Stalin's Surprise

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Stalin's Surprise PROFILES IN POWER STALIN AS WAR LEADER Clive Pearson assesses the Soviet dictator's war record. N Right: The marriage took place on 23 August 1939; divorce came on 22 June 1941, mucb to Stalin's surprise. WONDER. How LOHG THE HÛNÊYKÏIÛÎJ WU. LAST? s leader of a highly centralised more recently such as Thunder in the tiative. In addition. Soviet forces were dictatorship Josef Stalin East by Evan Mawdseley and biogra- hardly prepared for modern warfare. Ainevitably played a pivotal part in phies by Simon Sebag Montefiore and They lacked radios in tbeir tanks and air- every area of the Soviet war eflort during Robert Service give us a greater under- craft to co-ordinate any attack and there the Great Patriotic War (1941-45). standing of Stalin's real thought process- were very few transport vehicles to ferry Hence he bore direct responsibility for es and enable us to appreciate more the troops around quickly. Time was the course of the war and its outcome. clearly u'hy certain decisions were made. therefore needed before Soviet forces At the end of the titanic struggle he would be ready. paraded himself as Generalissimus and By tbe Nazi*So\iet Pact of August war hero. Yet the truth is rather mixed. The Pre-war Period 1939 Stalin believed he had bought pre- Why. for example, did Stalin allow him- cious space jnd time. He ratbcr rasbly self to be 'surprised' by Hitler in June The Soviet elite was imbued witb tbe pronounced, 'I know wbat Hitler's up to. 1941 when it was clear what German idea tbat war with the capitalist powers He thinks be bas outsmarted me. But plans were? Why did the Soviet leader was inevitable. Partly for this reason. actually it is 1 wbo bave outsmarted continue with failed military policies for Stalin had embarked on a course of rapid him,' He tbus took advantage of tbis so long? On the other hand, what were industrialisation, tbrougb his Five Year agreement to extend Soviet frontiers the decisions taken by Stalin, particular- Plans, so that by 1941 Russia's economy westward. The old defensive line, the ly after 1941. that steered Russia away easily rivalled tbe otber great powers of Stalin line, which had run along the pre- from catastrophe to triumphant victory? Europe. Unfortunately, the same could vious Soviet frontier was abandoned [\n 1 he collapse of the old Soviet Union not be said witb regard to military pre- line with the idea of'offensive strategy) in 1991 has allowed historians to gain paredness. The responsibility for tbis lies iind mo\'ed up to ¿i new frontier. But ibr access to archives and to better answer witb the suspicious and vindictive Soviet plan soon began to unravel wben I litler these questions. Richard Overy's Russia's dictator. His purges of army and air force made short shrift of bis opponents in the War, published in the 1990s, v;as commanders in 1957-8 had the effect of west and was quickly able to point bis ground-breaking. Other books written undermining morale and paralysing ini- armies eastward. By 1941 Soviet forward DECEMBER 2008 HISTORY REVIEW PROFILES I^ POWER Right: A map showing the distribution of German and Soviet forces in July 1941. At this stage Stalin denied his military commanders any flexibility. He only changed his tactics in August 1942. positions were still not ready and there was no second line to fall back to, as the Stalin line had been left in a state of dis- repair. Yet Statin still boped that Hitler would delay. The Soviet Union was vast. Surely the Wehrmacht, too. would need more time to huild up its forces. And, after all, Germany was still at war with Great Britain. But attack Hitler did. As sugjj,ested by Marshall G.K. Zhukov. the greatest of the Soviet war Commanders, Stalin's military leadershiji tan be divided into three phases. The first phase begins with the outbreak ot war and ends with the preparation for Stalingrad in Septenitier t942. The sec- ond phase goes up untit the end of the Baute of Kurstv in July 1943. The final phase covers up to the end of the war in May t945. By this time Stalin had emerged as a 'real mitítary commander'. Through these phases we can under- stand how he evolved as war leader. Phase One - Disaster Statin's first, atmost fatal, error was not to atlow his own forces to mobilise in time hefore the impending Nazi attack. In the West it was tong believed that the main reason for this was the Soviet dic- tator's unwillingness to accept that he had been outmanoeuvred by Hitler. To moment. Hence, when nothing hap- to react and were completely overrun. admit that the Germans were launching pened, Stalin was sceptical about their Nazi forces using their Blitzkrieg tactics an offensive now would mean that his usefulness. In any case the end of June were soon able to puneh huge boles in whole strategy of buying time with ihe seemed far too late For an attack on Rus the Soviet front line. It was easier going Nazi-Soviet Pact had failed. In addition, sia. Furthermore, for the Germans in he no doubt realised thai his armies Statin helieved that ttie centre and were still not ready for an all-out conflict the Nazi leadership • • I know what northern sector as with the Führer. was divided and that Hitler's up to. He Stalin had mistaken- However, other information from the to mobilise Soviet ty deployed the butk sources has recentty come to tight. Per- forces pre-emptively thinks he has of his forces in the haps another faetor influencing Stalin's eould trigger eonfliet. outsmarted me. south. As a result decision-making was the Nazi timing. Sueh thoughts German torces were Stalin received intettigence from Britain, undoubtedly But actually it is abte to reach Minsk japan and inside the German Air Min- weighed heavily in I who have (300 miles inside istry regarding the date of a likely attack. his mind. Soviet territory) All three suggested the offensive would iTie Nazi onslauglit outsmarted him within a week. In come in the tast half of June. Yet previ- began on the morning ttiiit area atone ously these sources had suggested May of 22 June 1941. Stalin's tardy orders to 340.000 So\iet troops wore tost in a cou- was the month ot" the attack. They were mobilise spelled disaster for Soviet ple of weeks. In addition, the Soviet air rigtii t)ut Hitler had detayed at the last forces. Many army units had no chance force was almost completely wiped out, HISTORY RFVIEW OECEMBI-H 2008 37 PROFILES IN POWER with about 4Ü0Ü combat aircraft lost in were blamed for the catastrophe at new Siberian forces, the Soviet comman- the initial days. Minsk and shot. Unfortunately all this der counter-attacked and sent the Ger- Stalin's reaction was not psychological had a stifling effect on initiative. In addi- mans reeling back a hundred miles. Il collapse. On the contrary he stayed in tion, in August, decree 270 ordered that showed just what Soviet generals could charge with a full diary. Only for a cou- the families of those who surrendered do if they were allowed some flexibility. ple of days at the end of June did he would be arrested and imprisoned. No This victory before Moscow, however, retreat in despair to his dacha. But he one was exempt. The surrender of Stal- did not herald a general turning of the soon pulled himself together and took in's son, Yakov, meant that the dictator's tide. Stalin determinedly kept overall charge of the situation. He made an own daughter-in-law spent two years in a control and his ambitious attempt to important rallying speech to the nation Soviet prison camp. Fear, if nothing else, push back the Germans all along the line on 1 July. On 12 July he re-established would keep his forces fighting. led to Further defeats. In the spring of Stavka (headquarters) and made himself Stalin arrogantly continued with his 1942 the Germans launched another Supreme Commander. At a critical all-out ilttacking strategy. In August major offensive. It was not on Moscow, moment he showed himself resolute and Hitler ordered his Army Group Centre to as expected, but in the south and determined. veer south and ensnare tbe bulk of Rus- towards the Caucasus. Again the Soviet sian forces in the south. Zhukov, a leader rushed in forces without giving member of Stavkii, then advised a their commanders enough flexibility to Stalin's strategic withdrawal and the abandon- meet the demands of the situation. A ment of the Ukrainian capital, Kiev, but further concern was that Soviet troops heavy-handed Stalin instead poured in further reserve had become dangerously demoralised by control of all army forces. The result was a disaster on an constant defeat and were no longer epic scale. In one short campaign the putting up much oF a Fight. Despite Stal- movements denied Soviet government now lost around in s decree of 'Not one step backwards!' his commanders any 500,000 troops. in July the German advance seemed unstoppable. The result vv-as that by The situation in the north was no bet- flexibility. Disasters September 1942 Hitler's Forées had ter as Leningrad was surrounded and reached the Caucasus Mountains and were almost besieged in September. Soon it would were in the suburbs of Stalingrad. inevitable * A be Moscow's turn.
Recommended publications
  • The Stalin Line: Home Fortification of the USSR’S Western Border by Ivan Volkov & Evgeny Khitryak
    Buy Now! The Stalin Line: Home Fortification of the USSR’s Western Border By Ivan Volkov & Evgeny Khitryak 5,000 men and was to have a length of about 62 miles (100 km). In the autumn of 1918, then, with the forming of special construction organizations for the emplacement of fortifications, the Special Committee of the Revolutionary War Council of the USSR (Revvoensovet, RVS) approved the construction of continuous fortified lines on the north- ern, western and southern borders. At that time the only military per- sonnel who had the necessary skills and experience for such projects were the engineering officers of the old tsarist army. The Soviet government therefore put out an appeal to all civilians in the A group of Mina bunkers in the Kiev Fortified Region (modern-day photo). country who had the required technical and military knowledge to join the Red Army (Raboche-Krestianskaya Krasnaya Armia, RKKA). Many eminent Russian civilian engineers responded to the call. At the same time, however, the ongoing military operations of the civil war made it clear that continuous fortified lines didn’t conform to the character of that war. The total length of the combat fronts—about 5,300 miles (8,500 km)—and their relatively The sections of a large light coverage by troops on both sides, machinegun bunker. worked to prevent the kind of positional 1 - embrasures warfare seen in the First World War. 2 - casemates The Russian Civil War was one of 3 - command post maneuver without continuous fronts. 4 - anti-gas vestibule That’s why the principle of continuous 5 - inner defense loophole fortifications was almost immediately 6 - cranked corridor door abandoned in favor of a new one.
    [Show full text]
  • Minsk City Tour
    Minsk City Tour Discover the Belarusian capital of Minsk. Located in the heart of the country, it has a population of 2 million inhabitants and is the political and cultural centre of Belarus. During your five day trip you will also explore other architectural and cultural highlights in the surroundings. 1st day: Outward journey Today you will begin your journey to Minsk. You will be picked up at the airport by your English-speaking tour guide. After checking in at your hotel, your guide will accompany you on an evening stroll around the city. This will be followed by an evening meal in a typical Belarusian restaurant, before visiting the Belarusian National Library where you will have a superb view of the night lights of Minsk from the roof-top. You will be able to discuss the programme for the next few days together with your tour guide. 2nd day: Walking tour of Minsk Today you will learn more about the turbulent history of the country and Minsk, the Belarusian capital. Your guide will collect you from your hotel after breakfast and together you will go on a walk around town to see the sights. Your journey through time will start at the first stone church (10th/11th century) and will continue to the Orthodox and Catholic churches built between the 13th and 17th century in the old town centre. In the Troitskoye district you will be able to imagine what Minsk looked like in the 19th century. The town was almost completely destroyed during the Second World War and is still considered today to be a prime example of socialist realism.
    [Show full text]
  • High Treason: Essays on the History of the Red Army 1918-1938, Volume II
    FINAL REPORT T O NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR SOVIET AND EAST EUROPEAN RESEARCH TITLE : HIG H TREASON: ESSAYS ON THE HISTORY OF TH E RED ARMY 1918-193 8 VOLUME I I AUTHOR . VITALY RAPOPOR T YURI ALEXEE V CONTRACTOR : CENTER FOR PLANNING AND RESEARCH, .INC . R . K . LAURINO, PROJECT DIRECTO R PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR : VLADIMIR TREML, CHIEF EDITO R BRUCE ADAMS, TRANSLATOR - EDITO R COUNCIL CONTRACT NUMBER : 626- 3 The work leading to this report was supported in whole or i n part from funds provided by the National Council for Sovie t and East European Research . HIGH TREASO N Essays in the History of the Red Army 1918-1938 Volume I I Authors : Vitaly N . Rapopor t an d Yuri Alexeev (pseudonym ) Chief Editor : Vladimir Trem l Translator and Co-Editor : Bruce Adam s June 11, 198 4 Integrative Analysis Project o f The Center for Planning and Research, Inc . Work on this Project supported by : Tte Defense Intelligence Agency (Contract DNA001-80-C-0333 ) an d The National Council for Soviet and East European Studies (Contract 626-3) PART FOU R CONSPIRACY AGAINST THE RKK A Up to now we have spoken of Caligula as a princeps . It remains to discuss him as a monster . Suetoniu s There is a commandment to forgive our enemies , but there is no commandment to forgive our friends . L . Medic i Some comrades think that repression is the main thing in th e advance of socialism, and if repression does not Increase , there is no advance . Is that so? Of course it is not so .
    [Show full text]
  • OSW Report | Opposites Put Together. Belarus's Politics of Memory
    OPPOSITES PUT TOGETHER BELARUS’S POLITICS OF MEMORY Kamil Kłysiński, Wojciech Konończuk WARSAW OCTOBER 2020 OPPOSITES PUT TOGETHER BELARUS’S POLITICS OF MEMORY Kamil Kłysiński, Wojciech Konończuk © Copyright by Centre for Eastern Studies CONTENT EDITOR Adam Eberhardt EDITOR Szymon Sztyk CO-OPERATION Tomasz Strzelczyk, Katarzyna Kazimierska TRANSLATION Ilona Duchnowicz CO-OPERATION Timothy Harrell GRAPHIC DESIGN PARA-BUCH DTP IMAGINI PHOTOGRAPH ON COVER Jimmy Tudeschi / Shutterstock.com Centre for Eastern Studies ul. Koszykowa 6a, 00-564 Warsaw, Poland tel.: (+48) 22 525 80 00, [email protected] www.osw.waw.pl ISBN 978-83-65827-56-2 Contents MAIN POINTS | 5 INTRODUCTION | 11 I. THE BACKGROUND OF THE BELARUSIAN POLITICS OF MEMORY | 14 II. THE SEARCH FOR ITS OWN WAY. ATTEMPTS TO DEFINE HISTORICAL IDENTITY (1991–1994) | 18 III. THE PRO-RUSSIAN DRIFT. THE IDEOLOGISATION OF THE POLITICS OF MEMORY (1994–2014) | 22 IV. CREATING ELEMENTS OF DISTINCTNESS. A CAUTIOUS TURN IN MEMORY POLITICS (2014–) | 27 1. The cradle of statehood: the Principality of Polotsk | 28 2. The powerful heritage: the Grand Duchy of Lithuania | 32 3. Moderate scepticism: Belarus in the Russian Empire | 39 4. A conditional acceptance: the Belarusian People’s Republic | 47 5. The neo-Soviet narrative: Belarusian territories in the Second Polish Republic | 50 6. Respect with some reservations: Belarus in the Soviet Union | 55 V. CONCLUSION. THE POLICY OF BRINGING OPPOSITES TOGETHER | 66 MAIN POINTS • Immediately after 1991, the activity of nationalist circles in Belarus led to a change in the Soviet historical narrative, which used to be the only permit­ ted one. However, they did not manage to develop a coherent and effective politics of memory or to subsequently put this new message across to the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Namibia 2004
    安邦有限公司(KKKP/PL):0557(94046-W) AIRBORNE SDN BHD 36, DICKENS STREET, 10050 PENANG TEL: +604-2632141 FAX: +604-2638336 EMAIL: [email protected] 1 安邦有限公司(KKKP/PL):0557(94046-W) AIRBORNE SDN BHD 36, DICKENS STREET, 10050 PENANG TEL: +604-2632141 FAX: +604-2638336 EMAIL: [email protected] Day 1 Depart for Chisinau, Moldova Depart for Chisinau. Day 2 Arrive Chisinau (L, D) On arrival, a half day city tour of Chisinau before transfer to hotel. After lunch, we will continue to Cricova Winery. Cricova is pearl of Moldovan wine that represents an unique underground city well-known all over the world by its huge labyrinths, and especially by its excellent wines. "Cricova" is the first winery in Moldova which makes sparkling wine as it was prepared by the monk - wine maker Pierre Perignon. Bristol Hotel 4* or similar Day 3 Chisinau – Tiraspol, Transnistria – Odessa, Ukraine (2N) (B, L, D) Travel to Transnistria. Many people see this place as nothing more than a relic of communism and denounce it as an uninteresting travel destination. The truth is way different. Transnistria is an unrecognized breakaway republic located on a strip of land between the river Dniester and the eastern Moldovan border with Ukraine. A small city itself, its capital Tiraspol is one of the most fascinating places you will ever visit. Cross the border to Odessa, Ukraine. Hotel Milano by Reikartz Collection 4* or similar Day 4 Odessa (B, L, D) Odessa is a port city on the Black Sea in southern Ukraine. It’s known for its beaches and 19th-century architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloads/Assets/201503 BP Russian Forces in Ukraine Kostyuchenko, “We Were Fully Aware of What We Brought Ourselves to FINAL.Pdf.And What Could Happen,” Op Cit
    HIDING IN PLAIN SIGHT Putin's War in Ukraine By Maksymilian Czuperski, John Herbst, Eliot Higgins, Alina Polyakova, and Damon Wilson © 2015 The Atlantic Council of the United States. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without permission in writing from the Atlantic Council, except in the case of brief quotations in news articles, critical articles, or reviews. Please direct inquiries to: Atlantic Council 1030 15th Street, NW, 12th Floor Washington, DC 20005 ISBN: 978-1-61977-996-9 Cover photo credit: Reuters/Marko Djurica. Pro-Russian rebels stand on top of a burnt-out Ukrainian personnel carrier near the village of Novokaterinovka in eastern Ukraine, September 24, 2014. This report is written and published in accordance with the Atlantic Council Policy on Intellectual Independence. The authors are solely responsible for its analysis and recommendations. The Atlantic Council and its donors do not determine, nor do they necessarily endorse or advocate for, any of this report’s conclusions. May 2015 ATLANTIC COUNCIL HIDING IN PLAIN SIGHT REPORT TEAM Maksymilian Czuperski Special Assistant to the President, Atlantic Council John Herbst Director, Dinu Patriciu Eurasia Center, Atlantic Council and former US Ambassador to Ukraine Eliot Higgins Founder, Bellingcat and Visiting Research Associate, Department of War Studies, King’s College London Alina Polyakova Associate Director, Dinu Patriciu Eurasia Center, Atlantic Council Damon Wilson Executive Vice President, Programs
    [Show full text]
  • TURKISH DIPLOMACY, 1936-1945 a Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts
    RUSSOPHOBIC NEUTRALITY: TURKISH DIPLOMACY, 1936-1945 A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History By Onur Isci, M.A. Washington, DC February 27, 2014 Copyright 2014 by Onur Isci All Rights Reserved ii RUSSOPHOBIC NEUTRALITY: TURKISH DIPLOMACY, 1936-1945 Onur Isci, M.A. Thesis Advisor: Mustafa Aksakal, Ph.D ABSTRACT This dissertation tells the story of Soviet-Turkish rivalry during the crucible of World War II. By 1939, Turkey began fast reverting to its old imperial attitude, when Istanbul’s foreign policy had been dictated largely by the Sultan’s fear of Russia. The state of wartime affairs between Ankara and Moscow gradually fell in sharp contrast with the cordial atmosphere of the 1920s and 1930s. As opposed to previous historians who have dismissed Turkey’s wartime neutrality as a wily strategy of capitalizing on war, I argue that the underlying factor, guiding the Turkish state in its quest to remain neutral was the revival of Russophobia amongst the ruling circles in Ankara. There had never been a moment during the war for neither the Allies nor the Axis to depart Turkey from its neutrality unless some form of guarantee had soothed its Russian complex. A closer examination of the Turkish archives and the parliamentary minutes reveals that Turkey desired a German victory over Russia provided that this was followed by a British victory over Germany. In other words, Turks very much hoped to see another Brest-Litovsk status quo: two separate wars involving Germany, conducted independently by Britain and the USSR without cooperation.
    [Show full text]
  • World War II Memory Politics: Jewish, Polish and Roma Minorities of Belarus
    7 The Journal of Belarusian Studies World War II Memory Politics: Jewish, Polish and Roma Minorities of Belarus BY ANDREJ KOTLJARCHUK* ‘No one is forgotten, nothing is forgotten!’ Olga Bergholz, 1960 A popular slogan used by the Soviet authorities in regard to WWII. The aim of this study is to interpret recent trends in contemporary memory politics in Belarus, with focus on the Holocaust, Roma genocide memorials, and the memorial sites of the Polish minority in Belarus. The author believes that the theory of ‘path dependence’ is suitable for analysis of contemporary Belarusian memory politics with respect to World War II. In accordance with this theory, the scope and limitations of new politics are determined by the political choices made or results attained much earlier by the previous political regime. Recent comparative political studies adapt the ‘path dependence’ concept to historical material (Hedlund 2005). From this point of view, a comprehensive analysis of contemporary Belarusian memory politics is not possible without an examination of the Soviet period. In his study on the memorialization of the Holocaust in Poland, Hungary and Slovakia Jeffrey Blutinger defines three basic approaches to contemporary memory politics in Eastern Europe. The first approach, ‘aphasia’, means a virtual taboo on memory typical for the communist age. The second stage, ‘deflective negationism’, means that the Holocaust is recognised, but all responsibility for it is placed exclusively on the Germans. At the same time, the problem of local collaborationism is slurred over. Finally, the third model, ‘open examination’, * Andrej Kotjlarchuk, PhD is a Senior Lecturer at the Institute of Contemporary History, Södertörn University, Sweden.
    [Show full text]
  • Stalinism Revisited Stalinism Revisited
    CYAN MAGENTA YELLOW BLACK Stalinism Revisited Stalinism Revisited Stalinism Revisited brings together representatives of multiple generations to create a rich examination The Establishment of Communist Regimes in East-Central Europe of the study and practice of Stalinism. While the articles are uniformly excellent, the book’s signal contribution is to bring recent research from Eastern European scholars to an English-speaking audience. Thus the volume is not just a “state of the discipline” collection, in which articles are collected to reflect that current situation of scholarship in a given field; instead, this one includes cutting edge scholarship that will prompt more of the same from other scholars in other fields/subfields. I would recommend this book highly to anyone interested in understanding the technology of Stalinism in both StalinismStalinism thought and practice. Nick Miller Boise State University The Sovietization of post-1945 East-Central Europe—marked by the forceful imposition of the Soviet- type society in the region—was a process of massive socio-political and cultural transformation. Despite its paramount importance for understanding the nature of the communist regime and its RevisitedRevisited legacy, the communist take-over in East Central European countries has remained largely under- researched. Two decades after the collapse of the communist system,Stalinism Revisited brings together a remarkable international team of established and younger scholars, engaging them in a critical re-evaluation of the institutionalization of communist regimes in East-Central Europe and of the period of “high Stalinism.” Sovietization is approached not as a fully pre-determined, homogeneous, and monolithic transformation, but as a set of trans-national, multifaceted, and inter-related processes of large-scale institutional and ideological transfers, made up of multiple “takeovers” in various fields.
    [Show full text]
  • Usee(Final).Pdf
    TThraceh Unitetenbergd States and Eastern Europe in 1945 The United States and Eastern Europe in 1945 A Reassessment ✣ Marc Trachtenberg There was a time when it all seemed so simple. The Soviet Union, it was said, sought to Communize Eastern Europe at the end of World War II; the Western powers, and especially the United States, were deeply opposed to that policy; and the ensuing clash played a decisive role in triggering the Cold War. But historians in recent years have been moving away from that sort of interpretation. This is not because there has been a fundamental shift in our understanding of Soviet policy. Some scholars, to be sure, claim that the USSR, even in the latter part of the war, did not plan to Communize any of the countries in Eastern Europe—that “nowhere beyond what Moscow con- sidered the Soviet borders did its policies foresee the establishment of commu- nist regimes.”1 But the prevailing view today is rather different. Soviet leaders might not have had a “master plan” or a “detailed blueprint” for the Comm- unization of Eastern Europe, but by the end of the war, it is now commonly argued, they did have certain general goals and a certain general strategy for achieving those goals. The USSR, according to this view, would initially take a relatively moderate line and Sovietization would not be on the agenda. But the Communists would “proceed step by step” and would gradually tighten their grip on power. Eventually the “appropriate moment” would come, and at that point, as the Soviet leader Josif Stalin himself put it, the “mask” would come off and the “maximal program” would be put into effect.2 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Trial of JV Stalin: Exercises in Critical and Moral Reasoning
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 429 008 SO 029 677 AUTHOR Thomas, Paul F. TITLE The Trial of J.V. Stalin: Exercises in Critical and Moral Reasoning. Critical Geopedagogy No.1. ISBN ISBN-0-919867-01-4 PUB DATE 1998-00-00 NOTE 98p.; Published by the Ukranian ACademy of Arts and Sciences in Canada. PUB TYPE Guides Classroom Teacher (052) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC04 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Class Activities; *Communism; *Critical Thinking; Curriculum Enrichment; Discovery Learning; Foreign Countries; High Schools; Higher Education; *Moral Issues; *Political Power IDENTIFIERS Critical Pedagogy; Moral Reasoning; *Stalin (Joseph); Trials; *USSR ABSTRACT The dissemination and synthesis of critical, but scattered, existing knowledge concerning the human costs of J.V. Stalin's once-acclaimed achievements are contained in this seed document. The document is primarily for teachers who are free to expand, contract, modify, or delete the seed suggestions provided according to the characteristics of their students and teaching situations. The package contains 10 representative activity modules about Stalin that may require anywhere from 1 to 4 class periods. The package's modules can be used in any order and as supplementary teaching materials that will enrich tc,7ics and exercise studens' critical thinking skills. The first component of each activity module lists a number of critical and/or moral thinking issues for the teacher'.: pedagogical consideration. The package alsc contains 20 reference sheets that complement the activity modules and provide databases for the lines of inquiry suggested in the modules. The document concludes with an extensive bibliography. (BT) ******************************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document.
    [Show full text]
  • "We Made a Mistake"- Hitler
    mmmmmm From the collection of the Frejinger " b t W P n San Francisco, California 2008 'WE MADE A MISTAKE"- HITLER ^^We Made A Mistake''— fliTLEi? RUSSIA'S SURPRISING DEFENSE AGAINST GERMANY By LUCIEN ZACHAROFF GROSSET & DUNLAP PtTBLISHERS NeW YoRK By arrangement with D. Appletcm-Century Co., Inc. COPYMGHT, 1941, BY D. Appleton-Century Company, Inc. All rights reserved. This book, or parts thereof, must not be reproduced in any form without permission of the publisher. \ LIBRARY JUN27 1967 UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC '^^^166990 PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Contents CHAPTER PAGE I. "According to Plan'* 1 II. The Legendary Luftwaffe .... 11 III. The Red Am Force 19 IV. Here Come the Panzers 29 V. Russia's Mechanized Forces .... 38 VI. Cavalry in Modern War? .... 46 VII. Parachute Troops 53 VIII. Encirclement Was Never Like This . 59 IX. "Osoavlvkhim" ........ 73 X. The World's Most Literate Army . 83 XI. What, No Fifth Column? .... 94 XII. Poison Gas and Microbe Mobilization . 101 XIII. Industtod^l Potential 116 XIV. The Ukraine 123 XV. The Red Navy 135 XVI. If Japan Strikes 144 XVII. Stalin as a Military Leader . 152 XVIII. Three Soviet Marshals 171 XIX. Winter Warfare 191 XX. The Seeds of Hitler's Defeat . 197 "WE MADE A MISTAKE"- HITLER CHAPTER I "According to Plan" Seven years ago. Lieutenant Colonel Justrow, an out- standing brain-truster of the Nazi army, wrote: "Decisive success against a defense prepared for all eventualities is possible, if at all, only by a lightning surprise attack." The italics are mine. At 4 A.M.
    [Show full text]