The Execution of Estonian Jews in the Local Detention Institutions in 1941–1942
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Denaturalization and Deportation of Nazi Criminals: Is It Constitutional
Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review Volume 11 Number 1 Article 4 1-1-1989 The Denaturalization and Deportation of Nazi Criminals: Is It Constitutional Norine M. Winicki Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/ilr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Norine M. Winicki, The Denaturalization and Deportation of Nazi Criminals: Is It Constitutional, 11 Loy. L.A. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 117 (1989). Available at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/ilr/vol11/iss1/4 This Notes and Comments is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NOTES AND COMMENTS The Denaturalization and Deportation of Nazi Criminals: Is It Constitutional? I. INTRODUCTION On June 22, 1941, Adolf Hitler launched an invasion of the So- viet Union.1 Under the plan for this attack, known as Operation Bar- barossa, Russia was to become an eastern annex of the German Reich, helping to consolidate Hitler's plan of a master Aryan race. 2 Consequently, Operation Barbarossa had two objectives, the military conquest of the Soviet Union and the extermination of Soviet Jews.3 The group whose responsibility it was to effectuate the elimination of the Jews in Russia were mobile killing units of SS troops called 4 Einsatzgruppen. In carrying out Operation Barbarossa, Hitler and his army set out to conquer the Baltic countries of Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia.5 In Latvia, the Einsatzgruppen formed the locals into the Arjs Kom- mando whose only purpose was to kill all the Jews of Latvia.6 In 1942, an Einsatzgruppe A report to Berlin stated, "'The number of Jews in Latvia in 1935 was 93,479-4.79 percent of the entire popula- tion ... -
London School of Economics and Political Science Department of Government
London School of Economics and Political Science Department of Government Historical Culture, Conflicting Memories and Identities in post-Soviet Estonia Meike Wulf Thesis submitted for the degree of PhD at the University of London London 2005 UMI Number: U213073 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U213073 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Ih c s e s . r. 3 5 o ^ . Library British Library of Political and Economic Science Abstract This study investigates the interplay of collective memories and national identity in Estonia, and uses life story interviews with members of the intellectual elite as the primary source. I view collective memory not as a monolithic homogenous unit, but as subdivided into various group memories that can be conflicting. The conflict line between ‘Estonian victims’ and ‘Russian perpetrators* figures prominently in the historical culture of post-Soviet Estonia. However, by setting an ethnic Estonian memory against a ‘Soviet Russian’ memory, the official historical narrative fails to account for the complexity of the various counter-histories and newly emerging identities activated in times of socio-political ‘transition’. -
Key Findings Many European Union Governments Are Rehabilitating World War II Collaborators and War Criminals While Minimisin
This first-ever report rating individual European Union countries on how they face up their Holocaust pasts was published on January 25, 2019 to coincide with UN Holocaust Remembrance Day. Researchers from Yale and Grinnell Colleges travelled throughout Europe to conduct the research. Representatives from the European Union of Progressive Judaism (EUPJ) have endorsed their work. Key Findings ● Many European Union governments are rehabilitating World War II collaborators and war criminals while minimising their own guilt in the attempted extermination of Jews. ● Revisionism is worst in new Central European members - Poland, Hungary, Croatia and Lithuania. ● But not all Central Europeans are moving in the wrong direction: two exemplary countries living up to their tragic histories are the Czech Republic and Romania. The Romanian model of appointing an independent commission to study the Holocaust should be duplicated. ● West European countries are not free from infection - Italy, in particular, needs to improve. ● In the west, Austria has made a remarkable turn-around while France stands out for its progress in accepting responsibility for the Vichy collaborationist government. ● Instead of protesting revisionist excesses, Israel supports many of the nationalist and revisionist governments. By William Echikson As the world marks the United Nations Holocaust Remembrance Day on January 27, European governments are rehabilitating World War II collaborators and war criminals while minimising their own guilt in the attempted extermination of Jews. This Holocaust Remembrance Project finds that Hungary, Poland, Croatia, and the Baltics are the worst offenders. Driven by feelings of victimhood and fears of accepting refugees, and often run by nationalist autocratic governments, these countries have received red cards for revisionism. -
Sol Littman Fonds
Library and Archives Bibliothèque et archives Canada Canada Political and Social Division du patrimoine Heritage Division politique et social SOL LITTMAN FONDS R2958 Finding Aid No. 2386 / Instrument de recherche no 2386 Prepared in 2005 by L. Tapper of the Social Préparé en 2005 par L. Tapper de la Section Archives Section des Archives sociales ii TABLE OF CONTENTS MICROFILM SHELF LIST .................................................... iii HELMUT RAUCA and RELATED MATERIAL SERIES .............................1 WAR CRIMES INCLUDING THE UKRAINIAN14TH WAFFEN-SS DIVISION SERIES . 7, 76 SUSPECTED WAR CRIMINAL CASE FILES .................................43, 75 HOLOCAUST DENIAL and HISTORICAL REVISIONISM SERIES...................51 LITTMAN’S PUBLICATIONS, ARTICLES, SPEECHES and NOTEBOOKS ............57 RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS and ARTICLES SERIES.............................61 iii WAR CRIMES INCLUDING THE UKRAINIAN 14th WAFFEN-SS DIVISION MICROFILM SHELF LIST M-8842 The records of the Reich Leader of the SS and Chief of German Police (Reichsführer SS und Chef der Deutschen Polizei). Published by the American Historical Association and General Services Administration, Washington, 1958 (Ref.: microfilm T175, roll 74) M-8843 Group XV, Ordner 439: (Der ress an SS-O’ Gruf Berger, 2/5/1944) Miscellaneous Non-Biographical Material (Schumacher Material). Published by the American Historical Association and General Services Administration, Washington, 1958 (Ref.: microfilm T580, roll 89) M-8844 Records of German Field Commands Panzer Armies, 1944. Published by the American Historical Association for the Study Of War document, Washington, 1960 (incomplete copy) (Ref.: microfilm T-313, roll 400) M-8845 Records of German Field Commands Panzer Armies, 1944. Published by the American Historical Association for the Study Of War document, Washington, 1960. (Ref.: microfilm T-313, roll 401) M-8846 Records of German Field Commands Panzer Armies, 1944. -
Mandr June Layout 1
Vol. 36-No.5 ISSN 0892-1571 May/June 2010-Iyyar/Sivan 5770 1010TH ANNUALANNUAL SPRINGSPRING LUNCHEONLUNCHEON OFOF THETHE AMERICANAMERICAN SOCIETYSOCIETY FORFOR YADYAD VASHEMVASHEM ore than 200 people attended the Annual Spring Luncheon, which took place May 27th, 2010, at the Grand Hyatt in New York City. This year’s Luncheon theme was M“Continuity.” Lili Stawski, Spring Luncheon Chairwoman, opened the event. Honoree and survivor Doris Gross was introduced by her daughter Lili Gross Barasch, and Honoree and Young Leadership Associate Yonina Gomberg was introduced by her grandmother and Yad Vashem Benefactor Gladys Halpern. Marilyn Rubenstein, a Yad Vashem Benefactor and longtime supporter of the American Society, introduced this year’s guest speaker, Professor Joseph Kertes, recipient of the Canadian National Jewish Book Award and the U.S. National Jewish Book Award for Fiction for his latest novel, Gratitude. The luncheon’s theme of Continuity was evident throughout the entire event as we saw many third-generation participants take their place among the guests. As a member of the Young Leadership Associates, Yonina pledged on behalf of the third generation to assume a leadership role in the American Society for Yad Vashem and continue the mission of Re- membrance so that the world may never forget. Doris Gross, 2010 Spring Luncheon Honoree, Eli Zborowski , Chairman, American Society for Yad Sam and Gladys Halpern; Fred Halpern; Yonina Gomberg, Honoree; Eric Gomberg; Cheryl Vashem; Yonina Gomberg, 2010 Spring Luncheon Honoree. Halpern; and Estelle and Rabbi Avrum Feldman. Members of the Young Leadership Associates. Lionel Barasch, Andrea Moneton, Fela Moncznik, Carol Moneton, Doris Gross, Lili Barasch, Kim- berly Barasch, Nicholas Barasch and Gene Moneton. -
Thesis with Signature Marii Valjataga
A small nation in monuments A study of ruptures in Estonian memoryscape and discourse in the 20th century Marii Väljataga Thesis submitted for assessment with a view to obtaining the degree of Doctor of History and Civilization of the European University Institute Florence, June 30, 2016 European University Institute Department of History and Civilization A small nation in monuments A study of ruptures in Estonian memoryscape and discourse in the 20th century Marii Väljataga Thesis submitted for assessment with a view to obtaining the degree of Doctor of History and Civilization of the European University Institute Examining Board Professor Pavel Kolář (EUI) - Supervisor Professor Alexander Etkind (EUI) Professor Siobhan Kattago (University of Tartu) Prof. dr hab. Jörg Hackmann (University of Szczecin, University of Greifswald) © Marii Väljataga, 2016 No part of this thesis may be copied, reproduced or transmitted without prior permission of the author Researcher declaration to accompany the submission of written work Department of History and Civilization - Doctoral Programme I, Marii Väljataga, certify that I am the author of the work A small nation in monuments. A study of ruptures in Estonian memoryscape and discourse in the 20th century I have presented for examination for the Ph.D. at the European University Institute. I also certify that this is solely my own original work, other than where I have clearly indicated, in this declaration and in the thesis, that it is the work of others. I warrant that I have obtained all the permissions required for using any material from other copyrighted publications. I certify that this work complies with the Code of Ethics in Academic Research issued by the European University Institute (IUE 332/2/10 (CA 297). -
Des Territoires D'extermination À L'est De L'europe (1941 - 1944)
02 sommaire page 1-3_maquette 06/01/2016 15:16 Page 1 Des territoires D'extermination À l'est De l'europe (1941 - 1944) 1 etudes tsiganes 02 sommaire page 1-3_maquette 06/01/2016 15:16 Page 2 sommaire Introduction Éditorial père Desbois p. 4 les persécutions des roms en europe de l’est au cours de la seconde Guerre mondiale alain reyniers p. 5 Cadre général politique de la race et expansionnisme nazi Henriette asséo p. 12 la politique raciale nationale-socialiste {à l’encontre des roms Karola Fings p. 28 le génocide des roms en ex-union soviétique et en roumanie marie moutier p. 46 La déportation en Transnistrie la déportation des rroms en transnistrie les données principales Viorel achim p. 68 Gospodar ou déporté : la catégorisation comme Des instrumentterritoires de la déportation tatiana sîrbu p. 90 Déporter la paysannerie tsigane - Destins brisés des ursari Grégire Cousin & de segarcea et sadova petre petcut p. 104 D'exterminationentretien avec nastasie Costel alain reyniers p. 124 En Union soviétique et ailleurs à l'Est le Génocide nazi à l’encontre À l'estdes roms en russie De occupée l'europe martin Holler p. 132 le génocide des roms en ukraine alexander Kruglov p. 150 les tsiganes dans les pays Baltes occupés par les nazis anton Weiss-Wendt p. 180 (1941le génocide- 1944) nazi des roms en Biélorussie et en ukraine andrej Kotljarchuk p. 194 Fusillades de victimes roms : au cœur d'une enquête de Yahad – in unum en petite-pologne michał Chojak p. 216 FOCUS Karl marx et les roms des principautés roumaines leonardo piasere p. -
June 18, 1981
, R. I. J e wi sh Hi s t orical As s ociation 1 1 1 3 0 Sessions Street P r ovidence , RI 02906 ,Support f1 Read By .. , Jewish . b More Than $ A9encies 1, 40,000 Wi th Y9ur People Membership Ii THE ONLY ENGLISH-JEW/SH WEEKLY IN R. I. AND SOUTHEAST MASS VOLUME LXVIII , NUMBER 30 THURSDAY, JUNE 18, 198 1 , _30$ P!cR GOPY Survivors Ga ther In Israel Jewish Shop Owner Arrested To Recall Pa st, Celebrate In Stolen Torah Case JERUSALEM - More than 4,000 sur fer want to make a statement, that this is NEW YORK - The owner of a yar involved in the theft and sale of stolen Torah vivors of the Holocaust gathered in Israel this what happened to us. We survived it and we mulka shop on Manhattan's Lower East Side scroll s. week fo r a four-day remembrance and pray that this will be a lesson so it will never was arrested this week on charges of posses Morgenthau said Levy "may have been a celebration of li fe, the first and last such happen again, to Jews or non-Jews. " sion of stolen Torahs. The arrest was made by major fence" and that an investigation in event since the capture and liberation of the Many of the thousands who came to Israel officers of the New York Police Department's volved in the trafficking of other stolen Nazi concentration camps. for the gathering brought with them stones Bias Incident Investigating Unit under the Torahs. Capt. Donnell y said 52 Torahs, Attending the event were surv ivors from marked with the names of relatives who command of Capt. -
Toomas Hiio Vabariigi Presidendi Mõttekojas 24. Aprillil 2007
Toomas Hiio Vabariigi Presidendi Mõttekojas 24. aprillil 2007 1990. aastate teisel poolel, kui Eesti, aga ka Läti ja Leedu üha julgemalt teatasid oma taotlusest liituda Euroopa Liidu ja NATOga, hakati ühe eeldusena selleks rääkima ja kirjutama sellest, et Eesti, nagu ka Läti ja Leedu peaksid tegelema oma lähiminevikuga toimetulekuga, mis on üks üsna kohmakas tõlge saksa terminist Vergangenheitsbewältigung. Loomulikult peeti sel ajal selle all eelkõige silmas eestlaste, lätlaste ja leedulaste osalemist juutide tapmises ja juutide vastastes repressioonides Teise maailmasõja ajal. Eesti avalikkuses oli sellest asjast teistsugune pilt, üldine ajalooteadvus rõhutas eeskätt Nõukogude Liidu repressioone Eesti elanikkonna vastu, mille ulatus ja tähendus ning teadmine millest oli Eestis palju suurem kui juutide tapmisest Teise maailmasõja ajal Eestis. Me peame ka tähele panema, et nõukogudeaegne ajalookirjandus juutide tapmisest palju ei rääkinud, ideoloogiliseks skeemiks oli „fašistide kuriteod nõukogude inimeste vastu”. Selle juurde liitus üsnagi levinud seisukoht, et suur osa esimesel punasel aastal Eestis Nõukogude julgeolekuteenistuses teeninud meestest, kes olid süüdi repressioonides Eesti riigi ja rahva vastu, olid juudid. Tõsi on see, et juute oli nende seas mitmeid, kuid tegelikult oli selline üldrahvalik teadmine pigem saksaaegse propaganda niinimetatud „judeobolševismi” teesi kauge järelkaja, mis läbi raamatu „Eesti rahva kannatuste aasta” on kandunud viimasel kuuekümnel aastal nii lugematutesse mälestustesse kui ka ajalookirjandusse. -
The Annexation of the Baltic States and Its Effect on the Development of Law Prohibiting Forcible Seizure of Territory William J.H
NYLS Journal of International and Comparative Law Volume 6 Article 5 Number 2 Volume 6, No. 2, 1985 1985 The Annexation of the Baltic States and Its Effect on the Development of Law Prohibiting Forcible Seizure of Territory William J.H. Hough III Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/ journal_of_international_and_comparative_law Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Hough, William J.H. III (1985) "The Annexation of the Baltic States and Its Effect on the Development of Law Prohibiting Forcible Seizure of Territory," NYLS Journal of International and Comparative Law: Vol. 6 : No. 2 , Article 5. Available at: https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/journal_of_international_and_comparative_law/vol6/iss2/5 This Notes and Comments is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@NYLS. It has been accepted for inclusion in NYLS Journal of International and Comparative Law by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@NYLS. THE ANNEXATION OF THE BALTIC STATES AND ITS EFFECT ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF LAW PROHIBITING FORCIBLE SEIZURE OF TERRITORY TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ....................................... 303 II. HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF LAW PROHIBITING FORCIBLE SEIZURE OF TERRITORY ................................ 305 A. European Origins ............................... 305 B. Legal Development After the Peace of Westphalia 308 C. Title to Territory in the Colonial Era ............ 319 D. Post World War I Development .................. 321 E. Birth of the Stimson Doctrine of Nonrecognition of Forcible Seizure of Territory ..................... 326 III. THE ANNEXATION OF THE BALTIC STATES ................. 351 A. Origins of the Baltic States ...................... 351 B. Independence of the Baltic States ................ 355 C. Soviet Invasion and Incorporation of the Baltic S ta tes .......................................... 369 IV. -
Estonian Units in the Wehrmacht, SS and Police System, As Well As the Waffen-SS, During World War II
266 Estonian Units in the Wehrmacht, SS and Police System, as well as the Waffen-SS, During World War II Recruitment and Establishment of the Units Toomas Hiio In the course of the Second World War, Estonia was occupied by two totalitarian states. In 1940–1941, and again, from 1944 on, the occupier was the Soviet Union, but during the years 1941–1944, it was Nazi Ger- many. And Estonians fought in the security and military forces of both occupiers. Plus, Estonians who had fl ed to Finland, also fought in the ranks of the armed forces of that nation. When Germany at fi rst attacked the USSR, in June 1941, it wasn’t interested in recruiting the inhabitants of the freshly conquered lands into its armed forces. But already in July, the Germans realized that they needed additional manpower, especially for securing the rear of their army; for transporting the large numbers of Soviet prisoners of war; as well as for guarding roads, railroads, bridges, military bases, etc. At fi rst, the Germans began to organize units of auxiliaries recruited from amongst anti-Communist Soviet prisoners of war, and later, also made use of volunteers from amongst the civilian population of the occupied territories. And many Estonians were ready to join the German armed forces, so as to help free their homeland of the Communist occupiers, and to fi ght on the front against the Soviet Union. Th e German Wehrmacht (unifi ed armed forces of Germany from 1935 to 1945) was, at fi rst, greeted in Estonia as a force freeing the country of the hated Communist regime. -
Dissertatsiones Historiae Universitatis Tartuensis 26
DISSERTATSIONES HISTORIAE UNIVERSITATIS TARTUENSIS 26 DISSERTATSIONES HISTORIAE UNIVERSITATIS TARTUENSIS 26 Meelis Maripuu Omavalitsuseta omavalitsused Halduskorraldus Eestis Saksa okupatsiooni ajal 1941–1944 Tartu Ülikooli ajaloo- ja arheoloogia instituut, Tartu, Eesti. Kaitsmisele lubatud Tartu Ülikooli filosoofiateaduskonna ajaloo- ja arheoloogia instituudi nõukogu otsusega 11. juulil 2012. Juhendaja: dots Tõnu-Andrus Tannberg Oponent: prof emeritus Kalervo Hovi (Turu Ülikool) Doktoritöö kaitsmine toimub 24. septembril 2012. aastal kell 16.15 Tartu Ülikooli senati saalis, Ülikooli 18, Tartu. ISSN 1406–443X ISBN 978–9949–32–091–2 (trükis) ISBN 978–9949–32–092–9 (PDF) Autoriõigus: Meelis Maripuu, 2012 Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus www.tyk.ee Tellimuse nr. 383 SISUKORD SISUKORD ................................................................................................. 5 LÜHENDID ................................................................................................ 8 SISSEJUHATUS ......................................................................................... 10 Uurimisprobleemistik ja töö struktuur ................................................... 13 Meetodid ......................................................................................... 18 Historiograafia ........................................................................................ 21 Allikad ............................................................................................ 38 Terminoloogia selgituseks .............................................................