DOCSLIB.ORG

And the Impact on Mouth-Feel and Aroma Distilling

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
And the Impact on Mouth-Feel and Aroma Distilling Still Waters run deep Vapour, Vacuum and Pot – and the impact on mouth-feel and aroma Distilling Techniques with Sam Carter and David T Smith SCIENCE AND NATURE. HOW CHEMICAL ANALYSIS CAN HELP GIN DISTILLERS TO ENSURE BOTANICAL QUALITY, CONTROL AND ASSURANCE. HENRIC MOLIN FOUNDER AND OWNER SPIRIT OF HVEN SAFETY UALITY Q CONSISTENCY LANDED COST MOST GIN ALL GIN MANY GIN CORIANDER WATER ANGELICA CITRUS ETHANOL CASSIA BARK JUNIPER CARDAMOM CHAMOMILE LIQUORICE ORRIS ROOT KINGDOM DIVISION CLASS ORDER FAMILY PLANTAE PINOPHYTA PINOPSIDA PINALES CUPRESSACEAE JUNIPERUS JUNIPERUS JUNIPERUS SABINAS (NEW WORLD) JUNIPERUS SABINAS (OLD WORLD) NEEDLE-LEAF JUNIPERS SCALE-LEAF JUNIPERS SCALE-LEAF JUNIPERS GENUS JUNIPERUS ANGOSTURANA JUNIPERUS CHINENSIS JUNIPERUS JUNIPERUS COMMUNIS JUNIPERUS ASHEI JUNIPERUS CONVALLIUM JUNIPERUS ARIZONICA JUNIPERUS EXCELSA COMMON JUNIPER JUNIPERUS BARBADENSIS JUNIPERUS EXCELSA JUNIPERUS CONFERTA JUNIPERUS BERMUDIANA JUNIPERUS FOETIDISSIMA SHORE JUNIPER JUNIPERUS BLANCOI JUNIPERUS INDICA JUNIPERUS RIGIDA JUNIPERUS CALIFORNICA JUNIPERUS KOMAROVII JUNIPERUS COAHUILENSIS JUNIPERUS PHOENICEA SPECIES TEMPLE JUNIPER JUNIPERUS COMITANA JUNIPERUS PINGII ~67 VARIETIES JUNIPERUS OXYCEDRUS JUNIPERUS DEPPEANA JUNIPERUS PROCERA JUNIPERUS BREVIFOLIA JUNIPERUS DURANGENSIS JUNIPERUS PROCUMBENS JUNIPERUS CEDRUS JUNIPERUS FLACCIDA JUNIPERUS PSEUDOSABINA JUNIPERUS DELTOIDES JUNIPERUS GAMBOANA JUNIPERUS RECURVA JUNIPERUS HORIZONTALIS JUNIPERUS SABINA JUNIPERUS FORMOSANA JUNIPERUS JALISCANA JUNIPERUS SALTUARIA JUNIPERUS LUTCHUENSIS JUNIPERUS MARITIMA JUNIPERUS SEMIGLOBOSA JUNIPERUS NAVICULARIS JUNIPERUS MONOSPERMA JUNIPERUS SQUAMATA JUNIPERUS OXYCEDRUS JUNIPERUS MONTICOLA JUNIPERUS THURIFERA JUNIPERUS OCCIDENTALIS JUNIPERUS TIBETICA JUNIPERUS MACROCARPA JUNIPERUS OSTEOSPERMA JUNIPERUS WALLICHIANA JUNIPERUS CARYOCEDRUS JUNIPERUS PINCHOTII JUNIPERUS DRUPACEA JUNIPERUS SALTILLENSIS JUNIPERUS SCOPULORUM JUNIPERUS STANDLEYI JUNIPERUS VIRGINIANA JUNIPERUS ZANONII KINGDOM DIVISION CLASS ORDER FAMILY PLANTAE EUDICOTS ASTERIDS APIALES APIACEAE CORIANDRUM SATIVUM CORINDRUM TORDYLIUM CILANTRO WILD CORIANDER GENUS CORIANDRUM CULTIVATED, ANNUAL HERB. WILD SPECIE. ALL PARTS OF THE PLANT ARE EDIBLE. SPECIES 2 KINGDOM DIVISION CLASS ORDER FAMILY PLANTAE EUDICOTS ROSIDS SAPINDALES RUTACEAE ORIGINAL VARIETIES HYBRIDS AND CULTIVARS HYBRIDS AND CULTIVARS SUBFAMILY CITRUS CRENATIFOLIA MAXIMA BASED RETICULATA BASED AURANTIOIDEAE CITRUS JAPONICA CITRUS ×NATSUDAIDAI CITRUS ×AURANTIUM CITRUS MANGSHANENSIS CAM SÀNH CITRUS ×MYRTIFOLIA CITRUS MAXIMA CITRUS GRANDIS OSBECK CITRUS ×CLEMENTINA CITRUS MEDICA CITRUS ×PARADISI CITRUS ×RESHNI CITRUS IMPERIAL LEMON CITRUS ×DAIDAI CITRUS RETICULATA KINNOW CITRUS ×DELICIOSA CITRUS TRIFOLIATA KIYOMI CITRUS ×MEYERI TRIBE CITRUS ×LIMON CITRUS ×UNSHIU AUSTRALIAN LIMES CITREAE MINNEOLA TANGELO CITRUS ×TANGERINA CITRUS AUSTRALASICA ORANGELO CITRUS ×JUNOS CITRUS AUSTRALIS OROBLANCO CITRUS GLAUCA UNRESOLVED HERITAGE CITRUS ×SINENSIS CITRUS GARRAWAYAE CITRUS ×MACROPHYLLA CITRUS ×TANGELO CITRUS GRACILIS CITRUS ×AMBLYCARPA CITRUS ×NOBILIS CITRUS INODORA CITRUS ×PENNIVESICULATA UGLI GENUS CITRUS WARBURGIANA CITRUS TAMURANA CITRUS CITRUS WINTERSII CITRUS MEDICA-BASED CITRUS ×ICHANGENSIS CITRUS SARCODACTYLUS CITRUS ×IYO PAPEDAS CITRON CITRUS ×HYSTRIX CITRUS HALIMII CITRUS ×LIMONIMEDICA CITRUS ×LIMETTA CITRUS INDICA CITRUS ×LIMON CITRUS ×LATIFOLIA CITRUS MACROPTERA CITRUS ×AURANTIIFOLIA CITRUS ×TACHIBANA CITRUS MICRANTHA LUMIA CITRUS LATIPES RHOBS EL ARSA YEMENITE CITRON C. RETICULATA C. MAXIMA C. MEDICA C. MICRANTHA MANDARIN POMELO CITRON KAFFIR LIME C. SINENSIS C. AURANTIUM C. DELICIOSA C. RETICULATA SWEET ORANGE SOUR ORANGE WILLOWLEAF MANDARIN PONKAN C. CLEMENTINA C. PARADIS C. LIMON C. AURANTIFOLIA CLEMENTINE MANDARIN GRAPEFRUIT LEMON MEXICAN LIME ORGANOLEPTIC MICROSCOPY LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY ATOMIC ABSORPTION SPECTROSCOPY INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASMA MASS SPECTROMETRY ENERGY-DISPERSIVE X-RAY SPECTROSCOPY (AKA ENERGY DISPERSIVE X-RAY ANALYSIS) POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION Alpha-pinene Caryophyllene pine, resinous, minty spicy, clove, peppery Ethanol transparent Limonene Linalool citrus, orange, sweet citrus, waxy, woody, rose This GCMS method was used to analyze Juniper, Coriander and Citrus was done as shown below. Fingerprint_1 substance Ret. Time 3-Thujene 7,319 JUNIPER COMMUNIS alpha.-Pinene 7,420 Camphene 7,634 beta.-Phellandrene 7,899 LA01799 Enbär ADRI (-)-.beta.-Pinene 7,968 beta.-Myrcene 8,059 alpha.-Terpinene 8,388 o-Cymene 8,464 D-Limonene 8,516 gamma.-Terpinene 8,801 2-Carene 9,072 alpha.-Campholenal 9,452 L-Pinocarveol 9,610 LA01800 Enbär 10489PL (S)-cis-Verbenol 9,666 p-Mentha-1,5-dien-8-ol 9,859 (-)-Terpinen-4-ol 9,922 alpha.-Terpineol 10,032 Myrtenol 10,060 Verbenone 10,161 p-Cymen-8-ol 10,304 Bornyl acetate 10,726 alpha.-Cubebene 11,198 alpha.-Copaene 11,427 LA01801 Enbär 10601BG beta.-Elemene 11,492 gamma.-Muurolene 11,625 Caryophyllene 11,758 (E)-.beta.-Famesene 11,850 Humulene 11,995 Copaene 12,079 Germacrene D 12,150 alpha.-Muurolene 12,221 delta.-Cadinene 12,343 Germacrene B 12,635 (-)-Spathulenol 12,765 Caryophyllene oxide 12,820 Caryophyllene oxide 12,981 Di-epi-.alpha.-cedrene 13,050 (-)-.delta.-Cadinol 13,136 alpha.-Cadinol 13,206 JUNIPER COMMUNIS (x1,000,000) 2.25 B-myrcene Terpinen-4-ol 2.00 A-pinene 1.75 Limonene Linalool 1.50 1.25 1.00 0.75 0.50 ALPHA-PINENE 0.25 7.00 7.25 7.50 7.75 8.00 8.25 8.50 8.75 9.00 9.25 9.50 9.75 10.00 10.25 10.50 (x1,000,000) substance Rt 1799 1800 1801 juniper Area Area Area 2.25 LA01799 = Blue alpha.-Pinene 7,42 1624786 8712140 2398423 2.00 LA01800 = Pink beta.-Pinene 7,97 133947 563344 175396 1.75 LA01801 = Black Humulene Caryophyllene D-Cadinene cadinol beta.-Myrcene 8,06 493162 2022972 682633 D-Limonene 8,52 174621 857283 346832 1.50 gamma.-Terpinene 8,80 92587 511298 199501 1.25 Linalool 9,86 49678 57492 56393 1.00 Terpinen-4-ol 9,92 21987 401026 73166 Caryophyllene 11,76 54166 163084 34900 0.75 Humulene 11,99 36784 139923 31105 0.50 Germacrene D 12,16 50574 146066 46622 0.25 delta.-Cadinene 12,34 44708 466181 57245 10.75 11.00 11.25 11.50 11.75 12.00 12.25 12.50 12.75 13.00 13.25 13.50 cadinol13.75 14.00 13,12 36582 89912 21105 MYRCENE JUNIPER COMMUNIS Extraction from juniper 1799, 1800 and 1801 Enbär 1799 1800 1801 10000000 Area Area Area 8000000 alpha.-Pinene 1624786 8712140 2398423 beta.-Pinene 133947 563344 175396 6000000 beta.-Myrcene 493162 2022972 682633 With alpha-pinene 4000000 D-Limonene 174621 857283 346832 gamma.-Terpinene 92587 511298 199501 2000000 Linalool 49678 57492 56393 Terpinen-4-ol 21987 401026 73166 0 Caryophyllene 54166 163084 34900 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 2500000 Germacrene D 50574 146066 46622 delta.-Cadinene 44708 466181 57245 2000000 Humulene 36784 139923 31105 1500000 Without alpha-pinene 1000000 500000 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 CORIANDER SATIVUM LA01802 Ret.Time LA01802 LA01803 LA01812 alpha.-Pinene 7.421 2329132 242176 616250 Camphene 7.634 378360 0 181568 beta.-Phellandrene 7.899 130145 79772 56404 beta.-Pinene 7.967 194576 79772 92797 beta.-Myrcene 8.068 345999 54983 22218 o-Cymene 8.465 522522 27674 247768 LA01803 D-Limonene 8.516 878346 90271 37070 gamma.-Terpinene 8.798 2908995 25822 1275963 2-Carene 9.073 165360 31005 44114 3057775 1727200 Linalool 9.161 3 9175977 6 (+)-2-Bornanone 9.664 2019256 44225 1020835 Terpinen-4-ol 9.931 87319 0 85342 alpha.-Terpineol 10.039 128855 18910 81647 Nerol 10.429 672008 31656 461769 LA01812 Geranyl acetate 11.305 372252 0 180106 CORIANDER SATIVUM (x1,000,000) 2.75 LA01802 = Blue Ret.Time LA01802 LA01803 LA01812 LA01803 = Pink alpha.-Pinene 7.421 2329132 242176 616250 2.50 LA01812 = Black Camphene 7.634 378360 0 181568 beta.-Phellandrene 7.899 130145 79772 56404 2.25 beta.-Pinene 7.967 194576 79772 92797 beta.-Myrcene 8.068 345999 54983 22218 2.00 o-Cymene 8.465 522522 27674 247768 D-Limonene 8.516 878346 90271 37070 gamma.-Terpinene 8.798 2908995 25822 1275963 1.75 2-Carene 9.073 165360 31005 44114 Linalool 9.161 30577753 9175977 17272006 1.50 (+)-2-Bornanone 9.664 2019256 44225 1020835 Terpinen-4-ol 9.931 87319 0 85342 1.25 alpha.-Terpineol 10.039 128855 18910 81647 Nerol 10.429 672008 31656 461769 1.00 Geranyl acetate 11.305 372252 0 180106 0.75 0.50 0.25 7.25 7.50 7.75 8.00 8.25 8.50 8.75 9.00 9.25 9.50 9.75 10.00 10.25 10.50 10.75 11.00 11.25 11.50 LINALOOL CITRUS AURANTIUM LA01804 Orange Peel 10617ES substance Ret.Time LA01804 LA01805 alpha.-Pinene 7.421 166838 200176 Sabinene 7.899 40988 61597 beta.-Pinene 7.966 149498 136172 beta.-Myrcene 8.064 363198 572174 D-Limonene 8.514 24974803 39586182 LA01805 Orange Peel K26158 Linalool oxide 8.930 244549 150229 Linalool 9.166 282022 242292 L-.alpha.-Terpineol 10.040 74282 129185 Linalyl acetate 10.387 57396 137664 CITRUS AURANTIUM (x100,000) 8.0 Orange Peel 7.5 LA01804 = Black substance Ret.Time LA01804 LA01805 LA01805 = Pink alpha.-Pinene 7.421 166838 200176 7.0 Sabinene 7.899 40988 61597 6.5 beta.-Pinene 7.966 149498 136172 6.0 beta.-Myrcene 8.064 363198 572174 5.5 D-Limonene 8.514 24974803 39586182 Linalool oxide 8.930 244549 150229 5.0 Linalool 9.166 282022 242292 4.5 L-.alpha.-Terpineol 10.040 74282 129185 4.0 Linalyl acetate 10.387 57396 137664 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 7.00 7.25 7.50 7.75 8.00 8.25 8.50 8.75 9.00 9.25 9.50 9.75 10.00 10.25 10.50 10.75 LIMONENE CITRUS AURANTIUM Extraction from Bitter Orange LA1804 and 1805 substance Ret.Time LA01804 LA01805 50000000 With Limonene alpha.-Pinene 7.421 166838 200176 40000000 Sabinene 7.899 40988 61597 30000000 beta.-Pinene 7.966 149498 136172 20000000 beta.-Myrcene 8.064 363198 572174 10000000 D-Limonene 8.514 24974803 39586182 Linalool oxide 8.930 244549 150229 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 Linalool 9.166 282022 242292 -10000000 L-.alpha.-Terpineol 10.040 74282 129185 700000 Linalyl acetate 10.387 57396 137664 600000 500000 Without Limonene 400000 300000 200000 100000 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 This GCMS method was used to analyze different gins.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Department of Planning and Zoning
    Department of Planning and Zoning Subject: Howard County Landscape Manual Updates: Recommended Street Tree List (Appendix B) and Recommended Plant List (Appendix C) - Effective July 1, 2010 To: DLD Review Staff Homebuilders Committee From: Kent Sheubrooks, Acting Chief Division of Land Development Date: July 1, 2010 Purpose: The purpose of this policy memorandum is to update the Recommended Plant Lists presently contained in the Landscape Manual. The plant lists were created for the first edition of the Manual in 1993 before information was available about invasive qualities of certain recommended plants contained in those lists (Norway Maple, Bradford Pear, etc.). Additionally, diseases and pests have made some other plants undesirable (Ash, Austrian Pine, etc.). The Howard County General Plan 2000 and subsequent environmental and community planning publications such as the Route 1 and Route 40 Manuals and the Green Neighborhood Design Guidelines have promoted the desirability of using native plants in landscape plantings. Therefore, this policy seeks to update the Recommended Plant Lists by identifying invasive plant species and disease or pest ridden plants for their removal and prohibition from further planting in Howard County and to add other available native plants which have desirable characteristics for street tree or general landscape use for inclusion on the Recommended Plant Lists. Please note that a comprehensive review of the street tree and landscape tree lists were conducted for the purpose of this update, however, only
    [Show full text]
  • Fruits; Fresh Vegetables and Fresh Limes” (Opp
    Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. http://estta.uspto.gov ESTTA Tracking number: ESTTA881622 Filing date: 03/07/2018 IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD Proceeding 91238258 Party Plaintiff Wonderful Citrus LLC Correspondence DARYA P LAUFER ESQ Address ROLL LAW GROUP PC 11444 WEST OLYMPIC BLVD LOS ANGELES, CA 90064 UNITED STATES Email: [email protected], [email protected] Submission Other Motions/Papers Filer's Name Michael M. Vasseghi Filer's email [email protected], [email protected] Signature / Michael M. Vasseghi / Date 03/07/2018 Attachments Opposition with Exhibits-reduced size.pdf(1950576 bytes ) IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD Wonderful Citrus LLC, Opposition No. 91238258 Opposer, Application Serial No. 87/472272 v. APB, Inc. dba Vision Produce Company, Applicant. OPPOSER WONDERFUL CITRUS LLC’S OPPOSITION TO APPLICANT’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS I. INTRODUCTION Applicant moves for judgment on the pleadings (“Motion”), arguing that “there is no genuine issue as to Opposer’s lack of prior rights in a trademark that could be confusingly similar to Applicant’s Mark.” (Motion pg. 3.)1 Applicant’s Motion is not well taken. It acknowledges that Opposer has alleged exactly what it takes issue with – that Opposer has prior rights in a trademark that could be confusingly similar to Applicant’s Mark. Despite this, Applicant seeks to take issue with those allegations, implicitly contending that Opposer will be unable to prove what it has alleged. (Motion pg. 2.) This is not a proper basis for judgment on the pleadings, which must accept as true all allegations asserted in the Opposition.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Fruits on the Southeast Asian Mainland
    OFFPRINT A history of fruits on the Southeast Asian mainland Roger Blench Kay Williamson Educational Foundation Cambridge, UK E-mail: [email protected] http://www.rogerblench.info/RBOP.htm Occasional Paper 4 Linguistics, Archaeology and the Human Past Edited by Toshiki OSADA and Akinori UESUGI Indus Project Research Institute for Humanity and Nature, Kyoto, Japan 2008 ISBN 978-4-902325-33-1 A history of Fruits on the Southeast Asian mainland A history of fruits on the Southeast Asian mainland Roger Blench Kay Williamson Educational Foundation Cambridge, UK E-mail: [email protected] http://www.rogerblench.info/RBOP.htm ABSTRACT The paper presents an overview of the history of the principal tree fruits grown on the Southeast Asian mainland, making use of data from biogeography, archaeobotany, iconography and linguistics. Many assertions in the literature about the origins of particular species are found to be without empirical basis. In the absence of other data, comparative linguistics is an important source for tracing the spread of some fruits. Contrary to the Pacific, it seems that many of the fruits we now consider characteristic of the region may well have spread in recent times. INTRODUCTION empirical base for Pacific languages is not matched for mainland phyla such as Austroasiatic, Daic, Sino- This study 1) is intended to complement a previous Tibetan or Hmong-Mien, so accounts based purely paper on the history of tree-fruits in island Southeast on Austronesian tend to give a one-sided picture. Asia and the Pacific (Blench 2005). Arboriculture Although occasional detailed accounts of individual is very neglected in comparison to other types of languages exist (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Arthropods and Other Biota Associated with the Azorean Trees and Shrubs: Juniperus Brevifolia
    Arquipelago - Life and Marine Sciences ISSN: 0873-4704 Arthropods and other Biota associated with the Azorean Trees and Shrubs: Juniperus brevifolia RUI NUNES, R. GABRIEL, R.B. ELIAS, F. RIGAL, A.O. SOARES, P. CARDOSO & P.A.V. BORGES Nunes, R., R. Gabriel, R.B. Elias, F. Rigal, A.O. Soares, P. Cardoso & P.A.V. Borges 2015. Arthropods and other Biota associated with the Azorean Trees and Shrubs: Juniperus brevifolia. Arquipelago. Life and Marine Sciences 32: 19-48. Appendix I-IV. This work aims to characterize the arthropods and other biota (lichens, bryophytes, vascular plants and birds) associated with the Azorean endemic tree, Juniperus brevifolia. This is the first of a series of publications that will (i) provide a comprehensive list of all the biota associated with the main Azorean endemic trees and shrubs, (ii) describe in detail the diver- sity, abundance and spatial patterns of canopy arthropods, and (iii) whenever possible, to extend biodiversity assessments to communities of bryophytes, lichens, vascular plants and vertebrates. We use standardized sampled data from BALA project for canopy arthropods and for the remaining taxa we surveyed literature data and the Herbarium of University of Azores. Juniperus brevifolia occurs in a wide range of elevation belts in Azores and accommodates a remarkable large number of taxa: besides canopy arthropods (161 species) it is also an important substrate to other vascular species (six species), bryophytes (105 spe- cies), lichens (106 species) and also birds (four species). In addition, the species richness and particularly the abundance of endemics are dominant, and the number of conservation concern species for bryophytes is noteworthy (30 out of 70).
    [Show full text]
  • Characteristic Volatile Fingerprints and Odor Activity Values in Different
    molecules Article Characteristic Volatile Fingerprints and Odor Activity Values in Different Citrus-Tea by HS-GC-IMS and HS-SPME-GC-MS Heting Qi 1,2,3 , Shenghua Ding 1,2,3, Zhaoping Pan 1,2,3, Xiang Li 1,2,3 and Fuhua Fu 1,2,3,* 1 Longping Branch Graduate School, Hunan University, Changsha 410125, China; [email protected] (H.Q.); [email protected] (S.D.); [email protected] (Z.P.); [email protected] (X.L.) 2 Provincial Key Laboratory for Fruits and Vegetables Storage Processing and Quality Safety, Agricultural Product Processing Institute, Hunan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changsha 410125, China 3 Hunan Province International Joint Lab on Fruits & Vegetables Processing, Quality and Safety, Changsha 410125, China * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-0731-82873369 Received: 24 November 2020; Accepted: 16 December 2020; Published: 19 December 2020 Abstract: Citrus tea is an emerging tea drink produced from tea and the pericarp of citrus, which consumers have increasingly favored due to its potential health effects and unique flavor. This study aimed to simultaneously combine the characteristic volatile fingerprints with the odor activity values (OAVs) of different citrus teas for the first time by headspace gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry (HS-GC-IMS) and headspace solid-phase microextraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS). Results showed that the establishment of a citrus tea flavor fingerprint based on HS-GC-IMS data can provide an effective means for the rapid identification and traceability of different citrus varieties. Moreover, 68 volatile compounds (OAV > 1) were identified by HS-SPME-GC-MS, which reflected the contribution of aroma compounds to the characteristic flavor of samples.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Temperature on Germination of Citrus Macroptera, Citrus Latipes and Citrus Indica Seeds *Anamika Upadhaya, Shiva S
    ISSN. 0972 - 8406 The NEHU Journal Vol. XVII, No. 1 (January - June) and No. 2 (July - December) 2019, pp. 12-20 Effect of temperature on germination of Citrus macroptera, Citrus latipes and Citrus indica seeds *Anamika Upadhaya, Shiva S. Chaturvedi, Brajesh K. Tiwari and Dibyendu Paul Department of Environmental Studies, North Eastern Hill University Umshing, Meghalaya, India – 793022 *Corresponding author : [email protected] Abstract Seeds are an important means of propagation of Citrus species. Seeds of three wild Citrus namely; Citrus macroptera Montrouz., Citrus latipes (Swingle) Tanaka and Citrus indica Tanaka were germinated at 20°C, 25°C, 30°C and 35°C temperature to observe the effect of temperature on germination. Mean germination time and percentage seed germinated were recorded and used to determine optimum temperature for germination. Viability of seeds determined using chemical and germination tests yielded similar results. Optimum temperature for germination was found to be 28°C for C. macroptera and C. latipes and 26°C for C. indica. Keywords: Germination, wild, C. macroptera, C. latipes, C. indica, Meghalaya Introduction Citrus has been domesticated since ancient times, and where ‘natural’ populations are located, it is often difficult to determine whether they represent wild ancestors or are derived from naturalized forms of introduced varieties. Though relatively rare in wild, Citrus are mostly found as scattered trees in primary forests in remote areas rather than as pure stands. In India, a vast reservoir of Citrus diversity exists both in wild and in cultivated forms. North-eastern India is considered as natural home of many Citrus species with wide occurrence of indigenous species like C.
    [Show full text]
  • EASTERN REDCEDAR (Juniperus Virginiana) EXPANSION, EFFECTS, and CONTROL
    EASTERN REDCEDAR (Juniperus virginiana) EXPANSION, EFFECTS, AND CONTROL A LITERATURE REVIEW FROM THE TALLGRASS PRAIRIE REGION OF THE CENTRAL U.S. Eastern redcedar burning, photo by Dirac Twidwell A collaborative product from the Great Plains Fire Science Exchange and Tallgrass Prairie and Oak Savanna Fire Science Consortium Written by: Tracy L. Hmielowski [email protected] Great Plains Pub # GPE 2014-17 Tallgrass Prairie Pub # TPOS LR02-2014 Page 1 of 14 Tallgrass prairie ecosystems in the United States are priorities for conservation of Key Points grassland communities. While much of the Changes in wildland fire regime have tallgrass prairie in the Great Plains and upper led to an expansion of eastern Midwest has been converted to cropland or redcedar in tallgrass prairie. other developments, some areas still support native prairie species (Samson and Knopf 1994). Increased eastern redcedar leads to Less than 4% of the original tallgrass prairie decreased herbaceous biodiversity, remains (Samson and Knopf 1994). In addition decreased forage production, and to the threats of expanding urban development increased Wildland Urban Interface and agriculture, many of these open grasslands concerns. are being invaded by woody species (Briggs et Prescribed fire is most effective for al. 2005). One tree species of concern in this controlling small trees, or change to woody dominance is eastern maintaining sites where eastern redcedar (Juniperus virginiana; hereafter cedar is not a problem; mechanical redcedar) a rapidly expanding evergreen treatments may be necessary for common throughout the eastern United States. In this document, we focus on the expansion of dealing with larger trees. redcedar (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Analyses of Juniperus Species in Turkey and Their Relations with Other Juniperus Based on Cpdna Supervisor: Prof
    MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSES OF JUNIPERUS L. SPECIES IN TURKEY AND THEIR RELATIONS WITH OTHER JUNIPERS BASED ON cpDNA A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF NATURAL AND APPLIED SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY AYSUN DEMET GÜVENDİREN IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN BIOLOGY APRIL 2015 Approval of the thesis MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSES OF JUNIPERUS L. SPECIES IN TURKEY AND THEIR RELATIONS WITH OTHER JUNIPERS BASED ON cpDNA submitted by AYSUN DEMET GÜVENDİREN in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Department of Biological Sciences, Middle East Technical University by, Prof. Dr. Gülbin Dural Ünver Dean, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences Prof. Dr. Orhan Adalı Head of the Department, Biological Sciences Prof. Dr. Zeki Kaya Supervisor, Dept. of Biological Sciences METU Examining Committee Members Prof. Dr. Musa Doğan Dept. Biological Sciences, METU Prof. Dr. Zeki Kaya Dept. Biological Sciences, METU Prof.Dr. Hayri Duman Biology Dept., Gazi University Prof. Dr. İrfan Kandemir Biology Dept., Ankara University Assoc. Prof. Dr. Sertaç Önde Dept. Biological Sciences, METU Date: iii I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name : Aysun Demet GÜVENDİREN Signature : iv ABSTRACT MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSES OF JUNIPERUS L. SPECIES IN TURKEY AND THEIR RELATIONS WITH OTHER JUNIPERS BASED ON cpDNA Güvendiren, Aysun Demet Ph.D., Department of Biological Sciences Supervisor: Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Organic Acids in the Juice of Acid Lemon and Japanese Acid Citrus by Gas Chromatography
    九州大学学術情報リポジトリ Kyushu University Institutional Repository Organic Acids in the Juice of Acid Lemon and Japanese Acid Citrus by Gas Chromatography Widodo, Soesiladi E. Fruit Science Laboratory, Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University Shiraishi, Mikio Fruit Science Laboratory, Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University Shiraishi, Shinichi Fruit Science Laboratory, Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University https://doi.org/10.5109/24091 出版情報：九州大学大学院農学研究院紀要. 40 (1/2), pp.39-44, 1995-12. 九州大学農学部 バージョン： 権利関係： ,J. Fat. Agr., Kyushu IJniv., 40 (l-a), 39-44 (1995) Organic Acids in the Juice of Acid Lemon and Japanese Acid Citrus by Gas Chromatography Soesiladi E. Widodo, Mikio Shiraishi and Shinichi Shiraishi Fruit. Science Laboratory, Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 81 l-23, Japan (RWC~i/‘~?C~ C/1/?1P 15, 199<5) Acetate, glycolate, butyratc, oxalate, malonate, succinate, furnaratp, glyoxylate, malate, tattarate, cis-aconitatc and citrate were detected in the juice of Hanayu (Ci7tnt.s /ttrr/c~jrr Hart. ex Shirai), Daidai (C:. tr/i,rnt/tGt /II Linn. var. Cynthifera Y. Tanaka), Kabosu (6’. .sp/~rc:r~oc~r ~IXI Hart,. cx Tanaka), ‘Lisbon lemon (C.limon Burm. f. Lisbon) and Yuzu (C:.,jrr/ros Sieb. ex Tanaka) with compositions and contcnt,s varied according t,o sampling years and species. Citrate and rnalat,e were predominant, accounting for more than 90% and 3-9% of the total detected acids, respect.ively. The other acids presented in tracts, accounting t.ol.ally for roughly less than 0.5%. INTRODUCTION A number of chromatographic methods have been employed for determining organic acids (OAs) in citrus extracts.
    [Show full text]
  • Freeze Response of Citrus and Citrus- Speeds (Nisbitt Et Al., 2000)
    HORTSCIENCE 49(8):1010–1016. 2014. and tree and grove size (Bourgeois et al., 1990; Ebel et al., 2005). Protection using microsprinklers is compromised by high wind Freeze Response of Citrus and Citrus- speeds (Nisbitt et al., 2000). Developing more cold-tolerant citrus varieties through breeding related Genotypes in a Florida Field and selection has long been considered the most effective long-term solution (Grosser Planting et al., 2000; Yelenosky, 1985). Citrus and Citrus relatives are members Sharon Inch, Ed Stover1, and Randall Driggers of the family Rutaceae. The subtribe Citrinae U.S. Horticultural Research Laboratory, U.S. Department of Agriculture, is composed of Citrus (mandarins, oranges, Agricultural Research Service, 2001 South Rock Road, Fort Pierce, FL pummelos, grapefruits, papedas, limes, lem- ons, citrons, and sour oranges); Poncirus 34945 (deciduous trifoliate oranges); Fortunella Richard F. Lee (kumquats); Microcitrus and Eremocitrus (both Australian natives); and Clymenia National Clonal Germplasm Repository for Citrus and Dates, U.S. (Penjor et al., 2013). There is considerable Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 1060 Martin morphological and ecological variation within Luther King Boulevard, Riverside, CA 92521 this group. With Citrus, cold-hardiness ranges from cold-tolerant to cold-sensitive (Soost and Additional index words. Aurantioideae, citrus breeding, cold-sensitive, defoliation, dieback, Roose, 1996). Poncirus and Fortunella are frost damage, Rutaceae, Toddalioideae considered the most cold-tolerant genera that Abstract. A test population consisting of progenies of 92 seed-source genotypes (hereafter are cross-compatible with Citrus. Poncirus called ‘‘parent genotypes’’) of Citrus and Citrus relatives in the field in east–central trifoliata reportedly can withstand tempera- Florida was assessed after natural freeze events in the winters of 2010 and 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Citrus from Seed?
    Which citrus fruits will come true to type Orogrande, Tomatera, Fina, Nour, Hernandina, Clementard.) from seed? Ellendale Tom McClendon writes in Hardy Citrus Encore for the South East: Fortune Fremont (50% monoembryonic) “Most common citrus such as oranges, Temple grapefruit, lemons and most mandarins Ugli Umatilla are polyembryonic and will come true to Wilking type. Because most citrus have this trait, Highly polyembryonic citrus types : will mostly hybridization can be very difficult to produce nucellar polyembryonic seeds that will grow true to type. achieve…. This unique characteristic Citrus × aurantiifolia Mexican lime (Key lime, West allows amateurs to grow citrus from seed, Indian lime) something you can’t do with, say, Citrus × insitorum (×Citroncirus webberii) Citranges, such as Rusk, Troyer etc. apples.” [12*] Citrus × jambhiri ‘Rough lemon’, ‘Rangpur’ lime, ‘Otaheite’ lime Monoembryonic (don’t come true) Citrus × limettioides Palestine lime (Indian sweet lime) Citrus × microcarpa ‘Calamondin’ Meyer Lemon Citrus × paradisi Grapefruit (Marsh, Star Ruby, Nagami Kumquat Redblush, Chironja, Smooth Flat Seville) Marumi Kumquat Citrus × sinensis Sweet oranges (Blonde, navel and Pummelos blood oranges) Temple Tangor Citrus amblycarpa 'Nasnaran' mandarin Clementine Mandarin Citrus depressa ‘Shekwasha’ mandarin Citrus karna ‘Karna’, ‘Khatta’ Poncirus Trifoliata Citrus kinokuni ‘Kishu mandarin’ Citrus lycopersicaeformis ‘Kokni’ or ‘Monkey mandarin’ Polyembryonic (come true) Citrus macrophylla ‘Alemow’ Most Oranges Citrus reshni ‘Cleopatra’ mandarin Changshou Kumquat Citrus sunki (Citrus reticulata var. austera) Sour mandarin Meiwa Kumquat (mostly polyembryonic) Citrus trifoliata (Poncirus trifoliata) Trifoliate orange Most Satsumas and Tangerines The following mandarin varieties are polyembryonic: Most Lemons Dancy Most Limes Emperor Grapefruits Empress Tangelos Fairchild Kinnow Highly monoembryonic citrus types: Mediterranean (Avana, Tardivo di Ciaculli) Will produce zygotic monoembryonic seeds that will not Naartje come true to type.
    [Show full text]
  • Citrus Industry Biosecurity Plan 2015
    Industry Biosecurity Plan for the Citrus Industry Version 3.0 July 2015 PLANT HEALTH AUSTRALIA | Citrus Industry Biosecurity Plan 2015 Location: Level 1 1 Phipps Close DEAKIN ACT 2600 Phone: +61 2 6215 7700 Fax: +61 2 6260 4321 E-mail: [email protected] Visit our web site: www.planthealthaustralia.com.au An electronic copy of this plan is available through the email address listed above. © Plant Health Australia Limited 2004 Copyright in this publication is owned by Plant Health Australia Limited, except when content has been provided by other contributors, in which case copyright may be owned by another person. With the exception of any material protected by a trade mark, this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivs 3.0 Australia licence. Any use of this publication, other than as authorised under this licence or copyright law, is prohibited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/ - This details the relevant licence conditions, including the full legal code. This licence allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to Plant Health Australia (as below). In referencing this document, the preferred citation is: Plant Health Australia Ltd (2004) Industry Biosecurity Plan for the Citrus Industry (Version 3.0 – July 2015). Plant Health Australia, Canberra, ACT. Disclaimer: The material contained in this publication is produced for general information only. It is not intended as professional advice on any particular matter. No person should act or fail to act on the basis of any material contained in this publication without first obtaining specific and independent professional advice.
    [Show full text]