DOCSLIB.ORG

Focus on the Future of Georgia 1970-1985. INSTITUTION Georgia State Dept

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Focus on the Future of Georgia 1970-1985. INSTITUTION Georgia State Dept DOCUMENT RESUME ED 075 482 TM 002 560 AUTHCR Schabac };er, William H., Ed.; And Others TITLE Focus on the Future of Georgia 1970-1985. INSTITUTION Georgia State Dept. of Education, Atlanta. Georgia. Assessment Project. PUB DATE 70 NOTE 520p. EDRS PRICE MF-$0.65 HC-$19.74 DESCRIPTORS *Educational Objectives; *State Programs; *State Surveys; *Statewide Planning; Technical Reports IDENTIFIERS *Georgia Assessment Project ABSTRACT As part of the Georgia Assessment Project (GAP), initiated in January 1969 to provide statewide measurement of the impact of educational programs, services, and resources on children and youth, 19 position papers were prepared by specialists to assist the Advisory Commission on Education Goals. The papers, some with critiques, concern Georgia's current status and probable status in 1985 with respect to the social, economic, technological, political, and cultural environment. The subjects discussed are Georgia's econcmy,-industrial development trends and forecasts, agriculture, automation, transportation, manpower and employment, demography, the individual, social disorganization, religion, civil rights, equality of educational opportunities, governmental structure, political culture, perspectives on health care, ecology, communications systems and mass media, leisure and recreation, and the arts. (DB) FILMED FROM BEST AVAILABLE COPY cc FocusonWe oFuturegfGeorgia, 1970 -1985 U S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH EDUCATION & WELFARE OFFICE OF EDUCATION THIS DOL.UML-NT HAS BEEN REPRO DUCED EXACTLY .S RECEIVED FROM THE PERSON OR 0!1GANIZATION ()RIG INATING IT POINTS OF VIEW OR PPM IONS STATED DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT OFFICIAL OFFICE OF EDU CATION POSITION OR POLICY Focus on the Future of Georgia 1970-1985 Edited by William H. Schabacker Russell S. Clark Homer C. Cooper Papers prepared for use by the Advisory Commission on Educational Goals of the State Board of Education Division of Planning, Research and Evaluatiogi. Office of Deputy Superintendent of Schools Georgia Department of Education Atlanta, Georgia 30334 1970 Jack P. Nix, State Superintendent of Schools Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 71-630709 Funds to underwritethe preparation and publication of the papersand staff support to the Commission were provided from TitleIII, Public Law 89-10, Elementary and Seco:Idary Act of 1965. Preface Georgia's State Board of Education, which is responsiblefor public elementary, secondary. adult, and vocational education, initiatedthe Georgia Assessment Project (GAP) in January 1969. GAP isdesigned to provide statewide measurement of the progress of Georgia's children and youth toward achievement of those qualitiesnecessary to live successfully in the Georgia and United States of 1985 andbeyond. Information secured from GAP will be used to (1) show the measurable impact of educationalprograms, services, and resources on children and youth; (2) determine the relationship between costs and educationalbenefits; (3) identify areas of critical educational need; and (4) develop long-range educational planning. To initiate GAP, the State Board of Education appointed eleven distinguished Georgians to an Advisory Commission on Education Goals. The Commission members were selected on the basis of their broad collective experience in many areas of Georgia life andinclude by occupation a federal judge, two university presidents,a physician, two industrialists, a banker, an attorney, two business executives, anda former president of the Georgia Congress of Parents and Teachers.Even though the Commission members represented varied interests and greatly different outlooks and philosophies, they possessedone common com- mitment: the desire to assure a superior education for all the children, youth, and adults in the state. The tasks of the Commissionwere to 1.examine the social, economic, and political life of Georgia; 2.project the probable social, political, and economic conditionsof the state through 1985; 3.identify as goals for education the knowledge, skills, and values that will enable the citizen of Georgia to live successfullyin the furore; 4.suggest the nature of the education systemnecessary to achieve the desired goals. To assist the Commission with these tasks, highly qualifiedspecialists prepared 19 position papers about Georgia's current status and probable status in 1985 with respect to the social, economic, technological, polit- ical, and cultural environment: In addition, critiques ofsome of the position papers were prepared to provide additional analyses, corrections, or amplification. The authors of the position papers and their critics came from the academic world, business and industry, government, and the professional world at large. They were selected for their demonstrated knowledge about conditions in Georgia today and their qualificationsto state expert opinion about probable conditions in Georgia for the future. The views expressed in the papers and critiques are those of the indi- vidual authors and not necessarily those of the Commission. Because of widespread interest in the work of the Advisory Com- mission on Education Goals and the wealth of material relatedto all facets of life in Georgia contained in the position papers and critiques, 3 these have been compiled and published for general use. It is hoped that after reading the contents of this book the citizens of Georgia will have a greater understanding of Georgia's present and future, of its people and institutions, of its problems and potential. This volume has been made possible by the cooperation and efforts of many people: the authors of the papers and their critics; the staff of the Publications and Information Services Unit of the Georgia Depart- ment of Education; the staff of the Social Science Research Institute and the Center for Continuing Education at The University of Georgia; the staff of the Division of Planning, Research, and Evaluation of the Georgia Department of Education. The individuals deserving special recognition for their contributions include Virginia W. Gerrett of the Social Science Research Institute; Rena K. Griffin, Rebecca H. Harkins, Sarah A. House, Charles E. Knott, Susan C. Kudrak, Sallie P. Newbill. Anne Ray- mond, and M. Eugene Wallace of the Georgia Department of Education. EDITORS William H. Schabacker Associate Director for Research Georgia Department of Education Russell S. Clark Director, Division of Planning, Research and Evaluation Georgia Department of Education Homer C. Cooper Director, Social Science Research Institute University of Georgia NOTE: Authors of wine position papers also wrote abstracts or summaries which pre /ace their detailed papers. Use of the GAP symbol indicates the bekinning of the detailed papers. 4 ADVISORY COMMISSION ON EDUCATION GOALS Mrs. Leland H. Bagwell Rufus C. Harris, Juris.D. Housewife President Canton Mercer University Macon Honorable Griffin B. Bell Vivian W. Henderson, Ph.D. Vice Chairman President United States Circuit Judge Clark College Court of Appeals for the Fifth Atlanta Circuit Atlanta Jesse B. Blayton, LL.B.,C.P.A. George E. Patterson, Jr. J. B. Blayton and Company President Atlanta Liberty National Bank and Trust Company Savannah Maurice M. Egan John T. Phillips, Jr. Executive Vice President President Administration Lilliston Corporation Lockheed-Georgia Company Albany Marietta James L. Goddard, M.D. Jac. H. Rothschild, Chairman Vice President - Health Sciences President and Treasurer EDP Technology, Inc. David Rothschild and Company Atlanta Columbus Stanley P. Krysiak* Robert M. Wood Professional Personnel and General Attorney Education Division Manager Sears, Roebuck and Company Lockheed-Georgia Company Atlanta Marietta *Served on an intecm basis while Mr. Egan was out of the country. 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS Economy of Georgia Joseph K. Heyman and W. Bethel Minter . 9 Critique: Economy of Georgia James L. Green . 41 Critique: Economy of Georgia Harold L. Johnson . 45 Industrial Development Trends and Forecasts Ross W. Hammond 49 Critique: Industrial Development Trends and Forecasts H. Hearn Lumpkin . 70 Critique: Industrial Development Trends and Forecasts John E. Mock 73 Agriculture in Georgia Fred \V. Greer, Jr. 77 Critique: Agriculture in Georgia Stephen J. Brannen . 106 Critique: Agriculture in Georgia Thomas T. Irvin . 110 Automation in Georgia Ellis L. Scott 113 Critique: Automation in Georgia John L. Jones 136 Transportation in Georgia Richard M. Forbes 139 Critique: Transportation in Georgia Henry A. Fahl. .149 Critique: Transportation in Georgia Emory C. Parrish . 153 Manpower and Employment in Georgia John L. Fulmer . 157 Critique: Manpower and Employment in Georgia Sam Caldwell. 182 Critique: Manpower and Employment in Georgia G. Clint Rodgers . .185 Demography of Georgia James a Tarver . 189 The Individual in Georgia Kenneth B. Matheny . 221 Critique: The Individual in Georgia Fred R. Crawford . 237 Critique: The Individual in Georgia Fred H. Wright. 241 Growing Pains: A Look at Social Alpha M. Bond. Jr. and Disorganizations in Georgia's Future Adrienne M. Bond . 245 Critique: Growing Pains: A Look at Social Disorganization in Georgia's Future Genevieve T. Mill . 271 7 TABLE OF CONTENTS Continued Critique: Growing Pains: A Look at Social Disorganization in Georgia's Future Raymond Payne. 274 Religion in Georgia Earl D. C. Brewer . 281 Critique: Religion in Georgia John E. Sallstron.. 303 Civil Rights in Georgia Vernon E Jordan, Jr.. 309 Critique: Civil Rights in Georgia Donald Hollowell . 329 Equality of Educational Opportunities for Black
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Atlanta's Civil Rights Movement, Middle-Class
    “To Secure Improvements in Their Material and Social Conditions”: Atlanta’s Civil Rights Movement, Middle-Class Reformers, and Workplace Protests, 1960-1977 by William Seth LaShier B.A. in History, May 2009, St. Mary’s College of Maryland A Dissertation submitted to The Faculty of The Columbian College of Arts and Sciences of The George Washington University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy January 10, 2020 Dissertation directed by Eric Arnesen James R. Hoffa Teamsters Professor of Modern American Labor History The Columbian College of Arts and Sciences of The George Washington University certifies that William Seth LaShier has passed the Final Examinations for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy as of November 20, 2019. This is the final and approved form of the dissertation. “To Secure Improvements in Their Material and Social Conditions”: Atlanta’s Civil Rights Movement, Middle-Class Reformers, and Workplace Protests, 1960-1977 William Seth LaShier Dissertation Research Committee Eric Arnesen, James R. Hoffa Teamsters Professor of Modern American Labor History, Dissertation Director Erin Chapman, Associate Professor of History and of Women’s Studies, Committee Member Gordon Mantler, Associate Professor of Writing and of History, Committee Member ii Acknowledgements I could not have completed this dissertation without the generous support of teachers, colleagues, archivists, friends, and most importantly family. I want to thank The George Washington University for funding that supported my studies, research, and writing. I gratefully benefited from external research funding from the Southern Labor Archives at Georgia State University and the Stuart A. Rose Manuscript, Archives, and Rare Books Library (MARBL) at Emory University.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Atlanta Traffic & Safety Council Aubrey Couch
    MINUTES OF THE FORTIETH MEETING OF THE METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY MAY 6, 1969 The Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid .Transit Authority held its regular meeting on May 6/ 1969 at 3:30 P.M. in the Conference Room/ 619 Glenn Building/ Atlanta/ Georgia. Mr. Roy A, Blount/ Vice Chairman/ presided. MEMBERS PRESENT: Dr. Sanford S. Atwood (DeKalb County) M. C. Bishop (Fulton County) Roy A. Blount (DeKalb County) S. Truett Cathy (Clayton County) Rawson Haverty (City of Atlanta) K. A. McMillon (Gwinnett County) L. D. Milton (City of Atlanta) John C. Staton (Fulton County) MEMBERS ABSENT: Richard H. Rich (City of Atlanta) John C. Wilson (City of Atlanta) OTHERS PRESENT: Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority H. L. Stuart/ General Manager E. W. Nelson/ Chief Engineer King Elliott/ Public Information Director Edmund W. Hughes/ Authority Secretary H. N. Johnson/ Administrative Assistant Consultants W. O. Salter/ PBQ&D/ San Francisco J. A. Coil and Ray Gustafson/ PETE, Atlanta E. E. Gilcrease/ PBQ&D/ St. Louis Don Hyde/ PBQ&D/ New York W. Stell Huie/ Huie and Harland Robert Keith/ Alan M. Voorhees and Associates/ Inc./ McLean/ Va. Others Jan Richey/ Planning Dept./ City of Atlanta Edgar E. Schukraft/ Southwest Atlanta Association Andy Springer/ Greater Atlanta Traffic & Safety Council Jeff Wingfield/ Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning Commission Aubrey Couch/ Decatur/DeKalb Development Association The meeting was called to order by the Vice Chairman. MINUTES Minutes of the April meeting had been mailed to the members and upon motion by Mr. Bishop, seconded by Mr, Haverty, they were unanimously approved.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Pages
    The ‘Fabulous’ Fox Theatre and Atlanta, 1929-1975 by Michael James Zarafonetis A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Auburn University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Auburn, Alabama May 14, 2010 Keywords: history, culture, film, architecture, Atlanta, Fox Theatre Copyright 2010 by Michael James Zarafonetis Approved by Lindy Biggs, Chair, Associate Professor of History David Carter, Associate Professor of History Larry Gerber, Professor Emeritus of History Carla Keyvanian, Assistant Professor of Architecture Abstract The Fox Theatre, currently one of Atlanta’s most prestigious performance venues and architectural icons, has stood at the corner of Peachtree Street and Ponce de Leon Avenue since its construction in 1929. Its fantastical aesthetic combines a monumental Arabesque exterior with various Middle Eastern interior decorative motifs. The opulence of the Fox was common to movie palaces around the country during their brief heyday in the 1920s. Relatively few of these palaces, however, have survived to become icons of their city like Atlanta’s “Fabulous” Fox. The Fox was originally conceived as a Shriners headquarters and community center, but spiraling construction costs forced the fraternal organization to lease the building’s auditorium to William Fox, which he would operate as a first-run movie theater. Economic troubles during the Great Depression bankrupted both William Fox and the Shriners, casting doubt over the future of the theater, but under new ownership and stable management in the mid-1930s it performed strongly. Both Atlanta and the Fox boomed during World War II, with the city assuming major military and industrial importance during wartime.
    [Show full text]
  • Communication in History: the Key to Understanding
    NATIONAL HISTORY DAY 2021 Communication in History: The Key to Understanding. Ideas for Topics for National History Day 2021 using Collections at the Georgia Archives Communication in History: the Colonial Experiment The Transactions of the Trustees are useful for documenting Georgia’s colonial experiment. They include Edgemont’s Journals, the private record of a leading trustee. Communication to parliament from two different camps, those loyal to James Oglethorpe, and the discontented group of colonists known as the Malcontents, ultimately doomed the vision of Oglethorpe and the trustees. Transactions of the Trustees for the Establishment of the Colony of Georgia, 1738-1744, https://tinyurl.com/yckwkt3s Communication in History: Georgia governors’ communication with constituents and state departments https://georgiaarchives.as.atlas-sys.com/repositories/2/classification_terms/153 Georgia’s governors left a large quantity of records documenting the state’s affairs: correspondence of governors, executive minutes, proclamations, and treaties. Communication in History: Stage/mail routes went from Washington to Milledgeville to Montgomery. The Federal Capitol had to communicate with the state capitol. Private stage companies with a mail contract. They were advertised through newspapers. Communication in History: Covering the legislature through newspapers. Communication in History: Rural power and telephone projects (1950s - 1970s). Information about bringing rural Georgia “up to standard.” The Georgia Archives has inactive corporation files for several phone, power, and telegraph companies. Communication in History: Trademark Registration books available in the Virtual Vault: https://vault.georgiaarchives.org/digital/collection/trade Communication in History: Transportation and Communication. Western and Atlantic Railroad: https://georgiaarchives.as.atlas- sys.com/repositories/2/classifications/22 Documents in this collection date from 1837 to 1888.
    [Show full text]
  • Archive Notes David B
    Georgia Archive Volume 2 | Number 1 Article 7 January 1974 Archive Notes David B. Gracy II Georgia State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/georgia_archive Part of the Archival Science Commons Recommended Citation Gracy, David B. II, "Archive Notes," Georgia Archive 2 no. 1 (1974) . Available at: https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/georgia_archive/vol2/iss1/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Georgia Archive by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Gracy: Archive Notes ARCHIVE NOTES Governor Jimmy Carter has honored the archivists of Georgia a second time by proclaiming "Archives Day in Georgia." In 1974, Archives Day is February 1, the date of our Society's annual meeting. * * * Professor Steve Gurr at Georgia Southwestern Col­ lege in Americus reports good progress in his project to involve students in Georgia history and at the same time to collect information about the sources available locally for the study_ of local history. Funded by grants from the new Sumte-r Historic Preservation Society, the America the Beautiful Fund in Washington, and the College, the project already has sent more than two dozen students into Dooly, Marion, Schley and Sumter counties. The project will eventuate in published guide books for each of eight counties marked for survey. The first may be issued as soon as next fall. * * * The New Archivist for December 1973 is not only as rich as always, but unusually pithy.
    [Show full text]
  • Race, Transportation, and the Future of Metropolitan Atlanta
    Partnership for Southern Equity TOGETHER WE PROSPER Opportunity Deferred: Race, Transportation, and the Future of Metropolitan Atlanta Every day in metropolitan Atlanta, residents face traffic gridlock that’s often ranked among the worst in the nation. For some, this daily ritual is a minor inconvenience endured in the relative safety and comfort of their climate-controlled cars. But for residents with limited resources and inadequate transportation options, commuting to work, school and other destinations represents a major roadblock to improving the quality of life for themselves and for their loved ones. While their transportation experiences may be dramatically different, both groups share more in common than many realize. The contemporary challenges we face – as individuals and as a community – have been undeniably shaped by a history of structural racism and divisive policy decisions that have hindered our collective potential to thrive in an ever-changing economy. In order to achieve more successful transportation outcomes for all sectors of our society, acknowledging our troubling past is an important first step. Going forward, we must courageously commit to making more equitable transportation and land use decisions now, and in the future. The unsuccessful 2102 referendum that was intended to create a truly regional transportation network for metro Atlanta offers a powerful reminder of how much the forces of racial inequity, unchecked sprawl, and de facto segregation still plague us today. The vote conjured historic comparisons to the tortured efforts 40 years earlier to win local approval for creation of the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority (MARTA). In both instances, the pernicious legacy of policies deeply rooted in race and class effectively deprived the region of access to funding for much-needed transportation infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Renewal, and the Re‐Making Of
    FROM ‘CRACKERTOWN’ TO THE ‘ATL’: RACE, URBAN RENEWAL, AND THE RE‐MAKING OF DOWNTOWN ATLANTA, 1945‐2000 by IRENE VALERIE HOLLIMAN (Under the Direction of PAUL S. SUTTER) ABSTRACT This dissertation considers the many ways in which successive waves of postwar urban renewal transformed the city of Atlanta. I contend that each renewal effort was inherently flawed because each attracted opposing interest groups with conflicting visions of how the city of Atlanta should be repaired and what the city of Atlanta, when “fixed,” should look like. Atlanta city planners, elected officials, businessmen, along with housing and Civil Rights advocates sought out federal Urban Renewal funding shortly after the end of the Second World War as a means of eliminating dilapidated housing and stabilizing downtown property values. In the 1960s, as federal renewal funding shifted away from programs that razed and re‐built the physical environment towards more comprehensive welfare programs, Atlanta’s governing power coalition of white elites and black middle class resisted incorporating federal antipoverty measures that mandated citizen participation of the poor. The city’s first black elected officials, many of whom had cut their political teeth in Civil Rights Movement protests, came to power just as early urban renewal failures and the end of segregation de jure convinced the city’s affluent tax base (both white and black) to relocate in the suburbs. Beginning in the mid‐1970s, the city’s tenuously reconfigured power coalition, faced with a sharp decline in the availability of federal renewal funding, turned to private and quasi‐privately funded downtown redevelopment plans for Atlanta.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlanta Transit History ERA Presentation FINAL, 7-3-17
    Transit in Atlanta – Past, Present, and Future Electric Railroaders’ Association Conference July 3, 2017 About Me 2 The Early Years 1861 Atlanta Street Railway starts first mule-powered street railway. Over a dozen street railways are incoroporated in the following 30 years. 1889 Atlanta & Edgewood Street Railroad Co begins operation of the city’s first electrified line. 1890s Major consolidation begins. The Atlanta Consolidated Street Railway and Atlanta Rapid Transit Company begin the “Second Battle of Atlanta.” 1901 All streetcar operations are consolidated into the Georgia Railway & Electric Company (today’s Georgia Power). 3 The Early Years Above: a mule car on Peachtree St in 1872. At the location of today’s Five Points Station. Upper Right: Track construction at Five Points, 1891. Right: Atlanta & Edgewood Street Railroad car barn on Edgewood Ave circa 1894. The building still stands today as an event facility. 4 Photo credits: Railga.com, New South Construction Second Battle of Atlanta § Two feuding figures: Joel Hurt and Henry M. Atkinson § Built competing lines blocks away, created legal obstructions, vandalized each other’s tracks; even rumors of a duel. § Hurt’s Atlanta Consolidated Street Ry ultimately merged into Atkinson’s Atlanta Railway & Power Co, forming Georgia Railway & Power (GR&P). 5 Photo credits: Railga.com, New South Construction The Georgia Power Years Period of Expansion and Improvement § System trimmed after the “Second Battle of Atlanta” § Profitable routes double-tracked § New interurban lines to suburbs § 1924 – 200 miles, 404 streetcars § 1925 - start of bus operations § 1930 - start of one- man operations 6 Photo credits: Beeler Report The Georgia Power Years Challenges and Change 1936 First bus substitutions 1937 Trackless trolleys introduced 1940s WWII delayed trackless conversion plans, cut buses, and increased streetcar use 1945 First air-conditioned trackless trolley, ridership of 150,964,244 1946 Start of wide streetcar/ trackless trolley conversions 1949 Last streetcar run Top: A streetcar on the #5-Highland/S Pryor line.
    [Show full text]
  • B-169491 Grants to Improve Bus Transit Systems
    REPORT TO THE CONGRESS 09W26 Grants To Improve @us Transit Systems - Progres$ And Problems B-769497 Urban Mass Transportation Admhstratton Department of Transportation BY THE COMPTROLLER GENEhAL OF THE UNITED STATES ’ COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES WASHINGTON DC 20548 B-169491 To the Speaker of the House of Representatives c and the President pro tempore of the Senate I This 1s our report entitled “Gryts to Improve Bus Transit Systems--Progress and Problems We made our review pursuant to the Budget and Accountmg Act, 1921 (31 U S C 53), and the Accounting and Auditing Act of 1950 (31 U S C 67) We are sendmg copies of this report to the Director, Office of Management and Budget, and to the Secretary of Transportation 1 ?.-P 9 2 A+- Comptroller General of the United States . Contents Page DLGE ST 1 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 Program obJectives 2 Scope of review 3 2 PROGRESS AND PROBLEMS IN MEETING UMTA PROGRAM OBJECTIVES 4 Growing operating deficits 4 Attracting new riders 6 Impact of traffic congestion 7 General improvements m service 9 Levels of service 9 E qulpment and f acllltles 10 Fare structure 11 Public commumcatlons 11 Special services to transit dependents 12 Improving the urban environment 13 Reducing air pollution 14 Impact on energy consumption 15 3 NEED FOR UMTA TO BECOME A MORE POSI- TIVE FORCE IN FOSTERING NEEDED IM- PROVEMENTS IN BUS TRANSIT 17 Strengthening role of transit development plans 17 Improving progress reporting 21 Collectmg and exchanging lnformatlon on transit improvement 22 Conclusions 24 Recommendations
    [Show full text]
  • “Setting Atlanta in Motion”: the Making and Unmaking Of
    “SETTING ATLANTA IN MOTION”: THE MAKING AND UNMAKING OF ATLANTA’S “PUBLIC” TRANSIT, 1952-1981 By ICHIRO MIYATA (Under the Direction of Bryant Simon) ABSTRACT This dissertation investigates the ways in which the making of a public transit system in Atlanta ended up not resolving, but instead perpetuating, and even accelerating, the city’s uneven development among the suburbs, center city, and affluent intown neighborhoods. It examines how the different actors, commercial civic elites, suburban county residents, and intown neighborhood residents produced and deployed their own configurations of the concept of “public,” and how these varied and frequently incompatible ideas conceived of, and affected, the public transportation system. Early planning demonstrated that the major beneficiaries of the transit plan would be the white middle class and downtown businesses. Advocates argued that public transit would perform its role as a “public” service by easing or eliminating the traffic congestion which threatened to deteriorate economic growth, while at the same time it would contribute to the convenience of suburban commuters. This concept of “public,” however, was fundamentally at odds with the notion held by African-Americans and suburban county residents. Each of these groups held a substantial stake in public transit and its impact on their neighborhoods. Failure to reconcile the conflicting understandings of “public” resulted in Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority (MARTA) losing in 1968 two county referendums to begin construction. Conversely, the victory of the public transit referendum in 1971 was a direct result of MARTA’s new plan, which included a 15-cent flat rate fare, a rail route to the poor African American neighborhoods in Northwestern Atlanta, and incorporation of the existing Atlanta Transit System’s bus network.
    [Show full text]
  • The William Breman Jewish Heritage Museum 1440 Spring Street NW Atlanta, GA 30309
    The William Breman Jewish Heritage Museum 1440 Spring Street NW Atlanta, GA 30309 GUIDE TO THE MANUSCRIPT COLLECTION OF THE IDA PEARLE AND JOSEPH CUBA COMMUNITY ARCHIVES AND GENEALOGY CENTER PROCESSED MANUSCRIPT COLLECTIONS Mss 1 Rabbi Harry H. Epstein (1903 - 2003). Papers, 1907-1984. Size: 8 linear feet. Content: Sermons, correspondence, speeches and academic course work. Significance: Harry H. Epstein, Rabbi Emeritus of Congregation Ahavath Achim was the spiritual leader of that congregation for over 50 years. He was ordained in 1925, and accepted his first pulpit at Congregation B’nai Emunah in Tulsa, Oklahoma in 1927. A year later, at the age of 25, Rabbi Epstein left Tulsa and assumed the rabbinate at Ahavath Achim Congregation in Atlanta. Mss 2 Georgia Farm School and Resettlement Bureau, Inc.-Atlanta, Georgia. Records, 1939-1943 Size: 1.6 linear feet. Content: Correspondence, minutes, committee reports, and financial records relating to the daily activities of this organization. Significance: The Georgia Farm School and Resettlement Bureau was organized in 1939, as a non-profit agency, interested in the resettlement and retraining of Jewish refugees. As the situation of Jews in Europe deteriorated, the Bureau developed a working relationship with the National Refugee Service. So that efforts on behalf of newcomers could be coordinated, the Farm School and Resettlement Bureau worked closely with other Jewish service organizations including the Atlanta Section, National Council of Jewish Women, B’nai B’rith Gate City Lodge #144, The Temple Sisterhood, the Atlanta Federation for Jewish Social Service and the Atlanta Free Loan Association. Mss 3 Joseph Cuba (1909-1993) Family.
    [Show full text]