DOCSLIB.ORG

12-4. Volby Do Zastupitelstev Krajů 17. a 18. Října 2008

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
12-4. Volby Do Zastupitelstev Krajů 17. a 18. Října 2008 VOLBY 12-4. Volby do zastupitelstev krajů 17. a 18. října 2008 - platné hlasy podle krajů v procentech Česká v tom kraje Číslo a název politické strany, republika Středo- Karlo- politického hnutí, koalice Czech Jihočeský Plzeňský Ústecký Liberecký Republic český varský Celkem 100,00 100,00 100,00 100,00 100,00 100,00 100,00 v tom pro stranu: 1 Komunistická strana Čech a Moravy 15,03 13,75 15,94 17,53 17,45 18,39 13,89 2 Šance pro náš kraj 0,21 x x x x x x 3 SNK Evropští demokraté 1,26 x 4,92 x x 1,54 x 4 Strana drobných živnostníků a podnikatelů 0,07 x x x x x x 5 STŘEDOČEŠI 0,22 1,64 x x x x x 6 Zelení 0,01 x x 0,27 x x x 7 Volba pro kraj 0,30 x x x x x x 8 S.O.S. pro kraj 0,02 x x x x x x 9 "Nezávislí starostové pro kraj" 1,22 5,73 x x x x x 10 Severočeši.cz 1,09 x x x x 13,20 x 11 Koalice pro Pardubický kraj 1,10 x x x x x x 12 Křesťanská a demokratická unie - 6,65 x 6,95 x x x x Československá strana lidová 13 NEZÁVISLÍ 0,61 x x x x x x 15 Starostové pro Liberecký kraj 0,61 x x x x x 13,78 16 Koalice nestraníků 0,21 x x x x x x 17 Masarykova demokratická strana 0,02 x x x x 0,26 x 18 Strana zelených 3,15 3,00 3,40 3,81 2,64 4,29 4,94 19 Moravané 0,37 x 0,20 x x x x 20 Dělnická strana - 0,09 x x 1,47 x x x NE americkému radaru! 21 Dohoda pro změnu 0,03 x 0,51 x x x x 22 NÁRODNÍ SOCIALISTÉ A ROZUMNÍ 0,01 x x x x x 0,41 23 NEZÁVISLÍ DEMOKRATÉ 0,07 x x 1,16 x x x 24 Osobnosti kraje 0,38 x x x x x x 25 Doktoři (za uzdravení společnosti) 0,37 x 1,47 x 9,56 x x 26 Česká strana národně socialistická 0,06 x x 0,38 x x x 27 Národní strana 0,09 0,41 x x x x x 28 Nejen hasiči a živnostníci pro kraj 0,08 0,61 x x x x x 29 Koalice pro Liberecký kraj 0,17 x x x x x 3,84 30 Strana pro otevřenou společnost 0,37 x x 1,60 x x 6,12 31 Nejen hasiči a živnostníci pro kraj - 0,06 x x x x x x www.hnpd.cz, www.sdzp.cz 32 Strana zdravého rozumu 0,43 0,82 x 0,69 0,44 0,39 x 33 Sdružení pro republiku- Republikánská strana Československa 0,15 x 0,21 0,20 0,18 0,19 0,24 34 DOHODA pro Ústecký kraj 0,03 x x x x 0,42 x 35 Koalice pro Středočeský kraj 0,46 3,44 x x x x x 36 Koalice pro Plzeňský kraj 0,44 x x 7,21 x x x 37 SDŽ - Strana důstojného života 0,48 0,43 0,97 0,55 0,92 x 0,85 38 Unie svobody - Demokratická unie 0,03 x x x 1,19 x x 39 Balbínova poetická strana 0,03 x x 0,32 x 0,19 x 40 STAROSTOVÉ A NEZÁVISLÍ 0,66 x x x x x x PRO ZLÍNSKÝ KRAJ 41 Spojení demokraté - 0,01 x x 0,24 x x x Sdružení nezávislých ELECTIONS 12-4. Elections to regional councils held on 17 and 18 October 2008 - valid votes by regions Per cent Regions Name of political party, Králové- Pardu- Jiho- Olomouc- Moravsko- Vysočina Zlínský political movement, coalition hradecký bický moravský ký slezský 100,00 100,00 100,00 100,00 100,00 100,00 100,00 Total 13,47 13,00 15,72 14,41 15,80 11,18 15,92 Coommunist Party of Bohemia and Moravia x x x x 3,20 x x Chance for our Region 6,02 x 3,79 1,39 x x x SNK- European Democrats x 1,20 x x x x x Small Traders Party x x x x x x x Inhabitants of Central Bohemia x x x x x x x The Greens 4,95 x x x x x x Vote for the Region x 0,41 x x x x x S.O.S. for the Region x 3,66 x x 3,32 x x "Independent Mayors for the Region" x x x x x x x Inhabitants of North Bohemia.cz x 18,59 x x x x x Coalition for Pardubický Region x x 10,81 23,89 8,75 13,35 7,10 Christian Democratic Union - Czechoslovak People´s Party 3,56 x x 1,89 2,21 x x THE INDEPENDENT x x x x x x x Mayors for Liberecký Region x x x x x 3,18 x Coalition of Non-party Persons x x x x x x x Masaryk Democratic Party 3,97 2,40 2,65 3,64 2,73 2,07 2,14 Green Party x 0,13 0,16 0,89 0,94 0,89 0,77 Moravians x x x x x x x Worker´s Party - No to American Radar x x x x x x x Agreement on Change x x x x x x x National Socialists and the Reasonable x x x x x x x INDEPENDENT DEMOCRATS x x x x x x 2,96 Personalities of the Region x x x x x x x Doctors (for recovery of society) x x x 0,29 x x x Czech National Socialist Party x x x x x x 0,28 National Party x x x x x x x Not only Firemen and Traders for the Region x x x x x x x Coalition for Liberecký Region x x x x x x x Open Society Party x x x x x x 0,47 Not only Firemen and Traders for the Region - www.hnpd.cz, www.sdzp.cz 0,63 1,00 0,31 0,30 0,37 0,21 0,27 Common Sense Party Association for the Republic - 0,27 0,07 0,18 0,09 0,20 0,14 0,17 Republican Party of Czechoslovakia x x x x x x x AGREEMENT for Ústecký Region x x x x x x x Coalition for Středočeský Region x x x x x x x Coalition for Plzeňský Region 0,81 0,53 0,62 0,22 0,56 0,37 0,36 SDŽ - Party of Dignified Life x x x x x x x Freedom Union - Democratic Union x x x x x x x Balbín´s Poetic Party x x x x x 10,08 x Mayors and the Independent for Zlínský Region x x x x x x x United Democrats - Association of Independents VOLBY 12-4. Volby do zastupitelstev krajů 17. a 18. října 2008 - platné hlasy podle krajů v procentech dokončení Česká v tom kraje Číslo a název politické strany, republika Czech Středo- Karlo- politického hnutí, koalice Jihočeský Plzeňský Ústecký Liberecký Republic český varský 1) 42 Volte Pravý Blok 0,68 0,88 0,73 0,71 0,98 0,50 1,17 43 NESPOKOJENÍ OBČANÉ! 0,08 x x x x 1,06 x 44 Demokracie 0,08 x x x x x x 45 DOHODA pro Vysočinu 0,17 x x x x x x 46 Alternativa 2008 0,03 x x x x x x 47 Občanská demokratická strana 23,57 32,81 29,63 26,76 18,08 20,57 22,50 48 Česká strana sociálně demokratická 35,85 35,16 33,80 36,37 31,39 32,78 26,79 49 "ALTERNATIVA PRO KRAJ" 0,28 x x x 9,94 x x 50 Koalice pro Královéhradecký kraj 0,47 x x x x x x 51 Folklor i Společnost 0,00 x x x x x x 52 Česká strana národně sociální 0,00 x x x x x 0,11 53 Dělnická strana - za zrušení poplatků ve zdravotnictví 0,90 1,02 1,20 x 1,23 1,19 0,89 54 Konzervativní koalice 0,08 0,23 x x x 0,11 x 55 Koalice pro Karlovarský kraj 0,16 x x x 5,93 x x 56 Evropská strana důstojného stáří 0,14 x x x x 1,76 x 57 Unie pro sport a zdraví 0,19 x x x x x 4,40 58 Koruna Česká (monarchistická strana Čech, Moravy a Slezska) 0,06 x x 0,65 x x x 59 "DOHODA PRO JIŽNÍ MORAVU" 0,10 x x x x x x 60 Sdružení pro zdraví, sport a prosperitu 0,25 x x x x 3,07 x 1) celý název strany je: Volte Pravý Blok - stranu za snadnou a rychlou ODVOLATELNOST politiků a státních úředníků přímo občany, za NÍZKÉ daně, VYROVNANÝ rozpočet, MINIMALIZACI byrokracie, SPRAVEDLIVOU a NEZKORUMPOVANOU policii a justici, REFERENDA a PŘÍMOU demokracii WWW.CIBULKA.NET, kandidující s nejlepším protikriminálním programem PŘÍMÉ demokracie VY NEVĚŘÍTE POLITIKŮM A JEJICH NOVINÁŘŮM? NO KONEČNĚ! VĚŘME SAMI SOBĚ!!! - ale i s mnoha dalšími DŮVODY, proč bychom měli jít tentokrát VŠICHNI k volbám, ale - pokud nechceme být ZNOVU obelháni, podvedeni a okradeni - NEVOLIT žádnou parlamentní stranu vládnoucí (post) komunistické kriminální fízlokracie!!! - jenž žádá o volební podporu všechny české občany a daňové poplatníky, kteří chtějí změnit dnešní kriminální poměry, jejichž jsme všichni obětí, v jejich pravý opak! V BOJI MEZI DOBREM A ZLEM, PRAVDOU A LŽÍ, NELZE BÝT NEUTRÁLNÍ A PŘESTO ZŮSTAT SLUŠNÝ!!! Proto děkujeme za Vaši podporu!!! ELECTIONS 12-4.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ISSP 2017 Czech Republic 1
    ISSP 2017 Czech Republic 1 ISSP Background Variable Documentation Please name the ISSP module which the documentation refers to (e.g., “Health and Health Care / ISSP2011”): Social Networks and Social Resources / ISSP 2017 Please name your country: Czech Republic SEX - Sex of respondent National Language English Translation Question T1. Zaznamenejte pohlaví T1. Enter respondent’s sex: no. and text respondenta: Codes/ 1) Muž 1) Man Categories 2) Žena 2) Woman Interviewer Interviewer observation Instruction Construction/Recoding: Country Variable Codes (in translation) è SEX 1. Man 1. Male 2. Woman 2. Female not used 9. No answer ISSP 2017 Czech Republic Documentation for ISSP background variables, ISSP 2014 onwards © GESIS 2 BIRTH – Year of birth This question can be asked as an alternative to asking about AGE. If BIRTH is not asked directly, it must be computed by DATEYR ‘year of interview’ minus AGE ‘age of respondent’. National Language English Translation Question B2. Ve kterém roce jste se B2. What year were you born? no. and text narodil/a? Codes/ ODMÍTL(A)=9999. REFUSED =9999. Categories Interviewer ZAPIŠTE ROK NAROZENÍ DO ENTER YEAR OF BIRTH IN Instruction RÁMEČKU. DIGITS IN THE BOX Translation Note Note Construction/Recoding: (list lowest, highest, and ‘missing’ codes only, replace terms in [square brackets] with real numbers) Country Variable Codes/Construction Rules èBIRTH Constructio n Codes 1930 [MIN BIRTH] 1999 [HIGH BIRTH] 9999. No answer 9999. No answer Optional: Recoding Syntax recode B01A (1923 thru 1999=copy) (else=9999) into BIRTH. ISSP 2017 Czech Republic Documentation for ISSP background variables, ISSP 2014 onwards © GESIS 3 AGE - Age of respondent This question can be asked as an alternative to asking about BIRTH.
    [Show full text]
  • Codebook Indiveu – Party Preferences
    Codebook InDivEU – party preferences European University Institute, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies December 2020 Introduction The “InDivEU – party preferences” dataset provides data on the positions of more than 400 parties from 28 countries1 on questions of (differentiated) European integration. The dataset comprises a selection of party positions taken from two existing datasets: (1) The EU Profiler/euandi Trend File The EU Profiler/euandi Trend File contains party positions for three rounds of European Parliament elections (2009, 2014, and 2019). Party positions were determined in an iterative process of party self-placement and expert judgement. For more information: https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/65944 (2) The Chapel Hill Expert Survey The Chapel Hill Expert Survey contains party positions for the national elections most closely corresponding the European Parliament elections of 2009, 2014, 2019. Party positions were determined by expert judgement. For more information: https://www.chesdata.eu/ Three additional party positions, related to DI-specific questions, are included in the dataset. These positions were determined by experts involved in the 2019 edition of euandi after the elections took place. The inclusion of party positions in the “InDivEU – party preferences” is limited to the following issues: - General questions about the EU - Questions about EU policy - Questions about differentiated integration - Questions about party ideology 1 This includes all 27 member states of the European Union in 2020, plus the United Kingdom. How to Cite When using the ‘InDivEU – Party Preferences’ dataset, please cite all of the following three articles: 1. Reiljan, Andres, Frederico Ferreira da Silva, Lorenzo Cicchi, Diego Garzia, Alexander H.
    [Show full text]
  • Experiences of the Heinrich Böll Foundation Across the World Imprint
    International Women’s Day in Karachi: Pakistani students demonstrate against violence against women Gender politics makes a difference experiences of the heinrich böll foundation across the world imprint Gender politics makes a difference experiences of the heinrich böll foundation across the world published by the heinrich böll foundation text: Renate wilke-launer (assisted by the heinrich böll foundation offices worldwide) cover photo: Asif hassan / AFP / Getty images photos: heinrich böll foundation archives and axel harneit-sievers (14), cyril Koky (16), damon lynch (17), tlo (18, 20), wclrf (19, 21), ursula Meissner / laif (24), amos schliack / laif (27 upper), debbie hill / upi / laif (27 lower), Marcos aragão (34 upper), paula de andrade (34 upper), criola (35), Krona (36), equipo consultor desarollo y Géne- ro (38), liz frank (41), rea / laif (54), Michael wolf/laif (55), Michael ende (56), dpa (63), and Jonkmann / laif (64). not all copyright holders could be found; they are invited to contact the heinrich-böll foundation. © heinrich-böll-stiftung design: blotto, berlin printed by: agit-druck, berlin editing: Barbara unmüßig, claudia rolf, susanne dittrich, bernd rheinberg, robert furlong english translation: Kate sturge information correct at: december, 2009 copies of this report are available free of charge from heinrich-böll-stiftung schumannstraße 8, 10117 berlin www.boell.de GENDER POLITICS MAKES A DIFFERENCE EXPERIENCES OF THE HEINRICH BÖLL FOUNDATION ACROSS THE WORLD Contents FOREWORD 3 MISSION STATEMENT 4 INTRODUCTION 5 { PORTRAIT: Ludmila Kabanowa } 8 I. GAINING POWER 10 Building political participation 11 Implementing women’s rights 16 Combating sexual discrimination 23 { PORTRAIT: Rukshanda Naz } 28 II. building A GENDER-EqUITABLE SOCIETy 30 Reshaping society 31 My image belongs to me 40 Resisting violence against women 42 { PORTRAIT: Ana Paula Assubuji } 50 III.
    [Show full text]
  • Network Pa Erns of Legislative Collaboration In
    Network Paerns of Legislative Collaboration in Twenty Parliaments Franc¸ois Briae [email protected] Supplementary online material is appendix contains detailed information on the data and networks briey documented in the short note “Network Paerns of Legislative Collaboration in Twenty Parliaments”. Section A starts by reviewing the existing literature on legislative cosponsorship as a strategic position-taking device for legis- lators within parliamentary chambers. Section B then documents the data collection process, Section C summarises its results, and Section D contains the full list of party abbreviations used in the data. Section E fully documents how the cosponsorship networks were constructed and weighted, and lists some derived measures. e replication material for this study is available at https://github.com/ briatte/parlnet. e code was wrien in R (R Core Team, 2015), and the cur- rent release of the repository is version 2.6. See the README le of the reposi- tory for detailed replication instructions including package dependencies. e raw data up to January 2016 are available at doi:10.5281/zenodo.44440. CONTENTS A Background information on legislative cosponsorship . 2 B Sample denition and data collection . 4 B.1 Bills . 4 B.2 Sponsors . 10 C Descriptive statistics by country, chamber and legislature . 11 D Party abbreviations and Le/Right scores . 17 E Cosponsorship network construction . 27 E.1 Edge weights . 28 E.2 Network objects . 30 E.3 Network descriptors . 31 References . 35 1 A. BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON LEGISLATIVE COSPONSORSHIP Legislative scholarship oers a wealth of studies that stress the importance of collabo- ration between Members of Parliament (MPs) in the lawmaking process.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Participation of Women in the Czech Republic Summary of the Country Report
    Summary of the POLITICAL Country Report (1993 – 2013) PARTICIPATION OF WOMEN IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC Mgr. Veronika Šprincová Mgr. Marcela Adamusová Fórum 50 %, o.p.s | www.padesatprocent.cz Political Participation of Women in the Czech Republic Summary of the Country Report Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................... 4 1. European Parliament .................................................................................. 5 2. National Politics ......................................................................................... 8 2.1. Lower House of the Czech Parliament ...................................................... 8 2.2. Upper House of the Czech Parliament .................................................... 10 2.3. Women in the Government .................................................................... 11 2.4. Regional and Local Politics...................................................................... 14 2.4.1. Regional Assemblies ......................................................................... 14 2.4.2. Local Assemblies ............................................................................... 16 2.5. Women in Czech Political Parties ........................................................... 18 2 Political Participation of Women in the Czech Republic Summary of the Country Report List of Tables and Figures Chart no. 1: The number of women elected to the European Parliament in 2004 and 2009 for each member state
    [Show full text]
  • European Election Study 2014 EES 2014 Voter Study First Post-Electoral Study
    European Election Study 2014 EES 2014 Voter Study First Post-Electoral Study Release Notes Sebastian Adrian Popa Hermann Schmitt Sara B Hobolt Eftichia Teperoglou Original release 1 January 2015 MZES, University of Mannheim Acknowledgement of the data Users of the data are kindly asked to acknowledge use of the data by always citing both the data and the accompanying release document. How to cite this data: Schmitt, Hermann; Popa, Sebastian A.; Hobolt, Sara B.; Teperoglou, Eftichia (2015): European Parliament Election Study 2014, Voter Study. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5160 Data file Version 2.0.0, doi:10.4232/1. 12300 and Schmitt H, Hobolt SB and Popa SA (2015) Does personalization increase turnout? Spitzenkandidaten in the 2014 European Parliament elections. European Union Politics, Online first available for download from: http://eup.sagepub.com/content/early/2015/06/03/1465116515584626.full How to cite this document: Sebastian Adrian Popa, Hermann Schmitt, Sara B. Hobolt, and Eftichia Teperoglou (2015) EES 2014 Voter Study Advance Release Notes. Mannheim: MZES, University of Mannheim. Acknowledgement of assistance The 2014 EES voter study was funded by a consortium of private foundations under the leadership of Volkswagen Foundation (the other partners are: Riksbankens Jubileumsfond, Stiftung Mercator, Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian). It profited enormously from to synergies that emerged from the co-operation with the post-election survey funded by the European Parliament. Last but certainly not least, it benefited from the generous support of TNS Opinion who did the fieldwork in all the 28 member countries . The study would not have been possible the help of many colleagues, both members of the EES team and country experts form the wider academic community, who spent valuable time on the questionnaire and study preparation, often at very short notice.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Module 3
    COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ELECTORAL SYSTEMS - MODULE 3 (2006-2011) CODEBOOK: APPENDICES Original CSES file name: cses2_codebook_part3_appendices.txt (Version: Full Release - December 15, 2015) GESIS Data Archive for the Social Sciences Publication (pdf-version, December 2015) ============================================================================================= COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ELECTORAL SYSTEMS (CSES) - MODULE 3 (2006-2011) CODEBOOK: APPENDICES APPENDIX I: PARTIES AND LEADERS APPENDIX II: PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS FULL RELEASE - DECEMBER 15, 2015 VERSION CSES Secretariat www.cses.org =========================================================================== HOW TO CITE THE STUDY: The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (www.cses.org). CSES MODULE 3 FULL RELEASE [dataset]. December 15, 2015 version. doi:10.7804/cses.module3.2015-12-15 These materials are based on work supported by the American National Science Foundation (www.nsf.gov) under grant numbers SES-0451598 , SES-0817701, and SES-1154687, the GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, the University of Michigan, in-kind support of participating election studies, the many organizations that sponsor planning meetings and conferences, and the many organizations that fund election studies by CSES collaborators. Any opinions, findings and conclusions, or recommendations expressed in these materials are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funding organizations. =========================================================================== IMPORTANT NOTE REGARDING FULL RELEASES: This dataset and all accompanying documentation is the "Full Release" of CSES Module 3 (2006-2011). Users of the Final Release may wish to monitor the errata for CSES Module 3 on the CSES website, to check for known errors which may impact their analyses. To view errata for CSES Module 3, go to the Data Center on the CSES website, navigate to the CSES Module 3 download page, and click on the Errata link in the gray box to the right of the page.
    [Show full text]
  • Main Right Party Responses to Radical Populist and Extremist Party Positioning in Central Europe
    Main Right Party Responses to Radical Populist and Extremist Party Positioning in Central Europe. Paper prepared for the ECPR Joint Sessions Workshop, Salamanca Spain April 10-15, 2014 Reinhard Heinisch, Kristina Hauser [email protected], [email protected] University of Salzburg Austria Abstract: Drawing on data from the Chapel Hill Expert Survey and case profiles, the paper traces the interaction between main right parties and (radical) right party competitors, to determine, whether the former adopt dismissive, accommodationist-convergent, accommodationist-cooperative, or, adversarial responses. Assuming that main right parties are forced to respond strategically to right party competitors, we examine in this the role of the dominant cleavage structure (socioeconomic or socio-cultural), the initial position of the main right party, the cost/pressure associated with changing a long-established position, the issue dimension involved (economic vs. exclusivist), and decision of cooperating with parties with more complementary or more compatible positions. Drawing on the literature, we argue that regime legacies and the role of the EU accession process on party realignment have structured party competition such that contestation occurs primarily over socioeconomic or socio-cultural issues. In the latter case, we expect main right parties to move to the right either to converge on positions of a far-right competitor or to prevent challenges from the right. If contestation is centered on the economic issue dimension, we assume main right parties be more constrained in their ability to accommodate right party competitors and rather engage in cooperation to form a right or center-right bloc to compete with a center-left bloc.
    [Show full text]
  • ISSP 2018 Czech Republic
    ISSP 2018 Czech Republic ISSP Background Variable Documentation Please name the ISSP module which the documentation refers to (e.g., “Health and Health Care / ISSP2011”): ISSP 2018, Religion IV Please name your country: Czech Republic SEX - Sex of respondent National Language English Translation Question T1. Zaznamenejte pohlaví T1. Enter respondent’s sex: no. and text respondenta: Codes/ 1) Muž 1) Man Categories 2) Žena 2) Woman Interviewer Interviewer observation Instruction Construction/Recoding: Country Variable Codes (in translation) SEX 1. Man 1. Male 2. Woman 2. Female not used 9. No answer ISSP 2018 Czech Republic BIRTH – Year of birth This question can be asked as an alternative to asking about AGE. If BIRTH is not asked directly, it must be computed by DATEYR ‘year of interview’ minus AGE ‘age of respondent’. respondent’. National Language English Translation Question B1. Ve kterém roce jste se B1. What year were you born? no. and text narodil/a? Codes/ ODMÍTL(A)=9999. REFUSED =9999. Categories Interviewer ZAPIŠTE ROK NAROZENÍ. ENTER YEAR OF BIRTH Instruction Translation Note Note Construction/Recoding: (list lowest, highest, and ‘missing’ codes only, replace terms in [square brackets] with real numbers) Country Variable Codes/Construction Rules BIRTH Constructio n Codes 1925 [MIN BIRTH] 2000 [HIGH BIRTH] 9999. No answer 9999. No answer Optional: Recoding Syntax recode B1 (1925 thru 2000=copy) (else=9999) into BIRTH. ISSP 2018 Czech Republic AGE - Age of respondent This question can be asked as an alternative to asking about BIRTH. If AGE is not asked directly, it must be computed by DATEYR ‘year of interview’ minus BIRTH ‘year of birth’.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative Voting, Alternative Outcomes: 2018 Presidential Election in the Czech Republic
    Munich Social Science Review, New Series, vol. 3 (2020) Alternative voting, alternative outcomes: 2018 Presidential election in the Czech Republic Jan Oreský Institute H21, Zapova 1559/18, 150 00 Prague 5, [email protected] Prokop Čech Institute H21, Faculty of Social and Economic Studies J. E. Purkyne University in Usti nad Labem, Czech Republic, [email protected] Abstract: In this paper, the official two-round system is compared to the D21- Janeček method, using representative data collected during the 2018 presidential election in the Czech Republic. Under the D21-Janeček method, voters were allowed to cast up to three plus votes, with the option of casting one minus vote for the nine presidential candidates. Because of the systematically capped multiple votes, the outcome of the Janeček method differed significantly from the actual election. Additional votes provided more information about voters’ preferences and candidates’ profiles. Here it showed that the Janeček method favours inclusive candidates who are able to attract the support from voters of other candidates, and disadvantages polarising candidates. Furthermore, the overlap of plus and minus votes reveals which candidates are most hurt by the splitting of votes under plurality voting. A relatively large overlap of plus votes between the main two contenders also suggests that the differences between them were not as big as was presented by the media. Keywords: Czech Republic, presidential election, representative study, D21- Janeček method, alternative voting system JEL Classification: D72 ; D78 ; H10 ; Z18 © 2020 Verlag Holler, München. ISSN 0170-2521 ISBN 978-3-88278-312-4 www.accedoverlag.de 114 Munich Social Science Review, New Series, vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Politics in Central Europe
    Politics in Central Europe The Journal of the Central European Political Science Association Volume 7 Number 2 December 2011 Regional Politics in Central Eastern Europe Next Issue: Cultural Transformation in Central Europe The articles published in this scientific review are placed also in SSOAR (Social Science Open Access Repository), http://www.ssoar.info CONTENTS ESSAYS Ladislav Cabada The Role of Central European Political Parties in the Establishment and Operation of the European Conservatives and Reformists Group . 5–18 Michaela Ježová Turkish Foreign Policy towards the Balkans . 19–37 Petr Jurek Possibilities for and Limitations of Regional Party Development in the Czech Republic and Slovakia . 38–56 Michal Kubát Reforming Local Governments in a New Democracy: Poland as a Case Study . 57–67 Přemysl Rosůlek Consolidation of the Centre-Right Political Camp in Hungary (1989–2002), Nationalism and Populism . 68–97 DISCUSSION Ladislav Jakl Regional European Integration of the Legal Protection of Industrial Property . 98–116. Tadeusz Siwek A Political-Geographic Map of Poland before the 2011 Election . 117–125. BOOK REVIEWS . 126–129 GUIDELINES FOR AUTHORS . 130–135 Politics in Central Europe 7 (December 2011) 2 ESSayS The Role of Central European Political Parties in the Establishment and Operation of the European Conservatives and Reformists Group1 Ladislav Cabada abstract: Central Eastern European political parties influenced and changed the ideological debate in the European parliament after the Eastern enlargement in 2004/2007 significantly. As the most influential ideological stream with a Central Eastern European “origin” or background we could observe the so-called Eurore- alist (or Eurogovernmentalist) political parties such as the Polish Right and Justice (PiS) or Czech Civic Democratic Party (ODS).
    [Show full text]
  • Codebook CPDS I 1960-2013
    1 Codebook: Comparative Political Data Set, 1960-2013 Codebook: COMPARATIVE POLITICAL DATA SET 1960-2013 Klaus Armingeon, Christian Isler, Laura Knöpfel, David Weisstanner and Sarah Engler The Comparative Political Data Set 1960-2013 (CPDS) is a collection of political and institu- tional data which have been assembled in the context of the research projects “Die Hand- lungsspielräume des Nationalstaates” and “Critical junctures. An international comparison” directed by Klaus Armingeon and funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation. This data set consists of (mostly) annual data for 36 democratic OECD and/or EU-member coun- tries for the period of 1960 to 2013. In all countries, political data were collected only for the democratic periods.1 The data set is suited for cross-national, longitudinal and pooled time- series analyses. The present data set combines and replaces the earlier versions “Comparative Political Data Set I” (data for 23 OECD countries from 1960 onwards) and the “Comparative Political Data Set III” (data for 36 OECD and/or EU member states from 1990 onwards). A variable has been added to identify former CPDS I countries. For additional detailed information on the composition of government in the 36 countries, please consult the “Supplement to the Comparative Political Data Set – Government Com- position 1960-2013”, available on the CPDS website. The Comparative Political Data Set contains some additional demographic, socio- and eco- nomic variables. However, these variables are not the major concern of the project and are thus limited in scope. For more in-depth sources of these data, see the online databases of the OECD, Eurostat or AMECO.
    [Show full text]