Bacterial Toxins and the Nervous System: Neurotoxins and Multipotential Toxins Interacting with Neuronal Cells

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bacterial Toxins and the Nervous System: Neurotoxins and Multipotential Toxins Interacting with Neuronal Cells Toxins 2010, 2, 683-737; doi:10.3390/toxins2040683 OPEN ACCESS toxins ISSN 2072–6651 www.mdpi.com/journal/toxins Review Bacterial Toxins and the Nervous System: Neurotoxins and Multipotential Toxins Interacting with Neuronal Cells Michel R. Popoff 1,* and Bernard Poulain 2 1 Institut Pasteur, Bactéries anaérobies et Toxines, 25 rue du Dr Roux, F-757254, PARIS cedex 15, France 2 Neurotransmission et Sécrétion Neuroendocrine, CNRS UPR 2356 IFR 37 - Neurosciences, Centre de Neurochimie, 5, rue Blaise Pascal, F-67084 STRASBOURG cedex, France; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]. Received: 21 February 2010; in revised form: 18 March 2010 / Accepted: 7 April 2010 / Published: 15 April 2010 Abstract: Toxins are potent molecules used by various bacteria to interact with a host organism. Some of them specifically act on neuronal cells (clostridial neurotoxins) leading to characteristics neurological affections. But many other toxins are multifunctional and recognize a wider range of cell types including neuronal cells. Various enterotoxins interact with the enteric nervous system, for example by stimulating afferent neurons or inducing neurotransmitter release from enterochromaffin cells which result either in vomiting, in amplification of the diarrhea, or in intestinal inflammation process. Other toxins can pass the blood brain barrier and directly act on specific neurons. Keywords: toxin; neurotoxin; enterotoxin; nervous system; actin cytoskeleton; small gtpases; neurotransmitter 1. Introduction Pathogenic bacteria use various strategies to interact with target tissues and cells of the host organism. Among them, toxin production constitutes an efficient way to alter specific functions of target cells. Toxins can act locally or at a distance from the infectious site and are responsible for severe diseases in man and animals. While some toxins, called cytotoxins, cause disruption of all cell types, thus permitting the pathogen access to nutrients, other toxins are only active on specific cells such as enterotoxins active Toxins 2010, 2 684 on epithelial intestinal cells and neurotoxins targeting neuronal cells. This is achieved by the recognition of specific cell surface receptor(s) and/or specific intracellular target(s). When bound to the receptor, toxins can unleash their toxic program at the cell membrane by interfering with signal transduction pathways, pore formation, or enzymatic activities towards membrane compounds. In contrast, other toxins enter the cytosol, recognize, and modify specific intracellular targets. According to the nature of the target and the type of modification, intracellular active toxins cause a dramatic alteration of cellular functions such as protein synthesis, cell homeostasis, cell cycle progression, vesicular traffic, and actin cytoskeletal rearrangements. The nervous system which is diffused through all the organism is one of the main target of bacterial toxins. If neurotoxins, like clostridial neurotoxins, exclusively interact with neuronal cells from the central or peripheral nervous system inducing specific neurological symptoms, other toxins recognize a broader range of cell types including neuronal cells. For example, cytotoxins can trigger necrosis or apoptosis in various cell types as well as in neuronal cells. Thereby various toxins, in addition to their specific activity on some cell types, affect certain neuronal cells, directly or indirectly, leading to neurological symptoms associated with typical clinical signs resulting from the other affected cells (Table 1, and Figure 1). This review is focused on the various modes of interaction with neuronal cells of bacterial neurotoxins and other toxins affecting the nervous system. 2. The Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms Involved in Neuroexocytosis: An Overview 2.1. An overview of neurotransmission Transfer of information or command between neurons, or neurons and target cells (muscle fibers, endocrine cells, etc.) is most often chemical in nature and occurs at highly specialized contact sites termed synapses. Here, the release of neurotransmitter molecules by the presynaptic elements enables activation of receptors localized on the postsynaptic target. Neurotransmitter molecules are comprised of small organic molecules as acetylcholine (ACh), catecholamines like dopamine or noradrenaline, serotonin (5-HT), glutamate, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), glycine, adenosine-triphosphate (ATP), and numerous peptides such as vaso-intestinal peptide (VIP), substance P (SP), and calcitonin gene-related protein (CGRP). Released transmitter substance(s) can activate ligand-gated ionic channels or metabotropic receptors, thus mediating either transmembrane ionic fluxes or activation of intracellular signaling pathway(s). For example, in the central nervous system, depending on the ion species flowing through the channel, activation of ligand-gated ionic channels can cause depolarization (i.e., excitation) or hyperpolarization (i.e., inhibition) of the postsynaptic plasma membrane, respectively, and the excitation/inhibition net balance determines eventual initiation of action potentials propagated in the neuron until the next synapses. The evoked endplate potential at muscle fibers following stimulation of the motor nerve (and subsequent ACh release) is a depolarization that may reach the threshold for initiating muscle action potential, which itself propagates along muscle fiber ultimately triggering its contraction. In the enteric nervous system, release of neurotransmitter molecules (as VIP) by mucosal nerve endings directly contacting the enterocytes, or indirectly via the activation of entero-chrommaffin cells releasing 5-HT, can lead to activation of metabotropic receptors, intracellular activation of the adenylate cyclase and downstream cAMP-dependent pathways, resulting in an active co-transport of ions species (Na+, K+, Cl−) and water efflux for osmotic compensation in the intestine lumen (viz the molecular mechanisms of diarrhoea [5]). Toxins 2010, 2 685 Table 1. Bacterial neurotoxins and other toxins interacting with the nervous system. Target neuronal MLD Toxin Bacteria Structure Receptor Activity Effects cell (μg/kg)1 Toxins inhibiting the neuroexocytosis proteolysis of gangliosides inhibiton of SNARE proteins Botulinum C. botulinum single chain protein (GD , GT ) acetylcholine motoneurons 1b 1b (VAMP, 0.0003 neurotoxins C. baratii (150 kDa) synaptotagmin, release (flaccid SNAP25, C. butyricum SV2 paralysis) syntaxin) inhibition of gangliosides proteolysis of neurotransmitter Tetanus single chain protein inhibitory (GD , GT ) 1b 1b SNARE protein release (GABA, 0.001 neurotoxin C. tetani (150 kDa) interneurons GPI-anchored (VAMP) glycine) (spastic protein paralysis) inactivation of inhibition of single chain protein potentially all Rho and Ras- Lethal toxin unknown neurotransmitter 0.1 C. sordellii (250 kDa) neurons GTPases release (glucosylation) inactivation of inhibition of single chain protein potentially all Toxin B unknown Rho-GTPases neurotransmitter 32 C. difficile (250 kDa) neurons (glucosylation) release neuronal single chain protein hippocampal pore-forming Pneumolysin cholesterol apoptosis S. pneumoniae (53 kDa) neurons activity (meningitis) single chain protein enterocyte pore-forming Enterotoxin 80 C. perfringens (36 kDa) neurons activity Toxins stimulating neurosecretion stimulation of single chain protein hippocampal pore-forming glutamate Epsilon toxin unknown 0.1 C. perfringens (36 kDa) neurons activity release (excitation) Toxins 2010, 2 686 Table 1. Cont. inactivation of enterochrompaffin Gsα and 5-HT release Cholera toxin V. cholerae AB5 structure cells and enteric ganglioside GM1 250 activation of (diarrhea) neurons adenylate cyclase inactivation of enterochromaffin Heat labile Gsα and 5-HT release E. coli AB5 structure cells and enteric ganglioside GM1 250 enterotoxin activation of (diarrhea) neurons adenylate cyclase release of inactivation of inflammatory single chain protein enterocytes membrane Rho-GTPases, Toxin A C. difficile mediators and 0.35 (300 kDa) enteric neurons glycoprotein other neuropeptides mechanism? (diarrhea) stimulation of GMP increase, Heat stable short peptide enterocyte c enteric nervous E. coli guanylate cyclase other enterotoxin (2–5 kDa) enteric neurons? system mechanism? (diarrhea) 5-HT release histocompatibility superantigen Staphylococcal single chain protein enterochromaffin stimulation of 20 S. aureus complex class II other enterotoxins (25–30 kDa) cells, vagal nerve 5-HT receptor (monkey) molecules mechanism? 3 (emesis) cyclic stimulation of + Cereulide B. cereus dodecadepsipeptide vagal nerve 5HT3 receptor K ionophore 5-HT3 receptor (1.2 kDa) (emesis) 1 Mouse lethal doses per kg of body weight according to [1–4]. Toxins 2010, 2 687 Figure 1. Schematic representation of bacterial toxins active on the nervous system. In nerve terminals, transmitter molecules are stored into at least two different classes of secretory organelles: the small lucent synaptic vesicles, and large dense core vesicles or granules. The small lucent vesicles, approximately 50 nm in diameter, contain small organic molecules and are formed by either budding from the early endosome or recycling of empty vesicles [6,7]. The large dense core Toxins 2010, 2 688 vesicles are analogous to the secretory granules present in endocrine and exocrine cells and have a biogenesis different from that of the synaptic vesicles. Similar to many cargo
Recommended publications
  • Tetrodotoxin
    Niharika Mandal et al. / Journal of Pharmacy Research 2012,5(7),3567-3570 Review Article Available online through ISSN: 0974-6943 http://jprsolutions.info Tetrodotoxin: An intriguing molecule Niharika Mandal*, Samanta Sekhar Khora, Kanagaraj Mohanapriya, and Soumya Jal School of Biosciences and Technology, VIT University, Vellore-632013 Tamil Nadu, India Received on:07-04-2012; Revised on: 12-05-2012; Accepted on:16-06-2012 ABSTRACT Tetrodotoxin (TTX) is one of the most potent neurotoxin of biological origin. It was first isolated from puffer fish and it has been discovered in various arrays of organism since then. Its origin is still unclear though some reports indicate towards microbial origin. TTX selectively blocks the sodium channel, inhibiting action potential thereby, leading to respiratory paralysis. TTX toxicity is mainly caused due to consumption of puffer fish. No Known antidote for TTX exists. Treatment is symptomatic. The present review is therefore, an effort to give an idea about the distribution, origin, structure, pharmacol- ogy, toxicity, symptoms, treatment, resistance and application of TTX. Key words: Tetrodotoxin, Neurotoxin, Puffer fish. INTRODUCTION One of the most intriguing biotoxins isolated and described in the twentieth cantly more toxic than TTX. Palytoxin and maitotoxin have potencies nearly century is the neurotoxin, Tetrodotoxin (TTX, CAS Number [4368-28-9]). 100 times that of TTX and Saxitoxin, and all four toxins are unusual in being A neurotoxin is a toxin that acts specifically on neurons usually by interact- non-proteins. Interestingly, there is also some evidence for a bacterial bio- ing with membrane proteins and ion channels mostly resulting in paralysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Saxitoxin Poisoning (Paralytic Shellfish Poisoning [PSP])
    Saxitoxin Poisoning (Paralytic Shellfish Poisoning [PSP]) PROTOCOL CHECKLIST Enter available information into Merlin upon receipt of initial report Review information on Saxitoxin and its epidemiology, case definition and exposure information Contact provider Interview patient(s) Review facts on Saxitoxin Sources of poisoning Symptoms Clinical information Ask about exposure to relevant risk factors Type of fish or shellfish Size and weight of shellfish/puffer fish or other type of fish Amount of shellfish/puffer fish or other type of fish consumed Where the shellfish/puffer fish or other type of fish was caught or purchased Where the shellfish/puffer fish or other type of fish was consumed Secure any leftover product for potential testing Restaurant meals Other Contact your Regional Environmental Epidemiologist (REE) Identify symptomatic contacts or others who ate the shellfish/puffer fish or other type of fish Enter any additional information gathered into Merlin Saxitoxin Poisoning Guide to Surveillance and Investigation Saxitoxin Poisoning 1. DISEASE REPORTING A. Purpose of reporting and surveillance 1. To gather epidemiologic and environmental data on saxitoxin shellfish, Florida puffer fish or other type of fish poisoning cases to target future public health interventions. 2. To prevent additional cases by identifying any ongoing public health threats that can be mitigated by identifying any shellfish or puffer fish available commercially and removing it from the marketplace or issuing public notices about the risks from consuming molluscan shellfish from Florida and non-Florida waters, such as from the northern Pacific and other cold water sources. 3. To identify all exposed persons with a common or shared exposure to saxitoxic shellfish or puffer fish; collect shellfish and/or puffer fish samples for testing by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) and the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Baseline Structure of the Enteric Nervous System and Its Role in Parkinson’S Disease
    life Review The Baseline Structure of the Enteric Nervous System and Its Role in Parkinson’s Disease Gianfranco Natale 1,2,* , Larisa Ryskalin 1 , Gabriele Morucci 1 , Gloria Lazzeri 1, Alessandro Frati 3,4 and Francesco Fornai 1,4 1 Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; [email protected] (L.R.); [email protected] (G.M.); [email protected] (G.L.); [email protected] (F.F.) 2 Museum of Human Anatomy “Filippo Civinini”, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy 3 Neurosurgery Division, Human Neurosciences Department, Sapienza University of Rome, 00135 Rome, Italy; [email protected] 4 Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (I.R.C.C.S.) Neuromed, 86077 Pozzilli, Italy * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The gastrointestinal (GI) tract is provided with a peculiar nervous network, known as the enteric nervous system (ENS), which is dedicated to the fine control of digestive functions. This forms a complex network, which includes several types of neurons, as well as glial cells. Despite extensive studies, a comprehensive classification of these neurons is still lacking. The complexity of ENS is magnified by a multiple control of the central nervous system, and bidirectional communication between various central nervous areas and the gut occurs. This lends substance to the complexity of the microbiota–gut–brain axis, which represents the network governing homeostasis through nervous, endocrine, immune, and metabolic pathways. The present manuscript is dedicated to Citation: Natale, G.; Ryskalin, L.; identifying various neuronal cytotypes belonging to ENS in baseline conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Review Cholera Toxin Structure, Gene Regulation and Pathophysiological
    Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 65 (2008) 1347 – 1360 1420-682X/08/091347-14 Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences DOI 10.1007/s00018-008-7496-5 Birkhuser Verlag, Basel, 2008 Review Cholera toxin structure, gene regulation and pathophysiological and immunological aspects J. Sncheza and J. Holmgrenb,* a Facultad de Medicina, UAEM, Av. Universidad 1001, Col. Chamilpa, CP62210 (Mexico) b Department of Microbiology and Immunology and Gothenburg University Vaccine Research Institute (GUVAX), University of Gçteborg, Box 435, Gothenburg, 405 30 (Sweden), e-mail: [email protected] Received 25 October 2007; accepted 12 December 2007 Online First 19 February 2008 Abstract. Many notions regarding the function, struc- have recently been discovered. Regarding the cell ture and regulation of cholera toxin expression have intoxication process, the mode of entry and intra- remained essentially unaltered in the last 15 years. At cellular transport of cholera toxin are becoming the same time, recent findings have generated addi- clearer. In the immunological field, the strong oral tional perspectives. For example, the cholera toxin immunogenicity of the non-toxic B subunit of cholera genes are now known to be carried by a non-lytic toxin (CTB) has been exploited in the development of bacteriophage, a previously unsuspected condition. a now widely licensed oral cholera vaccine. Addition- Understanding of how the expression of cholera toxin ally, CTB has been shown to induce tolerance against genes is controlled by the bacterium at the molecular co-administered (linked) foreign antigens in some level has advanced significantly and relationships with autoimmune and allergic diseases. cell-density-associated (quorum-sensing) responses Keywords.
    [Show full text]
  • Zetekitoxin AB
    Zetekitoxin AB Kate Wilkin Laura Graham Background of Zetekitoxin AB Potent water-soluble guanidinium toxin extracted from the skin of the Panamanian golden frog, Atelopus zeteki. Identified by Harry S. Mosher and colleagues at Stanford University, 1969. Originally named 1,2- atelopidtoxin. Progression 1975 – found chiriquitoxin in a Costa Rican Atelopus frog. 1977 – Mosher isolated 2 components of 1,2-atelopidtoxin. AB major component, more toxic C minor component, less toxic 1986 – purified from skin extracts by Daly and Kim. 1990 – the major component was renamed after the frog species zeteki. Classification Structural Identification Structural Identification - IR -1 Cm Functional Groups 1268 OSO3H 1700 Carbamate 1051 – 1022 C – N Structural Identification – MS Structural Identification – 13C Carbon Number Ppm Assignment 2 ~ 159 C = NH 4 ~ 85 Quaternary Carbon 5 ~ 59 Tertiary Carbon 6 ~ 54 Tertiary Carbon 8 ~ 158 C = NH Structural Identification – 13C Carbon Number Ppm Assignment 10 55 / 43 C H2 - more subst. on ZTX 11 89 / 33 Ring and OSO3H on ZTX 12 ~ 98 Carbon attached to 2 OH groups 19 / 13 70 / 64 ZTX: C – N STX: C – C 20 / 14 ~ 157 Carbamate Structural Identification – 13C Carbon Number Ppm Assignment 13 156 Amide 14 34 CH2 15 54 C – N 16 47 Tertiary Carbon 17 69 C – O – N 18 62 C – OH Structural Identification - 1H Synthesis Synthesis O. Iwamoto and Dr. K. Nagasawa Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology. October 10th, 2007 “Further work to synthesize natural STXs and various derivatives is in progress with the aim of developing isoform-selective sodium-channel inhibitors” Therapeutic Applications Possible anesthetic, but has poor therapeutic index.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Toxins Fact Sheet
    Work with FACT SHEET Biological Toxins The University of Utah Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC) reviews registrations for work with, possession of, use of, and transfer of acute biological toxins (mammalian LD50 <100 µg/kg body weight) or toxins that fall under the Federal Select Agent Guidelines, as well as the organisms, both natural and recombinant, which produce these toxins Toxins Requiring IBC Registration Laboratory Practices Guidelines for working with biological toxins can be found The following toxins require registration with the IBC. The list in Appendix I of the Biosafety in Microbiological and is not comprehensive. Any toxin with an LD50 greater than 100 µg/kg body weight, or on the select agent list requires Biomedical Laboratories registration. Principal investigators should confirm whether or (http://www.cdc.gov/biosafety/publications/bmbl5/i not the toxins they propose to work with require IBC ndex.htm). These are summarized below. registration by contacting the OEHS Biosafety Officer at [email protected] or 801-581-6590. Routine operations with dilute toxin solutions are Abrin conducted using Biosafety Level 2 (BSL2) practices and Aflatoxin these must be detailed in the IBC protocol and will be Bacillus anthracis edema factor verified during the inspection by OEHS staff prior to IBC Bacillus anthracis lethal toxin Botulinum neurotoxins approval. BSL2 Inspection checklists can be found here Brevetoxin (http://oehs.utah.edu/research-safety/biosafety/ Cholera toxin biosafety-laboratory-audits). All personnel working with Clostridium difficile toxin biological toxins or accessing a toxin laboratory must be Clostridium perfringens toxins Conotoxins trained in the theory and practice of the toxins to be used, Dendrotoxin (DTX) with special emphasis on the nature of the hazards Diacetoxyscirpenol (DAS) associated with laboratory operations and should be Diphtheria toxin familiar with the signs and symptoms of toxin exposure.
    [Show full text]
  • Harmful Algal Blooms Background and Reporting Information
    Rev 8-12-2019 Harmful Algal Blooms Background and Reporting Information Harmful Algal Blooms (HABs) Cyanobacteria are a kind of photosynthetic bacteria commonly found in Ohio’s lakes, ponds, and slow- moving rivers. Waters with excess nutrients (phosphorus and nitrogen) caused by pollutants may experience rapid growth in the cyanobacteria populations, leading to visible changes in the water known as “blooms”. Due to the green appearance blooms often give effected waters, cyanobacteria are commonly referred to as “blue-green algae”. Some species of cyanobacteria form Harmful Algal Blooms (HABs), releasing potentially dangerous cyanotoxins in the water. Recognizing a HAB There is no sure way to tell the difference between HABs and harmless blooms. Though commonly green or blue-green, the appearance of HABs vary greatly. Look for unusual colors (green to white to black), textures (film, crusts, puffballs) and patterns (clippings, dots, streaks). Some HABs look like spilled paint, pea soup, foam, wool, streaks or green cottage cheese curds. HABs Can Produce Harmful Toxins, Including Microcystin Cyanobacteria can release many kinds of toxins that cause damage to the liver, nervous system, or skin. Drinking, touching, or accidently breathing in droplets of dirty water can all lead to HAB-related illnesses. Symptoms of HAB-related illness includes diarrhea, vomiting, irritated skin, dizziness, light-headedness Toxin Type of Toxin and allergic Anatoxin-a Neurotoxin reactions. HABs can Anatoxin-a(s) Neurotoxin produce toxic Cylindrospermopsin Hepatotoxin chemicals in the Lyngbyatoxin Dermatoxin form of neurotoxins Microcystin Hepatotoxin (which affect the Saxitoxin Neurotoxin nervous system), hepatotoxins (which affect the liver), and dermatoxins (which affect the skin).
    [Show full text]
  • Cyanobacterial Toxins: Saxitoxins
    WHO/SDE/WSH/xxxxx English only Cyanobacterial toxins: Saxitoxins Background document for development of WHO Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality and Guidelines for Safe Recreational Water Environments Version for Public Review Nov 2019 © World Health Organization 20XX Preface Information on cyanobacterial toxins, including saxitoxins, is comprehensively reviewed in a recent volume to be published by the World Health Organization, “Toxic Cyanobacteria in Water” (TCiW; Chorus & Welker, in press). This covers chemical properties of the toxins and information on the cyanobacteria producing them as well as guidance on assessing the risks of their occurrence, monitoring and management. In contrast, this background document focuses on reviewing the toxicological information available for guideline value derivation and the considerations for deriving the guideline values for saxitoxin in water. Sections 1-3 and 8 are largely summaries of respective chapters in TCiW and references to original studies can be found therein. To be written by WHO Secretariat Acknowledgements To be written by WHO Secretariat 5 Abbreviations used in text ARfD Acute Reference Dose bw body weight C Volume of drinking water assumed to be consumed daily by an adult GTX Gonyautoxin i.p. intraperitoneal i.v. intravenous LOAEL Lowest Observed Adverse Effect Level neoSTX Neosaxitoxin NOAEL No Observed Adverse Effect Level P Proportion of exposure assumed to be due to drinking water PSP Paralytic Shellfish Poisoning PST paralytic shellfish toxin STX saxitoxin STXOL saxitoxinol
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Fungal (Mold) Toxins (Mycotoxins) Michael P
    ® ® KFSBOPFQVLCB?O>PH>¨ FK@LIKUQBKPFLK KPQFQRQBLCDOF@RIQROB>KA>QRO>IBPLRO@BP KLTELT KLTKLT G1513 Understanding Fungal (Mold) Toxins (Mycotoxins) Michael P. Carlson, Diagnostic Toxicologist/Analytical Chemist; and Steve M. Ensley, Veterinary Toxicologist of the immune system. Common mycoses include athlete’s This NebGuide briefly discusses mycotoxins commonly foot and ringworm. encountered in grains and feeds used in Nebraska and the mycotoxicoses they cause. Myco toxin sources and clini- Diagnosis and Treatment of Mycotoxicoses cal signs, lesions, diagnostic aids and treatment for each mycotoxicosis are listed. Different mycotoxins cause different diseases. Although they all are called mycotoxicoses, they are very different from Mycotoxins are chemicals produced by fungi (molds) each other. under certain conditions. They are not essential for fungal Modern agricultural practices make acute mycotoxicoses growth or reproduction, and are toxic to animals or humans. with high death loss (mortality) rare. Chronic mycotoxicoses Scientists do not yet know how many mycotoxins may ex- are often suspected when clinical signs include poor perfor- ist, even though more than 250 have been detected. They mance, ill thrift, or increased incidence of infectious diseases. represent many different kinds of chemicals. For many, if Establishing cause and effect relationships between consump- not most, their toxicological characteristics have not been tion of mycotoxin-contaminated feed and vague chronic fully determined. conditions is very difficult. Diseases in animals caused by mycotoxins are called my- Diagnosis of mycotoxicoses is usually not very easy. cotoxicoses. There are many different kinds of mycotoxicoses Exposure cannot be established by detection of mycotoxins in because there are many different kinds of mycotoxins.
    [Show full text]
  • The Enteric Nervous System: a Second Brain
    The Enteric Nervous System: A Second Brain MICHAEL D. GERSHON Columbia University Once dismissed as a simple collection of relay ganglia, the enteric nervous system is now recognized as a complex, integrative brain in its own right. Although we still are unable to relate complex behaviors such as gut motility and secretion to the activity of individual neurons, work in that area is proceeding briskly--and will lead to rapid advances in the management of functional bowel disease. Dr. Gershon is Professor and Chair, Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York. In addition to numerous scientific publications, he is the author of The Second Brain (Harper Collins, New York, 1998). Structurally and neurochemically, the enteric nervous system (ENS) is a brain unto itself. Within those yards of tubing lies a complex web of microcircuitry driven by more neurotransmitters and neuromodulators than can be found anywhere else in the peripheral nervous system. These allow the ENS to perform many of its tasks in the absence of central nervous system (CNS) control--a unique endowment that has permitted enteric neurobiologists to investigate nerve cell ontogeny and chemical mediation of reflex behavior in a laboratory setting. Recognition of the importance of this work as a basis for developing effective therapies for functional bowel disease, coupled with the recent, unexpected discovery of major enteric defects following the knockout of murine genes not previously known to affect the gut, has produced a groundswell of interest that has attracted some of the best investigators to the field. Add to this that the ENS provides the closest thing we have to a window on the brain, and one begins to understand why the bowel--the second brain--is finally receiving the attention it deserves.
    [Show full text]
  • Nicotine Induces Polyspermy in Sea Urchin Eggs Through a Non-Cholinergic Pathway Modulating Actin Dynamics
    cells Article Nicotine Induces Polyspermy in Sea Urchin Eggs through a Non-Cholinergic Pathway Modulating Actin Dynamics 1,2 1, 2 1, Nunzia Limatola , Filip Vasilev y, Luigia Santella and Jong Tai Chun * 1 Department of Biology and Evolution of Marine Organisms, Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, I-80121 Napoli, Italy; [email protected] (N.L.); [email protected] (F.V.) 2 Department of Research Infrastructures for Marine Biological Resources, Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, I-80121 Napoli, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Current address: Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montreal (CRCHUM) y Montreal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada. Received: 8 November 2019; Accepted: 21 December 2019; Published: 25 December 2019 Abstract: While alkaloids often exert unique pharmacological effects on animal cells, exposure of sea urchin eggs to nicotine causes polyspermy at fertilization in a dose-dependent manner. Here, we studied molecular mechanisms underlying the phenomenon. Although nicotine is an agonist of ionotropic acetylcholine receptors, we found that nicotine-induced polyspermy was neither mimicked by acetylcholine and carbachol nor inhibited by specific antagonists of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Unlike acetylcholine and carbachol, nicotine uniquely induced drastic rearrangement of egg cortical microfilaments in a dose-dependent way. Such cytoskeletal changes appeared to render the eggs more receptive to sperm, as judged by the significant alleviation of polyspermy by latrunculin-A and mycalolide-B. In addition, our fluorimetric assay provided the first evidence that nicotine directly accelerates polymerization kinetics of G-actin and attenuates depolymerization of preassembled F-actin. Furthermore, nicotine inhibited cofilin-induced disassembly of F-actin.
    [Show full text]
  • Pin Faculty Directory
    Harvard University Program in Neuroscience Faculty Directory 2019—2020 April 22, 2020 Disclaimer Please note that in the following descripons of faculty members, only students from the Program in Neuroscience are listed. You cannot assume that if no students are listed, it is a small or inacve lab. Many faculty members are very acve in other programs such as Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Molecular and Cellular Biology, etc. If you find you are interested in the descripon of a lab’s research, you should contact the faculty member (or go to the lab’s website) to find out how big the lab is, how many graduate students are doing there thesis work there, etc. Program in Neuroscience Faculty Albers, Mark (MGH-East)) De Bivort, Benjamin (Harvard/OEB) Kaplan, Joshua (MGH/HMS/Neurobio) Rosenberg, Paul (BCH/Neurology) Andermann, Mark (BIDMC) Dettmer, Ulf (BWH) Karmacharya, Rakesh (MGH) Rotenberg, Alex (BCH/Neurology) Anderson, Matthew (BIDMC) Do, Michael (BCH—Neurobio) Khurana, Vikram (BWH) Sabatini, Bernardo (HMS/Neurobio) Anthony, Todd (BCH/Neurobio) Dong, Min (BCH) Kim, Kwang-Soo (McLean) Sahay, Amar (MGH) Arlotta, Paola (Harvard/SCRB) Drugowitsch, Jan (HMS/Neurobio) Kocsis, Bernat (BIDMC) Sahin, Mustafa (BCH/Neurobio) Assad, John (HMS/Neurobio) Dulac, Catherine (Harvard/MCB) Kreiman, Gabriel (BCH/Neurobio) Samuel, Aravi (Harvard/ Physics) Bacskai, Brian (MGH/East) Dymecki, Susan(HMS/Genetics) LaVoie, Matthew (BWH) Sanes, Joshua (Harvard/MCB) Baker, Justin (McLean) Engert, Florian (Harvard/MCB) Lee, Wei-Chung (BCH/Neurobio) Saper, Clifford
    [Show full text]