Over Snow Vehicle Snow Program Cost Sharing Agreements

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Over Snow Vehicle Snow Program Cost Sharing Agreements Over Snow Vehicle Snow Program Cost Sharing Agreements Initial Study/ Negative Declaration November 2008 State of California, Department of Parks and Recreation, Off-Highway Motor Vehicle Recreation (OHMVR) Division Over Snow Vehicle Snow Program Cost Sharing Agreements Initial Study/ Negative Declaration November 2008 Prepared for: State of California, Department of Parks and Recreation, Off-Highway Motor Vehicle Recreation (OHMVR) Division 1725 23rd Street, Suite 200, Sacramento, CA 95816 Prepared by: TRA Environmental Sciences, Inc. 545 Middlefield Road, Suite 200 Menlo Park, CA 94025 (650) 327-0429 (650) 327-4024 fax www.traenviro.com NEGATIVE DECLARATION Project: Over-Snow Vehicle Snow Program Cost Sharing Agreements Lead Agency: California Department of Parks and Recreation Availability of Documents: The Initial Study for this Negative Declaration is available for review at the following locations: California Department of Parks and Recreation Off-Highway Motor Vehicle Recreation Division 1725 23rd Street, Suite 200 Sacramento, CA 95816 Contact: Terry Harper Email: [email protected] Project Description: The proposed project is the issuance of Cost Sharing Agreements (CSA) funding the Snow Program occurring in National Forests throughout California. CSAs would be issued to eleven National Forests and three county agencies for snow plowing, trail grooming, restroom and warming hut cleaning services, and garbage collection at trailheads. FINDINGS The Off-Highway Motor Vehicle Recreation (OHMVR) Division, having reviewed the Initial Study for the proposed project, finds that: 1. The proposed project will support the winter recreation program in National Forests by providing snow plowing, trail grooming, cleaning of restrooms and warming huts, and garbage collection. By providing groomed trails, the project facilitates over snow vehicle (OSV) use of trails. 2. Management actions for wildlife, plants, and soils will be undertaken concurrent with the OSV Snow Program. These management actions include patrols to limit intrusions into sensitive areas, limited operating periods on trails where OSV use may conflict with wildlife breeding, and protecting sensitive vegetation areas and soils during low snow conditions. 3. The proposed activities will continue routine maintenance of the existing trail system and support facilities and will not result in the expansion of the trail systems or the disturbance of previously undisturbed areas. The project will not result in new adverse environmental impacts and no mitigation is required. A Negative Declaration will be filed as the appropriate CEQA document of the Project. OSV Snow Program Cost Sharing Agreements Initial Study/Negative Declaration – November 2008 California Department of Parks and Recreation, Off-Highway Motor Vehicle Recreation Division Page 2 Negative Declaration BASIS OF FINDINGS Based on the environmental evaluation presented herein, the Project will not cause significant adverse effects related to aesthetics, agricultural resources, air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology/soils, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology/water quality, land use/planning, mineral resources, noise, population/housing, public services, recreation, transportation/traffic, and utilities/service systems. In addition, substantial adverse effects on humans, either direct or indirect, will not occur. The Project does not affect any important examples of the major periods of California prehistory or history. Nor will the Project cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, or substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal. A copy of the Initial Study is attached. Questions or comments regarding this Initial Study/Negative Declaration should be submitted in writing to: Terry Harper California Department of Parks and Recreation Off-Highway Motor Vehicle Recreation Division 1725 23rd Street, Suite 200 Sacramento, CA 95816 Email address: [email protected] Pursuant to Section 21082.1 of the California Environmental Quality Act, CDPR has independently reviewed and analyzed the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the proposed project and finds that these documents reflect independent judgment of the CDPR. OSV Snow Program Cost Sharing Agreements Initial Study/Negative Declaration – November 2008 California Department of Parks and Recreation, Off-Highway Motor Vehicle Recreation Division Table of Contents Page i OVER SNOW VEHICLE SNOW PROGRAM COST SHARING AGREEMENTS INITIAL STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION..................................................................1-1 1.1 Background and purpose...............................................................................................1-1 1.2 Regulatory Guidance.....................................................................................................1-1 1.3 Lead Agency Contact Information................................................................................1-2 1.4 Document Organization................................................................................................1-3 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION...........................................................................................2-1 2.1 Overview.......................................................................................................................2-1 2.2 Project Objectives.........................................................................................................2-1 2.3 Site Descriptions and Locations....................................................................................2-2 2.3.1 Eldorado National Forest – Amador Ranger District...........................................2-2 2.3.2 Inyo National Forest – Mammoth and Mono Ranger Districts............................2-2 2.3.3 Klamath National Forest – Goosenest Ranger District........................................2-2 2.3.4 Lassen National Forest – Almanor, Eagle Lake and Hat Creek Ranger Districts2-3 2.3.5 Modoc National Forest – Doublehead Ranger District........................................2-4 2.3.6 Plumas National Forest – Mt. Hough and Feather River Ranger Districts..........2-4 2.3.7 Sequoia National Forest – Tule River/Hot Springs, Greenhorn, and Hume Lake Ranger Districts....................................................................................................2-5 2.3.8 Shasta-Trinity National Forest – Mt. Shasta and McCloud Ranger Districts ......2-5 2.3.9 Sierra National Forest – High Sierra Ranger District ..........................................2-5 2.3.10 Stanislaus National Forest – Calaveras and Summit Ranger Districts ................2-6 2.3.11 Tahoe National Forest – American River, Yuba River, Truckee, and Sierraville Ranger Districts....................................................................................................2-6 2.4 Project Characteristics...................................................................................................2-8 2.4.1 Plowing of Access Roads and Parking Areas/Trailheads ....................................2-8 2.4.2 Grooming of Trails...............................................................................................2-9 2.4.3 Facility Maintenance..........................................................................................2-11 2.4.4 Preseason Trail Maintenance .............................................................................2-11 2.5 Guidelines, Policies, AND Standards Incorporated Into the Project ..........................2-11 2.5.1 1997 Snowmobile Trail Grooming Guidelines..................................................2-11 2.5.2 Land and Resource Management Plan Policies .................................................2-12 2.5.3 Sierra Nevada Framework Standards and Guidelines........................................2-12 2.6 Related Actions...........................................................................................................2-12 2.7 Uses Facilitated by CSA Funding...............................................................................2-13 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST AND RESPONSES ............................................3-1 3.1 Aesthetics......................................................................................................................3-4 3.2 Agriculture Resources...................................................................................................3-7 3.3 Air Quality....................................................................................................................3-8 3.4 Biological Resources...................................................................................................3-20 3.5 Cultural Resources......................................................................................................3-30 3.6 Geology and Soils.......................................................................................................3-31 3.7 Hazards and Hazardous Materials...............................................................................3-36 3.8 Hydrology and Water Quality.....................................................................................3-39 OSV Snow Program Cost Sharing Agreements Initial Study/Negative Declaration – November 2008 California Department of Parks and Recreation, Off-Highway Motor Vehicle Recreation Division Page ii Table of Contents
Recommended publications
  • Seriating Arrow Points from Dart Points Subdivide the Study Area Into Seven Sub-Regions Depicted in Figure 1
    PREHISTORY CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 103 SSSPPPAAATIALTIALTIAL ANDANDAND TEMPORALEMPORALEMPORAL DISTRIBUTION OFOFOF ROSEOSEOSE SPRINGPRINGPRING PROJECTILEROJECTILEROJECTILE POINTSOINTSOINTS INININ THETHETHE NORTHORTHORTH-C-C-CENTRALENTRALENTRAL SIERRAIERRAIERRA NEVEVEVADAADAADA RICHARD W. DEIS Rose Spring corner-notched projectile points have been used within the North-Central Sierra Nevada region primarily to date surface assemblages, in an attempt to develop temporal affinities between sites and to trace technological innovation (i.e. introduction of the bow and arrow). Temporal placements have primarily been based upon projectile point cross-dating using typologies established for the Great Basin, without regard for a demonstrated link to this region of study. This paper presents the results of analysis that addressed the utility of Rose Spring corner-notched points as temporal markers, and presents implications for the results of this study. ose Spring corner-notched projectile points Rivers) which are located along the eastern margin of have been used within the North-Central the project area. RSierra Nevada region to date surface assemblages, in an attempt to develop temporal affinities between sites and to trace technological TYPE CONCEPT AND innovation, i.e. introduction of the bow and arrow. DEVELOPMENT OF TYPOLOGIES Temporal placements have primarily been based upon projectile point cross-dating using typologies Definitions of types used in this study are established for the Great Basin, without regard for a according to Steward (1954) who defined these in demonstrated link within the study region. terms of morphology, historical significance, functional traits or cultural characteristics. This paper briefly summarizes more extensive Morphological types are the most basic and consist of research presented in an MA thesis of the same title descriptions of form or visually observed (Deis 1999).
    [Show full text]
  • August 24, 2020—5:00 P.M
    BUTTE COUNTY FOREST ADVISORY COMMITTEE August 24, 2020—5:00 P.M. Meeting via ZOOM Join Zoom Meeting https://us02web.zoom.us/j/89991617032?pwd=SGYzS3JYcG9mNS93ZjhqRkxSR2o0Zz09 Meeting ID: 899 9161 7032 Passcode: 300907 One tap mobile +16699006833,,89991617032# US (San Jose) +12532158782,,89991617032# US (Tacoma) Dial by your location +1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose) Meeting ID: 899 9161 7032 ITEM NO. 1.00 Call to order – Butte County Public Works Facility, Via ZOOM 2.00 Pledge of allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America 2.01 Roll Call – Members: Nick Repanich, Thad Walker, Teri Faulkner, Dan Taverner, Peggy Moak (Puterbaugh absent) Alternates: Vance Severin, Carolyn Denero, Bob Gage, Holly Jorgensen (voting Alt), Frank Stewart Invited Guests: Dan Efseaff,(Director, Paradise Recreation and Park District); Dave Steindorf (American Whitewater); Jim Houtman (Butte County Fire Safe Council); Taylor Nilsson (Butte County Fire Safe Council), Deb Bumpus (Forest Supervisor, Lassen National Forest); Russell Nickerson,(District Ranger, Almanor Ranger District, Lassen National Forest); Chris Carlton (Supervisor, Plumas National Forest); David Brillenz (District Ranger, Feather River Ranger District (FRRD), Plumas National Forest); Clay Davis (NEPA Planner, FRRD); Brett Sanders (Congressman LaMalfa’s Representative); Dennis Schmidt (Director of Public Works); Paula Daneluk (Director of Development Services) 2.02 Self-introduction of Forest Advisory Committee Members, Alternates, Guests, and Public – 5 Min. 3.00 Consent Agenda 3.01 Review and approve minutes of 7-27-20 – 5 Min. 4.00 Agenda 4.01 Paradise Recreation & Park District Magalia and Paradise Lake Loop Trails Project – Dan Efseaff, Director- 20 Min 4.02 Coordinating Committee Meeting results – Poe Relicensing Recreational Trail Letter from PG&E, Dave Steindorf of American Whitewater to share history and current situation:.
    [Show full text]
  • Butte County Forest Advisory Committee
    BUTTE COUNTY FOREST ADVISORY COMMITTEE August 23, 2021—5:00 P.M. Meeting via Zoom Join Zoom Meeting: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/84353648421?pwd=bnprWUVJSTFpUVFkMEhNVzZmQ3pNUT09 One tap mobile +16699006833,,84353648421# US (San Jose) Dial by your location: +1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose) Meeting ID: 843 5364 8421 Passcode: 428997 ITEM NO. 1.00 Call to order – Zoom 2.00 Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America 2.01 Roll Call – Members: Nick Repanich, Thad Walker, Teri Faulkner, Trish Puterbaugh, Dan Taverner, Peggy Moak Alternates: Vance Severin, Bob Gage, Frank Stewart, Carolyn Denero, Holly Jorgensen Invited Guests: Deb Bumpus (Forest Supervisor, Lassen National Forest); Russell Nickerson,(District Ranger, Almanor Ranger District, Lassen National Forest); David Brillenz (District Ranger, Feather River Ranger District (FRRD), Plumas National Forest); Clay Davis (NEPA Planner, FRRD); Brett Sanders or Laura Page (Congressman LaMalfa’s Representative); Josh Pack (Director of Public Works); Paula Daneluk (Director, Development Services); Dan Efseaff (District Manager, Paradise Recreation and Park District); Representative (Butte County Fire Safe Council); Paul Gosselin (Deputy Director for SGMA, CA Dept. of Water Resources) 2.02 Self-introduction of Forest Advisory Committee Members, Alternates, Guests, and Public – 5 Min. 3.00 Consent Agenda 3.01 Review and Approve Minutes of 7-26-21 – 5 Min. 4.00 Agenda 4.01 Expansion of Paradise Recreation and Park Trails System - Dan Efseaff, District Manager –– 30 Min. 4.02 Sustainable
    [Show full text]
  • September 28, 2020—5:00 P.M
    BUTTE COUNTY FOREST ADVISORY COMMITTEE September 28, 2020—5:00 P.M. Meeting via ZOOM Join Zoom Meeting https://us02web.zoom.us/j/83095979126?pwd=SG8wZDMxeGcvblVJNG9EVERiSzJ5UT09 Meeting ID: 830 9597 9126 Passcode: 216958 One tap mobile +16699006833,,83095979126# US (San Jose) Dial by your location +1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose) ITEM NO. 1.00 Call to order – Butte County Public Works Facility, Via ZOOM 2.00 Pledge of allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America 2.01 Roll Call – Members: Nick Repanich, Thad Walker, Teri Faulkner, Dan Taverner, Peggy Moak, Trish Puterbaugh Alternates: Vance Severin, Carolyn Denero, Bob Gage, Holly Jorgensen, Frank Stewart Invited Guests: Eli Goodsell (CSUC Ecological Reserves Director), Deb Bumpus (Forest Supervisor, Lassen National Forest); Russell Nickerson,(District Ranger, Almanor Ranger District, Lassen National Forest); Chris Carlton (Supervisor, Plumas National Forest); David Brillenz (District Ranger, Feather River Ranger District (FRRD), Plumas National Forest); Clay Davis (NEPA Planner, FRRD); Brett Sanders (Congressman LaMalfa’s Representative); Dennis Schmidt (Director of Public Works); Paula Daneluk (Director of Development Services) 2.02 Self-introduction of Forest Advisory Committee Members, Alternates, Guests, and Public – 5 Min. 3.00 Consent Agenda 3.01 Review and approve minutes of 8-24-20 – 5 Min. 4.00 Agenda 4.01 CSU, Chico Environmental Collaborative Presentation – Eli Goodsell, Ecological Reserves Director, Chico State Enterprises – 15 Min. INFORMATION ONLY 4.02 Butte Creek
    [Show full text]
  • Storm Data and Unusual Weather Phenomena ....…….…....………..……
    FEBRUARY 2004 VOLUME 46 NUMBER 2 SSTORMTORM DDATAATA AND UNUSUAL WEATHER PHENOMENA WITH LATE REPORTS AND CORRECTIONS NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION noaa NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL SATELLITE, DATA AND INFORMATION SERVICE NATIONAL CLIMATIC DATA CENTER, ASHEVILLE, NC Cover: A heavy rain event on February 5, 2004 led to fl ooding in Jackson, MS after 6 - 7 inches of rain fell in a six hour period. Lieutenant Tim Dukes of the Jackson (Hinds County, MS) Fire Department searches for possible trapped motorists inside a vehicle that was washed 200 feet down Town Creek in Jackson, Mississippi. Luckily, the vehicle was empty. (Photo courtesy: Chris Todd, The Clarion Ledger, Jackson, MS) TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Outstanding Storm of the Month …..…………….….........……..…………..…….…..…..... 4 Storm Data and Unusual Weather Phenomena ....…….…....………..……...........…............ 5 Additions/Corrections.......................................................................................................................... 109 Reference Notes.................................................................................................................................... 125 STORM DATA (ISSN 0039-1972) National Climatic Data Center Editor: William Angel Assistant Editors: Stuart Hinson and Rhonda Herndon STORM DATA is prepared, and distributed by the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC), National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service (NESDIS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). The Storm Data and Unusual Weather Phenomena narratives and Hurricane/Tropical Storm summaries are prepared by the National Weather Service. Monthly and annual statistics and summaries of tornado and lightning events re- sulting in deaths, injuries, and damage are compiled by the National Climatic Data Center and the National Weather Service’s (NWS) Storm Prediction Center. STORM DATA contains all confi rmed information on storms available to our staff at the time of publication. Late reports and corrections will be printed in each edition.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historical Range of Beaver in the Sierra Nevada: a Review of the Evidence
    Spring 2012 65 California Fish and Game 98(2):65-80; 2012 The historical range of beaver in the Sierra Nevada: a review of the evidence RICHARD B. LANMAN*, HEIDI PERRYMAN, BROCK DOLMAN, AND CHARLES D. JAMES Institute for Historical Ecology, 556 Van Buren Street, Los Altos, CA 94022, USA (RBL) Worth a Dam, 3704 Mt. Diablo Road, Lafayette, CA 94549, USA (HP) OAEC WATER Institute, 15290 Coleman Valley Road, Occidental, CA 95465, USA (BD) Bureau of Indian Affairs, Northwest Region, Branch of Environmental and Cultural Resources Management, Portland, OR 97232, USA (CDJ) *Correspondent: [email protected] The North American beaver (Castor canadensis) has not been considered native to the mid- or high-elevations of the western Sierra Nevada or along its eastern slope, although this mountain range is adjacent to the mammal’s historical range in the Pit, Sacramento and San Joaquin rivers and their tributaries. Current California and Nevada beaver management policies appear to rest on assertions that date from the first half of the twentieth century. This review challenges those long-held assumptions. Novel physical evidence of ancient beaver dams in the north central Sierra (James and Lanman 2012) is here supported by a contemporary and expanded re-evaluation of historical records of occurrence by additional reliable observers, as well as new sources of indirect evidence including newspaper accounts, geographical place names, Native American ethnographic information, and assessments of habitat suitability. Understanding that beaver are native to the Sierra Nevada is important to contemporary management of rapidly expanding beaver populations. These populations were established by translocation, and have been shown to have beneficial effects on fish abundance and diversity in the Sierra Nevada, to stabilize stream incision in montane meadows, and to reduce discharge of nitrogen, phosphorus and sediment loads into fragile water bodies such as Lake Tahoe.
    [Show full text]
  • USGS Topographic Maps of California
    USGS Topographic Maps of California: 7.5' (1:24,000) Planimetric Planimetric Map Name Reference Regular Replace Ref Replace Reg County Orthophotoquad DRG Digital Stock No Paper Overlay Aberdeen 1985, 1994 1985 (3), 1994 (3) Fresno, Inyo 1994 TCA3252 Academy 1947, 1964 (pp), 1964, 1947, 1964 (3) 1964 1964 c.1, 2, 3 Fresno 1964 TCA0002 1978 Ackerson Mountain 1990, 1992 1992 (2) Mariposa, Tuolumne 1992 TCA3473 Acolita 1953, 1992, 1998 1953 (3), 1992 (2) Imperial 1992 TCA0004 Acorn Hollow 1985 Tehama 1985 TCA3327 Acton 1959, 1974 (pp), 1974 1959 (3), 1974 (2), 1994 1974 1994 c.2 Los Angeles 1994 TCA0006 (2), 1994, 1995 (2) Adelaida 1948 (pp), 1948, 1978 1948 (3), 1978 1948, 1978 1948 (pp) c.1 San Luis Obispo 1978 TCA0009 (pp), 1978 Adelanto 1956, 1968 (pp), 1968, 1956 (3), 1968 (3), 1980 1968, 1980 San Bernardino 1993 TCA0010 1980 (pp), 1980 (2), (2) 1993 Adin 1990 Lassen, Modoc 1990 TCA3474 Adin Pass 1990, 1993 1993 (2) Modoc 1993 TCA3475 Adobe Mountain 1955, 1968 (pp), 1968 1955 (3), 1968 (2), 1992 1968 Los Angeles, San 1968 TCA0012 Bernardino Aetna Springs 1958 (pp), 1958, 1981 1958 (3), 1981 (2) 1958, 1981 1981 (pp) c.1 Lake, Napa 1992 TCA0013 (pp), 1981, 1992, 1998 Agua Caliente Springs 1959 (pp), 1959, 1997 1959 (2) 1959 San Diego 1959 TCA0014 Agua Dulce 1960 (pp), 1960, 1974, 1960 (3), 1974 (3), 1994 1960 Los Angeles 1994 TCA0015 1988, 1994, 1995 (3) Aguanga 1954, 1971 (pp), 1971, 1954 (2), 1971 (3), 1982 1971 1954 c.2 Riverside, San Diego 1988 TCA0016 1982, 1988, 1997 (3), 1988 Ah Pah Ridge 1983, 1997 1983 Del Norte, Humboldt 1983
    [Show full text]
  • Butte County Forest Advisory Committee
    BUTTE COUNTY FOREST ADVISORY COMMITTEE October 23, 2017—5:00 P.M. Meeting ITEM NO. 1.00 Call to order – Butte County Public Works Facility, 44 Bellarmine Ct, Chico, CA 2.00 Pledge of allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America 2.01 Roll Call – Members: Nick Repanich, Thad Walker, Teri Faulkner, Peggy Moak Alternates: Vance Severin, Jim Shary, Bob Gage, Angel Korte (voting Alt), Pete Moak (voting Alt) Invited Guests: Calli-Jane DeAnda (Butte County Fire Safe Council); Wolfy Rougle (Graduate Student); Dick Waugh (Beckwourth Trail); Daryl Bender (Hillsliders); Lassen National Forest, Almanor Ranger District; Katherine Carpenter (Acting District Ranger, Plumas National Forest, Feather River Ranger District); Laura Page (Congressman LaMalfa); Dave Derby (Cal Fire); Dennis Schmidt (Coordinating Committee, Public Works) 2.02 Self-introduction of Forest Advisory Committee Members, Alternates, Guests, and Public – 5 Min. 3.00 Consent Agenda 3.01 Review and approve minutes of 09-18-17 – 5 Min. 4.00 Agenda 4.01 Calli-Jane DeAnda, Butte County Fire Safe Council – 15 Min. - Community Wildfire Protection Plan Landscape Level Plan - Support for Sierra Nevada Conservancy Grant Application – ACTION REQUESTED: Approve recommendation to issue letter of support from Coordinating Committee-due Oct. 30 4.02 Wolfy Rougle, Graduate Student: Collaboration on Fire Mitigation Planning – 10 Min. 4.03 Dick Waugh: Beckwourth Trail – 25 Min. 4.04 Daryl Bender, Hillsliders: Jonesville Snowmobile Park Activities & Perspective on OSV DEIS – 25 Min. ACTION REQUESTED: Draft comment letter for submission to the BOS 4.05 Forest Projects Review – Current Quarter: Discussion & required FAC action for USFS projects affecting Butte County residents’ forest management, recreational, environmental, socio-economic interests(Chair) - Lassen NF Almanor Ranger District- Erick Stemmerman (Acting District Ranger): Report and Q & A on pending, proposed and modified projects, SOPA and Non-SOPA – 15 Min.
    [Show full text]
  • Storm Data and Unusual Weather Phenomena ....………..…………..…..……………..……………..…
    JANUARY 2001 VOLUME 43 NUMBER 01 STSTORMORM DDAATTAA AND UNUSUAL WEATHER PHENOMENA WITH LATE REPORTS AND CORRECTIONS NATIONAL OCEANIC AND NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL SATELLITE, NATIONAL CLIMATIC DATA CENTER noaa ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION DATA AND INFORMATION SERVICE ASHEVILLE, NC Cover: Icicles hang from an orange tree with sprinklers running in an adjacent strawberry field in the background at sunrise on January 1, 2001. The photo was taken at Mike Lott’s Strawberry Farm in rural Eastern Hillsborough County of West- Central, FL. Low temperatures in the area were in the middle 20’s for six to nine hours. (Photograph courtesy of St. Petersburg Times Newspaper Photographer, Fraser Hale) TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Outstanding Storm of the Month ..……..…………………..……………..……………..……………..…. 4 Storm Data and Unusual Weather Phenomena ....………..…………..…..……………..……………..…. 5 Additions/Corrections ..………….……………………………………………………………………….. 92 Reference Notes ..……..………..……………..……………..……………..…………..………………… 122 STORM DATA (ISSN 0039-1972) National Climatic Data Center Editor: Stephen Del Greco Assistant Editors: Stuart Hinson and Rhonda Mooring STORM DATA is prepared, and distributed by the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC), National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service (NESDIS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). The Storm Data and Unusual Weather Phenomena narratives and Hurricane/Tropical Storm summaries are prepared by the National Weather Service. Monthly and annual statistics and summaries of tornado and lightning events resulting in deaths, injuries, and damage are compiled by the National Climatic Data Center and the National Weather Service's (NWS) Storm Prediction Center. STORM DATA contains all confirmed information on storms available to our staff at the time of publication. Late reports and corrections will be printed in each edition. Except for limited editing to correct grammatical errors, the data in Storm Data are published as received.
    [Show full text]
  • Lassen National Forest Backcountry Discovery Trail! Know Before You Go
    Get Ready to Explore! Drive 187 miles of unparalleled beauty. Discover a geological playground. Hike to alpine snowfields. Relax at quiet lakes while raptors soar overhead. Trace the footsteps of Gold Rush emigrants. Discover the heritage of northern California. Welcome to the Lassen National Forest Backcountry Discovery Trail! Know Before You Go The Lassen Backcountry Discovery Trail was established to invite exploration of the remote areas of the Lassen backcountry. The Trail generally follows gravel and dirt roads and is intended for high clearance street- legal vehicles. Expect rough road conditions and slow travel through remote country. Be prepared for downed trees or rocks on the road. Much of the route is under snow in the winter Volcanic views and early spring. There are no restaurants, grocery stores, or gas stations along the main route and cell phone coverage is intermittent. Introduction ~ ~ Stay Current Off-road motor vehicle travel is prohibited in the Lassen National Forest; please stay on designated routes. Call any forest office for updated road condition and project work information that may affect your travel plans. Periodic updates to the Trail maps in this Guide may occur to reflect changes in vehicle use or other revisions. Map updates and other Lassen Backcountry Discovery Trail information may be found at: www.fs.fed.us/r5/lassen/ Your Planning Checklist Lassen National Forest Visitor Map Adequate food, water, and fuel Friends to share the fun, and assist in an emergency Insect repellant and first-aid kit Know how to identify poison oak Toilet paper and shovel to bury human waste GPS unit, binoculars, and camera Campfire permit if you plan to use a fire, barbecue, or camp stove (available for free at most Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, California Department of Forestry/Fire Protection offices or fire stations).
    [Show full text]
  • Volcanic Legacy Scenic Byway All-American Road
    Volcanic Legacy Scenic Byway All-American Road Corridor Management Plan Update For Oregon and California December 2018 Cover Photo: View of Lassen Peak and Manzanita Lake in Lassen Volcanic National Park Ahjumawi Lava Springs State Park, California Come experience America’s Volcanic Legacy Explore the wonder and beauty of a dramatic volcanic landscape, from Crater Lake in Oregon to Lassen Peak in California. You’ll encounter the ancient natural forces that shaped exquisite mountain lakes and snow-capped peaks all throughout this “volcano to volcano” driving adventure. Along with spectacular scenery, you’ll enjoy legendary history, charming towns, and extraordinary recreational and cultural opportunities. A once-in-a- lifetime experience awaits you along the 500-mile Volcanic Legacy Scenic Byway. Ahjumawi Lava Springs i ii Table of Contents Acronym List ......................................................................................................................................................... vii Introduction: ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose of the Corridor Management Plan (CMP) Update ............................................................... 1 How the Byway Came to Be…A Brief History .......................................................................................... 2 Bringing the Byway Together and Moving Ahead ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Forested Communities of the Upper Montane in the Central and Southern Sierra Nevada
    United States Department Forested Communities of the Upper of Agriculture Forest Service Montane in the Central and Southern Pacific Southwest Sierra Nevada Research Station Donald A. Potter General Technical Report PSW-GTR-169 Publisher: Pacific Southwest Research Station Albany, California Forest Service Mailing address: U.S. Department of Agriculture PO Box 245, Berkeley CA 94701-0245 Abstract (510) 559-6300 Potter, Donald A. 1998. Forested communities of the upper montane in the central and southern http://www.psw.fs.fed.us Sierra Nevada. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-169. Albany, CA: Pacific Southwest Research Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture; 319 p. September 1998 Upper montane forests in the central and southern Sierra Nevada of California were classified into 26 plant associations by using information collected from 0.1-acre circular plots. Within this region, the forested environment including the physiographic setting, geology, soils, and vegetation is described in detail. A simulation model is presented for this portion of the Sierra Nevada that refines discussions of climate, and disturbance regimes are described to illustrate the interaction between these features of the environment and vegetation in the study area. In the classification, plant associations are differentiated by floristic composition, environmental setting, and measurements of productivity. Differences in elevation, aspect, topographic setting, and soil properties generally distinguish each plant association described. A detailed description is presented for each plant association, including a discussion of the distribution, environment, vegetation, soils, productivity, coarse woody debris, range, wildlife, and management recommendations. A complete species list and tables for cross referencing specific characteristics of each association are provided.
    [Show full text]