DOCSLIB.ORG

Archived Content Information Archivée Dans Le

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Archived Content Information Archivée Dans Le Archived Content Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or record-keeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page. Information archivée dans le Web Information archivée dans le Web à des fins de consultation, de recherche ou de tenue de documents. Cette dernière n’a aucunement été modifiée ni mise à jour depuis sa date de mise en archive. Les pages archivées dans le Web ne sont pas assujetties aux normes qui s’appliquent aux sites Web du gouvernement du Canada. Conformément à la Politique de communication du gouvernement du Canada, vous pouvez demander de recevoir cette information dans tout autre format de rechange à la page « Contactez-nous ». CANADIAN FORCES COLLEGE / COLLÈGE DES FORCES CANADIENNES CSC 30 / CCEM 30 EXERCISE/EXERCICE NEW HORIZONS Fine Wine, New Label: Effects-Based Operations By Maj R.M. Haskins This paper was written by a student attending La présente étude a été rédigée par un stagiaire the Canadian Forces College in fulfilment of one du Collège des Forces canadiennes pour of the requirements of the Course of Studies. satisfaire à l'une des exigences du cours. The paper is a scholastic document, and thus L'étude est un document qui se rapporte au contains facts and opinions which the author cours et contient donc des faits et des opinions alone considered appropriate and correct for que seul l'auteur considère appropriés et the subject. It does not necessarily reflect the convenables au sujet. Elle ne reflète pas policy or the opinion of any agency, including nécessairement la politique ou l'opinion d'un the Government of Canada and the Canadian organisme quelconque, y compris le Department of National Defence. This paper gouvernement du Canada et le ministère de la may not be released, quoted or copied except Défense nationale du Canada. Il est défendu de with the express permission of the Canadian diffuser, de citer ou de reproduire cette étude Department of National Defence. sans la permission expresse du ministère de la Défense nationale. Haskins 1 Abstract The concept of effects-based operations (EBO) has generated much hyperbole and marketing, with some analysts contending that doctrine published before EBO was akin to the Ptolemaic version of the universe, which saw the ancients believing that the Earth was at the centre of the universe. This paper demonstrates that characterizing EBO as new or revolutionary doctrine is to ignore historic examples of EBO such the Combined Bomber Offensive in the Second World War. It also shows the error in denying a close association that EBO shares with well-established principles of war such as selection and maintenance of the aim and economy of effort. Finally, it shows that the Law of Armed Conflict is replete with principles and examples which demand care and attention be paid to weapons selection and effects in operations. It concludes that EBO is neither radical nor new, but that in view of new technologies and weapons available to effects-based planners, better intelligence will be required. ________________________________________________________________________ In a paper written for the United States Air War College, Lieutenant Colonel Allen W. Batschelet proposes a definition for effects-based operations stating that they “represent the identification and engagement of an enemy’s vulnerabilities and strengths in a unified, focused manner, and uses all available assets to produce specific effects consistent with the commander’s intent.”1 In a strategic-level definition, the United States’ Joint Forces Command glossary offers the following definition: Effects-Based Operations (EBO): A process for obtaining a desired strategic outcome or "effect" on the enemy, through the synergistic, multiplicative, and 1 Lieutenant Colonel Allen W. Batschelet. “Effects-Based Operations: A New Operational Model?” (U.S. Army War College, Carlisle Barracks. 2002) 5. Available at http://www.iwar.org.uk/military/resources/effect-based-ops/ebo.pdf. Internet; accessed 29 April 2004 Haskins 2 cumulative application of the full range of military and nonmilitary capabilities at the tactical, operational, and strategic levels.2 Perhaps most simply put, effects-based operations are those which focus on the “effect” one is trying to exert on the enemy, which use all means available and appropriate, and which do not necessarily seek to meet the enemy in a force-on-force battle. Effects-based operations may be able to force an enemy to comply with ones will, without necessarily destroying fielded forces. These kind of operations seem to some to evoke a more cognitive and intellectual approach to combat, and this focus on “effects” contrasts with “objective” based operations, which for many officers will conjure up non- manoeuvrist visions of attrition and annihilation. In the rush to adopt doctrine, simulation, war fighting, training and perhaps marketing philosophies relevant to the latest and most successful technologies, one of the trendy “revolutions” in recent thinking has been Effects-Based Operations. Many analysts, technologists, and academics, have written about the revolutionary changes that effects-based operations will and must have on the conduct and nature of warfare and military forces. In fact, according to the RAND Corporation, effects-based operations pose a “grand challenge” to defence analysts, and “current methods of analysis and 2 Joint Forces Command. “Joint Forces Command Glossary” (United States Joint Forces Command, Norfolk, VA.) Available at http://www.jfcom.mil/about/glossary.htm#E Internet: accessed 25 Apr 2004 Haskins 3 modeling are inadequate.” Furthermore, meeting “the challenge will require changes of mindset, new theories and methods,” and will take years to adapt to.3 In the rush to evangelize the concept, there is even some muddling and melding of concepts such as Rapid Dominance, and Parallel Operations with the Effects-Based Operations concept. According to Major General David Deptula, the wunderkind architect of many Desert Storm successes in 19914, “Effects-based operations have the potential to reduce the force requirements, casualties, duration of conflict, forward basing, and deployment of forces previously required to prevail in war. In short, the parallel approach changes the basic character of war.”5 Some smug proponents of effects-based operations compare non-believers to the unenlightened ancients, and compare “pre-EBO” doctrine to the Ptolemaic view of the universe, while holding their effects-based doctrine out as equally as revolutionary as Copernicus’ suggestion that Earth was not the center of the universe.6 3 Paul K. Davis, “Effects-Based Operations (EBO): A Grand Challenge for the Analytical Community.” (Copyright held by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA. 2001) page xiii. Available at http://www.rand.org/publications/MR/MR1477/MR1477.sum.pdf . Internet; accessed 27 April 2004. 4 According to the current biography posted at http://www.af.mil/bios/bio_print.asp?bioID=5213&page=1 the then Lieutenant-Colonel Deptula was from August 1990 - March 1991, the “Principal Offensive Air Campaign Planner for the Director of Campaign Plans, Operation Desert Shield, and Director, Iraq Target Planning Group, Operation Desert Storm, Joint Force Air Component Command, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia” 5 Brigadier General David Deptula, “Effects-Based Operations: A Change in the Nature of Warfare”. (Aerospace Education Foundation, Arlington VA, 2002) 25. Available at http://www.aef.org/pub/psbook.pdf . Internet accessed 25 April 2004 6 Ibid. 17 Haskins 4 However, notwithstanding the enthusiastic cheerleading and fervour of some writers, it is my assertion that to characterize Effects-Based Operations as a revolutionary military doctrine is to be ignorant of our past, well-established principles of war, and the Law of Armed Conflict. This paper will demonstrate that effects-based operations are not new or revolutionary by offering historic examples of effects-based operations in both the air, and maritime environments. Further, the paper will link effects-based operations to well- established principles of war,7 showing that even though the concept may be labeled differently, it is a familiar wine with which most officers’ palates will be immediately familiar. The paper will also show that familiar principles underpinning the Law of Armed Conflict have encouraged EBO-like operations for quite some time. Finally, the paper will conclude that although effects-based operations are not new, due to the precision of the weapons now being employed in effects-based operations, there is a requirement for a greater understanding of an enemy, his culture, and his infrastructure systems. What this paper will not do is engage in a lengthy treatise on effects-based operations themselves. The paper will neither contest nor seek to show that new technology is enabling more rapid dominance in some environments or concentrate on demonstrating that parallel attack with precision weapons is allowing a greater breadth of simultaneous attacks using fewer resources. These precepts are not critical to, nor are 7 Canadian principles of war may be found at B-GJ-005-500/FP-000 CF Operational Planning Process 2002-11-06 (Department of National Defence, Ottawa, 2003) 1-6, 1-7. Available at http://www.dnd.ca/dcds/jointDoc/docs/opsPlanProcess_e.pdf. Internet; accessed 28 April 2004 Haskins 5 they necessarily component parts of, effects-based operations. What the paper does aim to do is to dispel much of the single-minded hyperbole that effects-based operations are new, that they are revolutionary, and that massive changes to our fundamental philosophies will be required to adapt to this alledgedly new and improved method of warfare. Notwithstanding the many modern effects-based zealots, there are also many who believe that we have been conducting effects-based operations for quite some time.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cataloging Service Bulletin 098, Fall 2002
    ISSN 0160-8029 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS/WASHINGTON CATALOGING SERVICE BULLETIN LIBRARY SERVICES Number 98, Fall 2002 Editor: Robert M. Hiatt CONTENTS Page DESCRIPTIVE CATALOGING Library of Congress Rule Interpretations 2 SUBJECT CATALOGING Subdivision Simplification Progress 58 Changed or Cancelled Free-Floating Subdivisions 58 Subject Headings of Current Interest 58 Revised LC Subject Headings 59 Subject Headings Replaced by Name Headings 65 MARC Language Codes 65 Editorial postal address: Cataloging Policy and Support Office, Library Services, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. 20540-4305 Editorial electronic mail address: [email protected] Editorial fax number: (202) 707-6629 Subscription address: Customer Support Team, Cataloging Distribution Service, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. 20541-4912 Subscription electronic mail address: [email protected] Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 78-51400 ISSN 0160-8029 Key title: Cataloging service bulletin Copyright ©2002 the Library of Congress, except within the U.S.A. DESCRIPTIVE CATALOGING LIBRARY OF CONGRESS RULE INTERPRETATIONS (LCRI) Cumulative index of LCRI to the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, second edition, 1998 revision, that have appeared in issues of Cataloging Service Bulletin. Any LCRI previously published but not listed below is no longer applicable and has been cancelled. Lines in the margins ( , ) of revised interpretations indicate where changes have occurred. Rule Number Page 1.0 98 11 1.0C 50 12 1.0E 69 17 1.0G 44 9 1.0H 44 9 1.1B1 97 12 1.1C 94 11 1.1D2 84 11 1.1E
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Ensigns & Jacks
    INTERNATIONAL TREASURES ™ A NATIONAL TREASURE Naval Ensigns & Jacks ZFC3577 USSR, Cruiser Aurora, unique, Order of the Oct. Revolution & Military Order of the Red Banner, Holiday Ensign, 1992. This variant of the Soviet Naval Ensign is from the Cruiser Aurora, a ship with a long and distinguished career. The Aurora is an armored cruiser currently preserved and serving as a school and museum in Saint Petersburg, Russia. ZFC0228 Lead Royal Navy ship, D-Day Operation Overlord, ZFC0514 France Ensign, FFL Aconite WWII, Sank 2 German Invasion of Normandy, 1944. This battle ensign was on the leading U-Boats on same day, 1943. An iconic French ensign which embod Royal Navy ship of the invasion that assaulted the Normandy ies the brief, yet brave, struggle of French forces against fascist beaches on June 6, 1944. Commander Anthony Kimmins secured Germany in the opening years of WWII. This flag comes from the the flag for Calvin Bullock for his return visit to New York. FNFL corvette ‘Aconite’ and was part of the Bullock Collection. ZFC0232 Royal Canadian Navy White Ensign, HMCS Wetaskiwin, ZFC0503 Lead Royal Navy ship Eastern Tack Force, Operation “Battle of the Atlantic,” 1943. This White Ensign, according to Husky, Invasion of Sicily, 1943. Due to wartime security constraints, Calvin Bullock’s documentation was “From His Majesty’s Canadian the name of the vessel that wore this ensign remains unknown. The Corvette WETASKIWIN, which for long had been flown in both the documentation states only that it flew on the task force leading the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans.” allied attacks on Sicily.
    [Show full text]
  • Consequences of the Attack on Pearl Harbor from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Jump to Navigationjump to Search
    Consequences of the attack on Pearl Harbor From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigationJump to search Hideki Tojo, Japanese Prime Minister at the time of the attack Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor took place on December 7, 1941. The U.S. military suffered 18 ships damaged or sunk, and 2,400 people were killed. Its most significant consequence was the entrance of the United States into World War II. The US had previously been neutral but subsequently entered the Pacific War, the Battle of the Atlantic and the European theatre of war. Following the attack, the US interned 120,000 Japanese Americans, 11,000 German Americans, and 3,000 Italian Americans. Contents 1American public opinion prior to the attack 2American response 3Japanese views 4Germany and Italy declare war 5British reaction 6Canadian response 7Investigations and blame 8Rise of anti-Japanese sentiment and historical significance 9Perception of the attack today o 9.1Revisionism controversies 10Analysis o 10.1Tactical implications . 10.1.1Battleships . 10.1.2Carriers . 10.1.3Shore installations . 10.1.4Charts o 10.2Strategic implications 11See also 12Notes 13External links American public opinion prior to the attack[edit] From the outbreak of World War II on September 1, 1939 to December 8, 1941, the United States was officially neutral, as it was bound by the Neutrality Acts not to get involved in the conflicts raging in Europe and Asia. Prior to the attack on Pearl Harbor, public opinion in the United States had not been unanimous. When polled in January
    [Show full text]
  • Publisher's Note
    Adam Matthew Publications is an imprint of Adam Matthew Digital Ltd, Pelham House, London Road, Marlborough, Wiltshire, SN8 2AG, ENGLAND Telephone: +44 (1672) 511921 Fax: +44 (1672) 511663 Email: [email protected] POPULAR NEWSPAPERS DURING WORLD WAR II Parts 1 to 5: 1939-1945 (The Daily Express, The Mirror, The News of The World, The People and The Sunday Express) Publisher's Note This microfilm publication makes available complete runs the Daily Express, The Daily Mirror, the News of the World, The People, and the Sunday Express for the years 1939 through to 1945. The project is organised in five parts and covers the newspapers in chronological sequence. Part 1 provides full coverage for 1939; Part 2: 1940; Part 3: 1941; Part 4: 1942-1943; and finally, Part 5 covers 1944-1945. At last social historians and students of journalism can consult complete war-time runs of Britain’s popular newspapers in their libraries. Less august than the papers of record, it is these papers which reveal most about the impact of the war on the home front, the way in which people amused themselves in the face of adversity, and the way in which public morale was kept high through a mixture of propaganda and judicious reporting. Most importantly, it is through these papers that we can see how most ordinary people received news of the war. For, with a combined circulation of over 23 million by 1948, and a secondary readership far in excess of these figures, the News of the World, The People, the Daily Express, The Daily Mirror, and the Sunday Express reached into the homes of the majority of the British public and played a critical role in shaping public perceptions of the war.
    [Show full text]
  • World War II at Sea This Page Intentionally Left Blank World War II at Sea
    World War II at Sea This page intentionally left blank World War II at Sea AN ENCYCLOPEDIA Volume I: A–K Dr. Spencer C. Tucker Editor Dr. Paul G. Pierpaoli Jr. Associate Editor Dr. Eric W. Osborne Assistant Editor Vincent P. O’Hara Assistant Editor Copyright 2012 by ABC-CLIO, LLC All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, except for the inclusion of brief quotations in a review, without prior permission in writing from the publisher. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data World War II at sea : an encyclopedia / Spencer C. Tucker. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-59884-457-3 (hardcopy : alk. paper) — ISBN 978-1-59884-458-0 (ebook) 1. World War, 1939–1945—Naval operations— Encyclopedias. I. Tucker, Spencer, 1937– II. Title: World War Two at sea. D770.W66 2011 940.54'503—dc23 2011042142 ISBN: 978-1-59884-457-3 EISBN: 978-1-59884-458-0 15 14 13 12 11 1 2 3 4 5 This book is also available on the World Wide Web as an eBook. Visit www.abc-clio.com for details. ABC-CLIO, LLC 130 Cremona Drive, P.O. Box 1911 Santa Barbara, California 93116-1911 This book is printed on acid-free paper Manufactured in the United States of America To Malcolm “Kip” Muir Jr., scholar, gifted teacher, and friend. This page intentionally left blank Contents About the Editor ix Editorial Advisory Board xi List of Entries xiii Preface xxiii Overview xxv Entries A–Z 1 Chronology of Principal Events of World War II at Sea 823 Glossary of World War II Naval Terms 831 Bibliography 839 List of Editors and Contributors 865 Categorical Index 877 Index 889 vii This page intentionally left blank About the Editor Spencer C.
    [Show full text]
  • Biismarck MAJESTIC "Arise My Love"
    THE SHEBOYGAN (WIS.) WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 13, 1940 17 bog skis and effected a dramatic jured rescue of three men near Terrell's Carole Lombard SERIAL STORY Wide Search island in Lake Butte Des Morts. Italian Fleet Crippled Jo The trio had become caught in a Has Leading Role lor bog. West carried Carl Hartman, GOAL TO GO Continues For of West Allis, three-quarters of a By British Air Attack At The Sheboygaa mile, to safety. Another hunter in 1Mb. A deeply aborting dram* of » BY W. H. PEARS NKA SERVICE. INC. that region was rescued by deputy sterna under water. Storm Victims sheriffs. (Continued from page 1) man's love and a woman's «acrt- New Talking Points fice is told by two of th« l vFVI'ERDATt ••!•• ••• The Weyauwega fire department will see the various problems that (Continued from page 1) saved Rudy Miller and Louis Snet- render to their country serv- had foremost Btara in "They Knew Ap. The People Speak; confront our team. With your per- The British apparently What They Wanted", film version Injury camp, both of Milwaukee, when ice of the highest order." given new talking points to the rdltor Buck Tells Board mission, I'll show you how I pro- rescuers expected to reach them their boat became caught in the arguments of "airplanes vs. bat- of the prize-winning Broadway run pose to meet these problems." today. ice. Miller was rushed to the New The planes, presumably operat- success which is playing through ch lr> ing from an aircraft carrier, tleships." So far in this war, no " Members His Plans Bill turned off the lights, started London Community hospital where nation has admitted the loss of a Saturday at the Sheboygan.
    [Show full text]
  • The Revolution in Warship Design Between 1797 and 1945, As Told by America's Historic Ships Or: What I Did on My Holidays
    The revolution in warship design between 1797 and 1945, as told by America’s historic ships Or: What I did on my holidays I am not a historian. Valentine’s Day Battle of Cape St Vincent (1797) "Nelson's patent bridge for boarding enemy vessels." How did this happen? USS Constitution, 1797 USS New Jersey, 1943 San Salvador (replica),1500-40 ish Rig Bits of a ship Bow Hull Superstructure Port Amidships Starboard Stern Battle of the Chesapeake (1781) USS Constitution (1797), Boston Who needs a navy? Warships are really expensive USS Constitution (1897) = USS Gerald R. Ford (2017) = $ 13+ billion $300000 ≈ $ 10 million in 2020 What kind of navy? HMS Surprise (replica), frigate San Diego HMS Victory, first-rate ship of the line Portsmouth What kind of navy? HMS Surprise (replica), frigate HMS Victory, first-rate ship of the line USS Constitution, heavy frigate Heavy frigates From sail to steam USS Mississippi (1841) Napoléon (1850) USS Constellation (1854), Baltimore Ironclads Glorie (1859) HMS Warrior (1860) Battle of Hampton Roads (1862) Turrets + Steam + Iron = ??? USS Olympia (1892), Philadelphia Battle of Manila Bay (1898) Wright Flyer (1903) HMS Dreadnought (1906) Battleships and Battlecruisers USS Texas (1912) HMS Queen Mary (1913-1916, abruptly.) USS Texas (1912), Houston USS Texas (1912), Houston USS Texas (1912), Houston Battle of Jutland (1916) Second World War - the end of the battleship? Sinking of Prince of Wales Battle of Taranto (1940) Attack on Pearl Harbour (1941) and Repulse (1941) USS Iowa (1942), Los Angeles USS Missouri (1944), Honolulu Inside Missouri Aircraft Carriers Foudre (1912) HMS Argus (1917) USS Midway (1945), San Diego Conclusions ● Historic ships are fun, and there are a lot of them to look around.
    [Show full text]
  • LCSH Section T
    T (Computer program language) T cell growth factor T-Mobile G1 (Smartphone) [QA76.73.T] USE Interleukin-2 USE G1 (Smartphone) BT Programming languages (Electronic T-cell leukemia, Adult T-Mobile Park (Seattle, Wash.) computers) USE Adult T-cell leukemia UF Safe, The (Seattle, Wash.) T (The letter) T-cell leukemia virus I, Human Safeco Field (Seattle, Wash.) [Former BT Alphabet USE HTLV-I (Virus) heading] T-1 (Reading locomotive) (Not Subd Geog) T-cell leukemia virus II, Human Safeco Park (Seattle, Wash.) BT Locomotives USE HTLV-II (Virus) The Safe (Seattle, Wash.) T.1 (Torpedo bomber) T-cell leukemia viruses, Human BT Stadiums—Washington (State) USE Sopwith T.1 (Torpedo bomber) USE HTLV (Viruses) t-norms T-6 (Training plane) (Not Subd Geog) T-cell receptor genes USE Triangular norms UF AT-6 (Training plane) BT Genes T One Hundred truck Harvard (Training plane) T cell receptors USE Toyota T100 truck T-6 (Training planes) [Former heading] USE T cells—Receptors T. rex Texan (Training plane) T-cell-replacing factor USE Tyrannosaurus rex BT North American airplanes (Military aircraft) USE Interleukin-5 T-RFLP analysis Training planes T cells USE Terminal restriction fragment length T-6 (Training planes) [QR185.8.T2] polymorphism analysis USE T-6 (Training plane) UF T lymphocytes T. S. Hubbert (Fictitious character) T-18 (Tank) Thymus-dependent cells USE Hubbert, T. S. (Fictitious character) USE MS-1 (Tank) Thymus-dependent lymphocytes T. S. W. Sheridan (Fictitious character) T-18 light tank Thymus-derived cells USE Sheridan, T. S. W. (Fictitious
    [Show full text]
  • New Jersey-Built Battleship, Uss Oklahoma (Bb 37)1
    Capt. Lawrence B. Brennan, (Ret.) ~ FIRST WARSHIP SUNK 7 DEC 1941: USS OKLAHOMA THE FIRST U.S. WARSHIP SUNK ON 7 DECEMBER 1941: 1 NEW JERSEY-BUILT BATTLESHIP, USS OKLAHOMA (BB 37) By: Captain Lawrence B. Brennan, U.S. Navy (Retired). Member, NJPHS “Oklahoma failed to fire a single shot in anger during two world wars.” Captain Herbert Fox Rommel, Jr., U.S. Navy (Retired) Pearl Harbor Survivor of USS Oklahoma2 The first and last U.S. warships sunk in the Pacific during World War II were violently destroyed with the massive loss of life; both were built by New York Shipbuilding in Camden, New Jersey; both suffered fatal damage from multiple torpedoes; both capsized within 12 minutes. The battleship, USS Oklahoma (BB 37), was sunk at Pearl Harbor on the morning of Sunday, 7 December 1941, with the loss of 429 officers and men; suffering the second greatest number of casualties that morning. Together with USS Arizona (BB 39) more than 60% of the fatalities that morning were suffered by these two ships on Battleship Row. Oklahoma was struck on the port side by as many as nine aircraft-launched torpedoes.3 Nearly 44 months later, the heavy cruiser, USS Indianapolis (CA 35),4 was sunk when struck in the starboard bow and amidships by two torpedoes fired by the Imperial Japanese submarine I-58 in the Philippine Sea on Monday, 30 July 1945, with the loss of approximately 880 officers and men. A further sad coincidence was that the last Commanding Officer Indianapolis, Captain McVay, the only naval officer court martialed and convicted for the loss of his ship in combat during either world war, was the son of Admiral Charles B.
    [Show full text]
  • Pearl Harbor INTRODUCTION
    Reading Comprehension/History Name ________________________________________________ Date ___________________ Pearl Harbor INTRODUCTION On December 7th, 1941, the Japanese Empire launched a sneak attack against the naval base of the American Pacific Fleet at Pearl Harbor, on the Island of Oahu in what was then the territory of Hawaii (Hawaii did not become a state until 1959). Most Americans refer to the attack simply as "Pearl Harbor," and many historians regard it as one of the single most important events in the history of the United States. PART 1: CAUSES Between the 1860s and the 1940s, Japan's culture underwent profound changes, abandoning a long-standing isolationism in favor of rapid growth and change. After years of refusing to involve itself in the politics or economies of its neighbors, this was a big change. The economy of the Japanese Empire changed with it, going from a medieval agricultural economy to an urban industrial economy. New factories sprang up all over the country, ready to build goods which would be sold all over the world. However, Japan is a relatively small island nation, with very few natural resources. In order to get the materials they would need to supply their factories, the Japanese Empire began to invade mainland China, starting with the First Sino-Japanese War, in 1894-1895, during which Japan occupied, or took possession of, Korea and part of Manchuria (the northernmost territory of China). In 1904, Japan went to war with Russia (the Russo- Japanese War) in order to secure its new holdings in Korea. In 1931, Japan occupied the rest of Manchuria, prior to a series of skirmishes leading up to the Second Sino-Japanese War in 1937.
    [Show full text]
  • WORLD WAR II ™ Flags and Artifacts of the Second World War a NATIONAL TREASURE
    WORLD WAR II ™ Flags and Artifacts of the Second World War A NATIONAL TREASURE ZFC1072 48 Star US Flag - This flag was the ensign of one of the ZFC1090 48 Star US – Battle of the Atlantic, 1942 – This large and major warships that participated in the bombardment of the well used wool 48 star US ensign was worn by a US vessel during the beaches during Operation Overlord the D-Day invasion of France Battle of the Atlantic. In America’s early participation in WWII, 1942 beginning the morning of June 6th, 1944. To maintain secrecy, the was a critical year. The war against German submarines in the North name of the ship that flew this flag was not revealed when it was Atlantic was not going well. This ensign was provided to Mr. Calvin subsequently donated to the collection of Calvin Bullock of New Bullock by Capt. R.C. Sanders, the Head of the Supplies Department York City. The rips and tears are typical of the damage inflicted at Navy Yard New York, from “an undisclosed vessel,” which reflects on a ships flag due to weather and/or battle conditions. the tight secrecy on the movement of military and merchant vessels supplying Great Britain through the North Atlantic route. ZFC1082 48 Star US Ensign - This ensign was formerly part of the collection of Wall Street financier Calvin Bullock; a successful busi - nessman and promoter of Anglo-American goodwill during WWII. His 1 Wall street offices in New York City contained one of the world’s leading collections of memorabilia pertaining to Napoleon & Lord Nelson.
    [Show full text]
  • Pull Together Winter/Spring 2013
    Preservation, Education, and Commemoration Vol. 52, No. 1 Winter 2012-2013 PULL TOGETHER Newsletter of the Naval Historical Foundation Doing History the Royal Navy Way Interview with former First Sea Lord Adm. Sir Jonathon Band GCB DL—page 3 Unsung American Naval Hero —page 9 Also in this issue: Message From the Chairman, p. 2; Navy Museum News, pp. 15-18; Lady Franklin Bay Relief Expedition, pp. 20–21; Naval History News, pp. 22-24; News From the NHF, pp. 25–31. Message From the Chairman In recent weeks you should have received a letter from our new president, Rear Adm. John Mitchell, detailing many of the accomplishments made by your Naval Historical Foundation (NHF) during 2012. This annual appeal generates needed funds to sustain the day-to-day operations of the NHF. Copy paper, paper clips, pens, sticky notes, and most especially our people are the motor oil that keep the Foundation engine running; past year- end appeals have generated the sums needed to strengthen our fi nancial base. Thus, I hope that you can respond with a check or an online contribution. If you are in government service, also think about us as a designated charity for the Combined Federal Campaign. Your contributions make a big difference in our ability to preserve our naval history, commemorate the accomplishments of our Sailors, and educate Americans about our Navy’s great history and heritage. Education is one of our most important priorities. Current Navy leaders are a key component of the audiences we seek to enlighten. In that regard, we received much positive feedback on our last edition of Pull Together, which opened with a reprint of Dudley Knox’s 1926 “Our Vanishing History and Traditions” article that led to the creation of our organization.
    [Show full text]