Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 04/01/2021 to 06/30/2021 Lassen National Forest This Report Contains the Best Available Information at the Time of Publication
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Seriating Arrow Points from Dart Points Subdivide the Study Area Into Seven Sub-Regions Depicted in Figure 1
PREHISTORY CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 103 SSSPPPAAATIALTIALTIAL ANDANDAND TEMPORALEMPORALEMPORAL DISTRIBUTION OFOFOF ROSEOSEOSE SPRINGPRINGPRING PROJECTILEROJECTILEROJECTILE POINTSOINTSOINTS INININ THETHETHE NORTHORTHORTH-C-C-CENTRALENTRALENTRAL SIERRAIERRAIERRA NEVEVEVADAADAADA RICHARD W. DEIS Rose Spring corner-notched projectile points have been used within the North-Central Sierra Nevada region primarily to date surface assemblages, in an attempt to develop temporal affinities between sites and to trace technological innovation (i.e. introduction of the bow and arrow). Temporal placements have primarily been based upon projectile point cross-dating using typologies established for the Great Basin, without regard for a demonstrated link to this region of study. This paper presents the results of analysis that addressed the utility of Rose Spring corner-notched points as temporal markers, and presents implications for the results of this study. ose Spring corner-notched projectile points Rivers) which are located along the eastern margin of have been used within the North-Central the project area. RSierra Nevada region to date surface assemblages, in an attempt to develop temporal affinities between sites and to trace technological TYPE CONCEPT AND innovation, i.e. introduction of the bow and arrow. DEVELOPMENT OF TYPOLOGIES Temporal placements have primarily been based upon projectile point cross-dating using typologies Definitions of types used in this study are established for the Great Basin, without regard for a according to Steward (1954) who defined these in demonstrated link within the study region. terms of morphology, historical significance, functional traits or cultural characteristics. This paper briefly summarizes more extensive Morphological types are the most basic and consist of research presented in an MA thesis of the same title descriptions of form or visually observed (Deis 1999). -
August 24, 2020—5:00 P.M
BUTTE COUNTY FOREST ADVISORY COMMITTEE August 24, 2020—5:00 P.M. Meeting via ZOOM Join Zoom Meeting https://us02web.zoom.us/j/89991617032?pwd=SGYzS3JYcG9mNS93ZjhqRkxSR2o0Zz09 Meeting ID: 899 9161 7032 Passcode: 300907 One tap mobile +16699006833,,89991617032# US (San Jose) +12532158782,,89991617032# US (Tacoma) Dial by your location +1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose) Meeting ID: 899 9161 7032 ITEM NO. 1.00 Call to order – Butte County Public Works Facility, Via ZOOM 2.00 Pledge of allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America 2.01 Roll Call – Members: Nick Repanich, Thad Walker, Teri Faulkner, Dan Taverner, Peggy Moak (Puterbaugh absent) Alternates: Vance Severin, Carolyn Denero, Bob Gage, Holly Jorgensen (voting Alt), Frank Stewart Invited Guests: Dan Efseaff,(Director, Paradise Recreation and Park District); Dave Steindorf (American Whitewater); Jim Houtman (Butte County Fire Safe Council); Taylor Nilsson (Butte County Fire Safe Council), Deb Bumpus (Forest Supervisor, Lassen National Forest); Russell Nickerson,(District Ranger, Almanor Ranger District, Lassen National Forest); Chris Carlton (Supervisor, Plumas National Forest); David Brillenz (District Ranger, Feather River Ranger District (FRRD), Plumas National Forest); Clay Davis (NEPA Planner, FRRD); Brett Sanders (Congressman LaMalfa’s Representative); Dennis Schmidt (Director of Public Works); Paula Daneluk (Director of Development Services) 2.02 Self-introduction of Forest Advisory Committee Members, Alternates, Guests, and Public – 5 Min. 3.00 Consent Agenda 3.01 Review and approve minutes of 7-27-20 – 5 Min. 4.00 Agenda 4.01 Paradise Recreation & Park District Magalia and Paradise Lake Loop Trails Project – Dan Efseaff, Director- 20 Min 4.02 Coordinating Committee Meeting results – Poe Relicensing Recreational Trail Letter from PG&E, Dave Steindorf of American Whitewater to share history and current situation:. -
Lassen National Forest
USDA Forest Service Pacific Southwest Region LASSEN NATIONAL FOREST Eagle Lake District Almanor District Hat Creek District _____________________________ __ Susanville OUTREACH NOTICE LASSEN NATIONAL FOREST Supervisor’s Office - Susanville, CA Almanor Ranger District - Chester, CA Eagle Lake Ranger District - Susanville, CA Hat Creek Ranger District – Hat Creek/Fall River Mills, CA _____________________________ ______ 2021 NON-FIRE TEMPORARY (NTE 1039 Hours) POSITION OUTREACH GS-03 through GS-09 and WG-03 Announcements will be posted in USAJOBS October 30 – November 10, 2020 Anticipated Start Dates for the 2021 Season April –May 2021 The Lassen National Forest is looking for committed, hardworking, highly skilled temporary workforce to manage the resources of the Forest. Lassen National Forest is comprised of the Forest Supervisors Office and three (3) Districts (Almanor, Hat Creek, and Eagle Lake). The work is very rewarding and requires talented, skilled people working safely as part of a team in a variety of specialized positions, including: • Archeology Aid/Technician • Biological Science Technician (Wildlife/Fisheries/Plants/Invasive Plants/Natural Resources) • Botanist • Forestry Aid (Recreation/Timber) • Forestry Technician (Recreation/OHV/Wilderness/Trails) • Forestry Technician (Timber Stand Improvement/Timber Sale Prep/Silviculture) • Hydrologic Technician • Visitor Services Information Assistant/Customer Services Representative/Admin Support Asst. • Wildlife Biologist October 20, 2020 “The USDA Forest Service is an equal opportunity -
Backcountry Discovery Trail
Have you ever wanted to get into the backcountry Backcountry of a National Forest? Have you wondered if you have Discovery Trail what it takes? Rest assured: exploring the backcountry doesn’t necessarily require an ATV or a dirt bike. You can do it in a high clearance vehicle or a 4WD sport utility vehicle. This guide gives directions for the route from point to point, gives tips on what to bring and how to prepare, provides background information on history and general topics, and directs travelers to points of interest along the way. This 150-mile-long discovery trail is a perfect place to begin your explorations of the Plumas National Forest! Plumas National Forest Plumas National Forest Backcountry Discovery Trail The Plumas Backcountry Discovery Trail is published by the USDA Forest Service, in cooperation with the California State Parks OHV Division. Printed in the USA 2013 ISBN: Welcome to the Plumas Backcountry Discovery Trail The Plumas Backcountry Discovery Trail (BDT) invites exploration of the remote areas of the Plumas National Forest. You can expect rough road conditions on gravel and dirt roads and a slow pace of travel, maybe only 30-50 miles a day. Be prepared for downed trees or rocks on the road, rough and rocky surfaces, and brush encroaching on the road- way. Much of the route is under snow in the winter and early spring. There are no restaurants, grocery stores, or gas stations along the main route and cell phone coverage is intermittent. The non-paved roads are currently maintained for travel by sport utility vehicles (SUVs) and high-clearance vehicles. -
Butte County Forest Advisory Committee
BUTTE COUNTY FOREST ADVISORY COMMITTEE August 23, 2021—5:00 P.M. Meeting via Zoom Join Zoom Meeting: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/84353648421?pwd=bnprWUVJSTFpUVFkMEhNVzZmQ3pNUT09 One tap mobile +16699006833,,84353648421# US (San Jose) Dial by your location: +1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose) Meeting ID: 843 5364 8421 Passcode: 428997 ITEM NO. 1.00 Call to order – Zoom 2.00 Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America 2.01 Roll Call – Members: Nick Repanich, Thad Walker, Teri Faulkner, Trish Puterbaugh, Dan Taverner, Peggy Moak Alternates: Vance Severin, Bob Gage, Frank Stewart, Carolyn Denero, Holly Jorgensen Invited Guests: Deb Bumpus (Forest Supervisor, Lassen National Forest); Russell Nickerson,(District Ranger, Almanor Ranger District, Lassen National Forest); David Brillenz (District Ranger, Feather River Ranger District (FRRD), Plumas National Forest); Clay Davis (NEPA Planner, FRRD); Brett Sanders or Laura Page (Congressman LaMalfa’s Representative); Josh Pack (Director of Public Works); Paula Daneluk (Director, Development Services); Dan Efseaff (District Manager, Paradise Recreation and Park District); Representative (Butte County Fire Safe Council); Paul Gosselin (Deputy Director for SGMA, CA Dept. of Water Resources) 2.02 Self-introduction of Forest Advisory Committee Members, Alternates, Guests, and Public – 5 Min. 3.00 Consent Agenda 3.01 Review and Approve Minutes of 7-26-21 – 5 Min. 4.00 Agenda 4.01 Expansion of Paradise Recreation and Park Trails System - Dan Efseaff, District Manager –– 30 Min. 4.02 Sustainable -
Data Set Listing (May 1997)
USDA Forest Service Air Resource Monitoring System Existing Data Set Listing (May 1997) Air Resource Monitoring System (ARMS) Data Set Listing May 1997 Contact Steve Boutcher USDA Forest Service National Air Program Information Manager Portland, OR (503) 808-2960 2 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9 DATA SET DESCRIPTIONS -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------10 National & Multi-Regional Data Sets EPA’S EASTERN LAKES SURVEY ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------11 EPA’S NATIONAL STREAM SURVEY ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------12 EPA WESTERN LAKES SURVEY------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------13 FOREST HEALTH MONITORING (FHM) LICHEN MONITORING-------------------------------------------------14 FOREST HEALTH MONITORING (FHM) OZONE BIOINDICATOR PLANTS ----------------------------------15 IMPROVE AEROSOL MONITORING--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------16 IMPROVE NEPHELOMETER ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------17 IMPROVE TRANSMISSOMETER ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------18 NATIONAL ATMOSPHERIC DEPOSITION PROGRAM/ NATIONAL TRENDS NETWORK----------------19 NATIONAL -
Storm Data and Unusual Weather Phenomena ....…….…....………..……
FEBRUARY 2004 VOLUME 46 NUMBER 2 SSTORMTORM DDATAATA AND UNUSUAL WEATHER PHENOMENA WITH LATE REPORTS AND CORRECTIONS NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION noaa NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL SATELLITE, DATA AND INFORMATION SERVICE NATIONAL CLIMATIC DATA CENTER, ASHEVILLE, NC Cover: A heavy rain event on February 5, 2004 led to fl ooding in Jackson, MS after 6 - 7 inches of rain fell in a six hour period. Lieutenant Tim Dukes of the Jackson (Hinds County, MS) Fire Department searches for possible trapped motorists inside a vehicle that was washed 200 feet down Town Creek in Jackson, Mississippi. Luckily, the vehicle was empty. (Photo courtesy: Chris Todd, The Clarion Ledger, Jackson, MS) TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Outstanding Storm of the Month …..…………….….........……..…………..…….…..…..... 4 Storm Data and Unusual Weather Phenomena ....…….…....………..……...........…............ 5 Additions/Corrections.......................................................................................................................... 109 Reference Notes.................................................................................................................................... 125 STORM DATA (ISSN 0039-1972) National Climatic Data Center Editor: William Angel Assistant Editors: Stuart Hinson and Rhonda Herndon STORM DATA is prepared, and distributed by the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC), National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service (NESDIS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). The Storm Data and Unusual Weather Phenomena narratives and Hurricane/Tropical Storm summaries are prepared by the National Weather Service. Monthly and annual statistics and summaries of tornado and lightning events re- sulting in deaths, injuries, and damage are compiled by the National Climatic Data Center and the National Weather Service’s (NWS) Storm Prediction Center. STORM DATA contains all confi rmed information on storms available to our staff at the time of publication. Late reports and corrections will be printed in each edition. -
Regional Order No. 21-07 Emergency Forest Closures
Regional Order No. 21-07 USDA Forest Service Pacific Southwest Region Emergency Forest Closure Pursuant to 16 U.S.C. § 551 and 36 C.F.R. § 261.50(a) and (b), and to provide for public safety and protect natural resources, the following acts are prohibited on National Forest System lands within the Pacific Southwest Region. This Order supersedes Regional Order No. 21-04 and is effective from August 31, 2021, at 11:59 p.m. through September 17, 2021, at 11:59 p.m. 1. Going into or being upon National Forest System lands within the National Forests listed below. a. Tahoe National Forest b. Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit c. Plumas National Forest d. Lassen National Forest e. Mendocino National Forest f. Klamath National Forest g. Six Rivers National Forest h. Shasta-Trinity National Forest i. Modoc National Forest j. Cleveland National Forest k. San Bernardino National Forest l. Angeles National Forest m. Los Padres National Forest n. Sequoia National Forest o. Sierra National Forest p. Stanislaus National Forest q. Inyo National Forest 36 C.F.R. § 261.52(e). 2. Being on a National Forest System road within the National Forests listed below. a. Tahoe National Forest b. Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit c. Plumas National Forest d. Lassen National Forest e. Mendocino National Forest f. Klamath National Forest g. Six Rivers National Forest h. Shasta-Trinity National Forest i. Modoc National Forest j. Cleveland National Forest k. San Bernardino National Forest l. Angeles National Forest m. Los Padres National Forest n. Sequoia National Forest o. Sierra National Forest p. -
Evaluation of Caribou and Thousand Lakes Wilderness Areas, Lassen National Forest (FHP Report NE07-01)
Forest Health Protection Pacific Southwest Region Date: January 11, 2007 File Code: 3420 To: Forest Supervisor, Lassen National Forest Subject: Evaluation of Caribou and Thousand Lakes Wilderness Areas, Lassen National Forest (FHP Report NE07-01) At the request of Elizabeth Norton, Resource Staff Manager, Lassen National Forest, I conducted a field evaluation of the Caribou and Thousand Lakes Wilderness Areas on October 24 and 25, 2006. The objective of my visit was to evaluate the current forest health conditions, including impacts to tree health from recreational use within the wilderness areas and discuss potential management options such as campsite relocation and closure, prescribed fire, and vegetation management. Elizabeth Norton, Bob Andrews, and Kevin McCombe accompanied me in the Caribou Wilderness. Elizabeth Norton accompanied me in the Thousand Lakes Wilderness. Background The Caribou Wilderness (CW) is located within the Lassen National Forest adjacent to the east boundary of Lassen Volcanic National Park. The general legal description is T30N, T31N and R7E. The average elevation is 6,900 feet and the 20,000 acre area receives an average of 50-60” of precipitation per year (Figure 1). Taylor and Solem (2001) identified 5 forest compositional groups within the CW: white fir – Jeffrey pine, red fir – white fir, lodgepole, red fir – lodgepole and red fir – western white pine. These stand types are mostly separated by soil properties and slope aspect. Lodgepole pine is the dominant stand type over much of the CW. No timber harvest has occurred within the wilderness boundary however grazing in the 19th century altered the fire regime by removing fine fuels (Taylor and Solem 2001). -
1U+- ~ Nate TI Fletcher Linton Forest Botanist Sequoia National Forest I
BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT FOR FEDERALLY LISTED THREATENED OR ENDANGERED PLANT SPECIES AND BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION FOR FOREST SERVICE SENSITIVE PLANT SPECIES for Taylor and Long Meadow Grazing Allotment Renewal Kern River Ranger District Sequoia National Forest Kern County, California March 2017 7 Prepared/ Approved 1u+- ~ nATE TI Fletcher Linton Forest Botanist Sequoia National Forest I. INTRODUCTION The Taylor/Long Grazing Project and allotment is located on approximately 875 acres within the Kem River Ranger District of the Sequoia National Forest, Tulare County, California. This allotment is located is the southern central and western portions of the Kem Plateau between 7 ,000 and 7, 700 feet, near the Domeland Wilderness. The allotment consists of Taylor Meadow and Long Meadow, mostly located on formerly private land, acquired by the National Forest System (NFS). These two meadows are about two miles apart, but managed as one allotment. The proposed action is to continue current, authorized livestock grazing with modifications. Along with reauthorizing grazing, certain improvements are proposed for resource improvement. The resulting Allotment Management Plan and Term Grazing Permit would be issued for a 10-year period. All proposed activities would be expected to be in place within a two year period and would be described in the Allotment Management Plan. The purpose of this biological assessment (BA) and biological evaluation (BE) is to review the proposed Taylor and Long Meadow Grazing Allotment Renewal Project in sufficient detail to determine the potential effects on Threatened, Endangered, and Sensitive (TES) plant species. Specifically, the BA will document effects on proposed, threatened, or endangered species and/or critical habitat; and determine whether formal consultation or conference is required with the United States Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), pursuant to the Endangered Species Act. -
The Historical Range of Beaver in the Sierra Nevada: a Review of the Evidence
Spring 2012 65 California Fish and Game 98(2):65-80; 2012 The historical range of beaver in the Sierra Nevada: a review of the evidence RICHARD B. LANMAN*, HEIDI PERRYMAN, BROCK DOLMAN, AND CHARLES D. JAMES Institute for Historical Ecology, 556 Van Buren Street, Los Altos, CA 94022, USA (RBL) Worth a Dam, 3704 Mt. Diablo Road, Lafayette, CA 94549, USA (HP) OAEC WATER Institute, 15290 Coleman Valley Road, Occidental, CA 95465, USA (BD) Bureau of Indian Affairs, Northwest Region, Branch of Environmental and Cultural Resources Management, Portland, OR 97232, USA (CDJ) *Correspondent: [email protected] The North American beaver (Castor canadensis) has not been considered native to the mid- or high-elevations of the western Sierra Nevada or along its eastern slope, although this mountain range is adjacent to the mammal’s historical range in the Pit, Sacramento and San Joaquin rivers and their tributaries. Current California and Nevada beaver management policies appear to rest on assertions that date from the first half of the twentieth century. This review challenges those long-held assumptions. Novel physical evidence of ancient beaver dams in the north central Sierra (James and Lanman 2012) is here supported by a contemporary and expanded re-evaluation of historical records of occurrence by additional reliable observers, as well as new sources of indirect evidence including newspaper accounts, geographical place names, Native American ethnographic information, and assessments of habitat suitability. Understanding that beaver are native to the Sierra Nevada is important to contemporary management of rapidly expanding beaver populations. These populations were established by translocation, and have been shown to have beneficial effects on fish abundance and diversity in the Sierra Nevada, to stabilize stream incision in montane meadows, and to reduce discharge of nitrogen, phosphorus and sediment loads into fragile water bodies such as Lake Tahoe. -
View the Nationwide List of Thomas Fire Cooperating Agencies
THOMAS FIRE NATIONWIDE COOPERATING AGENCIES Alaska Alaska Fire Service Resources, Alaska Fire Service - Galena Zone, Mat-Su Area Forestry, Northern Region Office, Alaska Fire Service - Tanana Zone Arkansas Ouachita National Forest, Ozark & St. Francis National Forests Arizona Phoenix District, Flagstaff District, Tucson District, Arizona State Forestry - Central District, Arizona State Forestry - Northwest District, Avondale Fire Department, Alpine Fire District, Arizona Strip Field Office, Apache-Sitgreaves National Forest, Arizona State Forestry Division - State Office, Beaver Dam / Littlefield Fire District, Bisbee Fire Department, Bullhead City Fire Department, Benson Fire Department, Buckskin Fire District, Buckeye Fire Department, Central Arizona Fire and Medical Authority, Central Yavapai Fire District, Casa Grande Fire Department, Coronado National Forest, Coconino National Forest, Colorado River Agency, Daisy Mountain Fire Department, Arizona State Forestry Division - Deer Valley Office, Eloy Fire District, Fry Fire District, Gila District Office, Globe Fire Department, Green Valley Fire District, Golder Ranch Fire District, Greer Fire District, Heber-Overgaard Fire Department, Highlands Fire District, Kaibab National Forest, Mayer Fire District, Mohave Valley Fire Department, Navajo Region Fire and Aviation Management, North County Fire and Medical District, Nogales Fire Department, Northwest Fire Rescue District, Patagonia Volunteer Fire Department, Peoria Fire Department, Phoenix District Office, Picture Rocks Fire District,