DOCSLIB.ORG

David Noel Keightley, 1932-2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
David Noel Keightley, 1932-2017 H-Asia David Noel Keightley, 1932-2017 Discussion published by Ryan Dunch on Tuesday, March 7, 2017 Ed. note: Our colleague Frank Shulman has shared the sad news of the death of the great Shang China scholar David Keightley, who passed away in California on February 23. Frank has kindly compiled the messages below, which are reproduced with the permission of their authors. Text from the Wikipedia article on Prof. Keightley is reproduced with attribution under the terms of the relevant Creative Commons license. I encourage others who knew David Keightley to share their memories and tributes to him on H-Asia in the days to come. Ryan Dunch On February 26th, Keith Knapp, Professor of History at the Citadel in Charleston, South Carolina, informed the members of three listserves for Chinese Studies -- ["[email protected]", "[email protected]", and "[email protected]" – of the passing of Professor David Noel Keightley. He wrote as follows: Dear Colleagues, It is with deep sadness that I inform you of the death of David Noel Keightley who passed away at 3:00 am on Thursday, February 23. David was a world renowned expert on the Shang Dynasty and Oracle Bones. He was also a much beloved instructor and towering intellect. He was certainly one of the best teachers that I have ever had. The memorial service will be held onMarch 25 at 11:00 am at the Sunset View Mortuary and Cemetery, 101 Colusa Ave, El Cerrito, California 94530. With much sorrow, Keith ===== According to Wikipedia [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Keightley]: David N. Keightley was born on October 25, 1932, in London, England, and lived there until his family moved to the United States in 1947. He attended Amherst College as an undergraduate student, graduating in 1953 with a B.A. in English with a minor in biochemistry. He then received a Fulbright Scholarship, which he used to study Medieval French at the University of Lille. He received an M.A. in modern European history from New York University in 1956. He then worked for several years at publishing companies in New York City and as a freelance writer before beginning his study of Chinese and Sinology. Keightley began his graduate study in East Asian history at Columbia University in 1962. In 1965, Keightley moved to Taipei, Taiwan where he studied Chinese for two years at the Stanford Center (modern Inter-University Program for Chinese Language Study). He then returned to the United Citation: Ryan Dunch. David Noel Keightley, 1932-2017. H-Asia. 03-07-2017. https://networks.h-net.org/node/22055/discussions/170323/david-noel-keightley-1932-2017 Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 1 H-Asia States to complete his doctoral studies at Columbia under the Swedish Sinologist Hans Bielenstein, and received a Ph.D. in 1969 with a dissertation entitled "Public Work in Ancient China: A Study of Forced Labor in the Shang and Early Chou". After receiving his Ph.D. in 1969, Keightley was selected to replace Woodbridge Bingham (1901–1986) as professor of East Asian history at the University of California, Berkeley. Keightley became one of the leading Western scholars of Chinese oracle bones, which contain the earliest known examples of Chinese writing. In 1995, the American Sinologist Edward Shaughnessy stated that Keightley "has done more to introduce the depth and breadth of early China's oracle-bone divination to Western readers than any [other] scholar." He taught and worked at Berkeley until his retirement in 1998. Keightley died peacefully in his sleep at his home on February 23, 2017, aged 84. To this should be added the fact that David Keightley received a Guggenheim Fellowship in 1978 and an award from the MacArthur Fellows Program in 1986. His many publications included Sources of Shang History: The Oracle-Bone Inscriptions of Bronze Age China. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978; "The Shang: China's First Historical Dynasty." In Michael Loewe and Edward Shaughnessy. The Cambridge History of Ancient China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999. pp. 232–291; The Ancestral Landscape: Time, Space, and Community in Late Shang China (ca. 1200-1045 B.C.). Berkeley: Institute of East Asian Studies, University of California, Berkeley, 2000; Working for His Majesty: Research Notes on Labor Mobilization in Late Shang China (ca. 1200-1045 B.C.), as Seen in the Oracle-Bone Inscriptions, with Particular Attention to Handicraft Industries, Agriculture, Warfare, Hunting, Construction, and the Shang’s Legacies. Berkeley: Institute of East Asian Studies, University of California, Berkeley, 2012; and These Bones Shall Rise Again: Selected Writings on Early China. Albany: State University of New York Press. 2013. He was co-founder of the journal Early China and the author of over sixty articles dealing with the history of early China. ===== The tributes that have since come to my attention are as follows: We have lost a giant in Chinese studies. David Keightley was a wonderful person and scholar whose work on ancient China and its antecedents inspired me a lot, and is highly relevant to modern China studies, too, especially because of the intense struggles today, over how to understand China's past. I was lucky to meet him one last time, when he graced my presentation on just that topic, at Berkeley two years ago. In sadness, Magnus Fiskesjö Associate Professor of Anthropology, Cornell University [email protected] ===== Citation: Ryan Dunch. David Noel Keightley, 1932-2017. H-Asia. 03-07-2017. https://networks.h-net.org/node/22055/discussions/170323/david-noel-keightley-1932-2017 Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 2 H-Asia Among the Soviet Jews who applied for exit visas to emigrate to Israel during the early 1970s was Vitaly A. Rubin, a specialist in early Chinese history and philosophy, a senior research fellow in Chinese Studies at Moscow's Institute of Oriental Studies, and a leader in the Soviet Jewish emigration movement. He and his wife Inessa became "refusedniks" when their applications were officially rejected. A nearly five-year long international campaign to persuade the government to reverse its decision ensued. David Keightley played an active role early on in that campaign -- and at an early point in his own professional career. He joined with me, Harold Z. Schiffrin, Steven I. Levine, Wm. Theodore deBary, Lucien Bianco, Rhoads Murphey, and many other American, European and Israeli scholars engaged in China studies in undertaking a concerted effort that finally culminated in success in 1976. For some further information in this regard, please see: Schiffrin, Harold Z. "Obituary: VITALY ARONOVICH RUBIN (1923-1981)". Journal of Asian Studies (Ann Arbor, Michigan) 41, no.3 (May 1, 1982): 645. search.proquest.com/openview/.../1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=1817327 Vitaly A. Rubin. Individual and State in Ancient China: Essays on Four Chinese Philosophers. Translated by Steven I. Levine. New York: Columbia University Press, 1976. xxix, 149p. "The Fate of Rubin", by L. Carrington Goodrich. New York Review of Books, October 3, 1974. http://www.nybooks.com/articles/1974/10/03/the-fate-of-rubin/ Additional information about David Keightley and his connection with Vitaly Rubin may be found through a search of the Internet. In addition, I have a number of files and copies of personal correspondence with David Keightley that document his efforts on behalf of Vitaly Rubin, all of which I eventually intend to deposit in an appropriate institutional archive. May David Keightley's wonderful assistance to other scholars be remembered for many years to come! Frank Joseph Shulman Bibliographer, Editor and Consultant for Reference Publications in Asian Studies [email protected] ===== I am saddened by the news of David Keightley's passing. Although I never had the pleasure of meeting him in person and my own work in the contemporary China field was at the other end of his outstanding work on ancient China, I viewed him with great respect both as a scholar and a humanist involved in a common struggle. Allow me to indulge some old memories. As an untenured assistant professor at Columbia University (1973-76), with the support of intellectual giants like Wm. Theodore deBary, then the provost, John Fairbank, Zvi Schiffrin, and many others, including you, of course, I initiated the International Committee for Vitaly A. Rubin that I ran out of my upper right-hand desk drawer in my office at the East Asian Institute. It was Anne Birrell, then a graduate student in East Asian Languages and Literatures at Columbia, who suggested that as part of the campaign to free Vitaly Rubin, I translate his book on ancient Chinese thinkers, the Russian original of which my own mentor Benjamin I. Citation: Ryan Dunch. David Noel Keightley, 1932-2017. H-Asia. 03-07-2017. https://networks.h-net.org/node/22055/discussions/170323/david-noel-keightley-1932-2017 Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 3 H-Asia Schwartz had reviewed in a scholarly journal, I think the Journal of Asian Studies. David Keightley's intellectual and moral support during the campaign to persuade the Soviets to allow Rubin to emigrate to Israel was indispensable. I echo your hope that his friends, colleagues, former students, and others keep alive their memories of Professor Keightley for many years to come. Steven I. Levine Research Faculty Associate at the University of Montana [email protected] ===== I am very saddened by this news. David was a true giant in the field. He and I were fellow graduate students at Columbia , and I will never forget the moment when he emerged from the Tombs (the four underground floors of Kent Hall's East Asian library) to inform me excitedly, "Jonathan! I have just had in my hands a Han Dynasty crossbow trigger!" David knew that I was working on Sung- Dynasty poet Mei Yao-ch'en for my dissertation, and that Mei had a remarkable poem on a Han Dynasty crossbow trigger.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Later Han Empire (25-220CE) & Its Northwestern Frontier
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2012 Dynamics of Disintegration: The Later Han Empire (25-220CE) & Its Northwestern Frontier Wai Kit Wicky Tse University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Asian History Commons, Asian Studies Commons, and the Military History Commons Recommended Citation Tse, Wai Kit Wicky, "Dynamics of Disintegration: The Later Han Empire (25-220CE) & Its Northwestern Frontier" (2012). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 589. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/589 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/589 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Dynamics of Disintegration: The Later Han Empire (25-220CE) & Its Northwestern Frontier Abstract As a frontier region of the Qin-Han (221BCE-220CE) empire, the northwest was a new territory to the Chinese realm. Until the Later Han (25-220CE) times, some portions of the northwestern region had only been part of imperial soil for one hundred years. Its coalescence into the Chinese empire was a product of long-term expansion and conquest, which arguably defined the egionr 's military nature. Furthermore, in the harsh natural environment of the region, only tough people could survive, and unsurprisingly, the region fostered vigorous warriors. Mixed culture and multi-ethnicity featured prominently in this highly militarized frontier society, which contrasted sharply with the imperial center that promoted unified cultural values and stood in the way of a greater degree of transregional integration. As this project shows, it was the northwesterners who went through a process of political peripheralization during the Later Han times played a harbinger role of the disintegration of the empire and eventually led to the breakdown of the early imperial system in Chinese history.
    [Show full text]
  • Kwang-Chih Chang 1931-2001
    KWANG-CHIH CHANG 1931-2001 A Biographical Memoir by ROBERT E. MUROWCHICK © 2012 The National Academy of Sciences Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. KWANG-CHIH CHANG KWANG-CHIH KWANG–CHIH CHANG April 15, 1931–January 3, 2001 BY ROBERT E. MUROWCHICK FOR MORE THAN 40 YEARS Kwang-chih Chang bridged East and West with his scholarship serving as the main doorway through which Western scholars and students could approach the archaeology of ancient China as that country moved 1 from isolation to full international collaboration in the study of its past. With a modest smile and well-known aversion to pretentiousness, Chang transformed our understanding of early Chinese and East Asian history by integrating tradi- tional historiography with American anthropological archaeology, and by using Asian data to challenge long-held Western ideas about the rise of agriculture, urbanism, and kingship. Chang’s introduction of interdisciplinary field methods in his excavations in Taiwan brought new understanding of cultural and envi- ronmental change. The bonds he forged with mainland scholars helped pave the way for the new era of international cooperation in Chinese fieldwork we see today. Chang was a student of many of the giants in the fields of archaeology, anthropology, and ethnology, and he in turn trained multiple generations of students who carry forward both his research interests and his love for teaching. wang-chih Chang, to study at National Beiping or “K.C.” as he was Normal University and to write known among his bai hua poetry and essays.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Sinology and Field Journals
    Handbook of Reference Works in Traditional Chinese Studies (R. Eno, 2011) 9. WESTERN SINOLOGY AND FIELD JOURNALS This section of has two parts. The first outlines some aspects of the history of sinology in the West relevant to the contemporary shape of the field. The second part surveys some of the leading and secondary sinological journals, with emphasis on the role they have played historically. I. An outline of sinological development in the West The history of sinology in the West is over 400 years old. No substantial survey will be attempted here; that can wait until publication of The Lives of the Great Sinologists, a blockbuster for sure.1 At present, with Chinese studies widely dispersed in hundreds of teaching institutions, the lines of the scholarly traditions that once marked sharply divergent approaches are not as easy to discern as they were thirty or forty years ago, but they still have important influences on the agendas of the field, and they should be understood in broad outline. One survey approach is offered by the general introduction to Zurndorfer’s guide; its emphasis is primarily on the development of modern Japanese and Chinese scholarly traditions, and it is well worth reading. This brief summary has somewhat different emphases. A. Sinology in Europe The French school Until the beginning of the eighteenth century, Western views of China were principally derived from information provided by occasional travelers and by missionaries, particularly the Jesuits, whose close ties with the Ming and Ch’ing courts are engagingly portrayed by Jonathan Spence in his popular portraits, The Memory Palace of Matteo Ricci and Emperor of China.
    [Show full text]
  • PART TWO Interactions
    PART TWO Interactions ∵ Patricia Ebrey - 9789004272095 Downloaded from Brill.com09/25/2021 08:15:39PM via free access Patricia Ebrey - 9789004272095 Downloaded from Brill.com09/25/2021 08:15:39PM via free access Remonstrating Against Royal Extravagance in Imperial China Patricia Ebrey Soon after the Wanli emperor (r. 1572–1620) came to the Ming throne as a boy of nine, his tutor Zhang Juzheng (1525–1582) compiled an illustrated book about the good and bad actions of past rulers, chronologically arranged, titled The Emperor’s Mirror, Illustrated and Discussed.1 It consisted of seventy-two examples of wise actions taken by kings and emperors and thirty-six examples of unwise actions. Each started with a picture, followed by a passage in clas- sical Chinese drawn from original sources, and ended with a paraphrase and discussion of the case in vernacular language, a rare concession to the ruler’s age. The examples of good and bad acts range in date from high antiquity to the Song dynasty (960–1276). The admirable practices included accepting advice, rewarding critics, dismissing flatterers, inviting scholars to lecture on the classics, paying respect to the elderly, and maintaining good relations with brothers. Many of the negative examples revolved around extravagance or self- indulgence of one sort or another, including indulging the whims of a favourite concubine, building huge palaces, giving valuables to favourites, and taking long hunting trips or other travels. Some of the acts condemned were truly evil, such as killing people for no reason; at the other extreme we find peccadillos, such as being overly fond of music or sneaking out of the palace incognito.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA Santa Barbara Scribes in Early Imperial
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Santa Barbara Scribes in Early Imperial China A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in History by Tsang Wing Ma Committee in charge: Professor Anthony J. Barbieri-Low, Chair Professor Luke S. Roberts Professor John W. I. Lee September 2017 The dissertation of Tsang Wing Ma is approved. ____________________________________________ Luke S. Roberts ____________________________________________ John W. I. Lee ____________________________________________ Anthony J. Barbieri-Low, Committee Chair July 2017 Scribes in Early Imperial China Copyright © 2017 by Tsang Wing Ma iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to thank Professor Anthony J. Barbieri-Low, my advisor at the University of California, Santa Barbara, for his patience, encouragement, and teaching over the past five years. I also thank my dissertation committees Professors Luke S. Roberts and John W. I. Lee for their comments on my dissertation and their help over the years; Professors Xiaowei Zheng and Xiaobin Ji for their encouragement. In Hong Kong, I thank my former advisor Professor Ming Chiu Lai at The Chinese University of Hong Kong for his continuing support over the past fifteen years; Professor Hung-lam Chu at The Hong Kong Polytechnic University for being a scholar model to me. I am also grateful to Dr. Kwok Fan Chu for his kindness and encouragement. In the United States, at conferences and workshops, I benefited from interacting with scholars in the field of early China. I especially thank Professors Robin D. S. Yates, Enno Giele, and Charles Sanft for their comments on my research. Although pursuing our PhD degree in different universities in the United States, my friends Kwok Leong Tang and Shiuon Chu were always able to provide useful suggestions on various matters.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeology of Asia
    BLACKWELL STUDIES IN GLOBAL ARCHAEOLOGY archaeology of asia Edited by Miriam T. Stark Archaeology of Asia BLACKWELL STUDIES IN GLOBAL ARCHAEOLOGY Series Editors: Lynn Meskell and Rosemary A. Joyce Blackwell Studies in Global Archaeology is a series of contemporary texts, each care- fully designed to meet the needs of archaeology instructors and students seeking volumes that treat key regional and thematic areas of archaeological study. Each volume in the series, compiled by its own editor, includes 12–15 newly commis- sioned articles by top scholars within the volume’s thematic, regional, or temporal area of focus. What sets the Blackwell Studies in Global Archaeology apart from other available texts is that their approach is accessible, yet does not sacrifice theoretical sophistication. The series editors are committed to the idea that usable teaching texts need not lack ambition. To the contrary, the Blackwell Studies in Global Archaeology aim to immerse readers in fundamental archaeological ideas and concepts, but also to illu- minate more advanced concepts, thereby exposing readers to some of the most exciting contemporary developments in the field. Inasmuch, these volumes are designed not only as classic texts, but as guides to the vital and exciting nature of archaeology as a discipline. 1. Mesoamerican Archaeology: Theory and Practice Edited by Julia A. Hendon and Rosemary A. Joyce 2. Andean Archaeology Edited by Helaine Silverman 3. African Archaeology: A Critical Introduction Edited by Ann Brower Stahl 4. Archaeologies of the Middle East: Critical Perspectives Edited by Susan Pollock and Reinhard Bernbeck 5. North American Archaeology Edited by Timothy R. Pauketat and Diana DiPaolo Loren 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Earlychinaunicali00keigrich.Pdf
    Berkeley University of California Regional Oral History Office University of California The Bancroft Library Berkeley, California University History Series Department of History at Berkeley David N. Keightley HISTORIAN OF EARLY CHINA, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY, 1969-1998 With an Introduction by David Johnson Interviews Conducted by Frances Starn in 2001 * Copyright 2003 by The Regents of the University of California Since 1954 the Regional Oral History Office has been interviewing leading participants in or well-placed witnesses to major events in the development ofNorthern California, the West, and the Nation. Oral history is a method of collecting historical information through tape-recorded interviews between a narrator with firsthand knowledge of historically significant events and a well-informed interviewer, with the goal of preserving substantive additions to the historical record. The tape recording is transcribed, lightly edited for continuity and clarity, and reviewed by the interviewee. The corrected manuscript is indexed, bound with photographs and illustrative materials, and placed in The Bancroft Library at the University of California, Berkeley, and in other research collections for scholarly use. Because it is primary material, oral history is not intended to present the final, verified, or complete narrative of events. It is a spoken account, offered by the interviewee in response to questioning, and as such it is reflective, partisan, deeply involved, and irreplaceable. ************************************ All uses of this manuscript are covered by a legal agreement between The Regents of the University of California and David N. Keightley dated July 1 6, 200 1 . The manuscript is thereby made available for research purposes. All literary rights in the manuscript, including the right to publish, are reserved to The Bancroft Library of the University of California, Berkeley.
    [Show full text]
  • Han Dynasty Classicism and the Making of Early Medieval Literati Culture
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2013 In Pursuit of the Great Peace: Han Dynasty Classicism and the Making of Early Medieval Literati Culture Lu Zhao University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, and the Asian History Commons Recommended Citation Zhao, Lu, "In Pursuit of the Great Peace: Han Dynasty Classicism and the Making of Early Medieval Literati Culture" (2013). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 826. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/826 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/826 For more information, please contact [email protected]. In Pursuit of the Great Peace: Han Dynasty Classicism and the Making of Early Medieval Literati Culture Abstract This dissertation is focused on communities of people in the Han dynasty (205 B.C.-A.D. 220) who possessed the knowledge of a corpus of texts: the Five Classics. Previously scholars have understood the popularity of this corpus in the Han society as a result of stiff ideology and imperial propaganda. However, this approach fails to explain why the imperial government considered them effective to convey propaganda in the first place. It does not capture the diverse range of ideas in classicism. This dissertation concentrates on Han classicists and treats them as scholars who constantly competed for attention in intellectual communities and solved problems with innovative solutions that were plausible to their contemporaries. This approach explains the nature of the apocryphal texts, which scholars have previously referred to as shallow and pseudo-scientific.
    [Show full text]
  • 11.11.15 China + ANU.Indd
    CHINA & ANU DIPLOMATS, ADVENTURERS, SCHOLARS CHINA & ANU DIPLOMATS, ADVENTURERS, SCHOLARS William Sima © e Australian National Univeristy (as represented by the Australian Centre on China in the World) First published November 2015 by ANU Press e Australian National University Acton ACT 2601, Australia Email: [email protected] is title is also available online at press.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Creator: William, Sima, author. Title: China & ANU : diplomats, adventurers, scholars / by William Sima. ISBN: 9781925022964 (paperback) 9781925022971 (ebook) Target Audience: For tertiary students. Subjects: Research teams--China. | Research teams--Australia. | China-- Research--Australia. | Australia--Foreign relations--China. | China--Foreign relations--Australia. | Australian. Dewey Number: 327.94051 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmied in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. is publication is made available as an Open Educational Resource through licensing under a Creative Commons Aribution Non-Commercial Share Alike 3.0 Australia Licence: creativecommons.org/licensese/by-nc-sa/3.0/au/deed.en Note on Visual Material All images in this publication have been fully accredited. Cover design, art direction and typeseing by Yasmin Masri. Maps designed by CartoGIS, ANU. Printed by Cabin Design Graphics Printing, Taipei, Taiwan e Australian Centre on China in the World is an initiative of the Commonwealth Government of Australia and e Australian National University For my teachers at e Australian National University MAPS Manchukuo and Japanese-occupied China, December 1941, showing places visited by Frederic Eggleston, 1941–1944.
    [Show full text]
  • The Abbreviation CHC Refers to the Cambridge History of China, Ed
    Notes The abbreviation CHC refers to The Cambridge History of China, ed. Denis Twitchett and John K. Fairbank. For full details, see 'Further Reading', pp. 309-10. Notes to the Introduction 1. John W. Dardess, A Ming Society: T'ai-ho County, Kiangsi, Fourteenth to Seventeenth Centuries (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1996). 2. Li Jun, Chinese Civilization in the Making, 1766-221 Be (London: Macmillan, 1996). 3. Paul A. Cohen, Discovering History in China: American Historical Writing on the Recent Chinese Past (New York: Columbia University Press, 1984) pp. 9-55. Notes to Chapter 1 The Prehistory and Early History of China 1. D.C. Lau (trans. and ed.), Mencius (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1970) p. 128. 2. Quoted in Derk Bodde, 'Feudalism in China', in Rushton Coulborn (ed.), Feudalism in History (Hamden, CT: Archon Books, 1965) p. 58. 3. Herrlee G. Creel, The Origins of Statecraft in China: The Western Chou Empire (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970) p. 320. 4. Xueqin Li, Eastern Zhou and Qin Civilizations (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1985) p. 477. 5. Raymond Dawson, Confucius (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981) p. 76. 6. D. C. Lau (trans. and ed.), Confucius: The Analects (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1979) pp. 74, l31. 7. W. T. de Bary et al. (eds), Sources of Chinese Tradition, 2 vols (New York: Columbia University Press, 1960) vol. I, p. 40. 8. D. C. Lau (trans. and ed.), Lao Tzu: Tao Te Ching (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1975) p. 57. 9. Ibid., p. 59. 10. De Bary et al. (eds), Sources of Chinese Tradition, vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient China and Its Enemies
    Ancient China and Its Enemies It has been an article of faith among historians of ancient China that Chinese culture represented the highest level of civilization in the greater Asia region from the first millennium b.c. throughout the pre-imperial period. This Sinocentric image – which contrasts the high culture of Shang and Chou China with the lower, “barbarian” peoples living off the grasslands along the northern frontier – is embedded in early Chinese historical records and has been perpetuated over the years by Chinese and Western historians. In this comprehensive history of the northern frontier of China from 900 to 100 b.c., Nicola Di Cosmo investigates the origins of this simplistic image, and in the process shatters it. This book presents a far more complex picture of early China and its relations with the “barbarians” to the North, documenting how early Chinese perceived and inter- acted with increasingly organized, advanced, and politically unified (and threatening) groupings of people just outside their domain. Di Cosmo explores the growing ten- sions between these two worlds as they became progressively more polarized, with the eventual creation of the nomadic, Hsiung-nu empire in the north and Chinese empire in the south. This book is part of a new wave of revisionist scholarship made possible by recent, important archaeological findings in China, Mongolia, and Central Asia that can now be compared against the historical record. It is the first study investigating the antag- onism between early China and its neighbors that combines both Chinese historical texts and archaeological data. Di Cosmo reconciles new, archaeological evidence – of early non-Chinese to the north and west of China who lived in stable communities, had developed bronze technology, and used written language – with the common notion of undifferentiated tribes living beyond the pale of Chinese civilization.
    [Show full text]
  • Richard Rafes International Pioneer in Translation of Historical Material
    Jun 02, 2011 19:06 EDT Richard Rafes international pioneer in translation of historical material Richard Rafe Champion de Crespigny, is a retired Adjunct Professor with the China and Korea Centre, Australian National Universaty, in Canberra, Australia and author of many books about the Later Han and Three Kingdoms. He is also been acknowledged internationally as a pioneer in the translation and historiography of historical material concerning the Three Kingdoms period. During his early years as a scholar de Crespigny developed an interest in the Later Han via the classic Romance of the Three Kingdoms, by Luo Guanzhong.[1] BiographyEdit Biography sectionEdit De Crespigny's first degree was European history. Afterwards he began studying Chinese under Hans Bielenstein, a historian specialized in the restoration of the Han dynasty. During his first year as a student under Bielenstein, de Crespigny read the Brewitt-Taylor translation of the Sanguo yanyi. De Crespigny fell in love with the story. Apparently he has the same goals as Gongjin's Campaign Memorials; which is to find out what really happened some 1800 years ago.[2] His seminal dissertation in 1964 was "The Development of the Chinese Empire in the South; a discussion of the origins of the state of Wu of the Three Kingdoms", which provided the basis for much of his later work, including his most well-known monograph Generals of the South: the Foundation and Early History of the Three Kingdoms State of Wu. Since then Rafe de Crespigny has arguably become (one of) the best English sources for Later Han and Three Kingdoms information.
    [Show full text]