Historic Wales and United Kingdom Sites for BYU Wales Study Abroad

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Historic Wales and United Kingdom Sites for BYU Wales Study Abroad Historic Wales and United Kingdom Sites for BYU Wales Study Abroad Volume 2 H–R Compiled by Ronald Schoedel Contents Articles Hadrian's Wall 1 Hampton Court Palace 10 Harlech Castle 20 Hay-on-Wye 27 Hill fort 31 Isca Augusta 39 Kenilworth Castle 43 Kidwelly Castle 61 King Doniert's Stone 62 King's College Chapel, Cambridge 63 Lacock 66 Lacock Abbey 68 Lanhydrock 71 Lanyon Quoit 74 Llandaff Cathedral 75 Malvern Hills 80 Margam Stones Museum 98 Monmouth 110 Monmouth Castle 126 Museum of London 130 Mên-an-Tol 135 National Assembly for Wales 137 National Eisteddfod of Wales 146 National Gallery 151 National Museum Cardiff 168 National Museum of Scotland 171 National Portrait Gallery, London 176 National Railway Museum 181 National Roman Legion Museum 194 National Slate Museum 195 Newcastle Castle, Bridgend 196 North Hill, Malvern 197 Offa's Dyke 199 Ogmore Castle 203 Old Beaupre Castle 205 Old Sarum 207 Oxford University Museum of Natural History 211 Oxfordshire 217 Palace of Whitehall 224 Pierhead Building 228 Plas Mawr 231 Preston England Temple 232 Raglan Castle 235 Roman Baths (Bath) 247 Roman Baths Museum 253 Royal Monmouthshire Royal Engineers 254 Royal Shakespeare Company 256 References Article Sources and Contributors 264 Image Sources, Licenses and Contributors 268 Article Licenses License 278 Hadrian's Wall 1 Hadrian's Wall Hadrian's Wall (Latin: Vallum Aelium, "Aelian Wall" – the Latin name is inferred from text on the Staffordshire Moorlands Patera) was a defensive fortification in Roman Britain. Begun in 122 AD, during the rule of emperor Hadrian, it was the first of two fortifications built across Great Britain, the second being the Antonine Wall, lesser known of the two because its physical remains are less evident today. The wall was the most heavily fortified border in the Empire. In addition to its role as a military fortification, it is thought that many of the gates through the wall would have served as customs posts to allow trade and levy taxation.[1] A significant portion of the wall still exists, having been rescued in the 19th century by John Clayton, who, alarmed at the destruction by quarrying, bought a number of sections.[2] For much of its length, the wall can be followed on foot by Hadrian's Wall Path or by cycle on Location of Hadrian's Wall National Cycle Route 72. It is the most popular tourist attraction in Northern England. It was made a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 1987. English Heritage, a government organisation in charge of managing the historic environment of England, describes it as "the most important monument built by the Romans in Britain".[3] Dimensions Hadrian's Wall was 80 Roman miles (73 statute miles or 120 km) Route of Hadrian's Wall long,[4] its width and height were dependent on the construction materials which were available nearby. East of River Irthing the wall was made from squared stone and measured 3 metres (9.7 ft) wide and five to six metres (16–20 ft) high, while west of the river the wall was made from turf and measured 6 metres (20 ft) wide and 3.5 metres (11.5 ft) high. This does not include the wall's ditches, berms and forts. The central section measured eight Roman feet wide (7.8 ft or 2.4 m) on a 10-foot (3 m) base. Some parts of this section of the wall survive to a height of 10 feet (3 m). Route Sections of Hadrian's Wall remain along the route, though much has been dismantled over the Hadrian's Wall extended west from Segedunum at Wallsend on the years to use the stones for various nearby River Tyne, via Carlisle and Kirkandrews-on-Eden, to the shore of the construction projects. Solway Firth, ending a short but unknown distance west of the village of Bowness-on-Solway.[5] Although the curtain wall ends near Bowness-on-Solway, this does not mark the end of the line of defensive structures. The system of Milecastles and Turrets is known to have continued along the Cumbria Hadrian's Wall 2 coast as far as Maryport. For classification purposes, the Milecastles west of Bowness-on-Solway are referred to as Milefortlets. The A69 and B6318 roads follow the course of the wall as it starts in Newcastle upon Tyne to Carlisle, then along the northern coast of Cumbria (south shore of the Solway Firth). It is a common misconception that Hadrian's wall marks the boundary between England and Scotland. This is not the case; Hadrian's wall lies entirely within England, and south of the border with Scotland by less than one kilometre in the west at Bowness-on-Solway, and 110 kilometres Hadrian's Wall facing East towards Crag Lough (68 mi) in the east.[6] Purpose of construction Hadrian's Wall was likely planned before Roman Emperor Hadrian's visit to Britain in 122. According to restored sandstone fragments found in Jarrow that date from 118 or 119, it was Hadrian's wish to keep "intact the empire," which had been imposed upon him by "divine instruction."[7] The fragments then announce the building of the wall. It is entirely possible that, on his arrival in Britain in 122, one of the stops on his itinerary was the northern frontier and an inspection of the progress of the wall as it was being built. Although Hadrian's biographer wrote "(Hadrian) was the first to build a wall 80 miles long to separate the Romans from the barbarians",[8] reasons for the construction of the wall vary, and no recording of any exact explanation survives. However, a number of theories have been presented by historians, primarily centring around an expression of Roman power and Hadrian's policy of defence before expansion. For example, on his accession to the throne in 117, Hadrian had been experiencing rebellion in Roman Britain and from the peoples of various conquered lands across the Empire, including Egypt, Israel, Libya and Mauretania.[7] These troubles may have had a hand in Hadrian's plan to construct the wall, and his construction of limes in other areas of the Empire, but to what extent is unknown. Scholars also disagree over how much of a threat the inhabitants of northern Britain actually presented, and whether there was any more economic advantage in defending and garrisoning a fixed line of defences like the Wall over simply conquering and annexing what has become the Scottish Lowlands and manning the territory with a loose arrangement of forts.[7] The limes of Rome were never expected to stop whole tribes from migrating or entire armies from invading, and while a frontier protected by a palisade or stone wall would surely help curb cattle-raiders and the incursions of other small groups,[9] the economic viability of constructing and constantly manning a 72-mile (116 km) long boundary along a sparsely populated border to stop small-scale raiding is dubious.[7] Another possible explanation for the erection of the great wall is the degree of control it would have provided over immigration, smuggling, and customs.[7] Limes did not strictly mark the boundaries of Rome, with Roman power and influence often extending beyond its walls.[7] People inside and beyond the limes travelled through it each day when conducting business, and organized check-points like those offered by Hadrian's Wall provided good opportunities for taxation. With watch towers only a short distance from gateways in the limes, patrolling legionaries would have been able to keep track of entering and exiting natives and Roman citizens alike, charging customs dues, and checking for smuggling activity. Another theory is of the simpler variety—Hadrian's Wall was, if not wholly, at least partially, constructed to reflect the power of Rome, and was used as a political point by Hadrian. Once its construction was finished, it is thought to have been covered in plaster and then white-washed, its shining surface able to reflect the sunlight and be visible for miles around.[7] Hadrian's Wall 3 Construction Construction probably started sometime in 122[10] and was largely completed within six years.[11] Construction started in the east, between milecastles four and seven, and proceeded westwards, with soldiers from all three of the occupying Roman legions participating in the work. The route chosen largely paralleled the nearby Stanegate road from Luguvalium (Carlisle) to Coria (Corbridge), upon which were situated a series of forts, including Vindolanda. The wall in the east follows a hard, resistant igneous diabase rock escarpment, known as the Whin Sill. The initial plan called for a ditch and wall with 80 small gated milecastle fortlets, one placed every Roman mile [12], holding a few dozen troops each, and pairs of evenly spaced intermediate turrets used for observation and signalling. However, very few milecastles are actually situated at exact Roman mile divisions; they can be up to 200 yards east or west because of landscape features or to improve signalling to the Stanegate forts to the south.[13] Local limestone was used in the construction, except for the section to the west of Irthing where turf was used instead, since there were no useful outcrops Roman fort and town at Corstopitum viewed nearby. Milecastles in this area were also built from timber and earth along the Stanegate rather than stone, but turrets were always made from stone. The Broad Wall was initially built with a clay-bonded rubble core and mortared dressed rubble facing stones, but this seems to have made it vulnerable to collapse, and repair with a mortared core was sometimes necessary.
Recommended publications
  • Roman Britain
    Roman Britain Hadrian s Wall - History Vallum Hadriani - Historia “ Having completely transformed the soldiers, in royal fashion, he made for Britain, where he set right many things and - the rst to do so - drew a wall along a length of eighty miles to separate barbarians and Romans. (The Augustan History, Hadrian 11.1)” Although we have much epigraphic evidence from the Wall itself, the sole classical literary reference for Hadrian having built the Wall is the passage above, wrien by Aelius Spartianus towards the end of the 3rd century AD. The original concept of a continuous barrier across the Tyne-Solway isthmus, was devised by emperor Hadrian during his visit to Britain in 122AD. His visit had been prompted by the threat of renewed unrest with the Brigantes tribe of northern Britain, and the need was seen to separate this war-like race from the lowland tribes of Scotland, with whom they had allied against Rome during recent troubles. Components of The Wall Hadrian s Wall was a composite military barrier which, in its nal form, comprised six separate elements; 1. A stone wall fronted by a V-shaped ditch. 2. A number of purpose-built stone garrison forti cations; Forts, Milecastles and Turrets. 3. A large earthwork and ditch, built parallel with and to the south of the Wall, known as the Vallum. 4. A metalled road linking the garrison forts, the Roman Military Way . 5. A number of outpost forts built to the north of the Wall and linked to it by road. 6. A series of forts and lookout towers along the Cumbrian coast, the Western Sea Defences .
    [Show full text]
  • The Making of the Sainsbury Centre the Making of the Sainsbury Centre
    The Making of the Sainsbury Centre The Making of the Sainsbury Centre Edited by Jane Pavitt and Abraham Thomas 2 This publication accompanies the exhibition: Unless otherwise stated, all dates of built projects SUPERSTRUCTURES: The New Architecture refer to their date of completion. 1960–1990 Sainsbury Centre for Visual Arts Building credits run in the order of architect followed 24 March–2 September 2018 by structural engineer. First published in Great Britain by Sainsbury Centre for Visual Arts Norwich Research Park University of East Anglia Norwich, NR4 7TJ scva.ac.uk © Sainsbury Centre for Visual Arts, University of East Anglia, 2018 The moral rights of the authors have been asserted. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior written permission of the publisher. British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data. A catalogue record is available from the British Library. ISBN 978 0946 009732 Exhibition Curators: Jane Pavitt and Abraham Thomas Book Design: Johnson Design Book Project Editor: Rachel Giles Project Curator: Monserrat Pis Marcos Printed and bound in the UK by Pureprint Group First edition 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Superstructure The Making of the Sainsbury Centre for Visual Arts Contents Foreword David Sainsbury 9 Superstructures: The New Architecture 1960–1990 12 Jane Pavitt and Abraham Thomas Introduction 13 The making of the Sainsbury Centre 16 The idea of High Tech 20 Three early projects 21 The engineering tradition 24 Technology transfer and the ‘Kit of Parts’ 32 Utopias and megastructures 39 The corporate ideal 46 Conclusion 50 Side-slipping the Seventies Jonathan Glancey 57 Under Construction: Building the Sainsbury Centre 72 Bibliography 110 Acknowledgements 111 Photographic credits 112 6 Fo reword David Sainsbury Opposite.
    [Show full text]
  • “Powerful Arms and Fertile Soil”
    “Powerful Arms and Fertile Soil” English Identity and the Law of Arms in Early Modern England Claire Renée Kennedy A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History and Philosophy of Science University of Sydney 2017 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My greatest thanks and appreciation to Ofer Gal, who supervised my PhD with constant interest, insightfulness and support. This thesis owes so much to his helpful conversation and encouraging supervision and guidance. I have benefitted immensely from the suggestions and criticisms of my examiners, John Sutton, Nick Wilding, and Anthony Grafton, to whom I owe a particular debt. Grafton’s suggestion during the very early stages of my candidature that the quarrel between William Camden and Ralph Brooke might provide a promising avenue for research provided much inspiration for the larger project. I am greatly indebted to the staff in the Unit for History and Philosophy of Science: in particular, Hans Pols for his unwavering support and encouragement; Daniela Helbig, for providing some much-needed motivation during the home-stretch; and Debbie Castle, for her encouraging and reassuring presence. I have benefitted immensely from conversations with friends, in and outside the Unit for HPS. This includes, (but is not limited to): Megan Baumhammer, Sahar Tavakoli, Ian Lawson, Nick Bozic, Gemma Lucy Smart, Georg Repnikov, Anson Fehross, Caitrin Donovan, Stefan Gawronski, Angus Cornwell, Brenda Rosales and Carrie Hardie. My particular thanks to Kathryn Ticehurst and Laura Sumrall, for their willingness to read drafts, to listen, and to help me clarify my thoughts and ideas. My thanks also to the Centre for Editing Lives and Letters, University College London, and the History of Science Program, Princeton University, where I benefitted from spending time as a visiting research student.
    [Show full text]
  • Monmouthshire Local Development Plan (Ldp) Proposed Rural Housing
    MONMOUTHSHIRE LOCAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN (LDP) PROPOSED RURAL HOUSING ALLOCATIONS CONSULTATION DRAFT JUNE 2010 CONTENTS A. Introduction. 1. Background 2. Preferred Strategy Rural Housing Policy 3. Village Development Boundaries 4. Approach to Village Categorisation and Site Identification B. Rural Secondary Settlements 1. Usk 2. Raglan 3. Penperlleni/Goetre C. Main Villages 1. Caerwent 2. Cross Ash 3. Devauden 4. Dingestow 5. Grosmont 6. Little Mill 7. Llanarth 8. Llandewi Rhydderch 9. Llandogo 10. Llanellen 11. Llangybi 12. Llanishen 13. Llanover 14. Llanvair Discoed 15. Llanvair Kilgeddin 16. Llanvapley 17. Mathern 18. Mitchell Troy 19. Penallt 20. Pwllmeyric 21. Shirenewton/Mynyddbach 22. St. Arvans 23. The Bryn 24. Tintern 25. Trellech 26. Werngifford/Pandy D. Minor Villages (UDP Policy H4). 1. Bettws Newydd 2. Broadstone/Catbrook 3. Brynygwenin 4. Coed-y-Paen 5. Crick 6. Cuckoo’s Row 7. Great Oak 8. Gwehelog 9. Llandegveth 10. Llandenny 11. Llangattock Llingoed 12. Llangwm 13. Llansoy 14. Llantillio Crossenny 15. Llantrisant 16. Llanvetherine 17. Maypole/St Maughans Green 18. Penpergwm 19. Pen-y-Clawdd 20. The Narth 21. Tredunnock A. INTRODUCTION. 1. BACKGROUND The Monmouthshire Local Development Plan (LDP) Preferred Strategy was issued for consultation for a six week period from 4 June 2009 to 17 July 2009. The results of this consultation were reported to Council in January 2010 and the Report of Consultation was issued for public comment for a further consultation period from 19 February 2010 to 19 March 2010. The present report on Proposed Rural Housing Allocations is intended to form the basis for a further informal consultation to assist the Council in moving forward from the LDP Preferred Strategy to the Deposit LDP.
    [Show full text]
  • Woodend Farm, Huntley, Gloucestershire Gl19 3Ha
    WOODEND FARM, HUNTLEY, GLOUCESTERSHIRE GL19 3HA WOODEND FARM, HUNTLEY, GLOUCESTERSHIRE GL19 3HA A SUBSTANTIAL GRADE II LISTED VICTORIAN FARMHOUSE WITH EARLIER FEATURES BEING SOLD TOGETHER WITH 17½ ACRES OF ADJACENT PASTURE LAND TO BE SOLD IN 3 LOTS WOODEND FARM (LOT 1) SOLICITORS SITUATION & DESCRIPTION Harrison Clark Rickerbys inc. Shawcross, Overross House, Ross Park, Ross-on-Wye, Situated in fine open countryside just outside the busy village of Huntley having access to both Herefordshire HR9 7US. Tel: 01989 562377. For the Attention of Mary Wathen. the A40 Gloucester to Ross-on-Wye road and the A4136 Huntley to Monmouth road. The village offers Primary School, Village Shop and Post Office, noted Butchers, Public House and LOCAL AUTHORITY a Garden Centre together with a local Cricket Club and a 9 hole Golf Course. Forest of Dean District Council, Council Offices, High Street, Coleford, Glos. GL16 8HG Tel: 01594 810000 Delightfully situated on the south-eastern edge of the Royal Forest of Dean the property is close to May Hill with fine walks and hacking out countryside. OUTGOINGS The Market Town of Newent is under 5 miles to the north where there is a Secondary School. Council Tax Bandings:- 1 Woodend Farmhouse: Band ‘C’ The City of Gloucester is only some 9 miles away to the east with all the facilities that one Woodend Cottage: Band ‘C’ would expect from a City together with its fine Cathedral and also having main line railway 2 Woodend Farmhouse: Band ‘D’ station for fast access to London Paddington, Birmingham New Street and Bristol Parkway together with a private Airport at Staverton.
    [Show full text]
  • Storm Callum 12Th - 14Th October 2018
    Investigation Report into Flooding - Storm Callum 12th - 14th October 2018 P2.23 Final Version July 2019 1 | P a g e Title of document Storm Callum Section 19 Flood Investigation Report Document date March 2019 Authors Carmarthenshire County Council Service responsible Flood Defence and Coastal Protection, Waste and Environmental Services. Department Environment Review March 2019 (Multi agency) Approval 29 July 2019 (CCC Executive Board) Published September 2019 Document History Revision Purpose description Originated Checked Reviewed Approved Date 0 Initial draft BK Mar 2019 P1.1 First draft for BK CCC Mar Internal review NRW 2019 DCWW Network Rail P1.2 BK CA April 2019 P2 BK CCC 7 May CMT 2019 P2.1 BK CCC PEB 3 June 2019 P2.22 BK CCC 5 July Scrutiny 2019 P2.23 BK CCC 29 July Executive 2019 Board P2.23 Final Version July 2019 2 | P a g e Contents 1 Introduction ......................................................................................... 5 2 The focus of the report .......................................................................... 7 3 Storm Callum ....................................................................................... 9 3.1 Forecasting and Prediction time line .................................................. 9 3.2 Rainfall data ................................................................................... 9 3.3 The Wind ..................................................................................... 11 4 Flood Investigation, Johnstown (Carmarthen) .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Area Planning Sub- Committee Held at the Council Chamber, Brockington, 35 Hafod Road, Hereford on 16Th July, 2003 at 2:00 P.M
    Southern Area Planning Sub- Committee Date: Wednesday, 13th August, 2003 Time: 2.00 p.m. The Council Chamber, Place: Brockington, 35 Hafod Road, Hereford Please note the time, date and venue of Notes: the meeting. For any further information please contact: Pete Martens, Members' Services, Brockington, 35 Hafod Road, Hereford Tel: 01432 260248 Fax: 01432 260286 e-mail: [email protected] County of Herefordshire District Council COUNTY OF HEREFORDSHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL 13TH AUGUST, 2003 AGENDA for the Meeting of the Southern Area Planning Sub-Committee To: Councillor Mrs. R.F. Lincoln (Chairman) Councillor P. G. Turpin (Vice-Chairman) Councillors H. Bramer, M.R. Cunningham, N.J.J. Davies, Mrs. C.J. Davis, G.W. Davis, J.W. Edwards, Mrs. A.E. Gray, T.W. Hunt, Mrs. J.A. Hyde, G. Lucas, D.C. Taylor and J.B. Williams Pages 1. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE To receive apologies for absence. 2. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST To receive any declarations of interest by Members in respect of items on the Agenda. 3. MINUTES 1 - 18 To approve and sign the Minutes of the meeting held on 16th July, 2003. 4. ITEM FOR INFORMATION - APPEALS 19 - 20 To note the contents of the attached report of the Head of Planning Services in respect of the appeals received or determined for the southern area of Herefordshire. 5. HEAD OF PLANNING SERVICES REPORT 21 - 78 To consider and Take any appropriate action on the attached reports of The Head of Planning Services in respect of the planning applications received for the southern area of Herefordshire, and to authorise him to impose any additional conditions and reasons considered to be necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • DISSERTATION-Submission Reformatted
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title The Dilemma of Obedience: Persecution, Dissimulation, and Memory in Early Modern England, 1553-1603 Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5tv2w736 Author Harkins, Robert Lee Publication Date 2013 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California The Dilemma of Obedience: Persecution, Dissimulation, and Memory in Early Modern England, 1553-1603 By Robert Lee Harkins A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Ethan Shagan, Chair Professor Jonathan Sheehan Professor David Bates Fall 2013 © Robert Lee Harkins 2013 All Rights Reserved 1 Abstract The Dilemma of Obedience: Persecution, Dissimulation, and Memory in Early Modern England, 1553-1603 by Robert Lee Harkins Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Berkeley Professor Ethan Shagan, Chair This study examines the problem of religious and political obedience in early modern England. Drawing upon extensive manuscript research, it focuses on the reign of Mary I (1553-1558), when the official return to Roman Catholicism was accompanied by the prosecution of Protestants for heresy, and the reign of Elizabeth I (1558-1603), when the state religion again shifted to Protestantism. I argue that the cognitive dissonance created by these seesaw changes of official doctrine necessitated a society in which religious mutability became standard operating procedure. For most early modern men and women it was impossible to navigate between the competing and contradictory dictates of Tudor religion and politics without conforming, dissimulating, or changing important points of conscience and belief.
    [Show full text]
  • Eisteddfod Genedlaethol Cymru - Cyfansoddiadau a Beirniadaethau (GB 0210 CYFANS)
    Llyfrgell Genedlaethol Cymru = The National Library of Wales Cymorth chwilio | Finding Aid - Eisteddfod Genedlaethol Cymru - cyfansoddiadau a beirniadaethau (GB 0210 CYFANS) Cynhyrchir gan Access to Memory (AtoM) 2.3.0 Generated by Access to Memory (AtoM) 2.3.0 Argraffwyd: Mai 04, 2017 Printed: May 04, 2017 Wrth lunio'r disgrifiad hwn dilynwyd canllawiau ANW a seiliwyd ar ISAD(G) Ail Argraffiad; rheolau AACR2; ac LCSH Wrth lunio'r disgrifiad hwn dilynwyd canllawiau ANW a seiliwyd ar ISAD(G) Ail Argraffiad; rheolau AACR2; ac LCSH https://archifau.llyfrgell.cymru/index.php/eisteddfod-genedlaethol-cymru- cyfansoddiadau-beirniadaethau-2 archives.library .wales/index.php/eisteddfod-genedlaethol-cymru-cyfansoddiadau- beirniadaethau-2 Llyfrgell Genedlaethol Cymru = The National Library of Wales Allt Penglais Aberystwyth Ceredigion United Kingdom SY23 3BU 01970 632 800 01970 615 709 [email protected] www.llgc.org.uk Eisteddfod Genedlaethol Cymru - cyfansoddiadau a beirniadaethau Tabl cynnwys | Table of contents Gwybodaeth grynodeb | Summary information .............................................................................................. 3 Hanes gweinyddol / Braslun bywgraffyddol | Administrative history | Biographical sketch ......................... 3 Natur a chynnwys | Scope and content .......................................................................................................... 4 Trefniant | Arrangement .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 070 Peters Books.Indb
    HUGH WHITEHEAD, THE ORIGINS LARS HESSELGREN Of J PARRISH SMARTGEOMETRY Smartgeometry (SG) was founded in 2001 by former colleagues and friends Hugh Whitehead, Lars Hesselgren and J Parrish as a way to recapture parametric and computational design for architecture. At the time of founding SG they were leaders in the London-based architectural practices Foster + Partners, Kohn Pedersen Fox (KPF) and ArupSport respectively, and were strong proponents of digital design. Each was striving to create architecture through the use of parametric tools and computational methods. Through SG they hoped not only to create new digital tools, but to foster a community that would develop, test and disseminate these ideas of architecture and design to a wider audience. Whitehead founded the Specialist Modelling Group at Foster + Partners in 1998 which has been responsible for a host of innovative buildings and consistently pioneers computational design methods in architectural practice. After years at KPF in London, architect Lars Hesselgren is now the Director of the Computational Design Research Group at PLP Architects. J Parrish is a globally renowned sports stadium designer leading teams to design some of the most iconic stadium projects in the world. After many years at ArupSport, he moved to AECOM where he is currently working on the venues for the Rio Olympic Park. Here each tells their story of the origins of SG, now an international multidisciplinary community of professionals, academics and students in the fields of architecture and engineering.COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL 1 HUGH WHITEHEAD BACK TO THE FUTURE Four people were sitting in a car travelling to a Bentley conference.
    [Show full text]
  • DISSERTATION-Submission Reformatted
    The Dilemma of Obedience: Persecution, Dissimulation, and Memory in Early Modern England, 1553-1603 By Robert Lee Harkins A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Ethan Shagan, Chair Professor Jonathan Sheehan Professor David Bates Fall 2013 © Robert Lee Harkins 2013 All Rights Reserved 1 Abstract The Dilemma of Obedience: Persecution, Dissimulation, and Memory in Early Modern England, 1553-1603 by Robert Lee Harkins Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Berkeley Professor Ethan Shagan, Chair This study examines the problem of religious and political obedience in early modern England. Drawing upon extensive manuscript research, it focuses on the reign of Mary I (1553-1558), when the official return to Roman Catholicism was accompanied by the prosecution of Protestants for heresy, and the reign of Elizabeth I (1558-1603), when the state religion again shifted to Protestantism. I argue that the cognitive dissonance created by these seesaw changes of official doctrine necessitated a society in which religious mutability became standard operating procedure. For most early modern men and women it was impossible to navigate between the competing and contradictory dictates of Tudor religion and politics without conforming, dissimulating, or changing important points of conscience and belief. Although early modern theologians and polemicists widely declared religious conformists to be shameless apostates, when we examine specific cases in context it becomes apparent that most individuals found ways to positively rationalize and justify their respective actions. This fraught history continued to have long-term effects on England’s religious, political, and intellectual culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Romans in Cumbria
    View across the Solway from Bowness-on-Solway. Cumbria Photo Hadrian’s Wall Country boasts a spectacular ROMANS IN CUMBRIA coastline, stunning rolling countryside, vibrant cities and towns and a wealth of Roman forts, HADRIAN’S WALL AND THE museums and visitor attractions. COASTAL DEFENCES The sites detailed in this booklet are open to the public and are a great way to explore Hadrian’s Wall and the coastal frontier in Cumbria, and to learn how the arrival of the Romans changed life in this part of the Empire forever. Many sites are accessible by public transport, cycleways and footpaths making it the perfect place for an eco-tourism break. For places to stay, downloadable walks and cycle routes, or to find food fit for an Emperor go to: www.visithadrianswall.co.uk If you have enjoyed your visit to Hadrian’s Wall Country and want further information or would like to contribute towards the upkeep of this spectacular landscape, you can make a donation or become a ‘Friend of Hadrian’s Wall’. Go to www.visithadrianswall.co.uk for more information or text WALL22 £2/£5/£10 to 70070 e.g. WALL22 £5 to make a one-off donation. Published with support from DEFRA and RDPE. Information correct at time Produced by Anna Gray (www.annagray.co.uk) of going to press (2013). Designed by Andrew Lathwell (www.lathwell.com) The European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development: Europe investing in Rural Areas visithadrianswall.co.uk Hadrian’s Wall and the Coastal Defences Hadrian’s Wall is the most important Emperor in AD 117.
    [Show full text]