 DIR 661 631 3811 Suite 102 LICENSE NUMBER 01420570 LICENSE NUMBER 01323185 Bakersfield, CA 93311 [email protected] [email protected] www.colliers.com/bakersfield ROSEDALE VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER PROPERTY INFORMATION 2649-2733 CALLOWAY DRIVE, BAKERSFIELD, CA Rosedale Village is a community shopping center located in the heart of the Northwest Bakersfield trade area. It is situated at the highly-traveled, signalized intersection of Rosedale Hwy and Calloway Drive with a combined average daily traffic count of 58,735 vehicles. Rosedale Village is one of only two community centers that services the entire Northwest trade area. It is also in proximity to power center, The Northwest Promenade. Per the REA, approved, shared parking is available at the north end of the property next to Firehouse Restaurant. > Primary Retail corridor in the Northwest > Come join these tenants!! AVAILABLE > Suite 110 3,375 SF > Suite 314 975 SF Contact Agent for Pricing! DEMOGRAPHICS 1 MILE 3 MILE 5 MILE POPULATION 9,327 86,076 199,609 EMPLOYEES 4,992 31,482 77,810 TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 3,266 29,383 71,617 AVERAGE
    [Show full text]
  • Metropolitan Bakersfield Transit System Long-Range Plan
    Golden Empire Transit District | Kern Council of Governments METROPOLITAN BAKERSFIELD TRANSIT SYSTEM LONG-RANGE PLAN Final Report April 2012 Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. | i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS METROPOLITAN BAKERSFIELD LONG-RANGE TRANSIT PLAN STEERING COMMITTEE Golden Empire Transit • Karen King, Chief Executive Officer • Gina Hayden, Marketing Manager • Emery Rendez, Planner Kern Council of Governments • Rob Ball, Interim Director • Ron Brummett, Executive Director (Retired December 2011) • Bob Snoddy, Regional Planner CONSULTANT TEAM Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates • Linda Rhine, Project Manager • Paul Jewel, Deputy Project Manager • Steve Boland, Lead Service Planner • Kara Vuicich, Financial Planner • Anneka Imkamp, GIS /Cartographer Fehr & Peers Transportation Consultants • Richard Lee, Modeler • Kyle Cooke, Assistant Modeler VRPA Technologies, Inc. • Georgiena M. Vivian, Marketing Specialist • Dena Graham, Marketing Assistant Table of Contents Page 1 Executive Summary .........................................................................................................1-1 Existing Conditions ................................................................................................................................. 1-1 Best Practices .......................................................................................................................................... 1-2 Public Outreach .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • OFFICE of the CITY MANAGER October 20, 2017 TO
    OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER October 20, 2017 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council AT FROM: Alan Tandy, City Manager SUBJECT: General Information Notable Items This week, Chevron announced a 26% reduction of its San Joaquin Valley Business Unit (SJVBU) workforce, a decision stemming from the company’s restructuring Transformation Project. The SJVBU includes Kern County, Fresno County and Monterey County. The exact number of employees to be reassigned or laid off is not known at this time. This reduction highlights the unfortunate repercussions to the local economy due to uncertainty in the oil market. On September 7, 2017, Amazon released a Request for Proposals (RFP) for their 2nd Headquarters in North America. Amazon expects to invest $5 billion in construction and provide up to 50,000 high-paying jobs. In addition to Amazon’s direct hiring and investment, construction and ongoing operation of Amazon HQ2 is expected to create tens of thousands of additional jobs and tens of billions of dollars in additional investment in the surrounding community. Under the direction of the City Manager’s Office, the Community Development Department has prepared a proposal on behalf of the City of Bakersfield. As you may be aware, this project and their locational process have generated submissions from all over the U.S. Many of those submissions will offer incentives not available to our situation. We felt our particular and unique advantages should be articulated and put forward. The thought processes involved will have applicability to other opportunities in the future. Thanks to the Community Development team for the special effort on this! The attached Proposal and Cover Letter was submitted to Amazon on October 19th, 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment to Submission L029 (Jerry Lakeman, Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District, October 13, 2011) - Fresno Metro Flood Control Attachments.Pdf - Continued
    California High-Speed Train Project EIR/EIS Fresno to Bakersfield Section Vol. IV Response to Comments from Local Agencies Attachment to Submission L029 (Jerry Lakeman, Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District, October 13, 2011) - Fresno Metro Flood Control Attachments.pdf - Continued Page 20-251 California High-Speed Train Project EIR/EIS Fresno to Bakersfield Section Vol. IV Response to Comments from Local Agencies Attachment to Submission L029 (Jerry Lakeman, Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District, October 13, 2011) - Fresno Metro Flood Control Attachments.pdf - Continued Page 20-252 California High-Speed Train Project EIR/EIS Fresno to Bakersfield Section Vol. IV Response to Comments from Local Agencies Attachment to Submission L029 (Jerry Lakeman, Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District, October 13, 2011) - Fresno Metro Flood Control Attachments.pdf - Continued Page 20-253 California High-Speed Train Project EIR/EIS Fresno to Bakersfield Section Vol. IV Response to Comments from Local Agencies Attachment to Submission L029 (Jerry Lakeman, Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District, October 13, 2011) - Fresno Metro Flood Control Attachments.pdf - Continued Page 20-254 California High-Speed Train Project EIR/EIS Fresno to Bakersfield Section Vol. IV Response to Comments from Local Agencies Attachment to Submission L029 (Jerry Lakeman, Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District, October 13, 2011) - Fresno Metro Flood Control Attachments.pdf - Continued Page 20-255 California High-Speed Train Project EIR/EIS Fresno to Bakersfield Section Vol. IV Response to Comments from Local Agencies Attachment to Submission L029 (Jerry Lakeman, Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District, October 13, 2011) - Fresno Metro Flood Control Attachments.pdf - Continued Page 20-256 California High-Speed Train Project EIR/EIS Fresno to Bakersfield Section Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Marketing Brochure Has Been Obtained from Sources Believed to Be Reliable, but the Accuracy Or Completeness of the Information Contained Therein Cannot Be Guaranteed
    STARBUCKS 2405 N. CHESTER AVE, BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 STARBUCKS TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 03 Investment Summary 04 Retail Aerial 05 Lease Summary 06 Retail Aerial 07 Rent Schedule 08 Shopping Center Photos 09 Site Plan 10 About the Brand 11 Location Overview CONTACT INFORMATION Joel Cukier Vice President (424) 343-2844 02 2405 N. CHESTER AVE, BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 STARBUCKS INVESTMENT SUMMARY Tenant Starbucks $2,666,667 2,200 SF Street Address 2405 N. Chester Ave $ List Price GLA City Bakersfield State CA 3.75% 13,600 SF Zip 93308 % Cap Rate Lot Size GLA 2,200 SF Lot Size 13,600 SF $100,000 Year Built 2020 $ NOI Brand New Development with the Largest Coffeehouse Chain in the World - The site features a brand new 10-year lease with four (4), 5-year options and 10% increases every 5 years throughout the base term and option periods, providing an excellent hedge against inflation. 2021 High Quality Construction - The state-of-the-art Starbucks development features a dedicated drive thru and outdoor patio seating which will maximize sales revenue. During the fourth quarter of 2020, approximately 75% of all Starbucks’ U.S. sales were generated through the drive-thru. Around the Corner from North High School - The site is strategically located less than one block from North High School (2,000+ students). Excellent Site Visibility with Strong Traffic Counts - Ideally positioned with great frontage & visibility on the heavily trafficked intersection of Chester Ave & China Grade Loop with combined traffic counts of 20,000+ per day. Limited Competition - This site is the only Starbucks in Northeast Bakersfield with the closest Starbucks over 4.5 miles away from this site.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.2 Aesthetics
    METROPOLITAN BAKERSFIELD METROPOLITAN BAKERSFIELD GENERAL PLAN UPDATE EIR 4.2 AESTHETICS This section evaluates the visual and aesthetic setting of Metropolitan Bakersfield and assesses the potential for visual impacts with implementation of the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan Update. Where potentially significant impacts are identified, General Plan goals and policies are referenced and mitigation measures are provided, where necessary, to reduce these impacts to a less than significant level. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Metropolitan Bakersfield includes the City of Bakersfield, its designated sphere of influence and contiguous properties located in the unincorporated portions of Kern County. The area covers approximately 408 square miles and is characterized by a core of urban and suburban land use types that were developed along the principal north-south arterial, of the Central Valley, Highway 99, and the Kern River. The core area is generally surrounded by low intensity agriculture, oil production and open spaces in which small communities historically developed as agricultural centers. In recent years, greater development has occurred in the northwest and southwest portions of the community. Metropolitan Bakersfield has developed in response to market pressures, availability of land for development and accessibility of that land to transportation systems and infrastructure. Development in the past has occurred in the absence of a strategy or program regarding urban design, as well as without concern for open space areas or public viewsheds. Downtown Bakersfield was physically and functionally identifiable as the principal center of the southern San Joaquin Valley for many years. The outward growth of development, including mid-rise structures and high activity areas has eroded this identity of downtown Bakersfield.
    [Show full text]