HIGH LIGHTS of the GERMAN-SOVIET WAR 25 Enemy Forces Left Capable of Annulling the "Hattie of the Frontier" Has Fully the Success Already Obtained

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

HIGH LIGHTS of the GERMAN-SOVIET WAR 25 Enemy Forces Left Capable of Annulling the HIGH LIGHTS OF THE GERMAN -SOVIET WAR By O. PRINCIPINI The Genllo71·S0-vjct tUt'lr is being lough.t on Sitch It tre1tlendous seate 01 ?/len and miles that it will lor a wng time be impossible to obtain a. clear lJieture of the actual course of events. Yet 80me general outlines are discernible. It is al?'eady obvious that the battle between Germany and the USSR differs from th~ previous campaigns of the prcsent war. Here a'/'e the views of a competent obsertler on the Ii-rst twelve weeks 01 hostilitics.-K.M. The Russo-German conflict, in the actual p;ovision of adequate, timely "first twelve weeks of war, has had two and effiCIent material aid to the Soviet essential phases-the "battle of the Union by Britain and America. frontier" and the "battle of the Stalin Line": battles of giants, the struggle of colossa" armies, along frontiers and NO BLITZKRIEG IN RUSSIA? in war-zones practically unlimited. During the first week of the war While it is still too early thoroughly there was real fear in London and to examine the various phases of the Washington, perhaps more than in fighting, certain conclusions are already Moscow, of seeing Russia "blitzed" in clearly enough revealed. However, an a few weeks, as had been the case first objective military or political observer, in Pola.nd. then France, and most re­ before reaching definite conclusions, cently in Yugoslavia and Greece. And must proceed cautiously. limiting him­ as Moscow, Leningrad, and Kiev are self to a rational examination of the today still in Russian hands, the Anglo­ 'first fundamental aspects of the tre­ American press speaks of a victorious mendous struggle and deducting from Russian resistance. them the basic elements for a logical The truth may very soon turn out to and well-based judgment. be quite different. It seems that in the Out of the fog of military secrecy the Russian campaign the German Com­ first lights and shadows of the new mand has again taken the enemy by war have begun to appear. surprise, not only in the choice of time but also in the choice of tactical Russia, upon entering this war, could methods. It should be remembered rely on two sources of strength: the that the real military purpose of a war tremendous distances, and the huge is the defeat of the enemy forces, not reserves of man-power and materials; the occupation of enemy territories. we shall later see how these have been Victory is very often manifested, it is utilized by the Red High Command. true, by the occupation of enemy ter­ Initiative and surprise-two fun­ ritories, but not unless the occupation damental elements of success in war­ of the strategic territorial objectives seem t.o have disappeared immediately, presupposes the destruction of the de­ and perhaps forever, from the hands fending forces by depriving the enemy of the Red Headquarters. Three other of the very sources of his war-power elements, however, seem still uncertain and by striking directly at the heart to the distant observer: the moral and will of enemy resistance. All this c!)hesion of the Red troops; the leader­ is only true if, after the objectives ship of the Red Command; and the have been reached, there are no more HIGH LIGHTS OF THE GERMAN-SOVIET WAR 25 enemy forces left capable of annulling The "hattIe of the frontier" has fully the success already obtained. confirmed what the German High Com­ mand suspected, namely, that Russia From reports known to us up to now was for a long time secretly preparing -reports that are necessarily frag­ for war, massing her forces to strike mentary and incomplete - we are at Germany while the latter was en­ prompted to conclude that the German gaged on other fronts. The tenacious Command is applying in Russia a new resistance met by the German troops tactical method which is perhaps most since the first day of this campaign appropriate to the particular situation has been possible only because there on the Russian front. There has been were already Russian troops and mate­ no spectacular drive, none of those rial at the Russo-German frontier prac­ audacious, impressive, arrow-like tically ready to start the offensive thrusts, as that on Lemberg in 1939 to themselves. cut any possible junction of Poland with Rumania, or as in France in 1940 Perha.ps history will later record the thrust on Amiens, Abbeville, and that it is just this which has been the Dunkirk, or that on Athens through fatal self-condemnation of Soviet Rus­ Salonika and Larissa. In the Russian ~a. The timely move of the German campaign, the day-to-day situation of Army compelled the Soviet Command the opposing fronts has on Borne days to employ a great quantity of its forces shown wide and deep indentations to­ when the Red Army was not yet com­ ward the east; but generally the fronts pletely ready to fight. And moreover, have kept, and are continuing to keep, to fight not only at a time but also in an almost unbroken line. a territory and in a manner less favor­ able to the Soviet forces. Perhaps the German Command, tak­ In a defensive struggle such as the ing into consideration the vastness of one now imposed on the Soviet forces, the Red provinces and the great nume­ the Russian High Command had prob­ rical strength of the Soviet armies, ably intended to exploit to the maxi­ preferred to thrust directly into sepa· mum the vastness and depth of the rate enemy armies instead of at great endless Soviet territory: in other words, territorial objectives. In other words, to give up space in order to gain time; "blitzkrieg" localized against the de­ to gain time in order to prepare a fight fending forces, as at Bialystok and under the most favorable conditions, Minsk, at Vitebsk and Smolensk, as re­ namely, where, when, and in which­ cently between the lower Bug and lowt;r ever way the grouping of her own Dniepr and as in many other locali­ forces and the general situation ties all along the wide Russian front. makes It advisable to fight, that is, to maintain the bulk of her own STALIN LOSES ADVANTAGE OF forces at a great distance from the enemy with a view to keeping fully her SPACE own freedom of action and of maneu­ Another of the main conclusions it ver; to withdraw as far as possible has been possible to draw immediately from the starting-bases of the German after the "battle of the frontier" is forces in order to compel the German that Stalin has been compelled to give Command to lose time by searching for up his advantage of space. Enormous the enemy, to build new advance-bases Russian land and aerial forces have for its land and air forces, and to re­ been compelled to fight and have been open long ways of communication or defeated, all along the frontier, since to bring into use new ones. the first day of the campaign without We all know today that exactly the being able to withdraw to the main opposite happened. The Red High Russian defense line. Command had deployed towards the 26 THE XXth CENTURY west all the bulk, and perhaps the best more to its natural advantages than its part. of its mammoth war-machine: its defensive preparations. Of great value headquarters, its mechanized units, its are the supporting wings at the two imposing land troops, its airfields, its opposite ends of the line, facing re­ deposits of supplies. These Russian spectively the Baltic and the Black forces, arrayed for an attack, were now Seas. suddenly forced to fight a defensive battle in a mo t critical situation. Since In the north, the system seems to it was impo..sible to take up in time have consisted of an advanced line of positions further back-as would have defense along the lower river Dvina, a been advisable in a defensive battle-­ line which is completed in the rear by the Russian Command had to accept an excellent defense in depth, linked up open battle from the first day of the with the Lake Peipus region and sup­ war, under conditions of great dis­ ported at a convenient distance by the advantage to its own forces. Indeed naval base of Kronstadt and the great the German Army was able, from the sUpply base of Leningrad. beginning of the campaign, to develop In the south. on the Black Sea front, to the full its unfa.iling ability for the there was another multiple system of offensive, operating at short distances defense lines. First, an advanced line of from its own starting-bases. fortifications along the lower Dniestr, For the Russian High Command the well supported by the central supply surprise was complete. Not until after base of Odessa and by the naval base of the first week of war was it reorganiz­ Niko}ayev. The main defense line was ed and the front divided into the perhaps constructed along the lower three known sectors: northern, central, river Bug. Still further to the east is and southern (Voroshilov, Timoshenko, a defense line curving back onto the Budenny). lower Dniepr, whose course at this point turns in again towards the east, THE STALIN LINE which is not very favorable for the The Stalin Line has already given economical defense of that territory. its name to the second phas'e of the In the centre, the Stalin Line was war.
Recommended publications
  • The Stalin Line: Home Fortification of the USSR’S Western Border by Ivan Volkov & Evgeny Khitryak
    Buy Now! The Stalin Line: Home Fortification of the USSR’s Western Border By Ivan Volkov & Evgeny Khitryak 5,000 men and was to have a length of about 62 miles (100 km). In the autumn of 1918, then, with the forming of special construction organizations for the emplacement of fortifications, the Special Committee of the Revolutionary War Council of the USSR (Revvoensovet, RVS) approved the construction of continuous fortified lines on the north- ern, western and southern borders. At that time the only military per- sonnel who had the necessary skills and experience for such projects were the engineering officers of the old tsarist army. The Soviet government therefore put out an appeal to all civilians in the A group of Mina bunkers in the Kiev Fortified Region (modern-day photo). country who had the required technical and military knowledge to join the Red Army (Raboche-Krestianskaya Krasnaya Armia, RKKA). Many eminent Russian civilian engineers responded to the call. At the same time, however, the ongoing military operations of the civil war made it clear that continuous fortified lines didn’t conform to the character of that war. The total length of the combat fronts—about 5,300 miles (8,500 km)—and their relatively The sections of a large light coverage by troops on both sides, machinegun bunker. worked to prevent the kind of positional 1 - embrasures warfare seen in the First World War. 2 - casemates The Russian Civil War was one of 3 - command post maneuver without continuous fronts. 4 - anti-gas vestibule That’s why the principle of continuous 5 - inner defense loophole fortifications was almost immediately 6 - cranked corridor door abandoned in favor of a new one.
    [Show full text]
  • Minsk City Tour
    Minsk City Tour Discover the Belarusian capital of Minsk. Located in the heart of the country, it has a population of 2 million inhabitants and is the political and cultural centre of Belarus. During your five day trip you will also explore other architectural and cultural highlights in the surroundings. 1st day: Outward journey Today you will begin your journey to Minsk. You will be picked up at the airport by your English-speaking tour guide. After checking in at your hotel, your guide will accompany you on an evening stroll around the city. This will be followed by an evening meal in a typical Belarusian restaurant, before visiting the Belarusian National Library where you will have a superb view of the night lights of Minsk from the roof-top. You will be able to discuss the programme for the next few days together with your tour guide. 2nd day: Walking tour of Minsk Today you will learn more about the turbulent history of the country and Minsk, the Belarusian capital. Your guide will collect you from your hotel after breakfast and together you will go on a walk around town to see the sights. Your journey through time will start at the first stone church (10th/11th century) and will continue to the Orthodox and Catholic churches built between the 13th and 17th century in the old town centre. In the Troitskoye district you will be able to imagine what Minsk looked like in the 19th century. The town was almost completely destroyed during the Second World War and is still considered today to be a prime example of socialist realism.
    [Show full text]
  • High Treason: Essays on the History of the Red Army 1918-1938, Volume II
    FINAL REPORT T O NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR SOVIET AND EAST EUROPEAN RESEARCH TITLE : HIG H TREASON: ESSAYS ON THE HISTORY OF TH E RED ARMY 1918-193 8 VOLUME I I AUTHOR . VITALY RAPOPOR T YURI ALEXEE V CONTRACTOR : CENTER FOR PLANNING AND RESEARCH, .INC . R . K . LAURINO, PROJECT DIRECTO R PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR : VLADIMIR TREML, CHIEF EDITO R BRUCE ADAMS, TRANSLATOR - EDITO R COUNCIL CONTRACT NUMBER : 626- 3 The work leading to this report was supported in whole or i n part from funds provided by the National Council for Sovie t and East European Research . HIGH TREASO N Essays in the History of the Red Army 1918-1938 Volume I I Authors : Vitaly N . Rapopor t an d Yuri Alexeev (pseudonym ) Chief Editor : Vladimir Trem l Translator and Co-Editor : Bruce Adam s June 11, 198 4 Integrative Analysis Project o f The Center for Planning and Research, Inc . Work on this Project supported by : Tte Defense Intelligence Agency (Contract DNA001-80-C-0333 ) an d The National Council for Soviet and East European Studies (Contract 626-3) PART FOU R CONSPIRACY AGAINST THE RKK A Up to now we have spoken of Caligula as a princeps . It remains to discuss him as a monster . Suetoniu s There is a commandment to forgive our enemies , but there is no commandment to forgive our friends . L . Medic i Some comrades think that repression is the main thing in th e advance of socialism, and if repression does not Increase , there is no advance . Is that so? Of course it is not so .
    [Show full text]
  • OSW Report | Opposites Put Together. Belarus's Politics of Memory
    OPPOSITES PUT TOGETHER BELARUS’S POLITICS OF MEMORY Kamil Kłysiński, Wojciech Konończuk WARSAW OCTOBER 2020 OPPOSITES PUT TOGETHER BELARUS’S POLITICS OF MEMORY Kamil Kłysiński, Wojciech Konończuk © Copyright by Centre for Eastern Studies CONTENT EDITOR Adam Eberhardt EDITOR Szymon Sztyk CO-OPERATION Tomasz Strzelczyk, Katarzyna Kazimierska TRANSLATION Ilona Duchnowicz CO-OPERATION Timothy Harrell GRAPHIC DESIGN PARA-BUCH DTP IMAGINI PHOTOGRAPH ON COVER Jimmy Tudeschi / Shutterstock.com Centre for Eastern Studies ul. Koszykowa 6a, 00-564 Warsaw, Poland tel.: (+48) 22 525 80 00, [email protected] www.osw.waw.pl ISBN 978-83-65827-56-2 Contents MAIN POINTS | 5 INTRODUCTION | 11 I. THE BACKGROUND OF THE BELARUSIAN POLITICS OF MEMORY | 14 II. THE SEARCH FOR ITS OWN WAY. ATTEMPTS TO DEFINE HISTORICAL IDENTITY (1991–1994) | 18 III. THE PRO-RUSSIAN DRIFT. THE IDEOLOGISATION OF THE POLITICS OF MEMORY (1994–2014) | 22 IV. CREATING ELEMENTS OF DISTINCTNESS. A CAUTIOUS TURN IN MEMORY POLITICS (2014–) | 27 1. The cradle of statehood: the Principality of Polotsk | 28 2. The powerful heritage: the Grand Duchy of Lithuania | 32 3. Moderate scepticism: Belarus in the Russian Empire | 39 4. A conditional acceptance: the Belarusian People’s Republic | 47 5. The neo-Soviet narrative: Belarusian territories in the Second Polish Republic | 50 6. Respect with some reservations: Belarus in the Soviet Union | 55 V. CONCLUSION. THE POLICY OF BRINGING OPPOSITES TOGETHER | 66 MAIN POINTS • Immediately after 1991, the activity of nationalist circles in Belarus led to a change in the Soviet historical narrative, which used to be the only permit­ ted one. However, they did not manage to develop a coherent and effective politics of memory or to subsequently put this new message across to the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Namibia 2004
    安邦有限公司(KKKP/PL):0557(94046-W) AIRBORNE SDN BHD 36, DICKENS STREET, 10050 PENANG TEL: +604-2632141 FAX: +604-2638336 EMAIL: [email protected] 1 安邦有限公司(KKKP/PL):0557(94046-W) AIRBORNE SDN BHD 36, DICKENS STREET, 10050 PENANG TEL: +604-2632141 FAX: +604-2638336 EMAIL: [email protected] Day 1 Depart for Chisinau, Moldova Depart for Chisinau. Day 2 Arrive Chisinau (L, D) On arrival, a half day city tour of Chisinau before transfer to hotel. After lunch, we will continue to Cricova Winery. Cricova is pearl of Moldovan wine that represents an unique underground city well-known all over the world by its huge labyrinths, and especially by its excellent wines. "Cricova" is the first winery in Moldova which makes sparkling wine as it was prepared by the monk - wine maker Pierre Perignon. Bristol Hotel 4* or similar Day 3 Chisinau – Tiraspol, Transnistria – Odessa, Ukraine (2N) (B, L, D) Travel to Transnistria. Many people see this place as nothing more than a relic of communism and denounce it as an uninteresting travel destination. The truth is way different. Transnistria is an unrecognized breakaway republic located on a strip of land between the river Dniester and the eastern Moldovan border with Ukraine. A small city itself, its capital Tiraspol is one of the most fascinating places you will ever visit. Cross the border to Odessa, Ukraine. Hotel Milano by Reikartz Collection 4* or similar Day 4 Odessa (B, L, D) Odessa is a port city on the Black Sea in southern Ukraine. It’s known for its beaches and 19th-century architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloads/Assets/201503 BP Russian Forces in Ukraine Kostyuchenko, “We Were Fully Aware of What We Brought Ourselves to FINAL.Pdf.And What Could Happen,” Op Cit
    HIDING IN PLAIN SIGHT Putin's War in Ukraine By Maksymilian Czuperski, John Herbst, Eliot Higgins, Alina Polyakova, and Damon Wilson © 2015 The Atlantic Council of the United States. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without permission in writing from the Atlantic Council, except in the case of brief quotations in news articles, critical articles, or reviews. Please direct inquiries to: Atlantic Council 1030 15th Street, NW, 12th Floor Washington, DC 20005 ISBN: 978-1-61977-996-9 Cover photo credit: Reuters/Marko Djurica. Pro-Russian rebels stand on top of a burnt-out Ukrainian personnel carrier near the village of Novokaterinovka in eastern Ukraine, September 24, 2014. This report is written and published in accordance with the Atlantic Council Policy on Intellectual Independence. The authors are solely responsible for its analysis and recommendations. The Atlantic Council and its donors do not determine, nor do they necessarily endorse or advocate for, any of this report’s conclusions. May 2015 ATLANTIC COUNCIL HIDING IN PLAIN SIGHT REPORT TEAM Maksymilian Czuperski Special Assistant to the President, Atlantic Council John Herbst Director, Dinu Patriciu Eurasia Center, Atlantic Council and former US Ambassador to Ukraine Eliot Higgins Founder, Bellingcat and Visiting Research Associate, Department of War Studies, King’s College London Alina Polyakova Associate Director, Dinu Patriciu Eurasia Center, Atlantic Council Damon Wilson Executive Vice President, Programs
    [Show full text]
  • TURKISH DIPLOMACY, 1936-1945 a Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts
    RUSSOPHOBIC NEUTRALITY: TURKISH DIPLOMACY, 1936-1945 A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History By Onur Isci, M.A. Washington, DC February 27, 2014 Copyright 2014 by Onur Isci All Rights Reserved ii RUSSOPHOBIC NEUTRALITY: TURKISH DIPLOMACY, 1936-1945 Onur Isci, M.A. Thesis Advisor: Mustafa Aksakal, Ph.D ABSTRACT This dissertation tells the story of Soviet-Turkish rivalry during the crucible of World War II. By 1939, Turkey began fast reverting to its old imperial attitude, when Istanbul’s foreign policy had been dictated largely by the Sultan’s fear of Russia. The state of wartime affairs between Ankara and Moscow gradually fell in sharp contrast with the cordial atmosphere of the 1920s and 1930s. As opposed to previous historians who have dismissed Turkey’s wartime neutrality as a wily strategy of capitalizing on war, I argue that the underlying factor, guiding the Turkish state in its quest to remain neutral was the revival of Russophobia amongst the ruling circles in Ankara. There had never been a moment during the war for neither the Allies nor the Axis to depart Turkey from its neutrality unless some form of guarantee had soothed its Russian complex. A closer examination of the Turkish archives and the parliamentary minutes reveals that Turkey desired a German victory over Russia provided that this was followed by a British victory over Germany. In other words, Turks very much hoped to see another Brest-Litovsk status quo: two separate wars involving Germany, conducted independently by Britain and the USSR without cooperation.
    [Show full text]
  • World War II Memory Politics: Jewish, Polish and Roma Minorities of Belarus
    7 The Journal of Belarusian Studies World War II Memory Politics: Jewish, Polish and Roma Minorities of Belarus BY ANDREJ KOTLJARCHUK* ‘No one is forgotten, nothing is forgotten!’ Olga Bergholz, 1960 A popular slogan used by the Soviet authorities in regard to WWII. The aim of this study is to interpret recent trends in contemporary memory politics in Belarus, with focus on the Holocaust, Roma genocide memorials, and the memorial sites of the Polish minority in Belarus. The author believes that the theory of ‘path dependence’ is suitable for analysis of contemporary Belarusian memory politics with respect to World War II. In accordance with this theory, the scope and limitations of new politics are determined by the political choices made or results attained much earlier by the previous political regime. Recent comparative political studies adapt the ‘path dependence’ concept to historical material (Hedlund 2005). From this point of view, a comprehensive analysis of contemporary Belarusian memory politics is not possible without an examination of the Soviet period. In his study on the memorialization of the Holocaust in Poland, Hungary and Slovakia Jeffrey Blutinger defines three basic approaches to contemporary memory politics in Eastern Europe. The first approach, ‘aphasia’, means a virtual taboo on memory typical for the communist age. The second stage, ‘deflective negationism’, means that the Holocaust is recognised, but all responsibility for it is placed exclusively on the Germans. At the same time, the problem of local collaborationism is slurred over. Finally, the third model, ‘open examination’, * Andrej Kotjlarchuk, PhD is a Senior Lecturer at the Institute of Contemporary History, Södertörn University, Sweden.
    [Show full text]
  • Stalinism Revisited Stalinism Revisited
    CYAN MAGENTA YELLOW BLACK Stalinism Revisited Stalinism Revisited Stalinism Revisited brings together representatives of multiple generations to create a rich examination The Establishment of Communist Regimes in East-Central Europe of the study and practice of Stalinism. While the articles are uniformly excellent, the book’s signal contribution is to bring recent research from Eastern European scholars to an English-speaking audience. Thus the volume is not just a “state of the discipline” collection, in which articles are collected to reflect that current situation of scholarship in a given field; instead, this one includes cutting edge scholarship that will prompt more of the same from other scholars in other fields/subfields. I would recommend this book highly to anyone interested in understanding the technology of Stalinism in both StalinismStalinism thought and practice. Nick Miller Boise State University The Sovietization of post-1945 East-Central Europe—marked by the forceful imposition of the Soviet- type society in the region—was a process of massive socio-political and cultural transformation. Despite its paramount importance for understanding the nature of the communist regime and its RevisitedRevisited legacy, the communist take-over in East Central European countries has remained largely under- researched. Two decades after the collapse of the communist system,Stalinism Revisited brings together a remarkable international team of established and younger scholars, engaging them in a critical re-evaluation of the institutionalization of communist regimes in East-Central Europe and of the period of “high Stalinism.” Sovietization is approached not as a fully pre-determined, homogeneous, and monolithic transformation, but as a set of trans-national, multifaceted, and inter-related processes of large-scale institutional and ideological transfers, made up of multiple “takeovers” in various fields.
    [Show full text]
  • Usee(Final).Pdf
    TThraceh Unitetenbergd States and Eastern Europe in 1945 The United States and Eastern Europe in 1945 A Reassessment ✣ Marc Trachtenberg There was a time when it all seemed so simple. The Soviet Union, it was said, sought to Communize Eastern Europe at the end of World War II; the Western powers, and especially the United States, were deeply opposed to that policy; and the ensuing clash played a decisive role in triggering the Cold War. But historians in recent years have been moving away from that sort of interpretation. This is not because there has been a fundamental shift in our understanding of Soviet policy. Some scholars, to be sure, claim that the USSR, even in the latter part of the war, did not plan to Communize any of the countries in Eastern Europe—that “nowhere beyond what Moscow con- sidered the Soviet borders did its policies foresee the establishment of commu- nist regimes.”1 But the prevailing view today is rather different. Soviet leaders might not have had a “master plan” or a “detailed blueprint” for the Comm- unization of Eastern Europe, but by the end of the war, it is now commonly argued, they did have certain general goals and a certain general strategy for achieving those goals. The USSR, according to this view, would initially take a relatively moderate line and Sovietization would not be on the agenda. But the Communists would “proceed step by step” and would gradually tighten their grip on power. Eventually the “appropriate moment” would come, and at that point, as the Soviet leader Josif Stalin himself put it, the “mask” would come off and the “maximal program” would be put into effect.2 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Trial of JV Stalin: Exercises in Critical and Moral Reasoning
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 429 008 SO 029 677 AUTHOR Thomas, Paul F. TITLE The Trial of J.V. Stalin: Exercises in Critical and Moral Reasoning. Critical Geopedagogy No.1. ISBN ISBN-0-919867-01-4 PUB DATE 1998-00-00 NOTE 98p.; Published by the Ukranian ACademy of Arts and Sciences in Canada. PUB TYPE Guides Classroom Teacher (052) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC04 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Class Activities; *Communism; *Critical Thinking; Curriculum Enrichment; Discovery Learning; Foreign Countries; High Schools; Higher Education; *Moral Issues; *Political Power IDENTIFIERS Critical Pedagogy; Moral Reasoning; *Stalin (Joseph); Trials; *USSR ABSTRACT The dissemination and synthesis of critical, but scattered, existing knowledge concerning the human costs of J.V. Stalin's once-acclaimed achievements are contained in this seed document. The document is primarily for teachers who are free to expand, contract, modify, or delete the seed suggestions provided according to the characteristics of their students and teaching situations. The package contains 10 representative activity modules about Stalin that may require anywhere from 1 to 4 class periods. The package's modules can be used in any order and as supplementary teaching materials that will enrich tc,7ics and exercise studens' critical thinking skills. The first component of each activity module lists a number of critical and/or moral thinking issues for the teacher'.: pedagogical consideration. The package alsc contains 20 reference sheets that complement the activity modules and provide databases for the lines of inquiry suggested in the modules. The document concludes with an extensive bibliography. (BT) ******************************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document.
    [Show full text]
  • "We Made a Mistake"- Hitler
    mmmmmm From the collection of the Frejinger " b t W P n San Francisco, California 2008 'WE MADE A MISTAKE"- HITLER ^^We Made A Mistake''— fliTLEi? RUSSIA'S SURPRISING DEFENSE AGAINST GERMANY By LUCIEN ZACHAROFF GROSSET & DUNLAP PtTBLISHERS NeW YoRK By arrangement with D. Appletcm-Century Co., Inc. COPYMGHT, 1941, BY D. Appleton-Century Company, Inc. All rights reserved. This book, or parts thereof, must not be reproduced in any form without permission of the publisher. \ LIBRARY JUN27 1967 UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC '^^^166990 PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Contents CHAPTER PAGE I. "According to Plan'* 1 II. The Legendary Luftwaffe .... 11 III. The Red Am Force 19 IV. Here Come the Panzers 29 V. Russia's Mechanized Forces .... 38 VI. Cavalry in Modern War? .... 46 VII. Parachute Troops 53 VIII. Encirclement Was Never Like This . 59 IX. "Osoavlvkhim" ........ 73 X. The World's Most Literate Army . 83 XI. What, No Fifth Column? .... 94 XII. Poison Gas and Microbe Mobilization . 101 XIII. Industtod^l Potential 116 XIV. The Ukraine 123 XV. The Red Navy 135 XVI. If Japan Strikes 144 XVII. Stalin as a Military Leader . 152 XVIII. Three Soviet Marshals 171 XIX. Winter Warfare 191 XX. The Seeds of Hitler's Defeat . 197 "WE MADE A MISTAKE"- HITLER CHAPTER I "According to Plan" Seven years ago. Lieutenant Colonel Justrow, an out- standing brain-truster of the Nazi army, wrote: "Decisive success against a defense prepared for all eventualities is possible, if at all, only by a lightning surprise attack." The italics are mine. At 4 A.M.
    [Show full text]