DOCSLIB.ORG

Chromosera Ambigua Fungal Planet Description Sheets 349

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

348 Persoonia – Volume 43, 2019 Chromosera ambigua Fungal Planet description sheets 349 Fungal Planet 1005 – 18 December 2019 Chromosera ambigua Tanchaud, Jargeat & Eyssart., sp. nov. Etymology. The epithet reflects the difficulties encountered in separating Habit, Habitat & Distribution — In small groups on poor san- this species from morphologically close Chromosera ‒ from Latin ambigua dy and clay soil not far from ponds, in a heathland with lichens (doubtful, uncertain). (Cladonia sp.), and surrounded by Erica arborea, E. cinerea, Classification — Hygrophoraceae, Agaricales, Agaricomy- Calluna vulgaris, Ulex europaeus and Pinus pinaster. Other cetes. rare and interesting species found at the same locality included Arrhenia chlorocyanea, Hydropus moserianus, Galerina nana, Basidiomata small-sized, omphalioid. Pileus 5–20(–30) mm Psathyrella flexispora, Plectania rhytidia and Rommelaarsia diam, initially convex to plano-convex with a central depression flavovirens. or soon umbilicate, translucently striate up to the centre, hygro- phanous, at first distinctly viscid, entirely whitish, yellow, lilac or Typus. FRANCE, Charente-Maritime, Saint-Gemme, La Grande-Vergne, 45.764873°N, -0.931785°E, alt. 10–20 m, 31 Jan. 2016, P. Tanchaud (holo- with a combination of these colours. Lamellae moderately dis- type GE18008, ITS, SSU, LSU, RPB2 sequences GenBank MK645573 tant, decurrent, concolorous with the cap, sometimes yellowish to MK645575, MK645581 to MK645583, MK645587 to MK645589 and with a whitish cap. Stipe 10–40 × 1–3 mm, cylindrical, viscid MK645593 to MK645595, MycoBank MB830214). when young, concolorous with the cap or more or less lilac espe- cially at the top. Context concolorous with the surface or paler, Notes — Because of its viscid pileus and stipe, decurrent without distinctive smell or taste. Spores (7.2–)7.4–9.3(–11) × lamellae with non-gelatinised edge but with interwoven trama (4.3–)4.5–5.5(–5.8) μm, Q = (1.4–)1.5–1.9(–2.1), ellipsoid or and sometimes constricted and white spores, this new species amygdaliform, sometimes with concave side or constricted in fits the genus Chromosera subgenus Oreocybe (Boertmann apical part. Basidia 30–40 × 8–9 μm, predominantly 4-spored, 1990, Lodge et al. 2013) that already includes C. xanthochroa, narrowly clavate, clamped. Cystidia absent. Gill trama interwo- C. citrinopallida and C. lilacina. According to Boertmann (1990, ven, with cylindrical elements measuring 35–50 × 8–13 μm, 2010), Candusso (1997) and Borgen & Arnolds (2004), C. citri- with yellow extracellular granules on fresh material. Pileipellis nopallida and C. lilacina have an arctic and alpine distribution a thin ixocutis of cylindrical hyphae, 2–5(–8) μm wide. Clamp while C. xanthochroa can also be found in oceanic temperate connections present. areas. Because of its habitat, C. ambigua could therefore be compared with C. xanthochroa, but the latter has the narrowest spores of the subgenus, measuring on average less than 4.5 KF407939 Chromosera lilacina RP: 10705 TENN:58791 Chromosera lilacina GE16112 µm diam, while the average width of the spores of our new 100 Chromosera lilacina Chromosera lilacina GE16115 species easily reaches 5 µm diam. 92 KF291054 Chromosera lilacina T.Borgen 86.294 (CFMR) GE18008-1 100 On the other hand, considering the three species with spores on GE18008-2 Chromosera ambigua sp. nov. 56 GE18008-3 average larger than 4.5 µm, C. citrinopallida is chrome-yellow GU234145 Hygrocybe citrinopallida GG312:86 99 U66435 Hygrocybe citrinopallida Lutzoni:930731-1 DUKE Chromosera citrinopallida and pales to white as it ages, and therefore never presents lilac Chromosera citrinopallida 45 Boertmann:2006.2 CFMR DEN:29 tones, while C. lilacina has a brownish orange to lilac cap and EU784356 Hygrocybe xanthochroa RGB K(m)55746 97 91 Chromosera xanthochroa GE16114 a lilac stem (Consiglio 1997, Hausknecht et al. 2003, Consiglio Chromosera xanthochroa Chromosera xanthochroa GE16110 & Contu 2007, Boertmann 2010). But as already pointed by Chromosera xanthochroa GE16113 AF261455 Chromosera cyanophylla DAOM208603 Boertmann (1990) and Consiglio & Contu (2007), discoloured AF261456 Chromosera cyanophylla DUKE1645 Chromosera cyanophylla 94 Chromosera cyanophylla AFTOL-ID 1684 specimens of the last two species can only be distinguished by MG050103 Chromosera sp. IMG 6589-17 Chromosera sp. 58 their ecological preferences, C. lilacina being more hygrophilous Chromosera cyanophylla TL-5091 (CFMR) 94 KJ194074 Chromosera cyanophylla PRM:922848 Chromosera cyanophylla than C. citrinopallida. Without considering the different ecolo- KJ194075 Chromosera cyanophylla WU:28831 gical preferences of the species, yellow and lilac specimens of EU784352 Hygrocybe viola RGB K(m)20264 98 KF477303 Gloioxanthomyces vitellinus LD 1617064 C. ambigua can therefore be respectively confused with C. citr- Gloioxanthomyces vitellinus EU784355 Hygrocybe vitellina RGB K(m)67295 100 Gloioxanthomyces nitidus isolate 2 GDGM41710 Gloioxanthomyces sp. inopallida and C. lilacina, from which they differ essentially by 96 KF468712 Gloioxanthomyces nitidus DJL05NC65c4 TENN:61894 100 their always clearly striate cap vs ‘sometimes short translucently KF468708 Gloioxanthomyces nitidus SC 13 VT (CFMR) Gloioxanthomyces nitidus KF468713 Gloioxanthomyces nitidus DJL05NC65c5 striate from margin’ or ‘± translucently striate’ (Boertmann 2010, see also Borgen & Arnolds 2004). Chromosera viola, which belongs to the subgenus Subomphalia, is readily distinguished PhyML analysis (Guindon & Gascuel 2003) of a combined SSU, ITS, LSU by its completely dry pileus and stipe and broad, subglobose and RPB2 sequence dataset (3 413 positions, including gaps), conducted with and non-constricted spores (Boertmann 2010, Lodge et al. the Geneious® platform placed this species in Chromosera, closely allied to 2013, Sánchez & Gibert 2015). C. lilacina, C. citrinopallida and C. xanthochroa. Chromosera cyanophylla is more divergent and appears to be separated into two groups, one American and one European. The scale bar indicates the number of substitutions per site and the bootstrap support values (based on 500 replicates) are indi- cated above branches. Blue dots are for European specimens, red dots for American specimens and green dots for Asiatic specimens. The alignment and the tree were deposited in TreeBASE (study 24563). Colour illustrations. France, La Grande-Vergne, part of the heathland where the holotype was collected. Basidiomata in situ (holotype); spores from holotype. Scale bars = 1 cm (basidiomata), 10 µm (spores). Patrice Tanchaud, 2 rue des Espics, F-17250 Soulignonne, France; e-mail: [email protected] Guillaume Eyssartier, Attaché honoraire au Muséum national d’histoire naturelle de Paris, 180 allée du Château, F-24660 Sanilhac, France; e-mail: [email protected] Patricia Jargeat & Hervé Gryta, Université Paul Sabatier, CNRS, IRD, UMR5174 EDB (Laboratoire Évolution et Diversité Biologique), 118 route de Narbonne, F-31062 Toulouse, France; e-mail: [email protected] & [email protected] © 2019 Naturalis Biodiversity Center & Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute.
Recommended publications
  • Checklist of Argentine Agaricales 4

    Checklist of Argentine Agaricales 4

    Checklist of the Argentine Agaricales 4. Tricholomataceae and Polyporaceae 1 2* N. NIVEIRO & E. ALBERTÓ 1Instituto de Botánica del Nordeste (UNNE-CONICET). Sargento Cabral 2131, CC 209 Corrientes Capital, CP 3400, Argentina 2Instituto de Investigaciones Biotecnológicas (UNSAM-CONICET) Intendente Marino Km 8.200, Chascomús, Buenos Aires, CP 7130, Argentina CORRESPONDENCE TO *: [email protected] ABSTRACT— A species checklist of 86 genera and 709 species belonging to the families Tricholomataceae and Polyporaceae occurring in Argentina, and including all the species previously published up to year 2011 is presented. KEY WORDS—Agaricomycetes, Marasmius, Mycena, Collybia, Clitocybe Introduction The aim of the Checklist of the Argentinean Agaricales is to establish a baseline of knowledge on the diversity of mushrooms species described in the literature from Argentina up to 2011. The families Amanitaceae, Pluteaceae, Hygrophoraceae, Coprinaceae, Strophariaceae, Bolbitaceae and Crepidotaceae were previoulsy compiled (Niveiro & Albertó 2012a-c). In this contribution, the families Tricholomataceae and Polyporaceae are presented. Materials & Methods Nomenclature and classification systems This checklist compiled data from the available literature on Tricholomataceae and Polyporaceae recorded for Argentina up to the year 2011. Nomenclature and classification systems followed Singer (1986) for families. The genera Pleurotus, Panus, Lentinus, and Schyzophyllum are included in the family Polyporaceae. The Tribe Polyporae (including the genera Polyporus, Pseudofavolus, and Mycobonia) is excluded. There were important rearrangements in the families Tricholomataceae and Polyporaceae according to Singer (1986) over time to present. Tricholomataceae was distributed in six families: Tricholomataceae, Marasmiaceae, Physalacriaceae, Lyophyllaceae, Mycenaceae, and Hydnaginaceae. Some genera belonging to this family were transferred to other orders, i.e. Rickenella (Rickenellaceae, Hymenochaetales), and Lentinellus (Auriscalpiaceae, Russulales).
  • Major Clades of Agaricales: a Multilocus Phylogenetic Overview

    Major Clades of Agaricales: a Multilocus Phylogenetic Overview

    Mycologia, 98(6), 2006, pp. 982–995. # 2006 by The Mycological Society of America, Lawrence, KS 66044-8897 Major clades of Agaricales: a multilocus phylogenetic overview P. Brandon Matheny1 Duur K. Aanen Judd M. Curtis Laboratory of Genetics, Arboretumlaan 4, 6703 BD, Biology Department, Clark University, 950 Main Street, Wageningen, The Netherlands Worcester, Massachusetts, 01610 Matthew DeNitis Vale´rie Hofstetter 127 Harrington Way, Worcester, Massachusetts 01604 Department of Biology, Box 90338, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 Graciela M. Daniele Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biologı´a Vegetal, M. Catherine Aime CONICET-Universidad Nacional de Co´rdoba, Casilla USDA-ARS, Systematic Botany and Mycology de Correo 495, 5000 Co´rdoba, Argentina Laboratory, Room 304, Building 011A, 10300 Baltimore Avenue, Beltsville, Maryland 20705-2350 Dennis E. Desjardin Department of Biology, San Francisco State University, Jean-Marc Moncalvo San Francisco, California 94132 Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Biology, Royal Ontario Museum and Department of Botany, University Bradley R. Kropp of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 2C6 Canada Department of Biology, Utah State University, Logan, Utah 84322 Zai-Wei Ge Zhu-Liang Yang Lorelei L. Norvell Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Pacific Northwest Mycology Service, 6720 NW Skyline Sciences, Kunming 650204, P.R. China Boulevard, Portland, Oregon 97229-1309 Jason C. Slot Andrew Parker Biology Department, Clark University, 950 Main Street, 127 Raven Way, Metaline Falls, Washington 99153- Worcester, Massachusetts, 01609 9720 Joseph F. Ammirati Else C. Vellinga University of Washington, Biology Department, Box Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, 111 355325, Seattle, Washington 98195 Koshland Hall, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-3102 Timothy J.
  • Biodiversity of Wood-Decay Fungi in Italy

    Biodiversity of Wood-Decay Fungi in Italy

    AperTO - Archivio Istituzionale Open Access dell'Università di Torino Biodiversity of wood-decay fungi in Italy This is the author's manuscript Original Citation: Availability: This version is available http://hdl.handle.net/2318/88396 since 2016-10-06T16:54:39Z Published version: DOI:10.1080/11263504.2011.633114 Terms of use: Open Access Anyone can freely access the full text of works made available as "Open Access". Works made available under a Creative Commons license can be used according to the terms and conditions of said license. Use of all other works requires consent of the right holder (author or publisher) if not exempted from copyright protection by the applicable law. (Article begins on next page) 28 September 2021 This is the author's final version of the contribution published as: A. Saitta; A. Bernicchia; S.P. Gorjón; E. Altobelli; V.M. Granito; C. Losi; D. Lunghini; O. Maggi; G. Medardi; F. Padovan; L. Pecoraro; A. Vizzini; A.M. Persiani. Biodiversity of wood-decay fungi in Italy. PLANT BIOSYSTEMS. 145(4) pp: 958-968. DOI: 10.1080/11263504.2011.633114 The publisher's version is available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/11263504.2011.633114 When citing, please refer to the published version. Link to this full text: http://hdl.handle.net/2318/88396 This full text was downloaded from iris - AperTO: https://iris.unito.it/ iris - AperTO University of Turin’s Institutional Research Information System and Open Access Institutional Repository Biodiversity of wood-decay fungi in Italy A. Saitta , A. Bernicchia , S. P. Gorjón , E.
  • 9B Taxonomy to Genus

    9B Taxonomy to Genus

    Fungus and Lichen Genera in the NEMF Database Taxonomic hierarchy: phyllum > class (-etes) > order (-ales) > family (-ceae) > genus. Total number of genera in the database: 526 Anamorphic fungi (see p. 4), which are disseminated by propagules not formed from cells where meiosis has occurred, are presently not grouped by class, order, etc. Most propagules can be referred to as "conidia," but some are derived from unspecialized vegetative mycelium. A significant number are correlated with fungal states that produce spores derived from cells where meiosis has, or is assumed to have, occurred. These are, where known, members of the ascomycetes or basidiomycetes. However, in many cases, they are still undescribed, unrecognized or poorly known. (Explanation paraphrased from "Dictionary of the Fungi, 9th Edition.") Principal authority for this taxonomy is the Dictionary of the Fungi and its online database, www.indexfungorum.org. For lichens, see Lecanoromycetes on p. 3. Basidiomycota Aegerita Poria Macrolepiota Grandinia Poronidulus Melanophyllum Agaricomycetes Hyphoderma Postia Amanitaceae Cantharellales Meripilaceae Pycnoporellus Amanita Cantharellaceae Abortiporus Skeletocutis Bolbitiaceae Cantharellus Antrodia Trichaptum Agrocybe Craterellus Grifola Tyromyces Bolbitius Clavulinaceae Meripilus Sistotremataceae Conocybe Clavulina Physisporinus Trechispora Hebeloma Hydnaceae Meruliaceae Sparassidaceae Panaeolina Hydnum Climacodon Sparassis Clavariaceae Polyporales Gloeoporus Steccherinaceae Clavaria Albatrellaceae Hyphodermopsis Antrodiella
  • Omphalina Sensu Lato in North America 3: Chromosera Gen. Nov.*

    Omphalina Sensu Lato in North America 3: Chromosera Gen. Nov.*

    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Sydowia Beihefte Jahr/Year: 1995 Band/Volume: 10 Autor(en)/Author(s): Redhead S. A., Ammirati Joseph F., Norvell L. L. Artikel/Article: Omphalina sensu lato in North America 3: Chromosera gen. nov. 155-164 ©Verlag Ferdinand Berger & Söhne Ges.m.b.H., Horn, Austria, download unter www.zobodat.at Omphalina sensu lato in North America 3: Chromosera gen. nov.* S. A. Redhead1, J. F Ammirati2 & L. L. Norvell2 Centre for Land and Biological Resources Research, Research Branch, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1A 0C6 department of Botany, KB-15, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, U.S.A. Redhead, S. A. , J. F. Ammirati & L. L. Norvell (1995).Omphalina sensu lato in North America 3: Chromosera gen. nov. -Beih. Sydowia X: 155-167. Omphalina cyanophylla and Mycena lilacifolia are considered to be synonymous. A new genus Chromosera is described to acccommodate C. cyanophylla. North American specimens are described. Variation in the dextrinoid reaction of the trama is discussed as is the circumscription of the genusMycena. Peculiar pigment corpuscles are illustrated. Keywords: Agaricales, amyloid, Basidiomycota, dextrinoid, Corrugaria, Hydropus, Mycena, Omphalina, taxonomy. We have repeatedly collected - and puzzled over - an enigmatic species commonly reported in modern literature under different names: Mycena lilacifolia (Peck) Smith in North America (Smith, 1947, 1949; Smith & al., 1979; Pomerleau, 1980; McKnight & McKnight, 1987) or Europe (Horak, 1985) and Omphalia cyanophylla (Fr.) Quel, or Omphalina cyanophylla (Fr.) Quel, in Europe (Favre, 1960; Kühner & Romagnesi, 1953; Kühner, 1957; Courtecuisse, 1986; Krieglsteiner & Enderle, 1987).
  • <I>Hygrocybe Griseobrunnea</I>

    <I>Hygrocybe Griseobrunnea</I>

    ISSN (print) 0093-4666 © 2013. Mycotaxon, Ltd. ISSN (online) 2154-8889 MYCOTAXON http://dx.doi.org/10.5248/125.243 Volume 125, pp. 243–249 July–September 2013 Hygrocybe griseobrunnea, a new brown species from China Chao-Qun Wang 1, 2, 3, Tai-Hui Li 1, 2* & Bin Song 2 1 South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, China 2 State Key Laboratory of Applied Microbiology, South China (The Ministry—Province Joint Development), Guangdong Institute of Microbiology, Guangzhou 510070, China 3 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China * Correspondence to: [email protected] Abstract — Hygrocybe griseobrunnea, a new species in Hygrocybe subsect. Squamulosae, is described and illustrated based on the morphological characters and molecular data. The fungus is characterized by numerous greyish brown to brown or dark brown squamules on the pileus surface, adnate to shortly decurrent lamellae, and a trichodermal pileipellis. Key words — Basidiomycetes, Hygrophoraceae, taxonomy Introduction The genus Hygrocybe (Fr.) P. Kumm. (Hygrophoraceae, Agaricales, Basidiomycota) is distributed worldwide, with ~150 accepted species (Kirk et al. 2008) and ~670 proposed names (http://www.indexfungorum.org). Hygrocybe sect. Squamulosae (Bataille) Singer is characterized by the dry fruitbody, squamulose or tomentose pileus, smooth stipe, and trichodermal pileipellis (at least in the pileus centre) (Boertmann 2010). More than 15 species in subsect. Squamulosae have been reported from different parts of the world (Singer 1986, Arnolds 1995, Borgen & Senn-Irlet 1995, Desjardin & Hemmes 1997, Young & Wood 1997, Borgen & Arnolds 2004, Cantrell & Lodge 2004, Leelavathy et al. 2006, Boertmann 2010, Ronikier & Borgen 2010, Vrinda et al. 2013). Only three species of the subsection — Hygrocybe cantharellus (Schwein.) Murrill, H.
  • Arrhenia Lobata

    Arrhenia Lobata

    © Demetrio Merino Alcántara [email protected] Condiciones de uso Arrhenia lobata (Pers.) Kühner & Lamoure ex Redhead, Can. J. Bot. 62(5): 871 (1984) Tricholomataceae, Agaricales, Agaricomycetidae, Agaricomycetes, Agaricomycotina, Basidiomycota, Fungi ≡ Cantharellus lobatus (Pers.) Fr., Syst. mycol. (Lundae) 1: 323 (1821) ≡ Corniola lobata (Pers.) Gray, Nat. Arr. Brit. Pl. (London) 1: 596 (1821) ≡ Dictyolus lobatus (Pers.) Quél., Enchir. fung. (Paris): 140 (1886) ≡ Leptoglossum lobatum (Pers.) Ricken [as 'lobatus'], Die Blätterpilze 1: 6 (1915) ≡ Leptoglossum lobatum (Pers.) Ricken, Die Blätterpilze 1: 6 (1915) var. lobatum ≡ Leptotus lobatus (Pers.) P. Karst., Bidr. Känn. Finl. Nat. Folk 32: 243 (1879) ≡ Merulius lobatus Pers., Syn. meth. fung. (Göttingen) 2: 494 (1801) ≡ Merulius lobatus var. crenatus Pers., Mycol. eur. (Erlanga) 2: 23 (1825) ≡ Merulius lobatus Pers., Syn. meth. fung. (Göttingen) 2: 494 (1801) var. lobatus ≡ Merulius muscigenus var. lobatus (Pers.) Sw., K. Vetensk-Acad. Nya Handl. 30: 177 (1809) Material estudiado: España, Granada, Güejar Sierra, Dehesa de San Juan, 30S VG6604, 2,532 m, en suelo silíceo sobre musgo junto a arroyo, 7-VIII- 2014, leg. Dianora Estrada, Salvador Tello y Demetrio Merino, JA-CUSSTA: 8159. Descripción macroscópica: Carpóforo de 1 a 2 cm. de largo, espatulado o en forma de abanico, ligeramente lobulado y con pie corto o ausente. Cutícula lisa o un poco rugosa, higrófona, brillante y de color pardo con tintes grisáceos. Himenio constituido por pliegues irregulares, anasto- mosados y de color algo más claro que la cutícula. Carne gelatinosa. Descripción microscópica: Basidios de cilíndricos a ligeramente claviformes, bi-tetraspóricos y con fíbula basal. Basidiosporas elipsoidales a subglobosas, algunas dacrioides, apiculadas y con pequeñas gútulas, de (7,23) 7,83 - 9,76 (10,79) x (5,11) 5,88 - 7,99 (9,00) µm; Q = (1,08) 1,14 - 1,49 (1,60); N = 51; Me = 8,84 x 6,86 µm; Qe = 1,30.
  • OF UKRAINE © Chvikov V., Prylutskyi O

    OF UKRAINE © Chvikov V., Prylutskyi O

    Біорізноманіття, екологія та експериментальна біологія, 2020, №2 MYCOLOGY UDC 582.284 (477) Prylutskyi O. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5730-517X Chvikov V. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5297-3996 ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF HYGROPHORACEAE (AGARICALES, BASIDIOMYCOTA) OF UKRAINE © Chvikov V., Prylutskyi O. V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University [email protected] , [email protected] https://doi.org/10.34142/2708-5848.2020.22.2.01 Hygrophoraceae is a family within Agaricales, which comprises 26 genera and approximately 690 agaricoid species, including ectomycorrhizal, lichen-forming, bryophilous, humus and litter decomposing fungi. Some of these species especially those from genera Cuphophyllus, Hygrocybe, Neohygrocybe and Porpolomopsis are associated with natural grasslands and show extreme sensitivity to the presence of nitrogen-containing fertilizers in their substrate. This makes them indicative species of grasslands of high conservation value. While casual observations of Hygrophoraceae of Ukraine were incorporated in studies of agaricoid fungi as a whole, this family has never been in the focus of special research. Previously accumulated data on the diversity of Hygrophoraceae in Ukraine must be aggregated and revised. We have summarized all available data on the occurrences of Hygrophoraceae in Ukraine, including published papers, open databases, citizen science observations, and the previously unpublished original collection materials. Also, we provide an original description of the rare European species Haasiella venustissima (Fr.) Kotl. & Pouzar ex Chiaffi & Surault, which is reported for the first time from the territory of Ukraine. The resulting checklist of Hygrophoraceae of Ukraine includes 66 species. Leading genera are Hygrophorus (22 species), Hygrocybe (17) and Arrhenia (10); 5 species among them (Hygrocybe punicea, Hyrgocybe splendidissima, Neohygrocybe nitrata, Neohygrocybe ovina, Porpolomopsis calyptriformis) are threatened and according to “IUCN Red List” considered “Vulnerable”.
  • Sporeprint, Spring 2018

    Sporeprint, Spring 2018

    LONG ISLAND MYCOLOGICAL CLUB http://limyco.org Available in full color on our website VOLUME 26, NUMBER 1, SPRING, 2018 Rhodocybe tugrulii: THE SEASON’S BOUNTY First North American record We had a good season thanks to slightly above Among the pink-spored Entolomataceae, normal rainfall, at least on eastern Long Island, Rhodocybe is distinguished by spores that in end where 50.35 inches were recorded at Upton’s Brook- view have 6-12 facets, the surface irregularly orna- haven National Lab., about 1.5 inches above average. mented by pustules; and by a lack of clamp connec- This compares favorably with the 2015 and 2016 to- tions. It is a small genus, with only 168 species (the tals, both about 39”. In contrast, Islip recorded only 43 present one included) listed in Mycobank, with a inches, 3 below normal, while NYC reached 45 inches, similar number in Index Fungorum if one discounts 5” below their annual average. The high geographic the recent controversial revisions that have allotted variability on L.I. requires constant vigilance in order many to other genera, particularly Clitopilus. With to hold our forays in the most productive habitats and so few species, the majority of serious collectors are is the reason for frequent foray site changes. Benefi- unfamiliar with this genus, which has few distinc- cially, the rainfall pattern was fairly equally distrib- tive macrocharacters. Moreover, in contrast to other uted throughout our collecting season, only November members of the Entolomataceae, the sporeprint being significantly lower at 2.26”. color may be grayish or No Black Morels, white2.
  • Nov., Subglobispora Hemispherical to Convex, Plano-Convex, Mostly Papillate, Centrally Depressed Depressed Around Papilla, With

    Nov., Subglobispora Hemispherical to Convex, Plano-Convex, Mostly Papillate, Centrally Depressed Depressed Around Papilla, With

    PERS OONIA Published by the Rijksherbarium / Hortus Botanicus, Leiden Volume Part 425-429 14, 4, pp. (1992) Hemimycena subglobispora, spec. nov., and Arrhenia acerosa var. tenella, comb. nov., from Wetlands in southern Norway A. Aronsen Tor0d, Norway* Hemimycena subglobispora, found on Phragmitesin a marsh, is described as a new spe- the cies, and new combination Arrhenia acerosa var. tenella is proposed togetherwith a redescription of the variety. The agarics occurring in wetland areas have not been given particularly great attention by carried in the of Vestfold in southern revealed two mycologists. A survey out County Norway new species. Mycena oligophylla was proposed by Aronsen & Maas Geesteranus (1990). Hemimycena subglobispora is another new species from the same area. The 2-spored variety of Arrhenia acerosa (Fr.) Kiihner, also found in wetlands, is rede- scribed from Norwegian material under the name Arrhenia acerosa var. tenella, comb. nov. Hemimycena subglobispora Aronsen, spec. nov.—Figs. 1-6 Basidiomata dispersa vel subcongregata. Pileus 1-5 mm latus, initio semiglobosus vel convexus, deinde plano-convexus, centro papillatus vel interdum depressus, translucide striatus, interdum sulcatus, pruinosus, albus. Caro pertenuis, alba odore indistincto. Lamellae 4-7 stipitemattingentes, latae, decurrentes, albae. Sti- pes 8—11(—15) mm longus, filiformis, pubescens, albus. Sporae 5-6 x 4.5-5.8 pm, subglobosae, inamy- loideae. Basidia 18-25 x 6-8 pm, clavata, 4(-2)-spora, fibulata. Cheilocystidia pleurocystidiaque nulla. Caulocystidia etpileocystidia ventricosa apice tenui. Pileipellishyphae diverticulatae, 3-5 pm latae. Ad cul- mos Phragmitis. Holotypus: 'Norway: Vestfold, Tpnsberg, Kjelle, 9 October 1988, Aronsen M 43 1 88' (O). Pileus 1-5 mm across, hemispherical to convex, with age plano-convex, mostly papillate, but sometimes centrally depressed or at least depressed around papilla, with margin long remaining incurved, translucent-striate, more or less sulcate, pruinose, white.
  • Notes, Outline and Divergence Times of Basidiomycota

    Notes, Outline and Divergence Times of Basidiomycota

    Fungal Diversity (2019) 99:105–367 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-019-00435-4 (0123456789().,-volV)(0123456789().,- volV) Notes, outline and divergence times of Basidiomycota 1,2,3 1,4 3 5 5 Mao-Qiang He • Rui-Lin Zhao • Kevin D. Hyde • Dominik Begerow • Martin Kemler • 6 7 8,9 10 11 Andrey Yurkov • Eric H. C. McKenzie • Olivier Raspe´ • Makoto Kakishima • Santiago Sa´nchez-Ramı´rez • 12 13 14 15 16 Else C. Vellinga • Roy Halling • Viktor Papp • Ivan V. Zmitrovich • Bart Buyck • 8,9 3 17 18 1 Damien Ertz • Nalin N. Wijayawardene • Bao-Kai Cui • Nathan Schoutteten • Xin-Zhan Liu • 19 1 1,3 1 1 1 Tai-Hui Li • Yi-Jian Yao • Xin-Yu Zhu • An-Qi Liu • Guo-Jie Li • Ming-Zhe Zhang • 1 1 20 21,22 23 Zhi-Lin Ling • Bin Cao • Vladimı´r Antonı´n • Teun Boekhout • Bianca Denise Barbosa da Silva • 18 24 25 26 27 Eske De Crop • Cony Decock • Ba´lint Dima • Arun Kumar Dutta • Jack W. Fell • 28 29 30 31 Jo´ zsef Geml • Masoomeh Ghobad-Nejhad • Admir J. Giachini • Tatiana B. Gibertoni • 32 33,34 17 35 Sergio P. Gorjo´ n • Danny Haelewaters • Shuang-Hui He • Brendan P. Hodkinson • 36 37 38 39 40,41 Egon Horak • Tamotsu Hoshino • Alfredo Justo • Young Woon Lim • Nelson Menolli Jr. • 42 43,44 45 46 47 Armin Mesˇic´ • Jean-Marc Moncalvo • Gregory M. Mueller • La´szlo´ G. Nagy • R. Henrik Nilsson • 48 48 49 2 Machiel Noordeloos • Jorinde Nuytinck • Takamichi Orihara • Cheewangkoon Ratchadawan • 50,51 52 53 Mario Rajchenberg • Alexandre G.
  • Notes, Outline and Divergence Times of Basidiomycota

    Notes, Outline and Divergence Times of Basidiomycota

    Fungal Diversity (2019) 99:105–367 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-019-00435-4 (0123456789().,-volV)(0123456789().,- volV) Notes, outline and divergence times of Basidiomycota 1,2,3 1,4 3 5 5 Mao-Qiang He • Rui-Lin Zhao • Kevin D. Hyde • Dominik Begerow • Martin Kemler • 6 7 8,9 10 11 Andrey Yurkov • Eric H. C. McKenzie • Olivier Raspe´ • Makoto Kakishima • Santiago Sa´nchez-Ramı´rez • 12 13 14 15 16 Else C. Vellinga • Roy Halling • Viktor Papp • Ivan V. Zmitrovich • Bart Buyck • 8,9 3 17 18 1 Damien Ertz • Nalin N. Wijayawardene • Bao-Kai Cui • Nathan Schoutteten • Xin-Zhan Liu • 19 1 1,3 1 1 1 Tai-Hui Li • Yi-Jian Yao • Xin-Yu Zhu • An-Qi Liu • Guo-Jie Li • Ming-Zhe Zhang • 1 1 20 21,22 23 Zhi-Lin Ling • Bin Cao • Vladimı´r Antonı´n • Teun Boekhout • Bianca Denise Barbosa da Silva • 18 24 25 26 27 Eske De Crop • Cony Decock • Ba´lint Dima • Arun Kumar Dutta • Jack W. Fell • 28 29 30 31 Jo´ zsef Geml • Masoomeh Ghobad-Nejhad • Admir J. Giachini • Tatiana B. Gibertoni • 32 33,34 17 35 Sergio P. Gorjo´ n • Danny Haelewaters • Shuang-Hui He • Brendan P. Hodkinson • 36 37 38 39 40,41 Egon Horak • Tamotsu Hoshino • Alfredo Justo • Young Woon Lim • Nelson Menolli Jr. • 42 43,44 45 46 47 Armin Mesˇic´ • Jean-Marc Moncalvo • Gregory M. Mueller • La´szlo´ G. Nagy • R. Henrik Nilsson • 48 48 49 2 Machiel Noordeloos • Jorinde Nuytinck • Takamichi Orihara • Cheewangkoon Ratchadawan • 50,51 52 53 Mario Rajchenberg • Alexandre G.