D Italian Archaeology in Libya

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

D Italian Archaeology in Libya Archaeology Under Dictatorship Archaelogy Under Dictatorship Edited by MICHAEL L. GALAXY Millsaps College, Jackson, Mississippi CHARLES WATKINSON American School oj Classical Studies at Athens, Princeton, New Jersey Springer Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Archaelogy under dictatorship / edited by Michael L. Galaty Charles Watkinson. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-306-48508-7 - ISBN 0-306-48509-5 (pbk.) 1. Archaelogy and state-Mediterranean Region-History-20th century 2. Dictatorship-Mediterranean Region-History-20th century. I. Galaty, Michael L. II. Watkinson, Charles. CC135.A735 2004 930.r072'01822—dc22 2004046114 ISBN: 0-306-48509-5 softcover ISBN: 0-306-48508-7 hardcover Printed on acid-free paper. First softcover printing, 2006 ©2004 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC All rights reserved. This work may not be translated or copied in whole or in part without the written permission of the publisher (Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013, USA), except for brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis. Use in connection with any form of information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed is forbidden. The use in this publication of tra(|le names, trademarks, service marks, and similar terms, even if they are not identified as such, is not to be taken as an expression of opinion as to whether or not they are subject to proprietary rights. Printed in the United States of America. 10 987654321 springer.com Contributors Stefan Altekamp • Winckelmann-Institut fiir Klassische Archaologie, Humboldt- Universitat zu Berlin, Germany Bettina Arnold • Department of Anthropology, University of Wisconsin- Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin D.J. Ian Begg • Trent University Archaeological Research Centre, Trent University, Peterborough, Ontario Margarita Diaz-Andreu • Department of Archaeology, University of Durham, Durham, United Kingdom Michael L Galaty • Department of Sociology-Anthropology, Millsaps College, Jackson, Mississippi Oliver Gilkes • Institute of World Archaeology University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom Dimitra Kokkinidou • Departamento de Filologia Clasica Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain Massimiliano Munzi • Sovraintendenza ai Beni Culturali del Comune di Roma/University Roma Tre, Rome, Italy Marianna Nikolaidou • Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California Manuel Ramirez Sanchez • Departamento de Ciencias Historicas, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain Wendy M. K. Shaw • Faculty of Communications, Bilgi University, Istanbul, Turkey Charles Watkinson • Director of Publications, American School of Classical Studies at Athens, Princeton, New Jersey Preface The destruction of Buddhist statues in Afghanistan, the looting of the National Museum in Baghdad, the toppling of images of Saddam Hussein... archaeology, our science of material culture, is daily challenged by such dynamic interplay of artifacts with politics. As recent news stories demonstrate, nowhere does this relationship come into sharper focus than under the most extreme political systems, such as dictatorships. This book is not, however, about recent events in Iraq, and none of the contributions dwell solely on the Middle East. The authors are united, rather, by their interest in the totalitarian political regimes which developed around the Mediterranean and mainly in the first half of the 20th century. Within this well- documented, carefully studied, theater, they explore both the treatment of the material remains of the past by dictators, and the roles archaeologists played, and continue to play, in interpreting that material. It may seem perverse not to discuss archaeology under contemporary dicta­ torships, since our colleagues continue to endure these regimes in every continent. Not only, however, would such broad coverage have made this book too dispersed, but we would also argue that, in Afghanistan and Iraq for example, it is still too soon to have a clear perspective, the experience of dictatorship being too recently ended. It is only as secret records are unearthed and the dangers of persecution are removed by regime-change that the complexity of the relationships between dictators and archaeologists becomes apparent. The dust will surely take many years to settle in the Middle East and new totalitarian regimes will continue to emerge. We only hope that the essays in this volume may point out some directions for unraveling the intricate webs of patron­ age and coercion dictators weave, and understanding more fully the opportunities and challenges that the past offers to those who seek to control it. This book project began as a conference session on archaeology under dicta­ torship, which was held at the 67th Annual Meeting of the Society for American \iii PREFACE Archaeology in Denver, Colorado. Several of the papers in this volume were first presented in Denver (those by Begg, Diaz-Andreu and Ramirez Sanchez, Galaty and Watkinson, and Gilkes). The symposium was stimulating and our schedule fluid, with much time reserved for discussion, and we would like to thank the participants, audience, and two excellent discussants, Phil Kohl and Tim Kaiser. Following the session, additional papers were soUcited and added, including the conclusion, expertly penned by Bettina Arnold. Our experience of dictatorship has not been direct (one of us being American and the other British), but our Albanian colleagues have, sometimes with hesita­ tion, told us about life and work under the Hoxha regime. As we prepared to edit this volume, we consulted Muzafer Korkuti, Director of the Albanian Institute of Archaeology in Tirana. P^of. Korkuti entered the field of archaeology and built his professional career during the communist period, and has made a remark­ ably successful adjustment to life and work in the new capitalist and democratic Albania. On two separate! occasions we interviewed Prof. Korkuti and portions of that interview have been excerpted for the introduction to this volume. We would like to thank Prof. Korkuti for his patience and insights, and we would like to dedicate this volume to the Albanian archaeological community We believe the future of Albanian archaeology is bright and feel honored and privileged to work there. Perhaps in the not-too-distant future Iraqi archaeologists can learn from the Albanian experience. MICHAEL L. GALATY CHARLES WATKINSON Contents Chapter 1 • The Practice of Archaeology Under Dictatorship 1 Michael L Galaty and Charles Watkinson Chapter 2 • Fascism in the Desert: A Microcosmic View of Archaeological Politics 19 D. J. Ian Begg Chapter 3 • The Trojans in Epirus: Archaeology, Myth and Identity in Inter-War Albania 33 Oliver dikes Chapter 4 • Italian Colonial Archaeology in Libya 1912-1942 55 Stefan Altehamp Chapter 5 • Italian Archaeology in Libya: From Colonial Romanita to Decolonization of the Past 73 Massimiliano Munzi Chapter 6 • Archaeological Resource Management Under Franco's Spain: The Comisaria General de Excavaciones Arqueologicas 109 Margarita Diaz-Andreu and Manuel Ramirez Sanchez Chapter 7 • Whose Hittites, and Why? Language, Archaeology and the Quest for the Original Turks 131 Wendy M. K. Shaw IX X CONTENTS Chapter 8 • On the St^ge and Behind the Scenes: Greek Archaeology in Times of Dictatorship 155 Dimitra Kokkinidou and Marianna Nikolaidou Chapter 9 • Deahng with the Devil: The Faustian Bargain of Archaeology Under Dictatorship 191 Bettina Arnold Index 213 Chapter 1 The Practice of Archaeology Under Dictatorship MICHAEL L. GALATY AND CHARLES WATKINSON A people lives happily in the present and future so long as it is aware of its past and the greatness of its ancestors. Heinrich Himmler (1936), quoted in Hassmann (2002:84) History is self-interest. Lucy Marsden in Oldest Living Confederate Widow Tells All (Gurganus, 2001:124) In recent decades, we have come to understand that archaeology and archaeologists can be and often have been—to paraphrase Phil Kohl and Claire Fawcett—made to "serve the state" (Kohl and Fawcett, 1995b). In fact, we now generally recognize the profound effect political ideologies have had on our understanding of the past, and vice versa. Furthermore—and with this most archaeologists would also agree—a relationship between politics and archaeology develops to some degree in every nation, regardless of (and in response to) the particular political and economic circumstances (Hamilakis and Yalouri, 1996). That said, however, it does seem to us that the relationship between politics and archaeology is more intense, perhaps more intimately realized, in situations of totalitarian dictatorship, notably when a dictator seeks to create and legitimize new state-supported ideologies, often, though not always, in the face of organized resistance. Dictators have long reaUzed the ideological importance of the past and have sought to wield archaeology as a poUtical tool. There are numerous examples MICHAEL L. GALATY • Millsaps College CHARLES WATKINSON • American School of Classical Studies at Athens 2 MICHAEL L. GALATY AND CHARLES WATKINSON of this, and they have been well described and analyzed: German archaeology under Hitler (Arnold, 1990, 2002a; Arnold and Hassmann, 1995; Harke, 2002; Hassmann, 2002; Junker, 1998; Wiwjorra, 1996), for instance; or the Soviet- style archaeology that formed under Stalin (Dolukhanov, 1996; Shnirelman, 1995, 1996;
Recommended publications
  • Seven Churches of Revelation Turkey
    TRAVEL GUIDE SEVEN CHURCHES OF REVELATION TURKEY TURKEY Pergamum Lesbos Thyatira Sardis Izmir Chios Smyrna Philadelphia Samos Ephesus Laodicea Aegean Sea Patmos ASIA Kos 1 Rhodes ARCHEOLOGICAL MAP OF WESTERN TURKEY BULGARIA Sinanköy Manya Mt. NORTH EDİRNE KIRKLARELİ Selimiye Fatih Iron Foundry Mosque UNESCO B L A C K S E A MACEDONIA Yeni Saray Kırklareli Höyük İSTANBUL Herakleia Skotoussa (Byzantium) Krenides Linos (Constantinople) Sirra Philippi Beikos Palatianon Berge Karaevlialtı Menekşe Çatağı Prusias Tauriana Filippoi THRACE Bathonea Küçükyalı Ad hypium Morylos Dikaia Heraion teikhos Achaeology Edessa Neapolis park KOCAELİ Tragilos Antisara Abdera Perinthos Basilica UNESCO Maroneia TEKİRDAĞ (İZMİT) DÜZCE Europos Kavala Doriskos Nicomedia Pella Amphipolis Stryme Işıklar Mt. ALBANIA Allante Lete Bormiskos Thessalonica Argilos THE SEA OF MARMARA SAKARYA MACEDONIANaoussa Apollonia Thassos Ainos (ADAPAZARI) UNESCO Thermes Aegae YALOVA Ceramic Furnaces Selectum Chalastra Strepsa Berea Iznik Lake Nicea Methone Cyzicus Vergina Petralona Samothrace Parion Roman theater Acanthos Zeytinli Ada Apamela Aisa Ouranopolis Hisardere Dasaki Elimia Pydna Barçın Höyük BTHYNIA Galepsos Yenibademli Höyük BURSA UNESCO Antigonia Thyssus Apollonia (Prusa) ÇANAKKALE Manyas Zeytinlik Höyük Arisbe Lake Ulubat Phylace Dion Akrothooi Lake Sane Parthenopolis GÖKCEADA Aktopraklık O.Gazi Külliyesi BİLECİK Asprokampos Kremaste Daskyleion UNESCO Höyük Pythion Neopolis Astyra Sundiken Mts. Herakleum Paşalar Sarhöyük Mount Athos Achmilleion Troy Pessinus Potamia Mt.Olympos
    [Show full text]
  • Antiquity, Archaeology, and National Imagination in Greece
    CLASSICAL PRESENCES General Editors Lorna Hardwick James I. Porter CLASSICAL PRESENCES The texts, ideas, images, and material culture of ancient Greece and Rome have always been crucial to attempts to appropriate the past in order to authenticate the present. They underlie the mapping of change and the assertion and challenging of values and identities, old and new. Classical Presences brings the latest scholarship to bear on the contexts, theory, and practice of such use, and abuse, of the classical past. The Nation and its Ruins: Antiquity, Archaeology, and National Imagination in Greece YANNIS HAMILAKIS 1 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford ox2 6dp Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide in Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With oYces in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries Published in the United States by Oxford University Press Inc., New York ß Yannis Hamilakis 2007 The moral rights of the author have been asserted Database right Oxford University Press (maker) First published 2007 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkish Language As a Politicized Element: the Case of Turkish Nation-Building
    GeT MA Working Paper Series No. 15 2018 Turkish Language as a Politicized Element: The Case of Turkish Nation-Building TOLGA SEVIN GeT MA Working Paper Series Department of Social Sciences Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Unter den Linden 6, 10099 Berlin www.sowi.hu-berlin.de/getma [email protected] TOLGA SEVIN GET MA WP 15/2018 GeT MA Working Paper Series Published by the German Turkish Masters Program of Social Sciences (GeT MA), Department of Social Sciences at Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. Papers in this series are the final theses of GeT MA graduates. Publication in this series does not preclude a later publication elsewhere. The views expressed in the GeT MA Working Paper Series are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the GeT MA Program or of Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. The copyright stays with the author(s). Copyright for this paper: Tolga Sevin Please cite in the following format: Sevin, Tolga (2018): Turkish Language as a Politicized Element: The Case of Turkish Nation-Building. GeT MA Working Paper No. 15, Department of Social Sciences, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. [online] Homepage: Edoc Server Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. URL: http://edoc.hu-berlin.de/series/getmaseries Corresponding authors: Tolga Sevin, Master of Social Science, German Turkish Masters Program, Institut für Sozialwissenschaften, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Unter den Linden 6, 10099 Berlin. Tolga Sevin, born in Ankara, studied at Bilkent University, Middle East Technical University, and Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin. He lives in Berlin. This thesis is dedicated to Müfit Kulen.
    [Show full text]
  • Mathias Mehofer
    REINHARD JUNG · MATHIAS MEHOFER MYCENAEAN GREECE AND BRONZE AGE ITALY: COOPERATION, TRADE OR WAR? »I continue to believe it probable that the occasion for the first introduction of Type II swords to the Aegean was military necessity that drove Mycenaean princes to hire warriors from outside Greece. These warriors brought their own armouries with them. Their swords in particular were greatly admired by their em - ployers, who set their own swordsmiths to copy and adapt them.« 1 Since the publication of Hector Catling’s paper, which contains the above interpretation of Late Bronze Age relations between Mycenaean Greece and its north-western neighbours, various research ers have decisively contributed to a better understanding of the pro - cesses that lead 1) to the adoption of new types of weapons, armour, dress accessories and implements (often referred to as metallurgical koiné or »urnfield bronzes«) at the end of the Aegean Bronze Age and 2) to the local production of impasto pottery of Italian Recent and Final Bronze Age type in the Aegean and beyond. Thanks to the results of recent studies, we are provided with detailed typological arguments 2 that support the theory that the origin of those bronze and pottery types has to be traced back to Italy (figs 1-2). Other schools of research argued that the majority of the types forming the Fig. 1 Sites of the studied objects in Italy. – (Map R. Jung / metallurgical koiné was invented in the regions of M. Mehofer). Fig. 2 Sites of the studied objects in Greece. – (Map R. Jung / M. Mehofer). Archäologisches Korrespondenzblatt 43 · 2013 175 the Balkans and/or Central Europe and reached the Aegean via a Balkan route 3, whereas still others proposed to ascribe at least specific types to a Central European/Balkan origin 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography Many books were read and researched in the compilation of Binford, L. R, 1983, Working at Archaeology. Academic Press, The Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology: New York. Binford, L. R, and Binford, S. R (eds.), 1968, New Perspectives in American Museum of Natural History, 1993, The First Humans. Archaeology. Aldine, Chicago. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Braidwood, R 1.,1960, Archaeologists and What They Do. Franklin American Museum of Natural History, 1993, People of the Stone Watts, New York. Age. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Branigan, Keith (ed.), 1982, The Atlas ofArchaeology. St. Martin's, American Museum of Natural History, 1994, New World and Pacific New York. Civilizations. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Bray, w., and Tump, D., 1972, Penguin Dictionary ofArchaeology. American Museum of Natural History, 1994, Old World Civiliza­ Penguin, New York. tions. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Brennan, L., 1973, Beginner's Guide to Archaeology. Stackpole Ashmore, w., and Sharer, R. J., 1988, Discovering Our Past: A Brief Books, Harrisburg, PA. Introduction to Archaeology. Mayfield, Mountain View, CA. Broderick, M., and Morton, A. A., 1924, A Concise Dictionary of Atkinson, R J. C., 1985, Field Archaeology, 2d ed. Hyperion, New Egyptian Archaeology. Ares Publishers, Chicago. York. Brothwell, D., 1963, Digging Up Bones: The Excavation, Treatment Bacon, E. (ed.), 1976, The Great Archaeologists. Bobbs-Merrill, and Study ofHuman Skeletal Remains. British Museum, London. New York. Brothwell, D., and Higgs, E. (eds.), 1969, Science in Archaeology, Bahn, P., 1993, Collins Dictionary of Archaeology. ABC-CLIO, 2d ed. Thames and Hudson, London. Santa Barbara, CA. Budge, E. A. Wallis, 1929, The Rosetta Stone. Dover, New York. Bahn, P.
    [Show full text]
  • Hamilakis Nation and Its Ruins.Pdf
    CLASSICAL PRESENCES General Editors Lorna Hardwick James I. Porter CLASSICAL PRESENCES The texts, ideas, images, and material culture of ancient Greece and Rome have always been crucial to attempts to appropriate the past in order to authenticate the present. They underlie the mapping of change and the assertion and challenging of values and identities, old and new. Classical Presences brings the latest scholarship to bear on the contexts, theory, and practice of such use, and abuse, of the classical past. The Nation and its Ruins: Antiquity, Archaeology, and National Imagination in Greece YANNIS HAMILAKIS 1 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford ox2 6dp Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide in Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With oYces in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries Published in the United States by Oxford University Press Inc., New York ß Yannis Hamilakis 2007 The moral rights of the author have been asserted Database right Oxford University Press (maker) First published 2007 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeology and History of Lydia from the Early Lydian Period to Late Antiquity (8Th Century B.C.-6Th Century A.D.)
    Dokuz Eylül University – DEU The Research Center for the Archaeology of Western Anatolia – EKVAM Colloquia Anatolica et Aegaea Congressus internationales Smyrnenses IX Archaeology and history of Lydia from the early Lydian period to late antiquity (8th century B.C.-6th century A.D.). An international symposium May 17-18, 2017 / Izmir, Turkey ABSTRACTS Edited by Ergün Laflı Gülseren Kan Şahin Last Update: 21/04/2017. Izmir, May 2017 Websites: https://independent.academia.edu/TheLydiaSymposium https://www.researchgate.net/profile/The_Lydia_Symposium 1 This symposium has been dedicated to Roberto Gusmani (1935-2009) and Peter Herrmann (1927-2002) due to their pioneering works on the archaeology and history of ancient Lydia. Fig. 1: Map of Lydia and neighbouring areas in western Asia Minor (S. Patacı, 2017). 2 Table of contents Ergün Laflı, An introduction to Lydian studies: Editorial remarks to the abstract booklet of the Lydia Symposium....................................................................................................................................................8-9. Nihal Akıllı, Protohistorical excavations at Hastane Höyük in Akhisar………………………………10. Sedat Akkurnaz, New examples of Archaic architectural terracottas from Lydia………………………..11. Gülseren Alkış Yazıcı, Some remarks on the ancient religions of Lydia……………………………….12. Elif Alten, Revolt of Achaeus against Antiochus III the Great and the siege of Sardis, based on classical textual, epigraphic and numismatic evidence………………………………………………………………....13. Gaetano Arena, Heleis: A chief doctor in Roman Lydia…….……………………………………....14. Ilias N. Arnaoutoglou, Κοινὸν, συμβίωσις: Associations in Hellenistic and Roman Lydia……….……..15. Eirini Artemi, The role of Ephesus in the late antiquity from the period of Diocletian to A.D. 449, the “Robber Synod”.……………………………………………………………………….………...16. Natalia S. Astashova, Anatolian pottery from Panticapaeum…………………………………….17-18. Ayşegül Aykurt, Minoan presence in western Anatolia……………………………………………...19.
    [Show full text]
  • RAG Vol 9 Issue 1
    Roman Archaeology Group Inc Volume 9, Issue 1 May, 2014 The RAG The Ancient City of Aphrodisias, Turkey, and the IN THIS ISSUE Roman Sebasteion Norah Cooper Caesar to Stephanus……This one city [= Aphrodisias] I have taken for my own out of all Asia. I wish these people to be protected as my own townsmen. From an inscription on the Archive Wall in the Aphrodisias Theatre from Octavianus (later the Emperor Augustus) to Stephanus of Laodicea. Aphrodisias is one of the loveliest of the many, splendid Graeco-Roman cities in Turkey, Ancient City of Aphrodisias 1 and the Roman Sebasteion, with Norah Cooper its remaining marbles on display in the Aphrodisias museum, is testament to the power and influence of the Romans in Turkey. More than that it shows how a ‘Greek’ city of the eastern part of the Roman Empire chose to view the imperial family and The Trajanic Mint of Rome 9 the newly established imperial John Melville-Jones cult. Turkey There is evidence of human presence in the area of modern Turkey from the Palaeolithic period (500,000 to 12,000 BC). From the early Bronze Age (c. 3000 BC) there were small city History in all Men’s Lives 11 states like Troy and then from Guy de la Bédoyère mid 2400BC, the Assyrians left numerous cuneiform records of their trade in gold, silver and iron with the peoples of Anatolia like the Hatti. About 2000 BC, the Hittites arrived in Anatolia and became both the dominant culture and an empire until the Assyrian Recent Developments 13 conquest of 1250 BC.
    [Show full text]
  • Die Falange Española Und Ihr Gründer José Antonio Primo De
    Die Falange Española und ihr Gründer José Antonio Primo de Rivera (1903-1936) - im Rahmen der Bewältigung der Vergangenheit der Zweiten Spanischen Republik (1931-1939) Frank Peter Geinitz Dissertation an der Sozialwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München vorgelegt von Frank Peter Geinitz aus Chemnitz München, den 5. Mai 2008 Meinen Eltern Erich und Ingeborg Erstgutachter : Professor Dr. Tilman Mayer, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms- Universität Bonn, Seminar für Politische Wissenschaft Zweitgutachter: Professor Dr. Martin Baumeister, LMU München, Historisches Seminar, Abt. Neueste Geschichte und Zeitgeschichte Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: Mittwoch, 27. Juni 2007 II Vorwort „Ohne Erinnerung keine Versöhnung“ „Ohne Gerechtigkeit kein Frieden“1 Wer ist dieser José Antonio Primo de Rivera, der ein im Chaos versinkendes Spanien retten möchte und dabei sein Leben aufs Spiel setzt? Ist dieser Adlige aus bestem Hause der geeignete und charismatische Anführer, der diesem Land in Zeiten großer politischer und sozialer Not den Weg zu einem ‚Neuen’ Staat, zu neuer Identität weisen kann? Warum das Interesse, 70 Jahre nach dem Tod des Gründers der politischen Bewegung Falange Española , eine Studie über ein anscheinend abgeschlossenes Thema aus der mit Abstand unglücklichsten Epoche der spanischen Geschichte anzufertigen? Es beruht schlicht und einfach auf dem Verlangen, dazu beizutragen, das damalige Geschehen mit den bestehenden Gegensätzen aufzugreifen, zu durchleuchten und, aus einem neuen Blickwinkel heraus, eine neutrale Wertung zur historischen Rolle der Falange Española und ihrer Führerpersönlichkeit hinzuzufügen. Denn die betreffende Epoche - die 30er Jahre des 20. Jahrhunderts - ist bis heute nicht hinreichend aufgearbeitet. Das Projekt wird ganz bewußt unter die eingangs genannten Mottos gestellt; beide sind für die Bewältigung jener tragischen Jahre der spanischen Geschichte gute ‚Leitbilder’.
    [Show full text]
  • WW2-Spain-Tripbook.Pdf
    SPAIN 1 Page Spanish Civil War (clockwise from top-left) • Members of the XI International Brigade at the Battle of Belchite • Bf 109 with Nationalist markings • Bombing of an airfield in Spanish West Africa • Republican soldiers at the Siege of the Alcázar • Nationalist soldiers operating an anti-aircraft gun • HMS Royal Oakin an incursion around Gibraltar Date 17 July 1936 – 1 April 1939 (2 years, 8 months, 2 weeks and 1 day) Location Spain Result Nationalist victory • End of the Second Spanish Republic • Establishment of the Spanish State under the rule of Francisco Franco Belligerents 2 Page Republicans Nationalists • Ejército Popular • FET y de las JONS[b] • Popular Front • FE de las JONS[c] • CNT-FAI • Requetés[c] • UGT • CEDA[c] • Generalitat de Catalunya • Renovación Española[c] • Euzko Gudarostea[a] • Army of Africa • International Brigades • Italy • Supported by: • Germany • Soviet Union • Supported by: • Mexico • Portugal • France (1936) • Vatican City (Diplomatic) • Foreign volunteers • Foreign volunteers Commanders and leaders Republican leaders Nationalist leaders • Manuel Azaña • José Sanjurjo † • Julián Besteiro • Emilio Mola † • Francisco Largo Caballero • Francisco Franco • Juan Negrín • Gonzalo Queipo de Llano • Indalecio Prieto • Juan Yagüe • Vicente Rojo Lluch • Miguel Cabanellas † • José Miaja • Fidel Dávila Arrondo • Juan Modesto • Manuel Goded Llopis † • Juan Hernández Saravia • Manuel Hedilla • Carlos Romero Giménez • Manuel Fal Conde • Buenaventura Durruti † • Lluís Companys • José Antonio Aguirre Strength 1936
    [Show full text]
  • Luigi Pernier, Direttore
    Volume LXXXVII Serie III, 9 Tomo I* 2009 ESTRATTO SCUOLA ARCHEOLOGICA ITALIANA DI ATENE 100 anni 1909/1910 - 2009/2010 LUIGI PERNIER: DIRETTORE “PEL BENE E L’AVVENIRE” * “Le dirò che la mia proposta del nome del Dr. Pernier per la direzione della Scuola di Atene è stata appoggiata presso il Ministro Rava dal Senatore Mosso e dall’On. Galli e che il Ministro ha risposto dando buon affidamento” 1 Con queste parole, scritte da Federico Halbherr 2 a Domenico Comparetti 3, nel settembre del 1908, si conclude la laboriosa genesi 4 della Scuola Archeologica Italiana di Atene. Il triangolo Comparetti-Halbherr-Pernier offre, nei frequenti scambi epistolari, uno spaccato affascinante e, per molti versi, estremamente attuale della rete di interessi politici e scientifici che avevano mosso, già all’indomani della scoperta di Gortina, l’appassionato roveretano a cercare una sede greca per le sue missioni archeologiche. Da Firenze Domenico Comparetti crea i presupposti politici e individua vari ambiti della ricer - ca scientifica, mentre a Halbherr il giovane Luigi Pernier 5 appare come una figura che possa unire la concretezza dell’attività sul campo ad un’indole diplomatica. “Luigi Pernier (…) si distingue per una speciale vocazione per questi studii di storia e di anti - chità” 6 Pernier era stato selezionato nel 1897 come allievo della Scuola Archeologica di Roma da una severa commissione composta da D. Comparetti, R. Lanciani, F. Halbherr, E. Loewy ed E. De Ruggiero. Il giudizio unanime di idoneità aveva confermato l’ottima prova che qualche mese prima Pernier aveva sostenuto discutendo la tesi di laurea di fronte, tra gli altri, a Giulio Beloch e con Lanciani come relatore.
    [Show full text]
  • Orbis Terrarum DATE: AD 20 AUTHOR: Marcus Vipsanius Agrippa
    Orbis Terrarum #118 TITLE: Orbis Terrarum DATE: A.D. 20 AUTHOR: Marcus Vipsanius Agrippa DESCRIPTION: The profound difference between the Roman and the Greek mind is illustrated with peculiar clarity in their maps. The Romans were indifferent to mathematical geography, with its system of latitudes and longitudes, its astronomical measurements, and its problem of projections. What they wanted was a practical map to be used for military and administrative purposes. Disregarding the elaborate projections of the Greeks, they reverted to the old disk map of the Ionian geographers as being better adapted to their purposes. Within this round frame the Roman cartographers placed the Orbis Terrarum, the circuit of the world. There are only scanty records of Roman maps of the Republic. The earliest of which we hear, the Sardinia map of 174 B.C., clearly had a strong pictorial element. But there is some evidence that, as we should expect from a land-based and, at that time, well advanced agricultural people, subsequent mapping development before Julius Caesar was dominated by land survey; the earliest recorded Roman survey map is as early as 167-164 B.C. If land survey did play such an important part, then these plans, being based on centuriation requirements and therefore square or rectangular, may have influenced the shape of smaller-scale maps. This shape was also one that suited the Roman habit of placing a large map on a wall of a temple or colonnade. Varro (116-27 B.C.) in his De re rustica, published in 37 B.C., introduces the speakers meeting at the temple of Mother Earth [Tellus] as they look at Italiam pictam [Italy painted].
    [Show full text]