DOCSLIB.ORG

Forested Communities of the Upper Montane in the Central and Southern Sierra Nevada

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Forested Communities of the Upper Montane in the Central and Southern Sierra Nevada United States Department Forested Communities of the Upper of Agriculture Forest Service Montane in the Central and Southern Pacific Southwest Sierra Nevada Research Station Donald A. Potter General Technical Report PSW-GTR-169 Publisher: Pacific Southwest Research Station Albany, California Forest Service Mailing address: U.S. Department of Agriculture PO Box 245, Berkeley CA 94701-0245 Abstract (510) 559-6300 Potter, Donald A. 1998. Forested communities of the upper montane in the central and southern http://www.psw.fs.fed.us Sierra Nevada. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-169. Albany, CA: Pacific Southwest Research Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture; 319 p. September 1998 Upper montane forests in the central and southern Sierra Nevada of California were classified into 26 plant associations by using information collected from 0.1-acre circular plots. Within this region, the forested environment including the physiographic setting, geology, soils, and vegetation is described in detail. A simulation model is presented for this portion of the Sierra Nevada that refines discussions of climate, and disturbance regimes are described to illustrate the interaction between these features of the environment and vegetation in the study area. In the classification, plant associations are differentiated by floristic composition, environmental setting, and measurements of productivity. Differences in elevation, aspect, topographic setting, and soil properties generally distinguish each plant association described. A detailed description is presented for each plant association, including a discussion of the distribution, environment, vegetation, soils, productivity, coarse woody debris, range, wildlife, and management recommendations. A complete species list and tables for cross referencing specific characteristics of each association are provided. Retrieval Terms: Vegetation classification, ecological classification, potential natural vegetation, plant association, red fir (Abies magnifica), white fir (Abies concolor), sugar pine (Pinus lambertiana), Jeffrey pine (Pinus Jeffreyii), lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta), mountain hemlock (Tsuga mertensiana), western white pine (Pinus monticola), western juniper (Juniperus occidentalis), quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides). Useful English/metric conversions for this classification are: 1 inch = 2.54 centimeters 1 centimeter = 0.39 inch 1 foot = 0.30 meters 1 meter = 3.28 feet 1 square foot = 0.09 square meters 1 square meter = 10.76 square feet 1 cubic foot = 0.03 cubic meters 1 cubic meter = 35.31 cubic feet 1 acre = 0.41 hectares 1 hectare = 2.47 acres The Author Donald A. Potter is Province Ecologist for the Sequoia, Sierra, and Stanislaus National Forests, Pacific Southwest Region, USDA Forest Service. He is located on the Stanislaus National Forest, 19777 Greenley Road, Sonora, California 95370. Acknowledgments No work of this size and scope could have been completed without the assistance of many people. Specialists in ecology, botany, genetics, silviculture, soil science, geology, hydrology, wildlife biology, range conservation, and fuels management enthusiastically offered their observations, insights, and advice from the field. It was a genuine pleasure to work with and learn from all of them. A collective round of thanks is truly offered to all. I would also like to thank Michael Barbour, Edward Stone, and Alan Taylor for reviewing the manuscript, and special thanks go to the following for their exemplary and dedicated efforts in the field and office: Botanists—John Rivera, Kathy Burnett, Susan Urie, and Tom Beck; Soil Scientists—Ben Smith, Alex Janicki, Randy Westmoreland, Ken Roberts, Calvin Pratt, Elise Pendall, and Wayne Verrill; Field Technicians—Wyrita Myster, and Charles Whitehead; Data Entry and Office Support—Thelma Joslin. Final drafts of the manuscript were edited by Laurie J. Dunn, and the layout produced by Kathy Stewart, both of the Pacific Southwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Albany, California. Forested Communities of the Upper Montane in the Central and Southern Sierra Nevada Donald A. Potter Contents: Introduction . 1 Pacific Southwest Study Area . 1 Research Station Classification Concepts . 3 Potential Natural Community. 3 USDA Forest Service Evolutionary Perspective . 4 General Technical Classification Hierarchy . 5 Report The Forest Environment . 5 PSW-GTR-169 Physiographic Setting . 5 Climate . 7 September 1998 Geology . 12 Soils . 15 Vegetation . 20 Disturbance Elements . 23 Methods . 40 Sampling . 40 Data Analysis . 42 Procedures . 43 Results . 46 General Relationships . 46 North-South Relationships . 47 East-West Relationships . 48 Ordination of Trees and Shrubs . 49 Using the Classification . 52 Use of the Key . 54 Key to Plant Associations . 56 Association Descriptions . 59 Bolander’s Locoweed . 59 Quaking Aspen/Mountain Pennyroyal . 65 Quaking Aspen/California Corn Lily. 73 Western Juniper/Sagebrush . 81 Western Juniper . 89 Red Fir/Mountain Mule Ears . 97 Mountain Hemlock//Steep . 105 Mountain Hemlock . 113 Red Fir-Western White Pine/Pinemat Manzanita . 121 Red Fir-Western White Pine/Sierra Chinquapin . 129 Red Fir-Western White Pine-Lodgepole Pine . 137 Red Fir-Western White Pine . 145 White Fir-Sugar Pine-Red Fir . 153 Jeffrey Pine/Huckleberry Oak . 161 Jeffrey Pine/Greenleaf Manzanita-Snowbrush . 169 Jeffrey Pine/Mountain Whitethorn-Sagebrush . 177 Red Fir-White Fir-Jeffrey Pine . 185 Jeffrey Pine-Red Fir . 193 Lodgepole Pine/Sagebrush . 201 Lodgepole Pine/Gray’s Lovage . 209 Lodgepole Pine//Woodlands . 217 Lodgepole Pine . 225 Red Fir-Lodgepole Pine/White Flowered Hawkweed . 233 Red Fir-White Fir . 241 Red Fir/Pinemat Manzanita . 249 Red Fir. 257 Appendices A-Classification Hierarchy of Plant Associations . 265 B-Soil Taxonomy by Plant Association. 268 C-Variables Used in the Classification . 272 D-Autecological Relationships of Selected Plants . 274 E-Environmental Summary by Plant Association . 289 F-Vegetation Summary by Plant Association . 290 G-Soil Summary by Plant Association . 291 H-Productivity Summary by Plant Association. 292 I-Common Plants of the Upper Montane . 293 Glossary . 307 Bibliography. 311 ii USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-169. 1998. The Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, is responsible for Federal Leadership in forestry. It carries out this role through four main activities: • Protection and management of resources on 191 million acres of National Forest System lands • Cooperation with State and local governments, forest industries, and private landowners to help protect and manage non-Federal forest and associated range and watershed lands • Participation with other agencies in human resource and community assistance programs to improve living conditions in rural areas • Research on all aspects of forestry, rangeland management, and forest.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lion Fire Fuels Report
    Lion Fire 2011 Sequoia National Forest Fire Behavior Assessment Report Lion Fire Mount Whitney Group Olancha Peak Kernville East Bakersfield Lower Kern Canyon Picture taken on August 3, 2011 at about 0930 by passenger on a 737 traveling north – view looking northeast from above the San Joaquin Valley Prepared September 14, 2011 (Draft 2) Fire Behavior Assessment Team (FBAT) Carol Ewell, Science Lead/Technical Specialist Scott Williams, Operational Lead/Technical Specialist John Wood, Operational Lead/Technical Specialist Nikos Hunner, Technical Specialist Clint Isbell, Technical Specialist Table of Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 2 Objectives ............................................................................................................................................... 2 Applications ........................................................................................................................................... 2 Approach/Methods ........................................................................................................... 2 Pre- and Post-Vegetation and Fuel Measurements ....................................................... 4 Fire Behavior Measurements and Observations ........................................................... 5 Findings/Results ................................................................................................................ 7 Pre- and Post-Vegetation and
    [Show full text]
  • YOSEMITE NATIONAL PARK O C Y Lu H M Tioga Pass Entrance 9945Ft C Glen Aulin K T Ne Ee 3031M E R Hetc C Gaylor Lakes R H H Tioga Road Closed
    123456789 il 395 ra T Dorothy Lake t s A Bond C re A Pass S KE LA c i f i c IN a TW P Tower Peak Barney STANISLAUS NATIONAL FOREST Mary Lake Lake Buckeye Pass Twin Lakes 9572ft EMIGRANT WILDERNESS 2917m k H e O e O r N V C O E Y R TOIYABE NATIONAL FOREST N Peeler B A Lake Crown B C Lake Haystack k Peak e e S Tilden r AW W Schofield C TO Rock Island OTH IL Peak Lake RI Pass DG D Styx E ER s Matterhorn Pass l l Peak N a Slide E Otter F a Mountain S Lake ri e S h Burro c D n Pass Many Island Richardson Peak a L Lake 9877ft R (summer only) IE 3010m F LE Whorl Wilma Lake k B Mountain e B e r U N Virginia Pass C T O Virginia S Y N Peak O N Y A Summit s N e k C k Lake k c A e a C i C e L C r N r Kibbie d YO N C n N CA Lake e ACK AI RRICK K J M KE ia in g IN ir A r V T e l N k l U e e pi N O r C S O M Y Lundy Lake L Piute Mountain N L te I 10541ft iu A T P L C I 3213m T Smedberg k (summer only) Lake e k re e C re Benson Benson C ek re Lake Lake Pass C Vernon Creek Mount k r e o Gibson e abe Upper an r Volunteer McC le Laurel C McCabe E Peak rn Lake u Lake N t M e cCa R R be D R A Lak D NO k Rodgers O I es e PLEASANT EA H N EL e Lake I r l Frog VALLEY R i E k G K C E LA e R a e T I r r Table Lake V North Peak T T C N Pettit Peak A INYO NATIONAL FOREST O 10788ft s Y 3288m M t ll N Fa s Roosevelt ia A e Mount Conness TILT r r Lake Saddlebag ILL VALLEY e C 12590ft (summer only) h C Lake ill c 3837m Lake Eleanor ilt n Wapama Falls T a (summer only) N S R I Virginia c A R i T Lake f N E i MIGUEL U G c HETCHY Rancheria Falls O N Highway 120 D a MEADOW
    [Show full text]
  • Seriating Arrow Points from Dart Points Subdivide the Study Area Into Seven Sub-Regions Depicted in Figure 1
    PREHISTORY CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 103 SSSPPPAAATIALTIALTIAL ANDANDAND TEMPORALEMPORALEMPORAL DISTRIBUTION OFOFOF ROSEOSEOSE SPRINGPRINGPRING PROJECTILEROJECTILEROJECTILE POINTSOINTSOINTS INININ THETHETHE NORTHORTHORTH-C-C-CENTRALENTRALENTRAL SIERRAIERRAIERRA NEVEVEVADAADAADA RICHARD W. DEIS Rose Spring corner-notched projectile points have been used within the North-Central Sierra Nevada region primarily to date surface assemblages, in an attempt to develop temporal affinities between sites and to trace technological innovation (i.e. introduction of the bow and arrow). Temporal placements have primarily been based upon projectile point cross-dating using typologies established for the Great Basin, without regard for a demonstrated link to this region of study. This paper presents the results of analysis that addressed the utility of Rose Spring corner-notched points as temporal markers, and presents implications for the results of this study. ose Spring corner-notched projectile points Rivers) which are located along the eastern margin of have been used within the North-Central the project area. RSierra Nevada region to date surface assemblages, in an attempt to develop temporal affinities between sites and to trace technological TYPE CONCEPT AND innovation, i.e. introduction of the bow and arrow. DEVELOPMENT OF TYPOLOGIES Temporal placements have primarily been based upon projectile point cross-dating using typologies Definitions of types used in this study are established for the Great Basin, without regard for a according to Steward (1954) who defined these in demonstrated link within the study region. terms of morphology, historical significance, functional traits or cultural characteristics. This paper briefly summarizes more extensive Morphological types are the most basic and consist of research presented in an MA thesis of the same title descriptions of form or visually observed (Deis 1999).
    [Show full text]
  • The ANZA-BORREGO DESERT REGION MAP and Many Other California Trail Maps Are Available from Sunbelt Publications. Please See
    SUNBELT WHOLESALE BOOKS AND MAPS CALIFORNIA TRAIL MAPS www.sunbeltpublications.com ANZA-BORREGO DESERT REGION ANZA-BORREGO DESERT REGION MAP 6TH EDITION 3RD EDITION ISBN: 9780899977799 Retail: $21.95 ISBN: 9780899974019 Retail: $9.95 Publisher: WILDERNESS PRESS Publisher: WILDERNESS PRESS AREA: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA AREA: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA The Anza-Borrego and Western Colorado Desert A convenient map to the entire Anza-Borrego Desert Region is a vast, intriguing landscape that harbors a State Park and adjacent areas, including maps for rich variety of desert plants and animals. Prepare for Ocotillo Wells SRVA, Bow Willow Area, and Coyote adventure with this comprehensive guidebooks, Moutnains, it shows roads and hiking trails, diverse providing everything from trail logs and natural history points of interest, and general topography. Trip to a Desert Directory of agencies, accommodations, numbers are keyed to the Anza-Borrego Desert Region and facilities. It is the perfect companion for hikers, guide book by the same authors. campers, off-roaders, mountain bikers, equestrians, history buffs, and casual visitors. The ANZA-BORREGO DESERT REGION MAP and many other California trail maps are available from Sunbelt Publications. Please see the following listing for titles and details. s: catalogs\2018 catalogs\18-CA TRAIL MAPS.doc (800) 626-6579 Fax (619) 258-4916 Page 1 of 7 SUNBELT WHOLESALE BOOKS AND MAPS CALIFORNIA TRAIL MAPS www.sunbeltpublications.com ANGEL ISLAND & ALCATRAZ ISLAND BISHOP PASS TRAIL MAP TRAIL MAP ISBN: 9780991578429 Retail: $10.95 ISBN: 9781877689819 Retail: $4.95 AREA: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA AREA: NORTHERN CALIFORNIA An extremely useful map for all outdoor enthusiasts who These two islands, located in San Francisco Bay are want to experience the Bishop Pass in one handy map.
    [Show full text]
  • August 24, 2020—5:00 P.M
    BUTTE COUNTY FOREST ADVISORY COMMITTEE August 24, 2020—5:00 P.M. Meeting via ZOOM Join Zoom Meeting https://us02web.zoom.us/j/89991617032?pwd=SGYzS3JYcG9mNS93ZjhqRkxSR2o0Zz09 Meeting ID: 899 9161 7032 Passcode: 300907 One tap mobile +16699006833,,89991617032# US (San Jose) +12532158782,,89991617032# US (Tacoma) Dial by your location +1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose) Meeting ID: 899 9161 7032 ITEM NO. 1.00 Call to order – Butte County Public Works Facility, Via ZOOM 2.00 Pledge of allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America 2.01 Roll Call – Members: Nick Repanich, Thad Walker, Teri Faulkner, Dan Taverner, Peggy Moak (Puterbaugh absent) Alternates: Vance Severin, Carolyn Denero, Bob Gage, Holly Jorgensen (voting Alt), Frank Stewart Invited Guests: Dan Efseaff,(Director, Paradise Recreation and Park District); Dave Steindorf (American Whitewater); Jim Houtman (Butte County Fire Safe Council); Taylor Nilsson (Butte County Fire Safe Council), Deb Bumpus (Forest Supervisor, Lassen National Forest); Russell Nickerson,(District Ranger, Almanor Ranger District, Lassen National Forest); Chris Carlton (Supervisor, Plumas National Forest); David Brillenz (District Ranger, Feather River Ranger District (FRRD), Plumas National Forest); Clay Davis (NEPA Planner, FRRD); Brett Sanders (Congressman LaMalfa’s Representative); Dennis Schmidt (Director of Public Works); Paula Daneluk (Director of Development Services) 2.02 Self-introduction of Forest Advisory Committee Members, Alternates, Guests, and Public – 5 Min. 3.00 Consent Agenda 3.01 Review and approve minutes of 7-27-20 – 5 Min. 4.00 Agenda 4.01 Paradise Recreation & Park District Magalia and Paradise Lake Loop Trails Project – Dan Efseaff, Director- 20 Min 4.02 Coordinating Committee Meeting results – Poe Relicensing Recreational Trail Letter from PG&E, Dave Steindorf of American Whitewater to share history and current situation:.
    [Show full text]
  • Insights Into Rhyolite Magma Dome Systems Based on Mineral and Whole Rock Compositions at the Mono Craters, Eastern California
    ABSTRACT INSIGHTS INTO RHYOLITE MAGMA DOME SYSTEMS BASED ON MINERAL AND WHOLE ROCK COMPOSITIONS AT THE MONO CRATERS, EASTERN CALIFORNIA The Mono Craters magmatic system, found in a transtensional tectonic setting, consists of small magmatic bodies, dikes, and sills. New sampling of the Mono Craters reveals a wider range of magmatic compositions and a more complex storage and delivery system than heretofore recognized. Space compositional patterns, as well as crystallization temperatures and pressures taken from olivine-, feldspar-, orthopyroxene-, and clinopyroxene-liquid equilibria, are used to create a new model for the Mono Craters magmatic system. Felsic magmas erupted throughout the entire Mono Craters chain, whereas intermediate batches only erupted at Domes 10-12 and 14. Mafic magmas are spatially restricted, having erupted only at Domes 10, 12 and 14. Data from the new whole rock analyses illustrates a linear trend. Fractional crystallization does not replicate this trend but rather the linear trend indicates magma mixing. This study also analyzes samples from the Mono Lake Islands and the June Lake Basalts and compares them to the Mono Craters. Although the Mono Lake Islands fall into the intermediate to felsic group, they contain distinctly higher Al2O3 and Na2O at a given SiO2. Therefore, this study concludes that the Mono Craters represent a distinct magmatic system not directly related to the magmatic activity that created the Mono Lake Islands. Michelle Ranee Johnson May 2017 INSIGHTS INTO RHYOLITE MAGMA DOME SYSTEMS BASED
    [Show full text]
  • Okanogan County Plant List by Scientific Name
    The NatureMapping Program Washington Plant List Revised: 9/15/2011 Okanogan County by Scientific Name (1) Non- native, (2) ID Scientific Name Common Name Plant Family Invasive √ 763 Acer glabrum Douglas maple Aceraceae 3 Acer macrophyllum Big-leaf maple Aceraceae 800 Alisma graminium Narrowleaf waterplantain Alismataceae 19 Alisma plantago-aquatica American waterplantain Alismataceae 1155 Amaranthus blitoides Prostrate pigweed Amaranthaceae 1087 Rhus glabra Sumac Anacardiaceae 650 Rhus radicans Poison ivy Anacardiaceae 1230 Berula erecta Cutleaf water-parsnip Apiaceae 774 Cicuta douglasii Water-hemlock Apiaceae 915 Cymopteris terebinthinus Turpentine spring-parsley Apiaceae 167 Heracleum lanatum Cow parsnip Apiaceae 1471 Ligusticum canbyi Canby's lovage Apiaceae 991 Ligusticum grayi Gray's lovage Apiaceae 709 Lomatium ambiguum Swale desert-parsley Apiaceae 1475 Lomatium brandegei Brandegee's lomatium Apiaceae 573 Lomatium dissectum Fern-leaf biscuit-root Apiaceae Coeur d'Alene desert- Lomatium farinosum Apiaceae 548 parsley 582 Lomatium geyeri Geyer's desert-parsley Apiaceae 586 Lomatium gormanii Gorman's desert-parsley Apiaceae 998 Lomatium grayi Gray's desert-parsley Apiaceae 999 Lomatium hambleniae Hamblen's desert-parsley Apiaceae 609 Lomatium macrocarpum Large-fruited lomatium Apiaceae 1476 Lomatium martindalei Few-flowered lomatium Apiaceae 1000 Lomatium nudicaule Pestle parsnip Apiaceae 1477 Lomatium piperi Piper's bisciut-root Apiaceae 634 Lomatium triternatum Nine-leaf lomatium Apiaceae 1528 Osmorhiza berteroi Berter's sweet-cicely
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution, Status, and Origin of Water Pipits Breeding in California ’
    The Condor89:788-797 0 The CooperOrnithological Society 1987 DISTRIBUTION, STATUS, AND ORIGIN OF WATER PIPITS BREEDING IN CALIFORNIA ’ JON H. MILLER 1034 ShattuckAvenue, Berkeley, CA 94707 MICHAEL T. GREEN Department of Biology, Universityof North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27514 Abstract. We investigatedthe racial identity, distribution, and abundanceof WaterPipits (Anthusspinoletta) breeding in the mountainsof California.This commonnesting species of alpinetundra was not knownto breedin Californiauntil the 1970s;a reviewof historical evidencesuggests recent colonization. Mensural and plumagecomparisons show California populationsto be A. s. alticola, the breedingrace of the Rocky Mountains. This is of biogeographicalinterest, because the abundantwintering and migratorypipit of California is A. s. pacificus,while alticola normally occurshundreds of miles to the east.Water Pipits currentlynest in mesicalpine vegetation throughout much of the southernand centralSierra Nevada.Breeding densities are highestand mostuniform in the southernmostpart of this range.The only known breedingpopulation in California outsideof the Sierra Nevada occurson San Gorgonio Mountain in southernCalifornia. We hypothesizethat the previous absenceor rarity of breeding Water Pipits in the Sierra Nevada may be attributable to the most recentpaleoclimatic xerothermic period, the Hypsithermal(ca. 5,000 to 2,900 years BP), whichimuoverished many alnine biotasof arctic-oldcordilleran affinitv. Climate and habitat differencesmay prevenipa$cus from breedingin California, and geographicbarriers may have hindered colonization by alticola. The occurrenceand timing of the present colonizationmay be fortuitous.Alternatively, it is possiblethat prior colonizationof Great Basinranges by alticola facilitatedeventual dispersal to the SierraNevada. Key words: Water Pipit; Anthus spinoletta;Sierra Nevada;historical status; colonization; biogeography;alpine. INTRODUCTION and Montana (Verbeek 1970; Miller and Green, The Water Pipit (Anthus spinoletta) is a principal pers.
    [Show full text]
  • Download The
    SYSTEMATICA OF ARNICA, SUBGENUS AUSTROMONTANA AND A NEW SUBGENUS, CALARNICA (ASTERACEAE:SENECIONEAE) by GERALD BANE STRALEY B.Sc, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, 1968 M.Sc, Ohio University, 1974 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Department of Botany) We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA March 1980 © Gerald Bane Straley, 1980 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the Head of my Department or by his representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department nf Botany The University of British Columbia 2075 Wesbrook Place Vancouver, Canada V6T 1W5 26 March 1980 ABSTRACT Seven species are recognized in Arnica subgenus Austromontana and two species in a new subgenus Calarnica based on a critical review and conserva• tive revision of the species. Chromosome numbers are given for 91 populations representing all species, including the first reports for Arnica nevadensis. Results of apomixis, vegetative reproduction, breeding studies, and artifi• cial hybridizations are given. Interrelationships of insect pollinators, leaf miners, achene feeders, and floret feeders are presented. Arnica cordifolia, the ancestral species consists largely of tetraploid populations, which are either autonomous or pseudogamous apomicts, and to a lesser degree diploid, triploid, pentaploid, and hexaploid populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Butte County Forest Advisory Committee
    BUTTE COUNTY FOREST ADVISORY COMMITTEE August 23, 2021—5:00 P.M. Meeting via Zoom Join Zoom Meeting: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/84353648421?pwd=bnprWUVJSTFpUVFkMEhNVzZmQ3pNUT09 One tap mobile +16699006833,,84353648421# US (San Jose) Dial by your location: +1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose) Meeting ID: 843 5364 8421 Passcode: 428997 ITEM NO. 1.00 Call to order – Zoom 2.00 Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America 2.01 Roll Call – Members: Nick Repanich, Thad Walker, Teri Faulkner, Trish Puterbaugh, Dan Taverner, Peggy Moak Alternates: Vance Severin, Bob Gage, Frank Stewart, Carolyn Denero, Holly Jorgensen Invited Guests: Deb Bumpus (Forest Supervisor, Lassen National Forest); Russell Nickerson,(District Ranger, Almanor Ranger District, Lassen National Forest); David Brillenz (District Ranger, Feather River Ranger District (FRRD), Plumas National Forest); Clay Davis (NEPA Planner, FRRD); Brett Sanders or Laura Page (Congressman LaMalfa’s Representative); Josh Pack (Director of Public Works); Paula Daneluk (Director, Development Services); Dan Efseaff (District Manager, Paradise Recreation and Park District); Representative (Butte County Fire Safe Council); Paul Gosselin (Deputy Director for SGMA, CA Dept. of Water Resources) 2.02 Self-introduction of Forest Advisory Committee Members, Alternates, Guests, and Public – 5 Min. 3.00 Consent Agenda 3.01 Review and Approve Minutes of 7-26-21 – 5 Min. 4.00 Agenda 4.01 Expansion of Paradise Recreation and Park Trails System - Dan Efseaff, District Manager –– 30 Min. 4.02 Sustainable
    [Show full text]
  • Gazetteer of Surface Waters of California
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTI8 SMITH, DIEECTOE WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 296 GAZETTEER OF SURFACE WATERS OF CALIFORNIA PART II. SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OP JOHN C. HOYT BY B. D. WOOD In cooperation with the State Water Commission and the Conservation Commission of the State of California WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1912 NOTE. A complete list of the gaging stations maintained in the San Joaquin River basin from 1888 to July 1, 1912, is presented on pages 100-102. 2 GAZETTEER OF SURFACE WATERS IN SAN JOAQUIN RIYER BASIN, CALIFORNIA. By B. D. WOOD. INTRODUCTION. This gazetteer is the second of a series of reports on the* surf ace waters of California prepared by the United States Geological Survey under cooperative agreement with the State of California as repre­ sented by the State Conservation Commission, George C. Pardee, chairman; Francis Cuttle; and J. P. Baumgartner, and by the State Water Commission, Hiram W. Johnson, governor; Charles D. Marx, chairman; S. C. Graham; Harold T. Powers; and W. F. McClure. Louis R. Glavis is secretary of both commissions. The reports are to be published as Water-Supply Papers 295 to 300 and will bear the fol­ lowing titles: 295. Gazetteer of surface waters of California, Part I, Sacramento River basin. 296. Gazetteer of surface waters of California, Part II, San Joaquin River basin. 297. Gazetteer of surface waters of California, Part III, Great Basin and Pacific coast streams. 298. Water resources of California, Part I, Stream measurements in the Sacramento River basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Visitor Guide to Devils Postpile and the Reds Meadow Valley
    National Forest Service Visitor Guide to Devils Postpile and U.S. Department of Agriculture the Reds Meadow Valley National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior The Post 2009-2010 What’s Inside Information and Services.................. 2 Ranger-led Activities Shuttle Bus Information.................... 3 Hiking ................................................ 4 Making the Most of Your Time Bear Safety......................................... 5 Maps .................................................. 6 Science and Resources Student Conservation Association Welcome to Devils Postpile Junior Ranger Program..................... 7 Volcanic Landscape Aquatic Hitchhikers and the Reds Meadow Valley Bookstores and Partners................... 8 Welcome to Reds Meadow Valley and Southern Sierra species of plants as “wanton destruction of scenery” displayed as an exhibit in the valley or and Devils Postpile in the spectacu- and animals converge along the river and enlisted the support of District in Mammoth. If you have any pho- lar Upper Middle Fork of the San corridor and in the many wetlands. Forester F.E. Olmsted and Univer- tos or stories you would like to share, Joaquin River Valley. Beauty abounds sity of California Professor Joseph N. please feel free to contribute these for in the forms of unusually rich and The value of the natural and recre- LeConte to evaluate the situation with possible inclusion in this exhibit. diverse flora and fauna, traditional ational resources was recognized in the hope of denying the permit and recreational opportunities and a 1890 with its inclusion in the initial protecting the area. Devils Postpile is also embarking on fascinating cultural history. boundaries of Yosemite National Park. its first ever general management plan, Their efforts, along with the support of in cooperation with the Inyo National Researchers, writers, visitors, and In 1905 the Devils Postpile formation, the Sierra Club, resulted in President Forest.
    [Show full text]