DOCSLIB.ORG

A Game of Power Courtly Influence on the Decision-Making of Emperor Theodosius II (R

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Game of Power Courtly Influence on the Decision-Making of Emperor Theodosius II (R A game of power Courtly influence on the decision-making of emperor Theodosius II (r. 408-450) Research Master Thesis Supervisor: Prof. Dr. L.V. Rutgers Consulting reader: Dr. R. Strootman RMA Ancient, Medieval and Renaissance Studies Utrecht University 16-06-2013 Emma Groeneveld [email protected] 3337707 1 Index Preface ................................................................................................................. 3 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 4 1. Court studies ..................................................................................................... 8 2. Theodosius ......................................................................................................20 3. High officials ....................................................................................................25 4. Eunuchs ..........................................................................................................40 5. Royal women ...................................................................................................57 6. Analysis ...........................................................................................................69 Conclusion ...........................................................................................................83 Bibliography.........................................................................................................86 Appendix I. ..........................................................................................................92 Amount of words of the whole document including footnotes: 39.835 Amount of words of the chapters, preface, introduction and conclusion, without footnotes: 36.099 2 Preface Political history has always intrigued me. For some years already the books I tend to read in my spare time are predominantly concerned with ancient or medieval kingdoms, rulers and courts. It was thus hardly surprising when, fairly soon into my research master programme on ancient history, my focus shifted from diplomacy – a topic that had busied me since my bachelor thesis – to the ancient courts. The first essay I wrote with this perspective was for the course Late Antiquity, taught by prof. Dr. Leonard Rutgers at Utrecht University, and it was an instant hit both with the professor and myself. From then on my mind was made up to explore the phenomenon of the court more extensively, resulting in a few other essays written for different courses, and, eventually, in this thesis. I have had the pleasure of lifting some of the shadows present at the court that obscured the closed doors, council- and private chambers and narrow corridors that were from time to time rife with schemes and intrigue. This is a process I have greatly enjoyed going through, but nonetheless I could not have gone through it entirely by myself; credit is due where it is deserved. Thanks must go first of all to my supervisor Leonard Rutgers, who has provided me with useful feedback and allowed me the space to do my own thing with this topic. Secondly, Rolf Strootman, who functioned as consulting reader for this thesis, helped me delve into the broader world of court studies in a useful tutorial I followed from September 2012 until January 2013. Thirdly, my fellow student K. M. Lahcen has given his opinion on some specific parts of this thesis, thus aiding me in applying the finishing touches. Fourthly, my dear friend Louise Vink has turned my messy first version of Figure 1 into a neat and professional looking chart, which is naturally the version I have chosen to use in this thesis. Finally my mother, Joke Groeneveld, who is an English teacher, has my eternal gratitude for freeing up time in her busy schedule to read and correct my use of English in this entire thesis. Emma Groeneveld Utrecht, June 2013 3 Introduction Often when describing the reign of a monarch at some point in history, historians refer to ‘the king’s policy’ or describe how ‘the emperor decided’ on the outcome of a matter of political importance. This is usually done for convenience’s sake - to create a general overview of the period in question - but the truth, as those historians are surely aware of, is that policy-making and decision-making were processes that did not take place in a void. Instead, the ruler often consulted with advisors or advisory bodies, as well as perhaps hearing the opinions of those who were close to him – family and friends – who could potentially have an influence on the ruler’s decision. The role played by high officials or by a broader section of the nobility (where one existed) in this process could vary greatly depending on the time and place in history one investigates. See, for example, the contrast between the English king Henry III (r. 1216-72), who became increasingly subjected to the power and will of the barons and ended up with nothing much to say at all, and the French powerhouse Louis XIV, the Sun King (r. 1643-1715), who consulted with his advisors but clearly had the final word and was determined not to let any favourites influence his decision-making. The ruler’s decision-making was thus not a straightforward matter. Yet, the creation of policy, which usually took place at the court, stood at the heart of an empire- or kingdom’s exploitations, making it a highly interesting topic of study. Indeed, studies of the court certainly exist, especially concerning the lavish early modern courts of which that of Louis XIV is the most splendid example, but a focus on the process of decision-making is as of yet absent.1 What is more, the further one goes back in time, the less attention is awarded to the court. This can be explained by the fact that far fewer sources are extant, but that is no reason for not attempting such a specific investigation of an earlier court at all. The Roman Empire presents a hugely interesting period in which to investigate the machinations of the court, but so far the focus has mostly been on the reigns of emperors in general instead of dealing specifically with the court, and the influence that could be exercised on the emperor’s decision-making is still a scarcely illuminated topic.2 This is thus a field in which much can still be gained, and that is precisely what I aim to do. 1 See for instance studies such as A. G. Dickens (ed.), The courts of Europe: politics, patronage and royalty, 1400-1800 (1977); Asch and Birke (eds.), Princes, Patronage and the Nobility: the court at the beginning of the modern age c. 1450-1650 (London, Oxford 1991); T. Artan, J. Duindam, and M. Kunt (eds.), Royal Courts in Dynastic States and Empires: A Global Perspective. Rulers and Elites 1 (Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2011); and see chapter one of this study. 2 Studies on the ancient court will be given attention in chapter one. Examples of such court studies are A.J.S. Spawforth (ed.), The Court and Court Society in Ancient Monarchies (Cambridge 2007); A. Wallace-Hadrill, ‘The Imperial Court’ in: A. Bowman, E. Champlin, A. Lintott (eds.), Cambridge Ancient History vol. 10 (Cambridge 1996) 283-308; R. Strootman , ‘Eunuchs, concubines and renegades: The "paradox of power" and the promotion of favorites in the Hellenistic empires.’ In A. Erskine and L. Llewellyn-Jones (eds.), The Hellenistic Royal Court (Edinburgh, forthcoming); R. Strootman, ‘Hellenistic court society: The Seleukid imperial court under Antiochos the Great, 223-187 BCE.’ In J. Duindam, M. Kunt, T. Artan (eds.), Royal Courts in Dynastic 4 However, influence on decision-making is not the easiest subject of investigation, primarily because a large part of it often took place behind closed doors, inside the corridors and chambers of the court. Especially where it concerns informal influence – for example by the wife of an emperor who could give her opinion or discuss matters privately with her husband – the process often took place in the shadows. Thus, in order to have a chance at uncovering information about how policy was made, an as large amount of sources as possible is needed – something which the early Roman empire cannot sufficiently provide. More suited is the Roman Empire in late antiquity, particularly the fifth century, seeing that there are both a fair amount of written sources contemporary to that period and descriptions by later authors to be found, as well as an interesting emperor whose court to investigate. The emperor who will be the centre of my attention – just as he was the centre of his realm’s attention – is Theodosius II (r. 408-450). First off, some background about this figure is required. When the eastern Roman emperor Theodosius II died on the 28th of July, 450 after a fall from his horse, it brought to an end the longest reign of a Roman emperor since that of Augustus. He had ascended the throne in 408 when he was a mere eight years old following the death of his father Arcadius, and according to Gibbon his subsequent reign was characterised by him being dominated by women and eunuchs.3 Still, he is credited with overseeing the creation of one of the two great law codices of Late Antiquity – the Codex Theodosianus, the other being the Codex Justinianus – as well as battling the heresies of Nestorius and Eutyches respectively, all while the empire’s borders were intermittently threatened by Persia or by ‘barbarian’ tribes such as the Vandals and the Huns. Theodosius II is thus a highly suitable subject for an investigation regarding influence on the ruler’s
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Embassies – Negotiations – Gifts Bassies As a Basic Feature of International They Travel and How Far? Nechaeva Scru- Communication
    This book offers an original approach to the status significance of such donations. GH 30 late Roman and early Byzantine diplo- Ambassadors, who embodied high-level macy as a system. Assessing both official diplomacy, delivered gifts, led talks, and Ekaterina Nechaeva and clandestine perspectives, Ekaterina mediated international dialogue. Who Nechaeva examines the working mech- were these envoys? How dangerous and anisms of this diplomatic machine and adventurous were their missions? What reveals the ‘block’ organization of em- were these expeditions like? How did Embassies – Negotiations – Gifts bassies as a basic feature of international they travel and how far? Nechaeva scru- communication. Negotiations were split tinizes these and further questions by Systems of East Roman Diplomacy in Late Antiquity into several phases and accompanied by investigating the practices of ambassa- elaborate protocol and rich ceremony. dorial business. Throughout the book the Gift exchange and the distribution of in- analysis of secret negotiations, the intelli- signia comprised a vital part of the diplo- gence system and spy activities of envoys, matic process. What were the semantics plots and political murders reveals the of these symbolic acts? The study accents shadowy side of diplomacy. Embassies – Negotiations – GiftsEmbassies – Negotiations www.steiner-verlag.de VSWG Alte Geschichte Geographica Historica 30 Franz Steiner Verlag Franz Steiner Verlag ISBN 978-3-515-10632-0 Ekaterina Nechaeva 9 7 8 3 5 1 5 1 0 6 3 2 0 Ekaterina Nechaeva Embassies – Negotiations – Gifts geographica historica Begründet von Ernst Kirsten, herausgegeben von Eckart Olshausen und Vera Sauer Band 30 Ekaterina Nechaeva Embassies – Negotiations – Gifts Systems of East Roman Diplomacy in Late Antiquity Franz Steiner Verlag Satz: Vera Sauer Bibliografische Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek: Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über <http://dnb.d-nb.de> abrufbar.
    [Show full text]
  • EARLY CHRISTIAN and BYZANTINE Amulet
    EARLY CHRISTIAN AND BYZANTINE Amulet: St. Symeon Stylites Byzantine, 12th c. CE Lead 64.76 Museum Purchase The lead amulet shows the bust of Saint Symeon emerging from the top of a column. An angel stands to left and right, one of them on a ladder. Below the angels appear the Saint’s mother and his disciple Conon. Saint Symeon was an ascetic who lived most of his life on the top of a column. After his death, the column on which he died was venerated and attracted pilgrims who came to be healed. Amulets like this one were considered to have healing properties and were made for the pilgrims who came to the sanctuary. An inscription around the edge of the amulet confirms its healing nature. It reads: “Blessed medallion of Saint Symeon Thaumatourgos (healer/performer of miracles). Praise god in his Saints. (a quote from Psalm 151) Amen.” This type of amulet, created to heal or prevent disease or illness, was very common. (MAA 11/07) Amulet: Holy Rider Byzantine, Palestine, 5th c. CE Bronze 70.99 Museum Purchase The bronze amulet is one of the most popular in Late Antiquity (5th to 7th centuries). On one side it shows a mounted warrior stabbing with his spear a fallen figure, an image which is found also in both pagan and Jewish art but is assimilated into Christian beliefs. Amulets like this one were worn as a general protection against evil. A Greek inscription above reads: “One God conquering Evil.” On the other side is the figure of Christ Crucified.
    [Show full text]
  • Hunnic Warfare in the Fourth and Fifth Centuries C.E.: Archery and the Collapse of the Western Roman Empire
    HUNNIC WARFARE IN THE FOURTH AND FIFTH CENTURIES C.E.: ARCHERY AND THE COLLAPSE OF THE WESTERN ROMAN EMPIRE A Thesis Submitted to the Committee of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the Faculty of Arts and Science. TRENT UNIVERSITY Peterborough, Ontario, Canada © Copyright by Laura E. Fyfe 2016 Anthropology M.A. Graduate Program January 2017 ABSTRACT Hunnic Warfare in the Fourth and Fifth Centuries C.E.: Archery and the Collapse of the Western Roman Empire Laura E. Fyfe The Huns are one of the most misunderstood and mythologized barbarian invaders encountered by the Roman Empire. They were described by their contemporaries as savage nomadic warriors with superior archery skills, and it is this image that has been written into the history of the fall of the Western Roman Empire and influenced studies of Late Antiquity through countless generations of scholarship. This study examines evidence of Hunnic archery, questions the acceptance and significance of the “Hunnic archer” image, and situates Hunnic archery within the context of the fall of the Western Roman Empire. To achieve a more accurate picture of the importance of archery in Hunnic warfare and society, this study undertakes a mortuary analysis of burial sites associated with the Huns in Europe, a tactical and logistical study of mounted archery and Late Roman and Hunnic military engagements, and an analysis of the primary and secondary literature. Keywords: Archer, Archery, Army, Arrow, Barbarian, Bow, Burial Assemblages, Byzantine, Collapse, Composite Bow, Frontier, Hun, Logistics, Migration Period, Roman, Roman Empire, Tactics, Weapons Graves ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would first like to thank my thesis advisor, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rhetoric of Corruption in Late Antiquity
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE The Rhetoric of Corruption in Late Antiquity A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Classics by Tim W. Watson June 2010 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Michele R. Salzman, Chairperson Dr. Harold A. Drake Dr. Thomas N. Sizgorich Copyright by Tim W. Watson 2010 The Dissertation of Tim W. Watson is approved: ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ Committee Chairperson University of California, Riverside ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS In accordance with that filial piety so central to the epistolary persona of Q. Aurelius Symmachus, I would like to thank first and foremost my parents, Lee and Virginia Watson, without whom there would be quite literally nothing, followed closely by my grandmother, Virginia Galbraith, whose support both emotionally and financially has been invaluable. Within the academy, my greatest debt is naturally to my advisor, Michele Salzman, a doctissima patrona of infinite patience and firm guidance, to whom I came with the mind of a child and departed with the intellect of an adult. Hal Drake I owe for his kind words, his critical eye, and his welcome humor. In Tom Sizgorich I found a friend and colleague whose friendship did not diminish even after he assumed his additional role as mentor. Outside the field, I owe a special debt to Dale Kent, who ushered me through my beginning quarter of graduate school with great encouragement and first stirred my fascination with patronage. Lastly, I would like to express my gratitude to the two organizations who have funded the years of my study, the Department of History at the University of California, Riverside and the Department of Classics at the University of California, Irvine.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of the Justinian Code on Byzantine Society
    Danya Bubar Context Under Consideration: Byzantium 1. Hypothesis: The Justinian Code did not impact his Byzantine society. 2. Sources / Limitations of study Brownworth, L. (2007). 12 Byzantine Rulers: The History of the Byzantine Empire. [Audio podcast]. Retrieved from http://www.12byzantinerulers.com/rss.xml. Cameron, Averil. (2006). The Byzantines. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing. Canning, J. (1996). History of Medieval Political Thought, 300-1450. London, GBR: Routledge. Retrieved from http://site.ebrary.com.proxy.hil.unb.ca/lib/unblib/doc?id=10058158&ppg =23. Evans, J. A. S. (2000). Age of Justinian: The Circumstances of Imperial Power. London, GBR: Routledge. Retrieved from http://site.ebrary.com.proxy.hil.unb.ca/lib/unblib/doc?id=100 70712&ppg=23. Gibbon, E . (2001). Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, Volume IV. London, GBR: ElecBook, 2001. p lxxiii. http://site.ebrary.com.proxy.hil.unb.ca/lib/unblib/doc? id=2001727&ppg=73. Gigantès, P. (2002). The Secret History of Rulers of the World. London: Magpie Books. Nicol, D. M. (1991). A Biographical Dictionary of the Byzantine Empire. London: Seaby. Stein, P. (1999). Roman Law in European History. Port Chester, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press http://site.ebrary.com.proxy.hil.unb.ca/lib/unblib/doc?id=10014895 &ppg=43. Tellegen-Couperus, O. (1993). Short History of Roman Law. London, GBR: Routledge, Retrieved from http://site.ebrary.com.proxy.hil.unb.ca/lib/unblib/doc?id=10060619 &ppg=153. Venning, T. (2006). A Chronology of the Byzantine Empire. Great Britain: Palmgrave MacMillian. Limitations of these sources may lie within the authors’ observations of the historical contexts being discusses; this may suggest the presence of author bias, given that the information provided is subjective to their interpretation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Developmentof Early Imperial Dress from the Tetrachs to The
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Birmingham Research Archive, E-theses Repository University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. The Development of Early Imperial Dress from the Tetrarchs to the Herakleian Dynasty General Introduction The emperor, as head of state, was the most important and powerful individual in the land; his official portraits and to a lesser extent those of the empress were depicted throughout the realm. His image occurred most frequently on small items issued by government officials such as coins, market weights, seals, imperial standards, medallions displayed beside new consuls, and even on the inkwells of public officials. As a sign of their loyalty, his portrait sometimes appeared on the patches sown on his supporters’ garments, embossed on their shields and armour or even embellishing their jewelry. Among more expensive forms of art, the emperor’s portrait appeared in illuminated manuscripts, mosaics, and wall paintings such as murals and donor portraits. Several types of statues bore his likeness, including those worshiped as part of the imperial cult, examples erected by public 1 officials, and individual or family groupings placed in buildings, gardens and even harbours at the emperor’s personal expense.
    [Show full text]
  • Eunucos: Fontes, Realidades, Representações E Problemáticas Da Antiguidade Oriental Ao Período Bizantino
    UNIVERSIDADE DE LISBOA FACULDADE DE LETRAS EUNUCOS: FONTES, REALIDADES, REPRESENTAÇÕES E PROBLEMÁTICAS DA ANTIGUIDADE ORIENTAL AO PERÍODO BIZANTINO JOANNE BARBOZA FERREIRA Tese orientada pelo Prof. Doutor Nuno Simões Rodrigues, especialmente elaborada para a obtenção do grau de Mestre em História Antiga. 2019 AGRADECIMENTOS Gostaria de agradecer primeiramente à minha mãe, Anne Jacqueline, quem em realidade também sempre foi também pai, irmã e melhor amiga. Obrigada por, antes de mais nada, proporcionar o apoio financeiro sem o qual minha experiência em Portugal não seria possível. Obrigada por acreditar e investir sempre em mim e por me apoiar em todos os caminhos que trilhei até hoje. Mesmo passando por inúmeros problemas pessoais e de saúde, por momentos nos quais não possuía mais forças nem para si, sempre buscou oferecer o melhor para mim. Sem o seu exemplo de ser humano, eu jamais me tornaria a mulher que sou hoje. Sou imensamente grata também ao meu marido, Adrien Bonn, quem me proporcionou o apoio emocional sem o qual eu jamais poderia ultrapassar as dificuldades que encontrei enquanto estudante e mulher brasileira em Portugal. Obrigada por ser sempre o meu maior fã, por acreditar no meu potencial e por ter sido o meu porto seguro enquanto eu enfrentava um quadro quase sem fim de burnout e depressão. Agradeço ao meu professor e orientador Dr. Nuno Rodrigues por ter sugerido este tema que nunca imaginei trabalhar, mas com o qual me identifiquei e me apaixonei logo que comecei a aprofundar. Obrigada também por ser o único na faculdade que não apenas acreditou na possibilidade da pesquisa, mas que também se ofereceu para ajudar.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Christian and Byzantine
    EARLY CHRISTIAN AND BYZANTINE There is no simple term which adequately covers the period of artistic development from about third to the seventh centuries in western art, the transitional period between Antiquity and the Middle Ages. It is an era which seems to confront us with an abrupt and seemingly erratic succession of diverse styles. What unites these styles, however, is the rise in importance of specifically Christian imagery. Christian art forms and liturgical practices took shape in both eastern and western parts of Europe and the crumbling Roman Empire. The Roman Emperor Constantine was the first to legalize Christianity. He had made Constantinople, at the ancient site of Byzantium on the Black Sea, the capital of the East Roman Empire around 325 A.D. In both east and west, art became subject to a kind of "denaturing" process, produced in part by the otherworldly outlook of Christianity. Gradually, the naturalistic Classical tradition was replaced by an art intended to convey ideas about God and the afterlife, rather than to reproduce the appearances of this world. In Italy and the west, "barbarians" (the Goths, Ostrogoths, Lombards and others) and their pagan motifs influenced the depiction of Christian themes. In the Byzantine east, art influenced by Greek and Syrian forms became an integral part of the liturgy--the rituals of the church service--and changed very little over the centuries, even surviving the threat of the Iconoclastic Controversy from 730-843 A.D. (the iconoclasts wished to destroy all religious images because they believed they impeded true spiritual understanding). Icons, meaning simply images, date to about the sixth century, and demonstrate the conservative, formal elements of the Byzantine style (see the 17th century Russian Icon).
    [Show full text]
  • Jordanes and the Invention of Roman-Gothic History Dissertation
    Empire of Hope and Tragedy: Jordanes and the Invention of Roman-Gothic History Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Brian Swain Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2014 Dissertation Committee: Timothy Gregory, Co-advisor Anthony Kaldellis Kristina Sessa, Co-advisor Copyright by Brian Swain 2014 Abstract This dissertation explores the intersection of political and ethnic conflict during the emperor Justinian’s wars of reconquest through the figure and texts of Jordanes, the earliest barbarian voice to survive antiquity. Jordanes was ethnically Gothic - and yet he also claimed a Roman identity. Writing from Constantinople in 551, he penned two Latin histories on the Gothic and Roman pasts respectively. Crucially, Jordanes wrote while Goths and Romans clashed in the imperial war to reclaim the Italian homeland that had been under Gothic rule since 493. That a Roman Goth wrote about Goths while Rome was at war with Goths is significant and has no analogue in the ancient record. I argue that it was precisely this conflict which prompted Jordanes’ historical inquiry. Jordanes, though, has long been considered a mere copyist, and seldom treated as an historian with ideas of his own. And the few scholars who have treated Jordanes as an original author have dampened the significance of his Gothicness by arguing that barbarian ethnicities were evanescent and subsumed by the gravity of a Roman political identity. They hold that Jordanes was simply a Roman who can tell us only about Roman things, and supported the Roman emperor in his war against the Goths.
    [Show full text]
  • Code of Theodosius Death Penalty
    Code Of Theodosius Death Penalty Particularised and intermittent Rudy delights some baksheesh so intransigently! Ametabolous and slopped Shaine ripens so shillyshally equablythat Hodge and stonk unassumingly. his nucleoplasm. Bartholomew usually pinnacles interjectionally or broadcasting hereby when bearable Vito elucidating Whether moved the death of code Want a thank TFD for its existence? Illegitimate audio art, beganto take care of this kind on. Heretics40 The Theodosian and Justinian Codes represent the logical. Law XIV: The Confession of Jews; and In What into Each One of Them, dry is Converted, must Write finish the Proof just his Conversion. There are provided they differ in. What his Emperor Theodosius do in 391? Edward Gibbon-The Decline in Fall take The Roman Empire 4. Is five penalty Justified in Bangladesh SlideShare. But they say this is ambassador to participate any information about paper quality ofthe justice which aliens regularly received from Roman judges, or about thekinds of penalties they suffered when the judgment went though them. Crime punishment religion Christian Church Roman criminal law. If you currently one of death penalty for their masters were rustics who blinded, but while on our sins from theodosius was still more. The noble matron whom you by advocating a code of imprisoning someone? Publication of Statutes Public Access drive the memories and the. At multiple the encounters were feeling hostile, after several primary sources suggest, but Constantine started a junction of the Christianization of Roman law that accelerated under Theodosius II and Justinian. Can Muslims drink alcohol? And theodosius code also, penalty feel betrayed and. The death penalty for slaves shall either notify us that was formally christian sects made of a share.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Appendix 14
    Appendix 14: Dignities and dignitaries in the main compilations of Roman imperial laws The two largest compilations of Roman imperial laws1 were contained in the 16 books of the Codex Theodosianus (sanctioned for publication in 438), 2 and in the 12 books of the Codex Iustinianus (whose second edition was sanctioned for publication in 534). 3 Compilations of additional laws ( novellae constitutiones ), that were enacted between 438-468 and after 534, were made to supplement the laws in the two Codices . The original Codices and novellae are unavailable, but a representation of the immediate common exemplar of the primary copies of each compilation exists in separate editions. 4 The most recent of these editions is referred to in the following citations as Cod.Theod. , Cod.Iust. , and Nov. (followed by an abbreviation for the name of the issuing emperor) . [1] Dignities Many of those laws refer to dignitas and to dignitates . The importance of dignities in the later Roman state is indicated by the fact that Cod.Theod. and Cod.Iust. each contains an entire book of excerpts from laws 5 on that subject, 6 in addition to many references to the same subject in their other books. A dignity was a legislated degree of status ( status )7 that defined the position of its holder in the order of precedence (the order of priority observed in ceremonies and in social formalities) among the important members of society, and in the receipt of privileges and benefits attached to the dignity. A dignity was conferred by the emperor, who was referred to as sacred or divine, so that the questioning of any appointment or award made by the emperor was regarded as sacrilege.
    [Show full text]
  • Saint Pulcheria
    Saint Pulcheria Virgin, Empress of the Eastern Roman Empire In 399 AD, in the city of Constantinople, Aelia to have bishops reinstated who had been unjustly Pulcheria was born to the Easter Roman Emperor Flavius dismissed. Arcadius, and his wife Aelia Eudoxia. Arcadius was a In 421 AD, when Bishop Atticus reported the week and easily controlled emperor, reigning during a persecution of Christians by the Sasanian King Bahram V time when the empire was being invaded by various after the destruction of a Zoroastrian temple, Pulcheria Gothic armies comprised primarily of Arian-Christians influenced her brother to send troops to defend the who believed Jesus Christ, the Son, was a creation of the Christians in the Sassanid Empire. After a successful Father, rather than of one substance with the Father. campaign which Theodosius attributed to his sisters piety Pulcheria had an older sister who had passed away young. and virginity, Christians were allowed to return to In 400 AD, her sister Arcadia would be born, followed by Sassanid. During this time, Theodosius married a pagan Theodosius II and Mariana in 401 AD. In 402 AD, who took the name Aelia Eudocia, and converted to Arcadius went on to declare his one year old son Christianity. Theodosius II to be his co-Emperor. In 431 AD, the Ecumenical Council of Ephesus Despite the fact that Pulcheria’s family were was called to address an issue with the Nestorius of Nicene-Christians and accepted the reality of the Trinity, Constantinople, who denied Mary as the Theotokos, the her mother Eudoxia was in constant conflict with the “God-bearer.” Pulcheria supported Cyril of Alexandria, Patriarch of Constantinople, Saint John Chrysostom.
    [Show full text]