20094241 Newsletter.Pub

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

20094241 Newsletter.Pub Volume 13, Number 2 Page The Bulletin www.uvm.edu/~uvmchs Volume 13, Number 2 Spring 2009 The Fifth Miller Symposium: “The Law in Nazi Germany” by Michelle Magin On 19 April 2009, the University of Vermont hosted responses grew increasingly radical. Previously dis- the Fifth Miller Symposium, focusing on “The Law in missed explanations, which blamed the growing inde- Nazi Germany.” The speakers included Konrad H. pendence of women, the “world Jewish conspiracy,” Jarausch of the University of North Carolina at Chapel and the influx of foreigners, became more widely ac- Hill, Douglas G. Morris of the Federal Defenders of cepted. With the Weimar government offering no viable New York, Harry Reicher of the University of Pennsyl- remedies to this situation, many academics and profes- vania Law School, Raphael Gross of the Jüdisches Mu- sionals sought more radical alternatives. seum in Frankfurt and the Leo Baeck Institute of Lon- The popularity of the Nazis grew among students, don, and Kenneth F. Ledford of Case Western Reserve after the 1933 electoral breakthrough. Although Nazi University. Robert Rachlin of Downs, Rachlin, Martin purges had excluded Social Democrats, political dissent- and the Vermont Law School moderated the proceed- ers and Jews from numerous professions, these actions ings. The main themes addressed in their papers were only impacted a narrow base of individuals. Many stu- the active and passive acceptance of anti-Semitism by dents and professionals embraced Nazi rhetoric, and lawyers in the Third Reich; the persecution of Jewish this acceptance facilitated a dramatic push to the right. lawyers by the Nazis; post-war trials of Nazi judges, Gradually, mainstream society began to view Nazism as prosecutors, and civil servants; the role of morality in a quasi-respectable ideology. Nazi groups quickly be- Nazi ideology and law; and the transformation of the gan to criticize the over-representation of Jews in medi- German judiciary before, during, and after Nazism. cine and law. Jarausch argued that the drive to remove Professor Jarausch opened the symposium with a Jews from the professions stemmed from both a desire paper on “The Conundrum of Complicity: German Pro- to racially nationalize Germany and an eagerness to fessionals and the Final Solution.” Throughout his lec- open jobs in an overcrowded market. Subsequent laws ture Jarausch incorporated the personal experiences of expelled Jewish colleagues and restricted the entry of his family; however, he began his presentation with a Jewish students into the professions. The civil service more general historical narrative of academic and pro- endured similar purges of leftists, political opponents fessional involvement in Nazi Germany. While he dis- and “non-Aryans.” By 1938, the “cleansing” of the gov- missed the average book burner as an overzealous fas- (Continued on page 3) cist follower, he puzzled over the willingness of profes- sionals to contribute enthusiastically, or at least will- ingly, to the “Final Solution.” In order to explain this involvement, Jarausch sketched the typical histories and Dear Friends, experiences of lawyers and other German professionals In order to communicate more effec- both before and during the Third Reich. There was so- tively with our community, we are building cial distance between professionals and the lower a database of e-mail addresses. If you classes. Professionals possessed theoretical knowledge, would like to receive e-mails regarding up- practical competence, and job security, but the First coming events and other news from the World War and the Great Depression shattered this sta- UVM Center for Holocaust Studies we ask bility. The Weimar period saw an overabundance of that you send us an e-mail to the following students, alongside declining industrial revenues, gov- address: [email protected]. ernment pay cuts, and shrinking job markets. Given the uncertainty of their future, the younger generation We thank you for your assistance! viewed these new circumstances as a betrayal of their previous expectations. As a result, their attitudes and Page 2 The Bulletin News from the Faculty Professor Jonathan Huener had two pieces pub- Third Reich and the Middle East: Jews and Arabs in lished in the last year: an article entitled “Auschwitz Nazi Race Policy,” is reviewed on Page 4. 1945-1947: the Politics of Memory and Mourning” ap- Professor Nicosia published a book, Zionism and peared in the most recent issue of Polin: Studies in Polish Anti-Semitism in Nazi Germany (New York: Cambridge Jewry (vol. XX/2008), and a chapter entitled “Mémoire University Press, 2008). He also contributed a chapter, catholique et commémoration à Auschwitz” appeared “German Zionism in Nazi Berlin,” to the book from the in the anthology Juif et Polonais 1939-2008, ed. Jean- Fourth Miller Symposium, Jewish Life in Nazi Germany: Charles Szurek and Annette Wieviorka (Paris, Albin Dilemmas and Responses (Berghahn Books, forthcoming Michel, 2009). He also attended the annual meeting of 2010), which he co-edited with David Scrase. the Polish Institute of Arts and Sciences in America, Professor Nicosia is conducting research on another where he presented a paper on “Polish Catholicism and book, “The Middle East Policy of Nazi Germany,” the Legacy of German Occupation,” and in May deliv- which includes a research trip this May – June to the ered the annual Milewski Lecture in Polish Studies at Bundesarchiv-Militärarchiv in Freiburg im Breisgau. Central Connecticut State University. He will be presenting the paper “Hachscharah und Professor Huener continues his research on the Pol- Aliyah-Beth: Jüdisch-zionistische Auswanderung in ish Roman Catholic Church under Nazi occupation, and den Jahren 1938-1941,” at the May conference “Jüdische to support this work he received a Career Enhancement Perspektiven auf die Jahre der ‘forcierten Auswan- Grant from the University of Vermont's Office of the derung’ bis zur Ghettosisierung und Deportation der Vice President for Research. He will be spending part of Juden aus dem Deutschen Reich, 1938-1941,” sponsored the summer working in the archives of the German For- by the Institut für die Geschichte der Juden in eign Office in Berlin and the Instytut Zachodni in Deutschland, Hamburg. Poznan. Over the last year Professor Susanna Schrafstetter's Professor Dennis Mahoney’s “’Tails of Hoffnung’: work has focused on the Third Reich's government offi- transatlantische Metamorphosen unterdrückter cials who survived the end of the Second World War Menschlichkeit in Marc Estrin’s Insect Dreams: The Half unscathed and continued their careers in postwar West Life of Gregor Samsa,” appeared in Kulturökologie und Lit- Germany. Her article on Karl M. Hettlage, Albert eratur: Beiträge zu einem transdisziplinären Paradigma der Speer's financial mastermind and unoffical deputy in Literaturwissenschaft, ed. Hubert Zapf. Heidelberg: Win- the Ministry of Armaments, was published in the Ger- ter, 2008, pp. 323-337. The article is about Marc Estrin's man Vierteljahrshefte für Zeitgeschichte in the summer of continuation of Kafka's Metamorphosis, which imagines 2008 and a review of the article appeared in the national Gregor Samsa's futile efforts to encourage the United newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung. States government to take action against Nazi Germany Professor Schrafstetter presented in November 2008 before 1939. a paper at the 10th bi-annual “Lessons and Legacies” Professor Mahoney also published, “’The bird and conference at Northwestern University, on Gustav A. the fish can fall in love’: Proverbs and Anti-Proverbs as Sonnenhol, a Nazi diplomat and SS officer who became Variations on the Theme of Racial and Cultural Inter- West German Ambassador to South Africa in 1968. mingling in The Time of Our Singing,” in The Proverbial In addition, Professor Schrafstetter continued her “Pied Piper”: A Festschrift Volume of Essays in Honor of work on reparations for victims of Nazism. Her article Wolfgang Mieder on the Occasion of his Sixty-Fifth Birthday, on the Anglo-German 1964 agreement for compensation ed. Kevin J. McKenna (New York: Lang, 2009). In his to victims of Nazism appeared in the journal Contempo- interpretation of The Time of Our Singing, he traces the rary European History in the spring of 2008. During the origin of “The bird and the fish can fall in love, but summer of 2009 Susanna hopes to make good progress where will they build their nest”—an allegedly old Jew- on her book on reparations for victims of Nazism in ish proverb—to Fiddler and the Roof, and then discusses Great Britain. its function in this novel on the marriage of an African- Professor Helga Schreckenberger of the Depart- American singer and a German-Jewish mathematician ment of German and Russian delivered the twentieth and refugee from Nazi Germany who meet and fall in annual Harry H. Kahn Memorial Lecture at UVM, “A love at Marian Anderson's Easter 1939 concert on the Jewish Quest for Belonging: Ruth Beckermann's Film, Washington Mall. The Paper Bridge (1987).” Professor Francis Nicosia completed his service as Professor David Scrase of the Department of Ger- the interim director of the Miller Center, and assumed man and Russian presented two lectures in Australia. the Raul Hilberg Distinguished Professorship of The first, delivered at the Jewish Museum in Sydney, Holocaust Studies at UVM. His inaugural lecture, “The addressed rescue during the Holocaust. The second, Volume 13, Number 2 Page 3 Faculty News (continued) The Fifth Miller Symposium presented at the University of Sydney, dealt with Holo- (Continued from page 1) caust fabrications. Professor Scrase has in preparation a ernment bureaucracy and professions was complete. piece on the conductor Rudolf Schwarz entitled, “From Jarausch identified three levels of professional in- the Berlin Kubu Orchestra to the Bournemouth Sym- volvement in the Third Reich. First, he described the pas- phony Orchestra.” sive facilitators who enthusiastically supported the gov- Professor Alan E. Steinweis joined the faculty at ernment and allowed the state to continue to function.
Recommended publications
  • An Analysis of the Acquittal of John Demjanjuk and Its Impact on the Future of Nazi War Crimes Trials Lisa J
    Boston College International and Comparative Law Review Volume 18 | Issue 1 Article 4 12-1-1995 Not Guilty – But Not Innocent: An Analysis of the Acquittal of John Demjanjuk and its Impact on the Future of Nazi War Crimes Trials Lisa J. Del Pizzo Follow this and additional works at: http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/iclr Part of the Criminal Law Commons Recommended Citation Lisa J. Del Pizzo, Not Guilty – But Not Innocent: An Analysis of the Acquittal of John Demjanjuk and its Impact on the Future of Nazi War Crimes Trials, 18 B.C. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 137 (1995), http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/iclr/vol18/iss1/4 This Notes is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Boston College International and Comparative Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Not Guilty-But Not Innocent: An Analysis of the Acquittal of John Demjanjuk and Its Impact on the Future of Nazi War Crimes Trials INTRODUCTION On July 29, 1993, the Supreme Court of the State of Israel acquit­ ted John Demjanjuk of charges that he was "Ivan the Terrible," a sadistic Nazi gas chamber operator who assisted in the extermina­ tion of thousands of Jews at the Treblinka death camp in Poland during World War II.! The acquittal, which overturned the district court's 1988 conviction and death sentence,2 was based on new evidence which created a "reasonable doubt" that Demjanjuk was "Ivan the Terrible" of Treblinka.3 The acquittal of John Demjanjuk comes after a sixteen year legal battle which began in the United States in 1977, when the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Holocaust Archaeology: Archaeological Approaches to Landscapes of Nazi Genocide and Persecution
    HOLOCAUST ARCHAEOLOGY: ARCHAEOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO LANDSCAPES OF NAZI GENOCIDE AND PERSECUTION BY CAROLINE STURDY COLLS A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Institute of Archaeology and Antiquity College of Arts and Law University of Birmingham September 2011 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT The landscapes and material remains of the Holocaust survive in various forms as physical reminders of the suffering and persecution of this period in European history. However, whilst clearly defined historical narratives exist, many of the archaeological remnants of these sites remain ill-defined, unrecorded and even, in some cases, unlocated. Such a situation has arisen as a result of a number of political, social, ethical and religious factors which, coupled with the scale of the crimes, has often inhibited systematic search. This thesis will outline how a non- invasive archaeological methodology has been implemented at two case study sites, with such issues at its core, thus allowing them to be addressed in terms of their scientific and historical value, whilst acknowledging their commemorative and religious significance.
    [Show full text]
  • Entdecke Die Ausstellung »Anne Frank. Hier & Heute«
    Anne Franks Tagebuch und ich (Bearbeitungsdauer: max. 20 Minuten) Entdecke die Ausstellung »Anne Frank. hier & heute« »Wir leben alle, wissen aber nicht, warum und wofür. Wir leben alle mit dem Ziel, glücklich zu werden. Wir leben alle verschieden und doch gleich.« Anne Frank, 6. Juli 1944 Anne Frank war ein jüdisches Mädchen aus Frankfurt am Main. Sie wurde am 12. Juni 1929 geboren. Als die Partei der Nationalsozialisten, die NSDAP, im Jahr 1933 an die Anne schrieb in ihrem Tagebuch über Themen, die für sie wichtig Macht kam, beschlossen Annes Eltern Deutschland zu verlassen. Sie entschieden sich waren. In diesem Teil der Ausstellung findest du vier Gedanken- für die Niederlande und gingen nach Amsterdam. Dort lebten sie in Sicherheit, bis die inseln, die sich mit diesen Themen beschäftigen. Hier kommen deutsche Armee im Zweiten Weltkrieg die Niederlande besetzte. Anne Frank und fünf Berliner Jugendliche zu Wort, die ungefähr so alt sind wie Anne während ihrer Zeit im Versteck. Um der Verhaftung zu entgehen versteckten sich die Franks und vier weitere Personen in einem Hinterhaus. Es gehörte zu Otto Franks Firma »Opekta« in der Prinsengracht 265. Vier Angestellte versorgten die Untergetauchten mit Lebensmitteln und anderen wichtigen Dingen. Dort schrieb Anne Frank ihr Tagebuch. Etwas mehr als zwei Jahre Gehe zu den Hörstationen und Ausstellungswänden in den Inseln. Verschaffe dir zunächst einen Überblick. Auf der unten lebten die Untergetauchten im Hinterhaus, bis sie verraten und verhaftet wurden. Von stehenden Skizze siehst du, worum es in den Inseln geht. Beschäftige dich anschließend mit einem der vier Bereiche den acht Versteckten überlebte nur Anne Franks Vater Otto.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Van Tekst
    Vooys. Jaargang 12 bron Vooys. Jaargang 12. Vooys, Utrecht 1993-1994 Zie voor verantwoording: http://www.dbnl.org/tekst/_voo013199401_01/colofon.php © 2012 dbnl i.s.m. 2 [Nummer 1] Het fijne raadsel Over de heterodoxie van de kunst1 Redbad Fokkema ‘Elke kunstenaar houdt zich in zekere zin bezig met metafysica, ook al is zijn werk aards bepaald. En omgekeerd zal het wel hetzelfde zijn.’ Gerrit Kouwenaar (1963) Aan het slot van de roman Houtekiet (1939) van Gerard Walschap bekeert Houtekiet, de natuurmens die van God en maatschappij los is, zich in zekere zin. Als de hoogmis begint, gaat hij niet de kerk binnen, maar beklimt hij de toren. Er staat dan: Niemand heeft Jan Houtekiet kunnen overtuigen dat het beter was naar [...] onnozele preken te luisteren en dat hij daar hoog niet dichter bij God zat dan in de duffe kerk. Hij zat daar niet te prevelen of kruiskens te maken. Hij keek rustig over de velden en in de lucht. En hij voelde zich één met de oneindigheid, waarin onvatbaar voor woorden en gedachten, dat fijne raadsel zweeft [...] dat ons allen boeien blijft in dit aardse leven. Aan deze inwisseling van dogmatische orthodoxie voor een algemene religiositeit - een betrokkenheid op de werkelijkheid en de onwerkelijkheid waarover de ratio zwijgt - moest ik denken toen ik het boekje Over God las, dat in 1983 verscheen. Zeven jonge auteurs schrijven er over de betekenis van hun protestantse dan wel roomse opvoeding voor hun huidig godsidee of godservaring. Oek de Jong had graag het idee God allang vervangen gezien door het idee van het Verhevene: ‘Ieder kan namelijk, zonder enig zielsconflict, ervaren dat de poëzie tot het Verhevene behoort.
    [Show full text]
  • The Barnes Review SOBIBÓR a JOURNAL of NATIONALIST THOUGHT & HISTORY HOLOCAUSTPROPAGANDAANDREALITY VOLUME XVI NUMBER 4 JULY/AUGUST 2010 BARNESREVIEW.ORG
    WHAT IS THE TRUTH ABOUT THE SOBIBOR CONCENTRATION CAMP? FIND OUT! BRINGING HISTORY INTO ACCORD WITH THE FACTS IN THE TRADITION OF DR. HARRY ELMER BARNES The Barnes Review SOBIBÓR A JOURNAL OF NATIONALIST THOUGHT & HISTORY HOLOCAUSTPROPAGANDAANDREALITY VOLUME XVI NUMBER 4 JULY/AUGUST 2010 BARNESREVIEW.ORG A scholarly examination of the infamous Nazi “death camp” NEW FROM TBR: By Juergen Graf, Carlo Mattogno & Thomas Kues n May 2009, the 89-year-old Cleveland autoworker John Demjanjuk was deported from the United States to Germany, where he was arrested and charged with aiding and abetting murder in at least 27,900 cases. These mass murders were allegedly perpetrated at the Sobibór “death” Icamp in eastern Poland. According to mainstream historiography, 170,000 to 250,000 Jews were exterminated here in gas chambers between May 1942 and October 1943. The corpses were buried in mass graves and later incinerated on an open-air pyre. A DAGGER IN THE But do these claims really stand up to scrutiny? SOBIBOR In this book, the official version of what transpired at LEGEND Sobibór is put under the scanner. It is shown that the historiog- raphy of the camp is not based on solid evidence, but on the selec- tive use of eyewitness testimonies, which in turn are riddled with con- tradictions and outright absurdities. Could this book exonerate falsely accused John Demjanjuk? For more than half a century mainstream Holocaust historians made no real attempts to muster material Also in this issue: evidence for their claims about Sobibór. Finally, in the 21st century, professional historians carried out an archeological survey at the former camp site.
    [Show full text]
  • The Aftermath of Nuremberg . . . the Problems of Suspected War
    NYLS Journal of Human Rights Volume 6 Article 8 Issue 2 Volume VI, Part Two, Spring 1989 1989 The Aftermath of Nuremberg . The rP oblems of Suspected War Criminals in America Natalie J. Sobchak Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/journal_of_human_rights Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Sobchak, Natalie J. (1989) "The Aftermath of Nuremberg . The rP oblems of Suspected War Criminals in America," NYLS Journal of Human Rights: Vol. 6 : Iss. 2 , Article 8. Available at: https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/journal_of_human_rights/vol6/iss2/8 This Notes and Comments is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@NYLS. It has been accepted for inclusion in NYLS Journal of Human Rights by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@NYLS. THE AFrERMATH OF NUREMBERG... THE PROBLEMS OF SUSPECTED WAR CRIMINALS IN AMERICA L INTODUCrON Treblinka. Auschwitz. Sobibor. The mere mention of these places and others like them is a devastating reminder of the ultimate experience in human suffering. These were a few of the many concentration camps -- death camps -- designed to carry out Hitler's Final Solution: to exterminate as many Jews, Slavs, Gypsies, and Homosexuals as possible and create a supreme Aryan' society. Millions upon millions of innocent civilians would suffer miserable deaths before the liberation would come.2 Who were these per- secutors? While the Nazis3 devised "the plan," supplied the materials and man-power to build the camps, and supervised these atrocities, only a few of the death camps were actually located in Germany. The camps were situated in various Slavic countries which had capitulated under Nazi onslaught.' To assist them in their crimes, the Nazis obtained the cooperation of some of the local people and prisoners of war.' Whether their participation was voluntary or not, 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Norman J.W
    Introduction Norman J.W. Goda E The examination of legal proceedings related to Nazi Germany’s war and the Holocaust has expanded signifi cantly in the past two decades. It was not always so. Though the Trial of the Major War Criminals at Nuremberg in 1945–1946 generated signifi cant scholarly literature, most of it, at least in the trial’s immediate aftermath, concerned legal scholars’ judgments of the trial’s effi cacy from a strictly legalistic perspective. Was the four-power trial based on ex post facto law and thus problematic for that reason, or did it provide the best possible due process to the defendants under the circumstances?1 Cold War political wrangl ing over the subsequent Allied trials in the western German occupation zones as well as the sentences that they pronounced generated a discourse that was far more critical of the tri- als than laudatory.2 Historians, meanwhile, used the records assembled at Nuremberg as an entrée into other captured German records as they wrote initial studies of the Third Reich, these focusing mainly on foreign policy and wartime strategy, though also to some degree on the Final Solution to the Jewish Question.3 But they did not historicize the trial, nor any of subsequent trials, as such. Studies that analyzed the postwar proceedings in and of themselves from a historical perspective developed only three de- cades after Nuremberg, and they focused mainly on the origins of the initial, groundbreaking trial.4 Matters changed in the 1990s for a number of reasons. The fi rst was late- and post-Cold War interest among historians of Germany, and of other nations too, in Vergangenheitsbewältigung—the political, social, and intellectual attempt to confront, or to sidestep, the criminal wartime past.
    [Show full text]
  • Britannica's Holocaust Resources
    Britannica’s Holocaust Resources Britannica has opened up a large portion of its database on the Holocaust: more than 100 articles, essays, and lesson / classroom prompts, some of which also contains photographs and videos. Many of the articles have been written by Dr. Michael Berenbaum, an internationally known scholar with a stellar reputation in Holocaust studies and the former director of the Research Institute at the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum. In essence, Britannica is offering a free encyclopedia of the Holocaust as part of a new partnership with a number of eductional institutions. More about this project can be found HERE . These Britannica articles provide an unmatched resource, and not just for teachers and students. It will certainly be of interest to anyone who would like a convenient, reliable resource for Holocaust-related information. Part 1: Hitler and the Origins of the Holocaust • ADOLF HITLER • ANTI - SEMITISM • KLAUS BARBIE • BEER HALL PUTSCH • E V A B R A U N • ADOLF EICHMANN • GENOCIDE • GESTAPO • H A N S F R A N K • HERMANN GÖRING • JULIUS STREICHER • REINHARD HEYDRICH • RUDOLF HESS • HEINRICH HIMMLER • KRISTALLNACHT • M E I N K A M P • N A Z I P A R T Y • NÜRNBERG LAWS • FRANZ VON PAPEN • ALFRED ROSENBERG • SA • SS • SWASTIKA • T HYSSEN FAMILY DISCUSSION QUESTIONS Part 2: The Holocaust • THE HOLOCAUST • NON - JEWISH VICTIMS OF TH E HOLOCAUST • A N N E F R A N K • THE DIARY OF ANNE FR ANK • MORDECAI ANIELEWICZ • ALFRIED KRUPP VON BO HLEN UND HALBACH • AUSCHWITZ • B A B Y Y A R • BELZEC • BERGEN - BELSEN • BUCHENWALD
    [Show full text]
  • A New Definition of a War Criminal: Present Day Nazi War Criminal Prosecutions
    A NEW DEFINITION OF A WAR CRIMINAL: PRESENT DAY NAZI WAR CRIMINAL PROSECUTIONS Jennifer Snyder INTRODUCTION As early as 1942, the Allied Powers were determined to punish the Axis war criminals.1 The leaders of the United States, Great Britain, and Soviet Union jointly vowed to prosecute those responsible for the crimes against the civilian population; particularly those crimes involving the mass murders of the European Jewish population.2 The Moscow Declaration, signed by the United States, United Kingdom, and the Soviet Union, stated that at the time of Armistice, those who had been determined responsible for war crimes would be sent back to their home country and would be tried according to the laws of their homeland.3 The majority of the post-1945 war crime trials consisted of lower level officials and functionaries.4 At first, the U.S., Great Britain, France, and the Soviet Union focused on perpetrators in their respective zones of occupations – many trials involved the murder of captured Allied military personnel by Germans or Axis troops.5 Over time, the Allied powers expanded their judicial mandate to include the commandants, concentration camp guards, and others who had committed crimes against Jews.6 In the decades following World War II, both the German Federal Republic (West Germany) and the German Democratic Republic (East Germany) continued to try Nazi-era defendants.7 To date, the Federal Republic has held 925 proceedings trying defendants of the Nazi era war crimes.8 Subsequently, many of those trials ended in acquittals, light sentences due to the aging of the defendant, or defendants who claimed superior orders.9 1 War Crimes Trials, UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM HOLOCAUST ENCYCLOPEDIA (August 18, 2015), http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10005140.
    [Show full text]
  • Holocaust Center Events Spring 2016
    Holocaust Education and Programming Center Spring 2016 Calendar of Events January 28, 2016, 6pm, Manzulli Board Room, Foundation Hall Erasing Jewish Vienna: The 1943 Gustav Klimt Retrospective Laura Morowitz, Professor of Art History International Holocaust Remembrance Day-71st Anniversary Auschwitz Liberation Dr. Laura Morowitz, Professor of Art History at Wagner College, is currently writing a book examining art in Jewish Vienna in relation to cultural erasure. Last year she taught a course on Nazi Art and Aesthetics at Wagner College. She served as researcher for a novel on Adele Bloch Bauer painting by Klimt, Woman in Gold, to be published by Atria (Simon and Schuster) in 2016. *Light kosher dinner. Free. Please call for reservation 718-390-3253. Sunday, January 31, 2016, 3-5pm, Manzulli Board Room, Foundation Hall Holocaust Remembrance Readings. Co-hosted by Theater Major Jazmine Minner and Prof. Lori Weintrob, with SIOutLoud. Featuring Wagner's Hillel President and Theater Major Adam Goldenberg in the play Dr. Korczak and the Children (excerpt). Staten Island OutLOUD presents a special afternoon of readings and conversation. *Kosher falafel and cookies served. February 24th, 4:30, Spiro Hall 2 WWII Veteran William Morris Jr.: Eyewitness to D-Day From Omaha Beach to confrontations with the German Military, William Morris assisted in the Allied defeat of the Nazis, even as he experienced racism. These experiences were recently published in a children’s book by Dolores Morris, his daughter, The Dog That Wagged her Tail: A Black Veteran’s Story World War II. Both father and daughter will answer questions about these experiences. William Morris Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • Filming the End of the Holocaust War, Culture and Society
    Filming the End of the Holocaust War, Culture and Society Series Editor: Stephen McVeigh, Associate Professor, Swansea University, UK Editorial Board: Paul Preston LSE, UK Joanna Bourke Birkbeck, University of London, UK Debra Kelly University of Westminster, UK Patricia Rae Queen’s University, Ontario, Canada James J. Weingartner Southern Illimois University, USA (Emeritus) Kurt Piehler Florida State University, USA Ian Scott University of Manchester, UK War, Culture and Society is a multi- and interdisciplinary series which encourages the parallel and complementary military, historical and sociocultural investigation of 20th- and 21st-century war and conflict. Published: The British Imperial Army in the Middle East, James Kitchen (2014) The Testimonies of Indian Soldiers and the Two World Wars, Gajendra Singh (2014) South Africa’s “Border War,” Gary Baines (2014) Forthcoming: Cultural Responses to Occupation in Japan, Adam Broinowski (2015) 9/11 and the American Western, Stephen McVeigh (2015) Jewish Volunteers, the International Brigades and the Spanish Civil War, Gerben Zaagsma (2015) Military Law, the State, and Citizenship in the Modern Age, Gerard Oram (2015) The Japanese Comfort Women and Sexual Slavery During the China and Pacific Wars, Caroline Norma (2015) The Lost Cause of the Confederacy and American Civil War Memory, David J. Anderson (2015) Filming the End of the Holocaust Allied Documentaries, Nuremberg and the Liberation of the Concentration Camps John J. Michalczyk Bloomsbury Academic An Imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc LONDON • OXFORD • NEW YORK • NEW DELHI • SYDNEY Bloomsbury Academic An imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc 50 Bedford Square 1385 Broadway London New York WC1B 3DP NY 10018 UK USA www.bloomsbury.com BLOOMSBURY and the Diana logo are trademarks of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc First published 2014 Paperback edition fi rst published 2016 © John J.
    [Show full text]
  • Anne Frank House Annual Report 2019
    Anne Frank House Annual Report 2019 The Anne Frank House is an independent organisation dedicated to the preservation of the place where Anne Frank went into hiding and wrote her diary during the Second World War. The organisation brings the life story and the work of Anne Frank to the attention of as many people as possible worldwide, partly with the aim of raising awareness of the dangers of antisemitism, racism and discrimination and the importance of freedom, equal rights and democracy. Foreword More than 1.3 million people from all over the world visited the Anne Frank House in 2019, as you will read in this annual report. How much the situation has changed! The world is going through an unprecedented crisis, which has an enormous impact on people everywhere, and also on the Anne Frank House. As part of the global effort to stop the spread of the coronavirus, we had to close the doors to the museum on 13th March. Since its opening on 3 May 1960, the number of visitors has grown almost every year. From several tens of thousands in the first years, to the record number of 1.3 million visitors in 2019. People from all over the world come to the Anne Frank House and, through the bookcase, enter the empty spaces of the Secret Annex, where the Frank family, the Van Pels family, and Fritz Pfeffer hid from the Nazis for more than two years. These are the 25 months Anne Frank describes so poignantly in her diary. This year, the upward trend of visitor numbers came to an end around the 60th anniversary of the House.
    [Show full text]