Interspecies Interactions That Result in Bacillus Subtilis Forming Biofilms Are
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Interspecies interactions that result in Bacillus subtilis PNAS PLUS forming biofilms are mediated mainly by members of its own genus Elizabeth A. Shanka, Vanja Klepac-Ceraja,1, Leonardo Collado-Torresa,2, Gordon E. Powersa,3, Richard Losickb, and Roberto Koltera,4 aDepartment of Microbiology and Immunobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115; and bDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138 Edited by James M. Tiedje, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, and approved October 10, 2011 (received for review March 9, 2011) Many different systems of bacterial interactions have been de- populations of motile cells, matrix-producing cells, and dormant scribed. However, relatively few studies have explored how spores (5, 6). interactions between different microorganisms might influence The regulation of the expression of the epsA-O and tapA bacterial development. To explore such interspecies interactions, operons has been studied extensively (10, 13–20). Both operons we focused on Bacillus subtilis, which characteristically develops are controlled indirectly by the master regulator, phosphory- into matrix-producing cannibals before entering sporulation. We lated Spo0A (Spo0A∼P) (11, 21, 22). This transcription factor investigated whether organisms from the natural environment of modulates the expression of a large number of genes depending B. subtilis—the soil—were able to alter the development of B. on its concentration (23, 24). Low levels of Spo0A∼Pleadtothe subtilis. To test this possibility, we developed a coculture micro- induction of transcription of the epsA-O and tapA operons, colony screen in which we used fluorescent reporters to identify resulting in the production of extracellular matrix and thus soil bacteria able to induce matrix production in B. subtilis. Most of biofilm formation (Fig. 1) (22). At high levels of Spo0A∼P, the bacteria that influence matrix production in B. subtilis are matrix genes are repressed, sporulation genes are induced, and members of the genus Bacillus, suggesting that such interactions these matrix-producing cells go on to become spores. MICROBIOLOGY may be predominantly with close relatives. The interactions The matrix-producing cells have a second important physio- we observed were mediated via two different mechanisms. One logical function: They are cannibals (Fig. 1) (25, 26). These cells resulted in increased expression of matrix genes via the activation produce two toxins, sporulation-delaying protein (SDP) and of a sensor histidine kinase, KinD. The second was kinase indepen- sporulation-killing factor (SKF) (25, 27). To survive, these cells dent and conceivably functions by altering the relative subpopula- also produce immunity proteins (28, 29). Both the toxin and tions of B. subtilis cell types by preferentially killing noncannibals. immunity genes are under the control of Spo0A∼P. These toxins These two mechanisms were grouped according to the inducing are able to kill B. subtilis cells not expressing immunity (those ’ B. subtilis strain s relatedness to . Our results suggest that bacte- that have not yet phosphorylated Spo0A) as well as other ria preferentially alter their development in response to secreted microbes (30). This killing presumably provides the matrix-pro- molecules from closely related bacteria and do so using mecha- ducing cannibal with nutrients and delays sporulation (25). The nisms that depend on the phylogenetic relatedness of the interact- production of biofilm matrix thus is linked intrinsically to this ing bacteria. mechanism of siblicide that prolongs the survival of this sub- population of B. subtilis cells (25, 26). ell–cell interactions are a feature common to all living sys- The levels of Spo0A∼P are controlled by the action of mem- Ctems. Bacteria are no exception, and numerous mechanisms brane-bound histidine sensor kinases (KinA, KinB, KinC, KinD, that use secreted products as signaling molecules are known (1, and KinE) that directly and indirectly phosphorylate Spo0A in 2). Among these, the so-called “quorum sensing” systems are response to still poorly defined environmental cues (31). The perhaps the best studied (3, 4). In quorum sensing, all bacterial activities of these kinases thus control differentiation in B. sub- cells within a population produce secreted molecules. Only when tilis (31–33). KinC has a role in defining the matrix-producing population densities are high is there a response to these com- cannibal subpopulation when it is activated by the self-produced pounds, thus allowing the bacteria to coordinate their behavior. molecule surfactin (34). Purified natural products functionally However, it is clear that there is much more to bacterial cell–cell related to surfactin but produced by other bacteria also induce interactions than simply counting numbers and coordinating matrix synthesis in B. subtilis in a KinC-dependent manner behavior. Secreted molecules also play key roles in microbial (34). In addition, nisin, an antimicrobial produced by Lactococcus development so that different cell fates can arise and coexist within a single-species population (5, 6). In addition, in settings where multiple species coexist, their interactions often are me- Author contributions: E.A.S., R.L., and R.K. designed research; E.A.S., L.C.-T., and G.E.P. diated through extracellular compounds. Development in one performed research; E.A.S. and V.K.-C. analyzed data; and E.A.S., R.L., and R.K. wrote microbe can be influenced by small molecules secreted by other the paper. species (7, 8). The authors declare no conflict of interest. We have been interested in understanding the role of in- This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. terspecies interactions in the well-studied developmental pro- Data deposition: The sequences reported in this paper have been deposited in the Gen- cesses that the soil bacterium Bacillus subtilis undergoes during Bank database (accession nos. JF501232–JF501388 and JF496856–JF496919). biofilm formation. Biofilms are aggregations of cells held to- 1Present address: Forsyth Institute, Cambridge, MA 02142. gether by an extracellular matrix (9, 10). The matrix has two main 2Present address: Winter Genomics, Mexico City, Mexico 07300. components, an exopolysaccharide synthesized by the products 3Present address: Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305. fi of the epsA-O operon, and amyloid bers encoded by the prod- 4To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected]. ucts of the tapA operon (formerly yqxM) (9, 11, 12). Within This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10. biofilms, several different cell types coexist, including sub- 1073/pnas.1103630108/-/DCSupplemental. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1103630108 PNAS Early Edition | 1of8 Downloaded by guest on September 24, 2021 Pseudomonas (1) Matrix-producing Spores A cannibals Erwinia (1) Bacillus (2) Toxins Pasteuriaceae B. subtilis Incertae Sedis (1) Matrix [ Spo0A~P ] Unclassified Enterobacteriaceae (4) Fig. 1. Diagram illustrating the development of B. subtilis into matrix- Enterobacter (6) producing cannibals and then spores. At low Spo0A∼P levels B. subtilis activates genes required for the production of matrix and produces two cannibalism toxins. At high Spo0A∼P levels sporulation begins. Bacillus (2) B Paenibacillus (1) Pasteuriaceae lactis, induces a hypercannibalism phenotype in B. subtilis (26). Pseudomonas (2) Incertae Sedis (1) Thus, small molecules from numerous bacteria are capable of influencing differentiation in B. subtilis. This observation sug- Raoutella (1) gests that B. subtilis development may be influenced by the Buttiauxella (1) presence of other bacteria in natural settings. We therefore hypothesized that other soil microbes, when grown next to B. subtilis, might trigger its differentiation into Unclassified Enterobacter (3) matrix-producing cannibals. To investigate these possible in- Enterobacteriaceae (4) B. subtilis terspecies interactions, we developed a screen in which Fig. 2. The cultivable organisms growing under the microcolony coculture and soil microorganisms were cocultured. While the colonies screen conditions are phylogenetically diverse. Soil organisms were selected grew, we monitored B. subtilis differentiation into matrix pro- systematically from random fields of view of soil A and soil B (grown as for ducers using a fluorescent reporter. In this way we identified coculture screen) and were isolated. (A) The 16S rRNA gene from 71 isolates a large number of soil organisms that induced differentiation in from soil A and (B) 89 isolates from soil B were sequenced. The pie chart B. subtilis. The majority of these organisms were other members sectors are proportional to the number of representatives within each la- of the genus Bacillus. This result led us to explore how broadly beled group. The number of operational taxonomic units at the 99% level distributed the ability to induce matrix production is among a within that group is noted in parentheses. The darkly shaded exploded wedges represent the Firmicutes, whose representatives are all within the range of phylogenetically diverse Bacillus species. We found that class Bacillales. All other sequences were from Proteobacteria. many Bacillus species induce matrix production in B. subtilis, and the mechanisms they use are grouped according to their phylo- genetic relatedness to B. subtilis. We therefore suggest that the We conducted interspecies-interaction