Other People's Books Nan Z
Other People's Books Nan Z. Da New Literary History, Volume 51, Number 3, Summer 2020, pp. 475-500 (Article) Published by Johns Hopkins University Press DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2020.0031 For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/765982 [ Access provided at 5 Oct 2020 15:36 GMT from University of Virginia Libraries & (Viva) ] Other People’s Books Nan Z. Da entral to the discipline of literary studies is the question of how others read, an activity that “rarely leaves traces, is scattered into an infinity of singular acts, and purposely frees itself from C 1 all the constraints seeking to subdue it.” Accounts of the contingency of reading and the unpredictable itineraries of books appear across the disciplinary spectrum—in narratology, book theory, book history, ethnography, publishing history, university studies, cultural studies, and literary computing; conducted in the style and spirit of Pierre Bourdieu, Janice Radway, Roger Chartier, Franco Moretti, and others; or by using a “mixed-methods approach.” 2 The concept of “contingency” performs a great deal of analytical and rhetorical work in the sociology of literature, encompassing history and historical counterfactualism, the distortions of fieldwork, situatedness and subject position, and differences in the behavioral patterns of readers and book acquirers. Contingency’s se- mantic flexibility allows it to “scale” from situational variation (the way reading materials are activated, taken up, used, distributed, and passed on, or not) to larger
[Show full text]