Inter-Discursive Dynamics and Darfur: Analyzing Narrative Complexity Behind

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Inter-Discursive Dynamics and Darfur: Analyzing Narrative Complexity Behind Inter-Discursive Dynamics and Darfur: Analyzing Narrative Complexity Behind Responses of the United Nations and African Union, 2003-2006 A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at George Mason University by Kathryn E. Crewe Master of Public Policy Harvard University 2002 Director: Sara Cobb, Professor School of Conflict Analysis and Resolution Spring Semester 2015 George Mason University Fairfax, VA ! This!work!is!licensed!under!a!creative!commons!! attribution5noderivs!3.0!unported!license.! ii DEDICATION) This is dedicated to all of the people of Darfur, who deserve to write their own story, as well as my father, the original Dr. Crewe. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS) I would like to thank the many friends, relatives, and supporters who have helped me complete this dissertation. All of those I interviewed, who shall remain anonymous, generously contributed their time and honest input. My friend, Nicole, assisted me in transcribing hours and hours of interviews. My husband, Brian, patiently listened to me frame and reframe my research questions. My mother attended my conference presentations in Europe to show her support. Finally, thanks to Sara Cobb, Susan Hirsch, and Tojo Thatchenkerry for helping me translate ideas into words on paper. iv TABLE)OF)CONTENTS) Page List of Tables ................................................................................................................... viii! List of Figures .................................................................................................................... ix! List of Abbreviations ......................................................................................................... ix! Abstract .............................................................................................................................. xi! Chapter One: Introduction .................................................................................................. 1! The Positivist Approach to Decision-Making Analysis .................................................. 7! Taking an Interpretive Approach to Decision-Making Analysis .................................. 10! Research Questions ....................................................................................................... 18! Organization .................................................................................................................. 21! Chapter Two: The Darfur Conflict ................................................................................... 24! Territory and Local Governance ................................................................................... 26! Ethnic and Tribal Identity ............................................................................................. 28! Regional Conflict and Racist Ideology ......................................................................... 30! Political Islam ................................................................................................................ 32! Environmental and Demographic Pressures ................................................................. 36! Central Government Neglect and Oppression ............................................................... 38! The Darfur Rebellion .................................................................................................... 39! International Response .................................................................................................. 41! Summary ....................................................................................................................... 46! Chapter Three: Literature Review .................................................................................... 47! Frames ........................................................................................................................... 50! Narratives and Counternarratives .................................................................................. 54! Discourse and Storylines ............................................................................................... 60! Summary of Analytic Frameworks ............................................................................... 68! Chapter Four: Methodology .............................................................................................. 70! Inter-Discursive Narrative Complexity Analysis .......................................................... 71! v Communities of Meaning .......................................................................................... 77! Framework for Analyzing Narrative Complexity ..................................................... 77! Data Collection .............................................................................................................. 79! Limitations, Possible Objections, and Refutations ........................................................ 87! Chapter Five: Architecture of Meaning ............................................................................ 91! Mapping Communities of Meaning .............................................................................. 92! Architecture of Meaning ............................................................................................... 96! Advocacy: The Responsibility to Protect .................................................................. 97! Human Rights: International Human Rights and Humanitarian Law ..................... 100! Humanitarian: Impartiality and Neutrality .............................................................. 104! United Nations: Comprehensive Solutions .............................................................. 106! African Union: African States and African Solutions ............................................. 110! Academia: Local Ownership ................................................................................... 112! Summary of Communities ....................................................................................... 114! Chapter Six: Inter-Discursive Narrative Complexity Analysis ...................................... 123! Early 2003-Early 2004: Complexity and The Lens of the South ................................ 126! Early to Late 2004: Discourse Structuration ............................................................... 135! Mobilization of Bias—the Rwanda Storyline ......................................................... 143! Late 2004 to Early 2005: Argumentative Struggle ..................................................... 160! Complex Counternarratives ..................................................................................... 162! Storylines Positioning Advocates as Harmful ......................................................... 171! Re-Positioning by Advocates and Recompression of the Storyline ........................ 174! Approaching Discourse Institutionalization ............................................................ 182! Late 2005-Early 2006—Discursive Hegemony .......................................................... 186! Dominance of a Discourse Coalition ....................................................................... 187! Discourse Institutionalization .................................................................................. 193! Conclusion ................................................................................................................... 206! Chapter Seven: Discussion ............................................................................................. 209! Significance of the Case for Discursive Policy Analysis ............................................ 210! Significance of the Case to Conflict Resolution ......................................................... 212! Importance of this Research ........................................................................................ 216! Additional Questions for Research and Exploration ............................................... 220! vi Annexes ........................................................................................................................... 224! I.! “Helicopter” Interview Questions ......................................................................... 224! II.! “Key Player” Interview Questions ...................................................................... 225! References ....................................................................................................................... 226! vii LIST)OF)TABLES) Table Page Table 1. Barbara Stone (1989), Causal Stories and Policy Agendas ................................ 68 Table 2. Findings by Time Period ................................................................................... 118 Table 3. Examples of Discursive Affinity ...................................................................... 120 Table 4. Possible Generalized Typology of Simplified Narrative Features ................... 219! viii LIST)OF)FIGURES) Figure Page Figure 1. Darfur ethnic groups (Human Rights Watch, Darfur Destroyed: Ethnic Cleansing by the Government and Militia Forces in Western Sudan, 7 May 2004). ....... 34 Figure 2. Darfur migration routes, UN Humanitarian Information Center (HIC), 2005. 37 Figure 3. Crude Mortality Rates in Darfur as Reported in 81 Surveys (Degomme, 2011). ........................................................................................................................................... 43
Recommended publications
  • Advance Edited Version Distr
    Advance edited version Distr. GENERAL A/HRC/6/19 28 November 2007 Original: ENGLISH HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL Sixth session Agenda item 4 HUMAN RIGHTS SITUATIONS THAT REQUIRE THE COUNCIL’S ATTENTION Final report on the situation of human rights in Darfur prepared by the group of experts mandated by the Human Rights Council in its resolution 4/8, presided by the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Sudan and composed of the Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions, the Special Representative of the Secretary-General for children and armed conflict, the Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences, the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the situation of human rights defenders, the Representative of the Secretary-General on the human rights of internally displaced persons and the Special Rapporteur on the question of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment* * The annexes to the present report are circulated as received in the language of submission and in Arabic and French only. A/HRC/6/19 page 2 Summary The mandate of the group of experts, comprising seven mandate holders, was established on 30 March 2007 by the Human Rights Council in its resolution 4/8 to ensure effective follow-up to and foster the implementation of resolutions and recommendations on Darfur, as adopted by the Council, the Commission on Human Rights and other United Nations human rights institutions, as well as to promote the implementation of relevant recommendations of other United Nations human rights mechanisms, taking into account the needs of the Sudan, ensuring the consistency of these recommendations and contributing to the monitoring of the human rights situation on the ground.
    [Show full text]
  • A Year of Campaigning a Year of Campaigning
    A YEAR OF CAMPAIGNING A YEAR OF CAMPAIGNING “They carried guns all the time. I was afraid of and petitions but by mobilizing public pressure the guns. Actually, I was in constant fear.” through street protests, vigils and direct These are the words of Fereh Musu Conteh, lobbying. Thousands of AI members respond who was abducted by an armed group during to Urgent Action appeals on behalf of the conflict in Sierra Leone when she was just individuals at immediate risk. Publicity 13 years old. through the news media and online takes AI’s “When there are guns, there are more message swiftly and in a range of languages to victims,” said Malya, a woman from Port-au- millions more. Prince, Haiti, describing the level of violence AI members invent creative and innovative in her neighbourhood. forms of activism, both online and on the Gun violence afflicts countries around the streets. In 2006, for example, AI Paraguay world – armed conflict and violent crime claim organized “toy gun swaps” in the run-up to the lives of men, women and children every Christmas, offering new toys to children in day. AI is part of a worldwide coalition exchange for toy weapons, and street theatre campaigning for a global Arms Trade Treaty in to persuade parents not to buy them. AI order to prevent the proliferation and misuse Morocco carried out a survey on poverty and of arms and so reduce the number of victims. government responsibility, and AI Australia In 2006, activists achieved a major victory sought the public’s view on the country’s new when the UN voted overwhelmingly to start anti-terror laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Genocide in Darfur - No Business with Death“ Monday, 29Th October 2007, 10:00 - 11:30Am, Au Premier in Zurich
    Blocking period: 29th October 2007, 10:00 am Media conference „Genocide in Darfur - No business with death“ Monday, 29th October 2007, 10:00 - 11:30am, Au Premier in Zurich Advert placed in Tagesanzeiger newspaper on 26th October 2007 Press release „Genocide in Darfur - No business with death“ Speech by Christoph Wiedmer, Director, Society for Threatened Peoples, Switzerland (STP) Speech by Andreas Missbach, „Banks and Financial Centre Switzerland“ Programme, Berne Declaration Speech by Scott Wisor, Senior Field Organizer for the Sudan Divestment Task Force, a project of the Genocide Intervention Network Background information: Detailed information on investments by Swiss financial institutions in oil companies operating in Sudan. Source: Bloomberg Financial Services Background information: Arguments for the Efficacy of Targeted Divestment from Sudan; Source: Genocide Intervention Network Background information: Summary of Engagement Points for Sudan; Source: Genocide Intervention Network Background information: „The Highest Offenders“, Source: Genocide Intervention Network Background information: graphic „The Problem“, Source: Save Darfur Coalition Background information: graphic „The Solution“, Source: Save Darfur Coalition „Who’s who“ Society for Threatened Peoples Switzerland / Wiesenstrasse 77 / CH-3014 Bern Phone: 031 311 90 08 / Fax: 031 311 90 65 / E-mail: [email protected] Internet: www.gfbv.ch / PC 30-27759-7 Press release, Zurich, 29 October 2007 (Translation) Genocide in Darfur – No business with death The genocide in Darfur relies mainly on the income of the Sudanese government from the oil industry. Involved are also Swiss financial institutions such as UBS or Credit Suisse which in total hold around 6 billion US dollars worth of investments in the controversial oil companies in Sudan.
    [Show full text]
  • Role of Peace and Stability on Nomadic Animal Movements in South Kordofan
    Sudan University of Science and Technology College of Graduate Studies Role of peace and stability on nomadic animal movements in south kordofan Submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Ph.D. (on peace & conflicts studies) دور اﻷﻣﻦ اﻹﺳﺘﻘﺮار ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﺤﺮﻛﺎت ﺣﯿﻮاﻧﺎت اﻟﺮﺣﻞ ﻓﻲ ﺟﻨﻮب ﻛﺮدﻓﺎن By: Abdel Aziz Abdalla Nour Eldin BSc. Agric. (Alex) Egypt June (1984) M. Sc (Animal Production Institute) University of Khartoum Sep. (1988) Supervision : Prof: Elhaj Abba (May 2015) اﻵﯾﺔ ﺑﺳم اﷲ اﻟرﺣﻣن اﻟرﺣﯾم } { 41 I Dedication This thesis is dedicated to soul of my mother, my father and my family for continuous support and encouragement II Acknowledgment I am gratefully indebted my supervisor Dr. Elhaj Abba for his keen interest in this study, his unfailing help and invaluable achieve during this work. Sincere gratitude also extended to my co-supervisor Dr. Salah Said Ahmed for his patient and encouragement throughout this work. Also thank extended to the following: Ustaz Lobna Hassan (um Maaz) for her constatnt encouragement, moral help, and advice throughout this work. Thanks to my extend family (brothers, sisters, unclose..) Finally, I want to thank my family for their constant encouragement, kind help, patient and support that help me to achieve this study. III Abstract The aim of this study is to focus on the movement of animals in its Southward and Northward tracks and the effect of such movement on tribal conflicts in this area and current resulting effect on the movement as well as the future effect, socially, economically, politically and the effect of the same movement on peace, stability and development in state along with method of treatment, provision of suggesting of the necessary solutions, determining the real effects of conflicts and the reasons leading to conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4. Pastoralism in North Kordofan
    Pastoralism in Practice: MonitoringOn the Livestock Hoof Mobility inLivestock Contemporary Trade Sudan in Darfur http://unep.org/Sudan/ First published in November 2013 by the United Nations Environment Programme © 2013, United Nations Environment Programme First published in September 2012 by the United Nations Environment Programme United© 2012, Nations United EnvironmentNations Environment Programme Programme P.O. Box 30552, Nairobi, KENYA Tel:United +254 Nations (0)20 Environment762 1234 Programme Fax:P.O. +254Box 30552, (0)20 762Nairobi, 3927 KENYA E-mail:Tel: +254 [email protected] (0)20 762 1234 Web:Fax: +254http://www.unep.org (0)20 762 3927 E-mail: [email protected] ThisWeb: publication http://www.unep.org may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder provided acknowledgement of the source is made. No use of this publication mayThis bepublication made for mayresale be or reproduced for any other in commercialwhole or in purposepart and whatsoever in any form without for educational prior permission or non-profit in writing purposes from UNEP. without special Thepermission contents from of thisthe copyrightvolume do holder not necessarily provided acknowledgement reflect the views of theUNEP, source or contributory is made. No organizations. use of this publication The designations may be made for employedresale or for and any the other presentations commercial do purpose not imply whatsoever the expressions without of prior any permissionopinion whatsoever in writing on from the UNEP. part of The UNEP contents or contributory of this volume organizationsdo not necessarily concerning reflect thethe legalviews status of UNEP, of any or contributorycountry, territory, organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter to UNGC Regarding Petrochina Membership
    Mr. Georg Kell Executive Director of the Global Compact Office of the Secretary General United Nations New York, NY 10017 January 7, 2009 Dear Mr. Kell, On May 12, 2008, a broad base of civil society organizations collectively urged the United Nations Global Compact (UNGC) to use its leverage and the privilege and prestige of membership in the UNGC to engage with PetroChina Co Ltd. (PetroChina), a UNGC participant, on behalf of the people of Sudan. At that time, you forwarded the letter of concern to PetroChina. Since that time, Investors Against Genocide (IAG) and Centre for Research on Multinational Corporations (SOMO), have privately engaged with representatives of the UNGC in an effort to address the concern. On December 15, 2008, after more than seven months and with still no response from PetroChina, IAG and SOMO submitted a formal complaint against PetroChina to the UNGC of “systematic or egregious abuse” of the Global Compact‟s overall aims and principles. We strongly believe in the founding principles of the Global Compact, which calls for businesses to support and respect the protection of internationally proclaimed human rights and for businesses to ensure that they are not complicit in human rights abuses. The grave human rights abuses in Darfur, Sudan, demand the urgent and determined application of these principles. In spite of these principles, PetroChina, the listed arm of China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC), Sudan's largest oil industry partner, is indisputably linked to the regime perpetuating the violent conflict in Darfur. Therefore, we ask the UN Global Compact to formally and urgently address this serious complaint against PetroChina under the UNGC‟s Integrity Measure for “Allegations of Systematic or Egregious Abuses.” In doing so, the UNGC will be taking a strong stand against abuse of its founding principles.
    [Show full text]
  • Sudan's North
    Concordis International Sudan Report September 2010 MORE THAN A LINE: SUDAN’S NORTH - SOUTH BORDER SEPTEMBER 2010 02 Concordis International Sudan Report Contents Contents 04 Acknowledgements 50 Abyei 1.1 Snapshot Summary 1.2 Conflict Drivers 05 Glossary 1.2.1 National Political Context 1.2.2 Border Demarcation and the 08 Executive Summary Abyei Referendum 1.1 General Findings 1.2.3 Physical Demarcation 1.2 Thematic Findings 1.2.4 Land 1.3 Conflict Prone Areas 1.2.5 Militarisation 14 Introduction 1.3.6 Additional Factors 1.1 General Findings 1.4 Conflict Management 1.2 Thematic Findings 1.3 Conflict Prone Areas 67 Southern Kordofan/Unity 1.1 Snapshot Summary 28 South Darfur-Western Bahr al Ghazal 1.2 Conflict Drivers 1.1 Snapshot Summary 1.2.1 Transhumance 1.2 Conflict Drivers 1.2.2 Political Marginalisation 1.2.1 Border demarcation 1.2.3 Hardening Conflict Memory 1.2.2 Militarisation 1.2.4 Land/Oil and Demarcation 1.2.3 SPLA-Rezeigat Clashes 1.2.5 Community Land 1.2.4 Other Armed Groups 1.2.6 Militarisation 1.2.5 Wider Regional Instability 1.2.7 Community Conflict Management 1.2.6 Conflict Trends 1.3 Conflict Trends and Mitigation 1.3 Conflict Mitigation 79 Southern Kordofan 38 South Darfur-Northern Bahr al Ghazal 1.1 Snapshot Summary 1.1 Snapshot Summary 1.2 Conflict Drivers 1.2 Conflict Drivers 1.2.1 National Political Context 1.2.1 Contested Rights Along the 1.2.2 Land Grazing Area 1.2.3 Socio-economic Underdevelopment 1.2.2 Transportation of Arms 1.2.4 Integration of Adminstration 1.2.3 Militarisation 1.2.5 Security Integration and
    [Show full text]
  • Save Darfur Coalition and Genocide Intervention Network Are Now
    Save Darfur Coalition and Genocide Intervention Network are now Testimony of the Hon. Thomas H. Andrews President of United to End Genocide Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission “Sudan: The Ongoing Humanitarian Crisis in South Kordofan and Continuing Human Rights Violations in Darfur” September 22, 2011 Thank you Chairman Wolf, Chairman McGovern and members of the Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission for holding this hearing. I greatly appreciate the opportunity to testify before you today on the escalation of attacks against civilians in Sudan. So many members of this Commission have been long-time champions of peace and accountability in Sudan. Your leadership on Sudan is critical. I was in the region a little over two months ago visiting Rwanda, Kenya and South Sudan, and in Juba just weeks after violence broke out in South Kordofan. Everywhere I went I heard story after story of the horror that continues to be inflicted. Two refugees from Darfur told me about their harrowing experience of being awakened at dawn by the sound of hooves and gunfire as the Janjaweed raided their village. They fled to South Kordofan’s Nuba Mountains and described how the people there welcomed them. They expressed their alarm and horror that the same regime that had forced them to flee their homes in Darfur was now attacking the very people who provided them refuge. The common denominator in the devastating attacks on civilians in both Darfur and South Kordofan is Sudan’s President Omar al-Bashir. Let me be clear - Bashir is a genocidal monster who is already wanted by the International Criminal Court for directing atrocities in Darfur.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report (June 2006 – May 2007)
    Sven Torfinn/ Panos Pictures Panos Torfinn/ Sven Annual Report (June 2006 – May 2007) with Accounts Year overview When I started this role a year ago I knew think tanks and faith groups joining us. that to be effective Crisis Action had to work This growth in reach and partners means that internationally. Gone were the days when civil Crisis Action is now well placed to have even society could be constrained by the silos of state more impact during the next twelve months. boundaries. I’m confident that together we can make the Twelve months later we have established Crisis voice of civil society a new super power when it Actions in Germany and France, a hub office in comes to decisions of war and peace. Brussels and a temporary office in Portugal for the EU presidency (July-Dec 07). This growth has been achieved thanks to the support of partners and funders who have continued to back us because the Crisis Action model has been shown to work. Our role, as a professional facilitator of impact orientated campaigns around armed conflict, not only adds value but also impact to our partners' work. On both of our major campaigns during the last year - Iran and Darfur - we have helped our partners influence the debate and change policy. Our partner base – the foundation for all our work - has also increased three fold during the last Brendan Cox year with new aid agencies, human rights groups, Executive Director Our current partners include: Aegis Trust Church of England (International Office) Amnesty International UK Foreign Policy Centre British
    [Show full text]
  • Why Save Darfur Didn T Save Darfur
    Why Save Darfur Didn’t Save Darfur: United to End Genocide is Making All the Same Mistakes By Prof. Gregory Stanton March 11, 2012 In 2003, Humanity United (HU) called a national conference of people its staff identified as potential activists for an anti-genocide movement. Notably missing were any members of the Republican party, most of the heads of member organizations of the International Campaign to End Genocide and any leaders of the International Association of Genocide Scholars. At the conference, Humanity United announced that Pierre and Pam Omidiyar, HU’s funders, intended to donate $100 million over the next seven years to support activism against genocide, human trafficking, and a few other causes. They also announced that unsolicited applications for grants would not be accepted. Most of the money they pledged has now been spent. In early 2003, after an attack by rebels on a Sudanese Air Force base in Al Fasher, the Sudanese government began a genocidal counter-insurgency war against the Fur, Massalit, Zaghawa and other black African groups in Darfur. Genocide Watch was the first organization to declare a Genocide Watch for the situation in June, 2003. In the summer of 2004, David Bernstein, Jerry Fowler, John Prendergast, Ruth Messinger, Gloria White-Hammond, and a few other activists founded the Save Darfur Coalition, and a number of organizations quickly joined it. (Genocide Watch was among the first to join in 2004, but was not even listed as a member on the Save Darfur website until 2008, and was excluded from all leadership meetings.) The Coalition staff were paid from funds donated by Humanity United and other fundraising via the Center for American Progress, the liberal think tank organization headed by John Podesta, and funded by George Soros.
    [Show full text]
  • South Kordofan and Blue Nile Country Report
    1 June 2016 (COI up to 1 April 2016) South Kordofan and Blue Nile Country Report Explanatory Note Sources and databases consulted List of Acronyms CONTENTS 1. Background information 1.1. Geographical information (map of Sudan; maps of South Kordofan and Blue Nile) 1.2. Background to the current state of the conflict 2. Actors involved in the conflict 2.1. Government forces 2.1.1. Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) 2.1.2. Rapid Support Forces (RSF) 2.1.3. National Intelligence and Security Service (NISS) 2.1.4. Law enforcement 2.1.5. Paramilitary militias 2.1.5.1. Popular Defence Forces (PDF) 2.1.6. Defection from government forces 2.1.7. Immunity from human rights abuses 2.2. Armed opposition groups 2.2.1. Sudan People’s Liberation Movement/Army – North (SPLM/A-N) 2.2.2. Sudan Revolutionary Front (SRF) 2.2.3. Human rights abuses committed by armed opposition groups 3. Current state of the conflict/peace negotiations 3.1. Territorial control 3.2. Peace negotiations 4. Security situation: impact of the conflict on civilians 4.1. Aerial bombing campaigns and ground attacks 4.1.1. Casualties caused by aerial bombing campaigns and ground attacks between 1 July 2014 and 1 April 2016 4.1.1.1. Two Areas 4.1.1.2. South Kordofan 4.1.1.3. Blue Nile 4.2. Unexploded ordinance (UXO) 4.2.1. South Kordofan 4.2.2. Blue Nile 4.3. Forced displacement 4.3.1. South Kordofan 4.3.2. Blue Nile 4.4. Denial of humanitarian access 1 4.4.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights Ngos and the Sponsoring of Public Activism
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 5-2007 Professional Publics/Private Citizens: Human Rights NGOs and the Sponsoring of Public Activism Christopher Todd Minnix University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Minnix, Christopher Todd, "Professional Publics/Private Citizens: Human Rights NGOs and the Sponsoring of Public Activism. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2007. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/407 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Christopher Todd Minnix entitled "Professional Publics/Private Citizens: Human Rights NGOs and the Sponsoring of Public Activism." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in English. Mary Jo Reiff, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: Janet Atwill, Michael Keene, Rosalind Hackett Accepted
    [Show full text]