DOCSLIB.ORG

The Management of Archaeological Sites in Arable Landscapes BD1701

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Management of Archaeological Sites in Arable Landscapes BD1701 The Management of Archaeological Sites in Arable Landscapes BD1701 Final Project Report Supporting Documentation Appendix L: Bibliography o a Oxford Archaeology May 2002 (revised December 2002) Client Name: DEFRA Issue No: 2 Appendix L Bibliography A ...............................................................................................................................................................2 B ...............................................................................................................................................................3 C ...............................................................................................................................................................7 D .............................................................................................................................................................11 E .............................................................................................................................................................14 F..............................................................................................................................................................16 G.............................................................................................................................................................17 H.............................................................................................................................................................19 I ..............................................................................................................................................................22 J..............................................................................................................................................................22 K.............................................................................................................................................................23 L .............................................................................................................................................................23 M ............................................................................................................................................................25 N .............................................................................................................................................................28 O.............................................................................................................................................................29 P..............................................................................................................................................................30 Q.............................................................................................................................................................31 R .............................................................................................................................................................32 S..............................................................................................................................................................33 T .............................................................................................................................................................35 U .............................................................................................................................................................36 V .............................................................................................................................................................36 W ............................................................................................................................................................37 Y .............................................................................................................................................................39 DEFRA Management of Archaeological Sites in Arable Landscapes Appendix L Bibliography A Abrams, J and Macaulay S, 2001 The effects of agriculture on selected Archaeological Sites within the Cambridgeshire County Farms Estate, MAFF/OAU Research Project by Cambridgeshire Archaeological Field Unit, unpublished report No.196 ADAS 1996a Environmental Monitoring in the South Downs ESA 1987-1995, London, MAFF Publications ADAS 1996b Environmental Monitoring in the Pennine Dales ESA 1987-1995, London, MAFF Publications ADAS 1996c Environmental Monitoring in the West Penwith ESA 1987-1995, London, MAFF Publications ADAS, 1996d Broads Report of Environmental Monitoring 1987-1995 ESA Scheme, London, MAFF Publications ADAS, 1996e Somerset Levels and Moors Report of Environmental Monitoring 1987- 1994 ESA Scheme, London, MAFF Publications ADAS, 1997a South Wessex Downs Report of Environmental Monitoring 1993-1996 ESA Scheme, London, MAFF Publications ADAS, 1997b North Peak Report of Environmental Monitoring 1988-1996 ESA Scheme, London, MAFF Publications ADAS, 1997c Breckland Report of Environmental Monitoring 1988-1996 ESA Scheme, London, MAFF Publications ADAS, 1998a Dartmoor Report of Environmental Monitoring 1994-1997 ESA Scheme, London, MAFF Publications ADAS, 1998b Cotswold Hills Report of Environmental Monitoring 1994-1997 ESA Scheme, London, MAFF Publications ADAS, 1998c The Upper Thames Tributaries Report of Environmental Monitoring 1994-1997 ESA Scheme, London, MAFF Publications ADAS, 1999 Monitoring and Evaluation of the Countryside Stewardship Scheme, Topic Report on Historic Landscape Agreements, draft report (May) ADAS, 2002 Report on a Survey of the Effects of the 2001 Foot and Mouth Disease Outbreak (England), unpublished document for DEFRA, January 2002 Agro Business Consultants Ltd, 1999 Farm Machinery Costs, Abc Ltd, Melton Mowbray Agro Business Consultants Ltd Annual (May and November), The Agricultural Budgeting And Costing Book, Abc Ltd Melton Mowbray Allbrooke, R, Ashworth, S, Cook, P, Copus, A and Gourlay, D, 1998 Agriculture and its Future in Rural Dumfries and Galloway, Scottish Agricultural and Rural Business Division to Dumfries and Galloway Council Oxford Archaeology 2 May 2002 (revised December 2002) DEFRA Management of Archaeological Sites in Arable Landscapes Appendix L Bibliography Allden, A, 1981 A study of some Devon long barrows and their diminishing future, DAS/DCRA Occasional Paper 10 Allen, M J, 1988 Archaeological and environmental aspects of colluviation in South East England, in Man Made Soils (eds W Groenmann-van Waateringe and M Robertson), BAR Internat. Series 410, 69-94 Allen, M J, 1991 Analysing the landscape: a geographical approach to archaeological problems, in Interpreting artefact scatters contributions to ploughzone archaeology (ed A J Schofield), Oxbow Monograph 4, Oxford, 39-59 Anderton, M and Went, D, 2002 Turning the plough, loss of a landscape legacy, Conservation Bulletin 42, March 2002, 52-55 Arable Farming, Monthly, Miller Freeman UK Ltd Ipswich Arshad, M A, 1999 Tillage and soil quality. Tillage practices for sustainable agriculture and environmental quality in different agroecosystems, Soil and Tillage Research 53, 1-2 Ashbee, P, Smith, I F and Evans, J G, 1979 Excavations of three long barrows near Avebury, Wiltshire, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 45, 207-300 Asteraki, E J, 2000 Cereal Field Margins: Enhancement of Plant and Invertebrate Biodiversity through Management and targeting of ELMS, in Review of MAFF’s Research and Development on Biodiversity and Conservation Management, Review Document for Conference, 14 July 2000 Atkinson, R J C, 1957 Worms and Weathering, Antiquity 31, 219-233 B Baker, C J, Saxton, K E and Ritchie, W R, 1996 No-tillage seeding, CABI Barclay, A and Halpin, C, 1999 Excavations at Barrow Hills, Radley, Oxfordshire, Vol 1. The prehistoric monument complex, Thames Valley Landscapes Vol 11, Oxford Archaeological Unit Barclay, A, Lambrick, G, Moore, J and Robinson, M, forthcoming Cursus Monuments in the Upper Thames Valley: Excavations at the Drayton and Lechlade Cursus, Thames Valley Landscapes Monograph, Oxford Archaeology Barnatt, J and Collis, J, 1996 Barrows in the Peak District: Recent Research, J R Collis Publications Barnatt, J, 1989 The Peak District Barrow Survey, unpublished Barnes, F A and Potter, H R, 1958 A flash flood in western Derbyshire, East Midland Geographer 10, 3-15 Barnett, E W, Somerset levels and Moors Strategy: Framework for Implementation Basore, N S, Best, L B and Wooley, J B(Jr), 1986 Bird nesting in Iowa no-tillage and tilled cropland, Journal of Wildlife Management 50, 19-28 Bell, B, 1993 (Reprinted 1996) Fifty Years of Farm Machinery, Farming Press, Ipswich Oxford Archaeology 3 May 2002 (revised December 2002) DEFRA Management of Archaeological Sites in Arable Landscapes Appendix L Bibliography Bell, B, 1999 Farm Machinery, 4th Edition Farming Press Bell, M, 1977 Excavations at Bishopstone, Sussex Archaeol. Coll. 115, 1-299 Bell, M, 1982 The effects of land use and climate on valley sedimentation, in Climatic Change in Later Prehistory (ed A F Harding), Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, 127-142. Bell, M, 1983 Valley Sediments as Evidence of Prehistoric Land-use on the South Downs, Proc. Prehistoric Soc. 49, 119-150 Bell, M and Boardman, J, 1992 Past and Present Soil Erosion: Archaeological and Geographical Perspectives, Oxbow Monograph 22, Oxford Bell,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Landscape Character Assessment
    OUSE WASHES Landscape Character Assessment Kite aerial photography by Bill Blake Heritage Documentation THE OUSE WASHES CONTENTS 04 Introduction Annexes 05 Context Landscape character areas mapping at 06 Study area 1:25,000 08 Structure of the report Note: this is provided as a separate document 09 ‘Fen islands’ and roddons Evolution of the landscape adjacent to the Ouse Washes 010 Physical influences 020 Human influences 033 Biodiversity 035 Landscape change 040 Guidance for managing landscape change 047 Landscape character The pattern of arable fields, 048 Overview of landscape character types shelterbelts and dykes has a and landscape character areas striking geometry 052 Landscape character areas 053 i Denver 059 ii Nordelph to 10 Mile Bank 067 iii Old Croft River 076 iv. Pymoor 082 v Manea to Langwood Fen 089 vi Fen Isles 098 vii Meadland to Lower Delphs Reeds, wet meadows and wetlands at the Welney 105 viii Ouse Valley Wetlands Wildlife Trust Reserve 116 ix Ouse Washes 03 THE OUSE WASHES INTRODUCTION Introduction Context Sets the scene Objectives Purpose of the study Study area Rationale for the Landscape Partnership area boundary A unique archaeological landscape Structure of the report Kite aerial photography by Bill Blake Heritage Documentation THE OUSE WASHES INTRODUCTION Introduction Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right 2013 Context Ouse Washes LP boundary Wisbech County boundary This landscape character assessment (LCA) was District boundary A Road commissioned in 2013 by Cambridgeshire ACRE Downham as part of the suite of documents required for B Road Market a Landscape Partnership (LP) Heritage Lottery Railway Nordelph Fund bid entitled ‘Ouse Washes: The Heart of River Denver the Fens.’ However, it is intended to be a stand- Water bodies alone report which describes the distinctive March Hilgay character of this part of the Fen Basin that Lincolnshire Whittlesea contains the Ouse Washes and supports the South Holland District Welney positive management of the area.
    [Show full text]
  • The Management of Archaeological Sites in Arable Landscapes BD1701
    The Management of Archaeological Sites in Arable Landscapes BD1701 Final Project Report Supporting Documentation Appendix F: Case Studies of Archaeological Damage from Arable Activities o a Oxford Archaeology May 2002 (revised December 2002) Client Name: DEFRA Issue No:2 Appendix F Case studies of archaeological damage from arable activities 1 Types of damage to archaeological sites caused by different arable activities..........................1 1.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................1 1.2 Cultivation of previously uncultivated archaeological sites........................................................1 1.3 Understanding cropmarks/soilmarks...........................................................................................2 1.4 Lateral erosion on archaeological sites.......................................................................................3 1.5 Deeper ploughing (or subsoiling) of existing arable or grass leys on already cultivated sites ...4 1.6 Potato cultivation.........................................................................................................................9 1.7 Sugar beet..................................................................................................................................12 1.8 Energy crops..............................................................................................................................12 1.9 The effective deepening of cultivation
    [Show full text]
  • Planning and the AONB Sustaining Landscape Character
    Planning and the AONB Sustaining Landscape Character Cranborne Chase and West Wiltshire Downs Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty AONB Office, Castle Street, Cranborne, Dorset, BH21 5PZ Telephone: (01725) 517417 Fax: (01725) 517916 Email: [email protected] Website: www.ccwwdaonb.org.uk Planning and the AONB – Sustaining Landscape Character AONBs are designated for their outstanding natural beauty. This has not, however, been defined in the legislation that relates to AONBs. The Government did confirm, in June 2000, that the landscapes of National Parks and AONBs are of equal quality. They are, however, living and working communities, not preserved reservations. Before the requirement for AONBs to have Management Plans to conserve and enhance their natural beauty, the constituent Local Planning Authorities sought to protect them from inappropriate development via policies and development control decisions. Whilst this had some success, it tended to promote a view that the AONB designation was a millstone that meant no development would be likely to be allowed. The commonly held view that ‘beauty is in the eye of the beholder’ fuelled opinions that planning decisions were being made on a subjective, and potentially biased, basis. From Zig-Zag Hill towards Shaftesbury Landscape Character Assessment is a structured and repeatable analysis which provides a greater understanding of the landscapes around us. It informs planning and land management options, policies, and decisions. The Countryside Agency sponsored an initial assessment, which led to the production of a popular booklet about the landscapes of this AONB, in 1995. A more detailed assessment was completed in 2003, and that is available on our web site www.ccwwdaonb.org.uk.
    [Show full text]
  • Excavations at Frilford, Berks., 1937-8 by J
    Excavations at Frilford, Berks., 1937-8 By J. S. P. BRADFORD and R. G. GOODCHILD 1. TIlE NOAH'S ARK FIELD N the autumn of '937, at the suggestion of Sir Arthur Evans, the Oxford University Archaeological Society undertook the investigation of the barrel­ I vaulted cellar, reputed locally to be of some antiquity, beneath the Noah's Ark Inn at Frilford. The Inn stands beside the Oxford-Wantage road and is 800 feet to the south-east of the well-known Romano-British and Anglo-Saxon cemetery.' It was soon apparent that the cellar had had no structural existence independently from the Inn and did not extend more than a few feet beyond its eastern frontage: there is no reason to suspect that it antedates the Inn. Meanwhile, trial trenches at the north end of the adjacent long and narrow meadow· ·on the surface of which, when ploughed, stray finds of Roman pottery and coins had often been made' revealed a well-defined layer of Roman building debris associated with • ghost-walls', or foundation-trenches from which all masonry had been removed by stone-robbers. Below this was a stratum of dark occupation-earth with an abundance of pottery indicating the presence of an extensive Early Iron Age settlement. In view of the possibility of continuity of occupation between the pre­ Roman and Roman periods it was decided to make a thorough investigation of the site, and with the kind permission of the late Mr. T. Skurray of Abingdon, the owner, and with the constant cooperation of Mr. A.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Plan 2031 Part 2 Detailed Policies and Additional Sites
    Publication Version October 2017 Local Plan 2031 Part 2 Detailed Policies and Additional Sites APPENDICES Contents Appendix A: Site Development Templates…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….1 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 2. General Requirements for All Housing Site Allocations ................................................................................................................................ 3 3. South-East Vale Sub-Area ........................................................................................................................................................................... 6 4. Abingdon-on-Thames and Oxford Fringe Sub-Area ................................................................................................................................... 13 Appendix B: Land for Safeguarding for Future Transport Schemes - Maps ........................................................................................................ 30 1. Abingdon-on-Thames and Oxford Fringe Sub-Area ................................................................................................................................... 30 2. South-East Vale Sub-Area ......................................................................................................................................................................... 34 Appendix C:
    [Show full text]
  • Late Bronze Age and Iron Age Resource Assessment
    SOLENT THAMES RESEARCH FRAMEWORK RESOURCE ASSESSMENT THE LATER BRONZE AGE AND IRON AGE PERIOD George Lambrick May 2010 (County contributions by David Allen, Tim Allen, Steve Ford, Sandy Kidd and Ruth Waller; palaeoenvironmental contribution by Mike Allen) Background Studies carried out for the Solent Thames Research Framework The study for Buckinghamshire was written by Sandy Kidd; Oxfordshire by Tim Allen; Berkshire by Steve Ford; Hampshire by Dave Allen; and Isle of Wight by Ruth Waller. Environmental background was supplied by Michael Allen. Regional and national research context There have been various previous reviews of different aspects of late prehistory in the area, and various conferences have outlined key research issues. Some are now becoming quite elderly but are still useful despite no longer being fully up to date, and they all vary in geographical scope, and few span the full period covered here (cf Barrett and Bradley 1980; Brück 2001; Cunliffe and Miles 1984; Fitzpatrick and Morris 1994; Champion and Collis 1996; Haselgrove and Pope 2007; Haselgrove and Moore 2007; Lambrick with Robinson 2009). Understanding the British Iron Age an Agenda for Action (Haselgrove et al. 2000) is the most recent attempt at a national research framework for the latter half of the period. Nature of evidence base General Scale and Character of investigations The way in which later prehistoric sites and finds are recorded in county Historic Environment or Sites and Monuments Records is rather variable and not always easy to extract, so the following figures give only a broad brush indication of the scale of the known resource.
    [Show full text]
  • Ebbsfleet Style
    295 Bibliography Aberg, F A, 1978 Medieval moated sites, CBA Res Rep of south-east Dorset black burnished category 1 17, London pottery in south west Britain, Britannia 27, 223-81 Abrams, J, 2003 Rose Cottage, Elm Road, Tylers Allen, J R L and Fulford, M G, 2004 Early Roman Green, Buckinghamshire, unpublished report mosaic materials in southern Britain, with particular Addyman, P V and Leigh, D, 1973 The Anglo-Saxon reference to Silchester (Calleva Atrebatum): a village at Chalton, Hampshire: second interim regional geological perspective, Britannia 35, 9-38 report, Medieval Archaeology 17, 1-25 Allen, J R L, Fulford, M G and Todd, J A, 2007 Burnt Addyman, P V, Leigh, D and Hughes, M J 1972, Kimmeridgian shale at early Roman Silchester, Anglo-Saxon houses at Chalton, Hampshire, South-East England, and the Roman Poole-Purbeck Medieval Archaeology 16, 13-32 complex-agglomerated geomaterials industry, Oxford Adkins, R A and Petchey, M R, 1984 The Secklow J Archaeol 26, 167-91 hundred mound and other meeting place mounds in Allen, J R L and Todd, J A, 2010 A Kimmeridgian England, Archaeol J 141, 243-251 (Upper Jurassic) source for early Roman yellow Aiello, L and Wheeler, P, 1995 The Expensive-tissue tesserae and opus sectile in southern Britain, Hypothesis the Brain and the Digestive System in Britannia 41, 317-21 Human and Primate Evolution, Current Anthropology Allen, M J, 1988 Archaeological and environmental 36, 199–221 aspects of colluviation in south-east England, in Airs, M, 1998 The strange history of paper roofs, Trans Man-Made Soils, (eds W.
    [Show full text]
  • Whence This Severance of the Head?”: the Osteology and Archaeology of Human Decapitation in Britain
    UNIVERSITY OF WINCHESTER FACULTY OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES “Whence this Severance of the Head?”: The Osteology and Archaeology of Human Decapitation in Britain KATIE TUCKER Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy January 2012 UNIVERSITY OF WINCHESTER ABSTRACT FACULTY OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES Doctor of Philosophy “Whence this Severance of the Head?”: The Osteology and Archaeology of Human Decapitation in Britain Katie Tucker Decapitation burials (burials in which the cranium and mandible are displaced from correct anatomical position and replaced elsewhere in the grave) are a relatively common minority burial practice in Romano-British cemeteries. They have usually been ascribed to a post-mortem funerary ritual with various different motives being postulated. However, these interpretations seem to have largely been based on assumption rather than evidence from the archaeological context or the human remains, only small numbers of which have been subjected to detailed skeletal analysis. Decapitated burials are also found in the early medieval period, and, conversely, these are normally concluded to be the victims of judicial execution, an interpretation that is only very rarely used when discussing Romano-British examples. This thesis examines the archaeological and osteological data from a large sample of Romano- British decapitated burials and compares them with the wider Romano-British cemetery population, in order to better understand the differences between decapitated individuals and the rest of the population, in terms of burial practice, demographics, and ante-mortem health status. The evidence for decapitation in the Neolithic, Bronze and Iron Ages, early medieval, medieval and post-medieval periods was also examined, with the analysis of samples of decapitated individuals being undertaken where possible, in order to provide comparanda for the Romano- British examples, and assess whether there is any evidence for continuity in the practice between the periods.
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Plant Register
    1 BSBI RARE PLANT REGISTER Berkshire & South Oxfordshire V.C. 22 MICHAEL J. CRAWLEY FRS UPDATED APRIL 2005 2 Symbols and conventions The Latin binomial (from Stace, 1997) appears on the left of the first line in bold, followed by the authority in Roman font and the English Name in italics. Names on subsequent lines in Roman font are synonyms (including names that appear in Druce’s (1897) or Bowen’s (1964) Flora of Berkshire that are different from the name of the same species in Stace). At the right hand side of the first line is a set of symbols showing - status (if non-native) - growth form - flowering time - trend in abundance (if any) The status is one of three categories: if the plant arrived in Britain after the last ice age without the direct help of humans it is defined as a native, and there is no symbol in this position. If the archaeological or documentary evidence indicates that a plant was brought to Berkshire intentionally of unintentionally by people, then that species is an alien. The alien species are in two categories ● neophytes ○ archaeophytes Neophytes are aliens that were introduced by people in recent times (post-1500 by convention) and for which we typically have precise dates for their first British and first Berkshire records. Neophytes may be naturalized (forming self-replacing populations) or casual (relying on repeated introduction). Archaeophytes are naturalized aliens that were carried about by people in pre-historic times, either intentionally for their utility, or unintentionally as contaminants of crop seeds. Archaeophytes were typically classified as natives in older floras.
    [Show full text]
  • An Early Iron Age Site at Allen's Pit, Dorchester by J
    An Early Iron Age Site at Allen's Pit, Dorchester By J. s. P. BRADFORD URING the last ten years, in the course of working Messrs. John Allen Dand Sons' Burcot gravel-pit at Dorchester, much valuable Iron Age and Romano-British archaeological material has been salvaged 1 and most generously presented to the Ashmolean Museum by the late Major G. W. G. Allen, to whom every gratitude is due, and by his brother, Capt. J. J. C. Allen. The comprehensive Iron Age pottery series, thus acquired, and the occupation site from which it came have been briefly discussed by E. T. Leeds, preparatory to a special memoir and it is with his encouragement and kind consent that I now put forward a more detailed interpretation. The pit, which covers a considerable area, lies about I! m. N . of Dorchester Bridge on one of the gentle slopes within the broad, well drained, gravel terraces between the confluence of the Thames and Thame, and less than i m. from the Iron Age and Romano-British settlement examined by J. N. L. Myres2 at Mount Farm, Dorchester. Although no more than 180 ft. above O.D. there is an extensive prospect towards the Chiltern escarpment, and beyond Wittenham Clumps to the N. fringes of the Berkshire Downs. Lying close to the river, the neighbourhood on both sides of the Thames was one evidently favourable to primitive subsistence agriculture from the Bronze Age onwards, as Major Allen's incomparable air-photographs have emphasized. This site should therefore be considered as one element of a cluster of Iron Age settlements along the river, most of which can be re-identified after the Roman conquest when, with improved communications, they probably increased in prosperity.
    [Show full text]
  • Place~Names and Topography in the Upper Thames Country: a REGIONAL ESSAY
    Place~Names and Topography in the Upper Thames Country: A REGIONAL ESSAY By W. J. ARKELL ,IN future the etymological study of English place-names must no longer be a game of hide and seek with abstruse and unintelligible personal names, but a carefully conducted study of topography and word-lore, likely to throw much fresh light on both the history of the English nation and the history of words.' Zachrisson (1932, p. 60) here placed topography- first, and every geographer and geologist will agree with him. It is certain that our forefathers from whom our place-names are handed down were hypersensitive to topography. Just as the Arab has a score or more words for a camel, so the Anglo-Saxon had at least forty words for a hill, each appropriate to a particular shape, size, or context. Many other topographical names,too, show refinements of meaning now lost on us, and there is much to be learnt and much delight to be derived from attempting to unravel them. If it be conceded that topography should be the basis of place-name study, then it follows that the most satisfactory way to treat place-names is by natural geological or topographical districts. This has been brought home to me while mapping certain geological formations on the 6-inch scale from east of Oxford to west of Swindon. Here are two natural districts determined by geological structure: the clay lowland of Otmoor with the old Shotover and Bernwood forests and the surrounding hills on the one hand ; and the White Horse and upper Thames valleys, subdivided by the Corallian ridge, on the other.
    [Show full text]
  • The Archaeologist 78
    Winter 2010 Number 78 The ARCHAEOLOGIST This issue: MANAGEMENT OF RURAL SITES Heritage and agriculture: will the reformed CAP fit? p12 Natural England and World Heritage sites p20 Scotland’s rural heritage: sites at risk p48 Rural conservation areas p48 C ONTENTS 1 Contents 2 Editorial 3 From the Finds Tray 5 View from the (Chief Executive’s) Chair Peter Hinton page 20 6 IfA AGM: The Past Changing the Future: ALSF funding in the Historic Environment Buzz Busby 7 IfA Standards and guidance update Kate Geary 8 Scottish archaeological assemblages and museums Stuart Campbell and Ian Ralston 10 Legislative developments – strengthening the Scottish Historic Environment Bill Jo Robertson 11 Reasons to be cheerful? Scheduled monuments and the agri-environment Vince Holyoak 12 Heritage and agriculture: will the reformed CAP fit? Stephen Trow 14 What have the farmers ever done for us? The role of land-managers and agri-environment schemes page 30 Victoria Hunns 16 Natural England and English Heritage: facing the challenge of risk together Sam Barnes 18 COSMIC+: informed protection for rural sites Robin Jackson 20 Natural England and World Heritage Sites Joy Ede and Dawn Enright 22 Scotland’s rural heritage: sites at risk Jonathan Wordsworth 24 The National Trust for Scotland: managing archaeological sites Derek Alexander 26 The historic environment in woodland: the role of Forest Plans Matt Ritchie 30 Soft felling on Comar Wood dun Brian Duff, Cameron Hall-Gardiner and Matt Ritchie 32 The Norfolk Monuments Management Project David Robertson 34
    [Show full text]