DOCSLIB.ORG

Côte D'ivoire Nepal Uzbekistan Djibouti Nicaragua Viet Nam Ecuador Niger Yemen Egypt Nigeria Zambia El Salvador Pacific Islands Ethiopia Papua New Guinea

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Côte D'ivoire Nepal Uzbekistan Djibouti Nicaragua Viet Nam Ecuador Niger Yemen Egypt Nigeria Zambia El Salvador Pacific Islands Ethiopia Papua New Guinea Empowered lives. Resilient nations. ASSESSMENT OF DEVELOPMENT RESULTS EVALUATION OF UNDP CONTRIBUTIONCÔTE D’IVOIRE HUMAN DEVELOPMENT effectiveness COORDINATI efficiency COORDINATION AND PARTNERSHIP sust NATIONAL OWNERSHIP relevance MANAGING FOR sustainability MANAGING FOR RESULTS responsivene DEVELOPMENT responsiveness NATIONAL OWNER NATIONAL OWNERSHIP effectiveness COORDINATI efficiency COORDINATION AND PARTNERSHIP sust NATIONAL OWNERSHIP relevance MANAGING FOR sustainability MANAGING FOR RESULTS responsivene HUMAN DEVELOPMENT effectiveness COORDINATI ASS ESSMENT OF DEVELOPMENT RESULTS EVALUATION OF UNDP CONTRIBUTIONCôte d’IvoIRE The Management Response for this evaluation can be accessed here: http://erc.undp.org/evaluationadmin/manageresponse/view.html?evaluationid=6534 Evaluation Office, February 2013 United Nations Development Programme REPORTS PUBLISHED UNDER THE ADR SERIES Afghanistan Georgia Paraguay Argentina Ghana Peru Bangladesh Guatemala The Philippines Barbados and OECS Guyana Rwanda Benin Honduras Senegal Bhutan India Serbia Bosnia and Herzegovina Indonesia Seychelles Botswana Jamaica Somalia Brazil Jordan Sri Lanka Bulgaria Lao PDR Sudan Burkina Faso Liberia Syrian Arab Republic Cambodia Libya Tajikistan Chile Malawi Thailand China Maldives Tunisia Colombia Moldova Turkey Democratic Republic of Congo Mongolia Uganda Republic of the Congo Montenegro Ukraine Costa Rica Mozambique United Arab Emirates Côte d'Ivoire Nepal Uzbekistan Djibouti Nicaragua Viet Nam Ecuador Niger Yemen Egypt Nigeria Zambia El Salvador Pacific Islands Ethiopia Papua New Guinea ASSESSMENT OF DEVELOPMENT RESULTS: CÔTE D’Ivoire Copyright © UNDP 2013, all rights reserved. Manufactured in the United States of America. Printed on recycled paper. The analysis and recommendations of this report do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations Development Programme, its Executive Board or the United Nations Member States. This is an independent publication by UNDP Evaluation Office. Copy editing: Sanjay Upadhya Graphic design: Laurie Douglas Graphic Design (lauriedouglas.com) Cover photos: UNDP Côte d’Ivoire ACKNOWledgements This evaluation was conducted by the Evaluation The cooperation of Ngokwey Ndolamb, the Office of UNDP, with Roberto La Rovere as UN Resident Coordinator and UNDP Resident evaluation manager. The office drew on the Representative, and the contribution by André following persons to conduct the evaluation: Carvalho, former Country Director, and the new team leader Nadia Bechraoui, and the team UNDP Country Director, Mr. Luc Gregoire, members Mamadou Coulibaly (on the poverty are acknowledged with thanks. We particularly component, and the fight against HIV/AIDS); appreciate the cooperation received from Aissata Clément Sekongo (on governance aspects); Asna De, Deputy Country Director (Programme), who Fall (gender) and Gabriella Buescher (crisis acted as focal point for the ADR; her support prevention and recovery). At the Evaluation was crucial for the success of the evaluation. We Office in New York, Anna Dall’Oca provided also acknowledge the support by Christian Do research support. Rosario, Deputy Country Director (Operations), and Emma Ngouan-Anoh, Assistant Resident Our thanks are extended to stakeholders and Representative (Programme), and the other staff partners of UNDP-Côte d’Ivoire, including of UNDP-Côte d’Ivoire, including those in the mem bers of the Government, civil society, inter- field. We would also like to thank the UNDP national development community, the United Regional Bureau for Africa for their valuable Nations family and members of the communities support and contribution to the process, and the that the ADR team consulted during the evalu- interest in the process by the Bureau for Conflict ation. Their engagement was constructive, allow- Prevention and Recovery in New York. ing the team to conduct the evaluation while maintaining independence. It is our hope that this evaluation will help UNDP further leverage its strategic partner- We are grateful to Mr. Albert Mabri Toikeusse, ship with the Government of Côte d’Ivoire, as Minister of State, Ministry of Planning and UNDP advances with its transformation process Development, who chaired the stakeholder work- to become an ever more relevant and valuable shop on 15 February 2013 in Abidjan. Credit partner to the country. should also be given to members of the reference group, led by the Director-General of Plan and Poverty Reduction Diaby Lacine. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iii iv FOREWORD The Assessment of Development Results (ADR) that is more focused towards informing a strategic as a core area of the work of the Evaluation direction for UNDP. Office (EO) seeks to independently and sys- tematically assess progress around key United The evaluation showed that generally, and Nations Development Programme (UNDP) despite a context of political instability that has interventions in countries which receive UNDP persisted since 2000, the UNDP programme has support. This ADR was conducted in collabora- succeeded in achieving tangible results at both tion with the Government of Côte d’Ivoire with strategic and operational levels in all areas of a view to strengthening ownership of evaluation intervention, including poverty reduction, crisis results by national partners, and consequently its prevention and recovery and promoting the val- credibility and utility. For this purpose and to ues of the United Nations. oversee the process, a reference group was set up with participants from the Ministry of State for However, administrative procedures must be Planning and Development, the Country Office reviewed as they are cumbersome and delay and Regional Office for Africa as main reference operational implementation, making it difficult points and included other government ministries, to implement work plans within required time- the National Statistics Institute, United Nations frames and consequently placing expected out- Population Fund, the European Union, and comes at risk. members of the civil society and non-govern- ment organizations. The process was conducted UNDP must focus its support so as to prepare by an independent national team and guided Côte d’Ivoire to face not only its chronic chal- by a professional evaluation manager from lenges such as poverty, food insecurity and cli- the EO. Through this mechanism, both the mate issues, but also the emerging challenges, Government and the EO ensured that estab- those that will allow it to recover the stability lished norms and standards for evaluation, such needed to continue its development. as independence, impartiality and rigorous meth- odology, were followed. The conclusions and recommendations from this study help UNDP to reflect on its effec- This approach also helped the evaluation team tiveness and strengthen its strategic position in gather contributions from a wide range of Côte d’Ivoire. Having provided the opportunity national partners as well as from various activities to take stock of what worked, what did not and that have been recently carried out, such as the why over the past 11 years, this study recom- report entitled ‘Repositioning UNDP in Côte mends the roles that UNDP could play in the d’Ivoire (2011-2013)’, drawn up in 2011, and future. The Evaluation Office sincerely hopes the ‘Joint Review of the Priority Plan for Côte that this evaluation will support ongoing and d’Ivoire’ by DPKO, PBSO, DPA and UNDP, future efforts by UNDP to enhance its sup- written in September 2009. The result is a report port to the Government of Côte d’Ivoire and that closely mirrors the national situation and is other national partners towards achievement of therefore of greater use to our national partners ever increasing levels of human development for and UNDP itself, in view of a future commitment the people of Côte d’Ivoire. We also hope that FOREWORD v the study will inform UNDP’s strategy more new programming cycle and innovative processes widely and that the recommendations from for a more secure and sustainable future. the ADR will lead to management action and imple mentation. We believe that this evaluation was very timely, since it took place at the same time as the country’s Indran A. Naidoo recent strategic planning and formulation of the Director, Evaluation Office vi FOREWORD Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations ix Executive Summary xv Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Scope of the Evaluation 1 1.2 Methodology and Approach 2 1.3 Evaluability and Limitations 4 1.4 Evaluation Report 5 Chapter 2 National Context And Development Challenges 7 2.1 General Overview of Côte d’Ivoire 7 2.2 Attaining the Millennium Development Goals 13 2.3 Challenges and Constraints on National Development 22 Chapter 3 UNDP Responses And Strategies 27 3.1 Intervention Strategy and Programme Cycles 27 3.2 Change in UNDP Resources And Expenditure 31 Chapter 4 UNDP’s Contribution To Development Results In Côte d’Ivoire 37 4.1 Poverty Reduction with a View to Achieving the Mdgs 37 4.2 Governance 45 4.3 Crisis Prevention and Recovery 50 Chapter 5 Strategic Positioning of UNDP 57 5.1 Strategic Relevance and Capacity for Adaptation 57 5.2 Ability to Capitalize on Strengths 58 5.3 Promoting the Values of the United Nations 63 Chapter 6 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 65 6.1 Conclusions 65 6.2 Recommendations for the UNDP Country Office 68 6.3 Recommendation for UNDP Headquarters 70 Annexes Annex 1. Terms of Reference 71 Annex 2. Sample of Projects Included 81 Annex 3. Sampling – Projects List 83 Annex 4. Data Sources and Data
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Côte D'ivoire
    CÔTE D’IVOIRE COI Compilation August 2017 United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees Regional Representation for West Africa - RSD Unit UNHCR Côte d’Ivoire UNHCR Regional Representation for West Africa - RSD Unit UNHCR Côte d’Ivoire Côte d’Ivoire COI Compilation August 2017 This report collates country of origin information (COI) on Côte d’Ivoire up to 15 August 2017 on issues of relevance in refugee status determination for Ivorian nationals. The report is based on publicly available information, studies and commentaries. It is illustrative, but is neither exhaustive of information available in the public domain nor intended to be a general report on human-rights conditions. The report is not conclusive as to the merits of any individual refugee claim. All sources are cited and fully referenced. Users should refer to the full text of documents cited and assess the credibility, relevance and timeliness of source material with reference to the specific research concerns arising from individual applications. UNHCR Regional Representation for West Africa Immeuble FAALO Almadies, Route du King Fahd Palace Dakar, Senegal - BP 3125 Phone: +221 33 867 62 07 Kora.unhcr.org - www.unhcr.org Table of Contents List of Abbreviations .............................................................................................................. 4 1 General Information ....................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Historical background ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Geography of Welfare in Benin, Burkina Faso, Côte D'ivoire, and Togo
    Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized The Geography of Welfare in Benin, Burkina Faso, Côte d’Ivoire, and Togo Public Disclosure Authorized Nga Thi Viet Nguyen and Felipe F. Dizon Public Disclosure Authorized 00000_CVR_English.indd 1 12/6/17 2:29 PM November 2017 The Geography of Welfare in Benin, Burkina Faso, Côte d’Ivoire, and Togo Nga Thi Viet Nguyen and Felipe F. Dizon 00000_Geography_Welfare-English.indd 1 11/29/17 3:34 PM Photo Credits Cover page (top): © Georges Tadonki Cover page (center): © Curt Carnemark/World Bank Cover page (bottom): © Curt Carnemark/World Bank Page 1: © Adrian Turner/Flickr Page 7: © Arne Hoel/World Bank Page 15: © Adrian Turner/Flickr Page 32: © Dominic Chavez/World Bank Page 48: © Arne Hoel/World Bank Page 56: © Ami Vitale/World Bank 00000_Geography_Welfare-English.indd 2 12/6/17 3:27 PM Acknowledgments This study was prepared by Nga Thi Viet Nguyen The team greatly benefited from the valuable and Felipe F. Dizon. Additional contributions were support and feedback of Félicien Accrombessy, made by Brian Blankespoor, Michael Norton, and Prosper R. Backiny-Yetna, Roy Katayama, Rose Irvin Rojas. Marina Tolchinsky provided valuable Mungai, and Kané Youssouf. The team also thanks research assistance. Administrative support by Erick Herman Abiassi, Kathleen Beegle, Benjamin Siele Shifferaw Ketema is gratefully acknowledged. Billard, Luc Christiaensen, Quy-Toan Do, Kristen Himelein, Johannes Hoogeveen, Aparajita Goyal, Overall guidance for this report was received from Jacques Morisset, Elisée Ouedraogo, and Ashesh Andrew L. Dabalen. Prasann for their discussion and comments. Joanne Gaskell, Ayah Mahgoub, and Aly Sanoh pro- vided detailed and careful peer review comments.
    [Show full text]
  • Cote D'ivoire Situation
    SITUATIONAL EMERGENCY UPDATE Cote d’Ivoire Situation 12 November 2020 As of 11 November 2020, a total Nearly 92% of the new arrIvals who UNHCR has set up of 10,087 Ivorians have fled have fled Cote d’Ivoire are In LIberIa contingency plans in the Cote d’Ivoire, and the numbers where an airlIft of CRIs for 10,000 countrIes neIghbourIng Cote continue to rIse amid persIstent refugees is planned from DubaI. In the d’Ivoire and Is engaging wIth tensions despIte valIdation of the meantIme, locally purchased core- natIonal and local authorIties, electIon results by the relief items, food and cash-based sister UN agencies and other Constitutional Court. interventions are being delIvered. partners. POPULATION OF CONCERN Host Countries New arrivals LiberIa 9,255 Ghana 563 Guinea 249 Togo 20 Cote d’IvoIre (IDPs) 5,530 Total 15,617 * Data as of 11 November 2020 as reported by UNHCR Operations. New arrIvals at Bhai border, Grand Gedeh. CredIt @UNHCR www.unhcr.org 1 EMERGENCY UPDATE > Cote d’Ivoire Situation / November 2020 OperatIonal Context PolItIcal and securIty sItuatIon In Cote d’IvoIre Aftermath of the election ■ On 9 November, the ConstItutIonal CouncIl valIdated the electoral vIctory of PresIdent Alassane Ouattara as proclaimed by the Independent Electoral CommIssIon. The sItuatIon remaIns calm yet tense and the opposItIon, whIch announced the formatIon of a NatIonal TransItIonal CouncIl, has yet to recognIze the PresIdent’s vIctory. ■ FollowIng the valIdatIons of the electIon of PresIdent Ouattara, a Government spokesperson declared that a total of 85 people were kIlled, IncludIng 34 before the election, 20 on polling day, 31 after the election.
    [Show full text]
  • Côte D'ivoire Country Focus
    European Asylum Support Office Côte d’Ivoire Country Focus Country of Origin Information Report June 2019 SUPPORT IS OUR MISSION European Asylum Support Office Côte d’Ivoire Country Focus Country of Origin Information Report June 2019 More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://europa.eu). ISBN: 978-92-9476-993-0 doi: 10.2847/055205 © European Asylum Support Office (EASO) 2019 Reproduction is authorised, provided the source is acknowledged, unless otherwise stated. For third-party materials reproduced in this publication, reference is made to the copyrights statements of the respective third parties. Cover photo: © Mariam Dembélé, Abidjan (December 2016) CÔTE D’IVOIRE: COUNTRY FOCUS - EASO COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INFORMATION REPORT — 3 Acknowledgements EASO acknowledges as the co-drafters of this report: Italy, Ministry of the Interior, National Commission for the Right of Asylum, International and EU Affairs, COI unit Switzerland, State Secretariat for Migration (SEM), Division Analysis The following departments reviewed this report, together with EASO: France, Office Français de Protection des Réfugiés et Apatrides (OFPRA), Division de l'Information, de la Documentation et des Recherches (DIDR) Norway, Landinfo The Netherlands, Immigration and Naturalisation Service, Office for Country of Origin Information and Language Analysis (OCILA) Dr Marie Miran-Guyon, Lecturer at the École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales (EHESS), researcher, and author of numerous publications on the country reviewed this report. It must be noted that the review carried out by the mentioned departments, experts or organisations contributes to the overall quality of the report, but does not necessarily imply their formal endorsement of the final report, which is the full responsibility of EASO.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of the Implementation of Alternative Process Technologies for Rural Heat and Power Production from Cocoa Pod Husks
    Assessment of the implementation of alternative process technologies for rural heat and power production from cocoa pod husks Dimitra Maleka Master of Science Thesis KTH School of Industrial Engineering and Management Department of Energy Technology Division of Heat and Power Technology SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM Master of Science Thesis EGI 2016: 034 MSC EKV1137 Assessment of the implementation of alternative process technologies for rural heat and power production from cocoa pod husks Dimitra Maleka Approved Examiner Supervisors Reza Fakhraie Reza Fakhraie (KTH) David Bauner (Renetech AB) Commissioner Contact person ii Abstract Cocoa pod husks are generated in Côte d’Ivoire, in abundant quantities annually. The majority is left as waste to decompose at the plantations. A review of the ultimate and proximate composition of CPH resulted in the conclusion that, CPH is a high potential feedstock for both thermochemical and biochemical processes. The main focus of the study was the utilization of CPH in 10,000 tons/year power plants for generation of energy and value-added by-products. For this purpose, the feasibility of five energy conversion processes (direct combustion, gasification, pyrolysis, anaerobic digestion and hydrothermal carbonization) with CPH as feedstock, were investigated. Several indicators were used for the review and comparison of the technologies. Anaerobic digestion and hydrothermal carbonization were found to be the most suitable conversion processes. For both technologies an analysis was conducted including technical, economic, environmental and social aspects. Based on the characterization of CPH, appropriate reactors and operating conditions were chosen for the two processes. Moreover, the plants were chosen to be coupled with CHP units, for heat and power generation.
    [Show full text]
  • Interrupting Seasonal Transmission of Schistosoma Haematobium and Control of Soil-Transmitted Helminthiasis in Northern and Cent
    Tian-Bi et al. BMC Public Health (2018) 18:186 DOI 10.1186/s12889-018-5044-2 STUDYPROTOCOL Open Access Interrupting seasonal transmission of Schistosoma haematobium and control of soil-transmitted helminthiasis in northern and central Côte d’Ivoire: a SCORE study protocol Yves-Nathan T. Tian-Bi1,2*, Mamadou Ouattara1,2, Stefanie Knopp3,4, Jean T. Coulibaly1,2,3,4, Eveline Hürlimann3,4, Bonnie Webster5, Fiona Allan5, David Rollinson5, Aboulaye Meïté6, Nana R. Diakité1,2, Cyrille K. Konan1,2, Eliézer K. N’Goran1,2 and Jürg Utzinger3,4* Abstract Background: To achieve a world free of schistosomiasis, the objective is to scale up control and elimination efforts in all endemic countries. Where interruption of transmission is considered feasible, countries are encouraged to implement a comprehensive intervention package, including preventive chemotherapy, information, education and communication (IEC), water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH), and snail control. In northern and central Côte d’Ivoire, transmission of Schistosoma haematobium is seasonal and elimination might be achieved. In a cluster-randomised trial, we will assess different treatment schemes to interrupt S. haematobium transmission and control soil-transmitted helminthiasis over a 3-year period. We will compare the impact of (i) arm A: annual mass drug administration (MDA) with praziquantel and albendazole before the peak schistosomiasis transmission season; (ii) arm B: annual MDA after the peak schistosomiasis transmission season; (iii) arm C: two yearly treatments before and after peak schistosomiasis transmission; and (iv) arm D: annual MDA before peak schistosomiasis transmission, coupled with chemical snail control using niclosamide. Methods/design: The prevalence and intensity of S.
    [Show full text]
  • Plan Cadre De Gestion Environnementale Et Sociale (PCGES) Du Projet Electrification De 1088 Localités De La Côte D’Ivoire 3 5.6.2
    REPUBLIQUE DE COTE D’IVOIRE Union – Discipline – Travail ---------------- MINISTERE DU PETROLE, DE L’ENERGIE REPUBLIQUE DE COTE ET DES ENERGIES RENOUVELABLES GROUPE DE LA BAD D'IVOIRE ---------------- UNION-DISCIPLINE-TRAVAIL ------------ PROJET D’ELECTRIFICATION RURALE DE 1 088 LOCALITES EN COTE D’IVOIRE ------------- Plan Cadre de Gestion Environnementale et Sociale (PCGES) LOT 4 : SASSANDRA-MARAHOUE (31), YAMOUSSOUKRO (01), LACS (93), ZANZAN (88), COMOE (09), LAGUNES (09) RAPPORT FINAL Octobre 2019 Abidjan Riviera palmeraie Triangle Résidence Mariam appt. B4 - 20 BP 12 ABJ 20 Tel : 07 21 17 83 – 01 14 01 40 Email : [email protected] TABLE DES MATIERES TABLE DES MATIERES ............................................................................................................... 2 SIGLES ET ABREVIATIONS .......................................................................................................... 6 LISTE DES FIGURES .................................................................................................................... 8 LISTE DES TABLEAUX ................................................................................................................ 9 RÉSUMÉ EXÉCUTIF .................................................................................................................. 11 CHAPITRE 1 : INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 13 1.1- Contexte et justification de l’étude .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ADMINISTRATIVE MAP of COTE D'ivoire Map Nº: 01-000-June-2005 COTE D'ivoire 2Nd Edition
    ADMINISTRATIVE MAP OF COTE D'IVOIRE Map Nº: 01-000-June-2005 COTE D'IVOIRE 2nd Edition 8°0'0"W 7°0'0"W 6°0'0"W 5°0'0"W 4°0'0"W 3°0'0"W 11°0'0"N 11°0'0"N M A L I Papara Débété ! !. Zanasso ! Diamankani ! TENGRELA [! ± San Koronani Kimbirila-Nord ! Toumoukoro Kanakono ! ! ! ! ! !. Ouelli Lomara Ouamélhoro Bolona ! ! Mahandiana-Sokourani Tienko ! ! B U R K I N A F A S O !. Kouban Bougou ! Blésségué ! Sokoro ! Niéllé Tahara Tiogo !. ! ! Katogo Mahalé ! ! ! Solognougo Ouara Diawala Tienny ! Tiorotiérié ! ! !. Kaouara Sananférédougou ! ! Sanhala Sandrégué Nambingué Goulia ! ! ! 10°0'0"N Tindara Minigan !. ! Kaloa !. ! M'Bengué N'dénou !. ! Ouangolodougou 10°0'0"N !. ! Tounvré Baya Fengolo ! ! Poungbé !. Kouto ! Samantiguila Kaniasso Monogo Nakélé ! ! Mamougoula ! !. !. ! Manadoun Kouroumba !.Gbon !.Kasséré Katiali ! ! ! !. Banankoro ! Landiougou Pitiengomon Doropo Dabadougou-Mafélé !. Kolia ! Tougbo Gogo ! Kimbirila Sud Nambonkaha ! ! ! ! Dembasso ! Tiasso DENGUELE REGION ! Samango ! SAVANES REGION ! ! Danoa Ngoloblasso Fononvogo ! Siansoba Taoura ! SODEFEL Varalé ! Nganon ! ! ! Madiani Niofouin Niofouin Gbéléban !. !. Village A Nyamoin !. Dabadougou Sinémentiali ! FERKESSEDOUGOU Téhini ! ! Koni ! Lafokpokaha !. Angai Tiémé ! ! [! Ouango-Fitini ! Lataha !. Village B ! !. Bodonon ! ! Seydougou ODIENNE BOUNDIALI Ponondougou Nangakaha ! ! Sokoro 1 Kokoun [! ! ! M'bengué-Bougou !. ! Séguétiélé ! Nangoukaha Balékaha /" Siempurgo ! ! Village C !. ! ! Koumbala Lingoho ! Bouko Koumbolokoro Nazinékaha Kounzié ! ! KORHOGO Nongotiénékaha Togoniéré ! Sirana
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Geology and Groundwater 5 Geology and Groundwater
    5 GEOLOGY AND GROUNDWATER 5 GEOLOGY AND GROUNDWATER Table of Contents Page CHAPTER 1 PRESENT CONDITIONS OF TOPOGRAPHY, GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY.................................................................... 5 – 1 1.1 Topography............................................................................................................... 5 – 1 1.2 Geology.................................................................................................................... 5 – 2 1.3 Hydrogeology and Groundwater.............................................................................. 5 – 4 CHAPTER 2 GROUNDWATER RESOURCES POTENTIAL ............................... 5 – 13 2.1 Mechanism of Recharge and Flow of Groundwater ................................................ 5 – 13 2.2 Method for Potential Estimate of Groundwater ....................................................... 5 – 13 2.3 Groundwater Potential ............................................................................................. 5 – 16 2.4 Consideration to Select Priority Area for Groundwater Development Project ........ 5 – 18 CHAPTER 3 GROUNDWATER BALANCE STUDY .............................................. 5 – 21 3.1 Mathod of Groundwater Balance Analysis .............................................................. 5 – 21 3.2 Actual Groundwater Balance in 1998 ...................................................................... 5 – 23 3.3 Future Groundwater Balance in 2015 ...................................................................... 5 – 24 CHAPTER
    [Show full text]
  • Region Du Gontougo
    REPUBLIQUE DE COTE D’IVOIRE Union-Discipline-Travail MINISTERE DE L’EDUCATION NATIONALE Statistiques Scolaires de Poche 2015-2016 REGION DU GONTOUGO Sommaire Sommaire ................................................................................................. 2 Sigles et Abréviations ................................................................................ 3 Méthodologie ........................................................................................... 4 Introduction .............................................................................................. 5 1 / Résultats du Préscolaire 2015-2016 ....................................................... 7 1-1 / Chiffres du Préscolaire en 2015-2016 ............................................. 8 1-2 / Indicateurs du Préscolaire en 2015-2016 ...................................... 14 1-3 / Préscolaire dans les Sous-préfectures en 2015-2016 .................... 15 2 / Résultats du Primaire 2015-2016 ......................................................... 20 2-1 / Chiffres du Primaire en 2015-2016 ................................................ 21 2-2 / Indicateurs du Primaire en 2015-2016 .......................................... 32 2-3 / Primaire dans les Sous-préfectures en 2015-2016 ......................... 35 3/ Résultats du Secondaire Général en 2015-2016 ..................................... 41 3-1 / Chiffres du Secondaire Général en 2015-2016 ................................ 42 3-2 / Indicateurs du Secondaire Général en 2015-2016..........................
    [Show full text]
  • REPUBLIC of CÔTE D'ivoire ---Union, Discipline, Labor MINISTRY of NATIONAL EDUCATION
    REPUBLIC OF CÔTE D'IVOIRE -------------------------------------------- Union, Discipline, Labor MINISTRY OF NATIONAL EDUCATION, TECHNICAL EDUCATION AND VOCATIONAL TRAINING Terms of Reference (ToR) FINAL EVALUATION OF THE FIRST PHASE AND BASELINE EVALUATION OF THE SECOND PHASE OF"SUPPORT FOR THE INTEGRATED SUSTAINABILITY PROGRAM FOR SCHOOL CANTEENS" IN COTE D’IVOIRE. WFP COTE D’IVOIRE 1 | P a g e Summary 1. Introduction ...................................................................................... 4 2. Reason for evaluation ........................................................................ 4 2.1. Logic ................................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Goals................................................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Stakeholders and users ................................................................................................. 5 3. Context and subject of the evaluation ................................................ 9 3.1. Context .............................................................................................................................. 9 3.2. Subject of the evaluation ............................................................................................. 13 4. Evaluation approach ........................................................................ 16 4.1. Scope ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Côte D'ivoire
    Côte d’Ivoire Monthly Humanitarian Report October 2011 www.unocha.org The mission of the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) is to mobilize and coordinate effective and principled humanitarian action in partnership with national and international actors. Coordination Saves Lives • Celebrating 20 years of coordinated humanitarian action October 2011 Côte d’Ivoire Humanitarian Bulletin | 2 Côte d’Ivoire Monthly Humanitarian Report Coordination Saves Lives No.1 | October 2011 HIGHLIGHTS ■ The number of Internally Displaced People (IDPs) on 35 sites across the country is gradually decreasing. ■ A National Committee for Coordination of Humanitarian Action (CNCAH) was established by ministerial decree (Minister of State, Employment, Social Affairs and Solidarity) on 5 October 2011. ■ Ivorian refugees in Liberia are spontaneously and gradually returning to their villages of origin in the Moyen Cavally region. ■ The Humanitarian Coordinator and the Ivorian Minister for Employment, Solidarity and Social Affairs visited several European capitals to mobilize support for humanitarian action in Côte d'Ivoire. ■ The Special Representative of the UN Secretary General in Côte d'Ivoire took office on 24 October. I. GENERAL CONTEXT During October, violent incidents took place in the towns of Issia, Guiglo and Bangolo in the West of the country. These incidents resulted in the displacement of an estimated 450 people according to the Protection Cluster. In the Lagunes region, there has been an upsurge of security incidents: several cases of armed robbery, home intrusion and theft are reported to have been committed by armed men in the districts of Anyama, Abobo and Yopougon, in Abidjan. This situation is reportedly due to the free circulation of firearms and to escapee- prisoners since the post-electoral crisis.
    [Show full text]