DOCSLIB.ORG

1U+- ~ Nate TI Fletcher Linton Forest Botanist Sequoia National Forest I

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1U+- ~ Nate TI Fletcher Linton Forest Botanist Sequoia National Forest I BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT FOR FEDERALLY LISTED THREATENED OR ENDANGERED PLANT SPECIES AND BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION FOR FOREST SERVICE SENSITIVE PLANT SPECIES for Taylor and Long Meadow Grazing Allotment Renewal Kern River Ranger District Sequoia National Forest Kern County, California March 2017 7 Prepared/ Approved 1u+- ~ nATE TI Fletcher Linton Forest Botanist Sequoia National Forest I. INTRODUCTION The Taylor/Long Grazing Project and allotment is located on approximately 875 acres within the Kem River Ranger District of the Sequoia National Forest, Tulare County, California. This allotment is located is the southern central and western portions of the Kem Plateau between 7 ,000 and 7, 700 feet, near the Domeland Wilderness. The allotment consists of Taylor Meadow and Long Meadow, mostly located on formerly private land, acquired by the National Forest System (NFS). These two meadows are about two miles apart, but managed as one allotment. The proposed action is to continue current, authorized livestock grazing with modifications. Along with reauthorizing grazing, certain improvements are proposed for resource improvement. The resulting Allotment Management Plan and Term Grazing Permit would be issued for a 10-year period. All proposed activities would be expected to be in place within a two year period and would be described in the Allotment Management Plan. The purpose of this biological assessment (BA) and biological evaluation (BE) is to review the proposed Taylor and Long Meadow Grazing Allotment Renewal Project in sufficient detail to determine the potential effects on Threatened, Endangered, and Sensitive (TES) plant species. Specifically, the BA will document effects on proposed, threatened, or endangered species and/or critical habitat; and determine whether formal consultation or conference is required with the United States Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), pursuant to the Endangered Species Act. The BE will analyze effects on Forest Service sensitive plant species in order to determine whether the proposed action will result in a trend toward a sensitive species becoming Federally listed. This BA/BE was prepared in compliance with standards and direction established in Forest Service Manual 2670 .3 and 2672.42 and conforms with legal requirements set forth under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (19 U.S.C. 1536 (c), 50 CFR 402.12 (t) and 402.14 (c). No federally proposed or listed plant species would be expected to occur in the project area. The Forest Service sensitive plant species considered in this Biological Evaluation are: Upland Guild • Muir's Raillardella, ( Carlquista muirii) • Greenhorn Fritilary, (Fritillaria brandegeei) • Yosemite Bitterroot, (Lewisia disepala) • Twisselmann's Nemacladus, (Nemacladus twisselmannii) Meadow/Riparian Guild • Scalloped Moonwort, (Botrychium crenulatum) • Mingan Moonwort, (Botrychium minganense) • Mountain Moonwort, (Botrychium montanum) • Blandow's Bog Moss, (He/odium blandowii) • Broad Nerved Hump-Moss, (Meesia uliginosa) Please see Appendix A and 'Species and Habitat Accounts' in Existing Environment for the rationale behind including and dismissing specific sensitive plants in this analysis. II. CONSULTATION TO DATE Taylor and Long Meadow Grazing Allotment Renewal - Biological Assessment I Biological Evaluation for Plants Page 2of15 Pursuant to 50 CFR 402.12, the Sequoia National Forest received a species list from the US Fish and Wildlife Service showing which federally listed, proposed, or candidate species might be affected by projects in the Sequoia National Forest. The species list for the Sequoia National Forest was obtained from the USDI Fish and Wildlife Service, Sacramento Field Office web site: https://www.fws.gov/sacramento/es species/Lists/es species lists-overview.htm This list is updated on a project-by-project basis and every 90 days. The list was updated March 6th, 2017 and is reflected in Appendix A. The list contains and 1 category of critical habitat and 2 plant species that occur within the Forest. Keck's checkerbloom (Sidalcea keckii) is only known from outside the Forest to the north in clay soils below 1,400 feet. The proposed critical habitat for Sidalcea keckii falls entirely outside the national forest boundary. The Sequoia National Forest (Sequoia NF) currently has two plant species federally listed by the USFWS and 62 species designated as sensitive, i.e., identified by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Forest Service (FS) Regional Forester for Region 5 (RS) as requiring special management attention (See Appendix A). Springville clarkia (Clarkia springvillensis), is listed by the FWS as threatened, is restricted to the foothills of the Tule River drainage. There is neither potential habitat nor likelihood for it to exist within the analysis area for the Taylor Long Grazing project, therefore, it may be eliminated from further consideration and preparation of a Biological Assessment (BA) is not required. Bakersfield cactus (Optunia basilaris var. treleasei), is listed by the FWS as threatened. It is endemic to a limited area of central Kern County in the vicinity of Bakersfield. There is neither potential habitat nor likelihood for it to exist within the analysis area for the Taylor Long grazing project, therefore, it may be eliminated from further consideration and preparation of a BA is not required. ID. CURRENT MANAGEMENT DIRECTION Existing management direction for federally listed or candidate species and Forest Service Pacific Southwest Region sensitive plant species is summarized as follows: Forest Service Manual 2672 provides standards for biological evaluations and provides a list of all Regional Forester designated sensitive wildlife and plant species occurring on National Forest System lands. Supplemented by: 2006 Region 5 Revised Sensitive Plant and Animal Lists (FSM 2600). Specific management direction for sensitive plants: Current policy as shown in the Forest Service Manual (FSM 2672.4) is to conduct a pre-field review of available information, and in instances where there is evidence of sensitive plant species or habitat, conduct a field reconnaissance if necessary to determine whether the project poses a threat to sensitive plants. The results of surveys and conflict determination are documented in the BE. Seguoia National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (FLRMP, USDA FS, 1988). Sensitive species and their habitats are managed to ensure conservation or enhancement of their populations and habitats so that the species do not become federally listed or suffer loss of viability (FSM 2670.2 and 2670.3). Sierra Nevada Forest Plan Amendment, 2001, and Supplement. 2004: Two new standards and guidelines for the management of TES plants are found on page A-29 of the Record of Decision: Taylor and Long Meadow Grazing Allotment Renewal - Biological Assessment I Biological Evaluation for Plants Page 3 of15 • Conduct field surveys for threatened, endangered, proposed, and sensitive (TEPS) plant species early enough in the project planning process so that the project can be designed to conserved or enhance TEPS plants and their habitat. Conduct surveys according to procedures outlined in Forest Service Handbook (FSH 2609.25.11). If additional surveys are conducted as part of project implementation, document the survey results in the project file. • Minimize or eliminate direct and indirect impacts from management activities on TEPS plant unless the activity is designed to maintain or improve plan populations (FSM 2670). IV. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT The Allotment Management Plan and Term Grazing Permit for the Taylor/ Long Meadow Allotment would be issued for a 10-year period. Along with reauthorizing grazing, certain improvements are proposed for resource improvement. Specific actions at Taylor meadow include: corral at Taylor Meadow would be dismantled and moved to the south side of meadow; a fence would be constructed to provide a cattle exclosure and to control use of the meadow area; and a small spring area (-1/10 acre) at the north end of Upper Taylor Meadow would be fenced for protection from trampling by livestock. At Long meadow proposed activities are: the fence on east side of meadow would be moved approximately 200 feet east of the existing fence to align with an old skid road and the existing fence would be removed where practical; and modifying or resetting the culvert at the downstream edge of the meadow. This culvert is set at the bottom of the gully and establishes a low point for which the meadow channel will attempt to achieve equilibrium and raising the culvert to match the flood plain would reestablish the point of equilibrium with the rest of the meadow. All proposed activities would be expected to be in place within a two year period and would be described in the Allotment Management Plan. V. EXISTING ENVIRONMENT The project area can be accessed off of Cherry Hill road off of Sherman Pass road. The Taylor/Long Grazing Project and allotment is located on approximately 875 acres within the Kem River Ranger District of the Sequoia National Forest, Tulare County, California. This allotment is located is the southern central and western portions of the Kem Plateau between 7 ,000 and 7, 700 feet, near the Domeland Wilderness. The allotment consists of Taylor Meadow and Long Meadow, mostly located on formerly private land, acquired by the National Forest System (NFS). Plant communities in the project area consist of eastside pine, montane forest, and montane meadows.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tulare County Measure R Riparian-Wildlife Corridor Report
    Tulare County Measure R Riparian-Wildlife Corridor Report Prepared by Tulare Basin Wildlife Partners for Tulare County Association of Govenments 11 February 2008 Executive Summary As part of an agreement with the Tulare County Association of Governments, Tulare Basin Wildlife Partners (TBWP) visited nine potential riparian and wildlife corridors in Tulare County during summer 2007. We developed a numerical ranking system and determined the five corridors with highest potential for conservation, recreation and conjunctive uses. The selected corridors include: Deer Creek Riparian Corridor, Kings River Riparian Corridor, Oaks to Tules Riparian Corridor, Lewis Creek Riparian Corridor, and Cottonwood Creek Wildlife Corridor. For each corridor, we provide a brief description and a summary of attributes and opportunities. Opportunities include flood control, groundwater recharge, recreation, tourism, and wildlife. We also provide a brief description of opportunities for an additional eight corridors that were not addressed in depth in this document. In addition, we list the Measure R transportation improvements and briefly discuss the potential wildlife impacts for each of the projects. The document concludes with an examination of other regional planning efforts that include Tulare County, including the San Joaquin Valley Blueprint, the Tulare County Bike Path Plan, the TBWP’s Sand Ridge-Tulare Lake Plan, the Kaweah Delta Water Conservation District Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP), and the USFWS Upland Species Recovery Plan. Tulare Basin Wildlife Partners, 2/11/2008 Page 2 of 30 Table of Contents Introduction ………………………………………………………………………………. 4 Goals and Objectives………………………...……………………………………………. 4 Tulare County Corridors……………………..……………………………………………. 5 Rankings………………………………………………………………………….. 5 Corridors selected for Detailed Study…………………………………………….. 5 Deer Creek Corridor………………………………………………………. 5 Kings River Corridor……………………………………………………… 8 Oaks to Tules Corridor…………………………………..………………… 10 Lewis Creek East of Lindsay……………………………………………… 12 Cottonwood Creek………………………………………...……………….
    [Show full text]
  • Lassen National Forest
    USDA Forest Service Pacific Southwest Region LASSEN NATIONAL FOREST Eagle Lake District Almanor District Hat Creek District _____________________________ __ Susanville OUTREACH NOTICE LASSEN NATIONAL FOREST Supervisor’s Office - Susanville, CA Almanor Ranger District - Chester, CA Eagle Lake Ranger District - Susanville, CA Hat Creek Ranger District – Hat Creek/Fall River Mills, CA _____________________________ ______ 2021 NON-FIRE TEMPORARY (NTE 1039 Hours) POSITION OUTREACH GS-03 through GS-09 and WG-03 Announcements will be posted in USAJOBS October 30 – November 10, 2020 Anticipated Start Dates for the 2021 Season April –May 2021 The Lassen National Forest is looking for committed, hardworking, highly skilled temporary workforce to manage the resources of the Forest. Lassen National Forest is comprised of the Forest Supervisors Office and three (3) Districts (Almanor, Hat Creek, and Eagle Lake). The work is very rewarding and requires talented, skilled people working safely as part of a team in a variety of specialized positions, including: • Archeology Aid/Technician • Biological Science Technician (Wildlife/Fisheries/Plants/Invasive Plants/Natural Resources) • Botanist • Forestry Aid (Recreation/Timber) • Forestry Technician (Recreation/OHV/Wilderness/Trails) • Forestry Technician (Timber Stand Improvement/Timber Sale Prep/Silviculture) • Hydrologic Technician • Visitor Services Information Assistant/Customer Services Representative/Admin Support Asst. • Wildlife Biologist October 20, 2020 “The USDA Forest Service is an equal opportunity
    [Show full text]
  • Backcountry Discovery Trail
    Have you ever wanted to get into the backcountry Backcountry of a National Forest? Have you wondered if you have Discovery Trail what it takes? Rest assured: exploring the backcountry doesn’t necessarily require an ATV or a dirt bike. You can do it in a high clearance vehicle or a 4WD sport utility vehicle. This guide gives directions for the route from point to point, gives tips on what to bring and how to prepare, provides background information on history and general topics, and directs travelers to points of interest along the way. This 150-mile-long discovery trail is a perfect place to begin your explorations of the Plumas National Forest! Plumas National Forest Plumas National Forest Backcountry Discovery Trail The Plumas Backcountry Discovery Trail is published by the USDA Forest Service, in cooperation with the California State Parks OHV Division. Printed in the USA 2013 ISBN: Welcome to the Plumas Backcountry Discovery Trail The Plumas Backcountry Discovery Trail (BDT) invites exploration of the remote areas of the Plumas National Forest. You can expect rough road conditions on gravel and dirt roads and a slow pace of travel, maybe only 30-50 miles a day. Be prepared for downed trees or rocks on the road, rough and rocky surfaces, and brush encroaching on the road- way. Much of the route is under snow in the winter and early spring. There are no restaurants, grocery stores, or gas stations along the main route and cell phone coverage is intermittent. The non-paved roads are currently maintained for travel by sport utility vehicles (SUVs) and high-clearance vehicles.
    [Show full text]
  • Data Set Listing (May 1997)
    USDA Forest Service Air Resource Monitoring System Existing Data Set Listing (May 1997) Air Resource Monitoring System (ARMS) Data Set Listing May 1997 Contact Steve Boutcher USDA Forest Service National Air Program Information Manager Portland, OR (503) 808-2960 2 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9 DATA SET DESCRIPTIONS -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------10 National & Multi-Regional Data Sets EPA’S EASTERN LAKES SURVEY ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------11 EPA’S NATIONAL STREAM SURVEY ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------12 EPA WESTERN LAKES SURVEY------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------13 FOREST HEALTH MONITORING (FHM) LICHEN MONITORING-------------------------------------------------14 FOREST HEALTH MONITORING (FHM) OZONE BIOINDICATOR PLANTS ----------------------------------15 IMPROVE AEROSOL MONITORING--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------16 IMPROVE NEPHELOMETER ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------17 IMPROVE TRANSMISSOMETER ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------18 NATIONAL ATMOSPHERIC DEPOSITION PROGRAM/ NATIONAL TRENDS NETWORK----------------19 NATIONAL
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Order No. 21-07 Emergency Forest Closures
    Regional Order No. 21-07 USDA Forest Service Pacific Southwest Region Emergency Forest Closure Pursuant to 16 U.S.C. § 551 and 36 C.F.R. § 261.50(a) and (b), and to provide for public safety and protect natural resources, the following acts are prohibited on National Forest System lands within the Pacific Southwest Region. This Order supersedes Regional Order No. 21-04 and is effective from August 31, 2021, at 11:59 p.m. through September 17, 2021, at 11:59 p.m. 1. Going into or being upon National Forest System lands within the National Forests listed below. a. Tahoe National Forest b. Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit c. Plumas National Forest d. Lassen National Forest e. Mendocino National Forest f. Klamath National Forest g. Six Rivers National Forest h. Shasta-Trinity National Forest i. Modoc National Forest j. Cleveland National Forest k. San Bernardino National Forest l. Angeles National Forest m. Los Padres National Forest n. Sequoia National Forest o. Sierra National Forest p. Stanislaus National Forest q. Inyo National Forest 36 C.F.R. § 261.52(e). 2. Being on a National Forest System road within the National Forests listed below. a. Tahoe National Forest b. Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit c. Plumas National Forest d. Lassen National Forest e. Mendocino National Forest f. Klamath National Forest g. Six Rivers National Forest h. Shasta-Trinity National Forest i. Modoc National Forest j. Cleveland National Forest k. San Bernardino National Forest l. Angeles National Forest m. Los Padres National Forest n. Sequoia National Forest o. Sierra National Forest p.
    [Show full text]
  • Kern River Valley Groundwater Basin Bulletin 118
    Tulare Lake Hydrologic Region California’s Groundwater Kern River Valley Groundwater Basin Bulletin 118 Kern River Valley Groundwater Basin • Groundwater Basin Number: 5-25 • County: Kern • Surface Area: 74,000 acres (124 square miles) Basin Boundaries and Hydrology The Kern River Valley basin is in the southern Sierra Nevada at elevations ranging from 2,500 to 4,500 feet. It is irregularly shaped, reflecting the dendritic drainage pattern of the north and south forks of the Kern River, Kelso Creek, and smaller tributary creeks. The Greenhorn Mountains and Kern Canyon Fault form the basin’s western boundary, and the Piute and Kiavah Mountains bound the basin to the south and east (Smith 1964). The southern portion of the basin is dominated by Isabella Reservoir, from which the Kern River flows towards the San Joaquin Valley. Average annual precipitation ranges from 6 inches in the eastern portion of the basin to 14 inches in the western portion of the basin. Hydrogeologic Information Water Bearing Formations Groundwater is produced from predominantly Recent alluvium, and to a lesser degree from older (Pleistocene) alluvium in the northern portion of the basin. This alluvium is derived from the granitic and metamorphic bedrock that surrounds the basin on all sides. At the basin’s southwest corner, alluvium below the auxiliary Isabella Dam was classified as layers of clayey and silty sands with associated sand and clay layers to a maximum depth of 126 feet (USACE 1964). Similar materials were found approximately one mile south of the dam site during a 1959 investigation by the USACE (1964).
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Caribou and Thousand Lakes Wilderness Areas, Lassen National Forest (FHP Report NE07-01)
    Forest Health Protection Pacific Southwest Region Date: January 11, 2007 File Code: 3420 To: Forest Supervisor, Lassen National Forest Subject: Evaluation of Caribou and Thousand Lakes Wilderness Areas, Lassen National Forest (FHP Report NE07-01) At the request of Elizabeth Norton, Resource Staff Manager, Lassen National Forest, I conducted a field evaluation of the Caribou and Thousand Lakes Wilderness Areas on October 24 and 25, 2006. The objective of my visit was to evaluate the current forest health conditions, including impacts to tree health from recreational use within the wilderness areas and discuss potential management options such as campsite relocation and closure, prescribed fire, and vegetation management. Elizabeth Norton, Bob Andrews, and Kevin McCombe accompanied me in the Caribou Wilderness. Elizabeth Norton accompanied me in the Thousand Lakes Wilderness. Background The Caribou Wilderness (CW) is located within the Lassen National Forest adjacent to the east boundary of Lassen Volcanic National Park. The general legal description is T30N, T31N and R7E. The average elevation is 6,900 feet and the 20,000 acre area receives an average of 50-60” of precipitation per year (Figure 1). Taylor and Solem (2001) identified 5 forest compositional groups within the CW: white fir – Jeffrey pine, red fir – white fir, lodgepole, red fir – lodgepole and red fir – western white pine. These stand types are mostly separated by soil properties and slope aspect. Lodgepole pine is the dominant stand type over much of the CW. No timber harvest has occurred within the wilderness boundary however grazing in the 19th century altered the fire regime by removing fine fuels (Taylor and Solem 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Sierra Nevada Ecoregional Plan
    SIERRA NEVADA ECOREGIONAL PLAN December 1999 Photo Courtesy Charles Webber Sierra Nevada Ecoregional Plan 2 Sierra Nevada Ecoregional Plan Sierra Nevada Ecoregional Plan: Craig Mayer Pam Weiant Larry Serpa Christine Tam Robin Cox Jim Gaither 201 Mission Street, 4th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 (415) 777-0487 3 Sierra Nevada Ecoregional Plan 4 Sierra Nevada Ecoregional Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Ecoregional Plan A. Executive Summary ……………………………………………….. 7 B. Purpose ……………………………………………………… 9 C. Description of Ecoregion ……………………………………… 9 D. Conservation Issues ……………………………………………… 11 E. Data Sources and Management ……………………………… 11 F. Conservation Targets ……………………………………… 12 G. Conservation Goals ……………………………………………… 12 H. Portfolio Assembly ……………………………………………… 14 I. Portfolio Results ……………………………………………… 15 J. Evaluation of Conservation Lands ………………………………… 25 K. Functional Aggregations …………….……………………………… 25 L. Selecting Action Areas ……………………………………………… 26 2. Analysis and Results by Ecological Group A. Aquatic Systems ……………………………………………… 35 B. Riparian ……………………………………………………… 49 C. Foothill Woodlands ……………………………………………… 61 D. Chaparral ……………………………………………………… 67 E. Montane and Subalpine Coniferous Forests ……………………… 75 F. Interior Wetlands Meadow, and Aspen ……………………… 81 G. Alpine ……………………………………………………… 95 H. Desert Scrub and Woodland ……………………………………… 101 I. Isolated Rare Plants ……………………………………………… 107 J. Common and Widespread Communities ……………………… 111 3. References and Contacts ……………………………………………. 115 4. Appendices ……………………………………………………… 127 Appendix I. Conservation
    [Show full text]
  • Final Environmental Assessment Lower Kern Canyon and Greenhorn Mountains OHV Restoration ______
    United States Department of Final Environmental Agriculture Forest Assessment Service August 2013 Lower Kern Canyon and Greenhorn Mountains Off-Highway Vehicle (OHV) Restoration Project Kern River Ranger District, Sequoia National Forest Kern County, California For Information Contact: Penelope Shibley P.O. Box 9, Kernville, CA 93238 760-376-3781 [email protected] Cover photo: Easily accessed and popular recreation site located along the lower Kern River The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, or call (800) 795- 3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Final Environmental Assessment Lower Kern Canyon and Greenhorn Mountains OHV Restoration ______________________________________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • View the Nationwide List of Thomas Fire Cooperating Agencies
    THOMAS FIRE NATIONWIDE COOPERATING AGENCIES Alaska Alaska Fire Service Resources, Alaska Fire Service - Galena Zone, Mat-Su Area Forestry, Northern Region Office, Alaska Fire Service - Tanana Zone Arkansas Ouachita National Forest, Ozark & St. Francis National Forests Arizona Phoenix District, Flagstaff District, Tucson District, Arizona State Forestry - Central District, Arizona State Forestry - Northwest District, Avondale Fire Department, Alpine Fire District, Arizona Strip Field Office, Apache-Sitgreaves National Forest, Arizona State Forestry Division - State Office, Beaver Dam / Littlefield Fire District, Bisbee Fire Department, Bullhead City Fire Department, Benson Fire Department, Buckskin Fire District, Buckeye Fire Department, Central Arizona Fire and Medical Authority, Central Yavapai Fire District, Casa Grande Fire Department, Coronado National Forest, Coconino National Forest, Colorado River Agency, Daisy Mountain Fire Department, Arizona State Forestry Division - Deer Valley Office, Eloy Fire District, Fry Fire District, Gila District Office, Globe Fire Department, Green Valley Fire District, Golder Ranch Fire District, Greer Fire District, Heber-Overgaard Fire Department, Highlands Fire District, Kaibab National Forest, Mayer Fire District, Mohave Valley Fire Department, Navajo Region Fire and Aviation Management, North County Fire and Medical District, Nogales Fire Department, Northwest Fire Rescue District, Patagonia Volunteer Fire Department, Peoria Fire Department, Phoenix District Office, Picture Rocks Fire District,
    [Show full text]
  • Avian Monitoring in the Lassen National Forest 2009 Report
    Avian Monitoring in the Lassen National Forest 2009 Report April 2010 Ryan D. Burnett, Diana Humple, Alissa Fogg, and Tim Guida PRBO Conservation Science Sierra Nevada Program PO BOX 634 Chester, CA 96020 PRBO Contribution #1740 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................. 1 Chapter 1. Landbird Monitoring of Fuel Treatments on the Lassen National Forest ................... 2 Background and Introduction ................................................................................................. 3 Methods ...................................................................................................................................... 4 Results ...................................................................................................................................... 12 Discussion................................................................................................................................. 18 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................. 20 Literature Cited ...................................................................................................................... 21 Chapter 2. Resident and Neotropical Migratory Bird Response to Aspen Enhancement on the Lassen National Forest ................................................................................................................. 24 Background and Introduction ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Friends of the Kern River Preserve
    Friends of the Kern River Preserve Volume 12, Issue 1 Spring 2008 Audubon's mission is "to conserve and restore natural ecosystems, focusing on birds, other wildlife, and their habitats for the benefit of humanity and the earths' biological diversity." SPRING NATURE Calendar of Events Check our website for special events! FESTIVAL Saturday, April 19, 2008 – 8 a.m. Spring This is the 14th year of the Kern River Valley Nature-Fest Prep. RSVP. Spring Nature Festival! It will be held from April Friday, April 25, 2008 - 1 p.m. - Friends 30 - May 6, 2008, at Audubon's Kern River Preserve of the Kern River Preserve Spring Nature in Weldon and Circle Park in Kernville. The festival Festival preparation. RSVP. celebrates the biodiversity of the Kern River Valley Wednesday - Tuesday, April 30 - May 6, and Southern Sierra Nevada; home to over 200 nesting 2008 - Kern River Valley Spring Nature species of birds, over 100 species of mammals, over Festival. 130 species of butterflies, and over 2000 species Saturday, May 17, 2008 – 8 a.m. – Spring of plants. This great diversity is a result of the area Cleaning. RSVP. [email protected] being at the intersection of three of North America's Saturday, June 14, 2008 - 9 a.m. - 4 p.m. 10 Floristic Provinces (Great Basin Desert Province, John Schmitt completed another California Amphibian & Reptile Celebration. Mojave Desert sub-province of the Sonoran Desert masterpiece in his amazing Kern River Preserve HQ, Weldon. Province, and Californian Province). series of the birds of the Kern River Valley & Southern Sierra. Saturday, June 21, 2008 – 8 a.m.
    [Show full text]