MEMORANDUM
FROM: Dawn Sanders/Bureau of Environmental Services DATE: June 25, 2015 SUBJECT: Background Information on Willamette Park, including the Former Portland Shipbuilding Company
Fish tissue samples collected in the Willamette River, between River Mile (RM) 16 and RM 16.5, are elevated compared to samples both upstream and downstream of this stretch (Figure 1). There are three samples in the RM 16W to RM 16.2W segment, all located at the upstream end of the Park; concentrations range from 157.6 to 427.7 ng/g. The highest fish tissue sample (at 633.4 ng/g) was collected upstream of this segment at RM 16.5 (see sample ID LW4-SB-16W-02), which is about a ½ -mile upstream of the Park.
It has been hypothesized that Willamette Park, including the northern tax lot previously owned by the Portland Shipbuilding Company (PSBC), could be a source of PCBs. Willamette Park is located on the west shore between RMs 15.6 – 16. This memorandum provides information on historical operations and fill activities at Willamette Park and at the former PSBC facility. It also summarizes existing sediment and fill soil data to aid the evaluation of the Park as a potential source to upstream fish tissue concentrations.
Willamette Park For the purposes of this section, the former PSBC property is excluded and addressed separately in the next section. Most of the Park was purchased in 1926 with some subsequent expansion at the upstream end of the park. Although it was used by residents, the Park was not developed until the 1970s -- after it was filled to its current footprint. Currently, the Park is completely covered with vegetation, tennis courts and parking lots. The banks consist of concrete fill, riprap and vegetation. Any pathway for erodible soil is limited to the bank.
A Redevelopment Plan1 for the Park has some information about the filling conducted in the 1960s and early 1970s. According to the Plan, the Park was used as a relocation site for the 1969 demolition of the Oregon Journal Building, the removal of Front Avenue, and the excavation of the Vista Ridge Tunnel (on Highway 26). The fill increased the Park elevation and extended the Park into the river.
1 See Willamette Park Redevelopment and Phasing Plan at https://www.portlandoregon.gov/parks/article/469574
1 WILLAMETTE PARK BACKGROUND INFORMATION
It is unclear what is meant by the “removal of Front Avenue” and when this occurred; it could be referring to the removal of Harbor Drive, which occurred in 1974, or some refurbishment of Front Avenue. The Vista Ridge Tunnel was constructed in 1969 to 19702. Portland Shipbuilding Company The PBSC was a small facility; the entire tax lot is 5 acres and not all the property appears to have been utilized (see picture below). Historical information about the PSBC indicates that the facility specialized in wooden water craft and that it did not have the significant shipbuilding operations compared with many of the downstream shipbuilding facilities. A 1926 City Club Report (see page 7), provided in Attachment C, states that the Portland Shipbuilding Co. built river boats, barges and smaller craft. A 1948 US Navy report (excerpt also provided in Attachment C), describes the PSBC as “an established firm engaged in the building and repair of wooden craft.” The types of boats constructed at PSBC during World War II were all non-self-propelled barges and, therefore, would not have had on-board electronic equipment typically associated with PCBs in ships. Forty-one barges were constructed at PSBC during World Water II for the Navy.
Below are several pictures from the Oregon Maritime Museum website3 showing workers at the PSBC facility in 1943. Note the material being used to caulk between the wooden boards. Based on this picture, it appears that they were using the traditional caulking cotton or oakum method4 to seal the barge.
A 1969 Oregonian article (Attachment C) indicates that the Company relocated to the property in 1918; it formerly operated at the foot of SW Oak. The article also states that the last sternwheeler constructed at the facility was 1919, a time when PCBs were not in use. After that, the facility only did rebuilding and repairs until World War II, when it
2 See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vista_Ridge_Tunnels 3 See http://www.oregonmaritimemuseum.org/veWebsite/vex2/9945E9AE-16C6-4143-9AE9-223322341374.htm and http://www.oregonmaritimemuseum.org/veWebsite/vex2/39681A42-42F5-4119-948F-639139041220.htm 4 See http://www.boat-building.org/learn-skills/index.php/en/wood/caulking-calking/ and http://mediaserver.dwpub.com/fjd- profile/15020/Caulking+Seams+PBO.pdf
2 WILLAMETTE PARK BACKGROUND INFORMATION constructed “a mile of ugly wooden barges” for the Navy and Army. According to this article, the facility did not operate after a flood in 1946 (This is likely a typo for 1964). Note that the article states that the facility was 7 acres but the current tax lot is 5 acres; it is unclear if the article incorrectly stated the acreage or if several acres were not sold to the City.
There is also no evidence that the PSBC facility did any shipbreaking activities, which can contribute to sediment contamination.
Records in the City Archives indicate that filling at the PSBC facility occurred separately from filling in the rest of Willamette Park. There were likely at least two filling activities on the PSBC tax lot. The tax lot was purchased in 1969 and a 1968 aerial photo (see Figure 3), shows the condition of the property before the City purchased it. This aerial photo shows the PSBC facility with the northern (downstream) half of the tax lot filled, extending to the current riverward tax lot boundary. It is unknown when this filling occurred, but it apparently happened not long before this photo was taken. The second fill event was in 1971 by the Willamette Sailing Club, using dredge spoils from their mooring. This work was conducted under an Army Corps dredge permit. Information related to this activity is provided in Attachment A. Note that the Corps permit required that the dredge spoil be placed behind a water-tight berm.
The 1968 aerial shows dredge barges adjacent to the downstream half of the tax lot. The Willamette Sailing Club moved to the location just downstream of the PSBC facility in 19675 and the dredge barges may be related to establishment of the moorage, although no documentation was located to verify this.
The PSBC tax lot included a portion of the river adjacent to the PSBC facility during its operation. The pictures below show the current tax lot boundary (with a portion of the upstream Park tax lot) and the 1962 and 2010 aerials. These pictures show that if there was any historical contamination at or adjacent to the facility it would be capped by the fill used to extend the property riverward. Additionally, deposition has occurred adjacent to the PSBC tax lot, creating a mud flat over historical sediment as clearly shown below in the 2010 aerial.
5 http://willamettesailingclub.com/about/history/
3 WILLAMETTE PARK BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Available Sediment Data The City previously provided DEQ with a report titled Sediment Characterization Report for the Willamette Park Boat Ramp (AMEC, 2011) that summarizes all sediment data adjacent to the Park. An annotated figure from the report is attached (Figure 2) showing the depth and concentrations of PCBs adjacent to the Park. Both surface and subsurface sediment samples were collected; no PCBs were detected in any of these samples. Of the three sediment trap samples collected by the LWG at a single location about 300 feet offshore of the Park, two were non-detect and one had a PCB concentration of 13 ppb. These data do not indicate that the Park could be a significant source to upstream fish tissue.
Specifically for the former PSBC property, PCBs were not detected in the adjacent surface (sample G028) and subsurface (sample C017-D) sediment data collected by DEQ (see Figure 2 for sample locations). Both of these samples were collected at the outside boundary of the mud flat adjacent to the former PSBC property. DEQ’s protocol for selecting the subsurface core interval was based on sediment lithology (dominant grain size and color) and the criterion used to determine which depth intervals to analyze was stated as the “deeper core section showing the most evidence of contamination was selected for chemical testing.”6 Core C017- D was collected at a depth of 8.7 to 12.2 feet at a location in the core where there was a slight sheen (see Attachment C for the Core Processing Log and core mosaic for this sample). In other words, the subsurface sediment that would be considered the most likely to be contaminated and that likely represents sediment adjacent to the PSBC facility when it was operating did not show any detectable PCBs.
Available Fill Soil Data As part of several construction or planning projects, soil samples from the Park fill have been collected to determine appropriate disposal. Although subsurface construction debris
6 Field and Data Report, Downtown Portland Sediment Characterization (GSI, Jan. 2009)
4 WILLAMETTE PARK BACKGROUND INFORMATION was noted in these projects, no significant contamination was found (reports are provided in Attachment B). Reports and findings include:
Soil Sampling Data Report – Environmental Investigation for the Willamette Park Boat Ramp Swale, E10154/CSA Job 1216 (BES, 4/14/2011)
Two soil samples were collected just north of the parking lot in advance of a stormwater infiltration swale retrofit. The samples were analyzed for TPH, PCBs, and metals. The laboratory results for these samples were non-detect for petroleum hydrocarbons, non-detect for PCBs, and all metals concentrations were below accepted background levels with the exception of lead, which was slightly elevated.
Results of Sampling and Analysis for the Willamette Park Bank Restoration, BES Project E10395 (BES, 2/22/2012)
Soil sampling was conducted in support of a potential bank restoration project in the Park (as described in the Willamette Park Redevelopment and Phasing Plan). Five test pits were excavated near the bank, two on the former shipbuilding property and three in the Park south of this property. Samples were collected from 4 of the test pits and analyzed for TPH, PAHs, and metals. Two of the soil samples and some debris were also tested for asbestos. All concentrations were below RBCs for construction and excavation workers and no asbestos was detected. Demolition debris was encountered primarily in the area south of the parking lot.
A geotechnical report was produced as part of the test pit work and is also provided in Attachment B. The report shows that Test Pits 5 and 6, located on the former PSBC property, consist primarily of silty sand with some trace debris and wood material. This is consistent with the composition of dredge spoils. In contrast, Test Pits 1 to 4 had much more construction debris (e.g., concrete, rebar, brick, and metal), consistent with the fill sources identified in the Park Redevelopment Plan.
Although there are limited data for PCBs in the Park fill material, there is no indication of significant contamination related to the dredge spoils from the Willamette Sailing Club moorage (at the former shipbuilding property) or the mixed demolition materials (in the remainder of the Park).
Summary The former PSBC facility was a small operation constructing and repairing wooden water craft. Any historical contamination that may have been associated with the facility is covered with dredge spoils (within the tax lot) and mud flats created by deposition of upstream sediment (adjacent to the tax lot). Sampling riverward of the mud flat did not reveal any surface and subsurface PCB contamination, even though the subsurface interval was targeted at the most likely contaminated horizon.
5 WILLAMETTE PARK BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Fill material for the former PSBC facility was likely dredge material, as supported by the Willamette Sailing Club dredge records and geotechnical explorations. Although PCBs were not sampled in the fill, other contaminants were not significantly elevated and do not indicate that the dredge material was contaminated. Sediment samples adjacent to the Park also do not indicate a PCB source.
Figures Figure 1. Annotated Figure 3-k Figure 2. Annotated Maintenance Dredging Figure Figure 3. Sept. 30, 1968 Aerial Photo: Willamette Park, Portland Shipbuilding Co. and Willamette Sailing Club
Attachments A. Portland Shipbuilding Company Records B. Willamette Park Fill Environmental Reports C. Subsurface Sediment Core C017D Field Notes and Mosaic
6 d x m . A P E t r o p e R a t a D k - 3 e r u g i F \ A
P Total PCB Congener concentration, pg/g Navigation Channel E !.
r ´ o f \ s p
a River miles Parcel Boundary 0 400 800 1,600 M d
l Feet e i F _
8 FEATURE SOURCES:
2 All concentrations are Total PCB Congeners in pg/g
2 Transportation, Property, or Boundaries: Metro RLIS . 0
3 Note: pg/g = picograms per gram Channel & River miles: US Army Corps of Engineers. 1
0 Bathymetric Information: David Evans and Associates, Inc. 2 \ s t n e v E \
G Figure 3-k
W DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE L
\ Portland Harbor RI/FS 3 s t 1
c This document is currently under review by US EPA
0 Data Report e j 2 / o r 3 and its federal, state, and tribal partners, and is subject 1 P / \ : 3 I
2012 Smallmouth Bass : : to change in whole or in part. e h t t
a Sample Locations and Analytical Results a P D K:\12000\12400\12400\124001\SedimentReport\Figures\FigureCharacterization Sample - 2 Sediment Locations.mxd - - patrick.mccarthy 12/5/2011 - 12:27:00 PM DPSC-C017-D
&, DPSC-G028
LW3-ST4-010 LW3-ST2010 &, LW3-ST1010 Trap Samples Sediment CLIENT: DMMU1-3 BUREAU OF ENVIRONMENTAL OF BUREAU SERVICES ENVIRONMENTAL Portland, OR, U.S.A. 97224 U.S.A. OR, Portland, DMMU1-4 7376 SW Durham Road Durham SW 7376 AMEC &-
CITY OF PORTLANDCITYOF &- DMMU1-2
&-
&- DMMU1-5 &- DMMU1-1 SCALE: PROJECTION: DATUM: BY: CHK'D BY: DWN 1 = inch feet 100 OR SP N. Ft. SP OR NAD83 PM JF DPSC-G080 TITLE: PROJECT:
&,
SEDIMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE SEDIMENT LOCATIONS &, DPSC-C0322 MAINTENANCEDREDGING CITY OF PORTLANDCITYOF 0 Legend &, &- Characterization, Phase II Phase Characterization, Sediment Portland Downtown report, Data and Field 2010, - DEQ, Report Investigation Remedial Draft 2009, Group, Willamette - Lower Sources: Previous Sediment Sample Location Sample Sediment Previous 2011 Location October Sample AMEC 100 200 FIGURE NO.: FIGURE NO.: PROJECT DATE: REV. NO.: REV. DECEMBER 2011 DECEMBER 1-61M-124001 300 Feet
2 1 I
WILLAMETTE PARK BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Attachment A. Portland Shipbuilding Company Records
WILLAMETTE SAILING CLUB 6336 SW BEAVER ST. PORTLAND, OREGON
Park Bureau November 19,1970 Department of Public Affairs City of Portland Subject: Dredging at Willamette Sailing Club- Gentlemen: You are undoubtedly aware that the Willamette Sailing Club is encountering difficulty in keeping our port facilities cleared of silt. Due to the nature of sailing, our harbor depth must be maintained at 8 to 10 feet below mean low water, to accomodate the center boards and keels of our boats. At the present time, the harbor has silted to such an extent, that less than one third of the area meets the minimum conditions. This situation is not only inconvenient, but extremely dangerous while landing, or departing. We have had several cases of our boats being swamped, due to this condition. As we see it we have three alternatives; a- Abandon our facilities and move elsewhere b- Dredge out the accumulated silt c- As one member puts it 11 Sell our boats and buy motorcycles .. We like it where we are, and don•t really feel that we could find a better location. Also I believe we do add a great deal of atmosphere to the City•s water front. Sail boats on our Willamette River always are pleasing to anyone•s eye. Any dredging is expensive, however, in order to dredge, we must have a 11 11 1ocati on to dispose of the Spoi 1 • We are prepared to undertake the expenses, if the City will allow us to dispose of the spoil on their property. The attached plan shows the area we are requesting for disposal purposes. Both of these areas are unusable in their present condition and our operations would bring it up to grade, making it more useful property. In no case, would we perform any acts that would be harmful to the City, or reduce or destroy the value of the City owned property. We would also carry any adequate insurance to cover our dredging operation and would hold the City free of any or all claims that might result from any of our operations. Our personnel operating on City property or other persons would be completly covered by us, in the event of any accidents etc. We will be glad to coordinate our activities with the City Park Bureau or whoever they designate to insure compliance with the agreement. We will also acquire all necessary permits and clearances with the necessary authorities be fore proceeding with any operations. cont•d If these conditions are acceptable, please either sign below or submit a letter to us accepting the proposal plan. We need o·ne or the other to submit to the Corps of Engineers office. As you know, it takes a great deal of time to obtain a dredging permit, and we would certainly appreciate your attention on this matter so that we may proceed without delay. If there are further questions or additional information necessary, please feel free to call me. at the address given below. ~~~~~/ C.H.Fullman, Port Captain Willamette Sailing Club
Approved by:
City of Portland
Please direct all correspondence to:
Carl H Fullman Port Captain, Willamette Sailing Club % 5221 SW Corbett Avenue Portland, Oregon ~;; S" - • 7
u Ul
ill 11. WILLAHETTE SAILING CLUB 6336 S. W. Beaver Portland, Oregon
January 11, 1971
City of Portland Planning Commission
Gentlemen.
The ill ~ ili Club, 6336 S. W. Beaver has applied to the Corps of En i & r ~ rmit to dredge our moorage area. This dredgin~ is necessary to insure adeQuate depth for our boats.
'le h ve a lied and r ~ ~ 1ved approval frorr. th(! City Pureau of Parks and Public Recre ti o 1, 'r. H 11 , to di spo!;e of the materia 1 on c1 ty owned property. The lett~r re1 ~ sti , tds aut orization, the approval and the ['llan showing the areas involve aT\. clos ' •
~le th 1 li c t - le orps of ~"ngin ~ rs our application has heen posted in PutlL ;~ ;)-7 -1 .... . To ~ate n otjections to the subject dredging have en rt i v I ince t.,e fin 1 d1"" . I . 1ection could be recei " ·' 1 '1 s January , 1171 i~. · p~ rs that ther will " no ob.1 ctions. He have been assured t~ t 1 r rmit ith certain re~tri tions (~o dredoino durino fish runs) is forth coni n .....
The n ~. t ~ is f coursf o aoolv to th,. citv lior a condition 1 usP oermft to allo fillin of l su 1 c ~ ... no , on Ue ~ lan as ~. .. tailed in our let .. r to tl "ity Par~ r u, • ' ronos,:~e to fill certain areas to a de r f ... . _ 1 i r c r ve n 1 r ~ n 1 ti . ~,~rs ori or to dr j in .
It is un ~. rc:t th t 1 1 n arer~ 1ill not ~ ,e suitahle for I uildinn sites \'lithout ~pedal preci\utions.
~Je would appr1 c1ate the issuance of this nentit ac: oon as possibl~ sc tha+ we may initiate dredg1n ~ at the earliest possible tiMe. Very truly yours,
C H Fullman
Please direct correspondence to: Port Ca~ta1n, W. S. c. 5221 S. W. Corbett Ave. Portland. Oreqon 17201 224-5221 cc: R. G. Gustafson CuPY January 4 1 1971
.Park Bureau Department of Public Affaire .., OffiCE I OF PUBLIC. Aff Commissioner Francia J. Ivancie Willamette Sailing Club PrOpoaal
Dear Commiaaioner Ivancie:
Reference ia made to Willamette Sailing Club's request to put dredging spoila on Willamette Park property.
Several weeks ago Boland Hall 1 Carl Pullman and myaelf diacuaaed thia propoaal and inapected the site intended to be filled. It was our opinion that fillina this area would actually improve the area by brinaina it up on a level with the rest of the park.
As part of thia project the Willamette Sailing Club haa also agreed to clean up a significant amount of rotten timber and other debris.
It is our recommendation that thia proposal recei~e your approval.
Very truly yours,
Harry B. Buckley Superintendent of Parks By
Aasiatant Superintendent RGG:k CC: Hall Pullman
APPROVED______COMMISSIONER PUBLIC APPAllS ,----~----· COM. I - j EARL DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PORTLAND DISTRICT. CORPS OF ENGINEERS : cO P. 0. BOX 2946
PORTLAND. OREGON 97208 SEC. I; STENO. NPPND-WM-P 8 December - 1910----- ~ 1522-14(Willamette R.-Dredging)-198. ~ It !c~ !~7; \U COJ'I'.MIS5IONt.~· Off\(E Of r · "fA\?.~ PUBLIC NOTICE NPP 70-149 :F pusu- N tHLU.METTE RHTER MTT .1<' 15. 8 AT PORTT -4.NT' OFFGON--DFFDGTNG
The Willamette Sailing Club has applied for a Department of the Army permit to do maintenance dredging in their mooring basin as shown on the reverse side of this nutict::. The work is to be done by suction dredge with the spoils being placed behind a watertight berm on land owned by the City of Portland, Bureau of Parks and Public Recreation. The area to be dredged is approximately 320 feet long by 220 feet wide, to a depth of -8 feet a.l.w., removing approximately 6,700 yards of silt and sand.
Additional information may be obtained from Carl H. Fullman, Port Captain, Willamette Sailing Club, 6336 S. W. Beaver Street, l'ort land, Oregon 97201; phone (503) 246-9140.
Interested parties are requested to submit in writing any com ments or objections they may have to the proposed work.
The determination as to whether a permit will be issued will be based on an evaluation of all relevant factors, including naviga tion, fish and wildlife, water quality, economics, conservation, aesthetics, recreation, water supply, flood damage prevention, eco systems, and in general the needs and welfare of the people. Conunents on these factors will be accepted and considered in deter mining whether it would be in the best public interest to grant the permit as requested.
Replies to this notice should be mailed to reach this office not later than 8 January 1971.
..... c ..<( :-. ~· r· - ~ 0 -7 c• "71 &~!{!A__- ~ -.,-, r
-o~ J Chief, Navigation Division o,. ;r.;r :x n r v• )>.~ ...-..... 2')>. .. ~ ~t: - · • j 0~ ::0- C.J ~0 _, -"' r: · , .·
.. .~ ~ .· ... - .. .. . --·· ·- ...... -;;; . . - - ....~: -,. ' . - ... . : ... ~--. j:'
... ·-· ·...... : __,. ..• - ~-. ... · .. '"·." .. . ..• ; "''.,
i -~ ·!
~ ...... :r .. ,- ·I .I 1 1
t WEOAA"l'A '.:·. .. .. CST. · /·:~·-,> ·. .NOTE:. ' .' 1. S!>OII. TO •. B~ P~J>a.O ~li c~ · Pt _:.- ~-~ -. Portland State University PDXScholar City Club of Portland Oregon Sustainable Community Digital Library 10-15-1926 City Club of Portland Bulletin vol. 07, no. 03 (1926-10-15), supplement City Club of Portland (Portland, Or.) Follow this and additional works at: http://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/oscdl_cityclub Part of the Urban Studies Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Recommended Citation City Club of Portland (Portland, Or.), "City Club of Portland Bulletin vol. 07, no. 03 (1926-10-15), supplement" (1926). City Club of Portland. Paper 77. http://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/oscdl_cityclub/77 This Bulletin is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in City Club of Portland by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SUPPLEMENT TO t-1111 II till ...... , 't"" ... •...... 1 ·t l l PORTLAND CITY CLUB "HarmoDyin i "Active I i 01._.,.. l CitizetUbip'" I i BULLETIN ,.111111111111 Ill I r I •1. ~-----~ VOLUWE VII PORTLAND, OREGON, OCTOBER 15, 1926 NUMBD 3 PoRTLAND SHIPPING A Report lry The Port Development and Public Utilities Section of the CITY CLUB OF PORTLAND 2 PORTLAND CITY CLUB BULLETIN TABLE of CONTENTS PAGE I. SUMMARy AND RECOMMENDATIONS______,______2 I ~~: ~~::L:~~:,~~~N -~F ~ORTLAND ...... , ...... _ ...... ______4 - __ , ·····-·--·------·····-·······-··········-··-.. ·-·------· 4 IV. PORT AND HARBOR F ACILITIES ...... --.-······················-·--·--···- --··········------5 v~ : ~~~~H~:~!~=-~:~~~ ::::~-~~~~=~:=~~:::~::::~==::::~~~-=::~::=:~=::=~:~:----- ~ V I I . SHIPBUILDING AND REPAIR PLANTs ...... - -··-··· · ··· · · · ···--·· ------·- · · · ···--···--·--~~~: 7 VII I. FACILITIES FOR RAIL AND WATER INTERCHANGE...... 7 XI.·~: RAIL~~:~~: FREIGHT:s~~~_:~~:~~::==~-.:::::~:~~===~==~~::~=:~:=~~=~:~:~::=~=-= RATES... ______;8 XI I . IMPORT AND EXPORT RATES...... _____ ,______~ 8 X III. CoMMERCE, TERRITORY TRIBUTARY, RAr E RELATIONSHIP, Ere. ______9 Appendices A. TRIPS AND DRAFTS OF VESSELS---·······---···-·········-···------·-·······--·---··--·-····· 10 B. OCEAN-GoiNG VESSEL CLASSIFICATION 10 C. SHIP SERVICE AT PORTLAND, APRIL, 1 926~--~~:~~~:~::::~=~-~::::~:~:::~~~:~~::::::::~:=~~= 11 POR 'fLAND SHIPPING I. SUMMARY and RECOMMENDATIONS cargo, comparative freedom from fog lessens risk in navigation, and fresh water lessens cost Portland is better situated than any other of cleaning hulls. These advantages, except Pacific port for assembling of domestic products that regarding fog, arc greater in proportion as for export and for distribution inland of foreign the distance from the mouth of the Columbia is manufactures, also for import of raw materials greater, therefore they operate in favor of Port for their manufacture and for the distribution land as against Longview and other ports on of the finished product in the United States by the Columbia below Portland. rail or by ship and abroad by ship. This great Docks and railroad facilities at Portland are advantage comes about because of the port's ample. as shown in the main body of this report. position. In the first place being at the head of There is much available frontage for new docks, ship navigation on a waterway 113 miles from the the harbor is being deepened to float ships the Pacific Ocean qualifies it to become one of of the deepest draft and widened at Swan the great ports of the world, in accordance with Island to give room for ships to turn or anchor. the dictum of Virgil G Bogue in a report for the The character of ships, however, mostly port of Seattle made in 1894. Bogue said that freighters of low speed, and the present limitation the great ports were those which had the largest of draft to thirty feet combine to make this percentage of land within a radius of I 50 miles principally a port for export of bulk com for this fact made them centers for economical modities having relatively luw value. Imports, assembling and distribution of cargo. A second being mostly of high value, are usually carried advantage is revealed by reports of the weather on fast liners to other ports. bureau, which show that Portland has only half Effort should be directed to improvement of as many days of fog as have Pugct Sound and the channel to the point where it can be na vi San Francisco Bay. By being in fresh water gated more safely at any stage of tide in any while steaming up and down the Columbia and season of year by fast passenger vessels of the while lying at the dock, ships arc much aided deepest draft and the greatest length and beam, in freeing their hulls of marine growth. These and to the establishment of lines of that type, points have weight with owners and masters first to the Orient, then on other trade routes as for the inland position aids them in obtainin~ PORTIANO CITY CLUB BULLETIN 3 commerce develops. To this end, no effort justice to Portland and to the Columbia Pacific should be spared for adoption by Congress of Shipping Company, its operating agent at thiS the project for a channel to the sea 35 feet deep port, the agency for the Seattle freight line and at least 500 feet wide. should be transferred to that company, which Determined opposition should be offered to should be broadened to include Seattle capital. the construction of any bridge in or below Port Discrimination against the Oregon Oriental land not high enough and of wide enough span line in making rates at which it may obtain to clear the largest ship that might enter the cargo is alleged by Capt. J. S. Bockwalter in a river at any stage of water at any time during report from Kobe, Japan, dated March 18, 1926, the life of the bridge. In giving or withholding to the Shipping Board, of which he is a repre consent to the construction of a bridge the port sentative on the Pacific coast. The only other should measure development in the future by member of the Shipping Board Conference at that in the past. After comparing the present Shanghai is the Oregon Oriental"s competitor, large fleet of :;hips with the low ebb to which the American Oriental line, operating fast our shipping declined during the war, we should passenger ships from Seattle, since sold to the use that as a guage by which to measure the Dollar company, and this line refused to consent great progress to be expected during the hundred to the Oregon Oriental"s meeting competition years that a bridge may stand. We should not of other freight lines at North China ports. permit a bridge that might prove a fence shut Appeal lies :ro the board's agent at Manila, ting out a ship of any size. who has ofte~ upheld the Oregon Oriental, but the delay involved caused loss of the traffic in Attention should be directed immediately to question. Capt. Bockwalter reported similar increase of imports on the shipping lines we have, conditions at Japanese ports, though the ad thus to correct the situation which makes this ditional cargo is not secured by the Board's practically a one-way port. This requires es passenger lines but by foreign freight lines. The tablishment of industries that would consume Oregon Oriental is "compelled to quote mail a large tonnage of raw materials, such as would steamer freight rates" for its slower freight be carried on the freight vessels now in operation. ships. At Dairen open rates prevail, and the From the shipping view-point alone this policy Portland line "is receiving a full and fair share would go far to put freight lines on a paying of cargo." In the South China service from basis, which would incline shipping companies Hongkong, the Oregon Oriental"s competitors, to establish a fast passenger-cargo or passenger the Blue Funnel and the American Oriental, line here. "accept Portland cargo at direct Portland freight While striving thus to strengthen existing rates, tran:;hipping the Portland cargo at Seattle lines, and also to secure improvement of the and absorbing the cost of transhipment at channel and to prevent its obstruction by Seattle and the rail freight cost from Seattle to bridges, the port should persevere in the labor Portland.'' This tends to nullify the rate to secure establishment of a home-owned line of differential between Portland and the Columbia American passenger-cargo ships to the Orient, basin. The other lines refuse to add a dollar to so well equipped with capital and ability that their Portland rate for this rail haul and tran it might from time to time extend its operations shipment charges. The Shipping Board has also to other trade routes. liberally advertised its Seattle passenger service, The Shipping Board having sold its trans but has denied such aid to the Portland service. Pacific passenger-cargo line hitherto operated The Board should cease these various forms from Seattle to a San Francisco company with of discrimination against the Portland line, which Seattle as its home port and with an option of are the sole cause of the losses which the board 'calling at Portland for passengers only, however, has suffered on its Portland operation and to there is no prospect of an American passenger which its members frequently advert to the line from Portland during the five years for which injury of Portland's reput>ltion >1s a rort. No the contract with the Dollar company runs. reasonable doubt exists that, if this discrimina The situation thus created by the Board, in tion should cease, if the two lines should be spite of the efforts of a Portland and Seattle combined as, proposed and, if the operating company to buy the passenger line at a higher company were set free to compete for traffic, it price than the Dollars pay, gives Portland a would soon be on a paying basis, and that the moral claim to control of both freight lines now Columbia Pacific company would buy both operated for the board, the Oregon Oriental line lines as a fair price. from Portland and the American Oriental line Having been in effect deprived of passenger from Seattle, especially as the operating com service under the American flag, by the contract pany at Seattle is controlled by the Dollars. In which does not require the Dollar Company to 4 PORTLAND CITY CLUB BULLETIN railroads from the interior to Portland- ulti PoRTLAND CITY CLUB mately of b arge lines o n a canalized river as described in dew il in a fo rmer rcfXJrt of the City Club-and of ship from this port down BULLETIN the river and across the ocean to all foreign markets fo r products of the whole area we st of Publishtd \¥1eekly By the Rocky mountains and beyond. THE CITY CLUR II. OF PORTLAND CENLHAL DESCRIPTIO\' v/ PORTLAVD Office of the Club 607 Oregon Building Portland is one of the principal ports on the Telephone Broadwav 8079 Pacif1c coast. It serves what is known as the Columbia River basin, comprising parts of Subscription Price . $1.00 per year Oregon, Washington, Idaho. iv1ontana and Entered as Second Class Matter, October 2 channel is now under improvement and will The mouth of the Columbia river is f,j() miles very soon be the main channel. as it is straighter north of San Francisco Bay and ](,0 miles south and shorter than the ea river at the foot of Sixteenth street. It is served which handle ocean traffic are adequate for that by the tracks of the Northern Pacific system. business at the present time. The intercoastal The Union Pacific dock has a frontage of 580 trade which is now handled mostly at Municipal feet, located at the foot of Fremont street on terminal No. I will probably need greater the east side of the river. While the wharf is facilities as it increases. open to vessels in foreign, intercoastal and coast V. OWNERSHIP of W' A TERFRONT wise business, it is used principally for handling The City of Portland owns approximately 178 river traffic. The Albina dock adjoins this dock acres of waterfront property on both sides of the and is connected with the Southern Pacific rail river, in addition to the street ends. This road. property is controlled by the Commission of The Montgomery dock, a short distance above Public Docks, and has been developed for water the Union Pacific dock, has a frontage of 550 terminals as follows: feet. It is connected with the Oregon-Wash Feet of ington Railway and Navigation Company's Municipal Terminal Acres W'ater Front tracks. It is used almost exclusively for the No. ! ...... I 1.85 1075 Luckenbach Steamship Company, for their in 3.64 526 tercoastal vessels. No. 2.------·~·----··-~ -- .. --. No. 3 ...... 2.64 540 Supple's dock at the foot of east Belmont 160.00 2730 street, consists of two wharves each with 128 No. 4..--·----·-----~-.... ---... -- feet o f water frontage, with a slip between. It Total...... 178 . 13 4871 is connected with the tracks of the Portland • Water front property owned by the Port of Electric Power Company, and is used for Portland District and controlled by the Port of handling general cargo and grain in domestic Portland Commission consists principally of business. Swan Island, which has a water frontage of Ainsworth dock is located on the west side 2000 feet, and of a section of the east bank of the of the river, at the foot of Irving street, and is river, where its two floating dry docks and owned by the Oregon-Washington Railway and repair ships are located. The Port of Portland Navigation Company. It is operated by that provided a main channel on the west side of company as ,a terminal for the vessels of a sub Swan Island filling in the lowlands on the west sidiary company, the San Francisco and Port side of the channel with material dredged from land Steamship Company, and is not open to the new channel . The Port has received in general public use. The wharf has a water payment for the fills a tract of land from the frontage of 980 feet and is served by the Northern owners having a frontage of about one mile on Pacific Railway tracks. the channel. The remainder of the water The 1\:orth Bank wharf, on the west side of frontage i~ owned by lumber companie~ . rail the river at the foot of Thurman street, is owned roads, and private interests. by the Spokane. Portland and Seattle Railway, which has leased it to the Admiral Line for VI . STORAGE W'AREHOUS&'i operation of coastwise steamships. The general commerce of the port now re The lumber wharves in the port arc generally quires only a limited amount of storage space. located at sawmills. There arc. however, two \Vater shipment~ generally mo\·e quickly. Ample wharves on the cast side which are U>cd for the storage space is, howe\·cr, available at terminals receipt of rail comignments of lumber for water l':os. I, 3 and 4. and the Southern Pacific wharf. shipment. While probably more than one Very little space is required for the storage of third of the total tonnage of the grain and material in bulk and only a small amount_o£ grain products shipped out of the Port of Port space has been provided. land passes over the municipal terminals and Lumber requires only temporary storage on the North Bank dock, thi~ trade is handled account of its quick movement. The storage mostly at the wharves operated by the flour of grain and flour is provided for by the grain mills in the port and at wharves leased and elevators at flouring mill~ and at Terminal No. operated by companies engaged in the grain 4, where there is an clc\'ator with a capacity of exporting business. over a million bushels. and an unloading capacity The river traffic is handled at street ends and of 120,000 bushels in eight hours from cars. at landings on the west side of the \\' illamcttc Grain can be dcliwred to \'essels at a rate of river between the Burnside street and Haw 30,000 bushels per hour. A storage warehouse thorne bridge. !\:early all of the wharves in the for fruit and other pcri~hables has al~o been pro port have two docks to accommodate all classes vided at terminal l':o. 4 with cold storage of boats during high and low stages of the river. capacity for 105,000 boxes of apples and ad In general it may be stated that the wharves joining it an air-cooled storage for 350,000 boxes PORTLAND CITY CLUB BULLETIN 7 more. Other cold storage plants on the harbor which are the main parts of Portland's im bring the total capacity for apple storage at mediate field of commerce, by means of the Portland up to 700,000 boxes. 0.-W. R. & N. and Oregon Short Line tracks to VII. Sl-IJPBUTLDJNG and REPAIR connect with the main line at Granger, Wyo .., PLANTS whence it extends on eastward and by allied There are two floating dry docks at Portland, lines through the middle West to Chicago. both owned and operated by the Port of Port Branches extend through the Palouse wheat belt, and into the Coeur d'Alene mining district and land Commission. One dock has a capacity of 10,000 tons and can accommodate vessels of 500 into northern, central and eastern Oregon. It feet length. The second has a capacity of 15,000 extends to Seattle by use of the joint double tons and can accommodate vessels of 525 feet track from Portland. length. The Northern Pacific and Great Northern, There arc six plants in the port where repairs which between them serve all of Washington and of all kinds can be made to ships and their the Northwest as far east as Chicago, enter machinery. They are operated by the Albina Portland over the joint track from Seattle and Marine Iron Works, the Commercial Iron Works, over the Spokane, Portland & Seattle (which the Helser Machine Works, Robert Mcintosh, they jointly own) from Spokane. The latter Smith & Watson Iron Works, Willamette Iron system continues to Astoria and the Oregon & Steel Works, who are bonded contractors. beach and has branches consisting of the United After a ship is lifted on the dry dock by the Railway into the coast range timber, the Oregon Port Commission, the owner lets the contract Electric up the Willamette valley to Eugene and by competitive bidding and the contractor has the Oregon Trunk through central Oregon to the use of a complete machine shop at the dry Bend, whence it is to be extended to Klamath dock, which has been installed by the Port. Falls. Repairs done by the Port Commission are The Souther Pacific runs from San Francisco limited to its own dredging fleet. through California and western Oregon to Port There are three shipyards at Portland. The land and well serves that section of Oregon with Albina Marine Iron Works is equipped to build many branches, also giving connection with the steel ships, the Peninsula Shipbuilding Co. to East by way of the Central Pacific. It has just build wooden ships, the Portland Shipbuilding opened a new line from Eugene to Klamath Co. to build river boats, barges and smaller Falls, which brings the latter city much r:earer craft. to Portland than to San Francisco, and has au Vll I. FACILITIES FOR RAIL and thority from the Interstate Commerce Com \\lATER INTERCHANGE mission to build other branches through south- All of the wharves are served by the rail ' eastern Oregon that will connect with the lines entering Portland, so that the interchange Central Pdcific a:1d will grca~!y reduce its mileage of freight is usually direct between rail and from all Oregon points to the East. water. The port district is divided into eight These railroads drain the products of the switching zones which cover the west side of Columbia ri\·er basin on the ware~ grades of the Willamette River from Willamette Slough that river and its main tributaries into Portland, to the head of Ross Island, and the east side therefore are feeders of the Portland shipping from the North Portland harbor on the Columbia lines. By interchange of service, cars of any one River opposite Vancouver, Washington, to the of these roads reach any dock or industry over head of Ross Island. another ·s tracks. Uniform rates, depending upon the com X. \YATER LINES modity handled, prevail as between all shippers. There are now 54 steamship lines operating The actual switching charge is in the form of ou: of Portland, and regular service has been published tariffs based on commodity and zone established to most of the important ports of the movement. world. IX. RA!LROAD FACILITIES There are now 12 steamship lines on the inter Four transcontinental railroad systems serve coastal service, operating through the Panama Portland, the Union Pacific, Southern Pacific, Canal, and all of the important ports on the Northern Pacific, and Great Northern. There Atlantic and Gulf of l\1cxico are now reached are also three local railroads, the Spokane, Port from Portland. land and Seattle, the Oregon Electric, and the Portland Electric Power Company. The lower rates by water have helped in The Union Pacific system extends through developing the markets on the Atlantic coast eastern Oregon, eastern Washington and Idaho, for western lumber products. 8 PORTLAND CITY CLUB BULLETIN ~·teamers equipped with refrigerating faditics of the !\1issouri river has been maintained by the arc being 0["crntcd tfuon'!h rhc cn.,>Jl to t!-:c railroads for many ~-ears. These rates covered Adantic Co urc nO\\' in operation to Chi!la, but also ma'1y commodities intct~ded for domestic ja,nn, :\t.:~tra!ia. \Jew Zealand. PU\\aii, the consumption and more or lc•s general import Philipp?nc bJ,,nds. rhc \\'C~t co XI fl. COMMERCE. TERRITORY TR I IJUTOR Y, RATE REL!\TlO\'S!·f !P, ETC. The following statistics of the commerce of Portland which were compiled by the United States Enghccrs and the Po rt of Portland, represent the commerce of P ortland proper for the past thirteen years: TONNAGE OF IMPORTS AND EXPORTS THROUGH PORTLAND. OREGON Domestic Foreign Y ear Imports Exports Imports E xports Total 19ll ...... _. .. , ...... 1,133 ,059 725 017 57 .5l' l 6 ~7. b·S\':) 2,5 \13.3 23 ]9!4 ...... 990,422 634. 142 65,3 17 51S::'.,9 N 2.272.855 19 15...... 954,877 51 9. 211 0 3l' 4~3 5 17,795 2.028,43 5 191 6 ...... 1,1 33,534 41 3.695 33:4o4 I I7.910 I ,598,5<.'3 1917 ...... ______1,027.201 3 20, 195 19,085 171 ,504 1.5 37,985 19 1!L ...... --.... ~. ------··· 1,107.b37 177.323 !6,8b9 227 ,980 l,529,::l09 191 9.~---~--··-----~ ----.------· -· l,l 87,5 17 155 ,458 16,9% 41 9,919 U~5 1 .>ill0 1920______...... 1,31 6,759 165,8 75 58.415 863,4o2 2.404.51 1 1921 ...... 1, 159,641 248,666 31,962 I ,656.702 3,09 ),971 ~ ~------~------1,456,019 434,132 63,442 1,299,516 3.252.109 19l3''...... 1,900,1 88 705 ,037 105,453 l,26 l.b l5 3,972.293 1924...... _ .. ______1,967,718 904.429 109,273 I ,396.93 7 4,378. 357 1925 ...... 2,1 15,797 1,035,998 122 , 151 828,640 4,102 ,58b It will be noted that for 1925 the domestic eighty-four and one-half per cent of the total imports were more than twice as great as the shipments. domestic exports, while in the case of the foreign Of the 828,640 tons of foreign exports from commerce the imports were about fifteen per Portland for the year 1925, 224,139 tor.s, or cent of the exports. The total tonnage was twenty-seven per cent, went to the United 4, I 02,5 86 tons, of which the domestic imports Kingdom; 258,171 tons, or thirty-one per cent, were fifty-one and one-half per cent, the domestic to Japan; 107,987 tons, or thirteen per cent, to exports twenty-five per cent, the foreign imports China; and 78,458 tons, or nine per cent, to three per cent, and the foreign exports twenty Australia. per cent. Compared with the foreign exports, the foreign A study of the records of the commerce of imports were 14.7 per cent of the exports. This Portland, compiled by the Port of Portland, makes practically a one-way traffic. shows that of the total of 122, 151 tons of foreign T he receipts in the intercoastal trade for 1925 imports for 1925 the most important was cement, were 132, 144 tons or fifty-nine per cent of the with 25,386 tons, or twenty-one per cent; copra, shipments of 391 ,097 tons, leaving forty-one second, with 18,497 tons, or fifteen per cent; per cent delivered at other ports to balance the iron and steel, third, with 12 ,922 tons or about load. ten per cent and oils fourth with 12,475 or Nearly all of the steamship lines in the fo reign another ten per cent. These four comprised trade include the more important Pacific coast approximately fifty-six per cent of the total ports in their schedules, and arc not dependent foreign imports. upon one port. Some have regula r service while Of the foreign exports of 828,640 tons, lumber others have irregular and tramp service. \\'heat leads with 44b,2615 tons or Mty-four per cent ; is the principal cargo available at Portlond for wheat is second, with 217,448 tons or twenty-six European ports, and affects the shipping service per cent; flour third, with 67,055 tons or eight 1 on account of the seasonal nature of its move per cent; and apples fourth with 24,673 tons or ment. Lumber exports are mostly to the Orient, about three per cent. These four items com and affect lines operating freight service only. prised approximately ninety-six per cent of the The last combination passenger and freight total tonnage. companies between the Pacific coast and the Portland is the largest wheat shipping port Orient have their terminals at San Francisco of the Pacific coast and one of the largest in the and Seattle so that Portland does not enjoy an United States. equal share of the movement of through ship The intercoastal receipts amounted to 231 , 144 ments of general cargo between the interior and tons in 1925, of which iron and steel led with eastern manufacturing districts and the Orient. 52,321 tons or twenty-two and one-half per Vessels plying from foreign ports call at Portland cent ; miscellaneous supplies second with 34,704 principally for grain, lumber and flour. During tons, or fifteen per cent; plumbing supplies third the years 1917 to 1921 these three commodities with 31,b75 tons, or fourteen per cent; tin plate constituted 94.4 per cent of the exports of fourth, with 17,77b tons. or seven per cent, and Portland. In I ()22 they amounted to 95.9 ger sulphur fifth, with 16, !52 tons or seven per cent. cent, in 1924 to about 95 per cent and in 192 5 These five items comprised sixty-five and one to over 88 per cent of the foreign export com half per cent of the total receipts. merce of the port. The intercoastal shipments amounted to No large foreign import trade has, as yet, been 391,097 tons of which lumber led with 259,498 developed through Portland but there has been a tons or sixty-six per cent; flour, second with steady increase. In 1922 imports amounted to 31,032 tons, or eight per cent; copper third, 73,000 tons, as compared with exports of 1,267,- with 15,934 tons or four per cent; canned goods 000 tons, and in 1924 amounted to 109,274 tons fourth, with 14,302 tons or three and one-half as compared with 1,396.937 tons of exports. per cent; and prunes fifth, with I I ,603 tons or In 1925 imports amounted to 122,161 tons as three per cent. These five items comprised compared to 828,640 tons of foreign exports. 10 PORTLAND CITY CLUB BULLETIN The principal commodities in the import territory, and though most of the traffic originates trade in 1921 were copra, vegetable oils, coal, in the Columbia Basin, shipments have been paper, wood pulp and glass. Out of 29,700 tons made from states as far east as Ohio, New York, import of these items, 20,9<16 tons came from the Pennsylvania, and West Virginia. Orient and 7.614 tons came from the United In comparison with other Pacific coast ports Kingdom and Europe. In 1924 the principle it is understood that the through business of commodities were copra, vegetable oil, beans and Portland is smaller than that of Seattle, Tacoma bean cake, linseed, cement, and coal and and San Francisco, but much larger than that of amounted to 58,905 tons of which 6,562 tons Los Angeles and San Diego. came from the Orient and 1,589 tons from the As all of the important Pacific coast ports have United Kingdom and Europe. Exports to the transcontinental rates for imports and exports, United Kingdom and Europe in 1921 amounted Portland is in a position to compete with them to 832,989 tons and in 1925 to 294.088 tons. for through business on a shipping service basis Out to the low rail rates from the Columbia and efficiency and economy in handling traffic. Basin, the great wheat producing district, Port Portland has, however, an advantage in rates land is the principal wheat shipping port of from the grain and lumber producing areas west the Pacific coast, exports of wheat from year to of the Rocky Mountains, and especially on year far exceeding those from all other Pacific grain from the Columbia Basin. Vessels to the ports combined. United Kingdom and Europe handle grain in The territory served by Portland for import bulk, while those to the Orient take most of their and export commerce lies at present mostly west grain in sacks. of the Rocky Mountains, though small quantities Ocean rates are the same from all of the of imports pass through Portland to points east Pacific ports to foreign ports for regular service, of the Rockies. Most of the imports are con but this does not apply to tramp service. The sumed in the immediate vicinity of Portland. rates for regular intercoastal service to Atlantic, The territory for export traffic served by Port Gulf and Pacific ports are also the same to all land is much more extensive than the import North Pacific ports. APPENDICES Appendix A TRIPS AND DRAFTS OF VESSELS YEAR 1924 TRIPS INBOUND TRIPS OUTBOUND Draft ------1~------in Feet Motor Sail Motor Sail Steamers Vessels Vessels Steamers Vessels Vessels ------31 to 32...... I 30 to 3 L ----·-----.. --...... -·- ...... I 29 to 30...... 2 ...... 10 28 to 29...... 38 II 9 27 to 28...... J2 7 19 14 26 to 27 ... -,...... 48 3 75 2 ~6 ;~ ~t : : ::: :: 2t6 8~ 2 4~ 6~ 15 to 20...... 692 49 3 505 34 10 to I 5...... I 1 2 3 I 50 *l to H}... _ , ______~-----•------.. ---. --5,%7------2,169 ------5,%7------2,169 --- 7,319 2,319 7,198 2,297 *Includes coastmg and tnland vessels, Appendix B OCE.-\N-GOING VESSEL CLASSIFICATION YEAR 1924 HARBOR Of PORTLAND Total C lasses of Vcssd s American F or<' ign T otal Net Registered r\'umbt:r Number Number Tonnage ( 1) -Ai'riv~h; rTrips) :- s·tcun"t...... _____ ,, ...... 1,0Cli) 11 8 1,217 J,8'l2,636 l\,-1QLOt .. .-..... 140 10 110 227,202 SaiL ...... "...... 'i 5 10,070 ------TuraL ...... ~. 1,239 133 I LJ72 3.929.900 (2) Dcg~;!~c s::-:- . ()C)J 21R I 1,231 3,712,767 Motor ...... l 15 I 3 128 140.005 Sail . 2 2 1.oo4 Total.. .. .· i == l,i(j ~= ==UJ]=- I,~!_- =3 , 85~~- Total -•Arrivals and Departures) . .. .. __ 2,347 38u I 2,733 7,784,374 PORTLAND CITY CLUB BULLETIN 11 Appendix C TABULATION SHOWING SHIP SERVICE AT PORTLAND AS OF APRIL, 1926 Size of Ships Company Name Num (Net Tons) Class and Ports Served ber of Schedule ------1--Boats- ---Max. - Min.--- -Service------HAWAIIAN ISLANDS OcEANic S. S. Co.- 2 6,000 6,000 Freight Monthly Honolulu, Hila...... · s;:.;:,:;;;;~;:y :~- .-~::: :: :: : ::::::::: : ::::: 2 6,000 6,000 Freight COASTWISE SERVICE ADMIRAL LINE- San F rancisco, San Diego, Los Angeles...... 4 I ,450 I, 144 Frt. Ill Pass. Twice Week M cCoRMICK S. S. LINE- San F rancisco, Oakland, Los Angeles...... 2,154 1,090 Frt. & Pass. Twice Week NELSONS. S. Co.- Marshfield, Eureka, San Francisco...... 828 498 Frt. Ill Pass. Weekly PACIFIC S. S. Co.- San F rancisco, Oakland, Los Angeles ...... Freight On Cargo Off's. (Connects with Panama Pacific Line at San Fran- cisco for North Atlantic ports.) NESPACH BROS. FRT. LINE- Newport, T a ledo, Waldport, Kernville, Alsea Bay ...... Freight Fortnightly YAQUINA BAY NAviGATION Co.- Newport, Waldport, Kernville, Toledo ...... •...... - ..--·············· ...... Freight Fortnightly Summary...... 12 2,154 498 Frt. & Pass. NORTH ATLANTIC INTERCOASTAL SERVICE AMERICAN HAwAIIANS. S. Co.- New York, Philadelphia, Boston, Charleston._...... 10 5,077 3,545 Freight 20 days Charleston, 10 days Others. ARGONAUT L INE - New York, Baltimore, Boston, Providence, Phila- delphia, Portland, Me ...... 6 4,380 Freight Fortnightly ISTHMIAN LINE- New York, Baltimore ...... 10 6,105 3,450 Freight Fonnightly ARROW L INE- New York, Baltimore...... 12 Average 4, 500 Freight Weekly LucKENBACH S. S. Co.- Boston, New York, Philadelphia, Galveston, H ouston , Mobile, New Orl eans...... 16 8,063 Pass. Ill Frt. Weekly MUNsoN-McC:oRMI<:K LINE- Baltimore, Boston, New York, Jacksonville.... 4 2,845 Freight Fortnightly PANAMA PAC IF IC LJNE- (Connects at San FranciSco with Pacific S. S. Co. coastwise service.) T! Summary·· ···----- 74 8,063 2,445 Frt. Ill Pass. GULF AND SOUTH ATLANTlC PORTS LUCKENBACH S. S. LINE- Galveston, New Orleans, M obile ...... 5,064 Freight Fortnightly PACIFIC CARRIElBEAN GULF LI NE- Mobile, New Orleans, Tampico...... 11 Freight Monthly Summary ...... 14 5,064 Freight AUSTRALIAN SERVICE GENE RAl. S. S. COJ Appendix C.-Continued TABULATION SHOWING SHIP SERVICE AT PORTLAND AS OF APRIL, 1926 Size of Ships Com_pany Name Num· (Net TOfls) Class and Ports St:rved ber of Schedule ------·------Boats- --Max.----1 Min. -----~rvicc 1------UNI'tED AMERICAN LINES- Liverpool, GlasgOw, London, Hull, Antwerp, Ham• berg, Bremen...... ····--·--·------·-······················ 8 7·14 days NAVIGAZIONE LlBER.IA- Triestina, Trieste, Genoa, Naples; Italian, Spanish, French and Greek Qorts in Med.iteranean...... _ ...... 12,000 Frt. & Pass. Monthly COMPAGNIE GENERALE TRANS ATLANTIQUE- Havre, Bordeaux, Antwerp Hamburg ()amiaca to transfer toW . India and South American ports) .. It> 10,000 !0,000 Freight Fortnightly JoHNSON LrNE - Oiso, Gottenburg, Hamburg, Antwerp...... 6 Pass. & Frt. Monthly EAsT AsrATrc Co.- H amburg, Hull, Copenhagen, Gothenburg..... q 13,160 9,812 Monthly NOll WAY PACIFIC LI NE- Dublin, Antwerp, Bergen, Oslo and others where offered ...... 4 4,493 2,%9 Pass. & Frt. 6 weeks Summary ...... 81 13,160 2,969 Pass. & Fl't. WEST COAST SOUTH AMERICA GENERALS. S. CoRP.- Guayaquil, Callao, Mollendo, Aries, Antofagasta, Valparaiso and other ports...... 8,800 8,800 Freight Three weeks GllACE LrNE- Talara, Parta, Salaverry, Huacho, Callao, Mollendo, Arica, Antorogasta, lquiqui, Valparaiso and others.. b 3,636 737 Freight Oc.:a:oionally LATIN AMERICAN LINE- Buenaventura, Call ao, Mollendo, Guayquil, Aria, Antofagasta, Valparaiso and other Mexican and Central American ports ...... 4 7,500 3,298 Freight When cargo off. PAN-PACIFIC L!NE- Paita, Callao, Mollendo, Arica, lquiqui, Antofogasta, Valparaiso and others...... 3 10,000 3,500 Freight Monthly ToYo KrsEN KAr SHA- Manzanillo, Balboa, Callao, Mollendo, Arica, lquiqui, Valparaiso, Pisco...... s 6,1tJ9 4,767 Frt .& Pass. Occasionally Summary ...... 13 !0,000 737 Frt. & Pass. EAST COAST SOUTH AMERICA PACIFIC A!lGENT!NE BllAZ!L LINE- Ponce, San Juan, Curacao, Rio de Janerio, Santos, Bahia, Montevideo, Buenos Aires ...... s Average 3,700 Freisht Monthly WESTFAL LARSEN Co. Bohia, Buenos Aires, Santos,t;Montevldeo, Rio de Janerio...... Fortnil!htly ·· · -~···~ ··••u ·········-··--·------· ·· · · ···-~- -- Summary ...... 8 Average 3,700 Freight WEST INDIA SERVICE PACIFIC CAilR!BEAN GULF LINE- New Orleans, Mobile, T ampico, Vera Crw:...... 2 ··••·•••••••w••• • ••••• •n•-•··· Freisht Monthly PACIFIC AAGENT!NE BRAZIL LINE- Ponce, San j uan...... 2 Average 3,700 Freisht Monthly CoMPAGNIE GENERAL TRANSATLANTI QUE- Puntarenas, Cartagena, Cayenne, Paramaribo, Georgetown, Champerico, Amapala, Acapulco, Manzillo, Mazatlan, Corinto and West India ports, if offered...... 6 10,000 10,000 Freight 1-2 weeks Summary ...... 10 10,000 3,700 Freight TRANS-PACIFIC SERVICE DoLLAR S. S. Co...... OccasiOJlally GENERALS. S. Co!lP.- y okohama, Shanghai, Hongkong...... Occasionally MITSur Ill CoMPANY- Kobe, Yokohama, Osaka, Moji, Nagoya, D airen, Shangha1, Taku Bar.. ... __ ...... 8 8,982 6,981 ·········--········ 3-4 weeks TATSUUMA K I SE:"J- Yokoh.::ma. K< ,hC', Osaka, Na.goye .. 8,000 Freight Monthly OREGON 0RJE,..,;TJ\f~ LINE- Yokohama, Kobe, Shanghai, Tsingtao, Taku Bar, Darien, Manila ····------IO 4,518 3,343 Freight Fortnightly K L!NE- Kobe. Yohohama, Moji, Nagoya, Osaka______---·-············- Occasionally TATSUUMA KISEN KABUSHIK! KAISI-IA- Yokohama, Osaka, Nagoya, Kobe, Shanghai, Hong- kong...... ··•·-1····-····---- ...... Monthly ToYo K1 sE>< KAISHA- I Honolulu, Kobe, Yokohama, Moji, Shanghai, Hong I kong via South America ... ----···············- ·-··- --·-·------· 6,269 4,7b7 Pass. & Frt. Monthly YAMASHITA 0>. INC.- Yokohama, 1\:agoya, Kobe, Osaka ...... Freight Summary ...... J2 8,000 3,343 Frt. Ill Pass. GRAND SuMMARY-(Less duplications) ...... 233 13 ,160 498 F rt. Ill Pass. NOTE:-Several Companies have fleets of ships.from which other boats, in addition to those listed above, will be sent to Portland when cargo is available. ll y MUL TI'JOMAI-I CUUNTY LIBRARY (UtJrary Asso-.ldbon of Portland, Ore.) -, r .-. .. r • ' 5 , r t ' ~ ! t I Ll ) FEB 1 6 1961 '-' 3~ t C7:'!" ~c:-,plc :~t' tr3t.'t~.. r ::.. c..~ ~f J..! ·. ( ..1 I!! ~i:aly. !.91-;4. ::a cr.>. p·:;ra"tin 1 ':;!"!6 .wmrd~d 'c-r lo 1c ~r~\f·:; c.::.n·i.!·ol :o:::;;scis ::hie~ ·; el'e Gl.:.'!>o:~oquen·l;ly c:m·~aJ. C~l£"t1"UC. : 1<:? C~i1G )."''lr;~t·,;.o:-,.. £ f'i"!.Jl!l ~}/0' \"J .::t:: il':tn!"c•.·C:. to t! ,._;_ ~ c;:~ •. 1 cr.y _r. July~ 19L~~ -t> t~030 ·•;-;l&c~lo ·.·•~! ~ 65 2 1 lon~, ave 17' 2~ bor. tO!'! 1"i.ei,. r.'lin p.n. \~1:i.01~ pl!tnt CC.l:ilJ·totl :Jf ,;· ~·?11'•~rs:i. blt:~ d:'.o c] O.:>Gi· ·.ri.th rd;·':;nc:-:,.,~c - ..:7U~·so ::ond bu m-i·r:.. n ~- ~!nclo ·:-1·c - il :;h.:.f~ ~.~-s ';tliJ Gl .. ~r ·,:sn· ' )y Gioj, "l\.i_, In{.l.: o!"' i.{a" 'f.r:rk Ci't:'i· ·i;h;:: c. ·trl , 11.. ·.,..J;,' or. .hs~3 ::;;;-G inccrn.r>late~ '-ma cf which -:-;nc. ~J~~llF.t; !1.! ·-'ely or.~p!i:lt.:xi~ -t;ho l'·:.~nnu1:::.._. ·.r•lG t Th5.e. ~O!'()Orat:i.o~'l e.:..c;;: l!ITI'1orGci in'!;c; cc::::~;;r·r.r.: J.\JZ" con The T'..-··: t:.&.'10 -'~).:. ~: ~.-d l ~-i\_,; r.c . ··:\..... &"> 1r-r.-? ·..-< c: 1''-r .• ...,,, ...... ,,.. : ...-11· -t·, c ()!' <.. J·-i·-~-, .,, =--~a·~, - ... ""'J.' _ ..,__...._,, .. -"~1 •,...... ,. J..V l.t.,.,."\. ""' .. _,.~,_..~ •~ J- "" U ~ \lliO.I\J._. ~J\_,. ~ ... t. - t.l'""' ~ • 0 ,'l 1~ ...~ • ~::tl C -. -·· • 'V"''1 "1 t.~- .._, • ' ~, ?rOpo~.~C ~O'J'3I"C ..... "-~•wro, -<';..i.!;-),.1.).. lCi. uJ/.0 ·1 ~\;:-' 'i'J't1.~ ~~:.~n.rec .\.!1' .}S.rc;oc i/31'( 110 I 10n{5 r.nL! O! "i2 1 be~. !k'2C!"e tho!:O }. :; f':-d;~ "::J 'I".Si" cor::trt:'.ct f'cr t:1~ C01'$trud:.ion t~! ~0 cch~~ nou-~olf'-E-• o~· ~::.113d 2 op--:.;1 is!!te1· s ~ ·c91l•J3-Q !?.t·;o.r~cd tl'>..i c 111Jr.ll-'~..n:'l ~-'h ?c.llt :tin?- i·l-tc c::t cc.ni.r'"·.c:~o ~ contr~c £or .fO\tr r:':'•~ ;t ;:s:.ll>~ 5. J.1~ -: ~-~ • :~if:E6..r:':J71$ ...-~ .r. :::.t'C.B:;: this ~;;;... :;-fray.. Thc;eo >·a::;~'3l.o ':'>-Dr<: i~or·i;i:}~l ~::d 1:-ui:~.t ·~.- sa;,·l':l o·~~di tic ;:; of =;o~tr~c-t-, ~-s tllosa "r-.•asnl.:; :>r;-it;J.r..... "\1 ~: m·.t:~C.::xZ. .. !h~ E ~{.u;r~ ·,!'._'; for ·thG Uu~~ ca~·riod out; cy ..;.11 c; Ha1·c~~ ELl.: fu~ t1 C:).!J1tructicn ,of four :aora sl:11:i.~ .~ lith· .. l,h<3 lo.ct .r l~hich 1•.1:1.~ - h'O·Aod c-r. 17 iby 19J.,t~. J\.1rir,;; th. li; ii'...~!::. ir~ 11 .t:·=-o cielivorod to ':r.o !h-~! Th·~ ~;~:ulo '' ~t::J..:::l G<:rr.o~, ...'1~-:Joco u!"~.ncit:>aJ. oJ. . ~.2 Metnories 111ade of \Vood Bv.; Larryol Barber THE familiar old sight of a puffing stem- of the ovmers and work cre\v as well as tyou and me if ·we want to kid ourselves :r:en. wheel steamboat pushing ahead of it a the works. that we don't contribute to the Federal Oak Street in those days was close to barge loaded vdth logs, 1umber, sawdust, Not lost from memory~ howeyer, were and state funds. the center of Portland's hustling water pulp, paper, sand or gravel or tovving a familiar :names to Portlanders of long i We asked Hany Buckley, director of front activities and soon beciime too two-block-long raft of saw logs under a ago;· Joseph Kellogg, N.R. Lang, BeaYer, the Por'"Jand Park Bureau, what plans congested for an expanding shipyard so 'billowing cloud of whHe smoke passed Sarah DL"!{On, Bailey Gatzeert, Shaver, the city has for the shipyard site. He said Nelson moved his base in 1898 to the foot out of the Portland scene some years Umatilla, Dalles City, Henderson, Claire, final p'lans nave not been finned but a of SW Meade St., now a part of tl:te Zidell ago. Georgie· Burton. These were sternwheel boat launching site on the old shipways · operations. ·- In its place came squat and noisy little steamers which wer:e built or rebuilt by which sloped gradually into the liver was. _ From ship repairs, Nelson got !nto steel diesel tugs doing the same job more Portland Shipbuilding Co. during its bet- natural. A break-water out at the t.arbor ~pbuilding in 1900 when he rebuilt the economically because they required few- ter years and were important fu Willam- line would be good to protect boats from hull ~d bouse of the steamer Joseph er men. They were not usually as power- ette and Co1urr:.bia River operations. river wash, and there was ample land for Kellogg for the owner of the same name. ful or fast as the big steam towboats, but Forlorn and almost forgotten, its build- parking. The office and warehouse build The steamer, of 462 gr~ss tons, orlgina'lly they managed to get there at less cost. ings and Kays rotting beside the river, ings could be retained for park use. was built m 1882 and 'its macbinery came from an old steamer, the Dayton, vintage With the change in :river power came Portland Shipbuilding Company's seven Willamette Sailing Club, which has a of 1868, The Kellogg remained in service the passing of the shipyards which built acres and remaining buildings were pur- moorage just no...~ of the shipyard, until 1929, but under another name dur with wood instead of steel, aluminum or chased last February by the City of Port-. Buckley said, wants to rent a smaU por Ing its last ten years. new~fangled fiberglass. land from Albert K. Nelson and his son, tion of the nortth end of the property, and Nelson also built the N. R. Lang in 1900 this may be arranged. The city offered Last of these old wood shipyards here Charles M., for Sl25,000 to be added to !ram the hull and house of the former .W .~'' l i .. ~ id'-~ 1· J \ \ i I ( ! The Umatilla, Beaver and Northwestern I I (Continued from page 12) had been handed down from more an example of the little yards that built cient craft. Some of the · steamers had wooden steamers and it remained in new names when they left the yard as· business to become the last of the race. the result of changes of ownerships. On Not only did Nelson build for Columbia the waterfront the sternwheelers were and Willamette river owners, but he jour referred to as «wet tassers". neyed to Everett, Wash., iri. 1903 m build As World War I approached, Nelsori the fast steamer Telegraph for Puget was literally forced to move from Meade . Sotmd operations. However, it was for a · St. by tll_e establishment.of. the:. wrawling. · Portland owner, Capt. U.B. Scott. who <:;ol~~' :i{i,~r. _Shipbuilding:: :Gorp., a_ challenged the Puget Sound operators for large steel ®p building enterprise, and business. Eventually the Telegraph came he relocated at the present site. to the Columbia River and lnitiated a It was at the foot of SW Nebraska St. <.--·- rather unprofitable roll-on, roll-off ser- that Nelson built and launched the . vice for loaded trucks between Portland steamer Claire for Western Transporta and The Dalles. 1t ended its career as a tion Co. and followed ·the next year with Shaver towboat under the workaday construction of the rrrst sternwheel f name of Logger. steamer Portland for the Port of Port: Nelson's clients in Portland were large land. Others which came from that yard ly commercial freighting and towing were the Undine. Georgie Burton and · . . companies, but be also built for trhe Ar Pomona, all rebuilt from former veSsels. 1934 after the wooden ship .era was virtu witib. it five -tons of rock salt, but not as my Engineers, the City of Poitland and The old Portland served well until 1947 ally ended, but his son continued to build cargo. The salt had been carefully laid County of Multnomah. Three ferry boats, when it · was replaced by the presem wooden barges and repair such steamers along the tops of the keelsons where it including. the Liooel R. Webster which Portland, a larger steel-hulled vesseL as came to the side-haul railway. gradually melted and drifted downward ran oo. tile Albina route between NW 17th When the Pomona was launched, Nel Among the latter were the steamers to pickle the wood and prolong the life of Ave. and Randolph St., and the John F. son's shipyard bad turned oot 25 com- Henderson and Northwestern which were the vesseL However, these barges were lifted in 1939 for replanking of their hulls built to a large extent from green timber and the steamer Claire which ~s repair salvaged from -the Tillam Attachment B. Willamette Park Fill Environmental Reports MEMORANDUM Date: 4/14/11 To: Jeremy Person From: André Mellott RE: Soil Sampling Data Report –Environmental Investigation for the Willamette Park Boat Ramp Swale, E10154/CSA Job 1216 INTRODUCTION: The City of Portland’s Bureau of Environmental Services (BES), Coordinated Site Analysis (CSA) program, was requested by the Watershed Revegetation program to perform environmental soil sampling of a stormwater swale for the Willamette Park Boat Ramp Retrofit project. The site location is at the northeast corner of the parking lot adjacent to the boat ramp within Willamette Park. The existing stormwater swale will be retrofitted with performance improvements this summer, 2011. Two individual borings were conducted. PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND: This project involves retrofit work to be performed on a stormwater infiltration swale that has been in place for 10 years. The purpose of this environmental investigation is to evaluate the environmental condition of the excavated soil for the safety of excavation workers and disposal characterization. The parking lot associated with this stormwater swale is approximately 3 acres in size. Non-point source petroleum contamination was suspected. This assessment was conducted by collecting a representative environmental soil sample from the proposed excavation area. These soil samples were quantitatively analyzed for contaminants of concern (COCs). SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS: Sampling methodology and analyses corresponded to standard requirements for human health and safety and disposal characterization. For the purposes of this investigation the swale was treated as upper and lower portions separated by a culvert and pathway. The soil samples from this investigation were analyzed for petroleum hydrocarbons, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, selenium, silver, mercury, and lead. 1 Memorandum Willamette Park Boat Ramp Swale; E10154 On March 10, 2011, two soil borings were conducted with a hand auger within the infiltration zone of the facility (see Figure 2). Auger refusal was encountered approximately 10 inches below ground surface. The weather was clear and sunny during sampling. Surface stormwater was not present at the time of sampling. Soil sampling was conducted by BES personnel in accordance with, ASTM Standard Guide for Soil Sampling within the Vadose Zone D-4700, and Oregon DEQ guidance documents. Field personnel wore clean nitrile gloves during sample collection. Soil samples that were lab tested were stored in four ounce glass amber jars. Sample jars were immediately placed in an iced cooler and transported to TestAmerica laboratory under chain of custody for analysis. ANALYTICAL RESULTS: The laboratory results for these samples were non-detect for petroleum hydrocarbons, non- detect for PCBs, and all metals concentrations were below accepted background levels with the exception of lead. The lead concentrations for the Upper and Lower swale segments were 44.7 mg/Kg and 51.7 mg/Kg, respectively. The accepted background concentration for lead is 17 mg/Kg. CONCLUSIONS: • No quantifiable petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations were detected in either soil sample. • No quantifiable PCB concentrations were detected in either soil sample. • All of the metals concentrations in both soil samples were well below accepted background levels for this region with the exception of lead. • The lead concentrations of both samples (44.7 mg/Kg & 51.7 mg/Kg) exceed the Unrestricted Clean Fill screening level of 17 mg/Kg. • These lead concentrations do not exceed any pertinent Oregon DEQ Risk-Based Screening Levels (RBCs). • Based on these lead concentrations, this soil is characterized as Restricted Fill. • If removed from the site, disposal of soil excavated from this project will require approval from the receiving facility, the DEQ, and possibly the receiving county. 2 Memorandum Willamette Park Boat Ramp Swale; E10154 LIMITATIONS This subsurface environmental sampling report was prepared exclusively for the City of Portland Bureau of Environmental Services by the Coordinated Site Analysis program. The quality of information, conclusions, and estimates contained in this report is based on: information available at the time of preparation, data supplied by outside sources, and the assumptions, conditions, and qualifications set forth in this report. This report is intended to be used by the City of Portland for this Site only. The findings contained in this report are relevant to the dates of the investigation and should not be relied upon to represent conditions at later dates. In the event that changes in the nature, usage, or layout of the property or nearby properties are made, the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report may not be valid. The purpose of this subsurface investigation is to collect and test soil and/or groundwater samples in an attempt to evaluate the potential for adverse impact from past practices at a given property or neighboring properties. In performing this type of investigation, it is understood that an evaluation must be made between a reasonable inquiry into the environmental issues and an exhaustive analysis of each conceivable issue of potential concern. No subsurface exploration can be thorough enough to exclude the possible presence of hazardous materials or wastes at a given site. The data from discrete sampling locations may not represent conditions at locations not sampled. It should be noted that the presence of contaminants at a particular property may not always be apparent, and the completion of a subsurface investigation cannot provide a guarantee that hazardous wastes or materials are not present at a site. If unknown contamination is encountered during construction activities, contact the Coordinated Site Analysis group immediately. 503-823-7881 3 Figures 6404 Figure 1 Willamette Park Boat Ramp Retrofit Upper Swale BES Project #10154 CSA # 1216 Culvert & Pathway Legend Lower Swale Swale Boundary 1:1,126 1 inch = 94 feet . Map Created by: Andre M. April 14, 2011 Map Produced in ArcMap \\Oberon\GIS_ESRI\ArcGIS_8x\Projects\Special_wastes\ArcMap Master.mxd Upper Portion Figure 2 W. Park Upper Willamette Park Lead = 44.7 mg/Kg Boat Ramp Swale kj BES Project #10154 CSA # 1216 Legend kj Sample Points Swale Boundary W. Park Lower Lead = 51.7 mg/Kg Culvert Lower Portion Pathway 1:455 kj 1 inch = 38 feet . Map Created by: Andre M. April 14, 2011 Map Produced in ArcMap \\Oberon\GIS_ESRI\ArcGIS_8x\Projects\Special_wastes\ArcMap Master.mxd Appendix 1 2 3 4 5 ANALYTICAL REPORT 6 TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. TestAmerica Portland 7 9405 SW Nimbus Ave. Beaverton, OR 97008 Tel: (503) 906-9200 TestAmerica Job ID: PUC0389 Client Project/Site: E10154 Client Project Description: W. Park Boat Ramp Swale Revision: 1 For: City of Portland Water Pollution Laboratory 6543 N. Burlington Ave. Portland, OR 97203 Attn: Andre Mellot Authorized for release by: 03/31/2011 03:12:41 PM Darrell Auvil Project Manager [email protected] Results relate only to the items tested and the sample(s) as received by the laboratory. The test results in this report meet all 2003 NELAC requirements for accredited parameters, exceptions are noted in this report. Pursuant to NELAC, this report may not be reproduced except in full, and with written approval from the laboratory. For questions please contact the Project Manager at the e-mail address or telephone number listed on this page. This report has been electronically signed and authorized by the signatory. Electronic signature is intended to be the legally binding equivalent of a traditionally handwritten signature. Page 1 of 15 03/31/2011 Sample Summary Client: City of Portland Water Pollution Laboratory TestAmerica Job ID: PUC0389 1 Project/Site: E10154 2 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Matrix Collected Received 3 PUC0389-01 W. Park Lower Soil 03/10/11 14:15 03/10/11 15:40 PUC0389-02 W. Park Upper Soil 03/10/11 14:30 03/10/11 15:40 4 5 6 7 TestAmerica Portland Page 2 of 15 03/31/2011 Case Narrative Client: City of Portland Water Pollution Laboratory TestAmerica Job ID: PUC0389 1 Project/Site: E10154 2 Job ID: PUC0389 3 Laboratory: TestAmerica Portland 4 Narrative Amended report to reflect additional PCB data. 5 6 7 TestAmerica Portland Page 3 of 15 03/31/2011 Qualifier Definition/Glossary Client: City of Portland Water Pollution Laboratory TestAmerica Job ID: PUC0389 1 Project/Site: E10154 2 Qualifiers 3 Fuels Qualifier Qualifier Description 4 Q6 Results in the diesel organics range are primarily due to overlap from a heavy oil range product. Metals 5 Qualifier Qualifier Description M7 The MS and/or MSD were above the acceptance limits. See Blank Spike (LCS). 6 M8 The MS and/or MSD were below the acceptance limits. See Blank Spike (LCS). R4 Due to the low levels of analyte in the sample, the duplicate RPD calculation does not provide useful information. 7 Glossary Abbreviation These commonly used abbreviations may or may not be present in this report. ☼ Listed under the "D" column to designate that the result is reported on a dry weight basis. EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency ND Not Detected above the reporting level. MDL Method Detection Limit RL Reporting Limit RE, RE1 (etc.) Indicates a Re-extraction or Reanalysis of the sample. %R Percent Recovery RPD Relative Percent Difference, a measure of the relative difference between two points. TestAmerica Portland Page 4 of 15 03/31/2011 Analytical Data Client: City of Portland Water Pollution Laboratory TestAmerica Job ID: PUC0389 1 Project/Site: E10154 2 Method: EPA 8082 - Polychlorinated Biphenyls per EPA Method 8082 3 Client Sample ID: W. Park Lower Lab Sample ID: PUC0389-01 Date Collected: 03/10/11 14:15 Matrix: Soil 4 Date Received: 03/10/11 15:40 Percent Solids: 79 Sampler Name: Sampler Phone Number: (503) 823-9629 5 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Aroclor 1016 ND 42.1 ug/kg dry ☼ 03/22/11 15:00 03/25/11 14:15 1.00 6 Aroclor 1221 ND 84.7 ug/kg dry ☼ 03/22/11 15:00 03/25/11 14:15 1.00 Aroclor 1232 ND 42.1 ug/kg dry ☼ 03/22/11 15:00 03/25/11 14:15 1.00 Aroclor 1242 ND 42.1 ug/kg dry ☼ 03/22/11 15:00 03/25/11 14:15 1.00 7 Aroclor 1248 ND 42.1 ug/kg dry ☼ 03/22/11 15:00 03/25/11 14:15 1.00 Aroclor 1254 ND 42.1 ug/kg dry ☼ 03/22/11 15:00 03/25/11 14:15 1.00 Aroclor 1260 ND 42.1 ug/kg dry ☼ 03/22/11 15:00 03/25/11 14:15 1.00 Surrogate % Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Decachlorobiphenyl 102 16 - 149 03/22/11 15:00 03/25/11 14:15 1.00 Client Sample ID: W. Park Upper Lab Sample ID: PUC0389-02 Date Collected: 03/10/11 14:30 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 03/10/11 15:40 Percent Solids: 62.8 Sampler Name: Sampler Phone Number: (503) 823-9629 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Aroclor 1016 ND 52.3 ug/kg dry ☼ 03/22/11 15:00 03/25/11 14:38 1.00 Aroclor 1221 ND 105 ug/kg dry ☼ 03/22/11 15:00 03/25/11 14:38 1.00 Aroclor 1232 ND 52.3 ug/kg dry ☼ 03/22/11 15:00 03/25/11 14:38 1.00 Aroclor 1242 ND 52.3 ug/kg dry ☼ 03/22/11 15:00 03/25/11 14:38 1.00 Aroclor 1248 ND 52.3 ug/kg dry ☼ 03/22/11 15:00 03/25/11 14:38 1.00 Aroclor 1254 ND 52.3 ug/kg dry ☼ 03/22/11 15:00 03/25/11 14:38 1.00 Aroclor 1260 ND 52.3 ug/kg dry ☼ 03/22/11 15:00 03/25/11 14:38 1.00 Surrogate % Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Decachlorobiphenyl 103 16 - 149 03/22/11 15:00 03/25/11 14:38 1.00 TestAmerica Portland Page 5 of 15 03/31/2011 Analytical Data Client: City of Portland Water Pollution Laboratory TestAmerica Job ID: PUC0389 1 Project/Site: E10154 2 Method: NWTPH HCID - Hydrocarbon Identification per NW-TPH Methodology 3 Client Sample ID: W. Park Lower Lab Sample ID: PUC0389-01 Date Collected: 03/10/11 14:15 Matrix: Soil 4 Date Received: 03/10/11 15:40 Percent Solids: 79 Sampler Name: Sampler Phone Number: (503) 823-9629 5 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Gasoline Range Hydrocarbons ND 23.2 mg/kg dry ☼ 03/14/11 12:00 03/15/11 12:07 1.00 6 Diesel Range Hydrocarbons ND 58.1 mg/kg dry ☼ 03/14/11 12:00 03/15/11 12:07 1.00 Residual Range/Heavy Oil Organics ND 116 mg/kg dry ☼ 03/14/11 12:00 03/15/11 12:07 1.00 7 Surrogate % Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 1-Chlorooctadecane 76.2 50 - 150 03/14/11 12:00 03/15/11 12:07 1.00 Client Sample ID: W. Park Upper Lab Sample ID: PUC0389-02 Date Collected: 03/10/11 14:30 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 03/10/11 15:40 Percent Solids: 62.8 Sampler Name: Sampler Phone Number: (503) 823-9629 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Gasoline Range Hydrocarbons ND 31.1 mg/kg dry ☼ 03/14/11 12:00 03/15/11 12:33 1.00 Diesel Range Hydrocarbons ND 77.8 mg/kg dry ☼ 03/14/11 12:00 03/15/11 12:33 1.00 Residual Range/Heavy Oil Organics ND 156 mg/kg dry ☼ 03/14/11 12:00 03/15/11 12:33 1.00 Surrogate % Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 1-Chlorooctadecane 79.1 50 - 150 03/14/11 12:00 03/15/11 12:33 1.00 TestAmerica Portland Page 6 of 15 03/31/2011 Analytical Data Client: City of Portland Water Pollution Laboratory TestAmerica Job ID: PUC0389 1 Project/Site: E10154 2 Method: EPA 6020 - Total Metals per EPA 6000/7000 Series Methods 3 Client Sample ID: W. Park Lower Lab Sample ID: PUC0389-01 Date Collected: 03/10/11 14:15 Matrix: Soil 4 Date Received: 03/10/11 15:40 Percent Solids: 79 Sampler Name: Sampler Phone Number: (503) 823-9629 5 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Arsenic 6.06 0.633 mg/kg dry ☼ 03/14/11 09:35 03/15/11 17:07 10.0 6 Barium 166 0.633 mg/kg dry ☼ 03/14/11 09:35 03/15/11 17:07 10.0 Cadmium ND 0.633 mg/kg dry ☼ 03/14/11 09:35 03/15/11 17:07 10.0 7 Chromium 20.9 1.27 mg/kg dry ☼ 03/14/11 09:35 03/15/11 17:07 10.0 Lead 51.7 0.633 mg/kg dry ☼ 03/14/11 09:35 03/15/11 17:07 10.0 Selenium ND 0.633 mg/kg dry ☼ 03/14/11 09:35 03/15/11 17:07 10.0 Silver ND 0.633 mg/kg dry ☼ 03/14/11 09:35 03/15/11 17:07 10.0 Client Sample ID: W. Park Upper Lab Sample ID: PUC0389-02 Date Collected: 03/10/11 14:30 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 03/10/11 15:40 Percent Solids: 62.8 Sampler Name: Sampler Phone Number: (503) 823-9629 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Arsenic 5.44 0.758 mg/kg dry ☼ 03/14/11 09:35 03/15/11 17:23 10.0 Barium 126 0.758 mg/kg dry ☼ 03/14/11 09:35 03/15/11 17:23 10.0 Cadmium ND 0.758 mg/kg dry ☼ 03/14/11 09:35 03/15/11 17:23 10.0 Chromium 26.7 1.52 mg/kg dry ☼ 03/14/11 09:35 03/15/11 17:23 10.0 Lead 44.7 0.758 mg/kg dry ☼ 03/14/11 09:35 03/15/11 17:23 10.0 Selenium ND 0.758 mg/kg dry ☼ 03/14/11 09:35 03/15/11 17:23 10.0 Silver ND 0.758 mg/kg dry ☼ 03/14/11 09:35 03/15/11 17:23 10.0 TestAmerica Portland Page 7 of 15 03/31/2011 Analytical Data Client: City of Portland Water Pollution Laboratory TestAmerica Job ID: PUC0389 1 Project/Site: E10154 2 Method: EPA 7471A - Total Mercury per EPA Method 7471A 3 Client Sample ID: W. Park Lower Lab Sample ID: PUC0389-01 Date Collected: 03/10/11 14:15 Matrix: Soil 4 Date Received: 03/10/11 15:40 Percent Solids: 79 Sampler Name: Sampler Phone Number: (503) 823-9629 5 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Mercury ND 0.125 mg/kg dry ☼ 03/16/11 15:49 03/17/11 01:12 1.00 6 Client Sample ID: W. Park Upper Lab Sample ID: PUC0389-02 Date Collected: 03/10/11 14:30 Matrix: Soil 7 Date Received: 03/10/11 15:40 Percent Solids: 62.8 Sampler Name: Sampler Phone Number: (503) 823-9629 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Mercury ND 0.150 mg/kg dry ☼ 03/16/11 15:49 03/17/11 01:14 1.00 TestAmerica Portland Page 8 of 15 03/31/2011 Analytical Data Client: City of Portland Water Pollution Laboratory TestAmerica Job ID: PUC0389 1 Project/Site: E10154 2 Method: ASTM D2216-80 - Percent Dry Weight (Solids) per ASTM D2216-80 3 Client Sample ID: W. Park Lower Lab Sample ID: PUC0389-01 Date Collected: 03/10/11 14:15 Matrix: Soil 4 Date Received: 03/10/11 15:40 Percent Solids: 79 Sampler Name: Sampler Phone Number: (503) 823-9629 5 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac % Solids 79.0 0.0100 % by Weight 03/14/11 10:13 03/15/11 08:45 1.00 6 Client Sample ID: W. Park Upper Lab Sample ID: PUC0389-02 Date Collected: 03/10/11 14:30 Matrix: Soil 7 Date Received: 03/10/11 15:40 Percent Solids: 62.8 Sampler Name: Sampler Phone Number: (503) 823-9629 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac % Solids 62.8 0.0100 % by Weight 03/14/11 10:13 03/15/11 08:45 1.00 TestAmerica Portland Page 9 of 15 03/31/2011 Quality Control Data Client: City of Portland Water Pollution Laboratory TestAmerica Job ID: PUC0389 1 Project/Site: E10154 2 Method: EPA 8082 - Polychlorinated Biphenyls per EPA Method 8082 3 Lab Sample ID: 11C0624-BLK1 Client Sample ID: 11C0624-BLK1 Matrix: Soil Prep Type: total 4 Analysis Batch: U000798 Prep Batch: 11C0624_P Blank Blank 5 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Aroclor 1016 ND 33.0 ug/kg wet 03/22/11 15:00 03/23/11 22:31 1.00 6 Aroclor 1221 ND 66.4 ug/kg wet 03/22/11 15:00 03/23/11 22:31 1.00 Aroclor 1232 ND 33.0 ug/kg wet 03/22/11 15:00 03/23/11 22:31 1.00 Aroclor 1242 ND 33.0 ug/kg wet 03/22/11 15:00 03/23/11 22:31 1.00 7 Aroclor 1248 ND 33.0 ug/kg wet 03/22/11 15:00 03/23/11 22:31 1.00 Aroclor 1254 ND 33.0 ug/kg wet 03/22/11 15:00 03/23/11 22:31 1.00 Aroclor 1260 ND 33.0 ug/kg wet 03/22/11 15:00 03/23/11 22:31 1.00 Blank Blank Surrogate % Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Decachlorobiphenyl 111 16 - 149 03/22/11 15:00 03/23/11 22:31 1.00 Lab Sample ID: 11C0624-BS1 Client Sample ID: 11C0624-BS1 Matrix: Soil Prep Type: total Analysis Batch: U000798 Prep Batch: 11C0624_P Spike LCS LCS % Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D % Rec Limits Aroclor 1016 330 293 ug/kg wet 88.6 57 - 135 Aroclor 1260 330 298 ug/kg wet 90.4 60 - 135 LCS LCS Surrogate % Recovery Qualifier Limits Decachlorobiphenyl 99.9 16 - 149 Lab Sample ID: 11C0624-MS1 Client Sample ID: PUC0696-01 Matrix: Soil Prep Type: total Analysis Batch: U000798 Prep Batch: 11C0624_P Sample Sample Spike Matrix Spike Matrix Spike % Rec. Analyte Result Qualifier Added Result Qualifier Unit D % Rec Limits Aroclor 1016 ND 420 345 ug/kg dry ☼ 82.1 37 - 145 Aroclor 1260 ND 420 371 ug/kg dry ☼ 88.3 25 - 144 Matrix Spike Matrix Spike Surrogate % Recovery Qualifier Limits Decachlorobiphenyl 109 16 - 149 Lab Sample ID: 11C0624-MSD1 Client Sample ID: PUC0696-01 Matrix: Soil Prep Type: total Analysis Batch: U000798 Prep Batch: 11C0624_P Sample Sample Spike Matrix Spike Dup Matrix Spike Dup % Rec. RPD Analyte Result Qualifier Added Result Qualifier Unit D % Rec Limits RPD Limit Aroclor 1016 ND 423 358 ug/kg dry ☼ 84.8 37 - 145 3.81 26 Aroclor 1260 ND 423 372 ug/kg dry ☼ 88.0 25 - 144 0.41 30 5 Matrix Spike Dup Matrix Spike Dup Surrogate % Recovery Qualifier Limits Decachlorobiphenyl 107 16 - 149 TestAmerica Portland Page 10 of 15 03/31/2011 Quality Control Data Client: City of Portland Water Pollution Laboratory TestAmerica Job ID: PUC0389 1 Project/Site: E10154 2 Method: NWTPH HCID - Hydrocarbon Identification per NW-TPH Methodology 3 Lab Sample ID: 11C0365-BLK1 Client Sample ID: 11C0365-BLK1 Matrix: Soil Prep Type: total 4 Analysis Batch: 11C0365 Prep Batch: 11C0365_P Blank Blank 5 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Gasoline Range Hydrocarbons ND 20.0 mg/kg wet 03/14/11 12:00 03/14/11 13:23 1.00 6 Diesel Range Hydrocarbons ND 50.0 mg/kg wet 03/14/11 12:00 03/14/11 13:23 1.00 Residual Range/Heavy Oil Organics ND 100 mg/kg wet 03/14/11 12:00 03/14/11 13:23 1.00 7 Blank Blank Surrogate % Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 1-Chlorooctadecane 88.6 50 - 150 03/14/11 12:00 03/14/11 13:23 1.00 Lab Sample ID: 11C0365-DUP1 Client Sample ID: PUC0254-07 Matrix: Soil Prep Type: total Analysis Batch: 11C0365 Prep Batch: 11C0365_P Sample Sample Duplicate Duplicate RPD Analyte Result Qualifier Result Qualifier Unit D RPD Limit Gasoline Range Hydrocarbons 3080 DET mg/kg dry ☼ 49.4 50 Diesel Range Hydrocarbons 13400 DET Q6 mg/kg dry ☼ 41.3 50 Residual Range/Heavy Oil 71500 DET mg/kg dry ☼ 32.3 50 Organics Duplicate Duplicate Surrogate % Recovery Qualifier Limits 1-Chlorooctadecane 72.0 50 - 150 Method: EPA 6020 - Total Metals per EPA 6000/7000 Series Methods Lab Sample ID: 11C0363-BLK1 Client Sample ID: 11C0363-BLK1 Matrix: Soil Prep Type: total Analysis Batch: 11C0363 Prep Batch: 11C0363_P Blank Blank Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Arsenic ND 0.500 mg/kg wet 03/14/11 09:35 03/15/11 16:58 10.0 Barium ND 0.500 mg/kg wet 03/14/11 09:35 03/15/11 16:58 10.0 Cadmium ND 0.500 mg/kg wet 03/14/11 09:35 03/15/11 16:58 10.0 Chromium ND 1.00 mg/kg wet 03/14/11 09:35 03/15/11 16:58 10.0 Lead ND 0.500 mg/kg wet 03/14/11 09:35 03/15/11 16:58 10.0 Selenium ND 0.500 mg/kg wet 03/14/11 09:35 03/15/11 16:58 10.0 Silver ND 0.500 mg/kg wet 03/14/11 09:35 03/15/11 16:58 10.0 Lab Sample ID: 11C0363-BS1 Client Sample ID: 11C0363-BS1 Matrix: Soil Prep Type: total Analysis Batch: 11C0363 Prep Batch: 11C0363_P Spike LCS LCS % Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D % Rec Limits Arsenic 49.5 52.6 mg/kg wet 106 80 - 120 Barium 49.5 53.2 mg/kg wet 107 80 - 120 Cadmium 49.5 52.8 mg/kg wet 107 80 - 120 Chromium 49.5 54.3 mg/kg wet 110 80 - 120 Lead 49.5 53.9 mg/kg wet 109 80 - 120 Selenium 49.5 49.9 mg/kg wet 101 80 - 120 Silver 24.8 23.9 mg/kg wet 96.4 80 - 120 TestAmerica Portland Page 11 of 15 03/31/2011 Quality Control Data Client: City of Portland Water Pollution Laboratory TestAmerica Job ID: PUC0389 1 Project/Site: E10154 2 Method: EPA 6020 - Total Metals per EPA 6000/7000 Series Methods (Continued) 3 Lab Sample ID: 11C0363-MS1 Client Sample ID: W. Park Lower Matrix: Soil Prep Type: total 4 Analysis Batch: 11C0363 Prep Batch: 11C0363_P Sample Sample Spike Matrix Spike Matrix Spike % Rec. 5 Analyte Result Qualifier Added Result Qualifier Unit D % Rec Limits Arsenic 6.06 60.3 60.7 mg/kg dry ☼ 90.7 75 - 125 6 Barium 166 60.3 206 M8 mg/kg dry ☼ 66.4 75 - 125 Cadmium ND 60.3 59.7 mg/kg dry ☼ 98.5 75 - 125 7 Chromium 20.9 60.3 78.4 mg/kg dry ☼ 95.3 75 - 125 Lead 51.7 60.3 125 mg/kg dry ☼ 122 75 - 125 Selenium ND 60.3 53.5 mg/kg dry ☼ 88.0 75 - 125 Silver ND 30.1 25.9 mg/kg dry ☼ 85.6 75 - 125 Lab Sample ID: 11C0363-MSD1 Client Sample ID: W. Park Lower Matrix: Soil Prep Type: total Analysis Batch: 11C0363 Prep Batch: 11C0363_P Sample Sample Spike Matrix Spike Dup Matrix Spike Dup % Rec. RPD Analyte Result Qualifier Added Result Qualifier Unit D % Rec Limits RPD Limit Arsenic 6.06 62.7 65.9 mg/kg dry ☼ 95.5 75 - 125 8.25 40 Barium 166 62.7 217 mg/kg dry ☼ 81.1 75 - 125 5.10 40 Cadmium ND 62.7 62.6 mg/kg dry ☼ 99.5 75 - 125 4.82 40 Chromium 20.9 62.7 82.9 mg/kg dry ☼ 99.0 75 - 125 5.64 40 Lead 51.7 62.7 144 M7 mg/kg dry ☼ 148 75 - 125 14.2 40 Selenium ND 62.7 55.1 mg/kg dry ☼ 87.2 75 - 125 2.94 40 Silver ND 31.3 29.0 mg/kg dry ☼ 92.4 75 - 125 11.5 40 Method: EPA 7471A - Total Mercury per EPA Method 7471A Lab Sample ID: 11C0463-BLK1 Client Sample ID: 11C0463-BLK1 Matrix: Other dry Prep Type: total Analysis Batch: U000728 Prep Batch: 11C0463_P Blank Blank Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Mercury ND 0.0939 mg/kg wet 03/16/11 15:49 03/17/11 00:51 1.00 Lab Sample ID: 11C0463-BS1 Client Sample ID: 11C0463-BS1 Matrix: Other dry Prep Type: total Analysis Batch: U000728 Prep Batch: 11C0463_P Spike LCS LCS % Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D % Rec Limits Mercury 0.590 0.601 mg/kg wet 102 80 - 120 Lab Sample ID: 11C0463-BSD1 Client Sample ID: 11C0463-BSD1 Matrix: Other dry Prep Type: total Analysis Batch: U000728 Prep Batch: 11C0463_P Spike LCS Dup LCS Dup % Rec. RPD Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D % Rec Limits RPD Limit Mercury 0.591 0.588 mg/kg wet 99.5 80 - 120 2.14 20 Lab Sample ID: 11C0463-MS1 Client Sample ID: PUC0285-01 Matrix: Other dry Prep Type: total Analysis Batch: U000728 Prep Batch: 11C0463_P Sample Sample Spike Matrix Spike Matrix Spike % Rec. Analyte Result Qualifier Added Result Qualifier Unit D % Rec Limits Mercury 0.00795 0.618 0.597 mg/kg dry ☼ 95.4 75 - 125 TestAmerica Portland Page 12 of 15 03/31/2011 Quality Control Data Client: City of Portland Water Pollution Laboratory TestAmerica Job ID: PUC0389 1 Project/Site: E10154 2 Method: EPA 7471A - Total Mercury per EPA Method 7471A (Continued) 3 Lab Sample ID: 11C0463-MSD1 Client Sample ID: PUC0285-01 Matrix: Other dry Prep Type: total 4 Analysis Batch: U000728 Prep Batch: 11C0463_P Sample Sample Spike Matrix Spike Dup Matrix Spike Dup % Rec. RPD 5 Analyte Result Qualifier Added Result Qualifier Unit D % Rec Limits RPD Limit Mercury 0.00795 0.601 0.611 mg/kg dry ☼ 100 75 - 125 2.28 40 6 Lab Sample ID: 11C0463-DUP1 Client Sample ID: PUC0285-01 Matrix: Other dry Prep Type: total 7 Analysis Batch: U000728 Prep Batch: 11C0463_P Sample Sample Duplicate Duplicate RPD Analyte Result Qualifier Result Qualifier Unit D RPD Limit Mercury 0.00795 0.0161 R4 mg/kg dry ☼ 68.0 40 Method: ASTM D2216-80 - Percent Dry Weight (Solids) per ASTM D2216-80 Lab Sample ID: 11C0370-DUP1 Client Sample ID: PUC0335-01 Matrix: Soil Prep Type: total Analysis Batch: 11C0370 Prep Batch: 11C0370_P Sample Sample Duplicate Duplicate RPD Analyte Result Qualifier Result Qualifier Unit D RPD Limit % Solids 69.7 70.0 % by 0.33 20 Weight 6 Lab Sample ID: 11C0370-DUP2 Client Sample ID: PUC0335-02 Matrix: Soil Prep Type: total Analysis Batch: 11C0370 Prep Batch: 11C0370_P Sample Sample Duplicate Duplicate RPD Analyte Result Qualifier Result Qualifier Unit D RPD Limit % Solids 77.0 77.3 % by 0.39 20 Weight 1 TestAmerica Portland Page 13 of 15 03/31/2011 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Page 14 of 15 03/31/2011 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Page 15 of 15 03/31/2011 Memorandum Date: 02/22/12 To: Fred MacGregor From: Bethany Nabhan RE: Results of Sampling and Analysis for the Willamette Park Bank Restoration; BES Project E10395 Introduction The City of Portland’s Bureau of Environmental Services (BES) Coordinated Site Analysis (CSA) program was requested to conduct sampling and analysis of soil slated for excavation for the Willamette Park Bank Restoration project; BES Project E10395. This project will be designed to improve the amount and quality of riparian and shallow water habitat of the Willamette River by regrading the riverbank at Willamette Park, adding large wood structures, removing rip rap and concrete from the bank and revegetating with native plant species. The new top of bank will be set back approximately 30 to 60 feet along about 1,300 linear feet of the riverbank. The project footprint is expected to be around 2 acres. An environmental records search was conducted for the site in January 2012. The Portland Shipbuilding Co. was identified as an industry that was previously located on the northern portion of the park property, within the subject site boundaries. Shipbuilding activities are typically associated with the use of asbestos. It was also discovered that Willamette Park was used as the disposal site for demolition debris originating from the Oregon Journal Building, Front Avenue, and the Vista Ridge Tunnel. In addition, records for three Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Environmental Cleanup Sites (ECSI) and two leaking underground storage tank (LUST) sites were identified for properties near the subject site. Based on the findings of the environmental records search, the CSA Program recommended conducting sampling and analysis to identify any contamination in soil slated for excavation. This memorandum presents the results of this sampling and analysis. Memorandum Results of Environmental Sampling and Analysis for the Willamette Park Bank Restoration Sampling and Analysis BES CSA personnel conducted environmental soil sampling on January 19th and 26th, 2012. Five test pits were dug with an excavator near the bank of the Willamette River at Willamette Park to explore the presence and depth of the fill material. Four soil samples were collected from four separate test pits for chemical analysis. Soil from TP-3, TP-4 and TP-5 was screened with a Photoionization Detector (PID) to identify the presence of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Test pit and sample locations are shown on the attached Figure. BES personnel donned clean Nitrile gloves to collect each sample. The soil samples were collected from the piles of soil removed from the test pits and homogenized in a decontaminated stainless steel bowl to ensure that the samples were a good representation of the total depth of the excavation. The soil samples were placed in 4 oz. glass amber jars and capped with Teflon-lined lids. Water samples were collected from the B-1 and B-5 sample locations shown on the attached Figure. The sample jars were labeled and placed in a chilled container for delivery to the Test America Laboratory in Beaverton, OR under chain of custody for analysis. The soil samples were analyzed for Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH-HCID) and Resources Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) total metals with applicable follow-ups. Two of the soil samples were analyzed for asbestos. Some gray plaster and off-white skim coat and paint removed from TP-4 were also analyzed for asbestos. Field Observations Visual indications of contamination were encountered during this sampling event. Crushed up bricks, asphalt, chunks of concrete, metal, and plastic were observed in all test pits dug south of the large parking lot and boat ramps (TP-1 through TP-4). A very large chunk of concrete and bricks, measuring approximately nine feet long, two to three feet tall and one to two feet thick was pulled out of TP-4. Chunks of metal and plastic were also observed in TP-5 and TP-7 dug north of the boat ramps, although those pits did not uncover as much demolition debris as the southern four test pits. Photographs of the test pits and excavated soil are included in the Figures at the end of this memorandum. The PID scan on soil from TP-3 and TP-5 did not result in any detection of VOCs. The PID scan on soil from TP-4 resulted in a reading of 1 part per million (ppm) VOCs. Analytical Results Soil sample results were screened against Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Risk Based Concentrations for soil ingestion, dermal contact and inhalation exposure pathways (DEQ RBCs) and DEQ accepted background concentrations for metals. The laboratory analysis report that includes all of the analytical results is provided in the Appendix at the end of this memorandum. Tables presenting the results of this environmental investigation are also provided at the end of this memorandum. 2 Memorandum Results of Environmental Sampling and Analysis for the Willamette Park Bank Restoration Metals were found to be above DEQ accepted background concentrations for arsenic, lead and zinc in every sample. Chromium slightly exceeded its DEQ accepted background concentration of 42 mg/Kg in sample TP-7 (45.9 mg/Kg). Mercury exceeded its DEQ accepted background concentration of 0.07 mg/Kg in TP-1 (0.072 mg/Kg), TP-4 (0.351 mg/Kg), and TP-5 (0.345 mg/Kg). A toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) test was run for lead on sample TP-5 since the concentration of lead was over 20 times the laboratory Method Detection Limit (MDL). A TCLP test determines the leachability of the lead out of the soil in a landfill scenario. The sample passed the TCLP test, making the material acceptable for disposal at a RCRA Subtitle-D landfill. Arsenic was found to be below the DEQ accepted background concentration of 7 mg/Kg in all samples. The concentrations of arsenic detected in the samples exceed the DEQ RBCs for residential, urban residential and occupational receptors but are below DEQ RBCs for construction and excavation workers. Concentrations of all other metals are below applicable DEQ RBCs. Lube oil was detected in all soil samples collected from the test pits. All concentrations of lube oil are below DEQ RBCs. Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) were detected in all soil samples. Concentrations of benzo(a)anthracene, benzo(b)fluoranthene and dibenzo(a,h)anthracene exceeded one or more DEQ RBC in TP-1, TP-4 and TP-5. Concentrations of benzo(a)pyrene and indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene exceed one or more DEQ RBC for all samples. All concentrations of PAHs detected in these samples are found to be below applicable DEQ RBCs for construction and excavation workers. Asbestos was not detected in soil or in the plaster and skim coat. Conclusions Based on the results of the sampling and analysis, excavation spoils from the bank of the Willamette River at Willamette Park will require disposal at a RCRA Subtitle-D solid waste landfill. Since the excavation spoils south of the large parking lot and boat ramps will be intermixed with large amounts of demolition debris, the landfill will require that to be disposed as Special Waste rather than Petroleum Contaminated Soil (PCS). The excavation spoils north of the parking lot and boat ramps will likely not have much demolition debris intermixed and will be able to be disposed as PCS at the landfill. The CSA Program currently has active price agreements for disposal of Special Waste and PCS with three Subtitle-D landfills that are relatively close to Portland. These prices are as follows (only includes tipping and does not include costs for excavation, trucking, and truck liners): CSA Contract Prices with nearby Subtitle-D Landfills Hillsboro Landfill Riverbend Landfill Wasco County Landfill Waste Stream Type (~20 miles away) (~40 miles away) (~80 miles away) Special Waste $65/ton + $6/load $61/ton (no additional $21/ton (no additional fees) environmental fee fees) PCS $29/ton plus a $6/load $20/ton (no additional $14.28/ton (no additional environmental fee fees) fees) 3 Memorandum Results of Environmental Sampling and Analysis for the Willamette Park Bank Restoration Additional sampling and analysis may be recommended as the project design progresses and permit requirements become clear. Limitations The purpose of this investigation is to report the findings of sampling and analysis. The investigation is intended to identify contamination related to environmental conditions at the subject site. The samples collected only indicate the presence or absence of contaminants in the composite sample. Contamination may exist in areas not sampled. The focus of this survey is on hazardous substances likely associated with the historic activities conducted within the subject site. In this context, the term hazardous substance includes the chemicals listed as hazardous substances in the Code of Federal Regulations, Oregon Administrative Rules, and petroleum products. This survey is in effect as of February 22, 2012. Please contact me if you have further questions. I may be reached at 503-823-5524. 4 Tables Willamette Park Bank Restoration Test pit sample results Table-1: Results of Environmental Soil Sampling and Analysis, Metals - Willamette Park Bank Restoration DEQ Accepted Background Soil Sample Results Concentrations DEQ RBCs Soil Ingestion Dermal Contact and Inhalation RCRA Metals Urban Construction Excavation (mg/Kg) TP-1 TP-4 TP-5 TP-7 Residential Residential Occupational Worker Worker Arsenic 4.41 5.31 11.0 3.68 7 0.39 1.0 1.7 13 370 Barium 333 224 221 198 -- 1.5E+04 3.1E+04 1.9E+05 6.0E+04 >MAX Cadmium 0.337 0.449 0.973 0.148 1 39 78 510 150 4,300 Chromium 26.6 24.9 36.1 45.9 42 ------Copper 26 29.5 75.0 26.7 36 3,100 6,200 4.1E+04 1.2E+04 3.4E+05 Lead 240 93.3 354 32.5 17 400 400 800 800 800 Selenium 1.00U 1.00U 1.00U 1.00U 2 ------Silver 0.100U 0.100U 0.100U 0.100U 1 390 780 5,100 1,500 4.3E+04 Zinc 225 146 382 103 86 ------Mercury 0.072 0.351 0.345 0.037 0.07 23 47 310 93 2,600 TCLP (mg/L) Waste Acceptance for lead -- -- 0.156 -- Criteria: 5.0 mg/L ------ NOTES: Bold = Result exceeds one or more screening value RCRA = Resources Conservation and Recovery Act DEQ = Oregon Department of Environmental Quality RBCs = Risk-Based Concentrations U = The analytes was not detected at or above the Laboratory Method Reporting Limit (MRL) -- = not analyzed or no screening value found >MAX = The constituent RBC for this pathway is greater than 100,000 mg/Kg or 100,000 mg/L. DEQ believes it is highly unlikely that such concentrations will ever be encountered TCLP = Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure test (determines leachability in a landfill scenario) 02/16/2012 Page 1 of 1 Table 2: Results of Environmental Soil Sampling and Analysis, Organics - Willamette Park Bank Restoration Soil Sample Results DEQ RBCs Soil Ingestion Dermal Contact and Inhalation Urban Construction Excavation Hydrocarbon Scan TP-1 TP-4 TP-5 TP-7 Residential Residential Occupational Worker Worker Gasoline ND ND ND ND ------Diesel ND ND ND ND ------Lube Oil DET DET DET DET ------Diesel/Oil Hydrocarbons (mg/Kg) Diesel 120U 25U 25U 25U 1,100 2,200 14,000 4,600 >MAX Lube Oil 700 100 390 80 Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (μg/Kg) Acenaphthene 100U 40U 61 20U 4.7E+06 9.4E+06 6.1E+07 1.9E+07 5.2E+08 Acenaphthylene 140 41 570 20U ------Anthracene 100U 40U 420 20U 2.3E+07 4.7E+07 3.1E+08 9.3E+07 >MAX Benzo(a)anthracene 290 830 1100 11 150 340 2,700 2.1E+04 5.9E+05 Benzo(a)pyrene 520 1300 1100 18 15 34 270 2,100 5.9E+04 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 630 1900 1300 19 150 340 2700 2.1E+04 5.9E+05 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 700 1500 1000 20 ------Benzo(k)fluoranthene 180 670 420 10U 1,500 3,400 2.7E+04 2.1E+05 5.9E+06 Chrysene 370 1300 1100 14 1.4E+04 3.2E+04 2.5E+05 2.1E+06 5.7E+07 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 160 410 230 10U 15 34 270 2100 5.9E+04 Fluoranthene 350 660 1500 24 2.3E+06 4.6E+06 2.9E+07 8.9E+06 2.5E+05 Fluorene 100U 40U 40U 20U 3.1E+06 6.3E+06 4.1E+07 1.2E+07 3.4E+08 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 450 1100 780 14 150 340 2700 2.1E+04 5.9E+05 Naphthalene 200U 80U 80U 40U 4600 2.5E+04 2.3E+04 5.8E+05 1.6E+07 Phenanthrene 110 140 390 20U ------Pyrene 390 790 1700 30 1.7E+06 3.4E+06 2.1E+07 6.7E+06 1.9E+08 2/16/2012 Page 2 of 2 Table 2: Results of Environmental Soil Sampling and Analysis, Organics - Willamette Park Bank Restoration NOTES: DEQ = Oregon Department of Environmental Quality RBCs = Risk-Based Concentrations U = The analytes was not detected at or above the Laboratory Method Reporting Limit (MRL) -- = not analyzed, or no screening value found >MAX = The constituent RBC for this pathway is greater than 100,000 mg/Kg or 100,000 mg/L. DEQ believes it is highly unlikely that such concentrations will ever be encountered 2/16/2012 Page 3 of 2 Figures Willamette Park Bank Restoration Sample Locations Map Test Pit photos 6328 6318-6338 0505 6333 6336 SW DAKOTA ST SW MACADAM AVE 6342 50 6405 64026406 6410 6401 0524-0526 35 TP-7 6415 6414 0530-0532 6418 6415-6417 DE 6427 0603-0605 6420 10 0505 0531 0615 6437 0521-0523 6439 55 6404 0516 30 0430 05120524 Willamette Park 6500 05280536 0618 6509 6515 0520 Bank Restoration 60 0604-0608 6538 30 Environmental 6533 65460519-0535 6500 0607 6535-6595 0507 Records Map 30 TP-5 E10395 SW IDAHO ST DE 0426-0434 6610 6605 66146618 0524-0600 6615 0612 6606 66246620 50 6621 45 Legend 05250535 6639 0425 6636 6626 Test_Pits SW VERMONT ST Sampled? 6705 0536-0538 67100514 0524 55206020614 6719 DE No 6715 40 0542546 6722-67240537 05490601 Yes 6733 0535 DE 6736 05470615-062506256733-6767 05390543 0541 6720 Taxlots TP-4 SW FLORIDA ST 6805 DE 0520 0544 0610-0612 6806 05300536 6815 0604 06246805-6811 0518 0550 6823 0549 1:3,165 0557 6835 0531-0535 0559 0627 6835 6834 15 0517-051905470555 6835 6840 TP-3 SW VIRGINIAAVE SW CALIFORNIA ST 0544 DE 6905 05100524-05260542 6914 0534 06040606 6915 25 65 0602 6920 6932 40 6915 0521 05350543 . 6929 0509 05150523 06010603 Map Created by: bethanyn February 15, 2012 05110513 05370541 0553 0551 60 45 SW TEXAS ST 6932 TP-2 7005 0614 DE 7006 0524053405420602 30 7007 20 75 7007 6932 35 0512-0514 06080618 25 7026 052705310549 7031 06137025-7027 051105190535 0607 0615 7035-7037 7036 0523 0557 0609 TP-1 0553 0611 25 DE 80 55 SW NEVADA ST 70 0514 7107 7110 0540 7107-7223 7140 Map Produced in ArcMap S:\JOHNO\1317 Willamette Park Bank Restoration\Sampling and Analysis Jan 2012\willamette park bank restoration initial sampling map.mxd Willamette Park Bank Restoration – Exploratory Test Pits, January 18th and 26th, 2012 TP-1 (1/18/2012) Excavation pile at TP-1 Close-up of soil and demolition debris excavated from TP-1 Black (asphalt) lens visible in wall of TP-1. Red brick chunks are visible below. TP-1 – demolition debris intermixed with soil TP-7 (1/18/2012) Excavation pile at TP-7 TP-7. Very little demolition debris intermixed with soil at this pit. Close-up of excavated soil at TP-7. TP-3 (1/26/2012) Soil pile at TP-3. Excavator claw holding demolition debris. View inside TP-3. TP-4 (1/26/2012) Excavator attempting to remove large chunk of demolition debris from TP-4. Excavation pile and large demolition debris (far right) from TP-4. Excavation pile from TP-4 Sample from TP-4 in stainless steel bowl. Considerable amounts of demolition debris were found in this test pit. View inside the completed TP-4. Groundwater was encountered at 13 ft below ground surface. The excavation (and fill) terminated at approximately 15 ft bgs at this location. Demolition debris is visible along the walls of the excavation. TP-5 (1/26/2012) A fairly active groundwater seep was encountered in the first couple of feet of TP-5, resulting in caving. Excavation spoils from TP-5 Appendix Laboratory Report City of Portland Water Pollution Control Laboratory 6543 N. Burlington Ave. / Portland OR 97203 (503) 823-5600 fax (503) 823-5656 LABORATORY ANALYSIS REPORT Project: Willamette Park Bank Restoration Client: Coordinated Site Analysis Work Order: W12A174 Project Mgr: Bethany Nabhan Received: 1/19/12 16:33 WQDB #: Janus750 Submitted By: Coordinated Site Analysis Sample Collection Date Sample Laboratory ID Matrix Type Start End Qualifier TP-1 W12A174-01 Soil Composite 01/19/12 10:30 01/19/12 10:30 TP-7 W12A174-02 Soil Composite 01/19/12 12:30 01/19/12 12:30 Analyte Result Units MRL Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Qualifier General Chemistry Total Solids TP-1 : W12A174-01 Total solids 79.0 % W/W 0.01 B12A360 01/23/12 01/24/12 SM 2540G TP-7 : W12A174-02 Total solids 76.2 % W/W 0.01 B12A360 01/23/12 01/24/12 SM 2540G Total Metals Total Metals by ICPMS TP-1 : W12A174-01 Arsenic 4.41 mg/kg dry 0.500 20 B12B037 02/02/12 02/03/12 EPA 6020 Barium 333 mg/kg dry 0.100 80 B12B037 02/02/12 02/03/12 EPA 6020 Cadmium 0.377 mg/kg dry 0.100 20 B12B037 02/02/12 02/03/12 EPA 6020 Chromium 26.6 mg/kg dry 0.500 20 B12B037 02/02/12 02/03/12 EPA 6020 Copper 26.0 mg/kg dry 0.200 20 B12B037 02/02/12 02/03/12 EPA 6020 Lead 240 mg/kg dry 0.100 80 B12B037 02/02/12 02/03/12 EPA 6020 Mercury 0.0720 mg/kg dry 0.0100 20 B12B037 02/02/12 02/03/12 EPA 6020 Selenium ND mg/kg dry 1.00 20 B12B037 02/02/12 02/03/12 EPA 6020 Silver ND mg/kg dry 0.100 20 B12B037 02/02/12 02/03/12 EPA 6020 Zinc 225 mg/kg dry 0.500 80 B12B037 02/02/12 02/03/12 EPA 6020 TP-7 : W12A174-02 Arsenic 3.68 mg/kg dry 0.500 20 B12B037 02/02/12 02/03/12 EPA 6020 Barium 198 mg/kg dry 0.100 20 B12B037 02/02/12 02/03/12 EPA 6020 Cadmium 0.148 mg/kg dry 0.100 20 B12B037 02/02/12 02/03/12 EPA 6020 Chromium 45.9 mg/kg dry 0.500 20 B12B037 02/02/12 02/03/12 EPA 6020 Copper 26.7 mg/kg dry 0.200 20 B12B037 02/02/12 02/03/12 EPA 6020 Lead 32.5 mg/kg dry 0.100 20 B12B037 02/02/12 02/03/12 EPA 6020 Mercury 0.0374 mg/kg dry 0.0100 20 B12B037 02/02/12 02/03/12 EPA 6020 Selenium ND mg/kg dry 1.00 20 B12B037 02/02/12 02/03/12 EPA 6020 Silver ND mg/kg dry 0.100 20 B12B037 02/02/12 02/03/12 EPA 6020 Zinc 103 mg/kg dry 0.500 20 B12B037 02/02/12 02/03/12 EPA 6020 Reported: 02/10/12 15:44 The results in this report apply only to the samples analyzed. Qualifiers and case narrative comments are essential to interpretation of the analytical results. Report reproductions and/or data summaries without qualifiers and comments are incomplete. Renee Chauvin, Laboratory Coordinator QA/QC Page 1 of 12 City of Portland Water Pollution Control Laboratory 6543 N. Burlington Ave. / Portland OR 97203 (503) 823-5600 fax (503) 823-5656 Project: Willamette Park Bank Restoration Client: Coordinated Site Analysis Work Order: W12A174 Project Mgr: Bethany Nabhan Analyte Result Units MRL Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Qualifier TCLP Metals TCLP Metals by ICP TP-1 : W12A174-01 Lead, TCLP 0.032 mg/L 0.025 1 B12B134 02/08/12 02/08/12 EPA 6010 Fuels Diesel/Oil Hydrocarbons by GC-FID TP-1 : W12A174-01 Diesel ND mg/kg dry 120 5 B12A521 01/31/12 01/31/12 NWTPH-Dx Lube oil 700 mg/kg dry 250 5 B12A521 01/31/12 01/31/12 NWTPH-Dx Surrogate Result Expected %Rec Limits(%) 2-Fluorobiphenyl 19.7 21.8 90% 50-150 B12A521 01/31/12 01/31/12 NWTPH-Dx TP-7 : W12A174-02 Diesel ND mg/kg dry 25 1 B12A521 01/31/12 01/31/12 NWTPH-Dx Lube oil 80 mg/kg dry 50 1 B12A521 01/31/12 01/31/12 NWTPH-Dx Surrogate Result Expected %Rec Limits(%) 2-Fluorobiphenyl 21.2 23.1 92% 50-150 B12A521 01/31/12 01/31/12 NWTPH-Dx Hydrocarbon Scan by GC-FID TP-1 : W12A174-01 Gasoline ND mg/kg dry 20 5 B12A343 01/23/12 01/24/12 NWTPH-HCID Diesel ND mg/kg dry 50 5 B12A343 01/23/12 01/24/12 NWTPH-HCID Lube oil DET mg/kg dry 100 5 B12A343 01/23/12 01/24/12 NWTPH-HCID Surrogate Result Expected %Rec Limits(%) 2-Fluorobiphenyl 12.1 12.7 95% 50-150 B12A343 01/23/12 01/24/12 NWTPH-HCID TP-7 : W12A174-02 Gasoline ND mg/kg dry 20 1 B12A343 01/23/12 01/24/12 NWTPH-HCID Diesel ND mg/kg dry 50 1 B12A343 01/23/12 01/24/12 NWTPH-HCID Lube oil DET mg/kg dry 100 1 B12A343 01/23/12 01/24/12 NWTPH-HCID Surrogate Result Expected %Rec Limits(%) 2-Fluorobiphenyl 13.0 13.1 99% 50-150 B12A343 01/23/12 01/24/12 NWTPH-HCID Reported: 02/10/12 15:44 The results in this report apply only to the samples analyzed. Qualifiers and case narrative comments are essential to interpretation of the analytical results. Report reproductions and/or data summaries without qualifiers and comments are incomplete. Renee Chauvin, Laboratory Coordinator QA/QC Page 2 of 12 City of Portland Water Pollution Control Laboratory 6543 N. Burlington Ave. / Portland OR 97203 (503) 823-5600 fax (503) 823-5656 Project: Willamette Park Bank Restoration Client: Coordinated Site Analysis Work Order: W12A174 Project Mgr: Bethany Nabhan Analyte Result Units MRL Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Qualifier Semivolatile Organics - SIM Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons by GCMS-SIM TP-1 : W12A174-01 D2, H5 Acenaphthene ND ug/kg dry 100 50 B12B075 02/06/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Acenaphthylene 140 ug/kg dry 100 50 B12B075 02/06/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Anthracene ND ug/kg dry 100 50 B12B075 02/06/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Benzo(a)anthracene 290 ug/kg dry 50 50 B12B075 02/06/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Benzo(a)pyrene 520 ug/kg dry 50 50 B12B075 02/06/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Benzo(b)fluoranthene 630 ug/kg dry 50 50 B12B075 02/06/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 700 ug/kg dry 50 50 B12B075 02/06/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Benzo(k)fluoranthene 180 ug/kg dry 50 50 B12B075 02/06/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Chrysene 370 ug/kg dry 50 50 B12B075 02/06/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 160 ug/kg dry 50 50 B12B075 02/06/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Fluoranthene 350 ug/kg dry 50 50 B12B075 02/06/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Fluorene ND ug/kg dry 100 50 B12B075 02/06/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 450 ug/kg dry 50 50 B12B075 02/06/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Naphthalene ND ug/kg dry 200 50 B12B075 02/06/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Phenanthrene 110 ug/kg dry 100 50 B12B075 02/06/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Pyrene 390 ug/kg dry 50 50 B12B075 02/06/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Surrogate Result Expected %Rec Limits(%) 2-Methylnaphthalene-d10 100 127 80% 50-150 B12B075 02/06/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Fluoranthene-d10 150 127 118% 50-150 B12B075 02/06/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM TP-7 : W12A174-02 H5 Acenaphthene ND ug/kg dry 20 10 B12B075 02/06/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Acenaphthylene ND ug/kg dry 20 10 B12B075 02/06/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Anthracene ND ug/kg dry 20 10 B12B075 02/06/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Benzo(a)anthracene 11 ug/kg dry 10 10 B12B075 02/06/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Benzo(a)pyrene 18 ug/kg dry 10 10 B12B075 02/06/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Benzo(b)fluoranthene 19 ug/kg dry 10 10 B12B075 02/06/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 20 ug/kg dry 10 10 B12B075 02/06/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Benzo(k)fluoranthene ND ug/kg dry 10 10 B12B075 02/06/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Chrysene 14 ug/kg dry 10 10 B12B075 02/06/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene ND ug/kg dry 10 10 B12B075 02/06/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Fluoranthene 24 ug/kg dry 10 10 B12B075 02/06/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Fluorene ND ug/kg dry 20 10 B12B075 02/06/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 14 ug/kg dry 10 10 B12B075 02/06/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Naphthalene ND ug/kg dry 40 10 B12B075 02/06/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Phenanthrene ND ug/kg dry 20 10 B12B075 02/06/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Pyrene 30 ug/kg dry 10 10 B12B075 02/06/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Surrogate Result Expected %Rec Limits(%) 2-Methylnaphthalene-d10 81 131 62% 50-150 B12B075 02/06/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Fluoranthene-d10 100 131 78% 50-150 B12B075 02/06/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Reported: 02/10/12 15:44 The results in this report apply only to the samples analyzed. Qualifiers and case narrative comments are essential to interpretation of the analytical results. Report reproductions and/or data summaries without qualifiers and comments are incomplete. Renee Chauvin, Laboratory Coordinator QA/QC Page 3 of 12 City of Portland Water Pollution Control Laboratory 6543 N. Burlington Ave. / Portland OR 97203 (503) 823-5600 fax (503) 823-5656 Project: Willamette Park Bank Restoration Client: Coordinated Site Analysis Work Order: W12A174 Project Mgr: Bethany Nabhan Quality Control Report General Chemistry - QC Spike Source %Rec RPD Prepared: Analyte Result Units MRL Level Result (Limits) (Limit) Analyzed Qualifier Total Solids - Batch B12A360 Duplicate (B12A360-DUP1) Source: W12A174-01 Total solids 78.8 % W/W 0.01 79.0 0.1 (5) 01/23/12 :01/24/12 Duplicate (B12A360-DUP2) Source: W12A191-37 Total solids 81.0 % W/W 0.01 80.3 0.9 (5) 01/23/12 :01/24/12 Duplicate (B12A360-DUP3) Source: W12A191-74 Total solids 74.0 % W/W 0.01 74.4 0.6 (5) 01/23/12 :01/24/12 Total Metals - QC Spike Source %Rec RPD Prepared: Analyte Result Units MRL Level Result (Limits) (Limit) Analyzed Qualifier Total Metals by ICPMS - Batch B12B037 Blank (B12B037-BLK1) Arsenic ND mg/kg wet 0.500 02/02/12 :02/03/12 Barium ND mg/kg wet 0.100 02/02/12 :02/03/12 Cadmium ND mg/kg wet 0.100 02/02/12 :02/03/12 Chromium ND mg/kg wet 0.500 02/02/12 :02/03/12 Copper ND mg/kg wet 0.200 02/02/12 :02/03/12 Lead ND mg/kg wet 0.100 02/02/12 :02/03/12 Mercury ND mg/kg wet 0.0100 02/02/12 :02/03/12 Selenium ND mg/kg wet 1.00 02/02/12 :02/03/12 Silver ND mg/kg wet 0.100 02/02/12 :02/03/12 Zinc ND mg/kg wet 0.500 02/02/12 :02/03/12 Standard Reference Material (B12B037-SRM1) Arsenic 218 mg/kg wet 0.500 225 97 (75-125) 02/02/12 :02/03/12 Barium 623 mg/kg wet 0.100 565 110 (75-125) 02/02/12 :02/03/12 Cadmium 78.6 mg/kg wet 0.100 69.1 114 (75-125) 02/02/12 :02/03/12 Chromium 143 mg/kg wet 0.500 124 115 (75-125) 02/02/12 :02/03/12 Copper 72.5 mg/kg wet 0.200 78.8 92 (75-125) 02/02/12 :02/03/12 Lead 233 mg/kg wet 0.100 223 104 (75-125) 02/02/12 :02/03/12 Mercury 5.652 mg/kg wet 0.0100 5.15 110 (75-125) 02/02/12 :02/03/12 Selenium 157 mg/kg wet 1.00 147 107 (75-125) 02/02/12 :02/03/12 Silver 39.1 mg/kg wet 0.100 35.2 111 (75-125) 02/02/12 :02/03/12 Zinc 394 mg/kg wet 0.500 349 113 (75-125) 02/02/12 :02/03/12 Duplicate (B12B037-DUP1) Source: W12A191-28 Arsenic 4.31 mg/kg dry 0.500 4.60 7 (20) 02/02/12 :02/03/12 Barium 177 mg/kg dry 0.100 166 7 (20) 02/02/12 :02/03/12 Cadmium 0.133 mg/kg dry 0.100 0.142 6 (20) 02/02/12 :02/03/12 Reported: 02/10/12 15:44 The results in this report apply only to the samples analyzed. Qualifiers and case narrative comments are essential to interpretation of the analytical results. Report reproductions and/or data summaries without qualifiers and comments are incomplete. Renee Chauvin, Laboratory Coordinator QA/QC Page 4 of 12 City of Portland Water Pollution Control Laboratory 6543 N. Burlington Ave. / Portland OR 97203 (503) 823-5600 fax (503) 823-5656 Project: Willamette Park Bank Restoration Client: Coordinated Site Analysis Work Order: W12A174 Project Mgr: Bethany Nabhan Total Metals - QC Spike Source %Rec RPD Prepared: Analyte Result Units MRL Level Result (Limits) (Limit) Analyzed Qualifier Total Metals by ICPMS - Batch B12B037 Duplicate (B12B037-DUP1) Source: W12A191-28 Chromium 21.7 mg/kg dry 0.500 20.5 5 (20) 02/02/12 :02/03/12 Copper 23.0 mg/kg dry 0.200 24.4 6 (20) 02/02/12 :02/03/12 Lead 9.11 mg/kg dry 0.100 9.36 3 (20) 02/02/12 :02/03/12 Mercury 0.03484 mg/kg dry 0.0100 0.03244 7 (20) 02/02/12 :02/03/12 Selenium ND mg/kg dry 1.00 ND (20) 02/02/12 :02/03/12 Silver ND mg/kg dry 0.100 ND (20) 02/02/12 :02/03/12 Zinc 69.9 mg/kg dry 0.500 71.7 3 (20) 02/02/12 :02/03/12 Matrix Spike (B12B037-MS1) Source: W12A191-28 Arsenic 18.0 mg/kg dry 0.500 14.4 4.60 93 (75-125) 02/02/12 :02/03/12 Barium 370 mg/kg dry 0.100 216 166 95 (75-125) 02/02/12 :02/03/12 Cadmium 14.4 mg/kg dry 0.100 14.4 0.142 99 (75-125) 02/02/12 :02/03/12 Chromium 60.7 mg/kg dry 0.500 43.1 20.5 93 (75-125) 02/02/12 :02/03/12 Copper 91.2 mg/kg dry 0.200 71.8 24.4 93 (75-125) 02/02/12 :02/03/12 Lead 78.7 mg/kg dry 0.100 71.8 9.36 97 (75-125) 02/02/12 :02/03/12 Mercury 0.7291 mg/kg dry 0.0100 0.718 0.03244 97 (75-125) 02/02/12 :02/03/12 Selenium 67.2 mg/kg dry 1.00 71.8 ND 93 (75-125) 02/02/12 :02/03/12 Silver 14.5 mg/kg dry 0.100 14.4 ND 101 (75-125) 02/02/12 :02/03/12 Zinc 139 mg/kg dry 0.500 71.8 71.7 94 (75-125) 02/02/12 :02/03/12 TCLP Metals - QC Spike Source %Rec RPD Prepared: Analyte Result Units MRL Level Result (Limits) (Limit) Analyzed Qualifier TCLP Metals by ICP - Batch B12B134 Blank (B12B134-BLK1) Lead ND mg/L 0.010 02/08/12 :02/08/12 Blank (B12B134-BLK2) Lead ND mg/L 0.025 02/08/12 :02/08/12 BL Blank (B12B134-BLK3) Lead ND mg/L 0.025 02/08/12 :02/08/12 BL LCS (B12B134-BS1) Lead 0.509 mg/L 0.010 0.500 102 (85-115) 02/08/12 :02/08/12 Duplicate (B12B134-DUP1) Source: W12A246-02 Lead 0.054 mg/L 0.025 0.053 2 (20) 02/08/12 :02/08/12 Matrix Spike (B12B134-MS1) Source: W12A246-02 Lead 2.48 mg/L 0.025 2.50 0.053 97 (70-130) 02/08/12 :02/08/12 Reported: 02/10/12 15:44 The results in this report apply only to the samples analyzed. Qualifiers and case narrative comments are essential to interpretation of the analytical results. Report reproductions and/or data summaries without qualifiers and comments are incomplete. Renee Chauvin, Laboratory Coordinator QA/QC Page 5 of 12 City of Portland Water Pollution Control Laboratory 6543 N. Burlington Ave. / Portland OR 97203 (503) 823-5600 fax (503) 823-5656 Project: Willamette Park Bank Restoration Client: Coordinated Site Analysis Work Order: W12A174 Project Mgr: Bethany Nabhan Fuels - QC Spike Source %Rec RPD Prepared: Analyte Result Units MRL Level Result (Limits) (Limit) Analyzed Qualifier Diesel/Oil Hydrocarbons by GC-FID - Batch B12A521 Blank (B12A521-BLK1) Diesel ND mg/kg wet 25 01/31/12 :01/31/12 Lube oil ND mg/kg wet 50 01/31/12 :01/31/12 Surrogate 2-Fluorobiphenyl 17.3 mg/kg wet 20.0 86 01/31/12 :01/31/12 LCS (B12A521-BS1) Diesel 82.2 mg/kg wet 25 100 82 (50-150) 01/31/12 :01/31/12 Lube oil 93.8 mg/kg wet 50 100 94 (50-150) 01/31/12 :01/31/12 Surrogate 2-Fluorobiphenyl 17.5 mg/kg wet 20.0 88 (50-150) 01/31/12 :01/31/12 Duplicate (B12A521-DUP1) Source: W12A158-04 Diesel ND mg/kg dry 25 ND (50) 01/31/12 :01/31/12 Lube oil 300 mg/kg dry 50 330 10 (50) 01/31/12 :01/31/12 Surrogate 2-Fluorobiphenyl 19.0 mg/kg dry 21.7 87 01/31/12 :01/31/12 Hydrocarbon Scan by GC-FID - Batch B12A343 Blank (B12A343-BLK1) Gasoline ND mg/kg wet 20 01/23/12 :01/24/12 Diesel ND mg/kg wet 50 01/23/12 :01/24/12 Lube oil ND mg/kg wet 100 01/23/12 :01/24/12 Surrogate 2-Fluorobiphenyl 9.51 mg/kg wet 10.0 95 01/23/12 :01/24/12 Duplicate (B12A343-DUP1) Source: W12A158-01 Gasoline ND mg/kg dry 20 ND (200) 01/23/12 :01/24/12 Diesel ND mg/kg dry 50 ND (200) 01/23/12 :01/24/12 Lube oil ND mg/kg dry 100 ND (200) 01/23/12 :01/24/12 Surrogate 2-Fluorobiphenyl 9.79 mg/kg dry 10.8 90 01/23/12 :01/24/12 Reported: 02/10/12 15:44 The results in this report apply only to the samples analyzed. Qualifiers and case narrative comments are essential to interpretation of the analytical results. Report reproductions and/or data summaries without qualifiers and comments are incomplete. Renee Chauvin, Laboratory Coordinator QA/QC Page 6 of 12 City of Portland Water Pollution Control Laboratory 6543 N. Burlington Ave. / Portland OR 97203 (503) 823-5600 fax (503) 823-5656 Project: Willamette Park Bank Restoration Client: Coordinated Site Analysis Work Order: W12A174 Project Mgr: Bethany Nabhan Semivolatile Organics - SIM - QC Spike Source %Rec RPD Prepared: Analyte Result Units MRL Level Result (Limits) (Limit) Analyzed Qualifier Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons by GCMS-SIM - Batch B12B075 Blank (B12B075-BLK1) Acenaphthene ND ug/kg wet 20 02/06/12 :02/07/12 Acenaphthylene ND ug/kg wet 20 02/06/12 :02/07/12 Anthracene ND ug/kg wet 20 02/06/12 :02/07/12 Benzo(a)anthracene ND ug/kg wet 10 02/06/12 :02/07/12 Benzo(a)pyrene ND ug/kg wet 10 02/06/12 :02/07/12 Benzo(b)fluoranthene ND ug/kg wet 10 02/06/12 :02/07/12 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ND ug/kg wet 10 02/06/12 :02/07/12 Benzo(k)fluoranthene ND ug/kg wet 10 02/06/12 :02/07/12 Chrysene ND ug/kg wet 10 02/06/12 :02/07/12 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene ND ug/kg wet 10 02/06/12 :02/07/12 Fluoranthene ND ug/kg wet 10 02/06/12 :02/07/12 Fluorene ND ug/kg wet 20 02/06/12 :02/07/12 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ND ug/kg wet 10 02/06/12 :02/07/12 Naphthalene ND ug/kg wet 40 02/06/12 :02/07/12 Phenanthrene ND ug/kg wet 20 02/06/12 :02/07/12 Pyrene ND ug/kg wet 10 02/06/12 :02/07/12 Surrogate 2-Methylnaphthalene-d10 74 ug/kg wet 100 74 02/06/12 :02/07/12 Fluoranthene-d10 110 ug/kg wet 100 112 02/06/12 :02/07/12 LCS (B12B075-BS1) Acenaphthene 35.6 ug/kg wet 20 40.0 89 (50-150) 02/06/12 :02/07/12 Acenaphthylene 39.6 ug/kg wet 20 40.0 99 (50-150) 02/06/12 :02/07/12 Anthracene 34.8 ug/kg wet 20 40.0 87 (50-150) 02/06/12 :02/07/12 Benzo(a)anthracene 33.6 ug/kg wet 10 40.0 84 (50-150) 02/06/12 :02/07/12 Benzo(a)pyrene 32.8 ug/kg wet 10 40.0 82 (50-150) 02/06/12 :02/07/12 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 32.4 ug/kg wet 10 40.0 81 (50-150) 02/06/12 :02/07/12 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 34.0 ug/kg wet 10 40.0 85 (50-150) 02/06/12 :02/07/12 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 32.8 ug/kg wet 10 40.0 82 (50-150) 02/06/12 :02/07/12 Chrysene 34.0 ug/kg wet 10 40.0 85 (50-150) 02/06/12 :02/07/12 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 31.6 ug/kg wet 10 40.0 79 (50-150) 02/06/12 :02/07/12 Fluoranthene 36.4 ug/kg wet 10 40.0 91 (50-150) 02/06/12 :02/07/12 Fluorene 35.6 ug/kg wet 20 40.0 89 (50-150) 02/06/12 :02/07/12 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 32.4 ug/kg wet 10 40.0 81 (50-150) 02/06/12 :02/07/12 Naphthalene 32.4 ug/kg wet 20 40.0 81 (50-150) 02/06/12 :02/07/12 Phenanthrene 37.2 ug/kg wet 20 40.0 93 (50-150) 02/06/12 :02/07/12 Pyrene 33.6 ug/kg wet 10 40.0 84 (50-150) 02/06/12 :02/07/12 Surrogate 2-Methylnaphthalene-d10 94 ug/kg wet 100 94 (50-150) 02/06/12 :02/07/12 Fluoranthene-d10 110 ug/kg wet 100 114 (50-150) 02/06/12 :02/07/12 Duplicate (B12B075-DUP1) Source: W12A191-64 Reported: 02/10/12 15:44 The results in this report apply only to the samples analyzed. Qualifiers and case narrative comments are essential to interpretation of the analytical results. Report reproductions and/or data summaries without qualifiers and comments are incomplete. Renee Chauvin, Laboratory Coordinator QA/QC Page 7 of 12 City of Portland Water Pollution Control Laboratory 6543 N. Burlington Ave. / Portland OR 97203 (503) 823-5600 fax (503) 823-5656 Project: Willamette Park Bank Restoration Client: Coordinated Site Analysis Work Order: W12A174 Project Mgr: Bethany Nabhan Semivolatile Organics - SIM - QC Spike Source %Rec RPD Prepared: Analyte Result Units MRL Level Result (Limits) (Limit) Analyzed Qualifier Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons by GCMS-SIM - Batch B12B075 Duplicate (B12B075-DUP1) Source: W12A191-64 Acenaphthene ND ug/kg dry 20 ND (50) 02/06/12 :02/07/12 Acenaphthylene ND ug/kg dry 20 ND (50) 02/06/12 :02/07/12 Anthracene ND ug/kg dry 20 ND (50) 02/06/12 :02/07/12 Benzo(a)anthracene ND ug/kg dry 10 ND (50) 02/06/12 :02/07/12 Benzo(a)pyrene ND ug/kg dry 10 ND (50) 02/06/12 :02/07/12 Benzo(b)fluoranthene ND ug/kg dry 10 ND (50) 02/06/12 :02/07/12 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ND ug/kg dry 10 10.7 (50) 02/06/12 :02/07/12 M8 Benzo(k)fluoranthene ND ug/kg dry 10 ND (50) 02/06/12 :02/07/12 Chrysene ND ug/kg dry 10 ND (50) 02/06/12 :02/07/12 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene ND ug/kg dry 10 ND (50) 02/06/12 :02/07/12 Fluoranthene ND ug/kg dry 10 ND (50) 02/06/12 :02/07/12 Fluorene ND ug/kg dry 20 ND (50) 02/06/12 :02/07/12 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ND ug/kg dry 10 ND (50) 02/06/12 :02/07/12 Naphthalene ND ug/kg dry 40 ND (50) 02/06/12 :02/07/12 Phenanthrene ND ug/kg dry 20 ND (50) 02/06/12 :02/07/12 Pyrene ND ug/kg dry 10 ND (50) 02/06/12 :02/07/12 Surrogate 2-Methylnaphthalene-d10 110 ug/kg dry 116 99 02/06/12 :02/07/12 Fluoranthene-d10 130 ug/kg dry 116 116 02/06/12 :02/07/12 Qualifiers BL This blank was carried through the leaching process. D2 The sample required dilution due to high levels of target analytes. H5 Holding time was exceeded due to delayed request for analysis. M8 The matrix duplicate control limit is not applicable at concentrations less than 5 times the reporting limit. Definitions DET Analyte Detected ND Analyte Not Detected at or above the reporting limit MRL Method Reporting Limit MDL Method Detection Limit NR Not Reportable dry Sample results reported on a dry weight basis % Rec. Percent Recovery RPD Relative Percent Difference Reported: 02/10/12 15:44 The results in this report apply only to the samples analyzed. Qualifiers and case narrative comments are essential to interpretation of the analytical results. Report reproductions and/or data summaries without qualifiers and comments are incomplete. Renee Chauvin, Laboratory Coordinator QA/QC Page 8 of 12 Page 9 of 12 EMLab P&K Report for: Mr. Darrell Auvil TestAmerica-Portland 9405 SW Nimbus Ave Beaverton, OR 97008 Regarding: Project: PVA0662 EML ID: 880420 Approved by: Dates of Analysis: Asbestos-EPA Method 600/R-93/116: 01-30-2012 Technical Manager Miguel Ines Service SOPs: Asbestos-EPA Method 600/R-93/116 (EPA-600/M4-82-020 (SOP 01264)) All samples were received in acceptable condition unless noted in the Report Comments portion in the body of the report. The results relate only to the items tested. The results include an inherent uncertainty of measurement associated with estimating percentages by polarized light microscopy. Measurement uncertainty data can be provided when requested. EMLab P&K ("the Company") shall have no liability to the client or the client's customer with respect to decisions or recommendations made, actions taken or courses of conduct implemented by either the client or the client's customer as a result of or based upon the Test Results. In no event shall the Company be liable to the client with respect to the Test Results except for the Company's own willful misconduct or gross negligence nor shall the Company be liable for incidental or consequential damages or lost profits or revenues to the fullest extent such liability may be disclaimed by law, even if the Company has been advised of the possibility of such damages, lost profits or lost revenues. In no event shall the Company's liability with respect to the Test Results exceed the amount paid to the Company by the client therefor. Document Number: 200091 - Revision Number: 5 EMLab P&K, LLC EMLab ID: 880420, Page 1 of 2 Page 10 of 12 EMLab P&K 3585 Cadillac Ave, Suite A, Costa Mesa, CA 92626 (866) 465-6653 Fax (858) 569-5806 www.emlab.com Client: TestAmerica-Portland Date of Sampling: 01-19-2012 C/O: Mr. Darrell Auvil Date of Receipt: 01-25-2012 Re: PVA0662 Date of Report: 01-30-2012 ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA-600/M4-82-020 & EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116 Total Samples Submitted: 1 Total Samples Analysed: 1 Total Samples with Layer Asbestos Content > 1%: 0 Location: PVA0662-01 Lab ID-Version‡: 3909060-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content Brown Soil ND Composite Non-Asbestos Fibrous Content: < 1% Cellulose Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good The results relate only to the items tested. Interpretation is left to the company and/or persons who conducted the field work. The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government. All samples were received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted. EMLab P&K reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified. Inhomogeneous samples are separated into homogeneous subsamples and analyzed individually. ND means no fibers were detected. When detected, the minimum detection and reporting limit is less than 1% unless point counting is performed. ‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is reflected by the value of "x". EMLab P&K, LLC EMLab ID: 880420, Page 2 of 2 Page 11 of 12 Page 12 of 12 City of Portland Water Pollution Control Laboratory 6543 N. Burlington Ave. / Portland OR 97203 (503) 823-5600 fax (503) 823-5656 LABORATORY ANALYSIS REPORT Project: Willamette Park Bank Restoration Client: Coordinated Site Analysis Work Order: W12A247 Project Mgr: Bethany Nabhan Received: 1/26/12 13:15 WQDB #: Janus750 Submitted By: Coordinated Site Analysis Sample Collection Date Sample Laboratory ID Matrix Type Start End Qualifier TP-4 0-15ft W12A247-01 Soil Composite 01/25/12 12:45 01/25/12 12:45 TP-5 0-6ft W12A247-02 Soil Composite 01/25/12 15:30 01/25/12 15:30 Analyte Result Units MRL Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Qualifier General Chemistry Total Solids TP-4 0-15ft : W12A247-01 Total solids 80.9 % W/W 0.01 B12A445 01/27/12 01/28/12 SM 2540G TP-5 0-6ft : W12A247-02 Total solids 71.0 % W/W 0.01 B12A445 01/27/12 01/28/12 SM 2540G Total Metals Total Metals by ICPMS TP-4 0-15ft : W12A247-01 Arsenic 5.31 mg/kg dry 0.500 20 B12B039 02/03/12 02/03/12 EPA 6020 Barium 224 mg/kg dry 0.100 20 B12B039 02/03/12 02/03/12 EPA 6020 Cadmium 0.449 mg/kg dry 0.100 20 B12B039 02/03/12 02/03/12 EPA 6020 Chromium 24.9 mg/kg dry 0.500 20 B12B039 02/03/12 02/03/12 EPA 6020 Copper 29.5 mg/kg dry 0.200 20 B12B039 02/03/12 02/03/12 EPA 6020 Lead 93.3 mg/kg dry 0.100 20 B12B039 02/03/12 02/03/12 EPA 6020 Mercury 0.351 mg/kg dry 0.0100 20 B12B039 02/03/12 02/03/12 EPA 6020 Selenium ND mg/kg dry 1.00 20 B12B039 02/03/12 02/03/12 EPA 6020 Silver ND mg/kg dry 0.100 20 B12B039 02/03/12 02/03/12 EPA 6020 Zinc 146 mg/kg dry 0.500 20 B12B039 02/03/12 02/03/12 EPA 6020 TP-5 0-6ft : W12A247-02 Arsenic 11.0 mg/kg dry 0.500 20 B12B039 02/03/12 02/03/12 EPA 6020 Barium 221 mg/kg dry 0.100 20 B12B039 02/03/12 02/03/12 EPA 6020 Cadmium 0.973 mg/kg dry 0.100 20 B12B039 02/03/12 02/03/12 EPA 6020 Chromium 36.1 mg/kg dry 0.500 20 B12B039 02/03/12 02/03/12 EPA 6020 Copper 75.0 mg/kg dry 0.200 20 B12B039 02/03/12 02/03/12 EPA 6020 Lead 354 mg/kg dry 0.100 100 B12B039 02/03/12 02/03/12 EPA 6020 Mercury 0.345 mg/kg dry 0.0100 20 B12B039 02/03/12 02/03/12 EPA 6020 Selenium ND mg/kg dry 1.00 20 B12B039 02/03/12 02/03/12 EPA 6020 Silver ND mg/kg dry 0.100 20 B12B039 02/03/12 02/03/12 EPA 6020 Zinc 382 mg/kg dry 0.500 100 B12B039 02/03/12 02/03/12 EPA 6020 Reported: 02/10/12 15:49 The results in this report apply only to the samples analyzed. Qualifiers and case narrative comments are essential to interpretation of the analytical results. Report reproductions and/or data summaries without qualifiers and comments are incomplete. Renee Chauvin, Laboratory Coordinator QA/QC Page 1 of 12 City of Portland Water Pollution Control Laboratory 6543 N. Burlington Ave. / Portland OR 97203 (503) 823-5600 fax (503) 823-5656 Project: Willamette Park Bank Restoration Client: Coordinated Site Analysis Work Order: W12A247 Project Mgr: Bethany Nabhan Analyte Result Units MRL Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Qualifier TCLP Metals TCLP Metals by ICP TP-5 0-6ft : W12A247-02 Lead, TCLP 0.156 mg/L 0.025 1 B12B134 02/08/12 02/08/12 EPA 6010 Fuels Diesel/Oil Hydrocarbons by GC-FID TP-4 0-15ft : W12A247-01 Diesel ND mg/kg dry 25 1 B12A521 01/31/12 01/31/12 NWTPH-Dx Lube oil 100 mg/kg dry 50 1 B12A521 01/31/12 01/31/12 NWTPH-Dx Surrogate Result Expected %Rec Limits(%) 2-Fluorobiphenyl 20.1 22.9 88% 50-150 B12A521 01/31/12 01/31/12 NWTPH-Dx TP-5 0-6ft : W12A247-02 Diesel ND mg/kg dry 25 1 B12A521 01/31/12 01/31/12 NWTPH-Dx Lube oil 390 mg/kg dry 50 1 B12A521 01/31/12 01/31/12 NWTPH-Dx Surrogate Result Expected %Rec Limits(%) 2-Fluorobiphenyl 24.0 27.4 88% 50-150 B12A521 01/31/12 01/31/12 NWTPH-Dx Hydrocarbon Scan by GC-FID TP-4 0-15ft : W12A247-01 Gasoline ND mg/kg dry 20 1 B12A494 01/30/12 01/31/12 NWTPH-HCID Diesel ND mg/kg dry 50 1 B12A494 01/30/12 01/31/12 NWTPH-HCID Lube oil DET mg/kg dry 100 1 B12A494 01/30/12 01/31/12 NWTPH-HCID F0, V1 Surrogate Result Expected %Rec Limits(%) 2-Fluorobiphenyl 11.9 12.4 96% 50-150 B12A494 01/30/12 01/31/12 NWTPH-HCID TP-5 0-6ft : W12A247-02 Gasoline ND mg/kg dry 20 1 B12A494 01/30/12 01/31/12 NWTPH-HCID Diesel ND mg/kg dry 50 1 B12A494 01/30/12 01/31/12 NWTPH-HCID Lube oil DET mg/kg dry 100 1 B12A494 01/30/12 01/31/12 NWTPH-HCID F0, V1 Surrogate Result Expected %Rec Limits(%) 2-Fluorobiphenyl 13.6 14.1 96% 50-150 B12A494 01/30/12 01/31/12 NWTPH-HCID Reported: 02/10/12 15:49 The results in this report apply only to the samples analyzed. Qualifiers and case narrative comments are essential to interpretation of the analytical results. Report reproductions and/or data summaries without qualifiers and comments are incomplete. Renee Chauvin, Laboratory Coordinator QA/QC Page 2 of 12 City of Portland Water Pollution Control Laboratory 6543 N. Burlington Ave. / Portland OR 97203 (503) 823-5600 fax (503) 823-5656 Project: Willamette Park Bank Restoration Client: Coordinated Site Analysis Work Order: W12A247 Project Mgr: Bethany Nabhan Analyte Result Units MRL Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Qualifier Semivolatile Organics - SIM Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons by GCMS-SIM TP-4 0-15ft : W12A247-01 D2 Acenaphthene ND ug/kg dry 40 20 B12A522 01/31/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Acenaphthylene 41 ug/kg dry 40 20 B12A522 01/31/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Anthracene ND ug/kg dry 40 20 B12A522 01/31/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Benzo(a)anthracene 830 ug/kg dry 20 20 B12A522 01/31/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Benzo(a)pyrene 1300 ug/kg dry 20 20 B12A522 01/31/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1900 ug/kg dry 20 20 B12A522 01/31/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 1500 ug/kg dry 20 20 B12A522 01/31/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Benzo(k)fluoranthene 670 ug/kg dry 20 20 B12A522 01/31/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Chrysene 1300 ug/kg dry 20 20 B12A522 01/31/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 410 ug/kg dry 20 20 B12A522 01/31/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Fluoranthene 660 ug/kg dry 20 20 B12A522 01/31/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Fluorene ND ug/kg dry 40 20 B12A522 01/31/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 1100 ug/kg dry 20 20 B12A522 01/31/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Naphthalene ND ug/kg dry 80 20 B12A522 01/31/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Phenanthrene 140 ug/kg dry 40 20 B12A522 01/31/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Pyrene 790 ug/kg dry 20 20 B12A522 01/31/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Surrogate Result Expected %Rec Limits(%) 2-Methylnaphthalene-d10 100 120 86% 50-150 B12A522 01/31/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Fluoranthene-d10 150 120 123% 50-150 B12A522 01/31/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM TP-5 0-6ft : W12A247-02 D2 Acenaphthene 61 ug/kg dry 40 20 B12A522 01/31/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Acenaphthylene 570 ug/kg dry 40 20 B12A522 01/31/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Anthracene 420 ug/kg dry 40 20 B12A522 01/31/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Benzo(a)anthracene 1100 ug/kg dry 20 20 B12A522 01/31/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Benzo(a)pyrene 1100 ug/kg dry 20 20 B12A522 01/31/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1300 ug/kg dry 20 20 B12A522 01/31/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 1000 ug/kg dry 20 20 B12A522 01/31/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Benzo(k)fluoranthene 420 ug/kg dry 20 20 B12A522 01/31/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Chrysene 1100 ug/kg dry 20 20 B12A522 01/31/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 230 ug/kg dry 20 20 B12A522 01/31/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Fluoranthene 1500 ug/kg dry 20 20 B12A522 01/31/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Fluorene ND ug/kg dry 40 20 B12A522 01/31/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 780 ug/kg dry 20 20 B12A522 01/31/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Naphthalene ND ug/kg dry 80 20 B12A522 01/31/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Phenanthrene 390 ug/kg dry 40 20 B12A522 01/31/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Pyrene 1700 ug/kg dry 20 20 B12A522 01/31/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Surrogate Result Expected %Rec Limits(%) 2-Methylnaphthalene-d10 110 130 83% 50-150 B12A522 01/31/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Fluoranthene-d10 160 130 126% 50-150 B12A522 01/31/12 02/07/12 EPA 8270-SIM Reported: 02/10/12 15:49 The results in this report apply only to the samples analyzed. Qualifiers and case narrative comments are essential to interpretation of the analytical results. Report reproductions and/or data summaries without qualifiers and comments are incomplete. Renee Chauvin, Laboratory Coordinator QA/QC Page 3 of 12 City of Portland Water Pollution Control Laboratory 6543 N. Burlington Ave. / Portland OR 97203 (503) 823-5600 fax (503) 823-5656 Project: Willamette Park Bank Restoration Client: Coordinated Site Analysis Work Order: W12A247 Project Mgr: Bethany Nabhan Quality Control Report General Chemistry - QC Spike Source %Rec RPD Prepared: Analyte Result Units MRL Level Result (Limits) (Limit) Analyzed Qualifier Total Solids - Batch B12A445 Duplicate (B12A445-DUP1) Source: W12A233-42 Total solids 74.5 % W/W 0.01 74.9 0.6 (5) 01/27/12 :01/28/12 Duplicate (B12A445-DUP2) Source: W12A242-01 Total solids 73.4 % W/W 0.01 73.8 0.6 (5) 01/27/12 :01/28/12 Duplicate (B12A445-DUP3) Source: W12A247-02 Total solids 72.6 % W/W 0.01 71.0 2 (5) 01/27/12 :01/28/12 Total Metals - QC Spike Source %Rec RPD Prepared: Analyte Result Units MRL Level Result (Limits) (Limit) Analyzed Qualifier Total Metals by ICPMS - Batch B12B039 Blank (B12B039-BLK1) Arsenic ND mg/kg wet 0.500 02/03/12 :02/03/12 Barium ND mg/kg wet 0.100 02/03/12 :02/03/12 Cadmium ND mg/kg wet 0.100 02/03/12 :02/03/12 Chromium ND mg/kg wet 0.500 02/03/12 :02/03/12 Copper ND mg/kg wet 0.200 02/03/12 :02/03/12 Lead ND mg/kg wet 0.100 02/03/12 :02/03/12 Mercury ND mg/kg wet 0.0100 02/03/12 :02/03/12 Selenium ND mg/kg wet 1.00 02/03/12 :02/03/12 Silver ND mg/kg wet 0.100 02/03/12 :02/03/12 Zinc ND mg/kg wet 0.500 02/03/12 :02/03/12 Standard Reference Material (B12B039-SRM1) Arsenic 220 mg/kg wet 0.500 225 98 (75-125) 02/03/12 :02/03/12 Barium 595 mg/kg wet 0.100 565 105 (75-125) 02/03/12 :02/03/12 Cadmium 70.4 mg/kg wet 0.100 69.1 102 (75-125) 02/03/12 :02/03/12 Chromium 130 mg/kg wet 0.500 124 105 (75-125) 02/03/12 :02/03/12 Copper 71.7 mg/kg wet 0.200 78.8 91 (75-125) 02/03/12 :02/03/12 Lead 224 mg/kg wet 0.100 223 100 (75-125) 02/03/12 :02/03/12 Mercury 4.512 mg/kg wet 0.0100 5.15 88 (75-125) 02/03/12 :02/03/12 Selenium 154 mg/kg wet 1.00 147 105 (75-125) 02/03/12 :02/03/12 Silver 37.5 mg/kg wet 0.100 35.2 106 (75-125) 02/03/12 :02/03/12 Zinc 378 mg/kg wet 0.500 349 108 (75-125) 02/03/12 :02/03/12 Duplicate (B12B039-DUP1) Source: W12B025-02 Arsenic 3.70 mg/kg dry 0.500 3.53 5 (20) 02/03/12 :02/03/12 Barium 228 mg/kg dry 0.100 229 0.4 (20) 02/03/12 :02/03/12 Cadmium 0.122 mg/kg dry 0.100 0.111 10 (20) 02/03/12 :02/03/12 Reported: 02/10/12 15:49 The results in this report apply only to the samples analyzed. Qualifiers and case narrative comments are essential to interpretation of the analytical results. Report reproductions and/or data summaries without qualifiers and comments are incomplete. Renee Chauvin, Laboratory Coordinator QA/QC Page 4 of 12 City of Portland Water Pollution Control Laboratory 6543 N. Burlington Ave. / Portland OR 97203 (503) 823-5600 fax (503) 823-5656 Project: Willamette Park Bank Restoration Client: Coordinated Site Analysis Work Order: W12A247 Project Mgr: Bethany Nabhan Total Metals - QC Spike Source %Rec RPD Prepared: Analyte Result Units MRL Level Result (Limits) (Limit) Analyzed Qualifier Total Metals by ICPMS - Batch B12B039 Duplicate (B12B039-DUP1) Source: W12B025-02 Chromium 50.7 mg/kg dry 0.500 52.0 3 (20) 02/03/12 :02/03/12 Copper 25.8 mg/kg dry 0.200 26.2 1 (20) 02/03/12 :02/03/12 Lead 11.2 mg/kg dry 0.100 11.3 0.9 (20) 02/03/12 :02/03/12 Mercury 0.02165 mg/kg dry 0.0100 0.02110 3 (20) 02/03/12 :02/03/12 Selenium ND mg/kg dry 1.00 ND (20) 02/03/12 :02/03/12 Silver ND mg/kg dry 0.100 ND (20) 02/03/12 :02/03/12 Zinc 89.4 mg/kg dry 0.500 89.1 0.3 (20) 02/03/12 :02/03/12 Matrix Spike (B12B039-MS1) Source: W12B025-02 Arsenic 17.8 mg/kg dry 0.500 15.5 3.53 92 (75-125) 02/03/12 :02/03/12 Barium 460 mg/kg dry 0.100 232 229 100 (75-125) 02/03/12 :02/03/12 Cadmium 16.1 mg/kg dry 0.100 15.5 0.111 104 (75-125) 02/03/12 :02/03/12 Chromium 94.4 mg/kg dry 0.500 46.4 52.0 91 (75-125) 02/03/12 :02/03/12 Copper 102 mg/kg dry 0.200 77.3 26.2 99 (75-125) 02/03/12 :02/03/12 Lead 89.3 mg/kg dry 0.100 77.3 11.3 101 (75-125) 02/03/12 :02/03/12 Mercury 0.7825 mg/kg dry 0.0100 0.773 0.02110 99 (75-125) 02/03/12 :02/03/12 Selenium 70.5 mg/kg dry 1.00 77.3 ND 91 (75-125) 02/03/12 :02/03/12 Silver 16.4 mg/kg dry 0.100 15.5 ND 106 (75-125) 02/03/12 :02/03/12 Zinc 168 mg/kg dry 0.500 77.3 89.1 102 (75-125) 02/03/12 :02/03/12 TCLP Metals - QC Spike Source %Rec RPD Prepared: Analyte Result Units MRL Level Result (Limits) (Limit) Analyzed Qualifier TCLP Metals by ICP - Batch B12B134 Blank (B12B134-BLK1) Lead ND mg/L 0.010 02/08/12 :02/08/12 Blank (B12B134-BLK2) Lead ND mg/L 0.025 02/08/12 :02/08/12 BL Blank (B12B134-BLK3) Lead ND mg/L 0.025 02/08/12 :02/08/12 BL LCS (B12B134-BS1) Lead 0.509 mg/L 0.010 0.500 102 (85-115) 02/08/12 :02/08/12 Duplicate (B12B134-DUP1) Source: W12A246-02 Lead 0.054 mg/L 0.025 0.053 2 (20) 02/08/12 :02/08/12 Matrix Spike (B12B134-MS1) Source: W12A246-02 Lead 2.48 mg/L 0.025 2.50 0.053 97 (70-130) 02/08/12 :02/08/12 Reported: 02/10/12 15:49 The results in this report apply only to the samples analyzed. Qualifiers and case narrative comments are essential to interpretation of the analytical results. Report reproductions and/or data summaries without qualifiers and comments are incomplete. Renee Chauvin, Laboratory Coordinator QA/QC Page 5 of 12 City of Portland Water Pollution Control Laboratory 6543 N. Burlington Ave. / Portland OR 97203 (503) 823-5600 fax (503) 823-5656 Project: Willamette Park Bank Restoration Client: Coordinated Site Analysis Work Order: W12A247 Project Mgr: Bethany Nabhan Fuels - QC Spike Source %Rec RPD Prepared: Analyte Result Units MRL Level Result (Limits) (Limit) Analyzed Qualifier Diesel/Oil Hydrocarbons by GC-FID - Batch B12A521 Blank (B12A521-BLK1) Diesel ND mg/kg wet 25 01/31/12 :01/31/12 Lube oil ND mg/kg wet 50 01/31/12 :01/31/12 Surrogate 2-Fluorobiphenyl 17.3 mg/kg wet 20.0 86 01/31/12 :01/31/12 LCS (B12A521-BS1) Diesel 82.2 mg/kg wet 25 100 82 (50-150) 01/31/12 :01/31/12 Lube oil 93.8 mg/kg wet 50 100 94 (50-150) 01/31/12 :01/31/12 Surrogate 2-Fluorobiphenyl 17.5 mg/kg wet 20.0 88 (50-150) 01/31/12 :01/31/12 Duplicate (B12A521-DUP1) Source: W12A158-04 Diesel ND mg/kg dry 25 ND (50) 01/31/12 :01/31/12 Lube oil 300 mg/kg dry 50 330 10 (50) 01/31/12 :01/31/12 Surrogate 2-Fluorobiphenyl 19.0 mg/kg dry 21.7 87 01/31/12 :01/31/12 Hydrocarbon Scan by GC-FID - Batch B12A494 Blank (B12A494-BLK1) Gasoline ND mg/kg wet 20 01/30/12 :01/31/12 Diesel ND mg/kg wet 50 01/30/12 :01/31/12 Lube oil ND mg/kg wet 100 01/30/12 :01/31/12 Surrogate 2-Fluorobiphenyl 19.8 mg/kg wet 10.0 198 01/30/12 :01/31/12 SU6 Duplicate (B12A494-DUP1) Source: W12A247-01 Gasoline ND mg/kg dry 20 ND (200) 01/30/12 :01/31/12 Diesel ND mg/kg dry 50 ND (200) 01/30/12 :01/31/12 Lube oil DET mg/kg dry 100 DET (200) 01/30/12 :01/31/12 F0, V1 Surrogate 2-Fluorobiphenyl 11.8 mg/kg dry 12.4 95 01/30/12 :01/31/12 Reported: 02/10/12 15:49 The results in this report apply only to the samples analyzed. Qualifiers and case narrative comments are essential to interpretation of the analytical results. Report reproductions and/or data summaries without qualifiers and comments are incomplete. Renee Chauvin, Laboratory Coordinator QA/QC Page 6 of 12 City of Portland Water Pollution Control Laboratory 6543 N. Burlington Ave. / Portland OR 97203 (503) 823-5600 fax (503) 823-5656 Project: Willamette Park Bank Restoration Client: Coordinated Site Analysis Work Order: W12A247 Project Mgr: Bethany Nabhan Semivolatile Organics - SIM - QC Spike Source %Rec RPD Prepared: Analyte Result Units MRL Level Result (Limits) (Limit) Analyzed Qualifier Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons by GCMS-SIM - Batch B12A522 Blank (B12A522-BLK1) Acenaphthene ND ug/kg wet 20 01/31/12 :02/07/12 Acenaphthylene ND ug/kg wet 20 01/31/12 :02/07/12 Anthracene ND ug/kg wet 20 01/31/12 :02/07/12 Benzo(a)anthracene ND ug/kg wet 10 01/31/12 :02/07/12 Benzo(a)pyrene ND ug/kg wet 10 01/31/12 :02/07/12 Benzo(b)fluoranthene ND ug/kg wet 10 01/31/12 :02/07/12 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ND ug/kg wet 10 01/31/12 :02/07/12 Benzo(k)fluoranthene ND ug/kg wet 10 01/31/12 :02/07/12 Chrysene ND ug/kg wet 10 01/31/12 :02/07/12 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene ND ug/kg wet 10 01/31/12 :02/07/12 Fluoranthene ND ug/kg wet 10 01/31/12 :02/07/12 Fluorene ND ug/kg wet 20 01/31/12 :02/07/12 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ND ug/kg wet 10 01/31/12 :02/07/12 Naphthalene ND ug/kg wet 40 01/31/12 :02/07/12 Phenanthrene ND ug/kg wet 20 01/31/12 :02/07/12 Pyrene ND ug/kg wet 10 01/31/12 :02/07/12 Surrogate 2-Methylnaphthalene-d10 56 ug/kg wet 100 56 01/31/12 :02/07/12 Fluoranthene-d10 120 ug/kg wet 100 120 01/31/12 :02/07/12 LCS (B12A522-BS1) Acenaphthene 34.8 ug/kg wet 20 40.0 87 (50-150) 01/31/12 :02/07/12 Acenaphthylene 36.4 ug/kg wet 20 40.0 91 (50-150) 01/31/12 :02/07/12 Anthracene 37.2 ug/kg wet 20 40.0 93 (50-150) 01/31/12 :02/07/12 Benzo(a)anthracene 36.0 ug/kg wet 10 40.0 90 (50-150) 01/31/12 :02/07/12 Benzo(a)pyrene 34.8 ug/kg wet 10 40.0 87 (50-150) 01/31/12 :02/07/12 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 34.0 ug/kg wet 10 40.0 85 (50-150) 01/31/12 :02/07/12 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 36.4 ug/kg wet 10 40.0 91 (50-150) 01/31/12 :02/07/12 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 34.4 ug/kg wet 10 40.0 86 (50-150) 01/31/12 :02/07/12 Chrysene 35.6 ug/kg wet 10 40.0 89 (50-150) 01/31/12 :02/07/12 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 34.0 ug/kg wet 10 40.0 85 (50-150) 01/31/12 :02/07/12 Fluoranthene 38.4 ug/kg wet 10 40.0 96 (50-150) 01/31/12 :02/07/12 Fluorene 35.6 ug/kg wet 20 40.0 89 (50-150) 01/31/12 :02/07/12 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 34.8 ug/kg wet 10 40.0 87 (50-150) 01/31/12 :02/07/12 Naphthalene 34.4 ug/kg wet 20 40.0 86 (50-150) 01/31/12 :02/07/12 Phenanthrene 38.8 ug/kg wet 20 40.0 97 (50-150) 01/31/12 :02/07/12 Pyrene 35.2 ug/kg wet 10 40.0 88 (50-150) 01/31/12 :02/07/12 Surrogate 2-Methylnaphthalene-d10 74 ug/kg wet 100 74 (50-150) 01/31/12 :02/07/12 Fluoranthene-d10 120 ug/kg wet 100 120 (50-150) 01/31/12 :02/07/12 Duplicate (B12A522-DUP1) Source: W12A055-02 Reported: 02/10/12 15:49 The results in this report apply only to the samples analyzed. Qualifiers and case narrative comments are essential to interpretation of the analytical results. Report reproductions and/or data summaries without qualifiers and comments are incomplete. Renee Chauvin, Laboratory Coordinator QA/QC Page 7 of 12 City of Portland Water Pollution Control Laboratory 6543 N. Burlington Ave. / Portland OR 97203 (503) 823-5600 fax (503) 823-5656 Project: Willamette Park Bank Restoration Client: Coordinated Site Analysis Work Order: W12A247 Project Mgr: Bethany Nabhan Semivolatile Organics - SIM - QC Spike Source %Rec RPD Prepared: Analyte Result Units MRL Level Result (Limits) (Limit) Analyzed Qualifier Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons by GCMS-SIM - Batch B12A522 Duplicate (B12A522-DUP1) Source: W12A055-02 Acenaphthene ND ug/kg dry 20 ND (50) 01/31/12 :02/07/12 Acenaphthylene ND ug/kg dry 20 ND (50) 01/31/12 :02/07/12 Anthracene ND ug/kg dry 20 ND (50) 01/31/12 :02/07/12 Benzo(a)anthracene ND ug/kg dry 10 ND (50) 01/31/12 :02/07/12 Benzo(a)pyrene ND ug/kg dry 10 ND (50) 01/31/12 :02/07/12 Benzo(b)fluoranthene ND ug/kg dry 10 ND (50) 01/31/12 :02/07/12 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ND ug/kg dry 10 ND (50) 01/31/12 :02/07/12 Benzo(k)fluoranthene ND ug/kg dry 10 ND (50) 01/31/12 :02/07/12 Chrysene ND ug/kg dry 10 ND (50) 01/31/12 :02/07/12 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene ND ug/kg dry 10 ND (50) 01/31/12 :02/07/12 Fluoranthene ND ug/kg dry 10 ND (50) 01/31/12 :02/07/12 Fluorene ND ug/kg dry 20 ND (50) 01/31/12 :02/07/12 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ND ug/kg dry 10 ND (50) 01/31/12 :02/07/12 Naphthalene ND ug/kg dry 40 ND (50) 01/31/12 :02/07/12 Phenanthrene ND ug/kg dry 20 ND (50) 01/31/12 :02/07/12 Pyrene ND ug/kg dry 10 ND (50) 01/31/12 :02/07/12 Surrogate 2-Methylnaphthalene-d10 63 ug/kg dry 120 52 01/31/12 :02/07/12 Fluoranthene-d10 140 ug/kg dry 120 114 01/31/12 :02/07/12 Qualifiers BL This blank was carried through the leaching process. D2 The sample required dilution due to high levels of target analytes. F0 High CCV result indicates possible high estimate in sample, but follow-up NWTPH-Dx verifies presence of lube oil. SU6 Recovery for surrogate compound was high. No associated target analytes were detected and results are not affected. V1 Continuing calibration verification was high; sample results for this analyte may be high estimates. Definitions DET Analyte Detected ND Analyte Not Detected at or above the reporting limit MRL Method Reporting Limit MDL Method Detection Limit NR Not Reportable dry Sample results reported on a dry weight basis % Rec. Percent Recovery RPD Relative Percent Difference Reported: 02/10/12 15:49 The results in this report apply only to the samples analyzed. Qualifiers and case narrative comments are essential to interpretation of the analytical results. Report reproductions and/or data summaries without qualifiers and comments are incomplete. Renee Chauvin, Laboratory Coordinator QA/QC Page 8 of 12 Page 9 of 12 EMLab P&K Report for: Mr. Darrell Auvil TestAmerica-Portland 9405 SW Nimbus Ave Beaverton, OR 97008 Regarding: Project: PVA0832 EML ID: 882616 Approved by: Dates of Analysis: Asbestos-EPA Method 600/R-93/116: 02-03-2012 Technical Manager Miguel Ines Service SOPs: Asbestos-EPA Method 600/R-93/116 (EPA-600/M4-82-020 (SOP 01264)) All samples were received in acceptable condition unless noted in the Report Comments portion in the body of the report. The results relate only to the items tested. The results include an inherent uncertainty of measurement associated with estimating percentages by polarized light microscopy. Measurement uncertainty data can be provided when requested. EMLab P&K ("the Company") shall have no liability to the client or the client's customer with respect to decisions or recommendations made, actions taken or courses of conduct implemented by either the client or the client's customer as a result of or based upon the Test Results. In no event shall the Company be liable to the client with respect to the Test Results except for the Company's own willful misconduct or gross negligence nor shall the Company be liable for incidental or consequential damages or lost profits or revenues to the fullest extent such liability may be disclaimed by law, even if the Company has been advised of the possibility of such damages, lost profits or lost revenues. In no event shall the Company's liability with respect to the Test Results exceed the amount paid to the Company by the client therefor. Document Number: 200091 - Revision Number: 5 EMLab P&K, LLC EMLab ID: 882616, Page 1 of 2 Page 10 of 12 EMLab P&K 3585 Cadillac Ave, Suite A, Costa Mesa, CA 92626 (866) 465-6653 Fax (858) 569-5806 www.emlab.com Client: TestAmerica-Portland Date of Sampling: 01-25-2012 C/O: Mr. Darrell Auvil Date of Receipt: 01-31-2012 Re: PVA0832 Date of Report: 02-03-2012 ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA-600/M4-82-020 & EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116 Total Samples Submitted: 2 Total Samples Analysed: 2 Total Samples with Layer Asbestos Content > 1%: 0 Location: PVA0832-01 Lab ID-Version‡: 3919345-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content Brown Soil ND Composite Non-Asbestos Fibrous Content: < 1% Cellulose Sample Composite Homogeneity: Moderate Location: PVA0832-02 Lab ID-Version‡: 3919346-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content Gray Plaster ND Off-White Skim Coat and Paint ND Composite Non-Asbestos Fibrous Content: 2% Cellulose Sample Composite Homogeneity: Moderate The results relate only to the items tested. Interpretation is left to the company and/or persons who conducted the field work. The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government. All samples were received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted. EMLab P&K reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified. Inhomogeneous samples are separated into homogeneous subsamples and analyzed individually. ND means no fibers were detected. When detected, the minimum detection and reporting limit is less than 1% unless point counting is performed. ‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is reflected by the value of "x". EMLab P&K, LLC EMLab ID: 882616, Page 2 of 2 Page 11 of 12 Page 12 of 12 April 16, 2012 To: Fred MacGregor Re: Pre-Design Geotechnical Report Willamette Park Restoration Portland, OR Project No. BES E10395 Introduction This letter report presents the results of our geotechnical study as part of the pre-design phase of the Willamette Park Restoration project. Our study is per your request and is based on provided sketches and correspondence. The project is located at the Willamette Park in Southwest Portland. The City of Portland Bureau of Environmental Services (BES) is planning on restoring the river banks within Willamette Park and to construct a backwater area that expands the existing mud flat. The purpose of the restoration is to recover the ecological potential of the site within the constraints of urban infrastructure as defined in the City of Portland 2000 Framework. The goal of BES is to grade the banks to a form where BES can restore the native riparian and plant communities to benefit the terrestrial and aquatic species. BES is considering several different slope options for the bank and widening the beach area below the ordinary high water level. Improvements will also benefit park users and the community. Our review of aerial photos taken of the site over the past 75 years show that industrial buildings used to exist in sections of the site, trees were removed or planted in portions of the site, the placement of fill in many portions of the park area, and that the shoreline has been extended farther east into the Willamette River. In areas where the river banks are proposed to be regraded and in the proposed backwater area, the purpose of our study, as part of the pre-design phase of this project, was to report subsurface conditions, analyze the stability of slopes, and to provide recommendations for the proposed slope options. Field Work and Laboratory Testing Field explorations were completed on January 19 and 25, 2012 and consisted of six test pit explorations (TP-1 through TP-6). Test pits were excavated down to a maximum depth of 16. 5 feet below the ground surface (bgs) using a 2 foot wide bucket with either a Case 580K backhoe or a Deere 120 trackhoe. Test pits TP-1 through TP-3 and TP-5 were not able to penetrate through the fill and into the native alluvial soils. In TP-1 and TP-2 refusal was met on concrete debris at depths of about 6 ½ to 7 feet bgs. Due to rapid groundwater seepage and the walls of the test pit caving into the pit, we were only able to excavate down to a depth of about 14 ½ feet bgs in TP-3 and 6 feet bgs in TP-5. Test pits TP-1 through TP-4 and TP- 6 were located within 50 feet of the bank that slopes down to the Willamette River. Test pit TP-5 was located in the area for the proposed backwater channel. Test pit locations are shown on the Exploration Location Map, Plate 1. Summary of Field Investigations Surface Conditions Willamette Park is located to the east of SW Macadam Avenue adjacent to the Willamette River. About 70 to 80 percent of the park is covered by grass, trees, and shrubs. About 30 to 50 percent of the grass covered areas of the park are soccer fields. The remaining 20 to 30 percent of the park is covered by pavements (parking lots, pathways, and streets) and tennis courts. About 400 feet south of where SW Nebraska Street enters the park, is an asphalt concrete parking lot and boat ramp (main parking lot). The park is generally flat to the north and south of this parking lot, except for along the river banks. Based on LiDAR derived contours on the City of Portland CGIS Framework and observations made while on site, the slopes of the river banks in areas that are proposed to be regraded are about 1-½ to 2H:1V. The average height of the river banks is about 16 feet. To the south of the main parking lot, the river banks are covered with construction debris (concrete, asphalt, brick, metal, etc). To the north of the main parking lot the banks are covered with bushes and trees. Subsurface Conditions The geological map (Madin, 2004) shows the project area as underlain by Quaternary alluvium (Qal). Along the Willamette River the Quaternary alluvium (Qal) consists of gravel, sand, silt, clay, and organic material (Madin, 2004). Fill was encountered in all of our test pit explorations. In TP-1, TP-2, TP-3, and TP-5 fill was observed down to the maximum depth of each exploration. In TP-4 the depth of fill was about 15 feet and in TP-6 the depth of the fill was about 7 feet. In TP-1 through TP-4 the fill consisted of silt to sand with gravel, cobbles, and construction debris. The volume of the construction debris was about 30 to 60 percent of the excavated test pit material. Observed construction debris included concrete, brick, asphalt, metal, cables, and other types of building materials. In TP-4, we observed a section of concrete that was up to 9 feet long, 4 feet tall, and 1 ½ feet wide. In TP-5 the fill material consisted of silt to silty sand with trace to some metal, wood, and brick debris. In TP-6 the fill consisted of silt with sand, gravel, cobbles, and trace concrete and brick debris. Fill was also observed in several historical borings from our boring database. These borings were located between the railroad tracks and SW Macadam at about SW Florida Street. The depth of fill in borings located on the west side of the property near the railroad tracks was between 5-½ feet and 11 feet. In TP-4, we observed alluvial deposits of stiff silt with sand and loose to medium dense sandy silt underlying the fill. In TP-6, we observed alluvial deposits of soft to medium stiff gravelly silt underlying the fill. 2 Groundwater was observed in four out of the six test pit explorations. To the south of the main parking lot observed groundwater levels in TP-3 and TP-4 were about 13 to 14 feet bgs, which was about the same as the Willamette River levels. We did not observe groundwater in TP-1 and TP-2, which were located to the south of TP-3 and TP-4. To the north of the main parking lot observed groundwater levels in TP-5 and TP-6 were about 3 to 6 feet bgs, which was about 10 to 12 feet above the Willamette River levels. In test pits TP-3 through TP-5, we were only able to excavate about 1 ½ to 3 feet below the groundwater level due to severe caving and groundwater filling in the hole. In test pit TP-6, groundwater seepage was slower than in test pits TP-3 through TP-5, therefore we were able to excavate about 4 to 5 feet below the groundwater level before the caving of the sidewalls became so severe that excavation was no longer possible. Discussion Slope Stability Analysis In areas where river banks are proposed to be regraded, we performed slope stability analyses for both the existing slopes and for regraded slopes. Our analyses assumed that after the river banks are regraded that there will not be a net increase in the amount of fill and the weight of the fill compared to the existing fill conditions. If the design shows a net increase in the amount of fill and/or the weight of fill, then we will need to re-evaluate our stability analysis and possible perform additional explorations. Based on information from our test pits and observing fill debris along the face of the bank, we assumed for our stability analysis the fill extends from the top of the slope down to the toe of the slope and overlies alluvial deposits of silt with sand. We also assumed a static groundwater level at 13 feet bgs. We used the computer program XSTABL to analyze the existing river bank at a slope of 1- ¾H:1V and a height of 16 feet against shallow and global slope failure using Simplified Bishops and Spencer’s methods. Shallow failures are defined as failures that occur within the slope. Global failures are defined as failures that extend through the fill at the top of the slope and into the soils below the base of the slope. Based on observing stable slopes on the days of our explorations, we used a factor of safety of 1.05 in our analysis to back-calculate soil parameters for the fill. This is a conservative approach to developing soil parameters. In our analysis we compared how the soil parameters changed due to the river level being at the same elevation as the groundwater level versus the river level being at the toe of the slope and groundwater seeping from the face of the slope. We used XSTABL to analyze the shallow and global stability of the regraded river bank under static load conditions for slopes of 3H:1V, 2–½H:1V, and 2H:1V. Our analysis assumed: 1) bank materials consists of engineered fill, 2) the engineered fill is constructed on the existing fill and has a key at the toe of the slope, 3) existing fill is benched at a slope of 2H:1V, 4) groundwater is at 13 feet bgs and is seeping out of the face of the slope, and 5) the nominal velocity of the Willamette River along the west shoreline is not high enough to erode the soil in the bank. For slopes consisting of engineered fill and graded at 2H:1V, the results of our analysis indicated a factor of safety of about 1.3 to 1.4 against a global slope failure. Recommendations on the engineered fill are found below in our Conclusion section. The results of our analysis showed a relative increase in the factor of safety for shallow slope failures compared to global slope failures and for graded slopes flatter than 2H:1V. 3 Conclusion Banks Based on the results of our slope stability analysis, we do not recommend grading river banks steeper than 2H:1V. Banks can be regraded by laying back the existing fill materials or by constructing the bank out of engineered fill. From our understanding, BES will be modeling flows along the Willamette River, which will include determining stream velocities along the west shoreline adjacent to Willamette Park. Additional evaluation will be necessary for regraded river banks that consist of the existing fill, if the nominal velocity of the Willamette River along the west shoreline is greater than 1/3-foot per second. Based on our slope stability analysis, several different types of soils can be used as engineered fill. However, soils used as engineered fill should be within a particle size range that has a nominal velocity required for erosion that is greater than the nominal velocity of the Willamette River along the west shoreline. We can provide recommendations on the types of soils that can be used as engineered fill; however, we will need to know the nominal velocity for the Willamette River along the west shoreline over the expected lifetime of the bank. We recommend that materials used as engineered fill be compacted to 95% of maximum density of a standard proctor (ASTM 698). River banks constructed out of engineered fill should be benched into the existing soils at an approximate slope of 2H:1V. We recommend that the maximum height between the benches should be 4 feet. Based on our test pit observations, some sloughing of the soil along the vertical face of the bench should be expected to occur. We recommend that the minimum toe width at the base of the fill be equal to the horizontal thickness of the engineered fill. Prior to placing engineered fill, existing surfaces within the areas of the fill should be stripped free of vegetation and topsoil. We can provide estimated stripping depths if required. In the areas where river banks will be regraded, we do not anticipate that settlements will not be greater than what occurs under the existing conditions. This assumes that there is not a net increase in the amount and/or weight of the fill. If there are areas, where there will be a net increase in the amount and/or weight of the fill, then we recommend doing additional explorations to evaluate settlements, the impact that new fill will have on the stability of soils below the fill, and the impact on underground utilities. Based on information from our test pits, historical borings, and aerial photos, fill possibly covers the majority of the park and the depth to native soils will vary across the site and could be deeper than 15 feet bgs. If it is required to provide an estimated quantity of the existing fill, then we recommend additional explorations throughout the required area. Both the Willamette River and groundwater have seasonal levels that are above the base of excavations where river banks are to be regraded and the backwater area. Based on observations in our test pits, severe sloughing occurred within the test pit excavations below the water level. Based on river stage data between 1987 and 2011, water levels in the Willamette River are about 5 feet below the ordinary high water elevation of 12.8 feet (COP Datum) between mid-August and October. The toe of the slope is about 2 to 3 feet below the ordinary high water elevation. At the time of our explorations the groundwater levels were about the same as the river levels to the south of the main parking lot and about 10 to 12 feet above the river levels to the north of the 4 main parking lot. In order to provide information on how the groundwater levels change throughout the year, we recommend installing groundwater instrumentation and collecting groundwater data. Backwater Area In the backwater area, excavations will be about 16 feet deep. Due to rapid seepage of groundwater coming into the test pit at 3 feet bgs and severe caving of the side walls, we were only able to excavate down to a depth of about 6 feet bgs in TP-5. Soils in our test pit consisted of soft silt and loose sandy silt. Based on the conpitions we observed, excavations for the backwater channel may require special equipment and possible dewatering. In this area we recommend additional geotechnical explorations by cased sonic drilling methods in order to characterize the soils down to 5 feet below the proposed base of the excavation and to provide slope recommendations. We also recommend installing groundwater instrumentation to characterize how the groundwater level changes in the backwater area throughout the year. Further Work We trust this provides the information necessary at this time. If you have any questions or need additional information please don't hesitate to call at 823-2340. Sincerely, R~~~ Engineering Staff Thomas S Pfeiffer, P.E. Geotechnical Services, BES Materials Testing Laboratory Attachments: Plate 1 Exploration Location Map Plates 2 to 7 Test Pit Logs Plate 8 Soil Type Legend and Relative Density and Consistency of Soil 5 REFERENCES Madin, I.P., 2004, Preliminary Digital Geologic Compilation Map of the Portland Urban Area. Oregon. Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries, Open-file Report 0-04-02. Madin, I.P., 2004, Preliminary Digital Geologic Compilation Map of the Portland Urban Area; Description of Units. Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries, Open-file Report 0-04-02. 6 SW DAKOTA ST DE TP-6 SW NEBRASKA ST SW NEBRASKA ST SW IDAHO ST TP-5 DE SW VERMONT ST S W M A SW FLOR C IDA ST A D A M A V E DE TP-4 SW CALIFORNIA ST DE TP-3 SW TEXAS ST DE TP-2 TP-1 SW NEVADA ST DE D R Y R E LEGENDR V E A F A I S N R I G O L R I TP-1 DE Y Test Pit V A T W W S S Feet Exploration Location Map 010020050 Willamette Park Restoration BES E10395 . PLATE 1 LOG OF Test Pit TP-1 Equipment Case 580K Backhoe Laboratory Test Elevation28.028.0** Date 1/19/12 Depth(ft) Sample Results or Remarks Sample No. Blows/6" N Value (Uncorrected) Moisture Content(%) Dry Dens.(pcf) Groundwater 0 Sandy SILT with Gravel and Cobbles (ML); medium stiff, debris (concrete, AC, brick, building materials, metal), brown, moist (FILL, Debris up to 3 feet in 2" root zone). diameter Fill matrix grades to Silty Gravel with Sand 5 End of Exploration at 7 feet bgs. Refusal on large concrete debris. No groundwater observed. **Elevation from C.O.P. CGIS Framework March 2012 COP40REV BORING WITH SEWER B BES E10395 WILLAMETTE PARK RESTORATION.GPJ 4/10/12 RESTORATION.GPJ B BES E10395 WILLAMETTE PARK SEWER WITH BORING COP40REV CITY OF PORTLAND Willamette Park Restoration PLATE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Willamette Park MATERIALS TESTING LABORATORY Portland, Oregon 2 JOB NUMBER REVIEWED BY DATE PRINTED BES E10395 TSP 4/10/2012 LOG OF Test Pit TP-2 Equipment Case 580K Backhoe Laboratory Test Elevation27.027.0** Date 1/19/12 Depth(ft) Sample Results or Remarks Sample No. Blows/6" N Value (Uncorrected) Moisture Content(%) Dry Dens.(pcf) Groundwater 0 SILT with Sand (ML); medium stiff, debris (concrete, brick, AC, metal), trace to some gravel, brown, moist (FILL, 2" root zone). Debris up to 2 1/2 feet in diameter Fill matrix becomes Sand with Gravel 5 End of Exploration at 6.5 feet bgs. Refusal on large concrete debris. No groundwater observed. **Elevation from C.O.P. CGIS Framework March 2012 COP40REV BORING WITH SEWER B BES E10395 WILLAMETTE PARK RESTORATION.GPJ 4/10/12 RESTORATION.GPJ B BES E10395 WILLAMETTE PARK SEWER WITH BORING COP40REV CITY OF PORTLAND Willamette Park Restoration PLATE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Willamette Park MATERIALS TESTING LABORATORY Portland, Oregon 3 JOB NUMBER REVIEWED BY DATE PRINTED BES E10395 TSP 4/10/2012 LOG OF Test Pit TP-3 Equipment Deere 120 Trackhoe Laboratory Test Elevation27.027.0** Date 1/25/12 Depth(ft) Sample Results or Remarks Sample No. Blows/6" N Value (Uncorrected) Moisture Content(%) Dry Dens.(pcf) Groundwater 0 SILT with Sand and Gravel (ML); medium stiff, debris (concrete, brick, AC, cables, and rebar), trace organics, brown, moist (FILL, Debris up to 3 feet in 2-3" root zone). diameter Fill matrix grades to sandy silt with gravel 5 10 Cobble with Gravel and Silt (GP-GM); very dense, angular basalt ballast, debris (concrete and AC), brown, saturated (FILL). End of exploration at 14.5 feet bgs due to severe caving. Groundwater observed at 13 feet bgs. **Elevation from C.O.P. CGIS Framework March 2012 COP40REV BORING WITH SEWER B BES E10395 WILLAMETTE PARK RESTORATION.GPJ 4/10/12 RESTORATION.GPJ B BES E10395 WILLAMETTE PARK SEWER WITH BORING COP40REV CITY OF PORTLAND Willamette Park Restoration PLATE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Willamette Park MATERIALS TESTING LABORATORY Portland, Oregon 4 JOB NUMBER REVIEWED BY DATE PRINTED BES E10395 TSP 4/10/2012 LOG OF Test Pit TP-4 Equipment Deere 120 Trackhoe Laboratory Test Elevation27.027.0** Date 1/25/12 Depth(ft) Sample Results or Remarks Sample No. Blows/6" N Value (Uncorrected) Moisture Content(%) Dry Dens.(pcf) Groundwater 0 Silty SAND to Sandy SILT (SM/ML); medium dense, debris (concrete, brick, AC), trace gravel and organics, brown, moist (FILL, 2-3" rootzone). 9 feet x 1.5 feet x 4 feet section of concrete foundation and stem wall 5 Fill grades to Silt with Sand and Gravel 10 COBBLE wth Gravel, Sand, and Silt (GP-GM); dense, debris (AC, concrete), brown, saturated (FILL). 15 SILT with Sand (ML); stiff, brown with orange mottles, saturated. Silty SAND (SM); loose to medium dense, light brown, saturated. End of Explorations at 16.5 feet bgs. Groundwater observed at 13.5 feet bgs. **Elevation from C.O.P. CGIS Framework March 2012 COP40REV BORING WITH SEWER B BES E10395 WILLAMETTE PARK RESTORATION.GPJ 4/10/12 RESTORATION.GPJ B BES E10395 WILLAMETTE PARK SEWER WITH BORING COP40REV CITY OF PORTLAND Willamette Park Restoration PLATE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Willamette Park MATERIALS TESTING LABORATORY Portland, Oregon 5 JOB NUMBER REVIEWED BY DATE PRINTED BES E10395 TSP 4/10/2012 LOG OF Test Pit TP-5 Equipment Deere 120 Trackhoe Laboratory Test Elevation28.028.0** Date 1/25/12 Depth(ft) Sample Results or Remarks Sample No. Blows/6" N Value (Uncorrected) Moisture Content(%) Dry Dens.(pcf) Groundwater 0 SILT with Sand (ML); soft to medium stiff, debris (brick), brown, moist (FILL, 2" root zone). Silty SAND with Cobble and Gravel (SM); loose, trace to some organics (large roots), brown, saturated (FILL). 5 SILT with Sand (ML); soft, debris (metal and wood), gray, saturated (FILL). Silty SAND (SM); loose, debris (wood), gray, saturated (FILL). End of exploration at 6 feet bgs due to severe caving and groundwater. Groundwater observed at 3 feet bgs. **Elevation from C.O.P. CGIS Framework March 2012 COP40REV BORING WITH SEWER B BES E10395 WILLAMETTE PARK RESTORATION.GPJ 4/10/12 RESTORATION.GPJ B BES E10395 WILLAMETTE PARK SEWER WITH BORING COP40REV CITY OF PORTLAND Willamette Park Restoration PLATE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Willamette Park MATERIALS TESTING LABORATORY Portland, Oregon 6 JOB NUMBER REVIEWED BY DATE PRINTED BES E10395 TSP 4/10/2012 LOG OF Test Pit TP-6 Equipment Case 580K Backhoe Laboratory Test Elevation30.030.0** Date 1/19/12 Depth(ft) Sample Results or Remarks Sample No. Blows/6" N Value (Uncorrected) Moisture Content(%) Dry Dens.(pcf) Groundwater 0 SILT with Sand, Gravel, and Cobbles (ML); soft to medium stiff, debris (concrete, brick), brown, moist (FILL, 2" root zone). 5 Gravelly SILT (ML); soft to medium stiff, brown, wet to saturated. 10 End of exploration at 10 feet bgs due to severe caving. Perched groundwater at 5.5 feet bgs (moderate seepage). **Elevation from C.O.P. CGIS Framework March 2012 COP40REV BORING WITH SEWER B BES E10395 WILLAMETTE PARK RESTORATION.GPJ 4/10/12 RESTORATION.GPJ B BES E10395 WILLAMETTE PARK SEWER WITH BORING COP40REV CITY OF PORTLAND Willamette Park Restoration PLATE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Willamette Park MATERIALS TESTING LABORATORY Portland, Oregon 7 JOB NUMBER REVIEWED BY DATE PRINTED BES E10395 TSP 4/10/2012 SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART SAMPLER TYPE LEGEND based on ASTM D2487 and D2488 SYMBOLS TYPICAL MAJOR DIVISIONS GRAPH LETTER DESCRIPTIONS 2" O.D. Split Spoon Sampler WELL-GRADED GRAVEL GRAVEL AND CLEAN GRAVELS GW 3" O.D. Modified California Sampler GRAVELLY (LITTLE OR NO FINES) POORLY-GRADED GeoProbe Push SOILS GP GRAVEL Grab Sample MORE THAN 50% GRAVELS COARSE GM SILTY GRAVEL OF COARSE WITH FINES GRAINED FRACTION (APPRECIABLE SOILS RETAINED ON AMOUNT OF CLAYEY GRAVEL NO. 4 SIEVE GC FINES) SEWER Approximate Sewer Pipe SW WELL-GRADED SAND Invert Depth SAND AND CLEAN SANDS Groundwater Level MORE THAN 50% (LITTLE OR NO FINES) and Date SANDY SOILS POORLY-GRADED SAND OF MATERIAL IS SP (ATD = At Time of Drilling) LARGER THAN NO. 200 SIEVE MORE THAN 50% SANDS WITH SIZE OF COARSE SM SILTY SAND FINES FRACTION (APPRECIABLE PASSING ON AMOUNT OF CLAYEY SANDS WELL INSTALLATION NO. 4 SIEVE SC FINES) DETAILS ML INORGANIC SILT Concrete Seal SILTS AND LIQUID LIMIT LESS CL LEAN CLAY FINE GRAINED CLAYS THAN 50 Well Casing SOILS ORGANIC SILTS AND ORGANIC SILTY CLAYS OL Bentonite Seal OF LOW PLASTICITY ELASTIC SILT MORE THAN 50% MH OF MATERIAL IS LIQUID LIMIT SMALLER THAN SILTS AND FAT CLAY GREATER THAN CH NO. 200 SIEVE CLAYS 50 SIZE Slotted Well Casing OH ORGANIC SILT OR CLAY PEAT, HUMUS, SWAMP Sand Backfill HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT SOIL NOTE: DUAL SYMBOLS ARE USED TO INDICATE BORDERLINE SOIL CLASSIFICATIONS Soil Cuttings / Slough APPARENT/RELATIVE DENSITY OR CONSISTENCY VERSUS SPT BLOW COUNTS COHESIONLESS SOILS COHESIVE SOILS APPARENT SPT N-VALUE SPT N-VALUE CONSISTENCY DENSITY (# BLOWS/FT) (# BLOWS/FT) VERY SOFT < 2 VERY LOOSE < 4 SOFT 2 - 4 LOOSE 4 - 10 MEDIUM STIFF 4 - 8 MEDIUM DENSE 10 - 30 STIFF 8 - 15 DENSE 30 - 50 VERY STIFF 15 - 30 VERY DENSE > 50 HARD > 30 CITY OF PORTLAND Willamette Park Restoration PLATE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Portland, Oregon MATERIALS TESTING LABORATORY Soil Type Legend 8 JOB NUMBER APPROVED DATE BES E10395 RBC 4/6/2012 WILLAMETTE PARK BACKGROUND INFORMATION Attachment C. Subsurface Sediment Core C017D Field Notes and Mosaic Appendix F - Core Processing Logs Downtown Portland Sediment Characterization Field and Data Report CORE PROCESSING LOG Page .-L of L Station 10' '"D psc. - Go\:t- - c.oR£ \.. Proiect: Downlown Portland Sediment Chartacterization Core Type : Vibracore Core Size: 4" 00 Aluminum; 3.75" 10 Location Description Time: 1 3~ t..{O Date td"2./(} Po. Logged By: 1)~tr\...T"I"\. ~ \...... Cored By: Marine Sampling Sys. Water Depth: River Level: Penetration: 1"\ ' ~ Acquisition: Pen Log Depth Sampling Lithology Description (unit) % Sample Sample I PID Sediment Type, modifiers/grain size, sorting, color, cement! Recov Depth lithification, moisture content, porosity, permeability/fracturing - 1)P'>4> c.. - 2- 'la - Coil - :a .r '?J - - f - I)'Sc. 'l&L. ~() - CUI~ .~ - & - J\'i.~ - "to - - - - (to - - - ( i)0 - 1'1z, -~> - t> - 'JI7St- 1 - (.oq ,If,.,. far) - (.. - - - uO - - 2 Page 15 of 41 DPSC- C017 Mosaic D C B A 373 cm 265 cm 142 cm 30 cm 0 cm Archived Archived Archived Archived & Analyzed