The Abaya Geothermal Development Project

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Abaya Geothermal Development Project THE ABAYA GEOTHERMAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT The Great Eye – Divine Rulers (2018) by Ms. Katrin Fridriks STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN VERSION 01 July 2019 RG SEP–01: 2019 Contents LIST OF TABLES 5 LIST OF FIGURES 5 REPORT REVIEW & VERIFICATION 6 ACRONMYS 7 1 INTRODUCTION 8 1.1 Overview 8 1.2 Objectives of Stakeholder Engagement 8 1.3 Scope of Application 9 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 10 2.1 Project Location 10 2.2 Project Settings 10 2.3 Project Description 11 2.3.1 Abaya Prospect & RG Concession 11 2.3.2 Project /Study Area 12 2.3.3 Drilling Area 13 2.4 Impacts, Benefits 13 2.4.1 Geothermal Project Impacts 13 2.4.2 Geothermal Project Benefits 14 2.5 Project Area of Influence 14 3 NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL REQUIREMENTS 16 3.1 Overview 16 3.2 Policies 16 3.2.1 Environmental Policy and Strategy, 1997 16 3.2.2 Ethiopian National Policy on Women, 1993 16 3.2.3 IFC PSs on Environment and Social Sustainability (2012) 17 3.2.4 IFC Good Practice Handbook on Stakeholder Engagement 18 3.2.5 Other Relevant International Policies and Conventions 19 3.3 National Laws 20 3.3.1 The Constitution 20 3.3.2 Environmental Protection Organs, Proclamation No. 295 /2002 20 3.3.3 Environmental Impact Assessment, Proclamation No. 299 /2002 21 3.3.4 Geothermal Resource Development Proclamation No. 981 /2016 21 4 STAKEHOLDER IDENTIFICATION /MAPPING 22 4.1 Introduction 22 4.1.1 Primary Stakeholder 22 4.1.2 Secondary Stakeholder 22 4.1.3 Tertiary Stakeholder 22 4.2 Stakeholders Identification 22 2 RG SEP–01: 2019 4.2.1 Government Officials 23 4.2.2 Project Proponent 23 4.2.3 Project Affected Persons 23 4.2.4 Vulnerable Groups 24 4.2.5 CSOs, NGOs and Conservation Organizations 25 4.2.6 Development Partners 26 4.2.7 Media 26 4.3 List of Stakeholders 26 4.4 Project Phases & Stakeholders Engagement 27 4.4.1 Pre-feasibility & Feasibility Study Phase 27 4.4.2 Operation Phases 29 4.4.3 Decommissioning Phases 30 4.5 Applicability of IFC PS7 30 5 STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS 32 5.1 General Information 32 5.1.1 Stakeholder Analysis 32 5.1.2 Conceptual Framework and Proposed Structure 35 5.2 Stakeholder Methods 36 5.2.1 General Information 36 5.2.2 Activities and Methods 36 6 SUMMARY OF STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT ACTIVITIES 39 6.1 Background 39 6.2 Information Disclosure Consultations 39 6.3 Household Survey 43 6.4 Identified Impacts & Mitigation Measures Disclosed 45 6.5 Disclosure of SEP & RPF /RAP, Grievance Redress Mechanism 45 7 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN 46 7.1 Plan Overview 46 7.2 ESIA Implementation 46 7.3 Final ESIA Disclosure & Consultation 49 7.4 Indicative Timeframes 49 8 RESOURCES FOR SEP IMPLIMENTATION 51 8.1 Resources & Responsibilities 51 8.1.1 Management Resources 51 8.2 Resources and Responsibilities 52 8.2.1 Environmental & Social Manager 52 8.2.2 Environmental & Social Unit 53 8.2.3 Stakeholder Engagement Materials 54 9 GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM 55 3 RG SEP–01: 2019 9.1 Introduction 55 9.1.1 Objectives 55 9.2 RG’s Roles & Responsibilities 55 9.3 Procedure for Grievance /Comment Response 55 9.4 Record Keeping 57 9.5 Appeal & Disclosure 58 9.5.1 Appeal 58 9.5.2 Disclosure 58 10 MONITORING & EVALUATION OF THE PROPOSED SEP 59 10.1 Definition & Purpose 59 10.2 Monitoring the SEP Implementation Inputs 59 10.3 Monitoring the SEP Implementation Process 59 10.4 Methods of Monitoring the Efficiency of the SEP Implementation Process 59 10.4.1 Monitoring the Overall Efficiency of SEP Implementation 59 10.4.2 Developing Summary Indicators 60 10.4.3 Indicators of the Efficiency of Individual SEP Activities 60 10.4.4 Studying Community Level Organizations 60 10.5 Impact Evaluation 60 10.5.1 Estimation of Net Impacts 61 10.5.2 Comparison of ‘Effectiveness’ of 2 or More Alternative Strategies 61 10.6 Tools for Participatory Monitoring & Evaluation 61 10.6.1 Quantitative Surveys 61 10.6.2 Focus Group Discussions 61 10.7 Reports and Deliverables 61 10.7.1 Weekly CLOs Reports 62 10.7.2 Monthly Reports 62 10.7.3 Quarterly Reports 62 10.7.4 Annual Reports 62 11 LIST OF APPENDICES 63 Appendix 1: Stakeholder Engagement Forms 64 Appendix 1.1: Grievance & Concerns Logging Form 64 Appendix 1.2: Feedback Logging Form 65 Appendix 1.3: Simple Grievance & Concerns Logging Database 66 Appendix 1.4: Simple Commitment Register 66 Appendix 2: Project Disclosure & Information Dissemination 67 Appendix 2.1: Hobicha Digiso 68 Appendix 2.2: Hobicha Bongota 70 Appendix 2.3: Abala Longana 72 Appendix 2.4: Abala Qolshobo 74 Appendix 2.5: Abala Gafata 76 Appendix 2.6: Abala Maraka 78 Appendix 2.7: Abaya Chawkare & Abaya Gurucho 80 Appendix 2.8: Abaya Bilate 83 Appendix 2.9: Abaya Bisare 85 Appendix 3: Disclosure of ESIA & ESMP Impacts and Mitigation Measures 89 4 RG SEP–01: 2019 LIST OF TABLES Table Description Page Table 1: Project /study area coordinates ................................................................................................ 13 Table 2: Population of local communities (kebeles) included in the AoI (Project area) ............................ 24 Table 4: Source of livelihood of households ........................................................................................... 25 Table 6: CSOs and NGOs actively working in the Project AoI ................................................................... 26 Table 7: Stakeholders bodies and their relevance to the Project ............................................................ 26 Table 8: Stakeholder analysis ................................................................................................................. 33 Table 10: ESIA implementation – Project disclosure and consultation .................................................... 47 Table 11: ESIA implementation – Interim /preliminary results ................................................................ 47 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Description Page Figure 1: Location of the Abaya geothermal concession (orange polygon) .............................................. 10 Figure 2: Zones of SNNP Regional State .................................................................................................. 11 Figure 3: The Abaya geothermal prospect (approx. the red box) ............................................................ 12 Figure 4: Kebeles in the Project /Study area for baseline and geoscience studies (marked in blue) ......... 12 Figure 5: Drilling area map with three possible water plans and two tentatively located well-pads ........ 13 Figure 10: Stakeholder analysis matrix ................................................................................................... 32 Figure 11: Expected communication flow through stakeholder engagements ........................................ 35 Figure 6: Stakeholder participants in Abala Longana kebele ................................................................... 41 Figure 7: Stakeholder participants in Abala Qolshobo kebele ................................................................. 41 Figure 8: Stakeholder participants in Abaya Bilate kebele....................................................................... 41 Figure 9: Key Informant Interview at Abala Gafata kebele ...................................................................... 43 Figure 12: Possible structure for the E&S system.................................................................................... 51 Figure 13: Grievance Redress Mechanism .............................................................................................. 57 5 RG SEP–01: 2019 REPORT REVIEW & VERIFICATION Prepared for/client: Ministry of Water, Irrigation and Electricity, GRMF Project name: Ethiopia – Abaya RG report number: 17004-17 Project manager: ESIA: Loftur R. Gissurarson Author(s): Reykjavik Geothermal Distribution of all Reykjavik Geothermal reports is restricted as the general rule, unless otherwise stated. Report review and verification: Description Date Responsible (signature not necessary) Internal draft prepared February 2017 Loftur Reimar @RG Internal draft completed September 2017 Loftur Reimar @RG External draft reviewed September 2017 African Union Commission /RGMF External draft updated October, 2017 Loftur Reimar @RG External draft updated August, 2018 Loftur Reimar @RG External draft approved July, 2019 Jon Örn @RG 1st version published July, 2019 Reykjavik Geothermal 6 RG SEP–01: 2019 ACRONMYS AfDB Africa Development Bank AoI Area of Influence CBO Community Based Organizations CDP Community Development Plan /Program CLO Community Liaison Officer CSOs Civil Society Organizations CSA Central Statistics Agency CSR Community and Stakeholder Relations CSR Corporate Social Responsibility EE Environmental Experts EEPO Ethiopian Electric Power Office EHS Environment and Social Sustainability EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EIB Europe International Bank EPA Environmental Protection Authority EPs Equator Principles E&S Environmental and Social ESAP Environmental and Social Action Plan ESIA Environmental and Social Impact Assessment ESMP Environmental and Social Management Plan ESMS Environmental and Social Management System FDRE Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia FGDs Focus Group Discussions FPIC Free, Prior, and Informed Consent HIV /AIDS Human Immunodeficiency Virus /Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome H&S Health and Safety ICP Informed Consultation and Participation IFC International Finance Corporation IPP Independent Power Producer IPP Indigenous Peoples Plan ISS Integrated Safeguards System KII Key Informant Interview KPI Key Performance Indicator masl Meters above sea level M&E Monitoring and Evaluation MFI Micro
Recommended publications
  • Districts of Ethiopia
    Region District or Woredas Zone Remarks Afar Region Argobba Special Woreda -- Independent district/woredas Afar Region Afambo Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Asayita Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Chifra Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Dubti Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Elidar Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Kori Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Mille Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Abala Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Afdera Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Berhale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Dallol Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Erebti Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Koneba Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Megale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Amibara Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Awash Fentale Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Bure Mudaytu Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Dulecha Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Gewane Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Aura Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Ewa Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Gulina Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Teru Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Yalo Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Dalifage (formerly known as Artuma) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Dewe Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Hadele Ele (formerly known as Fursi) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Simurobi Gele'alo Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Telalak Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Amhara Region Achefer -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Angolalla Terana Asagirt -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Artuma Fursina Jile -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Banja -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Belessa --
    [Show full text]
  • World Vision Ethiopia Early Warning Unit Grants Division
    WORLD VISION ETHIOPIA EARLY WARNING UNIT GRANTS DIVISION RAPID NUTRITIONAL ASSESSMENT CONDUCTED IN FIVE DISTRICTS. (February 2000) Tenta South Wollo (Adjibar) Gera Keya North Shoa (Mehal Meda) Sodo zuria North omo (Damota) Humbo North omo (Damota) Tseda amba E. Tigray (Kilte Awlaelo) April 2000 Addis Ababa 1 1. Summary A rapid nutritional assessment was conducted in five districts of World Vision Ethiopia operational areas during February 2000. The objective of the In Gera keya district, it was reported that assessment was to monitor the status of two people died and 102 were sick of acute malnutrition (wasting) in the typhoid fever. As copping mechanism districts, which had high prevalence of farmers sold live animals, migrated to malnutrition during the November 1999, adjacent areas in search of food, sold survey. The districts are located in their labor, reduced frequency, quality Tigray region (Tseda amba), Amhara and quantity of their meals, and (Gera keya and Tenta) and Southern consumed less preferred foods. regional state (Humbo and Sodo zuria). 2. Methodology The assessment result reveals that the highest wasting level was observed in The sampling size was determined using Tseda Amba district 22.2%, Tenta the sampling formula (see Annex 1). 21.5%, Sodo zuria 16.7%, Gera keya Every Peasant Association was included 13.6% and Humbo 9.6%. in to the sample by randomly selected sub Peasant Associations (50% of sub Land preparation for short cycle crop has Peasant Associations). In each district not been started because the onset of over 700 children were weighed and short rain is distorted and is late by over measured using sub Peasant Associations eight weeks.
    [Show full text]
  • Nutrition Surveys 1999
    NUTRITION SURVEYS 1999 – 2000 Region/Zone woreda Date of Agency Sample size Methodology Nutrition Indicatorsi survey Tigre throughout August SCF-UK 937 30 cluster Mean WHL <80%WFL W/H<-2 Z score W/H <-3 Z score 1999 92.8% 5.5% 7.7 % 1.0% Tigre Feb 2000 WVI W/H <-2 Z score W/H <-3 Z score Eastern May 2000 Feb 2000 May 2000 Feb 2000 May 2000 Asti Wenberta 685 13.1% 10.9% NA 2.6% Saesi Tsaedaemba 1412 22.3% 20.1% 3.7% 4.4% Amhara: May-June SCF-UK + 2900 58 clusters in Mean WFL < 80% WFL N.Wello Bugna 1999 worst drought 88.8% 4% Wadla affected woredas. 89,4% 7% Gidan 87.8% 3% Delanta Dawnt 89.4% 7% Gubalafto 90.0% 7% S. Wello Dessie Zuria 89.8% 7% Tenta 90.5% 3% Legambo 90.8% 5% Ambassel 90.7% 6% Mekdella 91.2% 4% Wag Hamra Dehana 88.2% 4% Oromyia Chefa 92.8% 2% Amhara Aug - Oct SCF-UK + 2500 50 clusters in Mean WFL < 80% WFL 1999 worst drought Aug Sept Oct Aug Sept Oct N.Wello Bugna affected woredas. 91.2% 88.7% 89.7% 6.6% 10.6% 7.0% Wadla 91.1% 90.7% 90.6% 7.3% 5.5% 5.7% Gidan 88.4% 88.2% 88.4% 8.9% 8.2% 9.6% S. Wello Delanta Dawnt 87.5% 87.6% 87.5% 11.0% 8.0% 7.6% Dessie Zuria 91.9% 90.9% 90.1% 4.0% 6.2% 5.2% Tenta 89.2% 89.1% 88.4% 10.0% 8.3% 11.7% Legambo 89.1% 89.7% 89.6% 8.4% 6.0% 6.4% Wag Hamra Dehana 89.7% 89.5% 90.5% 8.3% 8.2% 6.4% Amhara March- May SCF-UK + 2500 50 clusters in Mean WFL < 80% WFL N.Wello 2000 worst drought March 2000 May 2000 March 2000 May 2000 Bugna affected woredas 90.1% 90.6% Wadla 90.5% 91.1% S.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change Mitigation Potential of Ethiopia's Productive Safety Net
    Cover Sheet November 2015 Climate Change Mitigation Potential of Ethiopia’s Productive Safety Net Program (PSNP) Dominic Woolf1, Eleanor Milne2, Mark Easter2, Stefan Jirka1, Dawit Solomon1, Stephen DeGloria1, and Johannes Lehmann1 1 Cornell University 2 Colorado State University Climate Change Mitigation Potential of Ethiopia’s Productive Safety-Net Program (PSNP) This report was prepared on behalf of The World Bank by: Dominic Woolf1, Eleanor Milne2, Mark Easter2, Stefan Jirka1, Dawit Solomon1, Stephen DeGloria1, and Johannes Lehmann1. 1 Cornell University 2 Colorado State University November 2015 Please cite this work as follows: Woolf, D., Jirka, S., Milne, E., Easter, M., DeGloria, S., Solomon, D., & Lehmann, J. 2015. “Climate Change Mitigation Potential of Ethiopia’s Productive Safety-Net Program (PSNP)”. A World Bank Climate Smart Initiative (CSI) Report. Cornell University. https://ecommons.cornell.edu/handle/1813/41296 The PSNP is implemented by the Government of Ethiopia with support from the following development partners: Canadian International Development Agency, Irish Aid, European Commission, Royal Netherlands Embassy, Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency, UK Department for International Development, United States Agency for International Development, World Food Program and World Bank. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures .................................................................................................................................. 4 Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • World Vision Ethiopia Grants Division, Early Warning Unit
    WORLD VISION ETHIOPIA GRANTS DIVISION, EARLY WARNING UNIT FOOD SECURITY MONITORING REPORT OF MAY 2000 Rainfall, crop and livestock conditions Market prices situations Socio-economic conditions Nutrition and human health July 2000 Addis Ababa ACRONYMS ADPs Area Development Programs Belg Short rainy season from February to April BOA Bureau of Agriculture BOH Bureau of Health Kolla Ecological zones less than 1500 m.a.s.l. Weina-Dega Ecological zone varying from 1500 to 2500 m.a.s.l. Dega Ecological zone varying from 2500 to 3500 m.a.s.l. DPPC Disaster Prevention and Preparedness Commission EPI-INFO Epidemiological Information- Computer program used for anthropometric data analysis FFW Food For Work m.a.s.l. Meter Above Sea Level Meher Long rainy season from June to September Normal Long-term average PAs Peasant Associations Quintal Local measurement equivalent to 100 kg WAZ Weight for height Z score (indices) used to calculate acute and chronic malnutrition WHZ Height for age Z Score (indices) used to calculate chronic malnutrition WHZ Weight for height Z score (indices) used to calculate acute malnutrition Woreda Administrative area similar to district WVE World Vision Ethiopia Z-Score Indices used to calculate Weight for height, weight for age and height for age. Global Acute malnutrition Wasting (Height for weight below –2SD) ADPs with their respective Regions, Zones districts and distance from Addis Ababa Distance Project from Addis S. No. Sites Region Zone Woredas/districts Ababa (Km)* 1. Adama Oromia East Showa Adama and Boset 118 2. Adjibar Amhara South Wollo Tenta 523 3. Antsokia I Amhara North Showa Antsokia Gemza 350 Antsokia Arthume Jile & Dawa 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Folk Medicinal Use of Some Animals and Their Products in Wolaita, Southern Ethiopia
    Folk Medicinal Use of Some Animals and Their Products in Wolaita, Southern Ethiopia Abenezer Wendimu Wolaita Sodo University Wondimagegnehu Tekalign ( [email protected] ) Wolaita Sodo University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4721-7528 Research Keywords: Ethnozoology, Folk medicine, Indigenous knowledge, Traditional medicine, Zootherapy Posted Date: July 24th, 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-733638/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Page 1/27 Abstract Background Ethiopia is endowed with a diverse set of oral and faunal resources that are useful to human beings in one or another ways. A faunal resource has played a signicant role in human life from the earliest days of recorded history for medicinal purposes to treat different ailments and is still common in many parts of the world. Methods A eld survey was carried out in Diguna Fango district from March 2021 to June 2021 by personal interviews through semi- structured questionnaires and open group discussions. Results Altogether 200 (125 male and 75 female) informants provided information regarding the therapeutic uses of different animal parts/products. A total of 39 animal parts/products used for the treatment of 159 different ailments were identied. Mammals occupied the highest use report 26(66.67%), followed by arthropods 5(12.81%) and avian species 4(10.26%). Further, some most popular zootherapeutic animals i.e. Phacochoerus africanus, Hystrix cristata, Bos taurus, Equus africanus asinus, Homo sapiens, etc. were used to treat more than three different ailments. Anemia, asthma, bone fractures, cold, evil eye, fever, pleurisy, rheumatism, skin disease, and stomach pain were some of the frequently occurring ailments.
    [Show full text]
  • Demography and Health
    SNNPR Southern Nations Nationalities and Peoples Demography and Health Aynalem Adugna, July 2014 www.EthioDemographyAndHealth.Org 2 SNNPR is one of the largest regions in Ethiopia, accounting for more than 10 percent of the country’s land area [1]. The mid-2008 population is estimated at nearly 16,000,000; almost a fifth of the country’s population. With less than one in tenth of its population (8.9%) living in urban areas in 2008 the region is overwhelmingly rural. "The region is divided into 13 administrative zones, 133 Woredas and 3512 Kebeles, and its capital is Awassa." [1] "The SNNPR is an extremely ethnically diverse region of Ethiopia, inhabited by more than 80 ethnic groups, of which over 45 (or 56 percent) are indigenous to the region (CSA 1996). These ethnic groups are distinguished by different languages, cultures, and socioeconomic organizations. Although none of the indigenous ethnic groups dominates the ethnic makeup of the national population, there is a considerable ethnic imbalance within the region. The largest ethnic groups in the SNNPR are the Sidama (17.6 percent), Wolayta (11.7 percent), Gurage (8.8 percent), Hadiya (8.4 percent), Selite (7.1 percent), Gamo (6.7 percent), Keffa (5.3 percent), Gedeo (4.4 percent), and Kembata (4.3 percent) …. While the Sidama are the largest ethnic group in the region, each ethnic group is numerically dominant in its respective administrative zone, and there are large minority ethnic groups in each zone. The languages spoken in the SNNPR can be classified into four linguistic families: Cushitic, Nilotic, Omotic, and Semitic.
    [Show full text]
  • ENCU Bulletin 3Rd Quarter 06.Qxd
    EMERGENCY NUTRITION ENCU/EWD/DPPA Addis Ababa QUARTERLY BULLETIN Tel. (011) 5 523556 e-mail:[email protected] (Third Quarter 2006) http://www.dppc.gov.et Emergency Nutrition Coordination Unit Early Warning Department (Disaster Prevention and Preparedness Agency) INSIDE SNNP REGION WOLAYITA ZONE (OFFA AND DAMOT WEYDE WOREDAS) Page 2 SIDAMA ZONE (DALE AND ALETA WONDO WOREDAS) Page 4 SILTI ZONE (DALOCHA WOREDA) Page 5 HADIYA ZONE (SHASHEGO WOREDA) Page 6 OROMIA REGION EAST HARARGHE ZONE (DEDER AND META WOREDAS) Page 7 This bulletin compiles the results from 14 surveys carried out in rural woredas WEST HARARGHE ZONE (DARO LEBU WOREDA) of Ethiopia between June and September 06. An additional 8 surveys were Page 8 conducted in the refugee camps of Ethiopia. Summary results for rural Ethiopia AMHARA REGION are presented in the graph below. SOUTH WOLLO ZONE (KALU AND DESSIE ZURIA WOREDAS) Nutrition Survey Results - June/September 2006 Page 9 Rural Ethiopia SOMALI REGION 18 . 0 16 . 0 AFDER ZONE (ELKERE AND HARGELLE WOREDAS) Page 12 14 . 0 12 . 0 AFDER AND LIBEN ZONES (DOLO ADO, DOLO BAY AND BARE WOREDAS - PASTORAL) 10 . 0 Page 13 8.0 LIBEN ZONE (MOYALE AND HUDET WOREDAS) 6.0 Page 14 4.0 REFUGEE CAMPS 2.0 Page 16 Prevalence of global acute malnutrition (%) 0.0 Offa Damot WeydeDalocha Daro Lebu D/AW MaizeShashego LZ Meta Deder Kalu Elkere & HargeleDessie ZuriaDO/DB/ Ba reD/AW Pas toral Coffee LZ SURVEY QUALITY CONTROL Page 18 Severe Malnutrition Moderate Malnutrition NUTRITION SURVEY DATABASE Page 20 ENCU September 30, 2006 Page 1 SNNP REGION WOLAYITA ZONE Offa and Damot Weyde Woredas Two surveys were conducted in flash floods in March or lack of rains.
    [Show full text]
  • Study on Ruminal and Reticular Foreign Bodies in Cattle Slaugthered at Boditii Municipal Abattoir, Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia
    Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research 28 (2): 80-89, 2020 ISSN 1990-9233 © IDOSI Publications, 2020 DOI: 10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2020.80.89 Study on Ruminal and Reticular Foreign Bodies in Cattle Slaugthered at Boditii Municipal Abattoir, Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia 12Temesgen Zekarias, Tadewos Tantasa and 3Amanuel Ashebo 1Animal Health Researcher, Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 2Animal Health Expert, Livestock and Fisheries Development Office, Humbo, Wolayta Zone, Ethiopia 3Animal Health Expert, livestock and Fisheries Development Office Hadero Tunto Zuria Woreda, Kembeta Tembaro Zone SNNPR, Tunto, Ethiopia Abstract: A cross-sectional study was conducted from November, 2017 to April, 2018 at Boditi Municipal Abattoir, Wolaita zone, Southern Ethiopia. With the objectives of to assess the prevalence and type of ruminal and reticular foreign bodies in cattle slaughtered at Boditi Municipal Abattoir. The study animals were selected by using systematic random sampling method from the total slaughtered animals. From the total of 514 male animals that were examined, 20.8% (n=107) were had foreign bodies at slaughter. When the prevalence was compared between breed, among different age groups, among different body condition score and animal originated from different areas, higher prevalence of foreign bodies 39.6%, 27.2%, 40.1%, 26.1% were observed in cross breed, old animals, animals having poor body condition and animals originate from Sodo, respectively. These factors are considered as potential risk factors and found highly significantly associated (P<0.05) with the occurrence of foreign bodies. The rumen harbored mostly non-metallic materials while reticulum was the major site for the retention of metallic objects.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia: SNNP Region Administrative Map (As of 15 Aug 2017)
    Ethiopia: SNNP region administrative map (as of 15 Aug 2017) ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Suten ! ! ! ! ! ! Inge Sodo ! ! !Bui ! ! WelikiteKebena Abeshege ! Kokir Gedbano ! ! Kela ! ! Muhur Na Ak!lil ! Gubire ! ! ! Cheha Agena ! Imdibir! ! Ezha Me!skan ! ! Inseno ! Gonichire ! ! ! Kibet Qewaqoto! Koshe ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Enemorina Eaner Alicho Woriro ! Gumer Mareko ! Selti ! ! Areket Alkeso town ! ! ! ! ! ! Geta Kose Tora ! Fofa ! Werabe ! ! ! Dinkela ! ! Sayilem! ! ! ! ! Yadota Geja Endiguagn Yem SP Woreda ! Dalocha ! Misrak Azenet Berbere ! ! ! ! Misha !LERA Dalocha Masha ! Wilb!areg Gibe ! ! Mierab Azenet Berbere ! ! Lanfero ! Homec!ho ! ! Fonqo town ! Mito ! GAMBELA Gesha (Deka) Kondo GECHA TOWN ! Analemmo ! ! !Deka ! Doesha !Belesa town ! Alem Gebeya Anderacha Getawa Gembora ! ! Limu ! ! Bonosha Sankura ! ! ! Lisana town Jajira Shashogo Gimbichu! ! Hufa ! ! ! Diri Soro ! Gojeb Bita (Big) Gimbo Doya Gena Jacho A!nigach!a ! Alaba SP Woreda ! ! ! Daniboya Wishiwishi Dune Kulito ! Kaka Idget ! Bita Genet ! OROMIA Kelata Mudula Hobichaka ! ! Bonga ! ! ! ! ! Yeki ! Menjiwo ! Chena Tembaro Ke!diada Gambela TEPI TOWN Hadero !TubitoKacha Bira ! ! ! !Adilo Chda Idge T!unito ! Legend WACHA ! ! Terche Misrak Badawacho ! Gena Bosa Chiri BOMIBE 01 ! ! ! ! !Karewo ! Mierab Badawacho ! Ameya P ! Tocha Tocha Edget Boloso Bombe Sheka Tulo ! Regional capital ! Waka ! Semen Bench Alem Gena ! ! ! ! Mehal Sheko Mareka Boloso SoreDamot Pulasa Hawassa Zuria PWondo-Ge! net Gesa ! ! Shanito Hawasa Town ! ! ! ! Shama Chuko Shay Bench ! Bitena Town Mizan Aman ! ! Tula ! Damot
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report International Organization for Migration Special Liaison Office (IOM SLO) in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
    2015Annual Report International Organization for Migration Special Liaison Office (IOM SLO) in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia IOM OIM IOM PRESENCE In EthIOpIA IOM Presence in Ethiopia ETHIOPIA: Administrative Map (as of 14 January 2011) R ShireERITREA E Legend Tahtay Erob Laelay Adiyabo Mereb Ahferom Gulomekeda \\( Adiyabo Leke D National Capital Ganta Medebay Dalul North Adwa Afeshum Saesie Tahtay Zana Laelay Tsaedaemba Kafta Western Maychew PP Koraro Central Humera Asgede Tahtay Eastern Regional Capital Naeder Werei Hawzen Western Tsimbila Maychew Adet Leke Koneba Berahle Welkait Kelete Atsbi S Tigray Awelallo Wenberta International Boundary Tselemti Kola Degua Tsegede Mekele E Temben Temben P Addi Tselemt Tanqua Afdera Zone 2 Enderta Arekay Abergele Regional Boundary Tsegede Beyeda Ab Ala Mirab Saharti A Armacho Debark Samre Hintalo Erebti Abergele Wejirat Tach Megale Bidu Zonal Boundary Armacho Dabat Janamora Alaje Lay Sahla North Armacho Wegera Southern Ziquala Woreda Boundary Metema Gonder Sekota Endamehoni Raya Wag Azebo Chilga Yalo Amhara East Ofla Teru West Belesa Himra Kurri Gonder Dehana Belesa Lake Dembia Zuria Gaz Alamata Zone 4 Quara Gibla Semera Elidar Takusa Libo Ebenat Gulina Kemkem Bugna Lasta Kobo Awra Afar Gidan Lake Tana South (Ayna) 0 50 100 200 km Ewa Alfa Fogera Gonder North ¹ Lay Zone 1 Farta Meket Guba Lafto Dubti Gayint Asayta Semen Wollo P Jawi Achefer Tach Habru Chifra Bahr Dar East Wadla Delanta G U L F O F A D E N P Gayint Aysaita Creation date:14 Jan.2011 Dera Esite Bahirdar Ambasel Map Doc Name:21_ADM_000_ETH_011411_A0
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Afromontane Biodiversity Hotspot
    Ecosystem Profile EASTERN AFROMONTANE BIODIVERSITY HOTSPOT FINAL VERSION 24 JANUARY 2012 Prepared by: BirdLife International with the technical support of: Conservation International / Science and Knowledge Division IUCN Global Species Programme – Freshwater Unit IUCN –Eastern Africa Plant Red List Authority Saudi Wildlife Authority Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, Centre for Middle Eastern Plants The Cirrus Group UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre WWF - Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Programme Office Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund And support from the International Advisory Committee Neville Ash, UNEP Division of Environmental Policy Implementation; Elisabeth Chadri, MacArthur Foundation; Fabian Haas, International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology; Matthew Hall, Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, Centre for Middle Eastern Plants; Sam Kanyamibwa, Albertine Rift Conservation Society; Jean-Marc Froment, African Parks Foundation; Kiunga Kareko, WWF, Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Programme Office; Karen Laurenson, Frankfurt Zoological Society; Leo Niskanen, IUCN Eastern & Southern Africa Regional Programme; Andy Plumptre, Wildlife Conservation Society; Sarah Saunders, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds; Lucy Waruingi, African Conservation Centre. Drafted by the ecosystem profiling team: Ian Gordon, Richard Grimmett, Sharif Jbour, Maaike Manten, Ian May, Gill Bunting (BirdLife International) Pierre Carret, Nina Marshall, John Watkin (CEPF) Naamal de Silva, Tesfay Woldemariam, Matt Foster (Conservation International)
    [Show full text]