DOCSLIB.ORG

Planning Worthing Schools for the Future

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Planning Worthing Schools for the Future Agenda Item Number 5 Children and Young People’s Services Select Committee 27 November 2013 Planning Worthing Schools for the Future Report by: Director Communities Commissioning and Head of Capital and Infrastructure Executive Summary: The County Council has approved a capital allocation in support of changes to the age of transfer in Worthing and the prescribed consultation process is now underway. A Cabinet Member Decision Report will be required in January 2014 which will decide on whether to progress to the next stage which is the Publication of Statutory Notices. Recommendation: The Committee is asked to support the proposals for reorganisation of schools within Worthing, subject to the outcome of the consultation, to enable the Age of Transfer to change, to bring these schools into line with the policy of the County Council. 1. Background 1.1 Reviewing areas of non-standard transfers between schools has been a priority for the County Council since its Ofsted inspection in 2001. Effective reviews and subsequent reorganisations have been undertaken in Crawley, Adur (Shoreham and Lancing) and the rural areas of the Rother Valley. Worthing remains the largest area requiring reorganisation in West Sussex and is experiencing significant population growth. An additional 1606 pupils are expected in Worthing schools over the period 2011/16. The County Council has not previously been able to bring forward a proposal to change the Age of Transfer in Worthing as there has been, until now, no additional capital funding and no additional site for a secondary school to deliver such a change. A bid to change the Age of Transfer under the Buildings Schools for the Future Programme was not prioritised by the last government. 1.2 There is convincing evidence, both locally and nationally, that minimising the number of transfers in the school career of pupils leads to better attainment and outcomes. In Crawley the Age of Transfer (AoT) changed in 2004 and a two-tier system replaced a three-tier pattern with the effect that performance levels in Key Stage 3 and 4 improved significantly. The funding and time constraints mean that change in the primary sector will not involve amalgamations and the proposals involve the establishment of a number of infant and junior schools. Governors and headteachers have Agenda Item Number 5 supported the concept of phased change, thereby allowing the move to more all -through primary schools when the opportunity arises in the future. 2. Proposals 2.1 This is an appropriate time to undertake a review of the AoT of pupils and introduce a 2-tier system to replace the existing 3-tier arrangement and bring Worthing into line with the majority of the rest of the County and country. There has been significant local support from Worthing headteachers, governors, Worthing Borough Council (WBC), Northbrook College and local MPs. Superficial testing by WBC has also indicated there is interest and support from the Worthing population. 2.2 The target date for implementing a change in the AoT is September 2015. This date is conditional on the necessary consultation process being successfully undertaken no later than the Autumn & Spring Terms 2013/14. If consultation can be completed by March 2014 the preparations and delivery of the essential capital projects required for meeting the September 2015 implementation date is achievable. 2.3 A critical element of the proposals is the provision of a sixth ‘secondary school’ in Worthing. The restricted sites of existing schools and the growth in numbers, together with Year 7 moving to secondary school, makes an additional school essential. A time limited opportunity to provide a site is now available on the Northbrook Further Education (FE) College site, but only until April 2014. There are complex issues associated with the availability of this site and the availability could be compromised if plans are not in place by April 2014 and it is unlikely that an alternative site will be found. The College would welcome collaboration to form a new school adjacent to its own operation where a curriculum could be developed which would blend with existing provision at the College. 2.4 In essence the proposals would create a pattern of primary schools (including some infant and junior schools) for the 4-11 age range and secondary schools for the 11-16 age group including a new academy on Northbrook College (Broadwater site). This site is the only one available currently for an additional secondary school due to land availability in Worthing. The introduction of this new system would necessarily require it to be a single event timed for September 2015, but the impact from the additional pupils moving into secondary schools means that the capital investment could be phased over a longer period. 2.5 This is a key time to act to gain the greatest range of benefits from capital investment, which include: i) Coordinating educational development with Northbrook FE College to facilitate a new secondary school/academy on a part of the College site. This is a time limited opportunity which is conditional on Northbrook being able to progress their next phase of development on the Broadwater site. Agenda Item Number 5 ii) Progressing agreed proposals to allow a two-tier pattern of education in the town from September 2015 that is known to enhance pupil progress. iii) Supporting a widely agreed local demand for a standard pattern of school transfers to meet the aims of the local community. iv) Investing capital resources in accordance with the need to provide additional places. v) Ensuring sufficient places are available in time and making maximum use of existing restricted site capacities. vi) A pragmatic solution which minimises disruption to children and their families during the period of change whilst reducing potential costs associated with temporary building programmes. vii) Providing local school places where required and allowing an offer of a primary school place within walking distance of home to all Worthing children. viii) Support for schools’ revenue budgets through the establishing of robust and viable schools and academies. 3. Alternative Options 3.1 Failure to change the Age of Transfer would still mean that there is a need to invest in additional places for demographic growth and would potentially involve investment into an unsustainable system. There would be a need to review capital allocations with the DfE. 3.2 It is possible that alternative proposals to accommodate the Age of Transfer may emerge on a school-by-school basis during the course of the current consultation. Each proposal will be considered on its merits by the Cabinet Member. 4. Consultation 4.1 The consultation commenced on the 11 November 2013 and ends on the 23 December 2013 and is based on educational principles and the benefits of changing the ages at which pupils move between schools. The consultation will also indicate the detailed proposals for each Worthing school. 4.2 Following the consultation the Cabinet Member for Children – Start of Life will decide whether to proceed to publish Statutory Notices which will be a further 6 week period of consultation. In making this decision the Cabinet Member will consider whether any of the proposals should be amended in the light of the initial consultation phase. 4.3 The current consultation is an open invitation for comments from all members of the public. Public meetings have been held at 16 school venues, the consultation document has been widely circulated through schools, Children & Family Centres, Libraries, pre-school providers and other community venues. Separate meetings are being held for staff and school governors. A briefing paper and the consultation document have been sent to the 2 Worthing MPs, Local Councillors, Cabinet Member Children-Start of Life, and the teaching associations and unions. Agenda Item Number 5 4.4 Worthing Borough Council has also explored the interest for a new school pattern in Worthing and established a Joint Overview Scrutiny Committee to examine the position including a survey of schools and parents. 4.5 Sir Peter Bottomley and Tim Loughton as local MPs have been briefed and are supportive of a review. Their support was significant for the funding secured for additional school places in Worthing. 5. Equality 5.1 Worthing secondary schools include single sex education at Davison High School for Girls and St Andrews CofE High School for Boys. The proposals retain these schools as single sex establishments but reduce the disparity on the number of places currently on offer. 5.2 The existing Roman Catholic schools in the locality are unaffected by the proposals because they already operate on the 2-tier system, the subject of this consultation. The proposals for the schools reflect the demand and population increase in the area. 6. Resource Implications & Value for Money 6.1 Outline proposals have been the subject of high level feasibility studies which have included general cost information and have confirmed that the proposals can be delivered at a cost of approximately £30m. 6.2 The County Council has been successful in its bid to the DfE for capital resources to provide additional secondary school places in Worthing at Durrington High School, Davison High School for Girls and a new Academy. In total this bid is worth nearly £20m. Therefore the County Council is adding £10m of its own funding to provide an overall total of £30m for this scheme. 7. Risks and Issues 7.1 The key issues for reviewing the AoT in Worthing involve funding, timescales and working with a new sponsor to establish the new academy for September 2015. 7.2 There is an opportunity to use Government grant to provide secondary school places in the context of changing the AoT in Worthing.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Playing Pitch Strategy Stage C Needs Assessment Report
    Adur & Worthing Playing Pitch Strategy Stage C Needs Assessment Report Adur and Worthing Playing Pitch Strategy Stage C: FINAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT REPORT for Adur and Worthing District Council December 2019 1 | P a g e Adur & Worthing Playing Pitch Strategy Stage C Needs Assessment Report CONTENTS 1 Introduction 3 2 Context 8 3 Football 24 4 Cricket 80 5 Rugby 101 6 Hockey 114 7 Tennis and Bowls 124 See also Key Findings and Issues – separate document 2 | P a g e Adur & Worthing Playing Pitch Strategy Stage C Needs Assessment Report 1 INTRODUCTION Introduction 1.1 The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) requires local planning authorities to set out policies to help enable communities to access high quality open spaces and opportunities for sport and recreation. These policies need to be based on a thorough understanding of local needs for such facilities and opportunities available for new provision. 1.2 In view of the above, in 2019 Adur & Worthing Councils appointed Ethos Environmental Planning to review a joint study completed in 2014 to provide an up-to-date and robust assessment identifying needs, surpluses and deficits in open space, sport and recreation to support the Local Plans. 1.3 The two councils have separate local plans; this study will assist Worthing Borough in the preparation of a new plan and will support the implementation of the Adur Local Plan which was adopted in 2017. The study will also inform the Council’s asset management process, health and well-being plans and its investments and infrastructure funding process. 1.4 In summary the requirements of the brief are to provide: A comprehensive Open Space Assessment, Indoor/Built Sports Facilities Needs Assessment that represents an update to the existing (2014) assessment.
    [Show full text]
  • Adur & Worthing Local Walking & Cycling Infrastructure Plan (LCWIP)
    Adur & Worthing Councils Local Cycling & Walking Infrastructure Plan We received an overwhelming positive response at the consultation. I’m delighted to support this plan to improve our cycling and walking infrastructure across the Borough Dan Humphreys Leader (Worthing Borough Council) 2 Contents It’s clear that our residents Our vision 4 What is the LCWIP 10 and visitors to the District Adur and Worthing 18 would cycle and walk more Worthing Borough 22 Adur District 28 with improved routes. This plan Case studies 34 provides us with a fantastic Liveable cities & towns 36 Low traffic neighbourhood 38 foundation to create the Worthing walking & cycling network map 40 Adur walking & cycling network map 42 network of the future PCT commute data 46 Neil Parkin PCT school data 47 Worthing PCT commute data 48 Leader (Adur District Council) Adur PCT commute data 49 Worthing PCT school data 50 Adur PCT school data 51 Adur & Worthing census commuters by car 52 Glossary of terms 54 All maps © Crown Copyright and database right (2020). Ordnance Survey 100024321 & 100018824 Our Vision We share the ambition to achieve this through: To create a place where walking and Better Safety Better Mobility cycling becomes The Councils share A safe and reliable way to travel for More people cycling and walking - easy, the preferred way of the government’s short journeys normal and enjoyable ambition: Streets where people cycling and More high quality cycling facilities To make cycling and • • moving around Adur walking feel they belong, and are walking the natural More urban areas that are considered safe • and Worthing.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex SCHEMES to BE PROGRESSED IF DEVELOPER FUNDING IS SECURED
    Annex SCHEMES TO BE PROGRESSED IF DEVELOPER FUNDING IS SECURED March 2009 Background This document is called “Schemes to be progressed if developer funding is secured” and is also known as the “Blue Book”. In line with latest national guidance (see below), County and District Councils have developed a structured approach to the identification of transport needs related to development proposals. This aims, in particular, to improve the link between meeting the needs of development and the aims of the Local Transport Plan. The County Council’s Works Programme and Forward Programme are produced annually to list the highways and transport schemes to be progressed with the funds available. This year, the Forward Programme has been extended to include schemes that have been identified, in liaison with the Local Planning Authorities, as meeting LTP objectives but that cannot be progressed within available funding. Developer contributions will be sought towards these schemes, where they are seen to meet the needs of development proposals. This extended Forward Programme has been subject to consultation and will be supported by District Councils and used to assist the development control process. The programme will be updated each year and it is intended to engage wider community interests in developing and updating the programme in future years. Planning Context Planning Policy Guidance Note 13 : Transport requires authorities to demonstrate a linkage between land use planning and transport policies and objectives. PPG13 recognises that: • Local Transport Plans have a central role in co-ordinating and improving local transport provision and should relate to measures which form part of the local approach to the integration of planning and transport.
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Programme 2015 – 2021
    CAPITAL PROGRAMME 2015/16 - 2020/21 Appendix 1A SUMMARY OF CAPITAL PAYMENTS Service 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 Subsequent Total £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 Adult Social Care and Health 2,904 15,895 12,700 11,500 0 0 0 42,999 Community Wellbeing 1,160 1,000 0 0 0 0 0 2,160 Education and Skills / Children - Start of Life 60,254 48,597 36,197 29,512 7,464 6,887 0 188,911 Finance 10,955 10,351 3,201 3,201 3,201 3,201 0 34,110 Highways and Transport 42,668 31,780 32,230 43,166 37,035 45,567 38,924 271,370 Leader 2,164 4,368 18,535 53,933 30,600 600 0 110,200 Residents' Services 10,436 8,401 6,221 189 630 700 0 26,577 TOTAL PROGRAMME 130,541 120,392 109,084 141,501 78,930 56,955 38,924 676,327 Financing 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 Subsequent Total £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 Ringfenced Government Grant 42,358 30,051 45,438 51,317 35,109 26,529 3,850 234,652 Un-Ringfenced Government Grant 33,565 31,993 30,106 27,097 24,387 22,553 0 169,701 Capital Receipts 8,874 6,900 2,000 1,500 1,250 1,000 0 21,524 Revenue Contributions to Capital Outlay 33,081 12,860 2,615 8,532 532 532 0 58,152 External Contributions including S106 5,671 4,024 2,736 1,692 1,692 1,692 0 17,507 Core Borrowing 6,992 25,617 17,000 17,000 15,960 4,649 12,573 99,791 Additional Borrowing 0 8,947 9,189 34,363 0 0 22,501 75,000 TOTAL PROGRAMME 130,541 120,392 109,084 141,501 78,930 56,955 38,924 676,327 Income Generating Initiatives 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 Subsequent Total £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 Finance 3,594 7,352 2,506 627 0 0 0 14,079 Leader 20,100 9,500 8,800 6,300 6,300 6,300 25,200 82,500 TOTAL PROGRAMME 23,694 16,852 11,306 6,927 6,300 6,300 25,200 96,579 Agenda Item No.
    [Show full text]
  • Category School Name Cost Nursery Bognor Regis £8,197.20 Boundstone £7,120.80 Chichester £8,776.80 Horsham £7,783.20 Primary Albourne C.E
    Category School Name Cost Nursery Bognor Regis £8,197.20 Boundstone £7,120.80 Chichester £8,776.80 Horsham £7,783.20 Primary Albourne C.E. Primary School £7,021.08 Aldingbourne Primary School £7,609.14 All Saints C.E. Primary School £7,520.04 Amberley C.E. First School £2,174.04 Arundel C.E. Primary School £6,985.44 Arunside Primary School, Horsham £7,769.52 Ashington C.E. First School £6,237.00 Ashurst C.E. Primary School £2,316.60 Ashurst Wood Primary School £4,490.64 Balcombe C.E. Controlled Primary School £5,167.80 Barnham Primary School £10,727.64 Barton Primary School £6,067.71 Bersted Green Primary £8,862.60 Billingshurst Primary £21,526.56 Birchwood Grove Community Primary School, Burgess Hill £12,652.20 Birdham C.E. Primary School £5,025.24 Bishop Tufnell C.E. Infant School, Felpham £9,622.80 Bishop Tufnell C.E. Junior School, Felpham £13,044.24 Blackwell Primary School, East Grinstead £9,230.76 Bolney C.E. Primary School £4,027.32 Bolnore Village Primary School £10,585.08 Bosham Primary School £7,163.64 Boxgrove C.E. Primary School £2,387.88 Bramber First School, Broadwater, Worthing £7,540.71 Broadwater C.E. First and Middle School, Worthing £16,088.61 Brook First School, Maidenbower, The £7,270.56 Buckingham Park Primary £14,968.80 Bury C.E. Primary School £2,138.40 Camelsdale Primary School £7,912.08 Castlewood Primary School, Southwater £7,021.08 Central C.E. Junior School, Chichester £11,903.76 Chesswood Middle School £18,901.90 Chidham Parochial Primary School £4,455.00 Clapham and Patching C.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Schools Forum Membership
    EDUCATION AND SKILLS (Schools) FORUM MEMBERSHIP: SCHOOLS MEMBERS Primary School Representatives (10) Headteachers (7): Debbie Carter Horsham Nursery School, Horsham Gill Leadbetter-Simms St Mary’s CofE First School, Washington Sian Rees-Jones Bognor Regis Nursery School, Bognor Regis Chris Luckin Steyning Primary School, Steyning Richard Yelland St John the Baptist CofE Primary, Worthing Dean Clegg Thorney Island CP School, Emsworth Shelley Dutson St Mary’s CofE, Horsham Substitutes: Becky Linford Upper Beeding Primary, Steyning Governors (3) David Herson Steyning Primary School, Steyning Howard Oyns Milton Mount Primary School, Crawley VACANCY Secondary School Representatives (5) Headteachers (3) Peter Woodman The Weald School, Billingshurst Simon Liley Bourne Community College, Emsworth Eddie Rodriguez Oathall Community College, H Heath Substitute: David Brixey The Angmering School, Littlehampton Governors (2): Ken Lloyd Felpham Community College, Bognor Regis John Thompson Davison High School, Worthing Substitute Stewart Boyling Oathall Community College, H Heath Special School representatives (2) Headteacher (1): Grahame Robson Manor Green College, Crawley Substitute: Maria Davis Cornfield School, Littlehampton Governor (1): Therese Brook Fordwater School, Chichester Substitute Matthew Young Herons Dale School, Shoreham By Sea ACADEMIES MEMBERS Academies Representatives (7) Secondary (4) Colin Granlund (BM) Warden Park Academy Trust Carolyn Dickinson (HT) Worthing High School, Worthing Mike Garlick (Principal) The Regis School, Bognor
    [Show full text]
  • WSCC TTS 6Pp Newsletter
    ROAD RACE - UP year, the performances will be shown to to examine what life would be like in the upper year students at primary schools. future unless we adopt the ‘TravelWise’ AND COMING message. And then we ask them to look SPEED COMMITMENT at what measures they can adopt in their The “Make the Commitment” campaign communities by reducing danger The StopWatch Theatre Company own lives to make a difference in is part of a long-term strategy in Sussex and nuisance to other road users reducing the reliance on cars. This work to create a safer environment for road •Make speeding as socially The performance, which combines compliments School Travel Plan users, especially pedestrians and cyclists. unacceptable as drink driving has theatre in education and a drama development, which is now widely being 25 sites have been now been introduced become. • Storrington Primary workshop will run for 2 week (w/b 7 undertaken across West Sussex. across the county and you will probably •Portfield Community Primary October and w/b/21 October). “Road be aware of the ‘Kill Your Speed’ signs. Over the last year, 10 schools have been (Chichester) Race” is part of the County Council’s Changing attitudes of road users is an The main objectives of the campaign involved in the Speed Commitment • Balcombe Primary TravelWise initiative which encourages important part of TravelWise and raising include; Campaign within their local area. School • Handcross Primary & drivers to use their cars more responsi- awareness of children of the alternatives • Encouraging drivers to make a participation has included designing Handcross School bly and encourages the use of the alter- to car travel will help to educate them personal commitment to keep posters and publicity material.
    [Show full text]
  • Information for Parents Booklet and Appendix 1
    Appendix 1 This Appendix lists the oversubscription criteria for all schools which do not use the West Sussex County Council standard oversubscription criteria for Community and Voluntary Controlled schools (reproduced at the bottom of this page). It includes all Church Voluntary Aided Schools, Foundation Schools, Free schools, Academies as well as Community and Voluntary Controlled schools which use variations of the standard West Sussex County Council oversubscription criteria. Where a school was oversubscribed in September 2020 the number of places offered in each category are listed beside the criteria. For oversubscribed schools the total number of places offered, together with the criteria and distance of the last place offered, is shown at the bottom of the oversubscription criteria. FAITH SCHOOL ADMISSION ARRANGEMENTS and COVID-19: Some faith based admission authorities define children's or families' membership or practice of the faith for the purpose of school admissions through regular attendance at a place of worship over a specified period. Due to the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak, there have been restrictions on the opening of places of worship (especially for communal worship) and parents and their children may have been unable to attend their place of worship as normal. This has meant that faith schools with admissions arrangements that prioritise applicants based on membership or practice of the faith, evidenced through regular attendance at a place of worship and/or at communal worship, may find their admission arrangements have been affected for the September 2021 intake. When making a preference for a faith school please check the school’s website to see what changes to their arrangements they may have made.
    [Show full text]
  • Higher Standards, Better Schools For
    Higher Standards, Better Schools For All More choice for parents and pupils Higher Standards, Better Schools For All More choice for parents and pupils 0845 7 023474 Lo-Call 19 High Street, CF10 1PT Cardiff - TSO Accredited Agents TSO Accredited (see Yellow Pages) booksellers good and through TSO Shops 123 Kingsway, London,WC2B 6PQ 020 7242 6393 Fax 020 7242 6394 68-69 Bull Street, Birmingham B4 6AD 0121 236 9696 Fax 0121 236 9699 9-21 Princess Street, Manchester M60 8AS 0161 834 7201 Fax 0161 833 0634 Arthur Street,16 Belfast BT1 4GD 028 9023 8451 Fax 028 9023 5401 18 029 2039 5548 Fax 029 2038 4347 71 Lothian Road, Edinburgh EH3 9AZ 0870 606 5566 Fax 0870 606 5588 TSO 29,PO Box Norwich, NR3 1GN enquiries: orders/General Telephone 0870 600 5522 the Parliamentary through Hotline Order Published by TSO (The Stationery Office) and available from: TSO (The Stationery Office) and available Published by Online www.tso.co.uk/bookshop Mail,Telephone, & E-mail Fax Fax orders: 0870 600 5533 E-mail: [email protected] 0870 240 3701 Textphone Higher Standards, Better Schools For All More choice for parents and pupils Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Education and Skills by Command of Her Majesty October 2005 Cm 6677 £21.00 © Crown Copyright 2005 The text in this document (excluding the Royal Arms and departmental logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing that it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 EAST GRINSTEAD TOWN COUNCIL CHARITIES To: All
    pdfMachine by Broadgun Software - a great PDF writer! - a great PDF creator! - http://www.pdfmachine.com http://www.broadgun.com EAST GRINSTEAD TOWN COUNCIL CHARITIES To: All Trustees of the Parish Halls and Chequer Mead Community Arts Centre Charities (30.6.05) (Other distribution for information only) Agenda Item 5 CREATION OF CHARITY - CHEQUER MEAD COMMUNITY ARTS CENTRE (Min 27 31.3.05) Trustees are advised that the new charity was created as from 6 April 2005, charity number 1108890. The outstanding legal action now remaining is conclusion of the lease agreement between the Town Council and Chequer Mead Community arts Centre Trust. This will be finalised during the summer; asb law are dealing with this, and all trustees will be forwarded a copy in due course. Agenda Item 6: CHEQUER MEAD – FINANCIAL REPORT 2004/2005 FINANCIAL YEAR AND APRIL 2005 - MAY 2005 (Min 30 31.3.05) A copy of the outturn financial report for 2004/2005 financial year is being sent to all Trustees under separate cover. This confirms the core information previously sent. At the yearend there was an underspend against budget of £20,652 totally accounted for by income generation performance. This balance has subsequently been paid across to the new Charity. The financial position at year-end exceeded expectation and was satisfactory. It should be noted that apart from the first quarters trading income for the catering concession (£3,099) no further funds were received for bar or catering from the trading company during the 2004/2005 financial year as such sums can only be covenanted to a registered charity and the new charity was not established during the financial year.
    [Show full text]
  • Schools Forum Membership
    SCHOOLS FORUM MEMBERSHIP: SCHOOLS MEMBERS Primary School Representatives (9) Headteachers (6): Debbie Carter Horsham Nursery School, Horsham Tracy Taylor Bramber Primary, Worthing Sian Rees-Jones Bognor Regis Nursery School, Bognor Regis Mark McCadden Birdham Primary, Birdham Richard Yelland St John the Baptist CofE Primary, Worthing Anthony White Pound Hill Junior School, Crawley Substitutes: Becky Linford Upper Beeding Primary, Steyning Governors (3) Kerry Jones Lyndhurst Infant School, Worthing Howard Oyns Parklands Community Primary, Chichester Stuart Blunden East Wittering Community Primary Secondary School Representatives (5) Headteachers (3) Peter Woodman The Weald School, Billingshurst Simon Liley The Angmering School Eddie Rodriguez Oathall Community College, H Heath Substitute: Vacancy Governors (2): Ken Lloyd Felpham Community College, Bognor Regis John Thompson Davison High School, Worthing Substitute Stewart Boyling Oathall Community College, H Heath Special School representatives (2) Headteacher (1): Grahame Robson Manor Green College, Crawley Substitute: Maria Davis Cornfield School, Littlehampton Governor (1): Therese Brook Fordwater School, Chichester Substitute Matthew Young Herons Dale School, Shoreham By Sea ACADEMIES MEMBERS Academies Representatives (7) Secondary (4) Colin Granlund (Business Mgr) Warden Park Academy Trust Kay Haffenden (Gov) Shoreham Academy, Shoreham By Sea Peter Edgley (Dir of Resources) The Littlehampton Academy Andrew Meggs (Finance Dir) Hazelwick School Primary (4) James Everett (HT) Barnham
    [Show full text]
  • Download Project Evaluation Report
    Martin Hayes County Local Studies Librarian Area Office Library Service Worthing Library (01903) 704811 (Direct) Richmond Road (01903) 704839 (Fax) Worthing [email protected] West Sussex www.westsussex.gov.uk BN11 1HD WARTIME WEST SUSSEX 1914-18 PROJECT ACTIVITIES, OUTCOMES & EVALUATION REPORT 1. Main Aims Agreed by HLF Compared to Actual Outcomes AIM OUTCOME Complete at least 30 educational case 103 case studies completed and studies on individuals or themes published online Digitise complete runs of at least 8 local 10 newspapers digitised covering newspapers 1910-1920 1914-25 Digitise all available Royal Sussex All available RSR battalion war diaries Regiment battalion war diaries (official digitised and published online, plus daily accounts) many more sources – see Appendix 2 Digitise at least 100 photographs and 173 photographs, plus numerous documents in private hands for use in the documents, were digitised and used in case studies, exhibition or website case studies, exhibition, website and book Train and manage at least 15 volunteers to 150 volunteers took part in the project participate in the project and 200 people (including additionally book authors & contributors, donors/lenders of material and staff) in total – see book Train and manage at least 5 students to 5 BA History undergraduates took part participate in the project in the project Work with partner schools to develop at Working with 3 partner schools, we least 5 of the case studies for use in the created 4 case studies of Royal Sussex classroom; to be
    [Show full text]