Access to Electronic Thesis
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Access to Electronic Thesis Author: Paul O’Shea Thesis title: Playing the Sovereignty Game: Understanding Japan's Territorial Disputes Qualification: PhD This electronic thesis is protected by the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. No reproduction is permitted without consent of the author. It is also protected by the Creative Commons Licence allowing Attributions-Non-commercial-No derivatives. If this electronic thesis has been edited by the author it will be indicated as such on the title page and in the text. ABSTRACT This dissertation fills a gap in the literature created by the focus of conventional International Relations approaches on the escalation and de-escalation of conflict in territorial disputes. Japan’s territorial disputes, while prone to controversy and flare-ups, have not witnessed any militarised conflict in their recent histories. By shifting the focus from conflict to sovereignty the dissertation allows an examination of what does take place in Japan’s territorial disputes, and provides an understanding of Japan’s approach to its territorial disputes and how this approach varies across time as well as across each individual dispute. The dissertation takes a constructivist approach to the relationship between international politics and international law, constructing a conceptual framework – the sovereignty game – which is adapted to the study of Japan’s territorial disputes. Simply put, in contemporary international relations, states rarely use force to conquer territory. Rather, they play the sovereignty game, in which they attempt to gain or maintain sovereignty over a disputed territory by (a) successfully undertaking exercises of sovereignty over the disputed territory, and preventing other states in the dispute from engaging in exercises of sovereignty over that territory; and (b) by gaining international recognition of sovereignty over the disputed territory. States seek to exercise sovereignty by utilising their resources (capital), and the extent to which they employ this capital is determined by the relative value of the territory in question. The dissertation applies this sovereignty game approach to each of Japan’s three territorial disputes, the Liancourt Rocks dispute with South Korea, the Pinnacle Islands dispute with China and Taiwan, and the Northern Territories dispute with Russia, examining the dynamics of the sovereignty game in the post-Cold War period. The dissertation finds that, due to the different relative values of the territorial disputes, Japan’s approach varies: it has taken a formal, legalistic approach to the Liancourt Rocks and Pinnacle Islands dispute – at least until the mid-2000s – using sovereignty only to preserve its existing position in the disputes. However, its approach to sovereignty in the Northern Territories dispute has been characterised by a sense of moral justice, thus it seeks to prevent all Russian exercises of sovereignty while constantly attempting to push its own. Table of Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................... i List of Figures ....................................................................................................... ii Abbreviations ........................................................................................................ iii Notes on the Text ................................................................................................... v Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1 Chapter One: Literature Review 1.1 Overview ................................................................................................... 11 1.2 Territorial Conflict Approach .................................................................... 12 1.2.1 The Theory of Territorial Conflict .................................................. 13 1.2.2 Norms and International Law .......................................................... 16 1.2.3 National Identity and Symbolic Value ............................................ 17 1.2.4 Methodological Focus on Conflict .................................................. 18 1.2.5 Challenger/Target Dichotomy ......................................................... 20 1.2.6 The Insights of Territorial Conflict ................................................. 21 1.2.7 Summary ......................................................................................... 27 1.3 Fravel’s Theory of Territorial Disputes .................................................... 28 1.3.1 Cooperation ..................................................................................... 31 1.3.2 Escalation ........................................................................................ 32 1.3.3 Summary ......................................................................................... 34 1.4 Literature on Japan’s Territorial Disputes ................................................. 37 1.4.1 Pluralist Approaches ....................................................................... 37 1.4.2 Economic Interdependence ............................................................. 40 1.4.3 Constructivism and Identity ............................................................ 43 1.4.4 Relational Power ............................................................................. 45 1.4.5 Issue Linkage and Coercive Diplomacy .......................................... 47 1.4.6 Geopolitics ....................................................................................... 48 1.4.7 Chaos Theory? ................................................................................. 51 1.5 Summary .................................................................................................... 53 Chapter Two: Theoretical Approach 2.1 Overview .................................................................................................... 54 2.2 International Politics and International Law .............................................. 55 2.2.1 Realism ............................................................................................ 56 2.2.2 Neoliberalism ................................................................................... 59 2.2.3 Constructivism ................................................................................. 60 2.3 A Constructivist Theory of International Law ........................................... 62 2.4 What is Sovereignty? ................................................................................. 67 2.4.1 Wendt and the Social Construction of Sovereignty ......................... 67 2.4.2 Understanding Sovereignty ............................................................. 68 2.4.3 Summary .......................................................................................... 71 2.5 The International Law of Territorial Disputes ........................................... 71 2.5.1 The Acquisition of Territory under International Law .................... 71 2.5.2 The Jurisprudence of Territorial Dispute Resolution ...................... 73 2.5.3 The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea .................. 77 2.6 The Sovereignty Game ............................................................................... 78 2.6.1 The Acquisition of Territory by Force ............................................. 80 2.6.2 International Recognition ................................................................ 83 2.6.3 Authority: The Effective Exercise of Sovereignty .......................... 85 2.7 Resources: Capital ..................................................................................... 89 2.8 Value of the Disputed Territory ................................................................. 91 2.8.1 Economic Value ............................................................................... 92 2.8.2 Symbolic Value ............................................................................... 94 2.8.3 Precedential Value ........................................................................... 95 2.8.4 Strategic Value ................................................................................. 97 2.9 Summary .................................................................................................... 97 Chapter Three: The Liancourt Rocks Dispute 3.1 Overview ................................................................................................... 99 3.2 History ........................................................................................................ 101 3.2.1 Pre-1905 History .............................................................................. 102 3.2.2 The Russo-Japanese War ................................................................. 104 3.2.3 The San Francisco Peace Treaty ...................................................... 105 3.2.4 The Rhee Line .................................................................................. 108 3.2.5 The Secret Pact ................................................................................. 109 3.3 The Value of the Liancourt Rocks ............................................................. 111 3.3.1 Economic Value ............................................................................... 111 3.3.2 Symbolic Value ............................................................................... 114 3.3.3 Precedential Value ..........................................................................