The Development of Aboriginal Watercraft in the Great Lakes Region

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Development of Aboriginal Watercraft in the Great Lakes Region In the thousands of years before Samuel and around Ontario. Transportation provided by de Champlain explored the Great Lakes basin there the many types of watercraft would have been was scarcely a populated place where the land met essential to the indigenous peoples of the Great river, lake or bay that prehistoric people did not Lakes region, not only for fishing and crop use some form of watercraft. Today, there is a gathering, but also for short and long distance wealth of information about these indigenous trade with other indigenous populations. Such vessels from two primary sources: ethnographic considerations are important in formulating a accounts and archaeological remains. The Period cohesive understanding of the peoples who have of Contact provides us with European explorers' roamed our waterways for over 11,000 years. The letters, books, journals, sketches and paintings of earliest constructed watercraft used in the Great indigenous watercraft. We must also depend on Lakes region, aside from reed constructed craft, archaeology for additional knowledge about the was the skin boat (Roberts & Shackleton 1983: very earliest watercraft. In some geographical 145). areas the use of watercraft can be inferred simply because islands were settled and material remains were found (McGhee 1984: 7). In others, representations of vessels have been discovered in Indigenous peoples of the Arctic region the form of pictographs, petroglyphs, engravings, constructed the highest quality and most murals, models and even surviving aboriginal exceptional boats of animal skin. However, the boats. Woodland Indians were also familiar with hide Through the analysis of both historical covered craft and utilized this mode of and archaeological evidence, I wish to study the transportation to assist in many utilitarian tasks three primary watercrafts of the Great Lakes (Roberts & Shackleton 1983: 149). The simplest region: the skin boat, dugout canoe and bark skin boat used in the Great Lakes region was canoe. This discussion will include information on actually a coracle called a 'bull-boat'. Adapted the regional styles of bark canoes among the from the Plains Indians, the name was derived Eastern Cree, Algonquin and Colonial fur-traders. from the use of buffalo hides. Generally, one or It will also discuss the materials and methods of two of these hides were stretched over a basket- canoe construction, the decorative styles of these like framework of willow or other boughs. various canoes, and the variety of utilitarian Usually, the 'bull-boat' was towed by someone in purposes to which the canoe was employed. the water or propelled with short-handled paddles Ultimately, the focus of this paper is to analyze the or with poles. Moose skin was also used as the development of Great Lakes watercraft in an effort covering for rough-and-ready boats among people to emphasize the importance of this line of study to of the Woodlands region (Roberts & Shackleton a comprehensive and complete picture of Ontario 1983: 152). archaeology and prehistory. Ethnographic reports show that various Great Lakes groups used the bull-boat quite extensively. In the seventeenth century, north of Lake Superior, Pierre-Esprit Radisson became In the Great Lakes region, skin boats, involved with a party of Cree who were using a dugout canoes and birch bark canoes were used for bull boat (Radisson 1885: 123). George Seton centuries by the indigenous people. The gives other evidence of the use of the 'bull-boat' in environment dictated the need for watercraft and 1858, whereby he sketched a group of indigenous provided the natural resources for tools and peoples modifying the skin boat concept. The building materials. Environmental niches also location of these indigenous peoples was identified played a major role in the development of only as "Rupertsland", the name given earlier to specialized local watercraft in diverse regions in the old Hudson's Bay Company. Thus, the specific peoples who were using and modifying a 'bull- through it so as to gauge the thickness of the hull. boat' are not unequivocally known (Roberts & Once the desired thickness had been reached, the Shackleton 1983: 150). However, Seton reports holes were plugged in with wooden pegs that these peoples improvised with other (Christensen 1986: 148). The canoe was then construction materials to cover a frame while filled with hot water to soften the wood and make traveling. It is reported that sheath sections of it more pliable. The sides of the canoe were oiled cloth were carried along, that could be fitted stretched apart at the top, and held apart by shaped over canoe frames made from resilient willow rods called thwarts. Native watercraft branches and shoots. manufacturers would also make the boat wider at Roberts and Shackleton (1983: 153) report the center, and therefore much more stable than a that the 'bull-boat' was primarily constructed and round boat. This procedure would force the front maintained by women for assistance in the and the back of the boat to lift up slightly gathering of agricultural crops and natural (Christensen 1986: 152). The height of the bow foodstuffs, but was also used for fishing. Thus, the and stem relative to the center is called rocker. 'bull-boat' was primarily a type of watercraft used This was important because the more rocker a boat locally as a working transport and was rarely has the greater maneuverability it would allow. utilized as a long-distance travelling vessel. The hull of the dugout canoe was usually Through its capacity as a working vessel, it constructed so that the bow of the canoe was the allowed women the ability to carry out the bottom of the tree, because the wood from the gathering of crops in a much easier and more bottom of the tree is denser than the wood from the productive manner (Roberts and Shackelton 1983: top of the tree. Thus, with a single individual 154). In the Lake of Woods area, an unknown sitting towards the back of the canoe, the denser artist sketched Ojibwa women carrying these boats wood in the front would level the canoe out in the to and from the river. This artist also noted that water. This process is referred to as trim the boats were removed from the water when not (Johnstone 1980: 50). After the basic hull was in use, in order to help preserve the skin covering made, special attachments were designed. Often (Adney & Chapelle 1964: 219). there were decorative bow and stem cones that The 'bull-boat' was actually quite an served to break large waves and keep them from awkward vessel to construct and maintain. It was coming into the boat (Johnstone 1980: 52). relatively large, and the materials for its Many examples of dug-out canoes have construction were often sparse. Furthermore, it been found in Ohio. A 3,500-year-old dugout was required high maintenance to last any significant accidentally discovered in 1976 on the Ringler amount of time. As such, the bull-boat was not a property in Savannah Lake, Ohio (Brose & Greber mainstay in the Great Lakes region. While, it 1982: 274). This peat-filled bog had earlier continued to be employed on a minor scale for yielded two similar canoes. This vessel of white fishing and personal transportation needs, as oak, now known as the Ringler Archaic dugout, testified to by the ethnographic reports, generally has been radiocarbon dated to around 1,500 B.C. the bull-boat was replaced by the dugout canoe. This attests to the use of such canoes in the Great The 'bull-boat' simply did not provide a secure Lakes region before the first millennium B.C. basis for everyday extensive use by the indigenous Archaeologists Brose and Greber point out that the peoples of the Great Lakes region. Ringler dugout exhibits construction techniques that involved the use of fire and stone axes (Brose and Greber 1982: 275). The dugout is the most prolific and well The dugout canoe was probably the first known of all prehistoric boat types. The dugout type of canoe made by indigenous groups across canoe allows individuals and groups to travel North America (Johnstone 1980: 48). It was easily across great distances of water and for the constructed by selecting a tree of suitable size, movement of large amounts of cargo from place to which was then chopped or burned down at the place with little effort. It was very useful for the base. The top of the tree would then be cut off, travel necessary for getting to far away hunting and the outside roughly shaped, while the inside areas and returning to camp with game. was carefully burned and removed. Once the Furthermore, the dugout canoe is the most likely to canoe was the desired size many holes were drilled survive to be included in the archaeological record. The sturdy and hearty wood of a dugout canoe is Other uses of the bark canoe included the most unyielding construction material, food gathering. In the south and west of Lake compared to skin and bark, to natural bio- Superior, during harvest time in early September, decompositional processes (Hornell 1946: 46). women lined their canoes with thin birch bark and Although the dugout canoe was preferred paddled them into standing stalks of wild rice, a in the Great Lakes region to the skin-boat, it had staple of the Indian diet and an important trade disadvantages. Namely, the weight of the boat commodity (Roberts & Shackleton 1983: 162). made it difficult to transport on land and difficult The stalks were bent over the gunwales and the to paddle in the water (Johnstone 1980: 190; ears of rice were beaten with short paddles so that Christensen 1986: 145).
Recommended publications
  • Borobudur 1 Pm
    BOROBUDUR SHIP RECONSTRUCTION: DESIGN OUTLINE The intention is to develop a reconstruction of the type of large outrigger vessels depicted at Borobudur in a form suitable for ocean voyaging DISTANCES AND DURATION OF VOYAGES and recreating the first millennium Indonesian voyaging to Madagascar and Africa. Distances: Sunda Strait to Southern Maldives: Approx. 1600 n.m. The vessel should be capable of transporting some Maldives to Northern Madagascar: Approx. 1300 n.m. 25-30 persons, all necessary provisions, stores and a cargo of a few cubic metres volume. Assuming that the voyaging route to Madagascar was via the Maldives, a reasonably swift vessel As far as possible the reconstruction will be built could expect to make each leg of the voyage in using construction techniques from 1st millennium approximately two weeks in the southern winter Southeast Asia: edge-doweled planking, lashings months when good southeasterly winds can be to lugs on the inboard face of planks (tambuku) to expected. However, a period of calm can be secure the frames, and multiple through-beams to experienced at any time of year and provisioning strengthen the hull structure. for three-four weeks would be prudent. The Maldives would provide limited opportunity There are five bas-relief depictions of large vessels for re-provisioning. It can be assumed that rice with outriggers in the galleries of Borobudur. They sufficient for protracted voyaging would be carried are not five depictions of the same vessel. While from Java. the five vessels are obviously similar and may be seen as illustrating a distinct type of vessel there are differences in the clearly observed details.
    [Show full text]
  • INP Seance Scientifique
    Ship Construction Techniques in Antiquity around the World and Modern Documentation Methods in Underwater Archaeology INP Séances scientifiques Speaker: Max Fiederling M.A. Ancient Ship Building and construction techniques around the world Terms and categories: hide, log, sewn, lashed-plank, clinker (and reverse-clinker), Mortise and tenon / shell-first and frame-first. Frame-first technique dominates the modern ship construction industry, the ancient ship builders relied primarily on the other techniques to build their watercrafts. Regardless of differences in the construction, the vessels of the ancient world were also seaworthy crafts, capable of allowing people to engage in large-scale maritime trade as well as in inland trade on rivers and lakes. Stone carving - Norway / 9000 BCE? During the Paleolithic people probably began to build watercrafts for the first time, with which the high seas can be sailed. They were probably already plank boats or larger skin boats. Cyprus, Crete, Sardinia, Ireland, Canary Islands => first traces of settlements originating from the mainland. The targeted deep-sea fishing also begins a little outside of visual contact with the coast. Framed Boats Bark Canoes Skin boats Skin boats dominated seafaring in places that were scarce on wood, including the arctic and subarctic. They were made by stretching skin or leather over frames of wood or bone. These include kayaks and umiaks, coracles and currachs Birchbark Canoe Coracle / India 2019. Large birchbark canoes, like the one pictured above (1926) were used by northern Indigenous groups to reach interior waterways Ancient Assyrian bas relief (700-629 BC) of the river Tigris showing the shipping of in search of caribou.
    [Show full text]
  • Meroz-Plank Canoe-Edited1 Without Bold Ital
    UC Berkeley Survey Reports, Survey of California and Other Indian Languages Title The Plank Canoe of Southern California: Not a Polynesian Import, but a Local Innovation Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1977t6ww Author Meroz, Yoram Publication Date 2013 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California The Plank Canoe of Southern California: Not a Polynesian Import, but a Local Innovation YORAM MEROZ By nearly a millennium ago, Polynesians had settled most of the habitable islands of the eastern Pacific, as far east as Easter Island and as far north as Hawai‘i, after journeys of thousands of kilometers across open water. It is reasonable to ask whether Polynesian voyagers traveled thousands of kilometers more and reached the Americas. Despite much research and speculation over the past two centuries, evidence of contact between Polynesia and the Americas is scant. At present, it is generally accepted that Polynesians did reach South America, largely on the basis of the presence of the sweet potato, an American cultivar, in prehistoric East Polynesia. More such evidence would be significant and exciting; however, no other argument for such contact is currently free of uncertainty or controversy.1 In a separate debate, archaeologists and ethnologists have been disputing the rise of the unusually complex society of the Chumash of Southern California. Chumash social complexity was closely associated with the development of the plank-built canoe (Hudson et al. 1978), a unique technological and cultural complex, whose origins remain obscure (Gamble 2002). In a recent series of papers, Terry Jones and Kathryn Klar present what they claim is linguistic, archaeological, and ethnographical evidence for prehistoric contact from Polynesia to the Americas (Jones and Klar 2005, Klar and Jones 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • Wao Kele O Puna Comprehensive Management Plan
    Wao Kele o Puna Comprehensive Management Plan Prepared for: August, 2017 Prepared by: Nālehualawaku‘ulei Nālehualawaku‘ulei Nā-lehua-lawa-ku‘u-lei is a team of cultural resource specialists and planners that have taken on the responsibilities in preparing this comprehensive management for the Office of Hawaiian Affairs. Nā pua o kēia lei nani The flowers of this lovely lei Lehua a‘o Wao Kele The lehua blossoms of Wao Kele Lawa lua i kēia lei Bound tightly in this lei Ku‘u lei makamae My most treasured lei Lei hiwahiwa o Puna Beloved lei of Puna E mālama mākou iā ‘oe Let us serve you E hō mai ka ‘ike Grant us wisdom ‘O mākou nā pua For we represent the flowers O Nālehualawaku‘ulei Of Nālehualawaku‘ulei (Poem by na Auli‘i Mitchell, Cultural Surveys Hawai‘i) We come together like the flowers strung in a lei to complete the task put before us. To assist in the preservation of Hawaiian lands, the sacred lands of Wao Kele o Puna, therefore we are: The Flowers That Complete My Lei Preparation of the Wao Kele o Puna Comprehensive Management Plan In addition to the planning team (Nālehualawaku‘ulei), many minds and hands played important roles in the preparation of this Wao Kele o Puna Comprehensive Management Plan. Likewise, a number of support documents were used in the development of this plan (many are noted as Appendices). As part of the planning process, the Office of Hawaiian Affairs assembled the ‘Aha Kūkā (Advisory Council), bringing members of the diverse Puna community together to provide mana‘o (thoughts and opinions) to OHA regarding the development of this comprehensive management plan (CMP).
    [Show full text]
  • Linguistic Evidence for a Prehistoric Polynesia—Southern California Contact Event
    Linguistic Evidence for a Prehistoric Polynesia—Southern California Contact Event KATHRYN A. KLAR University of California, Berkeley TERRY L. JONES California Polytechnic State University Abstract. We describe linguistic evidence for at least one episode of pre- historic contact between Polynesia and Native California, proposing that a borrowed Proto—Central Eastern Polynesian lexical compound was realized as Chumashan tomol ‘plank canoe’ and its dialect variants. Similarly, we suggest that the Gabrielino borrowed two Polynesian forms to designate the ‘sewn- plank canoe’ and ‘boat’ (in general, though probably specifically a dugout). Where the Chumashan form speaks to the material from which plank canoes were made, the Gabrielino forms specifically referred to the techniques (adzing, piercing, sewing). We do not suggest that there is any genetic relationship between Polynesian languages and Chumashan or Gabrielino, only that the linguistic data strongly suggest at least one prehistoric contact event. Introduction. Arguments for prehistoric contact between Polynesia and what is now southern California have been in print since the late nineteenth century when Lang (1877) suggested that the shell fishhooks used by Native Hawaiians and the Chumash of Southern California were so stylistically similar that they had to reflect a shared cultural origin. Later California anthropologists in- cluding the archaeologist Ronald Olson (1930) and the distinguished Alfred Kroeber (1939) suggested that the sewn-plank canoes used by the Chumash and the Gabrielino off the southern California coast were so sophisticated and uni- que for Native America that they likely reflected influence from Polynesia, where plank sewing was common and widespread. However, they adduced no linguistic evidence in support of this hypothesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Dugout Canoe Gr: Prek-2 (Lesson 6)
    TRADITIONAL TRANSPORTATION: DUGOUT CANOE GR: PREK-2 (LESSON 6) Elder Quote/Belief: “Summer came and they would go around by boat. They made their first dugout canoes. They chopped down large cottonwood, and fashioned that into a canoe. They went in that into Eyak Lake. Then they tried spruce instead of cotton wood. That too was good. They carved large boats out of spruce.” -Anna Nelson Harry 1 Anna Nelson Harry, Yakutat, about 1975. (Photo courtesy of Richard Dauenhauer) Grade Level: PreK-2 Overview: The Eyak and Sugpiaq people traditionally carved dugout canoes in the Chugach Region, specifically in Prince William Sound. “The canoes were so seaworthy that they were used not just for interisland voyages to visit relatives or allies, but also to wage war and to engage in trade missions over hundreds of miles. In fact, dugout canoes plied the waters between Southeast Alaska, (Eyak) and Kodiak Island in the days before the coming of Europeans”. (Echo’s http://www.echospace.org/articles/273/sections/665.html) Standards: AK Cultural: AK Content Science: CRCC: E4: Culturally-knowledgeable students B2: A student should understand and MC1: Different kinds of wood have demonstrate an awareness and be able to apply the concepts, models, different qualities and different uses; appreciation of the relationships and theories, universal principles, and facts wood can be obtained from the forest processes of interaction of all elements in that explain the physical world. and from driftwood. the world around them. A student should determine how ideas and concepts from one knowledge system relate to those derived from another knowledge system.
    [Show full text]
  • Dugout Canoe, Prehistoric Period - 20Th Century
    Dugout Canoe, Prehistoric Period - 20th Century The dugout canoe, or log boat, is one of the simplest and earliest forms of watercraft used by humans. Dugouts were the primary boat used throughout the Americas before the arrival of Europeans and played an essential role in Native American riverine trade networks spanning across the eastern half of the present U.S. The earliest archaeological examples of this type of watercraft in the New World come from DeLeon Springs, Florida, where two specimens have Archaeologists from LAMP and the St. Johns County record a historic canoe at the Alligator Farm. This appears to be the same been dated to over 6,000 years ago. This type of vessel canoe seen in the banner image above, which was photographed in St. Augustine in the late 1800s. was hollowed out from a felled tree using a tedious process of burning with fire and scraping the charred wood away with shells. After the introduction of European iron tools, construction was rendered much easier and faster. The size of a dugout was limited by the dimensions of available trees; Columbus witnessed 100' long canoes with dozens of paddlers in the Caribbean. Dugouts were also common throughout West Africa and enslaved Africans brought canoe-building traditions with them from the coasts and river deltas of their stolen homeland. The combination of Indian, African and European boatbuilding skills resulted in an increasingly sophisticated dugout canoe. Metal tools were used to shape the outside of the log, flatten the bottom to decrease draft and weight and increase stability, and shape the bow and stern ends to increase seaworthiness.
    [Show full text]
  • Traditional Fishing Crafts of India
    Traditional fishing crafts of India Fishing boats of Gujarat There is marked difference in the geographical and physical features of northern and southern regions of Gujarat. Whereas the northern region is arid and stony, the southern region is distinguished by sandy bottom. The following types of boat with their broad features gives along side are found in Gujarat. 1) Haler machwa: Length varies from 8-10 m Broad beam and square stern Open boat except for short decking in the fore and aft. Carvel planking with unusually large and heavy frames Tall mast carries on large lateen sail of Arab pattern It is used for gillnet fishing. 2) Porbandar machwa Length varies from 6-8 m Square stern and raked stem Used for gill net fishing 3) Cambay machwa Raked stem Undecked except for short length at stern Truncated stern with a slight rake 1 4) Navalaki hodi Length 5-6 m, breadth 1-1.5 m and draft of 90-105 cm Square stern and overhang bow Decked only fore and aft Single mast carries lateen soil 5) Malia boat Flat bottom boat which measure about 6-7 m in length, breadth 1.5 m with 65cm draft. Ends are pointed and there is small rudder Carvel planking Mast carries a lateen sail Small decking fore and aft Used in tidal waters for prawn fishery 6) Dugout canoe Double – ended round bottom boat Length varies from 5-9 m, breadth 60-90 cm and depth 60-68 cm Small sail raised on a wooden mast Used for gill netting 2 7) Ludhia The boat measures 9-10 m in length and 1.5 to 2 m breadth Short decking at the fore and aft Slightly racked stem and stern Two masts with small lateen sails Carved planking and has strong keel and heavy frames 8) Madhwad type wahan Length 10-13 m and breadth 2-3 m Raked stem and square stern Decked at the fore and aft Large heavy rudder Mast with lateen soil Used for operation of gill nets and dol nets Fishing boats of Maharashtra The physical and geographical features of northern Maharashtra up to Mumbai are similar to those of southern Gujarat.
    [Show full text]
  • Humbler Craft: Rafts of the Egyptian Nile, 17Th-20Th Centuries AD’, International Journal of Nautical Archaeology 40(2): 344-360
    This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Wiley Blackwell in the International Journal of Nautical Archaeology (IJNA), appearing online on 26 October 2010 and in print in Volume 40, Issue 2, in September 2011. The published version is available online at doi: 10.1111/j.1095- 9270.2010.00295.x. Please use the IJNA version in any citations: Cooper, J.P. 2011. ‘Humbler Craft: Rafts of the Egyptian Nile, 17th-20th Centuries AD’, International Journal of Nautical Archaeology 40(2): 344-360 Humbler Craft: Rafts of the Egyptian Nile, 17th-20th Centuries AD John P. Cooper The MARES Project, Institute of Arab and Islamic Studies, University of Exeter, Stocker Road, Exeter, EX4 4ND, UK, [email protected] Abstract Written accounts and images created by foreign travellers on the Egyptian Nile over the past four centuries indicate the widespread use of rafts and floats for both local and long-distance Nile travel. Many of the materials employed are poor survivors in archaeological deposits, or are otherwise easily overlooked as components of river-craft: moreover, several of these raft types were built for a single season or journey, then dismantled. Well- preserved wooden boats belonging to the pharaonic élite have commanded the attention of maritime archaeologists of the Nile. But these traveller accounts alert us to a class of vessels not yet recognized in archaeological deposits, and which point to a humbler quotidian experience of Nile navigation than the royal ships of antiquity. Key words: Egypt, Nile, Boat, Raft, Navigation, Landscape. Introduction When it comes to the watercraft of the Egyptian Nile, scholarly and popular attention has so far been drawn powerfully towards high-status, wooden- hulled vessels of the Pharaonic period.
    [Show full text]
  • The Welsh, the Vikings, and the Lost Tribes of Israel on the Northern Plains: the Legend of the White Mandan
    Copyright © 1988 by the South Dakota State Historical Society. All Rights Reserved. The Welsh, the Vikings, and the Lost Tribes of Israel on the Northern Plains: The Legend of the White Mandan JAMES D. MCLAIRD From the earliest European discoveries, rumors of "white Indi- ans" have circulated in America. Always to the west of settled areas, there were supposed to be people who possessed advanced customs and technology, unlike the "uncivilized savages" the frontiersmen had already met and fought. Sometimes these claims were buttressed by "eyewitness accounts" of meetings with bearded, light-skinned Indians, some of whom possessed Bibles.' While such curious tales plainly fascinated settlers, politi- cal significance was often attached to them as well. John Dee and 1. Bernard De Voto, The Course of Empire (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1952), pp. 68-73, 470-71, contains a good discussion of rumors and "evidence" of reported "white Indians" assumed to he descendants of "Prince Madoc of Wales," who sup- posedly came to America in A.D. 1170. A detailed listing of meetings between fron- tiersmen and "white Indians" is included in Zella Armstrong's uncritical account of the Madoc theory entitled Who Discovered America?: The Amazing Story of Madoc (Chattanooga, Tenn.: Lookout Publishing Co., 1950). She mentions remnants of an old tattered book among the Indians (p. 122). Another account of the Madoc legend by an advocate of the theory is Richard Deacon's Madoc and the Discovery of America: Some New Light on an Old Controversy (New York: George Braziller, 1966), pp. 108-23, 151-63. David Williams, "John Evans' Strange Journey: Part I.
    [Show full text]
  • Snorri Sturluson Skáldskaparmál 2
    Snorri Sturluson Edda Skáldskaparmál 2 Snorri Sturluson Edda Skáldskaparmál 2. Glossary and Index of Names Edited by ANTHONY FAULKES VIKING SOCIETY FOR NORTHERN RESEARCH UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON 1998 © Anthony Faulkes 1998 First published by Viking Society for Northern Research 1998 Reprinted with minor corrections 2007 ISBN: 978 0 903521 38 3 Volume 2, paper bound edition Printed by Short Run Press Limited, Exeter Contents of Volume 1 Introduction ............................................................................. vii Title ....................................................................................... vii Synopsis ...............................................................................viii The composition of the work ............................................... x Date and authorship.............................................................. xi The verse quotations ..........................................................xiii The flulur .............................................................................. xv The dialogue frame...........................................................xviii The prose narratives .......................................................... xxii The analysis of poetic diction .......................................... xxv Purpose............................................................................xxxvii Manuscripts ..................................................................... xxxix This edition ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Kua Kohikohi Noa Atungia He Waka E Nga Whare Taonga Huri Noa Te Ao, Mo Etahi, Ka 200 Tau Neke
    MUSEUMS TE PAPA NEW ZEALAND NATIONAL MARITIME MUSEUM AUCKLAND MUSEUM Museums around the world have collected canoes for a long time, some for over 200 years. The Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, the New Zealand National Maritime Museum Te Huiteananui-A-Tangaroa, and the Auckland Museum are three of these museums. As well as holding many Maori canoes (not listed), they hold canoes from around the Pacific. You can see the lists of these Pacific canoes below. The lists are only examples of the many collections worldwide. Aside from the canoes listed, each museum also has a lot of model canoes, as well as paddles, sails, and other items. You can contact the curators of the museums for background information and photos. THE CANOE IS THE PEOPLE TE PAPA REGISTRATION DESCRIPTION ISLAND GROUP HISTORY FE005098 Tapuakaira: A double-hulled Mauke, This canoe was apparently made in 1823. FE005099 canoe with two bow covers and Southern Cook Tekura, Maru, Maunga, and Tura of Ngati FE010373 three cross-beams. The canoe Islands. Kopati gave it to the museum in 1931 through FE010374 has been taken apart. Judge H. F. Ayson, Resident Commissioner in FE005116 Rarotonga. FE005122 FE005097 FE010421 Tauhunu: A large outrigger Manihiki, This canoe was named after the main village of FE005109 canoe with a shell-lined hull and Northern Cook Islands. Manihiki atoll. It was possibly made by Te Hau outrigger float. The canoe has Nehemia, who made many models of Manihiki been taken apart. canoes when he was old. Colonel Gudgeon, Administrator of the Cook Islands, sent the canoe to the Christchurch Exhibition 1906–1907.
    [Show full text]