9. the Early Dynastic Period 2900-2350 BCE Collapse of the Uruk System, Ca

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

9. the Early Dynastic Period 2900-2350 BCE Collapse of the Uruk System, Ca

Before Baghdad: Cities of Ancient Mesopotamia MW 10-11am, Peabody Museum 59D 9. The Early Dynastic Period 2900-2350 BCE Collapse of the Uruk system, ca. 3100 BC • Hostile local peoples? • Hostile pastoral groups? • Social/political unrest in the core? • Other colonists? Jemdet Nasr period, 3100-2900 BC The Sumerian King List 1-39After the kingship descended from heaven, the kingship was in Eridu. In Eridu, Alulim became king; he ruled for 28800 years. Alaljar ruled for 36000 years. 2 kings; they ruled for 64800 years. Then Eridu fell and the kingship was taken to Bad-tibira. In Bad-tibira, En-men-lu-ana ruled for 43200 years. En-men-gal-ana ruled for 28800 years. Dumuzid, the shepherd, ruled for 36000 years. 3 kings; they ruled for 108000 years. Then Bad-tibira fell (?) and the kingship was taken to Larak. In Larak, En-sipad-zid- ana ruled for 28800 years. 1 king; he ruled for 28800 years. Then Larak fell (?) and the kingship was taken to Zimbir. In Zimbir, En-men-dur-ana became king; he ruled for 21000 years. 1 king; he ruled for 21000 years. Then Zimbir fell (?) and the kingship was taken to Šuruppak. In Šuruppak, Ubara- Tutu became king; he ruled for 18600 years. 1 king; he ruled for 18600 years. In 5 cities 8 kings; they ruled for 241200 years. Then the flood swept over. Weld-Blundell Prism (Larsa, ca. 1817 BC) Regions of Southern Mesopotamia in the 3rd Millennium BC Early Dynastic City-States Cities of the Gods • Enlil at Nippur (Ekur) • Inanna/Ishtar at Uruk (Eanna) • Enki at Eridu • Utu/Shamash at Sippar and Larsa • Nanna/Sin at Ur Enki, God of Subterranean Waters Nippur City of the god Enlil University of Chicago, Oriental Institute Inana Temple, level VIIA Kish Kish Palace P Palace A Al Hiba Ancient Lagash Plano-convex bricks Plaque of Ur-Nanshe, Ruler of Lagash, ca. 2500 BC Tello (Girsu) “Vulture Stele” of Eannatum of Lagash, ca. 2400 BC “Vulture Stele” of Eanatum of Lagash, ca. 2400 BC “Vulture Stele” of Eanatum of Lagash, ca. 2400 BC Iconography related to the god Ningirsu Anzu-bird, lion-headed eagle Silver vase of Entemena [Enmetena] of Lagash found at Tello (Girsu) Sir Leonard Woolley Excavations at Ur in the 1920’s Excavations at Ur “King’s Grave” Meskalamdug Pu-Abi “Death Pit” Meskalamdug Burial of Meskalamdug .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Nabu 2015-2-Mep-Dc
ISSN 0989-5671 2015 N°2 (juin) NOTES BRÈVES 25) À propos d’ARET XII 344, des déesses dgú-ša-ra-tum et de la naissance du prince éblaïte* — Le texte administratif ARET XII 344 est malheureusement assez lacuneux, mais à notre avis quand même très intéressant. Les lignes du texte préservées sont les suivantes: r. I’:1’-5’: ‹x›[...] / šeš-[...] / in ⸢u₄⸣ / ḫúl / ⸢íl⸣-['à*-ag*-da*-mu*] v. II’:1’-11’: ...] K[ALAM.]KAL[AM(?)] / NI-šè-na-⸢a⸣ / ma-lik-tum / è / é / daš-dar / ap / íl-'à- ag-da-mu / i[n] / [...] / [...] r. III’:1’-9’: ⸢'à⸣-[...] / 1 gír mar-t[u] zú-aka / 1 buru₄-mušen 1 kù-sal / daš-dar / NAM-ra-luki / 1 zara₆-túg ú-ḫáb / 1 giš-šilig₅* 2 kù-sig₁₇ maš-maš-SÙ / 1 šíta zabar / dga-mi-iš r. IV’:1’-10’: ⸢x⸣[...] / 10 lá-3 an-dù[l] igi-DUB-SÙ šu-SÙ DU-SÙ kù:babbar / 10 lá-3 gú-a-tum zabar / dgú-ša-ra-tum / 5 kù-sig₁₇ / é / en / ni-zi-mu / 2 ma-na 55 kù-sig₁₇ / sikil r. V’:1’-6’: [x-]NE-[t]um / [x K]A-dù-gíd / [m]a-lik-tum / i[n-na-s]um / dga-mi-iš / 1 dib 2 giš- DU 2 ti-gi-na 2 geštu-lá 2 ba-ga-NE-su!(ZU) r. VI’:1’-6’: [...]⸢x⸣ / [m]a-[li]k-tum / [šu-ba₄-]ti / [x ki]n siki / [x-]li / [x-b]a-LUM. Tout d’abord, on remarquera qu’au début du texte on peut lire in ⸢u₄⸣ / ḫúl / ⸢íl⸣-['à*-ag*-da*- mu*], c’est-à-dire « dans le jour de la fête (en l’honneur) d’íl-'à-ag-da-mu ».
[Show full text]
The Sumerian King List the Sumerian King List (SKL) Dates from Around 2100 BCE—Near the Time When Abram Was in Ur
BcResources Genesis The Sumerian King List The Sumerian King List (SKL) dates from around 2100 BCE—near the time when Abram was in Ur. Most ANE scholars (following Jacobsen) attribute the original form of the SKL to Utu-hejel, king of Uruk, and his desire to legiti- mize his reign after his defeat of the Gutians. Later versions included a reference or Long Chronology), 1646 (Middle to the Great Flood and prefaced the Chronology), or 1582 (Low or Short list of postdiluvian kings with a rela- Chronology). The following chart uses tively short list of what appear to be the Middle Chronology. extremely long-reigning antediluvian Text. The SKL text for the following kings. One explanation: transcription chart was originally in a narrative form or translation errors resulting from and consisted of a composite of several confusion of the Sumerian base-60 versions (see Black, J.A., Cunningham, and the Akkadian base-10 systems G., Fluckiger-Hawker, E, Robson, E., of numbering. Dividing each ante- and Zólyomi, G., The Electronic Text diluvian figure by 60 returns reigns Corpus of Sumerian Literature (http:// in harmony with Biblical norms (the www-etcsl.orient.ox.ac.uk/), Oxford bracketed figures in the antediluvian 1998-). The text was modified by the portion of the chart). elimination of manuscript references Final versions of the SKL extended and by the addition of alternative the list to include kings up to the reign name spellings, clarifying notes, and of Damiq-ilicu, king of Isin (c. 1816- historical dates (typically in paren- 1794 BCE). thesis or brackets). The narrative was Dates.
[Show full text]
Zur Repräsentation Von Geschichte Und Kultur Des Alten Orients in Großen Europäischen Museen: Die Analyse Der Dauerausstel
Zur Repräsentation von Geschichte und Kultur des Alten Orients in großen europäischen Museen: Die Analyse der Dauerausstellungen in den vorderasiatischen Museen im Louvre, British Museum und Pergamonmuseum Inaugural- Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades am Fachbereich Geschichts- und Kulturwissenschaften der Freien Universität Berlin vorgelegt von Hussein Bakkor aus Idleb/ Syrien Berlin 2011 1. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Dominik Bonatz 2. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Reinhard Bernbeck Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 14. November 2011 ii Hiermit versichere ich, dass ich die vorlegende Arbeit mit dem Titel „Zur Repräsentation von Geschichte und Kultur des Alten Orients in großen europäischen Museen: Die Analyse der Dauerausstellungen in den vorderasiatischen Museen im Louvre, British Museum und Pergamonmuseum“ selbstständig und ohne Benutzung anderer als der von mir angegebenen Hilfsmittel verfasst habe. Alle Stellen, die wortgetreu oder sinngemäß aus anderen Veröffentlichungen entnommen sind, sind als solche kenntlich gemacht. Die vorliegende Studie hat an noch keiner anderen Stelle als akademische Abschlußabrabeit vorgelegen. Berlin, im Juni 2011 …………………………………………………………. iii Vorwort Die vorliegende Studie wurde von der Aleppo Universität gefördert. Ich danke der Universität für ihre Unterstützung und auch für die Flexibilität, als es um eine Konzeptionsänderung und damit um eine Verlängerung der Forschungsdauer ging. Meinen besonderen Dank möchte ich meinem Betreuer Herrn Prof. Dr. Dominik Bonatz aussprechen. Er hat mir mit seinem unerschütterlichen Optimismus die Entstehung dieser Arbeit überhaupt erst möglich gemacht und diese dann kritisch und wohlwollend begleitet. Des weiteren bin ich Herrn Prof. Dr. Reinhard Bernbeck für die fachliche Unterstützung und für die Übernahme des Zweitgutachtens zu Dank verpflichtet. Danken möchte auch Herrn Prof. Dr. Hartmut Kühne, Frau Prof. Dr. Susan Pollock und Frau Dr.
[Show full text]
This Thesis Has Been Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for a Postgraduate Degree (E.G
This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: • This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. • A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. • This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. • The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. • When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. Touching the Void: The museological implications of theft on public art collections Jillian Seaton Ph.D. University of Edinburgh 2014 Abstract Of central importance to this thesis is the way security measures contradict the process through which museums have been seeking to divest themselves of theoretical hierarchies and value judgments in recent years. A context for investigation is established that considers how a perceptible increase in art theft, complicated by the escalating value of individual objects and the proliferation of museums as represented by a rise in attendance figures has produced a climate of vulnerability for arts collections around the world. In response, museums are installing unprecedented levels of security that are having a significant impact on established viewing conditions and redefining museum space. Further hindering this situation is the disparity between the fields of museology and museum security.
[Show full text]
A Comparison of the Role of Bārû and Mantis in Ancient Warfare
A Comparison of the Role of Bārû and Mantis in Ancient Warfare Krzysztof Ulanowski Divination played a huge role in both the Mesopotamian and Greek civiliza- tions. Diviners were consulted by their clients in all possible situations. The results of divination were especially important during times of war, when asso- ciated with the very life of the king along with thousands of others. Divination was a salient characteristic of Mesopotamian civilization; likewise, in Greek politics and warfare, a leader who ignored omens would incur the ominous anger impressions of those by whom he was followed.1 In this paper I will compare the role and responsibility of diviners in two different civilizations in relation to the affairs of war. What did the Assyrian bārû and the Greek mantis (μάντις) have in common and in what ways did they differ? Could they really decide the course of battles? Would it be possible to describe the skills of the bārû priest in the words of Euripides: “the best mantis is he who guesses well”?2 War When writing systems first appeared in the history of both Mesopotamian and Greek civilizations, the first written works not only had a codifying- mythological nature, but above all a military character. Weil’s essay, L’Iliade ou le poème de la force holds that “the true hero, the true subject at the centre of the Iliad is force”.3 Homer was the poet of war and the Iliad needs hardly be mentioned. In the case of Mesopotamian civilization, one could refer not only to The Gilgamesh Epic, but also to many other Sumerian, and therefore early texts which have war as a leading motif, such as The Victory of Eanatum 1 M.A.
[Show full text]
The Lagash-Umma Border Conflict 9
CHAPTER I Introduction: Early Civilization and Political Organization in Babylonia' The earliest large urban agglomoration in Mesopotamia was the city known as Uruk in later texts. There, around 3000 B.C., certain distinctive features of historic Mesopotamian civilization emerged: the cylinder seal, a system of writing that soon became cuneiform, a repertoire of religious symbolism, and various artistic and architectural motifs and conven- tions.' Another feature of Mesopotamian civilization in the early historic periods, the con- stellation of more or less independent city-states resistant to the establishment of a strong central political force, was probably characteristic of this proto-historic period as well. Uruk, by virtue of its size, must have played a dominant role in southern Babylonia, and the city of Kish probably played a similar role in the north. From the period that archaeologists call Early Dynastic I1 (ED 11), beginning about 2700 B.c.,~the appearance of walls around Babylonian cities suggests that inter-city warfare had become institutionalized. The earliest royal inscriptions, which date to this period, belong to kings of Kish, a northern Babylonian city, but were found in the Diyala region, at Nippur, at Adab and at Girsu. Those at Adab and Girsu are from the later part of ED I1 and are in the name of Mesalim, king of Kish, accompanied by the names of the respective local ruler^.^ The king of Kish thus exercised hegemony far beyond the walls of his own city, and the memory of this particular king survived in native historical traditions for centuries: the Lagash-Umma border was represented in the inscriptions from Lagash as having been determined by the god Enlil, but actually drawn by Mesalim, king of Kish (IV.1).
[Show full text]
Part 6: Old Testament Chronology, Continued
1177 Part 6: Old Testament Chronology, continued. Part 6C: EXTRA-BIBLICAL PRE-FLOOD & POST-FLOOD CHRONOLOGIES. Chapter 1: The Chronology of the Sumerian & Babylonian King Lists. a] The Post-Flood King Lists 1, 2, 3, & 4. b] The Pre-Flood King Lists 1, 2, & 3. Chapter 2: The Egyptian Chronology of Manetho. a] General Introduction. b] Manetho’s pre-flood times before Dynasty 1. c] Manetho’s post-flood times in Dynasties 1-3. d] Post-flood times in Manetho’s Dynasties 4-26. Chapter 3: Issues with some other Egyptian chronologies. a] The Appollodorus or Pseudo-Appollodorus King List. b] Inscriptions on Egyptian Monuments. c] Summary of issues with Egyptian Chronologies & its ramifications for the SCREWY Chronology’s understanding of the Sothic Cycle. d] A Story of Two Rival Sothic Cycles: The PRECISE Chronology & the SCREWY Chronology, both laying claim to the Sothic Cycle’s anchor points. e] Tutimaeus - The Pharaoh of the Exodus on the PRECISE Chronology. Chapter 4: The PRECISE Chronology verses the SCREWY Chronology: Hazor. Chapter 5: Conclusion. 1178 (Part 6C) CHAPTER 1 The Chronology of the Sumerian & Babylonian King Lists. a] The Post-Flood King Lists 1, 2, 3, & 4. b] The Pre-Flood King Lists 1, 2, & 3. (Part 6C, Chapter 1) The Chronology of the Sumerian & Babylonian King List: a] The Post-Flood King Lists 1, 2, 3, & 4. An antecedent question: Are we on the same page: When do the first men appear in the fossil record? The three rival dating forms of the Sumerian King List. (Part 6C, Chapter 1) section a], subsection i]: An antecedent question: Are we on the same page: When do the first men appear in the fossil record? An antecedent question is, Why do I regard the flood dates for Sumerian and Babylonian King Lists (and later in Part 6C, Chapter 2, the Egyptian King List) as credible, or potentially credible? The answer relates to my understanding of when man first appears in the fossil record vis-à-vis the dates found in a critical usage of these records for a Noah’s Flood date of c.
[Show full text]
Sumero-Babylonian King Lists and Date Lists A
XI Sumero-Babylonian King Lists and Date Lists A. R. GEORGE The Antediluvian King List The antediluvian king list is an Old Babylonian (b) a tablet from Nippur, now in Istanbul text, composed in Sumerian, that purports to (Kraus 1952: 31) document the reigns of successive kings of (c) another reportedly from Khafaje (Tutub), remote antiquity, from the time when the gods now in Berkeley, California (Finkelstein first transmitted to mankind the institution of 1963: 40) kingship until the interruption of human histo- (d) a further tablet now in the Karpeles Manu- ry by the great Flood. The list exists in several script Library, Santa Barbara, California, versions. Sometimes it appears as the opening given below in a preliminary transliteration section of the Sumerian King List, as in text (No. 97) No. 98 below. More often it occurs as an inde- (e) a small fragment from Nippur now in Phil- pendent list, of which one example is held by adelphia that bears lines from the list fol- the Schøyen collection, published here as text lowed by other text (Peterson 2008). No. 96. Other examples of the Old Babylonian A more extensive treatment of the lists of ante- list of antediluvian kings copied independently diluvian kings, including No. 96 and the tablet of the Sumerian King List are: in the Karpeles Manuscript Library, is promised (a) the tablet W-B 62, of uncertain prove- by Gianni Marchesi as part of his forthcoming nance and now in the Ashmolean Museum larger study of the Sumerian king lists. (Langdon 1923 pl. 6) No.
[Show full text]
In Search of the Historical Adam: Part 2
In Search of the Historical Adam: Part 2 Dick Fischer P. O. Box 50111, Arlington, VA 22205 From PSCF 46 (March 1994): 47. In this article, the second in a series of two, the culture that surrounded the early Adamites in Southern Mesopotamia starting about 5000 to 4000 BC is examined. Early cuneiform writings and inscriptions speak about an historical figure that could have been Adam of Genesis. The Sumerian king lists of early pre-flood rulers begin with "Alulim," the probable equivalent of Adam. Eridu, the oldest city in Southern Mesopotamia, dating to about 4800 BC, is the most likely place to have been Eden, the original home for Adam and his kin. Even the word "Eden" apparently was derived from the Sumerian "edin," meaning "plain," "prairie," or "desert." "Enoch," the city Cain built in the pre-flood period corresponds with "Eanna(k)," a Sumerian and Semite post-flood site. Thus the early passages of Genesis are seen as factually relevant, and an integral part of secular pre-history. Cuneiform inscribed clay tablets discovered in Mesopotamian excavations have given archaeologists a picture of a civilization almost totally unknown only one hundred years ago .1 These have given us valuable insights into the history, religion, and racial diversity in the region. And some of these tablets contain references that may appear to pertain to Adam of the Bible. The Legend of Adapa Related to Adam Several fragments of the "Legend of Adapa" were taken from the Library of Ashurbanipal (668-626 BC) at Ninevah. One was also found in the Egyptian archives of Amenophis III and IV of the fourteenth century BC.
[Show full text]
Entemena Was the Fifth Ruler of the So-Called Urnanse Dynasty in The
ON THE MEANING OF THE OFFERINGS FOR THE STATUE OF ENTEMENA TOSHIKO KOBAYASHI I. Introduction Entemena was the fifth ruler of the so-called Urnanse dynasty in the Pre- Sargonic Lagas and his reign seemed to be prosperous as same as that of Ean- natum, his uncle. After the short reign of Enannatum II, his son, Enentarzi who had been sanga (the highest administrator) of the temple of Ningirsu became ensi. Then, his son Lugalanda suceeded him, but was soon deprived of his political power by Uruinimgina. The economic-administrative archives(1) of Lagas which are the most important historical materials for the history of the Sumerian society were written during a period of about twenty years from Enentarzi to Urui- nimgina, and a greater part of those belong to the organization called e-mi (the house of the wife (of the ruler)). Among those, there exist many texts called nig-gis-tag-ga texts,(2) which record offerings to deities, temples and so on mainly on festivals. In those we can find that statues of Entemena and others receive offerings. I will attempt to discuss the meaning of offerings to these statues, especially that of Entemena in this article. II. The statues in nig-gis-tag-ga texts 1. nig-gis-tag-ga texts These are detailed account books of the kind and the quantity of offerings which a ruler or his wife gave to deities, temples and so on. We find a brief and compact summarization of the content at the end of the text, such as follows: DP 53, XIX, 1) ezem-munu4-ku- 2) dnanse-ka 3) bar-nam-tar-ra 4) dam-lugal- an-da 5) ensi- 6) lagaski-ka-ke4 7) gis be-tag(3) III "At the festival of eating malt of Nanse, Barnamtarra, wife of Lugalanda, ensi of Lagas, made the sacrifice (of them)." Though the agent who made the sacrifice in the texts is almost always a wife of a ruler, there remain four texts, BIN 8, 371; Nik.
[Show full text]
" King of Kish" in Pre-Sarogonic Sumer
"KING OF KISH" IN PRE-SAROGONIC SUMER* TOHRU MAEDA Waseda University 1 The title "king of Kish (lugal-kiski)," which was held by Sumerian rulers, seems to be regarded as holding hegemony over Sumer and Akkad. W. W. Hallo said, "There is, moreover, some evidence that at the very beginning of dynastic times, lower Mesopotamia did enjoy a measure of unity under the hegemony of Kish," and "long after Kish had ceased to be the seat of kingship, the title was employed to express hegemony over Sumer and Akked and ulti- mately came to signify or symbolize imperial, even universal, dominion."(1) I. J. Gelb held similar views.(2) The problem in question is divided into two points: 1) the hegemony of the city of Kish in early times, 2) the title "king of Kish" held by Sumerian rulers in later times. Even earlier, T. Jacobsen had largely expressed the same opinion, although his opinion differed in some detail from Hallo's.(3) Hallo described Kish's hegemony as the authority which maintained harmony between the cities of Sumer and Akkad in the First Early Dynastic period ("the Golden Age"). On the other hand, Jacobsen advocated that it was the kingship of Kish that brought about the breakdown of the older "primitive democracy" in the First Early Dynastic period and lead to the new pattern of rule, "primitive monarchy." Hallo seems to suggest that the Early Dynastic I period was not the period of a primitive community in which the "primitive democracy" was realized, but was the period of class society in which kingship or political power had already been formed.
[Show full text]
Ledgers and Prices: Early Mesopotamian Merchant Accounts
Ledgers and Prices Larly Mesopotamian Merchant Accounts 1)ANIl:l. C. SNEI-L \ew Haven and London Yale University Press Yale Near Eastern Researches, 8 EDlTORlA L COMMITTEE \VILL.IAM W HAL-LO. ed~tor MARVlh H. POPE WILLIAM K. SIMPSON Published with assistance from the In memory of Yale Babylonian Collection Iva Hawkins Snell and Clair John Snell Copyright @ 1982 by Yale University. All rights reser~ed. my first and best teachers This book may not be reproduced. in whole or in part, in any form (beyond that copying permitted by Sections 107 and 108 of the C.S. Copyright Law and except by reviewers for the public press). without written permission from the publishers. Designed b! Sali! Harm and set In Timez Roman t!pe. Printed in the l'nited State\ of America b! The \'ail-Ballou Press. Bingharnton. S.Y. Librar~of Congress Cataloging In Publ~cationData Snell. Daniel C Ledgers and prices-earl! Mesopotamian merchant accounts (Yale Sear Eastern researches: 8) A re\ision of the author's thesis. Yale. 1975. Bihl~ograph!: p. Includes ~ndcx. I. Bookkeeping-~Histor! 2. .Accounting-~lraq History. 3. ?rlerchnnts - Iraq- hist to^-!. I. Title. 11. Series. HF5616.172S63 1982 657'.0935 80-26604 ISBh 0-300-025 17-3 Contents Tables ix Plates xi Acknowledgments xiii Abbreviations xv Metrological Tables xix Introduction i Study of Merchants 3 Study of Prices 6 1 The Forms of the Silver Accounts 11 Accounts Here Studied 12 A Representative Text 17 Parts of the Accounts 24 Toward a Definition 36 Distinctions .Among Accounts 40 Composition and Point of \'iew 45
[Show full text]