Full NAT FASID AOP.Doc Appendix A-12 NAT FASID Part III-AOP

Home , Simiutaq (Kujalleq), Simiutaq Island

WORKING COPY OF

NORTH ATLANTIC AIR NAVIGATION PLAN

FASID, DOC 9635

RECORD OF AMENDMENTS

Note: A consolidated text of this section, containing the following approved amendments to the NAT FASID, will be officially disseminated on an annual basis. This document is produced solely as reference material to assist States in the preparation of proposals for amendment to the NAT FASID.

AMENDMENTS

P. f. Amdt. Originator Date Date P. f. Amdt. Originator Date Date Serial No. Notified Entered Serial No. Approved Entered EUR/NAT-F 06/10 Sec Gen 23/12/2008 23/12/2008 EUR/NAT-F 08/07 Denmark 27/11/2008 23/12/2008 EUR/NAT-F 08/06 Portugal 25/05/2009 25/05/2009 EUR/NAT-F 10/21 Sec Gen 09/07/2010 30/08/2010 EUR/NAT-F 11/11 Ireland 06/05/2011 06/05/2011 EUR/NAT-F 12/05 Iceland, 02/04/2012 13/04/2012 IATA, Sec Gen EUR/NAT-F 13/37 Sec Gen 25/10/2013 25/10/2013

NAT ANP Oct 2013 Working Copy A-1 NAT FASID

NORTH ATLANTIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES IMPLEMENTATION DOCUMENT (FASID), DOC 9635

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction ...... A-3

Part I — Statement of Basic Operational Requirements and Planning Criteria (BORPC) – FASID ...... A-4 ......

Part II — General planning aspects (GEN) General ...... A-5 Air Navigation Systems Planning And Production Of Supporting Statistical Data On Future Traffic Demand ...... A...... -5 NAT Service Development Roadmap ...... A-5...... Forecasts Of Aircraft Movements In The ICAO North Atlantic Region ...... A-6 North Atlantic Traffic Forecasts - Aircraft Movements: 1990-2010 ...... A-7 North Atlantic Scheduled Flights 2000-2004 ...... A-8 . Long-Term Forecasts Of Aircraft Movements In The ICAO North Atlantic Region ...... A-9 ..... North Atlantic Traffic Forecasts – Aircraft Movements: 1990-2010 ...... A-10

Part III — Aerodrome Operations (AOP) Introduction ...... A-11 Aerodrome facilities and services ...... A-11 Runway surface condition information ...... A-11...... Aerodrome emergency planning ...... A-12 Table AOP 1- Physical Characteristics, Radio And Visual Aids At Aerodromes ...... A-13...... Chart AOP 1 - Index of Aerodromes ...... A...... -19 Attachment A - Measuring And Reporting Of Runway State Information ...... A-20

Part IV — Communications - Navigation - Surveillance (CNS) General ...... A -24 Table CNS 1A - AFTN Plan ...... A -25 Chart CNS 1A - Rationalized AFTN plan ...... A -28 Table CNS 1B - ATS direct speech circuits plan...... A -29 Chart CNS 1B - ATS speech circuits and switches...... A -31 Table CNS 2A - Aeronautical mobile service and AMSS ...... A -32 Chart CNS 2A - NAT VHF air/ground communications coverage at FL300 ...... A -35 Table CNS 3 - Table of radio navigation aids ...... A -36 Chart CNS 3A - En-route radio navigation aids ...... A -40 Chart CNS 3B - Aids to Final Approach and Landing...... A -41 Table CNS 4 - Surveillance systems ...... A -42 Chart CNS 4A - Radar Surveillance (To be developed) ...... A -44 Chart CNS 4B - ADS-B (To be developed)...... A -45 Table CNS 5 - ATS Data Circuits Plan ...... A -46 Chart CNS 5 - ATS Data Circuits Plan ...... A -48

Part V — Air Traffic Management (ATM) HF VOLMET Broadcasts ...... A-49 Table ATS 2 - HF VOLMET Broadcasts ...... A-50 ...... Chart ATS 2 - Area Control Service ...... A...... -53

NAT FASID IntroBORPCGEN.doc Appendix A-2 NAT FASID

Part VI — Meteorology (MET)1 Introduction ...... A-54 Meteorological service required at aerodromes and requirements for Meteorological Watch Offices ...... A-54 Exchange of operational meteorological information ...... A-54 Tropical Cyclone And Volcanic Ash Advisory Centres ...... A-54 World Area Forecast System (WAFS) ...... A-55...... Table MET 1A - Meteorological Service Required at Aerodromes ...... A-56 Chart MET 1 - AFTN Routing Areas ...... A-...... 58 Table MET 1B - Meteorological Watch Offices ...... A-59 Table MET 2A – OPMET Information (METAR, SPECI and TAF) required in ISCS & SADIS ...... A-61 Table MET 2B – Exchange requirements for SIGMET, Volcanic Ash and Tropical Cyclone Advisories, and Special Air Reports for which SIGMET has not been issued ...... A...... -63 Table MET 3A - Tropical Cyclone Advisory Centres ...... A-64 Chart MET 3A - Tropical Cyclone Advisory Centres ...... A-66 Table MET 3B - Volcanic Ash Advisory Centres ...... A-67 Chart MET 3B – Areas of Responsibilities of the VAAC’s ...... A-69...... Table MET 3C – Selected States Volcano Observatories...... A-70 Table MET 4 - Regional Telecommunications Schemes ...... A...... -72 Table MET 5 - Requirements for WAFS Forecasts ...... A-73

Part VII — Search And Rescue Services (SAR) Introduction ...... A-75 Search And Rescue Services ...... A-75 Table SAR 1 - Search and Rescue Facilities ...... A-76 ..

Part VIII — Aeronautical Information Services (AIS) Introduction ...... A-78 International NOTAM offices (NOFs) ...... A-78...... Table AIS 1 - Designated International NOTAM Offices (NoF) in the NAT Region ...... A-79 .... Chart AIS 1 - International NOTAM Offices and Area of Responsibility...... A-80

1 As per approved amendment proposal EUR/NAT-F 10/21-NAT A-3 Appendix Introduction NAT FASID

INTRODUCTION - FASID

1. This second volume of the Air Navigation Plan (ANP) constitutes the NAT Facilities and Services Implementation Document (FASID) and accompanies the NAT Basic ANP. The background to the publication of air navigation plans in two volumes (Basic ANP and FASID) is explained in the introduction to the NAT Basic ANP. This FASID may only be amended according to the procedure approved by the ICAO Council as shown in the introductory part of the NAT Basic ANP.

2. This FASID contains the details of the facilities and services to be provided in order to fulfill the basic requirements of the plan and are as agreed between the provider and user States concerned. Such agreement indicates a commitment on the part of the State(s) concerned to implement the requirement(s) specified. The elements of the FASID are kept under constant review by the North Atlantic Systems Planning Group (NAT SPG) in accordance with its schedule of management, in consultation with user and provider States, and with the assistance of the ICAO European and North Atlantic Office.

3. The Standards, Recommended Practices and Procedures to be applied and related guidance material for each part of the FASID (i.e. GEN, AOP, CNS, ATM, MET, SAR and AIS) are as listed in the equivalent parts of the Basic ANP. The BORPC in Part I of the NAT Basic ANP is also taken into consideration in the overall planning processes for the NAT region.

NAT FASID IntroBORPCGEN.doc Appendix A-4 NAT FASID Part I-BORPC

PART I

STATEMENT OF BASIC OPERATION REQUIREMENTS AND PLANNING CRITERIA (BORPC)

1. The facilities and services set out in this FASID have been developed by the regional planning process referred to in the NAT Basic ANP. The Basic Operational Requirements and Planning Criteria contained in the basic ANP and agreed by the ICAO Air Navigation Commission is the cornerstone of that process.

2. Additional planning requirements that are identified as being NAT Region specific will be included in this section.

NAT FASID IntroBORPCGEN.doc A-5 Appendix Part II-GEN NAT FASID

PART II

GENERAL PLANNING ASPECTS (GEN)

GENERAL

1. The material in this Part complements that contained in the NAT ANP and should be taken into consideration in the overall planning processes for the NAT Region. As indicated in paragraph 1, Part II — GEN of the North Atlantic Air Navigation Plan, forecasts for the NAT Region are prepared on an annual basis by the North Atlantic Traffic Forecasting Group (NAT TFG).

2. The following summarized information and the data contained in the attachments to this Part are updated biennially and are not subject to the amendment procedure outlined in page 0-2 of this document.

AIR NAVIGATION SYSTEMS PLANNING AND PRODUCTION OF SUPPORTING STATISTICAL DATA ON FUTURE TRAFFIC DEMAND

3. The major task of the NAT TFG is to update the NAT annual and peak period forecasts. To this end, the estimates of the previous year's data concerning passengers and flights in the region are used as the base for the preparation of the annual forecasts. In addition, the Group prepares long-term forecasts extending to the year 2020. These long-term forecasts are normally reviewed every four years.

4. Figures showing the actual and projected traffic growth for aircraft movements in the region are contained in the Attachments to this part. Full details on the forecasting exercise which resulted in these figures may be found in the Report of the 34th Meeting of the NAT TFG (Montreal, 19 to 28 April 2004) and the NAT Air Traffic Forecasts for the years: 2004-2010, 2015, 2010 and 2020. Tabulations of the medium- term and long-term forecasts, up to the year 2020 are as follows.

NAT SERVICE DEVELOPMENT ROADMAP

5. The mapping of the NAT Region implementation initiatives with the ICAO Global Air Navigation Plan (Doc 9750) and Aviation System Block Upgrades (ASBU) modules are outlined in the NAT Service Development Roadmap (NAT SDR) (NAT Doc 009). This document outlines the major NAT programmes and timelines for their implementation. The NAT SDR is supported by executive summaries of the NAT programmes with links to more detailed programme documentation.

Note: the NAT Service Development Roadmap (NAT SDR) (NAT Doc 009) can be found at www.paris.icao.int under “EUR & NAT Documents”.

NAT FASID IntroBORPCGEN.doc Appendix A-6 NAT FASID Part II-GEN

FORECASTS OF AIRCRAFT MOVEMENTS IN THE ICAO NORTH ATLANTIC REGION (THOUSANDS)

ACTUAL FORECAST

SCENARIO 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002R 2003e 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

OPTIMISTIC 379.5 410.5 435.2 459.2 481.7 504.4 524.7

BASELINE 281.5 302.8 313.9 338.4 365.0 382.0 368.9 344.3 353.6 372.9 398.5 417.9 435.9 451.9 468.4 486.5

PESSIMISTIC 365.4 374.1 387.0 400.9 411.7 423.3 435.4

ANNUAL PERCENTAGE CHANGE IN AIRCRAFT MOVEMENTS

ACTUAL FORECAST 1996/9 1997/9 1998/9 1999/9 2000/9 2001/0 2002/0 2003/0 2004/0 2005/0 2006/0 2007/0 2008/0 2009/0 2010 SCENARIO 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 /09 OPTIMISTIC 7.3% 8.2% 6.0% 5.5% 4.9% 4.7% 4.0%

BASELINE 7.6% 3.7% 7.8% 7.9% 4.7% -3.4% -6.7% 2.7% 5.5% 6.9% 4.9% 4.3% 3.7% 3.7% 3.9%

PESSIMISTIC 3.3% 2.4% 3.4% 3.6% 2.7% 2.8% 2.9%

e = Estimate R = Revised

NAT FASID IntroBORPCGEN.doc A-7 Appendix Part II-GEN NAT FASID

NORTH ATLANTIC TRAFFIC FORECASTS AIRCRAFT MOVEMENTS: 1990-2010

600 Low - April 2004 Forecast Base - April 2004 Forecast 500 FORECAST High - April 2004 Forecast

400

300 ACTUAL

200 Movements(thousands) 100

0 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 Calendar Years

NAT FASID IntroBORPCGEN.doc Appendix A-8 NAT FASID Part II-GEN

NORTH ATLANTIC SCHEDULED FLIGHTS 2000-2004 2000 28000 2001 2002 26000 2003 24000 2004

22000 Flights

20000

18000

16000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

1/00 through 9/03 - Actual Data Month 10/03 through 12/04 - NAT TFG Estimates

NAT FASID IntroBORPCGEN.doc A-9 Appendix Part II-GEN NAT FASID

LONG-TERM FORECASTS OF AIRCRAFT MOVEMENTS IN THE ICAO NORTH ATLANTIC REGION (THOUSANDS)

ACTUAL FORECAST

SCENARIO 2000 2001 2002R 2003e 2005 2010 2015 2020

OPTIMISTIC 410.5 524.7 644.4 777.7

BASELINE 382.0 368.9 344.3 353.6 398.5 486.5 583.9 688.1

PESSIMISTIC 374.1 435.4 504.8 580.4

AVERAGE PERCENTAGE CHANGE IN AIRCRAFT MOVEMENTS PER ANNUM

ACTUAL FORECAST

SCENARIO 2000/99 2001/00 2002/01 2003/02 2005/2003 2010/05 2015/10 2020/15

OPTIMISTIC 7.7% 5.0% 4.2% 3.8%

BASELINE 4.7% -3.4% -6.7% 2.7% 6.2% 4.1% 3.7% 3.3%

PESSIMISTIC 2.9% 3.1% 3.0% 2.8%

e = Estimate R = Revised

NAT FASID IntroBORPCGEN.doc Appendix A-10 NAT FASID Part II-GEN

NORTH ATLANTIC TRAFFIC FORECASTS AIRCRAFT MOVEMENTS: 1990-2020

900 Low - April 2004 Forecast 800 Base - April 2004 Forecast 700 High - April 2004 Forecast FORECAST 600

500

400

300

200

ACTUAL Movements(thousands) 100

0 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 Calendar Years

NAT FASID IntroBORPCGEN.doc A-11 Appendix Part III-AOP NAT FASID

Part III

AERODROME OPERATIONS (AOP)

INTRODUCTION

1. The Standards, Recommended Practices and Procedures to be applied and related guidance material are as listed in paragraph 1, Part III — AOP of the NAT ANP. The material in this part complements that contained Part I — BORPC of the Basic ANP and should be taken into consideration in the overall planning processes for the NAT Region.

2. This part contains the details of the facilities and/or services to be provided to fulfill the basic requirements of the plan and/or as agreed between the provider and user States concerned. Such agreement indicates a commitment on the part of the State(s) concerned to implement the requirement(s) specified. This element of the FASID, in conjunction with the NAT Basic ANP, is kept under constant review by the NATSPG in accordance with its schedule of management, in consultation with user and provider States and with the assistance of the ICAO European and North Atlantic Office, Paris.

AERODROME FACILITIES AND SERVICES [FASID Table AOP 1]

3. Table AOP 1 shows the requirements for physical characteristics, radio and visual aids as well as other facilities and services to be provided at each aerodrome included in the NAT ANP (see also paragraph 2). The explanation preceding Table AOP 1 provides a detailed description of the data included in the Table.

4. Pertinent information or comments on specific requirements or identification of particular issues affecting the provision of a system and target dates for the implementation of a facility/service may be shown as “Remarks” (in italics) in the Table.

Note.— When no information or requirement has been shown or agreed upon, the related entry(ies) in FASID Table AOP 1 is(are) omitted.

RUNWAY SURFACE CONDITION INFORMATION

5. States should publish information on the runway surface friction characteristics such as skid-resistant treatment, etc., for the guidance of the operators. The runway friction characteristics should be maintained at acceptable levels, measured using continuous friction measuring equipment and the measured values published. Information on publishing runway surface characteristics as specified in Annex 14, Volume I, 2.9 are available in Annex 15 and Airport Services Manual (Doc 9137), Part 2.

6. Measuring and reporting of runway state information should be done at airports in Iceland in a non- meteorological eight-figure code group added to all routine and selected special aerodrome meteorological reports in accordance with Attachment A.

NF06-10 - YZ - Full NAT FASID AOP.doc Appendix A-12 NAT FASID Part III-AOP

AERODROME EMERGENCY PLANNING

7. Every aerodrome should establish a comprehensive aerodrome emergency plan and test the plan by carrying out full-scale emergency exercises every two years and partial exercises during the intervening period. Guidance on aerodrome emergency planning is available in Airport Services Manual (Doc 9137), Part 7.

NF06-10 - YZ - Full NAT FASID AOP.doc A-13 Appendix Part III-AOP NAT FASID

TABLE AOP 1 — PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS, RADIO AND VISUAL AIDS AT AERODROMES

EXPLANATION OF THE TABLE

Table AOP 1 shows the operational requirements for physical characteristics, radio navigation aids, visual aids and runway visual range (RVR) at each aerodrome.

Columns 5 to 9 for physical characteristics relate to runways and taxiways. The physical characteristics of taxiways and aprons should be appropriate for the runways with which they are related.

Columns 4 and 10 to 13 show the requirements for air traffic services, radio and visual aids and reporting the RVR for the runway with which the entry is associated. These aids are generally indicated by “x” and the “x” indicates that the aid should be in accordance with the type of runway (Column 7). If the aid is different from the type of runway, then a “1”, “2” or “3” is entered to indicate Category I, II or III respectively.

Column

1 Name of the city and aerodrome, preceded by the location indicator.

Note.— When the aerodrome is located on an island and no particular city or town is served by the aerodrome, the name of the island is included instead of the name of a city.

Designation of the aerodrome as:

RS — international scheduled air transport, regular use; RNS — international non-scheduled air transport, regular use; RG — international general aviation, regular use; and AS — international scheduled air transport, alternate use.

When an aerodrome is needed for more than one type of use, normally only the use highest on the above list is shown. An exception is that AS aerodromes are identified even when they are required for regular use by international non-scheduled air transport or international general aviation, as some specifications in Annex 14, Volume I, place special requirements on these aerodromes.

Example 1 — An aerodrome required for both RS and RG use would only be shown as RS in the list.

Example 2 — An aerodrome required for both RS and AS use would only be shown as RS in the list. However, Table AOP 1 may still show specific requirements for AS use.

2 Alternate aerodromes for the regular aerodromes listed in Column 1, or if the aerodrome listed in Column 1 serves only as an alternate, the regular aerodromes for which it is an alternate. The aerodrome is shown by listing the name of the city, preceded by the location indicator.

3 Required Rescue and Fire Fighting Service (RFF):

The required level of protection expressed by means of an Aerodrome RFF Category Number, in accordance with Annex 14, Volume I, Chapter 1, 1.6.

NF06-10 - YZ - Full NAT FASID AOP.doc Appendix A-14 NAT FASID Part III-AOP

4 ATS — Air traffic services.

APP — Approach control service. An “X” indicates that the service should be provided and when an “R” is shown it indicates that the service should be provided with radar.

TWR — Aerodrome control tower. An “X” indicates that the service should be provided and when an “R” is shown it indicates that the service should be provided with an aerodrome surface movement radar.

ATIS — Automatic terminal information service. An “X” indicates that the service should be provided.

AFIS — Aerodrome flight information service. An “X” indicates that the service should be provided.

5 Runway designation numbers.

6 Aerodrome reference code for aerodrome characteristics expressed in accordance with Annex 14, Volume I, Chapter 1.

7 Type of each of the runways to be provided. The types of runways, as defined in Annex 14, Volume I, Chapter 1, are:

NINST — non-instrument runway;

NPA — non-precision approach runway; PA1 — precision approach runway, Category I; PA2 — precision approach runway, Category II; PA3 — precision approach runway, Category III.

8 Taxiway (TWY) to be provided to threshold of associated runway.

9 Required runway length expressed in terms of a balanced field length. In planning, account is taken of local conditions. If the requirement for alternate use is more critical, the aircraft type and runway length required are also indicated below the abbreviation “AS”.

Critical aircraft for pavement strength and required pavement strength expressed as the all-up mass in thousands of kilograms. The operational mass of an aircraft, such as the A3XX, B747 and MD11, which may have a bearing on the design of culverts, cable ducts, bridge overpasses, etc., is also shown. If the aircraft requiring the aerodrome for alternate use is more critical, the aircraft type and runway strength required are also indicated below the abbreviation “AS”.

Note 1.— A specific aircraft model based on the best available sources of information should be selected for planning runway length as this requirement is particularly affected by aircraft model differences. Aircraft models should thus be reviewed carefully to see that the correct one is used in determining the aerodrome characteristics. The Air Navigation Commission has directed that RAN meetings provide in the plan as realistic figures as possible on runway length and pavement strength requirements at individual aerodromes.

Note 2.— For international general aviation aerodromes, when there is no requirement for the runway to be paved, the pavement strength may be shown as “UNPAV”.

NF06-10 - YZ - Full NAT FASID AOP.doc A-15 Appendix Part III-AOP NAT FASID

Note 3.— Should a requirement for more than one runway be indicated for an aerodrome, the lengths of the secondary runways should be planned as appropriate. A specification concerning the lengths of such runways will be found in Annex 14, Volume I, Chapter 3, 3.1.7.

Note 4.— When the length or pavement strength is not a current requirement, the year in which it will be required is entered.

10 Radio navigation aids (approach and landing);

ILS — Instrument landing system, shown against the runway to be served and indicated by an “x” if the ILS is the same category as the runway type (Column 7)or if it is different, by a numeral 1, 2 or 3 to indicate a Facility Performance Category I, II or III respectively. The addition of a “D” indicates that a distance measuring equipment (DME) should be provided, e.g. as a substitute for marker beacon components of the required ILS. An “*” indicates that the ILS provides Category II signal quality, but without continuity of service provided by redundant equipment and automatic change-over.

VOR — Very high frequency omni-directional radio range. An "x" indicates that the aid should be provided. The addition of a “D” indicates that a DME is associated with the required VOR facility.

NDB/L — Non directional beacon, or locator. An “x” indicates that one of the aids should be provided.

GNSS — Global Navigation Satellite System, shown against the runway to be served and indicated by an “x” if the GNSS supports the same category as the runway type or, it if is different, by an appropriate designator followed by the letter G or S to indicate ground-based augmentation system (GBAS) or satellite-based augmentation system (SBAS), as appropriate.

11 Lighting aids

PA — Precision approach lighting system, Category I, II or III shown by an “x” if the aid is the same category as the runway type (Column 7) or if it is different by the numeral 1, 2 or 3 against the runway to be served, to indicate the type of system required.

SA — Simple approach lighting system, shown by an “x” against the runway to be served.

VA — Visual approach slope indicator system, shown by an “L” or an “S” against the runway to be served. The letter “L” indicates that the system should be PAPI or T-VASIS (AT-VASIS) and the letter “S” indicates that the system should be PAPI (APAPI).

RWY — Runway edge, threshold and runway end lighting. An “x” indicates that these aids should be provided.

CLL — Runway centre line lighting, shown by an “x” against the runway to be served.

TDZ — Runway touchdown zone lighting, shown by an “x” against the runway to be served.

TE — Taxiway edge lighting. An “x” indicates that the aid should be provided. This requirement pertains to the entire aerodrome and only one entry is made when planning requirements for more than one runway are shown.

TC — Taxiway centre line lighting. An “x” indicates that this should be provided for the particular runway with which the entry is associated.

NF06-10 - YZ - Full NAT FASID AOP.doc Appendix A-16 NAT FASID Part III-AOP

STB — Sop bars. An “x” indicates that stop bars should be provided for the runway with which the entry is associated.

B — Aerodrome or identification beacon. An “x” indicates that the aid should be provided. This requirement pertains to the entire aerodrome and only one entry is made.

12 Marking aids

DES — Runway designation marking, shown by an “x” against the runway to be served.

CLM — Runway centre line marking. An “x” indicates that the aid should be provided.

THR — Runway threshold marking, shown by an “x” against the runway to be served.

TDZ — Runway touchdown zone marking, shown by an “x” against the runway to be served.

SST — Runway side stripe marking. An “x” indicates that the aid should be provided.

AMG — Aiming point marking, shown by an “x” against the runway to be served.

TWY — Taxiway centre line and, where required, edge marking. An “x” indicates that the aid should be provided.

HLD — Taxiway holding position marking (renamed Runway holding position marking in Amendment No. 3 to Annex 14, Volume I), shown by an “x” against the runway to be served. The pattern of the marking should conform to the provisions of Annex 14, Volume I, Chapter 5, 5.2.9.

13 Runway visual range (RVR)

TDZ — Observations should be provided representative of the touchdown zone.

MID — Observations should be provided representative of the middle of the runway.

END — Observations should be provided representative of the end portion of the runway.

NF06-10 - YZ - Full NAT FASID AOP.doc A-17 Appendix Part III-AOP NAT FASID

TABLE AOP 1 — PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS, RADIO AND VISUAL AIDS AT AERODROMES

ATS Physical characteristics Radio aids Lighting Aids Marking Aids RVR City/Aerodrome/Use Alternate aerodromes RFF Rwy Rwy TW Runway length/ ND GN RW APP TWR ATIS AFIS RC ILS VOR PA SA VA AV CLL TDZ TE TC STB B DES CLM THR TDZ SST AMG TWY HLD TDZ MID END no Types Y Pavement Strength B/L SS Y 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 BERMUDA (United Kingdom) TXKF BERMUDA KBWI BALTIMORE ? ? ? ? ? 12 4E PA-1 B707-430 3720 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X RS KBOS BOSTON 30 B747 275 1? X X X X CYHZ HALIFAX KEWR NEWARK KJFK NEW YORK KPHL PHILADELPHIA KIAD WASHINGTON

GREENLAND (Denmark) BGSF KANGERLUSSUAQ CYYR GOOSE (1) 5 R X 10 A? PA-1 DC8-60 2810 X X X S X X X X X X X X X X X RS BIKF KEFLAVIK 28 NINST DC8-60 136 X X X X X X X X X X

BGQQ QAANAAQ/ Qaanaaq 5 X 01 NPA DHC7 900 X X S X X X X RG 19 UNPAV S X X X

BGUK UPERNAVIK/Upernavik 5 X 06 NPA DHC7 799 X S X X X X X X X X X X X RG 24 PCN29 X S X X X X X X X X X X

BGJN ILULISSAT/Ilulissat 5 X 08 NPA DHC7 845 X X S X X X X X X X X X X X RG 26 PCN29 X S X X X X X X X X X X

BGAA AASIAAT/Aasiaat 5 X 12 NPA DHC7 799 X S X X X X X X X X X X X RG 30 PCN29 X S X X X X X X X X X X

BGSS SISIMIUT/Sisimiut 5 X 14 NPA DHC7 799 X S X X X X X X X X X X X RG 32 PCN29 X S X X X X X X X X X X

BGMQ MANITSOQ/Manitsoq 5 X 16 NPA DHC7 799 X S X X X X X X X X X X X RG 34 PCN29 X S X X X X X X X X X X

BGGH NUUK/Nuuk 5 X 05 NPA DHC7 950 X S X X X X X X X X X X X RG 23 PCN46 X S X X X X X X X X X X

BGBW NARSARSUAQ/Narsarsuaq 7 X 07 NPA B757 1830 X S X X X X X X X X X X X RG+ 25 PCN43 X X X X X X X X X X RNS

BGUQ UUMMANNAQ/QAARSUT/ 5 X 16 NPA DHC7 900 X S X X X X Uummannaq/Qaarsut ? 34 UNPAV S X X X X

BGKK KULUSUK/Kulusuk 5 X 11 NPA FK50 1199 X S X X X X RG+ 29 UNPAV S X X X RNS

BGCO NERLERIT INAAT/ 5 X 18 NPA FK50 1000 X X X X X Nerlerit Inaat RG+ 36 UNPAV X X X RNS

FAEROES (Denmark) EKVG VAGAR/Vagar EGPA KIRKWALL 6 X 13 B? PA-1 FK27 1500 X X S X X X X X X X X X RS BIRK REYKJAVIK 31 PA-1 FK27 19 X X S X X X X X X X X X

ICELAND

NF06-10 - YZ - Full NAT FASID AOP.doc Appendix A-18 NAT FASID Part III-AOP

ATS Physical characteristics Radio aids Lighting Aids Marking Aids RVR City/Aerodrome/Use Alternate aerodromes RFF Rwy Rwy TW Runway length/ ND GN RW APP TWR ATIS AFIS RC ILS VOR PA SA VA AV CLL TDZ TE TC STB B DES CLM THR TDZ SST AMG TWY HLD TDZ MID END no Types Y Pavement Strength B/L SS Y 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 BIAR AKUREYRI/Akureyri BIKF KEFLAVIK 5 - 7 R X 01 4 D NPA L1011 1940 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X OR AS BIRK REYKJAVIK 19 NPA B757/300 X X X X X X X

BIEG EGILSSTADIR/ BIKF KEFLAVIK 5 - 7 X 04 4 D PA-1 B747 2000 X X X X X X X X X X X X Egilsstadir OR AS BIRK REYKJAVIK 22 NPA X X X X X X X X X

BIKF KEFLAVIK/Keflavik BIAR AKUREYRI 9 R X X 11 4E PA-2 X 3065 X XD X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X RS ENBR BERGEN 29 PA-1 X X XD X X X X X X X X X X X X X ENGM OSLO B747 X X EGPK PRESTWICK 02 PA-1 X 3054 X XD X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X BIRK REYKJAVIK 20 PA-2 X X XD X X X X X X X X X X X X X X EINN SHANNON BGSF KANGERLUSSUAQ ENZY STAVANGER

BIRK REYKJAVIK/Reykjavik BIAR AKUREYRI 7 R X X 01 3 D NPA X B757/300 1627 X X X X X X X X X X X RS BIKF KEFLAVIK 19 PA-1 X X X X X X X X X 13 NPA 1290 X X X X X 31 NPA X X X X X X X 06 NINST X X X X 24 NINST 960 X X X X

NORWAY ENSB SVALBARD/Longyear 10 4C PA-1 TU154 2201/90 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? RNS 6 X 28 NPA

ACORES (Portugal) LPPD PONTA DELGADA/ LPAZ SANTA MARIA 6/PA X X 12 NINST B707-300B 100 X X X X X Sao Miguel I. RS 30 PA-1 B707-300B 94 X X X X X X X X X X

LPAZ SANTA MARIA/Santa Maria I. LPFR FARO 6/PA X X 36 NPA B707-300B 2630 X X X X X X X X X X X RS LPPT LISBOA 18 PA-1 X B707-300B 128 X X X X X X X X X LEMD MADRID B747 300 LPPD PONTA DELGADA LPPS PORTO SANTO

NF06-10 - YZ - Full NAT FASID AOP.doc A-19 Appendix Part III-AOP NAT FASID

CHART AOP 1 – INDEX OF AERODROMES

[Editorial note: Old Chart AOP 1 to be amended as follows: 1. LEGEND: Categories to be shown: RS, RNS, RG, AS 2. Bodo Oceanic FIR to be added 3. Norway: Aerodrome Svalbard/Longyear (7815N 01528E) to be added.]

NF06-10 - YZ - Full NAT FASID AOP.doc Appendix A-20 NAT FASID Part III-AOP

Attachment A — AOP

MEASURING AND REPORTING OF RUNWAY STATE INFORMATION

COMPOSITION OF RUNWAY STATE MESSAGE

1. Information of runway conditions should be expressed by means of the figure group DRDRERCReReRBRBR where:

DRDR denotes the runway designator

ER denotes the runway deposits

CR denotes the extent of runway contamination

eReR denotes the depth of deposit

BRBR denotes the friction coefficient or braking action

2. The following instructions govern the composition and use of this eight-figure group:

Runway designator (DRDR)

This should be expressed as two digits corresponding to runway designator, e.g. 09, 27, 35, etc. At locations where there are parallel runways, “left” runways should be shown as already expressed, e.g. 09, 27, 35, etc., “right” runways should be expressed by adding numerically 50 to these figures, e.g. 59, 77, 85, etc. For example, 27L is shown as 27; 27R is shown as 77. When it is intended to indicate “all runways” the figure 88 should be used.

Note 1.- The digits 99 are used under certain circumstances as described in paragraph 3 below.

Note 2.- The information to be included in runway state messages should be for the main instrument runway or runway(s) in use. When parallel runways are in use, information on both runways should be included or, where this is not possible, the information given should not alternate between the two runways, but should be given for the runway with the best surface conditions.

Runway deposits (ER)

This should be expressed as a single digit as follows:

0 — Clear and dry 1 — Damp 2 — Wet or water patches 3 — Rime or frost covered (depth normally less than 1 mm) 4 — Dry snow 5 — Wet snow 6 — Slush 7 — Ice 8 — Compacted or rolled snow 9 — Frozen ruts or ridges / — Type of deposit not reported (e.g. due to runway clearance in progress).

NF06-10 - YZ - Full NAT FASID AOP.doc A-21 Appendix Part III-AOP NAT FASID

Extent of runway contamination (CR)

This should be expressed as a single digit in accordance with the following scale:

1 — less than 10 per cent of runway contaminated (covered) 2 — 11 per cent to 25 per cent of runway contaminated (covered) 5 — 26 per cent to 50 per cent of runway contaminated (covered) 9 — 51 per cent to 100 per cent of runway contaminated (covered) / — not reported (e.g. due to runway clearance in progress).

Depth of deposit (eReR)

This should be denoted by two digits in accordance with the following scale:

00 — less than 1 mm 01 — 1 mm 02 — 2 mm etc. 10 — 10 mm etc. 15 — 15 mm etc. 20 — 20 mm etc. up to 90 — 90 mm

thereafter:

92 — 10 cm 93 — 15 cm 94 — 20 cm 95 — 25 cm 96 — 30 cm 97 — 35 cm 98 — 40 cm or more 99 — meaning runway or runways non-operational due to snow, slush, ice, large drifts or runway clearance, but depth not reported // — depth of deposit operationally not significant or not measurable.

Note 1.— This does not necessarily require depth to be measured to a millimetre unit. Larger intervals up to 90 can be expressed by using the above direct-reading scale.

Note 2.— Where depth is measured at a number of points along a runway, the average value should be transmitted or, if operationally significant, the highest value.

Note 3.— Code Figure 91 is not used. Code Figures 92 to 98 permit the depth of deposit (in cm) to be derived by multiplying the last digit by 5 (e.g. 94 = 4 x 5 = 20).

Note 4.— If deposits of the type reported by the code figures 3, 7, 8 and 9 of code ER are reported, the depth of deposits is normally not significant and two oblique strokes (//) should be reported. Similarly, the depth of standing water should only be reported if an accurate and representative measurement is guaranteed.

Friction coefficient or braking action (BRBR)

NF06-10 - YZ - Full NAT FASID AOP.doc Appendix A-22 NAT FASID Part III-AOP

This should be denoted by two digits corresponding to the friction coefficient or, if not available, the estimated braking action, in accordance with the following:

a) Friction coefficient

Use the reported values, e.g:

28 — friction coefficient 0.28 35 — friction coefficient 0.35 etc.

b) Braking action

Use the following figures:

95 — good 94 — medium/good 93 — medium 92 — medium/poor 91 — poor 99 — unreliable // — braking conditions not reported, runway not operational.

Note 1.— Where braking action is assessed at a number of points along a runway, the mean value should be transmitted or, if operationally significant, the lowest value.

Note 2.— If measuring equipment does not allow measurement of friction with satisfactory reliability, which may be the case when a runway is contaminated by wet snow, slush or loose snow, the figure 99 should be reported.

Note 3.— If the braking conditions cannot be reported (e.g. due to runway clearance in progress, runway not operational, runway conditions not watched during airport closure, etc.), two oblique strokes (//) should be entered.

ISSUE OF RUNWAY STATE MESSAGES

3. The occasion may arise when a new report or a valid report is not available in time for dissemination over MOTNE with the appropriate METAR message. In this case, the previous runway state report will be repeated; this should be indicated by inserting 99 in place of the runway designator (DRDR). This procedure, however, should be an exceptional occurence. Consecutive use of group 99 should be avoided as much as possible.

Example: 99421594 means dry snow covering 11 per cent to 25 per cent of runway, depth 15 mm, braking action medium to good; this is a repetition of the previous report since no new report or valid report was available in time for insertion in the MOTNE.

4. If a runway is being cleared from ice, snow, slush, etc., this shall be reported as follows: DRDR//99//.

Example: 14//99// = RWY 14 non-operational due to runway clearance in progress.

NF06-10 - YZ - Full NAT FASID AOP.doc A-23 Appendix Part III-AOP NAT FASID

5. If runways are contaminated but runway reports are not available or are not updated due to aerodrome closure or curfew, etc., this should be reported as follows: DRDR//////.

Examples: 14//////; 88//////.

6. If contamination conditions on a single runway or on all runways at an aerodrome have ceased to exist, this should be reported as follows: DRDR CLRD//.

Examples: 14CLRD//; 88CLRD//.

If the cessation of contamination conditions on all runways at an aerodrome is reported by 88CLRD//, this means that no further runway state information will be sent over the MOTNE unless contamination conditions recur.

NF06-10 - YZ - Full NAT FASID AOP.doc Appendix A-24 NAT FASID Part IV-CNS

Part IV

COMMUNICATIONS - NAVIGATION - SURVEILLANCE (CNS)

GENERAL

1. The Standards, Recommended Practices and Procedures to be applied and related guidance material are as listed in paragraph 1, Part IV CNS of the of the NAT Basic ANP. The material in this part complements that contained in Part I Statement of Basic Operational Requirements and Planning Criteria of the Basic ANP and should be taken into consideration in the overall planning processes for the NAT Region.

2. This part contains the details of the facilities and services to be provided to fulfill the basic requirements of the plan and are as agreed between the provider and user States concerned. Such agreement indicates a commitment on the part of the State(s) concerned to implement the requirement(s) specified. This element of the FASID, in conjunction with the NAT ANP, is kept under constant review by the NAT SPG in accordance with its schedule of management, in consultation with user and provider States and with the assistance of the ICAO European and North Atlantic Office, Paris.

3. Detailed information on HF en-route radiotelephony network operation for the NAT Region is contained in the HF Management Guidance Material (NAT Doc 003).

NAT FASID CNS+F11-11CNS.doc A-25 Appendix Part IV-CNS NAT FASID

TABLE CNS 1A — AFTN PLAN

EXPLANATION OF THE TABLE

Column

1 AFTN Centres/Stations of each State are listed alphabetically. Each circuit appears twice in the table. The categories of these facilities are as follows:

M — Main AFTN COM Centre T — Tributary AFTN COM Centre S — AFTN Station

2 Category of circuit:

M — Main trunk circuit connecting Main AFTN communication centres. T — Tributary circuit connecting Main AFTN communication centre and Tributary AFTN Communications Centre. S — AFTN circuit connecting an AFTN Station to an AFTN Communication Centre.

3 and 7 Type of circuit provided:

LTT/a — Landline teletypewriter, analogue (e.g. cable, microwave) LTT/d — Landline teletypewriter, digital (e.g. cable, microwave) LDD/a — Landline data circuit, analogue (e.g. cable, microwave) LDD/d — Landline data circuit, digital (e.g. cable, microwave) SAT/a/d — Satellite link, with /a for analogue or /d for digital

4 and 8 Circuit signalling speed, current or planned in bits/s.

5 and 9 Circuit protocols, current or planned.

6 and 10 Data transfer code (syntax), current or planned:

ITA-2 — International Telegraph Alphabet No. 2 (5-unit Baudot code). IA-5 — International Alphabet No. 5 (ICAO 7-unit code). CBI — Code and Byte Independency (ATN compliant).

11 Target date of implementation

TBD — To be determined I — Implemented

12 Remarks

Note.— Due to loading factor considerations, 150 bits/s is required as minimum.

NAT FASID CNS+F11-11CNS.doc Appendix A-26 NAT FASID Part IV-CNS

TABLE CNS 1A — AFTN PLAN

Current Planned Target State/Station Category Signalling Signalling Remarks Type Procotol Code Type Protocol Code date speed speed 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 BERMUDA Bermuda-? ? ? ? ? ?

CANADA Ottawa-M Kangerlussuaq M LDD/d 9600 CIDIN IA-5 Reykjavik M LDD/d 9600 CIDIN IA-5 London A M LDD/d 9600 X.25 IA-5 London C M LDD/d 9600 X.25 1A-5 Atlanta M LDD/d 9600 X.25 1A-5 Salt Lake City M LDD/d 9600 X.25 1A-5

FAEROES (Denmark) Vagar-S Copenhagen M LDD/d 9600 CIDIN IA-5

GREENLAND (Denmark) Kangerlussuaq-M Copenhagen M LDD/d 9600 CIDIN IA-5 Reykjavik M SAT/d 9600 CIDIN IA-5

ICELAND Reykjavik-M Bergen M LDD/d 9600 CIDIN IA-5 London M SAT/a 9600 CIDIN IA-5 LDD/d 9600 CIDIN IA-5 2005

IRELAND London-A M LDD/a 9600 AFTN IA-5 LDD/d 64000 AFTN IA-5 2005 June London-B M LDD/a 9600 AFTN IA-5 LDD/d 64000 AFTN IA-5 2005 May Bordeaux M LDD/a 4800 AFTN IA-5

NAT FASID CNS+F11-11CNS.doc A-27 Appendix Part IV-CNS NAT FASID

Current Planned Target State/Station Category Signalling Signalling Remarks Type Procotol Code Type Protocol Code date speed speed 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

NORWAY Bergen-M Copenhagen M LDD/d 9600 CIDIN IA-5

PORTUGAL Lisboa-M Santa Maria M LDD/d 2400 AFTN IA-5

UNITED KINGDOM London-M Bergen M LDD/d 64000 CIDIN IA-5 Lisbon M LDD/d 9600 CIDIN IA-5

UNITED STATES ????-? ? ? ? ? ? ??

NAT FASID CNS+F11-11CNS.doc Appendix A-28 NAT FASID Part IV-CNS

CHART CNS 1A – RATIONALIZED AFTN PLAN FOR NAT REGION

[note: Old FASID Chart CNS 1 – Aeronautical Fixed Telecommunication Network (NAT) replaced by the following new Chart CNS 1A based on CARSAM model.]

NAT FASID CNS+F11-11CNS.doc A-29 Appendix Part IV-CNS NAT FASID

TABLE CNS 1B — ATS DIRECT SPEECH CIRCUITS PLAN

EXPLANATION OF THE TABLE

Column

1 and 2 Circuit terminal stations are listed alphabetically by the Terminal I.

3 A — indicates ATS requirement for the establishment of voice communication within 15 seconds. D — indicates requirements for instantaneous communications.

4 Type of service specified:

LTF — landline telephone (landline, cable, UHF, VHF, satellite). RTF — radiotelephone.

5 Type of circuits; Direct (DIR) or Switched (SW).

D — indicates a direct circuit connecting Terminals I and II. S — indicates that a direct circuit does not exist and that the connection is established via switching at the switching centre(s) indicated in column 6. IDD — International direct dialling by public switch telephone network

Note 1.— Number of D and/or S circuits between Terminals I and II are indicated by numerical prefix, i.e. 2 D/S means 2 direct circuits and one switched circuit.

Note 2.— Pending the implementation of proper ATS voice circuits, and provided that aeronautical operational requirements are met, IDD services may be used for the ATS voice communications in low traffic areas.

6 Location of switching centre(s). Alternate routing location, if available, is indicated in brackets.

7 Status of Implementation. Following codes are used in this column:

a) I — if the circuit is implemented.

Note 3.— If the circuit is implemented but there are short-term plans to establish it in other private/public network(s), the symbol I/P shall be introduced indicating in Column 8 — Remarks, the future network environment for the circuit.

b) No indication or mark if the circuit is not implemented and its implementation date is unknown.

c) If the circuit is not implemented but its implementation date is available, same is indicated in brackets.

8 Remarks

NAT FASID CNS+F11-11CNS.doc Appendix A-30 NAT FASID Part IV-CNS

TABLE CNS 1B — ATS DIRECT SPEECH CIRCUITS PLAN

ATS requirements for speech communications Circuit Status of To be implementatio Remarks Terminal I Terminal II Type Service D/S switched n via/ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 BODO STAVANGER A LTF D I MURMANSK A LTF IDD I REYKJAVÍK A LTF D I GANDER MONCTON A LTF D I MONTREAL A LTF D I NEW YORK A LTF D I PRESTWICK A LTF 2D I REYKJAVÍK A LTF 2D I SANTA MARIA A LTF S New York I SØNDRE STRØMFJORD A LTF D I NEW YORK BOSTON A LTF D ? I BERMUDA A LTF D I MONCTON A LTF D I SANTA MARIA A LTF 3D I WASHINGTON A LTF D ? I PRESTWICK BREST A LTF D I MADRID A LTF D I REYKJAVÍK A LTF 2D I SANTA MARIA A LTF 2D I SHANNON A LTF 2D I REYKJAVÍK ANCHORAGE A LTF S Edmonton I EDMONTON A LTF D I MURMANSK A LTF D STAVANGER A LTF S Prestwick I SØNDRE STRØMFJORD A LTF D I THULE A LTF D I SANTA MARIA SAL A LTF D I CANARIAS A LTF IDD I LISBOA A LTF 2D I MADRID A LTF 3D I PIARCO A LTF IDD I SØNDRE STRØMFJORD EDMONTON A LTF D I

NAT FASID CNS+F11-11CNS.doc A-31 Appendix Part IV-CNS NAT FASID

CHART CNS 1B - ATS DIRECT SPEECH CIRCUITS

Note: Replace FASID Chart CNS 2 ATS DIRECT SPEECH CAPABILITY (NAT) with following new Chart CNS 1B based on data in Table CNS IB

NAT FASID CNS+F11-11CNS.doc Appendix A-32 NAT FASID Part IV-CNS

TABLE CNS 2A — AERONAUTICAL MOBILE SERVICE AND AMSS

EXPLANATION OF THE TABLE

Column

1 The name of the State and the locations within the same where the service is provided.

2 The required services or functions are provided. Suitable abbreviations for these services or functions are listed below.

ACC-L Area control service for flights in lower airspace. ACC-U Area control service for flights in upper airspace. AFIS Aerodrome flight information service. APP Approach control centre. ATIS Automatic terminal information service. D-ATIS Data link-automatic terminal information service. CLRD Clearance delivery. FIC-L Flight information service in lower airspace. FIC-U Flight information service in upper airspace. VHF-ER VHF — Extended range. GP Facility providing VHF or HF en-route general purpose (GP) communication. These facilities provide air-ground radiotelephony for all categories of messages listed in Annex 10, Volume II, 5.1.8. This system of communication is normally indirect, i.e. exchanged through the intermediary of a third person who is usually a communicator at an aeronautical station. SMC Surface movement control up to limits of aerodrome. TMA Terminal area control service. TWR Aerodrome control service. VOLMET VOLMET broadcast.

3 Number of voice VHF channels for the corresponding services indicated in column 2. The number of implemented channels is shown in parentheses.

4 Requirement for VHF data link (x) for the corresponding services indicated in column 2. The implementation date (month/year) of the service is shown in parentheses

5 HF network designators for the corresponding services indicated in column 2. The number of implemented frequencies is shown in parentheses.

6 Requirement for HF data link (x) for the corresponding services indicated in column 2. The implementation date (month/year) of the service is shown in parentheses.

7 Requirement for satellite voice communications (x) for the corresponding services indicated in column 2. The implementation date (month/year) of the service is shown in parentheses.

8 Requirement for satellite data communications (x) for the corresponding services indicated in column 2. The implementation date (month/year) of the service is shown in parentheses.

9 Requirement for Mode S data communications (x) for the corresponding services indicated in column 2. The implementation date (month/year) of the service is shown in parentheses.

10 Remarks.

Note.— Data links and satellite voice will be used for CPDLC communications and the implementation year is indicated by two digits.

NAT FASID CNS+F11-11CNS.doc A-33 Appendix Part IV-CNS NAT FASID

TABLE CNS 2A— AERONAUTICAL MOBILE SERVICE AND AMSS

Service or VHF Satellite Satellite Country and location VHF data HF voice HF data Mode S Remarks function voice voice data 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 BERMUDA (United Kingdom) MXKF BERMUDA TWR 1 (1) APP 1 (1)

CANADA CZQX GANDER GP 5 (5) X NAT-A X X X NAT-B NAT-C NAT-D CLRD 5 (5) X NAT-F VNAT

GREENLAND (Denmark) BGGL SØNDRE STRØMFJORD FIC-L 4 (4) RDARA X BGSF KANGERLUSSUAQ TWR 1 (1) APP 2 (2)

FAROE ISLANDS (Denmark) EKVG VAGAR AFIS 1 (1)

ICELAND BIAR AKUREYRI TWR 1 (1) APP 1 (1)

BIEG EGILSSTADIR AFIS 1 (1)

BIKF KEFLAVIK TWR 1 (1) SMC 1 (1) APP 1 (1) CLRD 1 (1) ATIS 1 (1)

BIRK REYKJAVÍK TWR 1 (1) SMC 1 (1) APP 1 (1) ATIS 1 (1)

NAT FASID CNS+F11-11CNS.doc Appendix A-34 NAT FASID Part IV-CNS

Service or VHF Satellite Satellite Country and location VHF data HF voice HF data Mode S Remarks function voice voice data 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 BIRD REYKJAVÍK ACC-U 7 (7) X X X X ACC-L 1 (1)

BICC REYKJAVÍK GP 2 (2) NAT-B X NAT-C NAT-D

IRELAND EIAA SHANNON/Ballygireen GP 2 (2) NAT-A X VOLMET 1 (1) NAT-B NAT-C NAT-D NAT-F VNAT

NORWAY ENBD BODØ ACC L,U 1 (1) X NAT-D X X X ENSB SVALBARD AFIS 1 (1) 3023 Available to flights 6666 above FL 100 in 8840 emergency only

PORTUGAL LPPD PONTA DELGADA/San Miguel I., Açores TWR 1 (1) APP 1 (1)

LPPO SANTA MARIA, Açores ACC L,U 2 (2) X X X X GP 1 (1) NAT-A X NAT-E CLRD 2 (1)

LPAZ SANTA MARIA/Santa Maria I., Açores TWR 1 (1) APP 1 (1)

UNITED KINGDOM EGGX PRESTWICK CLRD 2 (2) X ACC L, U X X X X

UNITED STATES KZNY NEW YORK ACC L,U 9 (9) X X X X GP 2 (2) NAT-A X NAT-E

NAT FASID CNS+F11-11CNS.doc A-35 Appendix Part IV-CNS NAT FASID

CHART CNS 2A – NAT VHF AIR/GROUND COMMUNICATIONS COVERAGE AT FL300

[Editorial note: New Chart CNS 2A is taken from NAT Doc 001 - Guidance Material p. A-5]

The VHF coverage provided by the QAQATOQAQ and KULUSUK stations in Greenland (Søndre Strømfjord), serves Søndre Strømfjord FIC only (below FL 195). Available to flights above FL 195 in emergency only.

NAT FASID CNS+F11-11CNS.doc Appendix A-36 NAT FASID Part IV-CNS

TABLE CNS 3 — TABLE OF RADIO NAVIGATION AIDS

EXPLANATION OF THE TABLE Column

1 Name of the country, city and aerodrome and, for route aids, the location of the installation.

2 The designator number and runway type:

NINST — Visual flight runway NPA — Non precision approach runway PA1 — Precision approach runway, Category I PA2 — Precision approach runway, Category II PA3 — Precision approach runway, Category III

3 The functions carried out by the aids appear in columns 4 to 8 and 10 to 12.

A/L — Approach and landing T — Terminal E — En route

4 ILS —Instrument landing system. Roman numerals I, II and III indicate the acting category of the ILS I, II or III. (I) indicates that the facility is implemented.

The letter “D” indicates a DME requirement to serve as a substitute for a marker beacon component of an ILS.

Note.— Indication of the category refers to the performance standard to be achieved and maintained, in accordance with pertinent specifications in ICAO Annex 10, and not to specifications of the ILS equipment, since both specifications are not necessarily the same.

An asterisk (*) indicates that the ILS requires a Category II signal, but without the reliability and availability which redundant equipment and automatic switching provide.

5 Radio beacon localizer, be it associated with an ILS or to be used as an approach aid at an aerodrome.

6 Radiotelemetrical equipment. When an “X” appears in column 6 in line with the VOR in column 7, this indicates the need that the DME be installed at a common site with the VOR.

7 VOR — VHF omnidirectional radio range.

8 NDB — Non-directional radio beacon.

9 The distances and altitude to which the VOR or VOR/DME signals are required, indicated in nautical miles (NM) or thousands of feet, or the nominal coverage recommended of the NDB, indicated in nautical miles.

10, 11 GNSS — global navigation satellite system (includes GBAS and SBAS).

GBAS (ground-based augmentation system) implementation planned to be used in precision approach and landing CAT I, CAT II, CAT III.

SBAS (satellite-based augmentation system) implementation planned to be used for route navigation, for terminal, for non precision approach and landing. An “X” indicates service availability; exact location of installation will be determined.

Note. — GPS receiver is under standard rules and ABAS (aircraft-based augmentation system).

NAT FASID CNS+F11-11CNS.doc A-37 Appendix Part IV-CNS NAT FASID

12 Remarks

Note.— Columns 5 to 12 use the following symbols:

D — DME required but not implemented. DI — DME required and implemented. X — Required but not implemented. XI — Required and implemented.

NAT FASID CNS+F11-11CNS.doc Appendix A-38 NAT FASID Part IV-CNS

TABLE CNS 3 — TABLE OF RADIO NAVIGATION AIDS

GNSS Station/Territory Rwy type Function ILS L DME VOR NDB Coverage GBAS SBAS Remarks 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 BERMUDA (United Kingdom) BERMUDA A/L 12-I X 30-I X E X X 200/-

FAROE ISLANDS (Denmark)1 MYGGENAES T X VAGAR A/L X E X 30

GREENLAND (Denmark) HOLSTEINSBORG E X SD KULUSUK E X SD PRINS CHRISTIANS SUND E X LD SIMIUTAQ E X SD KANGERLUSSUAQ A/L X X T X E X SD

ICELAND AKUREYRI/BIAR Akureyri 01 NPA A/L XI XI 19 NPA A/L XI T/E XI XI T/E XI 50

EGILSSTADIR/BIEG Egilsstadir 04 PA1 A/L XI XI 22 NPA A/L XI XI T/E XI

INGO E XI XI

KEFLAVÍK/BIKF Leif Ericson 02 PA1 A/L I D (I) XI XI 20 PA2 A/L II D (I) XI XI XI 11 PA2 A/L II D(I) XI XI XI 29 PA1 A/L I D (I) XI XI T/E XI XI T/E XI 250

1 As per approved amendment proposal EUR/NAT-F 08/07-CNS NAT FASID CNS+F11-11CNS.doc A-39 Appendix Part IV-CNS NAT FASID

GNSS Station/Territory Rwy type Function ILS L DME VOR NDB Coverage GBAS SBAS Remarks 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

REYKJAVÍK/BIRK Reykjavik 01 PA1 A/L XI X 19 PA1 A/L I (I) XI XI 13 NPA A/L XI XI 31 NPA A/L X T/E XI 100

NORWAY SVALNARD/LONGYEAR 10PA1 A/L 1D X X 28NPA A/L X X

PORTUGAL FLORES, Flores I., Açores E,T X X 275/300

LAJES, Terceira I., Açores A/L X E X PONTA DELGADA, Sao Miguel I., E,T X X 275/300 Açores SANTA MARIA, Santa Maria I., Açores A/L 19-I X X E X X 200/500

NAT FASID CNS+F11-11CNS.doc Appendix A-40 NAT FASID Part IV-CNS

CHART CNS 3A - EN-ROUTE RADIO NAVIGATION AIDS

[Editorial note: Old NAT FASID Chart CNS 4 to become Chart CNS 3A with updates from Table CNS 3.]

NAT FASID CNS+F11-11CNS.doc A-41 Appendix Part IV-CNS NAT FASID

CHART CNS 3B - AIDS TO FINAL APPROACH AND LANDING

[Editorial note: Old NAT FASID Chart CNS 5 to become Chart CNS 3B with updates from Table CNS 3.]

NAT FASID CNS+F11-11CNS.doc Appendix A-42 NAT FASID Part IV-CNS

TABLE CNS 4 - SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS

EXPLANATION OF THE TABLE

(Note: Data that is incorporated in this Table and Chart CNS 4A should be limited to sensors exclusively servicing the NAT Region.)

Column

1 Name of State/Territory and location of the radar station

2 Longitude and Latitude of radar station.

3 Air traffic services unit served by the facility

4 PSR/Function — Primary surveillance radar/Function E — En-route area control centres T — Terminal

5 Coverage of primary surveillance radar in nautical miles

6 PSR/Status — Primary surveillance radar/Status of implementation

7 SSR/MSSR/Function — Secondary surveillance radar/Monopulse secondary surveillance radar/Function E — En-route area control centres T — Terminal

8 SSR/MSSR/Modes — Modes A, C or S

9 Coverage of secondary surveillance radar in nautical miles

10 SSR/MSSR/Status — Secondary surveillance radar/Monopulse secondary surveillance radar/Status of implementation

11 ADS-B/Coverage — Automatic dependent surveillance-Broadcast/Coverage

12 ADS-B/Status — Automatic dependent surveillance-Broadcast/Status of implementation

13 Remarks

Note.— The following codes are used in columns 6, 10, 12 and 13: 6, 10 and 12 I — Implemented using conventional SSR I* — Implemented using monopulse SSR NI — Not implemented I/P — (Implemented/Planned) Indicates the implemented radar system and enlargement and/or replacement of the radar system at short term (2 years) P — Planned using SSR P* — stands for future plan using monopulse SSR NP — (Not planned) Indicates that the State has no plans for radar implementation R — Recommended

13 * MSSR — Monopulse SSR < - Year — Planned commissioning year > - Year — Planned decommissioning year

NAT FASID CNS+F11-11CNS.doc A-43 Appendix Part IV-CNS NAT FASID

TABLE CNS 4 - SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS

PSR SSR ADS-B State Lat/Long ATS unit Function Coverage(NM) Status Function Modes(A, Coverage(NM) Status Coverage Status Remarks (territory)/Location served C or S) (NM) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 DENMARK Greenland 66 59 49N Kangerlussuac BGSF T A,C 200 I 050 36 58W 62 04 08N Reykjavik Faeroess E 240 I E A/C 240 I 006 58 00W ACC

ICELAND 65 39 18N Akureyri Akureyri T 20 I 018 04 09W APP 66 10 41N Reykjavik MSSR Bolafjall E 240 I E A/C 240 I 023 19 42W ACC 06 66 08 40N Reykjavik MSSR Gunnolfsvikurfjall E 240 I E A/C 240 I 015 05 18W ACC 06 64 14 28N Reykjavik MSSR Stokksnes E 230 I E A/C 230 I 014 57 46W ACC 06 64 01 19N Reykjavik MSSR Midnesheidi E 220 I E A/C 220 I 022 39 21W ACC 06 63 59 18N Reykjavik 022 35 12W ACC Keflavik T/E 60 I T/E A/C 140 I Keflavik APP

PORTUGAL Santa Acores Maria NP E/T C 240 P* <2005 OACC

UNITED KINGDOM Bermuda

NAT FASID CNS+F11-11CNS.doc Appendix A-44 NAT FASID Part IV-CNS

CHART CNS 4A - RADAR SURVEILLANCE

(TO BE DEVELOPED)

(Note: Data that is incorporated in the Table CNS 4 and Chart CNS 4A should be limited to sensors exclusively servicing the NAT Region.)

NAT FASID CNS+F11-11CNS.doc A-45 Appendix Part IV-CNS NAT FASID

CHART CNS 4B - ADS-B

(TO BE DEVELOPED)

NAT FASID CNS+F11-11CNS.doc Appendix A-46 NAT FASID Part IV-CNS

TABLE CNS 5 - ATS DATA CIRCUITS PLAN

EXPLANATION OF THE TABLE

Column

1 and 2 Circuit terminal stations are listed alphabetically by the Terminal I.

3 Type of service specified:

LTF — landline telephone (landline, cable, UHF, VHF, satellite). RTF — radiotelephone.

4 Type of circuits; Direct (DIR) or Switched (SW).

5 Location of switching centre(s). Alternate routing location, if available, is indicated in brackets.

6 Status of Implementation. Following codes are used in this column:

a) I — if the circuit is implemented.

b) No indication or mark if the circuit is not implemented and its implementation date is unknown.

c) If the circuit is not implemented but its implementation date is available, same is indicated in brackets.

Note.— If the circuit is implemented but there are short-term plans to establish it in other private/public network(s), the symbol I/P shall be introduced indicating in Column 8 — Remarks, the future network environment for the circuit.

7 Remarks

NAT FASID CNS+F11-11CNS.doc A-47 Appendix Part IV-CNS NAT FASID

TABLE CNS 5 - ATS DATA CIRCUITS PLAN

ATS requirements for data communications Circuit Status of To be switched implemen Remarks Terminal I Terminal II Service D/S via/ tation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 GANDER NEW YORK LTF D (2005) PRESTWICK LTF D I PRESTWICK LTF D I PRINS CHRISTIAN SUND LTF D I REYKJAVIK LTF D (2005) NEW YORk SANTA MARIA LTF D I PRESTWICK BREST LTF D I MADRID LTF D I REYKJAVÍK LTF D I SANTA MARIA LTF D I SHANNON LTF D I REYKJAVIK SCOTTISH LTF D ? STAVANGER LTF D ? SANTA MARIA SAL LTF D MADRID LTF S Lisboa I LISBOA LTF D CANARIAS LTF S Lisboa/Madrid

NAT FASID CNS+F11-11CNS.doc Appendix A-48 NAT FASID Part IV-CNS

CHART CNS 5 - ATS DATA CIRCUITS PLAN

[Editorial note: Chart CNS 1C to be used as model, updated with Table CNS 5]

NAT FASID CNS+F11-11CNS.doc A-49 Appendix Part V-ATM NAT FASID

Part V

AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT (ATM)

1. The Standards, Recommended Practices and procedures to be applied and related guidance material are as listed in paragraph 1, Part V — ATM of the Basic ANP. The material in this part complements that contained in Part I — Statement of Basic Operational Requirements and Planning Criteria of the Basic ANP and should be taken into consideration in the overall planning processes for the NAT Region.

2. Details of the facilities and/or services to be provided to fulfil the basic requirements of the plan and are as agreed between the provider and user States concerned. Such agreement indicates a commitment on the part of the State(s) concerned to implement the requirement(s) specified. This element of the FASID, in conjunction with the NAT Basic ANP, is kept under constant review by the NATSPG in accordance with its schedule of management, in consultation with user and provider States and with the assistance of the ICAO European and North Atlantic Office, Paris. While under development, details of required facilities and services will be documented in the Future ATM Concept of Operation for the NAT Region [NAT Doc 005].

HF VOLMET BROADCASTS (FASID Table ATS 2)

3. The HF VOLMET broadcast plan appears in Table ATS 2. The broadcasts should be made using radiotelephony. Routine aerodrome reports given in North Atlantic VOLMET broadcasts should include air temperature and dew point temperature at least at hourly intervals. The aerodrome forecasts should be transmitted before the routine reports plus trend. Relevant SIGMET information or an indication of “NIL SIGMET” should be broadcast as decided by the ATS centre concerned, at the beginning of the 5-minute time block.

4. The pilot of a flight should be advised that there is a SIGMET on the VOLMET broadcast which concerns that flight. Preferably this should be done at the completion of a position report or other communication.If the area control centre (ACC) concerned does not indicate a need for SIGMET information to be included in the VOLMET broadcast and all the elements of a broadcast have been transmitted in less than the 5 minutes allotted, remaining time should be used by:

a) repeating the first and possibly the second routine report, if there is time;

b) repeating the station identification if there is insufficient time for a) or at any time remaining after a).

5. The following procedures apply to Shannon HF VOLMET broadcasts as indicated:

a) the aerodrome forecasts only should, if required, be omitted if the broadcast would otherwise overrun;

b) when data have not arrived from an aerodrome in time for a broadcast, the latest earlier material should be included in the broadcast, together with the time of observation.

6. The Gander, New York and Shannon VOLMET broadcasts should be made only in the English language.

7. The order of stations in the broadcasts as shown in the tables should always be maintained. If States find it necessary to propose an amendment to the FASID aimed at a change in the sequence, they should give appropriate notice by NOTAM prior to implementing the change.

NF06-10 - YZ - Full NAT FASID ATM.doc Appendix A-50 NAT FASID Part V-ATM

TABLE ATS 2 — HF VOLMET BROADCASTS

EXPLANATION OF THE TABLE

The transmitting station appears at the top of each block.

Names in capital letters indicate aerodromes for which forecasts are provided in order of priority.

Names in small letters indicate aerodromes for which reports (routine and selected special) are provided in order of priority.

NF06-10 - YZ - Full NAT FASID ATM.doc A-51 Appendix Part V-ATM NAT FASID

TABLE ATS 2 — HF VOLMET BROADCASTS

New York New York New York New York Gander Gander 00-05 05-10 10-15 15-20 20-25 25-30 SIGMET (New York SIGMET (Miami/ SIGMET (1) Oceanic) San Juan Oceanic) DETROIT BANGOR NEW YORK/JFK BERMUDA MONTREAL/YUL WINNIPEG CLEVELAND WINDSOR LOCKS NEWARK MIAMI TORONTO EDMONTON CINCINNATI CHARLOTTE BOSTON ATLANTA OTTAWA CALGARY [CHURCHILL] Detroit Bangor New York Bermuda Gander Kuujjuaq Cleveland Windsor Locks Newark Miami Montreal/YUL Winnipeg Cincinnati Norfolk Boston Nassau Toronto Churchill Indianapolis [Charlotte] Baltimore Orlando Ottawa Pittsburgh Washington/IAD [Atlanta] Goose

30-35 35-40 40-45 45-50 50-55 55-60

SIGMET (New York SIGMET (New York SIGMET (1) Oceanic) Oceanic) CHICAGO INDIANAPOLIS BALTIMORE NASSAU GANDER GOOSE MILWAUKEE ST. LOUIS PHILADELPHIA ORLANDO ST. JOHNS IQALUIT MINNEAPOLIS PITTSBURGH WASHINGTON/IAD HALIFAX SØNDRESTRØM Chicago Indianapolis Baltimore Bermuda Gander Goose Milwaukee St. Louis Philadelphia Miami St. Johns Iqaluit Minneapolis Pittsburgh Washington/IAD Nassau Halifax Søndrestrøm Detroit [Atlantic City] New York/JFK Orlando Stephenville [Kuujjuaq] Boston Newark Atlanta Vancouver Tampa [West Palm Beach]

NOTES

1. SIGMET information in the Gander broadcasts includes SIGMET or notification of SIGMET affecting flights operating above FL 100 in the Gander Oceanic and Gander, Moncton, Montreal and Toronto flight information regions (FIRs). 2. The reports and forecasts shown in brackets may be deleted from the broadcasts to provide broadcasting time for the inclusion of SIGMET messages.

NF06-10 - YZ - Full NAT FASID ATM.doc Appendix A-52 NAT FASID Part V-ATM

SHANNON FREQUENCIES - FRÉQUENCES - FRECUENCIAS — 3413, 5505, 8957, 13264 kHz

00-05 05-10 10-15 15-20 20-25 25-30

SIGMET SIGMET SIGMET BRUXELLES/NATIONAL LONDON/HEATHROW DUBLIN SANTA MARIA PARIS/CHARLES- AMSTERDAM/SCHIPOL LONDON/GATWICK SHANNON LISBOA DE-GAULLE STANSTED MADRID PARIS/ORLY Bruxelles/National London/Heathrow Dublin Santa Maria Paris/Charles- Stockholm/Arlanda Amsterdam/Schipol London/Gatwick Shannon Lisboa de-Gaulle Manchester Frankfurt Stansted Manchester Madrid Paris/Orly Shannon Hamburg Prestwick Keflavik Lajes Zurich København/Kastrup München Glasgow Genève Bergen Milano/Malpensa Dublin Helsinki/Vantaa

30-35 35-40 40-45 45-50 50-55 55-00

SIGMET SIGMET SIGMET FRANKFURT KEFLAVIK ZURICH HAMBURG ROMA/FIUMICINO KOLN-BONN GLASGOW OSLO/GARDERMOEN GENÈVE MILANO/MALPENSA MANCHESTER KOBENHAVN/ KASTRUP Frankfurt London/Heathrow Zurich Bruxelles/National Roma/Fiumicino Köln-Bonn London/Gatwick Oslo/Gardermoen Genève Amsterdam/Schipol Milano/Malpensa Düsseldorf Keflavik København/Kastrup Paris/Charles-de-Gaulle Frankfurt Torino München Glasgow Göteborg/Landvetter Paris/Orly Köln-Bonn Lisboa Luxembourg Manchester Stockholm/Arlanda Hamburg Lajes Bergen Santa Maria Helsinki/Vantaa

NOTES

1. SIGMET denotes the time-blocks during which SIGMETs are broadcast. 2. Capital letters, for example BRUXELLES/NATIONAL, indicate aerodrome forecasts. Small letters indicate aerodrome reports. 3. SIGMETs (where appropriate), forecasts and reports are broadcast in the order shown. If all the elements of a broadcast have been transmitted in less than the 5 minutes allotted, reports are repeated at the end of each period of transmission as time permits. 4. The reports broadcast are the latest routine reports (or selected special reports) plus landing forecasts in the TREND form when the latter are available. If a new report is not available, the earlier one will be broadcast for one hour only together with the time of observation. 5. The valid period of the aerodrome forecasts normally extends to at least 6 hours following the broadcast time. If no amendment is received, a forecast is repeated in unchanged form in each scheduled broadcast for three hours only, or until a new forecast is received.

NF06-10 - YZ - Full NAT FASID ATM.doc A-53 Appendix Part V-ATM NAT FASID

CHART ATS 2 – AREA CONTROL SERVICE

[Editorial note: Bodo FIR to be added. This chart will be updated to show the current airspace delegation on the basis of information provided by the States.]

NF06-10 - YZ - Full NAT FASID ATM.doc Appendix A-54 NAT FASID Part VI-MET

PART VI - METEOROLOGY (MET)

INTRODUCTION

1. The Standards, Recommended Practices and Procedures to be applied are as listed in paragraph 1, Part VI - MET of the NAT ANP. The material in this part complements that contained in Part I - BORPC of the NAT ANP and should be taken into consideration in the overall planning processes for the NAT Region.

2. This Part contains a detailed description/list of the facilities and/or services to be provided to fulfil the basic requirements of the Plan and are as agreed between the provider and user States concerned. Such agreement indicates a commitment on the part of the State(s) concerned to implement the requirement(s) specified. This element of the FASID, in conjunction with the NAT ANP, is kept under constant review by the NATSPG in accordance with its schedule of management, in consultation with user and provider States and with the assistance of the ICAO European and North Atlantic Regional Office, Paris.

METEOROLOGICAL SERVICE REQUIRED AT AERODROMES AND REQUIREMENTS FOR METEOROLOGICAL WATCH OFFICES (FASID Tables MET 1A and 1B)

3. The meteorological service to be provided to satisfy international flight operations is outlined in FASID Table MET 1A. The requirements for meteorological watch offices (MWO) together with the service to be provided to flight information regions/control area (FIR/CTA), upper flight information regions (UIR) and search and rescue regions (SRR) are listed in FASID Table MET 1B.

EXCHANGE OF OPERATIONAL METEOROLOGICAL INFORMATION (FASID Tables MET 2A and 2B)

4. The requirements for the exchange of METAR/SPECI and TAF to satisfy international flight operations in the NAT Region are shown in FASID Table MET 2A (SADIS User Guide Annex 1).

5. FASID Table MET 2B contains the exchange requirements in the NAT Region for SIGMET, volcanic ash and tropical cyclone advisories, and special air-reports for which SIGMET has not been issued.

TROPICAL CYCLONE AND VOLCANIC ASH ADVISORY CENTRES (FASID Tables MET 3A, MET 3B, and MET 3C and FASID Charts MET 1 and MET 2)

6. The area of responsibility and period of operation of the tropical cyclone advisory centre (TCAC) Miami, and the NAT MWOs to which advisory information should be sent by the TCAC, are contained in FASID Table MET 3A. The areas of responsibility of the designated TCACs in all regions are shown on FASID Chart MET 1.

7. The areas of responsibility of the volcanic ash advisory centres (VAAC) London, Montreal, Toulouse, and Washington, and the MWOs and ACCs/FICs to which the advisory information should be sent by the VAACs are contained in FASID Table MET 3B. The areas of responsibility of the designated VAACs in all regions are shown on FASID Chart MET 2.

8. FASID Table MET 3C sets out the selected State volcano observatories designated for direct notification of significant pre-eruption volcanic activity, a volcanic eruption and/or volcanic ash in the atmosphere and the VAACs, MWOs and ACCs/FICs to which the notification should be sent by the observatories.

Note.— Operational procedures to be used for the dissemination of information on volcanic eruptions and associated ash clouds in areas which could affect routes used by international flights and

NAT FASID MET Part1.doc A-55 Appendix Part VI-MET NAT FASID necessary pre-eruption arrangements as well as the list of operational contact points are provided in the document entitled Handbook on the International Airways Volcano Watch (IAVW) — Operational Procedures and Contact List (Doc 9766). Additional guidance regarding the IAVW is contained in the Manual on Volcanic Ash, Radioactive Material and Toxic Chemical Clouds (Doc 9691).

WORLD AREA FORECAST SYSTEM (WAFS) (FASID Table MET 5)

9. FASID Table MET 5 sets out the NAT Region requirements for WAFS forecasts, to be provided by WAFC London and Washington.

Appendix A-56 NAT FASID Part VI-MET

TABLE MET 1A — METEOROLOGICAL SERVICE REQUIRED AT AERODROMES

EXPLANATION OF THE TABLE

Column

1 Name of the aerodrome or location where meteorological service is required (see Note).

2 ICAO location indicator of the aerodrome

3 Designation of the aerodrome: RS — international scheduled air transport, regular use AS — international scheduled air transport, alternate use.

4 Name of the meteorological office responsible for the provision of meteorological service at the aerodrome indicated in column 1. (See Note)

5 ICAO location indicator of the responsible meteorological office.

6 Requirement for trend forecasts.

7 Requirement for aerodrome forecasts in TAF code.

C - Requirement for 9-hour validity aerodrome forecasts in TAF code (9H) T - Requirement for 18/24-hour validity aerodrome forecasts in TAF code (18/24H) X - Requirement for 30-hour validity aerodrome forecasts in TAF code (30H)

8 Availability of OPMET information

F - Full : OPMET data as listed issued for the aerodrome all through the 24-hour period P - Partial : OPMET data as listed not issued for the aerodrome for the entire 24-hour period N - None : No OPMET data issued for the time being

Note: The name is extracted from the ICAO Location Indicators (Doc 7910) updated quarterly. If a State wishes to change the name appearing in Doc 7910 and this table, ICAO should be notified officially.

NAT FASID MET Part1.doc Appendix A-57 NAT FASID Part VI-MET

TABLE MET 1A — METEOROLOGICAL SERVICE REQUIRED AT AERODROMES

Forecasts of Availability

Aerodrome where service is to be provided Responsible MET Office to be OPMET provided ICAO ICAO

Name Loc. Use Name Loc. TR TAF Ind. Ind. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Bermuda (United Kingdom) L.F. WADE TXKF RS L.F. WADE TXKF T F INTERNATIONAL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AIRPORT Greenland (Denmark) KANGERLUSSUAQ BGSF RS AASIAAT BGAA X F Iceland AKUREYRI BIAR AS REYKJAVIK AIRPORT, BIRK T F NOF,MET EGILSSTADIR BIEG AS REYKJAVIK AIRPORT, BIRK T F NOF,MET KEFLAVIK APP/TWR, BIKF RS REYKJAVIK AIRPORT, BIRK X F OPS, MET NOF,MET REYKJAVIK AIRPORT, BIRK RS REYKJAVIK AIRPORT, BIRK T F NOF,MET NOF,MET Portugal (Madeira and Azores) (Portugal) PONTA DELGADA LPPD AS LISBOA LPPT T F SANTA MARIA LPAZ RS LISBOA LPPT X F

NAT FASID MET Part1.doc Appendix A-58 NAT FASID Part VI-MET

Table no longer referenced – to be removed.

NAT FASID MET Part1.doc A-59 Appendix Part VI-MET NAT FASID

TABLE MET 1B — METEOROLOGICAL WATCH OFFICES

EXPLANATION OF THE TABLE

Column

1 Name of the State with Meteorological Watch Office (MWO) responsibility.

2 Location name of the MWO

3 ICAO location indicator assigned to the MWO.

4 Name of FIR/CTA, UIR and/or search and rescue region (SRR) served by the MWO.

5 ICAO location indicator assigned to the ATS unit serving the FIR/CTA, UIR and/or SRR.

6 Requirement for the issuance of SIGMET, excluding SIGMET for volcanic ash and tropical cyclone.

7 Requirement for issuance of volcanic ash SIGMET.

8 Requirement for issuance of tropical cyclone SIGMET

9 Remarks

Note.— Unless otherwise stated in Column9, the MWO listed in Column 2 is the designated collecting centre for the air-reports received within the corresponding FIR/CTA/UIR/SRR listed in Column 4.

NAT FASID MET Part1.doc Appendix A-60 NAT FASID Part VI-MET

TABLE MET 1B — METEOROLOGICAL WATCH OFFICES

Meteorological Watch Office FIR/CTA, UIR and/or SRR SIGMET issued (MWO) served by the MWO Remark State ICAO ICAO s Name Loc. Name Loc. WS WV WC Ind. Ind. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Canada MONTREAL CWUL GANDER CZQX Y Y See note (QUEBEC CENTRE (ACC) 1 FORECAST OFFICE), QUE Denmark KANGERLUSSUAQ BGSF SONDRESTROM BGGL Y Y See note (Greenland) FIR 1 Iceland REYKJAVIK BIRK REYKJAVIK FIR, BIRD Y Y AIRPORT,NOF,MET OAC, ACC, FIC Norway TROMSO ENVN BODO FIC/OFIR ENOB Y Y (VAERVARSLINGA FOR NORD- NORGE/MET FORECASTING CENTRE) Portugal LISBOA LPPT SANTA MARIA LPPO Y Y OAC/FIC United MET OFFICE EGRR SHANWICK EGGX Y Y Kingdom EXETER OACC MET OFFICE EGRR KINLOSS EGQK EXETER United KANSAS CITY NEW YORK KZNY Y Y Y See States KKCI (ARTCC) notes 2 RONKONKOMA and 3 NY

NOTES 1. Søndrestrøm FIR/Gander Oceanic CTA and Søndrestrøm FIR/Reykjavik CTA served by Montreal MWO and Reykjavik MWO respectively. 2. The Washington MET/COM Centre (KWBC) is the AIREP Collecting Centre for the United States. 3. KKCI location indicator not included in DOC 7910/141, September 2011

NAT FASID MET Part1.doc A-61 Appendix Part VI-MET NAT FASID

TABLE MET 2A - OPMET INFORMATION (METAR, SPECI AND TAF) REQUIRED IN ISCS AND SADIS

EXPLANATION OF THE TABLE

Column

1 Aerodromes in the AOP Tables of the Air Navigation Plans

Note: The name is extracted from the ICAO Location Indicators (Doc 7910) updated quarterly. If a state wishes to change the name appearing in Doc 7910 and this table, ICAO should be notified officially.

2 Aerodromes not listed in the AOP Tables of the Air Navigation Plans

3 ICAO location indicator

4 Availability of METAR/SPECI

5 Requirement for aerodrome forecasts in TAF code

6 Availability of OPMET information

NAT FASID MET Part1.doc Appendix A-62 NAT FASID Part VI-MET

TABLE MET 2A - EXCHANGE REQUIREMENTS FOR METAR/SPECI AND TAF

Aerodrome where service is to be provided OPMET to be provided

Availability

ICAO SA/SP Loc. TAF Listed in AOP Tables Not Listed in AOP Tables

Ind.

1 2 3 4 5 6 Bermuda (United Kingdom) L.F. WADE INTERNATIONAL TXKF Y T F AIRPORT Denmark VAGAR EKVG Y C F Greenland (Denmark) ILULISSAT BGJN Y C F KANGERLUSSUAQ BGSF Y X F KULUSUK BGKK Y C F NARSARSUAQ BGBW Y C F NUUK BGGH Y C F THULE AIR BASE (MIL) BGTL Y T F Iceland AKUREYRI BIAR Y T F EGILSSTADIR BIEG Y T F BILDUDALUR BIBD Y C P HOFN/HORNAFJORDUR BIHN Y C P ISAFJORDUR BIIS Y C P KEFLAVIK AIRPORT, BIKF Y X F APP/TWR, OPS, MET REYKJAVIK AIRPORT, NOF, BIRK Y T F MET SAUDARKROKUR BIKR Y C P VESTMANNAEYJAR BIVM Y C P Portugal (Madeira and Azores) (Portugal) PONTA DELGADA LPPD Y T F SANTA MARIA LPAZ Y X F

NAT FASID MET Part1.doc A-63 Appendix Part VI-MET NAT FASID

TABLE MET 2B — EXCHANGE REQUIREMENTS FOR SIGMET, VOLCANIC ASH AND TROPICAL CYCLONE ADVISORIES, AND SPECIAL AIR REPORTS FOR WHICH SIGMET HAS NOT BEEN ISSUED

Since the EUR Region has a requirement for a global set of SIGMET, AIRMET, volcanic ash and tropical cyclone advisories, and special air reports for which SIGMET has not been issued, no FASID Table MET 2B is included in the document. All the foregoing information issued outside the EUR Region should be AFTN addressed as follows:

Source Region Responsible EUR Gateway in AFTN address to be used AFI France LFZZMAFI MID Austria LOZZMMID ASIA United Kingdom EGZZMASI CAR United Kingdom EGZZMCAR NAM United Kingdom EGZZMNAM NAT United Kingdom EGZZMNAT PAC United Kingdom EGZZMPAC SAM United Kingdom EGZZMSAM

______

NAT FASID MET Part1.doc Appendix A-64 NAT FASID Part VI-MET

TABLE MET 3A — TROPICAL CYCLONE ADVISORY CENTRE

EXPLANATION OF THE TABLE

Column

1 Location of the Tropical Cyclone Advisory Centre (TCAC).

2 ICAO location indicator of the TCAC (for use in the WMO heading of advisory bulletin)

3 Area of responsibility for the preparation of advisory information on tropical cyclones by the TCAC in Column 1.

4 Period(s) of operation of the TCAC.

5 MWO to which the advisory information on tropical cyclones should be sent.

6 ICAO location indicator of the MWO in Column 5

NAT FASID MET Part2.doc A-65 Appendix Part VI-MET NAT FASID

TABLE MET 3A — TROPICAL CYCLONE ADVISORY CENTRE

MWO TO WHICH TROPICAL CYCLONE ADVISORY ADVISORY CENTRE AREA OF PERIOD(S) OF INFORMATION IS TO RESPONSIBILITY OPERATION BE SENT ICAO ICAO Name Name Loc. Ind. Loc. Ind. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Miami KNHC Tropical Atlantic 1 June – 30 Lisboa LPPT (United States) Caribbean Sea* and November Gulf of Mexico* Kansas KKCI City/Kansas City Downtown, MO. Miami KMIA International , FL.

* Requirement shown in CAR , NAM and PAC regional air navigation plans, respectively.

Note: KKCI location indicator is not included in ICAO Doc 7910.

NAT FASID MET Part2.doc Appendix A-66 NAT FASID Part VI-MET

FASID CHART MET 1 – AREAS OF RESPONSIBILITY OF THE TCACs

NAT FASID MET Part2.doc A-67 Appendix Part VI-MET NAT FASID

FASID TABLE MET 3B — VOLCANIC ASH ADVISORY CENTRES

EXPLANATION OF THE TABLE

Column

1 Name of the Volcanic Ash Advisory Centre (VAAC).

2 ICAO location indicator of VAAC (for use in the WMO header of advisory bulletin).

3 Area of responsibility for the preparation of advisory information on volcanic ash by the VAAC in Column 1.

4 State where the MWOs and ACCs/FICs are located.

5 ICAO Region where the MWOs and ACCs/FICs are located.

6 MWOs to which the advisory information on volcanic ash should be sent.

7 ICAO location indicators assigned to the MWO in column6.

8 ACCs/FICs to which the advisory information on volcanic ash should be sent.

9 ICAO location indicators assigned to the ACCs/FICs in column8.

Note- MWOs and ACCs/FICs in italics are situated outside the NAT Region.

NAT FASID MET Part2.doc A-68 Appendix Part VI-MET NAT FASID

FASID TABLE MET 3B — VOLCANIC ADVISORY CENTRES

ACC/FIC to which MWO to which Volcanic ash advisory centre information is to be information is to be sent ICAO sent State ICAO Region ICAO ICAO Area of Name Loc. Name Loc. Name Loc. responsibility Ind. Ind. Ind. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Montreal CWAO Søndrestrøm, Canada NAM Edmonton CWEG Gander CZQX (Canada) Gander Oceanic, Iceland NAT Reykjavik BIRK Reykjavik BIRD Canadian Denmark EUR Kangerlussuaq BGSF Søndrestrøm BGGL continental FIRs (including the Arctic Ocean)*

London EGRR Bødo Oceanic, Norway EUR Tromsø ENVN Bodø ENOB (United Reykjavik, Iceland NAT Reykjavik BIRK Reykjavik BIRD Kingdom) Shanwick United EUR Met Office EGRR Shanwick EGGX Oceanic, Kingdom Exeter London*, Scottish*, and Shannon* FIRs Toulouse LFPW Santa Maria Portugal EUR Lisboa LPPT Santa Maria LPPO (France) Oceanic FIR, AFI Region north of S60* EUR Region* (except for London, Scottish and Shannon FIRs) west of E90 and south of N71 and MID Region*, and ASIA Region west of E90 north of N20 (plus Mumbai, Chennai (west of 82E) and Male FIRs)

Washington KNES New York United NAM Kansas City KKCI New York KZNY (United States) Oceanic, States Oakland Oceanic south of N43 E165, N48.20 W150, N48.20 W128 and United States continental FIRs, north of S10 W140

Note: KKCI location indicator is not included in ICAO Doc 7910.

NAT FASID MET Part2.doc Appendix A-69 NAT FASID Part VI-MET

FASID CHART MET 2 – AREAS OF RESPONSIBILITY OF THE VAAC AND CORRESPONDING FIR

NAT FASID MET Part2.doc Appendix A-70 NAT FASID Part VI-MET

FASID TABLE MET 3C — SELECTED STATE VOLCANO OBSERVATORIES

EXPLANATION OF THE TABLE

Column

1 Provider State of the volcano observatory designated for direct notification of volcanic activity.

2 Name of the volcano observatory.

3 VAAC to which the information related to pre-eruption volcanic activity, a volcanic eruption and/or volcanic ash cloud should be sent.

4 ACC/FIC to which the information related to pre-eruption volcanic activity, a volcanic eruption and/or volcanic ash cloud should be sent.

5 ICAO location indicator assigned to the ACC/FIC listed in Column 4.

6 MWO to which information related to pre-eruption volcanic activity, a volcanic eruption and/or volcanic ash cloud should be sent.

7 ICAO location indicator of the MWO listed in Column 6

NAT FASID MET Part2.doc Appendix A-71 NAT FASID Part VI-MET

FASID TABLE MET 3C — SELECTED STATE VOLCANO OBSERVATORIES

Provider Volcano observatory VAAC to which the ACC/FIC to which MWO to which State of information is to be the information is information is to be sent volcano sent to be sent observatory Name ICAO Name ICAO Loc Loc Ind. Ind. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Iceland Icelandic Meteorological VAAC London Reykjavik BIRD Reykjavik Airport, BIRK Office (IMO) FIR, OAC, NOF, MET ACC, FIC Portugal Centro de Vulcanologia e VAAC Toulouse Santa Maria LPPO Lisboa LPPT Avaliação de Riscos OAC, FIC Geológicos (CVARG)/ Centro de Informação e Vigilância Sismovulcânica dos Açores (CIVISA)

Note:— AFTN is not available at all selected volcano observatories; therefore, it is the responsibility of each State to make appropriate communication arrangements.

______

NAT FASID MET Part2.doc A-72 Appendix Part VI-MET NAT FASID

FASID TABLE MET 4 - REGIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS SCHEMES

Table MET 4 is used to show the requirements for regional telecommunications schemes. No such schemes are applicable to the NAT Region.

NAT FASID MET Part3.doc Appendix A-73 NAT FASID Part VI-MET

FASID TABLE MET 5 — REQUIREMENTS FOR WAFS FORECASTS

EXPLANATION OF THE TABLE

Column

1 WAFS forecasts required by the NAT States, to be provided by WAFC London and Washington.

2 Area of coverage required for the WAFS forecasts, to be provided by WAFC London and Washington.

NAT FASID MET Part3.doc Appendix A-74 NAT FASID Part VI-MET

FASID TABLE MET 5 — REQUIREMENTS FOR WAFS FORECASTS

FORECAST REQUIRED AREAS REQUIRED

1 2 SWH forecasts (FL 250 - 630) in the BUFR code form GLOBAL SWM forecasts (FL 100 -250) in the BUFR code form NAT Forecasts of upper-air wind, temperature and humidity, cumulonimbus clouds, icing, clear-air GLOBAL and in-cloud turbulence and of altitude of flight levels in the GRIB code form

Note 1.— SWM forecasts are provided for limited geographical areas as determined by regional air navigation agreement. Area “NAT” is provided by WAFC Washington.

Note 2.— WAFCs will continue to issue forecasts of SIGWX in PNG chart form for backup purposes for fixed areas of coverage as specified in Annex 3.

Note 3.— Forecasts of cumulonimbus clouds, icing, clear-air and in-cloud turbulence are labelled as ‘trial forecasts’ and are currently distributed through the internet-based Services..

NAT FASID MET Part3.doc A-75 Appendix Part VII-SAR NAT FASID

Part VII

SEARCH AND RESCUE SERVICES (SAR)

INTRODUCTION

1. The Standards, Recommended Practices and Procedures to be applied and related guidance material are as listed in paragraph 1, Part VII – SAR of the NAT Basic ANP. The material in this part complements that contained in Part I – Statement of Basic Operational Requirements and Planning Criteria of the Basic ANP and should be taken into consideration in the overall planning processes for the NAT Region.

2. This part contains the details of the facilities and services to be provided to fulfil the basic requirements of the plan and are as agreed between the provider and user States concerned. Such agreement indicates a commitment on the part of the State(s) concerned to implement the requirement(s) specified. This element of the FASID, in conjunction with the NAT ANP, is kept under constant review by the NATSPG in accordance with its schedule of management, in consultation with user and provider States and with the assistance of the ICAO European and North Atlantic Office, Paris.

SEARCH AND RESCUE SERVICES [FASID Table SAR 1]

3. FASID Table SAR 1 contains a list of the search and rescue (SAR) facilities to be provided in the NAT Region.

NF06-10 - YZ - Full NAT FASID SAR+AIS.doc Appendix A-76 NAT FASID Part VII-SAR

TABLE SAR 1 — SEARCH AND RESCUE FACILITIES

EXPLANATION OF THE TABLE

Column

1 Name of the rescue coordination centre (RCC), or rescue sub-centre (RSC) followed by the location of each rescue unit.

SPOC — SAR point of contact for the reception of alert messages detected by the COSPAS- SARSAT*system.

2 Minimum requirements for other services, including parachute rescue units (PRU), mountain rescue units (MRU), mission control centres (MCC) of the COSPAS-SARSAT* system and the automated mutual- assistance vessel rescue (AMVER) system.

— Extra long range (ELR). — aircraft with a radius of action of 2 780 km (1 500 NM) or more, plus 2½ hours search remaining.

— Very long range (VLR). — aircraft with a radius of action of more than 1 850 km (1 000 NM) plus 2½ hours search remaining.

— Long range (LRG). — aircraft with a radius of action of 1 390 km (750 NM) plus 2½ hours search remaining.

— Medium range (MRG). — aircraft with a radius of action of 740 km (400 NM) plus 2½ hours search remaining.

— Short range (SRG). — aircraft with a radius of action of 280 km (150 NM) plus ½ hour search remaining.

— Helicopter (HEL-L). — light helicopter with a radius of action for rescue purposes of up to 185 km (100 NM) and a capacity for evacuating 1 to 5 persons.

— Helicopter (HEL-M). — medium helicopter with a radius of action for rescue purposes of 185-370 km (100-200 NM) and a capacity for evacuating 6 to 15 persons.

— Helicopter (HEL-H). — heavy helicopter with a radius of action for rescue purposes of more than 370 km (200 NM) and a capacity for evacuating more than 15 persons.

— Rescue Boat (RB). — short-range coastal or river craft with an approximate speed of 14 knots or higher.

— Rescue Vessel (RV). — sea-going craft, good manoeuvrability, long range and relatively high speed. Patrol boats, customs, and pilot launches, among others, are of particular value if assigned as high priority for search and rescue operations.

Minimum requirements for other readily available services including parachute rescue units (PRU), mountain rescue units (MRU) and ship position information from the Automated Mutual-assistance Vessel Rescue (AMVER) system and the Greenland Ship Position Reporting System (Greenpos).

* COSPAS = Space system for search of vessels in distress SARSAT = Search and rescue satellite-aided tracking

NF06-10 - YZ - Full NAT FASID SAR+AIS.doc A-77 Appendix Part VII-SAR NAT FASID

TABLE SAR 1 — SEARCH AND RESCUE FACILITIES

RCC and rescue Required rescue facilities RCC and rescue Required rescue facilities units units 1 2 1 2

CANADA PORTUGAL HALIFAX RCC* LAJES RCC SPOC Dartmouth HEL-L RV Lajes VLR Gander HEL-H SRG Goose HEL-L Greenwood ELR Ponta Delgada RV

TRENTON RCC SPOC UNITED KINGDOM KINLOSS RCC VLR SPOC DENMARK HEL-H SØNDRESTRØM RCC* SPOC RV (Greenland) Denmark Søndre Strømfjord VLR UNITED STATES SPOC ? Grønnedal LRG RB Greenpos MIAMI RCC* (Florida) RV AMVER HEL-M RV Key West ELR RV Nuuk HEL-H RV Miami LRG HEL-H ICELAND St. Petersburg HEL-H RV REYKJAVÍK RCC* SPOC Keflavík LRG NEW YORK RCC* (New AMVER HEL-H York) Reykjavík LRG RV MRU Brooklyn HEL-H SRG RB Elizabeth City ELR RB HEL-H HEL-M New York RV NORWAY RB Bodø RCC ELR RV SPOC Otis AFB, Cape Cod HEL-H HEL-H Bermuda ELR HEL-L

* Escort service available.

NF06-10 - YZ - Full NAT FASID SAR+AIS.doc Appendix A-78 NAT FASID Part VIII-AIS

Part VIII

AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION SERVICES AND CHARTS (AIS/MAP)

INTRODUCTION

1. The Standards, Recommended Practices and Procedures to be applied are as listed in paragraph 1, Part VIII — AIS of the NAT ANP. The material in this part complements that contained in Part I — BORPC of the NAT ANP and should be taken into consideration in the overall planning processes for the NAT Region.

2. This element of the FASID, in conjunction with the NAT ANP, is kept under constant review by the NAT SPG in accordance with its schedule of management, in consultation with user and provider States and with the assistance of the ICAO European and North Atlantic Office, Paris.

INTERNATIONAL NOTAM OFFICES (NOFs)

3. The international NOTAM Offices designated to serve the NAT Region are set out in FASID Table AIS 1 and Chart AIS 1.

NF06-10 - YZ - Full NAT FASID SAR+AIS.doc A-79 Appendix Part VIII-AIS NAT FASID

Table AIS 1

DESIGNATED INTERNATIONAL NOTAM OFFICES (NOF) IN THE NAT REGION

NOF Areas of responsibility by FIR Remarks Ottawa Gander Oceanic Reykjavik Reykjavik Sondre Stromfjord Sondre Strom Washington New York Oceanic, Miami Oceanic

NF06-10 - YZ - Full NAT FASID SAR+AIS.doc Appendix A-80 NAT FASID Part VIII-AIS

CHART AIS 1 - INTERNATIONAL NOTAM OFFICES AND AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY

– END –

NF06-10 - YZ - Full NAT FASID SAR+AIS.doc